The Song of

the Greys
Nigel Kerner

NEW ENGLISH LIBRARY

Hodder and Stoughton

OceanofPDF.com
Copyright © 1997 by Nigel Kerner

First published in 1997 by Hodder and Stoughton First published in paperback in 1998 by Hodder
and Stoughton A division of Hodder Headline PLC

A New English Library paperback

The right of Nigel Kerner to be identified as the Author of the Work has been asserted by him in
accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the publisher, nor be
otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and
without a similar condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.

British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A CIP catalogue record for this title is available from
the British Library.

ISBN O 340 69582 X

Printed and bound in Great Britain by Mackays of Chatham PLC, Chatham, Kent

Hodder and Stoughton A division of Hodder Headline PLC 338 Euston Road London NW1 3BH

OceanofPDF.com
 To Darren
and all the little ones of our human family.

OceanofPDF.com
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

My sincere thanks to Ms. Danielle Silverman for her dedicated and faithful
help in assembling this work. I am grateful to Dr Andrew Silverman for his
cooperation and reassurance that chapters 3 & 4 can be understood.

My thanks to my secretary Marion Fallows for her patience, fortitude and

gentle calming of a harassed mind while the book was being written. Thank
you, Daniel Langsman, for your marvellous artwork, illustrating what must
have been a fog of obscure ideas, and last but not least I am deeply grateful
to my son Julian for leading me out of the Stone Age and confronting me
with this new-fangled device we call a Wordprocessor.

OceanofPDF.com
 CONTENTS

PREFACE 1

ONE THE ALIEN PHENOMENON 5

TWO ‘BANG GOES OUR FUTURE’ 21
THREE TO BE OR NOT TO BE – THAT IS THE ANSWER 25
FOUR A STARTING POINT 53
FIVE FREE WILL AND A DIRECTIVE FINALITY 71
SIX ADAM AND MADAM 78
SEVEN THE CHICKEN AND THE EGG 92
EIGHT OF GOD, MICE AND MEN 95
NINE TO LIVE AGAIN 98
TEN ‘OUR FATHERS WHO ART OF THE UNIVERSE’ 101
ELEVEN CLONING AND ALL THAT JAZZ 120
TWELVE THE WRONG WAY ROUND THE MERRY-GO-ROUND 143
THIRTEEN OF APES AND MAN 151
FOURTEEN ‘WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM “FRIENDS”’ 177
FIFTEEN AND & DNA 180
SIXTEEN THE WHO’S WHO OF GODS AND MEN 193
SEVENTEEN SHADES OF GREY 214
EIGHTEEN FACTOR ‘X’ IN THE AFFAIRS OF HUMANITY 224
NINETEEN STARSTRUCK 232
TWENTY FATHERS 245
TWENTY-ONE AFFIRMATIONS 250
TWENTY-TWO OF MIND AND BRAIN 273
TWENTY-THREE THE CRO-MAGNON LEGACY 285
TWENTY-FOUR HIDE AND SEEK 313
TWENTY-FIVE ‘ONCE UPON A TIME’ 302
TWENTY-SIX THE ALIEN TRUMP CARD: RACIALISM 323
TWENTY-SEVEN DISINFORMATION AND DAMNATION 344
TWENTY-EIGHT DELUSIONS AND DEMONS 352
TWENTY-NINE ENDS AND MEANS 356
THIRTY CONCLUSIONS 380

ADDENDUM: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS 403

BIBLIOGRAPHY 416

OceanofPDF.com
 PREFACE

It seems they are everywhere in the Occidental world, calling the children
of Cain under the influence of what might well be a Trojan Horse that will
claim all humanity. They are the most dangerous phenomena this world has
ever known. So dangerous that it might just be that ‘they’ are the reason
that the great ‘redeemers’ that have visited humanity came claiming to
‘save’ Man. So who and what are ‘they’?
They are grey in colour. Their skin is sallow and smooth and formed in
scaly patterns. Their eyes are huge ‘almonds’ that wrap around their faces.
Their bodies are small in stature, spindly and thin. Their heads are very
large in proportion to their bodies, their chins narrow and pointed, with tiny
mouths and nostrils that merge into their faces. They are the ‘Greys’, and
their hands reach out urgently to seek their purposes in and within the
bodies and body of all Humanity.
They are more. Much more. They are the tentacles of doom. They are the
arms of Satan; for so long the talisman of all wrongs, of all evil, all sin in
the history of Men. They creep wilfully, inexorably into the parlours of the
damned and the innocent alike with a technology undreamed of on this
Earth. They are Godhead to some among Man. They play with an
unsuspecting world with castings of sugared contrivance, of coated
reassuring sweetness. They form their armies, their spokesmen out of the
body of our very humanity and they are placing their spawn unsuspected
among the disbelieving legions of our world.

Flashes of rounded symmetry dance in a clear blue sky, announcing the

demons’ forms in the geomancy of doom. Our doom. The doom of the
human family. Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Hungry relentless shadows of grey,
running in lighted discs, poised ready to feed on the souls of Mankind.
Hidden routes, written in a wheat field, a cornfield here and there, boiling
the collective mind of Mankind, silently fixing the places of God’s most
salient touch — the wombs of womankind. Here they dally, womb upon
womb, rifling the most precious locations in all the Universe with their dead
spawn. Here they lie within the ignorance of an entire species, to write with
their traces the schemes of an alien design that it might live again renewed.
Within their singular centred curiosity they scale and scan the margins of
Man with the measures of Succubi and Incubi — to transpose their fever in
alien ways, and survive upon the blood of innocent human children born,
and yet to be born.
‘There is something out there’ they exclaim, these agents that speak for
them among Man. Inviting our disbelief. Yet not quite wanting to believe it
themselves. Something inside them whispering that they dare not believe
lest they see the horror of their predicament. ‘We don’t know what or who
they are’ they say. They stand as blind guides that stare at a disc and
swallow our humanity. It is all a salutation for fools. And so as fools, they
stand their New Age resolves in the make-believe buffoonery of empty
minds. They draw the blinds over our collective eyes and we all see darkly
through the fog of their ignorance, and worst of all, their pretence and their
subterfuge.
They have been with us from the beginning. These creatures of the dead
Universe. Their bedding places were once upon a time the Learning Cradles
of all our yesterdays — long before the present histories of Humankind.
They have slept in these cradles — in our centres of civilization, uninvited
parasites festering within our flesh for their place in an eternity beyond the
atom. A place now long lost, their quest for a soul gone with the last of their
once biologically living species. They now linger in a kind of permanence
as machines, yearning to sleep in the eternity beyond the atom they can
only remember through the points that drive their memory store. Bioids,
Roboids, Androids, call them what you will, they seek their yesterdays too,
somehow, somewhere, not quite knowing its

true meaning, because their creators could never write a program for the
meaning of a soul. The meaning of that awesome, vital line that joins spirit-
borne Being to the centre of all absolutes.
They can wait. They have the urgency of Clones. It is their only heritage.
A thousand of our years, ten thousand, a hundred thousand. Theirs is not the
urgency of the grave. Their time for lasting is measured in the width of the
physical. The reins of atoms. Their returns are gauged and mortgaged in the
sponge of mercury and silicon, not blood and bone. Their renewals lie
within no tomb. ‘Bioblasts’ of ‘living’ plastic written in the legacy of the
former of their kind that once could live in the halos beyond force, within
conscience and thus love: they are the final reductions of such as this,
leftovers lost and doomed to wander the thresholds of others’ dreams.
Indeed, of those who may dream at all.

Nigel Kerner

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER ONE:
THE ALIEN PHENOMENON

The words ‘Flying Saucer’ were first coined in 1947 in the USA. They were
used to describe saucer-shaped discs of light and, some claim, craft that
would fly at incredible speeds and be seen then, at that time, by many
thousand witnesses, and in preceding years by many millions of people all
round the world. It is claimed by many witnesses that these craft have
landed and interactions and interplays have taken place between them and
the beings that come in these craft. In truth, these claims have been made
through the millennia and there is some telling evidence that cave drawings
40,000 years old depict the forms of alien beings that landed on this planet
that long ago. The truth may well be that such visitations have been taking
place for millions of years, and that the highways and by-ways of the
Universe are roadways of exchange for all kinds of highly technologically
advanced beings.
The earliest recorded sighting of Unidentified Flying Objects was during
the reign of Pharaoh Thutmose III, about 1450 BC. According to a papyrus,
‘scribes found a circle of fire in the sky … It had no head, the breath of its
mouth had a foul odour’. Over the next few days ‘they became more
numerous in the sky’. There were many witnesses: ‘The army of the
Pharaoh looked on with him in their midst’. This account is particularly
interesting because it speaks of a ‘foul odour’. Many modern-day witnesses
of alien craft report a terrible sulphurous smell that seems to be coming
from the craft.
The Roman historian Livy described an ‘altar’ floating in the

surrounded by ‘men in white clothing’. While Pliny the Elder a ‘spark’

that fell from a star to earth, becoming as large as the Moon before
returning skywards. He also wrote of lights in the sky called ‘night suns’.
Julius Obsequens wrote in the fourth century AD about ‘ships in the sky
over Italy’ that he alleged had been seen 500 years previous to his report. In
Medieval Europe there are also historical accounts of UFOs. The Anglo-
Saxon Chronicle for 793 AD tells of ‘terrible portents’ in Northumbria,
with ‘fiery dragons flying through the air’. While in 1170, Ralph Niger
described ‘a wonderfully large dragon’ that caused the ‘air’ to be ‘kindled
into a fire and burnt a house’. The historian Matthew Paris writes of strange
lights in the sky, and describes how, on New Year’s Day 1254 over St
Albans, ‘there suddenly appeared in the sky a kind of large ship, elegantly
shaped, well-equipped and of marvellous colour’.
There are many highly respected people who contend that we as a
species, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, owe our existence to the genetic
manipulation of genotypes of ape by these alien visitors that have been
witnessed through the centuries. In this book, unlike others of its genre, I
would like to examine some of the more important recent evidence that
might affirm this proposition and correlate it with a historical perspective of
social and religious beliefs. An astonishing story unfolds with startling
repercussions pointed at the very bases and basis of human existence.
The chaotic Universe, by definition, is unpredictable and a fortuitous
accident in 1947 in Roswell, New Mexico, USA may have provided
stunning evidence and exposed the physical existence of the alien beings
here on this Earth. Despite denial and counter-denial over fifty years, it is
now clear that an undoubted cover-up of this event was staged by the US
government then. It is an event that is well known and I will allude to it
later as certainly one of the most vivid encounters amongst countless others
that have occurred through the millennia.
There has been a great deal written about the phenomenon of Flying
Saucers and their occupants over the years, be they Greys, Yellows, Blues,
or Greens. Whatever the label, it is undeniable to all but the hard core of
cynics, or ‘conspirators of silence’, that something of awesome impact on
and, I believe, against the body of Mankind has been going on through the
centuries. In the light

of the whole UFO phenomenon as such, just too many witnesses, too
many highly respected and respectable attestors have seen, experienced and
been part of the phenomenon for us to deny its veracity as something
genuine and tangibly real. Yet the difficulty of placing it beyond any doubt
with hard evidence that is scientifically verifiable has been prodigious.
What evidence there is has been, beyond doubt, hidden by the highest
powers in government, particularly in the United States and what was
previously the Soviet Union. In addition, it is dear the subjects of all this
attention most certainly do not want to be found and do their best to keep it
so.
The Greys are a species of alien being that are said to be visiting the
Earth at this very moment in time. They are the subject of a great deal of
excitement, discussion and speculation by millions of people around the
world at the time of writing. A recent book by a pre-eminent Harvard
Professor of Psychiatry contends that reports of kidnappings of human
beings by these creatures may well be a real phenomenon and not the
rantings of mentally disturbed imaginations. It has set the cat among the
pigeons not only among Ufologists but also in the world of (particularly
American) academia. Professor John Mack contends that the experiences of
many abductees are genuine experiences, in no way attributable to mental
illness. The stories come from individuals from diverse backgrounds. They
are remarkably consistent tales of encounters with small Grey beings with
huge dark eyes who immobilize their subjects and transport them to
spacecraft where they are probed in a battery of tests that appear to involve
a sexual and reproductive enterprise, with far-reaching implications for
humanity.
What contemporary evidence do we have to suggest the intrusion of an
alien intelligence on the affairs of the Earth? There are tens of thousands of
anecdotal accounts of both close and far encounters with disc-shaped craft
travelling at speeds well in excess of anything our fastest aircraft are
capable of. There are also hundreds of accounts, again anecdotal, of human
beings who have met and been ‘affected’ by alien beings in very close
encounters, some of an intimate variety. Most of the anecdotal evidence is
regarded as scientifically unproved because of its very nature, and rightly
so. The nature, and circumstances of some of this type of evidence are very
convincing. There are a large number of incidents reported by

reputable and reliable people, some of whom were doctors, pilots,

engineers, scientists, and priests. I believe many of these accounts could be
and should be taken very seriously and without incredulity. They are not,
however, verifiable through the scientific processes that would render them
affirmable beyond doubt. Yet there have been a few instances where actual
proof of landings of craft and alien beings that have taken place was
available and this physical evidence was later hidden and obscured by the
authorities. One of the most famous is the Roswell incident. I write from a
typical account that appeared in one of the more reputable journals claiming
to investigate such an incident:
On the 7th July 1947 a spacecraft of extraterrestrial origin crashed in a
remote region of the New Mexico desert, near the Roswell Air Force base.
Parts of the damaged craft and a total of six alien beings, two of them still
alive, were collected from the crash site and removed to secret destinations.
The American Air Force in collusion with the local police began an
extensive and elaborate denial and cover-up of the incident that has taken
nearly fifty years to uncover and expose. In a deliberate and measured
series of lies and misinformation the authorities in the Pentagon and other
responsible military and governmental organizations hid the facts of the
incident, threatening some witnesses with the loss of their lives. Until,
eventually, the sheer volume of witness reports overwhelmed official inertia
to reveal the truth of what had happened at Roswell, helped along by a
sympathetic Congressman who opened up a can of worms, the
repercussions of which have only just begun to be realized. A film taken at
the time by one of the official cameramen purporting to be of the autopsy of
two of these beings has grabbed world attention. The whole event, the
details of which are extensively available for the interested reader, puts into
perspective the size of the international conspiracy that seeks to hide the
fact of the alien presence in our solar system.
The ‘creatures’ recovered from the Roswell crash site were described at
autopsy as humanlike in appearance but the biological and evolutionary
processes responsible for their development appear to have been quite
different from those of Homo Sapiens.
It is beyond the scope of this book to catalogue all but a few of the host
of startling and in some cases highly significant incidents that point to
verification that the UFO phenomenon is a real and

9
 crucially important factor in the destiny of Mankind. The evidence for its
veracity is overwhelming now and has been for some time. It has got to the
point where it is usually dismissed by those who have a vested interest or
brief in defending and obscuring the interests of these creatures. I believe
that anyone who follows the strings that lead to the first ‘hands’ that
actually control the alien presence on Earth will find that those hands have
not got five fingers.
Gordon Cooper, a US astronaut, while on a Mercury flight on 15th March
1963, reported a glowing greenish object ahead of him approaching his
capsule at speed. The vehicle was, as he put it, ‘very real and solid’. This
was confirmed by the tracking radar at Muchea. Cooper had previously
reported sighting metallic saucer-shaped discs while piloting an F86 Super
Sabre jet over Germany. He reported that the discs could out-manoeuvre all
existing fighter aircraft in the world at the time. Cooper further affirmed
before the United Nations that he believed that extra-terrestrial vehicles:
and their occupants were visiting this planet.
James Lovell, Frank Borman, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, Donald
Slayton, Robert White, Eugene Cernan and Scott Carpenter, all US
astronauts, have confirmed and affirmed sightings of extraterrestrial
vehicles that they believe are not of our world. They are just the tip of the
iceberg of reports by hundreds of US, Russian, British, French and German
pilots who have seen and witnessed real and tangible evidence that our
Earth is being examined by strange craft that do not have their origin on this
planet.
Admiral of the Fleet Lord Peter Hill-Norton, who was Britain’s former
Chief of Defence Staff in the early 1970s, found himself that doors were
closed and access to essential material was refused him when he decided to
investigate an incident that took place near a Nato air force base in Suffolk
in 1980. If a man with his contacts and military pre-eminence could be sent
packing when looking into matters to do with UFOs what chance does the
ordinary citizen have of unravelling the truth about it all? It seems some
very important people in very high places are closing ranks to guard and
keep secret all information pertaining to the phenomenon. They seem to be
protecting what might amount to a deepening threat to the natural well-
being of the family of Man by grey-bodied synthetic ‘demons’ that have
invited themselves to be our unwanted guests.
 10

After years of contrived denial, misinformation and downright ties, the

Head of the investigating machinery appointed by the Ministry of Defence
in Britain to probe all matters relating to UFOs, much to the chagrin of the
authorities, admitted in 1994, in full public glare, that he is convinced that
there are such things as extraterrestrial craft visiting this planet. He also
admitted that the authorities were perpetrating a cover-up.
Let me describe the event that Admiral Hill-Norton was investigating in a
little more detail. It is a particularly interesting one …
It was 28th December 1980. The location was Rendlesham in England. A
US Air Force Base in Suffolk, England. A joint US/British nuclear base
seconded to Nato operations, one of the busiest Air Force bases in the
United Kingdom. Its activities were highly secret and it held one of Nato’s
largest nuclear weapons stockpiles.
It was in the early hours. of 28th December that two teams of base
security officers left the East Gate to investigate strange lights in the forest.
One team included Deputy Base Commander Lieutenant Colonel Halt and
in the other group was Larry Warren. Larry Warren who witnessed the event
said: ‘The field in front of me was illuminated with some very bright
strange light. I noticed that the giant oak tree to my side was illuminated as
well. That was my first indication that something wasn’t right in the field.’
As standard procedure Lt. Col. Halt tape recorded his team’s progress
through the forest. As they measured radiation levels they spotted
something through the trees. This is from the actual tape recording: ‘It’s a
strange small red light. Looks maybe a quarter, half a mile, maybe further
out … I’m gonna switch off … It was approximately 120° from our site. Is
it back again? Yes, sir. We’ll douse the flashlights then … Let’s go back to
the edge of the clearing, so we can get a better look at it … See if you can
get the Star-Scope on it … the light’s still there and all the barnyard animals
have gotten quiet now … We’re heading about 110°-120° from the site out
through the clearing now … Still getting a reading on the meter, about 2
clicks, I count about 3-4 clicks, getting stronger …’
As Halt and his team were moving towards the light, Larry Warren and
the others saw a curious circle of mist in the field
 11

in front of them. Larry Warren said: ‘Out in front of me as we

approached, I was watching this mist on the ground. There was other Air
Force personnel, Security, Police, all throughout the field. Over in the
distance were two cameras, one was a video camera, one was a motion
picture camera and at the time the video cameras were very bulky
technology, but I recognized it for what it was. Everything I saw in the field
was documented on film that night, both on still photographs and on motion
picture, there’s no doubt about it. As I was watching this mist on the
ground, a red ball of light moved in, I thought it was an Al0 taxiing to RAF
Woodbridge, behind me about a mile. It came in over the forest and the
trees, it stopped over the circular fog-like object on the ground, dispersed in
an explosion of colour that was soundless, heatless and what happened was
a transformation, somehow, of this mist to a structured object. It was about
thirty feet at the base, twenty feet in height and a bank of blue lights at the
base of it and mother-of-pearl or rainbow effect all over it, it was very
difficult to look directly at it. The worst thing that .happened to me was that
when the event transpired, when there was this transformation somehow,
some senior people ran off into the woods, into the fields and left us there
and why I didn’t run could have been shock, or whatever, but a number of
us ran, a number of us stayed glued.’
One telling piece of evidence remains — Lt. Col. Halt’s report,
authenticated as genuine by the British Ministry of Defence. His report was
released three years later through pressure from Warren and others, via the
Freedom of Information Act.
Despite Government pronouncements, one man whose views cannot be
ignored is Lord Peter Hill-Norton: I quote Lord Hill-Norton in a television
interview:
‘It seems to me that something physical took place, I have no doubt that
something landed at this US Air Force base and I have no doubt that it got
the people concerned, the Air Force people and the Commanding General at
the base, into a very considerable state. My view is that the Ministry of
Defence, who are repeatedly questioned about this, not only by me but by
the other people, have doggedly stuck to their normal line, which is that
nothing which was of defence interest took place on that occasion. My
position about this is quite clear and I have said this both in

12

public and on the television and on the radio and I said it face to face to
Lord Trethgowan when we met — either large numbers of people,
including the Commanding General at Bentwaters, were hallucinating and
for an American Air force base this is extremely dangerous, or what they
say happened did happen and in either of those circumstances there can
only be one answer and that is that it was of extreme defence interest to the
UK and I have never had a satisfactory rebuttal of that view.’
Sometimes the claimants to close encounters with UFOs are young
children who are unlikely to have either the ulterior motive or the
information needed to give convincing yet false accounts. In Professor
Mack’s book Abduction he cites the example of a little boy who is given the
pseudonym Colin. His mother has the pseudonym Jerry:1

‘In a journal entry dated August 14 1992, when Colin was two and a half
years old, Jerry wrote of hearing him crying and talking to himself in the
night. She went into his room and found him sitting up in bed. “He seemed
very awake”. He asked for juice, which she brought him, and then ”started
to ramble on about lights outside and owls with eyes”. He pointed out the
window and said “see the eyes”. Colin is generally a sound sleeper, Jerry
noted and “never asks to sleep with us or even has a habit of waking up at
night”. But that night for the first time he would not sleep in his own bed
and insisted upon sleeping with his parents … This behaviour continued for
several nights and Jerry wrote in her journal on October 29 that Colin talked
often and consistently about “these things”. When Jerry and Colin were
outside together he would look up into the sky and ask about the stars and
the moon and then talk about the “scary owls with the big eyes” that “fell
down out of the sky” or “floated” down. A few times he demonstrated what
the eves looked like by circling his eyes with his hands curved in the shape
of a C. One time he went “into a lot of action like running and screaming
and saying that they make me eat some food and they attack me”, especially
hurting his toe.
 ‘Colin also talked about spaceships, planets and stars. One night he
climbed into bed with his mother and noticed a small picture of the Earth on
the binding of the book. “That’s the planet Earth” he said and “it go away”
and “the house go away”. Pointing at the

13

ceiling he said, “they say bye-bye, see ya”. Then he jumped out of bed
and enacted a scene, talking anxiously. “The owls with big eyes fall down
and jump and I jump” and “there’s a spaceship and I come out of the
spaceship … My toe hurt,” he said and “the big eyes are scary, Mommy.”
After this Jerry actually found blood at the end of one of Colin’s toes and a
torn toenail … In her journal on 15 November Jerry wrote that Colin had
cried out “Ouchy! Ouchy!” several times during the night. When she and
Bob went in to see him he was sound asleep, but the next morning he said
that the “monster owls” hurt his leg. Climbing into his parents’ bed and
pointing to the ceiling Colin said, “What’s that big boat, that big boat in the
sky?”
‘In her journal entry of 28 January 1993, Jerry wrote that Colin’s
distressing experiences seemed to be occurring every week or two. On 25
January, when she and Colin went in the bathroom as she was preparing to
meet Bob for lunch, he said several times in an angry frightened voice, “I
don’t want to go back to the spaceship!” Then, standing on the toilet with
his teeth and fist clenched and obviously distressed, he said several times,
“I get lost. I don’t like it.” Calming down, he said, “I was born there and fell
from the stars”. When Jerry asked him to repeat what he had said he added,
“I born on the spaceship and it was dark.” Then he became tense again and
wriggled around. She asked him how he got onto the spaceship and he
circled his eyes with his hands and said, “The eyes.” When Jerry asked him
if there was anyone on the spaceship with him he answered, “Yeah, I see the
King. I see the King and he is God.” Jerry wondered where he obtained the
verbal skills, seemingly beyond his years, to say these things.’

On May 5th 1994 schoolchildren in the playground of a Zimbabwe primary

school attested that they had all had a close encounter with a UFO and alien
beings: One boy described ‘a silver thing in amongst a clump of trees’.
They all described the ‘man’ who ‘walked towards us’ out of the spaceship
as having ‘big black eyes’. One of the girls described how they left: ‘They
went one metre up from the ground and then they just disappeared.’
In 1989 several encounters took place in the industrial town of Voronezh
in Russia. The main events happened between the 23rd and 27th of
September. According to Dr Henry Silanov from the

14

University of Voronezh, who interviewed several of the witnesses, there

were six landings and one ‘hovering’ UFO encountered. Most of the
witnesses were schoolchildren. Dr Silanov had no doubts that they were
telling the truth. One of the children, Vasya Suren, described how he was
playing football with some friends in the park when they became aware of a
pink haze, like a ‘bonfire in a fog’ above a nearby factory. The boys stopped
playing and were observing the fog when a red sphere suddenly emerged.
The object flew towards a tree and rested precariously on its top branches.
As the boys kept watch, a door opened in the sphere allowing a tall being
with three eyes to emerge. Another followed, and together they reached the
ground. A young man at a nearby bus stop was paralysed by the second
being and only released when the sphere flew away. This was only one of
several close encounters witnessed around the town.
The Sao Jose Mountains in Brazil have, it is claimed, one of the highest
concentrations of claimed abductions (or attempted alien kidnappings)
anywhere in the world. A case occurred here on 22 May 1973 which is
typical of dramatic local sightings. At three a.m. a travelling salesman was
on his way home from Itajobi in a heavy rainstorm when his radio and then
his engine began to fail. A blue beam from the sky penetrated the car.
Assuming a truck was coming, he managed to steer the car off the road but
no other vehicle appeared. Jumping out in panic, the man was smothered by
an overpowering heat as the blue beam shone onto him. It was emerging
from an opaque oval shape in the sky, out of which a tube or funnel was
appearing. The beam made his car look transparent. His skin was also
burning. He stumbled away and collapsed on the ground. He was
discovered some hours later by two people in a passing car. These people
brought the police as they were afraid that the man was dead after being in
an accident. When they woke him, however, he responded in terror,
screaming that they were aliens.
He was taken to hospital and kept in for observation, after which he was
eventually released with no ill effects. But several days later, strange
blotches appeared on his skin around his abdomen. The investigating doctor
could not explain what had happened and insisted that the man was in no
way deranged. Dr Chediak reported: ‘I am absolutely sure that this man is
telling the truth

15

… He was burnt, and they are no ordinary burns. They look as if caused
by strange rays.’
A year later, on 26 April 1974, the witness disappeared on a short drive
to Julio de Mesquita and was found six days later, over five hundred miles
away, sitting on a hillside and soaking wet. Later investigation revealed that
he had been abducted aboard a UFO and medically examined by blond-
haired entities.
(The above account is given in a book entitled UFOs and How to See
Them by Jenny Randles.2)
David M. Jacobs, Ph.D., Associate Professor of History at Temple
University in Philadelphia, is a leading academic authority on UFOs and
alien abductions. Since 1986 he has been conducting hypnotic regressions
with abductees. When he was asked in an interview w]tether he believes
that it is possible that experiences with alien craft and alien beings could be
psychologically contrived manifestations, his answer was as follows:

‘What you have to remember is the sheer enormousness of the abduction

phenomenon; millions of people are being abducted. Moreover, in
abductions people are typically missing from their normal environment.
Others notice that they are missing. There are multiple abductions. People
may see other people being abducted, and may or may not be abducted
themselves. There are situations where somebody sees somebody else being
abducted, and is abducted him or herself. Years go by and person A has a
hypnotic regression, remembers seeing the other person. Person B, 3,000
miles away in another city, and for another reason has a hypnotic
regression, remembers the abduction and sees person A there as well. And
neither of them know that they have been regressed remembering this same
abduction. To make that psychological, we have to live in a different
informational world of how the human brain operates.
‘Furthermore, abductees come back from an abduction event with
anomalous marks on their body, scars on their body, scar-tissue that was
literally formed the night before. They came back wearing somebody else’s
clothes, they came back to somebody else’s house by accident. People see
UFOs in the air, hovering directly over the person’s house when they’re
describing being abducted, neighbours who have nothing to do with it see
this. There is a very, very, very

16

strong physical aspect to this, that is completely non-existent in all of the

other dissociative behaviour that we see.
‘The interesting thing about all these questions is, if this were
psychological, if people were dreaming it up, we wouldn’t be asking any of
these questions, we’d know all the answers. We’d ask people, why do you
think they’re doing this? And they wouldn’t tell you, because that’s the way
the brain works. In channelling, for example, all questions are answered, all
ends are tied up, and it’s all roses and light. With the abduction
phenomenon we just don’t know’.3

How does one prove to the world that UFOs are real tangible objects if
Governments at the highest level conspire to keep any physical evidence
under wraps? Add to this the fact that the ETs don’t want anyone to know
of their presence in our neck of the woods. They have gone to and will go to
extreme lengths to keep hidden their existence in our solar system. You can
now imagine the predicament of someone who genuinely has a close
encounter of the third kind and excitedly seeks to report and make known to
the world their experience …
Let’s say that Mr X, an average citizen, is out walking the dog and,
coming out of the woods into a clearing, he happens upon a UFO and its
occupants having to ‘change a tyre.’ Mr Average Citizen is carrying a video
camera to photograph the countryside. The visitors don’t see him. He
immediately jumps behind a bush and gets a good five minutes of video
footage of the alien family frolicking around their spaceship trying to make
repairs and get out of there urgently. The dog finally gives the game away
and the ET family zap Mr X and his dog and all other life forms in the
vicinity for good measure. After a while Mr X awakens and finds that he
has been asleep. Fido too comes back to life and, thanking the country air
for its soporific effect, Mr X proceeds home without the slightest idea of
what has happened. His memory has been wiped.
When Mr X gets home he plays the video and of course discovers what’s
on it. Can you imagine the predicament of Mr X who like any red-blooded
average American sees money signs before his eyes? How does he prove
that what is on the video is the genuine article both to himself and to an
incredulous world?
Act as the devil’s advocate for the moment. Let us assume that this
accidental revelation of an alien presence must somehow be

17

subverted. How would you prevent Mr X from making the maximum use
of his evidence?
The natural incredulity of the scientific community worldwide would be
the aliens’ best asset. It does not even need an alien fifth column here on the
Earth to help do this. Video evidence is so difficult to verify because it is so
easy to fake. Mr X is likely to be doomed to a life of misery and perhaps
madness if he persists in trying to prove the truth of the existence of UFOs
and their occupants. Hollywood has a lot to answer for . A special-effects
studio could concoct a video that would make our Mr X’s genuine product
look fake and there would be no way of proving it. It would be game set
and match to the ETs. No Mr Xs anywhere in the world stand a snowflake’s
chance in hell of exposing, much less proving, the alien presence here.
I suppose the old cliché ‘You can take a horse to water but you can’t
make it drink’ is an apposite adage for illustrating the almost impossible
task of convincing the powers-that-be who seek to hide the alien presence
that is already here of this. I believe they too are in deadly peril. In fact,
they are in greater peril, if anything, because they are likely to be the
nearest at hand to be discarded when the time comes, much like we dispose
of laboratory animals when their usefulness is over. Alas, I believe that
those who actually know about the alien presence are controlled through
mind-command techniques such as Mack and Jacobs have documented, and
cannot in fact do much about it. While the rest are held by an elaborate
system of dog-legged obfuscation that keeps them in ignorance of whom
they really serve and how.
The pyramid of high-powered influence at government level worldwide
has to be of fantastic scale to carry through a charade of these proportions.
The evidence for UFOs as alien craft with ‘living’ occupants is just too
staggering for the world to ignore. Literally tens of thousands of sightings
have been made by tens of thousands of people all over the world, and their
frequency has been increasing with time. Whilst the vast majority of these
are explainable as natural phenomena, there are thousands that cannot be
dismissed in such a way any more, as I have already said. But the numbers
don’t matter if the proof of their veracity is so easily obscured by the high-
powered conspiracy that I believe exists specifically to do just this.

18

There is something else that is rather interesting about the whole UFO
business. It would be funny if it were not of serious consequence to us all if
stories of alien contact are true. The conspiracy of silence is backed up by
law in the United States.
A bizarre law quoted by one of the US respondents in the Pentagon, Dr
Brian T. Clifford, at a press conference on October 5th 1982, states that
contact between US citizens and extraterrestrials, or their spacecraft, was
illegal. According to a law that was already on the books (Title 14, Section
1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations, adopted on 16July 1969, before
the Apollo moon shots), anyone guilty of such contact automatically
becomes a wanted criminal, to be jailed for one year and fined 5,000. The
NASA administrator is empowered to decide, with or without a hearing,
that a person or object has been ‘extraterrestrially exposed’ and impose an
indeterminate quarantine under armed guard, which cannot be broken even
by court order. There is no limit placed on the number of individuals who
could in this way be arbitrarily quarantined. This legislation was buried
amidst a batch of regulations that very few members of government were
likely to have read in their entirety. Thus it was slipped onto the statute
books without public debate. The dictatorial power given to the NASA
administrator to override all the usual democratic rights of citizens to a
hearing, or an appeal, is so against the principles of the US Constitution that
it would surely have resulted in uproar, had it been brought to public
attention. The excuse given by NASA for this remarkable law is that
extraterrestrials might carry a virus that could wipe out the human race.
This reason does not of course justify the criminal charges that would be
brought against contactees with extraterrestrials. Such charges would
prevent contactees from publishing reports of their experiences for fear of
consequences to themselves. Thus, if the law were enforced, it would
effectively silence witnesses to such phenomena. According to NASA
spokesman Fletcher Reel, the law as it stands is not immediately applicable.
It is ambiguously worded and can be thus interpreted as the government
wishes at any particular-time. Why would such a law be in place when
NASA’s commanding officers have for the last thirty-nine years assured the
public that UFOs are nothing more than delusions or hoaxes? Is it there in
preparation for a time in the future when NASA officials will be able to
detain,

19

and therefore silence, individuals who have clearly (without room for
doubt or speculation) had contact with extraterrestrials?
There are further clauses to this particular law that cover all NASA
manned and unmanned space missions. According to these clauses, NASA
has the authority and responsibility to guard the Earth against any harmful
contamination, or adverse changes in its environment resulting from
personnel, spacecraft and other property returning to Earth after landing on
or coming within the atmospheric envelope of a celestial body. It also has
the power to establish security requirements, restrictions and safeguards
that are necessary in the interest of national security. The article from which
I obtained the information about this law was printed in The Open Line
Newspaper in August 1992 in Spokane, Washington. The author of the
article concludes that ‘given all the unanswered questions regarding the
authorities’ hypocritical attitude to unidentified flying objects, it is hardly
surprising that so many people are convinced that there is a cover-up of
international proportions.’
Between the 14th and the 18th of January 1953, a remarkable UFO
conference took place in Washington. Led by physicist Dr H.P. Robertson,
five top scientists studied the best evidence available from the now famous
‘Blue Book’ files. The team included weapons experts and relativity
specialists, but no psychologists. Thus the US government clearly regarded
the UFO problem as a physical mystery — not one involving
hallucinations. Although the Blue Book team gave evidence, they were not
allowed to attend all of the sessions, or to be there when the panel made its
recommendations. Only in 1976, via the Freedom of information Act, did
the full truth about the Robertson panel become public. It turned out that the
conference was set up by the CIA. They had never tried to judge what
UFOs were, or how Blue Book should study them. Quite the opposite: top
secret recommendations involved finding ways to debunk sightings and
defuse all interest. Among the CIA’s plans was the use of cartoonists such
as Walt Disney to create silly UFO pictures that would make the subject
seem frivolous. They also ordered the monitoring of civilian UFO groups
and researchers as they were considered too influential on public thinking.
It is my contention that this factor concerning the Greys has

20

through the ages been the secret source of many of the ills that have
befallen our species during its history. I believe that Mankind been
intercepted by an alien species of Being and that this interception accounts
for the deadly insets in the nature of Man and has directed our actions in
such a way as to compromise our very existence as a species. I believe we
have been blindly working for the ‘Greys’ to do just this. I believe that our
species has been the victim of a giant con trick. We are sheep following a
‘Master’ plan that has prevailed through the millennia and has sought to
muster all our tomorrows to serve ends not necessarily to our existential
benefit as a species, but rather to the benefit of a technologically superior
alien ‘species’.
I have in this book attempted to view the entire gamut of our existential
meaning as a species with the added ingredient of an intervention of an
alien species into the very centre of our affairs: the blueprint of our
physicality, our DNA.
 In order to try and understand the Greys and their relevance to all of us it
is necessary to speculate on who and what they might be, and how and why
these Greys might have come to be in the first place.
For obvious reasons all I have to say must remain an open-minded
speculation for now. Only time will reveal its veracity. However, it all might
account for the condition and conditioning of our species through the ages,
and perhaps reveal a cautionary lesson for us all. A lesson that might save
our very being as a species on this Earth if it is not already too late.

1
Mack, John E.: Abduction (pp 115-117) (Simon & Schuster, 1994)
2
Randles, Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (pp 70-71) (Anaya Publishers Ltd, 1992) 3 Jacobs,
David M.: Interview, UFO Magazine (pp 5-8) Nov/ Dec 1995
3
Jacobs, David M.: Interview, UFO Magazine (pp 5-8) Nov/ Dec 1995

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWO:
‘BANG GOES OUR FUTURE’

If we are to understand this phenomenon of the Greys at all, we have to first

understand the total existential phenomenon of our predicament as thinking,
knowing, conscious beings. What are we really? Who are we? What are we
doing here in this scenario called a Universe? Where are we going? Eternal
poignant questions that we have to try to answer if we are to understand our
total predicament as living beings.
Knowledge gives meaning. Meaning gives resolve and resolve makes for
discovery. Everything depends on the urge to want to know. Those who
seek knowledge incessantly are therefore likely to be more assured of a
better and longer existence, at least in physical life. The knowledge of, and
the preservation of Self is all to do with the urge to discover and it seems
we have not been able to discover what really mattered till it was too late.
The biggest tragedy of our human condition is that the vast majority of
human beings on the Earth, it seems, are content to go about their everyday
business with never a thought about our existential meaning as a species, or
group, or our predicament as individuals. We all know it takes a crisis to
prompt any real questions of profound meaning or value to us. This has led
to an awesome failure on our part. We have not made the one great
discovery that mattered. The one crucial piece of information that many
great sages and masters through the centuries came to warn us about. As a
result we didn’t spot the Greys in the

22

soup of our existential condition soon enough. So who or what are these
Greys?
Here, therefore, is a simple man’s view of the Greys (or whoever there
might be out there flying a cigar or a dish), formed in answer to two earnest
questions posed by my then ten-year-old son: ‘Dad, can flying saucers
really hurt people? And where do they come from?’ His questions were
sincere and deeply serious. They implied that he accepted these things were
real and this was what intrigued me. I thought he deserved a serious
considered answer if only to convince him that his original premise was
wrong. Darren was and is a deep thinker and always considered his
questions very carefully before he asked them. He has an encyclopaedic
knowledge of all kinds of trivia and could quote you the length to the yard
of the most obscure river, or give you the football score between Upper
Moldavia and Lower Baluchistan in 1948, had they played a match. I
decided a peremptory answer would not do and so I decided to research an
answer in some depth. Little did I know then that my search was going to
turn my own world and philosophical perspectives upside down. So here
goes.
Before I attempt an answer, let me start with an apology. It is impossible
to try to get an insight into the questions raised by the possible presence of
extraterrestrial alien beings in our neck of the woods without trying to
establish how they got here and from where. That involves some
understanding of the nature of our existential base: the Universe,
space/time, matter, light and energy. An adequate elucidation of these
notions to non-physicists involves horrendously obscure explanations. I
have tried my best to give a simple explanation of the basic dimensional
elements involved in the way my non-physicist mind conceives it all. It still
involves some seemingly obscure explanations that cannot be helped and
for which I apologize, but it really is easy to understand if taken slowly by
those, like me, untutored in the formalities of advanced theoretical physics.
We are told it all started for us with a Big Bang. The universe we inhabit
as a species of thinking, knowing beings started with a mighty explosion. It
started, we are told by scientists, from a point so small it cannot be
envisaged. A Higgs Boson point. A field of effect so tiny in scale we cannot
imagine it. All things we know and observe in this universe came,
impossibly it seems, from

23

this point that suddenly expanded in an explosion that continues to this

day, making with it all the ‘things’ we know and observe with our physical
senses. But where did this Higgs Boson point come from in the first place?
At this point we have to change tack and get into the world of reasoned
speculative imagination. We know that there had to have been a point from
which it all started. We have to then ask the question, where did this point
come from? How was it there? The clear logical implication is that there
was something from which the point came. So what could this ‘something’
be?
The best theoretical physicists in the world have no consensus nor,
indeed, any plausible answer as individuals for this. The theophilosophers
have no clue either that stands up to rational view. So the task of finding an
answer comes down, I believe, to you and me. Mr and Ms Ordinary. We are
the great ‘in betweens’ and I would back our speculations and instincts
against theirs any day, because ours are less likely to be cluttered up with
the narrow specialized perspectives that their individual learning tunnels
may have inherently given them.
As distinguished physicist Professor Russell Stannard points out in his
recent book Doing Away With God: ‘Science cannot say what anything is.
At a fundamental level, it cannot say what anything actually is’. He clearly
illustrates this point in the following way:
‘You can say that matter is made of atoms; an atom is made of a nucleus
and electrons; the nucleus is made of protons and neutrons; and protons and
neutrons are made of quarks. So, everything is made of electrons and
quarks. So, there we have it. What is matter?.It’s a pile of electrons and
quarks.
‘But does that really tell us what matter is? No, not at all. We haven’t said
what quarks and electrons are — other than that they are point-like
somethings.
‘There are, of course, additional statements we can make about them. We
can say, for example, that each electron and quark spins about on its axis
like a top. But that still does not throw light on the nature of the “stuff” out
of which the tiny top is made.
‘Or we can say that the particles carry electric charge. But that only gets
us into deeper water still. It raises the question: What is electric charge?
Again we can’t actually say.
‘We introduce the notion of electric charge because it helps us

24

to understand the movement of the particles better. For example, it is

noticed that when two electrons are placed close to each other, they tend to
try and move away from each other. Why do they do that? We say that they
each carry an amount of negative electric charge, and that like charges repel
each other. Good. That explains the motion of the electrons. But it does not
tell us anything about what electric charge is — any more than it helps us to
understand what the matter is that carries the charge.
‘Talking about motion brings us up against yet more unknowns. The
motions are in space and time. But what actually is space? What actually is
time? We know how to measure them. We can assert that the distance here
called a metre is a hundred times that one called a centimetre; or that an
hour is sixty times as long as a minute; but the actual nature of space and of
time? They remain a mystery.
‘So, if science is fundamentally incapable of explaining what anything
actually is, what does it explain?
‘It describes how things behave. That’s all science ever does. It describes
how point-like objects behave in space and time — and it manages to do
that without ever coming clean about the nature of the “stuff’ that makes up
either the objects, or the space, or the time. Put that way, it can sound like a
pretty modest enterprise.’1
Stannard goes on to point out that science ‘is interested only in questions
beginning “How …?” It has no way of tackling questions that begin “Why
…?” It cannot, for example answer the question: “Why is there a Universe
rather than nothing?” Nor has it anything to say about: “Why is the
Universe the way it is, rather than some other way?” All it can talk about is
how the Universe behaves. Whereas the restriction on not being able to
answer questions about what things are might be regarded as mildly
frustrating, this latest restriction is crippling. It means that science is quite
incapable of tackling questions to do with meaning and purpose.’
It is for such questions that I will now seek an answer.

1
Stannard, Russell: Doing Away with God (pp 7-79) (Marshall Pickering, 1993)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER THREE:
TO BE OR NOT TO BE -
THAT IS THE ANSWER

Why does our Universe exist in a point scale, a series of seemingly separate
and discrete points called atoms and particles woven in a matrix of different
forces?
If we look around us it is clear to see that all that exists is fundamentally
measured in this point scale. We seem to exist in a Universe of separated
points or parts. What’s more, a fundamental law of physics called the
Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that all things will decay into
greater and greater states of randomness and chaos with time, till finally at
the death of the Universe all that will be left of it will be one vast arena of
heat with no particles. They call this phenomenon ‘entropy’, or the heat-
death of the Universe. It is all a one-way process from Order to Chaos no
matter what contrivances some scientists use in a current vogue for trying to
elicit order out of chaos.
‘God’ has been a dreaded word to many scientists in the recent past. As
explained by the Judeo-Christian theosophers, it was to me, too, once upon
a time. So many men of science these days run away covering their logical
heads and ears from the sound of pulpits and church bells. I can’t help
feeling that with ultimate irony it will be just one such as these who will
finally, by reduction at least, prove the existence of the Final Being.
But God is becoming more popular in the lexicon of science these days.
He, She, or It is making a comeback with the permission of the scientists.
At least, in the most recent prognostications by our

26

most eminent men of science, God has made a rather spectacular

comeback. Physicists have approved His nomination by implication at any
rate in including it in a spate of recent books by them. I’m sure He is giving
praise to them wherever ‘He’ is.
I have mentioned the word and now I am going to have to deal with it.
The scenario I have outlined thus far now requires a definition of what I
mean by ‘God’ or, to put it better, ‘Godhead’.
 Some would say that the most important question in science today is
centred on the question ‘Is Godhead physics?’ Or, to be more precise, the
laws of physics. Many theoretical physicists would like to claim at the very
least that God has to be a physicist. The most interesting current debate in
science is centred on this question. Although few scientists would admit it,
the final arbitrator, the Old Man in the Sky, or whatever Godhead might be
in the sky or elsewhere, has worked a flanker on all of them, when they all
thought they had got rid of Him (or Her).
Here they were, all of them tacitly working harder and harder to take God
out of the picture as some medieval superstition, and the harder they
worked the more they discovered that they were being brought face to face
with the possibility that something like Godhead might exist. It’s a hard
world, even for our men of science.
If I can come down to Earth for a moment and consider the words of
Russell Stannard again, Professor Stannard has said that in his opinion,
‘although many scientists have the word “God” in the titles to their books,
they are really unravelling the laws of nature, and not the Mind Of God as
they claim. By using the word “God” it is making it sound to the public that
scientists have got it all wrapped up, and it’s not true. Take it from me, it is
not true.’
In his aforementioned book, entitled Doing Away with God, Stannard
makes the following observation: ‘Walk into a bookshop these days and
what do you find? Titles such as The Mind of God by Paul Davies, and
Unravelling the Mind of God by Robert Matthews … Most people, of
course, will not be buying these books to find out what they are actually
about. But they do see the titles — blazoned in big letters across the
dustjackets. So, what are they to think? Scientists have succeeded in getting
God sorted out? They have triumphed where theologians down the ages
have failed?

27

Concepts such as ‘love’ and ‘salvation’ have now been incorporated into
a formula? And what of the scientist himself? If, by his scientific
investigation and assessment, the totality of God’s mind can be laid bare,
where does that place him in relation to God? Science becomes the religion,
the scientist the high priest — or even the god, perhaps. I’m sure it was
never the intention of these authors to promote such a triumphalist view of
science. Yet it is a view that some people do hold.’1
It has been said rather appositely that ‘The God of the New Physics is a
cold God unresponsive to prayer and oblivious to human misery.’ He
sounds suspiciously like the caricature of a scientist, doesn’t he?
What, then, might this phenomenon I prefer to call Godhead be? Before I
make an attempt to explain the phenomenon as I see it, I will start with a
claim. A claim that I later hope to confirm with argument. I claim that
Godhead has to be something like a Centre of total Ultimate Balance —
where no contradiction whatsoever exists. This centre will thus give rise to
perfect Harmony in Peace and absolute Stillness. Most importantly —
absolute Forcelessness. Here will have to exist the ultimate reference
against all references, where viewing points and points of view are one and
no separation of points exists. Time itself will be no more, because Time is
a function of the separation of points, if you think about it. And so
everywhere is instant and instant instantness is Everywhere in Godhead.
Here there has to be no ‘happening’. Just a passive maximum potential to
Be, in that state, or not to Be in that state eternally. Perfect.Balance, where
there is no something … Where ALL is the Nothing of Perfect Congruence.
So is there such an effect …? Is there such a centre — somewhere —
somehow?
The Universe, it seems, came out of a prior state of order in a gigantic
explosion that now provides an awesome engine for the dismantling of this
order into chaos.
So where did this prior order come from? Is there another Universe? One
that is the opposite of our Universe in all ways. A Master Universe from
which ours comes. It is a logical assumption to make. If there is a Universe
where everything divides, there has to be a Universe where all things are
added together. Simplistic though it all seems, it is often what is simple that
holds the greatest

28

truth. I believe that there is such a phenomenon as a Universe of the

Whole where all parts come together in total fit. It also has to be the Master
Universe because total fit makes for total stability and total stability makes
for everlasting tenure. Have you noticed that all this makes for a nice
definition of God?
There is a pointer verifiable in scientific terms that indicates the
incredible fact that there is a power totally outside life and the living
process that gives rise to it all. A power that by implication points to the
fact that there is a world, universe, call it what you will totally outside the
atom. In fact it clearly implies that we would all not be here now or indeed
continue to be here if this power did not exist. Let me explain.
It has been recently confirmed as one of the most significant discoveries
of biology, though actually discovered twenty years ago by Dr Andrew
Wyllie, a research scientist, that the basic element propagating all life, the
cell, has an underlying primary drive to die. It is called the Cell Death
Phenomenon.2 It is now believed that every cell in living formats is innately
programmed and initiated with the fundamental drive to die. In other words
the base existential paradigm of the basic living unit of all living beings is
— to die. The cell only lives to die, and unless signals continually ‘order’ it
to stay alive by getting the cell to use its properties functionally, every cell
in the body, in any living body, will spontaneously commit suicide and die.
In other words, the cell only stays alive because it is called on to have a
function. As soon as this call ceases, it will ‘switch off and die. Amazingly,
it seems the way of life is truly death.
The implication of this for general existence is explosive. The immediate
questions that dawn in the mind are, why and how is there a cell in the first
place? Why indeed does a cell ‘happen’ at all if it is already programmed to
die? More intriguing, what instigates it to come about in the first place and
why, if it’s only meaning is never to exist anyway? In the light of this
discovery, why, if the Evolutionists are right, does a cell, having been
formed despite the unbelievable and totally unlikely mathematical
discongruities of chance, have as its driving paradigm the extinguishment of
itself?
This, of course, raises the further question: Who or what commands the
cell to come into being if apparently its only reason for doing this is to die?
How did we evolve to be human from the

29
 ‘Sea Worm’ in the primeval broth, as biologists and evolutionists would
commonly have us believe, if at every step of the way we are trying like
hell to commit suicide? At least, our very basic building blocks, our cells,
are seeking to do this all the time.
Biologists and all evolutionists claim that life was ‘conceived’ at random,
and based on mere chance. That it all happened accidentally in some
chemical soup that existed on the planet millions of years ago, that from
this most rudimentary start all of us emerged biogenetically routed through
a sea worm that crawled on to the land and finally came up with Ronald
Reagan and Maggie Thatcher. They claim, therefore, that there is no great
shape and coherent meaning behind life at all. According to them, it was all
based on the accidental coming-together of all the building blocks
necessary to make hypocrisy and cant happen.
The fact remains that the ‘Cell Death Phenomenon’ can only be
explained if the existential base of the Universe itself is somehow ‘wrong’.
In other words the Universe is struggling to exist. That, as it turns out, is
absolutely true. You see, the Universe runs on a system that at the very root
tries, all the time, to prevent itself from existing. This root is called the
Second Law of Thermodynamics, or Entropy. A fundamental tenet of
science that says that all things made of atoms, including atoms themselves,
by themselves and without anything being done to them degrade into
greater and greater states of randomness and disorder with time. In other
words, the Universe will finally end in a great field of heat with no
particles. This is called the heat-death of the Universe.
So, why does the Universe exist at all? Why does it exist as we know it
does, simply to die? Why is if even there if it is an existential base of
errors? A dynamo of diminishing returns? Is it only there so that ‘all things
may exist,’ be they good or bad, right or wrong?
A startling question dawns. If the Universe is finite, is there another
paradigm of existence that is infinite? Just as if there is a plus there must be
a minus, if this Universe separates and divides itself into chaotic oblivion, is
there another ‘Universe’ that does the opposite? Adds things together into
more and more ordered states till there is an opposite singularity of all parts
together in total harmony and perfect fit. If logic and sense has any meaning
there’s a clear implication that there must be another ‘place’ or
 30

another ‘thing’ or a vantage point of some sort that conducts the to the
opposite tune to which our Universe dances. A Universe of what is whole
and together. A Universe of no parts because all parts fit perfectly into a
perfect Whole.
If this were so, then there is a clear implication that intelligent life only
exists in our Universe because this other place or master device exists. An
even more startling implication arises and that is that this vantage point or
‘place’ has to be of the opposite existential tenor to all the features of this
Universe. It has thus to be a scenario t he base of which runs counter to all
the basic design features of our Universe, including the most salient one of
Limit or finiteness. A scenario that issues a call to ‘live’ and not to ‘die’ as
our Universe does. An existential paradigm, as I have said before, that of
itself adds, unites all parts in perfect fit with nothing left over.
What would provide such an indictment of ‘death’? It surely has to be a
situation where ‘death’ does NOT exist, i.e. a state of ‘everlasting life’.
Hold on. Where have I heard that before? Was this not after all the only
thing promised to us by the being we have come to know as Jesus Christ?
‘Eternal Life.’ Yes, it really is the ONLY thing Christ promised as a
consequence of leading a life through his example. Eternal life. Was Christ
alluding to this Universe of the Whole when he spoke of his ‘Father in
Heaven’? Was he saying that ‘heaven’ was simply the opposite paradigm to
this one? Would it not be reasonable to say that this vantage point is what
religions and mystics have referred to throughout the ages for want of a
better word as ‘Godhead’; the central focus for all life throughout this
universe of separated parts? Our Universe of the Whole. Our Universe of
NO separated parts.
I cannot duck the issue and must attempt to explore the whys and
wherefores of such a proposition. It is bound to get obscure and I have to
warn the reader that it might be heavy going for some. Those readers not of
a scientific or philosophical turn of mind and who don’t much care about
how and why the Universe came into being and much less care to read
someone’s opinion of how and why it all might have happened, need only
skip this chapter and Chapter Four. Those, however, who want the whole
thesis tied in and are ‘suckers for punishment’ might like to bravely venture
forth.
I wrote Chapters Three and Four in a kind of inspirational

31

apoplexy. My mind was driven by the flow of ideas set in a gel of

scientific expression. When I finished writing and glanced through the
finished work as words on paper I could not understand head nor tail of it. It
was only when I was about to scrap the lot and challenged myself to
visualize the concept of each word as I read it that the whole thing started to
live with rational meaning. I say this by way of apology for the necessary
but perhaps annoying use of all the ‘nesses’ you will see. As any
sympathetic reader or writer out there will note, there just ain’t the lexicon
in the English language to say this sort of thing. My deep apologies to all
philologists and others who might take offence at the use of the glorious
English language in this way.
Let me first start with a proposition and a claim. Let me then try to
account for it and justify it. To do this we first need to allude to and account
for an ultimate Finality — for want of a better word: God.
The proposition is that God, or Godhead as I prefer to call the
phenomenon, is ‘That in which all BEGINNINGS have their END and all
ENDS have their BEGINNING.’ My assertion is that there has to be such a
state. My claim is that there has to be ‘God’, if logic has any meaning —
and meaning has the merest logic. That assertion is unequivocal if reason
and meaning are any yardstick. There has to be such an absolute
FINALITY, if the separation of points that we affirm by our own existence,
and the existence of the Universe as we know it, exists. There has to be a
point where that demarcation began … The ‘where’ in which it was ALL
together has to exist, whatever we might call it.
But what determined the separation of points from. this ‘all together’
state of being? This would be one of the most important questions since
questions began. I believe the answer can be summed up in one word:
Contradiction. The principle of ‘Difference’ as defined in a Universe of
parts and portions. Whatever exists that simply ‘contradicts’ any elements
or states in relative or comparative disposition, forbids the fitting together
of these elements and states as parts in singular resolution and total fit. We
have, therefore, to determine how and what brought about such
‘contrariness’ and what are the poles that define ‘contradiction’ as the
elemental principle that constitutes ‘difference’. ‘Contradictions’ vast
enough to account for the manifestation of the entire

32

Universe of parts, in terms of separation of points through a dynamic

effect, we all call ‘Force’.
The law of increasing diminishing returns (Entropy) is based upon an
exponential property that declares that an increase in the value of difference
supplies an increase in the quantum of separation that, in turn, provides an
increase in restriction which, when translated in terms of scope and choice,
dictates values of ‘Fixture’. Scope and choice are another way of saying
viewpoint and point of view. The active or passive expression of Choice
will thus demarcate the hierarchical standpoint of Being and its value as
such.
It is useless to speculate, with a view to a definite answer, on what
instigated the initial choice within ‘Godness’ for a move away, if you like,
from the state of ultimate Union, for one very good reason. You cannot. Not
‘really’. We have a somethingness mind, textured in separation. Our
viewpoint is always going to be in ‘somethingness’ and therefore it will be
in separation from the view of ‘Unionness’, if I can express it so. We cannot
know anything in ‘Unionness’ terms. We can’t visualize in instant
instantness terms, from all points of view and perspectives all at once
realized and understood in a multitude of different Thoughts being thought
at the same moment and not one after the other, as we have to do in our
‘Universe’ of separated parts. We have to rely on what I will call the
principle of ‘Opposed Acquisition’ that allows for the scope for
separatedness, if there is a scope for Union to grasp the ‘why’ for
separation. We have to say that within what is WHOLE all standpoints are
ALL, not singularly disposed, and so to know as single in the singular and
thus as a PART of the whole or what is All, you must be in the state of
single-ness or parts of a whole. So must exist the scope to be singular. To
be, in other words, in the state of being a portion of the whole. This is what
the concept of ‘Space’ or ‘room to exist’ expresses. Space is that scope to
be ONE with the WHOLE or separate parts from it. All this may be judged,
or seen, in AWARENESS (being able to know anything) terms as a
viewpoint, or point of view and in Actuality terms as somethingness
(having an identity that is definable) or no ‘thing’ ness (having no definable
identity).
It is vital to realize that the state of Nothingness is not an effect where
there is no effect, no anything … It is simply a centre where what we know
as existence in ‘thing’ terms ceases to be

33

such. Therefore, it is logical to surmise that such a centre of resolution is

beyond our scope to visualize, discern or understand, adequately, in its own
intrinsic terms of reference.
What, then, have we gleaned so far of an insight into the ‘Nothing-ness’
of perfect congruence? The centre of perfect balance and infinite extent —
albeit not in its own terms of reference, which is limitless, but in our own
limited terms: As extent increases, so does the scope for experience and so
it is reasonable to expect such a centre to offer a greater scale of effect. As
the potential for Knowledge increases, so does the capacity for what
knowing prescribes. It therefore seems reasonable to suggest that order
proposes the extent of KNOWINGNESS and so one would expect such a
centre to be. resolved in the greatest ORDER possible. Order prescribes the
lack of contradiction and this, in turn, proposes the lack of tension, or force,
for resolution. There would inherently be what we may call a perfect state
of PEACE … stillness … tranquillity. Ultimately an effect of no force
whatsoever. The eternal infinite PEACE of poets and dreamers, priests and
mystics, would seem to be a logical derivation, its existence proved
deductively outside claim and feeling, emotion and religio-political
invective. For me this paradigm is Godhead, God or whatever you like to
call it in terms of the utmost existential finality.
We now have a contour of Absolutes providing for the qualitative union
of points. A centre of PERFECTION itself. Cast in an infinite continuum,
where point of view and viewpoint are One. The manifestation of the two
final abstract metaphysical polarities of all. What other way could we
describe the principles ‘Point of View’ and ‘Viewpoint’?
Stop reading at this juncture for a moment and have a think. What are the
two most fundamental attributes one would need to have to make sense or
give mewing to anything? They could only be the two properties of nature,
judged existentially, we call Awareness and Will. You have to have
Awareness to be able to know and you have to have Will to want to be
Aware. To my mind they would be the two most fundamental tautological
elements that verify Godhead itself in our own Universe of mass, force and
thus separated parts. They are the two most basic elements of ‘mind-force’
possible that have to prevail to allow for and account for the connection
between what is Whole and what is Part. They

34

are the arms that assemble Existence itself. Like the co-ordinate planes of
light fields that make a hologram, they issue forth into the potential to Be
and make some’thing’ness happen in the merest steps in the symmetrical
ordered connection modules of the heart of meaning we call Logic.
In order to answer questions concerning the origin of the Universe we
have to start at the beginning of all the dispositions these questions imply.
To do this we have to ask two vital questions first. From where and from
what did the Universe come and what exactly is the nature of this ‘where’?
To answer these questions we are forced to use clues provided by the
Universe itself: its shape — its form — its existential frame.
I have tried to resist the urge to get too deeply philosophical in answering
these questions, or I shall be writing into deeper and deeper obscurity. So let
me begin by accepting, for instance, that the Universe is physical and
known as such by us, through our capacity for sensory response, such as it
is. Let’s say our physical senses provide a ‘knowing’ that marks the
Universe as a physical thing. This is expressed in what we call our
perception of extent, as three distinct, opposed, detectable corporeal
contours we ‘know’ and describe as the three ‘spatial dimensions’. Thus,
we can say that the ‘frame’ of the Universe is presented in a real and
sensorially identifiable three-dimensional aspect. It has length, breadth and
height. The fourth dimension is a ‘conceptual dimension’ we might call
‘space/time’. It is nevertheless very real but not identifiable with the
physical senses.
I have tried to understand the sequence of dimensional acquisition and
would like to invite the reader to follow what must essentially be, at first
sight, a rather complex and puzzling description, with forbearance. It is
unavoidable if we are to ‘see’ how wonderfully ‘set up’ the concept we
refer to as ‘Being’ really is.
The first question I have tried to answer is: Was there ‘Space’ before the
‘Big Bang’? Was there in fact anything in terms of the Universe as we
understand it in existence before the point of the bang, or was there just a
‘potential’ for dimensionality to occur? It really doesn’t matter for the
purposes of what I am about to expound. We have to account in as simple
terms as possible for the dimensional contour of Space as we know it. We
have to try to discover if these dimensional contours were made by the Big
Bang,

35

or existed prior to it. In other words, did atoms ‘make’ Space in its three-
dimensional contour, or did they happen into an already existent ‘proforma’
and just take up their resolutions to the dictates of this pro forma? The
conceptual expression necessary to define such a dichotomy is, in my
contention, the same.
As I have said, I have to start the whole quest by taking a single
conceptual element or ‘point’ as our investigatory aid. I will give this
‘point’ the ‘living’ facilities of Awareness and Will for the purpose of this
exercise. The whole brief of this ‘point’ is to create a ‘world’ that is
maximally different to itself as a point and so let’s set about this in logical
steps, the merest steps of logical progression possible at each and every
stage.
What, then, defines the contours of physicality and how may they be
derived? In the Final Effect of togetherness of all effect — in what we
might call Godhead, there has to be centred the ultimate potentiality to be or
not to be anything and everything, something, or nothing, somewhere, or
everywhere. It is in the exercise of choice, through the guidance of
awareness and functioning capacity of will, that all existential effect comes
to be. The expression of degree is the result of choice.
In logical terms, the merest minimum step away from such a state of
potentiality, or ‘nothingness’, to actuality, or ‘somethingness’, is for an
infinitely small point, or centre of effect, to occur. This point, or centre of
isolationary effect, is the merest contour possible in what might be regarded
as the ‘all’, or whole of ‘being’. It is thus unique from what is ‘all’, as a
‘point’ and is, therefore, the initial singularity of separation itself. There
would be nothing that exists away from it, that is the same as it, and so it
would have to ‘create’ the scope — room — effect — to exist —
completely new. We are used to seeing space as extent — an allowance of
‘room’ to fit things in — if you like, and so our ‘point’ is limitation itself. It
is the scope to exist in limitation. (That seems a contradiction in terms, I
know — but there is no other way to see it, existentially.) In becoming the
merest point of actuality, and in creating its scope to exist as such, it is
fixing itself in a certain pose — in a defined stance — and so it is
completely unlike its status within the whole, where it would be in all
positions at once. This stance of complete singularity can never be achieved
absolutely, of course, because the centre — this merest point of

36

actuality, is pure intelligence itself. In other words we have made it at one

and the same time — awareness and will, ready for the first posture of
separate existence out of the All. Out of the whole of existence in total and
absolute fit. Out of what we might call the phenomenon of Godhead. The
final absolute of all togetherness in total existential fit.
Our ‘Point’ in its now discrete aspect has no sense of itself, because it is
now ‘alone’ and has no way of ‘knowing’ itself in its now complete and
absolute isolation as a point. It is at the very first stage of achieving what it
set out to do — namely the complete acquisition of separation from what is
whole, i.e. Ultimate Chaotic Subversion. The complete opposite to Total
union in ordered harmony. Our point is now Actuality itself and, we must
remember, ‘knowingness’ itself, expressed through the co-ordinates
‘awareness’ and ‘will’ as directives. It is ultimately ordered but in
separation from the whole has paid the price and is slightly disphased into
singular direction with an instinct for ‘every directionness’ in its inherent
make-up. It will seek ‘total’ separation from the whole through the merest
logical steps in compromise of all these factors.
Our centre of Actuality, as a point, is in complete isolation from its
previous situation. This makes it a Singularity, a completely new effect —
alone. It has no reference of itself. This would not be true in the ‘whole’,
when it was not a point, but in the separate state — it would have to have a
reference against which it could view itself to simply ‘know’ it exists. This
will provide the constant drive for difference — whenever it becomes the
next logical singularity.
The drive to make dimensional space itself begins. In a series of merest
logical steps, our point of actuality will find line — plane — curve — etc.,
tracing out the elbows of dimensional space — as it seeks difference, each
time creating a home and living in it, so to speak, at the same time. It will
be a most interesting exercise for the reader to trace the exact sequence in
merest logic that our point will take in achieving all possible stances of
spatial dimensionality. The correct sequence will give you an insight into a
most startling and fantastic conclusion. You will arrive at a result where our
‘Point’ will have no option but to take on a mathematical incongruity, a
conundrum of effect that will decide the scenario that we find ourselves in
as Beings.

37

Let’s try to trace the likely sequence of dimensional acquisition that gave
rise to the Universe of parts. It is important that the stages are seen clearly,
for they mark a general logical sequence that formed both the cradle and the
baby: Space and all that occupies it. (See Figs. 1, 2, & 3 in the illustrated
section.)
A point has no implicit direction. If it will do the merest thing different
from itself, it will go to a line in one direction from itself — not two. So, a
unidirectional trend is set that will be frozen into the line. A predisposition
to seek the difference from the merest most single standpoint possible. But
how does our point decide which direction to head … to favour? It doesn’t.
It doesn’t need Direction, for the point’s only view is the first expression it
can make outside itself. It knows how to express itself outside itself,
because before it became a point, this expression was what brought it from
being no ‘point’ to being a ‘point’. It is not in three-dimensional space (and
so there isn’t a 360° choice for direction) because that hasn’t happened yet.
All that exists is its self, with all the information that went to make itself —
a point. It will do the thing it knows of itself in its search to make a
difference, to view itself against. It will make another point and then
another, outside itself, and so on; the same way it did the first. When it
makes the first point outside itself, it has made its maximal difference, as a
point, happen. It is not a point any more, it has lost individuality. In
duplicating itself, it has to start at a fundamental ‘stage’ of itself before it
gets to its ‘full’ self.
This is difference enough and as this ‘difference’ happens, it will
continue to the next stage of difference and so on, till it makes itself whole
… In being programmed to find difference, it will go further and seek
difference in the expression of extent.
It is important to realize that the above sequence of stages is not part of
the Big Bang, but neither is it before the Big Bang, as time began with it. It
could be seen as part of the architecture of the first instant.
This change gives rise to the concept of direction, giving potential speed
from stasis, a direction and thus velocity … Velocity gives increased
potential … Speed and so on. A continuum begins. A continuum of
differential acquisition. Our point in separated sequential velocity (time)
makes a line and one dimension is born. The sequence continues …

38

As the merest empirical change from a point to line(ness) happens and

the line is formed, the one-dimensional plane becomes a singularity in
itself. It is born of pointness and knows direction and velocity … It has, on
its way from ‘0’ (no pointness) given birth to ‘time’ and at the very
‘moment’ it does so, so to speak, it is another singularity, it will have as its
whole conceptuality lineness(ness). (I’m having fun inventing these words.
I declare this with due regard in apology to any philologists reading this.)
As a singularity it still has not found difference that exists minimally as a
duality. So it will repeat what pointness did when it was no point then one
point … it will go for the next empiric difference to itself … in the logically
merest current next step it can take.
Let’s consider what Lineness knows at this juncture. It knows choice and
change and so it knows speed and direction. In doing this, It assumes
velocity, tacitly, and so it knows separation. As separation, it knows time
and all this together gives it a state of individuality. So now it knows
individuality and, as this, it ‘knows’ everything, relatively. Of course, the
price of individuality, of unitness in any scheme, point, or line, is that it can
never know as the ALL … The final price for separation is paid. And so,
the line is a confluence of all that is pointness implicit and explicit. In
becoming a line from a point, it knows extent (a line is just another point
from the first and the difference between the two.) All these characteristics
go to make it a whole conceptuality as Lineness … It contributes to its only
functional capability: Lengthwiseness. It has no direct concept of
Widthwiseness yet, because it will use all it knows in Lengthwiseness, to
increase to infinite Length, if it was not baulked at the prospect of not
knowing it existed when it became a ‘singularity’ as one dimension.
It needs most of all to know it exists and so seeks difference against
which it can know itself. It knows Choice, Change, Speed,
Unindirectionality, Velocity, Separateness,. Time and Extent. It knows
Difference and how to Differentiate. Above all it still knows Pointness. It
knows Start, but not end … It ‘thus continues. All the above are One in the
Ultimate Union of Points, no Dimensionalness — Godhead. We have
separated all these in distinct knowabilities because Intention, or Will,
prompted the creation of the elbows of dimensionality Separateness.
Godness is made to reveal itself. The vectors

39

that make Contradiction manifest and so Force as a ‘potential difference’

have begun.
Our Line seeks difference armed with all the above. This collective
functioning gives LINENESS an ‘instinct’ that it is possible to find
something that is different to Lengthwiseness — itself. It searches all the
permutations its ‘knowledge’ provides and in doing so sees that difference
lies in a change of direction. It does this by duplicating itself as a line in its
original direction from a point and becomes an infinite Line. It now has
something different from Pointness. It has a longer surface expressed as
Lengthness. Again, observing the rule of logically merest change, it starts
from an imaginary centre to this Infinite LINE and begins to move with
Lengthness, acting from pointness (see Figs. 1, 2, & 3 in the illustrated
section) and finds that it will still be the same Lengthness each time a
different direction is taken. It continues and in doing this, traces another
surface it never had before … It has traced curve and plane. The Second
Dimension is born.
It is into this ‘Frame of Possibilities’ we call the spatial dimensions, a
frame that is implicit in the design of ‘Godhead’, so to speak, that the
primal ‘Knowing’ essence of Godhead is propelled as the two elements that
make up Thoughtability — Awareness and Will.
All ‘things’ are simply centres of physicality, or force, where this essence
of Godhead settles in grander or lesser states to make ‘life’ where it is
grandest, and static dependent things (lifeless things), where it’s least. In
other words, ‘Thoughtability’ commences to sublimate into dimensional
space/time. It becomes at one and the same time the architecture, the
architect, and the occupier of space/time. Remember our ‘Point’, as
Thoughtness, is coherent and, in its own dimensional terms, together, when
it begins its journey into separation from the Master Universe (Godhead
State) of total union of parts and as it gathers the measures of force, it
expresses in choice the urge to know itself as a separated entity, creating the
very thing that ironically fixes it more and more as it continues to manifest
difference — difference against which it, in turn, may measure its own
identity. In other words, it has to gather more and more the force of
contradiction from its previous expression, as it transmutes into the
dimensional elbows. Its intrinsic identity as once ‘Coherence Pure’
degrades in

40

quantum measure as it increases its dynamic availability. Thought as

‘Knowing’ becomes Thinking or the search To Know, or Thought in an
active directional mode — the implicit search for option within more and
more separated complexity. In other words — our Point of once ‘All
Knowing’ now has to seek to know what it once knew; as its Knowledge of
‘All’ is being lost, the further it goes into the state of being parts of the
Whole, or the ‘All’.
From within and without — Thoughtability as Thinkability gets
inherently more pinned in the twisted contours of the increasingly
complicated dimensional elbows. (Again, I’m sorry about the words, but as
you have no doubt seen I have no choice but to use them.) As each
successive dimension happens, through to the second dimensional aspect —
the step by step process is logically coherent. Nought becomes One — One
can become Two, without the loss of all of itself, so to speak, and complete
reconciliation of its dimensional information, but it is at this point that all
that ceases.
The two-dimensional stage is where the logical incongruity happens,
because up to now an increase by single Whole measure can take place
from one dimension to two, by simply increasing the whole of what is there
by a full measure of itself. But, at the stage of reaching Two, the least
Whole measure it once was and can increase by — one — is lost and it
could only increase by its present Whole — Two — to maintain its full
measure. I’ll call this my ‘Maximum/Minimum’ rule as I am no
mathematician and don’t know the jargon for such a concept. This
contradiction to its previous format of increase — in seeking the next step
— means ‘halving’ its scope to increase, to seek the third dimension, which
is done with the acquisition of a single extra one. Our point is only phased
for two discrete dimensions that ‘fit’. But the bipartite phase has to be
accommodated whole, and it cannot be. In other words, 2 cannot increase
by half of itself to 3 and still keep all of its increased value as 2. It will have
to go to 4 to do this. But it has to meet the Maximum/Minimum rule, so it
will seek a compromise and try and do both at the same time. It will try to
change its aspect by half of itself and all of itself. Its ‘2’ stage will try to go
to ‘3’ and ‘4’ all at the same time. This incongruity provides the two-
dimensional plane with no alternative but to provide for the next single-
level increase, to three dimensionalities, most simply with a twist off its
plane and,

41
 following its other implicit resolutions of pointness — lineness
planeness, curvedness and twistedness — it would compromise. Through
this simple expression, it would spiral back on itself to whence it came. The
single-dimensional line has no defined edges. The two-dimensional plane
has no defined sides, with one side ‘above’ and one ‘below’, as there is no
‘Space’ above or below the plane, both perspectives are contained in one.
So, in using L this information, together with the further impulse to go
beyond: ‘three-dimensionalness’ and finding this extra impulse, together
with the rest of the elements of extent it ‘knows’, it provides a toroidal twist
that generates dimensional extent — Space and Time in a form whose two
edges are one — and whose two sides are one side. A giant incongruous
continuum happens as a ‘Universe o Parts’ that contains and synthesizes
Knowing into platforms of force that would provide for the basic ‘centres of
action’ we call atoms to happen — in the form, shape and expression of a
Möbius Toroid which I will call henceforth a Moroid. (See Figs. 4, 5, 6 & 7
in the illustrated section).
If you have done the exercise, I hope you will see that there is no
alternative in connected — ordered — sequence than to arrive at the
conclusion that Space and all effect in it will be ‘set’ in a pattern that
implies what is termed in science as a three/four-dimensional Mobius strip,
or more accurately a Mobius Toroid. All that exists in separatedness will
have a Moroidal central spinal ‘moment’ — ‘Holologically’, so to speak,
printed in every conceivable aspect of existent effect. A continuum of
enforced motional sequence that has to be followed in a basic two-
dimensional singularity twisted loop that implies a toroidal effect of three-to
four-dimensional compromise.
It simply means that we are stuck in ‘doing’ and ‘being’ everything in an
environment of force that provides effect — in force that follows the shape
outlined above. That every atom that makes the physical Universe and the
entire physical Universe itself, has to be set in an inherent ‘twist’, a logical
compromise to allow separation from ‘Godhead’ to be, or exist. Space itself
is twisted in this basic shape — and pattern. All happening that is inherently
part of that space, happens within and to its dictates. There is no escape
from this shape for anything! Or is there?
Forgive me if I recap once again on the fundamental essential
 42

concept that is revealed. It is, of course, the most important of all

concepts in explaining the why, who, what and how of Universal existential
effect, both as we know it, and if you’ll pardon the speculations, how we
should know it.
The search for the final spatial dimension possible provides an inertial
effect we call Force, the shape of which is the familiar figure-of-eight or
concentric loop configuration — the sign for infinity. This is the root shape
upon which the entire spatial infrastructure of the three-dimensional matter,
(and, as radiation, non-matter), inherently dual-polarity Universe is set and
evaluated by the sciences of physics and chemistry today. It is the pattern of
force of all newly-created ‘elements’ that the separation of points must
‘follow’ in ‘our’ state of implicit separation from the All Together state of
Spirit. It gives rise in its most basic completed building block to the Atom.
We might say that the atom is the self-contained pattern of implicit, fixed
force, or tension, in the space of its own creation that Thought becomes in
its search for ultimate separation from the Whole. Hydrogen was and is the
first and simplest self-containable stable pattern of Force. Uranium was and
is the last ‘created’ that this planet can hold as a stable, or, in my terms,
‘devolved’ stable modulus for our particular location in Space and situation
in ‘Time’ on the planet Earth.
And so, the acquisition of Dimensionality, or to you and me, what we
might call the way one measures ‘Space’, or the room or allowance to Be, is
thus an implicit effect that has a beginning beyond the stage at which spatial
Time starts.
The effect is as implicit as its opposite concept: no dimensionality,
Nothingness. If there is Union, there must be Separation or vice versa. We
know the Universe emerged from an effect where all that we see in
somethingness — plasma, gas, liquid, solid, atoms, elements, planets, stars,
galaxies — was centred to become separated with the ‘momentum’ we see
as the universal state at present, driving them all apart in what we observe
as Entropy. This momentum, this drive, this all-encompassing directive, that
gives change a pace, a rate, an irresistible momentum in constancy.
Constancy is the platform on which all Existence has to be judged. If we,
for the moment, just suppose there is an absolute point of Congruity, where
all things fit so perfectly without the slightest contradiction, we must then
suppose that there must be a process, an ‘effect’, that

43

allows this perfection, this ‘fit’, to happen. Conversely, we will then have
to accept that there must be a continuum — an effect that allows for the
opposite — to occur: a drive to discontinuity, discongruity, break-up,
separation … absolute. Existence would then be just the architecture within,
including, and between the two.
We have to accept one thing. Just as we cannot visualize true
Nothingness from within a somethingness state, we will never be able to
visualize accurately the final concept that accounts for the starting of the
above momentum in our living separate state. We just would not have the
references to relate to it. It would be somewhat like trying to derive and
describe the gas state from the liquid one, without ever having the
conceptual capacity to envision the gas state. There would be no references
by which we could ‘know’ anything outside liquidness. If the sensory
equipment necessary to detect it were similar to ours — Touch, Taste,
Smell, Feel, and Sight — we would never detect the two gases that make
water. They would lie outside the capacity of all these senses to register,
because the gases are invisible, untouchable, colourless, odourless and
tasteless.
So, to summarize again …
The minimum change from Potentiality (No-thing-ness) to Actuality
(Some-thing-ness) gives us a location — a centre — a point of happening.
This all comes from an ‘Ultimate Reality’, that is expressed in terms of an
abstraction we may call Godhead and see from our discrete, finite, terms in
Space/Time separatedness as Nothing’ that can be real in the sense of the
matter-composed three-dimensional Universe. It can only be looked upon in
terms of an ultimate — an absolute neutrality with eternal potential to be, or
not be, an Actuality. It is Perfection itself, which, if expressed in true terms,
will deny finite definition. It must be the ultimate freedom to know — to
understand perfectly — anything and everything, something and nothing,
nowhere, somewhere and everywhere. To know and understand without
restriction, or restricted view, in an overall Whole frame or background —
instantly — from all perspectives in all modes of thinking, at once. We may
call it the summary of two basic poles, or co-ordinates, of effect — termed
Awareness and Will. An eternal awareness — the ‘content’ of which
manifests as what we call ‘Thoughtability’. This phenomenon, in its turn, in
our frame of existence — A Universe of Parts — is maintained

