2024 EDelman
2024 EDelman
Statistical significance
28 32,000+
Countries Respondents
1,150+/-
Respondents per country**
- 0 + Significant change
Data collected is representative of the general population across age, gender, region and ethnicity/nationality (where applicable) within each country. For more details on global averages, country-specific sample
information, or to see the full text for any shortened statements,
please see the Technical Appendix
Trust
Shifts from
Authorities Business
to Peers Most Trusted
2005 2021
24
Years of Trust:
power shifts, 2016
The
divisions deepen Mass-Class 2024
Divide Innovation
in Peril
2018
The Battle
for Truth
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 4
save over 14 million Inflation Reduction on to Chat GPT in its commit to transition
lives in their first year Act, designed to first two months away from fossil fuels
incentivize green
innovation
Beijing rescinds U.S. Republican Hollywood Dutch Freedom Party to cast their vote
first vaccine presidential frontrunner screenwriters and wins power in protest
mandates after campaigns against actors strike over of green mandates
2 days of backlash electric vehicle studio use of
transition streaming and AI
technologies
Top row, left to right: The Lancet, Washington Post, Reuters, Reuters
Bottom row, left to right: Reuters, CNN, AP News, Politico
Far right: Time
P. 5
The Decline
of Authority
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer 2023 2024 P. 6
Lead on Trust 74
73
UAE
India
74
73
UAE
Indonesia
71 Saudi Arabia 72 Saudi Arabia
66 Singapore 70 Thailand Greatest changes in
Trust Index 66 Thailand 68 Malaysia
(average percent trust in NGOs, business, government, and media) 63 Kenya 67 Singapore S. Korea +7
62 Malaysia 64 Kenya
- 0 + Significant change Malaysia +6
61 Mexico 61 Nigeria
Distrust Neutral Trust 56 Nigeria 59 Mexico Nigeria +5
(1-49) (50-59) (60-100)
54 Netherlands 56 Netherlands
53 Brazil Thailand +4
53 Brazil
52 Canada 53 Canada Australia +4
2024 Trust Index among
51 Colombia 52 Australia
Developing countries 63 50 Italy 50 Italy
China -4
Developed countries 49 49 Sweden 49 S. Africa -4
Colombia
48 Australia 49 Sweden
48 Ireland 47 Colombia UK -4
48 U.S. 47 France
47 France 47 Ireland
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is the average percent trust in NGOs,
47 S. Africa 46 Spain
business, government and media. TRU_INS. Below is a list of institutions. For each one,
please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right. 9-point scale; top 4 46 Germany 46 U.S.
box, trust. General population, 28-mkt avg., and by developed and developing countries.
Year-over-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+ 44 Spain 45 Germany
confidence level.
43 UK 43 S. Korea
Due to a translation inconsistency in France, the 2023 Trust Index has been imputed using 42 Argentina 39 Argentina
a model. For more details, please see the Technical Appendix.
38 Japan 39 Japan UK now among
36 S. Korea 39 UK least-trusting countries
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 7
Business
(20, 4)
Media
(-21, -19)
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. The ethical scores are averages of nets based
on [INS]_PER_DIM/1-4. Media and NGOs were only asked of half the sample. Government 70 pts less
The competence score is a net based on TRU_3D_[INS]/1. Media and NGOs Government competent than business
were only asked of half the sample. General population, France.
