APCI For Corrosion Inhibitor
APCI For Corrosion Inhibitor
View Journal
NJC
New Journal of Chemistry
Accepted Manuscript
                                                                                                                                      A journal for new directions in chemistry
     This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: M. A. Quraishi, N.
     K. Gupta, C. Verma, R. Salghi, H. Lgaz and A. K. Mukherjee, New J. Chem., 2017, DOI:
     10.1039/C7NJ01431G.
                                                                                  Volume 40 Number 1 January 2016 Pages 1–846   This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the
                                                                                                                                Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
                                                                                                                                accepted for publication.
      NJC
      New Journal of Chemistry                           A journal for new directions in chemistry                              Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after
       www.rsc.org/njc
                                                                                                                                                                                             rsc.li/njc
                               Page 1 of 39                                                                                         New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Quraishi1,2*
                                                                                              1
                                                                                                  Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi
                                                                                              -221005, India.
                                                                                              2
                                                                                                  Center of Research Excellence in Corrosion, Research Institute, King Fahd University of
                                                                                              Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
                                                                                              3
                                                                                                  Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West
                                                                                              University, Mafikeng Campus, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa
                                                                                              4
                                                                                                  Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Environment, ENSA, Universite Ibn Zohr, PO Box 1136,
                                                                                              80000 Agadir,Morocco.
                                                                                              5
                                                                                                  Laboratory of separation methods, Faculty of Science, Ibn Tofail University PO Box 242,
                                                                                              Kenitra, Morocco
                                                                                                    *Corresponding author:
Abstract:
                                                                                                        Present work deals with the synthesis and study of inhibition effect of three               α-
                                                                                              aminophophonates        namely,    diethyl   (((4-chlorophenyl)amino)(phenyl)methyl)phosphonate
                                                                                              (APCI-1), diethyl (((4-chlorophenyl)amino)(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl)phosphonate (APCI-2)
                                                                                              and diethyl (1-((4-chlorophenyl)amino)-3-phenylallyl)phosphonate (APCI-3) on mild steel
                                                                                              corrosion in 1 M hydrochloric acid solution using both experimental and theoretical methods.
                                                                                              Weight loss results showed that the inhibition performance of the studied compounds increases
                                                                                              with the concentration and the maximum inhibition efficiency were obtained at just 564 X10-6M
                                                                                                                                 New Journal of Chemistry                                               Page 2 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                        View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                               DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              concentration. Among all the three tested inhibitors, APCI-3 showed the best result having
                                                                                              inhibition efficiency of 96.90%. The Potentiodynamic polarization study indicates that these α-
                                                                                              aminophosphonates act as mixed type inhibitors and predominantly functions as cathodic
                                                                                              supported by the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM)
                                                                                              methods. A good insight about the inhibition mechanism of the tested compounds was derived
                                                                                              using the DFT based quantum chemical calculations for their neutral as well as protonated forms.
                                                                                              The orientation of inhibitors on the metallic surface and the interaction energies of these
                                                                                              molecules were obtained using molecular dynamic simulation studies. Both experimental and
                                                                                              theoretical studies suggested that the inhibition efficiency of the tested compounds followed the
                                                                                              order APCI-3>APCI-2>APCI-1 and well corroborated each other.
                                                                                              negligible adverse effect on the surrounding environment and living being. Towards utilization
                                                                                              of green and sustainable solvents, water has gained substantial attention due to its non-
                                                                                              flammable, non-toxic, uniquely redox-stable, non-hazardous, free availability and inexpensive
                                                                                              have been considered as most powerful and interesting green and sustainable alternative
                                                                                              methods.
                                                                                                     Literature survey reveals that previously phosphonates were introduced as scale inhibitors
                                                                                              in water treatment and later their good corrosion inhibition behavior was also recognized [8].
                                                                                              And their impact on the environment was reported to be negligible at the concentration level
                                                                                              used for corrosion inhibition [9]. However, authors mainly exploited the use of phosphonates as
                                                                                              corrosion inhibitor in protective metal phosphonate films [10] or in H2SO4 medium [11, 12] and
                                                                                              very few literatures are available on the use of phosphonates as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel
                                                                                              in HCl medium [13,14]. In view of these observations, it was thought worthwhile to synthesize
                                                                                              α-aminophophonates (APCIs) to investigate their effect on the corrosion of mild steel in acidic
                                                                                              medium. The APCIs undertaken in the present work were synthesized using one pot
                                                                                              multicomponent reaction under ultrasound irradiation and under solvent and catalyst free
                                                                                              condition. The criteria behind considering these compounds for the corrosion inhibition test was
                                                                                              based on the fact that they contain several heteroatoms (N and O) along with π- electrons of the
                                                                                              aromatic rings that can act as adsorption centers during the metal-inhibitor interaction [15].
                                                                                              Novelty of the present study lies on the fact that although there are variety of organic compounds
                                                                                              containing nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur which have been successively used as a corrosion
                                                                                              inhibitor, but the use of phosphorus containing compounds as corrosion inhibitor is relatively
                                                                                              scare. In view of the above fact and considering the green synthesis by MCRs and ultrasound
                                                                                              technique, we herein synthesized and studied the inhibition effect of three phosphorus containing
                                                                                              compounds for the mild steel in 1M HCl solution using weight loss, electrochemical (PDP, EIS),
                                                                                              surface (SEM, AFM), DFT based quantum chemical calculations and molecular dynamic (MD)
                                                                                              simulations methods. A good agreement was observed in the results of experimental and
                                                                                              theoretical measurements. The investigated APCIs exhibited higher corrosion inhibition
                                                                                              efficiency (96.9% at 564 x10-6M concentration) than that of hexamine, a commonly used
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 4 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                        View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                               DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              inhibitor in steel industries during pickling process which shows 90% efficiency at 714x10-6M
                                                                                              optimum concentration. Moreover hexamine is a toxic inhibitor so its use must be avoided.
