Management
Management
department of manaGement
information SyStemS
introdUCtion to manaGement
GroUp aSSiGnment
name id no
1. HanaAbrham GUR/40895/13
2. HaymaontFiker GUR/40528/13
3. KalkidanTilahun GUR/41517/13
4. MarkosTaddese GUR/22804/13
5. MesayAssegid GUR/40528/13
6. MulukenAshenafi GUR/40118/13
7. NatnaelTadesse GUR/40099/13
8. RedietMandefro GUR/24047/13
9. RudwanJemal GUR/40200/13
10. Samuel Dagnaw GUR/00537/13
11. Samuel G/Tsadik GUR/23679/13
12. SemayawitMihert GUR/40570/13
SUbmitted to - yeSHiWorK
orGaniSinG
Objectives: After reading this lesson, the students will be able to understand the
meaning, characteristics and nature of organization; to explain steps in designing
effective organization; to analyze formal and informal organization; and to understand
the nature of different types of organizations.
Lesson Structure:
"It is grouping of activities necessary to attain enterprise objectives and the assignment
of each grouping to a manager with authority necessary to supervise it". Koontz and
O'Donnel
"The process of identifying and grouping the work to be performed, defining and
delegating responsibility and authority and establishing relationship for the purpose of
enabling people to work more effectively together in accomplishing objects". Louis A.
Allen
"The structure and process by which a cooperative group of human beings allocates its
tasks among its members, identifies relationship, and integrates its activities towards
common objectives". Joseph L.
Massive From the above definitions, it is clear that organizing is the process of
determining the total activities to achieve a given objective, grouping and assigning of
activities to individuals, delegating them authority necessary to perform the activities
assigned and establishing authority relationship among different positions in the
organization.
An analysis of the above definitions reveals the following characteristics of an
organization :
1. It is a group of individuals which may be large or small.
2. The group in the organization works under the executive leadership.
3. It is a machine or mechanism of management.
4. It has some directing authority or power which controls the concerted efforts of the
group.
5. The division of labour, power and responsibilities are deliberately planned.
6. It implies a structure of duties and responsibilities.
7. It is established for accomplishment of common objectives
8. It is a functional concept.
(i) Determining activities necessary for the accomplishment of the business objective.
(ii) Grouping of interrelated activities.
(iii) Assigning duties to persons with requisite competence,
(iv) Delegating authority, and
(v) Coordinating the efforts of different persons and groups.
When we consider organization as a process, it becomes the function of every manager.
Organizing is a continuous process and goes on throughout the life time of an enterprise.
Whenever there is a change in the circumstances or material change in situation, new
type of activities spring up. So, there is a need for constant review and reassignment of
duties. Right persons have to be recruited and necessary training has to be imparted to
enable them to be competent to handle the jobs. The process of organization thus,
involves dividing the work into rational way and interpreting the activities with work
situation and personnel. It also represents humanistic view of the enterprise since it is
the people which are uppermost in the process of integration of activities. Continuous
review and adjustment makes this dynamic as well.
A hierarchy has to be built-up i.e., a hierarchy of positions with clearly defined authority
and responsibility. The accountability of each functionary has to be specified. Therefore,
it has to be put into practice. In a way, organization can be called a system as well. The
main emphasis here is on relationships or structure rather than on persons. The
structure once built is not liable to change so soon. This concept of organization is, thus,
a static one. It is also called classical concept. Organization charts are prepared depicting
the relationship of different persons. In an organizational structure, both formal and
informal organizations take shape. The former is a per-planned one and defined by the
executive action. The latter is a spontaneous formation, being laid down by the common
sentiments, interactions and other interrelated attributes of the people in the
organization. Both formal and informal organizations, thus, have structure.
3. Assigning duties : The individual groups of activities are then allotted to different
individuals according to their ability and aptitude. The responsibility of every individual
should be defined clearly to avoid duplication and overlapping of efforts. Each person is
given a specific job suited to him and he is made responsible for its execution. Right man
is put in the right job.
4. Delegating authority :Every individual is given the authority necessary to perform the
assigned activity effectively. By authority we mean power to take decisions, issue
instructions, guiding the subordinates, supervise and control them. Authority delegated
to a person should commensurate with his responsibility. An individual cannot perform
his job without the necessary authority or power. Authority flows from top to bottom
and responsibility from bottom to top.
5. Coordinating activities :The activities and efforts of different individuals are then
synchronized. Such coordination is necessary to ensure effective performance of
specialized functions. Interrelationship between different job and individuals are clearly
defined so that everybody knows from whom he has to take orders and to whom he is
answerable.
It is thus clear from the foregoing analysis that organization provides a structural
framework of duties and responsibilities. It not only establishes authority relationship
but also provides a system of communication. The various processes of organization
explained above are technically performed through
(a) departmentation
(b) delegation of authority and fixation of responsibilities and
(c) decentralization of authority subject to central control through centralization of
decision-making.
