Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 113

Module-V: Values and Ethics for Personal and

Notes

e
Professional Development

in
Objectives:
At the end of this unit you will be able to understand

nl
●● Personal values—Empathy, honesty, courage, commitment
●● Values Clarification & Acceptance

O
●● Professional Values—Work ethics, respect for others
●● Its role in personality development
●● Learning based on project work on Scriptures like- Ramayana, Mahabharata,

ity
Bible, Quran, Gita etc.
●● Types of Judgment (Factual Aesthetic, Moral)
●● Domains in study of Ethics (Applied, Normative & Meta Ethics)
●● Ethics in Technological Era
●●
●●
Meaning, Types of Organizational Justice
Implications of Organizational Justice rs
ve
●● Consequences of Organizational injustice

Introduction
Personal ethics and values are person’s beliefs about right or wrong. They
ni

guide individuals in decision-making. The unique ethics determine how one handles
certain situations and take and deal life’s challenges ahead. Personal ethics are
a set of principles that the person uses while making decisions and behaving in
U

both professional and personal settings. These ethics influence various aspects of a
person’s life and help individuals develop their work ethics, personal and professional
goals and values. These help them determine what is right or wrong and influence the
behaviour in challenging situations. The set of code of ethics and values may vary, but
ity

people share some common ethics to various gradations, such as honesty and respect.

5.1 Personal Values—Empathy, Honesty, Courage, Commitment

m

Personal values engage, inspire and motivate people to do their obligations and
duties. Values are basic and fundamental beliefs that guide and motivate attitudes
or actions. These are the personal qualities we choose to personify to guide our
actions, the kind of person we want to be, the manner in which we treat ourselves
)A

and others, and our interaction with the world around us. In a narrow sense they are
good and desirable traits. They are the motive behind purposeful action. Personal
values are personal beliefs about right or wrong may or may not be considered morally
right. Values provide the general guidelines to conduct. They specify the relationship
between a person and a goal. Whatever one person values may not be same for the
(c

other person to value in the same situation. Values are essential to ethics. Ethics is
concerned with human action and choice of those actions. Ethics evaluates those

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 114 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

actions and values that underlie them. It determines the choice of values to be pursued.
Notes

e
Moral values can be turned into excellence of character with practice and repetition. We
become pure by being morally excellent and use practical wisdom to make decisions

in
about what virtuous behaviour is.

Empathy: It is the social radar. Sensing about other’s feelings, without them being
open towards it, is the essence of empathy. It starts with showing concern and feeling

nl
for others and them obtaining understanding for their point of view. It is the ability to put
one’s psychological self into psychological frame, reference or other’s point of view. It
is imaginative projection into other’s feelings and understanding of other’s background
in terms of parentage, physical and mental state, economic situation, and association.

O
This is considered to be an essential ingredient for good human relations.

Honesty: Honesty is a virtue exhibited by two aspects, namely:

ity
◌◌ Truthfulness: It is to face the responsibilities by telling truth. They build trust
through reliability and authenticity. Making judgements by maintaining and
defending the truth, by communicating it only when it does the good to others
are some of the reflections of truthfulness. It is about admitting own mistakes
and confronting ethical actions in others and even taking tough and principled

rs
stand, despite being unpopular.
◌◌ Trustworthiness: It is about maintaining integrity and taking responsibility for
personal performance. One should keep one’s word or promise. People abide
ve
by law and live by mutual trust. It is about reliability and authenticity.
Honesty is reflected in the following ways:

◌◌ Beliefs: intellectual honesty

ni

◌◌ Communications: Through writing and speech

◌◌ Decisions: Ideas and discretion
◌◌ Actions
U

◌◌ Intended and unintended results achieved

Courage: Courage is the tendency to accept and face risks and portray difficult
tasks rationally. Self-confidence is the basic requirement to nurture and raise it. It is
ity

classified into three types:

◌◌ Physical: In physical courage the focus and push is on the adequacy of

physical strength, including muscle power and ability to portray strength.
◌◌ Social: It involves the decisions and actions to change the order and an
m

established customary state of the society, based on conviction for or against

certain social behaviours. This requires leadership abilities to mobilize and
motivate the followers for a social cause.
)A

◌◌ Intellectual: It is inculcated and contained in people through acquired

knowledge, experience, education, games, tactics and training.
Commitment: It is meant by alignment to goals and adherence to ethical principles
during the activities. Having faith in one’s action performed and the expected end
results towards it gives the conviction without doubt towards success. Holding affirmed
(c

interest and firmness with the ardent attitude and hope towards achieving goals is

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 115

commitment. It is the driving force towards completion of a task and success. It is the
Notes

e
basic requirement for any profession.

in
Core Values
Core values are those values that are the foundation of our personalities and
the way we conduct ourselves. These values are so primary to us that despite of the

nl
changes in the society, government, policies, politics and technology, we always abide
by them. They are constant in an ever-changing world. They are subconsciously
imbedded in personalities. These values underlie our work, the way we interact with
others and how we fulfil our mission. They are the basic elements of our personalities.

O
They are the practices we use every day in everything we do. They are the fundamental
beliefs of a person or organisation.

They represent an individual or organisations deeply held beliefs and core

ity
fundamental driving forces. They are intrinsic to the vision of your organisation and that
you present to the world outside your organisation. They are fundamental to attracting
and retaining the best. Core values are reflected in values of action.

Core values are also known as guiding principles, because they form a solid core

rs
of personality and beliefs.

Identifying and abiding by the values is the base of being it to be the Core.
ve
5.2 Values Clarification & Acceptance
Values are your ideas about what is of utmost importance to you in your life—what
you want to live by and for. They serve as silent forces behind your actions, desires
ni

and decisions. Clarification of values means getting fully conscious of their influence
and to explore and acknowledge what is truly valued. It makes one more self-directed
and effective when there is awareness of the values one chooses to keep and take it
forward throughout adulthood, as per circumstances, and which values get priority over
U

other values.

Acceptance: Intended change in behaviour by accepting the values required

to attain a particular goal—translating the personal values to intended change in
ity

behaviour. The life goals are the driving force towards acceptance of values. When
values that we like or are part of personality are reflected in life, goal is to keep things
along steadily. And, when values are not reflected in life too well, goal becomes to
incorporate them in order to make something happen. What we want to happen is a
Goal.
m

Nurturing Good values

Noble values must be continued to be preserved and nurtured to act as a shield
)A

against the social ills plaguing the society. Promotion of good noble values are in great
need today than ever before. The process of inculcating such values should begin with
home and continue with school, universities and workplace.

To become a truly civilised nation, there must be social transformation in terms of

(c

changes in attitudes and value systems. Youths and teens must be an integral part of

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 116 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

this transformation to reflect upon. They need to channelize their energy into positive or
Notes

e
constructive activities reflecting their interests.

As becoming more effluent day by day, ethics and morality in society are taking a

in
back seat. Nurturing good noble family values amid rapid modernisations in youths is
challenging and is of utmost importance. A collective effort from all sections of society
is needed to achieve this goal. A country’s technical progress and economic growth

nl
should not cloud minds towards importance of checking and retaining the moral and
ethical values, and not letting it degrade.

Civilisation of a nation is not only measured by gross national products and

O
technological capacity but also by the development of human conscience and moral
sense. A morally corrupt country is disregarded everywhere.

Society needs to be sensitised to address the societal concerns. Members should

ity
always try to uplift the society through neighbourly spirit and stressing upon basic moral
values to the youth to prevent moral decay of the society.

Good moral values should be the highest point to train and build youths for nation
building. This process should begin with family as a unit at home and shall continue

rs
to schools, universities and workplaces. Counselling programmes involving family
institutions for promotion of good noble values and ethics are in much need today.
Strong human values along with strong families are the key to building a peaceful and
stable community and nation. Children today are in dire need of reinforcement to make
ve
them aware to the responsibilities towards themselves, their parents, community, and
their nation.

5.3 Professional Values—Work Ethics, Respect for Others

ni

Work Ethics
It is an attitude of determination and dedication towards one’s job. Those strong
U

at it place a high value towards professional success. With strong work ethics one
feels and believes in the importance of the job and feels that hard work is essential to
maintain strong character.
ity

Employees with strong work ethic display a particular set of values and behaviour
that makes them stand out as highly coveted team member and praise-worthy
employees.

●● Reliability: Reliability in terms of meeting their deadlines and delivering quality

m

work. They contribute fairly and are excellent co-workers and teammates.
●● Dedication: Commitment and dedication towards the job. They focus on tasks
without being distracted.
)A

●● Discipline: Highly disciplined employees show strong determination and

commitment towards their job. They strive towards meeting and exceeding
expectations along with seeking other opportunities for learning new skills with
regard to increase in knowledge and improving their performance further.
(c

●● Productivity: Such employees translate to outstanding productivity. They

complete projects early with minimum requirements than their counterparts.

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 117

●● Cooperation: they show good teamwork and readily assist others when in need.
Notes

e
They are cooperatively willing to provide their inputs to projects.
●● Integrity: Holding high moral principles and outstanding integrity by being honest,

in
polite and fair to others.
●● Responsibility: Ethically having keen sense of responsibility by being
accountable for their actions. They accept the blame for their actions equally easily

nl
to work towards improving it.
●● Professionalism: Exhibiting a clear professional attitude in the way they dress,
speak and carry themselves. They are respectful, focussed, organised and neat.

O
One can improve upon the work ethic skills by acting professionally and being
dedicated to job. These tips can be tried to demonstrate work ethic.

