Unit 2
Unit 2
of Forensic
       FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST1                                                                     Psychologist
Structure
2.0    Objectives
2.1    Introduction
2.2    Forensic Psychologist’s Roles and Functions
2.3    Qualifications and Training
2.4    Let Us Sum Up
2.5    References
2.6    Answers to Check Your Progress
2.7    Unit End Questions
2.0       OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to,
2.1       INTRODUCTION
The work of a forensic psychologist is varied and wide reaching. He/ she
assists the police in investigation, provides advice on interviewing of
suspects or witnesses, works as expert witness in court cases, works in the
rehabilitation of offenders, conducts forensic psychology research or work in
academia. This unit aims to present a balanced view of profession of the
forensic psychologist and to introduce you to the variety of roles within
which the forensic psychologist can, and does work. You will also be
introduced to the specific functions that a forensic psychologist performs
within these roles.
1
 Prof. Dipesh Chandra Nath, Head, Department of Applied Psychology, Calcutta University,
Kolkatta (adapted from Uni t4, Block 1 of BPCE021).
                                                                                                         31
Forensic Psychology:   The four roles are:
An Introduction
                       Clinical: In this role the forensic psychologist will usually be involved in the
                       assessment of an individual in order to provide a clinical judgement. The
                       psychologist could use interviews, assessment tools or psychometric tests
                       (i.e. special questionnaires) to aid in his or her assessment. These
                       assessments can inform the police, the courts, or the prison and probation
                       services about the psychological functioning of an individual and can
                       therefore influence how the different sections of the criminal justice system
                       process the individual in question. For example, a forensic psychologist may
                       be asked to assess individuals in order to determine whether they are fit to
                       stand trial or whether they have a mental illness which means that they would
                       not understand the proceedings.
                       Experimental: This may involve the forensic psychologist performing
                       research regarding the case. This can involve carrying out experimental tests
                       in order to illustrate a point or provide further information to the courts (for
                       example, how likely it is that someone can correctly identify an object in the
                       hand of an individual from a distance of 100 metres at twilight). Alternatively
                       it can involve psychologists providing the court with a summary of current
                       research findings which may be relevant to the case in question.
                       Actuarial: In this context the word ‘actuarial’ relates to the use of statistics
                       in order to inform a case. One example of how a forensic psychologist may
                       act in an actuarial role is if they are required to present actuarial information
                       relating to the probability of an event occurring to the court. For example, a
                       court may wish to know how likely an offender is to reoffend before the
                       sentence is decided. In such a case, a forensic psychologist could be called
                       upon in order to inform the pre-sentence report to the court.
                       Advisory: In this role the forensic psychologist may provide advice to the
                       police about how to proceed with an investigation. For example, an
                       offender’s profile could inform the investigation, or advice could be provided
                       about how best to interview a particular suspect. Alternatively a prosecution
                       or defence lawyer may ask for advice on how best to cross examine a
                       vulnerable witness or another expert witness. This role involves the use of the
                       psychologist’s expertise in order to advice the police, courts or prison and
                       probation services.
                       As you can see, psychology thus can be used in a variety of different
                       scenarios within the criminal justice system and for a number of different
                       reasons. The next few sub-sections will examine in more detail how
                       psychologists can and do contribute their expertise to aid the work of the
                       criminal justice system. This list of role, however, does not claim to be
                       exhaustive, as there are many more ways in which psychologists play their
                       part. We have therefore chosen the most well known roles in order to give an
                       indication of what kinds of roles and functions forensic psychology involves.
                       Let us now discuss the functions of a forensic psychologist.
                       Criminal investigations: The role of a forensic psychologist in criminal
                       investigations can take a variety of forms. Professor Laurence Alison of the
32
University of Liverpool has suggested a number of ways in which the                 Role and Functions
                                                                                            of Forensic
expertise of a psychologist could aid the police and support the work that                 Psychologist
they do. According to him, “It is important to appreciate that the ways in
which psychologists can contribute extends well beyond the process of
profiling offenders. Indeed the apprehension of the offender would be
assisted by enhancing police decision-making and leadership-skills,
improving methods of interviewing witnesses and victims, developing
accurate methods of recording, collating and analysing data on pre-
convictions of offenders, developing suspect prioritisation system based on
empirical research and enhancing intelligence-led policing and the use of
informations.” (Alison 2005)
From the list of functions within the quote above, it may be seen that the role
of the psychologist in assisting the police can be wide-ranging.