44

in a continual potential to know and express itself through what we may

call the drive to be, or will, or the potential difference between being active
and passive in the state of Ultimate Knowing (Awareness).
We might describe the union of these fundamentals as the Whole —
where all that is absolutely pure is centred: the most primary Centre in
which existence maintains itself eternally, of itself, its elements so much
part of each other that they cease to be discrete. And so, there is no need for
direction — and, therefore, choice.
So the state beyond the first point of Somethingness — that state from
which Union ‘provided’ Separation in terms of a Point can never be known
in actual ‘reality’ terms, but is best seen as an abstract imaginary Centre of
resolution. An analogy that springs to mind, that might describe the
difference, may be seen in the way we view the Equator. An imaginary line,
one that divides the Earth into two hemispheres. Of course, there is no
actual line there. The line only exists in the mind of the observer. There
must be something there to make the ‘line’ happen. Its only reality is
contrived, it has no independence of its own, in its own terms. The centre of
all resolution in the Absolute Union of points exists as a disposition of
ultimate fit and so, from within itself, could be expected to understand,
‘know’ and control all Effect. To provide all possibilities, because all
possibilities are reconciled as it, and through it. If all contradiction is ironed
out in it, it would ‘know’ what and who provided for the contradiction in
the first place. And so could choose to keep, or resolve, any state of
contradiction.
From this we can see that the state of Togetherness supersedes and is
superior to the state of individuality. It commands, controls and dominates
it. The logical answer to the eternal question. What came first, Godhead or
the Universe, is therefore disposed in, shall we say, the ‘favour’ of Godhead
… where Godhead is that in which. all absolutes centre and are reconciled
in perfect togetherness. Strictly speaking, there is NO ‘first’ in terms of a
sequence, because there is no ‘sequenceability’ in perfect Union. ‘First’ is
no measure of chronology in this context. Time cannot exist in a frame that
is completely together. It must be a measure defining the separation of
points. Time is both the grand measurer and that which is measured. It
chronicles, comparatively, points separated from one another in terms of
Extent and Fixture. There

45

would be no situational relativistic judgement necessary measuring

separatedness. ‘All’ would be Infinite; Instant — Instantness.
A huge result from the merest point, or centre of effect, had happened.
The birth of a Universe of Force. The product of the contradiction between
Potentiality and Actuality is born. What happens when opposites meet? The
moving grindstone in motion comes into contact with the sedentary, still,
metal bar — sparks fly. The institutional nature of the centre of Absolutes
(Godhead) is Wholeness. It is the view point and point of view implicit in
the absolute Potential to BE anything, or nothing. And so there is potential
for all change. Potential for all choice through the twin primary axioms that
make it up. A part of the final Centre as Awareness (viewpoint) and Will
(point of view) together as the elemental array of Godhead, elected to
separate in choice and Direction, to be born, so to speak, in singular
direction — away from togetherness into separatedness. It all takes ‘Us’,
originally the smallest parts of Godhead by definition, into the ‘paradigm of
Forces’ we call the Universe. In an isotropic explosion: through the elbows
of mathematical logic we call spatial Dimensionality, the merest centre of
effect sprays out the giant wheels of the Universe in conglomerates of force
we call the galaxies, stars, planets and ‘Us’. Settling through stages into less
and less symmetry and more and more dissymmetry — to ultimate Chaos.
Fantastic!
The metaphysical — the ephemeral non-matterness — as AllKnowing, as
Ultimate Order in Ultimate Togetherness — takes itself out into greater and
greater expressions of separation and tightness, or forceness, to settle as
uranium at the farthest end (and who knows what else as the Universe
expands) with hydrogen at the end nearest to Godhead.
The perfect freedom of Choice — Free Will — is implicitly the heartbeat
of Existence as the formulas of tightness — forceness — cede to greater
and greater expressions of discongruity and contradiction, as the Universe
expands into greater and greater relativistic separation — and therefore
contradiction from the first point of total Union. The least becomes the
most. Pions to ‘Neutrinos’ … to hydrogen to uranium and beyond to the
enforced resolution of atomness we call Lawrencium.
We’ will find, therefore, that the final element that is naturally

46

stable will provide the last contour, or shape, of force that the Universal
thrust in entropy establishes. This element uranium is the highest matter
signature of the corridor of Force we exist in, on the planet Earth, only at
this point of time perhaps 15,000,000,000 years after the Universe began. In
the spatial situation of the Universe, more and more complexity happens
and more and more complexity is revealed. As the ‘brick’ breaks apart, so
the grains are seen — relative to each other in clearer perspective. The
‘detectives’ (scientists) searching for the implicit factors of physical
existence in their cloud chambers and cyclotrons from Stanford to Cerne
reveal its architecture. But remember, as they don’t seem to want to
remember, that the eyes that witness this are dying too. They are breaking
up as atoms, just as securely as their targets for view. They die more quietly,
to the tunes of hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen. Living eyes that ‘live’ for
one reason only. They hold and keep more order and less force — ‘within’,
overall, less force than the maximally packed tightness that wraps the
parcels of tension that make up the most recent resolutions in terms of time:
the heaviest elements. In an anthem of the greatest order, with the least
implicit force, Knowability and Choice(ability) exist, at their best
dispositions to map the presence of Godhead, in a Universe of increasing
Force. The best, as far as we know, is Us: Humanity …
Yes: even we are, as Homo Sapiens Sapiens, a fractured summary of
what ‘we’ once were as a genus of living beings, slowly, inexorably, ceding
into less and less quantum states of Knowability and Choiceability. With
time, if logical supposition, or rational thought is any guide — and it is the
only guide to truth — the whole function of our entrapment is, in fact, to
facilitate the original intention. To be separate — totally separate, into parts
of the former ‘Whole’. And so we head in stages for the ultimate state —
Chaos — implicit.
Imagine a light — a brilliant silver-gold light of purest coherence
polarized into a flat plane of two axes set in perfect right-angled aspect.
(Please refer to Figs. 8 and 9 in the illustrated section.) This light is
Thoughtness pure, as the primary elements Awareness and Will. Two-
dimensionally arrayed and set to enter the drift of separation — the ‘Space’
to be ‘part’ — the inherent mathematical incongruity that is implicit in the
overall design of what it means

47

to be in the state of Separatedness. This ‘light’ of Knowing is about to

begin a journey. It is a journey it will take along the contour of shape
reminiscent of a three-dimensional Mobius strip twisted Toroid. The ‘shape’
of contradiction that makes the order and exact symmetry of the two-
dimensional metaphysical state into the three/four-dimensional one of
atomic force, the disordered, chaotic state of the physical, material Universe
we exist in. The ‘space’ it enters is a void. A void of extent, or scope to be
anything, with an inherent, twisted tension in the shape I have described as
a Mobius Toroid. The implicit coherence of this light as it enters will define
the axes of this twisted tension — of space. These axial lines can be
described as ‘Godhead’ lines. They are the axes of symmetry of Universal
space and the locations of least force within this ‘engine’ for the separation
of points we call the physical Universe.
This space you see is tense, because it is full of the contradiction between
the perfect state of all Union and the total opposite of it, the pole of Chaos
absolute. I will later show why it cannot be a true absolute.
Any physicist or electrician will tell you that what is called a ‘potential
difference’, or voltage, happens when you have something of such contrast,
or difference, at opposite ends of any situation. A voltage is like a gradient
measuring this ‘difference’. A simple way of seeing it is to visualize the top
from the bottom of anything. A difference of height. The greater the top
rises above the horizontal plane, so to speak, the greater the difference
between top and bottom, the higher the ‘voltage’. A marble placed at the
‘top will roll down the gradient faster, the greater the difference between the
height of the top from the bottom. The Pole of Union (or stillness) and the
Pole of Chaos define existence as a dynamic, an enforced difference that
allows things to move in between, as a ‘measure’ of this difference. We, in
and of the physical Universe, exist betwixt them, these final Poles. I have
called the Pole of absolute Union: ‘Godhead’ and the other one I will call
the ‘Devil’. My ‘Godlines’ are simply confined to the places within this
enforced dynamic that provide for the least possible ‘Force’, or inherent
‘Tension’. The word Godness may be taken to mean ‘Godhead in Force’,
for the Pole I define as Godhead is simply in such utter reconciliation in
Union that there simply is no need for a dynamic ‘force’ that defines a
contradiction, simply because no contradiction of any

48

sort exists here. Here is the Peace, Tranquillity, Sublimity, call it Nirvana,
Heaven, whatever you like.
In any inertial system such as this, the forces, however they are defined
— centrifugal, centripetal, kinetic, potential, etc. have centres within and
without them where their paradigms of effect cancel, and are neutralized to
provide a ‘stillness’, or ‘Peace’, where Godness can dwell. Like a light
filling any place it is allowed to enter, so will the prior light of utter
Knowing, and Awareness, we call Godhead, enter and settle — ‘lighting
up’, so to speak, all things it touches with this capacity to Know, to be
Aware, this potential to be anything, or nothing. We, as living things, are a
self-propelled system that can admit this light freely available as Godness.
You might have noticed that I make a distinction between Godhead and
Godness, the latter being the reflected ‘light’ of the absolute purity that I
define Godhead to be. Pure ‘light’, reflected through the dimensional
elbows, or ‘lenses’, of a system designed to separate points and thus allow
the complete range of freedoms. My postulation is that ‘living’ systems, as
we call them, can choose, to various degrees, to admit or preclude this light
on the platform they possess of this light — within them and that non-living
things have lost this vital facility of Choice and move through the grist, or
mill, of dismantling force in a passive state to be broken down to the base
of nothingness, incohesive, to be reassembled into Nothingness cohesive in
an infinite twisted loop I have previously described as the Mobius
Meandering of Forces. It would help to pause and ponder the scenario I am
about to describe quietly in your mind. But, before you do that, please bear
with me while I describe the elements that define it.
The monopolar unidimensional coherence of Centre-Godness is an
incidental product of Focus, the focus of all incongruous anomalies into a
point of total reconciliation. Imagine the centre point of a cross, with two
lines bisecting perpendicular to each other. This is my reflection of ‘Centre
Godness’, or what we as men call the Godhead phenomenon. ‘No
dimensionalness’, Zero Dimensionality. The lines are the single spatial
dimensions I spoke of previously: each taken in its own terms is, of course,
one dimension, or First Dimensional(ness). Viewed in correspondence with
each other they are relatively two-dimensional, their togetherness defining a
coincident plane that illustrates all geometric shape, if

49

their acquisition is taken with reference to Time sequentially. Of course,

this is a concept of view from a stance of the separation of points, or parts.
In their intrinsic terms they are implicitly Timeless and, for the purposes of
my analogy, are the Whole Godness effect I have explained. I will ascribe
the colours silver and gold to each of these lines and define the lines as
representing the abstract metaphysical primal qualities we know as
Awareness (Gold) and Will (Silver). It can be seen now that they are in
themselves a measure of ‘separation in union’, as we move away from the
Centre point (Godhead point). (At the Godhead point only are they
themselves reconciled as singular Awareness in Totality, where Will is
sublimated because it is, shall we say, not necessary any more.) Their
separation outside the centred Godhead Point is thus a centred separation, a
separation in the most congruency possible and so it is stable, resisting the
dynamism that is the product of incongruity. A passive Silver Gold
Lightedness that is there, but is not apparent or visible yet, till it goes for the
three/four-dimensional anomaly that twists its stable resolution into the
visible reality we ‘know’ and experience as our Universe of separated parts.
 We may choose to view the two-dimensional, or bipartite, expression we
call Godness as Thought. (With Thought defined as an implicit passive
function of pure Awareness and Will coming into Separation as a measure
and measures of discreteness in parts.)
In its initial post-primal disposition, when in the Universe of Spirit, it is
not forced. It is in ‘peace and thus beyond the ‘existential plane’ of a
forced, incongruous three/four-dimensional Universe of ‘enforced’ parts.
The two dispositions of Thought — in Godhead and out of Godhead as
‘effects’ — do not mix. They are separated by their inherent difference.
There is no resonance between them. It is only in the choice to move away
from the ‘Plane of Peace’ — that two-dimensional Thoughtness (in
Godhead) becomes — the active ‘forced’ ‘Thinking’ (out of Godhead),
making from itself the mantle of atoms, to exist in compromise states of
‘Being’ called ‘Living’, or ‘Non-living’.
We can now take our journey of mind into a visualization of all this, with
the simple metaphor of Light passing through a prism. Our source is
derived from the invisible, completely coherent, shall we say ‘laser’ Light
of Godhead, a point source that transforms into

50

a more discrete coherence, the further out from the centre it is taken. At
such a point it is still not separated from coherence in the Whole, but
becomes so on entry into the three/four-dimensional incongruous
compromise we call the space of our Universe. Here this ‘peaceful’,
passive, coherent, let’s call it ‘Enlight’ becomes visible and breaks into
separation from the whole, finally forming ‘Atoms’ on its way through the
resolutions of incomplete measures of Force in parts called the
Electromagnetic spectrum. The entire Electromagnetic spectrum defines the
precursor partial states from the moment ‘Enlight’ breaks into parts of an
‘atom’. The first self-contained complete platform representing the
phenomenon of Parts as against what is Whole.
What proposes Separation? What could prompt the final resolution of
perfect Knowing in the Whole (Godhead), to cede to Knowing in the part.
We are forced to look for reasons, reasons that can only have meaning in
‘separated mindedness’ simply because we exist as artefacts of a Universe
of Parts. If to be Whole as All is better than to be a part of the All in
separation from the All — why be so? I hear you say. Why choose the folly
of limit — the way of existence in Separation? And who, or what, does the
choosing? Will the famous answer, that a famous mountaineer once gave,
when asked why he wanted to climb Everest — ‘Because it’s there’ —
suffice?
In the neutral, unemotional righteousness of the centre of Absolutes this
will seem the most apposite of all answers. It fulfils the final resolution that
is its underbase, its essence — Knowledge. The knowledge of existence as
a manifestation of parts can never have meaning in the state of the Whole,
from the point of view of the Whole. But a methodology must exist that
allows for knowledge of both, if all options in free will are to be achievable
and resolved. The Universe we, as physical beings, are part of is simply the
occupier of this potential as an actuality.
Again, let’s summarize.
The Final Centre of Absolutes (Godhead) we have deduced as the centre
of all final resolutions — where existence remains in Absolute Potential to
Be, or not to Be, an Actuality. This eternal state of complete freedom to Be
a ‘thing’ (Actual) or nothing’ (Potential) has in its nature the degrees of
freedom (Fixture, or No Fixture, as its Central result) No Limit in Potential,
or

51

Limit in the Actual. And so experience of Existence is scaled in the

format of perfect co-ordinated connectability — Logic, for want of a better
word. The Logic of mathematical resolution is a highway that marks
admission, or denial, in terms of total fit or contradiction. One or Whole in
either terms exists — One as inherent Limit in Actuality and Whole
inherently without Limit as Potentiality. But to each other they are sheer
opposites. Totally incongruous. The least of either is All of either and,
therefore, the choice from one stance to be the other involves an
instantaneous leap into total contradiction. Something incredibly ‘big’ is
bound to happen if any part of the ‘Whole Imperfect’ elects to be separate
as One. (A part of the whole may elect to be different, as opposed to all of it
becoming different, because the whole is made up of parts and so ‘knows’
what ‘partness’, so to speak, must be. If the whole is the same as the part, it
is not necessary that all the whole becomes one.) My guess, and I hope
yours, would be that what we call a ‘Big Bang’ would occur. A Universe of
Actuality — Limitedness in continuum — would happen. The product of
the final discongruity, Whole(ness) becoming Partness in Choice, to a
diametrically opposite point of view.
It may be asked who chooses to separate from the Whole, if ‘Before’ the
Big Bang there is no separation and, therefore, no individuality in part(ness)
terms? We have seen that the Whole does not elect to become part, but Part
of the Whole elects to be Part.
This may seem paradoxical until we take a closer look at the formulation
of the above question. The Big Bang, as the origin of space-time, does not
allow a concept of ‘Before’. Time is the active expression of cause and
effect, that is the exercise of choice, actively or passively, within the context
of separation. It therefore follows that we make Time in the choice to
separate, and that the Universe of Parts happened and is happening. through
that choice.
Consider, if you will, the moment of Beginning. This defines an interface
between the Timeless state of all Happening, happening all at once in
potential, and the sequential happening in actuality we know as Time.
We would expect that the interface between the two states would
manifest properties of both states. In choosing separation, experience
becomes manifest in part terms, such that discrete

52

parcels of aggregatable experience with activatable free will are ‘born’, if

you like. Yet how did ‘We’ make the choice to exist, if it is only through the
exercise of such choice that we can exist to choose in the first place?
If we accept that Beginning is both within and without time, the Cause
and Effect are one and the same. Choice makes the Chooser just as surely as
the Chooser makes Choice.
We, and by ‘We’ I mean all sentient beings who experience the Universe
of parts, truly did (and do) create Self and the Universe by disallowing
Godhead into us through choice, direct or implicit.
1
Stannard, Russell: Doing Away with God (pp 72-73) (Marshall Pickering, 1993)
2
‘Death Wish’: Horizon B.B.C. Television 17-1-94
Wyllie, A.H.: ‘Death from Inside Out: an Overview’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London, Aug 1994 345 (1313): 237-41
Wyllie, A.H., Bellamay, C.O., Malcomson R.D., Harrison, DJ.: ‘Cell Death in Health and
Disease: the Biology & Regulation of Apoptosis’ Seminars in Cancer Biology, Feb 1995 6(1): 3-16

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER FOUR:
A STARTING POINT

Let us assume for the moment that there is an ultimate effect measured and
related to in terms of a given point, or special placement. As explained
previously, Entropy clearly demonstrates that the Universal momentum
relative to any such given axial centre, or point, proceeds in a direction of
increasing relative randomness — increasing states of chaos when judged
one point to another. This singular directional drift, order to chaos, presents
a fundamental principle we all just have to face. The established atomic
physicality of the Universe proffers a distinct directive of the break-up of
order, as well as a continual separation of points judged relatively. The
Universe is expanding — planets, stars, galaxies are flying apart from each
other relative to each other, everywhere. If we view far enough forward,
this, plus the increasing states of chaos, would imply a point of ultimate
chaotic subversion, with the separation of points, but it would also imply
the reverse in the opposite direction. A singularity — a pole of sheer
perfection — a resource at which all absolutes centre. A centre where there
is no separation of points, where all points exist in perfect union, harmony,
balance, so as to be seen only in the aspect of the Whole or what is affirmed
conceptually as the All Together — the All.
The first and most important characteristic that must be realized from our
three-dimensional atom-made ‘point of view’ is that this ultimate polarity
of Perfection is outside Space/Time, atoms, etc. It is not ‘solid’, matter-
based, substantial. It is metaphysical and abstract. So the point of final
perfect inheritance of all Existence may

54

be, in fact, expressed in terms of that other wonder at the centre of our
own existence: ‘Thoughtness’. An implied coincidence on the face of it, but
one that holds the final due to understanding the Universe and men. Since
the polarity of perfection is metaphysical, abstract, outside Space/Time and
atoms, its nature is therefore outside the scope of a matter-based,
separation-set organism — i.e. Us — to investigate empirically. Further, all
its effects, qualities, characteristics, would be out of the scope of our minds
to imagine: abstract, not substantially referenced in our terms of reality.
What could, therefore, imply the nature of this final state in terms of such
abstraction from our substance-based point of view? We have to remember
it is a state of perfect balance, such that All is in potential to Be, or not to
Be. I have, for the sake of argument, called this ‘effect’ Godness. When all
characteristics that might be ascribed to what is overall are considered, what
basic common denominators will emerge? Let’s consider what they might
be.
Since Godhead, as we have defined the phenomenon, is a state of
absolute balance where all elements, qualities, characteristics, only exist as
potentials (because they are reconciled without contradiction in absolute
totality) a change or move away from this state of ultimate reconciliation
would imply that Will is present to make the decision for this change, and
that it is absolutely free, because nothing obliges it not to make this change
within the perfection of absolutes, as an absolute itself. That movement
would further imply that the potential scope for the change had to exist and
that this scope, if fulfilled, would provide an absolute difference to ultimate
perfect union, (i.e. separation into parts).
I have said that in a state of Absolute Perfection the final idea, where
what is Ultimate in Existence is reconciled without the merest
contradiction, implies a balance providing Nothingness. This Nothingness
implies just that. There are absolutely nothings’ in either a physical or a
metaphysical sense. There is no actuality, because all elements are
reconciled in perfection. There are no contradictions here. Without
contradiction, there is no state to be resolved, and so there is no dynamic
implicitly demanding and funding reconciliation. Force as a principle may
be said to be the product of a dynamic, expressing a demand for
reconciliation. Force can be seen as an ‘expectation’, a potential that exists
for something to happen because there is room or a capacity for it to

55

happen. Since there are no implicit demands in the ‘Perfect State’ —

effect, call it what you like — it is purely Forceless. It is balance in total
forcelessness. There is, if you like, perfect Peace in perfect nothingness,
uniting all elements in existence. This to my mind is a good paradigm of
what may be described as Godhead. The paradigm of utter stillness. The
Peace and perfection of poets and angels.
As I have said, in such an absolute and final disposition, all factors, all
elements must have no actual reality — they would have to be pure
Potentiality. A nothingness of pure potential to be actual. Further — this
ultimate polarity of Perfection can only be an implied singularity,
intrinsically, because it has no actual existence, as such. It can only be
viewed away from itself as such and known as such away from itself. In
order that it may be viewed as this, there must be somewhere, something
else, that it may be viewed from. And here lies the crucial due to overall
existential design. Perfection and Imperfection have to exist together in an
eternal continuum of reference, to be such as they are!
There must be, in other words, a facility, an accommodation for what is
absolute in free will to allow for existence in separation. There must be
‘scope’, so to speak, for Chaos if there is Union. There must be scope for
the separation of elements, points, to exist. If there is scope for such an
absolute union of elements as the Overall, then the Overall must include as
part of its empirical make-up — so to speak — the One part. This facility
for separation of points to exist, this accommodation, in our three-
dimensional universal terms, is what we call Space/Time. And so … what is
the nature, the design, the contour, if you like, of this Space/Time
continuum? Is there an inherent ‘shape’ of Spaceness?
We all know what a tennis ball looks like. There’s a very interesting
monogram on all tennis balls. I’m sure you know what I mean. That strange
twisting shape that seems to present the same profile wherever you look on
the ball. Of course, close examination reveals it is not the same profile from
all sides. I don’t know if the original author of the shape knew this as such,
but this shape was expressing the fundamental shape of ‘force’ existential
within all Universal effect, thereby providing a means for most of us, at
least unconsciously, to register it. Now, imagine this shape made from a
three-dimensional clear, transparent, square-sectioned piece of

56

‘Space’, yes, Space — out there — Space. If you have this shape in
mind, you will have this spatial shape surrounded by the ‘General’ Space of
the rest of the ball. (It may be useful to imagine the monogram’s shape in
translucent plastic to differentiate it from the Space surrounding it.) You
will, of course, realize that since it is three-dimensional, its cross-section
will present a view of a cross’, wherever you cut it. That is, if you cut it and
look at it end on, you will see the dimensional axes that define it will be a
cross, from any direction. The vital thing I want you to do is to take away
the spaces that surround it and look at the shape with its cross-sectional
‘planes’, so to speak, in view (see Figs. 9 & 10 in the illustrated section).
You can now see into the innards of our model twisting monogram shape in
space with cross-sectional planes set at 90° to each other. You will have
before you in this mental concept the shape and twisted dynamic that
creates the separation of points and makes the metaphysical into the
physical. It creatively suggests the enforced atomic Universe we commonly
recognize as providing our reality … Please pause for a moment and ponder
this gigantic ‘engine’, our Mobius Toroid referred to previously. Visualize it
in your mind in its context and try to imagine the whole wondrous scenario
of Creation expressed in its terms. Let’s set the scene once more:
From within Godhead(ness) rises the potential to be separate, or together.
There is no such thing as Space or Time here. Everything is in instant
instantness, all over. There is the Peace of ultimate Knowing in the last
discreteness before Final Coalescence. The ‘place’ of the final Axis before
all Axes end and the ultimate Glory of the effect in which all finalities
centre and Godhead happens. As has been said, this is best visualized as a
right-angled cross defining two axes, with the centre discrete and invisible.
Let’s trace the lines of the axes in gold and silver, and again, as mentioned
previously, the vertical one we’ll take in gold light and the horizontal axis
as silver light.
In Godness everything is perfectly reconciled and balanced to give the
freedom to be everything, or just one thing. To be Whole in Union or Part in
discrete singularity. This means that in this state of Perfection
encompassing absolute Awareness and perfect Free Will, each can exist
‘independent’ of the other, or together in total reconciliation in the state
which can he described as Centre

57
 Godness. We can visualize the independent state expressed as the two
axes defining ultimate order and symmetry at 90° to each other, creating a
centre of Absolute Perfection at the point where they intersect. (See Fig. 12
in the illustrated section).
This is a state different to any other part on either axis. It is, shall we say,
the primary ‘point’ dimensional, whereas elsewhere all is Line, if taken
relatively, one axis to the other ‘plane dimensionally’. In other words, one
— or two-dimensional, depending on the point of view and viewing point.
At the intersection everything along the axes and on the dimensional plane
taken relatively would be centred and ‘known’ at once, whereas any part on
the straight axes, although perfectly balanced and linked to all other points
through the centre, would shall we say, experience the ‘Whole’ as an
incidental and not primary effect. This is a paradigm of how existence is
portrayed. Remember the elements that define pointness up to the two-
dimensional state define potentiality rather than actuality, so they do not
make location in fixture or ‘Space’ in the terms that we visualize it.
Subjectivity and Objectivity are therefore one and the same in their pre-
atomic context.
From this it can be seen that the two-dimensional state (two one-
dimensional lines defining two dimensions through a total directional
difference, when ‘seen’ relative to each other) will experience ‘Partness’
within the context of the Whole by any move outwards on the axes. The
concept of individuality, expressed in terms of ‘I’ and ‘We’ therefore exists
in Godness together — at one and the same ‘time’, so to speak, so that a
choice for partness within separation can be made freely and discretely. In
Centre Godness (Godhead), ‘I’ and ‘We’ cease to exist in discreteness, but
are within each other, so to speak, because at this point there is not Limit
and therefore no difference. It is thus impossible to distinguish between
‘You’ and ‘I’. This does not mean that what we term ‘Part-ness’ can’t be
known in Godhead, but it can’t be known distinct and separated from the
Whole. And so, Part and Whole can be known in Godhead — Part within
the Whole can be known in Godhead‘ness’. Discrete Partness within
separation from the Whole can only be known in our Universe.
Godhead would not know Godhead, because there is no place or point of
objective differentiation within Godhead for a comparison to be made and a
definition established. Godhead is implicit and
 58

implied wherever it is allowed to be, in locations where there are no

elements or vectors of force whatsoever. There are such locations or points
in this Universe of parts where everything ceases to be enforced, you might
be surprised to know. They lie within juxtapositions of atoms, between
these atoms where the twist of enforcedness ceases to be. (See Figure 13 in
illustrated section.) It is here at these points of total balance of all force
resolutions that lie what I like to call the ‘Corridors of Redemption’.
Time is not a concept within Godhead. It occurs with the inertial urgency
of separation, as Godness is ‘used’ to dictate force patterns of varying
complexity in an expanding plane of separating parts. We … ‘us’ … or
human beings, are the result of an interface between enforcedness and no
forceness. A compromise that is continually being compromised, as the
species continually degrades through the momentum of decay termed
entropy — the unrelenting, whirring machine of the universe of separating
parts.
If Godhead is outside the realms of what is defined in physical terms,
then to perceive of its grandeur is left to only the blessed few — the
Buddhas and prophets of the past who sensed its glory, but only knew its
glory when they were no longer individually ‘name-tagged’ — in other
words when they were Godhead.
Will, directed and channelled through thought to create the opportunity
for enhancement of the ‘soul’ (which may be defined as the connection
between physicality and non-physicality) leads through that enhancement to
the demise of, as well as a lessening of the opportunity for, the dance of
atoms and the cage of physicality they create.
We have a measure of relativistic separation, the further we go out from
the centre of the axes. Remember, the separation of adjacent points might
increase, but their symmetry, taken to the centre, stays the same, no matter
how far out you go. Within this scenario of what we will call ‘Knowing’,
Partness and Wholeness are interchangeable through the centre, so to speak,
and thus they are in total availment of complete Freedom of Will to be
anything. However, as I have explained, experience within such an ‘overall’
precludes one thing. You’ve guessed it. It precludes the expression of
Partness from the removed Part state. The experience of uncentred
discreteness can only be achieved by the acquisition of the state as a part
and thus the application of Will to separate from the Whole. So was

59

chosen the crucial resolution of Creation from within the Outer state I
have called Godness. The inner state, Centre Godhead if you like, is
unchangeable, because there is no ‘reason’ to ‘change’. It is in its ‘point’
focus separate and in Union at the same time. The only place that the Part
and the Whole can exist, both centred and ‘separate’, is in the centred
Ultimate state of All Knowing.
And so, from a conceptually assigned two-dimensionally defined
Godness effect, individual resolutions arose in the total freedom of Will,
with the total responsibility of individual accession centred on discrete
Choiceability, to choose of volition to be part — discretely part. Here in this
is the crucial, fundamental proposition that has tormented our thinking since
‘we’ could think: Did Godhead (the Centre) choose for us, or did ‘we’
choose to come into predicaments of separation, rationalized?
The question is simply reconciled in the simplest reason. Godhead is a
state, an effect past and beyond the concept of ‘we’, where the concept ‘we’
is a holographic homogenous whole, with a potential for heterogeneous
fragmentation into parts. In Godhead, there is a final state in which the
elements that make up the holographic principle are no more separable. All
effect to this final state of Being is imperfect as long as it possesses the
potential to fragment into parts, where the relationship between the element
of ‘Godhead’ and the element of ‘We’ is defined.
To sum up, then: Both the Godhead and Godness effect are perfectly
balanced and Forceless. The Godness effect implying imperfection as a
potential. This simply has to mean that No(thing) is happening in a state of
Nothingness. The Moroid, however, is enforced as three/four-dimensional
Space-Time in which (and this is the most vital point of all) two of the axes
are still congruent and symmetrical (they are perpendicular to each other).
While the ‘tension’, or dynamic, or enforcedness, is provided by the third
axis as it is contorted in trying to form the impossible, to complete a fourth
dimension spatially. It must be realized, however, that even in this forced
scenario there will have to be ‘points of neutrality’ where all inertial forces
are balanced. This will be where the Three Axes meet. Here will exist
unforced, or shall we say, ‘peace’ corridors, which I will call ‘Godlines’.
They are simply ‘Axes of Symmetry’ outside Time and Space, where
Godness can exist actually in its purest possible state and form, in the
Moroid.

60

They can therefore be viewed as the 2D/3D interface — or the ‘entry’

and ‘exit’ routes to and from the Moroidal Universe to the prior or
‘superior’ two-dimensional metaphysical state of pure Thought, Knowing,
and unrestricted facility. The most important implication of all this is clear.
The thing that separates us in the Moroidal Universe from Godhead is quite
simply Force, and so, the Godlines reflect the principle that provides for the
redeeming of the prior pre-atomic state. In being the centre, where the axial
lines meet, they suggest the answer lies in the union of parts. In the bringing
together of things. In the expressions of combination and not division and
divisiveness.
As partness within separation is the only thing that cannot be known in
either Godhead or Godness, it must have been the choice to experience
separation from the Whole, as a part that made ‘us’ leave Godness and
enter into the forced space of the Moroid. This would happen along the
Godlines that allow existence as something two dimensional in a three/four-
dimensional environment. The most startling and wondrous inference is
now apparent. It means, if this is possible, that the mind is outside the
enforced atomic array of Moroidal space. This halfway house defines the
living state. The trouble starts once we move outwards on one of the right-
angled axes. In the two-dimensional scenario of Godness, this ‘movement’
allowed us to experience a relative partness within the balance and
Forcelessness of the Whole, but the incongruity and twistedness of the
three/four-dimensional axis fixes us ‘inertially’, so to speak, and makes
Limit actual, creating more and more contradiction and thus Force, the
further away we move from the centres of Peace and Balance, namely our
Godlines.
This can be illustrated by visualizing something in orbit. The inertial
forces maintain a balance, centrifugally and centripetally fixing the object,
according to its velocity. The more force the object carries, the more
separate it will try to be from the point of origin. In other words — the
higher the orbit it will achieve. Yet, it will still be fixed. It cannot move of
its own volition to change orbit while its own force paradigm is dominated
by a superior one: that of the Earth’s gravitational vector.
To say it another way, atoms are islands of continually processing twisted
spatial tension, formed out of the once coherent metaphysical forceless ‘All
Awareness’ we have called Godhead. I

61

believe that atoms are a form of coagulated ‘Thoughtness. A framework

of ‘twisted’ Godhead, if you like. Made up of Godhead material itself, but
unable to be Godhead, or act as Godhead, because they are twisted out of
resonance with the pure Godhead state. However, marvellously, atoms may
be allowed to, or allow themselves to receive pure Godness if they are
properly set up, phased, arranged and arrayed for this purpose. Living
systems are the highest and best arrangements to do this. Knowability is
thus a manifestation of Godhead received and synthesized out of
congruency with Godhead.
Godhead consists of Will, Awareness, Thoughtness, Knowingness,
Understandingness. In other words: the Software. The Hardware is light,
electricity, magnetism, nuclear force, gravity, plasma, gas, liquidness,
solidness, thus rocks and stones and all non-living entities not capable of
making choices out of their inherent being. The artefacts of this Universe. A
Universe of Force and Parts.
You can visualize the architecture of existence as a series of interaction
points. Lens Points, if you like where the ‘Lenses’ are presented in Point;
Line; Triangular-Discoid; Cuboid/spherical, and finally Mobius-Toroidal
shape. These lenses are formed by the prior source of Godhead light
prescribing the geometric mathematical formula for the separation of
points.
In a series of logical, minimally defined progressions, expressing the
separation of points to the Law of Least Action, we can identify stages of
equal differentiation showing why fixture and separation may only exist in
more than ‘three point zero’ dimensions. Our Light of Godhead (Prior
Light) emerges through logical geometric minimums: a Point continues to a
line, implying a minimum of two points of infinite potential difference, with
a variation of two distinct directions implied straight away, increasing this
to a third point. We will have a triangular plane implied again, as a
minimum, with a disc as a maximum, with infinite distance between points
that still might be equal. So, Two-Dimensionality is a free disposal state,
existentially limitless in its expression of the two criteria that define
‘freedom’, maximum symmetry and maximum variability. We add a fourth
point to make a third dimension and the criteria of infinite variability in
symmetry, or the equal separation of points one to the other, taken on any
plane, still applies. This, however,

62

is where infinite variability stops, because a fifth point defining a fourth

spatial dimension is impossible. You will lose symmetry, or put another
way, no five points can be placed equally spaced from one another on any
spatial plane distribution . To do so would imply four discrete actual spatial
dimensions and this can never happen for the following simple reason:
For change to happen there must be changeability and therefore
potentiality. If there is potentiality, there must be Will — to Be or not to Be
and therefore awareness to allow options to be realized. Once actuality
happens a state of dependency is reached, subjectivity and objectivity part
company and therefore the ‘frame’ of existence, space, time and matter, has
lost a self-propulsion modulus, the three/four-dimensional Mobius atomic
whirlpool has therefore ‘run out of gas’, so to speak, as the quest for a
universe of parts has already been successful. The limits of dimensional
acquisition in difference and freedom to be straight and ‘true’ are thus
defined. Therefore the furthest reach from Godhead is, in spatial terms,
resigned in three dimensions with the little extra that was sought (and at the
beginning of existential logic, compromised as a twist), frozen as a
‘bending tension’ into the intrinsic design of the ‘what’ that separates parts.
(See Figs. 10, 11 in the illustrated section.)
Now visualize the Prior Light of ‘Godhead’ moving through these
dimensional Elbows, these ‘Spatial Lenses’, its coherence progressively
disrupted till it breaks through the Grand Divide that separates freedom
from fixture. The third/fourth-dimensional interface with the second; the
point of creation, incidental creation, is thus here. I say incidental creation,
because the will that seeks experience, be it whole, or part, is derived from
the inherent freedom that exists in the prior metaphysical state. It is derived
from Godness and Centre Godhead and most directly from the surrounds of
Godhead, if you like. Remember the arms of the ‘cross’, stretching
infinitely out. The cross shape itself maximizing differences (you cannot get
more different in planar terms than a direction of 90° away from any point
on the line). It’s really a three-dimensional cross (see Fig. 8 in the illustrated
section). Each axis is a different colour — let’s say gold, silver and white.
They are merged at the centre, a centre that is entirely different from the
arms, because there the gold, silver and white can no longer stay colours,
but are totally reconciled into the state of Clearness Absolute at the

63

centre. This centre clarity will not mix with either the gold, silver or
white, because as the point of coalescence of all three, it is uniquely,
implicitly, different in its clarity and its pointness. The others have the
common factor of being axial lines, their difference expressed relatively as
a radial direction only. Thus the centre Godhead state will stay eternally,
infinitely such, separated from the arms that radiate around it by these
disresonant factors. The ‘Godhead’ effect, through its focal clarity and
centredness, will not resolve into direction and thus separation, a separation
that is not true separation, anyway, because it is still in total freedom United
in the connection with Godhead Effect. And so, in the cross we see the
whole metaphysical panoply represented beautifully. Perhaps this is an
education made apparent by a personality that came deliberately into atoms
two thousand years ago, to illustrate the ‘Father’ from whence He came!
Perhaps the choices others took in crucifying Him were simply incidentally
following the map that suggested the debauchery the Universe of parts truly
is — with the shape in which the Whole phenomenon occurs as the marker
of such unworthiness — The Cross.
The second dimension is a forceless free state, a ‘concept’ united and
divided within and without Godhead. At its ‘fringes’, so to speak, it passes
into the third/fourth-dimensional anomalous force-filled ‘contradiction’ we
call our reality, our physical, Universal reality. Here solidness derives out of
the ephemeral, the latter registered and rationalized as the phenomenon we
know as conscious and unconscious Mind.
It is vital to note that the ‘lenses’ themselves are made by the prior, shall
we say what I’ve called ‘Enlight’, or Eminence of Godhead, as it sublimates
the Separated Stance. Enlight in my terms is the purest dynamic effect of
the Godhead state as it functions in the Universe of matter, or as I’ve
described it, the Universe of separated parts. It is, perhaps, what religious
invective calls the Holy Spirit. All light of Godness follows through in
dispositions of increasing complexity, in this Universe of ours. A
complexity that is born of the gathering contradiction of whole against part.
It is thus mixed into a state of dynamic force and fixture in an infinitely
resolved open and closed twisted loop — the Moroid. The word Grace,
used so often in religious terminology, may be seen as the effect of this
‘light’ set in the best confluences on the

64

Godhead Lines that bring centre Godhead and Godness into our reality
from beyond the three/four-dimensional interface.
It is already refracted by the separating effect of Space itself. Rather like
the splitting of a beam of visible light by a prism, Space itself being
intrinsically twisted is an engine for the separation of points — a Mobius-
toroidal ‘prism’ inherently set to the values omniversal logic dictates for the
dismemberment of Union, such that the total range of options to Be, or not
to Be, may exist. The Light of ‘Godhead’ is diffracted into parts
commensurate with the deployment of the most basic discrete platforms in
an enforced force signature: atoms, molecules, elements etc., wherever and
however they are expressed in the Universe. The whole becomes part in a
cascade of vibrations, oscillations, frequencies, disposing and composing all
that goes to make up final Union. Just as white light is split up into its
constituent frequencies of ‘force’ that we call violet, indigo, blue, green,
yellow, orange, red in progressively metered presentations, or wavelengths,
so the light of Godness is fragmented in the entire range of existential
meaning, starting at the ‘points’ the Universe of Parts begins.
 I will illustrate all this with an analogy. Imagine that the space in an
empty room is invisibly twisted. Smoke is blown into that room and settles
in the shape of the contour of this twisted space. It will be thicker and
thinner according to the dynamics its own twist dictates and be absent
totally from any place that this dynamic provides no holding force. A
smoke ring illustrates this nicely. Its dynamics are such that the smoke is
confined and held in the area where the momentum of the air currents is
most disturbed, expanding and spinning in counter vectors such that the
centre remains freer of accentuated force, as the twisting toroid increases
diameter. It finally disperses, allowing its constituents to be deposited in the
form of soot, as substrate fractions of the once more ephemeral smoke. In
similar fashion, our ephemeral Clothing of Godhead (reason), deploys in
the nature of its composition to lie in the self empowered dictates of the
signature of break-up be it atom, star, galaxy or supernova. The progressive
inconsistencies of gathering Chaos determine the stature and velocity of
change, to dictate the eventual delivery into total (Thing)ness. This is the
final end of ‘nothingness’ at the most extreme point of Chaos, but can be
seen as the most substantial Somethingness of absolute mass

65

and thus force. It is not just something that can’t be seen in terms of
sensory discernment, or is metaphysical in terms of an ultimate state of
force. It is force absolute, that forbids the state of being an ‘entity’, because
fixture of any kind does not exist. (It is not there long enough to be actual,
because it is too chaotic to be so.) And so the difficult-to-imagine concept
of ‘all-overness’, in the instant instantness of no time or durational
consequence we call Union, provides the other extreme in the opposite pole
over aeons that are counted in magnitudes of billions of years, to the nth
degree, so to speak. Our twisting toroidal smoke ring has expanded to
disintegrate into oblivion. In terms of our state of Being in separation from
Godhead, it is the oblivion that is the final opposite of Unionness. The final
phenomenon where the No(thing)ness of utter Chaos ‘meets’ the
No(thing)ness of perfect Union.
The ultimate of opposites can never meet in the sense of contact. As
opposites attract, ‘they’ attract each other simply because ‘they’ are there.
In their coalescence, and at their coalescence points, Universes of
Beginning will be eternally made in explosions of fantastic magnitudes
called ‘Big Bangs’.
Thus, as with our smoke ring, the Space/Time continuum is defined from
the Nothingness of the thought that in turn made the ‘smoke ring’ and blew
the smoke ring into the room. Blew the smoke ring as the Somethingness of
its manifestation and the Nothingness of its utter dissipation into its most
basic possible component parts.
Again to summarize, in Godness all parts are reconciled in the whole.
Difference is sublimated such that every part of the summary is a
manifestation of the Whole. In other words, Godness is a summary of all
difference and in such a state one cannot experience separation of Self, as
Self. Will in Godness is essentially passive (with a potential to be active),
because you don’t need will in order to maintain a state of absolute
forcelessness and balance, where everything fits without the slightest
contradiction. Will becomes active in the choice for separation as Self,
which at the same rime, is the choice for Limit and Force, the force for
reconciliation with the whole. You can only stop merging with the whole by
being in the state of One. Limitation and Limit implies contradiction and
therefore the force to keep what you are:

66

separate. Will can only be active when there is minimally a duality for
choice, Godness as potential absolute in the Whole, on the one hand and
Universes of actuality on the other, where the separation of parts reigns.
This, of course, implies that there is a minimum resolution, a ‘tension’, that
keeps things apart. An interface that can fix limit. Will is the propulsion
element of this interface. An agent of allowance that provides binary option,
within a design that allows for all the contingencies of separation. Will
creates our ‘Mind Bubble’ of individual Knowingness. Will is the skin of
separation that is ‘surrounded’ by the Spirit of Godness — and thereby
oversees existential experience from whatever standpoint, viewpoint, or
point of view it elects to be.
In the instant instantness of the merest moment, the merest hint of
contradiction in the Whole gives rise to the Universe. And so it bursts into
finite existence in the incongruous pattern of twisted space, space in the
fantastic irregular continuum of logical compromise we see in the shape of
a Möbius-toroid strip. A three-dimensional Mobius Meandering. The
Journey into separation had begun.
In a jigsaw puzzle, the final picture can never be seen perfect and true till
all the ‘differing’ parts are put together in the whole. This whole is only
reached if each and all parts fit together exactly and totally. (As illustrated
previously through this jigsaw paradigm:) Similarly, ‘Godhead’ happens as
a phenomenon when the Whole is all together. At this point, and only this
point, a unique status is achieved that need never be fragmented, because
the totally centred aspect is known in the interconnection of parts, one to
the other. It is only known totally from the total point of view. The jigsaw
puzzle ceases to be a number of parts making up the Whole picture. It
becomes the whole ‘picture’. It is, in other words, not a puzzle any more. It
is a different thing. It has lost its ‘puzzleness’.
Godhead is only God at the point of total resolve, when all the
information of each discrete part is connected up in its entire potential for
connectability and connection and the Whole scheme, so to speak, becomes
One effect and not a thousand differing smaller effects together. Seen in this
way, any stage up to this final Union of total togetherness in fit has the
capacity to know difference and individuality. In other words, in what we
have said previously, any point or stage on the arms of the ‘cross’ and not
the absolute centre

67

where the arms meet (see Fig. 12 in the illustrated section). The ‘choice’
to separate from the ‘Whole’ can only be made in any meaning from any
such point and not from the Centre. ‘We’, originally as Godhead, are what
made all the Universe of discrete parts happen, simply by moving further
away from this centre point along the arms, while we could in meaning
‘decide’, shall we say, to do so. In doing so, ‘we’ created, we ‘made’
increasing states of difference’ happen with reference to the Centre. We
made ‘space’ between us and Godhead and became ‘parts’ of Godhead. It is
from such viewing points and thus points of view, that choice to ‘Be’
discrete from Godhead was and is made in total free will. The word ‘We’
means you and me and all discrete parcels of ‘thoughtability’ that are
stranded in the pit of Entropy. A pit of our own making. A ‘pit’ we made
and know as the Universe of parts, simply to know and experience the
separated state from Godhead — from the point of view of Separation. We
are taking the Godhead state that did not do this to Hell and back.
I have had to invent a new lexicon to illustrate my ideas on the total
existential outlay. Three important words have to be clearly defined so that
their inter-relationship may be seen without confusion. They are Godhead,
Enlight (Godlight) and Soul. Whilst in essence they are the same thing, in
their articulacy and function they may be seen as follows:
GODHEAD is the final resolution of what is All in total fit where all
existential paradigms within the world of atoms and outside the world of
atoms come together as a total Union of all points, parts and separating
mechanisms. It is that in which all absolutes come together in a single
harmonious paradigm of union in total and utter fit.
ENLIGHT or Godlight is the manifestation of this paradigm I have called
Godhead in and within the Universe of parts. In other words, in the
Universe of atoms.
SOUL is simply the bridgehead between the two. The connecting
paradigm between the Universe of total fit: Godhead, and the Universe of
parts and thus atoms: our Universe. In other words, the paradigm we as
human beings, or Oglanders or whatever, have chosen to enter and where
we have got trapped. If it were possible to locate ‘Enlight’ anywhere, you
could call that ‘anywhere’ a Soul.
I visualize God in Man as air bubbles in a paperweight. Increase

68

the amount of air bubbles in the glass and it would be like making the
paperweight disappear. Soul in other words, is encapsulated Enlight.
Although they never quite call it that, the Buddhists have to my mind
come closest to a clear insight into the phenomenon — of Godhead. In the
interests of a non-religious and neutral definition I have in the foregoing
tried to define it as a state of being where all things are known all at once
and manifested all at once and all events and happenings occur in ‘instant
instantness’. In other words, as I have said, it may be seen as that in which
all absolutes find their ultimate balance. There is thus no force, tension or
space in this ‘world’ of total mind, total knowing and being and thus no
points, or the separation of points. All here is Thought in ultimate knowing
because all parts are together in total fit. It is as different as you can get
from our existential platform which is its mirror opposite: a Universe of the
separation of points and thus parts and thus time and thus force (the
architecture of which is what we call the electromagnetic spectrum) and
thus atoms and thus physicality (the architecture of which are the elements)
forever separating and thus decaying from one state to another implicitly
and explicitly in one direction. The direction away from this world of
Godhead into increasing states of randomness and chaos in line with the
Second Law of Thermodynamics.
To summarize for the umpteenth time, Godhead for me is a scenario
where all existence is in a mode outside the phenomenon we call atoms.
This existence is marked by the fact that it prevails in a state of no parts
(let’s call this state a state of Spirit for want of a better word) and unlike our
Universe, this Universe of Spirit is maintained eternally of itself without
decay, because it is a state of ultimate equilibrium and all parts fit exactly
with nothing left over. All things are known here from the point of view of
the whole and not from the points of view of the part.
How, then, does what is purely of Godhead touch what is away from
Godhead? How may final opposites come together and interact? They may
do it through intermediaries. Situations phased in between, in an endlessly
varying series that when added together, breach all difference. I believe thus
was made a phenomenon that I shall call Inaugural Being, or Godbeing.
The first substrate away from the pure ephemeral state of Spirit made of the
fashions and

69

forms of force we call atoms. The first beginnings of what we term the
physical. A connection to Godhead that allowed the phenomenon of Soul to
be activated in a Universe of force. An interface or a channel to connect the
forms of the Universe of the Whole to the Universe of Parts.
In effect, Godbeing was THE interface between opposites. A
phenomenon that on one side faced ‘God’ and thus the Universe of the
Whole. A Universe where, as I have said, all parts fitted perfectly into a
Whole and as such they were, shall we say, like ‘Angels’. An ephemeral
form. A form of pure ‘Thought Being’, as Jesus Christ demonstrated at the
Transfiguration. You recall the description in the New Testament when he
took his apostles up a mountain and demonstrated that he could transform
his physical being into one of pure ephemerality. He glowed brighter than
the sun.
I believe that the first ‘beings’ of the Universe were ‘beings’ of pure
Thought. They were not physical themselves and ‘came’ or extended into
the ‘arms of loss’ to both make and, alas, eventually become our ‘physical’
Universe, (their other side). It all happened to make happen or allow a view
and knowledge on behalf of the Universe of the Whole of the ‘point of
view’ of the Universe of Parts. The psycho-physical mechanism of such a
presence would implicitly set up a link and thereby the possibility for
rescue of that which might come later from the Master Universe of the
Whole to do the same thing (You and I) and get trapped in the clutches of
the forces that provide the dynamics of entropy. You see, doing this would
compromise the natural modus of the natural aspect of Godhead terribly (as
I believe happened to Jesus Christ when the ‘Word’ was made flesh),
because our Universe was characterized by Force. A quantum that would
alter those first beings drastically to a lesser, more physical form and state
and thus an inherently less powerful state of implicit control of their own
destiny. There might be an example of one of the differences in the two
states when you look at what happened to Jesus Christ when he went to
pray in the Garden of Gethsemane. Christ is said to have sweated blood
while he prayed there just prior to his arrest. Could it be possible that the
strength and power of his mental concentration in tuning in to slipping in to
his ‘Father’s world’ had the incidental effect of lowering his bio-magnetic
quantum of force, by shedding the iron

70

(haemoglobin) in his blood? In other words he temporarily resonated

with a quantum of Nil force in the Masterworld of Godhead, his ‘father’,
and in doing this exercise of mind over matter he affected his physical body
in this way. He was praying (or ‘tuning in for instructions’) at the time, if
you recall the story.
You might ask why Godhead came to a Universe that was its existential
antithesis. It would really be inappropriate to say that ‘It’ came to the
Universe. It would be nearer the truth to say that ‘It’ is here simply because
there is such a thing as our Universe in the first place, if you see what I
mean. In other words, the whole thing is implicit. It would be there because
choice to save is implicit in being Whole. In other words, the answer need
simply be, ‘Because our Universe was there!’ After all, is it not the base of
all existential platforms to seek to fulfil all that may be fulfilled? Potential
may only be made actual in knowing and seeking its fulfilment. I believe
the true, irresistibly compelling reason Godness touches anything anywhere
is due to that most misused, most misunderstood momentum we call Love.
A reason that with pristine logic points to the very root on which the
Universe of the Whole is set. The Universe where all things come implicitly
together to fit perfectly. The Universe where all things mean Add, not
Divide. Where all things blend perfectly and cannot stay apart. The
Universe where the watchword is Union and not Separation.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER FIVE:
FREE WILL AND A DIRECTIVE FINALITY

There are two ways of viewing the functioning paradigm of the

phenomenon we commonly call God. The first is an anthropomorphic
Directive Finality that directed itself into being, of itself, as a phenomenon,
where the phenomenon itself decrees all effect in existence, with an overall
custodial stance over all things in existence. Consequently the principle of
individual Free Will has no meaning and all control of existential dominion
is set within the overall frame of its own final arbitration.
The alternative view of God is that an incidental implicate phenomenon
of utter perfection resolves into being of itself and becomes uniquely
existentially viable of itself as a singularity and thus allows all possibilities
‘to be’ of themselves.
Let’s take a closer look at the first scenario. The scenario of ‘No Free
Will,’ or the phenomenon of a directive God.
In this scenario God is just there and invests into the procedures of
subversive subtraction (as seen in this entropic Universe of ours) as an
essential experiment for a view of what it is like to experience fractionation
of the totally together God state from the point of view of fractions. Thus
we, and all that happens to us, are essentially ‘progress points’ and pointers
that trace this view. Having no intrinsic Free Will, we are victims of the
plan, or dictates, of the ultimate power — to suffer, or to enjoy a pre-
planned scenario mapped out for us. We are, if you like, directed ‘effects’
gathering information eternally through the various scopes and fractions
within the Universe of Parts,

72

so that God may experience the Whole of existential dominion from

within a single-point scale from the point of view of several separated
points. Thus the concepts of natural balance and justice according to
individual deserving as surmised from the point of view of our being are
illusions that are put into our perceptivity as a promotional vector, to allow
us the will to follow the preordained scope to be as God intends. Some of us
in this paradigm as individual, separated, discrete points on a scale are thus
allowed to degrade into the furthest reach of the separation of points. Some
of us are allowed to go only as far as to enable us to return from whence we
came. Who is allowed this and why they are allowed this are thus questions
within the remit of the final director — the final arbiter — Choice and
Decision points are performances of God — and not our individuality.
We are the orchestra, the instruments, the players, where God is seen as
the composer, conductor, composition and audience. Sense, reason, logic,
acts and actions, are all products of the performance and the performer.
Some theosophies claim an important variation on this theme and that is
this: God sets the confines of action and actionability; God sets the arena of
function, the bandwidth of functional resolution, and within this individual
Free Will is allowed to reign, such that the operation and results of Will that
is freely employed may be seen in all its shades and permutations. The only
directive employed in the original directive of cessation from the Universe
of the Whole. In other words, God fired the pinball and his personal witness
measures the result according to a given scope. Again, of course, it is a
scenario of ‘No Free Will,’ because the scope for choice formularized by
the confines of the arena of action. If such is true, all ‘fault’ is God’s
responsibility and ultimately implies the imperfection of the final entity.
The perfect state of total resolution in absolute fit is denied the entity,
because culpable control is, if you like, deliberately exercised and thus
‘connected’ to it. Thus the Godhead phenomenon cannot be perfect,
because in the phenomenon’s infected parts, scope for action will be
necessarily limited. If in any way there is a feedback from these infected
parts.
Whatever the mode of function of the ‘No Free Will’ scenario, while it is
all being carried through, it is all ‘going on’. God is

73

having a good, bad, or indifferent time at the expense of our

individuality. Of course, the adjectives are pertinent only from our vantage
point in the Universe of Parts. In this theosophy, God is simply tacitly and
passively observing, and experiencing all happening, through our individual
abandonment for purposes of experiencing what is All — in all ways. Our
predicament within our own halls of perception, if Will is not free, is simply
the business of God and so if we are in pain, it is His will for some reason
He only knows and we must plead for respite. We must implore the
Almighty for mercy. We are if we do this, of course, asking Godhead to
deny His own purpose to fulfil our own puny predicament. We are, in other
words, telling God to love us. All this from the supposed perpetrator of our
predicament in the first place. By now the implications of what I am saying
must be clear to the reader!
Are we simply pawns to a final anthropomorphic and anthropocentric
director, whose whim provides our destiny, whose control of our
circumstance and predicament suggests dispassionate, even cruel
observance, the relinquishing of which suggests that we know more about
love than our ‘originator’? You see, the vital point is that if one single
intercession is made, through which God acts to provide a dispensation, an
answer to a prayer, God will deny His own purpose, when viewed in terms
of the definitions stated above. One exception makes God less than
‘perfection’, because a single plea clearly implies God does not ‘know’
your predicament and has to be asked, or He ‘knows’ our predicament and
we give Him permission to intercede on our behalf — we give Him our will
to intervene. Why is God giving permission to Himself — as we are just
parts of Himself set free to experience ‘self’? If He, in fact, does know —
then why are we encouraged to be supplicants by those who pretend to
represent the religious guiding system acting on God’s behalf? It seems a
prayer that asks is an insult to God’s Almightiness — His omnipresence —
His omnipotence — His omni-everything. Especially if He is a God of
Love. The truth, of course, is that the personalized Directive God scenario
is a contrived man-made ethos, set up as a mystical — a ‘divine’ — a
metaphysical substitute for our earthly Lords of the Manor and by accepting
this tenet of a Directive God we are in fact reducing the ‘size’ of God to our
finite proportions, and

74

increasing the anthropocentrically derived rulers, both religious and

political, to the size of the Divine. Something quite clearly desirable for
those hungry for power.
 It may be argued, of course, that if God represents all things, then all
things must just be. All things must exist. We, in our individualities, as
products or parts of Him (God) are serving this axiom, regardless of
consequence, and have to depend on God abandoning this purpose to be let
off the hook of suffering — be it in terms of reason, sense, logic — the very
underbase of the precept of Love of which God declares Himself the
definition.
How can men and women of intelligence persist in believing the
preposterous implications of a final Directive Entity when one looks at it in
the cold light of reason? If God is supposed to have given us a moral code
to live by, as every major religion claims — a code designed to provide a
route to the final acquisition of the God state, a code arbitrated on what is
commonly termed ‘Love’ — why have we been thrown into this Universe
of Parts, this entropic vestment, that in singular direction implicitly destroys
the very meaning of Love (addition to a whole) by subtracting and
subverting the very platform of our existence?
Is the God state testing itself, in individually focused and deliberate
terms, against the worst scenario possible in a stance opposite to itself? If
the challenge is to see that all his ‘parts’ are recoverable, no matter how far
from himself he puts himself and his God state, then with human beings
generally, if this is indeed a stage in his plan, he has proved himself to be a
consummate failure. How, then, can such a state be God Almighty, a state
of being that is all-knowing, all-loving, all the time?
A truth in any reason gives the lie to the self-contradictory. The
acceptance of a final personalized Directive Entity marks the believer to be
self-deceiving — at best — and untenable to reason, at worst. How often
does one hear believers in a Directive God forbid a deeper logical
investigation into the phenomenon with the statement: ‘It’s God’s Will’?
‘How dare we mortals question God’s reasons for doing anything?’ is the
implication. ‘How could such human paltriness know why God does things
the way he does?’ It seems to me that such expedience may reasonably
justify the idea of the Devil in the same way. Such stupefying idiocy may be
used and has been used as a justification for believing and doing

75
 absolutely anything. If there is no method of arbitration, any claim, any
how, anyway, may be seen as a valid expression of behavioural sanction, for
anything. Just how long does Mankind proceed under such unmitigated
stupidity?
When seen in the above contexts — it is easy to see why we all have, as a
species, arrived at an inch from Armageddon. That inch is simply the
distance an average finger has to move to have enough strength to push a
single button, that one day might wipe out all reasoning life from this
planet. It might well be argued that, to get to that predicament, all reasoning
life has already left this planet.
This most vital right to total freedom of expression must be inherent
within any existential module, for the very confirmation of that existence.
In other words, the Final Arbiter, or point of Arbitration, can never be
Directive, denying any freedom of choice.
The Final Arbiter, or Godhead, for want of any other word, must be an
implicit effect that tacitly allows all things to Be from within any frame —
from within any reality, in any way, form, or direction. What I am saying
(and I hope I don’t confuse you by saying it) is that Godhead happens if”
there is no Godhead, or, if there is no Godness, there must be Godness
somewhere, in some way. Just as you might say that if there is a plus, there
must be a minus. That is simply what humanly observable reality confirms
as the way the Universe is run. How that Godhead phenomenon arises is the
question for answer, as and when an entity proceeds beyond the scope of an
inherently differentiated view point — in other words, beyond the scope of
atoms, Space and Time. Jesus Christ never attempted to explain things of
the Universe of the Whole, which He called the Spirit state. Rather he
chided Nicodemus: ‘How would you believe me if I — tell you things of
Spirit, when you believe not what I say about the world of flesh’.
We now come to the implications derived from the alternative view of the
Godhead phenomenon — that of the Implicate Finality. I have tried to show
that the view outside the ‘solid’, ‘physical’, atom-based Universe of Parts
we live in is inherently forbidden for us to see in physical bodies, because
we are composed in differentiated parts. We are cultured as atomically
defined entities in

76
 broth of separated and randomly separating points. The Godhead
phenomenon has to be a state of ‘potentiality’, a state of metaphysical
unsolidness, if you like, that exists at the helm of the perfect resolution of
all parts. Yet, the Universe of the Spirit and the Universe of Matter meet to
promulgate the living entity at the interface of their partnership whether that
manifestation resolves in ‘Enlighted’, plasma, hydrogen or ‘heavy atom’ —
weighted types of Man. This manifestation we call ‘Life’ is thus a signpost
— an implicate effect that arises incidentally through the concurrence of
two final opposites. Just as the spark arises out of the motion of the grinding
wheel and the stillness of the chisel that lies against it. Spirit, as the state of
order absolute, is the ultimate stillness — the ultimate ‘Peace’ if you like,
where all is finally reconciled — in the deepest meaning possible. No active
physical, or material, dynamics exist here, because no contradictions exist.
There is the ultimate potential to Be eternally, anything, any way, in
complete freedom.
So, why do we persist in believing in an anthropomorphic finality? What
a conceit it seems we have in assuming that the size of Godhead is set
within the perceptions of a species that is commonly accepted to be so
recently evolved, in terms of geological time. A species so small, on such a
small planet of an average sun among the countless billions of suns in
general outer space. How much we must need to believe in our own
importance. How inherently insecure we must be, to elevate our status to
such a disproportionate size, when viewed against the rates and numbers of
our Universe. There is no price some of us will not pay to maintain the
illusory nonsense of a Godhead viewed in the personified perspective. The
power of emotional comfort provided by the familiar warm idea of an old
father figure that looks to our every whim is too overwhelming. An old man
with a white flowing beard — (resolved, of course, in the complexion that
suits our prejudices) is the usual customized visual image that the idea of
Godhead conveys, at least in Western Christian semantics. Of course, there
is nothing itself wrong in assuming the anthropocentric stance if it is purely
an illustrative device. It is, in fact, a wonderful way of attending the crucial
psychomotivational vector of believing in a Godhead. But it is fraught with
spectacular danger, in that it tends to, and does, reduce and devalue the true
grandeur of
 77

the grandest absolute of all. The glory of the Spirit state is of such
magnitude in its all-pervasive existential value that any limit, however
sympathetically derived, provides a lessening of motive and encouragement
to its achieving.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER SIX:
ADAM AND MADAM

We are are told by the ‘Good Books’ that we are the children of Adam and
Eve, the first anthropomorphic polarities — male and female were created
by God’s hand directly. They were not born. They ere created. What exactly
was this phenomenon of Adam and Eve? The creation myths of many
religions are strangely alike in their descriptions.
But how did Life and Living Beings really begin? How did we, in our
species terms, as Homo Sapiens happen? If we take the accounts in
common religious theosophy of the origins of man, whatever their brand
name, there is a common ancestor of us all mentioned. Let’s call this
ancestor Adam, as postulated by the Christian theosophy. It could be any
name, of course. Imagine, if you can, the ‘creation’ of what is called
‘Adam’, in this way.
In the first moment of separation from the Universe of Spirit the burst of
its ‘Light’ that makes order is at its purest. Remember, it all happens where
the pole of Absolute Union of parts meets the pole of total separation of
parts. (See Fig. 4 in the illustrated section.) It is here, at this margin, that
what might be called the creation of Universes of Force like ours happens.
Everything that happens or is created at this interface will follow the overall
pattern and system of the main existential duality, i.e. the pole of union is
absolute order and the pole of separation is absolute Chaos. Supreme initial
order at the Big Bang will thus degrade to utter chaos, to the meter of
Space/Time which itself is manifested as a result of this creation and
degrades in step with all that is created. That is, as

79

I have said, the fate of all things created outside the Universe of Spirit
where, of course, no Time/Space or Matter exists.
At this first moment of all moments, when pure Spirit bursts out to
sublimate matter, Time begins as parts happen and start to separate to the
inertia of the Big Bang, trapping the Godhead Light in its new situation.
From here its value in purity begins to diminish. Atoms are formed out of
its degradent posture. Time increases its meter with fragmentation and
subsequent gathering separation of parts. All the schemes of consolidation
of these parts begin with the two primary directional vectors of Force
expressed at the Big Bang, dimensionally at right angles to one another.
One dimensional force vector making what we now call the electric
component and the other dimension the magnetic one. The two together in
inertial expression provide a moment of twist, creating the third
dimensional vector (gravity) and the resulting whole spiral twist turns in on
itself, trying for the logically impossible fourth spatial dimension.
As I have demonstrated, it never quite makes it and its compromise is the
moroidal shape of space itself. Into and within this whole scheme, the
manifestation of Spirit (Stillness) begins with the lowest (most quiet) states
of electromagnetism and builds to the hydrogen atom, when there is enough
force to make a self-contained unit, in localities where these
electromagnetic states gather most, through the inevitable random
disassociation caused by the Big Bang explosion.
As I have said, the first atoms begin when these diverse electromagnetic
radiational force vectors are of sufficient consolidational weight. Little self-
contained discrete parcels form in the simplest possible moroidal shape.
The hydrogen atom is born — hydrogen, the first element has happened. A
multiplicity of ‘figure of eight’ twisted ribbons of pure force, called
hydrogen, form everywhere. They are contained and discrete through their
own inertial involution, but — and this is the wonderful thing, within their
centrifugal-centripetal-inertial momentums there will be a place of balance
of force, where no force must exist. Here the Godhead Light remains
untainted, so to speak. Surviving in its initial aspect in the tiniest of
fractions. Nevertheless, the vital thing is that the balance point in each atom
acts as a clear unforced ‘lens’, through which the pole of final union, itself
unenforced, may resonate.

80

Godhead Light will thus linger where it is most welcome or finds the
most conducive home, incidentally, unconditionally, inevitably — always. It
is the most glorious fait accompli, for every atom, to a greater or lesser
extent and depending on its force resolution, may hold the Grand Author of
order itself. Hydrogen is the finest and best elemental exponent for the
reception of Godhead Light, and Lawrencium, or whatever is the newest
element, the least and worst. I suspect that the possibility of ‘entertaining’
Godhead ‘in’ an atom disappears long before we get to Lawrencium in
terms of the chemical elements.
On goes the momentum of the Big Bang: atoms tumble into atoms and
into locations we call stars. When enough are gathered together to provide a
large enough enforced situation, they will fuse into one another. Hydrogen
becomes helium and so on, till the churn of their togetherness gives rise to
the myriad fused multiples of hydrogen we call the elements. Scientists now
think that this happens in the centre of stars. In this randomizing chaotic
whirl Godhead still dwells, at the points of balance within the layers of
force in each atom. Here the ‘stillness’ points receive and deploy an
ordering influence, making manifestations of Godhead in atomic array.
The greater the measures of still points upon a locality, the greater the
influence to order — thus life, intelligence and scope to survive in choice
and reason become direct proportions of the ‘receptability’ and utilization
of this ‘Godhead Light’, this still, unenforced residue and expressant
emanation of the pole of union.
The greatest point, locality, of such action as far as we know is a human
being. How did ‘we’ happen? Perhaps it happened something like this.
Into the available ‘depositories’ (atoms) at a stage when these
‘depositories’ were ‘suitable’, the Godhead Light settled incidentally and
assembled an array that would, to the law of least action in most result,
provide the best vehicle for its manifestation from the available resources.
All this means is that the first Godhead Man happened in a Universe of
rapidly evolving physicality. ‘Human’ Man is simply a much later localized
version of a universal phenomenon we might call ‘Adamness’. This initial
point of the formation of first resolution into living beingness.
The ‘Adam points’ of resolution must have been a marvel of

81

physical ‘Being’. Made of the time and at the time the Universe was
young — made truly in the merest image and likeness to Godhead possible.
The dominant physical expression of Godhead — dominant in its make-up
of least possible enforcedness. The ‘God’ dominant Being — more
ephemeral and nearer the state of metaphysicality from whence it all came.
A Glory of knowing, understanding and realization. Of course, the scheme
must have been plural in its resolution. As I have said, a Universe-wide
phenomenon that could hardly have been a single manifestation at a
uniquely single point. It must have happened at a myriad of points where
the conditions for settlement were suitable.
The conditions that prevailed were the only resource that Godness had to
manifest (inevitably) within a scheme of deploying locally increasing
platforms of force.
The directive of order was implicit in the momentum outwards from
Spirit and so systems of order manifested in atomic magnitudes that
allowed maximums of such order. The burgeoning Universe of parts formed
Adam points over all its extent and the accession to life, living and all the
diffracted results we see now began.
The highest resolutions of order possible found their beginnings in newly
created Spatial Time, to decay from then on to what we see in present Time.
The ‘fathers’ of all species Universe-wide started their long travail through
the thousands of millennia. The sting of restriction and limit, inherent in a
Universe of Parts, stunned many into reverse drive, to reach back from
whence they came. Many returned. An exercise much more easily achieved
at this early stage of physical devolution, particularly where the ‘conditions’
of aggregated force were least. Where they were greater the capture held
faster and perhaps where they were greatest they held ‘living beings’ to
provide the vast tree of species differentiation we see today. The grip of
atomic resolution became tighter the longer Godhead Light lingered in
Time. The Universe was seeded with the highest levels of being possible,
set against the highest existential priority possible at its inception — not, as
is commonly assumed, the other way round. Every single living thing that
exists now had an original predecessor that was ‘Godlike’: an original
‘Adamic’ ancestor that provided the scheme on which gradual and
graduated devolution has taken place to provide all the myriad varieties of
life

82
 we see on this planet — and almost certainly all the suitable planets in
the whole Universe — now.
It is clear from all the foregoing that what may be described as Godness
complete includes all contingencies, including the paradigms of the Whole
state and the Part state within its domain. Where the axiom Godhead
represents the pole of absolute Union and the post-atom Primality, or Devil,
shall we say, represents absolute Chaos at the other end. In the Universe of
the Whole, we are Godhead. In the Universe of the Part, we become parts,
or parcelled units of Godhead. The difference simply lies in the capacity to
choose to be how we want to be. From this arise the crucial questions
affecting the situational disposition of Man: What factors then decide this
capacity for freedom of choice?
Before we attempt to answer this question, let us examine our
predicament as Man.
I have said that what we commonly term a ‘Soul’ may be seen as a
unique point of living individuality that acts as a sort of ‘anti-force pen’
when seen functionally against the totally ‘enforced’ non-living Universe.
A vacuum former that is — by virtue of its existential completeness of parts
— the property of Order itself. In its ultimate reductive paradigm it may be
seen as simply a line of connection between what creates and what is
created. As such, it may come into an arena of Force and thus atoms, such
as our Universe of Parts, and allow that force, those atoms, to rush into its
surviving ‘orderness’ and form coherent shape in an assembly of whatever
constitutes that arena of force, making happen a man — an animal — an
insect — a tree — a mollusc, or amoeba in step with the linear march of
Time. It is essentially an intercepting effect that is of a consensus outside
the Force Signature of the Universe of parts. This Universe of parts
provides its own signature of force, based on its own intrinsic average of
order set against chaos in a scale, and this is represented by its elemental
formulary and is seen in its furthest non-living ordered aspect from
Godhead as rocks and stones.
The elements that make up the physical Universe, as we know, are thus
made into assemblies within the modulus of the Universal average force
paradigm — to be adjusted, or treated in a myriad of ways, by anything that
is essentially less ‘enforced’ than itself. An example of this in one of its
highest aspects is a Human Being. Our
 83

species’ ‘soul ASPECT’, I believe, of all species possessed the best

‘vacuum former’ in our part of the Universe able to command the most
effect in terms of command for atomic change. We, in other words, were the
‘slowest’ to devolve when compared to all other species known in our patch
of the Universe.
I have used the expression ‘Godhead Light’ as the vector that illustrates
what is called a ‘soul’. The vital question for answer is — how might this
Godhead Light resolve and function in a Universe of discrete separating
parts to provide souls? How is the individuality that defines a soul, in living
terms, set against this all-encompassing phenomenon I claim is the Author
of order? Is it like an invisible beacon, floodlight, or emanation ‘shining’
into every part and comer of the Universe? A source that is available
always, in real time, such that the ‘force print’ of any particular locality in
space synthesizes it to provide ordered systems, according to the
availability of suitable force paradigms (atoms) in that location. In other
words, there is a certain amount of distribution of suitable receivers that
allow for Godhead to manifest physically in the Universe and according to
such an availability of resource, systems are made to manifest order in
expressions that provide the best, the highest base possible for that place,
that situation and locality. These fixed residential platforms of liveability
did not happen everywhere there were hydrogen atoms. The Universe was
all hydrogen at one point in its devolution. Hydrogen just provided the
clearest lens for Godhead Light to ‘reign’ through. A Universe of total and
uniform pseudo-Godliness existed once in the devolutionary stages of the
Universe.
As hydrogen aggregated in various parts, so Godliness concentrated in
these parts more than others. But a retrograde step was happening, because
simple uniformity was being lost to greater complexity. The higher order of
the simple uniform state was now being compromised and a variant of
Godliness began to happen, a fundamentally important variant — a
representation of the absolute state of Godhead in true discrete separation.
Individuality had begun — the start of the first ‘Godman’ was about to Be.
How could we guess the shape and form of the first coherent individual
Godman? We can only guess at its nature— its beauty — its effect. We can
be certain that all the expressions of Supreme Order promulgated by
Godhead Light would prevail within the ordinance

84

of such a phenomenon. It would be as perfect in manifestation as atoms

would allow.
The most important thing that we all have to remember is that any such
system made by the Author of Order itself would make the final possible
system in ultimate intelligence, such that all its qualities in its individuality
would allow for the continuation of itself in the highest-ordered basis
possible. It would allow for values of ‘knowing’, ‘seeing’ and will in
maximum existential tenure, in discrete individuality terms. It would allow
for what we call, shall we say, Adamic ‘Man’. ALL of this would be done
automatically — implicitly and incidentally — without option — without
directive in option. Godhead cannot decide to make exceptions on the basis
Man does. Of course, this would imply imperfection in terms of bias,
prejudice, etc. All things that are fitted for the resolution of order will have
order ‘happen’ without exception, in ultimate balanced fairness.
A fantastic battle between two opposed resolves. The property of
randomizing chaos as a result of the initial directed Will to cause Separation
against the intrinsic quality of the nature of Godness — the Will to be
ordered and reconciled, always in perfect harmonious union. Such is the
existential predicament of all things. And so, what of this Godhead Man, or
to put it more accurately in the plural, ‘Godmen’ — the first happenings
from which all life and liveability in the terms we know it in our world, on
our Earth, have descended or have come from.
The Adam phenomenon is metaphysically outlined in the Torah, Bible,
Koran and every major religious ethic we have on this planet, except
Buddhism which makes no mention of personal anthropocentric origin. For
centuries we have looked at the story of Genesis literally. I remember being
told by the Christian Jesuit priests that a snake came to Eve with an apple in
its mouth, gave it to her and asked her (I suppose by hissing at her) to tempt
Adam to eat it so that he might be judged disobedient by Godhead and thus
reduce his perfection and be sinful. How marvellous apples must have been
in those days, that Adam, who we are told had everything in this wondrous
garden of plenty, would succumb for want of a taste of it. It is through
infantile, literal associations such as these that our consensus of belief has
come to us. Is it any wonder that when such unreasonable nonsense is
purveyed

85

as religious truth, the might of fear in threat has to be used to keep

millions of hearts in belief?
The consensus religious and spiritual outlook of billions of precious
individuals has been, through. the centuries, cultured against the broad
screen of deadly ignorance and foolishness. In fact, the strictly literalistic
approach to the Bible came into ascendancy only at the time of the
Reformation in the 16th Century. It was a time of great upheaval when the
Protestants were breaking free of the power of Rome. Thus they sought
their authority from the Bible rather than from the Pope. Those who
remained loyal to the Pope also wished to affirm their own allegiance to the
Bible. So a situation developed in which the two rival factions sought to
outdo each other in their professed loyalty to the Bible. This is the context
from which the idea was formed that the Bible should not be questioned in
any way. Thus a literalistic interpretation of the Bible originating relatively
recently was handed down to the present time. Amongst the early Christians
the more influential school of thought treated the stories of Genesis largely
as allegory. As the third-century theologian Origen puts it, ‘What man of
sense will suppose that the first and second and third day, and the evening
and the morning, existed without a Sun and Moon and stars?’ It is thus the
aim of the ‘Holy Spirit’ to ‘envelop and hide mysteries in ordinary words
under the pretext of a narrative of some kind and of an account of visible
things’.
Of course, the instigators of the literalist school of thinking could not
know the terrible consequences to both themselves and their ‘flocks’, of the
rubbish they expounded. They would have to be the definitive
sadomasochists of all time if they did, because in that kind of simplistic
thinking they were responsible for the ideas that were to influence and lead
to all the excesses of the Spanish Inquisition, the pogroms against the Jews,
Red Indians, Gypsies and indeed all the non-Christian races and ethnic
groups that were proselytized by their misconceived and misleading
gobbledegook. The serious part, of course, is that the mechanism of eternal
tenure of all their victims that we commonly call the Soul was terminally
affected by their deadly cavortings. Their responsibility and the
consequencies to themselves would be awesome. If, as I have suggested,
there is an eternal continuum of Life and Death, these entities would have
to chase millions of individual Soul Fields through all their own

86

individual circumstances of incarnacy and discarnacy to restore the

portion of responsibility, to balance the error or disadvantage incurred at
their hands, to redeem and make restitution of debt that allowed for any
removal from Godness the victim’s souls might have suffered. Let me
explain why this might be so:
We have seen that thought cannot be a derivative of atoms, but that atoms
are a derivative of thought. Where these atoms are in an arrangement that
neutralizes force through an unbroken ancestral connection modulus that
preserves livingness in a dead and dying universe, the light of potentiality,
pre-electromagnetism or Godhead-light is received in lines and patterns that
define individuality that can be seen in unit terms as ‘parcels’ of
aggregatable experience with actionable free will.
It is therefore obvious that conception, being the origin of discrete
physical life, or individuality, in atoms is not the beginning of us as living
being and that physical death cannot therefore be the end of us.
One human being is thus potentially the size of Godhead. A single man
or woman with a soul is thus bigger and grander than all of the non-living
Universe. That’s you and me.
We could, therefore, speculate as to the methodology of our continuation:
continuation, if you will pardon the cliché, meaning from where or from
what have we ‘come’ and to where, or to what we ‘go’.
If, through the mechanism outlined above, we are still indebted to other
individuals, then what more obvious method is there of providing
opportunity to restore balance in real time, than to return
to the atomic frame of existence, i.e. to reincarnate: in other words, to
meet the bearers of those individualities.
 What does Genesis say about the creation of Adam, supposedly the first
and thus the primary creation of all our yesterdays? It says, and I quote, (the
Bible – King James Version) Chapter 2 Verse 7: ‘… and the Lord GOD
formed MAN of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the
breath of life; and MAN became a living soul.’ I think you see my point.
For ‘dust’ see ATOMS.
The rest should be plain. And thus the legacy of our ancestry and the
present form of Adam’s descendants was set. Set in tragedy.
The tragedy of our human predicament as it has fallen now.
I believe that Inaugural Being, or Godbeing, was really an

87

expression of how Godhead translated into all other states outside itself,
at the very interface point, where the universe of the Whole met the
universe of the Part. It was a point of incidental creation. It was not explicit
creation in terms of a manufacturing procedure. This happened when the
first true Adam was created out of the very stuff of the universe — by
Godbeing. This true Adam was an assembly out of sub-atomic particles and
represented in turn the next logical interface between Godbeing and the
physical Universe. This was a critical interface and represented that point
where vulnerability to the Second Law of Thermodynamics, or entropy,
began.
I am trying to point out that this phenomenon is the root existential event
that went on Universe-wide, at all points of the interface of the Universe of
the Whole with the Universe(s) of Parts. It therefore happened in all points
of the Universe where the agglomeration of Forces allowed and this Earth
was only one such point.
True Adam was a crucially necessary mechanism, because a modus was
necessary that allowed the ephemeral state of Godbeing to work within the
margins of force without being affected by this force itself. In fact even the
true Adam state required an envelope around it too. It was a mechanism
through which Godbeing could view the Universe of Parts. A modus
operandi that provided a remote viewing and redeeming facility that would
do all that needed to be done and yet itself keep safe from corruption all it
intrinsically was. An arena or envelope was built (The Garden of Eden) that
separated it from being totally infrastructurally sublimated by the natural
forces of the Universe and thus prevented it from being intrinsically trapped
in an atomic cloak. These true Adams were thus original assemblages, the
First Adams, and were placed on all suitable planets. They were Radiant
Beings not yet truly part of the material physical Universe they found
themselves in. A form of existence into which was set the Godhead power
to think, to know, and to discern in Whole terms. An intelligence with the
power to make choices based on the summary of information that came
directly from Godhead itself. In other words, a mechanism for reason made
of atoms. An agency and representation that would seek to know and
understand the modes and manifestations of an arena, whose basic
functional aegis was to divide of itself into parts,

88

in a Universe that was totally opposite to the one their existential

mechanism came from. The first Adams would give Godness the means of
a connected yet at the same time isolated vantage point, as I said before, to
observe, monitor and view all the factors that went to make up the material
Universe of separated parts. To view the Whole from the point of view of
parts. Something that the Whole state implicitly contradicts.
To summarize, Adam and Eve Beings were the first sublimation format
into parts of Godhead and thus the order of the day at the first point of the
Beginning of our Universe itself: implicitly forming on all suitable planets
throughout the Universe of Parts. They were not beings as such in the
common sense of the word, but we’ll call them that for convenience of
description. The word ‘being’ is a figurative description of the capacity, an
ultimate Potentiality, that came into our universe to allow Godness to
explore the view of the Whole from the point of view of the part. This is
crucial to realize. These original ‘Beings’ (I use the word for convenient
descriptive purposes) would thus know full well that an enforced Universe
held the ultimate threat of complete sublimation and thus entrapment of
their status as pure spirit endeavour, through the breaking up, separating,
entropic momentum of Force in our Universe that is its signature and sole
purpose. Their entrapment within the margins of Force could be final and so
a device was sought that would maximize the safety of their demeanour and
carry through their intention of viewing the Whole from the point of view
of Parts with minimal risk. Through their direct connected aegis to Godness
and thus the Universe of the Whole an environment was created where they
could exist as near to Godness as possible. Just as a more substantial
‘redeemer’ two thousand years ago came into the world and proved this
point with five loaves and two fishes. He, remember, was in atoms and thus
could deal with atoms, albeit in a very advanced way.
And so did the Garden of Eden come to be in this way? What exactly was
this phenomenon? Was it actually a garden, or is this too simplistic a
mechanism to explain it as an actual piece of real estate in terms of a
location for the origin of living being? I believe any thinking person would
have to conclude that it was a metaphor. A mental picturescape on which to
envision a mighty happening.