●● Act as an ambassador of the company: Maintain a positive attitude towards

ity
your organisation in both professional and personal interactions by seeking ways
to further the common business.
●● Prioritise your personal responsibilities: Maintain good attendance and don’t
interfere work schedules with personal commitments.
●●
improve your work performance.
rs
Seek professional development: Independently and responsible seek ways to
ve
●● Review your work: Double check your work for quality and consistency before
submitting. Manage your time properly for tasks giving each ne the required
amount of time, attention and effort required.
●● Show respect to others: Speak respectfully to and about others.
ni

Its role in personality development

Our value system is based on our though process, beliefs, experiences, having
U

direct impact on personality. An individual’s personality refers to his/her appearance,

characteristics, attitude, mindset and behaviour with others. The relevant points that
show the importance of personality development are:

◌◌ Personality development grooms the individual and let him help leave or make
ity

a mark of his own.

◌◌ It goes a long way in reducing stress and conflicts
◌◌ It helps develop a positive attitude towards life.
m

◌◌ It helps individuals to learn and inculcate positive qualities like punctuality,

flexibility, willingness to learn, friendly nature and eagerness to help others
and so on.
)A

Moral Dilemmas
Moral dilemma is a situation in which the decision-maker must consider two or
more moral values, ethics and duties but is able to honour only one of them—choose
among the ideal moral values. Thus the individual will violate one of the important moral
concerns, regardless of the decisions. It is also called ethical dilemma. Although, we
(c

face many ethical and moral problems in our lives, most of them come with relatively
straightforward solutions.

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 118 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

How to solve an Ethical or Moral dilemma?

Notes

e
The biggest challenge in this case is that it doesn’t offer an obvious solutions that
comply to ethical norms. The following approaches should be considered while facing

in
an ethical dilemma.

◌◌ Refute the paradox (dilemma): Analyse the situation carefully. The existence
of the dilemma can be cured and solved with logic.

nl
◌◌ Value theory approach: Choose the alternative offering the greatest good and
lesser evil.

O
◌◌ Find alternative solutions: The problem can be reconsidered and alternative
solutions can be made to come up after careful analysis.
Some examples of ethical dilemmas include:

ity
◌◌ Taking credit for other’s work
◌◌ Offering a client a worse product for your own profit
◌◌ Utilising inside knowledge for your own benefit

Value Prioritization

rs
Value priorities are principles that provide people with a way of understanding and
knowing what they must do, and what type of a person they must be to live their best
life possible. Value prioritisation therefore provide people with a way of knowing what
ve
is important and what is unimportant to being happy and getting along in their worlds
smoothly. These principles operate like analogies and develop as a result of experience.

When encountering new situations, people and objects, they can look into their
value systems and can respond accordingly. These principles provide the basis of
ni

judgement in everyday life, even if the new situations come as a surprise of one being
unprepared to tackle it.
U

Value priorities are central to a person’s sense of self. People use them not only as
standards of self-evaluation but also as standards for evaluating other people, things,
actions, and situations. They provide us a benchmark of knowing what is important and
what is less important to living the best way possible. They assist people in making the
ity

right choices.

Perhaps, the most important aspect of value theory—past and present—is the
assumption that all people, everywhere, have the same values, but differ on the relative
importance they place on each value (shown by research). So, clearly, discussion
m

should be on value priorities, the existence of relations among value priorities and their
value systems.

It is about making decisions using altruism, morality and wisdom. Altruism helps
)A

to define Who. Morality helps us guide what should I do. And wisdom answers the
question of how. Altruism is regard for or devotion to the interest and service to others.
Morality can be described as believing and keeping ethical standards; personal honour
and integrity. Whereas, wisdom is the judgement and insight to appropriately apply
morality to each situation.
(c

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 119

Important distinctions in People’s Value Priorities

Notes

e
While the value priorities being discussed, the focus is mainly on personal value
priorities and perceptions of other’s value systems or social systems—other people,

in
group, organisations, institutions. Their value priorities are transmitted implicitly through
both overt (observable) and covert (secret or hidden) behaviour. Therefore, perceptions
of other’s value systems correspond exactly to their personal value system. This is an

nl
assumption that needs to be backed by more research.

Personal value priorities are also distinguished by ideological value system, as they
portray a specific image but may not have the same explicit structure similar to personal

O
value systems that are predictable relations among the value types.

5.4 Learning Based on Project Work on Scriptures like- Ramayana,

ity
Mahabharata, Bible, Quran, Gita etc.
These are the Holy Scriptures that describe how we are related to the ultimate God
and how we must live our life so that we do not do the sins while doing the work we
must have to do. They explain how work is worship when our heart is set up on the

rs
divine. By living our life as per scripture teachings, we remain free from all anxieties and
worries that life may bring. By establishing ourselves with the eternal and unchanging
principles of teachings by the scriptures, we can remain calm during the changing
scenario of life. People who are unattached and unestablished to the highest truth lose
ve
their sense of right or wrong and destroy themselves when met with even the smallest
problems.

By surrendering our lives to God, we can remain at peace, unlike people filled
with desires and torn with anxieties lasting till their death. A calm man surrendered to
ni

God is not attached to any place or people, and carries all his duties with all his purity,
as ordained by the Supreme God. Regular rituals bring us in contact with the spirit by
which the entire universe is pervaded. By following the teachings of the scriptures, an
U

individual protects himself from going down on the lower states of consciousness.

This is the very lesson that scriptures like Ramayana, Mahabharata, Bible, Quran,
Gita teach people. Actions performed, as ordained or prescribed by scriptures, are far
ity

superior than actions performed disregarding them. The whole idea is to remember
God/Supreme Being being the source of everything at all times.

As soon as we lose focus and shift it to something else, we get entangled with
creation instead of creator, which is the cause of lower consciousness and all the
m

misery in the world. People get deluded when they get attached to the materialistic
aspects of the world and do things that destroy their mental peace.

God is the source of everything and everything emanates from him. Thus we
)A

should dedicate all our work and duties to him, keeping him in mind. This is the whole
idea behind all the religious teachings of the religious books and rituals of different
religions around the world. Acting this way we can keep ourselves in a super-conscious
state at all times, above experiencing sorrow and misery.
(c

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 120 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

5.5 Types of Judgment (Factual Aesthetic, Moral)

Notes

e
●● Factual judgement

in
If a philosophical amateur asks for a proof of the conventional competition among the
“factual” and the “normative”, he’s apt to be informed some thing of the subsequent
sort: A judgement such as “Copper is a metal” expresses some thing that is the case
(a “factual judgement”)

nl
●● Aesthetic Judgment
By “aesthetic judgment” Kant intended a judgment primarily based totally on a feeling.

O
He turned into specifically involved to explain the ones feeling-primarily based totally
judgments wherein an item is observed stunning, after which to expose that we’re
entitled to make such judgments no matter being not able to affirm them.
The concept of some thing explicitly referred to as a cultured judgment appears first

ity
to have regarded withinside the eighteenth century and turned into formulated in
element via way of means of Kant (2000).
All aesthetic revel in, whether or not of artwork or nature, appears to be knowledgeable
via way of means of and established upon an workout of flavour. We pick out the

rs
item of aesthetic revel in, and frequently achieve this cautiously and deliberately.
Moreover, we’re judged via way of means of our choices, now no longer most
effective of works of artwork however additionally of shade schemes, dresses, and
ve
lawn ornaments, simply as we’re judged via way of means of our manners and our
feel of humour. By our flavour we betray ourselves—now no longer simply a small a
part of ourselves however the entire. Yet, the relation among flavour and morality is
never straightforward. There appears, in truth, to be a complicated query as to the
ni

appropriate nature of the relation among aesthetic and ethical values and among the
coolest flavour that discerns the primary and the coolest behaviour that responds
to the second one. If there’s no relation, the large quantity of human strength this
is invested in artwork and grievance can also additionally start to appear as an
U

alternative pointless. If the relation is simply too close, however, the end result is
an insupportable ethical elitism that makes refinement the only popular of suitable
behavior, as, for example, the elitism depicted via way of means of Villiers de L’Isle-
Adam in Axel, via way of means of J.K. Huysmans in À rebours, and via way of
ity

means of Oscar Wilde in The Picture of Dorian Gray. The aesthete is one that places
aesthetic values in particular others and who seeks for a morality that conforms
to them. In contrast, the philistine (or as a minimum one type of philistine) places
ethical values in particular others and rejects any aesthetics that doesn’t agree to
m

them. But each the aesthete and the philistine fail to spot that the relation among the
cultured and the ethical isn’t always certainly considered one among priority; every
informs and is knowledgeable via way of means of the alternative, with out taking
)A

precedence and with out dictating the selection that belongs withinside the different’s
sphere.
Contemporary aesthetics has been much less disposed to talk about the concept of
flavor than that of grievance. But clearly, the 2 thoughts are so intently associated
that some thing stated approximately the only has an immediate concerning the
(c

alternative. In each cases, the method has been the primary of these mentioned at
the start of this article: the method that begins off evolved with a take a look at of

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 121

the standards and modes of argument hired in discussing splendor and attempts to
Notes

e
comprehend the unique troubles of aesthetics via a take a look at of the logical and
ideological puzzles to which those standards and arguments provide upward thrust.

in
Philosophers frequently distinguish among varieties of crucial discussion—the
interpretative and the evaluative—and lessons of standards similar to them. In
describing an item of herbal splendor or a piece of artwork, we can also additionally

nl
use a number of so-referred to as aesthetic phrases, phrases that appear to have a
specific function whilst used on this context and which articulate a cultured impression.
Among such phrases we can also additionally observe affective phrases—moving,
frightening, disturbing; phrases denoting emotional qualities—sad, lively, mournful,

