Markkanen Et Al., 2023
Markkanen Et Al., 2023
g Human Microbiome Research Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Marko P. J. Virta and Anu Kantele contributed equally to this work. Author order was determined alphabetically.
ABSTRACT Antibiotic resistance is a global threat to human health, with the most
severe effect in low- and middle-income countries. We explored the presence of antibi-
otic resistance genes (ARGs) in the hospital wastewater (HWW) of nine hospitals in Benin
and Burkina Faso, two low-income countries in West Africa, with shotgun metagenomic
sequencing. For comparison, we also studied six hospitals in Finland. The highest sum of
the relative abundance of ARGs in the 68 HWW samples was detected in Benin and the
T he global antibiotic resistance crisis has multifaceted effects on human and animal
health and comes with substantial economic losses (1). Due to limitations in diag-
nostic testing in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs),
broad-spectrum antibiotics are often used empirically without microbiological verifica-
tion of the causative pathogen or its sensitivity to different antibiotics (2). In addition,
unregulated access to antibiotics results in self-medication for humans and animals in
these countries (3–5).
Acquired, potentially mobile antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) have a pronounced clini-
cal relevance and impact on the current antimicrobial resistance (AMR) problem (6, 7).
Furthermore, the genetic context of the ARG (e.g., whether under a strong promoter or
not) influences its expression and the resulting resistance phenotype (8). Class 1 integrons
are strongly linked to the dissemination of clinically relevant acquired ARGs (9, 10).
Although integrons are not mobile as such, multidrug resistance gene cassettes carried by
integrons can be transferred to new hosts: for example, via plasmids (11). The intI1 and
qacED genes (genes encoding the integron integrase and quaternary ammonium com-
pound resistance) are typically used as markers for class 1 integrons (10, 12).
The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics has increased in clinical practice as a con-
sequence of the increased prevalence of extended-spectrum b -lactamase-producing
Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) (13–15). The carbapenem resistance-encoding genes
blaGES, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-58, and blaVIM, which are typically carried
by plasmids, have emerged and spread around the world during the past 3 decades
(16–19). Colistin is a last-resort antibiotic used for treating infections caused by mul-
tidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant bacteria, such as those resistant to
carbapenems (20). The rapid emergence of colistin resistance mediated by mcr genes
threatens the efficacy of colistin in clinical use (21, 22).
Although AMR is a global concern, the crisis dramatically affects LMICs, such as
those in West Africa (2, 23–26). Lack of research data is one major factor hindering
tackling the AMR problem in these countries (2, 23, 27, 28). Despite these gaps in re-
sistance surveillance data, it is well known that the level of AMR is elevated in LMICs,
including African countries (14, 24, 29, 30). In contrast, in Northern European countries,
such as Finland, AMR occurrence is among the lowest globally, both in the community
RESULTS
General features of resistomes, mobilomes, and taxonomical compositions in
HWW and other water samples from Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finland. We studied
hospital wastewater (HWW) collected from Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finland (Table 1;
see Data Set S1, Sheets 1 and 2, in the supplemental material; see Fig. S1 and S2 in the
Supplemental Data Repository, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/9wxb37t49z/1). In
addition, 11 non-HWW water samples, such as those collected from rivers and near or
within the hospital environment, were analyzed to obtain a more comprehensive
understanding of the ARG prevalence in Benin and Burkina Faso. On average, 31 mil-
lion sequence reads per sample were analyzed. HWW from Benin showed the highest
and HWW from Burkina Faso the second-highest abundance of all detected ARGs nor-
malized to bacterial 16S rRNA genes (the sum of the relative abundance of ARGs). On
the other hand, the sum of the relative abundance of ARGs was the lowest in HWW
from Finland (Fig. 1A). Also, the lowest diversity of ARGs was observed in HWW from
Other samples
BH11 Benin BENN well water A (drinking) 1 A 27/11/19 No
BH13 BENN street gutter B 1 B 27/11/19 No
BH48 BENN puddle at yard C 1 C 9/12/19 No
BH52 BENN hand-washing C 1 C 9/12/19 No
BSE100 BENN river P (drinking) 1 P 4/12/19 No
BSE74 BENN river Q (drinking) 1 Q 4/12/19 No
BSE79 BENN river R (drinking) 1 R 4/12/19 No
BSE93 BENN tap water S (drinking) 1 S 4/12/19 No
BFH26 Burkina Faso BF exit after biological treatment 1 H 4/12/19 No
BFH27 BF wetland receiving treated HWW 1 H 4/12/19 No
BFH42 BF receiving river after WWTP 1 T 12/12/19 No
aHWW samples from hospitals in Benin (n = 26), Burkina Faso (n = 34), and Finland (n = 8) are denoted at the top, while the other samples are noted at the bottom.
Finland and the highest in Burkina Faso (see Fig. S3A in the Supplemental Data
Repository).
