0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

Calculating Sensitivity, Specificity, and Probabilities

Question

Uploaded by

feridhusen2016
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

Calculating Sensitivity, Specificity, and Probabilities

Question

Uploaded by

feridhusen2016
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

(12)Question

To calculate the values requested, we can use the following formulas:


a) Sensitivity = (True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives)) * 100
b) Specificity = (True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives)) *
100
c) Predictive Value Positive = (True Positives / (True Positives + False
Positives)) * 100
d) Negative Predictive Value = (True Negatives / (True Negatives + False
Negatives)) * 100
e) Prevalence = (True Positives + False Negatives) / Total Population
Let's calculate each value step by step:
a) Sensitivity:
Sensitivity = (480 / (480 + 20)) * 100
Sensitivity = 96%
b) Specificity:
Specificity = (1880 / (1880 + 120)) * 100
Specificity = 94%
c) Predictive Value Positive:
Predictive Value Positive = (480 / (480 + 120)) * 100
Predictive Value Positive = 80%
d) Negative Predictive Value:
Negative Predictive Value = (1880 / (1880 + 20)) * 100
Negative Predictive Value = 98.9%
e) Prevalence:
Prevalence = (480 + 20) / 1500
Prevalence = 33.3%
Therefore, the calculated values are:
a) Sensitivity = 96%
b) Specificity = 94%
c) Predictive Value Positive = 80%
d) Negative Predictive Value = 98.9%
e) Prevalence = 33.3

(13)Question

13. To calculate the predictive value negative (PVN) of the new test for
hepatitis C in a group of IV drug users with a known prevalence of
hepatitis C of 20%, we need to use the following formula

PVN = (1 - Prevalence) × Specificity / [(1 - Prevalence) × Specificity +


Prevalence × (1 - Sensitivity)]

Given information:
- Sensitivity of the new test = 50%
- Specificity of the new test = 75%
- Prevalence of hepatitis C in the group of IV drug users = 20%
Plugging in the values, we get:

PVN = (1 - 0.20) × 0.75 / [(1 - 0.20) × 0.75 + 0.20 × (1 - 0.50)]


PVN = 0.80 × 0.75 / (0.80 × 0.75 + 0.20 × 0.50)
PVN = 0.60 / (0.60 + 0.10)
PVN = 0.60 / 0.70
PVN = 0.857 or 85.7%

Therefore, the predictive value negative of the new test for hepatitis C
in the group of IV drug users is 85.7%.

(14)Question

To solve this problem, we need to use the standard normal distribution


and the given parameters (mean and standard deviation) to calculate
the probabilities.

a) Probability of having a cholesterol value between 180 and 200


mg/100 ml:
Mean (μ) = 200 mg/100 ml
Standard deviation (σ) = 20 mg/100 ml
Z-score for 180 mg/100 ml = (180 - 200) / 20 = -1
Z-score for 200 mg/100 ml = (200 - 200) / 20 = 0
Probability = P(Z between -1 and 0) = P(Z ≤ 0) - P(Z ≤ -1) = 0.5 - 0.1587 =
0.3413 or 34.13%

b) Probability of having a cholesterol value greater than 225 mg/100


ml:
Z-score for 225 mg/100 ml = (225 - 200) / 20 = 1.25
Probability = P(Z > 1.25) = 1 - P(Z ≤ 1.25) = 1 - 0.8944 = 0.1056 or
10.56%

c) Probability of having a cholesterol value less than 150 mg/100 ml:


Z-score for 150 mg/100 ml = (150 - 200) / 20 = -2.5
Probability = P(Z < -2.5) = 0.0062 or 0.62%

d) Probability of having a cholesterol value between 190 and 210


mg/100 ml:
Z-score for 190 mg/100 ml = (190 - 200) / 20 = -0.5
Z-score for 210 mg/100 ml = (210 - 200) / 20 = 0.5
Probability = P(Z between -0.5 and 0.5) = P(Z ≤ 0.5) - P(Z ≤ -0.5) = 0.6915
- 0.3085 = 0.383 or 38.3%

(15)Qestion
let's solve this problem step-by-step:

a) Probability that in the next year, among patients receiving


rocuronium, exactly three will experience anaphylaxis:

The Poisson probability mass function is given by:


P(X = x) = (e^(-λ) × λ^x) / x!

Where:
- e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.718)
- λ is the average number of incidents per year
- x is the number of events (in this case, 3 anaphylaxis incidents)

Since the question does not provide the value of λ, let's assume it is 2
incidents per year.

Plugging in the values:


P(X = 3) = (e^(-2) × 2^3) / 3!
P(X = 3) = (e^(-2) × 8) / 6
P(X = 3) = 0.1839 or 18.39%

b) Probability that at least three patients in the next year will


experience anaphylaxis if rocuronium is administered with anesthesia:
The probability of at least three anaphylaxis incidents is the
complement of the probability of less than three incidents:
P(X ≥ 3) = 1 - P(X < 3)

To calculate P(X < 3), we need to find the probability of 0 incidents, 1


incident, and 2 incidents, and then add them together:
P(X < 3) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2)

Plugging in the values:


P(X = 0) = e^(-2) = 0.1353
P(X = 1) = 2e^(-2) = 0.2707
P(X = 2) = 2^2e^(-2) / 2! = 0.2707

P(X < 3) = 0.1353 + 0.2707 + 0.2707 = 0.6767

P(X ≥ 3) = 1 - 0.6767 = 0.3233 or 32.33%

Therefore, the probability that at least three patients in the next year
will experience anaphylaxis if rocuronium is administered with
anesthesia is 32.33%.

You might also like