INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TRENDS IN ENGINEERING (IJITE) ISSN: 2395-2946

ISSUE: 94, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 01, OCTOBER 2020

Performance Evaluation of Tractor Drawn

Turmeric Planter
Vaijanath Bomble
SMS (Agri. Engineering), KVK Sagroli, Nanded, Maharashtra

Abstract: Tractor drawn turmeric planter developed by (manual planting)

Dattkrupa Agro engineering work, Satara. Krishi Vigyan T2: Use of Tractor
Kendra Sagroli, District Nanded Maharashtra was tested and drawn turmeric 10 10 6.8
demonstrated for sowing turmeric rhizomes on farmers’ field
planter
during 2019-20. Its performance evaluation was carried out
with conventional sowing by manual. Field tests showed that
turmeric planter performed well for sowing turmeric rhizomes Tractor drawn turmeric planter consists of following parts
in the Duatapur village. The field capacity of the planter was viz. Feeder, metering mechanism, chain drive, bevel gears,
0.6-0.8 ha/day. The planter saved 6-15% rhizomes, 25-43% rotating steel small bowl, fertilizer tank, seed box, furrow
labour and increased crop yield by 9-16% as compared to openers, seats and a ground wheel for transmitting the
conventional manual sowing. power to the shaft. Fig A shows the Plantation of turmeric
Keywords: turmeric planter, performance evaluation. with the Tractor drawn turmeric planter.

INTRODUCTION
Agriculture plays an important role in the life of economy.
It is the backbone of our economy system. Turmeric is an
important spice crop cultivated in Maharashtra. India
accounts for about 80% of world turmeric production and
60% of world exports. The root of turmeric is also widely
used for medicinal purposes. During manual planting, the
labors have to dig the soil to sow turmeric. The manual
method of seed planting, results in low seed placement,
serious back ache, need for huge labor source, high labor
cost and drudgery in their work. This results in inadequate
and non-uniform plant stand. This practice not only results
in higher planting material cost but also lower the crop
yield. Apart from this, conventional system requires skilled
Fig 1: Tractor drawn turmeric planter
labour. The traditional system has the limitations of uneven
depth of rhizomes placement, slow ground coverage and In Tractor drawn turmeric planter, two persons sitting on
high labour requirement. The availability of easy to use the machine filled the rotating steel small bowl with
Tractor drawn turmeric planter for farmers can alleviate turmeric rhizomes manually. The machine is mounted on a
these problems substantially, and can also help to maintain 3-point linkage of a tractor. The specifications of Tractor
timely planting and reduce the farmers’ drudgery. The drawn turmeric planter are given in Table B.
present study was hence, planned to evaluate tractor drawn Table B: Specification of tractor drawn turmeric planter
turmeric planter.
Particular Specifications
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Overall dimensions, cm 182 *167 *190
The different planting methods of turmeric were conducted Drive to working parts From ground wheel
at farmers’ fields at Duatapur village Block Biloli district Ridge forming device Ridgers
Nanded and Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sagroli during 2019-20 Seed hopper capacity, kg 85
which are described below: Type of furrow opener Shovels
Table A: Different method of plantation Row to row spacing, cm 45
Number of rows 2
Method of No of Area, Seed rate Working width, cm 90
plantation trails Acre (q/acre)
T1: farmers practice 10 10 8.5

30
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TRENDS IN ENGINEERING (IJITE) ISSN: 2395-2946
ISSUE: 94, VOLUME 70, NUMBER 01, OCTOBER 2020

Ten trails were conducted under On Farm Testing (OFT) at Rhizome missing, % 1-2
Duatapur village Block Biloli District Nanded. One acre Rhizome damage, % Negligible
area of each farmer was sown this tractor drawn turmeric Power requirement , hp 35-50
planter. The well rotten farm yard manure @ 10-12 tonne Labour requirement (No’s) 3
per acre had been applied before planting because turmeric Rhizome to rhizome
respond favorably to farm yard manure. Light and frequent 20
spacing, cm
irrigations were applied. In order to check weeds, one or Depth of planting, cm 7
two hoeings had been given. Harvesting was done Optimum speed of
manually. 1.0-1.5
operation, km/h
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The details of field performance of Tractor drawn turmeric Comparison of tractor drawn turmeric planter to traditional
planter are shown in Table 2. The machine worked method is shown in table 3.In traditional method average
satisfactorily and covered about 0.68-0.83 ha/day. The cost of operation is Rs.8800 per ha and in tractor drawn
damage to turmeric rhizomes was negligible. The turmeric turmeric planter average cost of operation is Rs. 4980 per
rhizome missing was about one per cent. ha. Due to use of tractor drawn turmeric planter cost of
operation saving up to 43%. In traditional method average
Table 2: Machine performance in the field for turmeric
yield of turmeric rhizome is 110 quintal per ha and in
plantation
tractor drawn turmeric planter average yield of turmeric
Particular Specifications rhizome was 124 quintal per ha. Tractor drawn turmeric
Effective field capacity, planter put rhizome at suitable depth and spacing. It
0.68-0.83 increased crop yield by 9-16% as compared to
ha/day
conventional manual sowing.
Table 3: Comparison of tractor drawn turmeric planter to traditional method
Traditional method Tractor drawn turmeric planter Change in
Parameters
Highest Lowest Average Highest Lowest Average parameter,%
Cost of operation,
10200 8000 8800 5600 4500 4980 43
Rs/ha
turmeric rhizome
115 104 110 130 120 124 12
Yield, Q/ha

Labour requirement for plantation of turmeric rhizome 40 [3] Gill, B.S., Kaur, S. and Saini, S.S. (2002). Effect of spacing
to 50 % saving as comparison to traditional method. Cost and farmyard manure on growth and yield of flat and ridge
of operation is saving 20 to 28 % as comparison to planted turmeric (Curcuma longa L.).
[4] Extended Summaries, Vol. 1, 2nd International Agronomy
traditional method.
Congress, November 26-30, 2002, New Delhi. pp. 301-303.
Holliday, R. (1960).
[5] Population and crop yield. Field Crop Abst. 13 : 159-167.
Philip, J. (1985). Effect of plant density on yield and yield
components of turmeric. Indian Cocoa Arecanut Spices J., 9
: 93-96.

Fig 2: Turmeric crop stand planted by tractor drawn planter

REFERENCES
[1] Chattopadhayay, S.B., Ghosh, S.K. and Mukhopadhyay, T.P.
(1993). Effect of planting distance on growth and yield of
turmeric. Indian Agric., 37 : 123-126.
[2] Fageria, M.S., Choudhary, B.R. and Dhaka, R.S. (2013).
Text book on vegetable crops : Production Technology, 2 :
227.

31