According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, there were significant (P , 0.005) country-wise
FIG 1 Sum of the relative abundances of (A) ARGs, (B) MGEs, and (C) class 1 integrons (intiI1) in HWW samples from Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finland. The
gene counts were normalized to 16S rRNA gene counts and gene lengths. Country medians are shown as horizontal lines, and the interquartile ranges
(25th and 75th quartiles) as box plot hinges. The horizontal lines represent the highest and lowest values. Outliers are defined as values higher or lower
than 1.5 times the upper or lower quartiles, respectively, and denoted with a text label referring to the category represented by that sample. The box plots
were drawn after excluding the outliers. The comparisons between countries were computed using the pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test, where the P
values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm. The significance levels are as follows: *, P # 0.05; **, P # 0.01; ***, P #
0.001.
FIG 2 Principal-component analysis (PCA) showing the significant dissimilarities of (A) resistomes, (B) taxonomical composition Metaphlan3, and (C)
mobilomes in HWW from Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finland. Count data were transformed using centered log ratio transformation (clr). Confidence ellipses
are drawn for visualization and represent 95% confidence levels.
the P values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm.
The differences in intI1 followed a similar pattern in country-wise comparisons to ARGs
(Fig. 1C). Contigs where multiple ARGs, such as carbapenemase or ESBL variants of blaGES
and quinolone resistance genes (qnrVC), were located in proximity to each other were
identified (Fig. S4 in the Supplemental Data Repository). These contigs might indicate gene
cassettes carried by class 1 integron elements as previously reported for blaGES and qnrVC
in various ARG combinations (8, 34, 35). In contrast to intI1 and qacED, no significant corre-
lations were observed between ARGs and int2 or int3 (Fig. S5C and D in the Supplemental
Data Repository), except with HWW from Burkina Faso (Fig. S5D in the Supplemental Data
Repository).
Compositional data analysis (CoDa) methods were applied to investigate the ordination
of the samples from the different countries by their resistome, mobilome, and taxonomical
FIG 3 Significantly differentially abundant ARGs in HWW in pairwise comparisons in Benin versus Finland, Burkina Faso versus Finland, and Benin versus
Burkina Faso were defined using ALDEx2 (36) with 16S rRNA as the reference gene. The difference-between (diff.btw) values represent the difference in alr-
transformed values of each ARG in samples from the compared countries. For instance, in panel A, significantly differentially abundant ARGs for Benin
(green dots above the blue dotted line) have negative diff.btw values (x axis), while ARGs that were significantly differentially abundant in Finland (blue
dots above the blue dotted line) have positive values. The dotted line represents a P value of ,0.05 of the Wilcoxon rank sum test, where the P values
were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm (wi.eBH). These P values were log10 transformed for the figure.
uses a single component (here, the 16S rRNA counts) as the reference for analyzing all indi-
vidual components.
In the comparisons Benin versus Finland and Burkina Faso versus Finland, ARGs sig-
nificantly differentially abundant in HWW from Finland were fewer than those from
Benin or Burkina Faso (Fig. 3A and B) (BENN [n = 258]-FI [n = 33]; BF [n = 257]-FI
[n = 29]). In addition, the ARGs that were significantly differentially abundant in HWW
from Finland in both comparisons (Benin versus Finland and Burkina Faso versus
Finland) were primarily the same (Table 2; Table S1A and B). blaOXA-211-like genes and
erm(B) macrolide resistance genes were characteristic of HWW from Finland (Table 2
[and see Table S1A to C for all results]). Those ARGs that were characteristic of HWW
TABLE 2 Top 10 differentially abundant ARGs in HWW from Benin, Burkina Faso, and
Finlanda
Comparison wi.eBH Diff.btw Gene Gene family
Benin vs Finland
Benin 0.000032 25.811741 tet(A)_1 tet(A)
0.000033 25.267743 tet(A)_6 tet(A)
0.000034 24.932008 tet(A)_4 tet(A)
0.000034 24.842077 tet(A)_5 tet(A)
0.000037 27.475163 qnrVC4_1 qnrVC4
0.000042 26.688637 blaVEB-2_1 blaVEB
0.000043 26.521372 blaVEB-6_1 blaVEB
0.000045 26.600232 blaVEB-7_1 blaVEB
0.000047 26.629523 blaVEB-1_1 blaVEB
0.000058 28.506581 lnu(F)_3 lnu(F)
Finland 0.000065 5.930829 blaOXA-373_1 blaOXA-211-like
0.000068 4.334039 erm(B)_18 erm(B)
0.000079 5.493227 blaOXA-212_1 blaOXA-211-like
0.000085 4.834230 erm(B)_21 erm(B)
0.000113 4.735091 blaOXA-309_1 blaOXA-211-like
0.000118 5.320211 erm(B)_10 erm(B)
0.000189 3.499903 erm(B)_9 erm(B)
0.000225 5.338762 blaOXA-334_1 blaOXA-211-like
0.000407 4.719647 blaOXA-299_1 blaOXA-299-like
0.000409 4.664600 blaOXA-281_1 blaOXA-211-like
TABLE 2 (Continued)
Comparison wi.eBH Diff.btw Gene Gene family
0.00999705 2.36292741 blaCMY-15_1 blaCMY-150
0.01017209 2.18229534 blaCMY-95_1 blaCMY-150
0.0104837 3.39104568 blaBEL-3_1 blaBEL
0.01139229 2.93238914 blaOXA-397_1 blaOXA-58-like
0.01498384 1.9958258 blaCMY-94_1 blaCMY-150
aThediff.btw values represent the median difference in the alr-transformed count data between the compared
HWW. The P values of the Wilcoxon rank sum test, where the P values were adjusted for multiple testing using
the Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm, are indicated in the table as “wi.eBH.” The table was sorted by the wi.eBH
value before subdividing the entries into the top 10 differentially abundant ARGs by country: Benin, Burkina
Faso, or Finland. The ARGs were clustered into gene families (Gene family column) based on 90% shared
sequence identity using CD-HIT (80). In the case of blaOXA genes, the gene family naming followed the scheme
by Naas and colleagues (46).
