KKU ENGINEERING JOURNAL 2016;43(S3):459-461                                                                             Research Article
KKU Engineering Journal
                                            https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kkuenj/index
Effect of drying methods on property of Thai rice cracker
P. Thanompongchart*1), P. Pintana1), K. Phimphilai2) and N. Tippayawong2)
1)Faculty   of Industrial Technology, Uttaradit Rajabhat University, Uttaradit, Thailand.
2)Department     of Mechanical Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
                                                                                                                     Received April 2016
                                                                                                                     Accepted June 2016
Abstract
Fried glutinous rice cracker is a popular snack for local Thais. One of the production steps usually requires drying. Method of
drying is an important process affecting products, shelf life and quality. In this research study, quality of rice cracker obtained
from various drying methods (direct solar radiation, solar dome, and hot air drying oven) was investigated and compared.
Properties of the rice cracker being analyzed were shrinkage ratio, expansion ratio, color, hardness and crispness. The rice
cracker samples were in rectangular slap. Experimental results showed that the final moisture content of the rice cracker was
in the range of about 8-10% wet basis. Direct solar drying gave minimum shrinkage ratio of 1.34 and maximum expansion
ratio of 4.99. The color of dried rice cracker was given as L* a* b* color space. The highest hardness of the rice cracker (2,200
g) can be reached by hot air drying, and the best crispness (18,000 g.s) was obtained by direct solar drying.
Keywords: Dehydration, Food processing, Food quality, Snack
1. Introduction                                                            The glutinous rice was obtained locally. Before
                                                                       experimentation, it was soaked in water overnight, after
    Fried glutinous rice cracker or “Khaotan” is a traditional         which it was washed and steamed. Then the cooked rice may
snack of local Thai communities. Khaotan is popular in north           be mixed with other ingredients, such as fruit syrup. The rice
of Thailand. From food preservation in small groups of                 was then molded into shape with volume of about 12 cm3.
housewives, khao tan is now an economically important                  The moisture content was about 60-70 % dry basis.
product with export to the World. It helps generate
significant extra income to local people. There are many               2.2 Drying methods
shapes of rice cracker such as round, oval, rectangular or
irregular shaped. In the production of rice cracker, drying is              Three methods of drying were used for removing
an essential step to preserve the rice cracker and prevent             moisture of the rice cracker. The configuration of the three
fungal spoilage. Subsequent step is frying. Fried rice cracker         dryers is shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3. For solar drying, it was
had moisture content about 8-10 % dry basis [1-2]. Drying              operated between 9.00 am. – 17.00 pm. A hot air drying oven
process can be challenging due mainly to uncertainty and               is a square room. It was operated at temperature of about 40-
fluctuation in final moisture content of product, which in             45oC. Air distribution throughout the room was about 3-3.5
turns, depending on method of drying. Normally, drying by              m3/s. Hot air entered at the bottom of the room. Moist air
direct solar radiation is adopted to reduce moisture content           exited at the top of the drying room. Moisture content was
of the steamed rice before frying. The energy is provided for          analyzed using a Mettler Toledo model MJ33. The final
free but the method has limitation regarding weather                   moisture content of rice cracker was about 8-10 % dry basis
conditions. It can take long period of up to 2-3 days and risk         before storage. Temperature, humidity and intensity of solar
contamination from insects, dust and others foreign materials          irradiation were also monitored.
that may damage the product [3-5]. Indirect solar drying
using greenhouse dome dryer or drying with hot air from                2.3 Property analysis
burning of fuel gas can offer alternative solution. However,
these drying techniques can result in varying quality and                  The following physical properties were considered;
property of the rice cracker.                                          shrinkage ratio, expansion ratio, color, hardness and
Hence, in this work, we aimed to study property of dried rice          crispness. Shrinkage and expansion ratios were calculated
cracker for each drying method and compare between them.               from change in volume [6]. Color analysis was based on CIE
                                                                       system; lightness (L*), redness (a*) and yellowness (b*). It
2. Materials and methods                                               was determined using Hunter Lab Color Flex [7]. Hardness
                                                                       and crispness were based on texture analysis using TAXT
2.1 Rice crack samples                                                 Plus. Three point bend, pre-test, test and post-test speeds of
*Corresponding author. Tel +6686 671 7937
Email address: patipat.than@gmail.com
doi: 10.14456/kkuenj.2016.155
460                                                                                   KKU ENGINEERING JOURNAL 2016;43(S3)
1, 2 and 10 mm/s, distance of 10 mm and trigger force of 5g    3. Results and discussion
were used.
                                                                   For direct solar drying in ambient air, experiments on
                                                               clear days showed average temperature and humidity of
                                                               outdoor ambience at 41.5oC and 45% RH. Average solar
                                                               power was 756 W/m2 with maximum of 1,100 W/m2. Drying
                                                               time was 8 h or about one day of work. Final moisture
                                                               content was about 8-9% dry basis. For indirect solar drying
                                                               with greenhouse dome dryer, average temperature, air
                                                               ventilation and dome solar power were found to be about 45-
                                                               50oC, 1.0 m3/s and 560 W/m2, respectively. Average drying
                                                               time was 13 h or about one and a half day of work. For hot
                                                               air drying in the LPG fired oven, temperature was set at 40-
Figure 1 Direct solar drying on a tray                         45oC with air circulation of about 3-3.5 m3/s. Average drying
                                                               time was about 12 h, or about one night of work.
                                                                   After frying of the dried rice crackers, their shrinkage
                                                               and expansion ratios, color, hardness and crispness were
                                                               analyzed and shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively.
                                                               Physical appearance of the products after drying and frying
                                                               was shown in Figures 4 and 5.