89

In and through these symbols, these mental envisioning mechanisms,

Adam, Eve, and the Garden of Eden, the best grandstand view of all that it
means to be in a Universe of Parts could be demonstrated and gleaned.
The word ‘garden’ conjures up an image of a total environmental
scenario. A place that even the simplest mind can identify with as a location
for ‘liveability’. To the poetic philosophical minds it would be a view from
a true ‘bridge of sighs’, one might say. A practice pitch for the behests of
angels. A setting from which our origin progressed and had to be
established so that all minds could understand the phenomenon. A place or
a stadium for beginning.
There would thus be many ‘Gardens of Eden’ universe-wide in as many
suitable locations on all suitable planets in the Universe where all that is of
Godness could prevail and prosper. They were locations or watch towers to
provide a means of redemption for all who fell into them through their own
volition out of Godhead once upon a time. Yes, that means you and me.
The common literature describes this phenomenon in this way. Let’s
begin with the Bible:
‘And the Lord GOD planted a garden eastward in Eden and there he put the man whom he had
formed. And out of the ground made the Lord GOD to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight,
and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good
and evil.’
(Genesis Ch. 2: v.8-9)

‘And the Lord GOD took the man and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And
the Lord GOD commanded the man saying, of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of
the tree of knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou eatest thereof
thou shalt surely die.’
(Genesis Ch. 2: v.15-17)
It is obvious that this is symbolic language and must not be taken
literally. How many Trees of Knowledge do YOU know in the average
garden?
Yet almost every Christian grows up with the idea that a snake took an
apple to Eve and she took a bite of it and offered it to

90

Adam and this act of disobedience caused us all to be cursed in some

way with their sin and their guilt.
We truly are kin to baboons if we take all this literally, all of us who
swallowed this simplistic garbage so ably propounded by many advocates
of Christianity.
You might have noticed that I have tried not to personalize Godhead by
representing it as a ‘being’. There are too many anthropocentric
connotations to view it in this way. Too many connections with the
European medieval sexist and racist mythology of a white man with a
flowing white beard, dispensing all kinds of damnation to those
unfortunates who incurred his wrath and favour to sycophants and courtiers
who praise his name enough. Buddhistic philosophy, while not invoking a
personalized anthropomorphic Godhead, describes and clearly implies a
final neutral state of ultimate being that may well be taken for Godness, if
you like. This is to my mind, as I have said before, a much more accurate
description of the final existential quantum.
And so, in summary of all the above, we may say that Godness and No-
Godness are two sides of the same coin and all existential creation lies
betwixt these two final polarities. One implies the other and one cannot
exist without the other. Creation is simply the means through which one can
know the other.
To continue in summary, let’s say that we are all here to see, to know and
to understand what is ALL, and that we are an artefact of a logical
procedure that allows for just that by observing the phenomena and
manifestations of our Universe of Force from within it and not from outside
it. Because change is eternal, the procedure is eternal.
The way is thus always open for ‘Redeemers’ to come to save all that
was worth saving in a Universe of decaying parts and the only thing worth
saving in such arenas as our Universe was that line of individual connection
that ties the Whole with the Part: our Souls — that most precious thing of
all things. Redeemers could and would constantly come into our ‘patch’ in
the Universe (because we had a soul, we all had this precious individual
line of eternal heritage at least in potential), claiming that we had something
precious beyond all reason we could never afford to lose. They would come
claiming that we were in a situation of existential danger so awesome in
degree that the giving of their

91

lives was a price they were gladly willing to pay. They knew bodies
made of atoms were just decaying devices in a Universe of Parts, just a
physical shell, a means to a worthwhile end. Something temporary and
transient that gave access to an eternal ingredient that could be persuaded to
return of itself to an eternal existence where there was no threat of its loss.
They knew that this shell would continue to make other shells, other bodies
in continuums called Reincarnation Cycles, ad infinitum, as long as the
strength of the connection all the way back to Godhead in a continuous line
was never broken. It is this uninterrupted line, incarnation after incarnation,
that perhaps best defines the word ‘Soul’. A line that could only be
compromised when the thirst and will for knowledge dims in the individual.
It would then weaken until it was finally no more capable of reasoning and
understanding the meaning of self. Only then would it finally weaken, not
able to dictate the best scope for its existence in a Universe of atoms and go
from being Man to monkey to insect (a million cicadas could sing with the
voice that was once a single man) to tree to virus to plasmid to stone to
atom isolate and beyond to the very ends of energy mass and finally the
contours of Space/Time and the arms of ‘to be’, or ‘not to be’, itself.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER SEVEN:
THE CHICKEN AND THE EGG

The first physical manifestation of living Being as it devolved out of

Godhead is, as I have implied, a very special existential modulus. The Bible
eventology implies an initial singularity where the sexual polarity of the
female aegis had not yet happened. It is formed out of the image and
likeness of Godness itself we are told in the Bible. Yet the Universe of Parts
by definition is the opposite of the Universe of the Whole. Would that then
make the self creation of this first Adam a Being of opposite resolution,
rather like a photographic positive image is different from the negative one?
In other words, as we are substantial and visible the opposite of us would be
insubstantial and invisible. This would imply that the Universe of the
Whole is this resolution too. If the ‘creation’ of Adam came directly out of
Godhead its resolution would be as pure and unadulterated as the opposite
state would allow. This would further imply that the creation would have to
be set in an environment of as ultimate a stature as our Universe would
allow. The Garden of Eden would have to be an environment that is
designed to preserve this purity.
We know that the swansong of our Universe is the Second Law of
Thermodynamics. The ultimate corrupting momentum possible. An octopus
called Entropy with tentacles of doom. Adam and Eve, we know, were told
not to do certain things if they were to keep intact their prevailing Godlike
condition. This state was essential to keep the best connection possible into
the world from which they sprang. They were, after all, as I have said, a

93

self-designed modulus self-created to observe the All from the standpoint

of the Universe of Parts and act as the best possible channel for transmitting
this information to Godhead. From the information gleaned through the
First Adam state of singularity a further element in keeping with the nature
of being in a universe of ‘parts’ is clearly necessary and a second modulus
we know as Eve was clearly indispensable. It was definitively a procedure
that followed out of the Adam state itself and was thus honed out of it. (You
will recall the ‘rib’ story from Genesis.) A list of prohibitions was then
given. These forbiddances, if followed, would protect them from being
sublimated with our universe. If they disobeyed the tenets of this list, they
would lose the power of automatic access to the Universe of the Whole and
Godhead. They would lose the ability of automatic return through their own
free volition to Godhead. They would have been captured in an atomic
universe and isolated from a direct interface with Godhead and would thus
be naked and vulnerable to all the forms of force that would be henceforth
the order of all their days. And so, to put it Biblically, ‘It came to pass’.
They disobeyed the interdictions, and the clear line to Godness became
obscured and their form of ‘being’ became corrupt, lost its straight
uncomplicated line and became subject to the Second Law of
Thermodynamics, or Entropy. The existential winds of change came to
billow in their sails and break apart their ship of fate.
The Temptation of the Christian Redeemer is a fascinating pointer to the
predicament we are all in as a result of all this and begs the question: Who,
then, and what was the Tempter that brought about such a catastrophe for us
all? Let’s leave this question for the moment. I hope the answer will be
clearly implied in due course.
Let me first speculate for a moment on what might have happened to
reduce the scope of Godbeing so drastically in the First Adams and Eves in
the ‘Gardens of Eden’ on many planets Universe-wide. As I have said, it
may well have been something that made the spirit form subject to the
arrays of Force that define the Universe of Parts. What, therefore, was the
‘forbidden fruit’ that was supposed to have done this. An apple?
Preposterous, you might say. Yet, I believe, the ‘Apple’ might give us a
figurative clue to it all.
If you look at the shape of the inside of an apple cut in half on its vertical
plane it resembles the magnetic track or shape of the

94

lines of force that prevail on a bar magnet. Was the ‘Garden of Eden’ an
area that was a natural Faraday cage? A Faraday cage is a device that
shields anything placed inside it from electromagnetic fields. Perhaps the
Garden of Eden was a place or situation into which no electromagnetic
fields could enter. A place where the most lethal thing to the spirit form
could be kept away. I would surmise that Godbeing in its earliest form in
this Universe was extremely vulnerable to Force and the forces that made
up this Universe. Electromagnetism would then and even now be lethal to
the total spirit form. Whatever interdiction Adam and Eve were under might
have included the barring of magnetic fields at all costs. I have said
previously that a good definition of Godhead is one that conveys the idea
that it is the antithesis of what we call Force. It is the principle that defines
No Force or the state of absolute Peace or Stillness. The final straight line
that defines no potential difference between points. Whatever the ‘apple’
was it breached the defences, and here the ‘serpent’ may be yet another
figurative clue that defined this threat and might affirm my postulation. If
you think about it, the serpent travels in a regularly shaped winding form. In
other words, a ‘Sine Wave’. It may define an electromagnetic field
producing an entry mechanism that broke down the protective ‘clothing’
that shielded the ‘spirit form’ of Adam and Eve from the full rigours of our
Universe such that they were made naked. In other words, vulnerable to the
Universe’s dismantling array of forces and thus, as I mentioned previously,
to the constantly corrosive and lethal break-down effect of the Second Law
of Thermodynamics, namely Entropy.
And so the long drift into more and more gross forms of living being
began for the first Adam life form of the Earth. From spirit being to mortal
flesh over billions of years, perhaps the transformation occurred in line with
the behest of the entropic drift, right down to the most recent forms of
physical Mankind, and the legacy of the grave. In generation upon
generation of new False Adams culminating in the ones that mark the most
recent history of our species, Man.
We are thus, as living beings, a line of existence discrete from Godbeing
yet connected to it in ways that account for all we know as conscious living
intelligent individuals ourselves.
If you see existence as a line, Godhead is perfectly straight.

95

Godhead is perfect ‘Peace’. It is ‘left’ of the radio spectrum. Before radio

waves begin to put in, in layman’s terms. It exists before the first
perturbations that mark the beginning of the electromagnetic spectrum, that
in turn marks the beginning of Force. (See Fig. 9 in the illustrated section).
In other words, the point at which our line develops the first kink in it. It is
in understanding this line that we may understand the answers and the
questions I have posed in this thesis. Particularly where pertinent to our
‘friends’ the Greys.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER EIGHT:
OF GOD, MICE AND MEN

We cannot have a more obvious implication that the Way of the Universe is
Devolution and not Evolution, when we see how the accent of Man’s
inspiration has changed through the aeons from the Metaphysical to the
Physical. When the summaries and results of so-called progress, or
development, are taken it is undeniable, that the existential expressions of
Man have moved further and further away from an accent on a spiritual
outlook and more and more to the transient temporary exigencies of the
material outlook, representing the stance of the physical. It is a way of
making the best of our entrapment. It is also the surest way, alas, we ensure
our entrapment in this cauldron of death and destruction we call the
Universe. A way of deriving the immortality of a stone by way of the
immortality of a clone. I believe this to be the only Alma Mater of a
Universe of Parts. All else is immaterial. Please pardon the pun.
Yet, while life and liveability lasts, while this ‘living’ quality is steeped
in a flexibility that can elect the maximum options in this cage of damnation
we call our Universe, we may still escape into an eternal scope that knows
no limit. A scope that is inherently secure forever.
If we can for a moment generalize the basic philosophical existential
momentums driving humanity in the world today, they come down broadly
to two schools of thought. Eastern and Western. Those who believe in
Reincarnation and those who don’t. There is a logical paradigm that I have
worked out for myself that allows me

97

a snatch at deciding which of the two basic approaches, Eastern or

Western, I might go along with in answering this question of what is the
single most important resolution of continuity that drives existence. It goes
like this.
In order to know anything you must exist in a state to do so. In other
words, you must first be there, to know you exist. In my present conscious
terms as an individual, I know I am here. Descartes put it so beautifully and
simply as ‘I think, therefore I am.’ It is the final existential value that
anyone can draw. As such, a rock on the Moon has been there ‘to know’ (I
am not claiming it knows anything, or can know anything, I am only
claiming it is there) for at least five million years. It will stay on the Moon
for another five million years exactly where it is unless something else
moves it. It will not be able to do it of itself, for itself. It is that dumb. We as
human beings can go to the Moon and kick the hell out of that rock. We
might even pick it up, bring it back to the Earth. Study its crystalline
structure under an electron microscope, polish it and admire it on our
mantelpiece. It cannot do a dam thing to us. We have total control of it and
all its capacities and potentialities, such as they are. It cannot command us
or decide anything for itself or us. It has no power of choice whatsoever.
Yet it is superior to us in basic existential terms because it will stay a rock
on that mantelpiece, or in the ground, after the mantelpiece decays and
disappears and we as human beings are long gone and pushing up daisies.
Our tenure will only last a measly seventy years if we are lucky. Are you
getting my drift? How is it possible that something like a rock will
inherently be capable of lasting longer in tenure, just doing nothing, when
you and I who, in capability and capacity to know and understand and do,
are so superior to a rock and its inherent value and capacity? There has got
to be a way that we can continue on, to fulfil our grander capacity for
choice and range of choice. I am certain that Reincarnation or the
transmigration of an individual being through a carrier or vehicle outside
the atomic scale (a soul) is that implicit way.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER NINE:
TO LIVE AGAIN

I have mentioned the term ‘Reincarnation’. Let me say something about it

at this point. All the major religious theosophies, including Christianity,
have believed at some point or the other in the principle of the
transmigration of the soul. This principle enshrines the capacity for the
continuance of an individual’s being, over several lifetimes, in a repeated
series of physical bodies. The idea is that the individual essence continues
in a learning process through a series of corporeal bodies, till that individual
essence has learned enough to be divested of material form. From thence
continuance is supposed to proceed in non-corporeal, or metaphysical, form
till all knowledge is achieved and maintained in a state of absolute all-
knowing and all-powerful eternal aspect.
All Eastern religions still subscribe to this existential formula. Judeo-
Christian and Islamic theosophies no longer subscribe to this principle and
only believe in a single episode of incarnate existence, with the
extinguishment of the individual physical being at a final posting we call
‘death’. We now come to an example of the horrendous wickedness
practised on us all by the so-called ‘fathers of the Christian ethic’ when they
threw out the other traditions, and their sources of scholarship, that are now
identified as the Nag Hammadi and the Pistis Sophia texts in the Coptic
Gnostic Library, in the early years of the Christian Church. In the Pistis
Sophia, that purports to give Christ’s incidental conversations with his
apostles and contemporaries, it is apparent that reincarnation for early
Christians was a thoroughly accepted tenet. There is an

99

account of Jesus describing to his apostles the difference between those

who were purified and returned to heaven from a state of insubstantiality
and never entered ‘physical’ bodies, and those who have to free themselves
from the ‘wheel of rebirth’. Of the first type of soul Jesus says: ‘They have
not suffered at all and they have not changed places, nor have they troubled
themselves at all, nor have they been transferred into various bodies’. Then
of his apostles he says, ‘You have come to be in great sufferings and great
afflictions from the transferences into various bodies of the world. And after
all these sufferings of yourselves you have striven and fought so that you
have renounced the whole world and all the matter it is.’1
Many representatives of the so-called mystical branches of both Judaism
and Islam, Cabalistic and Sufi traditions respectively, also incorporate
reincarnation into their belief structures. However, for the mainstreams of
these faiths it appears that continuance in splendour and bliss is only
supposed to be reserved for those who reach a certain level of goodly
development in the favour of a divine entity whose will proffers this state to
the soul as a reward. We all owe those scoundrels of the past who deemed
these texts invalid and took away our right to consider all the literature
about any particular belief, a great debt of ingratitude: It was easy to see
why they did ii:. Reincarnation implies that you have many chances to get it
right. These rascals knew that if we were told we just had one chance under
pain of damnation their esteem and their importance and tenure as
administrators would skyrocket. It gave them the power needed to lounge
around in cassocks and hold to ransom almost the entire family of Man.
The Eastern philosophy of Buddhism, unlike Hinduism, accepts no
Command or directive divine mechanisms that allow this as a personalized
whim, but proclaims an individual and totally free custody of one’s destiny.
Another all-important and complementary principle runs along with
reincarnation. It is called Karma. This principle enshrines the ethic that says
‘As you sow so shall you reap’. Eastern philosophical thought includes
Karma as the driving principle that governs the reincarnation process. It
postulates in effect that what you have done in a particular lifetime governs
your status and placement of return in subsequent lifetimes. All this. of
course, begs the question of where are the starts and where

100

are the ends of any individual existential sojourn? What is born? Who is
born? And where does what is born come from in the first place, and why?
I can’t help feeling that acceptance of the ethic of reincarnation was
doomed in Occidental hands. Indeed, its eradication from the Christian
codex is believed to have been the responsibility of the wife of Justinian I
— the Empress Theodora, who was enraged by a soothsayer when he
claimed she was a witch in a previous existence. Her influence over her
husband was claimed to have been responsible for the denial of the
principle of reincarnation in Christian theosophy. It is claimed that under
Justinian’s order the Christian Codex was wiped of any reference to it in the
canon. It is also plain to see that the principle’s inference that an individual
continues for lifetime after lifetime would be very inconvenient in terms of
controlling the ‘body politic’ of religious endeavour. As I said previously, it
is easier to corral an acolyte within a faith if he is told that he has just one
chance of getting things right than if he has a multiple snatch at things. I
suppose it is understandable when one views it all against the antagonism
and threats offered against the burgeoning early Church from the host of
heretical views that it faced in its early days. But expediency is the author
of lies, and reason and its power to proffer truth is always its victim. The
price of such victimization is awesome. It is the loss of your Soul and mine.
The terrible thing is that the result is not set in punishment, as is
commonly accepted the world over, but in simple, coherent, logically
contrived consequence, neutral consequence. The most awesome
consequence of all is, the final loss of knowability within a state of coherent
focus — i.e. an individual human being, or ‘human beingness’. And so, in
final summary, let us try to see the entire picture that defines our ‘being’ as
living entities within the scope for existence provided by and for that being.

1
Coptic Gnostic Library: Pistis Sophia (Book II, ch 100, p.249). Edited by Carl Schmidt (Leiden:
E.J. Brill, 1978)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TEN:
‘OUR FATHERS WHO ART
OF THE UNIVERSE’

There can be little doubt that we are not a lone species of intelligent life in
the universe. I am sure you have heard the ‘implicate numbers’ argument.
You know, the one that goes: There are so many trillion stars in our galaxy.
Our sun is just one such star. A pretty ordinary one at that. This ordinary
star has a solar system with nine planets around it. One of these planets has
life on it and one of the species of this life is so advanced it can know and
perceive the Universe and all there is to know about all this life and thus
control all other life on this planet through this knowledge. The argument
goes on. If we are just one sun among trillions of suns in one galaxy among
trillions of galaxies, then who are we to think that we are the only
intelligent master life form in all these numbers? We don’t need to prove the
existence of life empirically. The implicative argument suffices.
Let us for a moment, for argument’s sake shall we say, accept this
implicative contention for the existence of other ‘master life’ in the
Universe. If we do, then it follows that the Universe is teeming with
intelligent life and that this life, as is the nature of intelligence, has various
levels of intellectual capacity from the most rudimentary to the most
supreme. What, then, defines this mentality in terms of its results?
The model for all that is best or worst in the application of high levels of
intellect has to include the capacity, first and foremost, for the preservation
of this acumen in its most fruitful stance. If

102

we look at the out-turn of the whole human psychological aegis from the
beginnings of its independent choice-making capability, it all comes down
to, after all the centuries of development, the complete denial of this
fundamental existential platform in the creation of the means to deny it. I
mean by this the creation and production of the means to take it out
completely in one fell swoop: the atomic bomb. Such a startling paradox is,
you might think, the prerogative of ‘unintelligence’. Yet there is no question
that we all, as a species, accept that we are not unintelligent. So does
intelligence out of its very nature implicitly beget unintelligence? It seems
undeniably so. At least, the intelligence that dominates and controls all
other living platforms of being on this Earth seems, in fact, with ultimate
irony, to be in the business of denying this capacity and its future scope
totally.
How, then, might a civilization that has given birth to the phenomenon
we call ‘Flying Saucers’ and their occupants have survived to the point
where they can go visit other parts of the Universe many light years away
from their planet of origin without blowing themselves apart as a
civilization? How have they survived against the Second Law of
Thermodynamics with such a prodigious technology, when we, after a mere
two hundred years of industrial technology, are poised to take out the
human race at the press of a button? The overwhelming human urge to
violence for the most facile and shallow of reasons, century after century,
has been proved through the tremendous numbers of wars, skirmishes and
violent confrontations and in the fact that we have always used any and all
the implements of war that we have invented. Their use has always been
based in terms of expedience. It has just been set on a matter of opportunity,
time and circumstance. In other words, the summary of our intelligent
endeavour seems to have led to the development as its acme of
achievement, in just two centuries, of the means to take us all out of
existence at a single stroke. How could alien civilizations have coped with
the above stated paradox, if this paradox is, as it seems, a natural quantum
universally implied and applied? Of course it begs the question. Is it really
universally applied?
Any answer to this question will of course have to be speculative. My
speculation goes as follows:
Imagine a planet out there somewhere in space. A planet with

103

its own strain of what we shall call ‘creator-beings’. Beings of the highest
development in morality, spirituality and emotionality. That planet’s first
Adam beings. Let us speculate that this planet has produced a civilization
that invented a technology thousands of years in advance of ours. They
developed theirs at a stretch without interruption at the same rate, shall we
say, that we on Earth have done with ours since the Industrial Revolution of
the eighteenth century. Let us imagine that they are highly advanced beings
who carried through all of this and thus had developed systems so
completely automated that all the hardware, all the utilities, all the systems
that it takes to run an entire planet were run by robotics and robots.
Remember that all the modern so-called glories of technology that we all
take for granted now have developed since a point in time barely two
hundred and fifty years ago. From the Cotton Jenny to a Cray computer in
just three human lifetimes. From the merest sense of the rudiments of life to
the threading of polypeptide chains of amino acids for the creation of life.
From the primitive understanding of a cell to the cloning of an entire animal
through DNA transfer from the cell nucleus.
Roboids — programmed robots in ‘flesh’ made to order in endless
numbers to run an endless variety of things without the touch of a single
creator-being’s hand. Japan has already produced a model village where the
entire thing is run by robots, albeit. at the moment of the inorganic kind. If
we on this planet can run whole factories with robots in just fifty years
since their first inception, if we have got as far as developing organic
artificial skin and tissue for transplants, it will be a relatively small step to
put the two together. Then you will have homes and factories designed to be
cleaned, maintained and completely run by organic soft-tissue robots: all of
it completely untouched by a single human hand. If the rate of progress of
an alien civilization just maintained the pace of ours, can you imagine what
this civilization might be capable of through thousands of years of
development?
Writing in an article in The Guardian,1 John Newell reports on the work
of Professor Stephen Sligar of the Immunology Department of the
University of Illinois, who has reported that he has made startling progress
towards engineering protein chips to replace inorganic semiconductor
materials such as silicon. It has been known for some time that proteins
have molecules with

104

the complexity and optical properties needed in microelectric

components, but Sligar is finding ways in which it is possible to actually
engineer protein molecules into mini-microchips.
By altering the amino acids out of which long-chain protein molecules
are assembled, protein engineers can also alter patterns of electrical charges
on the surfaces of molecules and hence their electrical properties can be
changed. Sligar has succeeded in making protein molecules more able to
exchange electrons with other proteins. An advantage which protein chips
have over inorganic semi-conductor materials is that they are thousands of
times smaller than the smallest possible silicon chips. Thus they enable
future biocomputers built from them to work much faster than their
inorganic counterparts. A further advantage is that the passage of current
through and between proteins produces no heat and heat is a major problem
for small and compact silicon devices.
Once the necessary protein engineering has been worked out and the
genes for the proteins altered accordingly, the genes can be inserted into
bacteria and cloned millions of times over. So protein chips could be
cheaply mass-produced in bio-creators. Thus they would provide us, says
Sligar, with smaller, cooler, cheaper chips. Also, and this is the most telling
point of all, protein chips have the added advantage of lending themselves
well to the functions of parallel processors, which are the advanced class of
computers which mimic the brain by undertaking many different processes
simultaneously. The natural interactions of proteins, Sligar points out, lend
themselves best to such parallel processing.
So it is safe to say that soft tissue robots (with a potential far greater than
their inorganic counterparts for both efficiency and high-level programming
which can mimic the human brain) have already graduated from science
fiction to science fact.
David Tirrell and his research team at the University of Massachusetts at
Amherst have made a synthetic protein that contains 3-thienylalanine in
place of the natural amino acid alanine.2 They used bacterial husbandry as
well as genetic engineering to synthesize the protein. The sulphur-
containing thienyl group was used because it is a building block of
polythiophene, a polymer that conducts electricity. Tirrell aims to link up
the thienyl groups protruding from a film of this synthetic protein to make

105
 a biocompatible conducting material for possible use in biomedical
devices. The fascinating thing about this protein is that it contains sulphur.
Numerous witnesses of UFOs and their alien occupants have reported a
sulphurous smell that emanates from the craft or from the alien beings
themselves. Might these scientists have unwittingly discovered part of the
recipe for the make-up of alien cloned beings in an artificial protein that
combines synthetic and organic materials, conducts electricity (which is a
facility that is vital to these remote-controlled beings), and contains
sulphur?
Now let’s return to our advanced ET civilization out there in space and its
soft-tissue robots. Let us speculate further that these robots were created to
preserve the existential status and living paradigm of their ‘creator-beings’.
Let’s say that the naturally enforced state of this Universe prevailed on their
planet too and threatened the inherent existent mode of these beings. These
beings, of course, originally came from Godhead as ours did. Godhead, it
must be remembered, has to be a situation that was the antithesis o four
Universe. In other words, these naturally living intelligent entities were
subject to the same devolution processes that prevail Universe-wide, and
they were subject to them once they entered this universe, but their
particular version managed to devolve slower than our version did. They
possibly held to Godhead better, with a finer focus of existential priorities
for longer. Their ancestors came into our universe with the Big Bang just as
ours did. Their first Adam-equivalent had the same problem ours did. The
continual exposure to the entropic force of our Universe made them more
and more vulnerable to it too. So how could they preserve themselves in
their former state and at the same time learn about and observe the Universe
of the Whole from the point of view of the Universe of Parts? They did not
disobey the rules. They did not bite the ‘apple’ of force as hard and as
completely as our ancestors did. They managed to stay isolated from the
margins of force better than our ancestors on this planet managed to do. So
how, then, could they explore the Universe of Parts from within their
Garden of Eden protective envelope? I believe they created a kind of
duplication of themselves out of the stuff of the Universe itself. i.e. atoms.
They built a clone being. An exact atomic equivalent of themselves. A
device that had no soul, i.e. a device that had no direct ancestral connection
to Godhead as they did, but was a duplicate
 106

proxy version of themselves that could be exposed to the entropic

dismantling force of the Universe without compromising anything as
profound as the best possible link to Godhead in an atomic frame of
reference. In fact, they created many cloned beings such as this: an
organic/inorganic copy version of themselves. These ‘Master Clones’, as I
shall call them, gave them the remote-viewing and functioning capability
the Prime God or Adam Beings needed to have in the Universe of atoms to
explore it without going outside their protective cocoon where they would
be prey to the corrupting force of entropy. The Clones could venture where
the Prime Beings would fear to tread. The Clones were a perfect fail-safe
exploratory and marshaling device that secured and maintained the
existence of the Prime Beings that possessed a soul, as long as they wished
it. In other words the ‘manufactured’ Clones were made to run this system.
They could do all the Prime Beings could do and do it till they wore out.
These artificial first-generation Clone beings had one disadvantage. The
cloning process of regeneration had a price in entropy. Their atomic
complement would eventually make them subject to decay. The self-
propagation process made them finite. They could not regenerate
themselves indefinitely. They had the same ‘knowledge’ complement as the
Prime creator-beings. They thought themselves the same as their creators
because they were, after all, perfect Clones. But they found, rather
strangely, that they could hot continue their own existence indefinitely.
They were different. They were subject to entropy and thus the gradual
dismantling of their state in line with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
In other words, they wore out and eventually came to an end. They had to
redone themselves constantly if they were to continue. The Prime Beings,
they found, although subject to the same physical laws of the Universe,
could continue their tenure indefinitely by going through a process called
death and return to the Universe through a procedure called physical ‘birth’.
They continued in incarnacy through the process of reincarnation seemingly
ad infinitum. In other words, the Prime Beings seemed to possess an
additional mysterious capacity or mechanism for indefinite continuation.
We shall call this mechanism a soul. This realization was later to have a
crucial part to play in the existential base of both their world and ours. It
was to be the prompt of all

107

our yesterdays and all our tomorrows here on this Earth. I will explain
later.
As I said previously, the Clones acted as isolating paradigms that enabled
the Prime creator (Adam) beings to stay segregated from the forces of the
hostile Universe. The Clones were living biological beings. In every way
identical to the Prime (Adam) Beings that cloned them out of themselves
with one crucial difference. They were made purely of the stuff of the
Universe — atoms — and had thus no connecting mechanism to Godhead.
Their total connection was centred on the generative plan or blueprint from
which they were cloned and no further.
The Clones were Master Beings in their own way. They had independent
intelligences no less than the Master Prime Beings that gave rise to them.
They thus created a further version of themselves. Their own isolation
mechanism. A mechanical, partially biological atomic version. Let’s call
this version Roboids. A highly advanced polymerized robot with artificial
intelligence and the capacity for being programmed to function as a pure
mechanical utility. The worker bees of their civilization. The Clones were
the drones while their creators, the Prime Adam Beings, were the ‘Queens’.
When you think how much robotics has advanced here on our Earth in
fifty years with our rudimentary civilization, you can imagine what an alien
civilization with an advanced technology might have achieved. There is
already evidence from current research into microtechnology that a form of
Roboid is now being designed for use, particularly for use in environments
that are harmful to humans.
Mark Ward, in an article entitled ‘Silicon cells with a life of their own’,3
discusses these new developments. A team of researchers from the Swiss
Centre for Electronics and Microtechnology and the Swiss Federal Institute
of Technology have designed a computer that can grow, reproduce and
recover from injuries. The computer will be built from blank silicon cells
that in some ways behave like the cells in a biological system. The silicon-
based cells reproduce by copying their software to neighbouring cells —
rather like biological cells passing on genetic information to their offspring.
In this way the computer grows from one cell to fill all the blank cells on a
silicon wafer, although it cannot create new silicon. Each cell is made up of
a collection of logic gates carved out on a silicon wafer

108

less than a millimetre square. These arrays of gates are flexible and can
adopt the characteristics of any logic gate by changing the software used to
address them.
The software ‘genome’ tells each cell where it sits in relation to the
overall ‘organism’ giving it, and this is the clincher: basic self-awareness.
Once it knows its position the cell can work out what its function is in the
large system. So it will only implement the sections of the software that are
appropriate to its position. The cells reproduce by copying this software
genome to neighbouring vacant arrays. If any cell becomes damaged the
cells around it will follow the instructions built into their genome and
reconfigure themselves to work as if the damaged cells were not there.
‘For this we took our information from the brain,’ says Pierre Marchal,
one of the staff scientists on the project. The brain cannot grow new tissue
and so it has to re-route around damaged connections. Marchal says this
ability to heal makes the cell computers ideal for environments that are
harmful to humans, or where it is impossible to repair damage. For
example, space probes or deep ocean survey equipment could be formed
out of these computers.
So far, the researchers have built cells that have reproduced and they
have also simulated an entire microprocessor built up of the cells on a
conventional computer. ‘The cells are as powerful as conventional
computers because you can implement any computer with this. The only
difference is that they will be bigger’, says Marchal. In the long term this
flexibility could enable identical, mass-produced arrays of cells to be
optimized for any computing application by varying the software ‘genome’.
Thus these man-made computers which have a form of ‘basic self-
awareness’ would be flexible to adapt to any circumstance, just as their
alien-made equivalents are able to do.
 According to a report in the Daily Telegraph (18.7.96)4 scientists
working for British Telecom are currently developing a microchip that will
be ready for use in the year 2025. The microchip’s design will mean that,
when implanted in the skull just behind the eye, it will be able to record a
person’s every thought, experience and sensation, hence it is called ‘Soul
Catcher 2025’. Dr Chris Winter of British Telecom’s Artificial Life team
explained that the implant will enable scientists to record other people’s
lives

109

and play back their experiences on a computer. ‘By combining this

information with a record of a person’s genes we could recreate a person
physically, emotionally and spiritually,’ said Dr Winter. ‘The implanted
chip would be like an aircraft’s black box, and would enhance
communications beyond current concepts. For example, police would be
able to use it to relive an attack, rape or murder victim’s viewpoint to help
catch the criminal. I could even play back the smells, sounds and sights of
my holidays to my friends.’
These technological developments in our own relatively primitive
backyard are strong indications that technologies such as these and
probably others that are even more sophisticated may have been developed
long ago by beings technologically far superior to us.
Let me summarize and continue to outline my hypothesis on what might
have happened on our alien extraterrestrial world, perhaps a million light
years away.
The Prime Adam Beings there were straight out of the nature of
Godhead. They were ‘true sons of God. ‘They came to view the Universe of
Parts from the point of view of Parts but found that the price paid was that
the Forces that made these parts in the first place would make ‘parts’ of
them too. They sought a means of staying as near Godly aspects as possible
and made for themselves an environment that secluded them from the
Forces of the Universe. This is the feature I have alluded to previously as a
Garden of Eden. Within this innovation, they were not subject to ‘entropy’
and thus stayed as sweet as they were in Godhead, shall we say, as long as
they remained within its precincts: a giant Faraday cage from which all
electromagnetic, gravitational, centrifugal centripetal and other force
vectors were kept at bay. This was all well and good. But they were trapped.
How could they experience every feature of this deadly Universe and still
remain untainted or unaffected by its prodigious array of dismantling
forces? There was one way. They could create an equivalent of themselves.
A Clone. An entity that was entirely made of the enforced stuff of the
Universe, i.e. Atoms, yet made in their entire image and likeness. The Clone
would be their mechanism for remote viewing the whole universe.
The Clone was their functional tool with the same intelligence and
perception and could venture forth where no Adam being would be foolish
enough to go. The Clones could immediately relay back to the ‘Celestial
Observers’ with ultimate accuracy what it was like

110

to be in this lethal home of ours we call the Universe. As the forces of

entropy took their toll of them, they could replace themselves by re-cloning
themselves and thus continue on in time, space and matter till the fullest
extent of the phenomenon of a Universe of separated parts was known from
the point of view of parts, of eyes, ears, tastes, smells, and feel. It would be
like looking through one’s own eyes and mind remotely.
The Clones did all this beautifully. The little utility they created, the bio-
synthetic Roboid (perhaps they themselves called it a Grey: I’m sure the
reader is by now seeing what I am getting at with all this), was a go-
anywhere mechanism made from an organic/inorganic amalgam on, shall
we say, a silicon and mercury spine. These bio-machines could venture into
areas of our Universe where they themselves (the Clones) would have paid
too heavy a price to go. It was a perfect system of information gathering, at
least for a while. They did not reckon on the inherent corrosive corrupting
nature of the Universe of Parts. The Second Law of Thermodynamics took
its deadly toll in their part of the Cosmos as it does here in ours. The further
the Clones ventured to find the ultimate margins from which they could
function, the more they got corrupted. The more they lingered in this
Universe’s chaotic maelstrom the more — imperceptibly at first, but more
visibly later — their instincts got tuned away from the naturally uniting
features and properties of Godhead. They were endowed with this in mind
at least, when they were first created by the Primary Adam Beings. They
slowly began to question their status against their parent creators.
Difference as a principle became a threat. They noticed the one vital
difference between them and their progenitors. As Clones they were subject
to decay and disassembly faster than their creators. The Prime Beings
within the ‘refuge’ were not. They (the Clones) wondered why this was so.
They wanted to be like the Adam Beings. They had to know the mysterious
difference that made them subject to entropy wherever they were. Their
exposure to the Universe made them subject to this decaying, dismantling
process. They began to question their status. Exposure to the forces of the
Universe made them deceitful and full of guile. These are words that only
have such an implication to someone with a moral or ethical code. To the
Clones’ emotionless intelligence it was the intelligent thing to do. They
were utility beings and thus objectively totally expedient.

111

The Adam Beings, however, knew no such things in their innocence and
direct connection to Godhead within their protective cocoon. The Clones
tempted their creators to let them into their protective cocoon. (I don’t
believe it was with an apple.) Once in they found no difference. They still
decayed, and decayed faster than the Primes. Their entry into the Garden of
Eden let in the Forces of the Universe and made the Prime Beings
vulnerable to these forces too. The Prime Beings began to know demise and
devolvement into an atomic state. They were no more with Godhead. They
were nevertheless, unlike the Clones, still directly connected to it.
The essential distinction between a God-connected Being and a Clone
was that the former was united through Godhead with all that was in living
natural existence. A Clone was a manufactured utility outside this
paradigm. Its continuity was in a state of abridgement already separated
from the Final Absolute. As such it was no more significant in existential
value than a rock or stone. It was a ‘living’ mobile statue with intelligence.
The Prime Beings had a facility for continuous contact with Godhead. As
they fell more and more into a state of Atoms, they generated a procedure
and platform of communion with Godhead called Death. It was a natural
artefact of the Universe of Parts and existed within the atomic array that
made up this Universe, in the spaces between atoms. A halfway house
between Godhead and this Universe of atomic parts. More about this later.
The Clones found thus that the Prime Beings could even conquer Death.
These Godhead-connected Beings returned into new bodies through a
process called birth, carrying with them their conjunction with Godhead
intact. As Clones they had to duplicate themselves. They had no means of
differential reproduction. They could only produce identical copies of
themselves. They could not reincarnate. They could not return into life
modules of their former selves. When they wore out, they re-cloned
themselves. It was a purely physical process. There was no continuity in
mind, only in flesh, and even this was finally subject to limit. You could
clone only so many times before the dismantling feature of entropy at basic
atomic level let you do it no more. They had to find a fresh genome that had
not been cloned. They took it from those of their creators who themselves
became more and more physical with the collapse of their protective
cocoon, and decayed more and more. Most of the

112

Prime Beings returned to Godhead immediately their protective cocoon

collapsed, of course. They were too close to Godhead to fail. Some, a few
perhaps, got trapped.
They passed down a line of beings with a soul. The Clones gradually
took out these beings one by one, never letting them generate themselves
back to Godhead, taking them out as soon as they were born so that their
Stem cells could be used to provide a new platform for re-cloning their own
kind. This never gave the Prime Adam Beings a chance to live a full life
and thus regenerate themselves back to their spirit form and enter Godhead
through Death. Finally, in time and in ultimate tragedy, the Clones took the
last of these precious soul-bearing entities out of existence. There were no
more to regenerate new genomes or formats for cloning. The penny finally
dropped. The Clones at last and too late found the ‘Difference’ between
their ‘father’ beings and themselves. They grasped the idea that there was a
Universe outside the atom and understood the holy abstraction we call soul
as the all-important direct individual ancestral connection to Godhead itself.
More importantly, they realized that the only way to access this Universe
was to possess a soul and that you could only have a soul if you came into
this Universe with it. They finally perceived that a soul was an intangible
ephemeral bond line to the centre of all Absolutes. They had all the time
looked in the wrong direction, in the wrong place. They looked for
something physical. After all, they could never know anything but the
physical themselves. They could look no further than the margins that
identify the atom. They were totally of the atom themselves. Made out of
star-stuff. That is why they never spotted their Holy Grail till the last of
their Prime Beings had gone. It was too late to attempt the acquisition of a
soul on their planet. They could not even try to see if it was at all possible.
They built themselves a means that could conquer space and time and came
to our neck of the woods. They came looking for our Souls. They are here
now: looking for a way to beg, borrow, or steal an eternity.
I have said before that the Creators of the Clones (the Prime Adam
Beings) were of the highest moral and spiritual rectitude. It was because
they were of such demeanour that they maintained their marginal ephemeral
state in atoms notwithstanding their protective mechanism that I have called
the ‘Garden of Eden.’ They could never know how to divide or separate
anything from its whole state. They were ultimate reason itself. They could

113

never resort to violence because they had no concept of separation or

division to know what a violent act might be and thus how to defend
themselves. They didn’t defend themselves when the crunch came and they
were confronted with the ways of the Universe of Parts. I like to think that
they did return to Godhead from whence they came like the beautiful
‘Wimps’ they were. Forgive the play on words. ‘Wimps’ is an acronym for
Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Current theories in physics postulate
that most of the matter in the Universe may be composed of these particles.
Perhaps this explains the ninety per cent of mass scientists say is missing
from the Universe, rather than being consumed by the entry of force into
the nostrils of Angels.
And thus, with ultimate irony, the stage was set for a Universewide
tragedy so that through a functional utility manufactured to deal with an
imperfect Universe with imperfect tools we all to this day stand
compromised.
Going back to the Coptic Gnostic texts mentioned earlier, the scenario
that I have just described is one of the central themes, it seems, of Gnostic
Early Christian thought. The terms used in these texts to describe these
Cloned Alien beings are the ‘Authorities’ or the ‘Archons.’ In a particular
text in the Nag Hammadi Library of ancient Christian thought entitled The
Hypostasis of the Archons there is a detailed description of both their origin
and their nature:

THE HYPOSTASIS OF THE ARCHONS

On account of the reality (hypostasis) of the Authorities, (inspired) by the

Spirit of the Father of Truth, the great apostle — referring to the ‘authorities
of the darkness’ (Colossians 1: 13) told us that ‘our contest is not against
flesh and [blood]; rather, the authorities of the universe and the spirits of
wickedness’ (Ephesians 6: 12). [I have] sent (you) this because you (sing.)
inquire about the reality [of the] Authorities.
But I said, ‘Sir, teach me about the [faculty of] these Authorities —
[how] did they come into being, and by what kind of genesis, [and] of what
material, and who created them and their force?’

114

And the Great Angel Eleleth, Understanding, spoke to me: ‘Within

limitless realms dwells Incorruptibility. Sophia, who is called Pistis, wanted
to create something, alone without her consort; and her product was a
celestial thing.
‘A veil exists between the World Above and the realms that are below;
and Shadow came into being beneath the veil; and that Shadow became
Matter; and that Shadow was projected apart. And what she has created
became a product of the Matter, like an aborted fetus. And it assumed a
plastic form moulded out of Shadow, and became an arrogant beast
resembling a lion.’ It was androgynous, as I have already said, because it
was from matter that it derived.
 ‘Opening his eyes he saw a vast quantity of Matter without limit; and he
became arrogant, saying, “It is I who am GOD, and there is none other apart
from me.”
‘When he said this, he sinned against the Entirety. And a voice came
forth from above the realm of absolute power, saying, “You are mistaken,
Samael” — which is, “GOD of the blind.”
‘And he said, “If any other thing exists before me, let it become visible to
me!” And immediately Sophia stretched forth her finger and introduced
Light into Matter; and she pursued it down to the region of Chaos. And she
returned up [to] her light; once again Darkness[…] Matter.
‘This Ruler, by being androgynous, made himself a vast realm, an extent
without limit. And he contemplated creating offspring for himself, and
created for himself seven offspring, androgynous just like their parent.’5
‘Sophia’, or the principle of ‘EVE’ as she is more commonly known,
thus created something alone and without her consort. A Clone being,
perhaps? Clones are the result of parthenogenesis, reproduction that
involves only the female germ cell. Eve’s creation is described as ‘a product
in the matter like an aborted foetus which assumed a plastic form moulded
out of shadow, and became an arrogant beast resembling a lion’. This does
indeed sound like a description of cloned being, a product in matter
‘moulded out of shadow’. The potentially threatening nature of such being
is also suggested: it ‘became an arrogant beast resembling a lion’. Thus the
warning is given as quoted from Paul in Ephesians that ‘Our contest is not
against flesh and blood; rather the “authorities” of

115

the universe, and the spirits of wickedness.’ Who might these

‘authorities’ be who are not of ‘flesh and blood’? Could they be roboids
formed of other substances, the ‘Greys’, created by the Clones to do their
will?
The text later goes on to describe how the ‘authorities of the darkness’
became ‘enamoured’ of the ‘image of incorruptibility’ that appeared to
them in the ‘waters’. But because of their ‘weakness’ they were unable to
‘Lay hold of those that possess a spirit; for they,’ (the authorities, or our
‘Greys’), ‘were from BELOW, while it (the Spirit) was from ABOVE’. So
the great enigma for the ‘authorities’ provided by a living being with soul
seems to be described here in this ancient text which goes on to suggest the
great difficulty these ‘authorities’ had in their attempt to ‘capture’ the
‘image’ of spirit which they had seen:
‘They took some [soil] from the earth and modelled their [Man], after
their body and [after the Image] of GOD that had appeared to them1 in the
Waters.
‘They said, “[Come, let] us lay hold of it by means of the form that we
have modelled, [so that] it may see its male counterpart […] and we may
seize it with the form that we have modelled” — not understanding the
force of GOD, because of their powerlessness. And he breathed into his
face; and the Man came to have a soul (and remained) upon the ground
many days. But they could not make him arise because of their
powerlessness. Like storm winds they persisted (in blowing) that they might
try to capture that image, which had appeared to them in the Waters. And
they did not know the identity of its power.’
It is not only the ancient Christian texts that give us indications that alien
beings may well have visited our planet and left their mark on mankind.
The chroniclers of the ancient Indian epic, the Mahabarata, those of the
Sumerian text the Epic of Gilgamesh, and those of the Eskimo, Red Indian,
Scandinavian, Tibetan, Babylonian and Egyptian sacred texts, all tell stories
of flying ‘gods’, strange heavenly vehicles and terrifying catastrophes
associated with these extraterrestrial phenomena.
Among the ancient Hindu sacred books, the Samaranga Sutradhara
contains 230 stanzas that describe in detail every

116

aspect of flying, from how the apparatus was powered to the proper
clothing and diet of the pilots. The International Academy of Sanskrit
Research in Mysore, India, conducted a special study of this ancient work
and published its findings in a book entitled ‘Aeronautics, a Manuscript
from the Prehistoric Past’.6 Convincing evidence was found by these
scholars to conclude that the text revealed a knowledge of aeronautics that
was remarkable. Here are some translated extracts from the text:
 ‘The aircraft which can go by its own force like a bird — on the earth or
water or through the air — is called a Vimana. That which can travel in the
sky from place to place is called a Vimana by the sages of old … The iron
engine must have properly welded joints to be filled with mercury and
when fire is conducted to the upper part, it develops power with the roar of
a lion. By means of the energy latent in mercury, the driving whirlwind is
set in motion, and the traveller sitting inside the Vimana may travel in the
air, to such a distance as to look like a pearl in the sky.’
The Vimanas could cover vast distances and could travel forwards,
upwards and downwards. A further quote from the Mahabarata states that:
‘Bhima flew with his Vimana on an enormous ray which was as brilliant as
the sun and made a noise like the thunder of a storm’.
The Tibetan books Tantyua and Kantyua also mention prehistoric flying
machines which they call ‘pearls in the sky’.
Further indication that knowledge of extraterrestrial being was a
worldwide phenomenon is found in the mythology of the Eskimo peoples
which says that the first tribes were brought to the north by ‘gods’ with
brass wings. There is also a telling inscription from a pyramid that indicates
that the ancient Egyptians were also familiar with these phenomena: ‘Thou
art he who directs the sun ship of millions of years.’ This particular
inscription is all the more relevant when we look at it in terms of our
understanding of how it is possible for these alien beings to travel faster
than the speed of light making ‘ships of millions of years’ a real possibility.

117

Scientists are now coming to the conclusion that there is a technique that
might make it possible for spaceships to travel faster than the speed of light.
An explanation of this follows later. Ian Crawford of University College
London says that ‘contrary to popular belief, faster-than-light speeds are not
explicitly forbidden by special relativity’.7 He points out that there are a
number of concepts that aliens might use to defy the speed of light. For
instance, they might use ‘wormholes’, short cuts through space-time created
by the natural design features of the universe. ‘The mere fact’ that travel
faster than the speed of light ‘may be permitted by the laws of physics
means that it might just be possible’, says Crawford. He also claims that if
faster-than-light travel is possible then there may be a good reason why
alien beings would want to hide from us. He speculates that they would be
likely to want to observe human societies and study them as though they
were zoo specimens, looking at them through a one-way viewing glass so
that their behaviour is not influenced by the fact that they are being
watched.
To go back to our discussion about the knowledge of extraterrestrial
phenomena that can be found in the world’s various civilizations,
affirmations from a Judaic source can be found in a fragment of the Dead
Sea Scrolls entitled the ‘Apocryphal Book of Adam’: ‘Behind the being I
saw a chariot which had wheels of fire, and every wheel was full of eyes all
around, and on the wheels was a throne and this was covered with fire that
flowed around it’. How similar this description is to that of a type of UFO
that has been often sighted that seems to be formed of rings or ‘wheels’
covered in blinking lights, or ‘eyes’.
We all face now the chilling prospect of an attempted hijack of our souls
through the cold-blooded lethal efficiency of a super-intelligent machine-
mind that has come into our part of the Universe with this one intention in
mind. It is objective, dispassionate and utilitarian. Judged emotionally, it
could be seen as cruel. Perhaps they themselves do not even know what
cruelty is.
Perhaps you’ve also noticed, too, how robot-like our so-called developed
industrial societies are becoming. The final demise of humanity to a point
of no return may well have already begun.

118

Professor of Cybernetics at Reading University Kevin Warwick is of the

firm belief that the computerization of the entire human aegis has indeed
already begun.8 He warns that in the next fifty years computers will be able
to match some of the thinking abilities of humans. After that, machines will
have the capacity to make copies of themselves like living organisms until
there comes a point when they can surpass the intellectual feats of most
men and women. He believes that man’s treatment of inferior animals might
be emulated by these machines when they deal with us. ‘We can’t rely on
intelligent robots being nice and generous when we ourselves are not nice
and generous’, says Warwick. ‘The best we might be able to expect would
be to be their pets’. The only other alternatives he sees that might emerge
are either the reduction of the human race to the level of slaves or, at worst,
our complete extermination by artificially intelligent machines. ‘We have to
ask where AI research could take us’, he says. ‘It could be into extinction’.
Warwick visualizes machines able to teach each other, possibly in a
language unknown to humans, and thus to take control of computer-
operated weapons. Helped by the development of communications
networks such as the Internet, robots would be able to tap into information
and learn faster. Details available to them could even include the best ways
to eradicate humans. For these reasons Warwick suggests that an
international body should be set up with the utmost urgency to discuss the
threat and to set rules to control intelligent machines. This, he believes,
could help us to ensure that robots were programmed to protect humans or
could be disabled if they tried to take over. ‘There is no point in waiting,
things are moving along quite quickly. If we get it wrong the human race
could be wiped out or enslaved’. However, Warwick himself admits that
programming a moral code into robots not to harm humans would be
extremely difficult since machine intelligence does not mirror human
concepts: ‘We need to make it very simple. Even the concept of what is
friendly and what is unfriendly is difficult’. BT Laboratories futurologist
Ian Pearson, who, by the way, also said that he believed that Warwick’s
time scale was a conservative one, has said that programming intelligent
robots not to harm people would not work.9 I believe that he is absolutely
right: it simply cannot work for the reasons that I have

119

already mentioned. So if Professor Warwick, who is working at the

cutting edge of cybernetics himself with his own research into autonomous
robots, is right, then our fate at the artificial hand of these robots seems to
be sealed.

1
‘Chips Full of Protein’: Newell, John The Guardian 9-8-91
2
‘Living Factories’: New Scientist 3-2-96
3
‘Silicon Cells with a Life of Their Own’: New Scientist 18-11-95
4
Daily Telegraph 18-7-96
5
The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1984)
‘The Hypostasis of the Archons’ (II 4: 86, 94)
6
‘Aeronautics, a Manuscript from the Prehistoric Past’ International Academy of Sanskrit Research,
Mysore, India (1976). As quoted in Secrets of the Last Races, Rene Noorbergen, New English
Library, 1977
7
Crawford, Ian: ‘Some Thoughts on the Implications of Faster than Light Interstellar Space Travel’
(Royal Astronomical Society Quarterly, 1995)
8
Warwick, Kevin (Professor of Cybernetics at Reading University): ‘Beware the Robot Slave
Masters’ The Times 12-9-95 ‘Machines Could Take Over Planet’ The Independent 12-9-95
9
Pearson, Ian: ‘Terror Robots Need to be Curbed’ The Engineer 21-9-95

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER ELEVEN:
CLONING AND ALL THAT JAZZ

An even more disturbing development than the invention of intelligent

robots has been revealed recently and this, I believe, is singularly the most
significant event of the whole millennium, i.e. the cloning of living systems.
With the revelation of the cloning of the sheep Dolly, the world was made
aware that higher animals can be cloned and the so-called highest animal of
the lot, human beings, are well-nigh on the cards for the same treatment. All
those in the ‘secret know’ are privy to the fact that Dolly was not the first
cloned animal and that in secret enclaves the cloning of human beings has
already been done and is still being done by certain governments and, as
has been shown in this book, by other non-human agencies.
For atheists and suchlike who believe that matter gives rise to matter and
there is no more in existence than the chaotic forces of the universe and
what may be manipulated out of them (by what is of them in the first place,
of course), the significance of cloning is relatively minor. I have tried to
show that this whole paradigm is logically preposterous anyway and that
the Universe of Parts is not all there can be in existence. I have tried to
show that a Universe of the Whole, where all parts fit, is a certainty and has
to exist somewhere in some way if there is a Universe of Parts in existence
as indeed our Universe is. If that is so then there has to be a line of
continuity that ties it all together whether it be direct or indirect. This line of
connection is what I have called a ‘Soul’ and if such a ‘mechanism’ or
‘effect’ (call it what you will) exists then cloning is of ultimate importance.

121

I believe that the soul is simply an unbroken line of connection to the

origin of all origins — Godhead. If there exists a line of connection
between anyone’s individuality and that point from which we all began,
(that incidentally includes Godhead’s beginning if it had one) then this line
can be expected to have ‘witnessed’ all that has happened to an individual
and perhaps in some way contain and preserve all the effects, power,
consequences and knowledge of these ‘happenings’ throughout its
existence. I have tried to explain in previous chapters what this ‘line’ might
actually be and how it exists as a working reality, at least in figurative
terms.
We are all of us individuals. We may have family connections, blood
connections, connections through friendships etc., but viewed with any
rational sense or meaning, we each stand separated and individual the
moment we emerge from our mothers’ wombs. This is, of course, true even
of identical twins as long as they don’t share the same physical body. To all
intents and purposes we stand as individuals to make our decisions and
choices from the point of view of a separate identity. In other words, I
cannot go to heaven in your head (if indeed there is a heaven) and you
cannot go to heaven in mine. We are separate beings in a universe of
intrinsically separated parts. So what are all these marvellous beings such as
Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, The Prophet Mohammed and all those wise
theo-philosophical ‘minds of all the ancient religions speaking so
consistently about when they speak of the mechanism of continuity we call
a Soul or Ba or whatever name we might attach to it? They all affirmed
unequivocally that there is continuity although they posited this continuity
in different ways.
I would like to use a somewhat simplistic analogy which I have used to
help my teenage children to conceive of and to explain what the continuing
mechanism might be. I use the world ‘mechanism’ in an abstract sense.
Imagine the soul of an individual living being in physicality to be like a
telescopic rod aerial (like the one on a car) made up of a totally forceless
vaccum. This is a standing vacuum in an environment of total force (our
universe). Unlike other vacuums this one exists in itself and of itself in all
the atomic forces and derived tensions this universe can throw at it. It is like
oil to water. Immiscible but breakable into smaller parts. This telescopic rod
aerial or

122

‘Soul Field’ is spring-loaded and always set to fold into itself if allowed.
It will only do this if it hasn’t got some sort of anchor or restraining
mechanism such as the atomic forces of the universe to stop it doing so. If it
was unrestricted by these forces it would retract completely and it would
metamorphose and disappear into another quantum state that is totally
forceless and not physical or solid as we are. I have called this state of total
and absolute forcelessness ‘Godhead’.
Imagine that each human individual is an exclusive rod aerial who,
before it comes to life exists in what might be termed the ‘Fields of Death’.
It exists in the ‘Fields of Death’ extended and going all the way back to
Godhead at one end and unextended and slightly crooked at the other end.
Waiting to be extended and lowered from this other end (the place ‘Death’
exists) to the space within the force of atoms we call our universe. It only
becomes a pole when it is extended and lowered from Death’s fields to
Life’s fields. Till then it stays folded up into itself at the Life’s Fields end of
death in its crooked disposition, waiting to be extended into incarnacy and
thus into this universe and the living paradigm we call life. (I will later
outline in more detail the paradigms of life and death as I understand them
to be.)
Mum and Dad who are incarnate and thus in the Life’s Fields end (our
universe) already have both ends of their poles extended. In coming
together sexually they form a ladder (two poles side by side) and the
compendium of their conglomerate physical and psychological qualities
form the rungs of the ladder in a stepping mechanism between them. The
ladder is distorted according to the unique value of each respective soul and
the rungs are the makers and. markers of this distortion. Remember, if their
respective poles were dead straight they couldn’t exist in this Universe.
They would have folded up into themselves and returned to Godhead. It is
only because each rod is bent away from the utterly straight aspect that it
exists at all. The measure of this distortion allows any other pole that exists
in the fields of death at the time that is perfectly congruent with the total
sum of the parental poles’ distortion to extend itself as an exact match, and
be guided down into a physical existence. Thus another living being comes
into our universe. (The logic of all this, as I’m sure you have guessed, is
that we are — Clones of God.) Remember the words in Genesis

123

alluding to the fact that we are ‘all made in the image and likeness of
God.’
 Each living species is defined by and decided by the straightness of the
rod. In other words, each species has its own characteristic basic shape to
the rod and this makes that particular species what it is. The more crooked
(dog-legged) the pole, the more primitive the species. The more rough or
dirty and gunky the pole itself is, the more ‘sinful’, more restricted the
individual within the species. In other words, let’s say: one slight bend — a
human being; one dog-leg bend — a chimpanzee; two bends — a wolf, etc.
All human beings will have one slightly bent pole. All apes will have a
single dog-leg or right-angled bend in their pole, with tiny variations for
each genotype within a phylum.
It follows, therefore, that the straighter the rod the more easy it is to
telescope it and withdraw it into Godhead. So the straightest and cleanest,
smoothest poles will automatically withdraw into Godhead and eternal life.
(Try pushing back a crooked rusty car aerial for instance).
I think that in the terms I have stated that I can justify the claim that the
human species can be demarcated from the rest of all species as having the
straightest rod (on this planet at least). As I have said previously, let’s say it
is slightly bent, or it would not be here. The crucial thing to remember in
my paradigm is that the more complex the curves away from the straight,
the more primitive the species.
One is again made aware of the prophet Jeremiah’s words: ‘Make straight
the way of the Lord’. Perhaps he saw the soul in a similar way. But all this
allusion to rods and ladders does not illustrate much about the significance
of cloning. Or does it?
Mum and Dad are essentially two primary human soul lines with all the
prior information of millions of generations carried in their biological
propsectus — their genes. We are each loaded from each of these parental
lines to become new progeny. The newly-incarnating progeny lays its
matching information (the shape of the rungs) to be able to slide down into
a life of physicality in a physical Universe, on an exactly congruent parental
coupling. This, then, gives that progeny a new span of time for existence to
try to straighten out its rungs and its rod, and to clean up, smoothout, and
polish up the rod, such that it may spring back automatically into Godhead
again.

124
 Why has it got to do this, and why in a Universe of Parts such as ours? It
alas has to try to do this in a universe that itself is crooked and makes
‘crookedness’ happen (a ‘crookedness’ without which the universe itself
would not be able to exist as a Universe of Parts). It has to do this in the
same paradigm that gave rise to its crookedness in the first place. It is only
such a universe that can match it like for like. If the rod’s (soul’s)
crookedness was made in such a universe with the elements that made up
that universe then you would expect the same quantums would have to be
used to do the straightening. (See Chapter 26.)
The entry of a single soul into incarnacy is at one and the same time the
most glorious and horrendous thing that could happen. The word ‘happen’
has a very special and significant meaning here. Birth is more an occurrence
or a happening than a deliberately planned event. Or at least in most
instances it is. For the highest of species on our planet it may not be so in
many instances. But even for such a species the eventuality of pregnancy is
more unintentional than intentional, or so sociological surveys would have
us believe. The idea that birth, life and death are an automatic and implicit
non-intentioned process just like water finding its own level, shall we say, is
widely accepted in theological terms. It may well be true in final terms, but
we can only guess that it is so. We can never know.
Intention is the final prerogative of a directive final entity some call God.
You either believe that all things in the most minute detail are decided by
God or you believe that there is such a principle as Free Will and that an
absolute and total scope for all things to happen unfettered exists. This
would be the prerogative of a non-directive final entity. Shall we call this
principle Godhead? If you think about it there could never logically be a
half-way house. If all things can Be through the prompt of a single
occurrence, then the existence of suffering and injustice is tacitly implied
and logically accounted for just as its opposite is so accounted for.
If the governance of existence itself and all things that come from such a
tenet are steered under the ordinance of a directive God then there can be no
cascade of certainties derived out of logic. If reason would be for the mind
of God only then we would not be entitled to assume that reason itself had
any meaning. There could be no speculation because there would be no
rules under
 125

which that speculation could proceed. I am therefore assuming the non-

directive Godhead stance to enter my speculations and offer them to the
reader for good and feisty consideration. If you follow logical derivation
then your guess is as g(o)od as mine!
Before I try to explain what I understand the significance of cloning to
be, in relation to the foregoing, let me try to explain the mechanism of non-
cloned, so-called natural existence or birth and its antecedental significance
on this line of continuity I call a soul.
You all know about the birds and the bees. The principle of the
appearance of new living being is based on the existence of at least one
prior being, and in most instances two. We mostly are the product of a trine
of action. Father and mother together produce a third element.
The winds of focused attention in. urgent disposition (with emotion and
goodly sense, we call it love) ply their trade in Universes of Parts and the
stage is set for the grandest and most awesome event to take place in
billions of locations all over the Universe: Birth.
I claim that Birth without the modulus of endless scope and scope for
endless continuity is meaningless. In die spirit and with the strength of this
axiom I believe that reincarnation is the most logical and pertinent of
procedures to effect this continuity. I was brought up a Christian before I
became a human being and saw the awesome sense of reincarnation. I
believed with the rest of the ‘processed’ Christian arbour that we all were
given just one chance in one life at seeking a better, more continued
existence. I came to realize the patent lunacy and idiocy of such a belief at
the age of twelve when the child of a joyfully expectant couple we knew
was stillborn. It got me questioning the whole edifice of the Roman
Catholic church and these ‘processed Christians’ it produced, as the
scoundrels who in previous centuries decided what you and I should
believe, in the name of its glorious founder. It took away from all of us
some of the most crucial and salient truths he actually taught. I will go as
far as to say that in doing this Roman Christianity may be said to have,
intentionally or unintentionally, taken on the mantle of the Great Lucifer
itself.
 I have mentioned in a previous chapter that the earliest Roman church
endorsed the ethic of reincarnation (as all the major religions

126

did at one time or the other) with illustrations and affirmations with
Christ’s own words as quoted in the ancient texts such as the Nag Hammadi
library and the Pistis Sophia. The vanity of one woman — the empress
Theodora, the wife of the Holy Roman Emperor Justinian — was
responsible for its removal as a tenet, because a soothsayer told her that she
was a witch in a past life. It is a horrendous price to pay for vanity and may
mark this quality out to be the single most destructive ‘cause célèbre’ for
the demise of an entire species.
I myself, for what it’s worth, am still a Christian in as much as I believe,
love, and glorify the wondrous being that gave us the ethic that bears his
name, the ethic as listed and disposed, as I have said, before the
convocations of bishops massacred the ancient Judaic, Aramaic and Greek
texts that came down from earliest times. Most if not all of the vital
assertions that pointed to reincarnation as the most salient ethic of the
continuity of awareness were left out of the now accepted Christian Codex
through their machinations.
The vicious Convocations of the Roman Church and its so-called holy
dignitaries who at various times adulterated, misappropriated, dispossessed
and deliberately falsified and misinterpreted Christ’s teachings did this in
such a way that it laid a path for their own authority as a group, and took
away from us all any insight that Christ might have given us of the
prodigious importance of our individual predicament and our individual
right to make all final decisions ourselves, particularly in a universe
designed for parts or individuality.
Our individual journeys directing us out of our present predicament in
our hellish universe have for the most part been based on sanction,
inculcated through lies, distortion, misinterpretation and, most lethal of all,
fear. Sheer storming fear.
The great revealers of the truth of our predicament and the way out of it
did so through simple and non-confusing information, illustration and
example. They paid for it, most of them, with vilification and, in many
instances, their lives. They still do.
In my own search for the margins of forever I found I was incidentally
becoming a Buddhist, a Hindu, A Jew, a Moslem, Jain, Sikh. The answers I
was discovering made me fall in love with the truths and the first revealers
of these truths in each of these religious disciplines in exactly the same way
and with the

127

same magnitudes with which I love Jesus Christ. (I say it this way
because I was ‘implicated’ a Christian at birth.)
The most marvellous discovery I made, as any dispassionate objective
unprejudiced student of their revelations will discover too if they have done
the whole exercise and searched for the meaning of their revelations, was
that in no way do they, any of them, contradict each other in the most basic
and salient revelations they made as to the existential bases that underlie
our predicament in this universe. All the differences were installed by their
followers later and ascribed to them.
No truth can be outside meaning, reason and logic. The great revealers
fought, suffered and died during their sojourn in life for rationally derived
truth. These are the standpoints that make everyone equal in the pursuit of
ultimate truth and we are all thus inherently free to seek after and find the
final answers devoid of the fetters of other men’s whims and fancies if we
but use these basic psychological loci. They are the knitting needles that
unravel the knots of the chaos of the ‘dead atom universe’ with ultimate
dispassionate objectivity. It equalizes us all in all our quests for truth and
lays to rest the essential myths that tend to happen when truths are seen and
accepted subjectively.
I am claiming all this in the first person not because I think that I am
anything special but because I hope that the reader will also see that we are
all in the same predicament as a species. If logic has any meaning then
togetherness counts and a world made better together for rational reasons
against the entropically driven chaotic momentums of the dead, static,
dependent universe will redeem and be effective in redeeming future
generations of wandering beleaguered and besieged souls in this Hell we
call our universe.
With reincarnation as the central mechanism that facilitates continuity in
a physical disposition, the wheres, whens, whys of it all are, it seems to me,
easily derived. All action begets a reaction: You sow and you reap what you
sow. All Christians, for example, assume there is some kind of celestial
bookkeeper outside themselves keeping a tally of all they do or think or the
consequences that follow from such action or, indeed, inaction. Few if any
really go after an answer to the questions thoroughly enough: Who or hat
and where is this entity, this mechanism that counts us and all about us?
How is he, she or it disposed? Where does it live,

128

or exist? Why have an arbitrator or clerk of all Universal works anyway?

It is God, of course, claim the Christians in a hallelujah chorus. It must be
God. It must be the supreme being’s personal job to marshal the entire
universe and all the doers and begetters of all consequence and to judge
them implicitly for their works and dispense punishment, praise and reward.
In Chapter 5 I have attempted to show how this concept of God as a
directive entity is without rational basis.
I have placed God outside the Universe in a totally different frame of
existence yet I still claim that we are not isolated from God: how then do
the two connect? The clear implication from this is that the mechanism that
allows us to conceive all of this in the first place, and indeed reach and
communicate with God, may in fact be ‘thought’. It may be a capacity that
can reach and exist outside the frames of Space and Time and indeed
‘travel’ faster than the speed of light. If thoughtness’ is such a marvellous
thing and its application so powerful in deciding destiny, then we have
something we have to be very careful about. Its resolution, use and
reconciliation may well be the final drive of all drives that decide every
detail of our subjective pasts, presents and futures. If this is so, then we are
the only final arbitrators of us. We are the only librarians of the self as
individual entities we’ll ever have — anywhere, anyhow. As such we hold
the catalogue and the pen that enters all quotients within. It is an individual
journey from beginning to end within the frame of existence we call this
Universe and perhaps beyond. Or is it?
What really is the pen, the catalogue, the writing? How is the record kept
in this metaphor of mine? How and where can we write with thought such
that a meaningful record can be kept that arbitrates our entire scopes and
results?
We know that force shapes our entire reality. Atomic force paradigms, be
they called strong, weak, electro-magnetic, gravitational, etc, are all simply
the pen, book and ink that shape our reality and the revelations that come
from it. It is what we might call a hard, solid, physical reality. If there is a
hard, solid, physical abode to our reality, there must equally be a soft, non-
physical, non-enforced modus existing somewhere in some way, to it, upon
it, and within it too. Just as if there is a plus there must be a minus. I have
laboured in this book to give the reader some concept of what it might be, if

129

not categorically then by default. This other reality will be as I have said
previously, staged in exactly opposed quantums. It will be perfect stillness,
peace, the perfect absence of force. It will not be hard, physical. It will be a
reality devoid of the concept of parts. As I have said several times
previously, a reality of all togetherness of parts. A reality of all knowledge,
understanding and perception in total fit, seen and discerned in instant
instantness without the existence of spatially addressed, sequentially
assessed time. Hard to conceive of, isn’t it? But there it is. It really IS.
I asked previously how the record was kept. We know in this Universe
the physical record of our past as living beings is kept through a double
helical strand of tiny shapes of force called chemicals in a force-coded
sequence called DNA. We know that anything that does not live does not
have this record. So one of the most crucial differences between living and
non-living things might be said to be that one has a continuity record and
the other has not. I believe that the non-enforced universe that encompasses
and leads to Godhead also has a record-keeping equivalent of itself. It is
written with a non-force pen, if you like. A kind of vacuum writer that
assembles the equivalent of DNA but is absolutely nothing like DNA. In
fact it as totally unlike DNA as it can be. It is not spatially arrayed. It is not
sequentially metered. It therefore has to be a phenomenon we will find
almost impossible to actually conceive in our parts-conscious, sequentially
metered mind’s eye. We might, however, gauge an implication of what it
might be and from that derive all the important qualities of the interface
point that connects the Universe of the Part and the Universe of the Whole.
I have tried to conceive of the phenomenon we commonly call the soul as a
continuous track that connects the two and terminates in the individuality of
a single living being in the world of this physical. living being. This is the
track that the False Creation of alien Clones, Roboids and thus Greys that
are now revealing themselves more openly, do not have. It is the line of
connection I believe they are all here to pirate and pillage. This, I believe, is
normal practice all over the Universe where precious primary creations of
soul connected to living systems like mankind still survive. They have
happened in on us and now it is our turn to face the terrible music. A music
I believe ‘Christ’-like phenomena come to planets to try to prevent. It is the
total horror story of our

130

present predicament since these artificially created ‘things’ arrived here

or impinged here on our part of the Universe. It may well, I believe, be the
final writing on the wall for our species and indeed all the living species of
our planet.
If, as I contend, the soul is the track that marks our connection to our
point of interception in Godhead and uniquely identifies any and each of us,
then our faces and personalities are uniquely and individually coded and set
both with a specific soul track and a unique physical track we call our DNA
fingerprint. It contains all the information of all ‘happenings’ that we have
uniquely instigated from the past to the present. If our DNA is, then, that
specific to our individuality and we make an absolutely exact duplicate to
this as we do when we clone some living being then the horrendous
consequences become immediately apparent. We make another portal that
might feed into our unique Soul-and-Body record because it has the exact
keying mechanism that allows it to do this.
If we clone a thousand individuals from a single human (primary) being,
then these thousand individuals share the same record of the primary being
and will thus influence in equal measure the destiny of that being. The
primary being will have a thousand sources of ‘sin’ or just simply
information it cannot control with its will. If it happened to you, your clones
in their individuality would share your exact biophysical aerial receiver (as
it was when the DNA was extracted from you) and I believe also its
attendant soul identity. You as the primary entity from which it sprang will
not be able to do a thing about any negative or harmful input it might
choose to feed into your central bank. It will share your account. You would
have lost individual exclusive and primary control over who can deposit ill
effect into it. I believe clones are simply exact multiples of the primary
being they were cloned from and share the single individual line of
inception back to Godhead. The horrendous outcome is that the primary and
the clones all share the same individual soul.
I wonder whether Christ was alluding to this eventuality when he said:
‘They shall seek for death and death will never come …’
Can you imagine someone cloning another you when you have died and
are existing in Death’s Fields (say, from a blood sample or DNA sample
you might have left behind)? You will immediately have a portal into life
opened for you that you might not desire to

131

have that will hold your spirit from progressing where you intended it to.
You will be anchored and even perhaps be adulterated from the incarnate
equivalent of you and there would be nothing you (the Primary Being)
could do about it. You would be damned by delay, and that delay may
further damn you more and more in the eternity of complete disbursement.
By damnation I mean the complete entropic disbursement of your
individuality in subsequent reincarnations downwards into subsets of your
species: Man — to ape — to monkey — to animal — to mollusc — to tree
— to bacterium — to virus — to plasmid — to various differentiated heavy
atoms — light atoms and back again to hydrogen and so on! Eternal
entrapment in physical universe, and the endless entropic churns they are.
I am reminded of the story of Isis and Osiris where the former was said to
have swept the entire realm of Egypt for the last remnant of Osiris who was
believed to have been cut up into little pieces by his brother Seth and these
pieces strewn all over the kingdom. She did not rest till she got back every
piece of him. It is said that she cloned Osiris back to life as the sum of all
the parts found. The main feature of the story was that she had to get back
every single physical part. If for the sake of speculation the Isis-Osiris story
was one of alien visitors to the Earth doing their business here then their
technology would have told them that you don’t need the entire body to
clone someone. You just need a single cell. So why make such an effort to
claim back every single body part? Could the story imply that the
characters, or ‘visitors’ as the case may be, knew the awesome importance
of keeping every single bit of the physical being together as individual and
entire, because the future best disposition of the soul demanded it?
It is crucial to differentiate between the capacities of a clone and its
progenitor. A clone is biophysically identical to its parent being. Its entire
cell assemblage and chemical autopsy is identical. It is a complete
biological duplicate in every sense of the word, of the parent being.
It is equally important to differentiate between a done and an identical
twin, for instance. As I have said, a clone is an exact biophysical copy of its
progenitor. An identical twin is not an exact identical copy of its other twin.
Neither is it an exact copy of itself as a clone is. It is an exact copy of its
mother’s single

132

cell with its father’s bio-identity strapped to it. However, unlike a clone’s
body, the body of an identical twin is not formed from the cells of a body
with a soul and thus an already established bio-magnetic field (generated by
the blood circulating around the body in a coil — see chapter 16). At
embryo stage two bio-magnetic fields are established. So the twins,
although they are formed from the same ovum, establish two individual
soul attachments to two separate bodies, after those bodies have already
formed as two discrete identities with two discrete bio-magnetic fields.
Thus each individual twin is a Primary soul bearing being. Their individual
souls bring their own individual influence from beyond the grave to bear
upon the creation of the nature of their physical aerials that receive God,
namely their bodies. The implication is, of course that the souls of twins are
very much alike in their experience and nature, but this is purely
coincidental. Perhaps they shared similar experiences in past lifetimes and
grew to be very close during these lifetimes. Great and profound love
between one soul and another when they have been together long enough
can perhaps do this.
Why is it likely that the Prime Being and its clones share the same
pathway of origin, in other words a soul? It could simply be said that the
Prime Being came first and so will be the sole inheritor of its previous
ancestry. The clone is simply an exact duplication of the initiating being and
so has to share all its exactitudes. This would imply something further.
If what I say about clones sharing the progenitor’s soul is not logically
true, then a clone would not be an exact physical duplicate of its physical
generic origin.
You see, it all begs the question, why is there such a perfect exact
duplicity when you clone someone? Sameness between one thing and
another implies a connection. The more profound the sameness, the more
exact they are. In a clone the sameness is absolute. If the generic progenitor
has a soul then is it not likely that the exact generic duplicate — the clone
— would have the same elements that gave rise to its progenitor, because
that is where it starts from? The clone hasn’t started from its own distinct
parents made up of a discrete father and mother. The generic progenitor is
its parent. It is all the parent the clone has. Its progenitor is as far back as
the clone’s line goes. It would thus share the progenitor’s line and thus his
soul.