TABLE 3 Differentially abundant blaOXA variants in HWW from Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finlanda
Comparison for ALDEx2 Cluster name in BLDB Acquired/intrinsicb Host species if intrinsic Carbapenemase activity
Benin vs Finland
Benin blaOXA-5-like A
blaOXA-10-like A
blaOXA-2-like A
blaOXA-347 A and I Bacteroides spp.
blaOXA-229 I Acinetobacter bereziniae
blaOXA-46-like A
blaGES gene family seemed to dominate over other carbapenemase genes in all four hos-
pitals (Fig. 4). blaGES genes were also detected in the water puddle surrounding the sur-
gery room septic tank at a Beninese hospital yard (hospital C) (Fig. 4; Fig. S2E in the
Supplemental Data Repository) as well as in the water intended for hand washing in the
same hospital (Fig. 4; Fig. S2F in the Supplemental Data Repository). Also, the street gut-
ter, located ;100 m away from another Beninese hospital, was contaminated by blaGES
carbapenemase genes (Fig. 4).
In contrast to the homogeneity of carbapenemase genes in HWW from Benin, most of
the other carbapenemase genes were present in HWW from Burkina Faso and Finland at var-
ious prevalence levels (Fig. 4). blaIMP, blaNDM, and blaVIM were mainly detected in Burkinabe
and Finnish HWW samples, and the latter was significantly differentially abundant in HWW
from Burkina Faso (Fig. 4; Table S2B). blaOXA-48 was detected in two HWW samples from
Burkina Faso and not at all or in very low relative abundances in samples from elsewhere
(Fig. 4). Instead, blaOXA-58-like genes were present in the majority of Burkinabe and Finnish
HWW samples but only in a few Beninese samples (Fig. 4). The detection of blaKPC genes was
restricted to one Finnish HWW sample (Fig. 4). The samples collected from natural waters
and other drinking waters showed only low relative abundances of these carbapenemase
genes (Fig. 4). However, some blaOXA-58-like were detected in tap water used for drinking in
Benin (Fig. 4).
In Burkina Faso, blaGES carbapenemase genes were detected in HWW, which had
gone through the biological treatment in similar relative abundances as in some of the
samples of untreated HWW from the same hospital (hospital H) (Fig. 4 [note the differ-
ences in the plot scales]). Also, blaVIM was found both in the untreated and treated
water of that hospital (Fig. 4). Lower relative abundances of the studied carbapene-
mase genes were observed in wetlands and rivers receiving treated HWW in Burkina
Faso (Fig. 4). However, the spectrum of these carbapenemase genes, namely, blaOXA-58-
like, blaVIM, and blaGES, reflected the ones detected in the HWW in Burkina Faso (Fig. 4).
Mobile colistin resistance (mcr) genes. mcr genes were detected in several HWW
samples in Benin, Burkina Faso, and Finland (Fig. 5). mcr-5 (variants mcr-5.1 and mcr-
5.2) (Table S3B) was the most common of the mcr genes as they were found in HWW
from all except two hospitals in Burkina Faso (hospitals E and G) and two hospitals in
Finland (hospitals K and L) among the three countries (Fig. 5). In the few samples
selected for metagenomic assembly, this gene was found to be located within a Tn3-
like element (Fig. S7 in the Supplemental Data Repository).
In addition to the HWW samples, high relative abundances of mcr-5 genes were also
detected in the immediate and more distant surroundings of the hospitals in Benin and
Burkina Faso. A very high relative abundance (2.80 1022) of mcr-5 was observed in the
biologically treated HWW from hospital H (Fig. 5). In the wetland receiving treated HWW
from the same hospital, the relative abundance was lower (4.30 1024) but still high, con-
sidering that the sample represented a larger body of natural water. In Benin, mcr-5 was
detected in river water in a distant village and a street gutter near a hospital (hospital B)
(Fig. 5). Furthermore, for hospital C, the relative abundance of mcr-5 was greater in a pud-
dle near the septic tanks in the hospital yard (1.99 1023) than the average in the actual
HWW of that hospital (5.24 1024) (Fig. 5).