O
wistful; and phrases denoting the expressive or representational content material
of a piece of artwork, its formal capabilities, and its normal inventive genre—comic,
tragic, ironic. Some of those phrases may be carried out meaningfully most effective to

ity
works of artwork; others can be carried out to the entire of nature which will articulate
a cultured revel in. The exam in their good judgment has had an more and more more
vital function in analytical aesthetics. Frank N. Sibley, for example, argued that such
phrases are utilized in aesthetic judgment in a weird manner, with out conditions (i.e.,
with out a reasoned foundation), and which will describe aesthetic houses which are

rs
discernible most effective via way of means of the workout of flavor. This state-of-
the-art reminder of Kant’s principle that aesthetic judgment is loose from standards
has been criticized as growing too incredible an opening among the language of
ve
grievance and the language of normal life. But it’s far of significant hobby in itself in
trying to revive a conception of flavor that turned into fantastically influential in 18th-
century aesthetics. As cited above, flavor is, in step with this conception, a school
now no longer of assessment however of perception.
ni

In aesthetics, however, evaluative judgments are inescapable. Theories warding off

the implication that flavor is a shape of discrimination, which certainly ranks its items
in step with their merit, are primarily unsatisfying, now no longer the least due to the
U

fact they have got so little bearing at the exercise of grievance or the motives that
lead us to assign such overwhelming significance to artwork.
What then of the standards hired in aesthetic assessment? Burke delivered a well-
known difference among varieties of aesthetic judgment similar to orders of aesthetic
ity

revel in: the judgment of the stunning and that of the elegant. The judgment of
splendor has its foundation in our social emotions, mainly in our emotions in the
direction of the alternative sex, and in our desire for a comfort via love and desire.
The judgment of the elegant has its foundation in our emotions in the direction of
m

nature, and in our intimation of our closing solitude and fragility in a international
that isn’t always of our personal devising and that stays immune to our demands. In
Burke’s words,
)A

Whatever is equipped in any kind to excite the thoughts of pain, and danger, this is to
say, some thing is in any kind horrible, or is conversant approximately horrible items,
or operates in a manner analogous to terror, is a supply of the elegant; this is, it’s far
effective of the most powerful emotion which the thoughts is able to feeling.
Burke’s difference emerges as a part of a herbal philosophy of splendor: an try to
(c

provide the origins of our sentiments in place of to provide an explanation for the
good judgment of the judgments that carry them. In Kant, the difference is recast as

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 122 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

a difference among classes of aesthetic revel in and separate values that connect
Notes

e
to it. Sometimes whilst we feel the harmony among nature and our faculties, we’re
inspired via way of means of the purposiveness and intelligibility of the whole thing

in
that surrounds us. This is the sentiment of splendor. At different times, conquer
via way of means of the infinite greatness of the international, we resign the try to
apprehend and manipulate it. This is the sentiment of the elegant. In confronting
the elegant, the thoughts is “incited to desert sensibility”—to attain over to that

nl
transcendental view of factors that indicates to us the immanence of a supersensible
realm and our future as topics of a divine order. Thus, from the presentiment of the
elegant, Kant extracts the closing floor of his religion in a Supreme Being, and that is

O
for him the maximum vital fee that aesthetic revel in can carry.
The difference among the elegant and the stunning is now much less often made than
on the time of Burke and Kant. Nevertheless, it’s far plain that aesthetic judgment

ity
exists in lots of contrasting paperwork, of each reward and condemnation. A truth
seeker who sought to account for the concept of splendor with out getting to the
ones of the fashionable, the refined, the incredible, the delicate, the intelligent, the
profound, and the lovable might be not going to offer us with a whole lot information
of the character and feature of grievance. There can be, however, some thing that

rs
those judgments have in not unusualplace which is probably used which will forged
mild on all of them. Kant clearly might have concept so, considering the fact that
he argued that every one such judgments percentage the unique capabilities of
ve
flavor found out in his antinomy. In different words, they may be all grounded in an
immediate (“subjective”) revel in even as on the equal time being “universal”—i.e.,
held forth as legitimate for all rational beings regardless of their specific pursuits and
desires. Thus, critics attempt to justify their aesthetic judgments, in search of motives
as a way to convince others to look what the critics regard as fashionable or stunning
ni

in a comparable mild.
Could there be a true crucial system dedicated to that organization of supplying goal
U

grounds for subjective preferences? This query is integrally linked to any other that
we’ve got already mentioned: the query of the fee of aesthetic revel in. If aesthetic
revel in is valueless, or if it has no extra fee than attaches to idle enjoyment, then it
will become fantastic to insist at the life of goal assessment.
ity

Modern issues of this noticeably tough query generally tend to pay attention at
the grievance of artwork and at the function of critics of artwork. What are critics
doing once they talk a piece of artwork, what do they appearance for, and with what
purpose? It is probably stated that critics need to to begin with take a look at the artist’s
m

goal, considering the fact that this can display the actual that means of the artwork,
the actual content material that the artist is making an attempt to communicate.
The American critics W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley, however, argued that
there’s a fallacy (the so-referred to as intentional fallacy) worried on this method.
)A

What is to be interpreted is the paintings of artwork itself, now no longer the intentions
of the artist, which might be hidden from us and no concern for our challenge. If
judgment is to be aesthetic, it ought to challenge itself with the given item, and the
meanings that we characteristic to the item are people who we see in it, regardless
of the artist intended.
(c

The life of an intentional fallacy has been doubted. Some argue, for example, that
Wimsatt and Beardsley make too sharp a difference among an goal and the act that
Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education
 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 123

expresses it, assuming the goal to be a type of non-public intellectual episode all the
Notes

e
time hidden from an observer in place of a found out order withinside the paintings
itself. But whilst critics talk over with the inventive goal, it isn’t always clean whether

in
or not they imply some thing extra than the overall purposiveness of the paintings
of artwork, which may be interpreted via way of means of critics with out supposing
there to be a few goal past that of manufacturing the appropriate paintings earlier
than them. (Indeed, in Kant’s view, there may be purposiveness with out purpose,

nl
and this phenomenon gives the vital item of aesthetic hobby, whether or not in
artwork or in nature.) The dispute right here is tortuous and obscure. Nevertheless,
the circulate farfar from intentionalism, as it’s far referred to as, has been seemed

O
as imperative via way of means of maximum present day critics, who generally tend
to look the function of grievance in both certainly considered one among ways: (1)
grievance is dedicated to the take a look at and interpretation of the cultured item in
place of of the artist or the recipient, and (2) grievance is dedicated to the articulation

ity
of a reaction to the paintings of artwork and to the justification of a specific manner
of seeing it.
Underlying each those conceptions is the stylish preoccupation with artwork because
the most important item of crucial judgment. Nevertheless, in suggesting that the

rs
selection which lies earlier than the critic is among the cultured item and the revel
in that it arouses, the 2 perspectives make sure that the artist is saved hidden. As
a consequence, it isn’t always tough to evolve them to a much broader view of
ve
aesthetic judgment and aesthetic revel in—to a view that makes room for herbal
splendor and for the aesthetics of normal life, as it’s far manifested in get dressed,
manners, decoration, and the alternative beneficial arts.
It is probably concept that most effective the primary of the 2 conceptions can
ni

provide upward thrust to an goal crucial system, because it by myself calls for that
grievance recognition on an item whose life and nature is impartial of the critic. The
maximum vital modern-day protection of an goal grievance, that of the British literary
U

critic F.R. Leavis, relied closely on the second one concept, however. In a celebrated
controversy together along with his American counterpart, René Wellek, Leavis
argued that it’s far exactly due to the fact grievance is dedicated to the character
reaction that it could obtain objectivity. Although there can be objectivity withinside
ity

the scientific explanation of the cultured item—i.e., withinside the category and
outline of its typology, structure, and semiotic status—this isn’t always, in step with
Leavis, the type of objectivity that matters, for it’ll in no way cause a fee judgment
and could consequently in no way quantity to an goal grievance. Value judgments
stand up out of, and are established via way of means of, the direct disagreement
m

in revel in among the crucial intelligence and the cultured item, the primary being
knowledgeable via way of means of a ethical consciousness that gives the most
effective feasible floor for goal assessment.
)A

If grievance have been limited to the take a look at of nature, it might appearance
very peculiar. It is most effective due to the improvement of inventive and ornamental
traditions that the dependancy of aesthetic judgment will become established.
Accordingly, modern-day tries to offer a protection of aesthetic judgment pay attention
nearly completely at the grievance of artwork and endeavour to discover ideas
(c

wherein the separate works of artwork can be ordered in step with their merit, or as a
minimum characterised in evaluative phrases. Leavis’s “goal” grievance is expressly

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 124 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

limited to the assessment of literary works taken from a unmarried tradition. The
Notes

e
purpose for this narrowness may be positioned ironically as follows: grievance may
be goal most effective whilst it’s far primarily based totally in subjectivity. Criticism

in
is the justification of a reaction, and such justification calls for a body of reference
that each critics and their readers can simply recognize. The a success verbal
exchange and justification of a reaction are feasible most effective via way of means
of connection with the canon of works widely wide-spread inside a not unusualplace

nl
culture. The canonical works—what Matthew Arnold referred to as the touchstones
of grievance—offer the context of applicable comparisons, with out which no quantity
of specific evaluation may want to carry the best of the character paintings. Critical