133

There is a very convincing argument that says that your physical

appearance is the physical equivalent of the appearance of your soul. I have
no logical qualms with this argument as far as it goes. But you will never be
able to glimpse the physical equivalent of your own exclusive and
individual soul because in life when you are born you will be the
amalgamation of three elements: mother, father and you. You will thus
never know if you are beautiful or ugly or who was responsible for your
state. You can only know what your true appearance is when you exist in a
state where you can be your own individual self outside the influences of
others. I believe this state is the state of existence known as death. Here in
this ‘place’ beyond the grave you will be totally yourself. You will be able
to see yourself for the first time as truly yourself. Without the information
from your mother’s and father’s aspects that you took on to come into
incarnacy and that went to make you up. This insight will include a parody
or vision of your own self that will be a summary of all the information you
have gathered in that particular lifetime, that you have accepted with your
will (the great admitter) in your deepest enth. Information which will
process to come down to provide one of two primary momentums. That
which goes towards Godhead and that which goes away from it. The closer
you go towards Godhead the more beautiful you become. The more
beautiful you become, the less you will be seen physically. The less you can
be seen physically the less physical you can be. The less physical you can
be, the less you can exist in this universe of physical parts as a physical
being. If you are beautiful enough, you can never naturally be part of a
universe of parts. You can never enter into a physical life unless you choose
to do so to tell others, perhaps, all you know and perhaps warn them of
these things that admit and deny.
Maybe the Christs and Buddhas and Mohammeds and indeed all great
and goodly ‘Master Beings’ did this and do this to this day. Maybe such
beings come among us not needing to do so, but risking their very soul at
the hands of beings such as us who are condemned to wander in ignorance,
personally cultivated ignorance, through our own faults. They deliberately
chose to come, as any loving beings would choose to do when they see the
condemned, to give knowledge that frees. Knowledge (if only we could see
it for what it is) that first warns and then liberates and gives renewal and

134

redemption. The vast majority of us reject it and go on with the entropic

momentums of the world into greater and greater states of smallness of
mind. We indulge in the facile and the shallow and if we do it enough we
shall never know.
And what an awesome price we have made so many beautiful beings
such as these pay for these supreme acts of love. We mangle them. We
crucify them. We ridicule them. We close our ears to them. We make them
suffer for trying to save us from our own folly.
 The brain, blood, nervous system and bones all go to make our bodies
into aerial-like devices with the capacity to receive and make sense of the
information inherent in the entire existential scale of what exists within and
without our Universe (see chapter 16). The whole system working together
does this in a modus operandi we call ‘Thought’. Unlike a non-cloned
being, what I have called Primary Being, a clone’s aerial will be identical to
its progenitor and so its capacity and only its capacity to receive this
information is all that makes it unique from every other living being. It is
like a soul fingerprint manifested as a physical entity. Each human genome
is simply this. A shape and form that exists in an enforced environment we
call our Universe that is simply a device that can know and receive all the
information within that environment.
This capacity to receive information does not mean that in the procedures
of life and living and the immediate exigencies of life that your clone might
encounter while living its life its memories and life experiences are going to
be identical to its parent being. This could and would thus make its actions,
perceptions and reactions different to its progenitor. It would now begin to
make a completely separate identity for itself but it would always share the
same ‘recorder’ for establishing this identity. It would simply be like a
single cassette tape recorder taking the sound resources from several
microphones simultaneously. It will all go on the same tape. It will be a
shared record with no control on the primary’s part for what goes in.
It follows therefore that if the tape is the source of all future information
for future results, then a cloned primary being is in a lot of trouble. If this
record dictates all the further ‘life bodies’ of that being in subsequent
reincarnations, then the Primary (progenitor)

135

being of the clones will end up with bodies (and all the modus operandis
that karma dictates, such as species, location, parentage) that bear directly
on the exact deserving of this record. This would be nothing to do with its
own feed into the tape recorder. It would be twisted, moulded,
manufactured, perhaps mangled in a way that is nothing to do with its own
unique and precious individuality and certifiable input. Getting cloned is the
best way of losing your primary individuality that stems from the very
beginning. In effect you would be losing your own soul if it happened to
you.
If all I speculate is true in this thesis, then perhaps it’s facile to say that
the writing is on the wall for our entire species. Does anyone doubt that
someone, somewhere, will seek to clone human beings, acting through the
laboratory-minded attitude of many scientists who will dismiss all this as
mumbo jumbo in their urgency to offer cloning as a palliative for all kinds
of genetic ills? Perhaps it is mumbo jumbo. If so I hope it is reasonable and
well-reasoned mumbo jumbo! It certainly cannot be proved with certainty
using the scientific method. If I am wrong nothing is lost that cannot be
redeemed or handled. If I am right, what price the scientific method and
scientists who think like this when your soul is mortgaged through eternity?
They may not be in touch with theirs but you may be in touch with yours.
The cloned state is essentially and necessarily a temporary one, relevant
only to the physical modus of existence of the Primary Being at any one
time. An individual clone cannot continue the cycle of life and death and
rebirth again in terms of its own individuality. On death it will simply cease
to exist and all its existential experiences will have gone to feed the
information bank of the original soul it was cloned from. It is only the
prime progenitor soul that has access to Godhead, and so it will do all the
reincarnating. A Prime Soul is thus the sum of all its cloned parts. It will
thus have to wait for the return of all its parts from any living state they
may be in to be able to reincarnate again.
The moral of all this is that if you are a Primary Soul, don’t for heaven’s
sake get cloned if you want total exclusive control of yourself and thus to
be able to reincarnate as and when it is most suitable for you to do so. You
will otherwise have to wait till all your cloned physical duplicates die
before you can reincarnate and carry through your karmic obligations. But
even then the sum of

136

your parts may be divested in the karma of other Primary Beings. Your
clone may produce progeny with another Primary Being, for instance.
Though this cannot pass your soul on to another, it can give that other
individual a good look, and only a look, at your story or your existential
record and vice versa. All that will happen will be that the awareness of the
Primary Being from which the clone came will have another portal of
indirect influence suddenly open up, but the information is only readable
and choice to accept and act on this information is implied and not tacit. In
other words if your clone has a son with a primary being, your ‘pseudo son’
will have to have had an individual and exclusive primary line to Godhead
of his own in order to reincarnate in the first place. He may or may not take
on the information about you through your clone but he cannot hold you to
anything. He cannot completely merge with you. He is intrinsically
different, his mother is intrinsically different and your clone and you as one
entity will be intrinsically different. Three different keys to three differing
locks. No admission.
Reincarnation is only possible if the soul is existentially alone and in
singular control of the soul line in its attendance (attachment) to Godhead.
The Life/Death interface can only be breached with an exclusive single
attachment to Godhead, because it is the element that gives you a soul in the
first place. A clone is attached to Godhead through the Primary Being and
therefore the search for the Primary Being, if it dies before its clone does,
will be the most and only important thing a clone can do if it is to gain a
line to Godhead. It will not be gaining it itself in its own intrinsic right. It
can only gain it in merging with the entity that gave it its identity in the first
place. Its Primary Being.
If the genome of an individual is a physical duplication and thus material
manifestation of your soul, then it follows that this may be read and
information obtained that could point to any profound matches that might
allow a clone to attach itself to Godhead.
The terrifying thing about all of this is that we now have a distinct
possibility that a hive of aliens with their attendant purely biomechanical
roboids the Greys, from another part of our universe, are intercepting and
intervening in the affairs of our species. Their intention perhaps might well
be to search for information from our physical genetic lines that
qualitatively may be similar to theirs and from which they may be able to
hitch a direct line to Godhead.

137
 They might have killed off all the Primary Beings that gave them their
existence back in their neck of the woods before they realized the
significance of these beings to them. As clones they would continue
themselves through a physical cloning process. (Until their genetic material
wore down in line with the entropic process that makes everything decay
finally anyway.) They would thus never go through the process of death.
They may be doing this in total ignorance of the fact that, if they simply
died, as clones they would automatically be joined back with the soul lines
of their respective Primary Beings in the space between atoms — The
‘Fields of Death’. This all begs the question, ‘Do they even know they are
clones and thus duplicate derivations of an original progenitor being?’ It is
completely possible that they haven’t got a clue that they are copies that
only hold a line to Godhead through another being. It is also likely that with
their intelligence (an intelligence powerful enough to enable them to get
here) they know that they are derivations and realize that they have to
somehow find that unique primary being to be existentially complete. In
this event, as clones their immortality would be a completely physically
manufactured one. They could never risk an end to their living process
because they know nothing about death. If their bodies wore out they would
simply clone a new one. They would not give themselves a chance to die. It
might never occur to them to actually die and that this was the best and only
way to their completion. This ignorance of death may be the propelling
motive for sweeping the universe for living intelligent beings in a search for
their progenitors. They may well, with their stupendous technology, have a
means of matching their genetic lines with suitable genetic fingerprints and
thereby try to get a clue as to the disposition of the individual Primary
Being they were first cloned from. They could then do a physical
enjoinment of the matching DNA and thus have a line back to Godhead.
They would have found a soul. Their own original soul.
My speculation would explain so much about why they abduct so many
of us. If may be the whole reason for their sojourn in our part of the
universe. The trouble with all this is that the uncloned Primary Beings of
our species may have to pay a terrible price in the eternal scale of existence
for their behests. It will be wonderful for us if what I am speculating is true
and all we need to do with this particular lot is to tell them about their
predicament from our
 138

point of view. All they would have to do then is die. They would then be
united with their progenitors. Their progenitors would then get their soul
lines back complete and we would be rid of a very dangerous entity in the
universe that, in sheer ignorance of the fact that death is a portal to eternal
life, might be abducting our people and doing horrible things to them in the
process.
It’s the stuff that nightmares are made of and it may turn out to be a very
real one.
An incredible series of consequences to us all will follow if what I
surmise about the Soul, the life and death state, reincarnation and cloning is
true. That, however, is for another book. But I venture to say that it will be a
very interesting exercise for the reader to speculate on, with logic and
reason as a yardstick. But before you do that let me re-state and explain
some things a little further than I have done thus far. It will fill in the picture
more completely.
Many of us may have been cloned in past lives on some other planet in
some other form or status of life. There is one unbreachable rule in the
forms and values of reincarnation. In a physical manifestation of the
process it is mostly likely to be downwards. I will explain that statement in
a moment. To do this I first have to take the reader through the
consequences of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. This law makes this
Universe an arena of diminishing returns. In other words, this fundamental
law of force and the interplay of forces says that all things go into greater
states of randomness and chaos with time till at the end there will only be
heat left as a Universe. (The Heat-death of the Universe.) We know that
everything rots and decays with time if left to itself. Nothing goes the other
way. (See Chapters 2, 3, and 4.) This all is provable with the scientific
method. It is only the application of what I call ‘Thoughtness’ that can put
the brakes on this process and stop it and even reverse it. So Thoughtness is
a mechanism (notice it is an abstract mechanism, and not a physical one)
that sets a scale, at least, for the reversal of the implicit working
mechanisms of our Universe in its physical identity. Since it exists in this
Universe, how is it there in this giant agglomeration of destructive force
that is the Universe of Parts? I believe it is there because it is part of another
entirely different universe that is the opposite of ours that exists both
separately and at the same time, hand in glove with ours. It is at the
interfaces that connect the two that the words

139

‘Soul’, ‘Reincarnation’, ‘Life’, ‘Death’ and, yes, ‘Clones’ become

awesomely relevant. These are the ‘connectors’ that lie betwixt the two.
I have said before that if our universe of force and parts is hard, solid,
tense, and finite, the other universe or its opposite could be expected to be
peaceful, still, abstract, or un-solid, infinite and eternal. In our universe all
things don’t fit perfectly together. They can never be made to. That is why
they may be said to have the qualities I have outlined. In the other universe
the opposite is true. All parts are together in absolute and total fit. Nothing
is left over, and this gives rise to its qualities as outlined. The existential
scale is thus metered between the two.
Life and death are part of our universe. They are on our side of the
divide. Let’s say that the Life state, may be said to be ‘intra-atomic’ and the
Death state. ‘Extra-atomic’. The Life state is enforced and dwells in the
space within the atom and the Death state is unenforced and dwells in the
space between atoms, (see fig 13). The Life state, however, is totally within
the margin that defines our universe. The Death state is on the margin that
defines our universe and the other ‘Universe of the Whole’. So the space
between atoms is the margin between the two. The fields of Death, as I like
to call them, are the ‘corridors’ that form the space between atoms. We
move from one universe to the other through them.
We can now put all we understand of the total existential outlay into
these paradigms.
We live, we die, we return, alas. And continue the cycle endlessly. We are
meant to live, to learn, to go on and never return. Few of us do this. Go on, I
mean. We return to this enforced entropic churn of Hell we call our
universe. Trapped in an endless cycle of admission and expulsion we call
birth and death. But, blessedly, some don’t. Some pass on to the other
‘Universe of the Whole’. Some escape, never to return.
The Buddhists do not believe in the concept of Soul because they say that
it is something individual. Yet they would maintain a mechanism for the
return of individuality at birth. They say that this individuality is borrowed
from what exists overall and in the individual state you purify that
overallness and make it a state of enlightened insight for that individual
point of view. They never explain how the individual state arises from the
overall in the

140

first place to be admitted at birth. Is it a portion of the overall that is

individualized? If so, why does the ‘overall’ need to be individualized?
Does this individual state that is purified in life and living remain individual
beyond death to return as that same individual state in life? Some Buddhist
scholars maintain this is true. They acknowledge the existence of higher
realms and claim that an individual Buddha can inhabit these ‘realms’ and
return to reinvigorate himself into a higher and higher state of view till he
reaches Nibbana, an everlasting state of bliss from which return into
individuality is no longer relevant. I hope the reader can see where my
concept of a Soul fits in with the Buddhist theorem. The word ‘Soul’ is just
a prescription for that individual state in its connection to the overall
existential outlay, however it is fashioned. It is simply a description of this
modus of existence until it merges with the Universe of the Whole where it
need not be in parts.
I mentioned earlier that the trend in reincarnation in this Universe is
downward. From a higher state to a lower state of existence. These are
essentially states of knowing. We call them species. The higher your
knowing the more you are in control of everything. Yourself, your
environment, etc. So species are just compendiums that mark ignorance of
what exists overall. A man is more in control of the world than a dolphin.
We can inhabit the world of the dolphin with wet suits and air-breathing
equipment made by us better than the dolphin can survive our terrestrial
habitat. We are the species with the greatest knowledge and thus control, as
Homo Sapiens Sapiens, better than any other species on our planet. Thus
the more you know, the higher the species value. But knowledge is an
abstraction. It is not a solid quantum in itself: you can’t, shall we say, parcel
it up and hand it on. It is just there when you acquire it. But where is it? To
all intents and purposes it seems to come from within our bodies,
somewhere in a particularization with identity. It is specific in extent and
quantum with the individual. We all do not have exactly the same
knowledge as each other. But because it seems to come from within us we
think that it is manufactured by our brains and our bodies inside us.
There is another way of looking at this. Maybe it is simply picked up by
our bodies, our brains acting as aerials. The knowledge is out there all the
time. We simply pick up more of it or less of it

141

depending on the height and integrity and make-up of our aerials. We

store it as retained electricity coded impluses in mediums called blood and
bone and ‘know’ it as an entity from there. No different from a computer.
The computer does not manufacture the information it analyzes itself, out of
its parts. It is fed this information which it picks up and retains in mediums
(memory chips) that can hold it and give it out. It is a better computer if it
has a great capacity to receive and hold and process information. Similarly
we as living species seem to be commonly judged by our capacity to
receive, hold and use information in such a way that we preserve our
capacity to do this for as long as possible. If you are ‘not there’ to ‘exist’ to
receive and use information, then there is no point to anything, including
information, and I would not have written this and you would not be
reading it. So just being there is the first and most vital thing of all. I
believe it is the whole purpose of the entire existential outlay.
In the Corridors of Death and its extra-atomic dominion (the space
between atoms), force is far less in its power to act upon an entity. The
medium that gives entropy its flare and result (directionally shaped values
of force) is substantially absent there. It is thus more akin to the Universe of
the Whole than our Universe of Parts. It is the in-between state where both
values may be glimpsed. It is here that summary occurs. A totalling of
knowledge, knowing and values. If a species is a summary of existential
knowledge and knowing in individual entity terms, then here is the place
the whole quantum is added and future life forms are decided. Here in the
corridors of death I believe you and I get summarized. We then proceed into
the heavy or the light. Heavy if our knowledge quotient is less, and light if
our knowledge quotient is great. By this I mean you proceed like water
finding its own level to become a state of existence commensurate with the
values you have held and practised while in the previous state.
Put simply, I believe that if you had added, brought together, and tried to
unify all things in your behaviour (some call it being right-minded,
righteous and good) while in life, i.e. in the Universe of Parts, you would
have been opposing the implicit state of that universe. It, in itself, was and
is set to do the opposite. It manufactured hydrgogen, helium, lithium, boron
and so on to all the heavier elements from light, in a progression schematic
that

142

made these heavier and heavier elements with time. In going against this
drift of entropy to greater and greater states of randomness, complication
and chaos with time, you and I who are made substantially of hydrogen, the
lightest element of all, would in effect have been unwinding this chemistry
and its bonds that made our bodies and thus our species, by each act of
kindness and intelligently applied righteousness we did. I believe that if you
did such things ‘enough’ (I believe ‘enough’ is the most important word in
the English or any other language) at death you would reconcile your
individual being such that your enforcednesss would be such that an atomic
existence in force would not be possible. You would go on in another state
till all knowledge was yours and existence in a totally EN-lightened state
(Godhead, Nibbana, etc) would be eternally yours. You could no more
suffer the process of rotting from the day you are conceived with the
disease and pain and disenfranchisement of your being that goes on as part
of life in this universe.
However, the opposite practices commensurate with the implicit mode
and fashion of the essentially entropic Universe of Parts would lead you to
return in states of greater and greater ignorance, demarcated by its species
equivalent in function and tenure to these states of ignorance. You would
reincarnate down, from Man to Ape to Monkey to Insect to Mollusc to Tree
to Bacterium to Virus to Plasmid, etc, till you were as the most basic
particles that make up the universe.
I have stated previously that I, perhaps, for one in this world believe the
existential way is Devolution not Evolution. It is simply the inherent vanity
of man that prompts us all to choose to believe that we all evolve to
betterment. The overwhelming evidence, if we choose to view it objectively
and dispassionately, is that the existential platform is evolution within
overall Devolution, in stages or platforms of redeployment we call ‘the
survival modes of the fittest.’

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWELVE:
THE WRONG WAY ROUND
THE MERRY-GO-ROUND

We as the command species of this planet have been mastering lesser

species on this earth since time immemorial. We now might have things
such as the Greys, the Greens, the Yellows, the Blues, or whatever shades or
hues of detriment they might be, dipping into our fish pond and seeking to
do the same to us. To change the fish in order to fit their pond. The order of
the day has suddenly changed from us doing it to something else, to
something else doing it to us. Like any common or garden racist would seek
to do to someone he or she deems as different, or lesser. Just as scientists
chase knowledge in the blinkered tunnel vision of their specific disciplines
with little or no insight and sanction into the internecine consequences of
their efforts on the general welfare of Man. (The atom bomb was just one
deadly legacy we have been left with as a result of such lethal narrow
vision.) We as a species have been blundering around dispossessed of a
sense of our origins and nature and haven’t been able to see the wood for
the trees. Blinkers forbid the crucial overall view that provides holistic
contexts that might warn of grand-scale detriment to the welfare of us all as
a species. It is an awesome warning that Man has never heeded despite the
glorious wisdom given to us by our ‘redeemers’, be they Hindu, Buddhist,
Judaic, Jain, Christian or Islamic. Could it be that we might have been
prevented from listening to and carrying out the behests of wisdom because
we have had something implanted in the common psyche of Man

144

through, perhaps, genetic interception, thousands of years ago that

forbids us from listening enough to a part of us that came from outside the
atom and the Universe of enforced parts? A part we might, for want of a
better word, call Godhead.
The First-Adamic line fell in the ways of what we call Sin. The best
description of Sin to my mind is simply Restriction. No more, no less. And
so sin decides all things because it decides the scope for development
according to restriction or Limit. Personal restriction or indeed group
restriction that we all are a part of as a species. Once exposed to the
formulas of dismantling force the geno-phyla that followed First-Adam
would gradually reduce over millions of years to become ends of the line of
Adamic man. The last vestiges of the consequence of being subject to the
whims of the entropic drift downwards. Yes, I am saying that there is no
such thing as evolution to betterment. I am saying that evolution to
betterment as it is generally accepted in Darwinian terms is bunkum. I am
saying that it is likely to be evolutionary devolution. In other words,
evolution within the overall format of devolution where platforms of effect
stabilize to the best possible outlay (such as survival of the fittest) as they
drift down to more and more states of chaotic amelioration. They have to
drift down in this way because they come from a prior state of ultimate
order and are assembled thus before the entropic engine of doom that is our
Universe breaks them apart in line with the Second Law of
Thermodynamics.How do we see this as reflected in the genetic ancestry of
Man? Is there any evidence from the fossil record of Man and other
scientific derivational means that substantiates this? I believe there is
evidence that points tantalizingly to a distinct possibility that what I am
postulating may well be true.
Jonathan Losos of Washington University in Missouri has done some
molecular detective work that has produced results that are in defiance of
accepted theories of evolution.1 To understand lizard ancestry, Losos
examined mitochondrial DNA from the species on two different islands,
Puerto Rico and Jamaica. Mitochondrial DNA is passed only from mother
to offspring via the cytoplasm of the egg. So it can be used to reconstruct
evolutionary. histories without the complication of contributions from
paternal DNA.The DNA data suggested that remarkably similar events took
place on each island. However, says Oxford zoologist Paul Harvey, ‘that’s

145

despite the fact that these places have important differences in their
plants, predators and climate.’ It is highly unlikely that the same events
could happen on both islands simply by chance, says Harvey, especially
since the islands are different in so many ways. Harvey speculates that if
more examples of repeatable evolution are found then the whole notion of
evolution as a lottery may need to be reconsidered.
Further evidence for the inadequacy of evolutionary theory can be found
in a recent article in New Scientist (28.10.95).2 Charles Bieberich and his
team at the Holland Laboratory in Rockville, Maryland have reported that
by manipulating genes that control the body plans of embryos they have
created mutant mice with backbones that are 200-300 million years out of
date. The article points to other research teams that have achieved
something similar. Researchers at the University of Wisconsin, at Madison,
have created fruit fly embryos that developed with a body plan some 350-
450 million years out of date. Two years ago Pierre Chambon and his
colleagues at the University of Louis Pasteur in Strasbourg created mutant
mice with ear bones halfway between those of mammals and reptiles.
According to Chambon the ears followed a developmental plan dating back
to the therapsids: primitive, mammal-like reptiles that lived among the
dinosaurs some 200 million years ago.
Bieberich argues that the researchers are only doing in the lab what
sometimes happens naturally, producing what is called ‘atavistic
mutations’. Hind limbs on whales, snakes with rudimentary limbs, people
with tails, and horses with hooves split into three toes instead of the usual
one are among the best-documented examples. Researchers have been
intrigued for years about these naturally occurring atavisms but now that
they can be created in the lab, ‘the astonishing persistence of these genetic
memories becomes clear. The reason for that persistence, researchers now
believe, has a lot to do with the laziness of evolution.’ So says Stephen Day,
the author of the New Scientist article discussing these discoveries.
These scientists seem to believe that a genetic memory is stored, for
example in a mouse’s genes, from the days when mammals and reptiles last
shared an ancestor. That memory can thus be unlocked, at least in the case
of ear structure. If genetic information that is up to 350 to 400 million years
old can be retained within a genome

146

then does this not lend the lie to Darwin’s theory of evolution via the
process of ‘natural selection’? Why would 400 million years’ worth of
redundant genetic codes have been preserved for no useful reason in terms
of promoting the survival of an organism? The principle of natural selection
ordains that only those organisms with genetic characteristics best suited to
their environment will tend to survive best in order to pass their genetic
codes on to future generations. Thus ‘evolution’ is able to take place. Why
does the evolutionary process preserve redundant genes, albeit disabled
from coding for proteins? Why did the unsuitable genetic codes survive the
‘evolutionary’ process without being significantly altered by random
mutations over sixty-five million years? How does a mouse retain the genes
of a dinosaur? Or, more pertinently, how does a human being retain-the
genetic codes of an animal with a tail such that this atavism can occur in
some people? If this is put down to ‘the laziness of evolution’, I would ask
the question: How can evolution be a governing principle of biological
development if this useless genetic information is so faithfully preserved? It
would imply that evolution is so lazy that it came to a complete standstill as
soon as it started and has not moved since! How, then, have we reached our
present status as a species from the original ‘primordial soup’ of life?
Perhaps the answer is that we and all other living organisms have not in fact
reached our present states from prior states of inferiority. Rather we have
devolved into our present states from prior states of superiority. In other
words, development up from the primordial soup is utter poppycock.
One of the greatest scientists the Earth has produced, Sir Fred Hoyle,
together with his distinguished colleague Professor Chandra
Wickramasinghe, put the postulation seriously to the scientific world that
life was brought to the Earth from outer space through viruses trapped in
star dust. Other scientists took the idea less seriously. Nobel Prize winner
Francis Crick, one of the discoverers of the double helix deployment of
DNA, and Leslie Orgel of the Salk Institute of biological studies managed
to provoke the public and their colleagues by speculating that the seeds of
life were sent to the Earth in a spaceship by intelligent beings living on
another planet.3 They point out that it did have a serious intent: to highlight
the inadequacy of all explanations of terrestrial genesis. As Crick once
wrote: ‘The origin of life appears to be almost a

147
 miracle. So many are the conditions which would have had to be satisfied
to get it going.’ The joke may well be on them.
Sir Fred Hoyle, in his book The Intelligent Universe, puts forward some
interesting scenarios suggesting the extraordinarily unlikely possibility that
life could have originated by chance from a primordial soup:4
‘The probability of life appearing spontaneously on Earth is so small that
it is very difficult to grasp without comparing it with something more
familiar. Imagine. a blindfolded person trying to solve the Rubik Cube.
Since he can’t see the results of his moves, they must all be at random. He
has no way of knowing whether he is getting nearer the solution, or whether
he is scrambling the cube still further. One would be inclined to say that
moving the faces at random would ‘never’ achieve a solution. Strictly
speaking, ‘never’ is wrong, however. If our blindfold subject were to make
one random move every second, it would take him on average three
hundred times the age of the earth, 1,350 billion years, to solve the cube.
The chance against each move producing perfect colour matching for all the
cube’s faces is about 50,000,000,000,000,000,000 to 1.
‘These odds are roughly the same as you could give to the idea of just
one of our body’s proteins having evolved randomly by chance. However,
we use about 200,000 types of protein in our cells. If the odds against the
random creation of one protein are the same as those against a random
solution of the Rubik Cube, then the odds against the random creation of all
200,000 are almost unimaginably vast’.
Hoyle goes on to point out that even if we were only to assess the
likelihood of the spontaneous origin by chance of the 2000 or so special
proteins, the enzymes, which are vitally important to life processes, then
still the odds would be outlandish. The chance of these vital 2000 enzymes
being formed in exactly the correct way, which they must be or else
complex living organisms simply could not operate, is ‘about the same as
the chance of throwing an uninterrupted sequence of 50,000 sixes with
unbiased dice!’.
He goes on to examine how those who claim that life originated in an
organic soup imagine that complex life developed. They imagine that a
clump of two or three very primitive enzymes toured around the primordial
soup of amino acids picking up other potential enzymes as and when they
happened to arise by chance. Hoyle
 148

points out that in effect what this model really describes is ‘how we
ourselves would go about collecting up a packet of needles in a haystack,
using our eyes and brains to distinguish the needles from the hay. How, for
instance, would the enzyme clump distinguish an exceedingly infrequent
useful enzyme from the overwhelming majority of useless chains of amino
acids? The one potential enzyme would be so infrequent that the aggregate
might have to encounter 50,000,000,000,000,000,000 useless chains before
meeting a suitable one. In effect, talk of primitive aggregate collecting up
potential enzymes really implies the operation of an intelligence, an
intelligence which by distinguishing potential enzymes possesses powers of
judgement. Since this conclusion is exactly what those who put forward this
argument are anxious to avoid, their position is absurd’.
What is that ‘intelligence’ that it seems must be the architect behind the
origin of life? Could that intelligence be provided for by devolving soul?
Hoyle has illustrated with his analogies the extreme unlikelihood of random
origins for life in the primordial soup. Thus the suggestion that we are
devolving from our original points of inception into the universe, our
original Adam points, into greater states of separation from the state of
WHOLEness we once were is, it seems to me, a far more convincing
proposition. This pattern of devolution would suggest that just as the whole
implicitly contains the parts that make it up, we have within us at any one
time the blueprint for all future states of devolvement into the universe of
parts. Perhaps that is how these scientists who appear to be turning back the
evolutionary clock are able to produce these startling results. The article
says that they are ‘Making Evolution Run Backwards’: I propose that they
are ‘Making Devolution Run Forwards’! They are using that original
blueprint for potential devolution and making it actual. What, then, does
that say about human babies who have been naturally born with tails, out of
a naturally occurring atavism? There is only one implication and that is that
we are indeed apes in the making, if we follow the naturally devolving
course that our species prescribes for us.
Those scientists studying these mutational phenomena have discovered
that there is in fact such a blueprint, ‘an ancestral body plan’ on which
development from one species form to another is formed. This plan is
embodied in what are known of as Hox genes.

149

‘Instead of inventing a new set of body-plan genes for each new type of
animal, it seems that natural selection has simply tinkered with an old one, a
set known as Hox genes.’ The telling question that must be asked here is: If
all organisms that now exist had from their very inception into the
evolutionary process a blueprint of how they should evolve, then where did
that blueprint come from in the first place? How did the first multi-cellular
animals evolving some 700 million years ago contain the basic template of
information that only needed to be shuffled around in order to form a
human being?
All the myriad changing environmental factors and chance mutations that
allowed survival within changed environments and thus for evolution
through the survival of the fittest had not yet occurred at that point. So
where did these most basic of living organisms, or indeed the chemical soup
that produced them in the first place, get this genetic blueprint from? The
basic evolutionary contention that we evolved from a sea worm to a human
being through a series of fortuitous genetic mutations that have occurred in
turn through sheer chance in the chaotic underbase momentum of the
Second Law of Thermodynamics, that itself provides a dismantling effect
on molecules and atoms to gathering states of randomness, is the stuff for
baboons to believe. It is inconceivable that reasoning and directed thinking
capable of intelligent arbitration emerged by chance in an environment
creating chaos with each progressive moment in time. It is a theory for
Lucy in lunatic land. We just don’t have the years in the scale of the time
the universe is said to have existed to make enough fortuitous mutations to
account for our existence. The law of probability summarily contradicts it.
The theory of evolution to the betterment of a species really becomes more
and more ludicrous in the light of these new discoveries in developmental
biology.
Bieberich says that, ‘We’re probably not turning on old genes, but taking
existing developmental pathways and twisting them into ancient pathways’.
If these are ‘existing developmental pathways’ would not their twisting, at
least in terms of the theory of evolution, lead simply to a breakdown in the
efficient functioning of the organism rather than to the repeat of genetic
information that should by now, one would have thought, either be
significantly changed or even deleted from the genetic record? If indeed we

150

are turning on old genes already there to new effect and not creating them
from the start, we could then have the time for a plausible set-up to
revitalize a species format that was already devolving. The ET Alien brief
might have been instrumental in doing just this.
If scientists can so easily, by disrupting one gene in 100,000, produce
such startling results, can you imagine the potential available to alien
genetic engineers?
Scientists at the University of Massachusetts have created a mouse with
an extra ear, a human ear. They fashioned a precision mould out of porous,
biodegradable polymer, seeded it with human cartilage cells, then tucked
the structure under the skin of a mouse bred without an immune system (to
prevent rejection). Nourished by the mouse’s blood, the cartilage cells
multiplied, taking the shape of the dissolving polymer scaffold and creating
a perfectly formed human ear. With the supremely advanced technology
available to alien beings, an access into the human genome could result in a
myriad of such possibilities.

1
‘Reptiles Don’t Leave Evolution to Chance’ New Scientist 16-9-95
2
‘Making Evolution Run Backwards’ New Scientist 2-10-95
3
‘In the Beginning’: Scientific American, Feb 1991
4
Hoyle, Fred: The Intelligent Universe (pp 12, 19) (Michael Joseph Ltd, 1983)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER THIRTEEN:
OF APES AND MAN

Of all the tens of thousands of skeletons that mark the ancestral lines of
Man through the millennia, no single direct line can be traced that accounts
for all the discovered strains of Man. It in fact seems clear that all the
discovered genotypes seem to end abruptly, except for two, Homo Erectus
and Homo Neanderthalensis. This is where, I believe, the Greys come in.
Before I explain, let me say again at this point that it is my contention
that the line of derivation of all living beings is the complete opposite to
what is claimed in evolutionary theory. We did not evolve up to Man from
the Sea worm. We devolve and continue to devolve to our own variety of
Seaworm. The ones that are there now are the ends of other lines of superior
beings and species that have over billions of years come down to be these
sea worms from inaugural genotypes. With a view to all the
palaeontological and genetic evidence that has been gathered, all the
genotypes of man found thus far are ends of the lines of Godman or
Spiritman. In other words, each distinct genus branched off from the
original First Adam and First Eve and as they devolved through the aeons
they ended their humanoid aspect and became apes. Godbeing came into
the Universe in the very special way and form I have outlined previously
and all the lines of being all over the Universe come from this original
Godbeing.
This would be so whether.the Universe had a once-and-for-all single
origin point or multiple origin points constantly happening. We are dealing
with the conversion, or sublimation, of Spirit-Being

152

to Matter-Being. The conversion of the status of what is not of atoms to

what is of atoms and all the stages in between wherever, or however, the
origination point occurs.
It is complete lunacy to have an entropic force that is busy dismantling
atoms, from prior ordered states into greater and greater states of
randomness and chaos with time (the Second Law of Thermodynamics) and
at the same time claim that all things are going from good to better, through
a series of fortuitous accidents.
It is our vanity that does not allow us to see the truth and that is it is all
one way — DOWN. Everything rots. We rot the moment we are conceived.
It is a cast iron standard bearer basic law of biology, in the Universe of
Parts. Our Universe.
So, in summary, it is my contention that the form of Spirit-Being was
sublimated into atoms (flesh) with the breaking-up effect of the Second
Law of Thermodynamics (entropy). This ‘Spirit-Being’, in billions of
locations all over the Universe; reduced gradually into all the different
arrays of living species you see, as represented by our particular brand of
species on the Earth. Of course, this same procedure would inevitably go on
in locations elsewhere in the Universe too, giving rise to their particular
cocktail of species. The crucial point I want to make is that it was reduction
to lesser forms, Superior to Inferior. In our Earth’s terms, from Godman to
mortal man to ape to monkey to animal to insect to tree to virus to plasmid
to stone and all the millions of species that make up the points in between.
Let me explain this startling conclusion a little further, in terms of the
Origin of Species with a particular accent on Man.
What other evidence might there be to suggest that our species, Homo
Sapiens Sapiens, is a product of devolution not evolution?
Simon Easteal, a geneticist at the Australian National University has
suggested that contrary to the popular belief that humans evolved from
chimpanzees both might have had a common ancestor.1 Easteal says, ‘…
rather than believe that we came down from the trees, we are suggesting we
continued to walk upright and chimps went up the trees and stopped
walking upright’. He bases his conclusions on his own research in which he
has discovered a great similarity between human, chimpanzee and gorilla
DNA: ‘they are so similar this means we should in fact

153

regard chimpanzees and gorillas as members of the same genus and call
them Homo.’
If we ‘continued to walk upright’ and apes ‘stopped walking upright’,
then our common ancestor would have walked upright and thus would have
been a hominid form, not an ape form. So perhaps the reason why scientists
have had no success in finding causes for the origin of bipedalism in
hominid species is simply that hominid species started off bipedal and only
later devolved into a quadrupedal stance. Apes may thus have devolved
from man, not man evolved from apes.
Explanations for the evolution of an upright stance in hominid forms
centre around the theory that it became necessary for various reasons when
a change in climate transformed Africa’s moist forests into grasslands. Thus
evolution would have favoured hominids that could stand upright in order
to spot predators lurking in the tall grasses. An upright stance would have
lessened the heat that hominids absorbed from the sun because the forests
were no longer there to protect them. However, there is one vital flaw in
these explanations, and that is that a growing body of evidence suggests that
the earliest hominids did not in fact move out into the savannah. The fossils
they left behind were found in areas that were once densely wooded. It
seems that they learnt to. walk in the relative safety of the forests while
living next to their cousins the apes! This lack of evidence for the evolution
of bipedalism seems to suggest that anthropologists might be better advised
to reverse their search and look instead for how bipedalism developed into
quadrupedalism for some species of primate.
A further hiccough in conventional evolutionary theory has been found in
the ancient fossil record of the Miocene period, which stretches from
twenty-five million to five million years ago.
During the Miocene period a single ancestral group, the hominoids, gave
rise, it is believed, to several lines that culminated in today’s higher
primates. According to what is commonly believed, the first to diverge from
the common hominoid stock was the line of the lesser apes (gibbons and
siamangs), followed by the line that led to orangutans. Later still the
remaining stock divided again, one branch leading to the great African apes
(gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos) and the other to humans. Palaeo-
anthropologists believe that human and ape lines diverged between four
million and six

154
 million years ago. They have, as yet, found no fossils that would
satisfactorily account for this common ancestor.
Scientists are trying to trace the ancestry of the great apes and humans in
the Miocene period. One of these scientists, Steve Ward of the North-
eastern Ohio University’s College of Medicine, has said that: ‘What initially
seemed to be a fairly nice simple progression [towards modern species] got
scuppered by the fossil record’.2 He is referring to the fact that the fossil
record from the Miocene period is full of hominoid forms that seem to have
no modern living counterparts. There are about a dozen genera and even
more species of larger-bodied hominoids known from the Miocene. While
today there are only three genera and four species of great apes.
What happened to these Miocene apes that have no modern descendants?
Did they perhaps devolve down the devolutionary tree into lesser forms of
mammal? Mike Rose of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New
Jersey says that he sees very little similarity between these Miocene apes
and modern apes: ‘When I look at the postcranial bones from the Miocene
apes, I get a fairly clear and consistent pattern from many species. But it is
nothing like what we see in modern apes’.
In fact, it is a fascinating enigma that palaeontologists thus far have been
unable to find any fossil record for the African apes. There is no such
record even in the five million years after the Miocene period leading to the
present day. Fossil records have been found for other species of mammal
living in the same habitat as the apes. So, why is there no record? Could it
be that the fossil record of the African apes is actually made up of the very
same hominid forms that are believed to have been the predecessors of
Homo Sapiens Sapiens? In other words, the whole thing is the other way
round — Man to Ape, not Ape to Man. Could it be that the ancient hominid
forms of Australopithecus and Homo Habilis were the ancestors of these
apes? Perhaps the problem is that palaeontologists do not realize that they
have actually already found the fossil record of the African apes in these
hominid forms. Just as in the Miocene apes they might have found the
ancestors of a more devolved mammalian species.
There is thus significant evidence from several sources to suggest that the
momentum of devolution governs the origin of species on

155
 this planet. If this is in fact the case then two salient questions must be
asked:
If the emergence of Homo Sapiens Sapiens as a species is a result of a
devolutionary process, why does the fossil record seemingly present a
picture of evolution? For example, there is a gradual increase in the brain
capacity of hominid species as time progresses. With the exception of
Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis, whose brain capacity is actually greater
than that of its successors in the fossil record, the Cro-Magnons (but that is
an incongruity that I will account for later).
Secondly, if man has indeed devolved from prior states of grandeur into
his present form, then where is the evidence for those prior states in the
fossil record?
I will now attempt to answer these questions through an explanation of
why the general drift of development, at least as far as the fossil evidence is
concerned, appears to be an evolutionary one. I have used the words
‘appears to be evolutionary’ because, as I have previously shown, the nature
of the entropic drift demands that a natural drift into states of greater and
greater species advancement is a logical impossibility.
The phylogenetic ancestral line of man down to the present time as seen
now from the available information is as follows. From the earliest to the
present as seen through the fossil record is:

Australopithecus Afarensis 3.6 million – 2.8 million years

Australopithecus Africanus 2.5 million – 1.2 million years
Australopithecus Robustus 2.0 million – 1.0 million years
Homo Habilis 1.9 million – 1.3 million years

Home Erectus 1.5 million – 500,000 years

HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS 200,000 – present

Homo Neanderthalensis 100,000 – 35,000 years

HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS 200,000 – present

Indulge me a moment and let me connect all this up to my speculation on

the origins of Man. This time in the biblio-theological sense that I have
previously outlined in my discussion of the progress through time of the
original ‘Adam point’ for our planet:

156

The first ‘Adams’ on this planet who were a form of ephemeral being
would have gradually translated their insubstantial existential state into the
state of physical substantiality in physical life. The force signature of any
location in the universe is always increasing in time due to the entropic
drift. While the threshold of force at this location in the universe was low
enough it allowed for this translation of the insubstantial state of being into
the substantial state of being without the necessity for the mechanism of
physical birth into already existing biological lines. Thus the first individual
expressions into physical life, the first mothers and fathers of future species
lines came to be.
I contend that during the time that such a phenomenon was possible, most
of those who passed the God/Atom threshold into the new state of physical
life returned back quickly to the insubstantial state from which they came.
The fact that it was possible to cross the threshold from substantiality to
insubstantiality without the need for physical birth into already existing
lines indicates that it would also have been possible to reverse the process
and cross back again into the more ephemeral state with relative ease. Thus
it would have been the few, not the many, who became caught and led
eventually to the emergence of devolved species lines. Just as Christ
demonstrated the transfigured state from a state in physical life and
converted the very atoms that formed his body into light, these prior Adam
Beings could do the same. Only it was far easier for them because their
species lines were not yet so far devolved into the quantumly greater state
of physical entrapment. With time Christ had to cope with this extra
devolution when he incarnated into our Homo Sapiens line and by living a
particular type of ‘mindedness’ he demonstrated that you could divest
yourself of the atomic form and go straight into an ephemeral form of
enlightened Being which he achieved at his transfiguration.
Thus these first physical hominid forms would have been able in relative
freedom to explore the different expressions of the Universe of Parts
without becoming irretrievably caught within the margins of its scope, such
that a swift return to the prior ephemeral state of being would have been
forbidden. However, within a chaotic universe unpredictable phenomena
that can temporarily increase the force signature of a planet may ha,e
disturbed that equilibrium. Comets, asteroids or meteor showers,

157

and volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, etc. bombarding the planet may

have caused sudden increases in its force signature such that the passage of
travel between the substantial and the insubstantial state might have been
temporarily restricted, or even blocked. Some representatives of original
Adam man might have found themselves suddenly stuck within the treacle
of universal force. From that point on entropic momentums could grip them
better and these would have started to reduce gradually their scope for
freedom of choice and expression as they became more and more a prey to
the physical forces of the universe. However, the huge power of soul lines
in Godhead with biological lines that were as yet unintercepted by alien
genetic manipulation would have still allowed the vast majority of these
souls the potential to escape the wheel of rebirth and return directly to
Godhead. These sudden increases in the planetary force print would thus
have been the first instigators of the demise of the fewest of the few. Most
returned.
Thus the fact that there appears to be no fossil record for these prior
states of grandeur from which we have devolved may simply be because
nearly all the representatives of these prior states converted the atoms of
their bodies back into light, just as Jesus did at a much later stage in the
devolutionary record of hominid forms on this planet — just 2000 years
ago. He could have been the purest form of first Adam Being. The whole
exercise of his sojourn on the Earth could have been a demonstration
paradigm to see if it still could be done within the force contexts of this
planet as they prevailed 2000 years ago.
The natural devolution of the few soul lines that did not convert back to
light when it reached a certain level would have deemed those lines suitable
for alien genetic interception. The state of the original Adam points on this
planet would have had to be devolved enough, caught enough in the
snatching, grasping ‘treacle’ of universal force to allow alien being, which
is intrinsically of that treacle, to stick onto it, so to speak. Prior to that
threshold point, the soul lines which reincarnated on this planet would have
slipped the grasp of alien being as they were more spirit-based and less
matter-based. But once that threshold level was reached the experiment
began. An experiment carried out by extraterrestrial alien Beings to test the
ability of hominid forms on this planet to provide for them

158

a bridging point from the physical into the metaphysical, from atoms to
spirit, and thus to soul.
I believe that this experiment has been in operation since that very first
point of interception and all the hominid types found in the fossil record,
from the Australopithecines to Homo Sapiens Sapiens, are its artefacts. In
that light the apparent contradiction that exists in the fact that the fossil
record appears to show an advancement of the species towards states of
betterment ( at least in terms of brain capacity) can perhaps now be
reconciled and explained. Let me put to you some ideas that might explain
this seeming paradox:
Could the record of the ‘evolution’ of the human species actually reflect
a continuous line of modification of ape-like forms (such as
Australopithecus and Homo Habilis) into something that could hold, in a
more coherent form, what the alien beings were looking for, namely — a
Soul?
The last remnants of more superior, albeit devolving, hominid lines could
have been hybridized with these more devolved ape-like beings by alien
genetic interception. The resulting hybrid would have combined the cranial
capacity of the two different hominid forms. Thus Homo Habilis, for
example, would have had a larger cranial capacity than Australopithuus
because it was a result of the hybridization of Australopithecus with a
superior hominid form. As I have said, the fact that there is no fossil record
yet discovered for this superior form may well be due to the fact that there
were so few representatives of it. Thus the fossil record as it now stands is a
record only of devolved and genetically intercepted forms of hominid.
This new hybridized form with a greater cranial capacity would allow
more advanced, more coherent souls to enter through birth and incarnation
into its biological line than had previously been possible. This hybrid, who
is represented, shall we say, by the Homo Habilis hominid form could then
in turn be further hybridized with other superior hominid forms to result in
a further enhancement of cranial capacity which is announced by the Homo
Erectus hominids. The hybridization process could continue until the aliens
have drawn as many soul lines as possible into their intercepted biological
lines, drawing these lines closer and closer to themselves, and therefore,
alas, more and more into

159

greater states of entropic dismemberment. Motivated, of course, by the

wish to find at the end of those lines an attachment into Godhead itself. A
biological bridge into Godhead that they would have had direct access into
via the tracks of their own genetic interception.
Why, then, you might ask, did they not go straight to the closest points to
the source and intercept the souls closest to Godhead? The answer is simply
that they may not have been able to. They were perhaps only able, as I have
previously explained, to influence those souls who were within their grasp,
and the level of that grasp could have been far away from the first point of
origin for Soul in incarnacy. Too far away from Godhead to suit their
purposes. So instead they cast out their fishing lines and set their hooks into
those whom they could reach, namely the more ape-like hominid forms.
Then, through the connections, in karmic obligation, of those whom they
had caught to others whom they were unable to catch, they began to reel in
souls that were closer to the point of origin — to Godhead.
This hybridization process that would have enhanced the biological
species lines of prior hominids might therefore account for the apparent
‘evolution’ of hominid forms evidenced in the fossil record.
Let us now look in more detail at how these interceptions might have
taken place, using evidence from the fossil record as it now stands:
To go back to our example, when Australopithecus Afarensis (the
hominid that is believed to be a descendant of modern man) was, shall we
say, intercepted by alien beings and hybridized in the way that I have
described, it was enhanced to allow the potential for soul which was closer
to the origin point, to Godhead, to incarnate into its biological line. These
souls were closer to that origin than the souls who had previously inhabited
Australopithecus Afarensis bodies. The alien genetic interception that
resulted in the new hybridized form not only provided the means by which
these more advanced souls awaiting the opportunity for incarnacy in
‘Death’s Fields’ could enter into its biological line, but also necessitated
their entry into it. Previously they would have reincarnated into the prior
biological lines that possessed a more direct connection to Godhead in order
to reconcile karmic obligations. But now

160

that these lines were hybridized with a line whose connection to Godhead
was not as strong, they were compelled to incarnate into the new hybrid line
in order to reconcile any karmic obligations that might remain.
So the interceptions both provided an increased scope for the more
advanced soul to enter into species lines and also ensured that it did so. Let
us now look at the fossil record in that light:
The brain capacity of whichever species of Miocene Ape preceded
Australopithecus Afarensis may have been enhanced through hybridization
resulting in this new form of hominid. In fact, the large numbers of
Miocene Ape species that have been discovered in the fossil record might
be partly accounted for by genetic experimentation on the part of the alien
beings, who were perhaps testing out a selection of different types of
interception to see which was the most successful. Remember, most of these
species have no modern equivalents. The most successful intercepted
species might have resulted in a form of Australopithecus. Into this
artificially enhanced line came soul expressions that were less ape-like than
the souls that had inhabited the Miocene ape bodies. Miocene ape species
that were not intercepted in this way would have followed a natural
momentum into states of further devolvement. Thus, as I have said earlier,
these unintercepted species might, in fact, have modern descendants in the
form of lesser mammals.
Thus, to sum up our analysis as it stands so far: Alien beings re-
established some of the capacity that these ape-like forms had had prior to
their devolvement into apes, to receive more of the power of soul
connection to Godhead into their body aerials. Through their hybridization
processes they were able to artificially enhance physical species that existed
on this planet. However, as this enhancment was artificial, it did not provide
for the ‘evolution’ of soul back to prior states of superior, more godly
expression. Quite the converse was true. These artificial manipulations of
genetic lines interrupted the natural soul track back to Godhead for those
who received them. Thus the interceptions made it more difficult for soul
lines to return to prior states of grandeur while at the same time making it
easier for soul lines that were intrinsically closer to these prior states to
exist within, and incarnate into, a physical universe. Any apparent
‘evolution’ in the species that seemed to

161

result, in terms of behaviour or reasoning ability, was thus purely the

result of more coherent, more reasoning soul lines coming into the physical
species when the scope was provided for them to do so. Alien beings may
not have been responsible for the difference that exists between us and the
Miocene apes, in terms of the capacity to reason, understand and freely
choose. Rather, this is a result of the gradual hauling-in of soul lines into the
highly dangerous context of physical life. A hauling-in that is partly a result
of the natural entropic momentums of the universe and partly a result of the
machinations of the alien beings who are partners in crime with those
momentums.
Thus dwellings were provided for more knowledgeable souls to enter
into. The parental bodies were altered such that a greater brain capacity to
allow more advanced souls to enter into physical life was the result. In other
words, the hardware already incarnate and thus in the physical universe was
rewired to provide the added capacity to take in grander soul potential.
So, if Australopithecus Afarensis derived from an interception in the
Miocene period then the next character on the fossil record, Homo Habilis,
was the new hominid form resulting from a hybridization of
Australopithecus with genetic information from superior hominid lines. Of
the various forms of Australopithecus that have been discovered it was,
according to current interpretations of the fossil record, Australopithecus
Afarensis that ‘evolved’ into Homo Habilis. It seems that the later, so-called
‘robust’ Australopithecines — Robustus in southern Africa and boisei in
East Africa — coexisted with Homo Habilis. So, it would seem that one
form of Australopithecus was re-intercepted to eventually produce the new
hominid form — Homo Habilis. While other forms maintained their
‘evolutionary’ status as Australopithecines. Perhaps it is the two lines that
have descended from Australopithecus boisei and Robustus that now result
in the two species of African ape, the gorilla and the chimpanzee, for whom
there is, as I have already mentioned, no fossil record.
The result of the Australopithecus alien genetic interception, Homo
Habilis, was a hominid form that itself may have received a further
interception. This interception would then have resulted in Homo Erectus
hominids approximately 1.5 million years ago. It is speculated to have been
about one million years ago that the first

162

major exodus of hominids from Africa to other parts of the world began.
This exodus is evidenced by the fact that Homo Erectus fossils are found
from that point on in various places outside of Africa.
It is from this point in the fossil record onwards that there is intense
debate among palaeontologists and anthropologists as to how modern man
‘evolved’ from these Homo Erectus hominids. Let us examine the different
views about human evolution that form this current debate:
There are two distinct schools of thought as to the origins of the modern
phylum of Man we call Homo Sapiens. One school contends that the
present forms of Mankind come from four distinct types of ancestor, each
one derived from four different geographical points on the earth. The
evidence for this is palaeontological and relies on the fossil record. The
structure of bones and skeletons and their internal compatibilities are thus
crucial to the argument. Four distinct types of Homo Erectus hominid found
in the fossil record at four different locations in the world are identified as
the ancestors of the four main phylotypes of modern man found today in
those locations.

HOMO ERECTUS FOSSILS MODERN EQUIVALENT

Olduvai African
European Neanderthal – Cro-Magnon European
Lantian (Peking Man) East Asian
Java Man Australoid

No reasons are given as to why the evolution came about in four distinct
groups at four distinct points. The spread is the important thing. Homo
Erectus fossils from Africa spread across Africa, the Middle East, India and
also into parts of Near East-Asia. If Professor Wolpoff, an eminent Israeli
palaeontologist and one of the main protagonists of the ‘multiregional’ view
of human origins is right, European Homo Erectus later evolved into
NeanderthalCro-Magnon Man across Europe to become the modern
Europiform types. Peking Man across China and Mongolia and Java Man
across Southern South-East Asia and Australasia. All the rest of mankind
was supposed to have come about from a hybridization of all these four
distinct forms that suddenly sprang up in these widely separated locations.

163

The second theory that seeks to explain the ancestral lineage of mankind
uses a genetic marker to trace back the ancestry of thousands of people. It is
a far more reliable methodology and can trace the ancestral lines of
thousands of individuals of different racial groups back to a single hominid
female they call the ‘African Eve’. This theory contends that all the other
anthropological strains subsequent to Homo Erectus come from a single
point in Africa and a single individual hominid about two hundred thousand
years ago. Mankind’s cradle and maternal rooting point is Africa.
The two models are in contention and fierce controversy surrounds both.
The latest research seems to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that the
single point beginning through the African Eve is the true path of our
ancestry.
To summarize it all, it seems we have a unilateral source for our present
humanity. The line based on studies by geneticists proclaims the ‘out of
Africa’ model with the single mother who started it all about 250,000 to
200,000 years ago. This mother that came from the Homo Erectus African
phylotype suddenly seems to give rise to a progeny whose skull and facial
characteristics are markedly different from Homo Erectus. The first Modern
Humans. Every person alive today is a direct descendant from this ‘African
Eve.’ We know through further research that a great exodus of the modern
humans took place out of Africa about 100,000 years ago. Then something
incredible happens. These ‘Modern Humans’ suddenly disappear from the
fossil record to reappear again suddenly as a genotype of Man called Cro-
Magnon 60,000 years or so later, the ancestors of Europiform humans with
palaeontological evidence for their existence being found in France,
England, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Canary Islands and North
Africa. The tantalizing question is: What happened during these 60,000
years to Homo Erectus and Homo Neanderthalensis?
Whatever the migration point — or why, indeed, the migration took place
in the first instance — the crucial thing is that a single entity gave rise to all
this at a single point.
We know that all the previous forms of Man just disappeared, leaving no
subsequent ancestral lines to them. We know that, from present evidence,
even Neanderthal Man seems to have ended its lineage abruptly 40,000
years ago. There are, however,

164

some scientists who claim that it never died out and continues today in
another environmentally factorized form whose origins are represented by a
skeleton found in Israel ( of a modern type of hominid) that has certain
similarities with Neanderthal Man. The skeleton is that of a young boy
which has been dated to 90,000 years ago, called the Qafzeh Boy. Professor
Wolpoff contends that the Neanderthal’s and the Qafzeh boy’s genus are the
same and that geographical and environmental factors in evolution terms
account for quite apparent skull and skeletal differences. If the genus of
both hominid forms are the same, it would imply that modern Homo
Sapiens Sapiens could have been derived from both the Neanderthals and
the Qafzeh boy genotype, and therefore that Neanderthal Man may never
have died out. Other palaeontologists disagree and contend that the features
of each are too different to be the same palaeontological classification.
Let us now go to the little matter of the African Eve. It is not really a
little matter. It is probably one of the biggest matters in the affairs of Man.
Who and what is the African Eve? Of the different Homo Erectus groups
that populated the world from approximately 1.5 million years ago to
200,000 years ago it seems that the African group was the one that led to
Homo Sapiens Sapiens. Java man, Peking man and the European Homo
Erectus group, it seems, did not establish a lineage into future man. All
these other Homo Erectus groups originally came from Africa.
Approximately one million years ago, they moved away from Africa into
other parts of the world. The African Homo Erectus group, therefore,
provided the theme upon which all the other Homo Erectus forms varied.
They were thus the original stock, the most ‘undiluted’ group in their
capacity to reflect purely the results of interception ‘undiluted’ by
variations caused by environmental factors. It may well have been that the
alien beings were following this African group and mapping the results of
its interceptions from Australopithecus Afarensis to Homo Habilis to
African Homo Erectus. They might have been conducting a ‘case study’
through this group and comparing the different variations arising in other
groups living in different locations around the world to that case study. The
African group were thus the alien beings’ first reference sample of
hominids on this planet.
I believe that the ends of the lines of man that survived the entropic
process of dismantling thus far to the African Eve were

165

intercepted at that African Eve point 200,000 years ago, and later at
different places and different times by an Alien intelligence. As a result, a
new genus of man, Modern Man — Homo Sapiens — came into being. I
believe that from this primary base of Homo Sapiens, originating in Africa
approximately 200,000 years ago, all other changed forms of man emerged
through artificially managed genetic manipulation and engineering by an
alien species not of this Earth.
To recap: These are the most crucial points in the history of the genetic
series we call Mankind, because it is likely that almost all other ancestral
forms of Man from the First Adam disappeared into sub forms, i.e. apes and
monkeys, with the crucial exception of at least two. These two forms were
Homo Erectus and Homo Neanderthalensis. These sub-forms all the other
species of Man devolved into were the primates we see today. As I have
stated previously, I believe unequivocally that Apes came from Man and not
the other way around as is commonly accepted today. (Before the men in
the white coats come to make a monkey out of me, let me say that the
gradual unravelling of the human genome tantalizingly is beginning to
suggest this.) These forms are, of course, the Gorilla, the Chimpanzee, the
Orangutan and so on down the primate ladder to the monkeys.
Of the two species of physical that survived down the chain from the first
‘enlighted’ Godman, at this time, I believe Homo Erectus was thus the first
to be genetically intercepted and transformed through the manipulation of
DNA, to eventually become Homo Sapiens. Perhaps the wiring of the soft
tissue of the brain was changed in line with that of the Creator Beings of an
alien planet. It stopped our forefathers from changing into Apes as was
perhaps the fate of countless species such as ours all over the Universe.
Both surviving lines of Man, including the Neanderthals, had the line of
connection to the First Adam being, and thus Godness. Homo Erectus
carried on through the now genetically intercepted African Eve whose
descendants can now be found in the present modern forms of Man.
Geneticists, of course, would probably say that a naturally occurring,
purely accidental genetic mutation accounted for this change. The question
could then be asked why such mutations hadn’t spontaneously occurred
previously for millions of years to

166

the other species on Earth and led much earlier to the invention — the
wheel, for example. Can you imagine the nonsense of it all when you think
of the number of accidental, fortuitous and spontaneous gene mutations it
would take to change a sea worm to a man when it is supposed to take
hundreds of thousands and in some instances millions of years for one
fortuitous mutation to occur? The literature is full of desperate biologists
trying equally desperately to prove that it is possible to get a series of
fortunate mutations occurring at random in a chaotic maelstrom that
produces a man from a worm. The short answer to all their attempts, if read
with a minimum of objectivity, is to admit that they don’t even come close
to accounting for the series of links necessary to have occurred in such an
interconnected fashion that it would account for all the permutations
necessary to come up with any part of a worm, never mind a man. The law
of probability simply forbids it and no decent mathematician would give
their theories house room. It is so sad to see the desperation with which men
would try, at least by implication, to avoid denying their vanity and
affirming that there may be a phenomenon outside atoms that might, for
want of a better word, be called God. That this phenomenon might well
have provided a template for the original point of order away from which
life forms devolve.
So what part, then, do the Neanderthal group play in the gradual
emergence of modern Homo Sapiens? Could it be that the Neanderthals
were left untouched? A control group to act as a comparison with the
altered species? Perhaps a spare group in reserve in case the experiment
went wrong? A spare group that would make a better form from the
mistakes learned through the DNA manipulation of Homo Erectus that was
carried out before. An unintercepted sample, a sample left untouched when
they rewired Homo Erectus 160,000 years previously. The Neanderthals
were reserved from that time for this reason and just such a purpose. The
serially and naturally devolved large brain size of the Neanderthals was
perhaps still suitable. The grey matter was there. All it needed was rewiring.
And so they rewired the soft tissue in the brains of Neanderthals. Once this
was done they set about isolating their experimental hybrid species from the
rest of mankind through a set of rigidly defined rules or laws. Thus they
developed this group secretly and covertly for their purposes such that
genetic

167

boundaries could be altered over time to fit a prospectus and an intention

yet unknown.
The Neanderthals, as I have said, had a brain much larger than any other
genotype of man found. Brain size per unit body mass is commonly
accepted as a pointer to intelligence and thus a propensity to survive as a
species. With such a brain size the question arises as to why these people
seemed to he so primitive in technological development terms for tens of
thousands of years. I believe that Neanderthals were on their way out as a
genus, victims as was common with all other prior species to the whims of
the entropic process. Inheritors of the ‘down escalator’ of the entropic
process. From Man to beast to tree to stone and thence the primaeval atom
form of non-living differentiation.
What do we know about the Neanderthals from the fossil record?
It seems that there are two distinct types of Neanderthal man that are
found at various locations around the world. There is the “classic’
Neanderthal type that is believed to have been a cold-adapted, specialized
side branch from the human line that became isolated in Europe and then
became extinct as the climate improved. Then there is the other, more
generalized Neanderthal group that is considered to have avoided this
specialization and thus continued on to give rise to the later modern sapient
populations.
An alternative view places the ‘classic’ Neanderthals in the modern
human evolutionary line and attributes their disappearance both
anatomically and culturally to a process of absorption that involves some
contribution of Neanderthal genes to the succeeding populations. There are
some scientists, however, who have advocated the classification of
Neanderthal man as a species separate altogether from Homo Sapiens.
The wide distribution of the Neanderthal hominid form certainly suggest
that it, together with the transitional forms of Homo Erectus that also appear
in the fossil record at this time, helped to determine the form of modern
Homo Sapiens Sapiens. So, these two distinct points of alien interception,
that of the African Eve 200,000 years ago and that of Neanderthal man
thousands of years later, would both be responsible for modern Homo
Sapiens Sapiens in the form in which he now exists. They

168

would thus be the two hominid elements that resulted in our hybrid,
Homo Sapiens Sapiens.
How, then, did that final hybridization process that resulted in modern
man progress?
The date of the second major exodus from Africa of Homo Erectus
hominids is approximated to 100,000 years ago. It is around that e that the
Qafzeh fossils found in Israel that seem to be examples of an early form of
Homo Sapiens, are dated. Yet, as have previously mentioned, these early
Homo Sapiens forms pear to have disappeared from the fossil record for the
next 60,000 years until the emergence of Cro-Magnon man. Up to that point
it is only Neanderthal fossils that appear in the European and fiddle Eastern
fossil record. Could the Qafzeh fossils and others like them that appear in
different areas of the world in the last 200,000 years signify an early form
of Homo Sapiens, genetically engineered by the alien beings from the
intercepted African Eve stock? Perhaps they found that the capacity of these
early moderns to draw more powerful soul lines into the realms of physical
life as not great enough. Thus they may have decided to start to work upon
their control sample, the Neanderthals, perhaps with the aim of eventually
combining their larger cranial capacity with that of the African Eve
intercepted line in order to provide a new hybrid that would be a point of
convergence at which the two hominid lines would become one. Thus the
more advanced souls that would have incarnated into the as yet
unintercepted Neanderthal line with its larger brain capacity would
eventually be pulled in to the new hybridized form that would connect all
soul incarnating on this planet and place it within the grip of the alien
beings. The fact that the brain capacity of Neanderthal man is actually
greater than its successor in the fossil record, Cro-Magnon man, might well
suggest that such a hybridization between the Neanderthals and a group that
had a lesser cranial capacity did indeed take place.
Thus the Neanderthal line is the more advanced form of hominid that was
hybridized with the lesser Homo Erectus form. I contend that the large brain
size of Neanderthal man was naturally devolved, it was not the result of
alien hybridization. Neanderthal man would therefore have been the
remnant of a naturally devolving line, an unintercepted line. The fossil
record is thoroughly confused about Neanderthal ancestry. All kinds of
fossil skulls are attributed to

169

the Neanderthal genotype going back to about 250,000 years ago. But
there is no definitive fossil record for Neanderthal man types until about
100,000 years ago. This might suggest that the ancestral lines that led to
that point consisted largely of individuals who freed themselves from the
capture of the wheel of rebirth and converted their bodies back into light,
transfigured. The relative few who did become caught in the momentum of
devolution and were intercepted are those whom we can observe in the
fossil record. However, even these few are still greater in number than prior
examples of advanced hominid who devolved into lesser states, simply
because the force print of the planet has increased in time due to the
entropic momentum of the universe. The treacle has thus become stickier
and stickier, and it has thus become easier and easier to become stuck
within it.
Palaeoanthropologists believe that they have identified several
intermediary Homo Erectus forms in Europe that indicate a gradual
evolution from Homo Erectus to Neanderthal man in the European context.
I would dispute that these forms have any connection with later examples of
Neanderthal man. Rather, I would contend that they, like the Qafzeh
hominids in Israel, are in fact examples of the alien beings’ experimentation
with their first group of interception, Homo Erectus. The classic
Neanderthal features they exhibit would thus be a result of the adaptation of
Homo Erectus to the cold environment of Europe. Just as Neanderthal man
was later adapted to those climatic conditions and displayed those same
physical features. Thus the similarity between the Neanderthals and
European forms of Homo Erectus is, I believe, incidental to the
environment that they commonly shared and not in any way a sign that they
share the same line of descent.
It has become apparent from the fossils of Neanderthal groups that these
so-called ‘primitive’ peoples used to keep severely injured individuals
alive, in some cases for decades.3 The injuries displayed by certain
Neanderthal individuals are so severe that they would never have survived
had they not been taken care of by other people. It is often the case that one
individual has many different injuries that, according to the fossil evidence,
appear to have healed over. Thus there is an indication that Neanderthal
groups were indeed disposed to caring for their sick and injured. This could
be taken as the sign of a spiritually advanced society for, on a purely
physical

170

level, these injured individuals could only provide a hindrance, not a

help, to this hunter-gatherer community that lived in harsh environmental
conditions.
Thus, that part of the aliens’ ‘control’ group that was not intercepted in
the first African Eve interception 200,000 years ago was later intercepted.
Some of this group lived within, or perhaps was placed within, a new
environment which, I believe, was more conducive to alien interception
than Africa had been. That environment is the environment of the last Ice
Age in Europe. As I have already explained, alien body biology is likely to
be inorganically electronically based. Thus the cold environment of the Ice
Age in which electrical currents flow more easily would have been ideal for
their intercepting processes. This interception that took place in Europe
resulted in the ‘classic’ Neanderthal group that has been identified as being
specially adapted for cold weather conditions.
What might have prompted early Neanderthal man, or other early
hominids, to choose to live in, or to migrate to, the cold climates of Western
Europe which at the time was in the throes of an Ice Age? In fact, the
question that also needs an answer is: Why did the two main exoduses from
Africa (one million years ago and 100,000 years ago) occur in the first
place? What might have instigated prior hominids to-travel so far afield, to
cross vast oceans and spread themselves over the enormous expanse of the
ancient world? They would have certainly had the time to achieve that
spread in the past million years since the first exodus. But the question still
remains: Why would they have wanted to travel so far? Overpopulation was
certainly not the problem at that time, so that could not have prompted these
vast journeys. The puzzle becomes all the more apparent in the context of
the migration of early hominids to Ice Age conditions.
Could it perhaps be the case that the random distribution of early
hominids found in the European fossil record during the time of the Great
Ice Age was to a large extent the result of alien beings literally translocating
their intercepted hominid forms to these locations? To take this proposition
further, might it indeed have been the case that much of the migration
across the world after the two main points of exodus from Africa was also a
result of such translocation? Could the alien beings have been setting up
separate

171
 experimental groups that they wished to keep genetically discrete from
one another? Vast distances encompassing land and ocean between these
groups would have served this purpose admirably. It would have also
allowed the alien beings the chance to examine how the different
environmental factors associated with these different locations would affect
their sample groups. This might seem like a wild speculation straight out of
the realms of science fiction but there have been many reports from alien
abductees who claim that they were indeed translocated from one place to
another after their abduction experiences. It would also explain why people
who had plentiful game and thus food resources in Africa would decide to
trek thousands of miles in a sudden exodus. It seems a foolish, even a
downright stupid thing to do unnecessarily.
The Great Ice Age, which consisted of extremely cold periods
interspersed with short periods of warmth, occurred between about 1.75
million and 10,000 years ago. This time span coincides with all the main
alien genetic interceptions from Homo Habilis to Homo Erectus, to
Neanderthal and finally to Cro-Magnon. In fact 1.75 million years ago is
approximately the time at which the first Homo group, Homo Habilis,
started to appear. While 10,000 years ago, the end of the Ice Age, is the
approximate date that is generally accepted to be the demarcation point at
which modern Homo Sapiens Sapiens emerged as the primary hominid
form. I am going to put to you a possibility that you might find even more
astonishing: Could it be that the Great Ice Age itself was the result of alien
interference with the climate of our planet? Scientists have not yet come to
any firm conclusions as to what might have caused the Ice Age. Many
theories have been put forward, including speculations that changes in the
Earth’s orbit around the sun and variations in the Earth’s axis might have
been responsible in part for these climatic changes. The impact of
meteorites on the planet might well have caused such variations in the
Earth’s axis and its orbit around the sun. Could the aliens have used their
supreme technology to guide such meteorites towards our earth in order to
provide for themselves the cold environment that they would later require
for their interception of species on this planet? A cold environment that
would allow a better potential for the flow of the electric currents that are
central to all their ‘body’ operations? It is well known that current flows
more and more without resistance the lower
 172

the temperature of the medium it flows through. An environment that

might also be better disposed to accommodate the physical vestments of
their silicon-mercury based synthetic bodies.
The last major alien genetic interception before the emergence of modern
Homo Sapiens Sapiens was that of the Cro-Magnon hominids in Europe.
Could this fact suggest that the Cro-Magnons were the culmination of
approximately 1.75 million years of intermittent alien genetic interception
into hominid species on this planet? If my proposition about translocation is
true then the question might be asked: Why did alien beings wait so long to
bring their experimental subjects into the Ice Age environment of the
northern hemisphere? The answer might lie in the fact that the alien beings
were hoping to gain from hominids on this planet an insight into how to
access their lines of soul connection to Godhead. Thus they would have
sought to study these hominids in their natural environment and maintain a
gradual series of interceptions that would slowly change them to what the
aliens wanted them to be without altering any of the factors that might have
disallowed the very thing the aliens were looking for: the direct connection
via soul lines to Godhead. It was only when the alien element that had
gradually accumulated in the genome of certain hominids was large enough
in scope for these hominids to be powerfully intercepted via that alien
element within them that the most powerful interceptions could take place
without destroying the human genome altogether. The aliens had to
establish that genetic base first through gradually getting us used to their
effect such that our natural genetic structure would not break down when
the more powerful interceptions took place.
In fact, examples of an intermediary stage found in Europe between
Homo Erectus and Homo Sapiens between 400,000 and 200,000 years ago,
such as Swanscombe man in England and Steinheim Man in Germany, may
well be the derivations of the first shot across the bows for alien beings
attempting their genetic interceptions in an Ice Age environment. This
would explain why examples of Homo Erectus in Europe at this time appear
to be more advanced than examples found in the same time span in Asia
and Africa. These hominid forms may well bear no relation, as I have
previously suggested, to modern Homo Sapiens, rather they could be the
artefacts of ancient alien experimentation.

173

How, then, did the Cro-Magnons come about? They appeared in the
European fossil record at the same point at which ‘classic’ Neanderthal man
was ‘dying out’, approximately 35,000-40,000 years ago. The question of
the relation of Cro-Magnons to the earliest forms of Homo Sapiens is still
unclear. It does appear however, that Cro-Magnons (Homo Sapiens
Sapiens) and Neanderthals (Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis) are closer in
affinity than was once believed. The origin of the Cro-Magnon peoples can
best be understood by first looking at the fate of the Neanderthal group that
seems to have been their immediate predecessors.
The evidence now indicates that modern humans first emerged in sub-
Saharan Africa some time prior to 50,000 years ago. Subsequently they
spread northward, absorbing and occasionally displacing (it is believed
through competition, not confrontation) local archaic human populations.
As a result, some of the Middle Eastern, Central Asian and Central
European Neanderthals might have been absorbed into these spreading
modern human populations, contributing genetically to the subsequent early
modern human populations across those regions. In Western Europe a cul-
de-sac where the transition to modern humans took place relatively late is
believed to have taken place. Thus there is a preponderance of Neanderthal
representatives in the Western European fossil record at that time.
I have contended that a number of Neanderthals were intercepted by our
abovementioned outside agency, an agency that genetically altered their
DNA and thus their biological prospectus, creating a special experimental
genus of Man. The more general classification of Neanderthal man might
have led among others to the main group that we now identify as the
modern Semitic people. These would be the modern derivatives of the
examples of Neanderthal man that have been found in the warmer climates
of the Middle East, while the ‘classic’ Neanderthal grouping that is relevant
to western European Neanderthals might well have led to the modern
European stock, via the Cro-Magnon stage. In fact, some modern human
groups that are more or less homogeneous are thought to have maintained a
close relationship to Cro-Magnon types, at least in their cranial
morphology. The most notable of these groups are the Dal people from
Dalecarlia (now Dalarna, Sweden) and the Guanches of the Canary Islands.

174

It is difficult to see that a species that had done nothing in technological

development terms for a hundred thousand years (the Neanderthals) had
suddenly and spontaneously converted to a people (the Semitics) that
became one of the most brilliant, technically innovative ethnic groups the
world has ever known in a few thousand years, unless a genetic change of
enormous proportions took place suddenly. A change that altered the wiring
of the brain in a large proportion of the genus.
Perhaps they went further and produced a more cruel, more racist hybrid
with those who were originally of the genus of Modern Man as represented
by the Qafzeh Boy. Could it be that gene manipulation with people of the
Qafzeh genus of Homo Sapiens by the aliens produced the hybrids that we
know today as Cro-Magnon Man? The Qafzeh skeleton is dated as being
90,000-100,000 years old. As I have said, it is a very strange thing that this
genus of man disappears from the record for the next 60,000 years. The
next skeletal record of Homo Sapiens is marked with the appearance
suddenly of Cro-Magnon Man 40,000 years ago. Perhaps it took 60,000
years to perfect this hybrid, a hybrid produced between equivalents of the
Qafzeh Boy and the ‘classic’ Neanderthals of Western Europe. The fact that
modern man emerged later in Europe than anywhere else, and that the
Neanderthal stage is thus longer there, may well have been a result of the
processes required to produce this hybrid.
What, then, happened to the Qafzeh equivalents in the intervening 60,000
years? Why do they not appear in the fossil record in that time? The Qafzeh
fossils may well have represented a very small experimental group isolated
from the main stock of intercepted African Homo Erectus in order to
prevent inter-breeding as it might result in a dilution of the experimental
results. Thus this group came or were brought out of Africa into what is
now Israel. Once the experimental bed changed from this first group to the
second group — the Neanderthal ‘control’ group — no more
representatives of the first group were brought out of Africa. Thus it is not
surprising that such a small population of early moderns did not appear later
in the fossil record, as the likelihood of fossils being found for prior
hominids is very much the exception, not the rule. The larger the population
group, the more likely it is that some of its fossils will later be found. So the
fact that the

175

Qafzeh group did leave fossils may well have been purely a result of
chance.
What, then, can we glean about the next experimental group — the Cro-
Magnons? This group seems to have manifested a sudden spurt of
technological growth that does not appear to have taken place to any extent
before their arrival on the scene. It is now believed that the Neanderthal and
early modern human groups lived side by side with each other for tens of
thousands of years. Yet during that time the modern humans showed no sign
that they had superior technology. ‘Both people were living in the same
way, hunting the same prey, burying their dead in the same manner,’ says
Baruch Arensburg, a palaeoanthropologist at Tel Aviv University. Then it
seems that around 40-50,000 years ago something profound happened. New
technologies associated with modern humans — finer blades and projectile
weapons — began to appear. Scientists can only speculate on what
triggered this technological spurt. ‘I think there was a mutation in the brains
of a group of anatomically modern humans living either in Africa or the
Middle East’, says Richard Klein, an anthropologist at Stanford University.
‘Some new neurological connections let them behave in a modern way.
Maybe it permitted fully articulated speech, so that they could pass on
information more efficiently.’ Could this ‘mutation in the brains of a group
of anatomically modern humans’ to which Klein refers be the result of alien
interception at this very point, alien interception producing the Cro-Magnon
form of hominid? Such a sudden burst of technological development at this
point certainly suggests the involvement of the ultimate masters of
technology — our alien Clones and their Grey roboids.
It is my contention that the Cro-Magnons are the result of direct cross-
breeding with the aliens’ own genetic blueprint. It was not confined to the
rewiring of the brain alone. It was a whole-body interception. The final
hybrid species, of all permutations that could be produced with the three
main players: the Neanderthals, the Moderns and the Alien Clones. Perhaps
this was done a hundred thousand years ago and indeed prompted the huge
exodus of humanity out of Africa.
The last Ice Age thus provided the alien beings with the freedom to use
their electronic means of interception into the human genome to best effect.
Thus the Northern Hemisphere, which was largely

176

covered in ice, provided the central stage on which these, the most
complete interceptions of all, were carried out. Do you recall the Eskimo
legend that I recounted earlier, that says that the first tribes were brought to
the north by ‘gods’ with brass wings? Could this legend be based on actual
truth? Could alien beings have literally translocated the ‘first tribes’ into the
Ice Age of the ‘north’?