The next most prevalent mcr genes were mcr-3.1, mcr-10, and mcr-7, and similarly to
mcr-5, they were also present in non-HWW water samples, such as the water intended for
hand washing in the Beninese hospital C (Fig. 5). The gene mcr-2 was not detected at all,
and the lowest average relative abundance was detected for the gene mcr-1 (Fig. 5).
Taxonomical compositions. The taxonomical compositions of bacteria present in septic
tanks and sumps in Benin and Burkina Faso differed from those found in hospital sewers in
Finland. Genera belonging to the Bacteroidales family showed significantly different abundan-
ces in HWW from different countries and were characteristic of the HWW from Benin and
Burkina Faso (Fig. S8 and S9 in the Supplemental Data Repository). Other significantly differen-
tially abundant taxa in HWW from Benin compared to Finland included Chloracidobacterium,
Geobacter, Aminomonas, Flexilinea, Desulfovibrio, and genera of Synergistetes (Table S4A; Fig.
S8A in the Supplemental Data Repository). The first two mentioned were characteristic also of
the HWW from Burkina Faso (Table S4B; Fig. S8B at Supplemental Data Repository). In addi-
tion, in many HWW samples from Burkina Faso, the relative abundances of Pseudomonas and
Acinetobacter were high (Fig. S9 in the Supplemental Data Repository), and the difference in
their abundance in HWW from Burkina Faso versus Benin was significant (Table S4C; Fig. S8C
in the Supplemental Data Repository).
Coprococcus, Enterococcus, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Trichococcus, Tessaracoccus, Delftia,
Raultella, and genera of the Proteobacteria family, were all significantly differentially abundant
in HWW from Finland in comparison to Benin and Burkina Faso (Table S3A and B; Fig. S8A
and S8B in the Supplemental Data Repository). Also, the genera that were significantly differ-
entially abundant for HWW in Finland and not Benin were more commonly from the phylum
Pseudomonadota (synonym Proteobacteria), which are typically considered the major contrib-
DISCUSSION
We characterized the bacterial community composition, resistome, and mobilome of 60
HWW and 11 other water samples from Benin and Burkina Faso and compared them to 8
HWW samples from Finland. Due to the lack of systematic AMR surveillance in these West
African countries, available data on bacterial resistance are patchy and heterogeneous
(1, 2, 22, 26, 29). Thus, the magnitude of the resistance problem and the specific ARG reser-
voirs are yet to be unraveled. This is the first study investigating hospital wastewater from
Benin and Burkina Faso using a shotgun metagenomic approach.
Interestingly, the ARGs observed in HWW from Benin were the highest in number
but probably less clinically important (16, 19, 39) than those in the HWW from Burkina
Faso and Finland. While carbapenemase genes blaGES, blaIMP, blaNDM, blaOXA-48-like,
blaOXA-58-like, and blaVIM were detected at various abundances in at least one sample in
HWW from Burkina Faso and Finland, blaGES was the predominant carbapenemase in
HWW from Benin. blaGES genes were also present in the water puddle at the Beninese
hospital’s yard and in water intended for visitors’ hand washing in the hospital. Thus,
one route of transmission of these ARGs within hospitals might be via hands contami-
nated by hand washing water, which might explain the high prevalence of these genes
in hospitals. Jacobs and colleagues have also drawn attention to the potentially inferior
microbiological water quality in similar hand washing water tanks, which are very com-
mon in West Africa (2).
We speculate that the dominance of blaGES carbapenemase genes might have been
caused by selection pressure due to the presence of antibiotic residues in the HWW.
However, as carbapenem antibiotics are used less in West African countries than in
North America and Southern and Central Europe, due to their high price (15), we sug-
gest that compounds from other antibiotic classes could have driven the selection. In
fact, blaGES genes are typically carried by class 1 integrons, in which they may be
coupled with multiple other ARGs (41). Thus, we speculate that class 1 integrons (12)
and coselection phenomena (25, 42) have a role in the dominance of blaGES in HWW in
Benin. That is, in the example of metagenome-assembled contigs in which quinolone
ARGs (qnrVC) and blaGES genes seemed to be located near each other, putatively car-
ried by the class 1 integron gene cassette, the selection pressure targeted to the quino-
lone ARG would enrich both genes even in the absence of the target substrate for
blaGES. However, there is a high sequence similarity among blaGES variants, which
include those conferring ESBL and carbapenem resistance. Therefore, we acknowledge
the possibility that the putative lack of specificity related to the read mapping might
have resulted in some misidentifications between the carbapenemase- and ESBL-
encoding variants of blaGES genes. Nonetheless, ESBL-producing bacteria are very com-
mon in African countries (43) and cause major challenges for infection control (28) as
carbapenem antibiotics are less available.