Crime analysis: Crime analysis (sometimes also called intelligence analysis)
is one field of work which draws upon forensic psychological methods.
Crime analysts are generally employed by the police (or policing agencies,
for example in the UK, the National Crime and Operations Faculty and the
National Crime Squad) in order to analyse crime data to aid the police
carryout their roles. One of the most common roles of crime analysts is that
of case linkage. This process involves the linkage of crime based on the
similarities in the behaviours of the offenders as reported by the victim or as
inferred from the crime scene. For example, let us examine a rape case
committed by a stranger on a woman walking home alone after a night out
with her friends. Crime analysts could use the details of this case – the fact
that she had just left her office, that the rapist took some of her clothing away
from the scene with him, the contents of the threats used towards the woman
– in order to check against an already established database of similar crimes
to see whether there are any similarities to past crimes. If matches are found
– the same threats were used, similar items of clothing taken by a rapist, and
it was in a close geographical location to another rape – then this information
can be used by the police to investigate the potential that the same individual
offender has committed both crimes. This allows the focusing of the
resources of the investigation in order to avoid duplication of work.
Offenders profiling or criminal investigative analysis: Offender profiling
has received a great deal of attention from the media in recent years. Media
reporting of the utilisation of forensic psychologists in high profile cases has
introduced the general public to the notion of offender profiling. While this
has raised the profile of the field, it could be argued that the (largely)
sensationalist portrayal of profiling resulted in a general confusion of what
profiling actually is, how often it is done and who does it. This uncertainty
amongst the general public is not altogether surprising however, as there is an
absence of an agreed definition of the term ‘profiling’, even in academic
circles.
What we can be clear about is that profiling uses information gleaned from
the crime scene relating to the offender’s behaviour during the crime. This
can be pooled with other information, such as victim statements (if
available), in order to draw conclusions about the nature of the person who
                                                                                                  33
Forensic Psychology:   committed the crime. Was the crime planned meticulously or was it
An Introduction
                       impulsive? Does the offender live locally to the crime scene? What age range
                       is the offender likely to fall into? What gender is the offender? This
                       information can then be used to aid the police in investigations and in
                       targeting resources.
                       But how exactly is a profiler able to look at the scene and use this to specify
                       the characteristics of the offender? The answer to this question is not entirely
                       clear mainly because different people involved in offender profiling can, and
                       do, use a variety of techniques in order to reach their conclusions. Even those
                       individuals who claim to be working from the same theoretical standpoint
                       can still vary in how the theory is applied to any given case.
                       Interviewing, detecting deception and eye witness research: One of the
                       most important tasks during investigation is collecting reliable evidence in
                       order to put together a case of what happened during the event in question.
                       One of the main sources of this evidence is the people who were
                       eyewitnesses to the event. In order to gain this information, an interview
                       needs to be conducted by the investigating police officers with the aim of
                       gaining as much accurate information from the witness as possible. In
                       addition, once the suspect has been identified, he/ she too is interviewed in
                       order to gain his or her view of events and to possibly extract a confession to
                       the crime. Hence the interview (whether with a witness or suspect) and the
                       manner in which it is conducted can be crucial to a case.
                       It is not surprising, therefore, when you think of the processes (those relating
                       to memory and the retrieval of memory) that are involved in the interview
                       situation, the psychologists have been interested in this area for years. Given
                       research findings such as those that state that the recall of events by witness
                       can be manipulated by the interviewer (either intentionally or unintentionally
                       – for example, by the type of questions asked), it is clear that those carrying
                       out the interviews need to receive training in how to conduct the interviews
                       appropriately.