O
reasoning is an try to area works of artwork with regards to one any other, in order
that the perceived greatness of the only will offer the usual of size for the alternative.
At the equal time, the character best of feeling in every paintings ought to be elicited
and mentioned precisely as we would talk the best of feeling in normal life, praising

ity
it for its intensity, exactness, and generosity, and criticizing it for its sentimentality,
obscurity, or loss of seriousness. All of the ethical classes that we practice to human
feeling and man or woman we can also additionally consequently practice similarly
to artwork, and the premise of an goal grievance might be no one-of-a-kind from the

rs
premise (some thing it is probably) for an goal morality. The fee of artwork, in this
account, is living partially withinside the truth that it gives exemplary expression to
human feeling and man or woman, and so allows us to degree our personal lives and
aspirations in opposition to their imaginary counterparts.
ve
These thoughts are indistinct and were often criticized for his or her moralistic
overtones in addition to for the seeming narrowness in their application. Even in the
event that they practice to the grievance of literature, what can we say approximately
the grievance of music, of architecture, of get dressed and decor, of herbal splendor?
ni

In the nonliterary arts a whole lot grievance is directed first to shape, style, and
workmanship and most effective secondly to the ethical content material of the works
beneathneath consideration. There are exceptions to this rule, and yet again the
U

most important exception is English—namely, John Ruskin’s profoundly moralized

grievance of architecture. Nevertheless, the acute issue skilled in extending the
Leavisite strategies of sensible grievance (wherein the reader’s reaction will become
the most important recognition of crucial attention) to the nonliterary arts has given
ity

sustenance to the view that this “moralized” grievance is actually most effective one
type of grievance and now no longer always the maximum broadly relevant or the
maximum vital. If such is the case, it can not actually declare to have located a
foundation for the goal workout of flavor.
m

The moral judgement is the judgement which offers with the moral fee or high-
satisfactory of an movement. It is a judgement of price and it evaluates the rightness
or wrongness of our moves. When we examine a ethical judgement then we discover
)A

that it includes a) a topic to be able to decide, b) an item whose motion may be

judged, c) a preferred in conformity to which the motion of the issue may be judged
and d) a electricity of judging the motion as required. Moral judgment is the judgment
of moral quality of voluntary routine moves. Generally, a moral judgment is given at
the voluntary and routine moves of a rational being. The voluntary moves of a rational
(c

character which contain deliberation, choice, and resolution, have the ethical nice of
rightness and wrongness. They are taken into consideration to be proper or incorrect
with the connection with the ethical preferred. And on the idea of this preferred,
Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education
 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 125

moral judgment is given. If the voluntary moves have conformity with the same old
Notes

e
or the best, then the moral judgment will specific it because the proper motion. If the
motion has warfare with the same old or norms, then the moral judgment will specific

in
it as incorrect. So, moral judgment includes contrast of voluntary acts with the moral
preferred.
●● Moral judgment is lively in nature. Because ethical judgment is given upon

nl
voluntary and routine acts of humans and now no longer upon their passive
experiences.
●● Moral judgment is social in man or woman. Because, as we realize, voluntary

O
acts of someone are proper or incorrect, due to the fact they greater or much less
have an effect on the of hobby of others. Man is a social being. His rights and
responsibilities of moves upward push out of his relation to different humans in
society. So, moral judgment, other than society is inconceivable. Moral judgment

ity
may be stated to be compulsory in man or woman. Because a judgment may
be given as proper, even as we sense the moral duty to do it. Similarly, moral
judgment is given on an act as incorrect, whilst we sense the moral obligation
to chorus from it. Thus, moral judgment is continually followed through the
experience of responsibility or moral duty. And this moral responsibility is basically

rs
self-imposed. In this way, we are able to discover the that means of moral
judgment.
ve
Nature
Moral judgment is a judgment of values. It is wonderful from the judgment of
statistics. A Judgment of fee is a judgment of “what need to be”. But a judgment of truth
is a judgment of “what is”. Judgment of truth is a descriptive judgment, even as ethical
ni

judgment is an appreciative or crucial judgment. So, ethical judgment is a intellectual

act of saying a specific motion to be proper or incorrect. According to Mackenzie, ethical
judgment isn’t simply to country the character of a few item, however to examine it
U

with a preferred and to pronounce it to be proper or evil, proper or incorrect. So, it’s
miles normative. Muirhead says that ethical judgment is involved with the judgment
upon behavior, the judgment that such and such behavior is proper and incorrect.
The judgment upon behavior has a judicial experience and the judgment of truth has
ity

logical experience. Thus, whilst we understand a voluntary motion we examine it with

the moral preferred and as a result decide whether or not the motion is in conformity
with it or now no longer. So, it’s miles clean that, ethical judgment is inferential in
nature, regarding the software of a preferred to a specific motion. But withinside the
language of Bradley, basically ethical judgment is intuitive and immediate. Because,
m

we intuitively brings an motion below a ethical rule diagnosed through the network and
choose it to be proper or incorrect. It is most effective in tough or dubious instances
that we consciously examine an motion with the moral perfect and choose it as proper
)A

or incorrect. Hence, we are able to discover that a moral judgment presupposes a

topic, who judges an item this is judged, a preferred in keeping with which an motion is
judged.

Again, it’s miles essential to have a look at that moral judgment is outstanding
(c

from logical and aesthetical judgment. As we realize Ethics, Logic and Aesthetics are
normative science. And consequently they’ve 3 very best norms and beliefs of life.
Ethics is involved with the beliefs of Highest Good, common sense is involved with the

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 126 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

best of Truth and aesthetics is involved with the best of Beauty. It is authentic that each
Notes

e
one of them are appreciative or crucial judgment. But moral judgments are continually
followed through moral duty and moral sentiments, which aren’t followed through logical

in
and aesthetics judgments. When we decide an motion to be proper, we sense a moral
duty to carry out it and feature a sense of approval. And we decide an motion to be
incorrect, we sense that below moral duty we aren’t to carry out it and therefore, we’ve
a sense of disapproval. Feeling of approval, disapproval, rightness, wrongness etc.

nl
are referred to as moral sentiments. Thus, moral judgments are compulsory in man or
woman and are followed through ethical sentiments. So, they fluctuate from logical and
aesthetic judgments which aren’t followed through moral duty and moral sentiments.

O
Moral decisions, whether or not some thing is ideal or terrible in its personal proper
are contained utterly withinside the discipline of ethics. In the system of reasoning
additionally we discover unique lessons of decisions and they may be normally

ity
judgement of statistics. But ethical judgement as a judgement of fee is involved with
what need to be. It judges our moves need to be. It has specific features. It is crucial
judgement and appreciative. It is the intellectual act of discerning and saying a specific
motion to be proper or incorrect. After assessment and deliberation moves are to be
judged in conformity with a preferred. ‘To communicate the reality is continually proper’

rs
is a moral judgement. Moral judgement differs from judgement of truth that’s descriptive
judgement and it describes what is. Judgements of statistics are greater goal due to the
fact they rely on the actual nature of the world. For example ‘Water consists of oxygen
ve
and hydrogen’.

Moral judgement is inferential in man or woman though the detail of inference

normally stays implicit. It includes the software of a preferred to a selected action.
When we understand a voluntary motion, we examine it with the moral preferred and
ni

we decide whether or not the motion is in conformity with it or now no longer. Ordinarily
moral decisions are intuitive and immediate. F.H. Bradley says that they may be intuitive
subsumptions. But in complicated and dubious instances the complete system is turns
U

into specific and reflective. In complex occasions the moral preferred is explicitly held
earlier than the thoughts and implemented to the instances below consideration.

5.6 Domains in Study of Ethics (Applied, Normative & Meta Ethics)

ity

●● Applied ethics
refers to the realistic application of ethical concerns. It is ethics with admire to real-
global movements and their ethical concerns withinside the regions of personal and
public life, the professions, health, technology, law, and leadership.Applied ethics is
m

a department of ethics dedicated to the remedy of ethical troubles, practices, and

regulations in non-public life, professions, technology, and government. In comparison
to standard moral theory—worried with in simple terms theoretical troubles consisting
)A

of, for example, the improvement of a trendy criterion of rightness—carried out ethics
takes its factor of departure in realistic normative challenges. Along with trendy
overviews and journals, 9 relevant branches of carried out ethics are added, with
six to 8 references in connection to every department. It ought to be cited that those
branches represent handiest a choice a few of the plethora of disciplines inside
(c

carried out ethics. Moreover, a few overlap is located a few of the one-of-a-kind
regions.