Although the lowest sum of the relative abundance of ARGs was detected in HWW
from Finland, some of the seven carbapenemase genes showed higher relative abundan-
anaerobes, unlike the Finnish HWW, which flows through the system. Significant preva-
lence of anaerobic genera, such as Geobacter, Aminomonas, Flexilinea, and Desulfovibrio, as
well as genera of Synergistetes and Bacteroidales observed in HWW from Benin and Burkina
Faso and not in Finland, is in line with this speculation except for the last-mentioned taxa,
which are typical human gut commensals (53). These findings also align with the previous
reports on bacterial genera typically found in soil and aquatic environments (54) and previ-
ously described to dominate HWW from Benin and Burkina Faso (55). Genera of the faculta-
tively anaerobic bacteria, such as the lactic acid bacterium Aeromonas, and of the anaero-
bic bacterium Bifidobacterium (56), which are considered typical human gut microbes (53),
were significantly differentially abundant in the Finnish HWW instead of HWW of Benin or
Burkina Faso.
Compared to many high-income countries, such as those in Northern Europe, anti-
biotic usage in agricultural (4, 5) and clinical (2) settings differs (15) and is less con-
trolled—or even unregulated—in many African countries. For example, while banned
in many other countries, the use of colistin as a feed additive is allowed in many LMICs
(57), including in Africa (5). mcr-5 was the most commonly detected mcr gene in the
HWW in our study, contrary to previous reports on the prevalence of mcr genes glob-
ally (21) and in Africa (22, 58). This difference may be due to the methodologies used
to screen for colistin resistance. Other than the best-known mcr genes (mcr-1, -2, and
-3), other mcr gene variants are rarely targeted when screening for mcr genes using
conventional PCR (59). Therefore, our study shows that to obtain a more realistic view
of mcr genes in Africa, screening should be conducted for a broader set of different
mcr genes, as was recently done by Ngbede and colleagues (60).
The mcr-5 gene detected was embedded in a Tn3-like element, similar to previous
reports for Salmonella enterica (61, 62) and Escherichia coli (63) plasmids and the chro-
mosome of Cupriavidus gilardii (61). These Tn3-like elements are flanked by inverted
repeats, which enable translocation and putatively a broad host range for the mcr-5-
harboring element (61–63). Based on our results, the occurrences of mcr-5 and other
mcr genes in Benin and Burkina Faso were not restricted to HWW septic tanks. These
genes were also detected in water intended for the hand washing of visitors to the
hospital. The high prevalence of mcr-5 among various samples in this study raises
families as well as other carbapenemase genes studied here (Table S3A). For instance, only blaGES var-
iants known to encode carbapenemases were included in the visualization (Fig. 4), while those encoding
ESBL phenotypes were not. Similarly, ARG clustering of 90% shared nucleotide identity was applied to
group mcr variants (Table S3B).
To study the genetic environment of ARGs, a subset of samples was assembled into contigs with MEGAHIT
(v.1.2.8) (81) with parameters –min-contig-len 1000 -m 32000000000. The anvi’o (v.7) (82) and Bandage (83) pro-
grams were applied to visualize the genetic environments (Fig. S5 and S7 in the Supplemental Data
Repository). For the mcr-5 gene, one to two mcr-5-positive samples from all studied countries were selected for
the assembly and the analysis of the genetic background. The same samples were used to search putative inte-
gron-carried multidrug resistance gene cassettes. Those putative gene cassettes with multiple ARGs encoded
by the same fragment are represented in Fig. S4 in the Supplemental Data Repository.
Statistical analyses. (i) General. All statistical analyses described below were performed for the 68
HWW samples (Table 1; Data Set 1, Sheet 1). The sum of the relative abundances for ARGs, MGEs, and
intI1 was obtained using 16S rRNA gene counts and gene lengths to normalize the count data. As the
data did not fulfill the assumptions of normality, a Kruskal-Wallis test from the stats package (v.4.2.0)
(84) was applied to study whether the differences between countries were significant. Pairwise Wilcoxon
rank sum tests adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg from the stats package (v.4.2.0) (84) were performed to
determine which comparisons were significant for ARGs and intI1. Pearson correlations for the relative
abundances of ARGs and MGEs were computed using package ggpubr (v 0.4.0.999) (85, see below).
(ii) Compositional analyses. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data are compositional as they contain
only relative information (37). By ignoring this compositional nature of NGS data, results conducted by tradi-
tional normalization methods may suffer from technical artifacts due to sequencing depth limitations (86).
The ANOVA-Like Differential Expression tool for high-throughput sequencing data (ALDEx2) (v.1.28.0) (36)
was applied to study the divergent features of the resistomes in HWW from each studied country. ALDEx2
handles the compositionality of the data by applying suitable data transformations. To study the differentially
abundant ARGs in this study, additive log ratio (alr) transformation was used with the 16S rRNA gene as the
denominator gene. First, the ARG count data were split, so that pairwise comparisons between countries
were possible (e.g., Benin versus Finland). The command aldex.clr(df, conditions, denom = ref) excludes the
features with zero count in all samples and performs the alr transformation with the selected reference gene.
The significance of the comparisons was tested using the Wilcoxon rank test [command aldex.ttest(x, paired.t-
est = FALSE, verbose = FALSE)], in which Benjamini-Hochberg corrections control false-positive identifications.