2. Maximum production at minimum cost : The activities are allotted according to the
principle of division of labour. The efficient system of organization encourages every
employee to make his best contribution in raising output. The increase in output and
control of wasteful expenditure helps to decrease the cost of production. The
profitability of the concern will also go up.
A static business soon grows stale and get out of run. It should grow from a small scale
concern to a medium scale one and from a medium scale concern to large scale one.
Organization plays an important role in this respect. Execution of policies in organized
manner builds the necessary capacity and confidence in undertaking bigger activities.
(i) Division of work :While structuring organization, division of work, at the very outset,
should be considered as the basis of efficiency. It is an established fact that group of
individuals can secure better results by having division of work. Therefore, while
designing the organization we should aim at making suitable grouping of activities. This
is also called the principle of specialization.
(iii) Span of management : Span of management also refers to span of control signifying
the number of subordinates reporting directly to any executive. It is an established fact
that larger the number of subordinates reporting directly to the executive, the more
difficult it tends to be for him to supervise and coordinate them effectively. This
important principle of management should also be kept in mind.
(iv) Unity of command : Organization structure should also be designed in such a way
that there exists unity of command in the sense that a single leader is the ultimate
source of authority. This facilitates consistency in directing, coordinating and controlling
to achieve the end objectives.
(v) Flexibility : While designing the organization it should be kept in mind that
organizational structure should not be regarded as static. Every organization is a living
entity in a living environment which is fast changing . As such there must be sufficient
room for changing and modifying the structure in the light of environmental changes so
that the ultimate objective of the organization is achieved.
(x) Efficiency : The organization should be able to attain the predetermined objectives at
the minimum cost. It is done so, it will satisfy the test of efficiency. From the point of
view of an individual, a good organization should provide the maximum work
satisfaction. Similarly, from the social point of view, an organization will be efficient
when it contributes the maximum towards the welfare of the society.
(xi) Scalar principle :Scalar chain refers to the vertical placement of superiors starting
from the chief executive at the top through the middle level to the supervisory level at
the bottom. Proper scalar chain or line of command is prerequisite for effective
organization.
(xii) Unity of direction :This means that each group of activities having the same
objectives should have one plan and one head. There should be one plan or programme
for each segment of work which is to be carried under the control and supervision of
one head or superior. If different plans or policies are followed in one department by
the subordinates, confusion is bound to occur.
(xiii) Continuity :The form of organization structure should be such which is able to
serve the enterprise to attain its objectives for a long period of time.
(xiv) Coordination : The principal of coordination underlines that there should be proper
liaison and cooperation between different departments and units of work. Unity of
efforts for the accomplishment of desired objectives is the main aim of organization.
This can be achieved through the principle ofcoordination.
6. Training and Development :By delegating authority to lower levels, training and
development of future executives is made possible. A good organization puts 'right man
at the right job' and provide them right training and managerial development
programmes. By appointing employees in different department assigning them different
jobs, their training needs can be ascertained.
7. Creativity, initiative and innovation :A good organization encourages initiative and
creative thinking. Employees are motivated to break new grounds and try
unconventional methods. A sound organization offers the scope for recognition of merit
followed by financial incentives to the personnel showing creativity.
9. Proper weightage to all activities :A sound organization divides the entire enterprise
into different departments, sections and subsections according to the functions to be
performed by them. Each function of an enterprise has got its own importance.
Emphasis is given according to their relative importance. Funds and manpower is
allocated to their relative importance.
10. Better human relations : Human beings involved in an organization are only
dynamic element of organization. A dedicated and satisfied group of persons proves an
asset to any establishment. An organization, built on sound principles, helps harmony in
human relations. With properly defined authority, responsibility and accountability,
different persons enjoy job-satisfaction. Organization consists of human beings and their
satisfaction helps in improving human relations. Thus, organization is the foundation of
management. Sound organization is an indispensable mean for efficient management
and better business performance. It not only facilitates efficient administration but also
encourages growth and diversification. It provides for optimum use of new technology,
stimulates innovation and creativity.
The difference between formal and informal organizations can be enumerated briefly as
below : 1.
Formation : Formal organization is deliberately created by management. It is the result
of a conscious and deliberate effort involving delegation of authority. On the other hand,
informal organization arises spontaneously and no conscious efforts are made to create
it. It takes place on the basis of relationships, caste, culture, occupations and on
personal interests etc. No delegation of authority is essential in informal organization.
2. Basis : A formal organization is based upon rules and procedures, while an informal
organization is based upon attitudes and emotions of the people. It depends on informal,
social contacts between people working and associating with one another. 3.
Nature : A formal organization is stable and predictable and it cannot be changed
according to the whims or fancies of people. But an informal organization is neither
stable nor predictable.
4. Set up :A formal organization is a system of well defined relationships with a definite
authority assigned to every individual. It follows predetermined lines of communication.
On the contrary, an informal organization has no definite form and there are no definite
rules as to who is to report to whom. Even a low-placed employee may have an informal
relationship with an officer far above him in the formal hierarchy.