For full details regarding how this data was calculated and plotted, please see the
(-50, -30) Unethical
Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 8
I trust companies
headquartered in China U.S. Germany
SE Asia
30 %
58
-3
pts
+14
53 %
53
-9
pts
-19
62 %
66
-9
pts
-8
Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia
Asia 20 -3 60 -8 64 -10
Japan, S, Korea, India, China
Europe 16 -10 44 -8 60 -8
France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, UK
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_NAT. Now we would like to focus on global companies headquartered in specific markets. Please indicate how much you trust global companies headquartered in the following markets to do what is right. 9-
point scale; top 4 box, trust. Question asked of half the sample. General population, 21-mkt avg., and by region. Data excludes respondents from the country being rated. Ten-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+
confidence level.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 9
- 0 + Significant change
63 % 55% 63 %
+5 +6 +3
pts pts pts
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. POP_EMO. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the
following? 9-point scale; top 4 box, worry. General population, France. Attributes asked of half the sample. Year-over-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+ confidence level.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 10
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_PEP_TCNG. Below is a list of categories of people. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that person or group of people to tell you the truth about new innovations and technologies. 9-point
scale; top 4 box, trust. Question asked of half the sample. General population, France.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 11
- 0 + Significant change
Personal Existential
economic fears societal fears
85
78 77 76
72
67
Significant increase:
Change,
2023 to 2024
-1 -3 +7 -1 -2 +13 fear of foreign attacks on our
media to inflame differences
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. POP_EMO. Some people say they worry about many things while others say they have few concerns. We are interested in what you worry about. Specifically, how much do you worry about each of the
following? 9-point scale; top 4 box, worry. Some attributes asked of half the sample. General population, France. Job loss asked of those who are an employee of an organization (Q43/1). Job loss is a net of attributes 1-3, 5, and 22-24.Year-
over-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+ confidence level.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 12
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TRU_INS_TCNG. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right when it comes to ensuring that the introduction of new technologies and
innovations into society is well-managed (e.g., they are safe, understood by the public, beneficial to society as a whole, and accessible to the people who need them). 9-point scale; top 4 box, trust. Question asked of half the sample. General
population, France, and by income
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 13
in Industry Innovations 67 67
60
54
Percent trust, in France
Trust gap,
innovation
vs sector
+9pts -34 -21 -45
63
46
33
15
Innovation success:
Green energy 17 44 More enthusiasm for
green energy
AI 56 17
At a crossroads:
More recent technologies
struggle to build enthusiasm
Gene-based
40 26
medicine
Innovation failure:
GMO foods 77 7 GMO foods strongly
resisted
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; bottom 2 box, resistant or hesitant = reject; top 2 box, enthusiastic or passionate = embrace. General
population, France.
P. 15
Innovation is
on the Ballot
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 16
GLOBAL 28
59
45
%
Th
UK a nd
In
Ita
Au
Ch a li
Ca
I re d a
M d
M sia
S. o
U. ric a
Ja
Ar n
G ntin
In a n
Ne e s
Ni rla
Br ia
Co l
Fr b
Ke e
Sw a
S. e n
Sp re a
UA
Si
Sa po
al
ex
er
di
do y
ng
S.
ge nd
a n ia
pa
ge
az
ai
ly
la
Af
Ko
ud re
st
in a
na
th ia
lo
ny
ai
ed
E
ay
m a
a
ic
l
n
r
iA
ra
bi
s
a
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. POP_MDC. Below is a list of statements. For each one, please rate how true you believe that statement is using a nine-point scale where one means it is “not at all true” and nine means it is “completely true”. 9-point
scale; top 4 box, true. General population, 28-mkt avg.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 17
Science has become politicized in this country Government and organizations that fund research have
too much influence on how science is done
60 % 52 %
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CHG_AGR. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. 9-point scale; top 4 box, agree. Question asked of half the sample. General population, France.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 18
GLOBAL 28
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. Innovation Management Scale. General population, 28-mkt avg. For a full explanation of how the Innovation Management Scale was developed, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 19
GLOBAL 28 More likely to say innovation is poorly managed, not well, in 24 of 28 countries
Neither 39
14
17 16 19 17 25
Yes, 14 17 22
17 18 21 22 23
innovation is 22 19 21 35
21 17 20 30 34 37
well managed 20 26 35
21 24
56
No, 50 49 49 48 48 46 44 44 43 43 42 42 41 40
innovation is 39 39 36 36 35 33 31 30 30 30 29 28
poorly managed 26 24
G
G alia
U any
Fr tin
Ita e
Sp a
Sw
Ire en
S. d
C ica
M rla
C o
S.