Finally, the effect sizes and the within- and between-condition values were estimated with the command
aldex.effect. ALDEx2 (36) was also applied to study the differentially abundant taxa between the HWWs from
different countries. For that, centered log ratio transformation, which uses the geometric mean of the sample
vector as the reference, was applied to Metaphlan3 count data (generated using the parameter -t rel_ab_-
w_read_stats), and the significance of the comparisons was tested similarly as described above.
For principal-component analysis (PCA) ordinations, clr-transformed ARG, MGE, and taxon counts
(generated by Metaphlan3 with parameter -t rel_ab_w_read_stats) were visualized using microViz
(v.0.9.1) (87) with the command count_data %.% tax_transform(“clr”) %.% ord_calc(method = “PCA”)
%.% ord_plot(color = “country”). For PCA, taxa were fixed to the genus level as described earlier. The
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Supplemental material is available online only.
TABLE S1, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.
TABLE S2, XLSX file, 0.1 MB.
TABLE S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB.
TABLE S4, XLSX file, 0.02 MB.
DATA SET S1, XLSX file, 0.1 MB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the staff in all of the participating hospitals for their collaboration in
sampling. We also thank the laboratory personnel of the Research Unit in Applied
Microbiology and Pharmacology of Natural Substances at the University of Abomey-
Calavi in Benin and the Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro (CRUN) in Burkina Faso for
sample processing. Finally, we acknowledge CSC, IT Center for Science, Finland, for
providing the computational resources for the study.
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (grant no. 346125, 318643, and
316708) and the University of Helsinki HiLife Grand Challenges funding. Open access
funded by Helsinki University Library.
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organization. 2016. Global action plan on antimicrobial re- 19. Nordmann P, Poirel L. 2014. The difficult-to-control spread of carbapene-
sistance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509763. mase producers among Enterobacteriaceae worldwide. Clin Microbiol
2. Jacobs J, Hardy L, Semret M, Lunguya O, Phe T, Affolabi D, Yansouni C, Infect 20:821–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12719.
Vandenberg O. 2019. Diagnostic bacteriology in district hospitals in sub- 20. Falagas ME, Kasiakou Sofia K. 2005. Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for
Saharan Africa: at the forefront of the containment of antimicrobial resist- the management of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infec-
ance. Front Med (Lausanne) 6:205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00205. tions. Clin Infect Dis 40:1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1086/429323.
3. Belachew SA, Hall L, Selvey LA. 2021. Non-prescription dispensing of anti- 21. Ling Z, Yin W, Shen Z, Wang Y, Shen J, Walsh TR. 2020. Epidemiology of
biotic agents among community drug retail outlets in sub-Saharan Afri- mobile colistin resistance genes mcr-1 to mcr-9. J Antimicrob Chemother
can countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist 75:3087–3095. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa205.
Infect Control 10:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00880-w. 22. Anyanwu MU, Odilichukwu C, Okpala R, Chah KF, Shoyinka VS. 2021. Preva-
4. Butcher A, Cañada JA, Sariola S. 2021. How to make noncoherent problems lence and traits of mobile colistin resistance gene harbouring isolates from
more productive: towards an AMR management plan for low resource live- different ecosystems in Africa. Biomed Res Int 2021:6630379. https://doi.org/
stock sectors. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8:287. https://doi.org/10.1057/ 10.1155/2021/6630379.
s41599-021-00965-w. 23. Collignon P, Beggs JJ, Walsh TR, Gandra S, Laxminarayan R. 2018. Anthro-
5. Van TTH, Yidana Z, Smooker PM, Coloe PJ. 2020. Antibiotic use in food pological and socioeconomic factors contributing to global antimicrobial
animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: pluses and minuses. J Glob resistance: a univariate and multivariable analysis. Lancet Planet Health 2:
Antimicrob Resist 20:170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031. e398–e405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30186-4.
6. Martínez JL, Coque TM, Baquero F. 2015. What is a resistance gene? Rank- 24. van Boeckel TP, Pires J, Silvester R, Zhao C, Song J, Criscuolo NG, Gilbert
ing risk in resistomes. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:116–123. https://doi.org/10 M, Bonhoeffer S, Laxminarayan R. 2019. Global trends in antimicrobial re-
.1038/nrmicro3399. sistance in animals in low-and middle-income countries. Science 365:
7. Zhang AN, Gaston JM, Dai CL, Zhao S, Poyet M, Groussin M, Yin X, Li LG, van eaaw1944. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1944.
Loosdrecht MCM, Topp E, Gillings MR, Hanage WP, Tiedje JM, Moniz K, Alm EJ, 25. Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AKM, Wertheim HFL, Sumpradit
Zhang T. 2021. An omics-based framework for assessing the health risk of anti- N, Vlieghe E, Hara GL, Gould IM, Goossens H, Greko C, So AD, Bigdeli M,
microbial resistance genes. Nat Commun 12:4765. https://doi.org/10.1038/ Tomson G, Woodhouse W, Ombaka E, Peralta AQ, Qamar FN, Mir F,
Kariuki S, Bhutta ZA, Coates A, Bergstrom R, Wright GD, Brown ED, Cars O.
s41467-021-25096-3.
