0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views37 pages

7 Measures of Association

Uploaded by

Tut Kong Ruach
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views37 pages

7 Measures of Association

Uploaded by

Tut Kong Ruach
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 37

Measures of Association

Misrak G. (BSc., MSc., MPH)


2022

1
Learning Objectives
♦ At the end of this session learners are expected
to:
– Understand , explain and calculate the
different measures of association

2
Measure of association/Impact

♦ Measure of association : a statistic that


quantifies the relationship between an
exposure and a disease

3
Definitions…

♦ Exposure (E) : an explanatory factor; any


potential health determinant; the
independent variable
♦ Disease (D) : the response; any health-
related outcome; the dependent variable

4
Association

Exposure Outcome

Is there a relationship between the


exposure and outcome of interest?

5
“Exposure”

♦ Exposure in usual sense


e.g., ingestion of contaminated food
e.g., droplets from someone with active
pulmonary TB
♦ Behaviors
e.g., sharing needles, drinking alcohol etc
♦ Treatment
e.g., intervention - education program: yes or no
– drug 1 versus drug 2 in a clinical trial
♦ Inherent trait or characterizes 6
“Outcome”
♦ Disease
– e.g., infectious disease: malaria, TB
– e.g., non-infectious disease diabetes, cancer

♦ Event
– e.g., injury from land mine, car accident
♦ Condition
– e.g., blindness, other disabilities

♦ Death
♦ Other
7
"Every epidemiologic study

can be summarized

in a 2-by-2 table”

to show association
8
Standard Two-by-Two Table =
Contingency Table

9
Two-by-Two Table

♦ From the table one can calculate:

• Risk in Exposed,

• Risk in Unexposed,

• Odds of exposure,

• RR,

• OR,

10
Description of Relationship

♦ Variables can be Related or Unrelated to one


another
♦ If the two variables are Related, they can be
related either:
– positively or negatively
– strongly or weakly (one variable can have
large or small effect on the other)
– significantly or not significantly

11
Relationships between variables —
Related or unrelated?

10
2.00

8
Dependent variable

Dependent variable
1.50
6

1.00
4

0.50
2

0.00
0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20
Independent variable 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00
Independent Variable

Related unrelated

12
Relationships between variables —
Positive & Negative association

10 10

Y Y

0 0

0 X 1 0 X 1

Positive Negative
13
Relationships between variables —
Large or Small effect

10 10

Y Y

0 0

0 X 1 0 X 1

Strong/Large Weak/Small
14
Significant or non-significant

♦ Statistically significant
 The observed association is unlikely to be
due to chance alone
But remember:
• Statistically significant means that the
association is not likely due to chance

• It is dependent on the strength of the


association and sample size

15
Measures of Association

– Relative Risk
– Odds Ratio

16
RELATIVE RISK [RR]
♦ Is the term we use to describe the comparison of
two risks as a ratio
♦ Estimates the magnitude (size) of an association
between exposure and disease
♦ It indicates the likelihood of the exposed group
developing the disease relative to those not
exposed
♦ Indicates how many more times likely the
exposed are to develop the disease than the
non-exposed

17
Relative Risk or Risk Ratio

18
Relative Risk or Risk Ratio

19
Example 1:

♦ Data from a cohort study of oral contraceptive (OC) use and


Breast Ca. among women aged 16-49 years

B. CA
Yes No Total

Current OC use
Yes 27 455 482
No 77 1831 1908
Total 104 2286 2390

20
Example 1: cont…

RR = a/(a+b) =27/482 =1.4


c/(c+d) 77/1908
♦ Interpretation – OC users had 1.4 times the risk
more likely to develop B.Ca than nonusers

21
Example 2:

♦ Data from a cohort study of postmenopausal


hormone use and coronary heart disease among
female nurses
Coronary heart disease
Yes No Person-years

Postmenopausal
hormone use
Yes 30 - 54,308.7
No 60 - 51,477.5
Total 90 105,786.2
22
Example 2: …

RR = Ie =IDe = a/PY1 = 30/54,308.7 = 0.5


Io IDo c/PYo 60/51,477.5

♦ Interpretation: women who use


postmenopausal hormones had 0.5 times, or
only half, the risk of developing coronary heart
disease compared with nonusers.

23
Example 3:

In an outbreak of ♦ Risk of Measles among


Measles in AA in vaccinated children
2002, measles was = 18 ⁄ 152 = 0.118 =
diagnosed in 18 of
152 vaccinated
11.8%
children compared ♦ Risk of measles among
with 3 of 7 unvaccinated children
unvaccinated = 3 ⁄ 7 = 0.429 = 42.9%
children. Calculate
the RR.
♦ RR= 0.118 ⁄ 0.429 =
0.28
Interpretation? 24
Interpreting Relative Risk
 If RR = 1 Risk in exposed = Risk in non-exposed
– No association
 If RR > 1 Risk in exposed > Risk in non-exposed
– Positive association; ? causal
 If RR < 1 Risk in exposed < Risk in non-exposed
– Negative association; ? protective

25
Measures of Association
Interpretation
A. RR = 0.87
B. RR = 4.25
C. RR = 1.86

Which RR suggests the strongest association?


Why?

Which RR suggests a protective effect?


Why?
26
Odds Ratio

 Odds are a measurement of the likelihood of


occurrence of an event
 odds are a ratio of the probability that an event
occurs to the probability that the event does not
occur:

Odd = Probability of occurrence


Probability of non-occurrence

27
Odds Ratio
 Indicates the likelihood of having been exposed
among cases relative to controls

Cases and controls are predetermined and


we are calculating to determine whether
cases or controls are more exposed to a
postulated risk factor.

 It is an indirect measure of a risk in a disease of


rare occurrence.

 Thus, usually used in a case-control and


28
cross-sectional analytic study designs.
Odds Ratio

29
Odds ratio= cross product ratio

30
Example 1:

♦ Data from a case-control study of current


oral contraceptive (OC) use and MI in
premenopausal women

Myocardial infarction
Yes No Total

Current OC use
Yes 23 304 327
No 133 2816 2949
Total 156 3120 3276
31
Example 1 …

OR = ad = (23)(2816) = 1.6
bc (304)(133)

The odds of exposure history among MI


women is 1.6 times that of non- MI women.

32
Example 2:

Deep Vein Thrombosis

Yes No
History of OC Yes 40 20
use No 20 30

OR = Odds of exposure in diseased = a/c = 40/20 = 3

odds of exposure in non diseased b/d 20/30

The odds of oral contraceptive use among


women with DVT is three times as likely when
compared to women with out DVT. 33
Attention!

♦ How can we calculate measure of association


when you have multiple levels of exposure?
♦ How can you calculate OR from the following
2x2 table

D- D+
E+
E-

34
Interpretation

35
Interpretation

RR & OR
1. RR/ OR > 1, the exposure is risk
2. RR/ OR = 1, there is no association
3. RR/ OR < 1, the exposure is Preventive

36
THANK YOU

37

You might also like