Ja rea
In sia
In
K esi
Th
U nd
Si
Sa por
N
lo
.S
us
er
rg
ra
an
ol
et ia
hi
en a
AE
ig rab
ex nd
al
di
do
ng
an a
ly
pa
ai
la
Af
Ko
ai
ud e
ba
ed
om
he
na
er
.
en
zi
ay
a
tr
ad
ic
ya
n
la
c
a
r
n
l2
iA
ia ia
b
8
s
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. Innovation Management Scale. General population, 28-mkt avg. For a full explanation of how the Innovation Management Scale was developed, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 20
In France, Concern Innovation is Mismanaged Shared Across Income, Gender, and Age
On average, percent who say, in France
Neither 35
17 15 20 21 19 15
Yes, 16 12 17
innovation is
well managed
No, 48 47 49 47 50 48 51
46 46
43
innovation is 39 39 39 40 38 39
35
poorly managed
Fr
Lo
35
55
a
ig
ge
id
en
om
-5
+
w
nc
h
dl
4
18
in
e
en
e
co
-3
4
m
e
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. Innovation Management Scale. General population, France, and by demographics. For a full explanation of how the Innovation Management Scale was developed, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 21
GLOBAL 28 26 38 well
AI
43 26 poorly
27 33 well
Gene-based
medicine 41 25 poorly
55 15 well
GMO foods
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your 63 13 poorly
feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; bottom 2 box, resistant or hesitant =
reject; top 2 box, enthusiastic or passionate = embrace. General population, 28-mkt avg.,
by the innovation management scale. For a full explanation of how the Innovation
Management Scale was developed, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 22
GLOBAL 21
23 20 18 14 13 13 11
7 pts 9 7 6 6 6
2
-1 -2 -2
Far greater resistance on the right -5 -7 -8 -8
Political leaning than on the left
Right 27 53 37 47 37 32 32 35 38 45 30 22 24 29 13 12 15 23 14 14 16 13
Left 20 12 14 27 19 18 19 22 27 36 23 16 18 23 11 13 17 25 19 21 24 21
G
Ita
Sp
Fr
Ire
Sw
S.
In
S.
A
lo
.S
us
er
an
et
ra
ol
en
ig
rg
di
ex
al
an
ly
ai
la
Ko
Af
ed
ba
he
om
er
.
zi
ay
en
a
tra
ad
ya
ic
n
nd
ce
ric
bold font indicates
l
an
en
re
ia
rla
si
l2
tin
a
lia
bi
a
y
1
nd
a
20% or more reject innovation
s
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; Data is showing the percent of respondents who, on average, rejected innovation when looking at the mean
scores “acceptance ratings” for each of the four innovations, and the differences between those who lean left or right politically. Those that rejected innovation averaged a score between 1 and 2.49 on the 5-point scale. General population, 21-mkt avg.,
by political leaning. Political leaning is not asked in China, Saudi Arabia, Thailand or the UAE. Indonesia, Japan, and Singapore are excluded from the analysis due to having sample sizes too low to report (less than n100).
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 23
The base size for the “well managed” segment is too low to report (less than n100 respondents).
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 24
The base size for the “well managed” segment is too low to report (less than n100 respondents).