                       Psychologists have been instrumental in developing guidance and advice on
                       how best to interview witnesses and suspects and have also provided training
                       to various police forces on these techniques. The police can also use
                       psychologists in order to gain advice on how to interview particular types of
                       witnesses or suspects. For example, psychologists have conducted research
                       into interviews with vulnerable witnesses such as the young, the elderly and
                       learning disabled witnesses. This research can be used to inform the police on
                       how best to retrieve the information that they require from such witnesses
                       without causing them too much stress while at the same time ensuring that
                       the information received is as accurate as possible.
                       Research performed by forensic psychologists investigating the detection of
                       deception also has useful applications for the police when interviewing
                       witnesses and in particular suspects.
                       Function of forensic psychologist as a police psychologist: The information
                       here, thus far, been concerned with the application of psychological
                       knowledge to assist in police investigation. However, there is another field
34
within which the work of forensic psychologists, and the application of their      Role and Functions
                                                                                           of Forensic
knowledge, is useful to the police, that is police psychology. Like many                  Psychologist
organisations, the police force itself presents its own challenges – what type
of person makes a good police officer? What is the best way to train police
officers? How might the attendance at unpleasant scenes of crime, or
repeated exposure to negative events, impact on an individual and how are
those affected in this way best treated?
This area of work is not a new one – psychologists, both occupational and
forensic, have been advising the police on such matters for the last twenty-
five years or so. Psychologists have contributed their knowledge to the
process of police officer recruitment through the introduction of
psychometric tests which measure psychological characteristics that may be
important in relation to such work. These could assess, for example, whether
a person is an assertive individual, open to persuasion, and conscious of
detail. Psychologists have also provided advice on the composition of
interviews and assessment centres which will eliminate those who do not
have the necessary qualities for the role as well as providing an indication of
those who will prosper in such a role.
Another important area of police interest where psychologists have an
ongoing input is the moderation of police stress. The stress faced by police
officers is somewhat different from that in other types of employment.
Whereas stress can be elevated in most jobs through organisational change,
such as decreased workload or a pay rise, the police can be faced with
unexpected, perhaps threatening, situations at any time during their daily
work. These events, due to their unpredictable nature, cannot necessarily be
mediated by organisational change. So the police also need stress
management measures that can assist at an individual level, as and when they
are needed. Psychologists have been instrumental in advising the police on
what mechanisms would be beneficial (such as peer counselling and self-help
programmes), but will also provide professional services to police officers
who require more intensive stress management.
Expert witness: Court cases can involve complex issues including the
presentation of information that is judged to be beyond the knowledge of the
average layperson who may sit on a jury. In such situations, the court permits
the calling of an expert witness who, by definition, has an expertise relating
to the issue in question. Under the circumstances expert witnesses are
permitted to provide their opinion (rather than the facts) on the issue being
discussed.
The way the expert witnesses are called to the court could vary from one
jurisdiction to another. For example, in some countries within Europe, an
expert witness is called by the court itself in order to provide information as
and when it is needed. However, in the UK and USA, the expert is instructed
by either the defence or prosecution in order to provide extra strength to their
version of events.
The use of the psychologist as an expert witness has, in the past, been
constricted by the notion of the expert having to provide information that is
beyond the knowledge of the average person. Historically then, the                               35
Forensic Psychology:   admissibility of a psychologist’s opinion was often limited to provide
An Introduction
                       evidence relating to mental impairment or the psychological functioning of
                       an individual. However, in recent years, the psychologists’ expertise has been
                       increasingly recognised and they are now being called upon as evidence in
                       relation to a wide variety of issues. Some examples of these are the impact
                       that the interviewing techniques have on a suspect or witness, the reliability
                       of eyewitness testimony, the clinical assessment of suspect or witness, or the
                       use of profiling techniques during an investigation.
                                                                                               37
Forensic Psychology:   Box 2.1 Specific examples of the functions that forensic psychologists
An Introduction
                       may be asked to perform (Bartol and Bartol, 2008).