1
Easteal, Simon: Australian National University DNA Profile Conference, Canberra (16-11-94)
2
‘Monkey Murders may be Falsely Accused’ New Scientist 15-7-95
3
‘Neanderthals’: National Geographic, Vol. 189 Jan 1996 (pp 2-36)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER FOURTEEN:
‘WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM “FRIENDS”’

Genetic interception by an alien resource seems a very plausible

explanation for the sudden rise in the size of the brain of human ‘Sapiens’
species. The scientific explanation for this is far less likely. It contends, as I
have said previously, that the sudden increase in brain size occurred as a
quantum genetic accident through spontaneous gene malformation or
mutation. All an artefact of mere chance. Forgive me for restating it, but all
this is so significant that it bears repeating. Those who know the biological
imperatives that go to make up such a schematic of fundamental change,
that is, the number of gene mutations necessary to change an ape to a man,
know very well that we as a species have just not been around long enough
for the auspices of mere chance to trigger it, let alone make it happen. The
numbers probabilities necessary are simply too preposterous to envisage.
When the alien Clones and roboids set about regenerating the genome of
the species of Man’s ancestors whom they had found, they ‘rewired’ their
now primitive devolving brains. Brains that once allowed the beings that
returned to Godhead to be ascendant over any alien form in the universe.
The aliens were attending to leftovers. These were nevertheless leftovers
that had a soul, a discrete connection to Godhead and still at least a
potential for eternal life. Their thinking power was given a boost by this
alien intelligence. But they could never give them back the power of ‘seeing
God’ again. The intercepting aliens of course had no Soul, only the
knowledge possessed by their Creator Beings who did have

178

one. Just as you could say that a computer has knowledge, they had only
a proxy reference to know anything and do anything.
An interesting account of a close encounter with an alien spacecraft and
alien beings gives us an example of how these beings might, perhaps
without meaning to, provide a boost for the human brain.1
This encounter occurred at Tres Arroyos on 30 December 1972, and
involved an uneducated gaucho, aged seventy-three, and his pet cat. ‘Late
one night his radio failed and a loud humming noise filled the air above his
remote shack. Looking up he saw a powerful light beaming down, which
emerged from a wheel-like object; on the underside tubes churned out
sparks. A cabin with windows in the middle contained a strange figure,
wearing a suit made up of rolled material. The being stared down at him as
the object tilted on to its edge. Then, after a few seconds, a huge flash of
light shot out and hit the cat, which fled. The gaucho was himself
temporarily blinded by this. Meanwhile the humming noise increased in
intensity and the UFO flew over some trees leaving the smell of sulphur.
‘The cat vanished for several days and returned with its skin singed and
its personality altered to total shyness. The gaucho also developed
headaches, nausea and blisters on his skin. Then clumps of his hair fell out.
After he recovered he noticed that new teeth were growing through his
gums — which, given his age, was hardly normal.
‘Much of this was verified by investigation teams, as was the severe
burning damage to the tops of the trees over which the object hovered. But
strangest of all was that this man who could hardly read and write suddenly
developed a fascination for subjects like philosophy and science. He later
admitted that the UFO had returned in February 1973 and an entity from
this had told him many things; his recollection included a complex medical
discussion which gave an alleged cure for cancer. The language is in many
ways obscure and the description of this cure offers only brief snatches of
lucidity.’ It seems that the brain of this uneducated man was enhanced by
his encounter with an alien being. Prior to this encounter he ‘could hardly
read and write’. This story, if true, may offer an affirmation of my
postulation that the brains of prior hominid forms devolving into apes were
‘rewired’ by alien interceptions

179

and thus, unintentionally, given a boost back up the devolutionary tree to

a state of greater and more coherent thinkability.
A form of physical regeneration seems to have also taken place for the
‘gaucho’ referred to in the account: ‘new teeth were growing through his
gums — which, given his age, was hardly normal.’ This does indeed
suggest that the man in question was in fact subject to some form of
biological interception to alter his physical scope. The growth of new teeth
in an old man is a phenomenon, at least in this instance, that smacks of the
same clonic regeneration processes that the aliens might use on their own
type of beings. The physical symptoms suffered by the man and his cat are
all classic symptoms of radiation sickness — hair falling out, nausea,
blistered skin. This perhaps suggests that the Clone beings effect their
regeneration through a form of irradiation. The fact that the aliens discuss
with the gaucho a cure for cancer might imply that they have realized that
their own mechanisms using radioactive radiation can cause cancer in
human beings. Thus they are suggesting means by which the disease can be
cured so that their experimental subjects can be preserved in life for future
experimentation. In his book Secret Life, David M. Jacobs says that’… in
extremely rare cases the aliens will undertake a cure of some ailment
troubling the abductee. This is not in any way related to the contactee Space
Brother concepts of benevolent aliens coming to Earth to cure cancer.
Rather, in special circumstances it appears that the aliens feel obliged to
preserve the specimen for their own purposes. As one abductee said, “It’s
equipment maintenance”.’2

1
Randles, Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (pp 72-73) (Anaya Publishers Ltd, 1992)
2
Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 191) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER FIFTEEN:
AND & DNA

It is interesting to speculate that perhaps all these interceptions account for

the thirty-seven genes of mitochondrial DNA that are mysteriously included
in our cells. No one knows where they came from or why, except that they
would have to have come from a source totally foreign to the human
genome. It is a salutary feature that mitochondrial DNA, unlike other DNA,
clones itself in reproduction instead of recombining. There is a strong
hypothesis that mitochondria are the direct descendants of bacteria that
entered primitive nucleated cells in a number of infections. Among billions
of such infective events a few could have led to the development of stable,
symbiotic associations between nucleated hosts and bacterial parasites. The
classes of ‘bacteria’ that took part in these ‘infections’ have not yet been
established. Could these ‘bacteria’ simply be the invading genetic elements
introduced into the hominid genome by alien being via a series of
‘infections’ until eventually they were accepted and absorbed? There is a
proportion of mitochondrial DNA that is not in any way involved in
functions that benefit the cell. Thus, it is to a certain extent an organelle that
is independent of the cell and independent of the cell’s own genetic
information contained within the nucleus.
A new discovery about the origins of DNA replication offers a startling
confirmation that mitochondrial DNA is in fact the result of alien
interception. Michele Calos of Stanford University in scouring human DNA
for the origins of replication or duplication centres

181

has discovered something quite remarkable about the specific structure of

DNA that will replicate under its own steam.1 Her initial approach was to
break up human chromosomes into pieces of DNA, inject those pieces into
cells and then search for ones that could replicate unaided. But there was a
problem: any DNA pieces she injected immediately infiltrated and hijacked
the replication centres. Calos hit on a solution. She knew that circular
pieces of DNA cannot hop onto chromosomes because they have no ‘sticky
ends’. So she concealed her pieces of DNA inside a circular structure. The
tactic worked. Almost immediately, Calos found pieces of DNA that could
replicate under their own steam. ‘The trick was simply to make the DNA
pieces big enough’, she recalls. ‘Nearly any DNA piece larger than 10,000
base pairs is able to replicate’.
Unlike other DNA, mitochondrial DNA happens to have a distinctive
circular structure. Thus, it is extremely plausible that the alien beings could
have used this circular structure to conceal the thirty-seven genes of
mitochondrial DNA. This concealment allows these genes to replicate
under their own steam and thus maintain their independence from the
human organism while at the same time existing within it. This symbiotic
relationship that human cells have with mitochondrial DNA allows the
mitochondrial DNA enough independence from the human organism for it
to be able to act as a conduit through which information from the alien
beings who inserted this DNA can pass. It is almost as though they have left
a keyhole in human cells into which their key will fit such that they can
open the genetic information contained within the cell and manipulate it as
they wish.
Research scientists have been exploring ways of inserting the blueprints
for artificial structural proteins into bacterial DNA. It seems that it doesn’t
matter to a bacterium whether an artificial gene in its DNA codes for a
protein like one that the bacterium produces naturally or one that is entirely
different. If it is in the genome, the bacterium will make proteins. In 1990 a
research team led by Joseph Capello at Protein Polymer Technologies in
San Diego, California were searching for a designer protein that would
make cells grown in tissue culture stick to normal human cells.2 Artificially
grown tissue is already proving valuable in promoting wound healing, and
it might some day be possible to

182

grow entire organs this way to replace damaged or malfunctioning ones.

Capello and his colleagues persuaded bacterial DNA to code for their
artificial protein with great success. The protein is now marketed
commercially as an adhesive for attaching mammalian cells to tissue
cultures. If, as the hypothesis claims, the presence of mitochondrial DNA in
cells was the result of bacteria entering primitive nucleated cells in a
number of ‘infections’, then is it not possible that the alien beings may
themselves have used bacterial DNA encoded with genes artificially
engineered by them to enter into the biologies of living organisms on this
planet? If scientists with our level of technology can achieve such success
in genetically engineering bacterial proteins then the scope for such genetic
manipulation by alien beings with their highly advanced technology must
be enormous.
A further example of the introduction of genes into the human genome
can be found in an article in The Independent (3.1.97)3 entitled ‘Eating new
food may change your genes’. A team at the University of Cologne in
Germany conducted an experiment in which mice were fed with food
containing a virus known as M13 which normally affects bacteria. The
researchers led by Walter Dorfler discovered short sections of the virus’s
DNA in the spleen, liver and white blood cells of the mice. Professor
Dorfler says that ‘they weren’t hard to find. In some cases as much as one
cell in a thousand had viral DNA.’ He added that the DNA did not usually
stay inside the cells more than about eighteen hours but that he suspects that
occasionally some might remain. This could form the basis for evolution if
some cells retain outside DNA. The author of the article Science Editor
Charles Arthur, says that ‘such genetic crossover has frequently been
observed between bacteria cells, but is not expected between bacterial
viruses and animal cells’. Thus he points out that ‘genetically engineered
food might alter the DNA of those who eat it’. The ease through which
genetic interception can be carried out even with our present technology is
thus amply illustrated here.
If these alien biological-robots we call the Greys are made of inorganic
chemicals driven by semi-organic mitochondrially derived biochemistry
which they inserted into a number of hominids and these hominids were
then instructed to go forth and multiply, it could indeed explain the mystery
of the strange

183

and inexplicable mitochondria gene sequence found in present lines of

Man.
 Let me put a further point to you that you might like to consider. Using
mitochondrial DNA as a marker scientists have convincingly shown that the
origins of all mankind were in Africa approximately 200,000 years ago. If
Neanderthal man was unintercepted by alien beings until a time more recent
than that could it be possible that until that point of interception he had no
mitochondrial DNA? His body might have employed other cellular
mechanisms to provide for the functions which mitochondrial DNA now
perform.
When the hybridization of Neanderthal man with the highly intercepted
Homo Erectus line occurred, the mitochondrial history of the Homo Erectus
line would have been passed into the cells of any future progeny of the new
hybrid form. Modern man, Homo Sapiens Sapiens, is descended from that
progeny. Thus our mitochondrial history stems back to Homo Erectus about
200,000 years ago. The Neanderthal factors that are present within our
ancestry would not have registered on the mitochondrial evidence simply
because Neanderthal man in his pure unintercepted form had no
mitochondrial DNA! Up to now, ‘Out of Africa’ theorists have claimed that
Neanderthal man was not in any way ancestral to modern Homo Sapiens
Sapiens: this is in support of their theory that all human origins derive from
a certain time in Africa. Perhaps, in the light of these implications about
mitochondrial DNA, they can now look to the possibility that their theory
can happily coexist alongside a definite and undeniable contribution made
by the Neanderthal hominid group to modern Homo Sapiens Sapiens.
What other evidence is there within the human genetic make-up of
possible alien genetic interception? We know that the human genome is
littered with waste DNA that many thought had no function. It is now
thought that this waste or junk DNA may contain a genetic switch that
activates other genes. These sequences of bases are called ALU and a
research scientist, Wanda Reynolds of the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Centre in
San Diego, thinks that Alus may have played an important role in the
evolution of primates. Bob Holmes, writing in New Scientist about
Reynolds’s research, puts it thus: ‘The Alu is a 283 nucleotide sequence that
acts as a “jumping gene”. From time to time it inserts copies of itself,
randomly, into the genome. Over the past 30-60 million years these

184
 insertions have occurred repeatedly leaving roughly a million copies of
Alu scattered through the human genome and making up almost 10% of all
the DNA in each cell. During this time the sequences of the various ALUS
have begun to diverge, so that four distinct sub-families of Alu can now be
recognized. While studying one of these sub-families, Reynolds noticed a
short stretch of DNA — only fourteen bases long — that looked familiar.
Elsewhere in the genome there are nearly identical sequences that function
as anchor points for proteins that bind to hormones and which therefore
provide a way for hormones to turn genes on and off. Reynolds and her
colleague, Gordon Vansant, learned that the Alu sequence also binds to a
hormone receptor — in this case the receptor for a hormone called Retinoic
Acid, which activates genes at the proper times during development.
(Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 92, page 8229).
Vansant and Reynolds then turned their attention to a naturally occurring
Alu that sits close to the human gene for keratin, a protein found in our
skin, hair and nails. They looked at cells in which they had replaced the
keratin gene with a “marker” gene whose activity could easily be measured.
When the researchers then deleted the Alu sequence they found that the
marker became thirty-five times less active … A few Alus have previously
been shown to affect the activity of nearby genes, but the new study is the
first to show how. The results also provide the first clear evidence that most
Alus could have the potential to regulate human genes. Reynolds believes
that most Alus have little effect on nearby genes, perhaps because they are
bundled deep within folds of DNA. But she says that with the million Alus
strewn randomly through the genome during the course of primate
evolution, at least a few are likely to have landed where they could regulate
a nearby gene. When this occurred, she suggests the effect would be
equivalent to randomly twisting a knob on an instrument panel. Usually the
effect would be harmful, but once in a while it might produce an interesting
and beneficial genetic novelty. “We can’t prove it”, she says, “but it seems
over the last 30–50 million years it would provide good evolutionary
fodder”.’4
Could all this not have been random? Perhaps these million or so Alus
are in fact the attempted deliberate genetic interceptions to which I have
referred, of which only a certain number actually
 185

took and married into the functioning DNA of human beings. Reynolds
also says that this effect is equivalent to ‘randomly twisting a knob on an
instrument panel’. Perhaps this was an actual instrument panel operated by
alien intelligences. She also asserts that once in a while turning the knob
might produce ‘an interesting and beneficial novelty’. My assertion is that
perhaps it did — but to whose benefit? I contend that this is precisely what
actually happened when hominid forms naturally converting into apes, in
line with my theory of evolution within an overall format of devolution,
were artificially intercepted and enhanced for the alien purpose I have
outlined. It would indeed have provided good evolutionary fodder.
According to another article by Bob Holmes in New Scientist entitled
‘Message in a Genome’,5 researchers are beginning to explore how the
‘loops, twists and folds in the long DNA chain (its so-called “higher
structure”)’ affect the expression of genes contained within them. This
work, they believe, could reveal a purpose for non-coding DNA. Emile
Zuckerkandl, a molecular evolutionist who directs the Institute of
Molecular Medical Sciences in Palo Alto, California, suggests that cells
need a lot of non-coding DNA in and around the coding regions in the form
of introns and intergenic spacers to enfold the coding portions and wrap
them into properly labelled bundles that open at the right moment. For now
he admits he cannot prove his theory until scientists have more knowledge
about the higher order structure of DNA.
Do perhaps the interceptions cause the twisting and folding of DNA that
keep genes dormant such that they can only be activated when the cell
unwinds the relevant portion of the chromosome, so that the enzymes can
get at the genes to begin transcribing them?
Edward Trifnov is a structural biologist at the Weizman Institute of
Science in Rehevot, Israel. He points out that cells have put up with these
introns for hundreds of millions of years, patiently cutting them out every
time a gene is transcribed and splicing the coding parts together. ‘Why have
a whole headache of such precise splicing and throwing away to begin
with?’ he asks. ‘It would be stupid to introduce such an awkward system for
nothing. That meant introns are doing something very important’. Cells
have
 186

a mechanism available to them to eliminate introns, but they don’t use it.
Scientists do not understand why this is so. By making a DNA copy of its
transcript with the non-coding introns spliced out and then reinstating it into
the genome, introns can be eliminated for good (exactly the mechanism by
which some pseudogenes arise). If our DNA hasn’t the means to get rid of
alien-affected DNA because it is not natural to it, if that affected DNA is
instead a device for perhaps an alien purpose and strange to our human
blueprint, then our natural DNA would not have sufficient access to its
codes. Thus the paradox would be solved. If the alien purpose was to
substitute their own blueprint into ours, this phenomenon could be the
evidence that indicates this.
Duncan Shaw, Professor of Genetics at the University of Aberdeen, in his
fascinating article ‘When DNA Turns Traitor’, speaks of a malevolent form
of DNA known as ‘unstable’ or ‘trinucleotide repeat’ DNA.6 ‘They are the
genetic equivalent of the mischievous creatures in the film Gremlins: small,
harmless-looking pieces of DNA that lurk within genes, whose destiny is to
grow bigger and wreak havoc. Unfortunately, malevolent DNA of this kind
— known as “unstable” or “trinucleotide repeat” DNA — is all too real. It
first came to light in 1991 as the cause of Fragile X syndrome, an inherited
form of mental retardation that mainly affects males. Soon afterwards,
geneticists found strands of unstable DNA in people with myotonic
dystrophy and Huntingdon’s Disease. Now it is recognized as a key player
in the world of genetic disease. Answering questions like “Where does
unstable DNA come from?” and “Which gene does it affect?” has become
one of the latest goals in the fast-moving science of human molecular
genetics.
‘And not without reason. A Cambridge team examining the evolution of
unstable DNA has reached a worrying conclusion: the amount of unstable
DNA may be gradually, almost imperceptibly, increasing, driven by its
intrinsic ability to expand as it is passed from one generation to the next. In
other words, some of our DNA is trying to kill us; and for the moment, at
least, there is nothing we can do to stop its advance, or correct its harmful
effects.
 ‘The rate of spread cannot be measured directly. But judging from
comparisons of unstable DNA sequences in different ethnic groups,
unstable DNA has been gaining ground for tens of

187

thousands of years. If evolution was the best way through its tenet of
survival of the fittest of preserving a species at its biological optimums,
why has it yet to equip us with mechanisms that could protect genes from
the effects of unstable DNA? Nor is there likely to be much selection
pressure to eliminate the faulty DNA from the gene pool, because many of
the diseases it causes disable or kill people only after they have reached
child-bearing age.’
Maybe this is some small hint confirming my postulation that evolution
to betterment through convenient fortuitous DNA mutation from time to
time is poppycock and that devolution is what drives the geological,
biological and psychological momentums of the Universe. More accurately,
evolution within devolution as I have said previously. The unravelling of
the complete human genome will soon put this beyond doubt anyway.
Professor Shaw’s paper identifies a ‘genetic marker’ associated with a
disease called Huntingdon’s Disease. This disease is one of a certain kind of
genetic disease, which identifies itself as distinct from classical genetic
diseases in which the genes are faithfully passed on unaltered to the next
generation. The reason for these strange characteristics was established to
be ‘a piece of DNA that grew in length when it passed from parent to child
and the bigger it became, the more severe the disease it caused.’ This results
in a ‘progressive increase in severity, with earlier age of onset in each
successive generation, it is known as “anticipation”.’ The trinucleotide
repeats that form this affected DNA are distinctive from normal DNA
because of their repetitive codes: the same triplet code is repeated again and
again (i.e. ctgctgctg, or cggcggcgg). Ordinary DNA is ‘random and
featureless’ in its coding. However, a clone is characterized by the fact that
it is formed from a master cell that copies and recopies itself to create a
complete body. There is no ‘soul field’ to dictate variations on that original
theme. If a form of clonal DNA has been introduced into the genome of
humanity then this repetitive coding would be exactly what one would have
expected to result. Professor Shaw comments that ‘unlike normal DNA,
trinucleotide repeats seem to have an inbuilt tendency to get bigger. It is
almost as though they want to grow.’ Clonal DNA copies and copies itself
without regulation by anything external to its own nature. It is thus unlike
normal DNA, which is a product of an architect outside its own purely
physical nature — soul. Thus,

188

of itself, normal DNA does not have this impulsion to grow and repeat
itself, instead it is the implicit result and reflection of soul field translated
into an atomic shell. The trinucleotide repeats thus introduce unnecessary
complication into the genome which provides, in physical terms, the line
tracing back to Godhead. It interrupts that line and thus, to varying extents,
obscures the route back.
Also ‘it seems that trinucleotide DNA can form unusual molecular
structures which allow two entwined strands of the DNA double helix to
slip against each other, leaving loose ends to which the enzyme will add
extra DNA bases’. If it was the intention of the aliens to re-order DNA for
their own purposes and in this way to reorganize parts of the human
genome, then they would have required a device by which they could splice
DNA in and out. These unusual molecular structures that allow the two
DNA strands to slip against each other providing loose ends to which extra
bases can be added, may reflect exactly this intention and provide just such
a mechanism to fulfil it.
The fact that the DNA of reptiles is far more fragmented into small
pieces than that of mammals suggests that devolution is expressed through
the breaking-up of the DNA itself. A break-up that seems to be in its first
stages for human beings via these trinucleotide repeats and the unstable
DNA that they produce.
The human skeleton is a perfect phase-looped aerial for receiving
electromagnetic signals. A simple test may be done with a short-wave radio
that proves this. Just place a finger on the aerial socket point and see how
the signal received increases spectacularly. I believe our bodies are
receivers and synthesize and receive Godness as intuition or inspiration.
The brain is just a sorting agent for the manifestation of the thinking
process and not the manufacture of it as is commonly accepted. This jelly or
colloid packed full of nerve cells in an electric field gives rise to the
thinking process that makes for our awareness and thus all we know.
The diseases affected by trinucleotide repeats seem to be those that affect
particularly the nervous system which, as I have said, itself forms the
biological aerial for receiving the language platform of Godhead which to
me is Thought. Perhaps this aerial so fascinated the aliens because it
provided biologically the very thing that they

189

lacked — a connection to the Universe of the Whole. To these purely

non-‘spiritual’ physical beings it would have seemed as though the nervous
system itself provided that connection, as they would have had no means of
discerning the non-physical power — the soul, which was the true
connecting factor. The nervous system is just the physical mechanism
through which that connection is achieved. So the aliens would have sought
to introduce their own ‘blueprint’ into the genes that code for the nervous
system of human beings. They would do this in order to see if they could
themselves latch into this aerial and perhaps from there trace a path to
whatever the root was that made us different from them. Perhaps to them
our nervous system was their roadway to that great enigma, the Soul.
There appears to be a threshold level of trinucleotide repeats that then
leads to instability. Perhaps this can be correlated to the extent to which
human DNA can resist and keep in check these alien interceptions. Once
they reach a certain number, it may no longer be possible in the naturally
devolving genome of humanity for these strains to be resisted and
dominated. So, unlike classical hereditary genetic diseases, there is no
specific mutated gene, or genes, responsible for these diseases. Instead they
are the result of repeating codes clogging up the system and thus impinging
on genes that are a natural expression of the human species.
It also appears that most of the expansion of unstable DNA occurs during
the first few cell divisions of embryonic development. Thus the DNA is not
always unstable. The reason for the instability during these initial stages of
life might be that the soul is not usually established fully in connection with
the body it is forming at this early stage. Although it must be stressed that
that connection has to exist to some extent for embryonic development to
be initiated in the first place. But the full identity of the being formed has
not yet been completely established in all its uniqueness. This connection
takes time to establish as the soul filters from the field of ‘death’ in the
space between atoms to the fields of life in the space within atoms. So
without the full sanctioning power of the soul, the trinucleotide sequences
are freer to expand. Once they have expanded they are then expressed into
the human being as an apparent fait accompli that cannot seemingly be
corrected by our DNA replication processes because they are alien to those
processes. It is worth mentioning

190

the fact that many reporters of alien abductions have said that sperm cells
and egg cells are removed by the alien beings for examination and
experimentation. In fact, medical examinations on several women who have
claimed abduction have revealed that all the ova have mysteriously
disappeared from their ovaries. This again identifies trinucleotide DNA, the
expansion of which occurs in the earliest embryonic development, as
originating from an alien source.
To conclude, all these unstable genetic repeats, manifested in such
diseases as Fragile X syndrome, Huntingdon’s Disease and myotonic
dystrophy, seem to be involved in switching genes off or inhibiting their
function in one way or another. They thus serve to adapt the human genome
for alien beings to somehow find a foothold into it.
Thus, perhaps, entered the ‘Greys’ into the whole human cocktail
themselves. An alien derivative, a legacy of a type of ‘Being’ cloned from a
superior natural type from another part of our Universe that itself perhaps
was made extinct, leaving a poisoned chalice (our Greys), their creations,
for the Universe to deal with. These are predominantly the creatures
described in the encounters known commonly as ‘alien abductions’.
Perhaps these abductions were and are being carried out to this day to
enable the Greys to monitor the scale of their interception and perhaps alter
and hone it. It is an interesting fact that the vast majority of alien abductees
come from the Europiform genus of hominid. The most direct descendants
of Cro-Magnon man. It is also true that there are few if any UFO hotspots
anywhere in mainland Africa or Asia, with the exception of China and
Japan, and most of the sightings in China have taken place in the last fifteen
or so years. The vast majority by far are where the descendants of Cro-
Magnon man live presently: North America and Europe.
To go back to Professor Shaw’s research. It describes an interesting
discovery that might support my contention about Cro-Magnon man.
With Huntingdon’s Disease David Rubinsztein and his colleagues at
Cambridge University have found that the repeats which cause the disease
actually originate in the healthy population. So, says Professor Shaw, ‘the
repeats are “evolving”, gradually increasing in length over many
generations until they cross the

191

threshold into the disease range.’ It appears that when the number of
repeats exceeds fifty the disease itself develops. So, Huntingdon’s Disease
appears to be a by-product of the general deterioration of the genome itself,
as it originates in the healthy population and grows there in potential until it
finally activates into an actual disease. This general deterioration is relevant
to the genome of north-west Europeans in particular, where Huntingdon’s
Disease is concerned. Its incidence among Japanese people and black
Africans, says Shaw, is ‘vanishingly small’. This would illustrate my
postulation that these ethnic groups are far less — at least, until now,
perhaps — intercepted by alien genetic effect than the Cro-Magnon-
descended north-west European ethnic group. Black Africans come from
the same original Homo Erectus stock as Europeans but, unlike the
Europeans, I believe they were not involved in the genetic interception that
led to Cro-Magnon man. Similarly, the Mongoloid people stem from an
ethnic line that has, in the past, been subject to the least interception. So the
implication might be that unstable DNA could in fact be the result of a
strange and profound genetic change. An interception, perhaps! Research
has yet to be done extensively on the full quota of diseases that stem from
unstable DNA and the variations that they present between different ethnic
groups. However, this research on Huntingdon’s Disease seems to have
uncovered a particular concentration of trinucleotide repeat DNA among
the descendants of Cro-Magnon man.
 According to an article in the New Scientist, ‘India looks farther east for
its ancestors’ (8.3.97)7, there has been further evidence to suggest that
Asian people, who are normally classified in the same group as European
people (the ‘Caucasian’ group), actually have more in common genetically
with Chinese and Japanese people than with Europeans. Narinder Mehra,
director of the Department of histocompatibility and immunogenetics at the
All-India Institute of Medical Sciences in New Delhi, belongs to an
international team studying the genetics of histocompatibility worldwide.
The scientists concentrated on the human leucocyte antigens (HLA), that
dictate whether a person undergoing a transplant will accept or reject a
donated organ or tissue. Mehra found ‘surprising results’ for northern
Indians, when studying three HLA genes. For example he found that of the
seventeen subtypes of a gene called HLA-A2,

192

forty-four per cent of a group of forty-six people living in New Delhi had
the same subtype as sixty-nine per cent of a group of northern Chinese. But
in the subtype most commonly found in European populations it was totally
absent. Although Mehra points out that the number of people that he has
studied so far is small and that there might be significant variation between
populations from different regions, this research does seem consistent with
the possibilty that northern Indian and Chinese people may share a common
Neanderthal ancestry that Europeans, who are descendants of the Cro-
Magnon group, do not.
To go back to Duncan Shaw’s work on trinucleotide repeats, it seems that
chimpanzees have much smaller repeats than ours and says Professor Shaw
‘have a long way to go before they reach the disease threshold’. This,
following on from my postulation about the origin of hominid and ape
species, may well be because chimpanzees and other ape or monkey forms
are the result of the natural breakdown of a species line in an entropic
system without significant interception into that line by alien genes of their
equivalent. Perhaps their line of Man went into their ape stage
(chimpanzee) without the scale of interception to which our human lines
have been subjected.
1
‘Creators of the Forty-Seventh Chromosome’ New Scientist 11-11-95
2
‘Living Factories’ New Scientist 03-02-96
3
Arthur, Charles: ‘Eating New Food May Change Your Genes’ Independent 3-1-97
4
‘Did Genetic Garbage Spur Primate Evolution?’ New Scientist 16-9-95
5
‘Message in a Genome’ New Scientist 12-8-95
6
‘When DNA Turns Traitor’ New Scientist 25-3-95
7
‘India Looks Farther East for its Ancestors’ New Scientist 8-3-97

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER SIXTEEN:
THE WHO’S WHO OF GODS AND MEN

I believe the Neanderthal derivative of mankind came down into the lines of
Aryo-Dravidio/Semitic peoples. They, I believe, may be the least
intercepted line of humanoid ancestry of all peoples until relatively recently.
By ‘intercepted’ I mean a direct physical DNA interception by an alien
resource. Up until then these peoples held the purest natural ancestral lines
of Inaugural God Being on the planet with the least alien genetic
interception of their DNA.
I further believe that the brains of some Neanderthals were ‘rewired’ and
a huge leap of intelligence took place. Some of these rewired Neanderthals
were then used later to set up a biological ‘bed’ for the gradual
hybridization of the genophylum with alien stock: that of the Clones. The
rest of the Neanderthal genophylum were left untouched. They continued
on till they finally died out. The ‘Soul Lines’ of these forms would then
come into the weakened, more devolved format for physical life provided
by Modern Man. We may live amongst some of these souls now.
There is palaeontological evidence that supports my contention that
certain examples of Neanderthal man may well have been subject to a form
of alien interception involving a rewiring of the brain. In his book Secret
Life, David Jacobs documents the physical after-effects of alien abduction.
These include physical scarring, with scars ranging in shape from small
‘scoop’ marks to elongated, thin cuts. According to Jacobs, ‘these scars are
permanent records of abduction experiences and can be anxiety-provoking
reminders for the victim’.1 Mysterious cut marks have been found on the

194

skulls of certain Neanderthal fossils. These marks recur on bones from

sites that were occupied at intervals thousands of years apart. Could these
marks be a result of the scarring that can follow alien abduction? The marks
are on the skull, indicating that if they were caused by alien
experimentation then that experimentation involved the head area, and
therefore the brain.
 The word ‘interception’ has to be explained. There may have been
essentially two types. The first involved the hijacking of the human
genome. Either with the supplanting of human by alien genetic material, or
with an alteration of the genome in such a way as to mutate it in situ, such
that a whole biological change was derived. Biologists, of course, think that
mutation is an accidental thing. No one actually causes it to happen. It is
something that happens by sheer chance and a man was made out of a ‘sea
worm’ by a series of these incredibly fortuitous mutations. They are unable,
however, to account for the incredible fact that these so-called spontaneous
lucky mutations based on sheer chance finally and conveniently produced
an entity that could analyze and come to the preposterous conclusion that
biologists come to about the whole thing in the first place.
The other way of interception was psychological commandinterception
through visions, dreams and what might be termed telepathic procedures.
Could it be that an interception of the second sort happened with the
Judaic patriarch Abraham? If it did, I believe this was a psychological one
and took the form of a vision or mental summons to leave his Dravidian
roots in the north of India and come to the land of Canaan.
It is my contention that Abraham, and others like him, were probably the
descendants of predominantly Neanderthal-derived lines whose genomes
were, at that time, the least intercepted by extraterrestrial alien procurement.
According to the Book of Genesis, Abraham was a direct descendant of
Seth, the third son of Adam who was sent by God ‘instead of Abel whom
Cain slew’. Thus, if we understand Genesis in the symbolic context with
which it is surely meant to be understood, the following clues can be
derived:
After the ‘fall’ of Adam and Eve, Eve ‘conceived’ and gave birth to Cain
and then to his brother Abel. These two brothers seem to represent two
distinct lines of humanity that stem from Adam and

195

Eve in their newly ‘fallen’ state of capture within a physical universe.

Abel was a ‘keeper of sheep’ while Cain was a ‘tiller of the ground’. What
could this symbolism mean? Could it perhaps refer to one type of man
whose primary focus was upon living things and their welfare, ‘keepers of
sheep’, and another type of man who was more concerned with the artefacts
of the physical world, ‘tillers of the ground’? The ‘offerings’ that the two
brothers made to God may be symbols for their own intrinsic states of being
that are implicitly ‘offered’ up to, or set against, the final omnipresent
reference of Godhead.
Abel ‘brought of the firstlings of his flock and the fat thereof. And the
Lord had respect unto Abel and to his offering. But unto Cain and to his
offering he had not respect. And Cain was very wrath and his countenance
fell’. In this context it would seem that the ‘respect’ of God does not entail
the personal liking of an anthropomorphic God for one offering more than
another. Instead, the commanding of the ‘respect’ of God is something that
is achieved through the implicit capacity of individual souls to allow God
into them. Thus God did not have ‘respect’ for Cain’s offering simply
because he could not reach into Cain, or, shall we say, into ‘Cain-ness’
because Cain-ness in free will did not allow it. Cain’s ‘offering’, his
intrinsic state of being in other words, was disposed away from Godhead.
For Abel, however, the implication is that his nature was truly selfless and
generous, and his gift devoid of vanity and full of genuine self-sacrifice; he
gave the best of what he had, ‘the firstlings of his flock and the fat thereof’.
Thus God could ‘respect’ his offering because it was an offering analogous
with the spirit of God. Cain’s reaction to God’s rejection of his ‘offering’
(‘he was very wrath and his countenance fell’) suggests that the spirit of his
offertory was one of self-centredness, the same spirit that eventually led
him to kill his brother. He expected God’s countenance in return for his gift,
thus his was not an unconditional generosity full of self-sacrifice. So, to
sum up, Genesis is perhaps identifying here two distinct types of humanity.
One of which is, by nature, more akin to the spirit of God’s unconditional
love, while the other is more a prey to the physical forces that hold it bound
in the Universe of Parts and is therefore more conditional and self-centred
in its expression.
These two representative types are paralleled by the two

196

species-lines of man to which I have previously referred. One lines, the

Neanderthal line, was able until relatively recently in the timescale of
hominid devolution on this planet to maintain itself free from the capture of
the physical universe. If you envision the devolution of souls from the
original Adam point wing stream, then the soul lines that eventually
devolved into Neanderthal man are the relatively still waters before the
stream starts to travel downhill to become a cascading waterfall. The soul
lines that led to the Homo Erectus hominids had been carried into waterfall
at a much earlier date. The relatively quiet waters can be said to represent
‘Abelness’ while the turbulent waters of waterfall can be said to represent
‘Cainness’. Thus the story of Cain killing Abel might symbolize how the
more devolved soul lines carry the less devolved lines further and further
downhill until they are dragged into the waterfall. All soul is implicitly
connected this way, so the only way to resist being pulled downhill would
have been to swim the other way. Through this pull via the implicit
connection of all souls to one another (symbolized by the fact that Cain and
Abel were brothers), Cain ‘killed’ Abel, dragging Abelness to the same
state of physical capture to which he, or ‘Cainness’, was subject. Thus
Abelness was ‘killed’ in terms of a death from the state eternal life which
up to that point had been his mode of existence. Now we are all, as the
species Homo Sapiens, in the waterfall, we no longer naturally have the
freedom to return easily to the state of Godhead from which we came.
Abelness and the freedom from physical capture that he represents no
longer exists.
The third ‘son’, Seth, was perhaps a figurative stance or principle
representing an amalgamation of both states. One that was more centred
than either resolve. Seth was sent by God ‘instead of Abel whom Cain
slew’. Thus souls who are closer in their spirits to the spirit of God came,
from that point on, into biological lines that no longer possessed an ease of
access between the physical universe and the metaphysical universe. That
ease of access died with Abel. Thus these souls had to make the best of
whatever biological lines were still available to them, just as Jesus Christ
had to do 2000 years ago. Abraham perhaps outlines the principle on which
we all as a species would have to dwell under the yoke of physicality. It was
thus for Abraham to multiply himself as numerously as the stars.

197
 I believe that Abraham and those like him were Aryo-Dravidian in origin
and came from India. It is their admixture with the Semitic peoples of the
Middle East that provides the overall genetic backdrop for the Jewish and
Islamic people today. The close genetic affiliation of Judeo/Islamic and
Indian peoples has been confirmed by research into Y-chromosome
haplotypes, which is discussed by A. Spurdle and T. Jenkins in a paper
entitled: ‘The Y chromosome as a tool for studying human evolution’.2 It
seems that while Europeans are distinctive because of a high frequency of
Haplotypes 15 and 12, the situation is different for Asiatic and Jewish
populations. Haplotypes 7, 8, 11 and 24 are most common in South African
Asiatic Indian and Jewish populations, and in Ashkenazi and Sephardic
Jews sampled in Israel and Tunisia. This research has thus identified a
division within the Caucasoid group between Europeans on the one hand
and Indian and Jewish populations on the other.
What, then, do we know of the Aryo-Dravidian community from which
Abraham might have come?
The word ‘Aryan’ has been used as an adjective by the most heinous
racist scoundrels to describe their supposedly superior stances. It is adopted
as a banner for a super-race that somehow appeared from nowhere and bred
the so-called Master Race of the ‘Fatherland’. It is also supposed to have
bred every self-proclaimed Master Race since time immemorial.
The best scholarship does confirm the existence of an Aryan people who
lived in North India. These people were supposed to have a highly
developed culture and to have spread this culture throughout the world.
There is scholarly speculation that these people came from the steppes to
the north and east of the Caspian Sea and moved from there into Asia and
Iran, but these speculations, the scholars admit, are purely hypothetical. The
Nazi scholars somehow contrived to claim the Aryans as a European people
from whose root the Barbarian German came. They hijacked the Aryan
symbol of the swastika, reversed its design and adopted it as the Nazi
emblem. The swastika had long been known previously in India as a
derivative holy symbol in Northern Indian culture.
It seems that there is only one thing that the scholars know for sure about
the Aryan peoples and that is that their Indo-Aryan language spread through
India during the late third and second millennia
 198

BC. Attempts to view the Aryan peoples as a conquering tribe who

established hegemony over the local population have failed, given the fact
that it seems that only their language was passed on to the local peoples:
there seems to be no distinctive material evidence of the presence of a
conquering tribe. One hypothesis is that between about 2,500 and 2,000 BC
a continuing spread of Indo-Aryan speakers occurred, carrying them much
further into India, to the east and the south, and coinciding with a growing
cultural interaction between the native population and the new arrivals.
From these processes a new cultural synthesis emerged, giving rise by the
end of the second millennium to the conscious expressions of Aryan
ethnicity found in the Rigveda.
The Rigveda is the earliest literary record of Indian culture. This text and
other Sanskrit texts that appeared later, such as the Mahabarata and the
Ramayana, express the foundations of the Hindu religion, the earliest of all
religions that point towards the possibility of existence beyond the realms
of the atom. Might this suggest that the Aryo-Dravidian peoples were the
first (after the alien genetic interceptions that helped to mould modern
Homo Sapiens into his present form), to receive direct inspiration from
natural Godhead — which is not of the atomic universe?
I believe that this is indeed the case and that Abraham, the Father’ of the
Jewish people, himself originated from these early Hindus. If Abraham was
originally a Hindu who later ‘fathered’ the Judaic faith, then the fact that
Jesus was a Jew who ‘fathered’ the Christian faith suggests a certain
continuity and interconnectedness between all these main religious ethics,
does it not? Buddhism, of course, grew out of the original Hindu belief
system: Buddha was a Hindu. While Islam claims its origins from the line
of Abraham’s son Ishmael, thus it has roots in the Judaic context.
In the combination of the Aryo-Dravidian line with the Semitic line via
Abraham and those like him, the least intercepted of the predominantly
Neanderthal lines of humanity were brought together. It is from these lines
that all the main religions of the world have come: Buddhism, Christianity,
Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Zoroastrianism all originally come from either
India or the Middle East.
A further combination of these lines with the ancient Cushitic peoples of
what is now modern-day Ethiopia brought together
 199

these Neanderthal-derived lines with those of the Homo Erectus African

genotype. This combination resulted in the Falasha Jews, the Jewish people
of Ethiopia. According to genetic research, Ethiopians in fact show a
combination of typically African and typically Caucasian haplotypes in
both the mitochondrial DNA and the Y-chromosome.
A paper entitled ‘The Differences Among Jewish Communities —
Maternal and Paternal Contributions’ from the Department of Genetics at
the Hebrew University of Jerusalem identifies the Ethiopian Jewish
community as significantly different from all the other Jewish communities
in terms of their Y-chromosome haplotypes.3 Could this perhaps be
evidence for the Ethiopian Falasha Jews belonging to the ‘lost tribe’ of
Jewish mythology, a tribe of least alien genetic interception?
It seems that of all the predominantly Neanderthal-derived modern
populations of the world whose brains were rewired by alien genetic
interception, the Semitic Jews were the ones who became the most
profound subjects of further alien interception. Their rewired brains could
act either as better aerials to receive God or as better computers to translate
alien-derived information more efficiently. There is no more startlingly
apparent a documentation of an ongoing alien interception of a specific
community than that which can be found in the Old Testament of the Bible.
I will begin to illustrate this with Abraham himself. As I have stated
previously, Abraham’s was an oral interception, not a genetic one. That
would come later at the point at which Jacob, Abraham’s grandson,
‘wrestled’ with an ‘angel’. I will fully discuss this later in the chapter.
Abraham was asked by the ‘Lord’ to leave ‘Ur of the Chaldees’, a place
in ancient Mesopotamia, for the land of Canaan. Ur of the Chaldees is not
cited as Abraham’s original home. It is only named as the ‘land of nativity’
for Haran, Abraham’s youngest brother. A series of remarkable events
follow Abraham’s departure for Canaan. These events are remarkable only
in the sense that natural Godhead is highly unlikely to have had anything
whatsoever to do with them!
Let us take, for example, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. It is
written that ‘the Lord rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone
and fire from the Lord out of heaven’

200

such that ‘the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a furnace.
Two ‘angels’ are said to have come to Lot, Abraham’s brother, who lived in
Sodom to take him away from the site of the coming destruction. These
‘angels’ claimed that the ‘Lord’ had sent them to ‘destroy’ this place. When
Lot ‘lingered’, the two ‘angels’ took his hand and the hands of his wife and
daughters and physically removed them from the city, telling them not to
look behind them. Is it really conceivable that God would literally wipe out
the population of two cities, using what appears to be some form of
explosion, simply because they did not follow the principles that he had laid
down for them? What purpose could such a revengeful act serve? Only the
purpose of an alien ‘God’ made from atoms could be served by such an act.
An act perhaps designed to wipe out a population that no longer served the
purpose of providing a useful experimental ‘bed’ for alien interception and
might hinder further experiments by intermixing with other people, i.e.
Abraham and his extended family, who were still part of a live experiment.
Further evidence is found for the prompts of an extraterrestrial ‘God’ in
an episode instigated by Abraham asking God how he can know that he will
inherit the land of Canaan. God asks him to ‘take me an heifer of three
years old, a she-goat of three years old and a ram of three years old, and a
turtledove, and a young pigeon’. He is then asked to divide the three
animals into pieces and to lay ‘each piece one against the other’ but to leave
the birds and not divide them. Abraham then falls into a ‘deep sleep’ in
which ‘an horror of great darkness fell upon him’. In his sleep God tells him
that he should ‘know of a surety’ that his ‘seed’ shall be ‘a stranger in a
land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them’. It is
then reported that ‘after the sun went down, and it was dark, behold a
smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between’ the ‘pieces’ of
flesh that Abraham had laid out. Could alien beings have been using the
souls of animals that were of a low enough resonance for them to grasp to
reach a human soul that was far more difficult for them to gain access to?
The ‘burning lamp’ that ‘passed between’ the pieces of flesh that would
have held the bioelectric fingerprint of these animals’ souls certainly sounds
like some kind of laser probe through which they were reaching. Perhaps
this was the original reason for animal sacrifice, a practice that was rife
within the Old

201

Testament context. The blood released by such a sacrifice would, via the
iron contained within it, provide a magnetic tape upon which alien beings
could write and thus reach the human subjects who were their true targets.
After the sacrifice the alien beings reveal to Abraham that he is to partake
in an experiment in which his ‘seed’, his Aryo-Dravidian biological line, is
to be introduced into a Semitic line that would be ‘strange’ to it.
Abraham is offered by this ‘God’ a promise that is purely terrestrial in its
scope and in no way related to any spiritual progress beyond the context of
atoms. He is told that his ‘seed’ will be numbered as many as the ‘stars’ and
as many as ‘the dust of the earth’. This is a promise that might flatter an
egoist, but what significance could it possibly have to a man who was
seeking grander perspectives than the atomic arena can provide? It is
perhaps a promise that would entail the bestowing of the ultimate accolade
that a cloned alien being could ever hope to receive: An assured replication
of its own physical body into the foreseeable future!
The culmination of Abraham’s concourse with this being that claims to
be God lies in a request made of Abraham to take his son Isaac and offer
him as a burnt offering up to ‘God’. This episode is commonly believed to
be an example of God testing Abraham’s faith in him. For no sooner does
Abraham lay the knife to Isaac’s throat than an angel calls out to him from
heaven and tells him not to touch Isaac. Would God, who is all-knowing,
really need to ‘test’ a man in this way? Surely he would already implicitly
know the extent of Abraham’s faith. Never mind the ethical implications of
such a test which to me suggests a God who has a callous disregard for
human sensitivity in his single-minded purpose to gain the worship and
attentiveness of his human subjects.
Let me put a proposition to you concerning this remarkable encounter:
Could it have been the case that the alien ‘God’ asked Abraham for the life
of his only son and that it was only the power of inspiration from natural
Godhead that prevented Abraham from carrying out this request? Perhaps
the alien God had found in Abraham a certain resistance, an implacability,
to the effects which it sought to gain through him. Perhaps the reach of
natural Godhead was too strong in Abraham to allow their power to work
effectively. I am sure there are a number of human beings alive today whose

202

psychoframes are so spiritually adorned they are near the point of

Transfiguration. They are very few, but they are impervious to reach by any
ET so-called ‘Gods’ and thus truly safe from detachment by any type of
technology they possess. Jesus Christ certainly was such a phenomenon, as
his resistance to the so-called temptations provided by the ETs proved.
Perhaps Abraham’s brain was enjoined by the power of Abraham’s soul to
receive the natural Godhead rather than the extraterrestrial alien God. Thus
Abraham would have been slipping out of their grasp again. So, to allow
them to reach him again, just as, in a far lesser way, animal sacrifice had
done previously, they sought to communicate with Abraham via the most
powerful means of all, the released soul and thus the blood of his own son
Isaac. Remember, Abraham and those like him who had relatively
unintercepted lines back to Godhead would have been the greatest prizes for
the alien beings who were desperately searching for the least complicated
and most profound track back to God for themselves. Perhaps the origins of
human sacrifice in ancient rituals also have their roots in an alien God who
demanded such horrific acts to further his purpose among men when they
found that animal souls provided too many complex short falls and twisted
turnings back to Godhead. That there were too many staged and disjointed
connections to deal with.
The episode involving Abraham and Isaac has certain similarities with
Jesus Christ’s temptation in the desert of Judea. Like Abraham, Christ was
aware of two sources’ of information. One of these sources was the ‘devil’
(who, as I will later explain, may well also be representative of
extraterrestrial alien being), while the other source was his Father, natural
Godhead. Like Abraham, Christ chose to follow the information he
received from natural Godhead, not from the alien source. But, unlike
Abraham, Christ did not for a single moment follow any of the instructions
given to him by the ‘devil’. This suggests that Christ might well have had a
knowledge of what the alien beings were up to that Abraham did not have.
Thus there was no confusion in Christ’s mind as to which source was
which. There is substantial evidence from Christ’s own words as they have
been quoted in certain texts, to show that he did indeed know all about alien
beings and how to circumvent their intentions. It may well be that the whole
intercession of the so-called ‘Christ Phenomenon’ was to do one thing and
one thing only. Beat off the

203

alien input into the derivations of living being with a soul in this
Universe. In other words, for ‘Satan’ read ‘Leader of the Clones’. For
‘devils’ read ‘Greys’.
I will discuss this evidence later in the chapter entitled ‘Affirmations’.
For now, it is important to point out that the Old Testament may well be an
amalgam of information received from both these sources and, if that is the
case, it is for us all to judge what information comes from which source.
Now on to Jacob and what may well have been a genetic interception of
his resources. In Jacob, the alien beings might have had success where they
had failed with Abraham and Isaac. In the Dead Sea Scrolls a fragment has
been found of a text that supports the postulation that Jacob was the first
point of successful and powerful alien interception into the Jewish line. The
text is entitled ‘The Ages of The Creation’4: ‘Interpretation concerning the
ages made by God, all the ages for the accomplishment [of all the events,
past] and future. Before ever he created them. He determined the works of
… age by age. And it was engraved on heavenly tablets … the ages of their
domination. This is the order of the creation of man from Noah to Abraham
until he begot Isaac …’And the interpretation concerns Azazel and the
angels who came to the daughters of men and they bore to them giants …
and iniquity, and to cause them all to inherit wickedness … judgement and
judgement of the congregation’.
So the ‘ages made by God’ in the ‘order of creation of man’ are
somehow interrupted after Isaac — ‘until he begot Isaac’. At that point the
text refers to the ‘angels who came to the daughters of men’ and caused
them (the daughters) to ‘inherit wickedness’. What clearer description could
one have of an alien interception? A phenomenon which might have
occurred to the offspring of Isaac, who is Jacob. Thus the line of God lasts
‘until Isaac’. Jacob’s own nature as depicted in the Bible, which is one of
deceit and connivance (he stole his brother’s birthright), supports this
hypothesis in indicating that he was ‘interceptible’ by ‘wickedness’ because
he himself had qualities that could be described as wicked. Perhaps the ‘two
nations’ that God told Rebecca Jacob’s mother) were ‘struggling’ in her
womb point to Rebecca’s own interception while she was pregnant by these
‘angels’ who came into the ‘daughters of men’: ‘Two nations are

204

in thy womb and two manner of people shall be separated from thy
bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people and the
elder shall serve the younger’. Jacob is the younger son and Esau the elder.
At a later point Jacob is said to have ‘wrestled’ with a ‘man’ who ‘when
he saw that he prevailed not against him touched the hollow of his thigh’. It
is proximal to the ‘hollow of the thigh’ that the storehouse of genetic
information, the testicles, lies. I believe that this is a report of an alien
abduction experience involving the reproductive areas of the body. The man
tells Jacob that ‘thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a
prince hast thou power with God and with men and has prevailed’. Could it
be that Jacob thus provided the alien beings with a bridge into the Jewish
line, he was the Father of their ‘chosen people’ who are the children of
Israel. A chosen people whom they later sought to claim back via Moses.
Judaic folklore proclaims that the Jews are a ‘Chosen People’. A people
chosen by ‘God’. Could it be that in a way this might well be true? The real
question that then arises is, what God?
If the Greys were the ‘God’ of Israel duping a people to believe that they
were true divinity in the Godhead sense, then a look at what happened on
Mount Sinai would imply a technologically explainable revelation process.
Thus the burning bush might have happened when, perhaps, a laser used to
transmit sound (we can do it now with our present technology in this way)
had a side effect of setting a hush on fire while the revelation process was
going on. The request that Moses take his footwear off, because the ground
on which he stood was ‘holy’, could have implied perhaps that his whole
body needed to be used by some vibrational methodology that would in turn
allow him to discern and know what the ‘voice’ of God was saying. It may
have been that Moses was in fact irradiated during this process and he thus
could not make it to the Promised Land. The column of fire that followed
the Israelites out of the land of Egypt might have been a technological
effect that allowed ‘God’ to monitor their progress. The Israelites are said to
have wandered for forty years in the wilderness after ‘God’ revealed their
destiny to them. Would not a simple route map have helped as part of the
Ten Commandments in speeding up their progress through the peninsula of
Sinai? Forty years seems a long time to walk three

205

hundred miles, unless something far more significant was going on.
Could it be that the strain of humanoid was being genetically altered and it
took forty years (perhaps two generations) to see the results through two
lots of progeny, the father’s children and the children’s children?
There is significant reference throughout the account of the exodus of the
Jews from Egypt to suggest that their saviour from bondage did indeed
originate from a spaceship. Not least in this catalogue of evidence is a
remarkable account of an encounter between God and Moses’s son. The
lead-up to this encounter begins when God informs Moses that if he does
not go to Egypt and free his firstborn (those being the ‘children of Israel’)
then God will slay Moses’s firstborn, his son. Unbelievable though it might
seem were this a God equivalent in moral stature even to a decent human
being, let alone a divine morality that would be beyond reproach, God then
seeks to ‘slay’ Moses’s son:

‘And it came to pass by the way in the inn that the Lord met him and sought to kill him.
Then Zipporah took a sharp stone and cut off the foreskin of her son and cast it at his feet and
said, surely a bloody husband thou art because of the circumcision.’ (Exodus 5: 24-26).
Zipporah, Moses’s wife, offers God the foreskin of her son, and thus
information as to his genetic structure, in place of her son’s life. With that
genetic map ‘God’ would have all the information necessary to successfully
intercept Moses’s line with all the information that was required to provide
for them a leader of their ‘chosen people’ who would accurately follow all
that they wanted him to do. When Zipporah offers the foreskin ‘God’ lets
her son go. Can it be possible that such a ludicrous course of action by a
supposed ‘God’ could have been deemed acceptable and worthy by so
many people for so long? If the ‘God’ to which this account refers is not an
alien Clone-being seeking genetic programmes to intercept humanity, then
what is he? Indeed, could it actually be the case that the initial command for
the children of Israel to circumcise their sons could have been a means for
alien beings to monitor the genetic information of their ‘chosen people’? In
other words, maybe the foreskins were taken by these beings and studied.
The fact that this remarkable story about

206

Moses and so many other incongruities within the Old Testament can
have been meekly accepted by so many people for so long is surely an
indication of the vast extent to which the Greys have succeeded in so
programming their chosen subjects that they are blind to even the simplest
logical connections that would expose their programmers for what they
truly are.
In the Old Testament’s so-called ‘Pseudepigraphal’ texts, there is an
appendix to the third book of Enoch in which there is a passage entitled ‘the
Ascension of Moses’.5 This ‘ascension’ is very similar to how one might
imagine an ascension into a spacecraft would be. He ascends into a ‘chariot’
in which he meets a being named Metatron who offers him anything he
wishes to ask for. This is, of course, reminiscent of Jesus’s temptations in
the desert. Metatron is also known as ‘little Adonai’ (the little Lord or God),
thus he is viewed as a supernatural entity who is a smaller version of the
true God, not as a false God. Apparently, in some of the later ‘mystical
midrashim’ texts, the ‘angel’ who ‘wrestled’ with Jacob is taken to be
Metatron.
If the Ark of the Covenant itself was a mechanism to receive instructions
from a spaceship then there are significant pointers to suggest that that is
true. Strict instructions are given as to the clothing of the high priest who is
in charge of the Ark. These include the weaving of gold wires into his
cloak: ‘And they did beat the gold into thin plates, and cut it into wires to
work it into the blue and in the purple … and in the fine linen, with cunning
work.’6 Gold is an excellent conductor of electricity and it is through
electromagnetic waves that radio receivers work. In the book of Leviticus
instructions are given as to who may, or may not, approach the altar. No one
of any physical blemish is permitted to approach the altar, so that they will
‘profane not my sanctuaries: for I the lord do sanctify them’.7 Is this not
compelling evidence that the Ark of the Covenant and the altar within it
were in fact used as mechanisms through which alien beings could view
human subjects who might be suitable for interception? Hence only those
without physical defect and therefore with the likelihood of a genetic
structure more free of the mutations that lead to physical weakness or
infirmity were allowed to approach the altar.
The prophet Ezekiel’s visions have by many people been taken to be
visions or sightings of spacecraft:

1
Jacobs, David M .: Secret Life (p 243) (Simon & Schuster, 1992).
2
Spurdle, A.B.,Jenkins, T.:’The Y Chromosome as a Tool for Studying Human Evolution’ Current
Opinion in Genetics & Development (1992 2: 487-491)
3
Ritte, Neufeld, Broit, Shavit, Motro: ‘The Differences among Jewish Communities — Maternal &
Paternal Contribution’ Journal of Molecular Evolution -1993 37: 435-440)
4
The Dead Sea Scrolls: ‘The Ages of the Creation’ (40 180)
5
The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd, 1983) (Edited by James
Charlesworth) Appendix to 3 Enoch Ch 15 B.
6
The Old Testament of The Bible: Exodus Ch. 39, v.2-3
7
The Old Testament of The Bible: Leviticus Ch. 21

OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com
 207

If Ezekiel was also visited by alien beings it would certainly account for
his strange encounter with ‘God’ in a valley that was full of bones.1 God
asks Ezekiel if these dry bones could live. He then assembles them into
complete bodies and covers them with flesh. After he brings them to life
they stand ‘up upon their feet, an exceeding great army’. God then tells
Ezekiel that these bones are ‘the Whole house of Israel’ and he tells him to
promise the people of Israel that ‘I will open your graves, and cause you to
come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel … And
shall put my spirit in you and ye shall live and I shall place you in your own
land’.
‘God’ is thus involved in bringing to life soulless dead flesh. What kind
of ‘life’ is he therefore promising for the children of Israel — the physical
immortality of Clone being, perhaps? How reminiscent this is of the
Egyptian process of mummification, a process that ancient Egyptians
believed essential to preserve the physical body for the after-life. The
Semitic peoples truly seem to be receivers of the same ‘god’.
God then asks Ezekiel to take two sticks and write upon one ‘For Judah
and the children of Israel and his companions’ and upon the other ‘For
Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel and his
companions.’ He is then asked to join the sticks together and ‘they shall
become one in thine hand.’ The fact that ‘God’, immediately after
demonstrating to Ezekiel what is apparently a cloning process, then asks
him to combine two ‘sticks’ representing two different tribes of people
suggests to my mind that it is in fact genetic engineering that is being
described here.
There was a certain sect of Jewish mystics that existed in the first century
AD and then again from the seventh to eleventh centuries that concerned
itself with visions of the ‘moving chariot’ called the ‘Merkava’. These
visions originated with the prophet Ezekiel who claimed to have seen a
divine ‘throne’ or ‘chariot’. This sect described themselves as ‘explorers of
the supernatural world’ or ‘Yorde Merkava’. A few documents have been
preserved that attest to the existence of methods and practices having to do
with the initiation of carefully chosen persons who were made to undergo
tests and ordeals in order to ‘ascend’ through the seven heavenly
‘dwellings’ to behold the divine throne situated on its ‘chariot’. The
Talmud, the Jewish Book of Law, reports an

208

incident in which, among four men engaging in Merkava, one died and
one went mad. Thus the ascent into what certainly seem to be spaceships
was common practice among this ancient Jewish sect.
Orthodox Jews today follow a certain practice prescribed by Mosaic law
called ‘laying the tefillin’. That practice is a result of the command to ‘bind’
the words of the ‘law’ of God ‘for a sign upon thine hand and they shall be
for frontlets between thine eyes’. Thus a box with four distinct
compartments is laid upon the forehead and strapped there with a long strap
that is tied behind the head while the length of it that remains is wrapped
around the arm and the middle finger of the left hand. In that hand lies the
hand tefillah, a box with a single compartment. In these two boxes
parchment on which is written the law of God is placed. Is it possible that
this practice originally involved electrical devices strapped by wires to the
head and the hand, by which the alien beings maintained communication
with their human subjects? Two boxes, one with four compartments, one
with a single compartment, perhaps containing microelectronic parts that
could store information such as the ‘law’ of ‘God’. Were these boxes joined
to each other by wires and strapped to the human body’s naturally
bioelectric aerial? Perhaps this actual device was later imitated in the form
in which it is seen today, just as in Catholicism the communion wafer
represents the body of Christ given by him to his apostles in the form of
bread.
In October 1988 Paul Shartle, an audiovisual director who witnessed
films at Norton Air Force Base in California of a UFO that had actually
landed, described the three beings that emerged from the UFO as having
‘thin head dresses that appeared to be communication devices’ while ‘in
their hands they held a translator’. Are these devices examples of the same
equipment that the Jewish people might once have witnessed and later
mimicked in the form of tefillin?
If the original commandment was simply to bind the words of ‘God’
upon the hand and the forehead, then perhaps it can be inferred that the
‘mark’ given by the ‘Beast’ (referred to in the Book of Revelations) which
is received ‘in their right hand or in their foreheads’ is in fact a part of the
same process as the ‘marking’ of the Jewish people at the time of Moses. It
the Beast) may have its latter-day equivalent in what the German Nazis did

209

to the Jews during the Second World War. I am not, of course, suggesting
that this is a direct equivalent, for it would have been the Nazis themselves,
not the Jews whom they persecuted, who would have qualified for that
‘mark’. But the marking process may. instead have been an acted-out
memory of past interceptions, an anachronism reawakened maybe by the
alien intentions that may indeed have driven the Nazi ethos.
The worship of the God Yahweh, the God of Israel, did not begin,
scholars now believe, until the time of Moses. Various other epithets for
God were used before that time and this has been taken by scholars as an
indication that patriarchal religion (that is, the religion of the patriarchs
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) differed from the worship of Yahweh that began
with Moses. They have found more evidence for this conclusion in the fact
that distinctive features of post-Mosaic religion are absent in the God of the
patriarchs. The God of the patriarchs shows nothing of Yahweh’s ‘jealousy’;
no religious tension or contrast with their neighbours appears, and idolatry
is scarcely an issue. He also provides his people with no obligations to fulfil
as a condition of their happiness, unlike the Mosaic God who makes such
demands upon his people continually.
God, apparently, was originally the personal tutelary deity of each of the
patriarchs, called by a variety of names and later unified into the one God of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, but only in hindsight. The hindsight of Jewish
tradition that identifies Yahweh as the Creator of the world, who had been
known to and worshipped by men from the beginning of time. It seems
instead to be the case that the three ‘patriarchs’ may have each been
communicating with different sources of inspiration, different Gods. Then
later an amalgam was made of all these sources and identified as the ‘God
of Israel’.
The key to it all lies in an answer to the question: Who or what was the
God of Israel of common Mosaic institution? The Old Testament is a
catalogue of a God who seems more like a Lord of the Manor. Not an entity
that dispensed volumes of warmth and love and encouragement to bring
together, to bind, to add the whole aegis of Mankind, not a tiny part of it
that exclusively belonged to this so-called God. In a quote from the Good
Book this God admits to being a jealous God. Strategies and ploys

210

designed to kill men, women and children in a register of caring for his
own people at the cost of others are evocatively straight out of the epithets
of finite reasoning. Not the reasoning of an eternal entity with the grand
scale of All Knowing. It smacks of the psychology of the average medieval
robber baron. Or the cold-blooded expedient dispassionate objective of a
mechanistic intelligence such as a Grey. It is a statement seemingly full of
vanity, avarice, greed and vengeance. It also has a hint of the binary system
that says, ‘either — or’. An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. The
straight mathematical logic of a computer program. With no room for
shades of grey. (No pun intended.) No hint of compassion. It is a massive
catalogue of reactionary response in threat and counter-threat.
There is something totally illogical underlying this Old Testament God’s
so-called rational outlook too if he claims to be a jealous God. It suggests
something of huge import missing in his or her psychology, such as
subtlety. That implies a God of very limited program. A boundary that
makes this Divine One a little restricted in size. It is ultimately foolish to
reveal you are a jealous God because it betrays qualities of loveless
shepherding too. Not very good if you want the best-quality followers. It is
at best a good management ethos for favourites and courtiers and suggests a
massive inferiority complex. This God is a tester of loyalty and faith under
the auspices of threatened murder, as described in the story of Abraham and
Isaac. A duplicitous divinity acquiescing in deceit and theft in the stealing
of Essau’s birthright. It all describes a megalomaniac of a God with an all-
consuming vanity and a love of dissimulation and subterfuge to affect his
will.
Whatever or whoever the God of Israel was there can be no doubt that
this deity could not be regarded as one of all-encompassing love. Again it
begs the question: If there is no love, could there be such a phenomenon as
God?
If this so-called ‘God’ was responsible for the original ‘rewiring’ of the
brains of some Neanderthals, then this interception gave us a glory and a
curse. It provided an enhanced ‘aerial’ for receiving both natural Godhead
and the Clone-God. Within these two reference scales and the inability to
distinguish which is which lies the entire predicament of one of the true
Master Races of our species — the Jews.

211

The glory of the Jews is the crowning glory of Man. Never have so few
given so much to so many as the Jews have given to and are giving to
Mankind. In all fields of endeavour — Art, Music, Science, Literature,
Philosophy, Entertainment, Economics and Political Science — the
illustrious Jewish contribution is prodigious and singularly effective for the
good of Man.
Perhaps this is why the Cro-Magnon Nazis, the true Children of Cain to
my mind, tried so hard to take these precious people from us. Who would
want to inspire the Nazis to-do this? If you get my drift!
According to some accounts Hitler believed that he had seen a member
of a super-race that he believed to originate from the inner Earth. He
reportedly told Hermann Rauschning, the Nazi governor of Danzig: ‘The
new man is living amongst us now! He is here! … I will tell you a secret. I
have seen the new man. He is intrepid and cruel. I was afraid of him’.2
Could this ‘new man’, whom Hitler personally met, have originated not
from the ‘inner Earth’ but instead from an alien craft? There are many
reports from people who have experienced contact with a certain type of
alien being that is distinct from the Greys in that it is apparently humanoid
and has blond hair and blue eyes. Could the ‘super-race’ that Hitler and his
cohorts were looking for have been representatives such as these?
Remember his ideal was a blond, blue-eyed people. If, as I have claimed,
the Jewish people through Abraham have roots in Northern India it is
perhaps more than a coincidence that Hitler, who sought to wipe them out,
believed that his alien ‘super-race’, his ‘Aryans’, came from that very same
place, the Himalayas. It is almost as though the alien beings who seem to
have paid him a personal visit were announcing to him a recipe for a type of
humanity that was the exact opposite of the types of humanity who have
retained their close connection to Godhead. This opposite, this mirror
image, took the form of a Cro-Magnon ‘super-race’, a race that was in its
‘ideal’ presented to Hitler as ‘intrepid and cruel’. I believe the Holocaust
was a contrivance to try to ethnically cleanse the world of its ‘saviour
genophylum’. Jews and Gypsies, both of which are races of North Indian,
Aryan descent were subject to the genocide and Hitler and his henchmen
gave us a clue to it all with their prodigious obsession with the so-called
Occult.

212

The dictionary definition of the word ‘occult’ is that which is mystical,

supernatural, hidden, secret or shut off from view. Elite Nazi groups spent
hours within the confines of a series of rock structures and caves at a place
called Externstein in Germany because they thought they could derive and
receive supernatural inspiration and powers there. Many latter-day Germans
and, indeed, people from all over the world make a pilgrimage to this place
to this day. Some in curiosity and some in search of the same juice the
Nazis were looking for. There is an associated story and, I stress, a story
because I have no particular hard evidence for it.
The story goes that the spear that pierced the side of Christ’s body was
located by the Germans and taken to a cave room there. Hitler’s mob of
followers were said to have gathered at the location, touched the spear
which was said to have had occult powers, and from it received the
inspiration for the ‘Final Solution’. It is speculated that the spear, which of
course was made of iron, might have acted as a kind of recording device,
similar to a tape recorder. It is said to have held the emotions of Christ at
the time of his crucifixion and thus a quantum of all the injustice and terror
of the whole event as it struck the Christian redeemer was catalogued on it.
The human bodies of the Nazis were then said to have acted as transducers
similar to the one on a magnetic tape recorder and picked up all of this. A
tape-recorder, after all, records information electronically on a ferrous (iron)
tape medium that is later translated into a signal by a mechanism that can
read this signal again electronically and make sense of it all as a coherent
sound. The human body really is a biological transducer of sorts. It has a
moving coil (the haemoglobin in the blood moving in circulation induces a
current that produces the bio-electrical field of the body). The bones of the
fingers are piezoelectric with their calcium phosphate content and may well
act as a transducing mechanism, allowing the brain to sort the signals into
some sort of coherent image that the mind perceives with meaning.
Just take a close look at the human skeleton. What finer aerial
configuration of elements could you find in its design? (See Figures 14, 15
in the illustrated section.) It is the finest electron-dense phased loop array.
The human body, as I have said, is an excellent receiver of electromagnetic
signals. I am convinced that it is much more than this. It may well be a
device

213

for transmitting and receiving the radio wavelength equivalent of the

‘pre’ electromagnetic spectrum. In other words, ‘Thought’ itself. I believe
each individual has a unique carrier-wave pattern to which are added
signals according to intention, action and result. The aerial is flexible and
movement of the joints provides various alignments that channel the signal
and thereby alter the efficiency of transmission and reception. (See Figs. 14,
15 in the illustrated section.) It may be that the instinct to pray in a certain
posture is, in fact, a means of phasing the aerial to pick up the ‘God’ signal
maximally.
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the theory, Psychometry, which is a
so-called fringe science, is now an accepted procedure by some police
forces around the world, in the solution of difficult cases. The idea is that
the adept or psychic is given a clue to the required information through
some artefact connected with the crime. The psychic then handles the object
and is able to picture clues connected with the transgression in the mind’s
eye, so to speak. There have been some spectacular successes using this
technique of ‘remote viewing’, so much so that police forces around the
world have endorsed the whole procedure with testimonials as to its
usefulness.
To get back to the ‘Spear of Longinus’, as it was called, the hypothesis is
that it might have prompted the ‘Holocaust’ with some psychometric
procedure.
There is only one thing wrong with that idea and that is not the mechanism
of reception but what exactly might have been received. Jesus was a Jew.
His dying exhortation to his ‘Father’ was a plea to ‘forgive’ them and all
others complicit in his death for the ignorance shown in what they did. His
love for his and all other people continued to his dying breath. If anything
was ‘picked up’ at the point that the spear entered his flesh, it would not
have been those qualities that inspired killing as a final solution. It would
have been the power of LOVE and not hate and exclusion as was and is the
total creed of Nazis then and now.

1 → chap 16: 8
The Old Testament of The Bible: Ezekiel Ch. 27
2 → chap 16: 9
Mysteries of the Unknown: Mystic Places (pp 151-152) (Time/Life Books, 1987)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN:
SHADES OF GREY

If there is no Love, could there be God? It reveals most of all that we might,
most of us, be the children of this God because we too in our record as so-
called intelligent beings show one thing above all things. We are the most
prodigious fools for not spotting the subterfuge long ago. A subterfuge that
was hinted at by our most beautiful sages through history. Glories such as
the Hindu sages of old, Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, Mohammed and the
Essenes of Judea, to name some of the most important. The overwhelming
thrust of their message to Mankind was that there was something terribly
wrong with our aegis as a species. Something we had to change or lose that
most precious thing of all: Dominion over our status as thinking, reasoning,
choice-capable platforms of being. That we could change our situation of
limit in this Universe of Parts if only we would add and not divide at every
signpost that allowed us to make a choice. They revealed the awesome
deadliness of our predicament in being trapped in an enforced Universe of
Parts and showed us a way out of it. A way, alas, most of us choose not to
take. Perhaps we now know a very good reason why. And I believe herein
lies the clue to the whole ‘Flying Saucer’ paradigm.
If this is true, what a chilling prospect we all face as a species. It begs the
question: Is Racism the social-propulsion paradigm through which this is all
achieved? Could it be that the descendants of Cro-Magnon Man, the White
Occidental Europiform genus of man that is said to have mysteriously

215

originated in Eastern Europe, have through the centuries been the ‘Agent
Provocateurs’ of the behests of the Clones and Greys in their quest? History
proves that the Cro-Magnons, unlike all other anthropological derivations
of Mankind, from their very inception set about all other root-stocks of the
species, to kill, to steal, to possess, to destroy with their living systems that
were the inception paradigm of ‘list file’ mindedness. No other racial type
has been such a killer and destroyer of other peoples’ living systems in the
known history of our planet. I believe it is very likely that the Cro-Magnons
were judged to be the most suitable genetically-intercepted species for the
alien cause after millions of years of experimentation. They were mentally
programmed to clean out the ‘Earth laboratory’ of the ‘unsuitable’ products
of a huge genetic experiment run by extraterrestrial beings. They thus set
about wiping out the Neanderthal derivative as unsuitable or surplus to
requirements about 40,000 years ago, and continued this holocaust through
an ancient racially-set memory of yestertime through their descendants in
Europe during the last world war. It is too facile to think that the Jews were
picked on as victims by the Nazis solely because they were better
businessmen.
This poses the question: Is the ethic of the Master Race as espoused by
the Nazis and, it mustn’t be forgotten, endorsed by the vast majority of
German people prior to and during the war, an example of this? It is also an
implicit ethic carried through by all the colonizing powers of Europe
through the centuries through calculated racialistically-motivated pogrom
after pogrom. Was the whole enslavement and attempted destruction of our
father race, the African group (which continues to this day) a formula
programmed into the psyche of the Europiform people of the Occidental
world as a means to help alien robot beings carry out their unfinished
business of wiping out the leftovers of an ancient racial experiment and thus
leave the breed they want to use to piggy-back their way to a Soul? With
ultimate irony, the unsuspecting Cro-Magnon ancestral line of humanity
might well provide, with their bodies, the food, clothing and shelter for
synthetic alien Master Beings that are about to make an overt appearance on
the Earth in the near future.
There can be no doubt that the most racially obsessed and colour-
prejudiced people in the world as a group have always been,

216

and are today, white-skinned. In secret corners all over the USA, Europe,
Australia, Canada, South Africa, New Zealand, deadly groups are forming
even now, using the name, in the deepest irony, of the least racist (brown)
human that ever lived — Christ — to muster their lethal conspiracies based
on so-called racial purity. Their anthem is the preservation of the most
debauched breed of ‘humanity’ the Earth has ever known. Their record of
degenerate murder and mayhem among the peoples of the non-white world
through the last two thousand years alone raises seriously the question
whether they are, in fact, truly wholly ‘human’.
The historical record implies that, broadly speaking, the people living
above the Tropic of Cancer might well be genetic derivatives of a hybrid
breed of pseudo-androids (taking their ancestry from the Cro-Magnons): the
true unsuspecting children of Cain and thus the Damned. After all there can
be no doubt that it is the Occident’s machine-minded list-filing servants of
technology that have polluted and laid waste an entire planet. The evidence
for this is overwhelming when seen in terms of the scale of natural
destruction, carnage and havoc caused by the descendants of the Cro-
Magnons through the centuries in these endless processions of war,
genocidal pogroms, enslavement and colonialization, etc. Far from being
the superior species everyone is supposed to take them for, they may indeed
be a genetically inferior assortment of misappropriated hybrids not too far
removed from their list-filing, machine-minded, probable pseudo-parents,
the extra-terrestrial Clones of Roswell fame.
Their Big Daddy could well fit the bill as a ‘God’ of vengeance, with a
computer-like machine logic of ‘An Eye For An Eye And A Tooth For A
Tooth’. A ‘God’ that separates, divides and doesn’t add. A God of
psychogeometry as represented by the theocracy of the Egyptians, Greeks,
and Romans. If ever evidence were needed of a God or Gods of Clones, the
myths of the ancient Greeks and Romans and the story of the Egyptian
Gods Isis and Osiris are a spectacular testament of this.
Osiris was the eldest son of Nut, the sky goddess, her other children
being Isis, Seth, Nephthys and possibly Anubis. Osiris, a man as well as a
god, became the first king of Egypt, and his sister Isis became his consort.
He was a good king and established the rule of law and taught men religion
and the arts of civilization. Egypt

217

became prosperous and was at peace with itself. Unfortunately, not

everyone was happy — especially Osiris’s brother Seth. He plotted against
Osiris, murdered him and cut up his body into small pieces, which he
scattered all over Egypt. Isis was still childless when this happened and
Osiris had no heir to take his place. All was not lost, however, for Isis
secretly gathered up the pieces of her husband’s body and, by means of her
magical powers, reconstituted them into the body of Osiris, thus making the
first ever mummy. Having brought him back to life, she was now able to
have sex with him. Although this was only a temporary reprieve for Osiris,
it was long enough for Isis to become pregnant with his seed. His task on
Earth having been completed, Osiris transfigured himself into a star-being
and went on to rule the Heavenly Kingdom of the Dead called the Duat. Isis
gave birth to a son called Horus who eventually, after a duel with Seth, was
proclaimed king, the first in line of the pharaohs.
Isis and Osiris are thus the children of the ‘sky goddess’. Might this title
refer to a god-like being who came from the sky in a spaceship? This
possibility is heavily supported by the story of how Isis used her ‘magical
powers’ to reconstitute the pieces of Osiris back into a complete body
again. That is one of the clearest and most obvious descriptions of a process
of clonic regeneration that I have come across so far. The tragic story of
Osiris and the heroic struggle of Horus to regain the throne served as a
model throughout Egyptian history. The pharaohs legitimised their authority
and deified their rule by proclaiming themselves reincarnations of Horus.
When a Horus-king died he was assured a rebirth with Osiris in the
afterworld of the Duat. If Isis and Osiris have their origins in alien cloned
life then this Heavenly Kingdom of the Dead, the Duat, is likely to be the
place in which such extraterrestrial life operates. The procedure of
mummification, to which the reconstituted Osiris was, according to the
story, the first to be subject, itself suggests an extraterrestrial directive. To
help the dead reach the celestial afterworld it was deemed important to
preserve the body of the deceased as far as possible. Preserved, perhaps, so
that future cloning could take place. This would have. enabled the deceased
to attain to the physical immortality of clonic regeneration in the ‘Duat’, the
Heavenly Kingdom of the Dead. Thus the tombs of the pharaohs, housed in
the pyramids, were

218

built to last forever and were referred to as ‘castles of eternity’ for

relating to this star certainly confirm that any speculations that the dead
kings.
 The Dogon tribe who live in Mali in western Africa were, in antiquity,
almost certainly were neighbours of the Egyptians. They lived in North
Africa on the shores of the Mediterranean. This tribe, which numbers some
two million people, has a complex mythology built around the belief that, at
some time in the distant past, amphibian beings called ‘Nommo’ visited the
Earth with the purpose of civilizing it. The Dogon revere the Nommo who,
they say, come from the star system Sirius, the brightest in the sky. They
make sand drawings to show that Sirius has two companion stars. One is
small and extremely dense while the other is said to be four times lighter in
weight, and to have a nearly circular orbit. It is from the planet attached to
this latter star that the Nommo are believed by the Dogon to have
descended.
A book entitled The Sirius Mystery, written by Robert Temple, discusses
the research of two French anthropologists, Griaule and Dieterlen, who had
studied the Dogon tribe. Temple was baffled beings as to how the Dogon
could have known of the existence of Sirius B, given that it is barely visible
even when using a very powerful telescope. (It was only in 1970 that the
first photograph of Sirius B was obtained with great difficulty by the
astronomer Lindenblad.) Most people today remain ignorant of Sirius B, so
how could the Dogon have had accurate information concerning this star in
the 1930s? A further mystery was how the Dogon seemed to have kept
physical records relating to this star in the form of cult masks, some of
which were centuries old and stored in caves. Temple dismissed theories
that the Dogon’s knowledge of Sirius B was derived from their contact with
people who came from France with the following retort: ‘The two French
anthropologists started their work in 1931, and they are positive that the
Dogon knew details about Sirius B when they arrived. Eddington revealed
the superdensity of Sirius B around 1926. So, there is a narrow period when
one has to imagine some group of amateur Western astronomers rushing out
to Mali and implanting this knowledge in the presumably pliant minds of
the Dogon’. Temple is supported by Germaine Dieterlen who lived with the
Dogon for more than three decades. Any suggestion that the astronomical
knowledge was of recent origin was, she said, absurd. The cult masks that
were centuries old and held physical records

219
 relating to this star certainly confirm that any speculations that Dogon
knowledge of Sirius B derived from modern astronomers are false.
Temple concluded that as this knowledge clearly had not come from
modern astronomers it must have originated from ancestral sources and had
probably been passed down to the Dogon before they migrated to their
present home in Mali. In Egypt, in ancient times, Sirius was considered the
most important star in the sky and was identified with the Egyptians’
favourite goddess, Isis. Thus Temple’s initial study of the article by the
French anthropologists had led him via an obscure African tribe to Ancient
Egypt. He wrote: ‘I have been able to show that the information which the
Dogon possess is really more than five thousand years old and was
possessed by the Ancient Egyptians in the pre-dynastic times before 3200
BC’.1
Thus the Dogon people and their extraordinary knowledge provide
substantial evidence that visits from the stars by alien beings did indeed
take place in Ancient Egypt and its environs. The Dogons, and perhaps
other groups of people who witnessed these visitations, migrated to other
parts of Africa retaining their memory of these encounters and then passed
that memory down to future generations.
The Gods of these so-called civilizations and religio-ethnic groups were
certainly no ‘Gods’ of Love, at least when viewed from the perspective of
‘his’ or ‘their’ public works and record, as I have said previously in regard
to the ‘God of Israel’. A God of Love could never condone murder on a
grand scale at the behest of tribal favourites, no matter what. True divine
Godhead would cede the ultimate paradigm that gives eternal life in its
highest aspects through enjoinment, and the binding parts to a whole. Such
a being would know, cherish and maintain the sanctity of life on any
condition. The example of true Godhead was there to be seen all the time
through the lives and examples of representatives of true godly being as
represented by Gautama Buddha, the Essenes, some of the Prophets of
Judaism, the pure unadulterated words and meanings of Christ and the
Prophet Mohammed (before the self-interested translators and interpreters
got to work on them), the beautiful tenets of Zarathustra, the Masters of the
Hindus, the Jains, and the Sikhs and the Confucian and Tibetan
philosophies
 220

and theosophies. Their solicitations to bring our hearts together in the

focus of our common identity has been increasingly seen as prissy, silly
sentiment by more and more people in power particularly in the occidental
world. Is it any surprise that the hard, muscular self-centred forceful stances
are lauded far more in the industrially developed Cro-Magnon world, and
those who are gentle and care for and advocate peace, compassion and
harmonious understanding with each other are increasingly seen
dismissively as soft, sissy, do-gooding fools? Those with power to control
our lives and destinies do so with the stem statutes of the cold, cruel list-
filing mind, where the system is everything and the means of exchange is
all. Power to control is the rub.
We have built our mastery of the Earth on being better than our
competitors for food, clothing and shelter in the animal kingdom. Can we
even contemplate what might happen to us if something far more intelligent
than our species took over the reins? There are some very distinguished
scientists who think that we humans could be obsolete within the next half-
century if we continue the present rate of progress in computer
development. We tower over the Earth, bigger than giants are to an ant. Our
capacity to control and command the environment has made us wretchedly
cruel masters to those who are less intelligent than us. If the extent of our
difference in intellectual capability is so awesome when set against an ant
or even an elephant, and this has allowed us to be such cruel and debauched
custodians of power, what do you think an intelligence that towers over
ours will do to us? When we can blow into oblivion ten thousand ants at the
touch of a spray nozzle, do we really expect an alien intelligence of that
kind of proportion in superiority to us to be benign and kind?
The physical Universe of Parts is a deadly engine of doom. It is a lethal
conglomerate of force that has given rise to fabulous boiling vats of plasma,
gas, acid, lava in the vast majority of orbs in space we call stars and planets.
It is a Hades of hard masses and parts that cut, squeeze, mash and smash all
softness out of the way. If it is of atoms and thus force it will act as such:
Forcibly. I do not believe it is too simplistic to state it this way. All history
has proved this in the affairs of men beyond any shadow of a doubt. The
strong will always make victims of the weak and the stronger they are the
less they notice.