P. 25
A Reset for
Science in Society
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 26
of innovation
Showing top 5 of 11 items Technical experts 69
Government leaders 55
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. RSP_TEC_CHG. How big a role do you feel each of the following should have in ensuring that the introduction of new technologies and innovations is well-managed (e.g., they are safe, understood by the
public, beneficial to society as a whole, and accessible to the people who need them)? 5-point scale; top 2 box, a big or huge role. Question asked of half the sample. General population, France. Data is showing the top 5 roles, with ties broken
by decimal.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 27
GLOBAL 28
I reject this innovation I am okay with this I embrace this innovation
Among those who have Resistant Hesitant Comfortable Enthusiastic Passionate
(1-1.49) (1.5-2.49) (2.5-3.49) (3.5-4.49) (4.5-5)
low high
Green energy
confidence that each
innovation has been
evaluated by scientists AI
and ethicists
Gene-based medicine
Much more acceptance
among those with high
GMO foods confidence that each innovation
is vetted by scientists
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TEC_TST. How confident are you that these technologies have been adequately tested, evaluated, and assessed by scientists, ethicists, and other experts? 5-point scale; top 2 box, high confidence; bottom 2 box,
low confidence. Question asked of half the sample. CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; data plotted is an average acceptance rating for each innovation. General population, 28-mkt
avg., by level of confidence. For a full explanation of how the Average Acceptance Rating was calculated, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 28
GLOBAL 28
64
58
55 54 53 52 50 49 47
45
46 46 46 45 44 44 43 43 42 42 42 41 41 41 39 37 36 36 35
%
Ch
Th
In nd
Si sia
Fr po
M e
S. o
Au ic a
In a lia
I re e s
UA d
Ne
Ar rla
Co tin
Sa bi
Sp i Ar
Ita
UK
U.
Ca
G da
Ke a n
Sw a
Ni e n
Br ia
S. l
J a re a
al
ex
er
di
ng
do
a n re
ge
ge nd
az
pa
ai
Af
la ia
ud a
ly
Ko
in
st
th
lo a
ai a b
na
ny y
E
ed
ay
m
a
ic
la
n
a
i
r
n
s
ia
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CHG_AGR. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements. 9-point scale; top 4 box, agree. Question asked of half the sample. General population, 28-mkt avg.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 29
Local media 36
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. INO_INF_SRC. Where do you get most of your information and knowledge about new technologies and innovations from? Pick all that apply. Question asked of half the sample. General population, France. “Social
media” is a net of “My social media news feed” and “On social media posted by, or forwarded from, someone in my social network”. Data is showing the top 5 sources, with ties broken by decimal.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 30
Communicate pluses
and minuses 75 Help people keep up 73 Institute safeguards 74 Ensure our future prosperity 71
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. INS_CHG_PER. If [Institution] wants to earn or keep your trust in their being good stewards or managers of change, how important is it that they do each of the following in response to the technological and
social changes taking place in your country today? 6-point scale; top 3 box, moderately or more important. Media and NGOs were only asked of half the sample. General population, France. Data showing the top 3 trust-building actions, with ties
broken by decimal.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 31
GLOBAL 28
I reject this innovation I am okay with this I embrace this innovation
Among those who believe Resistant Hesitant Comfortable Enthusiastic Passionate
“people like me” have (1-1.49) (1.5-2.49) (2.5-3.49) (3.5-4.49) (4.5-5)
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TEC_INF. How much influence or control do you feel people like you have over how these technologies are used in ways that might affect their lives? 5-point scale; top 2 box, a lot of control; bottom 2 box, a little
control. Question asked of half the sample. CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; data plotted is an average acceptance rating for each innovation. General population, 28-mkt avg., by
level of control. For a full explanation of how the Average Acceptance Rating was calculated, please see the Technical Appendix.
P. 32
60 %
47
38
+15 +26 +8 +19 +3 n/a n/a +5 +13 n/a n/a +26 +6 +26 +12 +12 +30 +19 n/a +15 +21 +9 +22 +16 +1 +13 +8 +12
pts
Change,
Ch
In
In sia
Ni e si
Sa ia
UA Ar
Si
Ke por
Th
S. nd
Br ic a
S. o
Ne re a
Ire rla
Au d
Co a lia
Ita a ny
Ca
Sp a
UK
Fr
Ja e
U.