                                                                                                     2. Experimental:
                                                                                              All the experiments including weight loss, electrochemical and surface analysis (SEM/AFM)
                                                                                              was performed on the mild steel specimens having following composition (wt%): C=0.076,
                                                                                              P=0.012, Mn=0.192, Si=0.026, Al=0.023, Cr=0.050 and Fe=99.621. All the mild steel specimens
                                                                                              were prepared as per the standard procedures already reported in our previous publications [2,7].
                                                                                              The test solution of 1 M HCl acid was prepared by diluting the analytical reagent (37% HCl, AR
                                                                                              grade) grade HCl by double distilled water.
                                                                                              The purity of the synthesized inhibitors was confirmed by the thin layer chromatography result
                                                                                              performed using Siliaplate TLC plates- Aluminum (Al) Silica. Synthesized compounds were
                                                                                              characterized by the infrared (IR) spectra recorded on KBr discs by using Perkin-Elmer
                                                                                              Table 1: IUPAC name, molecular structure, molecular formula and analytical data of studied
                                                                                              APCIs.
                                                                                              S.      Name of inhibitor           Chemical structure                 Analytical data
                                                                                              No.
                                                                                              1     diethyl (((4-                                            C17H21ClNO3P (mol. wt. 353.78);
                                                                                                    chlorophenyl)amino)(                                     FT-IR (KBr cm-1): 3470, 3183,
                                                                                                    phenyl)methyl)phosp                                      2862, 2448, 2973, 2823, 1628,
                                                                                                    honate (APCI-1)                                          1664, 1580, 1130, 1238, 974,
                                                                                                                                                             835, 786, 654.1H NMR (CDCl3,
                                                                                                                                                             TMS, 500 MHz) δ (ppm) 6.5-7.4
                                                                                                                                                             (8H, Ar-H and 1H, NH) 4.7 (1H,
                                                                                                                                                             CH), 3.6-4.1 (4H, P-O-CH2-),
                                                                                                                                                             1.1-1.3 (6H, P-O-CH2-CH3).
                                                                                              2     diethyl (((4-                                            C18H23ClNO4P (mol. wt. 383.11);
                                                                                                    chlorophenyl)amino)(                                     IR (KBr cm-1): 3563, 3228,
                                                                                                    4-                                                       2986, 2854, 1670, 1594, 1474,
                                                                                                    methoxyphenyl)meth                                       1339, 1232, 1160, 948, 827,
                                                                                                    yl)phosphonate                                           792.1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS, 500
                                                                                                    (APCI-2)                                                 MHz) δ (ppm) 6.5-7.3 (8H, Ar-H
                                                                                                                                                             and 1H, NH) 4.6 (1H, CH), 3.6-
                                                                                                                                                             4.1 (4H, P-O-CH2-), 3.7 (3H, O-
                                                                                                                                                             CH3) 1.1-1.3 (6H, P-O-CH2-
                                                                                                                                                             CH3).
                                                                                              3     diethyl (1-((4-
                                                                                                    chlorophenyl)amino)-                                     C19H23ClNO3P (mol. wt. 379.82);
                                                                                                    3-                                                       IR (KBr cm-1): 3546, 3173,
                                                                                                    phenylallyl)phosphon                                     2948, 2836, 2684, 1728, 1658,
                                                                                                    ate (APCI-3)
                                                                                                                                                             1548, 1418, 1273, 1138, 926,
                                                                                                                                                             868, 675. 1H NMR (CDCl3, TMS,
                                                                                                                                                             500 MHz) δ (ppm) 6.6-7.4 (9H,
                                                                                                                                                             Ar-H and 1H, NH), 6.2-6.7 (2H,
                                                                                                                                                             -CH=CH-) 4.1-4.2 (4H, P-O-
                                                                                                                                                             CH2-), 3.7 (3H, O-CH3) 1.31-
                                                                                                                                                             1.34 (6H, P-O-CH2-CH3).
                                                                                                                                   New Journal of Chemistry                                                Page 6 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                           View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              triplicate and the average value was taken for calculating corrosion rate for greater accuracy. The
                                                                                              corrosion rates CR (mg cm−2 h−1) was calculated by using the following equation:
                                                                                              CR = W / At                                                                          (1)
                                                                                              where, W is the average weight loss occurred in the three parallel experiments, A is the total
                                                                                              surface area of one mild steel specimen, and t is the immersion time (3 h). From the calculated
                                                                                              corrosion rate, the inhibition efficiency η% and surface coverage area (θ) was calculated by
                                                                                              following equations:
                                                                                              η % = [(CR − CR(i) ) / CR ] × 100                                                    (2)
                                                                                              where CR and CR(i) represent the corrosion rates for mild steel in absence and presence of APCIs
                                                                                              in 1 M HCl solution, respectively.