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 127

Under what situations is an abortion morally permissible? Does a citizen have a

Notes

e
ethical duty to actively participate (possibly via way of means of voting) withinside
the democratic technique of one’s nation (assuming one is residing in a democracy)?

in
What obligations, if any, does one must the worldwide poor? Under what situations
is lady genital excision morally permissible? If there are situations below which it’s
far morally wrong, what measures, if any, ought to be taken towards the practice?
These are simply a number of the lots of questions that carried out ethicists consider.

nl
Applied ethics is regularly known as a element observe of the broader sub-subject
of ethics in the subject of philosophy. This does now no longer imply that handiest
philosophers are carried out ethicists, or that fruitful carried out ethics is handiest

O
completed inside instructional philosophy departments. In fact, there are folks that
accept as true with that a extra knowledgeable technique is nice gotten outdoor of
the academy, or as a minimum absolutely outdoor of philosophy. This article, though,
will in the main attention on how carried out ethics is approached via way of means

ity
of educated instructional philosophers, or via way of means of the ones educated in
very carefully associated disciplines.
This article first locates carried out ethics as wonderful from, however however
associated to, different branches of ethics. Since the content material of what’s

rs
studied via way of means of carried out ethicists is so varied, and for the reason that
running information of the sector calls for significant empirical information, and for
the reason that traditionally the pursuit of carried out ethics has been completed via
ve
way of means of searching at one-of-a-kind forms of human practices, it handiest
makes feel that there might be many one-of-a-kind forms of carried out moral studies,
such that an professional running in a single type will now no longer have an awful
lot to mention in every other. For example, enterprise ethics is a area of carried
out ethics, and so too is bioethics. There are lots of specialists in a single area that
ni

don’t have anything to mention withinside the different. This article discusses every
area, highlighting simply a number of the numerous troubles that fall inside every.
Throughout the presentation of the one-of-a-kind regions of carried out ethics, a few
U

methodological troubles hold to return back up. Additionally, the opposite branches
of ethics are consulted in handling some of the troubles of virtually all of the one-of-
a-kind fields. So, what can be a methodological fear for a enterprise ethics problem
can also be a fear for bioethical troubles.
ity

One unique type of carried out ethics that increases wonderful worries is bioethics.
Whereas with different forms of carried out ethics it also includes implicit that the
difficulty entails folks that we already recognize to have ethical status, bioethical
troubles, consisting of abortion, regularly contain beings whose ethical status is an
m

awful lot extra contentious. Our remedy of non-human animals is every other region
of bioethical studies that regularly hinges on what ethical status those animals have.
As such, it’s far vital that this newsletter dedicate a phase to the troubles that stand
)A

up regarding ethical status and personhood.

This article ends with a dialogue of the position of ethical psychology in carried
out ethics, and specially how carried out ethicists would possibly suitable social
mental information for the reason of know-how the position of emotion withinside the
formation of ethical judgments. Additionally, to what quantity is it vital to recognize
(c

the position of tradition in now no longer handiest what’s valued however in how
practices are to be morally evaluated?

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 128 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

●● Normative ethics
Notes

e
is the take a look at of moral behaviour, and is the department of philosophical ethics
that investigates the questions that get up concerning how one need to act, in a

in
ethical sense.
Normative ethics, that department of ethical philosophy, or ethics, involved with
standards of what’s morally proper and wrong. It consists of the components of

nl
ethical regulations which have direct implications for what human movements,
institutions, and methods of existence have to be like. It is normally contrasted with
theoretical ethics, or metaethics, that’s involved with the character in preference to

O
the content material of moral theories and ethical judgments, and carried out ethics,
or the software of normative ethics to sensible troubles.
Normative ethics seeks to set norms or requirements for conduct. The time period is
usually utilized in connection with the discussion...

ity
The primary query of normative ethics is figuring out how primary ethical requirements
are arrived at and justified. The solutions to this query fall into wide categories—
deontological and teleological, or consequentialist. The primary distinction among
them is that deontological theories do now no longer enchantment to price issues

rs
in setting up moral requirements, even as teleological theories do. Deontological
theories use the idea in their inherent rightness in setting up such requirements,
even as teleological theories bear in mind the goodness or price delivered into being
ve
through movements because the primary criterion in their moral price. In different
words, a deontological technique requires doing positive matters on precept or due
to the fact they’re inherently proper, while a teleological technique advocates that
positive sorts of movements are proper due to the goodness in their consequences.
ni

Deontological theories as a result pressure the principles of obligation, ought, duty,

and proper and wrong, even as teleological theories lay pressure at the good, the
valuable, and the desirable. Deontological theories set forth formal or relational
standards which include equality or impartiality; teleological theories, through
U

contrast, offer fabric or substantive standards, as, as an example, happiness or

pleasure (see utilitarianism).
The software of normative theories and requirements to sensible ethical troubles
ity

is the priority of carried out ethics. This subdiscipline of ethics offers with many
foremost problems of the modern scene, including human rights, social equality, and
the ethical implications of medical research, as an example withinside the place of
genetic engineering.
m

●● Meta Ethics
In metaphilosophy and ethics, meta-ethics is the examine of the character, scope,
and that means of ethical judgment. It is one of the 3 branches of ethics usually
)A

studied with the aid of using philosophers, the others being normative ethics and
carried out ethics
The examine of meta-ethics refers back to the nature of moral phrases and ideas
and to the try and apprehend the underlying assumptions at the back of ethical
theories; therefore, it’s far the department of ethics that seeks to apprehend the
(c

character of moral properties, statements, attitudes, and judgments. It covers a large

variety of questions surrounding how we understand what ethical reality is (or even if

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 129

ethical reality exists), and the way we study ethical facts. Meta-moral questions are,
Notes

e
with the aid of using their very nature, abstract. It would possibly appear that they
do now no longer always endure an awful lot relation to the undertaking of growing

in
practical, decision-making tools. However, a number of the problems are very critical
and applicable to that undertaking and meta-ethics gets a few interest here.
If we start to recall whether or not or now no longer one have to be a simply man

nl
or woman, for example, then we’re right away confronted with questions on the
character of justice and approximately what being a ‘simply’ man or woman means.
Is justice a human invention? Can we take delivery of that thoughts of justice may
be one of a kind in one of a kind societies? Or is the perception of justice an eternal,

O
unchanging idea that have to be upheld with the aid of using everyone, everywhere,
and at some stage in all time? This isn’t simply an abstract, instructional query. The
query of whether or not or now no longer one culture’s perception of justice can

ity
and have to be imposed upon any other has traditionally been - and keeps to be - a
reason of profound battle among people.
Major metaethical theories include naturalism, nonnaturalism (or intuitionism),
emotivism, and prescriptivism. Naturalists and nonnaturalists agree that ethical
language is cognitive—i.e., that ethical claims may be recognised to be genuine or

rs
false. They disagree, however, on how this understanding is to be done. Naturalists
keep both that those claims may be properly justified with the aid of using reasoning
from statements using most effective nonmoral phrases or that ethical phrases
ve
themselves may be described in nonmoral (herbal or factlike) phrases. Intuitionists
deny each of those positions and keep that ethical phrases are sui generis, that
ethical statements are autonomous of their logical status. Emotivists deny that ethical
utterances are cognitive, protecting that they consist in emotional expressions of
ni

approval or disapproval and that the character of ethical reasoning and justification
have to be reinterpreted to take this critical function of ethical utterances into account.
Prescriptivists take a fairly comparable approach, arguing that ethical judgments are
U

prescriptions or prohibitions of action, in place of statements of truth approximately

the world.

5.7 Ethics in Technological Era

ity

Technology gives lots of advantages to the humans round the sector while it
additionally offers the possibilities to abolish someone’s privacy. Information era in
today’s generation is a totally crucial issue to behavior commercial enterprise or to
switch records from one area to any other withinside the quickest manner possible.
m

With the improvement of records device, the function of ethics in it has turn out to be
an crucial subject matter as era can bring about the infection of individual’s highbrow
belongings rights. Ethics are the standards of creating proper or incorrect decisions.
Many corporations internationally depend on the records device for setting up
)A

commercial enterprise so protective someone’s privacy, data, and rights over the net is
essential. Ethics in commercial enterprise management refers back to the requirements
which manual to have trustworthy conduct in handling a a hit commercial enterprise.
One unethical exercise can positioned the complete company at stake. Thus, the boom
of the Internet and the records economic system withinside the absence of ethics
(c

indicates that every one those troubles will upward thrust in addition as we circulate into

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 130 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

the primary virtual century.

Notes

e
Ethics of era is a sub-discipline of ethics addressing the moral questions unique to
the Technology Age, the transitional shift in society wherein private computer systems

in
and next gadgets were delivered to offer customers an clean and short manner to
switch information. Ethics in era has end up an evolving subject matter through the
years as era has improvement.

nl
Ethics worries the ethical concepts that govern a person’s behaviour or how an
pastime is conducted . A key difference in ethics is the difference among that that’s
unethical and that that’s undesirable.

O
Primarily, ethical concepts observe to a person. However, ethical code also can be
ascribed to the behaviour of computerized or sensible structures (A/IS). Accordingly,
driverless vehicles are termed ‘synthetic ethical agents’.

ity
The Universal Declaration of human rights (1948) enshrines all folks with
human rights . This consists of rights bearing on dignity (Article 1), autonomy
(Article 3), privateness (Article 12), and safety (Article 29) . Some might argue that
rights additionally observe to generation and synthetic agents. These are cited as

rs
‘transhuman rights’ . To this end, the sector of roboethics has emerged. Specifically,
roboethics is involved with the ethical behaviour of people as they design, construct,
use and deal with artificially sensible beings.
ve
More broadly, ‘virtual ethics’ or ‘statistics ethics’ offers with the effect of virtual
Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) on our societies and the
surroundings at huge . As described with the aid of using Capurro , it addresses the
moral implications of factors which might not but exist, or matters which might also
ni

additionally have affects we can not predict.

