Epilepsie
Epilepsie
Personalized
Medicine
Review
State of the Art and Challenges in Epilepsy—
A Narrative Review
Aida Mihaela Manole 1,† , Carmen Adella Sirbu 2,3,† , Mihaela Raluca Mititelu 4,5, * , Octavian Vasiliu 6 ,
Lorenzo Lorusso 7 , Octavian Mihai Sirbu 2,8, * and Florentina Ionita Radu 9,10
1 Department of Neurology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital,
010242 Bucharest, Romania
2 Clinical Neurosciences Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest,
050474 Bucharest, Romania
3 Centre for Cognitive Research in Neuropsychiatric Pathology (Neuropsy-Cog), Department of Neurology,
Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes, ” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timis, oara, Romania
4 Nuclear Medicine Department, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital,
010242 Bucharest, Romania
5 Department No.8, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila” Bucharest,
050474 Bucharest, Romania
6 Department of Psychiatry, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital,
010242, Bucharest, Romania
7 Neurology Unit—Neuroscience Dept. A.S.S.T.Lecco, Merate Hospital, 23807 Merate, Italy
8 Department of Neurosurgery, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital,
010242 Bucharest, Romania
9 Department of Gastroenterology, ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ Central Military Emergency University Hospital,
010825 Bucharest, Romania
10 Department of Gastroenterology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy,
020021 Bucharest, Romania
* Correspondence: raluca.mititelu@umfcd.ro (M.R.M.); octaviansirbu@gmail.com (O.M.S.)
† These authors contributed equally to this study.
Abstract: Epilepsy is a common condition worldwide, with approximately 50 million people suffering
from it. A single seizure does not mean epilepsy; almost 10% of the population can have a seizure
during their lifetime. In particular, there are many other central nervous system disorders other
Citation: Manole, A.M.; Sirbu, C.A.; than epilepsy in which seizures occur, either transiently or as a comorbid condition. The impact of
Mititelu, M.R.; Vasiliu, O.; Lorusso,
seizures and epilepsy is, therefore, widespread and easily underestimated. It is estimated that about
L.; Sirbu, O.M.; Ionita Radu, F. State
70% of patients with epilepsy could be seizure-free if correctly diagnosed and treated. However, for
of the Art and Challenges in
patients with epilepsy, quality of life is influenced not only by seizure control but also by antiepileptic
Epilepsy—A Narrative Review. J.
drug-adverse reactions, access to education, mood, employment, and transportation.
Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623. https://
doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040623
Keywords: seizure; seizure-free; quality of life; epilepsy; education; drug-resistant; medically
Academic Editor: Chiara Villa intractable; pharmacoresistant; surgery; neurosurgery
Received: 23 February 2023
Revised: 18 March 2023
Accepted: 29 March 2023
Published: 1 April 2023 1. Introduction
Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by epileptic syndromes, diverse
etiologies, and variable prognosis. Epileptic seizures are quite common, affecting between
8 and 10% of the population throughout their lifetime and accounting for 1–2% of pre-
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
sentations to an emergency room, and about a quarter of these will be first seizure with a
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
different type (Table 1) [1,2].
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
3. Etiology
While some causes of seizures (Table 2) can affect children of any age, others have a
predilection for certain age groups. In newborns, for example, most of them are symptoms
of an identifiable etiology, such as neonatal encephalopathy, a metabolic disorder, or a
systemic infection of the central nervous system. In older infants and young children,
febrile seizures are the most common, age-dependent cause [5]. A structural etiology
is determined when an abnormality is seen on neuroimaging and when the signs and
symptoms of seizures, in combination with electroencephalogram (EEG) data, suggest this
abnormality is the probable cause of the seizures. If the clinical and EEG data are discordant
with the localization of the visible anatomical abnormality, then the imaging modification
is not relevant to the patient’s epilepsy. The structural difference may be genetic, acquired,
or both.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 3 of 13
4. Clinical Aspects
Seizures in younger children are significantly different from those in older children
and adults (Table 3). Those older than 6 years tend to have seizures similar to adults, while
younger children have fewer complex behaviors, especially focal seizures with impaired
consciousness [6].