                                                                                              electrical circuit on the obtained Nyquist plot. The corrosion inhibition performances of studied
                                                                                              APCIs were calculated from following equation:
                                                                                              η % = [( Rpi − Rp0 ) / Rpi ] × 100                                                  (4)
                                                                                              using Gaussian 09 program package. The molecular structures of all the APCIs (neutral and
                                                                                              protonated forms) were geometrically optimized using the Becke three-parameter hybrid
                                                                                              functional together with the Lee–Yang–Paar correlation functional (B3LYP) and the 6-31+G
                                                                                              derive all the quantum chemical electronic parameters. The frontier molecular orbital (FMO)
                                                                                              energies, i.e. the highest occupied molecular orbital energy (EHOMO) and the lowest unoccupied
                                                                                              molecular energy (ELUMO) were calculated and used for the calculation of other important
                                                                                              parameters such as the energy gap (∆E), global hardness (η), softness (σ), global
                                                                                              electronegativity (χ), and the fraction of electrons transfer (∆N) from the inhibitor to the metal
                                                                                              atom by the following equations respectively [22,23]:
                                                                                              ∆E = E LUMO − E HOMO                                                               (6)
σ = 1/η (8)
                                                                                              Where χFe and ηinh represent the electronegativity of iron and hardness of inhibitor respectively.
                                                                                              The values of χFe and ηinh is taken as 7eV mol-1 and 0 eV mol-1 respectively considering the bulk
                                                                                              Fe atoms according to the Pearson's electronegativity scale [24].
                                                                                              2.7. Molecular Dynamics
                                                                                                       Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations of tested inhibitors were carried out in a
                                                                                              simulation box with periodic boundary conditions using Materials Studio 6.0 (from Accelrys
                                                                                              Inc.) [25]. The iron crystal was imported and cleaved along (110) plane and a slab of 5 Å was
                                                                                              employed. The Fe (110) surface was relaxed by minimizing its energy using smart minimiser
                                                                                              method. Then Fe (110) surface was enlarged to a (10 × 10) super cell in order to provide a large
                                                                                              surface to the inhibitors for interaction. A zero thickness vacuum slab was built. A supercell with
                                                                                              a size of a = b = 24.82 Å c = 25.14 Å, contains 500 H2O, 5H 3O + , 5Cl − and one molecule of tested
                                                                                              inhibitors was created. The simulation was performed in a simulation box (24.82×24.82×35.69
                               Page 9 of 39                                                                                                      New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Å3) using the discover module having time step of 1 fs and simulation time of 500 ps carried out
                                                                                              at 303 K, NVT ensemble (constant number of atoms, constant-volume, constant-temperature)
                                                                                              and COMPASS force field [26]. In simulation system, the interactions between inhibitors and Fe
energy of Fe (1 1 0) surface and solution without the inhibitor and Einhibitor+solution represent the
                                                                                              total energy of inhibitor and solution; and Esolution is the total energy of the solution.
                                                                                                  3. Result and Discussion
                                                                                                        The values of percentage inhibition efficiency (%η) of APCIs, corrosion rate (CR) for
                                                                                              mild steel specimen and the surface coverage (θ) by APCIs obtained from weight loss
                                                                                              experiments at different concentrations of inhibitors in 1 M HCl solution at 308K are reported in
                                                                                              Table 2.
                                                                                              Table 2: The weight loss parameters (±SD) derived for Mild Steel in 1 M HCl solution at
                                                                                              different concentrations of APCIs.
(x10-6M) (θ)
                                                                                                 The variation of inhibition efficiency with the concentration of APCIs is also shown in Fig.
                                                                                              2. It is clear from the data that APCIs inhibits the corrosion at all studied concentrations and
                                                                                              their η% increases with concentration and achieved maximum values of 92.60, 94.78 and
                                                                                              96.95% for APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3, respectively at 564 x10-6M concentration. The
                               Page 11 of 39                                                                                       New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                         View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                               DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Table 3: Variation of corrosion rate with temperature in absence and presence of optimum
                                                                                              concentration of APCIs
                                                                                              The apparent activation energy (Ea) of corrosion process and corrosion rate can be related by
                                                                                              Arrhenius equation [33] given by:
                                                                                              C R = A exp( − E a / RT )                                                                   (13)
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                               Page 12 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                           View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Where, CR is the corrosion rate, R is the universal gas constant, T is the absolute temperature and
                                                                                              A is the pre-exponential factor. The value of Ea were calculated from the slope (Ea/2.303R) of
                                                                                              the Arrhenius graph plotted between log CR versus 1000/T for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution
                                                                                              respectively which clearly shows that the value of Ea for uninhibited solution is less than that of
                                                                                              inhibited solution . The significant rise in the Ea value indicates the protective film formation by
                                                                                              inhibitor on the metal surface [34]. The adsorbed inhibitor isolates the metal surface from the
                                                                                              corrosive environment and thus increases the energy barrier for the charge and mass transfer
                                                                                              between metal and solution interface [28]. In the present study APCI-3 has the highest Ea value
                                                                                              which confirms the best inhibition performance of APCI-3 among three studied inhibitors.
                                                                                              However, the inhibition efficiency of all the three APCIs decreases with rise in temperature
                                                                                              which shows the physisorptive type of interaction among the adsorbed inhibitor film and the
                                                                                              metal surface [35].
Fig.3: Arrhenius plots of log CR versus 1000/T for mild steel corrosion in 1M HCl solution in
                                                                                                     It is well reported in literature that the adsorption of an organic molecule on the metal
                                                                                              surface is the most important step in the corrosion inhibition process [36]. To understand the
                                                                                              studied by testing several adsorption isotherms including Langmuir, Temkin, Frumkin and and
                                                                                              thermodynamic/kinetic model of El-Awady isotherms.
Fig.4: El-Awady adsorption isotherm plot for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in presence APCIs at 308K.