Progress is usually described with regards to principles of development and

improvement. As said with the aid of using the Organization for Economic Co-Operation
U

and Development’s (OECD) ‘Being capable of degree people’s exceptional of lifestyles

is essential while assessing the development of societies’ . Future generation is shaping
(and could shape) our political, social and ethical lifestyles. The utility of ethics to
questions regarding generation improvement isn’t always new. In his seminal work ‘The
ity

Question Concerning Technology’, the logician Heidegger shows that during asking
what generation is, we ask questions on who we’re . In so doing, we have a look at the
character of lifestyles and human autonomy . Such thoughts have caused the idea of
‘ontological design’ which specializes in the ‘the relation among humans and lifeworlds’
. As argued with the aid of using Winograd and Flores, new generation does now no
m

longer honestly extrade the task, it modifications what it manner to be human. Put
honestly, we’re designed with the aid of using our designing and with the aid of using
that which we’ve got designed .
)A

The Information Technology (IT) zone is taking a few leaps with regards to
addressing those questions. Currently, there may be a huge awareness on problems
bearing on well-being, records privateness and cybersecurity. In 2016, Amazon,
Google, Facebook, IBM, and Microsoft have installed a non-earnings partnership (i.e.
(c

the Partnership on Artificial Intelligence to Benefit People and Society) to formulate

exceptional practices on synthetic intelligence technologies. Further, the IEEE

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 131

Standards Association has these days articulated a choice to create generation that
Notes

e
improves the human situation and prioritises well-being. Specifically, the ‘IEEE Global
Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems’ have described a fixed of

in
center moral concepts for self sustaining and sensible structures (A/IS). As said in
‘Ethically Aligned Design (EAD1e), A Vision for Prioritizing Human Well-being with
Autonomous and Intelligent Systems’ ‘for prolonged intelligence and automation to
provably boost a particular advantage for humanity, there desires to be clean signs

nl
of that advantage’. Further, the IEEE Global Initiative argue that ‘the world’s pinnacle
metric of value (Gross Domestic Product) should flow past GDP, to holistically degree
how sensible and self sustaining structures can avert or enhance human well-being’

O
When we consider moral troubles, we do now no longer commonly reflect
onconsideration on era. Even aleven though it isn’t always at the pinnacle of our minds
whilst we reflect onconsideration on moral troubles, era poses an moral catch 22

ity
situation on manufacturers and customers alike. The situation of technoethics, or the
moral implications of era, were studied via way of means of extraordinary philosophers
together with Hans Jonas and Mario Bunge.

●● Ethics cope with the troubles of what is ‘proper’, what is ‘simply’, and what is

rs
‘truthful’. Ethics describe ethical concepts influencing conduct; accordingly, the
examine of ethics makes a speciality of the movements and values of humans in
society (what humans do and the way they accept as true with they have to act
withinside the world).
ve
●● Technology is the department of understanding that offers with the advent and
use of technical manner and their interrelation with lifestyles, society, and the
environment; it is able to draw upon loads of fields, including commercial arts,
engineering, carried out science, and natural science. Technology “is center to
ni

human improvement and a key consciousness for information human lifestyles,

society and human consciousness.”
U

Using theories and strategies from a couple of domains, technoethics offers

insights on moral elements of technological structures and practices, examines era-
associated social regulations and interventions, and offers suggestions for the way to
ethically use new improvements in era.[8] Technoethics offers a structures principle
ity

and technique to manual loads of separate regions of inquiry into human-technological

interest and ethics.[8] Moreover, the sector unites each technocentric and bio-centric
philosophies, providing “conceptual grounding to make clear the position of era to the
ones laid low with it and to assist manual moral hassle fixing and selection making in
regions of interest that rely upon era.”[8] As a bio-techno-centric discipline, technoethics
m

“has a relational orientation to each era and human interest”;[8] it offers “a gadget
of moral reference that justifies that profound measurement of era as a vital detail
withinside the attainment of a ‘finalized’ perfection of man.”[10]
)A

Fundamental Problems
Technology is simply a device like a tool or gadget. With this notion method
of era simply being a tool or gadget, it isn’t always viable for era to own a ethical or
moral quality. Going via way of means of this notion method the device maker or quit
(c

consumer could be the only who comes to a decision the morality or ethicality in the
back of a tool or gadget. “Ethics of era” refers to 2 primary subdivisions:-

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 132 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

●● The ethics worried withinside the improvement of recent era—whether or not it’s
Notes

e
far always, never, or contextually proper or incorrect to invent and put into effect a
technological innovation.

in
●● The moral questions which might be exacerbated via way of means of the
approaches wherein era extends or curtails the electricity of individuals—how
preferred moral questions are modified via way of means of the brand new

nl
powers.
In the previous case, ethics of such matters as pc security and pc viruses asks
whether or not the very act of innovation is an ethically proper or incorrect act. Similarly,

O
does a scientist have an moral duty to provide or fail to provide a nuclear weapon?
What are the moral questions surrounding the manufacturing of technology that waste
or preserve power and resources? What are the moral questions surrounding the
manufacturing of recent production methods that could inhibit employment, or would

ity
possibly inflict struggling withinside the 1/3 world?

In the latter case, the ethics of era speedy wreck down into the ethics of diverse
human endeavors as they may be altered via way of means of new technology. For
example, bioethics is now in large part ate up with questions which have been

rs
exacerbated via way of means of the brand new lifestyles-retaining technology,
new cloning technology, and new technology for implantation. In law, the proper of
privateness is being always attenuated via way of means of the emergence of recent
ve
bureaucracy of surveillance and anonymity. The vintage moral questions of privateness
and loose speech are given new form and urgency in an Internet age.

Such tracing gadgets as RFID, biometric evaluation and identification, genetic

screening, all take vintage moral questions and expand their significance. As you
ni

could see, the essential hassle is as society produces and advances era that we use
in all regions of our lifestyles from work, school, medicine, surveillance, etc. we get
hold of high-quality benefits, however there are underlying fees to those benefits. As
U

era evolves even more, a number of the technological improvements may be visible
as inhumane and people equal technological improvements may be visible via way of
means of others as creative, lifestyles changing, and innovative.

The electricity of virtual technology to allow new reassets of sales may be

ity

significant. Due to a proliferation of virtual technology and the unique moral demanding
situations they present, companies are more and more more anticipated to recall moral
obligations, social responsibilities, and organizational values as publications to which
virtual possibilities to pursue and the way to pursue them.
m

As mentioned withinside the Managing statistics dangers for price advent fashion,
accountable and impartial collection, handling, use, and privateness are pinnacle
regions for situation with regards to statistics. Also, there are growing requires virtual
)A

offerings which might be truthful and equitably accessible, sell bodily and mentally
wholesome uses, inspire inclusion, and are geared towards socially useful uses. Digital
adopters need technology that aren’t dangerous or abusive and are secure and error-
loose. There’s an possibility to do nicely via way of means of doing precise—pursuing
digitally accountable increase techniques that construct stakeholder consider.
(c

Where has this fashion had an effect?

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 133

◌◌ As a reaction to societal issues round growing cellular telephone use, in

Notes

e
addition to to create long-time period price via moral leadership, a era agency
has delivered new equipment to its working gadget that assist customers

in
reveal and scale down time spent on cell gadgets.
◌◌ A collection of injuries concerning robotics shined a highlight on questions
of duty and selection making via way of means of independent structures in

nl
conditions wherein human judgment isn’t worried.
◌◌ A facial popularity software program agency has hooked up an “AI ethics
board” with the aim to increase public consider and manual its use of synthetic

O
intelligence to restrict social biases in its destiny products.
What does this suggest for companies?

◌◌ Changes in strategic choices as companies reflect onconsideration on virtual

ity
consider as a emblem price and marketplace differentiator.
◌◌ Difficulty in making decisions that contain balancing sales possibilities towards
emblem consider, mainly whilst different marketplace contributors might not be
behaving in accountable approaches.
◌◌ Reputational effect because of unanticipated effects of improvements,

◌◌
generated voices sound uncannily human.
rs
together with whilst virtual assistants “concentrate in” on conversations or pc-

Legal and regulatory effects of beside the point selection making via way
ve
of means of machines which could expand social and monetary biases or
feature in ethically grey regions.
◌◌ Pressure to head past assembly regulatory requirements and show precise
citizenship via way of means of selling considerate and socially useful use
ni

of era.
How can companies respond?
U

◌◌ Integrate ethics withinside the organization’s strategy via way of means of

instituting an ethics board or appointing a primary ethics officer that works
carefully with commercial enterprise devices and oversees transformation
efforts to manual use of technology in useful approaches.
ity

◌◌ Build a tradition of duty via way of means of education personnel on

enterprise-main practices, together with integrating concepts of fairness,
ethics, and safety aleven though the products or services lifestyles cycle,
and inspiring appropriate behaviors via robust guide from the pinnacle and
m

assisting overall performance control structures.

◌◌ Evaluate proposed applications of rising technology in services and products
to recall viable moral, social, and cultural implications.
)A

◌◌ Collaborate with enterprise stakeholders to construct moral frameworks for the

usage of rising technology, withinside the absence of hooked up requirements
and norms, to be regarded because the chief withinside the space.

5.8 Meaning and Types of Organizational Justice

(c

Organisational justice, first postulated with the aid of using Greenberg in 1987,
refers to an worker’s notion in their organisation’s behaviours, selections and moves

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 134 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

and the way those affect the personnel very own attitudes and behaviours at work.
Notes

e
The time period is intently linked to the idea of equity; personnel are touchy
to selections made on a every day foundation with the aid of using their employers,

in
each at the small and massive scale, and could decide those selections as unfair or
fair. These decisions affect an individual’s behaviour and can, in instances in which
the moves have a non-public impact at the worker and are judged as unfair, cause

nl
administrative center deviance.