Focal epilepsy can develop at any time of life, and the etiology varies according to age,
as does the semiology vary according to location as well:
Temporal lobe epilepsy is one of the most typical regions. Many patients present with
aura, which may include „deja vu,” „jamais vu,” and „butterflies in the stomach”—epigastric
aura, fear, dyscognitive phenomena, or olfactory symptoms [12]. The aura is usually fol-
lowed by impaired/maintenance of consciousness but with the appearance of oromandibu-
lar or brachial automatisms or even dystonic postures. Symptomatology associated with the
nondominant lobe may include nausea and vomiting. The seizure lasts between 60 and 90 s
and is followed by a state of confusion which predominates in patients with dominant-lobe
damage [13]. If the focus is in the lateral area of the temporal lobe, perisylvian, the eloquent
areas, Wernicke’s area, or primary and secondary auditory cortex are affected, leading to
an aphasia-type language disorder or auditory aura. Localization at the temporo-occipital
junction may associate with vertigo symptoms or visual aura. The aura may progress to a
capped gaze followed rapidly by bilateralization [14].
Frontal lobe epilepsy is the second-most-frequent location. Compared to the previous
one, seizures are predominantly motor, of shorter duration, and have a nocturnal onset.
The postictal period is characterized by a rapid return of awareness and may occasionally
be associated with a motor deficit. Regarding semiology, it is divided into the primary
motor area, somatomotor area, orbitofrontal, dorsolateral, and opercular regions. Most
of them are associated with predominantly motor phenomena, but those in the posterior,
opercular zone can easily be mistaken for temporal lobe epilepsies through gaze capping,
automatism, and head and eyeball versa. Asymmetric tonic seizures, which are described
as tonic flexion of one arm and extension of the other, with or without tonic involvement of
the lower limbs, are associated with activation of the Brodmann area [15,16].
Parietal and occipital lobe epilepsy. In this case, this type of localization is much rarer
than the others. The occipital region is associated with elementary visual hallucinations,
unlike the temporal lobe, where complex visual hallucinations occur [17]. Parietal lobe
epilepsy may present with a somatosensory aura, which may be unilateral or bilateral. Both
types can spread rapidly and may mimic/associate semiological elements [18].
5. Diagnostic of Epilepsy
First of all, the diagnosis of epilepsy is a clinical one, and the other additional tests
are supportive. For an accurate diagnostic, there are some paraclinical tests illustrated in
Table 4. The first thing to consider in correctly diagnosing epilepsy is to determine whether
a paroxysmal clinical event is actually an epileptic seizure or another pathology. For the
differential diagnosis, we must consider all the causes of episodes of altered consciousness,
altered mental status, motor or sensory manifestations, and seizures, which are common in
other epilepsies. For epileptologists, it is often easy to recognize different forms of epilepsy
when they are able to obtain a clear history of events. However, at the same time, even the
most experienced epileptologists have great difficulty in reaching an unequivocal diagnosis
for various reasons, such as atypical seizure presentations, inadequate or incomplete
historical data, or overlapping symptomatic manifestations.
Test Result
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
EEG helps us to complete the diagnosis of epilepsy, choose
Focal spikes or sharp waves with associated slowing of the
appropriate therapy, monitor response to treatment, and
electrical activity in the area of the spikes.
determine candidates for antiepileptic drug withdrawal and
surgical localization.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 5 of 13
Table 4. Cont.
Test Result
Video-electroencephalogram (EEG) long-term monitoring
(LTM)
Video-EEG recording is useful and indicated in patients with Capturing seizure activity simultaneously on video recording
suspected psychogenic seizures, for epilepsy classification, and and EEG; increased EEG sampling may reveal evidence of
especially in those with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy, interictal abnormalities (spikes and sharp waves), which may
possible candidates for epilepsy surgery. It is also helpful in make the diagnosis of focal seizures more likely.
intensive care units in the evaluation of encephalopathies and
non-convulsive status epilepticus.