                                                                                                     In this study, the values for degree of surface coverage (θ) were fitted to a series of
                                                                                              different stated adsorption isotherms but among them the Langmuir adsorption isotherm gave the
                                                                                              best fit with regression coefficient (R2) value very close to unity. This indicated a high degree of
                                                                                              fitness of the adsorption data to the Langmuir model. Langmuir adsorption isotherm expression
                                                                                              is generally represented by [17]
                                                                                              K ads C = θ / (1 − θ )                                                              (14)
                                                                                              Where Kads is the adsorption- desorption equilibrium constant, θ is the surface coverage and C(inh)
                                                                                              is the APCIs concentration in mg L−1. The Langmuir isotherm plot gave a straight line when
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                                 Page 14 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                             View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                   DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              plotted between log (θ/1-θ) and C(inh) but its slope deviated considerably (1.23 to 1.83) from the
                                                                                              unity which indicated that the isotherm could not be strictly applied (Table 4).
Table 4: Adsorption parameters calculated from El-Awady adsorption isotherm for mild steel in
                                                                                              In the derivation of Langmuir isotherm equation it is assumed that the adsorbed molecules do not
                                                                                              interact with each other, but this is not true in the present case. These adsorbed APCIs may
                                                                                              interact with each other by mutual repulsion or attraction and that might be the reason for the
                                                                                              deviation of slope from unity [37]. So, the experimental data was fitted for the modified form of
                                                                                              Langmuir isotherm known as El-Awady isotherm which is given by [38]
                                                                                              log(θ / 1 − θ ) = log K + y logC                                                     (15)
                                                                                              where, y is number of inhibitor molecules occupying one active site, θ is the degree of surface
                                                                                              coverage, C is the concentration, K is the constant related to the equilibrium constant of
                                                                                              adsorption process as Kads =K1/y. The values of y and log K calculated from El-Awady adsorption
                                                                                              isotherm plot (Fig.4) is given in Table 4. Values of 1/y less than one imply multilayer
                                                                                              adsorption, while 1/y greater than one suggests that a given inhibitor molecule occupies
                                                                                              more than one active site. In the present work the values of 1/y for all concentration were
                                                                                              found to be less than unity which indicates the presence of physisorption [39]. The calculated
                                                                                              value of Kads is reported in Table 5. In general, the value of Kads represents the strength of
                                                                                              adsorption of inhibitor molecule on the metal surface [40]. Higher the value of Kads, stronger is
                                                                                              the adsorption of inhibitor on metal surface. Stronger adsorption leads to the more surface
                                                                                              coverage by inhibitor on the metal surface and hence better inhibition efficiency [36]. Table 5
                                                                                              shows that the APCI-3 has the highest Kads value among all studied APCIs and thus has highest
                               Page 15 of 39                                                                                         New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                             View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                   DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              inhibition efficiency. The Kads values can be related to the standard free energy of adsorption
                                                                                              (∆G0ads) according to the relation [41,42]:
                                                                                                ο
                                                                                              ∆Gads = − RT ln(55.5 K ads )                                                         (15)
                                                                                              Table 5. The values of ∆G0ads at 308K were found to be -33.48, -33.89 and -34.19 kJ mol-1 for
                                                                                              APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3 respectively. However, these values are negatively less than the
                                                                                              threshold value (-40 kJ/mol) expected for the chemisorption but greater than the (-20kJ/mol)
                                                                                              assigned for physisorption [43]. Hence the adsorption APCIs on the mild steel specimen in 1 M
                                                                                              HCl solution is a case of both physical as well as chemical adsorption [44].
                                                                                              Table 5: The values of Kads and ∆ G◦ads for mild steel in presence of APCIs in 1M HCl solution
                                                                                              at different temperature.
                                                                                              Fig.5: Potentiodynamic polarization plots for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in the absence and
                                                                                              presence of different concentration of APCIs.
                                                                                                      From the result it is clear that on increasing the concentration of the inhibitor molecules
                                                                                              the corrosion current density decreases which suggest that the inhibition efficiency of the APCIs
                                                                                              increases with concentration. It can be also seen from the polarization curves that the inhibitor
                                                                                              molecules shifted the both anodic and cathodic domains of the polarization curves towards the
                               Page 17 of 39                                                                                         New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                            View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                   DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              lower corrosion current density without changing the shape of the curves. This finding suggests
                                                                                              that studied inhibitor molecules inhibit mild steel corrosion in 1M hydrochloric acid solution by
                                                                                              forming a protective film on the metallic surface without changing the corrosion mechanism
                                                                                              Table 6: Tafel Polarization parameters (±SD) for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in absence and
Published on 03 October 2017. Downloaded by University of Newcastle on 03/10/2017 14:39:46.
SCE) value
                                                                                                      Inspection of the results depicted in Table 6 revealed that presence of inhibitors in the
                                                                                              corroding solution at their optimum concentration causes substantial decrease in the values of
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 18 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              corrosion current density (icorr) and maximum decrease was obtained in the case of APCI-3. The
                                                                                              corrosion inhibition efficiency obtained from icorr values was compared with the values obtained
                                                                                              from polarization resistance and it was found that both follows the same trend and showed
                                                                                              Ecorr were 77 mV, 72 mV and 71 mV for APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3, respectively that is less
                                                                                              that 85 mV which indicate that APCIs are behaved as mixed type inhibitors [46,47]. However,
                                                                                              from the results depicted in Table 6, it is clear that presence of inhibitors cause relatively more
                                                                                              change in the βc values as compared to the βa values. On the basis of ongoing discussion it can be
                                                                                              inferred that investigated compounds acted as mixed type corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in 1M
                                                                                              hydrochloric acid solution with some cathodic predominance [48].