                       Functions of a forensic psychologists with reference to police psychology,
                       psychology of crime and delinquency, victimology and victim services, legal
                       psychology, and correctional psychology are described as follows:
                       Let us elaborate these:
                       1) Police Psychology: Police psychology includes functions as follows:
                       •   Assist police department in determining optimal shift schedules for their
                           employers.
                       •   Assist police in developing psychological profiles of serial offenders.
                       •   Establish reliable and valid screening procedures for law enforcement
                           officer positions at various police and sheriff departments.
                       •   Train police officers on how to deal with mentally ill persons.
                       •   Provide counselling services to officers after a shooting incident.
                       2) Psychology of Crime and Delinquency: This includes the following
                          functions:
                       •   Evaluate the effectiveness of preschool intervention strategies designed
                           to prevent violent behaviour during adolescence.
                       •   Conduct research on the development of psychopathy.
                       •   Consult with legislators and governmental agencies as a research policy
                           adviser on prevention of stalking.
                       •   Consult with school personnel on identifying troubled youth who are
                           potentially dangerous.
                       •   Develop a psychological test for assessing risk among the mentally ill.
                       3) Victimology and Victim Services: Victimology and victim services
                          include the following functions:
                       •   Evaluate and treat persons who are the victims of crime or witness of
                           crime.
                       •   Conduct psychological assessments for personal injury matters having to
                           do with such things as auto accidents, product liability, sexual
                           harassment and discrimination, and medical negligence or workers’
                           compensation.
                       •   Educate and train victim service providers on psychological reactions to
                           criminal victimisation, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
                       •   Assess, support, and counsel those who provide death notification
                           services.
                       •   Educate service providers on the impact of multiculturalism when
                           victims seek mental health and support services.
                       4) Legal Psychology: Under legal psychology the functions mentioned
                          below are included:
                       •   Conduct child custody evaluations, visitation risk assessments, and child
                           abuse evaluations.
38
•     Assist attorneys in jury selection through community surveys and other       Role and Functions
                                                                                           of Forensic
      research methods.                                                                   Psychologist
•     Perform evaluations of a defendant’s competency to stand trial.
•     Consult with attorneys and the courts concerning custody decisions,
      conflict resolution, and the validity of assessment procedures used in the
      evaluation of various psychological conditions.
•     Conduct competency evaluations for the civil court.
5) Correctional Psychology: Functions under correctional psychology
   include
•     Establish reliable and valid screening procedures for correctional officer
      positions at correctional facilities.
•     Evaluate the effectiveness of a variety of existing programmes (a process
      called programme evaluation) for juvenile and adult offenders, such as
      victim-offender reconciliation programmes, sex offender treatment, or
      health education programmes.
•     Develop a stress management programme for correctional personnel.
•     Assess the development of a system for classifying prison inmates for
      placement within a correctional facility.
2.5       REFERENCES
Ainsworth, P. B. (2000). Psychology and Crime: Myths and Reality. Harlow,
Essex : Longman.
Alder, J. R. (Ed.). (2004). Forensic Psychology: Concepts, Debates and
Practice. Cullompton: William.
Alison, L. (2005). The Forensic Psychologist’s Case Book : Psychological
Profiling and Criminal Investigation. Cullompton, UK : William.
Bartol, C. R. & Bartol, A. M. (2008). Introduction to Forensic Psychology:
Research and Application. New Delhi : Sage Publications.
Carson, D. and Bull, R. (2003). Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts,
2nd edn. Chichester : Wiley.
Gudjonsson, G. H. and Haward, L. R. C. (1998). Forensic Psychology: A
guide to practice. London : Routledge.
Harmening, W and Gamez, A. M. (2016). Forensic Psychology. Delhi:
Pearson
Veeraraghavan, Vimala (2009). Handbook of Forensic Psychology, Select
Scientific Publishers, New Delhi.
Weiner, I. B. & Hess, A. K. (Eds.) (1987). Handbook of Forensic
Psychology. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Wrigthsman, L. S. (2001). Forensic Psychology Bekmont, CA : Wardsworth.