2013. Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect
8. Nielsen TK, Browne PD, Hansen LH. 2022. Antibiotic resistance genes are
Dis 13:1057–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9.
differentially mobilized according to resistance mechanism. Gigascience
26. Iskandar K, Molinier L, Hallit S, Sartelli M, Hardcastle TC, Haque M, Lugova H,
11:giac072. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac072.
Dhingra S, Sharma P, Islam S, Mohammed I, Naina Mohamed I, Hanna PA,
9. Karkman A, Berglund F, Flach CF, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. 2020. Pre-
Hajj SE, Jamaluddin NAH, Salameh P, Roques C. 2021. Surveillance of antimi-
dicting clinical resistance prevalence using sewage metagenomic data.
crobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a scattered picture.
https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial 49. van Duin D, Doi Y. 2017. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-pro-
-resistance-europe-2019. ducing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence 8:460–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/
33. Buelow E, Rico A, Gaschet M, Lourenço J, Kennedy SP, Wiest L, Ploy M-C, 21505594.2016.1222343.
Dagot C. 2020. Hospital discharges in urban sanitation systems: long- 50. Mushi MF, Mshana SE, Imirzalioglu C, Bwanga F. 2014. Carbapenemase
term monitoring of wastewater resistome and microbiota in relationship genes among multidrug resistant Gram negative clinical isolates from a
to their eco-exposome. Water Res X 7:100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. Biomed Res Int 2014:303104.
.wroa.2020.100045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/303104.
34. Luk-In S, Pulsrikarn C, Bangtrakulnonth A, Chatsuwan T, Kulwichit W. 51. WHO Regional Office for Europe and European Centre for Disease Preven-
2017. Occurrence of a novel class 1 integron harboring qnrVC4 in Salmo- tion and Control. 2021. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe,
nella Rissen. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 88:282–286. https://doi.org/10 2020. Executive Summary. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/i/item/
.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.03.016. 9789289056298.
35. Xia R, Guo X, Zhang Y, Xu H. 2010. qnrVC-like gene located in a novel com- 52. Räisänen K, Lyytikäinen O, Kauranen J, Tarkka E, Forsblom-Helander B,
plex class 1 integron harboring the ISCR1 element in an Aeromonas punc- Grönroos JO, Vuento R, Arifulla D, Sarvikivi E, Toura S, Jalava J. 2020. Mo-
tata strain from an aquatic environment in Shandong Province, China. lecular epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in
Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3471–3474. https://doi.org/10.1128/ Finland, 2012–2018. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39:1651–1656. https://
AAC.01668-09. doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03885-w.
36. Fernandes AD, Reid JNS, Macklaim JM, McMurrough TA, Edgell DR, Gloor 53. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ. 2012. Human gut microbiome viewed
GB. 2014. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: across age and geography. Nature 486:222–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/
characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth nature11053.
experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome 2:15. https://doi 54. Thompson LR, Sanders JG, McDonald D, Amir A, Ladau J, Locey KJ, Prill RJ,
.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-15. Tripathi A, Gibbons SM, Ackermann G, Navas-Molina JA, Janssen S,
37. Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ. 2017. Micro- Kopylova E, Vázquez-Baeza Y, González A, Morton JT, Mirarab S, Zech Xu
biome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front Micro- Z, Jiang L, Haroon MF, Kanbar J, Zhu Q, Jin Song S, Kosciolek T, Bokulich
biol 8:2224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224. NA, Lefler J, Brislawn CJ, Humphrey G, Owens SM, Hampton-Marcell J,
38. Ma L, Li AD, Le Yin X, Zhang T. 2017. The prevalence of integrons as the Berg-Lyons D, McKenzie V, Fierer N, Fuhrman JA, Clauset A, Stevens RL,
carrier of antibiotic resistance genes in natural and man-made environ- Shade A, Pollard KS, Goodwin KD, Jansson JK, Gilbert JA, Knight R, Earth
ments. Environ Sci Technol 51:5721–5728. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est Microbiome Project Consortium. 2017. A communal catalogue reveals
.6b05887. Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551:457–463. https://doi
39. Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, Kattula D, Burkert F. 2017. Global priority .org/10.1038/nature24621.
list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and devel- 55. Oyem IM, Oyem HH, Atuanya EI. 2020. Molecular characterisation of bac-
opment of new antibiotics. http://remed.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/ teria strains of septic tank sewage samples from related sites in Delta and
Edo States of Nigeria using 16S rRNA denaturing gradient gel electropho-
03/lobal-priority-list-of-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria-2017.pdf. Accessed 3
resis (DGGE). Afr J Environ Sci Technol 14:132–138. https://doi.org/10
February 2019.
.5897/AJEST2020.2851.
40. Rice EW, Wang P, Smith AL, Stadler LB. 2020. Determining hosts of antibi-
56. Pärnänen K, Karkman A, Hultman J, Lyra C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Larsson
otic resistance genes: a review of methodological advances. Environ Sci
DGJ, Rautava S, Isolauri E, Salminen S, Kumar H, Satokari R, Virta M. 2018.