                                                                                                     The Nyquist plots with equivalent circuit used in the present analysis for electrochemical
                                                                                              data interpretation and the Bode phase angle plots for inhibited and uninhibited metallic
                                                                                              specimens are depicted in Fig. 6, 7 and Fig. 8 respectively. All the calculated EIS parameters
                                                                                              such as solution resistance (Rs), polarization resistance (Rp), phase shift (n), double layer
                                                                                              capacitance (Cdl) and corresponding surface coverage (θ) and inhibition efficiency (η) are listed
                                                                                              in Table 7.
                               Page 19 of 39                                                                                      New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                           View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Fig.6 : Nyquist plots for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in the absence and presence of
                                                                                              different concentration of APCIs.
Fig.7: Equivalent circuit used to fit the EIS data for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution.
                                                                                                     From Fig. 6 it is clear that Nyquist plots for uninhibited and inhibited mild steel
                                                                                              specimens gave the similar appearance which suggests that APCIs inhibit corrosion by
                                                                                              increasing the polarization resistance without changing the mechanism of corrosion [28]. The
                                                                                              Nyquist plots consist of depressed semicircles with the centers under the real axis, which is
                                                                                              commonly observed in the case of solid metal electrodes due to frequency dispersion of
                                                                                              interfacial impedance. This phenomenon is mainly due to the factors like surface roughness,
                                                                                              inhomogeneity of electrode surface, discontinuity in the electrode and the adsorption of inhibitor
                                                                                                                                    New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 20 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                            View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              and impurities [49]. It is important to mention that in the present investigation, polarization
                                                                                              resistance (Rp) was under taken for measurements rather than more commonly used charge
                                                                                              transfer resistance (Rct) because Rp represents the all type of resistances associated on the metal/
                                                                                              the interface [50]. The result showed that the presence of inhibitor molecules at their optimum
                                                                                              concentration causes substantial increase in the values of Rp.
                                                                                              Table 7: Electrochemical impedance parameters (±SD) obtained from EIS measurements for
                                                                                              mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in absence and presence of optimum concentration of APCIs.
                                                                                                     Results depicted in Table 7 showed that presence of inhibitors decreases the values of Cdl
                                                                                              as compared to the Cdl value of blank which is attributed to decrease in local dielectric constant
                                                                                              and/or an increase in the electrical double layer thickness [51]. Fig. 8 represents the Bode and
                                                                                              one time constant at the intermediate frequencies. The broadening of this maximum indicates the
                                                                                              formation of inhibitor layer on mild steel surface. Moreover the increase in the phase angle
                                                                                              values in presence of APCIs reveals their inhibitive action [52].
                                                                                                                                        New Journal of Chemistry                                            Page 22 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                              View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                     DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                                     Fig.8: Bode plots for mild steel in 1 M HCl solution in the absence and presence of APCIs at
                                                                                                     different concentration.
                                                                                                            The SEM study was performed on the mild steel specimens taken after 3h immersion
                                                                                                     time in presence and absence of APCIs and the micrographs obtained are shown in Fig. 9(a-d).
                                                                                              Fig. 9(a-d): SEM image of mild steel surface after 3h immersion (a) without APCIs (b) with APCI-1 (c)
                                                                                                      with APCI-2 (d) with APCI-3.
                               Page 23 of 39                                                                                      New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                         View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                                      Fig. 9(a) represents the micrograph of mild steel specimen immerged in blank solution
                                                                                              whereas Fig. 9(b-d) represents mild steel in presence of APCIs. From Fig. 9(a) it can be seen that
                                                                                              the surface of mild steel specimen is severely corroded and damaged due to free acid attack.
                                                                                                     The AFM study was performed to know the average roughness of mild steel specimen
                                                                                              surface in absence and presence of optimum concentration of APCIs after 3h immersion time.
                                                                                              Fig. 10(a) represent the 3D micrograph of mild steel surface in dipped in blank solution. The
                                                                                              observation of this micrograph shows that the surface of specimen is highly corroded and
                                                                                              contains many peaks and valley like areas due to the dissolution of metal in that region.
                                                                                              However, in presence of APCIs a relatively smoother and uniform surface morphology was
                                                                                              found in Fig. 10(b-d) due to the corrosion inhibition property of the inhibitors [21]. The average
                                                                                              surface roughness Ra (the average deviation of all points roughness profile from a mean line over
                                                                                              the evaluation length) of mild steel specimen was found to be 389 nm in absence of APCIs,
                                                                                              whereas in presence of APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3 the Ra values were 141nm, 127nm and
                                                                                              102nm, respectively.
              Published on 03 October 2017. Downloaded by University of Newcastle on 03/10/2017 14:39:46.
                                                                                                                                                            New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                            DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                                                                      View Article Online
                                                                                              Fig. 10(a-d): 3D AFM image of mild steel surface after 3h immersion (a) without APCI (b) with
                                                                                              APCI-1 (c) with APCI-2 (d) with APCI-3.
                                                                                              Fig. 11: Optimized molecular structure of non-protonated APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3.
                               Page 27 of 39                                                                                      New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                       View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                              DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Fig.12: The frontier molecular orbitals HOMO and LUMO of non-protonated APCI-1, APCI-2 and
                                                                                                  APCI-3.
                                                                                                  Fig. 13: Optimized molecular structure of protonated APCI-1, APCI-2 and APCI-3.
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 28 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              Fig. 14: The frontier molecular orbital HOMO and LUMO of protonated APCI-1, APCI-2 and
                                                                                              APCI-3.