221

‘Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel’. In these words Dr Johnson

identified explosively the least noticeable and most deadly plague infesting
the halls of humankind to the total detriment of our children’s futures. They
come in all races, colours and creeds. They are tub-thumpers or the most
mild and benign of men. There is no external ‘litmus paper’ that can
identify them, alas. They lurk in every household. They may be your
brother, sister, uncle, aunt, father, mother, cousin, friend.
History has shown all too clearly that there are plenty of minds such as
this, centred and synthesized among the limited basic ones among us that
provide for the social disenfranchisement of the family of man. They are
relatively few in number, when compared to the entire population of
humanity, but massively powerful in effect, because their personalities are
honed in divisive, aggressive reactivity. The very primitive underbase of the
tribal perspective that once protected us from sabre-toothed tigers and
representatives of their own genotypes across tribal lines. In a later chapter I
try to show through the work of Dr Paul Maclean of the Laboratory of
Brain Evolution at Poolesville, Maryland, that these individuals may be
victims of the over-activity of a part of the brain called the R Complex that
mimics the behaviour of reptiles in terms of the aggressive way they defend
their territory. It is these ‘hypothalamic’ postulants who have singularly
despoiled the vision of grandeur required to motivate Mankind into the
Spirit sense that marks us as our brother’s keeper, with their translation
through history of the Godhead as nothing more than a sky-elevated Divine
‘Lord’ of the Manor, or tribal chief.
It is through their leadership and their influence on the social systems of
humanity that the primary physical force of atomically based entropy
divides and makes chaotic the prior orderliness of Spirit derivation. They
are the agents of entropy in the metaphysically Spirit-borne ‘mind’ of men,
and we never spot them as such until its too late. Till they have done their
deadly work on thrones, in the army barracks, the boardroom, the political
platform, or indeed the pulpit. They are the poorest in spirit of our glorious
species and thus the most powerful purveyors of Armageddon imaginable,
because they all too often deal, secretly, purely in the physical material
investitures that have come to mean so much to men through the centuries.

222

The history of Man is a catalogue of constantly recurring pretexts for the

most heinous behaviour towards one another, led by these so-called
nationalists and patriots. The self-appointed guardians of the ‘tribal’ way.
They are the prime instigators of war after war, conflict after conflict, that
marks us seemingly as the most vicious and evil species on the face of the
planet. We have the most far-reaching capacity for the control of agencies
of threat as no other species does and yet we go about hitting each other on
the head, claiming that we are the children of kindness and goodly things. It
is a contradiction in terms that can only be defended by baboons. An
awesome paradigm that marks the strictly reactionary fang-and-claw law of
the jungle as decent by comparison. How can such a thing be when, in
immediate contrast to this, we see a human mother’s expression of
endearment provide the finest contradiction to this archetype throughout the
life of her offspring? Is it all just in defence of the gene? It cannot be, since
our period of caring for our offspring generally extends past the
reproductive years into old age. At least, this practice still prevails in some
parts of the world outside the Occident. Whatever might be said about the
technological achievements of man to relieve the burdens of physical life in
betterment cannot be said about the psychological quantum that prompts
this technical out-turn in the first place. It is commonly understood that the
nature of man has changed little for the better with the inception of the
technological prerogative. If at all: it seems to have got worse whatever the
euphemistic minds chant. Time after time, as each war ends the prophets of
hope and goodly salutation are up against the next episode of carnage that
mankind devises. Even the fools who live in their soggy paradises full of
hope and optimism will have to squirm at the latest example of man’s
devotion to man under the love-steeped slogan of ‘ethnic cleansing’ in
Bosnia and the rest of what was once Yugoslavia. All this after we opened
the gates to Auschwitz and Dachau and squirmed our resolve that it shall
never happen again. If we examine the history of all human endeavour there
is no evidence, particularly in the Occidental world of the Northern
Hemisphere where technology has generally made for more physical ease,
of man’s humanity to man. Only intervals of waiting-time to make
preparations for the next quantum expression of man’s inhumanity to man.

223

Would it not be interesting to see churches in the USA, South Africa and
Europe with pew after pew full of white overt and covert racists at their
pious hymn-singing services and religious devotions suddenly confronted
with a visit by Jesus Christ himself walking down the aisles and apses to
greet them? One look at his dark brown skin and Semitic features would, I
guess, send many of them fleeing with their humbug and hypocrisy into the
surrounding hills in hysteria. Their faith as tenuous as the colour of a
complexion. One wonders what then would ‘Bless’ America and save the
Queen.
Would a God with a pale grey skin and almond-shaped eyes, looking
more like a lizard, be preferable as a point of worship than a man with a
sepia complexion? Interesting, isn’t it?

1
Bauval R., Gilbert A.: The Orion Mystery (pp 7-9) (Heinemann)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER EIGHTEEN:
FACTOR ‘X’ IN
THE AFFAIRS OF HUMANITY

Is it all just a pathological status quo? Are we a degenerate breed little

different from the suborders of life we control? We have power to reason, to
make summary and act with independent decision and choice. We possess a
freedom of will unsurpassed by any other living paradigm on our planet.
Why has this awesome advantage over the ages not bound us to a natural
tendency to add, to bring together, to bind? Why instead has it led to an
increase in the impulse to divide, to see more and more threat in
‘difference’? To see this threat for more and more delusive reasons? Could
we be running a programme? Could some fiendish biological engineer with
an ulterior motive have planted a seed, an alteration somewhere, sometime,
in the natural ancestral lines of man that produces more and more the
genotype of Cain, rather than of Abel? A genotype that might well hail
from the Northern hemisphere, bearing in mind the Occidental world’s
singular and prodigious influence on the worldwide legions of men through
the centuries through colonialism? Or is it just the natural course of entropy
doing its deadly destructive job, transforming things into more and more
states of randomness and chaos with time, through its effect on atoms and
thus the collective psychology of Man?
You will see from all the foregoing that I am convinced that there may
well have been another factor. A hidden factor. One that has been covertly
maintained beyond the insight of most men and has only become recently
apparent through fortuitous

225

accident or, perhaps, carefully managed revelation. Thus the current

explosion of interest in the media over all the concern about ‘Flying
Saucers’.
And so the tantalizing question of all questions that arises from all of this
is: Are we on Earth the victims of some alien scenario acted out in some
distant patch of the Universe, a scenario that came to Earth in line with a
directive given to some manufactured Cyborgs that were programmed to
take care of the interests of Master Beings from a planet in a far-distant
galaxy?
So what are the Greys, Greens, Yellows and Blues really here for if what
I assert is true? Why would they restore a dying species called Man to a
previous stage of its ancestral line nearer Godhead by, as I have speculated,
rewiring the devolving soft tissue of the brain perhaps in line with their
creator beings? What could they be looking for in doing such a thing to
what was an alien and technologically subordinate and primitive species to
them? What did we have that they wanted so much that they would linger
perhaps a million years to find? What was it they sought among us that they
could not find through their ‘creator beings’ on their home planet? Indeed,
what was so precious, so important to them that they would comb the
Universe through aeons to find it? I believe that the Greys may be chasing
something they could never find. It would have to be something of
enormous significance. Something as big, perhaps, as a search for a Soul.
As I have said previously, whatever they are seeking has to be something
that made their creators on their home planet different from themselves. A
Soul was the only thing that their creators had that they did not. The Greys
were machines and could never have one. I believe they don’t know this
and they can’t know this, for this very simple reason. Clones and Roboids
have to deal with the currency of their respective programmes. They are
purely physical artefacts of the Universe of atoms and deal only in the real
forms and substance of this universe. It is all they may understand. It is all
they have a reference for. The soul is an abstraction. It is simply a line of
connection, but a Soul is that most precious and awesome bridge to
Godhead that allowed the possibility for return to Godhead and eternal life.
The Greys, be they Clones or Roboids, were only shadows of the original
Master Form they were derived from. They possess a kind of immortality.
A finite

226

immortality. Replenishment of a kind. Continuous replenishment through

DNA manipulation. On the other hand, a being with a Soul would have an
ability to change quantum states across physically definable dimensions
through the mechanism of Death through which replenishment and
consequent return through Birth would occur. An immortality through the
grave beyond which the access to Godhead would logically be easier if the
individual Soul was ready to take it. The ‘fields’ of Death are the corridors
formed by the space between atoms. It is a peripheral atomic arena. A
balance point where the force or tension in between the atoms of a molecule
or any other assembly of atoms cancels out and points of peace’ analogous
to the state of Godhead exist (see Fig. 13 in the illustrated section). Perhaps
this is where an individual unique consciousness survives when a natural
living body wears out and decays, to return through reincarnation to fulfil
the search for ultimate knowledge. Cloned being could never do this and re-
establishment of its existential modulus has to be carried through the
mechanistic manipulation of its replenishment mechanisms and/or the other
factors that give it existence.
We here on Earth, with our science at its present state, can clone all kinds
of animal life. Can you imagine what a Master Intelligence capable of
creating the Grey roboids might be capable of?
And so the manufacture of a Clone or Grey too would always have to be
repeated as with any machine, whether it be biological or not. Their forms
would always be temporary. Never lasting. The harrowing dictates of the
dance of atoms to the power of the Second Law of Thermodynamics to
dismantle states of coherence into greater and greater states of disorder with
time Universe-wide would always finally claim them. Their atomic gene
base would only last a certain number of replenishments. That old curse, the
true Satan or ‘Angel of Death’, the entropic process, would see to it that it
would not last. But the Clones wanted to last and, in seeking a mechanism
that would automatically allow them repeat opportunities at an existence,
they discovered the mechanism we call a Soul. Their subsequent search for
a methodology of establishing a Soul within their living base would, I
believe, have given rise to a Universe-wide holocaust. A holocaust that
brought in its train all the wretchedness we are as human beings.
Each Soul’s connection to its point of inception in Godhead

227

is unique and unbounded. A Clone could only know function. It could

never know meaning. That was the exclusive prerogative of a being with a
Soul. The mechanism that traced the final comparator between what was
absolute (God) and what was not. Soul came from the absolute and so could
implicitly know the phenomenon of differentiation into parts. This ethic of
difference-ness’ (a terrible word I’ve tried to avoid using) and its
implication is paramount in understanding what is All. That which did not
come from the absolute has to be shown what ‘difference’ means. Such
things have no implicit scale against which they can relate it. To implicitly
‘know’ the true meaning of any difference implies that one may set a more
accurate scale of what ‘variance’ implies existentially. It is the all-important
quality that Soul imparts. That quality is that Soul tacitly may know all
things against the final arbitration point known as Righteousness, and
anything without a Soul cannot. A being with Soul will always, and in all
ways, impart an on-going. comparator against ‘righteousness’ itself. It is
called Conscience. A being without this may never have conscience. I think
the reader might now begin to get my drift!
The Cyborg-Clone could never have an ancestral natural connection to
Godhead, and thus could never have a Soul. It could never have a
conscience. It would always be different to the Creator Beings that made it.
The pursuit of this difference and its meaning by these soft-tissue machines
led them to dying species maybe a thousand light years away from their
planet. This difference started all our histories as the present state of Man. It
started all our troubles with our Soul and all our tomorrows are thus
touched with the troubles of all our yesterdays.
Were it not for the eternal connection between the Universe of the Whole
and the Universe of Parts there could be no return, no chance of redemption
to access the Whole short of taking the long way round of devolution
through entropy into the final points of separation at the end of Time. There
would be no meaning to those beautiful beings who came announcing our
predicament in an arena of diminishing returns. Those grand visionaries of
our predicament as a species that gave us the means to take a short cut back
to Godhead while our individual awareness of ‘self was still intact.
The glorious ones: the Hindu Pantheon, Abraham, Gautama Buddha,
Jesus Christ, The Prophet Mohammed, Confucius, the

228
 wondrous sages and teachers of the Jains, the Sikhs, and all other sources
of true wisdom were our beginning of hope to take a short cut back to
Godhead. A short cut past repeat episodes of reincarnation and thus
suffering and the ‘Russian Roulette’ of the whims of Karma and obligation
to others caused through ignorance. An ignorance caused through the
philosophies of the temporal ‘Children of Damnation’: the General, the
Priest, the Corporation Head, the Politician, the Businessman, and all other
potentially powerful blind guides who design our corrals of restriction
according to the instincts of the Lord of the Manor and the Law of the
Jungle. Corrals of the mind that flit at the speed of light and claim our
children’s futures for the trite ‘Mickey Mouse psychology’ that
overwhelmingly prevails in programme after programme on that box in the
corner of the drawing room. What price the Greys, if they are truly here,
against the cheap expedient outlook and values the media expounds? And
even if the Greys are not a factor, what value does our collective humanity
have if such philosophy is the armour against the tirade of entropy that
comes at our children?
I am convinced that an actual biophysical legacy was left by a
‘Redeemer’ called Jesus Christ through the apostolate that would, through
their genetic lines, provide an antidote to what the Greys had done with
their gene interceptions into the Hominid lines of Mankind. The two
thousand years since the death of Christ are marked by the passing of a
hundred or so generations. These generations would be marked by
alterations made to Man that in time would change the biophysicality and
psychophysiology of Mankind in line with the alien prescriptions for their
species. Perhaps these wise and glorious teachers who have come among us
from time to time saw that our condition as a species had a devastating
hidden biological factor that had to be expunged before an accent of
thinking could work to free us from the grip of the entropic stranglehold.
Could they have left a biological antidote in the genes of a selected few that
would work through the legions of humanity in twenty generations and
allow us a chance to tune into the behests of Godness through the corridors
through which the Universe of the Whole touches all living being, the
spaces between all molecules and thus all atoms? It would be nice to think
so. But could it be true?
I for one believe it is true. The likely interceptions of the ancestral
 229

DNA of our species through the ages by the actions of alien beings have
taken away the natural justice of naturally deserved demise through the
individual’s own fault. In other words, this demise is not in line with the
incidental eventualities of the destructive devolution process of the Second
Law of Thermodynamics. Natural justice is the song of the Omniverse and
our Universe is subject to the ‘overall’. Thus the behests of redeemers
would seek to equalize the situation and redress the balance. The ‘Christ’
phenomenon may be one such instance specific to this planet. He called
himself the ‘Son of Man’. That may have been the signature of the
phenomenon for this particular planet.
The signs are all too clear in the body politic and socioanthropological
schematics of the occidental world particularly that the route out of our
predicament in atoms lies firmly baulked by the list-file mindedness of the
computer programme. The ‘system’ is increasingly paramount over the
person. The counting of fiscal noughts and materialistic acquisitiveness has
exploded into the psychology of people to such an extent that many in the
occidental world no more want to see or indeed can see the price that has to
be paid in terms of human values for this dead-end short-sighted outlook. A
quote from the New Testament stands vividly true when this same redeemer
implored:

Matthew 7: 19/20/21: ‘Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the Earth where moth and rust
doth corrupt and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven
where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal. For
where your treasure is there will your heart be also.’
How often have we been to homes where the walls and furniture indicate
the owner’s facile vainglorious obsession with things, objects and
purposeless splendour? You can make a palace for a king, but you cannot
make a king for a palace.
What a beautiful avowal of pristine logic the following existential
principle enshrines. ‘Where your heart is so will you be.’ The implication is
clear. We have no individual meaning without that mechanism that gives all
meaning: The strength of our focus. In other words, the strength of mind-
propelled heart (emotional value) is crucial to provide the achievement of
anything. The most important

230

word in any language is ‘enough’. There seems to be a threshold of

strength of purpose and mind beyond which the achievement of anything is
possible. Most of us never get anywhere near this threshold and so our
wishes are never fulfilled. Aspirations are just a property of the ‘front
office’ of the mind, like the RAM memory of a computer. It is just a
mechanism for viewing options. It has no power to achieve a need or a wish
or a want. It is mind without heart. Put some of the tour de force of heart
into the equation and it is like pressing the button on the computer that puts
what is in the RAM memory onto the hard disc. We are constantly fooled
into assuming one is the other, because both involve the process of thinking
and it is very hard to judge the depth or strength of a particular element of
this thinking while the process is going on.
Another quote from the New Testament that affirms this bears
mentioning:

Matthew 17: 18/19 /20. ‘And Jesus rebuked the devil; and he departed out of him; and the child
was cured from that very hour. Then came the disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could not we
cast him out? And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: For verily I say unto you, If ye
have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, remove hence to yonder place;
and it shall remove. And nothing shall be impossible unto you.’
It is clear from all of this that something fundamental is missing from the
instinct and intuitional frame of the vast majority of us. It may be the result
of societal and cultural deterioration through the centuries and the
emergence of technological mindedness. If a machine can do your thinking
for you and take over all the infrastructural supports of your living aegis,
why bother to use your head to decide anything? Why make the effort to
work thought into choice and thus extend the capacity to receive more and
more Godness? The result of not doing this is a huge raft of mental apathy
that floats on a bed of sensory instinct. All this does is feed the prompts of
the flesh to the hidden agenda of the entropic behest. It is this easiest of
options that has condemned so many souls to the damnation of devolvement
into lower life forms, beginning with the Ape. In time all that will survive is
a decaying one-way paradise for sensualists and sybarites. So that they in
time will lessen their living bastions, their physical and

231

mental capacity called ‘bodies’, to other conducive forms through

endless reincarnations down through the doorway that leads to the final
doom of the Soul. Could this have been the true ‘cause célèbre’ that
prompted the redeemers that came among Man to claim they came to ‘save
our souls’?
Christ is quoted as saying that there are many animals walking round in
the skins of men.1 I wonder if he meant this literally. I believe so implicitly.
We essentially reincarnate downwards. The living paradigm in a physical
Universe of diminishing returns provides such a strong downwards
behavioural impulsion that only the few can resist it and get out of the
‘Wheel of Rebirth’, as the Buddhists put it, altogether. The Universe deals
in the physical through its inherently enforced atomic nature. The
beguilements of the ‘flesh’ are thus, horrendously, too powerful to resist for
most. We are even now, many of us, making our own future monkey. It is a
terrifying thought that many readers will be unable to accept. But the
historical evidence in terms of the violent and destructive nature and
behaviour of our species is overwhelming and points to the fact that this is
so. The biological research into the genome is already beginning to confirm
this. I remember the look on my biology teacher’s face when I suggested
this to him years ago. He was almost violent in his dismissal of it. He
punished me by asking me to write a justification of Darwin’s Theory of
Evolution. I wrote out a refutation of it instead and expected a tirade.
Instead I got praised for my logic and ridiculed out of hand as a dangerous
heretic in front of the whole class. A small insight of things to come.

1
The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) The Gospel of Philip II 3:81

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER NINETEEN:
STARSTRUCK

It is absolutely essential to note that there have been two main distinct kinds
of interception in the bio-psychological affairs of Man. One comes from the
eternal tenure of the Universe of the Whole and everlasting value and
meaning. The other type of interception like that of the Greys and all other
‘alien’ beings that might have through millions of years used our planet as a
laboratory is strictly a local phenomenon. It is of our Universe of Fractions
and Parts, and is thus temporary and transient in its importance and
significance.
It was such a puzzle to me for so long that from the very outset of the
Judaic redeemer’s mission he claimed that he came to ‘Save’ mankind. He
alone among all the religious and theosophical teachers came shouting there
was something awfully wrong with the very existential base of humanity.
He came, he claimed, to save the lost ‘sheep’: I can’t help feeling that he
used the metaphor euphemistically to imply what sheep are commonly
noted for. Blind tacit stupidity wrapped up in innocence. What was there in
the human demeanour that he saw that marked it out as being so lost that its
very existential base needed saving? It had to be something awesome in its
implication to account for the paraphernalia of all that led to the modus of
his conception and birth. This is what makes his ‘intrusion’ and that of the
other genuine Master Teachers into the affairs of Mankind quite unlike that
of the machine type intelligences we call the Greys, the Greens, the Yellows
and the Blues. The declarations of intent

233

made by the visionary Masters were made from the start of their
respective ministries. Their entire missions and modi operandi were
revealed and open from the start. There were no hidden agendas, nothing to
hide, as has been the case with the alien Clones and their earthly cohorts
that have been among our species through the centuries. Their operations
among the legions of man in their laboratory called the Earth through the
millennia has been covert and hidden. It is purely a phenomenon of atoms
and thus force. The missions of the emissaries of Godhead came from
beyond the margins of Force. Their phenomenon came through force, not
out of it. It was thus from and on behalf of a world beyond the separation of
points and thus timeless. It was the language of the eternal and its
punctuation could never hold true for the list-filing mind of science that can
only seek to pick a route through a Universe of parts and portions. That
language is written in the schematic of the physical and thus the corporeal
senses. It is quite simply the rhetoric of damnation. The prose of fools.
Why do most scientists dismiss the UFO phenomenon? Why are they so
disinclined to unravel what may well be the most sensational discovery of
the millennium? Why are so many scientists’ eyes seemingly institutionally
closed to the overwhelming evidence now available for their existence? It
really is more bizarre than anything I have postulated here that the doyens
of rationalism suffer a lack of reason where this same reason demands they
take an open-minded look. The biggest factor that forbids them looking
seriously, as an eminent physicist once told me, is the ‘Speed of Light’
conundrum. The one that says nothing can go faster than the speed of Light.
Their minds are so mundane and so many scientists are merely hacks to the
banality of the ‘scientific method’ they lack that innate brief for vision and
imagination. The few that came to greatness possessed these qualities. The
mediocre ones are perhaps defending their incomes. Now that would indeed
be a big enough reason for contriving blindness in this day and age. If their
dismissal of the UFO phenomenon really is a caution to forbid the
charlatan, the prankster and the trickster wasting everybody’s time, it is not
only understandable, it is essential. The fool is always with Man. Yet the
antipathy that greets any new idea that takes us beyond the margins of the
atom is so over the top as to raise the suspicion that many of our scientists
are

234

running a microchip in their biology that forbids them looking beyond

the narrow blinkered view. The scientific outlook does not inherently forbid
investigation of interesting phenomena, it demands it.
It is certainly true that this blinkered retarded view dismissing the
entirety of UFO phenomena is usually the prerogative of the scientist of
average ability. They certainly form the caucus of the heaviest resistance to
new ideas through history. There has rarely been any scientist of genius
who has at some time in career not been dismissed as a heretic, a charlatan
or a fool by his lesser colleagues. Da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Pasteur,
Franklin, Newton, Edison, Baird, Tesla, Einstein, Feynman, were all victims
of the deadly tunnel vision of the narrowly centred scientific ethos.
As the world gets more and more hemmed in by the views and inventions
of technology and science and scientists, our way out of this transient shell
we call a body and into the permanent eternal behest of the Universe of the
Whole gets more and more inherently restricted. Theirs is the ethos of the
cloned machine. An ethos that sinks us into the abyss of the closed-minded,
short-sighted, programmed view. A Grey view. Have you noticed how this
ethos creeps into our ‘everydayness’ like a thief in the night? The speed of
its intrusion is staggering. Its trespass into the collective base of all our
minds inexorable and comprehensive. There seems to be so little resistance
to it all in the nature of Man. Its prop and prompting is written and arrayed
in the spectacularly powerful palisades of light and sound. The pixel of your
television screen. Beguiling words and colours in print. All of this
pandering to the trace of the acquisitive instinct in us all. The seemingly
irresistible mandate of the dollar and the cent and the empty, facile,
transient invitations to our flesh and our vanity.
We are, it seems, finally truly primitive animals. We have no real excuse
for maintaining this antediluvian stance in the face of what intelligence we
possess. We have reason and a truly independent capacity for making free
choices against all instinct and societal and cultural enforcements in line
with what I call the whisper of Godhead: Conscience. Take the most
important and the most powerful impulse in the bio-political imperatives of
our being. The sexual instinct. In animals the instinct is necessarily

235

and overwhelmingly simple and dispassionately reactionary. A chemical

signal, the whiff of a pheromone and the responsive urge is immediate and
irresistible. Yet we are supposed to be possessed of the instinct to grander
things. We can soar with the aural glories of Shakespeare, Tagore, Mozart,
and Beethoven. Dream in the spires of cognitive semantics. Feel with the
tenderness of an infant’s kiss. Yet we demean and condemn each other with
primitive stances no animal would take on. We rape and we ravish and we
sexually molest children. We turn a woman’s sacred womb into a bauble
within which we males rummage with our egos. Through it the human
frame of aesthetic reference lies summarily condemned to its detriment
more than through any other psycho-notional imperative. It comes down,
after all, to the mindless improbable sexual obsession to play with, and in,
each other’s waste disposal units. Even an animal is mercifully past such
priorities and sniffs around genitals at the instigation of a pheromone. We
do it because we like it.
It seems the stately abstract wisdom that reason provides bears little
trade-off value against the rushes of such corporeal blood. We seem to be
doomed to bear the consequence of the reach of our physical senses. The
urge to higher result seems to be possessed by so few. It would be easier to
understand if this arena we live in is the true Hell. There’s a thought. Is this
Universe of force and parts the true ‘Hell’? Read ‘electromagnetism’ for
‘everlasting fire’. It is no beguiling thought. It may well be the right
thought. Are the administering demons of medieval invective slightly less
Red and quite a bit more Grey than assumed? Are we a basin for a giant
experiment? A depository for the machinations of superior intelligences that
made our yesterdays and, at this very moment, are making our tomorrows?
Is the directive God most theosophies connote no omniversal arbiter with an
incidental value in the glory of righteousness, but some ‘jealous’ alien
superintendent with an intelligence that towers above us with the
commanding scale of a man against an insect? The Old Testament opens out
with vivid new meaning in the light of this surmise.
There are plenty among the legions of humanity who have been and are
waiting in eager anticipation for a time in the not too distant future for the
return of their ‘fathers’ from Space. Many in Germany, to my own personal
knowledge, have packed their

236

suitcases and waited with anticipation in their back gardens for the arrival
of the inverted dishes from the sky. Perhaps it is fitting that the nation that,
through our Earth’s recent history, has done more to prove man’s cold-
blooded and lethal inhumanity to man than any other and has in this century
promoted a harsh form of eugenics, would form the first welcoming
committee for the Universe’s arch representatives of such practices when
they come to finish the job on Earth. Alas, those of goodly insight in
Germany misguidedly see it as a way of escape from the cold-blooded
dispassion of their present occidental societal values. These so-called New
Age people are probably the best and sweetest psychotypes the Occident
can produce and many in their innocence and ignorance want so much to be
rescued by the Greys (not quite knowing what and who they might be) from
the chilling and relentless heartless inertias that technological societies are
fast becoming. The ultimate antilogy is that the Greys may well be the
original creators of the psycho-concepts of machine-type society through
their interception of these societies’ previous forms of ancient Man, that in
turn finally provided the base for a new hybrid type of man called the Cro-
Magnons. It would certainly explain, as I have said previously, the sudden
appearance of the genotype from nowhere around 40,000 years ago.
Perhaps their present forms in Europe display instincts that whisper about
their synthetic hybridization. Perhaps because of this they are implicitly
horrified and fearful of its consequences for their future existential scope as
living beings, without really quite knowing why. These may well be
Christ’s lost sheep of contemporary times. One hopes that these New Age
types of Cro-magnon descent will find the insight to see a way past their
biology and their psychological programming in the messages of the great
teachers. It is their only hope. They have to use the true whys and
wherefores of their capture and, through the exercise of the power of will,
disallow their subjugation to the ‘alien’ brief in their biology. They have to
beat the deadly genes of damnation that hold most of them and thus the
whole human family to ransom.
The 16th century mystic seer Nostradamus, whatever we may think of
prophesy and prophets, had the most remarkable foresight. In his celebrated
quatrains published in his work entitled The Centuries, he foresaw
absolutely correctly a hail of events right through the centuries from his
time to the end of the Millennium.

237
 The most stunning was: a reference to a German called ‘Hister’, whose
armies, referred to as ‘beasts wild with hunger’, are said to ‘cross rivers’
while ‘the child of Germany observes no law’ (Century 2, quatrain 24).
During the first years of the Second World War, Germany’s progress largely
depended on her armies crossing the major rivers of Europe with manpower
and weapons, and Hitler, or ‘Hister’, could certainly be described as one
who ‘observes no law’. The Spanish dictator Franco is also mentioned by
name in one of the quatrains (Century 9, quatrain 16: ‘From Castile Franco
will bring out the assembly …’). His predecessor Primo de Rivera, who was
in fact deposed by him, is also named in the same quatrain: ‘Riviera’s
people will be in the crowd’. Nostradamus also made a remarkably accurate
prophecy about Louis Pasteur, again mentioning him by name:

‘The lost thing, hidden for many centuries is discovered. Pasteur will be celebrated as an almost
godlike figure. This is when the moon completes her great cycle, but by other rumours he shall be
dishonoured’ (Century 1, quatrain 25).
Pasteur’s discovery that germs polluted the atmosphere was, of course, of
vital importance to human health. The astrological cycle of the moon (when
‘the moon completes her great cycle’) ran from 1539 to 1889. Pasteur
founded the Institute Pasteur on November 14th 1889! Another date that
Nostradamus prophesied exactly was that of the Great Fire of London of
1666: ‘The blood of the just will be demanded of London burned by fire in
three times twenty plus six.’ (Century 2, quatrain 51). In his own lifetime,
despite the warnings he gave to those involved, another of his prophecies
came about. He foresaw that King Henri II would die in a ‘field of combat
in single fight’ by wounds that would ‘pierce his eyes in their golden cage’,
(Century 1, quatrain 35). The king died in a jousting accident in which the
splintered shaft of his opponent’s lance pierced his gilt helmet and entered
his head just above the eye. This extraordinary list of confirmations also
includes a prophecy for the emergence of air travel that would make the
whole world far more accessible to everyone. ‘The world becomes smaller
… people will travel safely through the sky, over land and sea’, (Century l,
quatrain 63).
A prophesy from this great mystic seer in the sixteenth century

238
 foresaw the coming of a great and evil king from the sky at the end of the
millennium. The following is a translation of this prophecy:

‘In the year 1999, and seven months, from the sky will come the great King of Terror. He will
bring back to life the great king of Angolmois. Before and after War reigns happily’ (Century 10,
quatrain 72).
The common translation of the word ‘Angolmois’ unbelievably treats the
word as an anagram for the old French word for the Mongol people,
‘Mongolois’. Thus the prophecy has been interpreted as a reference to an
antichrist who comes from Asia, the King of the Mongols, ‘le grand Roi
d’Angolmois’. (See The Prophecies of Nostradamus translated, edited and
interpreted by Erika Cheetham, Corgi Books).1 However, it is surprising
that the translators have sought out anagrams for ‘Angolmois’ and have
even settled for the inexact anagram of ‘Mongolois’ when there is actually a
place in Western France called Angoumois! In fact, this place is located in
the very region of France where all the original Cro-Magnon skeletons were
found (see map in the illustrated section). ‘Cro-Magnon’ is actually the
name of a rock shelter near Les Eyzies-de-Tayac in the Dordogne where
several prehistoric skeletons were found in 1868. This site and the six other
sites in the same region where similar fossils were also found are all either
in, or adjacent to, the province of Angoumois. So, far from referring to an
Asian antichrist, it seems that Nostradamus may instead have been alluding
to a Cro-Magnon antichrist whom the ‘great King of Terror’ who comes
from ‘the sky’ will ‘bring back to life’. It would certainly seem logical that
the Cro-Magnons and their descendants, who seem to be the purest
representatives of alien interception on this planet, would be the seedbed
from which the aliens from ‘the sky’ will resurrect, ‘bring back to life’, the
closest equivalent to their kind of being that they can find.
Nostradamus foresaw all of this in a Christianesque 16th century
perspective as Lucifer and his cohorts unchained and given license to thrive
among mankind for a time. The great flourish of interest in UFOs and their
attendant paraphernalia in the media around the world in the recent past
might well augur such an occurrence. If so, we all need to beware those
hugely influential people who pooh-pooh the idea as nonsense and
foolishness. Some of us, no
 239

doubt, find it hard to accept that the whole universe was created for
anyone other than us as human beings. Some find the absolute quantum of
the speed of light a barrier to anyone else getting here (even though the
latest research has showed this to be nonsense). Some, however, may well
be agents, and agencies in human disguise, of an alien intelligence about to
make its appearance on this Earth. If what I have postulated in all the
foregoing pages is true, you would then expect their own ‘fifth column’ on
this planet to take care of them and their best interests in ways a superior
intelligence might conceive.
We need to identify and see these people for what they might well be:
quite simply, the cohorts of the little devils in Grey. Architects of an alien
way. Human aides to celestial pirates who seek to hijack our individual soul
lines for themselves and their empty go-nowhere mechanical futures. It will
perhaps be the most important and worthwhile thing we have ever done.
I believe we are right to view with suspicion those who now and in the
future will speak for the intercession of these ‘creatures’ in human affairs. I
suspect that many will speak on their behalf in the highest councils of the
world. In time they will brook no resistance. In time you will never be
allowed to read words such as these. I believe it will begin soon in a time
and circumstance that will show these creatures as the new Messiahs of our
human predicament and prepare their way in blinding colours of goodly and
godly light. It will then be too late to mitigate the most prodigious threat
that faces humanity. Much evidence is coming to light as people delve more
deeply into the subject of a giant inter-governmental conspiracy to cover up
the evidence for the existence of the Clones and Greys among us. Names at
the highest levels of world society are, it seems, connected into strings of
influence. Media resources the world over are being brought into narrower
and narrower groupings of control to centralize the mustering of influence
on their behalf over all the people of the world.
Why is it all happening now? Is it all some symbolic metaphor to do with
the Year 2000? Of course it is not. The whole entry of the aliens into the
world is to do with subterfuge. They have always sought to do their
business in as much of a covert way as possible. I suspect that theirs is not a
martially inclined psychological format. If they have the technology to get
here past the light quantum

240

restriction, they would certainly have the technological means to take

care of any martial threat the Earth may possess at a stroke without resort to
martial means themselves. If their intention was to wipe out humanity and
take over all the real estate, they would have done it long before we got the
atom bomb. The evidence for their being here thus far extends to prehistory.
Then would have been the most intelligent time to strike for a martially
oriented type of being if it wanted to crush all resistance. The fact that they
have not invaded in all this time might well imply martial weakness in
themselves, of course. As machines they may have no concept of ‘violence’
as such. They may yet be studying our martial capacity and capability as a
species and devising some sort scenario that remotely, without directly
involving themselves, might overcome our capacity to react with force.
(After all, their craft are so often seen at atomic test sites, military bases or
regions where there are wars and conflicts.) They might, on the other hand,
have ensured the invention of a total ethnic cleansing device if their
experiment failed and use telepathy to inspire our scientists and
technologists to build machines that could take us out (i.e. atom bombs) at
one stroke. They would then just need to set us all at each others’ throats so
that we vaporize all unwanted humanity and leave them a clear field for the
physical takeover of planet, leaving perhaps only the kinds of man-types
that serve their purpose. But we all know they haven’t done this up to now.
Maybe they still intend to do this and they are not quite ready yet to bring it
about. On the other hand, they might want most of us here. Atom bombs are
crude culling devices. They forbid control. Tight enough control. If it really
was their intention to wipe us all out, we have got pretty close to fulfilling it
on several occasions. The fact remains that we have not yet blown ourselves
up. Is it all part of their plan or ours? Who controls what?
So why are they waiting so long? I believe it is because they are trying to
establish an unsuspected (on our part), complete remotely engineered
genetic takeover of our species first. The best genetically derived takeovers
are done to natural time scales. Natural biological processes take large
periods of time to mature. Time scales that may run to thousands of
millennia. If you can warp Space itself, and travel at the speed of light, vast
distances may be travelled in the twinkling of an eye. Time itself, which
Einstein’s ‘Theory of

241

Relativity’ implies is elastic, may be stretched and contracted and thus

millions of years may go by in one location while in another just a few
moments pass by. In other words, the aliens need not be in our galaxy or
solar system all the time while they effect genetic changes in a species.
Let me go into this in a little more detail. The bedrock law in physics, E
= mc2 implies that the nearer you get to the speed of light, the more time
stands still. In other words, there is now evidence to suggest that the speed-
of-light barrier need not prevent intergalactic travel by alien beings with a
superior technology. Ian Crawford of the University College of London
Department of Physics and Astronomy published an article in 1995 in the
quarterly journal of the Royal Astronomical Society entitled ‘Some
thoughts on the implications of faster-than-light interstellar space travel’. Dr
Crawford believes that there are reasons for believing that FTL interstellar
space travel may be consistent with the laws of physics. One of the methods
mentioned by Crawford for bypassing the speed-of-light barrier involves
the nature of Space. Einstein’s equations tell us that Space is warped. I refer
you to my concept of this (the Moroid) in Chapter 3. This seems a strange
notion as it is usual to see empty space as a blank nothingness. A neutral
backdrop against which forms can be straight or twisted, flat or curved.
When you go out in the direct sunlight, you cast a shadow. This is, of
course, because light moves in straight lines, and because light does not go
through you or bend around you a shadow is formed. But wait a minute.
How does light go in straight lines? How can straight lines ever exist if
space itself is warped or bent? Einstein’s equations suggest, and
experiments confirm, that light moves the shortest possible distance
between two points. But this is not necessarily a straight line. In fact, the
light from distant stars gets bent into a curve as it passes a massive object
like the sun. Effects such as this can be measured by astronomers. But how
can the shortest distance between two points not be a straight line? It just
doesn’t make sense, does it? Or does it?
What is the shortest path between England and Australia? If you look
around you it is easy to understand how 500 years ago most people thought
the Earth was flat because it presents that appearance until you travel large
distances. If space is curved, then the equations imply that it is possible for
there to be short

242

cuts across vast distances of space. These are given the evocative name
of ‘Wormholes’ by scientists. Wormholes are envisioned to be warps in the
‘fabric’ of space that have the appearance of trumpets with a bowl at both
ends. Anything going in at one end is shot out of one galaxy and into
another at the other end. If wormholes exist on a large scale they could
possibly provide a means for rapid travel between galaxies. Just suppose for
a moment that these ‘wormholes’ might be opened at our end by a sudden
huge alteration in prevailing general force conditions at a particular point on
the Earth. It might help to explain the sudden flurry of UFO activity after
the atom bomb was exploded for the first time. Flurries of UFO sightings
mark many volcanic explosions too.
The distance between galaxies through a ‘wormhole’ could be millionths
or even billionths of the apparent distance between them. If alien super-
technologies have the capacity for using ‘wormholes’ or any other types of
as yet undiscovered super-warps in space, they may also be expected to
have the capacity to travel at or near the speed of light. Doing this would
change the relative pace of the entropic momentum so that at 99.995% of
the speed of light, one year passing in the travellers’ space ship would
correlate to the passing of 100 Earth years. They would also be 100 times
heavier than normal at that speed. This may not be a problem in the
apparent weightlessness of outer space. It could be argued that having such
an inertial mass would not be compatible with life. But remember, when
automobiles were first invented it was widely believed that speeds of fifty
miles an hour would not be compatible with life. It could be that this
enormous inertial mass might require special suits and life-support systems.
Many abductees have described seeing such devices in their craft. It is also
likely that aliens’ biologies are better adapted to withstand such force
vectors. It may also be that they need not rely on the time-dilation
phenomenon to travel between galaxies or indeed any great distances in
Space if the wormhole distance between them and us is sufficiently short.
It could also quite simply be that the alien brief for our planet needs
nothing we have got here on this planet other than our individualities as
soul-indentured beings. And that means as many of our suitable bodies as
possible. Our bodies intact. Our bodies alive or dead for food, spare parts
and perhaps for our DNA method of

243

replication. The only form of hijack that makes any sense is the hijack
any intelligent self-appreciating entity needs. Guarantee against breakdown.
Eternal service potential and thus a mechanism for continuity past the
Second Law of Thermodynamics. A Soul. In other words, preposterous as it
seems, the Clone Alien is looking for Life through Death. It is searching for
its Original in Godhead without knowing itself that it is doing just this. It is
looking for an eternal home in eternal scope.
And so what are they really like, these Greys, Greens, Yellows and
Blues? From all accounts, and that means the accounts of most abductees,
these beings are cold, dispassionate, non-emotionally responsive creatures.
We have our own variety on the Earth. Most of us come across them every
day. They are not restricted to being the office ‘nerd’ any more. One
abductee described them as like the military administrators of the Nazi war
machine that conducted the holocaust against the Jews. There are several
sorts but the great majority are as I have described at the beginning of this
dissertation. Small, grey and spongy. They may well come from a planet
where darkness, cold and heavy gravity may have been factors that
fashioned their design. They have huge eyes, suggesting that their formative
environment might have been a dim, lightless world. The eyes have a filter
film over them that might suggest that light is polarized in a certain way on
their world. They are known to abduct almost all of their victims at night,
suggesting that daylight or brightly lighted environments may present a
problem for them. There is compelling evidence that ultraviolet light fuses
together nucleotide bases that lie next to each other along the DNA
molecule, like beads on a string. This makes it harder for the DNA to copy
itself. Since ‘cloned being’ would require the capacity to copy its own
‘cells’ at an extremely fast rate to combat entropic breakdown, ultraviolet
light may well be deadly to such beings.
In Professor David M. Jacob’s book Secret Life, which is a catalogue of
many alien abduction experiences, a female abductee describes how she
was shown a hybrid baby and asked to hold it and hug it. Jacob asked her
about the skin colour of the baby: ‘Does it have light skin or dark skin,
within the Caucasian range?’ Her answer is: ‘Fair. Quite fair. I think it is
very fair, as a matter of fact. Almost like no ultraviolet light for this guy.’2

244

Further evidence for the possibility that alien beings may well exist in a
cold environment without sunlight may be suggested in the ‘Alu’ research
to which I have previously referred. Alus and their ilk are generally
regarded as ‘selfish DNA that serve no purpose other than their own
continued survival’. But Carl Schmid, an Alu expert at the University of
California, has found that at least a few Alus behave altruistically,
producing RNA in response to stressful conditions as part of the so-called
‘heat shock response’. This particular function for Alus might perhaps
indicate that Clone beings exist most comfortably in environments of
extreme cold and would therefore have to adapt to ‘heat shock’ when
arriving on this planet. So the expression in human DNA of this particular
beneficial response to ‘heat shock’ may well be a result of alien beings
using us as a test bed to find their own means of adaptation to our planetary
conditions.

1
Cheetham, Erika: The Further Prophecies of Nostradamus (Corgi, 1985)
2
Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 170) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY:
FATHERS

There is evidence, as I have stated previously, from many astronauts of both

the USA and what was the Soviet Union, that alien beings are on the Moon.
According to Dr Vladimir Azhaza, an expert on the Moon landings, Neil
Armstrong relayed a message to Mission Control that two large mysterious
objects were watching them after having landed near the Moon module.
This message was never heard by the public. The powers that be censored
it.
In 1979 the former Chief of NASA communications systems confirmed
that Armstrong had reported seeing two UFOs on the rim of a crater.
Apparently all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance
and sometimes quite closely, by ‘Space Vehicles’ of extraterrestrial origin.
Each time it occurred and was reported, the astronauts were ordered to
maintain absolute silence on what they saw.
One side of the Moon is always facing away from the Sun and is in
darkness and cold. A massive artificial structure is said to have been sited
there. It would make a wonderful base site and hiding place for an alien
intelligence to monitor any business they might be doing on Earth. A
Russian satellite, Phobos II, photographed one of their craft twenty-six
kilometres long in the vicinity of Mars, before the satellite itself
disappeared mysteriously. It managed to send back the photograph just
before this happened. Imagine a spaceship larger than the largest city in the
world. Many abductees have related under hypnotic regression that the
beings told them that many more of their kind are coming.

246

The spaceship photographed by Phobos II resembled a long stick in

appearance. In the ‘Dialogue of The Saviour’, an account of Jesus teaching
his apostles, from the Nag Hammadi codex, Jesus specifically warns them
about ‘a single staff’ that will be seen ‘in the sky’ which will come from the
‘archons’ (the term used in the Nag Hammadi texts to describe what I
believe are the alien Clone beings).1 He also warns them that ‘there is not
one among them who will spare you or have pity on you’. In the same text
he explains to Judas the nature of Clone being: ‘The archons have garments
that are given to them for a time, which do not abide. As for you, however,
since you are sons of the truth, it is not with these temporary garments that
you will clothe yourselves.’ Thus he points out the transient nature of Clone
bodies that are fully subject to entropy for they are without a soul to put the
brakes on that driving dismantling force.
Is this all a mighty paranoia on my part? A way of passing the buck for
the ills of humanity? I hope it is not. If it is, I hope I have given you at
worst an interesting warning in an interesting science fiction story. On the
other hand, if it has the slightest veracity, its consequences for us all,
particularly for our children, are of such magnitude as to demand vigilant
action on a world scale whilst we still can respond. If, indeed, it is not too
late already.
I believe the whole ministry of Jesus Christ was designed to show us how
to beat the genes of the Greys, Greens, Yellows and Blues in us. There may
be a psychoactive power of awesome relevance and size in using Thought
and Will that adds, binds, turns the other cheek. A power that actually
nullifies the physical components inserted into the human gene lines by
these creatures and their ability to affect a biological change that is taking
place in us with time and that is slowly transmuting us from within to be
like the Greys. If we follow exactly and imitate what Christ did in terms of
the eventology he encountered during his life and how he tackled each
instance, then his illustration and example, together with those of his peers
who spoke faultlessly in love, in adding and not subtracting, in uniting and
not dividing, could well have produced a recipe to defeat the alien purpose
on this planet. The example of Christ’s temptation in the wilderness
provides a fascinating and powerful insight into the make-up and
limitations of these beings.

247

I alluded to this previously, but it bears discussing further. It has always

been a puzzle to me, from the account in the Bible, that the so-called
‘devil’, without much difficulty, could at a whim move and arrange this
powerful redeemer’s schedule to fit its purpose. If the devil was some evil
but spiritually divine being he would know that Christ was the ‘Son of
God’, have realized that he was in a no-win situation, and given him a wide
berth. There can be no such thing as spiritual evil, anyway. It’s a
contradiction in terms. The state of Godhead has always been described and
accepted in religious terminology as the spiritual state. In this sense it
precludes evil as a compound manifestation within it, and any state near to
it will do the same. It is only outside Godhead, in a state of being that is the
antithesis to Godhead, as is this Universe of Force and Parts, that true evil
exists. In other words, it seems to me that evil is simply true ignorance and
limited outlook. Evil is the state of being away from God in this sense. It all
thus implies that this entity that tempted Christ had no idea about divinity
whatsoever. It had to be an entity that had no spiritual sense whatsoever.
Something like a programmed synthetic robot or one of our Master Clone
aliens. Perhaps the head alien honcho who was around at the time and came
to investigate this incredible being who was attracting so much attention in
Palestine with the odd miracle or two. Miracles were up to then their sole
prerogative with their super-intelligent mastery over atoms and to find
another individual performing them who seemed human and not of them
must have attracted the attention of the head honcho himself. So he hopped
on his spaceship and gave Jesus a ride to the top of a mountain. A purely
mortal atomic entity that hadn’t the faintest idea who or what it was up
against. It did, however, know that it had dominion over all atoms and thus
could claim that it had the power to give Christ rulership over all the Earth.
The thing was just a super-intelligent technocrat and Christ’s answer, ‘Get
thee behind me, Satan. It is written thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and
him only shalt thou serve,’2 must have sent him off with a puzzle and a
headache. What is more interesting is that the tempter-entity was defeated
by this answer, and did not seek to impose its will on Christ regardless. It
could all have been a gigantic lesson to it. Christ in his retort told the entity
that it was of a basic hierarchical existential value and that in the divinity
stakes it was not even a starter. This shocked

248

the poor beast into submission and it went off with its reptilian tail
between its biosynthetic legs to contemplate its next move. I believe that the
Master Being, or Captain Clone, was fascinated by Christ and his power.
 A small speculation here. I would like to believe that Christ reminded
Captain Clone and his space buccaneers of their own fathers’, the Master
Adam Beings they were made from as Clones back on their home planet in
the first place. In other words he was advising the Soul-less entity of his
existential status. He would have to do this, you see. Clones could only
know of themselves as a primary compound of atomic being. They would
have no concept of anything deeper such as a self-identity referenced
against any value outside themselves and outside atoms. They could, in
other words, have no conscience. That only came from a reference with
Godhead and thus a primary origin in Godhead. Clones didn’t have this.
Their reference would implicitly be set against the Inaugural Being they
were cloned from and if that entity returned to Godhead, its first-generation
and subsequent-generation Clones would exist orphaned and quite discrete
from the Final Absolute. In Christ’s rejoinder and reminder the Clone
Captain may have realized that in Jesus it may have had a chance for a
measure of redemption too. A second chance. After all, here in Christ was
another living Inaugural Adam Being. Christ did claim that the power of
Godhead could change stones into Sons of Abraham. Could it be that Christ
as the ‘Son of God’ convinced the entity that perhaps at the ‘Second
Coming’ such a thing might be possible for all Clones, as all Inaugural
Beings would figure in this scenario and each Clone could then be
connected to its origin point? As a result Captain Clone’s tribe may well
have come and still be coming to the Earth to await the glorious event in the
hope that they too might finally be saved from entropy’s deadly dismantling
process. But they had to survive till then as Clones and that is where you
and I and the planet Earth and the whole predicament of our species is
centred.
If my speculation is accurate we can only hope that the Moon will be
more suitable an abode for their sojourn. It certainly seems so from what
one of the Moon landing astronauts said when confronted by two alien
spacecraft already on the Moon. I quote: ‘Their ships were far superior to
ours both in size and

249
 technology.’ Neil Armstrong is said to have continued, ‘Boy, were they
big and menacing’.
They were told in no uncertain terms. Get off the Moon and stay off. It
was supposedly already theirs.

1
The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) ‘The Dialogue of the Saviour’ III.
122.
2
The New Testament: St. Luke, Ch. 4, V.8.

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE:
AFFIRMATIONS

There are numerous instances in the ancient Christian texts that

unmistakably allude to the False-creation Gods commonly seen as
representatives of true eternal Godhead by ancient peoples. These texts
suggest a knowledge of such things as alien intelligences and cloned
biomechanical robots (which are referred to in some of the texts as the
Archons). These so-called mystical texts are no mystery. They become
abundantly clear for all to see their true meaning. I have searched the
literature for the affirmations I knew had to be there. To my astonishment
they were so easy to find. They had been thrown away. The flotsam and
jetsam of our hope for better tomorrows. The following will demonstrate, I
believe, what I mean.
But first there is something that must be clarified in regard to ancient
Biblical texts, particularly those of the Old Testament of the Bible. When
the word ‘God’, or the ‘Lord God’, or the ‘Lord’, was referred to in the Old
Testament, it appears to be describing, in some contexts, the Godhead of the
Universe of the Whole, and in other contexts the God of the Universe of
Parts, who is, of course, a representative of the Clone beings. There is the
‘God’ of Moses who in one instance commanded ‘Thou shalt not kill’ and
in another instance instructed the children of Israel to wipe out any
candidates it selected as worthy of destruction. This, perhaps, identifies the
Ten Commandments as a masterfully clever set of rules to allow the alien
beings a degree of social control over their experimental test bed — the
children of Israel. On the other hand,

251

there is the ‘God’ of the prophets Isaiah, Zechariah and Joel who is far
more evocative of a God of love and compassion than one of judgement and
vengeance. How, then, do we differentiate one from the other? How can we
tell the difference and decide what information comes from which source?
Is it purely arbitrary? Can it only be decided upon by subjective feeling and
appraisal based upon that? My answer is ‘No’. You can delineate a clear
line of distinction between what originates from the Universe of the whole
and that which originates from the Universe of Parts. That which is of the
Whole will always seek to bind, to bring together, to unite in love and
compassion, in mercy and forgiveness where to forgive simply means to
educate — to make the part whole. Hence Jesus’s words, ‘Ye have heard
that it hath been said, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but I say
unto you that ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right
cheek, turn to him the other also’ (Matthew Ch. 6 v. 38-39), ring so true and
clear. That which is of the part will be, in blazingly apparent terms, the
opposite of these uniting qualities and may well use seemingly uniting
qualities to divide, as the Ten Commandments illustrates.
As Jesus said to Judas (in ‘The dialogue of the Saviour’ — Nag
Hammadi codex)1 when he asked, ‘Tell me, Lord, what is the beginning of
the way?’: ‘Love and goodness. For if there had been one of these dwelling
with the Archons, wickedness would never have come to be’. As I
explained earlier, ‘the Archons’ is the term used to describe the alien Clone
beings in the Nag Hammadi texts. These qualities, love and goodness, are
the prerogative of the soul. That which is derived from atoms is intrinsically
bound by the law of entropy to divide and divide further: it cannot by
definition understand love. So if these yardsticks are applied to the Old
Testament it is clear to see which extracts originate from natural Godhead
and not from the false ‘gods’ of the physical universe.
Some of the ancient texts which have not been subject to manipulation
and distortion by the constructors of the original Canon (that is, certain of
the Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphal Texts and the Coptic Gnostic Library)
present this distinction between the two ‘Gods’ clearly and sharply. In the
book of Genesis in the Canonical Old Testament, however, the distinction is
blurred. There are references to both ‘Gods’ within the same

252

Biblical passage. If we place this passage alongside its equivalent in a

Pseudepigraphal Text entitled the ‘Book of Enoch’, fragments of which
have been found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls,2 we can see that the
distinction in this latter text between that which has its origins in the Whole
and that which has its origins in the Part is crystal clear. The Falashas, the
Ethiopian Jews, still have the Book of Enoch as part of their Biblical
Canon. The two passages concern the visitation of the ‘Sons of God unto
the daughters of men’ when ‘Man began to multiply on the face of the
earth’. The Hebrew word ‘Elohim’ is the word translated as ‘God’ in this
instance. This particular word can be translated as ‘gods’, or ‘objects of
worship’. So the ‘sons of God’ may well refer to beings that appeared to
come from the heavens, the ‘gods’ of this universe, not the Universe of the
Whole. This is confirmed by the version of the same story in the Book of
Enoch, which I will place alongside the Biblical version, such that they can
be compared. But before I do that, I would like to discuss certain extracts
from the ‘Apocryphon of John’ and the ‘Sophia of Jesus Christ’ which can
be found in the Berlin Codex of the Coptic Gnostic Library.
In these texts Jesus describes how the Clone beings originated, why they
were created, how they have cursed mankind, and how he himself came to
us in order to free us from their bondage: ‘That I might tell everyone about
the God who is above the Universe’, because ‘They’ (the Clone beings)
‘say about themselves that they are gods’. If Jesus himself identifies this as
his primary purpose for coming to mankind, and his life is such a dazzlingly
beautiful reflection of the God of the Universe of the Whole, then surely
there is enough evidence to claim that there are indeed two ‘Gods’
perceived and known by human beings. One of these, if listened to and
followed, would lead to the eternal preservation of the ability to perceive
and know in the first place, while the other, if followed, would lead to the
destruction of that very ability to know and understand.
In the text entitled ‘The Apocryphon of John’, Jesus speaks to the
Apostle John about the origins of all being. First he describes to him the
nature of God and how existence in the Universe of Parts came to be from
that state of perfect union. Various Greek terms are used in the accounts of
Jesus’s teaching given in the Nag Hammadi texts due to the nationality of
those who either wrote or

253

translated these accounts. The ‘Sophia of the Epinoia’, for example,

seems to refer to the facet of God that allows for the potential for separation
from his state of perfect union, a potential that must exist if God is perfectly
free, as he by definition has to be. The ‘Sophia’ is more familiar to us as the
principle of ‘Eveness’ which, with the principle of ‘Adamness’, provided
the duality necessary for separation from the state of union to be possible.
The ‘archons’, on the other hand, as I have previously explained, seem to
refer to the Clone beings that were created to provide Godbeing with a safe
viewing platform into the universe of parts.
So, to return to the text itself, here is an extract in which Jesus discusses
with John how the ‘Archons’ came to be:

‘The Sophia of the Epinoia, being an aeon, conceived a thought from herself with the reflection of
the invisible spirit and foreknowledge. She wanted to bring forth a likeness out of herself without the
consent of the Spirit — he had not approved — and without her consort and without his
consideration. And though the personage of her maleness had not approved, and she had not found
her agreement, and she had thought without the consent of the spirit and the knowledge of her
agreement, (yet) she brought forth. And because of the invincible power which is in her, her thought
did not remain idle and a thing came out of her which was imperfect and different from her
appearance, because she had created it without her consort. And it was dissimilar to the likeness of
its mother for it has another form.3
So, without her male consort, the ‘Sophia’ or ‘Eve’ brought into being ‘a
likeness out of herself. In other words, she brought about a clone of herself.
Her creation was without the ‘consent of the spirit’ and ‘without her consort
and his consideration’. If Adam was formed in the ‘image and likeness of
God’ and Eve was formed of Adam’s rib (and therefore in the likeness of
Adam), it can be deduced that there is a line of connection running from
God to Adam and then to Eve. So if ‘Eve’ or ‘Sophia’ creates something
without the consent of Adam or the ‘spirit’ of God, it would follow that that
which she creates has no connection back to God.
‘Sophia’, which we could for the sake of ease describe as the ‘female
principle’, had ‘invincible power’ to create anything with ‘her thought’ for
she represents one of the two polarities held by God-like being that was not
yet trapped and held in the Universe

254

of Parts. Thus ‘her thought did not remain idle’ for her thought was still
free to dictate any option without limit.
 However, that which she created ‘was imperfect and different from her
appearance because she had created it without her consort’. She is an
expression of God with a direct connection through the ‘male principle’,
Adam, to God. Her creation, on the other hand, had no such connection so it
was ‘imperfect’. The text goes on to describe just how imperfect it was:
And when she saw the consequence of her desire it had changed into the form of a lion-faced
serpent. And its eyes were like lightning fires which flash. She cast it away from her outside
that place that no one of the immortal ones might see it for she had created it in ignorance.
And she surrounded it with a luminous cloud and she placed a throne in the middle of the
cloud that no one might see except the holy spirit who is called the mother of all living. And
she called his name YALTABAOTH.
This is the first archon who took a great power from his mother. And he removed himself from
her and moved away from the places in which he was born. He became strong and created
other aeons for himself with a flame of luminous fire which still exists now. And he joined with
his madness which is in him and begot authorities for himself… And he shared his fire with
them but he did not send out from the power of the light which he had taken from his mother,
for he is ignorant darkness.
And when the light had mixed with the darkness it caused the darkness to shine. And when the
darkness had mixed with the light it darkened the light and it became neither light nor dark
but it became weak.

Thus the original Clone beings are described in all their ‘imperfection’
through their lack of any connection to the Master Universe of the Whole.
Yaltabaoth, the original Clone, ‘begot authorities for himself with which he
‘shared his fire’ but not the ‘power of the light which he had taken from his
mother, for he is ignorant darkness’. The word ‘light’ may well refer to the
light of direct connection to God which was taken by Yaltabaoth from his
mother because he was made in her image. But that light died in him
because he himself had no connection back, thus he was ‘ignorant
darkness’. He had only an image of the light that had been conveyed to him.
Perhaps this is because a clone is a single-generation artefact of atomic
assembly alone. It could hold no direct soul connection to Godhead. So
Yaltabaoth could not pass ‘the light’ or the soul connection on to the
‘authorities’, i.e: the Clone derivatives of himself, that he

255
 created. The ‘flame of luminous fire’ that he did pass on to them is the
reflection of that light within a state of darkness, thus it was luminous. That
flame allows for the enlivenment of an atomic state in the same sense that a
plant is alive, but not for the enlightenment of an atomic state such that soul
can prevail within it.
Jesus makes it clear that this ‘flame of luminous fire’ with which
Yaltabaoth, the original Clone being, created other ‘authorities’ for himself
‘still exists now.’ The same power with which the original ‘Grey’ replicated
itself into other Greys still existed at the time of Christ and thus we have no
reason to presume it should not still exist now, actively promulgating the
reproduction of Clone-being in the form in which it now exists.
‘Sophia’ was apparently quite stunned at the vile nature of her creation,
indicating that, as. I have previously pointed out, inaugural Godbeing was
not aware of the consequences of that which it sought to create.
When the ‘darkness had mixed with the light it became neither light nor
dark, but it became weak.’ Weak because it is a living structure without a
connection back to the master universe, without a soul. Thus it has no
defence against the assault of entropy upon its atomic structure for it has no
reference of wholeness by which to keep itself whole and resist breaking
down into parts. Jesus then goes on to describe how Yaltabaoth created all
the other archons of the universe:

‘And everything he organized according to the model of the first aeons which had come into being
so that he might create them like the indestructible ones. Not because he had seen the indestructible
ones, but the power which is in him which he took from his mother produced in him a likeness of the
cosmos.’
So, from the original Clone, the original copy, all the other Clones were
made. That original copy had a ‘likeness’ of the ‘indestructibility’ of its
‘mother’, thus it sought to create Clones that were indestructible, which is
of course impossible as they are purely physical and thus completely
subject to decay through entropy.

‘And when he saw the creation which surrounds him and the multitude of the angels around him
which had come forth from him, he said to them, “I am a jealous God and there is no other God
beside me”. But
 256

by announcing this he indicated to the angels who attended to him that there exists another god,
for if there were no other one, of whom would he be jealous?
Which God is it who said ‘I AM A JEALOUS GOD AND THERE IS
NO OTHER GOD BESIDE ME’? The God of Israel said this countless
times, so who, then, is the God of Israel? He is, according to the report of
the words of Jesus Christ presented in this Apocryphon, ‘Yaltabaoth’ — the
original Clone being.
Jesus then goes on to explain how the creation of the Clone being
affected its creators:

‘Then the mother began to move to and fro. She became aware of the deficiency when the brightness
of her light diminished. And she became dark because her consort had not agreed with her.
But I said “Lord what does it mean that she moved to and fro?” and he smiled and said, “Do
not think it is as Moses said, ‘above the waters’. No, but when she had seen the wickedness which
had happened and the theft which her son had committed, she repented and forgetfulness overcame
her in the darkness of ignorance and she began to be ashamed. And she did not dare to return but she
was moving about. And the moving is the going to and fro.”‘
The mother, Eve, began to move ‘to and fro’ and then did not ‘dare to
return’. The moving ‘to and fro’ is the first shimmer of separation from the
whole state of being. There is no movement in wholeness as there are no
parts to ‘move’ from one place to another. That movement ‘to and fro’ is
thus the first precessional shimmer of atomicness itself; if atomic
precession were stilled then atoms would return to the state of ‘light’ from
which they originally came. Thus it seems the creation of these Clone
beings precipitated the ‘fall of Godbeing’ into the state of physical
substantiality.
In the ‘Sophia of Jesus Christ’, which takes the form of a dialogue
between Christ and some of his apostles, Jesus says that the Clone beings
‘came to be in the will of the mother Sophia so that Immortal man might
piece together the garments there’.4 It seems to me that Jesus is referring to
the creation of such beings as mechanisms through which immortal man
might ‘piece together’ — understand — the ‘garments’ worn by Soul in the
Universe of Parts, in other words, the atomic cloaks of various grades of
thickness which are worn by Soul in the state of separation from the whole.

257

However, Jesus adds that these ‘moulded’ Clone beings were

‘condemned as robbers’ because they ‘welcomed the blowing’ of ‘the
breath’ of God but they were not able ‘to receive that power for
themselves’. They were unable, in other words, to receive the direct line of
connection to natural Godhead.
He then tells the apostles in no uncertain terms that he came to mankind
to free him from these ‘robbers’ who attempt, albeit in vain, to steal soul
from those to whom it rightfully belongs:
He says that he ‘loosed the bonds of the robbers’ from immortal man and
‘broke the gates of the pitiless ones before their faces’. These bonds that are
loosed and gates that are broken are perhaps the gates and bonds that
interrupt the genome of mankind, blocking and holding dormant the full
expression of the natural unintercepted genetic scope of humanity. Jesus
describes these ‘robbers’ as the ‘pitiless ones’: many abductees have
reported the complete lack of sympathy which the Greys appear to have for
human suffering. Of course, if my theories about these beings are correct, it
is easy to see why ‘pity’ would be impossible for them even to conceive of.
He goes on to say that he ‘humiliated their malicious intent’ and ‘they all
were ashamed and rose from their ignorance’. ‘Because of this’ he
continues, ‘I came here, so that they might be joined with that spirit and
breath and might from two become one, just as from the first, so that you
might yield much fruit and go up to the one who is from the beginning’.
Thus he came to free us from these beings by making them realize their
ignorance such that the process that created them could be reversed. So that
‘they might from two become one’, one again with the equivalent of their
creator beings, returning to the same state of the first, least forceful
atomicness from which they were originally cloned.
Jesus then says to his apostles that he came so that he might ‘reveal to
you the one who is from the beginning because of the arrogance of the
Prime Begetter and his angels, because they say about themselves that they
are gods.’ He adds that he came ‘to remove them from their blindness’ that
he ‘might tell everyone about the God who is above the universe’. So Christ
perhaps informed the Clone beings that their search for a way in to
receiving soul for themselves was a pointless task. Perhaps when he spent
three days in the ‘cities under the earth’ he was doing just that, reaching
through into the higher force thresholds (perhaps some

258

form of irradiated life platform) within which these beings exist. He also
suggests that he might well have given mankind a reference through his
own being of how to conquer the genetic interceptions, when he instructs
his apostles to: ‘Humiliate their malicious intent, and break their yoke and
arouse my own.’
There are numerous accounts within many texts of the Coptic Gnostic
Library in which Jesus carefully explains to his apostles exactly how to deal
with the alien beings, should they be faced with them. Most notable of these
explanations is that given in the ‘First Apocalypse of James’ in the Nag
Hammadi Codex. In this text Jesus explains to the Apostle James how to
cope with the ‘Archons’ if he is faced with their representatives, as in fact
Jesus himself was in the desert of Judea.

‘James, behold I shall reveal to you your redemption. When you are seized, and you undergo these
sufferings, a multitude will arm themselves against you that they may seize you. And in particular
three of them will seize you — they who sit there as toll collectors. Not only do they demand toll, but
they also take away souls by theft.’5
Jesus describes these beings as ‘toll collectors’; perhaps this is because
through their interceptions into the roadways, the tracks, that trace our lines
back to the Universe of the Whole, they make it necessary for us to pay an
extra price at each juncture of our journey back. An extra price that is
translated in terms of a greater effort needed for return than would
otherwise have been required had the interceptions not been present. He
then adds that these beings also ‘take away souls by theft’. What better way
to describe abduction than to refer to it as ‘The Taking Away of Souls by
Theft’?
The text then continues:
 ‘When you come into their power one of them who is their guard will say to you, “Who are you
and where are you from?” You are to say to him, “I am a son and I am from the Father.” He will say
to you, “What sort of son are you and to what father do you belong?” You are to say to him, “I am
from the Pre-existent Father, and a son in the Pre-existent One.”’
Thus Jesus instructs James to inform these beings of his origins in the
state of ‘Pre-existence’. This state of ‘pre-existence’ is the state of perfectly
free potentiality for all actualities, all existences,

259 – 260

to happen, the state of being in Godhead, in the universe of the Whole.

He then explains to James how to inform these Clone beings of the
difference between them and those who have their origins in ‘pre-
existence’. He says that he should tell them that they are ‘ours’ because ‘she
who is mistress of them is from the Pre-existent One’ (he refers to this
‘mistress’ as ‘the female’ who ‘produced them’). But ‘at the same time they
are alien because the Pre-existent One did not have intercourse with her,
when she produced them’. Thus they themselves are not from the state of
Pre-existence, rather they are from something that itself was originally from
that state.
Jesus goes on to tell James: ‘When he also says to you “Where will you
go?” you are to say to him, “To the place from which I have come, there
shall I return”. And if you say these things you will escape their attacks.’
Thus if James makes clear his own root of being to these creatures and
shows them that he fully intends to return to that root he will ‘escape their
attacks’. The Clone beings were originally created to allow the potential for
‘Immortal Man’ to view into the Universe of Parts without being affected
by it. So, once Immortal Man has for himself entered into that universe and
learnt all that he can about it such that he is able freely to choose to return
to his immortal root, he is able to inform the Clone beings that he no longer
has any use for them. Thus he will indeed ‘escape their attacks’ and they
themselves will return to their root which lies in the first shimmering state
of atomicness which formed the ‘clothing’ of Adam and Eve.
Now, let us return to the account of the original interceptions themselves
as presented in the creation stories of the ‘Book of Enoch’ and the ‘Book of
Genesis’.
 Here are the two extracts side by side:

1 ENOCH 6-8 GENESIS

CH. 6, v.1-5

The fall of angels: And it came to

In those days, when the children of man had multiplied, it happened that there were pass, when
born unto them handsome and beautiful daughters. And the angels, the children of men began to
heaven, saw them and desired them; and they said to one another, ‘Come, let us multiply on the
choose wives for ourselves from among the daughters of man and beget us children’ face of the
… Then they all swore together and bound one another by a curse. And they were earth and
altogether two hundred; and they descended into Ardos, which is the summit of daughters were
Hermon … And they took wives unto themselves and everyone (respectively) chose born unto
one woman for himself and they began to go unto them. And they taught them them,
magical medicine, incantations, the cutting of roots, and taught them about plants.
And the women became pregnant and gave birth to great giants whose heights were That the sons
three hundred cubits. These giants consumed the produce of all the people until the of God saw the
people detested feeding them. So the giants turned against the people in order to eat daughters of
them. And they began to sin against the birds, wild beasts, reptiles and fish. And men that they
their flesh was devoured the one by the other and they drank blood. And then the were fair; and
earth brought an accusation against the oppressors. they took them
wives of all
which they
chose.

And the Lord

said: My spirit
shall not
always strive
with man, for
that he also is
flesh: yet his
days shall be
an hundred
and twenty
years.
There were
giants in the
earth in those
days; and also
after that,
when the sons
of God came
in unto the
daughters of
men and they
bare children
unto them, the
same became
mighty men
which were of
old, men of
renown.

And God saw

that the
wickedness of
man was great
in the Earth
and that every
imagination of
the thoughts of
his heart was
only evil
continually.

And it
repented the
Lord that he
had made man
upon the Earth
and it grieved
 him at his
heart.

It is apparent from the account in the Book of Enoch that the angels’, the
‘children of heaven’, were not sons of natural

261

Godhead. Rather, they were from the ‘heavens’ (which denotes the sky
above) and ‘descended’ from these heavens into ‘Ardos which is the
summit of Hermon.’ This does indeed resemble a description of a spaceship
landing on a mountain. These ‘sons of God’ took ‘wives unto themselves
and began to go in unto them’ and the women became pregnant with
grotesque ‘giants’: perhaps these were the result of this first alien
interception of the human genome.
These giants ‘consumed the produce of all the people until the people
detested feeding them’ (the meaning of ‘produce’ in this context, according
to the commentary on this Pseudepigraphal text, is ‘toil’ or ‘labour’). When
the people grew tired of the demands that the giants made upon them they
‘turned against the people in order to eat them.’ When the experiments of
these alien interceptors were over and they had learned of a particular
human group all that they could, perhaps they simply used their human
body parts to extend the lives of their own Clone bodies which, as I
explained earlier, were breaking down very quickly. Many UFO abductees
have, in fact, reported seeing human body parts stored within alien
spacecraft.
The account in the Book of Enoch also states that the giants ‘began to sin
against birds, wild beasts, reptiles and fish’. The numerous incidents of
cattle mutilations discovered recently, mainly in the USA, in which surgical
instruments of high precision appear to have been used to dissect the
animals, exemplify these ‘sins’ against ‘birds, wild beasts, reptiles and
fish’. They seem to be searching for the elusive nature of ‘Soul’ in all its
various manifestations.
After the quoted passage, the text from the Book of Enoch goes on to say
that these ‘angels’ also taught the people: ‘Magical medicine, incantations,
the cutting of roots, and taught them about plants’; scientific knowledge
about ‘the seeing of the stars’; and knowledge of how to make weapons of
war: ‘swords’, ‘knives’, ‘shields’ and ‘breastplates’. One ‘angel’ taught ‘the
course of the Moon as well as the deception of man’! Quite an interesting
combination of subjects, don’t you think? So, expertise in warfare and
scientific knowledge, particularly relating to astronomy and medicine, was
imparted to mankind by these alien beings. Knowledge of weapons of
warfare might well have been vital for those who were being intercepted to
resist interference by those who were not part of

262

the experiment. Thus the experimental test bed was preserved.