                                                                   From the experimental results, it was clear that minimum
                                                               drying time was obtained from direct solar drying (about 8
                                                               h). Maximum and minimum shrinkage of dried rice crackers
                                                               were 35% from hot air drying oven and 26% from direct solar
                                                               drying. Maximum expansion after frying was 400% from
Figure 2 Indirect solar drying with greenhouse dome            direct solar drying. Shrinkage of dried rice crackers and
                                                               expansion after flying were found to depend on temperature
                                                               and time in drying process. Dried rice crackers from direct
                                                               solar drying was lighter, lower redness and yellowness than
                                                               those obtained from other methods. Change in product colors
                                                               was also dependent on drying time and temperature. Color of
                                                               the fried rice cracker did not change significantly. For dried
                                                               rice crackers, maximum hardness and crispness were
                                                               4,676.87 ± 582.43 g of force from hot air drying oven and
                                                               14,193 ± 1,180.32 g.s from direct solar drying. For solar
                                                               dome dryer, hardness and crispness were quite low due to
                                                               long drying time where evaporation of water occurred slowly
                                                               and regularly. For fried crackers, maximum hardness and
                                                               crispness were obtained from hot air drying oven and direct
                                                               solar heating dryer, respectively.
Figure 3 Hot air drying in an oven with LPG combustion
Table 1 Shrinkage after drying and expansion after frying process
                                Shrinkage           Percent                      Expansion           Percent
   Drying methods                                                    S.D.                                            S.D.
                                  ratio            shrinkage                       ratio            expansion
   Direct solar drying              1.34              25.61          ±0.91          4.99              399.85        ±6.00
   Solar dome dryer                 1.41              28.95          ±1.10          4.71              371.58        ±4.27
   Hot air drying oven              1.54              34.93          ±0.50          4.68              368.37        ±2.34
          Direct solar drying                     Solar dome dryer                          Hot air drying oven
Figure 4 Color of rice crackers after drying
KKU ENGINEERING JOURNAL 2016;43(S3)                                                                                               461
Table 2 Color of rice crackers
       Rice cracker after drying               Color                  Rice cracker after frying                     Color
                process                L*         a*         b*               process                      L*         a*         b*
           Direct solar drying        60.35     0.95        17.22           Direct solar drying           69.41      9.315      29.73
                 S.D. ±               0.220    0.064        0.330                  S.D. ±                 0.350      0.420      0.250
           Solar dome dryer           62.39     3.74        22.45            Solar dome dryer             68.62      10.79      30.41
                 S.D. ±               0.610    0.098        0.200                  S.D. ±                 1.330      1.170      1.730
          Hot air drying oven         58.91     5.95        22.35           Hot air drying oven           66.92      10.2       29.96
                 S.D. ±               0.310    0.077        0.130                  S.D. ±                 0.007      0.410      0.470
             Direct solar drying                        Solar dome dryer                           Hot air drying oven
Figure 5 Color of rice crackers after frying
Table 3 Hardness and crispness of rice crackers
      Rice cracker after drying     Hardness       Crispness              Rice cracker after frying       Hardness         Crispness
               process                 (g)           (g.s)                        process                    (g)             (g.s)
         Direct solar drying        4,105.06       14,193.87                 Direct solar drying          1,883.42         17,976.87
               S.D. ±                517.32            1,180.32                     S.D. ±                 591.65            1,747.83
          Solar dome dryer          2,840.39           10,787.31              Solar dome dryer            1,275.85          13,481.66
               S.D. ±                423.32             958.56                      S.D. ±                  23.89            1,471.17
         Hot air drying oven        4,676.87           13,780.66             Hot air drying oven          2,188.67          10,223.54
               S.D. ±                582.43            1,125.43                     S.D. ±                 306.65            1,081.48
4. Conclusions                                                      [3]     Limpaiboon K, Wiriyaumpaiwong S. Drying kinetics
                                                                            of steamed glutinous rice with a free convective solar
    In this work, properties of rice crackers obtained from                 dryer. Walailak Journal of Science and Technology
different drying methods (direct solar radiation, solar dome,               2009;6(2):217-299.
and hot air drying oven) was analyzed and compared. It was          [4]     Ayensu A. Dehydration of food crops using solar dryer
shown that the highest quality of physical property of rice                 with convective heat flow. Solar Energy 1997;59:121-
crackers may be obtained using direct solar drying. However,                126.
alternative dryers can be useful. Nonetheless, works on             [5]     Gbaha P, Andoh HY, Saraka JK, Koua BK, Toure S.
investigation of drying characteristics and quality of rice                 Experimental investigation of a solar dryer with natural
crackers should be carried out further in the future.                       convective     heat    flow.     Renewable      Energy
                                                                            2007;32:1818-1829.
5. Acknowledgements                                                 [6]     Segnini S, Pedreschi F, Dejmek P. Volume
                                                                            measurement method of potato chips. International
   This work was supported by the National Research                         Journal of Food Properties 2004;7(1):37-44.
Council of Thailand, Uttaradit Rajabhat University and              [7]     Larrain RE, Schaefer DM, Reed JD, Use of digital
Chiang Mai University.                                                      images to estimate CIE color coordinate of beef. Food
                                                                            Research International 2008;41(4):380-385.
6. References
[1]     Intharapongnuwat W, Arkanit K, Wangcharoen W,
        Warasawas P. Process improvement for Thai-style
        fried rice crackers. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-
        Industry 2008;1(3):155-166.
[2]     Saiai S, Chithep S. Estimate of energy dissipation on
        cabinet dryer for decreased moisture of cracker.
        Proceedings of the 5th Endemic Conference; 2014
        May 20-21; Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.