CT head
Usually ordered in emergencies in patients presenting with a
first seizure episode (37). It is useful for identifying acute causes Structural lesions
of seizures but is less sensitive to smaller abnormalities often
seen on MRI.
MRI brain
Neuroimaging helps us to identify the underlying etiology of
focal or generalized seizures and the location of the
epileptogenic area and to determine the surgical location in
focal pharmacoresistant epilepsies [19].
Structural injuries (mesial
The optimal MRI technique for patients with focal seizures is 3
temporal sclerosis, neoplastic lesions, vascular malformations,
Tesla studies with coronal, axial, and sagittal T1, T2, and FLAIR
and developmental lesions).
sections [20]. The epilepsy protocol should also include a 3D T1
with a volumetric acquisition, which allows better assessment of
cortical dysplasia or discrete focal lesions [21]. FLAIR has a 97%
accuracy in detecting abnormalities, especially temporal
sclerosis [22,23].
PET scan
Part of the surgical evaluation of treatment drug-resistant focal Ictal-hypermetabolic; interictal-hypometabolic
epilepsy.
Laboratory test Extreme hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia can cause provoked
- Blood glucose focal seizures.
- Toxicology screen
- FBC
- Electrolyte panel
- Lumbar puncture is indicated when CNS infection or an
immune etiology is suspected.
Genetic testing
Genetic testing is increasingly available for a number of
inherited syndromes but has variable clinical utility depending
on the clinical and genetic heterogeneity of a syndrome [24,25].
9. Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
Epilepsy is considered drug resistant if at least two appropriately chosen and used
antiseizure medications have failed to control seizures [46].
Various anticonvulsant drugs are available for the treatment of focal epilepsy with
seizures refractory to a first or alternative monotherapy. Anticonvulsant drugs that are cur-
rently used in clinical practice as adjunctive treatments include lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine,
levetiracetam, pregabalin, clobazam, zonisamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam,
gabapentin, lacosamide, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin, and perampanel [47].
In cases with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, approximately 35% of them will require
adjuvant therapy. In some studies, perampanel has been demonstrated to reduce seizure
frequency by 76.5%. Other antiepileptics such as Lamotrigine, Levetiracetam, and Topira-
mate have shown efficacy in first generalized tonic–clonic seizures not controlled by a first
or additional monotherapy [48].
There are situations where monotherapy cannot succeed, and the addition of a second
antiepileptic is necessary. The choice of an adjuvant is difficult because issues of efficacy,
tolerability, pharmacokinetic properties, drug interactions, and frequency of administration
must be taken into consideration. Therefore, in order to have an ideal and rational poly-
therapy, some criteria should be met: synergistic effects (their mixed effectiveness should
be higher than the sum of the efficacy of each individual anticonvulsant drug) and infra-
additive toxicity (their summed toxicity should be lower than the individual one). Preferred
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 10 of 13
combinations are those that have different mechanisms of action or that have multiple
mechanisms of action [49]. For generalized epilepsies, the combination with the maximal
evidence for synergistic potency is valproic acid and lamotrigine. Patients who have not
reacted to the top-tolerated dose of lamotrigine or valproic acid may have seizure control
by combining them. In some patients with Dravet syndrome, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome,
cannabidiol can be used, an enzyme-inhibiting drug that can boost serum concentrations of
the active metabolite of clobazam [50].
Other options for patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy include surgery, the use
of neurostimulation (vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS),
deep-brain stimulation (DBS)), and modern minimally invasive techniques, laser interstitial
thermal therapy (LITT), and stereotactic radiosurgery.
Candidates with focal epilepsy for resective surgery can be divided into:
• Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy or neocortical epilepsy;
• Lesional epilepsy due to focal structural pathology (low-grade glioma, cavernous
malformation);
• Nonlesional focal epilepsy.
Patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy require pre-surgical evaluation to properly
determine and define the epileptogenic area to be removed, subsequently to have a chance
to be seizure-free. For this purpose, a history is taken with the semiology of epileptic
seizures, frequency, and duration in order to better understand their location and epilepsy
subtype. An important marker is video-EEG monitoring to observe interictal, ictal changes,
and correspondence between symptoms and location of seizure onset. In some situations,
antiepileptic treatment is reduced to increase the possibility of seizure recording and make
sure that the patient is having only one type of seizure [51,52].