                                                                                                 Figs. 11-14 represent the fully optimized and frontier molecular electron distribution pictures
                                                                                              of neutral as well as protonated forms of studied inhibitors molecules. From the frontier
                                                                                              molecular electron distribution pictures for neutral form of the inhibitor molecules it can be seen
                               Page 29 of 39                                                                                             New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                                 View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                        DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                                    that HOMO and LUMO are mainly localized over the p-chlorophenyl ring and diethyl-
                                                                                                    phosphonate moieties suggesting that only these part of molecules mainly involve in electron
                                                                                                    sharing during metal-inhibitor interactions. In contrast, HOMO for protonated form of these
                                                                                                    chemical calculation parameters such as energy of highest occupied (EHOMO) and lowest
                                                                                                    unoccupied (ELUMO) molecular orbitals, energy band gap (∆E), global electronegativity (χ),
                                                                                                    hardness (η), softness (σ), fraction of electron transfer (∆N) and dipole moment (µ) derived for
                                                                                                    neutral as well as protonated form of the investigated molecules are presented in Table 8.
                                                                                                    Table 8: Quantum chemical parameters derived for neutral and protonated form of the
                                                                                                    investigated APCIs
                                                                                                          According to the concept of electron transfer (and chemical reactivity) a molecule with high
                                                                                                    value of EHOMO and lower value of ELUMO would be associated with high chemical reactivity and
                                                                                                    thereby associated high inhibition performance [53,54]. In our present investigation, values of
                                                                                                    EHOMO increases on going from APCI-1 to APCI-3 suggesting that magnitude of electron transfer
                                                                                                    from inhibitors to metal surface and therefore inhibition performance increases in the same order.
                                                                                                    Similarly, value of ELUMO for any chemical species suggests its electron accepting tendency [53].
                                                                                                    The values of ELUMO decreases (increases in negative) on going APCI-1 to APCI-3 indicating
                                                                                                    that tendency of electron acceptation and thereby inhibition performance increases likewise [55].
                                                                                                    During metal-inhibitor interactions, a lower value of ∆E (energy band gap) is consisted with high
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 30 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              inhibition efficiency [56]. In our case, values of ∆E well established the experimental order of
                                                                                              inhibition efficiency. In the present study values of EHOMO, ELUMO and ∆E for neutral as well as
                                                                                              protonated form of inhibitor molecules were consistent with the exponentially determined
                                                                                              lower chemical reactivity and inhibition efficiency [57]. In our present case values of global
                                                                                              electronegativity did not follow any regular trend for neutral form of the inhibitor molecules.
                                                                                              However, for protonated form of the inhibition molecules, values of electronegativities were
                                                                                              accordance to the experimentally determined efficiency order. Besides, more commonly used
                                                                                              energies parameters (EHOMO, ELUMO and ∆E) chemical reactivity and the inhibition efficiency of
                                                                                              any chemical species can be predicted depending upon the value of its global softness (σ) and
                                                                                              hardness (η). Generally, a chemical species with higher value of softness and lower value of
                                                                                              hardness is comprised with strong metal-inhibitor interaction (high efficiency) [20]. In present
                                                                                              study values of softness followed the order: APCI-3 (17.34) > APCI-2 (14.06) > APCI-1 (13.89),
                                                                                              which is just accordance to the order of inhibition efficiency derived from weight loss and
                                                                                              electrochemical methods, while the values of global hardness follow just inverse order. The
                                                                                              values of global hardness and softness were well agreed with the experimental results for neural
                                                                                              as well as protonated forms. Relative inhibition performance of structurally similar molecules
                                                                                              can also be predicted based on values of their fraction of electron transfer which is a direct
                                                                                              measure of electron transfer from inhibitor to metal. Obviously, an organic inhibitor with higher
                                                                                              value of ∆N would be associated with higher inhibition efficiency as compared of the organic
                                                                                              molecule having lower value of ∆N [57]. In present study, values of ∆N are increasing on going
                                                                                              APCI-1 to APCI-3, indicating that magnitude of electron transfer (donation) followed the trend:
                                                                                              APCI-3 (1.275) > APCI-2 (1.120) > APCI-1 (1.110), which is consisted with the experimentally
                                                                                              determined inhibition efficiency. The values of dipole moment have been derived for neutral as
                                                                                              well as protonated form of inhibitor molecules and are listed in Table 8. Generally, value of
                                                                                              dipole moment is a measure of polarizability of any organic molecule on the metallic surface
                                                                                              during interactions between them. A molecule with high value of dipole moment is more
                                                                                              polarizable and covers larger surface area and thereby should act as better corrosion inhibition as
                                                                                              compared to the organic molecule with lower value of dipole moment. Both positive and
                               Page 31 of 39                                                                                      New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                            View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                   DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              negative trends of inhibition efficiency have been reported with the values of dipole moment
                                                                                              [53]. In our present study values of dipole moments did not show any regular trend.
                                                                                              Table 9. Selected energy parameters obtained from MD simulations for adsorption of APCIs on
                                                                                              Fe (110) surface
                                                                                                     The higher positive values of binding energies are attributed to an effective adsorption
                                                                                              and consequently the formation of adsorbed layer of phosphonate derivatives on Fe (110) surface
                                                                                              [62]. In the same case, the higher negative values of interaction energies indicate that there is a
                                                                                              strong interaction between tested inhibitors and metallic surface [63]. Based on these insights,
                                                                                                                                  New Journal of Chemistry                                              Page 32 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                          View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              we can draw a conclusion that the phosphonates tested in this study can provide an effective
                                                                                              protection of steel.
                                                                                                                     APCI-1                    APCI-2                  APCI-3
Fig. 15: Side views of the final adsorption of the APCIs on the Fe (110) surface in solution.