Organisational justice is worried with all topics of administrative center behaviour,

from remedy with the aid of using superiors to pay, get right of entry to to education and

O
gender equality. It is initially derived from fairness theory, which indicates people make
decisions on equity primarily based totally on the quantity they give (input) as compared
to the quantity they get back (output).

ity
Ensuring organisational justice must be a concern for organisation – it could
lessen the occurrence of administrative center deviance, absence, disengagement
and counterproductive administrative center behaviours (CWB) and additionally inspire
effective attributes like agree with and innovative communication. Organisational justice
is occasionally mentioned along company social responsibility (CSR), a shape of
societal justice.

rs
The idea of organizational justice specializes in how personnel choose the conduct
of the business enterprise and the way this conduct is associated with personnel’
ve
attitudes and behaviors concerning the firm (Greenberg, 1987). Organizational justice
includes 3 primary forms – distributive, procedural, and interactional. Organizational
justice refers to worker perceptions of equity withinside the workplace
ni

Types
1. Distributive justice: Fairness of final results distribution (pay, remarks etc.)
U

When we think about distributive justice, one of the first matters that come to
thoughts is ‘am I being paid pretty?’. Although how plenty we’re paid is essential for
maximum people, distributive justice additionally covers who receives the interesting
paintings and who receives the mundane tasks, who receives the higher profession
ity

possibilities and promotions, etc. In fact, distributive justice consists of any element
wherein some thing is sent withinside the employment setting, even punishment.
Distributive justice takes place while personnel consider that consequences are
equitable (Colquitt et al., 2013). These consequences are both tangible, which include
pay, or intangible, which include high quality remarks. When personnel consider that
m

they’re being paid or handled equally, then this outcomes in distributive justice (Adams,
1965).

2. Procedural justice: Fairness of decision-making processes

)A

Whereas distributive justice specializes in consequences, procedural justice

specializes in the equity of the decision-making or manner that results in those
consequences. Employees understand procedural justice after they sense they can
voice their opinion concerning the manner. Employees additionally consider methods
(c

are truthful while they’re consistent, accurate, moral, and absence bias (Colquitt et
al., 2013) Much of the employment regulation specializes in organising the minimal

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 135

requirements for what have to appear withinside the employment setting. Factors which
Notes

e
include consistency, unfastened from bias, primarily based totally on fact, correctable,
democratic, moral viewpoints, and criminal issues are all a part of the manner of

in
creating a truthful decision. While that is an goal view of what organisational justice
have to be, how we understand equity withinside the place of job is extra subjective. If
we assume a manner is unfair, then we’re much more likely to assume the final results
(some thing is sent) is likewise unfair[1], however we’re much less in all likelihood to

nl
impeach the equity of the manner if we’re satisfied with the quantity received[2]. Not
surprisingly, we’re much more likely to understand an final results as being truthful if we
have been concerned withinside the manner[3]..

O
3. Interactional justice: Fairness of decision-making remedy and communication

Regardless of who we’re withinside the organisation, all of us assume to be

handled with dignity and recognize, in addition to being trusted, however how

ity
consequences are communicated, which include the adequacy of the reasons and the
timeliness of the communication, additionally form our perceptions of what’s truthful
withinside the paintings setting.Interactional justice specializes in the manner wherein
an character is handled while choices are made; people sense they’re being handled

rs
pretty while employers offer causes for choices and deal with personnel with dignity,
recognize, and sensitivity (Colquitt et al., 2013). Interactional justice also can be
damaged down into types – interpersonal and informational justice.
ve
●● Interpersonal justice
Interpersonal justice specializes in the manner wherein companies deal with
personnel, with an emphasis on recognize and courtesy.

●● Informational justice
ni

Informational justice specializes in whether or not employers offer good enough

causes to personnel with an emphasis on timeliness, specificity, and truthfulness
U

(Colquitt, 2011)

5.9 Implications of Organizational Justice

ity

What is organizational justice?

The idea of organizational justice specializes in how personnel decide the conduct
of the company and the way this conduct is associated with personnel’ attitudes and
behaviors concerning the firm (Greenberg, 1987). Organizational justice includes 3
m

essential forms – distributive, procedural, and interactional.

Distributive justice: Fairness of final results distribution (pay, comments etc.)

)A

Distributive justice takes place whilst personnel agree with that results are
equitable (Colquitt et al., 2013). These results are both tangible, which include pay, or
intangible, which include nice comments. When personnel agree with that they’re being
paid or handled equally, then this outcomes in distributive justice (Adams, 1965).
(c

Procedural justice: Fairness of decision-making approaches

Whereas distributive justice specializes in results, procedural justice specializes in

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 136 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

the equity of the decision-making or procedure that results in those results. Employees
Notes

e
understand procedural justice once they sense they can voice their opinion concerning
the procedure. Employees additionally agree with tactics are truthful whilst they’re

in
consistent, accurate, ethical, and absence bias (Colquitt et al., 2013).

Interactional justice: Fairness of decision-making remedy and communique

nl
Interactional justice specializes in the manner wherein an person is handled whilst
selections are made; people sense they’re being handled pretty whilst employers offer
causes for selections and deal with personnel with dignity, admire, and sensitivity
(Colquitt et al., 2013). Interactional justice also can be damaged down into types –

O
interpersonal and informational justice.

Interpersonal justice

ity
Interpersonal justice specializes in the manner wherein agencies deal with
personnel, with an emphasis on admire and courtesy.

Informational justice

rs
Informational justice specializes in whether or not employers offer ok causes to
personnel with an emphasis on timeliness, specificity, and truthfulness (Colquitt, 2011).

How to enhance organizational justice?

ve
Organizational justice isn’t always given, however a end result of a fixed of control
interventions and behaviors. As a professional, it’s far essential which you recognize
how your conduct and decision-making sports have an impact on organizational justice.
ni

We have a study a fixed of realistic approaches how you may foster organizational
justive on your company.

Effective organizational communique

U

When employers use powerful communique, this may bring about perceptions of
interpersonal and informational justice (Kernan & Hanges, 2002). It is essential that
agencies use fine communique whilst explaining selections to personnel due to the fact
ity

this may boom trust, for each control and the company (Kernan & Hanges, 2002). An
instance of that is whilst agencies want to make numerous activity positions redundant.
It is essential to give an explanation for to all personnel why the redundancies are
happening and to additionally deal with the ones laid off with dignity and truthful remedy.
m

Greenberg (1990) examined this reason in a field-primarily based totally

experiment, wherein a production company decreased pay in of its plants. In one of
the plants, the purpose for the pay reduce become defined in a touchy and respective
)A

way and withinside the different plant, no rationalization become given to personnel.
Following the pay reduce, Greenberg (1990) tested the quantity of worker robbery that
came about withinside the plants. As anticipated the ones whose pay become reduce
had better robbery prices while folks who acquired a touchy rationalization stole much
less; moreover, perceptions of inequity had been decreased (Greenberg, 1990).
(c

Employee participation

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 137

Another predictor of organizational justice is worker participation. When agencies

Notes

e
encompass personnel in decision-making approaches concerning organizational
tactics this will increase perceptions of justice. This boom in organizational justice

in
takes place even if the final results isn’t always withinside the worker’s favor (Bies &
Shapiro, 1988). Research has additionally proven that after personnel are given voice
or enter in organizational tactics this will increase perceptions of each procedural and
interpersonal justice (Kernan & Hanges, 2002).

nl
Employee temper and emotions
When organizational activities occur, this may have an effect on worker temper

O
and emotions. Moreover, personnel interpret activities otherwise and this may depend
upon worker disposition; for instance, whilst a disaster takes place a few personnel
is probably greater hectic than others. In fact, a meta-analytic overview located that

ity
kingdom and trait degree have an effect on can have an impact on justice perceptions
(Barsky & Kaplan, 2007). When personnel revel in each nice kingdom and trait nice
affectivity, they’re much more likely to have better perceptions of interactional,
procedural and distributive justice (Barsky & Kaplan, 2007). Depressed people
additionally have a tendency to have greater terrible perceptions of organizational

rs
justice (Lang et al., 2011).

Organizational justice is an person and group degree phenomenon

ve
Organizational justice is each an person and group degree phenomenon. Most
studies has been carried out on the person degree but there may be studies displaying
that organizational justice operates on the group degree, mainly in phrases of group
weather. Employees are motivated with the aid of using colleagues and group stages
ni

of their perceptions of justice and this may result in group degree perceptions of
organizational justice withinside the shape of a justice weather (Li & Cropanzano,
2009).
U

For instance, if there may be a disaster withinside the company, group contributors
can percentage their perceptions with every different and this may result in a shared
interpretation of activities. Team contributors also are motivated with the aid of using
every different and this may result in homogeneity in group perceptions of justice,
ity

growing a robust weather (Roberson & Colquitt, 2005). Colquitt and associates
additionally confirmed that groups with a excessive justice weather have a tendency
to carry out greater effectively, in phrases of overall performance and much less
absenteeism (Colquitt, Noe & Jackson, 2002).
m

Benefits of organizational justice

Organizational justice is an essential assemble as it impacts results on the person,
)A

group and organizational degree. Research has proven that organizational justice is
connected to nice results which include

◌◌ trust,
◌◌ activity overall performance and satisfaction,
(c

◌◌ organizational commitment, and

◌◌ organizational citizenship behaviors (Colquitt et al., 2013).

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 138 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

Organizational justice is likewise connected to terrible results which include

Notes

e
counterproductive paintings behaviors, turnover and burnout, such that personnel who
understand equity in results and approaches have a tendency to have interaction much

in
less in those terrible behaviors (Colquitt et al., 2013).