Ar
al
ex
er ia
di
do
ng
2015 to 2024
ge a
S.
az
pa
ge
ud
ai
Af
Ko
la nd
ly
in
ny e
th
st
lo
na
ai
E a bi
nc
ay
m
a
ic
n
la
n
a
il
m
r
nt
i
d
b
in
a
s
a
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. INS_PTN. Below are a number of actions that could impact your trust in business and industry to develop and implement technology-led changes. What impact would each of these actions have on your trust? 9-point
scale, top 4 box, trust business and industry more. General population, 22-mkt avg. Year-over-year changes were tested for significance using a t-test set at the 99%+ confidence level.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 34
GLOBAL 28
I reject this innovation I am okay with this I embrace this innovation
Among those who have Resistant Hesitant Comfortable Enthusiastic Passionate
(1-1.49) (1.5-2.49) (2.5-3.49) (3.5-4.49) (4.5-5)
low high
Green energy
confidence that each
innovation is
effectively regulated AI
Gene-based medicine
Much more acceptance
among those with high
GMO foods confidence that each innovation
is effectively regulated
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TEC_SAF. How confident are you that each of the following is being effectively regulated? 5-point scale; top 2 box, high confidence; bottom 2 box, low confidence. Question asked of half the sample.
CHG_TEC_COM. How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; data plotted is an average acceptance rating for each innovation. General population, 28-mkt avg., by level of confidence. For a full explanation of
how the Average Acceptance Rating was calculated, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 35
67
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. CEO_RSP_CHOICE. You are about to see two choices. We want you to choose the one that best describes your beliefs. Question asked of half the sample. CEO_ISS. How important is it to you that the CEO or
head of the organization you work for speaks out publicly about each of the following issues? 9-point scale; top 4 box, important. Question asked of those who are an employee of an organization (Q43/1). General population, France.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 36
GLOBAL 28
I reject this innovation I am okay with this I embrace this innovation
Among those who have Resistant Hesitant Comfortable Enthusiastic Passionate
(1-1.49) (1.5-2.49) (2.5-3.49) (3.5-4.49) (4.5-5)
low high
Green energy
confidence that each
innovation will lead to
a better future AI
Gene-based medicine
Much more acceptance
among those with high
GMO foods confidence that each innovation
is effectively regulated
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer. TEC_FUT. How confident are you that these technologies will lead us to a better future? 5-point scale; top 2 box, high confidence; bottom 2 box, low confidence. Question asked of half the sample. CHG_TEC_COM.
How would you characterize your feelings about each of the following? 5-point scale; data plotted is an average acceptance rating for each innovation. General population, 28-mkt avg., by level of confidence. For a full explanation of how the Average
Acceptance Rating was calculated, please see the Technical Appendix.
2024 Edelman Trust Barometer P. 37
1 2 3 4
Implementation as Business must partner Science must integrate Give me control over
important as invention for change with society my future
Mismanaged innovations are Business is most trusted to Scientists are still trusted— When people feel in control
as likely to ignite backlash as introduce innovation into society, but increasingly subject to over how innovations affect
advance society. With with an emphasis on partnering public scrutiny. To build trust their lives, they are more likely
breakthroughs like AI, vaccines, with government. CEOs need to in expert recommendations, to embrace them, not resist
and green energy on the line, safeguard jobs and take a stand explain the research, engage them. Listen for concerns,
explaining the science and on emerging ethical concerns. in dialogue, and harness peer be open to questions.
managing impacts is essential. voices as advocates.
P. 38
Cody Armstrong
Abbey Derse
Research, Analysis, Catherine Aumiller MARKETING
and Operations Theresa Peterson
Rosie Delk Mike Bush
Claire Ritzmann Ryann Gastwirth
Kayley Goff
John Zamites Marketing Pamela Blandon
Data and Analytics Heather Daniels-Gontier
Kiera Cooke
Danielle Timmons
Romain Maradan
Drake Baer
Narrative and Esther Choi
Content Strategy Chloe Buckley Brad Good
Lily Battat Design Camila Gutierrez
Carolina Estrada
Justin Blake
Edelman Trust Institute Leadership, Ellie Smith
Partnerships and Content Teams Caitlin Semo
Susannah Ferris