Fig. 16: Top views of the final adsorption of the APCIs on the Fe (110) surface in solution.
                                                                                                 Fig. 17 presents the radial distribution function (RDF) curves of C, N, O, Cl and P of APCI-3
                                                                                              and Fe atoms. The radial distribution function (or pair correlation function) g(r) can be computed
                                                                                              through a structural analysis of the MD simulations results [64]. The RDF is widely used as
                                                                                              useful method to estimate the bond length. The peak within 3.5 Å, it’s an indication of small
                                                                                              bond length which indicates the chemisorption, while the peak outside 3.5 Å shows the physical
                                                                                              interactions [65].
                               Page 33 of 39                                                                                                                                                 New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
2.4 5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            g(r)
                                                                                                      1.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   2
Published on 03 October 2017. Downloaded by University of Newcastle on 03/10/2017 14:39:46.
0.8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                      0.4
                                                                                                      0.0                                                                                                                          0
                                                                                                            0         2       4       6        8       10          12        14        16        18        20                          0          2       4       6       8       10        12        14        16         18        20
                                                                                                                                               x (Ångström)                                                                                                               x (Ångström)
                                                                                                       2.0                                                                                                                         2.4
                                                                                                                    (4.35, 1.19)                                                                  Fe-N                                         (3.11, 1.55)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Fe-O
                                                                                                       1.6                                                                                                                         2.0
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   1.6
                                                                                                       1.2
                                                                                               g(r)
g(r)
1.2
                                                                                                       0.8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.8
                                                                                                       0.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   0.4
                                                                                                       0.0                                                                                                                         0.0
                                                                                                                0         2       4       6        8        10          12        14        16        18        20                         0          2       4       6       8        10        12        14        16         18        20
                                                                                                                                                   x (Ångström)                                                                                                               x (Ångström)
3.0
                                                                                                                                                                   2.0
                                                                                                                                                            g(r)
1.5
1.0
0.5
                                                                                                                                                                   0.0
                                                                                                                                                                         0         2         4         6         8    10     12          14        16     18      20
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 x (Ångström)
                                                                                                From the equilibrium configuration of the APCI-3 molecule, it can be concluded that the most
                                                                                              significant interactions (chemisorption) with Fe atoms are having C, O and Cl with the peak
                                                                                              distance less than 3.5 whereas the interactions of Van der Waals force or Coulomb force can be
                                                                                              4. Conclusions
                                                                                                     The    inhibition   effect    of   three   α-aminophophonates     namely,    diethyl       (((4-
                                                                                              chlorophenyl)amino)(phenyl)methyl)phosphonate (APCI-1), diethyl (((4-chlorophenyl)amino)(4-
                                                                                              methoxyphenyl)methyl)phosphonate (APCI-2)           and   diethyl   (1-((4-chlorophenyl)amino)-3-
                                                                                              phenylallyl)phosphonate (APCI-3) on mild steel corrosion in 1M hydrochloric acid solution was
                                                                                              studied using experimental and theoretical methods. From the obtained results following
                                                                                              conclusions were drawn:
                                                                                                 1. All the studied compounds acted as good corrosion inhibitor and their inhibition
                                                                                                     efficiency increases with the increase in concentration and maximum efficiency was
                                                                                                     obtained at an optimum concentration of 564 x10-6M .
                                                                                                 2. The inhibition efficiencies of the investigated compounds followed the order: APCI-3
                                                                                                     (96.9%) > APCI-2 (94.8%) > APCI-1 (92.6%).
                                                                                                 3. Potentiodynamic polarization study revealed that the studied inhibitors behaved as mixed
                                                                                                     type inhibitor by decreasing both anodic and cathodic corrosion densities and maximum
                                                                                                     decrease was observed by APCI-3.
                                                                                                 4. EIS measurements showed that investigated inhibitor molecules inhibit corrosion by
                                                                                                     adsorbing on the metal surface and forming the protective film over the metal/ electrolyte
                                                                                                     interfaces.
                                                                                                 5. Adsorption of the tested compounds over the metallic surface obeyed the El-Awady
                                                                                                     adsorption isotherm.
                                                                                                 6. The substantial improvement in the surface morphologies of the inhibited metallic
                                                                                                     specimens found after SEM and AFM analysis suggested that the investigated molecules
                                                                                                     adsorbed over the metal surface and protect it from corrosion by forming inhibitor film.
                                                                                                 7. DFT based parameters revealed that tested compounds have strong tendency of
                                                                                                     adsorption and thereby act as good corrosion inhibitors for mild steel corrosion in 1M
                                                                                                     hydrochloric acid solution.
                               Page 35 of 39                                                                                    New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                        View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                               DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                                 8. MD study reveals that all the investigated inhibitor molecules strongly adsorbed over the
                                                                                                    metallic surface nearly by flat or parallel orientation and thereby protect the larger
                                                                                                    surface area. The values of Einteraction were followed the order: APCI-3 (-877.11 kJ/mol) >
Acknowledgment
References
                                                                                                 1. http://insights.globalspec.com/article/2340/annual-global-cost-of-corrosion-2-5-trillion.