It is essential for agencies to make sure that they deal with their personnel pretty
via making sure that each results and approaches are equitable and just. Organizations

nl
can make sure that organizational practices are obvious and equitable in order that
personnel stay devoted to the dreams of the company.

O
Critical appraisal of organizational justice: Solidity Level five
Based at the empirical proof for the connection among group-efficacy and group
overall performance, this file is assigned a Level five score, (Based on a 1- five
dimension scale). A degree five is the very best score rating for a file primarily based

ity
totally at the proof supplied at the efficacy of organizational justice. To date, the studies
on organizational justice has confirmed the significance of this assemble on a myriad of
organizational results. Moreover, the studies has been carried out on the person, group,
and organizational degree.

5.10 Consequences of Organizational Injustice

rs
Below table depicts the consequences which an individual faces :
ve
These are characterized into three phases:

◌◌ General
◌◌ At Work
ni

◌◌ At Home
All the phases are further categorized into three types of effects:
U

◌◌ Immediate
◌◌ Intermediate
◌◌ Long-Term
ity

Consequences of Organisational Injustice for Indeviduals

Immediate Intermediate Long-Term

General Positive Negative
­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­↑anxiety ner ous breaskdown less naive high opportunity costs
m

↑frastration
↓self-esteem relationship strain more self-protective marital separation
↓self-confidence
↑stress burmout more assertive
)A

↑depression failure to achive personal,

↑anver, resentment professional potential
↑hopelessness commitment to self
↑crynicism emotionally dead
↑guilt
↑irritability, impetience
(c

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 139

At Work
Notes

e
↓ self-efficacy
↓ concentration
↑ disengagement questioning career

in
↑ tardiness choice molre responsive to subordinates
↓ participation
↓ initiative better communication
↑ sabotage hating work

nl
↑ time off
↓ and ↑ effort looking for other
↑ mistakes (intentional work more mindfull of possible inuustice
and unintentional)

O
↓ decision-making looking busy when reduced tolerance for injustice
ability missed not
deadlines intention to
quit
quiting

ity
At Home
weight gain/loss stgress related clearer boundaries between work/home
symptoms
mailgn organisation
sleep difficulty less time for or
withdrawal from

rs
other

reduced focus on dominant focus on clearer personal priorities and values

outside activities work (i.e., what’s important)
ve
Check your Understanding
1. __________must be continued to be preserved and nurtured to act as a shield
ni

against the social ills plaguing the society

2. __________are your ideas about what is of utmost importance to you in your life—
what you want to live by and for.
U

3. It is the social radar. Sensing about other’s feelings, without them being open towards
it, is the essence of__________
4. ___________are basic and fundamental beliefs that guide and motivate attitudes or
ity

actions
5. Values provide the general guidelines to __________
6. The existence of the dilemma can be cured and solved with __________
m

7. Morality can be described as believing and keeping __________

8. __________gives lots of advantages to the humans round the sector while it
additionally offers the possibilities to abolish someone’s privacy
)A

9. More broadly, ________or ‘statistics ethics’ offers with the effect of virtual Information
and Communication Technologies (ICT) on our societies and the surroundings at
huge
10. ___________seeks to set norms or requirements for conduct. The time period is
(c

usually utilized in connection with the discussion.

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 140 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

11. ________is a technique of ethical standards. These standards have giant impact on
Notes

e
humans to make choices and lead desirable great lives
12. __________takes place whilst personnel agree with that results are equitable

in
13. Organisational justice, first postulated with the aid of using ___________in 1987
14. _________refers to an worker’s notion in their organisation’s behaviours, selections

nl
and moves and the way those affect the personnel very own attitudes and behaviours
at work.
15. ___________specializes in whether or not employers offer good enough causes to

O
personnel with an emphasis on timeliness, specificity, and truthfulness

Summary
Personal values are the bedrock of ethics as they manual what someone considers

ity
good/awful or desirable/undesirable. Values create the muse for non-public and societal
judgment and action. 6 It is vital then earlier than discussing ethics to have a clean
expertise of the non-public values that manual us.

Ethics or ethical philosophy is a department of philosophy that “entails

rs
systematizing, defending, and recommending ideas of proper and incorrect behavior”.
The subject of ethics, together with aesthetics, worries subjects of cost, and as a
consequence incorporates the department of philosophy referred to as axiology
ve
Ethics, additionally referred to as ethical philosophy, the discipline involved with
what’s morally suitable and horrific and morally proper and incorrect. The time period is
likewise implemented to any gadget or idea of ethical values or principles.

Ethics offers with such questions in any respect levels. Its problem includes the
ni

essential problems of practical selection making, and its essential worries consist of the
character of remaining cost and the requirements with the aid of using which human
movements may be judged proper or incorrect.
U

Thus in a nutshell Organisational justice can be concludes as, The idea of

organizational justice specializes in how personnel decide the conduct of the employer
and the way this conduct is associated with personnel’ attitudes and behaviors
ity

concerning the firm (Greenberg, 1987). Organizational justice includes 3 predominant

forms – distributive, procedural, and interactional.

Organizational justice worries how personnel view equity in locations of

employment. The three varieties of justice are distributive, procedural, and interactional.
m

Have you ever been a part of a piece state of affairs in which you notion you
have been dealt with unfairly? If so, did it have an effect for your paintings or morale?
Employees need to paintings for truthful and moral organizations and be dealt with
)A

with respect. Organizational justice worries personnel’ perceptions of equity inside a

company. Distributive, procedural, and interactional are the 3 varieties of organizational
justice that organizations should embody as a way to have satisfied and efficient
personnel. Let’s check the Cheap Plastic Toys Company to look how organizational
justice is applicable to organizational conduct
(c

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 141

Activity
Notes

e
1. Differentiate between values and ethics.
2. Develop a list of own personal values and prioritise them in their top ten values.

in
3. Write short notes on Domains in study of Ethics (Applied, Normative & Meta Ethics)
4. What are the implications of organizational justice.

nl
Glossary
●● Ethics: Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that “involves

O
systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong
behavior”. The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of value,
and thus comprises the branch of philosophy called axiology
●● Empathy: Empathy is the capacity to understand or feel what another person is

ity
experiencing from within their frame of reference, that is, the capacity to place
oneself in another’s position. Definitions of empathy encompass a broad range of
emotional states.
●● Values: are the motive behind purposeful action. They are the ends to which we

rs
act and come in many forms. Personal values are personal beliefs about right
and wrong and may or may not be considered moral. Cultural values are values
accepted by religions or societies and reflect what is important in each context.
ve
●● Courage: Courage is the tendency to accept and face risks and portray difficult
tasks rationally.
●● Core values: Core values are those values that are the foundation of our
personalities and the way we conduct ourselves.
ni

●● Work ethics: It is an attitude of determination and dedication towards one’s job.

●● Moral dilemma: Moral dilemma is a situation in which the decision-maker must
U

consider two or more moral values, ethics and duties but is able to honour only
one of them
●● Technology: Technology is the sum of techniques, skills, methods, and processes
ity

used in the production of goods or services or in the accomplishment of objectives,

such as scientific investigation
●● Organisational Justice: Organisational justice, first postulated by Greenberg
in 1987, refers to an employee’s perception of their organisation’s behaviours,
decisions and actions and how these influences the employees own attitudes and
m

behaviours at work.
●● Whistleblower: A whistleblower is a person, usually an employee, who exposes
information or activity within a private, public, or government organization that is
)A

deemed illegal, illicit, unsafe, or a waste, fraud, or abuse of taxpayer funds

Questions & Exercises

1. Write short note on Empathy, honesty, courage and commitment
(c

2. How can someone Nurturing Good values

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 142 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics

3. What are the various ways through which honesty is reflected?

Notes

e
4. What are the important distinctions in the people’s value priorities?
5. What are the ways to solve ethical or moral dilemma?

in
6. Write short notes on Ethics in Technological Era
7. Write short notes on Types of Judgment (Factual Aesthetic, Moral)

nl
8. Explain the Meaning, Types of Organizational Justice
9. What is organizational justice and what are the Consequences of Organizational
injustice

O
Further Readings
1. Organizational Behaviour, Davis, K.

ity
2. Hoover, Judhith D. Effective Small Group and Team Communication,
2002,Harcourt College Publishers
3. Dick, Mc Cann & Margerison, Charles: Team Management, 1992 Edition, viva
books
4.
5. rs
Bates, A. P. and Julian, J.: Sociology - Understanding Social Behaviour
Dressler, David and Cans, Donald: The Study of Human Interaction
ve
6. Lapiere, Richard. T – Social Change
7. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/advisory/articles/digital-ethics.html
8. https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics
ni

9. https://www.britannica.com/topic/metaethics
10. http://www.kkhsou.in/main/philosophy/moral_judgement.html
11. https://www.ckju.net/en/dossier/benefits-organizational-justice-and-practical-
U

ways-how-improve-it
12. http://www.fairnesszone.com/types.html
ity

Answers: Check your Understanding

1. Noble values
2. Values
3. empathy
m

4. Values
5. Guidelines
)A

6. Logic
7. Ethical standards.
8. Technology
(c

9. ‘virtual ethics’

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education

 Individual Excellence and Social Dynamics 143

10. Normative ethics

Notes

e
11. ethics
12. Distributive justice

in
13. Greenberg
14. Organisational justice

nl
15. Informational justice

O
ity
rs
ve
ni
U
ity
m
)A
(c

Amity Directorate of Distance & Online Education