Technol Lett 7:282–291. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00202.
Maternal gut and breast milk microbiota affect infant gut antibiotic resis-
41. Araújo S, Sousa M, Tacão M, Baraúna RA, Silva A, Ramos R, Alves A, Manaia
tome and mobile genetic elements. Nat Commun 9:389. https://doi.org/
CM, Henriques I. 2021. Carbapenem-resistant bacteria over a wastewater
10.1038/s41467-018-06393-w.
treatment process: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in untreated
57. Olumuyiwa Olaitan A, Dandachi I, Alexandra Baron S, Daoud Z, Morand S,
wastewater and intrinsically-resistant bacteria in final effluent. Sci Total Envi-
Rolain JM. 2021. Banning colistin in feed additives: a small step in the
town, Benin (West Africa). IAHS-AISH Proc Rep 361:191–196. https://doi 77. Oksanen J, Blanchet GF, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D,
.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2668.0168. Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E,
66. Bougnom BP, Zongo C, McNally A, Ricci V, Etoa FX, Thiele-Bruhn S, Wagner H. 2022. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version
Piddock LJV. 2019. Wastewater used for urban agriculture in West Africa 2.5–7. https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
as a reservoir for antibacterial resistance dissemination. Environ Res 168: 78. Thomas AM, Segata N. 2019. Multiple levels of the unknown in microbiome
14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.022. research. BMC Biol 17:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-019-0667-z.
67. Bougnom BP, Thiele-Bruhn S, Ricci V, Zongo C, Piddock LJV. 2020. Raw waste- 79. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible
water irrigation for urban agriculture in three African cities increases the interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:
abundance of transferable antibiotic resistance genes in soil, including those e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217.
encoding extended spectrum b -lactamases (ESBLs). Sci Total Environ 698: 80. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. 2012. Sequence analysis CD-HIT: acceler-
134201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134201. ated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics
68. Mölder F, Jablonski KP, Letcher B, Hall MB, Tomkins-Tinch CH, Sochat V, 28:3150–3152. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565.
Forster J, Lee S, Twardziok SO, Kanitz A, Wilm A, Holtgrewe M, Rahmann 81. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast sin-
S, Nahnsen S, Köster J. 2021. Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake. gle-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via suc-
F1000Res 10:33. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.29032.1. cinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. https://doi.org/10
69. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput .1093/bioinformatics/btv033.
sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. 82. Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, Schechter MS, Fink I, Pan JN,
70. Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. 2016. Data and text mining Mul- Yousef M, Fogarty EC, Trigodet F, Watson AR, Esen ÖC, Moore RM,
tiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single Clayssen Q, Lee MD, Kivenson V, Graham ED, Merrill BD, Karkman A,
report. Bioinformatics 32:3047–3048. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/ Blankenberg D, Eppley JM, Sjödin A, Scott JJ, Vázquez-Campos X, McKay
btw354. LJ, McDaniel EA, Stevens SLR, Anderson RE, Fuessel J, Fernandez-Guerra
71. Marcel M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput A, Maignien L, Delmont TO, Willis AD. 2021. Community-led, integrated,
sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12. https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200. reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol 6:3–6. https://doi
72. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie .org/10.1038/s41564-020-00834-3.
2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923. 83. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization
73. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. https://doi
A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, Fagelhauer L, Chakraborty T, .org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383.
Neumann B, Werner G, Bender JK, Stingl K, Nguyen M, Coppens J, Xavier 84. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2022. R: a language and environment
BB, Malhotra-Kumar S, Westh H, Pinholt M, Anjum MF, Duggett NA, for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/. https://www.r-project.org/.
Kempf I, Nykäsenoja S, Olkkola S, Wieczorek K, Amaro A, Clemente L, 85. Kassambara A. 2022. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plots. https://
Mossong J, Losch S, Ragimbeau C, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2020. ResFinder cran.r-project.org/package=ggpubr.
4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemo- 86. Quinn TP, Erb I, Gloor G, Notredame C, Richardson MF, Crowley TM. 2019.
ther 75:3491–3500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa345. A field guide for the compositional analysis of any-omics data. Giga-
74. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, science 8:giz107. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz107.
Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 87. Barnett D, Arts I, Penders J. 2021. microViz: an R package for microbiome
2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics data visualization and statistics. J Open Source Softw 6:3201. https://doi
25:2078–2079. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. .org/10.21105/joss.03201.
75. Beghini F, McIver LJ, Blanco-Míguez A, Dubois L, Asnicar F, Maharjan S, 88. Wickham H. 2022. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. https://
Mailyan A, Manghi P, Scholz M, Thomas AM, Valles-Colomer M, Weingart ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
G, Zhang Y, Zolfo M, Huttenhower C, Franzosa EA, Segata N. 2021. Inte- 89. Pedersen TL. 2020. patchwork: the composer of plots. https://cran.r-project
grating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse micro- .org/package=patchwork.
bial communities with bioBakery 3. eLife 10:e65088. https://doi.org/10 90. South A. 2017. rnaturalearth: world map data from Natural Earth. https://