High-resolution brain imaging with epilepsy protocol is necessary to detect potential
abnormal structures that may be the cause of epileptic seizures. Neuropsychological testing
is necessary to detect any pre-surgical deficits that may be correlated with the seizure-onset
area and to predict possible postoperative deficits. Positron emission tomography (PET)
has proven to be useful, especially in cases with negative MRI; there may be areas of
hypometabolism that can confirm the epileptogenic site [53]. Once these investigations are
completed, and there is a reliable correlation between the symptoms and their outcome,
surgery can be performed. Otherwise, when in doubt, investigations should continue with
intracranial EEG monitoring. Intracranial EEG is also necessary when the seizure-onset
zone is close to the eloquent cortex.
Neurostimulation therapy may help patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who present
contraindications for epilepsy surgery or have epileptogenic regions close to the eloquent areas.
In general, a significant amount of epilepsy exploration endeavors have been centered
on the development of treatments and surgical interventions, but few clinical trials have
evaluated medical services, and etiologies, and there has been less evaluation of the process
of care and affiliated outcomes and costs.
It is well known that air pollution is also an important negative factor in exacerbating
neurological pathologies, epilepsy being no exception. That is why we need to create new
strategies and mechanisms to reduce its negative effects on the nervous system and mental
health [54,55].
10. Conclusions
Informing patients about all aspects of this pathology, such as triggers of seizures,
adverse reactions of treatment, and possible risks to which they are susceptible, can be
considered an important step in the management and, implicitly, in easier integration into
society. When doing so, it is important to consider the wider population, as those without
specialist care are likely to have poorer outcomes, which could be improved if outpatient
care were more accessible. These things combined draw our attention to the needs of these
patients and the care we need to take in managing both the underlying disease and adjacent
ones, which may or may not be secondary to treatment.
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 11 of 13
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, C.A.S. and A.M.M.; methodology, A.M.M., C.A.S., O.V.
and O.M.S.; software, A.M.M., C.A.S., M.R.M. and L.L.; validation, M.R.M., O.V., L.L. and F.I.R.;
formal analysis, M.R.M., O.V., L.L. and O.M.S.; investigation, A.M.M. and C.A.S.; resources, O.V.,
L.L., O.M.S. and F.I.R.; data curation, M.R.M., O.M.S. and F.I.R.; writing—original draft preparation,
A.M.M. and C.A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.M.M. and C.A.S.; visualization, O.M.S. and F.I.R.;
supervision, A.M.M. and C.A.S.; project administration, C.A.S. and A.M.M. All authors have read
and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol
Davila through the in-stitutional program Publish not Perish.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Annegers, J.F.; Hauser, W.A.; Lee, J.R.-J.; Rocca, W.A. Incidence of Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Rochester, Minnesota, 1935–1984.
Epilepsia 1995, 36, 327–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Hauser, W.A.; Annegers, J.F.; Kurland, L.T. Incidence of Epilepsy and Unprovoked Seizures in Rochester, Minnesota: 1935–1984.
Epilepsia 1993, 34, 453–458. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Fisher, R.S.; van Emde Boas, W.; Blume, W.; Elger, C.; Genton, P.; Lee, P.; Engel, J., Jr. Epileptic Seizures and Epilepsy: Definitions
Proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE). Epilepsia 2005, 46,
470–472. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Scheffer, I.E.; Berkovic, S.; Capovilla, G.; Connolly, M.B.; French, J.; Guilhoto, L.; Hirsch, E.; Jain, S.; Mathern, G.W.; Moshé,
S.L.; et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: Position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology.
Epilepsia 2017, 58, 512–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Fisher, R.S.; Cross, J.H.; French, J.A.; Higurashi, N.; Hirsch, E.; Jansen, F.E.; Lagae, L.; Moshé, S.L.; Peltola, J.; Perez, E.R.; et al.