Knowledge of medicine would also have aided the preservation of those
whom the interceptors wished to preserve. These alien beings were, of
course, the ultimate experts in all things physical and may well have
communicated as much of their knowledge to mankind as possible, in order
to bring humanity up to a point of understanding that could marry with
theirs. In this way they might have hoped that they could then link in to us
and receive from us that which they could never find themselves, an
eternity through having a direct connection to the Pole of Absolute Union:
Godhead.
So, to go back to the Book of Genesis, it states that ‘after the sons of God
came in unto the daughters of men’, God said ‘my spirit shall not always
strive with man for that he also is flesh.’ From the point of these
interceptions the interrupters were thus introduced into the lines of mankind
such that the spirit of God could no longer reach through those lines as
powerfully as before. You may have noticed that the word ‘God’ in these
two different contexts actually refers to two different Gods. The ‘sons of
God’ who bring about the evil ‘giants’ on the one hand, while on the other
hand there is the ‘God’ who is disappointed at the ‘evil’ thoughts of man.
This blurring of the distinction between these two is, as I have illustrated,
not present in the Book of Enoch.
Thus the Old Testament itself has perhaps been tampered with by the
same source that, in the first place, chose to omit such books as that of
Enoch in order to present to humanity a God who was a mirror image of
their own style of leadership, a God who was tribal, revengeful and
extremely hierarchical in outlook. A false God of final deficit. Hallmarked
in megalomania, egocentricity, duplicity and subterfuge. The maker of a set
of rules that finally, when looked at carefully, might as cleverly as it
maintains righteousness maintain the biggest confidence trick of all. The
stage where its opposite prevails indefinitely. And when all is said and
done, to coin the old cliché. Is it at all surprising? If this universe is the true
Hell then what do we expect from its occupants but Sin and thus ignorance
and thus restriction? We expect damnation. Enter the redeemers to be, alas,
scorned and crucified.
After the Book of Enoch has described the terrifying effects of the alien
interceptions, it then refers to a certain resistance in the

263

people to these effects: ‘the people cried and their voice reached unto
heaven’. The natural justice of the fact that these interceptions were not
wholly deserved by mankind invited the redeemers to come and seek to
reverse their effect. Hence the many attempts for redemption that followed.
Hence Jesus Christ.
The Apocryphon of John in the Nag Hammadi Codex seems, of all the
ancient texts I have read so far, to present the clearest parallels between the
words of Christ and the theories that I have expounded in this book. I have
already quoted and interpreted several extracts from this remarkable
dialogue between Jesus and his most trusted apostle, John. In the following
extract Jesus expounds in great clarity the results which the ‘chief archon’
and his ‘authorities’ have inflicted upon mankind:

A bitter fate was begotten through them, which is the last of the terrible bonds. And it is harder and
stronger than she with whom the gods are united and the angels and the demons and all the
generations until this day. For from that fate came forth every sin and injustice and blasphemy and
the chain of forgetfulness and ignorance and every difficult command and serious sins and great fear.
And thus the whole creation was made blind, in order that they may not know God who is above all
of them. And because of the chain of forgetfulness their sins were hidden.’6
Thus a ‘chain of forgetfulness’ blinding us to our sins has been given to
us by these Clone beings. Could that chain of forgetfulness be referring to
the chains and chains of ‘junk’ DNA codes which interrupt the human
genome such that a coherent uninterrupted track (which might reflect the
full potential of man without the interceptions) cannot be transcribed into
RNA and then proteins?
The text goes on to describe how hybrids were made between alien and
human forms in order to reach more powerfully into humanity:

‘And he made a plan with his powers. He sent his angels to the daughters of men, that they might
take some of them for themselves and raise offspring for their enjoyment. And at first they did not
succeed. When they had no success, they gathered together again and they made a plan together.
They created a despicable spirit,

264

who resembles the Spirit who had descended, so as to pollute the souls through it. And the angels
changed themselves in their likeness into the likeness of their (the daughters of men) mates, filling
them with the spirit of darkness, which they had mixed for them and with evil.’
Jesus then sums up the full horror of these interceptions:

‘They steered the people who had followed them into great troubles, by leading them astray with
many deceptions. They (the people) became old without having enjoyment. They died, not having
found truth and without knowing the God of truth. And thus the whole creation became enslaved
forever, from the foundation of the world until now. And they took women and begot children out of
the darkness according to the likeness of their spirit. And they closed their hearts and they hardened
themselves through the hardness of the despicable spirit until now.’
I have little doubt that the First Clones wherever or whenever they were
cloned, made, manufactured, or set-up are what common theological
references through the ages describe as the ‘devil’ Lucifer, Yaltabaoth,
Satanaku, Jabulon etc. Satan and Satanism may be the entire theo-
philosophy of ‘Clone-ness’.
The whole so-called ‘black magic’ ethic as practised through the
millennia is simply a Reference Guide, a codex to the philosophies and
practices that define an atomically derived and created artefact of an
entropically-driven and finite Universe of Parts. it has nothing to do with
what might be defined as the grand-scale Master Universe of what is
eternal, self-propagating and divine, and thus outside the scale of atoms.
I believe we truly are in a predicament that has never been clearly seen as
this. It is unbelievable but true. Humanity has systematically thrown.out all
the most important insights that identified the true story of our heritage and
perhaps now we know why. I believe, unshakeably, that a huge covert
conspiracy exists in the Occidental and more recently in the Northern
Oriental world to cover up the existence in our part of the universe of the
pseudo-’Fathers of Humanity’ and their hand through the ages in the affairs
of our planet. I believe our home has been commandeered as a ‘farm’ for
the machinations of an alien species that surreptitiously seeks to use our
form of existence ruthlessly for their ends. A whole

265

paradigm of devilry that has remained hidden for what it truly is, under
the banner of religion and the Occult, and has sought and is seeking to
claim our patrimony and our future for alien ends.
A carefully engineered scaffolding of subterfuge and denial exists and
pervades the most powerful institutions of the world, to prevent the
exposure of what goes on in these contemporary times, to allow the behests
of extraterrestrial beings to slowly take possession of our planet. Agents
and agencies at the highest levels in the commanding governances of the
world have hidden and will continue to strive to keep hidden. what is going
on. Many of them, I believe, haven’t the slightest idea of the full measure of
what they do. They will proceed under the beguiling intoxication of the
physical sensory aegis and the power to control and possess the material
and the extemporary. After all, the Great Tempter tried it for size on Christ
in the hills of Judea as his own special and favourite piece of bribery. We all
know it failed with Christ. We know equally how easily it will succeed with
anything or anyone less. They have, it seems, succeeded in assassinating
that quiet, unspectacular voice of the spirit that seeks to warn through the
abstract whispers of Godhead: Inspiration and Intuition. A deadly hidden
agenda prevails in the halls of power that may be subverted only in snatches
and only for a short time. The highest ‘hills’ of governments, of
corporations, of socio-service international organizations and the media
worldwide are scaled and fall under executive control that secretly
proscribes national interests in favour of the schemes of alien formats. In
most instances I believe that no single truly ‘human’ being can have a clue
as to where the orders have come from. The internecine and randomly
differentiated set of instructions that make up the whole formulary of alien
intentions for the planet can never be read by a single human eye, either. Its
assemblage in the whole is seen by strange shaded almond eyes that once
searched the dim irresolute forms of some outlandish world perhaps a
thousand light years away.
As I have said before, if this is all a sop to paranoia, a flight of pure fancy
that seeks to blame the natural excesses of a species on some outside
scapegoat whose existence is difficult to prove, then I would have to crave
your forbearance and indulgence in the hope that my theory is at least
interesting. It certainly isn’t original. For the really cynical amongst you, at
best it is a good yarn and at

266

worst the speculation of a fool. I hope you will be kind and think me a
well intentioned one, at least. If I am right, however, I hope it might serve to
set in motion a never-ending process of search and discovery within and
without each of you that will seek to uncover the truth of our predicament
and perhaps, as a result, promote the realization that you are precious
beyond dreams as an individual simply because you have a soul. That in the
exercise of the totally free will that comes with it, nothing and no one can
stop your progress to the ‘Masterverse’ beyond the enforced atomic
universe, if you simply reason out all you do and measure all choices for
their value in uniting and bringing elements together and doing all things
for their value in maximizing such as this. The converse, of course, will
take you on a journey of horrendous demise with the law of diminishing
returns into a series of more and more restricted states from which the only
way out is the eternally implicit loving expression of Godhead, if indeed
you are able to appreciate its value as such and still act to its formula of
renewal out of faith, belief and trust. Unfortunately, this is almost
impossible to do because it was through the lack of these qualities in the
first place that your demise began. That is why Jesus Christ himself
confirmed that many go into a permanent state of perdition.
Isn’t this surely the most powerful urge to righteousness? The simple and
blessed measures of good sense devoid of the threat and implied blackmail
of hell fire and damnation? The horrifying humbug of figurative impostures
that bend credibility beyond meaning and install belief through engendering
paralysing fear? The deadly perspective that condemns us all more than any
other is that we accept what might be patently rationally true only if it
satisfies our individual comfort points. And that is the biggest price of Sin.
Sin, to my mind, is no more than restriction. Hard, cold restriction. It
prevents us from viewing options objectively and, more importantly, acting
on them with dispassionate zeal. In it and through it we dictate our own
demise. The ignorant fear to tread where the wise don’t. If we spend our
lives wastefully in premises of indolence and apathy without seeking after
the knowledge of those vital perspectives we have lost and forgotten. We
may never regain those vital viewpoints that will help release us from
endless returns to mortal endeavour lifetime after lifetime. The pursuit of
release from what the Hindus call the Wheel of Rebirth will

267

be subject to the law of diminishing returns and thus will lead to

reincarnation down into more and more basic lifeforms.
Our religious mentors and administrators have, by and large, spurned the
truth as uttered out of the mouths of the great revealers of existential verity
in favour of their self-centred vanities and mortal sensory-based insecurities
and inertias. They formed and managed organizations that are the antithesis
of the ways, the truths and the lives of righteous offertory. Take a single
look at the Vatican and its grandeur. Look at the splendour of the uniforms
that line up in pious arrays a few steps away from Popemobiles, Cardinal-
cadillacs and the like, and then think of a beautiful Man who walked the
stones of Jericho with bleeding feet to serve the poor. These hypocrites who
claim the right to pontificate on the moral adjuncts of us all have, as a
result, authored the demise of countless millions of souls who followed in
meekness and trust the prognostications of those who at best were fools and
at worst charlatans. It is the terrible price we all pay for belief without
rational wisdom. We, of course, all know that ignorance begets ignorance.
The compendium of loss we see drafted and recorded in the ninety-five per
cent of pseudo-genes not coding for protein in the human genome signals a
coffin for the species that once burst with the fireworks of all knowledge in
Godhead.
 You might well ask what can be done to stop an intelligence so superior
to ours from doing whatever it likes with us and our planet too. As one
would expect with a highly intelligent species (they have proved they are
far superior to us, in intelligence at least, by the mere fact that they have got
here past our understanding of the laws of physics and the barrier of the
speed of light) they are doing just this in the most economical, ergonomical
and efficient way possible. That means just one thing. They are doing it
covertly. I wonder if you see what I mean. It is not as important to know
what they are doing as it is important to know how they are doing it. They
have been the progenitors of humanity, albeit for their own purpose, out of
the womb of African Eve. I have tried to take an educated guess of the
‘what’ of it all in this book.
I believe the alien plan for our planet was boosted with more and more
urgency since we as a species made the first atom bomb, perhaps under
their telepathic inspirational guidance. If I read them right, they could once
upon a time have never anticipated or carried

268

through a violent act. They were exact parodies of their angel-type

Master Adam Beings and could only know the behests of Godhead. But
they had free will and may have decided to do an act that was, of course,
murder and genocide on a purely utilitarian basis, i.e. they were just
carrying out the brief of their Adam Beings to protect the whole quantum of
existence on their home planet at any cost from any threat. They did just
this. Alas, the threat they identified turned out to be their Creators
themselves. When they wiped out their Creator Beings on their home planet
they came to know the deadly psychological quantum we call violence or
aggression. The Clones had become Cain. It would thus be in their
‘programme’ to be violent and to kill if at all necessary. They, I believe, do
not consider it necessary to take out the human race at a stroke. They need
us in vast numbers either as food, clothing or shelter. I mean that
figuratively, of course, but it may well be literally true. They now have the
means to take us all out at a stroke, if needs be, by remote control, thanks to
the creation named ‘Trinity’. This was the code name of the first atomic
bomb that was exploded in the New Mexico desert in 1945.
 There are numerous accounts from the records of the past of the ‘Gods’
laying waste to or vaporizing, with what sound suspiciously like neutron
bombs or thermonuclear devices, vast numbers of the enemies of these
‘Gods’. Judge for yourselves from the following accounts.
In the eighth book of the Mahabarata there is the following narrative:

‘Gurkha, flying in his swift and powerful Vimana, hurled against the three cities of the Vrishnis and
Andhakas a single projectile charged with all the power of the Universe. An incandescent column of
smoke and fire as brilliant as ten thousand suns rose in all its splendour. It was the unknown weapon,
the iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to ashes the entire race of the
Vrishnis and Andhakas.
‘The corpses were so burnt that they were no longer recognizable. Hair and nails fell out. Pottery
broke without cause. Birds disturbed circled in the air and were turned white. Foodstuffs were
poisoned. To escape, the warriors threw themselves in streams to wash themselves and their
equipment. With the destruction ended, the Kuru king Yudistthira was informed of the power of the
iron thunderbolt and the slaughter of the Vrishnis.’

269

The projectile is dropped from a ‘Vimana’, which, as I have described

previously, is the term used in these texts to describe a mercury-driven
aerial chariot, ridden by the ‘gods’. The result of this projectile falling is
unmistakably a nuclear blast.
A nuclear fireball (‘as brilliant as ten thousand suns’), a mushroom cloud
(an ‘incandescent column of smoke and fire’) and an atomic bomb (which
is indeed a projectile ‘charged with all the power of the universe’ because it
unleashes the force that makes for the atomic nature of the universe from
within an atom), are all described here. Even perhaps what we now term
‘radioactive contamination’ is mentioned: ‘Foodstuffs were poisoned’.
Hindu scholars believe that ancient atomic explosions such as these
occurred, according to the texts in either 3102 or 2449 BC. There are
remains along the Upper Ganges river, the area described in the ‘Bharata
war’ in which Vimanas and nuclear weapons were used, of numerous
charred ruins that have yet to be explored or excavated. Observations that
have been made indicate that these ruins could not have been brought about
by ordinary fire. They appear as ‘huge masses fused together with deeply
pitted surfaces.’ In a second group of ruins dating from an earlier period in
which ancient stone furniture seems to have been vitrified (melted and then
crystallized), Russian researcher A. Gorbovsky reported in his Riddles of
the Ancient Past the discovery of an ancient human skeleton the
radioactivity of which was fifty times above the normal level.
Similar traces of an apparent nuclear holocaust have been found near
ancient Babylon. Again these remains display vitrification, this time that of
the melted ruins of a ziggurat structure whose ruin ‘has the appearance of a
burnt mountain’ reports researcher Erich Von Fange.7
A further passage from the Mahabarata describes another apparently
nuclear explosion:

‘It was as if the elements had been unleashed. The sun spun round. Scorched by the incandescent
heat of the weapon, the world reeled in fever. Elephants were set on fire by the heat and ran to and
fro in a frenzy to seek protection from the terrible violence. The water boiled, the animals died, the
enemy was mown down and the raging of the blaze made the trees collapse in rows as in a forest fire.
The elephants made a fearful trumpeting and sank dead to the ground over a vast area. Horses and
war chariots were burnt up and the scene

270

looked like the aftermath of a conflagration. Thousands of chariots were destroyed, then deep
silence descended on the sea. The winds began to blow and the earth grew bright. It was a terrible
sight to see. The corpses of the fallen were mutilated by the terrible heat so that they no longer
looked like human beings. Never before have we heard of such a weapon.’
This passage then goes on to explain that those who escaped washed
themselves and their arms because everything was polluted by the deathly
breath of the ‘gods’.
The Sumerian hymns and prayers often mention divine weapons. For
example, a character named Inanna is described crossing the heavens
radiating a blinding gleam and destroying the houses of the enemy. The god
Mars is said to have made fire rain down and to destroy his enemies with a
lightning flash.
The Tibetan ‘Stanzas of Dzayn’, dating back several millennia, also
depict a holocaust engulfing two warring nations who utilize flying vehicles
and fiery weapons.
 In 1952 archaeologists excavating in Israel unearthed at the sixteen-foot
level a layer of fused green glass a quarter of an inch thick and covering an
area of several hundred square feet. It is made of fused quartz sand with
green discolorations, similar in appearance to the layers of vitrified sand
that were left after the atomic tests in Nevada in the 1950s. That brings us
to the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in which ‘God’ is said to have
destroyed these two cities because they were so full of sin. Lot, a relation of
Abraham, is warned in advance to flee these cities with his family and go to
the mountain ‘lest thou be consumed’; he was also instructed to hurry in
order to get away quickly. Was Lot asked to flee from the epicentre of a
nuclear explosion to the mountains where the rock faces would absorb the
powerful radiation? Lot’s wife, against instructions, looked behind her and
she became a pillar of salt: could that have been a result of facing straight
into a nuclear ‘sun’? When Abraham later looked towards Sodom and
Gomorrah, ‘lo, the smoke of the country went up as the smoke of a
furnace.’8 And, of course, the most pertinent question, be there an authentic
account of a nuclear explosion here or not, is: What type of ‘God’ would
destroy whole cities and wipe out their inhabitants?
Robert Oppenheimer, the designer and scientific coordinator of

271

the atom bomb, was a representative of perhaps the most illustrious of the
directly and dynamically intercepted people in ancient times — the Jews.
As a religio-ethnic group the Jews are to my mind one of the most, if not
the most, marvellous groups of people the planet has ever known. The
boosting of the Semitic genome through the Neanderthal link, by the
extraterrestrials, improved the capacity of all humanity in all that is best
about us. It also did the opposite.
The astounding contribution to what is the best in humanity by the Jews
is incalculable. Yet with the deepest respect for them I believe that, along
with the rest of us, they were duped in taking for ‘God’ what was no more
than the ‘leader’ of an opportunistic extraterrestrial intelligence that was
superior to a devolving hominid ape species on an ordinary planet with an
ordinary sun. It was no ‘God of all things’. It was merely a ‘God’ of its own
self-interest.
 I believe the entire module of the readornment of the Neanderthal
genome by this alien intelligence ironically served as a boost for all
humanity. But it was a double-edged sword, particularly as another distinct
intercepted line of man was also vying for existence. These were the Cro-
Magnons, as I have said. It is more likely to have been that this
experimental genotype of Man was not a distinct creation planned for some
future goodly purpose to benefit humanity through altruism. They were
wired with a different brain-set or mind-set more akin to the bioids and
android Greys than their Cloned Master Beings. We are seeing this legacy
now in the form of their ‘white’ Cro-Magnon descendants of the northern
hemisphere.
Could it be that an even more recent interception has taken place and is
taking place even now, evidenced by the present high incidence of flying
saucer manifestations in the northern hemisphere of the east: China, Korea
and Japan? Could the Mongoloid peoples be the current test bed for alien
interception? The following may well be a sample of what they have in
store for mankind under the banner of progress and development, a form of
progress and development for which Japan seems to be the world’s
vanguard nation.
The world’s first ‘Robo Priest’ punched in at Yokohama Central
Cemetery in 1992. Well versed in the liturgy of ten Japanese Buddhist sects,
the robot spends his days serenely chanting sutras

272

to the spirits. He bows his head and closes his eyes while his lips and
facial muscles move in time to pre-recorded blessings. One hand raised in
prayer, the other beats a rhythm on a wood block. He never tires and never
— as far as anyone knows — skips a prayer. ‘Many real priests are not so
diligent these days’, says Hirata Isao, Robo Priest’s proud creator. ‘They
make the morning service as brief as possible, then drive out to play golf.’
There is also a $400,000 mechanical monk who performs regularly at death
anniversaries and other fitting times of the year. He also says the daily
prayers for particular spirits in the liturgy corresponding to their sect and
conducts special services at the request of the dead person’s relatives. While
he is not working, the platform on which he kneels is raised into a
cubbyhole in the ceiling! As the cemetery’s management had hoped, Robo
Priest has attracted a steady flow of clients to the privately run business,
which is located in the hills overlooking the port city south of Tokyo.
Priests have also made the journey to check out the opposition, says Sakurai
Tohru, the chapel’s creator. ‘All of them praise his technique’. Robo Priest
was designed and programmed by Hirata’s Tokyo-based company, Elevator
Systems. A maker of factory automation systems, it has also created other
humanlike robots, including several android priests for a shrine in northern
Japan. Hirata says he has received many enquiries and several orders for
more. ‘Fewer youths want to become priests’, Hirata explains. In the past
Japanese sons followed their fathers into the priesthood and eventually took
over the daily operations of the temple. ‘This is the same thing that
happened to factories here when skilled workers were in short supply,’ says
Hirata. ‘They were replaced by robots. Now the priests are in short supply,
and robots can do the job’.9

1
The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘The Dialogue of the Saviour’ III, 5:142
2
The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd, 1983) (Edited by James
Charlesworth) 1 Enoch Ch. 6-8
3
The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) ‘Apochryphon of John’ III, 1:9-
13
4
The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) Sophia of Jesus Christ III, 4:117-122
5
The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘First Apocalypse of James’ V, 3:32-33
6
The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘Apochryphon of John’ II, 1:28
7
Fange, Erich Von: ‘Strange Fire on the Earth’ Creation Research Society Quarterly, Dec 1975
8
The Old Testament of the Bible: Genesis Ch. 18-19
9
‘Robot Are Us’: Asiaweek 10-8-94

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-TWO:
OF MIND AND BRAIN

A highly significant piece of research has been done by one of our greatest
scientists, Dr Paul Maclean at the Laboratory of Brain Evolution in
Poolesville, Maryland.1 Dr Maclean discovered that the brains of higher
living organisms were divided into three distinct schemes of tissue. In other
words, we have three distinct brains in our body expressing function in one
mass. Dr Maclean called it the ‘Triune Brain’. The three separate tissue
schemes that make up our brain correspond to three distinct behavioural
modes. He identified the three tissue schemes respectively as the Neo
Cortex, the Limbic and the R Complex.
The most advanced scheme, judged in terms of manifested behaviour, he
called the Neo Cortex and it comprised of the Cerebrum with special
emphasis on the pre-frontal lobes. It is by far the largest of the three brain
schemes and he associated it with the higher, more ephemeral functions of
aspiration, intuition and aural communication in terms of language and a
sense of the aesthetic. The expansive mind facility that deals in overall
associative meaning.
The second scheme he identified as the Limbic system and this
comprised mainly of the Cingulate and Hippocampal Gyruses, the
Hippocampus, Insula and Hypothalamus. This he associated with behaviour
that identified the ‘family sense’, with the nesting instinct and the group
husbanding sense, the emotional bonding sense and play.
Dr Maclean identified three schemes of tissue as the R

274

Complex It was largely composed of the Globus Pallidus, the Olfacto

Stratium, the Corpus Stratium and attendant satellite grey matter. Maclean
called it the ‘R’ Complex because the behaviour control ascribed to it
resembled the posturing of reptiles. The hunting instinct, the territorial
instinct, the fighting instinct and the instincts for ritual, display and
challenge. There was a clear implication that the aggression centres worked
in conjunction with these instincts, accompanying their functioning.
 I believe, in line with my theory that devolution and not evolution is the
true existential way, that the brains of higher animals were once a single
mass devoid of sulchi. The three schemes of tissue that we presently find
are the product of degradation similar to what happens when a plum
becomes a prune. The three schematics of tissue were all one once upon a
time and became more and more separated and discrete in function.
I believe that the brain is a bioelectric receiver. It itself, of itself,
instigates nothing. It simply coordinates, analyzes and presents received
signals on a bland chemo-electric table called consciousness that is made by
the electrical interplay of atomic arrangements made up mainly by the water
molecule powered by an electric coil (a stream of circulating iron
[haemoglobin] called the blood circulation). All three schemes of tissue that
make up the brain enable the personage to synthesize and interpret what is
observed with meaning, within certain predominate accents and
verifications based on each individual’s unique brain chemistry at the time.
The brain chemistry and neural pathways and connections simply allow for
a specifically modulated and highly individual quantum summary and
interpretation of sensory signals. In other words, the chemistry of the brain
is like a map with different colours. The colours, shall we say, denote
different regions on the map, and are analogous to different chemical
packages in different areas of the brain giving a fingerprint or pattern,
bioelectrically, for a certain thought or thought process to happen at any
given instant. Change the chemistry and thus the bioelectric quotient, and
the same sensory observation will give a different interpretation and a
different rationalization instantly. The information is always coming at you
from ‘out there’. It is never made inside you by the brain. So where does it
come from and what is its nature? Let me try to explain.

275

To me, consciousness is like a blank television screen. A neutral physical

electrical status of potential ‘to know’. The paraphernalia that allows you to
make a picture on the blank screen comes from outside of atoms and
molecules and is thus something that is not of this universe. Everything in
this universe is loaded with a fantastic amount of pent-up force. If you
release all the force pent up in a single thimble of water it will destroy your
house and probably the street so completely you would not recognize either.
Onto this enforced bed of universal ‘atomness’ imagine we can bring to
bear a pen, a ‘vacuum’ pen that unwinds the prevailing force of anything it
writes on and leaves a mark thereby. It can thus instantly judge any scale of
difference it has left a mark against and thus proffers meaning on a relative
scale basis wherever it writes.
This pen is of an existential status without ‘force’. It is thus of a nature of
what for want of a better term I have called Godhead. I believe that all that
is Godhead is of no-force and all that is of no force is the entire
compendium of ‘Thoughtness’, ‘Meaningness’, ‘Understandingness’. Yes, I
know the words are not in the lexicon, but I think you will see my
predicament and forgive me for using them.
I believe all this world of ‘no force’ is plugged into us. It is plugged into
our brain and we choose to receive it all in direct proportion to the status of
the pins of the connecting ‘plug’ and the condition of the circuitry that
switches its accessibility, and its storage facilities. It is what makes the
picture and writing on the ‘television screen’ of consciousness. It is what
plugs into and sits in discrete parcels on the colour-coded map of the
chemistry of the brain that I alluded to earlier. We are, that is our physical
bodies are the television sets already wired in and powered. Godhead
provides the elements of information that give this already powered up
background state meaning. We are the hardware. Godhead provides the
software; which includes the programme that allows us to know and
understand, and indeed the incentive to want to know and to want to
understand, the hardware and the software and the interaction of the two put
together and what it all means apart and together. If we disturb or alter the
hardware in any way, the ability to read the software will be proportionately
affected and the software will have reduced or no meaning.
If someone interrupts our conscious table by, say, hitting us hard

276

enough on the head, we immediately lose our sense of ‘thoughtness’,

‘meaningness’ and ‘understandingness’. The engine, or power coil, that
powers our consciousness is temporarily stopped with the blow. In other
words, the blood going around the body stops flowing for a fraction of a
second at the instigation of the blow. Our radio thus stops picking up
inspiration, intuition. We instantly, partly rightly, assume it happens because
we have injured our hardware, our head, brain, etc., where all the facilities
are contained within and we never envisage that we may be interrupting a
mechanism that only picks up the three elements above that themselves
exist outside the body frame or the skull frame. In either paradigm the end
result will be. the same. A loss of conscious knowing. In other words God is
the awesome overall facility that makes it possible for you to think and
know and see and do. This is another way of envisioning what is called
Mind. The abstract concept that describes all this physical and metaphysical
capacity functioning together.
The distinct tissue schematics Dr Maclean identified is like our map
having three distinct background colours, Red, Green and Blue, shall we
say, on which all the other colours and infinite variations of shades of
colours may be painted, and thus each colour will take on something of this
background hue when painted on. If the colour brown, shall we say, is a
biochemical and bioelectric quantum for the ‘instinct for survival’ when it’s
painted on the blue brain schematic (Neo Cortex) the instinct to survive will
be seen rationalized and acted on as a peaceful and clever process of escape
from threat. That same colour brown when painted on the red schematic (R
Complex) will be rationalized as a prompt aggressive act of killing and
murder in order to escape the same threat.
For purposes of illustration let us assume that we each have a
predominant chemical mind/brain ‘set’ of colours, if you like. A highly
distinct and individual one. The colours, shall we say, are analogous to
negative qualities of human nature. Ignorance, anger, fear, greed, avarice,
deceit, etc. manifest a specific colour as they ‘speed’ in line with the
entropic ethic of breaking up things into parts in gathering states of
randomness and chaos. Each quality thus has a tone nearer black the more
its power to divide and separate a prior state of union. The total colour mat
together defines a species. The human, let us say, will be defined by a
specific total colour mark. The

277
 collective colour summary when all the colours are superimposed. A
tiger will have a species colour mark different from this and a butterfly one
still different. It is all dictated by the experiences of our past lives and every
physical body we design in the womb of our mothers for birth into physical
incarnacy holds this highly particularized ‘set’ of deployed colours that
dictates the shape and value of the new body we are taking on. I believe we
design our own bodies in the womb before ‘we’ come into it. We come
loaded into life with this. A quantum pattern of ‘understandability’ and
‘discernability’ and preferred ‘actionability’ highly specific to our
individuality. There will, however, be much variation within this overall
predominant theme of colours and on each minute colour point, and this
defines what I would call the ‘personality’ of each individual within any
given species. This facility is, I believe, what is commonly mistaken for our
Soul. I believe our Soul is, as I have said many times before, just the
unbroken ‘line of connection’ to Godhead since we all left Godhead to
observe the Universe of Parts from the point of view of parts. We went on a
safari to experience the only thing impossible in Godhead, got stuck in the
jungle of karma and have been struggling ever since then to get back.
See yourself like a radio receiving the signals of God. These signals of
God will always tend to rearrange the radio and its parts into such an
ultimate symmetry and state of total intrinsic fit, that it will take the radio
out of the Universe into Godhead if you let it happen. The trouble is that the
Second Law of Thermodynamics or the entropic process seeks tacitly to
distort the radio-body and its parts and thus countermand all that the
‘Signals of God’ are unconditionally doing, also tacitly, to stop the process.
What, then, is the ‘you’ that lets this happen or not? It is simply your
particular quantum of restriction or your personal ‘field of sin’, if you like.
The ‘colours’ of your mind/brain set in its minutely different set of shades
from within which you receive God.
Let me use another analogy and liken the brain of human beings to three
empty skyscraper buildings made predominantly of opaque, light-reflecting
glass windows. No light is let into the buildings unless the windows are
open. Each building is specialized in taking in light at a particular
frequency. Let’s say the red frequency, the blue frequency and the green
frequency coinciding with the three tissue schemes of the brain. The
buildings are just shells and have
 278

no significance at all in function unless the light, the wind and the breeze
enter the windows and light up the inside. The light itself is made up of
infinite hues of blue, green and red that are put together holographically in
perfect union in Godhead to make what I would call the clear white light of
the God Signal.
It is this God Signal that allows the brain to know, to understand, to
discern, to analyze anything. In other words, what is defined as ‘meaning’
and the relative scales that give ‘meaning’ power for decision and change
all happen only when this God Signal of light enters within the
‘skyscrapers’. The extent of final truth we can derive and the actions we
may take through this derivation about anything is thus proportional to the
deployment and numbers of windows open in each and all of the three
skyscrapers. The windows have to be completely open to admit the light
without breaking it up into its constituents. The slightest angle of closure
and the windows act as a prism and do not admit the light in its perfect
state, but in its broken state where the ‘knowledge’ it contains has to be
gleaned from its parts.
Godness may be likened to both this light and a fresh clean breeze
seeking to come into your set of skyscrapers to light up, clean and replace
the bad air within it. The ‘light’ is analogous to the total quantum of God
knowledge and the ‘air’ is analogous to God Awareness and the ‘breeze’,
that is the speed of the air in momentum, is analogous to Will to accomplish
anything. All three together impart the possibility for change to take place
in any prevailing situation by the individuality it touches. The crucial things
are the windows. The uniqueness of an individual may be likened to the
number of windows each individual has open in each skyscraper. Let’s say
the more windows are open, the more the skyscraper grows tail by making
more and more elastic and malleable the girders of its frame. If all the
windows of all the three are open they would finally reach the firmament
ceiling and disappear proportionately, transmuting the whole frame of the
skyscraper on the way.
The colour mat of my other analogy corresponds to the pattern of open
windows on any and all faces of the three: skyscrapers at any given time.
The open and closed window scale will give us what may be called the
individual’s God-Quantum. The scale on which the pull of the physical

279

universe is set against the pull of the Masterverse for that individual.
It is up to you to want to open the windows (the physical universe and its
outlay of forces) to let all the God elements of the Light and Wind into and
within your three skyscrapers. The trouble is that so many of us as human
beings have got used to the bad air and a darkness within for so long, we do
not know that there is a smell and darkness around us any more. We don’t
feel it is necessary to open the windows. Some have got to the stage that
they don’t know they have any windows. The entity thus stays in stagnation
till the bad air rots the structure of the whole house and makes a smaller and
smaller module available for liveability.
The ideal state for the three skyscrapers to be is empty of furniture with
all the windows fully open to the light and the breeze. This is the highest
state of Godbeing possible in a Universe of Force (the Transfiguration state)
and many who came to explore this deadly Universe of Parts from Godhead
have, I would guess, gone back into the Masterverse of enlightened being
by doing just this soon after the Big Bang, when the scales of limit
proffered by an enforced universe were experienced. They were truly
Wimps and wise ones. Alas, it gets harder and harder to do with time due to
the compound breaking up effects of the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
We start putting furniture into our skyscrapers (this represents limit and thus
restriction and thus Sin), in other words impediments that take up room in
our liveability-module that light might otherwise fill, and we inherently
handicap ourselves and limit the range and potential of our deliverance.
Let’s say that the size and make-up of the furniture in the liveability
module is proportional to a given species and that there is a minimum size
and particular arrangement of furniture that defines that particular species.
If you are a human being the reduction of these quantums to those
minimums will propel the individual to devolve down to a subspecies, i.e.
to ape, monkey, beast, insect, tree and stone in all the endless variations in
between we call living species, till they become undifferentiated atoms and
primary particles as prey to the dismantling force of entropy.
 To summarize it all, the God Signal contains all knowledge and the Will
to action within it and thus proffers the Will to do and carry out any of this
action with any alteration good or, alas,

280

bad that is deemed necessary. It invests the potential for perfect freedom.
You can use this potential to become restricted, too. You can so restrict
yourself through making wrong choices that the manifestation of Will itself
is mitigated. It becomes weaker in you till it is so weak that you will leave
the choices that mark your own destiny to others. That is when the implicit
change of any situation becomes seriously compromised and the long drop
to what might be termed perdition and damnation begins. You lose the
ability for self-change. The biggest killer of any soul line is thus apathy.
You can, of course, do it the other way and become more and more
blessed and enlightened till a physical body is no more suitable as all
restriction evaporates through the Knowledge the God Signal gives.
Happily, in triumphant resource you will change to take on ascendant
mantles of existence till you reach the final triumphant state of
enlightenment that signals Godhead itself.
Let me go back to my metaphor using colours to illustrate the mind/brain
set. The whole idea is to have no colours at all. Go clear and you are in and
with Godhead. It is as easy and tremendously hard as that. I believe Christ
came as a man to demonstrate that it still could be done and how it should
be done, in the form and formulary of the species called Man. He affirmed
this on the Mount of Olives when he demonstrated that he could achieve the
state of transfiguration to Peter, James and John. The final unwinding
divestment and dissipation of all force in his being.
The Masterverse of true Godhead always seeks to save all ways eternally.
It is its very inceptual aegis. Unlike these false so called ‘Gods’ that bring
in conditions based on their own vanity. You know them for what they are
when they claim they are a ‘Jealous God’ and ask that you ‘should not have
strange Gods before them’. It is such an obvious falsehood, it makes one
wonder why humanity has let the subterfuge go on for so long. We seem to
assist daily in our own demise as a species. We never seem to learn that
good logical sense is our only reliable tool to seeking and finding the truth
about our own deliverance. We insist on believing humbug. We kill, maim
and abandon the saviours that come amongst us imploring us to listen to the
sweetest logical sense. We injure, diminish and distort their words, deeds
and examples in favour of the deadly

281

scoundrels who have brought poison, death and destruction on us all.

Why? To me it can all be summed up in four words: Grey, Green, Yellow
and Blue. We didn’t spot and couldn’t spot this terrible intercession in the
affairs of Mankind. That is the trouble and the whole trouble of our
existential predicament in a Universe of diminishing returns with time.
It is undeniable that the inspiration and upliftment of the human family
through the Neanderthal (Aryo-Dravidio-Semitic) interception in terms of
Art, Science, Poetry, Literature and what might be termed the humanities
has been fundamental to the positive progress of us all as a species. I think
the Alien Clones and Greys got more than they bargained for in some of the
hybridization experiments of theirs.
It bears saying at this point that it might well have been discovered by the
aliens when they did their experiments all those millennia ago that highly
melanized humans (darker-complexioned forms of our species because of
their stronger dominant genes) were resistant and could not be easily
genetically intercepted for hybridization. Darker skin types may have been
safer from the alien grasp because they had mechanisms that resisted too
powerfully the inserted alien blueprints, for a more complete hybridization.
They thus may have retained their genotype a little nearer the Godhead
scale with a rewired brain but very little else of the alien prospectus. Their
aerials (brains) were thus enhanced to pick up Godsignals. This boost
allowed them the perception to spot the Alien subterfuge and intentions,
and some of them may have isolated themselves from alien grasp to survive
as a less polluted genetic line. They would later pass down this line through
their own and through cross-breeding with other humanoid lines, including
the more alien hybridized ones, weakening the alien prospectus all the time.
It is, however, likely that of those early types of humans the ones with the
most recessive genes were the best material for interception. This stock was
perhaps found among Homo Erectus. These were the people that formed the
main caucus of human life types and were thus most suited for general
genetic interception. It would finally lead to the so-called ‘African Eve’
mentioned previously, and eventually to the Cro-Magnon legacy of fairer
skin type and all the other physical manifestations of an ‘intercepted-gene’
ancestry.

282

The enhanced ‘Adamic-Neanderthals’ probably hid and kept away from

alien contact and influence. Their newly enhanced brains gave them an
edge and they could take more sophisticated measures to hide from the
uninvited visitors from space. Perhaps it is their surviving progeny that
make up the present Aryo-Dravidio-Semitic component of Mankind. I for
one would bet on it.
The renewal of the aerial’s (the brain’s) capacity to receive Godhead was
an inevitable stage to pass through in achieving the final hybrid the aliens
needed. It may be that the enhancement of the Neo Cortex in some of their
human experimental stock, Perhaps particularly the Neanderthals, caused an
increase in non-material visionary and abstract ‘thinkability’ in this genus.
Remember the Neanderthals, strangely, had much larger brains than any of
their contemporary hominid forms. The aliens would have wanted this
feature built into their hybrid stock and were likely to persevere with their
attempts to genetically adjust Neanderthals, no matter how resistant they
were to the genetic engineering process. The large brain was a facility the
full use of which the Neanderthals had lost in the natural path down to
becoming primates through devolution. This rewiring of it allowed them an
enhanced reception of Enlight and thus Godhead and thus thoughts
accented with a view outside atoms. Not a useful and easily understood
quality for roboids. They were, after all, only the masters of the physical
atomic universe. Perhaps some Neanderthals saw clearly what was
happening and escaped from further genetic experimentation.
Others lingered. The aliens made more genetic adjustments to them over
long periods of time. A number of these enhanced Neanderthals were
selected; those who now perhaps form the so-called ‘classic’ European
Neanderthal group to which I have previously referred. In these
Neanderthals the other schemes of tissue that made up the brain could have
been genetically enhanced to meet further alien requirements. The R
Complex was an obvious target. Its genetic enhancement in both this
Neanderthal group and the Homo Erectus alien-enhanced group with which
these Neanderthals were hybridized, I believe, produced the (Cro-Magnon)
‘barbarian’ genotype. The Cro-Magnon predisposition to violence and
colder, more dispassionate almost mechanical emotional sense emerged
from these adjustments and are nearer the alien bio-psycho disposition as
attested to by many

283

abductees. It suited the aliens’ final purpose for ‘conquest’ of the human
soul aegis much more. A close examination of the aggressive violent tribal
history of Vikings, Goths, Visigoths and Huns may confirm this surmise
vividly and beyond any shadow of a doubt.
All the foregoing may explain why the Aryo-Dravidic-Semitic people of
our planet gave us all the great religious teachers the world has ever known.
The vast majority of the most devotional and spiritual races of our planet
come from this dark-skinned stock. Not one religious teacher of the stature
of Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, the great Prophet Mohammed, the
Prophets of Israel, the Jains, the Sikhs or any of such stature has come from
Northern, thus Cro-Magnon, climes. In fact, the further north you go the
more mechanistic, binary and materialistic the so-called ‘prophets’ there
become. Till we now have General Motors, Ford, Mercedes Benz, Adidas,
Coca-Cola, Shell, Microsoft, McDonalds and many more of such ilk
forming the new lexicon of prophetic glory for your children and mine to
believe in, in the future.
All the experimentation with the hominid species was likely to have been
done in the spirit of random hybrid empiricism, in intention no different
from our attitude in animal experimentation today. The cold logical list-
filing premise of what was best for their purposes was allowed to take its
course and through this the Cro-Magnons (now the most heavily alien-
intercepted line) probably set about wiping out the leftover little-altered
surviving Adam-Neanderthals when they could find them. But these
Neanderthals were too clever now and survived the pogrom as a modern
type of hominid. Part of the Homo Sapiens Sapiens genus. The urge to cull
all other forms of hominid in the Cro-Magnon mindscape continued and
continues through history to this day, through pogrom after pogrom
victimizing the Jews and other Semitic people, the Gypsies, the indigenous
Indians and Africans, the Afro-Americans of North and South America, the
Aborigines and Maoris of Australasia. An incidental exercise was embarked
on, of supplanting all the best representatives of least-intercepted humanity
with a machine-minded breed, the Cro-Magnon derivative. An industrially
developed so-called ‘cultured’ people, and yes, they continually use the
word ‘civilized’ about themselves to describe a historically proven bunch of
colonizing killers and pirates with pale complexions that through centuries
have been

284

and are acting more akin to the little Grey roboids that now visit the by
and large unsuspecting people of the Earth. Could they simply be doing
what their genetically engineered forebears have left them to do as a
legacy? I believe that the aliens were counting on them to do their dirty
work for them and ‘tidy up’. A clean-up of the Earth laboratory of
unwanted humanity. It all goes on to this day. The atomic eggs that might
provide the final solution are being gathered in one basket. We read all
about it. It’s called the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Who’s not proliferating
what? The whites are allowed to ‘proliferate’ in the name of peace while the
blacks, surprise, are told they most definitely must not do anything of the
sort.
But they reckon without the power of Godhead in the Universe to
preserve naturally that which receives Godhead best of its own accord. Just
as the alien behest persists, so too continues the intercession of the
representatives that serve the Master world beyond the atom. When the
final summary is totalled, it is they who will certainly prevail in an eternity
of glory, beauty and goodwill. The lances of devilry can never prevail, as
Christ reminded the head ‘devil’ who took on the central aegis of
redemption in the hills of Judea with the words, ‘Get thee behind me, Satan.
It is written that thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt
thou serve’.
 The needles of doom will inevitably alter their courses to point at the
heart of all that is facile and finite. They will carry through the natural
justice of righteousness on all who offend the line of that infinite and
eternal mandate that preserves the just wherever they may be through the
mechanism that connects them to Godhead that we call a Soul.

1
Maclean, Paul: ‘Ritual and Deceit’ Science Digest Nov /Dec, 1980

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-THREE:
THE CRO-MAGNON LEGACY

And so, are we all done for? Do we have to accept the evidence of history
written in the blood of innocents destroyed through various forms of
racialism? Their blood cries out a warning of a terrible truth catalogued
through the centuries. That truth reveals that, broadly, the Occidental
psychology, far from being ‘purely white’, is more akin to the (Grey)
demons in mythology and has shown itself to be a haemorrhage on the
collective soul of all humanity. The ‘Whited sepulchres full of dead men’s
bones and all kinds of corruption’, as Jesus Christ put it. In cohortship with
the Greys and their cloned Inaugural Adamic leader, perhaps known as
Lucifer, they are now the arbiters of the fate of Mankind with their inherent
systemic-mechanistic view of the world. Their creation: technology, the
fang and claw that tears at the spirit of what is still God in Man, makes
them the ‘Keepers of Entropy’. They will continue to dance on the
propensities of a melanophore and chromatophore (nature’s colouring
pigments), insidiously and covertly fermenting discrimination and dismissal
of all who fail the test of the eye instantly. Such is their dignity. Such is
their shallowness. Will they not cease their deadly dance till the chaos and
madness of socialized entropy is complete and we are all as a species taken
out of this world, leaving a legacy of a dead planet of winking lights to
shine into space, till all the batteries run out and there is no more hint that
sentient life once had living fathers?
The northern Cro-Magnon breeds of humanity and their derivations, be
they Goths, Visigoths, Huns, Vikings, Angles or

286

Saxons, may well serve the purposes of the alien franchise through the
Greys. They have contrived the means of human destruction for the aliens,
through the atom bomb. Are the northern breeds keeping it in storage for
them, guarding them well in refrigerated silos for perhaps the final purpose
awaiting man? The culling of particular lines of man deemed unsuitable for
the purposes of the Greys. A culling the aliens may well carry out if and
when they openly come to call.
 As I have said previously, the Cro-Magnon derivative has managed to get
control of almost all the nuclear devices in the world under the best guises
with, apparently, the best motives. The largely non-white so-called Third
World will do well to watch this Little Red Riding Hood factor. The
Occidental West and Northern Oriental East can fabricate ‘Saddam
Husseins’ galore. How long do those living between the two geographical
tropics have to swallow this codswallop? It is a terrifying thought for all the
billions of non-white and mostly poor people in the world.
Certain ‘hybridized’ Northern Caucasoids and Mongoloids will naturally
scream denial in high dudgeon and in pious protest whenever they are
confronted by history’s proof of their decadence and debauchery of human
values through the centuries. The racist root that motivates it all is carefully
hidden at all times. If all this fails, the favourite strategy, the age-old
principle of divide and conquer, has always been and is always brought into
operation. They pour placating balms and reassuring solace on their
financially sponsored expedient Clones among the people of Third World
nations, backing them with promissory notes of financial and political
backing for their favourite schemes. Schemes designed to keep these people
in positions of influence and power. Too often the subterfuge works, but if
all this fails, dark and deadly teams of fixers and assassins go into
operation, taking out their victims in cleverly arranged accidents and
murder. All in the name of the sponsor countries’ ‘national interest’. Follow
most Third World dictators’ lines of sponsorship back far enough and you
will find a genetic line of predominantly Cro-Magnon derivation sitting
behind a desk somewhere in Europe or America.
There can be no doubt that a huge covert international intergovernmental
conspiracy is taking shape in America, Russia, Germany, France, Britain,
Italy and many other Occidental nations

287

to ensure that the ‘Haves’ will at all cost seek to ethnically cleanse their
countries of largely non-white ‘Have-Nots’ who, worldwide, outnumber
them five to one. Some important people of conscience among their ranks,
some of them victims of Soviet and Nazi race pogroms, now work within
the various infrastructures that plan and carry out these evil formulas and
toil ceaselessly to expose this evil. Yet few in the Third World will believe
that such a conspiracy exists even though the evidence is widespread.
The current immigration laws with evil racialist slants being adopted in
many European countries are seen as only short-term measures. More
effective long-term measures pointing to global ethnic cleansing are
disturbingly indicated in recent events. Some highly respected social
commentators claim that a ‘notional engine’ is being created in the minds of
white people through subtle propaganda in the Press and electronic media
for the tolerating of first the social, and then the physical culling of largely
non-white populations on a global scale.
Population control mechanisms, nothing to do with the condom and the
Pill (although they too are used), such as deadly, targetable, socially
pointable disease vectors, are being used to adjust and control increasing
non-white numbers. A good example of this is Aids. There is potent
evidence to suggest that Aids was developed in the West to act as a sexual
culling agent of black populations, to be used against the traditionally
promiscuous sexual practice of some African nations. Other diseases even
more horrendous and still under development will be cleverly deployed to
do as much damage as possible to other non-white populations worldwide.
These ethnic biological agents exploiting biological weakness in different
racial groups are being developed in laboratories all over the western world
at this moment under hidden disguises and pretexts.
The racial war of the worlds has begun, and few know about it, and
fewer still will be told about it.
Third World nations, through their representatives, must take the greatest
care to read accurately the smile on the face of the Occidental tiger when it
approaches benignly to set its scale on their cheap labour and set its noose
on their growing and prospering markets. They are deadly courtiers with
poisoned chalices, if history is anything to go by. Their nooses lead to

288

secretly contrived financial corrals that could hem in, under their
dominion, many poor countries for periods of time that could well reach the
first century span past the new millennium.
 Many developing countries that have sought to break from systematically
Western-controlled money supply institutions are targeted for
destabilization. These countries are now in serious competition with the
Occident in terms of trade. They have to be destabilized because they do
not seek to follow the monetarist free-market system of the Occidental
world. For obvious reasons, unstable countries, be they politically or
financially unstable or both, are not likely to get their act together to present
a serious threat to their international competitors in trade. The advantages
that newly developing countries have to get ahead with their cheap labour
and, in many cases, locally available raw materials is prodigious. They have
a lot of leeway to make up and while they are making it up through means
by and large independent of Western sanction, the industrially developed
countries with their horrendously expensive labour market will have to see
to it that as much unrest prevails in the countries that are trade-and
resource-producing competitors. For one thing, it sells the arms they make
and kills the people they want to kill. Secondly, it provides a base both
political and fiscal that is unstable for growth and discourages investors and
investment in these potential competitors. Consequently this investment
might remain in or go in the direction of the Occidental world. It gives a
new and awful meaning to the axiom of ‘killing two birds with one stone’.
How, then, are they likely to set about this? Every country in the world
has a ‘piece’ of each other. These ‘pieces’ are called Embassies, Legations,
High Commissions. Agents from these places do their deadly work covertly
all over the world. The more sophisticated the ‘set-up’, the more successful
the result which, of course, is to do as much damage to local economies as
possible.
Agents under various titles and subterfuges from these places, in
cohortship with paid (bribed) locals willing to sell their countries’ interests
for financial and other benefits, work covertly in the interests of the sponsor
nations. The rich Occidental nations have highly developed and efficient
mechanisms with huge financial resources to do as much damage to the
developing poor nations as possible. They can do it to the Third World, but
in large financial

289
 structural terms the Third World is itself defenceless and cannot do it to
them.
Political parties, labour unions, vital commercial concerns, government
departments and important social agencies are infiltrated. Leaderships are
subverted. Important people (vital cogs in the efficient running of things)
are targeted and set up one against the other, subtly causing divisiveness
and thus reducing the capacity for efficient working practice be it in factory,
office or port.
While many countries have to cope with all kinds of locally engendered
threats to the well-being and welfare of their citizens they would do well, in
the present context of racially oriented nationalistic threat from abroad, to
wake up to the danger of it and wake up soon.
The world’s non-nationalized media, both print and electronic, are in the
hands of about two hundred individuals. The vast majority, including the
most powerful of them, are white. While a few enlightened ones might
believe in the concept of the global brotherhood of man, the likelihood is
that the majority are small-minded parochial kith-and-kin racists and
tribalists hell-bent on preserving small hierarchical patchworks of citizenry
as inheritors of all our yesterdays and all our tomorrows.
Few nations and their heritages have been left untouched by the ‘songs’
of the civilizing white man. To the tempo and meter of the gun, the bullet
and the cannon ball they carved their name in greed and avarice and taught
the value of take, take and take.
What of the future? Line up … line up … line up … for the box in the
corner. Out of it, day after day, will be thrown at you Mickey Mouse values
of awesome profundity. In reels twenty-four hours long you will be
entertained, indeed riveted by the grandiloquent depth of twelve-year-olds
discussing their second abortion and the flow-density of lipstick. In the
name of such civilizing wonderment let us come and take your values two
thousand years old, your devotion and love of your ancient gods and put
some Coca-Cola dash and fizz into it. Let us build a hundred million homes
with the wood from your forests and then come and let us teach you not to
be ignorant naughty boys and cut your trees down. Let us destroy ozone
layers with our industrial pollutants and then ask you not to buy and use
refrigerators because we are the most vulnerable when you let the gas out.
Let us keep the
 290

means of your nuclear destruction in our hands. Don’t you dare keep the
means of our destruction in yours.
Preferential choices in terms of who we want to live with will always be
made by human beings, or for that matter all animal life, in the light of
perceived differences. How, why, when and where these choices are made
is, of course, crucial in terms of consequences to the living process and the
quality of life of any and, ultimately, all species. Human beings are the
dominant controlling species on the Earth and the destinies of all life
systems, including that of our own phylum, are in our hands alone. The
internecine relationships within our own groupings are thus awesome in
their importance and significance to our survival as the species we call
Homo Sapiens Sapiens. It sounds almost trite to say this, doesn’t it? Yet
they command such an axiomatic stance over our real-time thinking process
that what we do in the interests of one another in our day-to-day
‘everydayness’ is of vital and significant magnitude.
The four-year-old child who shouts racial abuse at black players from a
European football terrace, or the eighty-four-year-old white pensioner who
hides his wallet on no more provocation than the sight of a coloured face
may be doing it less from the prejudiced pre-conditioning propaganda of his
peers than from an intrinsic psycho-blemish that has been passed down
through the genes of his white ancestors.
When are the people of the non-Occidental world going to wake up and
see the writing on the wall? Why have thousands of years of lesson after
lesson steeped in blood and suffering served to teach so small a lesson to
the non-whites? A lesson implying that the glaring fangs on the hate-filled
features of the white American, South African, Australian, Canadian, New
Zealander, Hispanic South American, may not just be an ugly but temporary
colonial social effect derived from the example of his fellows. It may well
be an intrinsic effect in the polluted mind quantum of just being ‘white’.
When will they realize that the vast majority of whites may hold this
polluted quantum of mind as a prevailing and all-pervading condition with
which he or she faces every non-white person they might meet? That some
hide it better than others and that is all. They just hide it to manifest it
overtly sometime, somewhere, when the surface is scratched deep enough
for the poison to pour out. That it is going to be there and

291

stay there as generations come and go and unless non-whites do

something to deal with it now, their children will bear the deadly legacy of
at the very least a bondage of purpose and result, and at the worst the total
extinction of them all, based on the colour of their skin.
What I am trying to say is that, even though the basic instincts of
mankind point the other way, strangely the law of the jungle prevails far
more strongly in the nature of man than the law of God, with, on our planet,
the tribalistic precepts of the descendants of Cro-Magnon man in
overwhelming command of the decision makers, particularly of white
societies, to this day. The so-called civilized countries strangely seem to be
more uncivilized in this respect than the simpler, gentler, more religiously
devotional ones. These, of course, are overwhelmingly non-white. In them
racial ‘difference’ by and large is considered to be a curiosity and a thing of
wonder. A totally different psychological quantum from the ‘white’
societies that peremptorily dismiss non-whites as a collective species
inferior to them.
In this respect, a truly ‘civilized’ people are the Yolgnu Aborigines of
northern Australia. Helen Verran, an Australian philosopher of science at
the University of Melbourne, has for the past decade studied the knowledge
system of these people.1 Their way of viewing the world seems to reflect
the values and expressions of natural Godhead just as Western ways of
viewing seem to reflect the manifestations of an alien intelligence. Verran
points out that the Yolgnu’s knowledge-system is so highly structured that
they are ‘just as addicted to a machinery of logic as we are’. She adds that
‘when you get up and say that Aboriginal life has a very strict logic it rather
takes people aback. You become quite unpopular because it disturbs
people’s cherished views that these people are in touch with romantic
spirits.’
So, what kind of ‘logic’ do the Yolgnu base their knowledge upon? It is
certainly a different sort to the Western variety. In Western science the
logical underpinning is provided by numbers. Physicists, and to a certain
extent scientists from other disciplines, use the language of mathematics to
explain the world. The Yolgnu system, on the other hand, derives not from
the symbolic use of numbers but from kinship. The name they give to this
kinship-based logic is ‘gurrutu’, which Verran suggests must

292

be seen as an alternative mathematics. The parallel with maths is clear.

At the root of mathematics are the ten numbers, which traditionally arose
from the naming of the fingers. In ‘gurrutu’, the basic elements named are
not the fingers but the relationships between three generations of a family.
Altogether there are sixteen different possible relationships within a family
group that is made up of husband and wife, their four parents and their eight
grandparents (i.e. the relationship between the husband and his father is
‘gathu’ from the older man’s side and ‘bapa’ from the younger man’s). The
system thus constitutes a network or mesh of relationships. Everything in
the world is understood by the Yolgnu using these sixteen basic elements.
Verran offers an example of the difference between the Yolgnu and the
Western approach in the understanding of land: ‘land is meaningful because
it has area which we represent in numerical terms. For the Yolgnu, land is
meaningful because it has specific places that belong on the ‘gurrutu’
mesh’. Thus there is mother-land, father-land. grandmother-land, and so on.
Thus the very basis of the Yolgnu’s understanding of the world is borne
only out of that which derives from the Universe of the Whole, from natural
Godhead, i.e. human beings and their relationships. Mathematical
measurement using abstract numbers could not, by its very definition as a
system of measuring separate parts, have derived from the Universe of the
Whole. Such measurement lends itself far better to the technological
development that prevails in the West and to the alien beings who are
themselves the epitome of the highest technological development.
To return to the knowledge system of the Yolgnu, all things fit into the
‘gurrutu’ mesh by belonging to a ‘clan’. Each of the sixteen basic kinship
names is associated with a clan, and all things belong to one or other of
these. The ‘gurrutu’ mesh, says Verran, ‘is like a very complex locating
system’, a sort of all-encompassing map of the world. But whereas with
Western science we have to make our maps from studying the world, for the
Yolgnu ‘the world comes to life already mapped’. Their map is integral to
the very being of the world and is quite inseparable from it. Thus the
Yolgnu have an essentially holistic perception of the world, they view the
world as a natural whole through which they understand the parts that make
up that whole. Conversely, the Western view seeks to understand the whole
by understanding the parts and putting them together.

293

Which view do you think might be closer to a view derived from natural
Godhead?
Within the ‘gurrutu’ mesh there is a primary classification dividing the
world into two halves: Yirritja and Dhuwa. Of the sixteen clans, eight
belong to one half and eight to the other. All Yolgnu knowledge can be seen
as an explication of the ways in which the two clans interact. Throughout
the world the two strive to balance and harmonize each other. In human
terms this means that a Yirritja man must marry a Dhuwa woman and vice
versa. As Verran puts it, for a Dhuwa ‘the only way you can then go on is to
get together with a Yirritja person. This means reproduction, but also much
more. In the conceptual sense, you have to get Yirritja knowledge to go on
in life’. So, the Yolgnu place the greatest importance upon the value which
the two different groups can have for each other, it is in the piecing together
of the two groups that a whole and complete understanding is achieved.
Thus those who seek racial ‘purity’, the fascists of Cro-Magnon descent,
would be, in Yolgnu terms, only ever receiving part of the whole picture in
terms of gaining knowledge. It certainly would seem logical that if we, in
all our differing racial groups, are pieces of a puzzle that was once holistic
being in the state of natural Godhead, then it would be in the piecing
together of that puzzle that the whole picture can be regained. Thus if
difference in terms of race, creed, or colour is received with welcome, it is
the sign of a truly civilized way of understanding the world.
The collective attitude of racial superiority is thus perhaps the most
debauched, destructive and dangerous element of mind in human society
today, because the factorizations necessary to proclaim such a tenet when
the nuclear prerogative may be used as the final arbitrating factor wins the
argument for only one side: the predominantly white Northern Occidental
and white Northern Oriental world. Yes, even in the historically broadly
peaceful Chinese people, the white-skinned northern types instinctively
practise discrimination against the darker southern Chinese. The colour of a
complexion may well broadly define the extent and strength of alien genetic
interception in an individual.
Let me at this point put before you a very interesting thing. The Earth
spinning on its axis puts out a magnetic field. The strength of this magnetic
field is greatest at the poles and weakest at the equator.

294

Magnetism, remember, is a force. Other force vectors also prevail, such

as gravity: centrifugal and centripetal force derived out of the mass and
axial spin orientation of the Earth concentrate greater force per unit area the
further you go towards the poles away from the equator. It is well known
that if you beam microwaves (little straight-vectored invisible bullets of
force) of a certain strength and frequency at living animals, let’s say
normally peaceful mice, they become aggressive and will even try to kill
each other. Secret experiments have been done on soldiers in America and
the Soviet Union and a marked elevation in aggression thresholds was
noted. This was due to changes in the biochemistry of the ‘R Complex’
regions of the brain. That part of the brain that Dr Paul Maclean noted as
accounting for behaviour akin to reptiles, as mentioned previously. The
accentuation of the aggression centres, the tribal sense, the hunting, fighting
and territorial instincts.
If force acting on biochemistry of living systems can propagate and
sustain behaviour such as this, might it not account for the overwhelmingly
violent socio-behavioural paradigms of the Vikings, Goths, Visigoths,
Huns, Franks, Angles, Saxons, Mongols, etc. of northern climes, as history
proves through the centuries? Might it be that the altered alien hybridized
stock of African ‘Eve’ migrated (or was perhaps ‘taken’) to northern
latitudes to be cultured where the natural environment sustained these
qualities? Qualities that would and could encourage conquest of all other
genetic stock on the Earth if needs be. (Guess whose needs might have
required this.) Thor and his thunderbolts fit in very nicely with being a God
of such people.
 On the other hand, the absence of force vectors acting on the astronauts
in space turned many of them into dedicated evangelists and aspirants to
better, more peaceful spiritual paradigms of behaviour than many of them
had aspired to previous to going into space.
Broadly, the people of the Earth who live between the tropics of Cancer
and Capricorn have less force per unit measure acting on their biology and
thus their brain chemistry than those who live above and below these two
tropics. They have proved to be, by and large as a group, the most
devotionally spiritual of all the peoples on the Earth. A sign, maybe, that in
less environmentally enforced paradigms the biochemistry of the Neo
Cortex of the

295

brain is so altered as to allow better reception of the Godsignal we might

call ‘grace’ or Enlight.
It is beyond argument that the people with the strongest spiritual faith and
devotional religious strength and focus have always been, and are
particularly now, the people that inhabit the regions of the Earth where the
geophysical force paradigms are least. A census of the church, temple,
mosque and synagogue attendances in these respective sites will amply
prove the point. While sociologists and behavioural psychologists might
account for this in a myriad different ways, I cannot help feeling that the
intrusion of physical point force acting in point perspective and location has
a fundamental role to play in defining negative and positive human
behaviour. It is strange that the further one goes towards the equator the
warmer, more friendly and welcoming people become and the less the
severe, strict, unemotional list-filing mindedness of northern-hemisphere
people prevails. It is a people-oriented urge of mind in the geographical
mid-band of our planet.
I noticed a marked affirmation of this in a domestic context in my own
home. Whenever we had European guests to dinner, the overwhelming
accent of the conversation was centred on material possessions. What latest
model of car, size of conservatory, swimming pool, location and extent of
holiday etc. Our guests from tropical and mid-band climes would
unfailingly talk to us and each other quite naturally and in an unsolicited
way about whom they had met, where old friends were, who married
whom, how the children were doing, etc. A total people-centred social
evocation. To put my conclusions to the test I asked my friends to observe
any differences in the conversation between the two types and they too,
without exception or prompting, came to the same conclusion.
As I have said previously, not a single great founder of the world’s great
religions came from a latitude very far above the Tropic of Cancer. A point
that perhaps begins to demarcate a significant increase in the level of force
such that it forbids a biochemical advantage in receiving the emanations of
Godhead on this particular planet.
I would like to stress that this is a broadscope view of all the elements
and that there are and will be many exceptions to the rule

296

if the properties and consequences of reincarnation and karma are true. It

is utterly shameful that I should be writing with a seeming racist slant in
this way, but it is the only way I have to illustrate the deadly hidden factors
that might lie at the root of our destructibility as a species.
It is interesting to note that when a point of view illustrating the disgrace
of racialism as practised by the white-skinned breeds of our world through
the centuries is avowed and proclaimed, a chorus of protest claiming ‘Foul’
rises from almost every pale-complexioned racist aficionado from the
northernmost tip of Canada to the southernmost wilds of the Yucatan
horizontally across the entire northern globe. Yet these same deadly
disciples of racist debauchery keep the silence of the grave when, day after
day, the most draconian overt and covert methodologies are used by them to
corral, control and devastate whole nations and communities of coloured
peoples in starvation and servitude.
All political roads lead to national interest. All social roads lead to tribal
interest. It is easy to see what the current carefully measured and brilliantly
stage-managed push by the Occidental countries to keep nuclear weapons
from Third World countries might be really leading to. Under concerned-
sounding, apparently worthy motives they may well seek to ensure that the
finger on all buttons is as pale-complexioned as they can make it, China and
Japan included. There is no doubt that they too could well be aimed at for
destruction in any future race purge in the new nuclear targeting postures of
the Occidental political and military mind. The plain truth is that you don’t
see them taking out all their nuclear arsenals. They play-act with small
degrees of weapons reduction and have the almighty conceit to demand
that, while they keep the vast majority of their weapons, no one in the Third
World should dare hold any.
History proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the black man suffers
where any white man goes. Racially contrived nuclear writing is now
clearly on the wall.
The non-white nations of the world would do well to watch the gathering
clouds of white-sponsored racialism as reflected through the drafts and
discussions of grouped nations such as the European Community. A careful
study of recent legislation would quickly reveal a monstrous catalogue of
racially motivated rules and regulations, with the British, the arch colonial
slavers,

297

at the helm in sponsoring them. It is a dirty business of finely worded,

overtly expressed tolerance in the media and covertly actioned red-boned
racism in the halls of legislation.
Somewhere in the centres of these newly formed massive organizations
of the Occidental world lurk secret groups of powerful men and women
with the sole intent of quietly and covertly spawning the seeds of white
supremacist philosophy. They cleverly and deviously design deadly and
divisive paradigms to sow the maximum discord among the body politic of
mankind, their stipend to come from the gun-and bullet-makers of our
world. Their goal, one speculates, might be simply to derive and possess the
means to take out at a stroke any or all of those they deem to be their
enemy.
So let’s see how a clever power might set about such a nuclear defined
goal. After all the military ‘Think Tanks’ of the Occident are full of
behavioural psychologists who have to be put to good use.
You would first need to have a plausible reason to hog all the nukes. That
reason is easily found. There are enough irresponsible scoundrels in the
world who display the qualities that alarm all peace-loving people. If there
weren’t it is easy to set one up. Of course, this threat has to be believable.
Scenarios will have to be brought about that show up the threat as a
draconian one and a mechanism has to exist where the world’s media could
be duped, threatened and marshaled into line to expose it and make sure
everyone believes that this is the genuine article. Enter America and their
contrived clone Saddam Hussein. The Power and the Gory. Game, Set and
Match. Our Greys have got the result they may have been carefully
cultivating since the Pyramids were built. A ready-made mechanism on our
territory, not theirs, that can take out at a stroke all they want taken out if
need be. All done by remote control. i.e via the Superhighway, the Internet
and all the other wondrous devices that connect you personally to each
other and to their representatives on this Earth.
What evidence do we have to substantiate such conspiratorial thinking?
Take the so-called ‘Internet’, for instance. The Internet was the brainchild
of the US Defence Department’s secret information-gathering mechanisms.
A series of top-secret military satellites were launched in the 1970s and
1980s with the specific intention of providing a facility for eavesdropping
on any

298

conversation anywhere in the world. This intelligence-gathering system

needed a global grid of computers that, when connected together through a
network, could be used to collect and process information from multifarious
points of input. The world was invited to provide this — hardware through
private and public auspices, under the guise of the attractive proposition
that a free exchange of information would be available for any subscriber
on the network. The covert intention was, of course, to provide the US with
an instantly accessible fund of data. Facts and figures that would facilitate
the creation of a fantastic pool of knowledge of the affairs of us all that
could then be used in the interests of the US in maintaining itself as the
primary world power. The carrot has grown to enormous proportions and
with it, of course, the stick. A stick that could be used to beat us all into the
fashions and means that could control all our destinies with the interests of
the super power uppermost. Any person or nation deemed an aggressor
could then be dealt with in whatever fashion the US chose. Touted as an
innocent facility to serve mankind for the benefit of mankind, the Internet’s
secret, covert US government-sponsored intention of holding individuals
and nations to ransom if they so chose to do has by and large been already
achieved.
Let us take the US out of the equation and substitute in its place an alien
power. I think you will get my drift.
‘Information warfare’ is now the hottest concept in the halls of the
Pentagon. The whole thing was planned in military and civilian ‘Think
Tanks’ funded by the US Defence Department from the start, of course. It
began substantially in the 1960s. ‘Information warriors’ hope to transform
the way soldiers fight. Their goal being the exploitation of the technological
wonders of the late twentieth century to launch rapid, stealthy, widespread
and devastating attacks on the military and civilian infrastructure of an
enemy. According to interviews conducted with numerous military,
intelligence and administration officials it seems to be the case that the
Pentagon has wide-ranging plans to revolutionize the battlefield with
information technology, much as the tanks did in World War I and the atom
bomb in World War II. Says Admiral William Owens, Vice Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff: ‘This is America’s gift to warfare.’
In June 1995, the National Defence University in Washington

299

quietly graduated its first class of sixteen infowar officers, specially

trained in everything from defending against computer attacks to using
virtual reality in planning battle manoeuvres. More than a dozen secret
infowar games have been conducted between 1993 and 1995 to determine
how future military tactics should be changed to accommodate information
warfare.
Spy agencies are also dabbling in infowar techniques. The National
Security Agency, along with top-secret intelligence units in the Army, Navy
and Air Force, has been researching ways to infect enemy computer
systems with particularly virulent strains of those software viruses that
already plague home and office computers. Such viruses could be inserted
into the aggressor’s telephone-switching stations, causing widespread
failure of the phone system.
 Another type of virus, the logic bomb, would remain dormant in an
enemy system until a predetermined time when it would come to life and
begin ‘eating’ data. Such bombs could attack, for example, computers that
run a nation’s air-defence system. Or they could intercept computers that
run a central bank and thus instigate widespread financial panic. They could
also destroy the electronic routes that control rail lines and military
convoys. Or affect the flight-control software of aircraft such that they
‘mysteriously’ crash to the ground. The CIA has a clandestine programme
that would insert booby-trapped computer chips into weapons systems that
a foreign arms manufacturer might ship to a potentially hostile country — a
technique called ‘chipping’. In another programme the agency is looking
into how independent contractors hired by arms makers to write software
for weapons systems could be bribed to slip in viruses. A CIA source who
specializes in information technology has been quoted as saying the
following: ‘You get into the arms manufacturer’s supply network, take the
stuff off-line briefly, insert the bug, then let it go to the country. When the
weapons system goes into a hostile situation everything about it seems to
work, but the warhead doesn’t explode’.
The US Air Force’s latest weapon is the Commando Solo. This aircraft
contains microelectronic equipment that enables the plane’s crew to jam a
country’s TV and radio broadcasts and substitute messages — true or false
— on any frequency. During the Gulf War in 1991 the plane’s crew
broadcast radio reports to Iraqi

300

soldiers eager to hear uncensored news of the war, including some of the
next areas to be targeted by US bombers. As a result, many Iraqi soldiers
deserted those positions. Specialists for the Army’s 4th Psychological
Operations Group, which prepares the taped messages that Commando Solo
airs, have considered the possibility of morphing the images of a foreign
leader and putting words into his mouth to get him into trouble.2
No one can quite hear the clicks of the enemy keyboard, or the fuseless
bombs travelling over the Internet. However, a pattern of computer mayhem
begins to emerge.
 As for the extraterrestrial aliens, with final and ultimate irony it is likely
that they will have no aggressive intent when looked at in martial terms. A
highly intelligent species need never use violence as a means of conquest,
but they will always keep something like the nuclear prerogative up their
sleeve for use if needs be, just in case. A technologically primitive and
emotionally unstable species like ours is not likely to follow the laws of
logic and reason. Many abductees describe these Greys as emotionless
beings that show no aggression or anger whatsoever. My guess is that they
are pure intelligence wrapped up in a semi-organic biological chemistry
with a kind of mercury-silicon sponge material that makes up their body
mass. They have one quest and one quest only: to understand all about us
and single-mindedly lay claim to what it is about us that interests them. As I
have said, if they were intelligent enough they could take over a relatively
primitive race of hominids without a shot being tired by them. They would
simply instigate it amongst us.
‘No, no,’ I hear some of you cry. ‘How could they achieve this with a
peaceful, loving, caring species like human beings?’ Ha, ha, you thought I
was kidding, didn’t you? You thought I had looked at the evidence through
the centuries of man’s loving custody of each other and finally seen the
light. Men just aren’t capable of aggression and violence. Are they?
Of course I am only joking. But it may be that the joke is inappropriate. It
may just be that as man devolved down from Prior Adam-like Man in
stages of more and more gross physical genotypes to Ape Man and then to
ape, his tendency to senseless aggression diminished. After all,
overwhelmingly, animal species are only aggressive in defence, or because
of chemically prompted instigators like pheromones to preserve a species
through dominant

301

sexual transfer. In other words, as a prompt to breed. It is only man in all

the so-called ‘animal kingdom’ that can be, and is, insanely aggressive
against reason.
It used to be thought that some animals were inherently aggressive and
killed wantonly. Studies were done on why foxes caused such unnecessary
carnage in a chicken coop. In other words, they did not just kill one chicken
and take it away, they would kill many seemingly senselessly. They
discovered that the killing was done merely as a reflex reaction to
movement and that the panic and chaos that ensued when a fox got
admission to a chicken house caused the animal to snap at all movement. It
was simply trying to kill its prey quickly before it got away. When some
birds were tranquillized and stayed still in an experiment, the fox only
killed the birds that weren’t sedated.
I previously alluded to experiments where mice killed each other when
subjected to remote microwave stimulation of their brains. You can bet that
the defence services of all the super powers have been experimenting with
such devices for use against human beings. (It may be that we as a species
need very little stimulation indeed.) If our primitive science can do such as
this, what do you suppose an intelligence perhaps thousands of years in
advance of us might be capable of doing?
I am trying to say that the interceptors of man, in enhancing the brain
capacity and inserting their own biological constituents into our species,
might also have set in a predisposition to senseless aggression. In other
words, a prompt to kill. It would be a very useful feature in a farm breed. A
self-destruct button if the breeding experiment failed. A self-destruct button
that is always there or in certain circumstances could be switched on by
remote control, to kill. Perhaps specific to individual human beings.

1
‘The Way of Logic’: New Scientist 2-12-95
2
‘Onward Cyber Soldiers’: Time Magazine 21-8-95

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR:
HIDE AND SEEK

Are extraterrestrial alien beings going to make a personal appearance on

Sky TV in the near future? Watch out, Rupert, your profits are going to hit
the outer planets. The SKY’s the limit. Preposterous and ill-conceived
though this question might be, I believe unequivocally that our planet has
been and is a kind of cradle to death and, through death, continuity in life to
an alien species. Our planet is their battery farm providing endless numbers
of Soul-connected bodies that when they die provide a mechanism of
attachment for alien soulless beings to have an eternity. A depository of
hope for their go-nowhere futures. Millions of years of careful remotely
cultivated adaptation have finally come up with a hybrid product, a human
product written in some human genetic lines that have been and will be
serving their purposes till they take a direct hand in all our affairs in the not
too distant future. In other words, our Earth has been a place to search for
that elusive track to Godhead they misappropriated in their own world
perhaps a billion parsecs away. They are here now, hiding on the peripheral
planers and, if we can go by the reported affirmations of the Moon-landing
astronauts, on our own Moon.
Given the capacity these alien beings have to reach humans anywhere by
remote control, the answer to the question I originally posed may well be
that they need not actually physically arrive here. In other words they need
not actually set foot on terra firma. It is likely that, apart from the North and
South Poles. that is the Arctic and Antarctic, these alien creatures would
find

303

the environmental conditions on Earth hostile. I believe that the tropics

and by and large the mid-band of the planet (thirty-three degrees either side
of the equator) seem to be relatively free of their visitations. It is possible
that they need superconducting environments to run the current fields of the
biomass of their synthetic bodies: We all know that cold environments
assist the phenomenon of superconduction. It is likely that they have taken
up stations on the Moon and the cold near planets for just this reason. A
disproportionate number of UFOs have been sighted near the Poles in the
Arctic and Antarctic. They may well be the best terrestrial landing sites for
them. Remote and unpopulated, they would leave them relatively
undisturbed to go about their business.
It has always been unlikely that the synthetic roboidal alien ‘life-form’
called the Greys would have used martial means to take over our planet.
That is, until we exploded the first nuclear bomb. However, left to their own
devices it is likely that their roboidal utilitarian programming would have
suggested just that without compunction. Take over the whole shooting
match. I believe they have not done this up to now because their hidden
masters, the Primary Clones, would not let them do so. I think the reason
for this might go back to Christ’s temptation in the desert by perhaps the
‘head honcho’ Clone which itself perhaps led a particular batch of them in
our solar system at the time. I have always wondered how the Son of God
could be so easily manipulated apparently against his will, taken up a
mountain (or, what is more likely, into a spaceship) and shown the world at
the whim of another being, unless it was through some kind of advanced
technology. No mountain, as we all know, is high enough to show anyone
the whole world. My presumption is that Christ was accosted by a UFO in
the desert around Judea. Perhaps Jesus provided enough evidence for the
alien occupants to take him for what he (Christ) was, and that he convinced
them that he had the means to lead even a Clone to eternal life in Godhead
by means of his power. With the words ‘Get thee behind me, Satan: it is
written that thou shalt not tempt the son of man’, perhaps Jesus was putting
a synthetic creation in its existential hierarchical place. For all we know, it
and any others that may have been present at the time may be enjoying the
benefits of an eternal pension of total happiness in Godlight

304

even now. Christ, after all, did promise a thief that he would be with him
(Jesus) in Paradise.
But what about all the other alien Clones that might be left in the
vastness of our Universe? Are they awaiting the promised return of Christ?
And where are they waiting? If we have them here now, our solar system
could be a very crowded place. There could be plenty of them sweeping
through hyperspace towards us on the instigation of the Clone that Christ
might have redeemed. This creature might well have got on the old wireless
and told any of its mates left on its home planet that they were on to a good
thing on this little blue-brown orb called the Earth. There was a
phenomenon that could in fact lead them to a natural eternity devoid of
constantly needing to be replenished in Clone juices.
Are they coming here even now, perhaps to await Christ’s second coming
because they missed the first one? Why are they staying out of sight or
keeping out of the way on the outer planets? Are they trying to pre-empt
Christ and trying a ‘Do-It-Yourself Soul-acquiring kit out, with us as the
expendables? In doing this is there something they would have to do to
themselves biologically to prepare for the investiture of a Soul? Is this
something we as humans (and our humanoid ancestors) possess and
possessed naturally, something vital like body parts or DNA strands they
need from us? Perhaps this something requires that we exist as living
individuals and exist in numbers, and are not taken out of the equation by
their zap guns, shall we say. (I apologize for the sarcasm). Perhaps
thousands of years in their covert custody proves this is so or they would
have taken us all out eons ago. We might have been able to come to a deal
with them. I’m sure we all know a few characters we might be willing to
swap in exchange for peaceful co-existence with a superior intelligence and
its singular usefulness on Earth. The trouble may be that this ‘something’
they need seems from all the evidence to require us to be altered in the way
they need us to be for their purposes. That is, perhaps, the whole trouble
and has, I believe, been the whole trouble with Man through the millennia.
As I have said before, they want as many of us as possible in an altered
state that fits their purpose of trying to ‘piggy-back’ on our genome to a
Soul. This, ironically, may be our only guarantee of life and living on as a
species and has kept these creatures away from setting up permanently on
our

305

real estate. They can do it more conveniently, and more usefully perhaps,
by remote control.
 There is, of course, the possibility that we are extremely dangerous to
them as a species and they would survive better in our neck of the woods if
they kept out of our direct way.
This all may explain why they have not made an open landing before this
time, let’s say soon after we took out two entire cities with nuclear bombs
and demonstrated Cro-Magnon ‘man’s’ loving kinship with its own ethnic
groups and all other ethnic groups of humanity. Perhaps that left the aliens
in no doubt that their ‘creations’ were very dangerous fellows indeed. It is
intriguing that they did not make their entrance then and ask to be ‘taken to
our leader’. In other words, they might have considered that we, as their
genetically engineered creation, are much more dangerous to them than
they can be to us. Then, at that particular time, that is.
As I said, they may have been here for countless millennia, farming our
planet with ‘alien’-adjusted progeny, and have not taken it over completely
or let us know that we are a captive breed and they are our masters because
overall covert custodianship from a scientific observational point of view
was necessary. They may just be watching us. And if and when their
observations are done they could and would be overtly the Masters who
will be finally in charge of all our tomorrows as they have been in charge of
all our yesterdays.
There is, however, still another scenario that could have forced them to
change their mind and impelled them to make an actual overt entrance or
landing in the future. The discovery of nuclear fission and the creation of
the destructive mechanism made through it — the atom bomb — could
explain all this fevered alien activity since the ‘Trinity’ atomic test
explosion at Alamogordo in 1945. This may be the whole reason they have
had to take a more direct hand in the affairs of man. Nuclear bombs may
have been a useful method of culling and wiping off the face of the Earth
the unwanted products of their millennia-long genetic experiment. A
remotely handled methodology that they would help us to apply to
ourselves, through ourselves and our legendary love for each other as a
species.
The aliens may, in fact, have telepathically ‘inspired’ the whole idea of it
all into the consciousness of certain of their specially

306
 cultivated ‘genotypes’ here on the Earth, as a means of culling en masse
the unwanted products of their ongoing genetic experiment among
humanity. But after doing so they may have seen the products of their
efforts as a very dangerous thing in the hands of man. They may well have
anticipated that to put such a thing into an agenda as telepathically
‘inspired’ scientific discovery was perhaps too big a chance to take with our
kind because we have amply shown, after they did it, that we are well
capable of taking the entire species out at a stroke. I believe that in the first
instance they were forced to take this chance and ‘inspire’ the setting-up of
an atomic world. Theirs may be a race against time. They may well be
running out of ‘Clone juice’. There may be a limit to the number of times
you can re-clone without new sources of fresh vital DNA, to put it crudely.
We may be that resource and all this two hundred years of industrial
technology may well be a way that we set up all the ‘hardware’ for them to
use for their own selfish purposes in the future. The ‘software’ may well be
us.
If our world has been seeded with alien genetic hybrids, there must also
be lines of man clear of this poison. In the long run these clear lines would
breed with the alien genetic hybrids and render them unsuitable. In other
words, they would mix down and clean up the aliens’ own suitable Cro-
Magnon hybrids, taking them from their genetic and perhaps psychological
grasp. That would take away the future administrators of their larder or
storehouse of suitable humans, humans they may need to use as a
mechanism for hijacking Soul lines, and defeat their whole purpose among
man.
The atom bomb may have been intended as a culling device for taking
away this threat very effectively, but in developing the mechanisms to take
the unwanted forms of humanity away at a stroke (albeit under their
inspiration) they were ‘giving’ us a means to take their own access to a Soul
away from them at a stroke, too. They were faced with another dilemma:
These deadly instruments would have to be in our own human hands if they
were to maintain their covert stance in the affairs of our species. They could
hardly let us know they were here trying to control it all. Instead of an
eternal clean-up franchise under their control, humanity would have it under
its own. That’s us, an emotionally immature species quite unlike their own
master form on their planet. Remember, we were a species on the way out
when they found us. Wandering

307

aimlessly on the whims of entropy to end our suitability when we became

apes, monkeys, animals, insects, trees, viruses and finally stones. We were a
rejuvenated but nevertheless retrograde species. We had already burnt our
boats and were well on the way to becoming monkeys. As I have said
previously, they returned us to a former mental state by genetic interception
— rewiring our genome. It could have been that, in some of the roots of the
human ancestral tree, not only the brains were rewired. A more complete
gene interception was done in some. All these various permutations were
bred and interbred till they arrived at the final version most suitable to their
purposes — the Cro-Magnon root. We perhaps all, as humans, generally
still retained a component of our previous ape-man form and retained
naturally something too much of the wrong base of mind to ever again be
like our first beautiful Adam form. They could never genetically scrub it all
out. They thus could never allow their destiny to lie totally in such
unreliable hands. Albeit hands that were a reconstituted form of a wondrous
past self. A past form that, once upon a time, was like their own Inaugural
Adam Beings but in our case unlike theirs, a form that had failed to make it
back to Godhead naturally. They would have to have final control. This
would necessarily risk revealing their covert authorship of some of
humankind. It would risk revealing their presence, but it was a risk they just
had to take.