                                                                                                 2. C. Verma, E.E. Ebenso, M.A. Quraishi, J. Mol. Liq. 233 (2017) 403.
                                                                                              22. C. Verma, M.A. Quraishi, A. Singh, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 000(2015)1.
                                                                                              23. I. Ahamad, R. Prasad, M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 3033.
                                                                                              24. R. G. Pearson, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988) 734.
                                                                                              27. Z. Zhang, N.C. Tian, X.D. Huang, W. Shang, L. Wu, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 22250.
                                                                                              28. N.K. Gupta, M. A. Quraishi, C. Verma, A. K. Mukherjee, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 102076.
                                                                                              29. C. Verma, M.A. Quraishi, Ain Shams Eng. J. 7 (2016) 1.
                                                                                              30. I. Ahamad, M.A. Quraishi, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 651.
                                                                                              31. J. Alijourani, K. Raeissi, M.A. Golozar, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009)1836.
                                                                                              32. C. Verma, M. A. Quraishi, K. Kluza, M. Makowska-Janusik, L.O. Olasunkanmi, E.E.
                                                                                                 Ebenso, Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 44432.
                                                                                              33. C. Verma, M.A. Quraishi, A. Singh, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 49 (2015) 229.
                                                                                              34. N.O. Eddy, H. Momoh-Yahaya, E.E. Oguzie, J. Adv. Res. 6 (2015) 203.
                                                                                              35. M.A. Deyab, J Ind. Eng. Chem. 22 (2015) 384.
                                                                                              36. P.B. Raja, A.K. Qureshi, A.A. Rahim, H. Osman, K. Awang, Corros. Sci. 69 (2013) 292.
                                                                                              37. R. Karthikaiselvi, S. Subhashini, J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci. 16 (2014) 74.
                                                                                              38. A. A. EI-Awady, B. A. Abd-EI-Nabey, S. G. Aziz, J. Electrochem. Soc. 139 (1992) 2049.
                                                                                              39. A.F.S.A. Rahiman, S. Sethumanickam, Arab. J. Chem. 10 (2017) 3358.
                                                                                              40. N.A. Odewunmi, S.A. Umoren, Z.M. Gasem, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 (2015) 239.
                                                                                              41. A. Singh, Y. Lin, W. Liu, S. Yu, J. Pan, C. Ren, D. Kuanhai, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20
                                                                                                 (2014) 4276.
                                                                                              42. S. Issaadi, T. Douadi, A. Zouaoui, S. Chafaa, M.A. Khan, G. Bouet, Corros. Sci. 53
                                                                                                 (2011) 1484.
                                                                                              43. N.A. Negm, E.A. Badr, I.A. Aiad, M.F. Zaki, M.M. Said, Corros. Sci. 65 (2012) 77.
                                                                                              44. M.M. Solomon, S.A. Umoren, A.U. Israel, E.E. Ebenso, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 24
                                                                                                 (2015) 4206.
                                                                                              45. El-Sayed, M. Sherif, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19 (2013) 1884.
                                                                                              46. I.B. Obot, S.A. Umoren, Z.M. Gasem, R. Suleiman, B. El Ali, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21
                                                                                                 (2015) 1328.
                                                                                                                              New Journal of Chemistry                                             Page 38 of 39
                                                                                                                                                                                     View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                            DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G
                                                                                              47. S. A. Umoren, I.B. Obot, A. Madhankumar, Z.M. Gasem, Carbohydr. Polym. 124 (2015)
                                                                                                 280.
                                                                                              48. M.M. Solomon, S. A. Umoren, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 462 (2016) 29.
                                                                                              50. J. Haque, V. Srivastava, C. Verma, M.A. Quraishi, J. Mol. Liq. 225 (2017) 848.
                                                                                              51. M.A. Deyab, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 22 (2015) 384.
                                                                                              52. G. Sı˘gırcık, T. Tüken, M. Erbil, App. Surf. Sci. 324 (2015) 232.
                                                                                              53. A. Ehsani, M.G. Mahjani, R. Moshrefi, H. Mostaanzadeh, J.S. Shayeh, RSC Adv. 4
                                                                                                 (2014) 2003.
                                                                                              54. S.K. Saha, A. Dutta, P. Ghosh, D. Sukul, P. Banerjee, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17
                                                                                                 (2015) 5679.
                                                                                              55. R. Tamilarasan, A. Sreekanth, RSC Adv. 3 (2013) 23681.
                                                                                              56. S. John, M. Kuruvilla, A. Joseph, RSC Adv. 3 (2013) 8929.
                                                                                              57. J. Haque, K.R. Ansari, V. Srivastava, M.A. Quraishi, I.B. Obot, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 49
                                                                                                 (2017) 176.
                                                                                              58. S. Kaya, L. Guo, C. Kaya, B. Tüzün, I.B. Obot, R. Touir, N. Islam, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem.
                                                                                                 Eng. 65 (2016) 522.
                                                                                              59. L.H. Madkour, S. Kaya, C. Kaya, L. Guo, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 68 (2016) 461.
                                                                                              60. H. Lgaz, R. Salghi, S. Jodeh, B. Hammouti, J. Mol. Liq. 225 (2017) 271–280.
                                                                                              61. S.K. Saha, M. Murmu, N.C. Murmu, P. Banerjee, J. Mol. Liq. 224 (2016) 629.
                                                                                              62. L.O. Olasunkanmi, I.B. Obot, E.E. Ebenso, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 86782.
                                                                                              63. A. Kokalj, Corros. Sci. 70 (2013) 294.
                                                                                              64. H. Lgaz, R. Salghi, S. Jodeh, B. Hammouti, J. Mol. Liq. 225 (2017) 271.
                                                                                              65. S.-W. Xie, Z. Liu, G.-C. Han, W. Li, J. Liu, Z. Chen, Comput. Theor. Chem. 1063 (2015)
                                                                                                 50.
                               Page 39 of 39                                                                                   New Journal of Chemistry
                                                                                                                                                                                    View Article Online
                                                                                                                                                                           DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ01431G