Operational classification of seizure types by the International League Against Epilepsy: Position Paper of the ILAE Commission
for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia 2017, 58, 522–530. [CrossRef]
6. Korff, C.; Nordli, D.R. Do generalized tonic-clonic seizures in infancy exist? J. Neurol. 2005, 65, 1750. [CrossRef]
7. Riikonen, R. Long-term outcome of patients with West syndrome. Brain Dev. 2001, 23, 683–687. [CrossRef]
8. Crespel, A.; Gelisse, P.; Reed, R.C.; Ferlazzo, E.; Jerney, J.; Schmitz, B.; Genton, P. Management of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.
Epilepsy Behav. 2013, 28, S81–S86. [CrossRef]
9. Mooney, H.A.; Cropper, A.; Reid, W. The millennium ecosystem assessment: What is it all about? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19,
221–224. [CrossRef]
10. Tatum, W.O. 4th Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 29, 356–365. [CrossRef]
11. Loddenkemper, T.; Kotagal, P. Lateralizing signs during seizures in focal epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2005, 7, 1–17. [CrossRef]
12. Kennedy, J.D.; Schuele, S.U. Neocortical Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 29, 366–370. [CrossRef]
13. Bagla, R.; Skidmore, C.T. Frontal Lobe Seizures. Neurol. 2011, 17, 125–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Lee, R.W.; Worrell, G.A. Dorsolateral Frontal Lobe Epilepsy. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 29, 379–384. [CrossRef]
15. Salanova, V.; Andermann, F.; Oliver, A.; Rasmussen, T.; Quesney, L.F. Occipital lobe epilepsy: Electroclinical manifestations,
electrocorticography, cortical stimulation and outcome in 42 patients treated between 1930 and 1991. Brain 1992, 115, 1655–1680.
[CrossRef]
16. Salanova, V.; Andermann, F.; Rasmussen, T.; Olivier, A.; Quesney, L.F. Parietal lobe epilepsy Clinical manifestations and outcome
in 82 patients treated surgically between 1929 and 1988. Brain 1995, 118, 607–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Iniesta, I. John Hughlings Jackson and our understanding of the epilepsies 100 years on. Pr. Neurol. 2011, 11, 37–41. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
18. Fountain, N.B.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, S.I. Sleep Deprivation Activates Epileptiform Discharges Independent of the Activating Effects of
Sleep. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998, 15, 69–75. [CrossRef]
19. Bernasconi, A.; Bernasconi, N.; Bernhardt, B.C.; Schrader, D. Advances in MRI for ‘cryptogenic’ epilepsies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011,
7, 99–108. [CrossRef]
20. Winston, G.P.; Yogarajah, M.; Symms, M.R.; McEvoy, A.W.; Micallef, C.; Duncan, J.S. Diffusion tensor imaging tractography
to visualize the relationship of the optic radiation to epileptogenic lesions prior to neurosurgery. Epilepsia 2011, 52, 1430–1438.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Duncan, J.S. Imaging in the surgical treatment of epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2010, 6, 537–550. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 12 of 13
22. Krumholz, A.; Wiebe, S.; Gronseth, G.; Shinnar, S.; Levisohn, P.; Ting, T.; Hopp, J.; Shafer, P.; Morris, H.; Seiden, L.; et al.
Practice Parameter: Evaluating an apparent unprovoked first seizure in adults (an evidence- based review): Report of the Quality
Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Am. Epilepsy Soc. Neurol.
2007, 69, 1996. [CrossRef]
23. Doğan, E.A.; Ünal, A.; Ünal, A.; Erdoğan, Ç. Cinical utility of serum lactate levels for differential diagnosis of generalized
tonic-clonic seizures from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and syncope. Epilepsy Behav. 2017, 75, 13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Sheidley, B.R.; Malinowski, J.; Bergner, A.L.; Bier, L.; Gloss, D.S.; Mu, W.; Mulhern, M.M.; Partack, E.J. Genetic testing for the
epilepsies: A systematic review. Poduri Epilepsia 2022, 63, 375. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Ottman, R.; Hirose, S.; Jain, S.; Lerche, H.; Lopes-Cendes, I.; Noebels, J.; Serratosa, J.; Zara, F.; Scheffer, I. Genetic testing in the
epilepsies-Report of the ILAE Genetics Commission. Epilepsia 2010, 51, 655–670. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Panayiotopoulps, C.P. The Epilepsies, Seizure, Syndromes and Management; Bladon Medical Publishing: Oxfordshire, UK, 2005;
pp. 2–56.