5. Emphasis :In a formal organization, the main emphasis is placed on authority and
functions. In an informal organization the stress is on people and their relationships.
6. Authority : Formal authority is attached to a position and it flows from top to bottom.
Informal authority is attached to a person and it flows either downwards or horizontally.
i. Line organization
ii. Line and staff organization
iii. Functional organization
iv. Committee organization
v. project Organization, and
vi. Matrix organization.
The nature, merits and demerits of line organization, and line and staff organization are
discussed as under :
3.9.1 Line Organization
The line organization represents the structure in a direct vertical relationship through
which authority flows. It is the simplest from of organization structure and is also known
as scalar or military organization. Under this, the line of authority flows vertically
downward from top to bottom throughout the organization. The quantum of authority
is highest at the top and reduces at each successive level down the hierarchy. Every
person in the organization is in the direct chain of command as shown in In line
organization, the line of authority consists of an uninterrupted series of authority steps
and forms a hierarchical arrangement. The line authority not only becomes the avenue
of command to operating personnel but also provides the channel of communication,
coordination and accountability in enterprise.
(i) It is very easy to establish line organization and it can be easily understood by the
employees.
(ii) If facilitates unity of command and thus conforms to the scalar principle of
organization.
(iii) There is clear-cut identification of authority and responsibility relationship.
Employees are fully aware of the boundaries of their jobs.
(iv) It ensures excellent discipline in the enterprise because every individual knows to
whom he is responsible.
(v) It facilitates prompt decision-making because there is definite authority at every level.
An executive cannot shift his decision making to others, nor can the blame be shifted.
(i) With growth, the line organization makes the superiors too overloaded with work. If
the executive try to keep up with every activity, they are bogged down in myriad details
and are unable to pay proper attention to each one. It will hamper their effectiveness. (ii)
There is concentration of authority at the top. If the top executives are not capable, the
enterprise will not be successful.
(iii) Line organization is not suitable to big organizations because it does not provide
specialists in the structure. Many jobs require specialized knowledge to perform them.
(iv) There is partially no communication from bottom upwards because of concentration
of authority at the higher levels. If superiors take a wrong decision, it would be carried
out without anybody having the courage to point out its deficiencies. In spite of these
drawbacks, the line organization structure is very popular particularly in small
organizations where there are less number of levels of authority and a small number of
people. A modification of this structure is line and staff organization under which
specialists are attached to line executives to provide them specialized assistance on
matters of great importance to be enterprise.
(i) Specialized knowledge. Line managers get the benefit of specialized knowledge of
staff specialists at various levels.
(ii) Reduction of burden. Staff specialists relieve the line managers of the botheration of
concentrating on specialized functions like accounting,selection and training, public
relations, etc.
(iii) Proper weightage. Many problems that are ignored or poorly handled in the line
organization can be properly covered in the line and staff organization by the use of staff
specialists.
(iv) Better decisions. Staff specialists help the line executives in taking better decisions
by providing them with adequate information of right type at the right moment and expert
advice.
(v) Flexibility. Line and staff organization is more flexible as compared to the
lineorganization. General staff can be employed to help line managers at various levels.
(vi) Unity of command. Under this system, the experts provide special guidance without
giving orders. It is the line manager who only has got the right to give orders. The result
is that the enterprises takes advantage of functional organization while maintaining the
unity of command i.e., one subordinate receiving orders from one boss only.
(i) There is generally a conflict between the line and staff executives. There is a danger
that the staff may encroach on the line authority. Line managers feel that staff specialists
do not always give right type of advice, and staff officials generally complain that their
advice is not properly attended to.
(ii) The allocation of duties between the line and staff executives is generally not very
clear. This may hamper coordination in the organization. (iii) Since staff men are not
accountable for the results, they may not be performing their duties well.
(iv) There is a wide difference between the orientation of the line and staff men. Line
executives’ deals with problems in a more practical manner. But staff officials who are
specialists in their fields tend to be more theoretical.
Line and staff organization is considered better than the line organization because of the
following reasons :
(i) Staff makes available expert advice to line executives. This is necessary to deal with
complex problems of management. For instance, personnel department is established as a
staff department to advise the top executives and other line executives on personnel
matters.
(ii) Better decisions are ensured in line and staff organization as compared to a simple
line organization
(iii) Line and staff structure is more suitable for large organizations as expert advice is
always available. The line managers can make use of the knowledge of staff specialists to
deal with complicated problems. Therefore, line and staff organization is certainly better
than line organization.
3.10 SUmmary
The word organization has two common meanings. The first meaning refers to the
process of organizing. The second meaning signifies the institution or group which comes
into existence as a result of organizing. The organizing process involves a number of
steps, viz. consideration of objectives, grouping of activities into departments, deciding
which departments will be treated line and which will be related staff, determining the
levels at which various types of decisions are to be made, determining the span of
supervision and setting up a coordination mechanism. There are a number of principles of
organizing, which should be remembered in the process of organizing