27. Saklani, P.; Krahn, A.; Klein, G. Syncope. Circulation 2013, 127, 1330–1339. [CrossRef]
28. Louis, E.K.S.; Cascino, G.D. Diagnosis of Epilepsy and Related Episodic Disorders. Continuum 2016, 22, 23–26.
29. Beghi, E.; Giussani, G.; Sander, J.W. The natural history and prognosis of epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2015, 17, 243–253. [CrossRef]
30. Katherine, N. Counseling an Management of the Risks of Living With Epilepsy. Continuum 2019, 25, 477–485.
31. Nair, D.R. Management of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Continuum 2016, 22, 157–163. [CrossRef]
32. VanHaerents, S.; Gerard, E.E. Epilepsy Emergencies: Status Epilepticus, Acute Repetitive Seizures, and Autoimmune Encephalitis.
Continuum 2016, 25, 454–473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Mitrica, M.; Dumitru, R.; Sirbu, C. The seasonal incidence of intracranial hemorrhages. Romanian J. Mil. Med. 2020, 123, 360–365.
[CrossRef]
34. Pan, B.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Q.; Ge, L.; Gao, C.; Xun, Y.; Tian, J.; Ding, G. The impact of major dietary patterns on glycemic control,
cardiovascular risk factors, and weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes: A network meta-analysis. J. Evid.-Based Med. 2019,
12, 29–39. [CrossRef]
35. Fiest, K.M.; Dykeman, J.; Patten, S.B.; Wiebe, S.; Kaplan, G.G.; Maxwell, C.J.; Bulloch, A.G.; Jette, N. Depression in epilepsy: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2012, 80, 590–599. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Scott, A.J.; Sharpe, L.; Hunt, C.; Gandy, M. Anxiety and depressive disorders in people with epilepsy: A meta-analysis. Epilepsia
2017, 58, 973–982. [CrossRef]
37. Josephson, C.B.; Lowerison, M.; Vallerand, I.; Sajobi, T.; Patten, S.; Jette, N.; Wiebe, S. Association of Depression and Treated
Depression With Epilepsy and Seizure Outcomes. JAMA Neurol. 2017, 74, 533–539. [CrossRef]
38. Barry, J.J.; Ettinger, A.B.; Friel, P.; Gilliam, F.G.; Harden, C.L.; Hermann, B.; Kanner, A.M.; Caplan, R.; Plioplys, S.; Salpekar, J.; et al.
Consensus statement: The evaluation and treatment of people with epilepsy and affective disorders. Epilepsy Behav. 2008, 13,
S1–S29. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39. Miller, J.M.; Kustra, R.P.; Vuong, A.; Hammer, A.E.; Messenheimer, J.A. Depressive symptoms in epilepsy: Prevalence, impact,
etiology, biological correlates and effect of treatment with antiepileptic drugs. Drugs 2008, 68, 1493–1509. [CrossRef]
40. John, J.B.; Alan, B.E.; Peggy, F.; Frank, G.G.; Cynthia, L.H.; Bruce, H.; Andres, M.K.; Rochelle, C.; Sigita, P.; Salpekar, J.; et al.
Consensus statement: The evaluation and treatment of people with epilepsy and affective disorders. Epilepsy Behav. 2008, 13,
S1–S29.
41. Naik, P.A.; Fleming, M.E.; Bhatia, P.; Harden, C.L. Do drivers with epilepsy have higher rates of motor vehicle accidents than
those without epilepsy? Epilepsy Behav. 2015, 47, 111–114. [CrossRef]
42. Camfield, C.; Camfield, P. Injuries from seizures are a serious, persistent problem in childhood onset epilepsy: A population-based
study. Seizure 2015, 27, 80–83. [CrossRef]
43. Birutė, T.; Mireia del Toro, R.; Grikiniene, J.; Samaitiene-Aleknienė, R.; Praninskienė, R.; Monavari, A.A.; Sykut-Cegielska, J.
Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Inherited Metabolic Diseases and Epilepsy: Current Perspectives. J. Multidiscip. Healthcare
2022, 15, 553–566.
44. Taylor, C.; Tudur-Smith, C.; Dixon, P.; Linehan, C.; Gunko, A.; Christensen, J.M.P.; Tomson, T.; Marson, A. The ESBACE consortium
and EuroNASH collab. Care in Europe after presenting to the emergency department with a seizure, position paper and insights
from the European Audit of Seizure Management in Hospitals. Eur. J. Neurol. 2022, 29, 1873–1884. [CrossRef]
45. Bauer, D.; Quigg, M. Optimizing Management of Medically Responsive Epilepsy. Contin. Lifelong Learn. Neurol. 2019, 25, 343–361.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Kwan, P.; Arzimanoglou, A.; Berg, A.T.; Brodie, M.J.; Allen Hauser, W.; Mathern, G.; Moshé, S.L.; Perucca, E.; Wiebe, S.; French, J.
Definition of drug resistant epilepsy: Consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic
Strategies. Epilepsia 2010, 51, 1069–1077. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Francesco, B.; Anthony, M. Approach to the Medical Treatment of Epilepsy. Continuum 2022, 28, 483–499.
48. French, J.A.; Krauss, G.L.; Wechsler, R.T.; Wang, X.-F.; DiVentura, B.; Brandt, C.; Trinka, E.; O’Brien, T.J.; Laurenzam, A.; Patten,
A.; et al. Perampanel for tonic clonic seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: A randomized trial. Neurology 2015, 85, 950–957.
[CrossRef]
49. Brigo, F.; Ausserer, H.; Tezzon, F.; Nardone, R. When one plus one makes three: The quest for rational antiepileptic polytherapy
with supraadditive anticonvulsant efficacy. Epilepsy Behav. 2013, 27, 439–442. [CrossRef]
J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 623 13 of 13
50. Verrotti, A.; Lattanzi, S.; Brigo, F.; Zaccara, G. Pharmacodynamic interactions of antiepileptic drugs: From bench to clinical
practice. Epilepsy Behav. 2020, 104, 106939. [CrossRef]
51. Jobst, B.C.; Siegel, A.M.; Thadani, V.M.; Roberts, D.W.; Rhodes, H.C.; Williamson, P.D. Intractable Seizures of Frontal Lobe Origin:
Clinical Characteristics, Localizing Signs, and Results of Surgery. Epilepsia 2000, 41, 1139–1152. [CrossRef]
52. Jobst, B.C.; Williamson, P.D.; Neuschwander, T.B.; Darcey, T.M.; Thadani, V.M.; Roberts, D.W. Secondarily Generalized Seizures in
Mesial Temporal Epilepsy: Clinical Characteristics, Lateralizing Signs, and Association With Sleep–Wake Cycle. Epilepsia 2001, 42,
1279–1287. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
53. Capraz, I.Y.; Kurt, G.; Akdemir, Ö.; Hirfanoglu, T.; Oner, Y.; Sengezer, T.; Kapucu, L.O.A.; Serdaroglu, A.; Bilir, E. Surgical outcome
in patients with MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure 2015, 29, 63–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Chen, Z.; Yu, W.; Xu, R.; Karoly, P.J.; Maturana, M.I.; Payne, D.E.; Li, L.; Nurse, E.S.; Freestone, D.R.; Li, S.; et al. Ambient air
pollution and epileptic seizures: A panel study in Australia. Epilepsia 2022, 63, 1682–1692. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
55. Sîrbu, C.A.; Stefan, I.; Dumitru, R.; Mitrica, M.; Manole, A.M.; Vasile, T.M.; Stefani, C.; Ranetti, A.E. Air Pollution and Its
Devastating Effects on the Central Nervous System. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1170. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.