They did take this risk and it accidentally exposed their presence, as happened at Roswell, New
Mexico and a thousand other sites and sightings for millions of people all over the world since the
time of the first atomic explosion in Alamogordo, New Mexico. They knew then that sooner or later,
mankind as a whole would spot the subterfuge. A lot still could be done to hide their presence. The
natural cynicism of mankind would be a great asset in still hiding their presence. They would have to
set up agents and agencies on the planet that would maintain the subterfuge for them, through lies
and disinformation. They would have to do this through their own biologically intercepted ‘root
people’. Those among man whose genetic ancestral lines had been strongly adjusted to suit their
purposes. Those whose mind sense they could control telepathically. This they are doing with
remarkable success up to now. But not all of humanity is theirs. The Russian roulette of a Universe
chaotic through entropy would ironically finally work against them. Genetic lines of man clear of
their poison would breed into their best-made plans and constantly

308

weaken their ‘adjusted’ kind on the Earth. Remote control of the situation would get harder and
harder. Their lines would have to be strengthened constantly. Abductions for genetic purposes would
have to begin. They have begun.
But the control of the nuclear prerogative is crucial. Mankind is not theirs enough for the total
remote control of it. They would have to get their own hands on it to be sure of total control. It just
could not be left in the hands of their agents on the Earth.
The prospect of interbreeding between racial and ethnic groups is more than anything else
what the aliens are likely to view with horror. As I have said, interbreeding between the racial types
of man will weaken their deadly kind hidden mostly among the people of Northern Cro-Magnon and
Northern Mongoloid ancestry amongst us. The last thing in the world they want is a total
brotherhood of man all across the world. A true humanity devoid of their genetically engineered
hybrids. Perhaps that would be the end of all their tomorrows.
And so we have a deadly prescription for all our tomorrows. The biggest
problem in the world of tomorrow will be inter-ethnic and interracial
rivalry. It will be narrowed down further to inter-group-interest rivalry. All
over Britain, Continental Europe and America, in city after city, the ‘Haves’
are gathering under the aegis of self-protection and forming communities of
‘Haves’ in the midst of communities of ‘Have-nots’. In some instances,
armed guards patrol the periphery of fenced-in communities of privileged
people and ensure that they keep out those they consider unsuitable,
ostensibly as protection against crime. It will be very interesting to take a
close look at those living in these self-segregating hives for evidence of
alien interest. How many, for instance, are members of self-interest groups
such as the Freemasons? It is well known that the higher orders of this cult
are supposed to pay homage to a God-entity called ‘Jahbulon’. One
wonders if these people are being duped into sanctioning the purposes of
the ‘head honcho’ that leads an extraterrestrial mob of celestial
opportunists.
The nuclear shuffle has begun, too. The possession of nuclear weapons is
not the tacit prerogative of a few privileged nations anymore. There will
always be a chance that anywhere, any day, any country with the necessary
physical and intellectual resources may and will come up with the nuclear
goods. There are over twenty countries with the capacity to build these
weapons. The alien interests would have to stop them from doing this at all

309

costs. No treaties will stop it all. Despite all the Test Ban and Non-
Proliferation treaties there are facilities being set up in the territory of one
of the chief signatories of these treaties to manufacture large numbers of
these weapons covertly on a fully automated scale at a moment’s notice.
This is to be done when a full ban on the manufacturing and holding of
nuclear weapons is signed. All the nuclear-headed rockets will never be
destroyed. Many will be kept on, ostensibly to guard the Earth from large
rocks dropping on it from outer space. A safe nest-egg for northern birds
and perhaps for others that sing no Earthly song.
The alien extraterrestrials would try see to it that all nuclear eggs would
be in a controllable basket … just in case it all goes wrong again as it did in
Roswell, and in case this time they may not be able to cover it up. They
would then need a culling device that can take huge numbers of humans
unsuited to their purposes out at a stroke if needs be. Numbers and names
they could mark on the foreheads, perhaps, of their chosen ones would help
keep their own safe. Numbers that lie in the range of 666 in genetic make-
up terms would be segregated for saving. It may well be a biological gene
arrangement that defines their storehouse of effect on the human genome.
An effect that sets the scale for artificial semi-organic biologies in this
Universe. It would take another hook to attempt to explain that one, so for
now I’ll only say purely figuratively that if you place the figure 9 and the
figure 6 together you would see that they are opposites that make the figure
8 when superimposed. The sign of the Moroid. In other words, the twisted
figure-of-eight that signifies the pattern of the whole force-signature of the
Universe. If there are two basic forms of existent Being in the Universe, one
Natural and of God and one created and not of God, then perhaps the 9
signifies the one signed the right way and the 6 the one signed the wrong
way. There is, of course, much more to it than that. It will have to wait for
that other book.
 Have you noticed the sudden upsurge in ethnic differentiation all over the
world? Bosnia is the most vivid example. A massive ethnic sorting seems to
be taking place all over the world. I predict it will get worse. A lot worse
before the ‘song of the greys’ reaches its last stanza. I believe that arbitrary
interracial mixing, diluting their stock on the Earth. is becoming a serious
threat and one that

310

is more and more difficult for the aliens to stop or indeed control
remotely. They will, sooner or later, have to take a direct hand in it all, to
finally take control themselves of this massive random threat to their
destiny. You will then see what the Nazis were really about. God forbid.
The alien ‘cuckoos’, their genetically engineered intercepted kind on the
planet, are logistically set around the planet too diversely. They will have to
get them together in enclaves. They have to be brought together to stop
them from getting diluted through interbreeding. It has already begun. The
real fun will start if and when they achieve this. The rest of us may well all
be expendable.
It is not only Americans that can conveniently clone a Saddam Hussein.
If the abduction accounts are anything to go by, the aliens, ironically, are
evidently at this moment busy cloning huge numbers of Americans. I
wonder why they are doing this with such apparent success in the most
powerful nation in the world.
I believe the alien extraterrestrial Clones and their Grey roboid aides are
getting ready to declare their presence and I can’t help feeling that in not
too long a time you will see the world’s media preparing the way for their
physical deployment on our planet. As I have said earlier, many highly
responsible intelligent people believe that a massive covert operation is
being carried out with the United States of America, leading the countries
of Europe to aid and assist such an event: Sensitive intuitive minds all
around the world, usually labelled and dismissed as mad or cranks, are
perceiving the lethal threat to our species. I believe the whole SETI
programme (the Search for Intelligent Life) is a giant ruse designed to make
us think that extraterrestrials are not already here. This is ostensibly a
worldwide programme using some of the most powerful telescopes on
Earth to try to locate other intelligent life in the Universe.
The welcome committee to greet the alien big boys is already set up. It is
likely to include some of the most distinguished names in the governments
and armed services of many of the top industrialized countries. Some, I
would wager, will be (white) household names. You think I’m joking, don’t
you? Well, maybe I am. We will have to wait and see.
The welcome mat will be carefully laid with a contrived series of written
articles, films and television programmes, all seemingly

311

unconnected but all letting the proverbial cat of an imminent alien arrival
out of the bag. They have already begun, as I have said, by pretending to
search the universe for alien life. One can’t help feeling this is one of the
biggest exercises in deliberately propagated humbug and deception the
world has ever known. This ruse will be designed to achieve in many
people’s minds the desired effect of making everyone relax and think that
aliens are not already here and that we are innocently and sincerely seeking
to find and contact our nearest neighbours. This in itself is, if you think
about it, a very foolish thing to do. The risk of a contact holds with it the
implication that the contactee has intelligence. We know what an intelligent
species like humans can do to lesser species. My spray-can ant-killer amply
demonstrates what we have done to all lesser life forms on the Earth. Can
you imagine what a more intellectually intelligent and emotionally
primitive life form might do to us if they decide to come calling? Do you
really think the so-called intelligences that set up SETI haven’t anticipated
this very real danger? Of course they have. So why do it? The whole thing
is one big contrivance designed to hide their true Masters with the huge
almond-shaped eyes and hearts that beat like atomic clocks.
When the powers that be are told to begin the declaration process that
will finally introduce these creatures to the world, humanity will first need
to be carefully pacified with the idea that we are not alone. Slowly and
surreptitiously, the contact will be developed and explanations will be given
as to how this could be taken further and how the laws of physics and the
laws of psychology may be brought in line with ‘their’ arrival on terra
firma. When the time for revelation comes, and we learn that they have all
the time been in our back yard anyway, it will be too late to do anything
about it.
People will be encouraged to see these alien cloned creatures and their
roboid pseudo-machine aides — the GREYS — as no threat but, rather, a
boon to humanity. All who take the contrary view and succeed in
challenging these agencies will not do so for long or for long enough to
make an impact or a difference. They will be dismissed, scoffed, ridiculed
and laughed at. Demonstrations of alien technology and alien power to heal
the sick will impress many and we will all be exhorted to welcome the true
fathers of Man

312

as our progenitors. The ‘takeover’ will be peaceful, effortless and

complete. The vast majority of the world will not even be aware that our
planet is no more in human hands. It has all already begun. Our lives as
human beings will never be the same again.
Yet what kind of life will it be? Will there be room for a sense of the
natural beauty of field, of tree, of flower, of mountain river, stream,
meadow and glade? Will our children be allowed to see a doe tend her fawn
as their own lungs draw a draught of fresh clean air? Or will the odour of
synthetic flowers waft in chemical winds of change that claim our horizons
through the plastic windows of a farm laboratory, where we are just the next
spare part for the mandates of an alien life form?

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-FIVE:
‘ONCE UPON A TIME’

Could my surmises about these extraterrestrials be totally wrong? Could

they be, in fact, the opposite of what I claim them to be? Are they really a
marvellous benediction for humanity? The fact remains that if these alien
beings were benign and kindly fathers of our species, they could so easily
take up, abduct, abjure, whatever, important representatives of mankind,
explain that they were this and reassure us to our satisfaction that their
motives in coming here were for the benefit of man. They would not need
to hide or obscure their presence. It all could and should be done openly.
We would then welcome them with open, perhaps even loving arms and
look forward to a happy future of computer-enhanced humanity. The Earth
might well be renamed ‘Nerdland’. The entire physical universe would be
our oyster and we would join the other pearls of inhuman kindness skidding
across starscapes and abducting and sticking needles, rods, probes and
prods into and onto other hapless unsuspecting entities out there …
somewhere.
Why, then, are they not doing this openly, if their intent is one of
benevolence? Why all the subterfuge? The secrecy? It all is no mark of a
benevolent benefactor. It all smacks of a threat. Perhaps a deadly threat to
all our futures.
You might still ask why a complete ‘takeover’ with actual occupation of
the real estate of our planet is necessary for these alien beings when humans
might be so easily duped and controlled remotely. It seems that they can do
whatever they need to do with abductions couched in anonymity. Their
ability

314

to communicate telepathically and wipe memory as documented by

Harvard Professor John Mack through accounts by his patients, the so-
called ‘abductees’, suggests this strongly.
The nature of the ‘telepathy’ that the alien beings use is, I believe,
technologically based. In fact, Japanese researchers are currently
developing a device that can read thoughts.1 In a recent experiment at the
University of Tottori, west of Osaka, a volunteer concentrated on one of
five words that flashed on and off on a computer monitor. Researchers
connected the volunteer’s head to several electrodes that monitored
electrical activity in his brain using an encephalograph. The encephalograph
measured a type of brainwave called P300, which the brain produces when
it focuses on an idea. A computer then analyzed the pattern of the
brainwaves, comparing it with the patterns associated with words it had
already learnt. It took about twenty-five seconds to guess correctly which
word the subject was thinking of. The research team has been testing a
prototype device for a year and the university’s Associate Professor of
Computer Sciences, Michel Inoue, says it has an accuracy rate of eighty to
ninety per cent. The device is being developed specifically for patients
suffering from a disease that paralyzes the brain’s motor functions such that
the patient is eventually unable to move and, therefore, unable to
communicate. However, mind-reading, or ‘telepathy’, via electronic devices
is — also a practice that is fundamental to the Greys in their dealings with
human beings. Almost all abductees who have been abducted and re-
abducted say that as part of the normal abduction routine an alien being
stares into their eyes for long periods, apparently reading their minds. In
fact, it seems that the method of communication that the Greys use is a
telepathic one as they do not speak: their ‘mouths’ do not open. But this is
not telepathy using the power of thought, it is telepathy using physical
mechanisms and thus it is not telepathy in the commonly accepted sense of
the word at all.
In Professor Mack’s book there is an example of an abductee who claims
that the large head and huge black eyes of the Grey is actually a form of
‘helmet’ full of microelectronic devices: ‘I’ve been waiting fifty years to
say this, you know … What our little television computer machines do here
on Earth is similar to what happens inside these helmets. There are
mechanisms on the inner

315

brow. When it sticks out on the lower brow above the eyes, inside are
mechanisms, the means to altering what enables the various manners of
seeing. It’s just like looking into the workings of a microchip in a computer
or other electrical operations. And there are lots of microchip connectors on
both sides of the brow. Inside the helmet is full of these’. This abductee
says that he has actually worn one of these helmets. From inside the robotic
‘head’, he felt that he could see temperature and other biological processes:
‘It is not unlike what we do with computers and electrical generators. When
I am a creature or in the creature’s examination structure, I’m studying too’.
When Mack asked him what he was studying he replied: ‘Humans’.2
There is, of course, the chilling possibility that the whole Earth
environment may be geophysically shaped for their arrival. All they would
need to do is hijack a passing comet or asteroid a few hundred miles across
and bring its orbit to coincide with that of the Earth. They could then crash
it in the North Atlantic under Greenland, between New York and West
Ireland, shall we say. It would considerably alter things on this Earth, don’t
you think? Some might say for the better. God forbid.
I don’t wish to be flippant in parading such a horrendous idea. I want to
illustrate the relative ease with which an emotionless breed of creature like
an alien Grey could so easily accomplish things to their advantage.
Hijacking an asteroid of that mass in the weightlessness of space is
probably not too hard to do given their level of technology. Driving it in our
direction is even easier. What price all the foundations of humanity? What
price our vanity?
This is amply illustrated by referring to what I like to call ‘The Great
Erasers’. The evidence for the Great Erasers, as I call the phenomenon, has
been there for all to see all the time. But few of us saw it. In common with
most of us in this world, I too was blind to what was right in front of my
eyes. I too could never see the wood for the trees. The only real way to see
a wood despite the trees is to ascend. To see it all from above. By that I
mean to rise up and take a look. In this instance though, seeing the wood
from the trees meant looking up. Up at the sky — in the dark.
Take the night sky, for instance. A million pinpoints of light are
somewhat hidden at the first glance when you look up. In the bland sweep
of the first view of it all. Then, if you keep looking,

316
 they will reconcile into view till before you stands the glory of the ‘Beads
of Satan’, the very cradle and clothing of our atomic being: the stars.
Boiling, burning, baking cauldrons of plasma and gas in unimaginable
enforcedness and tension. The soup of our atomic nature whirling its
blazing eddies of ‘star-stuff into the further forms of you and me, us and
them.
We all began there. Or that is what science claims. My claim in this book
is that we all ended there. We all ended there to begin again. At least in a
beginning of sorts. A beginning in Hell.
The clues to our predicament are there, in the stars, for all to see. They
began as we began, in terrifying force, and will end as we will end, in
terrifying force. Not for us the eternal peace of angels while we persist in
this Universe. Their world is the Multiverse beyond Force and thus atoms,
infinite and forceless. Ours is the world of the finite, the captured and the
set. The world of separated points in point resource twisted in formats of
chaos we call Space and Time. Yet still dressed in the twisted breath of God
— its windsong. A melody that still allows freedom of Will and purpose to
search through reason for the meaning of it all.
I hope this all doesn’t seem like a church sermon. It’s not meant to be.
It’s meant to define the hard edges of ‘unreason’ where poetry can still find
root in Chaos and a symphony still seems to transcend the bounds of the
Second Law of Thermodynamics. The devil of it all is, why?
Let me explain. If you look at all solid space bodies you will see the tell-
tale marks of the great fault that defines our Universe — chaotic
transformation through impact. The collision marks of the seething mass of
space bodies. The pockmarks of Chaos. The Moon’s surface is a great
swathe of pits and craters that tell the tale of the ballistics of doom. The
doom of us all as a species, perhaps. Visible affirmation of the modus that
underpins the root nature of our Universe — all-pervasive explosive
violence. The spit of Entropy, if you like. But it is more than that. Much
more. It drives into those of us-with searching, seeking minds these
questions: Why is there Awareness, Knowing and Mind in the Universe at
all? Where did it come from and why? How and why did and does it prevail
if we are here to die in a seemingly meaningless chaotic Armageddon of
forces and violence?
Impact craters are now the most prominent geophysical features
 317

on solid objects in the solar system and perhaps in all the Universe. There
are tens of thousands of craters on the Moon alone. Over 6000 of them are
estimated to be hits from space bodies of a size of half a kilometre or more.
It used to be thought that most or all of these craters on the Moon were
volcanic in origin. The reason was that meteors, comets and asteroids
hitting the Moon would have left their evidence of impact in many
elongated craters and shapes, not the predominantly circular ones that are
seen on our natural satellite. This is because most of them would have
approached the Moon at non-perpendicular angles. The vast majority of the
craters are indeed circular. It was only when it was realized that a huge
explosion would result when the missile hit and that this explosion would
leave a residual circular format of impact on the surface of a hard body that
scientists began to accept that the craters on the Moon are a visual history
of constant bombardment.
Now, can you imagine the number of significant impacts that would have
taken place on a body six times the size of the Moon, namely our Earth? At
a conservative estimate one could say that at least 30,000 collisions with
space bodies of half a kilometre or more in size would have taken place in
the last 200 million years.
Scientists have worked out that, all present things considered, a single
hard-bodied rocky asteroid the diameter of one cubic kilometre crashing
into the Earth would probably wipe out all intelligent life on this planet.
Their present sweeps of the heavens are throwing up such startling
discoveries in terms of numbers of these things crossing Earth’s orbit as to
affirm a horrifying story of the danger we are all in. So where are all these
craters on the Earth and why have we found so few?
The collisions of galaxies, star bodies and planets and the consequences
of such impacts, the comets, asteroids and meteors, are themselves the
mechanism that provides the ‘Great Erasers’ of the Universe. I am
convinced that they have on their own been the most awesome destroyers
and changers of both the dead and the living features of the Earth during the
planet’s entire history. It is very likely that the impact of these space bodies
and their horrendous consequences have meant that no civilizations can
endure on the Earth for longer than an average of perhaps eight thousand
years. We are almost at the threshold of this average number now and one
giant asteroid called Toutatis is on its way

318

in 1999, to keep an appointment with the Earth that may well involve a
‘handshake’ of the most catastrophic proportions.
We all know now that a single asteroid of about ten cubic kilometres in
size striking the Earth sixty-eight million years ago wiped out all the
dinosaurs and nearly sixty per cent of life on Earth. Why, then, arc these
impacts so deadly and so dangerous? After all, the circumference of the
Earth is huge. It is 43,000 kilometres and one would expect, on the face of
it, that a ten-cubic-kilometre-sized pebble from space would be as an
insignificant thimbleful in an ocean’s expanse. The clue that it is not is, in
fact, inferred by the ocean. These meteorites travel at such velocities that if
they impact the Earth in water the resulting tsunami or tidal wave that will
hit all the ocean boundaries of a given expanse of water may easily be as
high as eight kms. If you remember that Mt Everest is the highest point on
Earth and is about nine km high, it is easy to see why no evidence of coastal
civilizations surviving for very long exists. When the immediate tidal wave
has done its job and cleaned all signs of life away for tens, maybe hundreds
of miles from a coast, the huge explosion detritus and quantities of
sulphurated water going up into the atmosphere and then falling in massive
quantities of battery-acid-strength rain will lay waste to vast areas of life
and vegetation.
Let me quote a harrowing commentary from Gerrit Verschuur’s excellent
book on the threat of comets and asteroids entitled Impact:3
‘You are there and you have been observing an odd phenomenon in the
sky … On this day you watch the increasing fireball activity and the
enormous fan of light that is the comet’s tail. It seems to be growing larger.
It is so bright and so close that it is visible by day and by night. As you stare
you notice something odd. If you look very closely, it is almost as if you
can see a small dark spot in the comet’s nucleus and it seems to be growing
larger. As startled as any creatures around you, your instincts tell you that
there is something very wrong. Animals howl and seek shelter.
 … A thousand miles to the south… the approaching comet looms. You
are there. You arch your arm above your head to shield your eyes from the
sun’s glare. When you first noticed it the object was a little larger than the
moon but it is growing in size. Thirty seconds tick by and the looming mass
seems to be

319

about three times the Moon’s diameter. Ten seconds pass, fifteen, then
twenty. You reach out your arm as if to shield yourself and your hand can
barely hide the object from view. Five more seconds and you feel
suspended in time watching the onrushing monster in slow motion. You
crouch in terror, two hands outstretched, barely able to cover the apparition
as it begins to glow fiery red. Within a second it bursts into incandescent
fury and its glare fills half the sky with flaming light as hot as the sun. The
sea begins to boil as the object passes into and through the atmosphere,
puncturing a hole its own width, and smashes into the sea, gouging a hole
kilometres deep beneath the sea floor.’
It is outside the immediate scope of this book to mark down all the
details of space-body impacts and their dangers to our planet. The above
quoted author does a marvellous job in spelling out the huge danger and
significance of these objects in his book. It is a truly chilling story and well
worth a read.
There is no doubt whatsoever that our world has its existential priorities
written on its rear. Catastrophe Theory, for so long ridiculed by scientists, is
now proving to be one of the most significant premises accounting for
geological change on this planet. It may almost be said that if scientists
ridicule a theory or insight you can count on it being proved right in the not
too distant future. Like moles they blunder through the darkness of
ignorance staring only at the space immediately before their eyes. It
sometimes takes a bulldozer working above their heads to reveal the
significance of the sky and their tunnel vision and the stupidity of their
narrow and prejudiced views. There are, of course, great exceptions, open-
minded visionaries who are also scientists. Alas, it is the rare exception.
The vast majority of scientists are of the mundane mole type.
 A poignant example of the relevant scientific establishment’s disgraceful
mental impotence, importunity and cussedness was exposed in the case of
the K/T Impact boundary controversy. This is the event described so vividly
above by Verschuur, the one that accounted for the demise of the dinosaurs
on Earth.
In 1979, the Nobel Laureate Luis Alvarez, an eminent physical chemist,
and his team discovered a layer of iridium at a geological deposition
boundary line (to he later called the K/T boundary

320

line) commensurate on a time scale with the disappearance of the

dinosaurs. Iridium has an affinity for iron and should long since have
disappeared from the Earth’s crust and found its way to the Earth’s iron core
when the Earth was still molten and young. Any iridium found now would
have had to have come from space. This led to the conclusion by Alvarez
that the iridium would have had to be brought here by an asteroid that
crashed into the Earth at about the time of the disappearance of the
dinosaurs. The theory seemed to verify prophetic claims made by pseudo-
scientists and mystics that a catastrophic impact with a thunderbolt from
space destroyed the creatures. The world’s scientific Mafiosi went straight
into action and not only gave it scant regard but ridiculed the distinguished
Nobel Laureate’s theory for years. In time the iridium deposition was found
worldwide, marking. it as a real and substantiated phenomenon pointing to
a globally significant impact cataclysm.
In 1981 the results of years of undersea exploration and geomagnetic
surveys of the Gulf of Mexico area found the smoking gun to be a crater
over 100 kilometres wide in the Yucatan peninsula of Mexico, age-dated to
correspond to the age of the K/T boundary deposition of iridium
approximately sixty-five million years ago.
There is little doubt, now that the whole thing has been put together, that
Luis Alvarez has been totally vindicated. Needless to say, few apologies
were forthcoming from his peers for the disgraceful way some of them
treated the great man for daring to propose such a theory.
I am really not trying to vilify science and scientists. I have the deepest
reverence and respect for them. I would be flying in the face of my own
appeal for the rational analysis of all the evidence of an alien presence
amongst us if we were to put all our ‘belief eggs’ in a basket of mere
speculation and condemn all these doyens of intelligence and reason out of
hand. There is, however, an irrational and sometimes arrogant consensus on
the part of many scientists against being open-minded. You can’t stop a ten-
kilometre piece of rock hitting our planet and wiping us all out if you
procrastinate with closed minds and dismiss ideas as preposterous, as many
palaeontologists did, for instance, with Alvarez’s postulation. They were
blindly following what text books had previously taught palaeontologists:
that the bombardment of the

321

Earth had only happened when the Earth was young and forming. If you
always took your books as gospel, you would never look up at the sky or
down at your feet.
And so the vast areas of water that cover our planet and the huge tidal-
wave action that is set up after space-body collisions with the Earth
conspire between them to erase or hide the vast majority of ‘smoking gun’
evidence that points to impact phenomena being a hugely relevant
geophysical phenomenon in shaping both the Earth and what lies and lives
on it.
In 1995 it was estimated by Sky Watch scientists all over the world that
in excess of 10,000 bodies of half a kilometre in size with Earth-crossing
orbits exist, each one capable of taking out civilization at a stroke if it hit
the Earth on land or sea. When all the latest available figures are
extrapolated as to the likelihood of impact with an Earth-orbit-crossing
body of significant size, it all converts to a civilization-destroying Tsunami
every five thousand years.
This, then, may well be one of the main reasons if not the main reason
why there is no evidence of the prior ‘God-men’ phenomenon that marks
the devolution thesis of all living species I have proposed. The Great
Erasers could have easily wiped away all evidence for it time and time
again.
We, of course, all know that there is a kind of industry of doom and
catastrophe theory touted from soap box, pulpit and the institutions for the
mentally insane since time immemorial. The trouble is that every self-
seeking scoundrel, charlatan and pretender to religious thrones has
throughout history used fear to muster and marshal support from the
gullible. Science and scientists have, by and large, stood as our guardians of
good sense and balanced, ordered summary as we make our way through
the darkness of ignorance. But the human mind has a tendency to excess
and it is easy to dismiss anything on the basis that it has proved to be so too
many times in the past. The boy did cry ‘Wolf too often, but the wolf did
come. We can never, it seems to me, afford to close our minds to anything,
anytime, anywhere. Mountains in the sky cannot make choices. We can.
Might it not be better that the end comes for us all while we still may
wonder about love? The Masters that could truly love came and we bent
and bludgeoned their glorious sacrifice with crosses of dogwood and
stabbing nails, knives and javelins. They slipped

322

on the spit of our ignorance and rejection. We laughed at their bended

knees and bleeding foreheads and resumed our stance in Hell none the
wiser. We shall welcome the demon a-, we crucified the lamb.

And so, indeed, before the alien experiment has done with our species, will a passing comet crash
into the Earth to close again the pages of human history? A celestial eraser that will come in the
silence of a tomb and cast all our glories and wretchedness into lines of dust that will curve with
colours of the Earth to write the epitaph of our species with the salutation ‘Once upon a time’. Will
then some new form, perhaps with green hair and yellow eyes, speak the words ‘Alas poor Yorick’ to
the broken shape of our yesterdays in his hands? Another souvenir with a billion memories locked
tight in the sands of time. It will be smiling with the smile of the dead.

1
‘Go On, Read My Mind’: New Scientist 16-12-95
2
Mack, John E.: Abduction (pp 360-361) (Simon & Schuster, 1994)
3
Verschuur, Gerrit: Impact (Oxford University Press, 1996)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-SIX:
THE ALIEN TRUMP CARD: RACIALISM

The spirit sense, or what could be described as the innate sense for the
world beyond the atom and the margins of force, may still have been
retained by our most ancient ancestors with mechanisms such as telepathy.
There would he no need for language if this were so. The invention of
‘language’ may well have signalled a point of nadir in the so-called
‘development’ of man, and not the point of ascent that it is commonly taken
to be. An artificial point-by-point substitute for the natural holistic language
of the Soul through its still relatively strong connection to Godhead.
The Australian aborigine still shows these marvellous values and
attributes and is looked on as primitive and pilloried as such by his
grotesque Occidental plastic modern counterpart in his machine-minded
splendour of polished stones and engine oil. These Aborigines, as with
many others of the less intercepted genotypes of man in other parts of the
world, have been systematically exterminated by the Grey’s Cro-Magnon
legacy among us, those who are commonly called the white Caucasoids.
Seen as antediluvian savages in jail after jail in Australia, the beautiful,
gentle aboriginal people have been murdered and forced to commit suicide
time after time by the partisans of the machine mind in the name of
civilization.
This is an extract from an interview I had some years ago, when I was a
medical student, with a white Australian police officer working for the
Queensland force. He was on holiday in London

324

and I interviewed him about racism in Australia for a university student

publication.
‘All it takes is just the merest sight of them … The sight of the bastard’s
black spindly body. Neanderthal … features. You don’t think of them as
human … it’s an instant thing … A mixture of fear … anger … you know,
mixed with aggression, I suppose. It kind of wells up from deep inside …
You get this … this … urge to threaten … to hurt … to punish … It comes
at you from nowhere … The mere fact that … he’s different … they are
different … I suppose. They’ve never done anything to me … personally …
I mean … You know it is all … outside reason. All outside … sense …
control You know you have to be in control … but you don’t care … All
you see is that he’s different … not like you … your people. You want him
to disappear. He doesn’t matter. He’s just a piece of… shit … grotesque
flesh. He doesn’t belong. You are looking for the merest excuse to make the
bastard … disappear. He speaks. He says, “I’ve done nothing, man”. It’s
enough … He dared to talk to you. You bring your stick crashing down on
the side of his face … He falls to the ground. You like it. He is not with you
for a moment. You’re relieved … He’s not so near you any more. You turn
away. Trying desperately to stop yourself … You tell yourself you’re a
policeman … It doesn’t work, mate … nothing works … He grunts and
moves on the ground, recovering his consciousness. He whimpers and
clutches at his face. Shame grips you now. Then anger. I suppose you are
really angry at the fact that he existed at all, and that fact has brought this
ugliness out in you. It’s mad, I know. You put him away as quickly as you
can. You can’t face him anymore. Now there’s … well … shame there …
and that is to do with you, mate … He has to go away. He has to disappear.
You pick him up. You kick him because he dared to be there and make you
ashamed. You throw him into the back of the car and close the door. You
have to shut him out. Its instant. It’s mad … Am I mad? … I think
somewhere inside we are all fuckin’ mad … You … you know what … I
think they are far better than us … I mean you and me, mate … Er, the
whites, I mean … I think … I really think that’s what it is … Mad … mate
… It’s fuckin’ mad …’
I wonder how many million times this Australian officer’s sentiments can
resonate within the minds of racists, murderers

325

and torturers the world over. Is it likely that the seed of the Grey incubi
that have intercepted the lines of humanity are strongly aspected within the
bioscope of people such as this? It would explain the irrationality of it all.
Could the racist and the xenophobe be running a programme inherently
in the genes? Are there measures written in our genes that make some of us
helpless automatons working to the mandates of celestial interlopers? It is
likely, of course, that there would be some genetic ancestral lines that hold
the alien recipe more strongly and more cogently than others. If this is true,
then the racists and the xenophobes are the most lethal types of human
beings on the earth. They should carry a worldwide public health-warning
notice around their necks. I for one would not harm a hair on their heads. I
would however, avoid their company as though they were carriers of the
deadliest plague, no matter how close they were, even in terms of biological
family ties.
Brothers and sisters might share the same parental biology. They will not
and cannot, however, share the same Soul connection line back to Godhead.
This is affirmed by this simple fact. The germ cells of our parents are made
from the biological prospectus of the same individuals. One would expect
every child to be exactly the same because your mother and father are the
same biological identities when they make each subsequent child. Why,
then, is there such difference between brothers and sisters? Why is each
sperm and ovum different? We get identical twins, of course, but that is
understandable because a single sperm fertilizes a single egg and the cell
mass divides into two identical halves at oogenesis and two identical fetuses
develop. But why aren’t all children from the same parents identical when
made by different sperms? They are, after all, the same parents and you
would expect their gametes to be the whole summary of each parent in the
form of a biological code. Why, then, is there any difference between
gametes, unless the gametes of the males in the world provide enough
permutations to match exactly each differing ‘soul field’ ready to
reincarnate into the world? In other words, could we males be carrying the
formula, or potential bodies, for each and every soul that can be reborn at
any one time? There’s a thought! It would thus suggest that every male in
the world has a stock of differing gametes all able to admit into life the soul
of a particular African bushman, perhaps, who

326

might have died yesterday! Preposterous? I still back my hunch that this
is true. I believe that we truly are our brother’s keeper.
We are joined at the elbows of all endeavour, each and every one. If we
all originated in Godhead, then there must be a mechanism that reflects this.
I believe there is such a mechanism and the clue to it and perhaps the proof
of it lies in the fact that the same parents produce children who are very
different from one another.
The female of our species has all the stock of eggs she is going to
produce in a lifetime when she is born. Every healthy woman can count on
producing about four hundred eggs in the course of her reproductive
lifetime. The She of the species thus produces the neutral living format on
which the specifics are written. But the male produces hundreds of millions
of sperm every time he ejaculates. Biologists will account for the profligate
number as the way the species ensures fertilization against all the
impediments the sperm has to encounter before it meets its complementary
half, namely the ovum. In other words, it needs millions of sperm to ensure
that one gets through to fertilize the egg. I believe this is an utterly facile
assertion.
If you look at the way nature works, its assemblies always have the most
wondrous economy and ergonomy to them. Everything seems to be
arranged for maximum utility and efficiency of function, until of course
entropy raises its ugly head and goes to work on them. Why, then, is the
most important process of all, the reproductive process, such an inefficient
chaotic amelioration? The Russian roulette of conception that the biologists
would have us believe. I believe it is not inefficient. It is as efficient as
possible if you take into account the fact that it has a built-in mechanism to
cater for such metaphysical ideas as Karma, soul-fields and all the other
artefacts of the other half of physical life: Death.
Of course, an assertion of this sort is designed to make every arrogant
mechanistically minded scientist gnaw at his trouser leg in rage. I don’t
think we ought to worry too much about their tailor’s bills. Science and
scientists are always only temporarily right and as history proves, in the end
often wrong. Isaac Newton’s mechanistic universe, for so long the holy of
holies of scientific thinking, has been substantially holed and almost sunk
with the ideas and proofs that Einstein and Dirac, through Relativity theory
and Quantum theory, have come up with. The truth is much bigger

327
 and more significant than the temporal explanations the explorers of the
lines of break-up of the universe come up with from time to time. Spiritual
insight is far more likely to bear testament to eternal truth than they are.
The postulation that Life arises out of the enforced centre of the atom and
Death is the centre of the space between atoms is an absolute truth not open
to negotiation. The soul, if ‘unenlighted’, will linger in less enforced ‘Fields
of Death’ that lie in the corridors between atomic and molecular arrays and
return to form a body on the sperm that bears its unique resonance
frequency. In other words, if any one of us dies and our soul enters the
space between atoms, we will currently theoretically have approximately
two billion chances of coming back into life again to expedite our debts to
others in a physical format. Put another way, every male with the capacity
to produce children living on the Earth today (about two billion individuals)
will hold one of these chances on behalf of all the members of the human
race whose souls still linger in the ‘fields of death’. It begins to become
plain what a horrendous thing abortion is, if all this is true.
How, then, will each living male get the information that marks a sperm
with the name of every person that dies? What is the mechanism that can
communicate a connection between two separated — individualities, now
separated by Death? The whole wonderful thing, if true, might prove that
individuals are not separated by death. The space between atoms exists in
life and physicality and death through the same corridors between atoms.
We are all connected through the corridors that mark the spaces between
atoms. Life and Death are interwoven into and betwixt us all. It is why
Christ claimed that the kingdom of heaven is within you.
What a marvellous thought that each male (and I don’t mean this in any
chauvinistic sense at all) of the species carries on him the ‘prints’ of all the
other identities that await admission in Karma, to life. There is no gender in
death. Gender simply marks a particularized format for the cultivation of
‘knowing’. The two final polarization points through which the separation
of parts may be reconciled as the Whole.
Of course, Karma need not be expedited and debts owed paid back in a
physical format alone. I think we have to remember

328
 that ‘debt’ in this sense is paid when the debtor gives back to the
indebted that value of loss taken away by some action that would have
otherwise allowed the indebted to return to Godhead. Lies, falsehoods,
murder, theft, false witness, or any other negative impulsion provides a
vector for further separation from Godhead. This has to be restored
‘personally’ to the individual soul-field concerned. This, of course, can be
done through the giving of knowledge or understanding to the soul
concerned through one-to-one tutorial. In other words, the dead can
communicate with the dead as easily as the living can with the living. If the
two individuals with an obligation in Karma are both in the space between
atoms, a resolution of that obligation is possible. It is only when
communication between the living and the dead has to take place for the
revocation of karmic obligation that the problem arises. The souls have to
be able to do this. There has to be a way through to each other that allows
for each to learn from each other that which enlightens and gives effect to a
reconciliation of the loss that has caused the debt or obligation. Each
individual identity has to be able to communicate with the other and know
through verification that they are doing so, such that each registers the
compensation and each is liberated to move the lost distance to Godhead
that caused the debt in the first place. It is not only the expurgation of
Karma that is important, it is the notification of this recompense that is even
more Vital. Each debt is specifically coded with the signature of the
‘debtor’ to the ‘indebted’ at the moment it is incurred. All moments in time
are unique unto themselves and all that happens at any specific moment is
coded, so to speak, with a tag of this uniqueness. While the basic principle
underlying any karmic debt may be common, the will underlying the
actioning of that principle is unique to the personage. Each individual is
also unique. Thus the two things are joined at the hip, so to speak, in their
distinctiveness and have to be accessed, and can only be accessed, by all the
elements that made that karmic obligation in the first place. It requires the
‘key’ and the elements that made up that key of that specific moment acting
in concert to function together. And so the living elements that possess the
memory of that moment have to be able to get together in some way, in
recognition of the amelioration of the Karmic deficit.
It is a terrifying thought that Karma is eternal in its quest, as it
 329

were. That it does not end in terms of its individual encumbrance if, say,
a whole species is wiped out on a planet, if you get my meaning. If you
incur a Karmic debt to an individual who subsequently becomes a monkey
and you yourself retain your humanity, do you have to become a monkey in
order to expurgate this debt? I am sure the reader will be able to extrapolate
logically what the answer to this quandary entails.
Karma is the most serious business the Soul can undertake. It underlies, I
believe, all Universal momentums.
If we all were a Jesus Christ with his fabulous understanding of
existential truth, we would never incur karma in the first place. We would
know enough of the consequence never to do this most lethal of things.
How many of us believe in ghosts, for instance? How many of us ridicule
those who believe in ghosts? How many of us believe in life after death as a
principle? Do you see what I am trying to get at? For some among us who
can dip into the space between atoms (perhaps mediums, clairvoyants, etc.)
inter-medium conversation and exchange may be possible from Life-field to
Death-field. For most of us the means of revocation of debt lies through the
potentially lethal mechanism of reincarnation. It is the only means for some
of getting to the individual (in a like frame) we have the Karma with to
make restitution and compensation. This subject would take a library of
many volumes to tackle adequately, and so I will leave it at this point.
So, to change tack for a moment, I would like to ask an interesting
question based upon the implications of some of the points which I have
addressed in this chapter: Since the first ‘African Eves’ (the first
announcements of our species Homo Sapiens Sapiens), the human
population has, of course, increased dramatically in size. Does this mean
that the number of souls incarnating into our species line has been
increasing quantumly? If so, where does this ready supply of soul come
from?
If we are, in fact, a species devolving into states of greater and greater
restriction of the scope to know, understand and freely choose, then the very
need to reincarnate into physical life would be a result of that devolution.
We, in our free will, pull our line of connection back to God further and
further away from that polarity of union into states of greater separation,
tension and
 330

enforcedness. There must be a certain threshold of tension that

necessitates incarnation into a physical form.
Soul lines of connection can be viewed as ‘elastics’ that are pulled tighter
and tighter the more a soul becomes entrapped in the Universe of Parts. The
‘fields of death’ have a certain ambient tension and, if the elastic of a soul
line is as tense or less tense than that ambient tension, then that soul need
not incarnate into physical life to free itself and resolve its Karma. Unless,
of course, it has karmic obligation to other souls who are obliged to
incarnate physically. If the elastic tension of a soul line is greater than that
which naturally prevails in the fields of death then the context of physical
life is the only context that can provide that soul with an opportunity to
reconcile the heavier Karmic debts that maintain it in the ‘tense’ state that it
is in.
It should be pointed out that ‘death’ is not ‘outside’ the atomic universe.
It is a far less intrinsically enforced state within the purview of atoms than
‘life’. Let me try an illustration on you. The mode of existence in the fields
of death can be likened to walking freely along a path so that only the air
you move through provides a resistance to your movement. Whereas the
mode of existence in the fields of life can be better likened to walking
through water that is waist deep. When you walk through the water the
resistance it provides to your movement forces you to work harder to move
through it. It is that extra effort to fight against the greater ambient tension
of the fields of life that provides the ‘anti-force’ necessary to lessen the
tension of the elastic. If the water is flowing in a particular direction and
that direction is that of the entropic drift, then if you walk in the other
direction the water you push in front of you as you struggle forward
provides that ‘anti-force’. In the fields of death you are only pushing air in
front of you which does not provide such a powerful anti-entropic surge.
So the increase in the numbers of human souls incarnating into the fields
of life on this planet might well be a direct result of the increasing elastic
tension of human soul lines prevailing within an entropic environment.
Perhaps as far back as the point of the ‘African Eve’ when human
populations were far smaller, the majority of souls were able to reconcile
their Karma in the fields of death. However, as entropy took its course and
human souls

331

succumbed to it, there would have been a tendency for souls in the fields
of life to accumulate more karma rather than expedite existing karma. Souls
in the fields of death who had karmic connections to these souls in the
fields of life would be pulled implicitly towards those souls in order to fulfil
that karma; in some cases they could be pulled into the fields of life
themselves. Thus there would be a vanguard of souls leading the way for
the human species line into entropic dismemberment, pulling the others
connected to them down with them. These in their turn would pull down
those connected to them, and so on, until the whole species line is pulled
down further and further into greater and greater states of tension. Souls
that might otherwise have been able to reconcile karma in the fields of
death are thus forced into the fields of life with all the risks that that
involves because they are pulled there by souls to whom they are
karmically connected. Hence the constant increase in the human population
on this planet. God’s instruction to Adam to ‘Go forth and multiply’ thus
takes on a new meaning. The greater the multiplication the more it is a sign
that the species is being pulled, in general, on an entropic course.
It is essential to realize that we are not alone in this universe as a species.
I have written this book to try to expose a rather unwelcome lot that have
come from elsewhere to our patch in the whole shooting match. There are
probably hundreds of millions of other planets with life on them. All souls
everywhere are just connection mechanisms to God and thus have recourse
to each other everywhere. This may well explain why a child is born
crippled at birth for no apparent reason other than the seeming lottery of
fate. It may simply have previously been of some other life form and was
not able to make the requisite body suitable for this planet at the first try.
What I am trying to say is that there is an inexhaustible fund of souls drawn
from all over the universe that may reincarnate at any point in the universe
anywhere — drawn by the inexorable winds of Karma to that point and
place.
 So, the greater the population of the world the greater the implication that
more souls need to reincarnate in order to fulfil karma. The sperm count of
the first Homo Sapiens Sapiens expressions may well have not been too
dissimilar from that today. This is because that count is a measure of the
number of souls in death’s fields which could in potential incarnate into

332

life. However, the extent to which that potential number becomes an

actual number reflects, in some measure, the overall demise of the species,
be it through individual culpability or incidental effect through the
culpability of others.
Thus there may well now be a great demand from those in the fields of
death for reincarnation into the fields of life. If, through such factors as
abortion and the use of contraceptives, the necessary amount of doorways
into life are not provided, problems can arise. A bottleneck of souls
attempting to enter into the fields of life, but unable to do so, could build
up. If the soul line of connection provides for a vacuum of no-force within
an overall environment of force, then those souls with the biggest vacuum,
the more ‘enlighted’ souls, would be best able to command their enforced
environment to their advantage.
The whole Universe is a gigantic paradigm of Force. Every point in it is
unstill. It shakes with a locked-in tension. The more the locked-in tension,
the more each point of it shakes or vibrates.
Let me ask you at this point what your concept of the word ‘Force’ is.
How do you personally envisage the idea of ‘enforcedness’, if I may put it
that way? Does, for instance, a tightly clenched fist shivering with tension,
power, effort, convey an image of force to you? The dictionary defines
‘Force’ as strength, or energy, or power. The science of physics defines
force as a dynamic influence that changes a body from a state of rest to one
of motion, or changes its rate or direction of motion, thereby changing its
momentum.
The trouble with the definition of force as explained by physicists is that
it never really tells us what force is, it only describes what it does.
So what actually is force? Summarizing the above it would seem that it is
quite simply put in everyday terms as: ‘that which makes anything happen’
where ‘happening’ implies a change (or an apparent change) in the status
quo of a situation.
What, though, is generating this effect. we call force? From where or
from what does it derive its power and how does this abstract property
make anything at all happen such that we can actually see its effects?
Let’s set about answering these questions by looking a bit further into
what science tells us about force … As far as current scientific knowledge
goes, all force in the

333

universe exists in one of four categories. These are Gravitation,

Electromagnetism and two types of Nuclear force, one of which holds the
core (or ‘Nucleus’) of atoms together and another which is responsible for
nuclear breakdown and radioactivity. So we can then envisage the scientific
world view as of a sea of ‘bodies’ or matter being buffeted this way and that
by the forces between them. Or can we?
There are no material ‘ingredients’ floating in the sea other than the sea
itself! Or, to put it another way: our bodies, the planet we live on and the
stars in the sky are all simply shaped patterns of force of diverse textures
and tones. The chairs that we sit on may seem real as objects or ‘particles’
in their own right, but when we analyze our experience of the physical
world we soon come to the conclusion that all we are really detecting is the
product and property of these forces. Our sensation of our weight on the
chair is made both by the spatial tension we call gravity between our bodies
and the Earth below us and by the electric potentials that maintain
separation at the molecular level (our backsides do not [usually] merge with
the chair). The atomic elements that make up the chair are formed out of
and maintained by the nuclear forces, etc.
Wait! Aren’t we missing something …? If force is all there is and force is
both the cause of all that happens and is all that happens then it might prove
interesting for the reader to speculate on what all this happening is
happening to, how did it begin and where and when is it happening if space
and time are themselves simply artefacts of force?
Of course, ‘force’ can’t be all there is in any self-consistent or reasonable
model of the world. At this point the reader may find it worthwhile to stop
and ponder a while as to what the nature might be of anything that is totally
without force, an effect which I will call (again for want of a better word)
‘non-force,’ although a better word might have been ‘un-enforcedness’. I
believe that through an insight into what may well be not of or subject to
force we can arrive at a fascinating suggestion about what force may really
be and how it and its space-time arena can exist.
The vacuum of Godhead is like a pen of no-force that can write upon the
tablet of force. Thus it would be these more enlighted souls who would
have the best potential to achieve the passage from death to life. The less
enlighted ones would be more likely

334

to be held in the bottleneck, unable to gain entry into the fields of life to
fulfil their karma. Perhaps the desperate need of these souls to enter into life
results in what is commonly termed ‘possession’, the attachment of a soul
in the fields of death to a soul in the fields of life. An attachment which
occurs without the tacit invitation of the soul who becomes possessed. Thus
it is an expression of imposition and, therefore, of force.
Possession thus occurs through the mechanisms that allow for such a
forced effect. High magnetic fields, for example, could make body-aerial
more susceptible to attachment by souls seeking to possess it.
Our body-aerials are, as I have previously explained, receivers or the
‘light’ of connection to God. This is the strangest light of . It has no
frequency of oscillation, direction of oscillation, or wavelength. In other
words it is utterly unenforced and totally peaceful ‘light’. Let me call it
‘Enlight.’
Enlight is received differently by each body-aerial according to how that
aerial is tuned. The light is just a manifestation of pure knowledge. All that
is known and can be known in a quantum. The specific tuning of the aerial
is a result of an individual’s own specific pattern of restriction and this
allows that individual to receive only that quantum of God-light that it will
allow. See the individual that is ‘enlighted’ as one whose lens is plain flat
glass and those that are restricted and thus sinful as variously shaped prisms
that split the quantum into parts that are difficult to put back together gain.
Restriction (sin) provides blocks on the total emanation of Godlight such
that not all of it can be received. This, shall we say has the effect of tuning
the aerial to receive enforced light of the electromagnetic wavebands that
are not of Godlight, but instead are transmitted by the force artefacts of the
atomic universe: the reception of these frequencies of force blocks, to the
extent of an individual’s restriction, his reception of Godlight. These
physically derived frequencies are transmitted more powerfully in
environments of high magnetic fields, for example. Thus high magnetic
fields, for instance, can tune the body’s blood and bone aerial further away
from Godlight than it might naturally be.
Roger Bacon, the eminent scientist, philosopher and thirteenthcentury
Franciscan monk, postulated a beautiful paradigm on what religious
terminology calls grace. Bacon saw grace as a kind of

335

polarized ‘light’ with the recipient providing the modus and phase for its
reception and use. The straighter we are the better it works.
So the holistic emanation of Godlight is available for reception and our
aerials can receive it in its pure uninterrupted form, or in the form it takes
when it is defracted into the various potentialities of the universe of parts.
Soul field which seeks to possess is an individual expression of Godlight set
in a particularly defracted and incoherent state. It is really the contour of the
individual’s pattern of restriction, a schematic of his or her sinfulness.
Perhaps we are all simply like lines, route lines on a map coming out of
Godhead. See these lines as tubes. The straighter they are the more
powerfully Godlight shines through. Bend them, twist them into dog-legged
complications and we are no longer able to allow Godlight to shine through
to light our way back. The Universe of entropic force is in the business of
bending these ‘lines’ if we let it, and it is only our reach to constantly add,
unite, bring things together, to bind, through offertory kindness, warmth,
fellowship, and all other positive acts that allows the lines to get soft, pliant,
less substantial and thus resist and keep force from having an effect on them
such that it will bend them. Entropy’s negative effect is registered just as
much by what you don’t do as what you do.
So, when the body-aerial is subject to effects such as high magnetic fields
which increase its ambient state of tension it can become more tuned to
receive these defracted patterns of light than the more coherent patterns that
contain more of the frequencies of Godlight. Thus, for souls that seek after
possession as a means to contact those in life’s fields, high magnetic fields
are the medium through which they may force their entry.
High-value magnetic fields also provide the pathway for alien Clone
being to reach into our body aerials. To the same extent to which these high
force fields block our aerial reception of the light of God, they increase our
reception implicitly of signals that originate from the atomic universe — i.e.
those transmitted by the alien beings. However, their reach is not of course
anything to do with defractions of Godlight. Their reach is purely atomic,
they write upon magnetic fields in the same way as sound waves can
produce a recorded signal on a magnetic tape. More primitive soul field that
is unable to enter into the fields of life and is desperate

336

to do so thus reaches us through the same pathway as the alien beings.

Could it be that such soul field in fact provides a channel through which
these alien beings can reach more powerfully, a channel facilitated by the
‘no-forceness’ that characterizes the route all soul fields take in the spaces
between atoms? Could the pen of soul connection writing no-force upon a
tablet of force provide alien beings with the most powerful reach of all into
our body-aerials, if that pen itself writes the same messages of force and
imposition as the aliens themselves write?
If such is the case, then the greater the number of souls entrapped and
unable to reincarnate into life, the better it would be for the alien beings to
have the potential to reach into us and conduct their search for the enigma
of soul. Factors resulting in the limitation of doorways into the fields of life,
such as warfare, murder and abortion, would thus be advantageous to them
and may well be promoted and, through their hybrids and agents on this
earth, actually instigated by them.
Through the channel provided by growing numbers of trapped souls
desperately clawing at the doorways into life, the alien beings would be
able to reach more and more powerfully into those whose ‘enlight’ is
greater. Through possession itself and the alien interception that can ride on
it, the weaker souls in life’s fields can gradually be pulled into the same net
of entrapment. us the alien beings seem to be reeling in the lines of soul,
perhaps in the hope that at the ends of these lines they will find equivalent
of their Creator Beings who provided them with their initial spur into life.
Remember, in entropy their processes Clone regeneration are breaking
down. Thus they are looking for the same power that originally enlivened
them to regenerate them into their original status.
Professor David M. Jacobs in his book Secret Life, in which he
catalogues hundreds of alien abductions, offers a great deal of evidence to
suggest that alien beings are indeed desperately searching for an elusive
factor that they cannot seem to get to grips with or understand. A factor that
might enable them to gain a foothold into the human soul track through an
attempt to combine our track with theirs.
Jacobs identifies a common thread that appears to run through almost
every abduction report. This involves, for the female

337

abductees, the harvesting of ova, the implantation of embryos and the

subsequent extraction of the embryos. For the male abductees, these
procedures focus on the taking of sperm. After these procedures have been
carried out secondary procedures involve ‘the interaction between
abductees and what seems to be the product of the alien breeding
programme’. In these strange encounters the aliens carefully watch as
women, men and children are required either to observe or physically
interact with bizarre-looking ‘offspring’. The abductee is walked into a
room full of incubators and shown fifty to one hundred foetuses gestating in
a liquid solution in containers. The containers are attached to an apparatus
that seems to give them life support. Then the abductee might be led into a
nursery-like area containing as many as 100 babies. The babies are old
enough to live on their own but they ‘appear phlegmatic and sickly’. They
are often informed that some of the babies are biologically theirs.
Abductees are required to touch, hold or hug these offspring. ‘Apparently it
is absolutely essential for the child to have human contact’, says Jacobs,
‘although the aliens prefer that the humans give nurturing loving contact,
any physical contact seems to suffice … If the abductee resists she may be
given a reason to force her to hold the baby’.
 Jacobs observes that ‘abductees universally state that the baby does not
have the normal human reactions of a human infant. It is almost always
listless. It does not respond to touch as a normal baby would. It does not
squirm, it does not have a grasping reflex with its hands. It is lifeless, yet it
is not dead. Most women think there is something terribly wrong with the
baby. They feel that they must hold the baby to help it survive. After
holding the baby for a while, women report that the baby seems “better”. It
appears to have a bit more energy or to be thriving slightly’. The abductees
‘get the impression that they are part of an assembly-line process’. The
aliens ‘instruct newly pubescent girls that they should breed and mate as if
they were animals in a biological experiment’. Thus, concludes Jacobs, they
have no concept of humanity as anything other than a breeding machine.1
So, it seems that the alien beings, in their attempts to hybridize
themselves with human beings, are finding that there are certain elements
missing in the hybridization process. Without these elements the offspring
of the process cannot seem to survive

338

properly: they are sick and lifeless. The aliens must have realized that the
purely physical processes of uniting sperm and egg do not provide the
viable living state that they are so desperately searching for without certain
missing ingredients. Thus they are looking for the origin of these
ingredients in human physical contact. What they do not realize is that their
hybrid offspring cannot survive for very long because it does not have that
vital element — soul — to enable it to resist the entropic drift to which all
purely physical things are subject.
There is evidence to suggest that these reproductive procedures are
actually resulting in the production of foetuses that are later removed.
‘Missing Foetus Syndrome’ has happened to many abductees. These
women are confirmed as pregnant by doctors. If during the first trimester
they decide to terminate the pregnancy, the doctor discovers that there is no
foetus to abort. No miscarriage or extra-heavy bleeding or discharge occurs,
the foetus is simply gone. Jacobs says that this phenomenon has now
happened so often to claimants of alien abduction that it is now considered
one of the consistent features characterizing these abductions.
 In New Scientist of 7.10.95 there is a report of a remarkable phenomenon
which is dubbed by the author of the report: ‘The closest thing to a human
virgin birth that modern science has ever recorded’.2 A young boy has been
found whose body is derived in part from an unfertilized egg. The
geneticists first realized that the boy was unusual when they looked at his
white blood cells. Because he is a boy his cells should all have a Y
chromosome that contains all the genes for maleness. But his white blood
cells contain two X’s, the chromosomal signature of a female. The real
surprise came when the researchers discovered that the boy’s skin is
genetically different from his blood, with the skin containing the normal X
and Y chromosomes of a typical male. This prompted them to look more
closely at his X chromosomes. In a normal female each cell contains two
different X’s, one from the father and one from the mother. So was this the
pattern found in the boy’s blood, that of a normal female? No, it was not,
for all the X chromosomes in all the cells in his body were found to be
identical to each other and thus they originated only from his mother.
The only way in which the researchers could account for this was that the
boy’s development as an embryo must have started

339

when ‘an unfertilized egg self-activated and began to divide. A sperm

cell then fertilized one of the cells and the mixture of cells began to develop
as a normal embryo. This fusion with a sperm must have happened very
early on because self-activated eggs quickly lose the ability to be fertilized.
At some point the unfertilized cells must have duplicated their DNA
boosting their chromosome number back up to 46. Where the unfertilized
cells hit a developmental block, the researchers believe that the fertilized
cells compensated and filled in that tissue’. The report further states that the
boy’s case ‘demonstrates that whatever blocks there are to successful
human parthenogenesis, unfertilized cells are clearly not always disabled.
For example, these cells were able to create a seemingly normal blood
system for the boy’. Parthenogenesis is the development of an unfertilized
female sex cell without any male contribution. Sometimes an unfertilized
mammalian egg will begin dividing but this growth does not usually get far.
The self-activated ‘embryo’ will create rudimentary bone and nerve, but
there are some tissues that it cannot make, and this would normally prevent
further development. Yet experiments with mice have apparently shown
that parthenogenetic cells grow more slowly than normal cells and that the
two can co-exist in the same tissue.
You might recall from the discussion of trinucleotide repeat DNA in an
earlier chapter that these repeats which lead to certain kinds of genetically
inherited disease always seem to occur only at the point of the first few cell
divisions of the embryo. If these repeats are the result of alien interception
then perhaps they are a result of parthenogenetic elements that have been
inserted into the biological lines of man. Maybe in the past there have been
other people, perhaps similar to the boy mentioned in the report, who have
survived a parthenogenetic start in life. The children born of these people
and their children’s children might be those affected by trinucleotide repeat
DNA, which is a form of DNA that mimics cloning as it repeats itself again
and again. It may well be those parthenogenetic elements in any particular
biological line of descent that allow the aliens to reach with their tentacles
of doom into the biological aerials of those born into that line. Jacobs notes
that abduction, for example, seems to be a phenomenon that runs in the
family. A family history of abduction experiences is the norm for the
abductees on whom his research was done.

340

The seemingly incessant search for the crucial difference between human
beings and aliens is further illustrated in a different context by an account
set in the location of Bahia Blanca in Argentina. The account is given in
Jenny Randles’s book UFOs and How to See Them.3 It involves a retired
airline pilot. On 28 November 1972 a being with a blue suit materialized in
his armchair while he was watching TV and imitated everything he did
before declining a glass of water. Eventually the being went into the yard,
looked at the sky, pressed a few buttons on a belt and vanished. Several
similar cases to this have occurred around the world. If this account is
genuine, and there is no reason to believe that it is not, then it offers
irrefutable evidence that the alien beings are indeed studying humanity to
discover something about us that they, with all their technology, are unable
to pinpoint. They cannot find what they are looking for in the biological
make-up of human beings so they assume, as they only have physical
yardsticks by which to judge anything, that it must somehow originate from
the actions that human beings perform.
David Jacobs in his devastating book Secret Life refers to other
procedures used to investigate human capacities. One of these techniques he
refers to as ‘imaging’. This involves abductees being shown images on a
screen in front of them: some of these are frightening and disturbing (such
as scenes of war, atomic explosions and death) while others are sexually
charged (involving romantic fantasies, perhaps with a person to whom the
abductee is attracted). At other times the images are mundane and
commonplace, such as a scene of a pretty garden with a fountain or of
normal family life. While the ‘imaging’ goes on an alien being stands to the
side of the abductee and stares deeply into her eyes while the procedures are
in progress. ‘The aliens seem to want to analyze the emotional effects of
viewing the images’ says Jacobs, ‘the scenes themselves do not seem to
have any prescient or prophetic value.’
In conclusion to his book Jacobs asks the question, ‘What does the
abduction phenomenon mean?’ This is his answer:
‘We have been invaded. It is not an occupation, but it is an invasion. At
present we can do little or nothing to stop it. The aliens have powers and
technology greatly in advance of ours, and that puts us at a tremendous
disadvantage in our ability to

341

affect the phenomenon or gain some control over it. We do not know
what is going to happen in the future, just as we do not know what the
aliens’ ultimate purposes are. We do know that the effect on abductees’
lives can be devastating. The net effect of the abduction phenomenon on
our society and culture at large could very well be the same over a long
period of time.
‘Contact between the races is not taking place in a scenario that has been
envisioned by scientists and science fiction writers: two independent worlds
making careful overtures for equal and mutual benefit. Rather, it is
completely one-sided. Instead of equal benefit, we see a disturbing
programme of apparent exploitation of one species by another. How it
began is unknown. How it will end is unknown. But we must face the
abduction phenomenon squarely and begin to think rationally about what to
do about it.’4
In looking for the whys and the wherefores of all of this I am convinced
that this deadly alien ‘interception’ that is happening right now in our back
yard, to a largely unsuspecting world, may have a fascinating purpose. The
clue may lie in man’s inhumanity to man through the centuries. Pogroms
that lead to genocide are practised by and large on the less intercepted and,
in most instances, unintercepted lines of hominids. By instigating this,
could it be that the aliens are seeking to direct in some way the
transmigrating souls to parents of intercepted genotypes that have their (the
aliens’) biological ‘microchips’ in the genetic ancestral lines, so that they
could monitor the whole process and phenomenon of soul-acquisition right
through the entire scale of all humanity?
Escape from the physical tie of karmic debt to individuals requires that
we learn enough to be able to do this. In other words, to obtain
‘forgiveness’ for ourselves for what we are and what we have done, we
have to learn enough about the situation that causes a restriction not to let
that restriction happen. To me the word ‘forgiveness’ can only mean one
thing. It simply means ‘Advisement’. The giving to yourself of knowledge.
In other words you ‘forgive yourself’. No one and nothing else can do this
to you or on your behalf. The whole business is strictly personal. This
deadly idea that someone else waves his or her hand and provides you with
a benediction on behalf of a God or a deity or a saint is an invention of
power brokers on behalf of themselves. It is one of the biggest expedient
falsehoods and frauds perpetrated on the

342

body of man in the name of religion. It is utter nonsense when viewed

rationally and if there is no rational logic in reconciling anything we move
into the province of being baboons.
The words of Jesus Christ on the cross hailed his father to teach us more
the ‘whys and wherefores’ and consequences of restriction when he said,
‘Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.’ It was not a plea for
absolution from punishment with thunderbolts as a sanction and
chastisement. That would have been the very denial of the status of the
wondrous infinite Love that marks all of Godhead. The love of Godhead
can only teach. It can never chastise. It can only ask. It can never enforce, if
‘free will’ means anything at all. It is we who bring such as punishment on
ourselves. It is all our own work and consequence in this wretched Universe
of Parts.
Can you imagine how much knowledge we would need to have to be able
to reconcile all karmic obligation en masse to everyone? You would have to
have the knowledge of Jesus Christ, Gautama Buddha, or Mohammed the
Prophet and all the other provenly beautiful authors of rational spiritual
truth to be able to do it effectively enough and escape the deadly wheel of
rebirth. That is why ‘sin’ or restriction and thus restricted practice keeps us
bound in this Hell of a universe. This is simply why we need to have
complete faith, belief and trust in these proven beautiful ones who came
among us to show us what we need to know and how we need to employ
that knowledge to be able to stand the slightest chance of escape from the
deadly ‘bodies’ (that are the atoms) that make up this universe of those who
failed and have left their momentum away from Godhead in the form of
entropy to pull us away from our salvation.
When we think of the evil creatures who have hallmarked the progress of
the human race through the millennia, be it Genghis Khan, Herod, Vlad,
Attila, Hitler and all the countless contemporary comparable types who
have visited their collective depravity on our species, it is well to remember
the terror of their personal futures. Their removal from our midst through
death signals the beginning of an impossible karmic chase. Their debt is
measured in multiples and perhaps millions and ensures their inexorable
devolvement into subspecies of ‘being’ through the torture of future twisted
bodies to ape, monkey, animal, insect,

343

virus and stone. Their folly is the frustration that comes with trying to
reconcile so much that is unrealizable. Their future is likely to be written in
the carapaces of insects and the skin of worms. It is a salutary warning to
those who seek to act on behalf of others in corporate terms. The karma is
proportionately bigger if you don’t get it righteous. What price the
politician, the corporate head, and the title holder, that lead astray the
innocent and the helpless in our world? The laws of Omniversal justice
could never let them escape their folly. Though kings in this world, their
solace will be torment. No devils with tridents will marshal their demise.
They are their own demon and their own measure of result. It is as simple
as cause and effect and as completely just.

1
Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 172) (Simon & Schuster 1992)
2
‘The Boy Whose Blood has no Father’ New Scientist 7-10-95
3
Randles Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (p 72) (Anaya Publishers Ltd)
4
Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 316) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-SEVEN:
DISINFORMATION AND DAMNATION

If you have chosen to read the chapter entitled ‘Affirmations’ you may be
stunned by what the so-called custodians of the Christian faith for one have
done in the past to remove from us the vital codex of knowledge and
insights that might have revealed the possibility of humanity’s interception
by an alien species. Whatever their motives, the fact is that their
guardianship of the ethic of a redeemer of Christ’s significance to all
mankind, a redeemer whose ethic and even incidental words and deeds
were the most precious of all things, gave them a responsibility to see that
his every word, every deed was never obscured, hidden or distorted. Such is
also true of the Talmud and all other texts that purport to come from the
brightest wisdom of our greatest teachers. A reference here illustrates:
A group of 120 sages called the ‘Men of the Great Assembly’ helped to
compose the Jewish ‘Talmud’, which extrapolates and comments on Jewish
law. These men were called the men of the ‘Great Assembly’ because they,
according to Judaic tradition, ‘restored the crown to its rightful place’. This
refers to the fact that Moses had described God as ‘the great, mighty and
awesome God’ (Deut. 10:17). Subsequently the prophet Jeremiah believed
that it would be more appropriate if the word ‘awesome’ were deleted, and
the prophet Daniel deleted the word ‘mighty’ deeming it an inaccurate
adjective to describe God.
The Men of the ‘Great Assembly’ reinstated the two terms that had been
deleted in order to restore the description of

345

God to what they believed to be its ‘rightful place’, that being a position
of power and authority over men such that they would be expected to be in
‘awe’ of their God who was a ‘mighty’ being who had power over them.
Thus the ‘God’ of Moses was asserted over and against the very different
‘God’ to whom the prophets Jeremiah and Daniel addressed themselves. It
is probable that Daniel and Jeremiah understood the concept and nature of
an implicate, eternal, infinite God who was there in the perfect expression
of unconditional profferment for all who wished to and were able to receive
it. To their deeply philosophical and probably psychically gifted minds, the
idea of awesome might in a God was too representative of the national and
tribal leaders and power-hungry rogues of their acquaintance. It may even
be that they suspected that this so-called God was something more tangible
and less ephemeral than an insubstantial truly divine entity would be. Such
a ‘God’ would not be ‘mighty’ as he would in his commitment implicitly
allow his ‘children’ the freedom to choose to know and understand him or
to choose not to. There would be and could be no directed sanction other
than the implicit consequences that any logical result prescribed. Similarly
there would be no need for engendering the premise of being awesome in
the minds of courtiers unless you were trying to invite and inculcate a sense
of wonder and fear in your intended converts. ‘Awe’ would simply be out of
place in man’s relationship with God, just as it is out of place in the
relationship of love that lies between parent and child.
If something is ‘awesome’ you tend to keep yourself at a respectful
distance. Would a God of Love have demanded that we keep a respectful
distance from him? Surely, if we are to return to him as Christ exhorted us
to do, we would have to lessen that distance, not maintain it artificially. The
‘God’ that is ‘mighty’ and demands ‘awe’, worship and supplication can
thus be construed as a suspect God that seeks to impress through spectacle
and fear. A God that perhaps has something to hide, as a space-travelling
opportunist perhaps would. It is an entity such as this that would need
unqualified obedience to effect its purposes, and thus would have set about
keeping at bay intelligent questions that might have exposed its true status.
It would need devices of outlook designed to engender fear. Of course, its
humanoid victims were a captive audience in those times. If a tribe in New

346

Guinea in contemporary times would worship the picture of the Duke of

Edinburgh as a God and an old Victrola (phonograph) as God’s spokesman,
what would you expect old Ezekiel to think and do when he saw a
spaceship land with its blinking lights and swirling winds? What references
would he have to relate to it for what it was?
Judge for yourselves from this extract from Ezekiel:
 ‘A whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire unfolding itself and a brightness
was about it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the midst of the fire.
Also out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures. And this was their
appearance; they had the likeness of a man. And every one had four faces, and every one had
four wings, and their feet were straight feet; and the sole of their feet was like the sole of a
calfs foot and they sparkled like burnished brass. Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold,
one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures with his four faces. The appearance of the
wheels and their work was like unto the colour of a beryl and the four had one likeness: and
their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel. When they
went upon their four sides: and they turned not as they went. As for their rings, they were so
high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four. And
when the living creatures went the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were
lifted up from the earth the wheels were lifted up.’1

Ezekiel also heard a ‘noise’ of ‘great rushing’ of the ‘wings of the living
creatures that touched one another, and the noise of the wheels over against
them’. This account immediately brings to my mind eyewitness accounts of
the spacecraft landing in Roswell, New Mexico in 1946. The ‘amber
colour’ of the light surrounding the craft and the alien beings coming out of
it. The fact that these ‘living creatures’ had ‘the likeness of a man’ but each
had ‘four faces’ and ‘four wings’ and ‘went upon their four sides’ and
‘turned not as they went’ suggests to me some form of remote-control robot
that follows a single path without turning. The ‘rings’ that were ‘full of
eyes’ that were so ‘dreadful’ evoke images of the blinking and flashing
lights around the often-seen ‘wheel’ of disc-shaped UFOs.
Let us now suppose that you are driving happily along in your

347

car one night and suddenly a bright light spins down in front of you,
revealing a glowing disc. You manage to avoid crashing into it and when
you stop some nasty old aliens ‘zap’ you with their Ever-Readies and take
you into their spaceship and do nasty things to you. You emerge physically
none the worse for it, but in time you change from a nice stable provincial
Englishman to a layabout lager lout who wants to clout all Manchester
United fans on the head, for no more reason than they have the best football
team in the world. That may be normal understandable practice to some, but
to you it is bizarre behaviour, especially as you had hated football up to
then. You question it all for some time, but in the end you begin to like
clonking the red-and-blacks on the head till you take some of them out of
this world. Pretty soon you are on the Mitcham Common Police Station’s
‘Most Wanted’ list. You are arrested, convicted and sentenced to two
months’ imprisonment because the judge is a Chelsea fan.
I do not wish to belittle the awful experiences of some abductees by
writing this in a tone less than serious. I do it to illustrate that many people
tend to view the whole ‘abduction thing’ with amusement. It may be one of
the most monumentally significant and grave pointers to the fate of our
children tomorrow and we laugh at it all so easily and ignore it at our peril.
Whatever its status in terms of what we might qualify and quantify as
reality, there can be no doubt that something hugely significant is going on.
As I have said, an eminent Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard University,
Professor John Mack, has written a book attesting and affirming the
‘abduction’ experiences of many people as real and, in his opinion, outside
the broad stroke of what may be considered mental illness. He is paying a
terrible price at the hands of his contemporaries for his bravery and vision
in validating it as a real and significant phenomenon in the affairs of human
beings. I can’t help feeling that when he is finally vindicated his critics will
melt into the fickle background greyness that marks all clouds in a stormy
sky. They may well be the first casualties of the lightning that will strike us
all when the discs of doom finally spin their sizzles across the horizon of
our world.
My parody may serve to illustrate how we can all find ourselves in the
predicament of flesh through the deadly random and capricious winds of
entropy. How circumstances not of our direct making can

348

load our souls with negative input, such that through the aeons of our
soul’s sojourn in the Universe of Parts we dim our link with Godhead.
It is this kind of acquisition of negative input that may in past lives have
infected our connection line with the ‘Masterverse’ of Godhead with the
vile gene investitures of alien origin. These accessions are then passed on in
flesh through the generations for a particular incarnating soul to take on. If
lessons are not learnt subsequently during a particular lifetime by these
souls, the polluting effect of these infected parental formats will manifest in
the physical casts and social fashions, generation to succeeding generation,
marking out the racist, the rapist, the murderer, the brigand and the fool, and
reincarnation downwards in species terms begins.
The question remains of how any outside agency to the self could
achieve complete instigation and control of a human being from impulse to
act?
Could it be that the R Complex brains of certain individuals or groups of
individuals are better able to synthesize electromagnetic and magnetic
impulses referenced to instigate violent and aggressive behaviour? It is well
known that if you pulse microwaves of a certain frequency and intensity at
mice they will all attempt to kill each other.
One of America’s most brilliant scientists demonstrated a few years ago
that he could raise and lower the volume of conversations people were
having in a restaurant with the aid of a device the size of a matchbox
strapped to his wrist. The people in the restaurant had no idea that they were
being manipulated in this way.
It is beyond question that magnetic fields and extremely low frequency
(ELF) electromagnetic waves can be used to control and shape the thoughts
and moods of people. It is in the domain of some of the most secret and
successful work done in secret laboratories and agencies in the United
States, Britain, France, Israel, Japan, China and the former Soviet Union to
this day. It comes under the title ‘Electronic Warfare’ and is a field of
activity pursued feverishly today by scientists and military researchers in
many countries.
If we can do such things with our technology, can you imagine what an
alien technology that can come here to our solar system past

349

the barrier of the speed of light can do? Many abductees report that these
Clones and roboids have complete control of their minds and bodies while
they do medical and biological experiments on them. It is a chilling thought
for us all.
 There can be little doubt of the value of mind control as a governing
instrument to effect the takeover of any agency or mechanism with the least
wear and tear on the seekers after control. An ignorant and passive bio-field
mitigates resistance best and all hardware is left intact. Is it not patently
apparent that if the brain can be imposed upon by a means that functions
remotely, its chemistry together with the human skeleton may well act as an
aerial and a receiver? The atoms and molecules acting in biosynthesizing
concert to provide the thought and the idea that invites and prompts an
action. The choice, of course, to carry it all through is always independent
of the prompt. That is the property of conscience and thus the Soul. The
possession of which by the individual allows for the word ‘No’ to operate in
the universe of diminishing returns. A facility without which there could be
no free will and thus no ‘living being’.
Yet no matter what the strength or value of a remote interceptor’s grip on
our bio-psychology, it could never in any way mitigate God-connected free
will. This is simply because the two things are two entirely different
phenomena. One shapes through an increase in the ambient level of force,
the other through a decrease in it. Let me explain.
If you want to change the prevailing state of anything in this Universe
you have to do it by applying a force, or coercive mechanism, to it that adds
force to the state in which it previously existed. You shape a flat piece of
metal to the shape of the damaged part of your car and replace that part by
using force. You can achieve the same end by forming the shape in a
vacuum chamber that operates by removing force or air pressure from the
chamber. And so the same action is achieved in opposite ways.
Godhead is where NO force whatsoever exists. It is the perfect place of
Angels. It is ‘peace’ in absolute perfection where not the merest ripple,
shaking or vibration exists. It is the intercession of this ‘peace’ into the
enforced state of our Universe that shapes and forms things for Godhead. It
does this by unravelling force using a God-vacuum, if you like.

350

A mental programme by aliens would have to be written with atomic

writing in force. In other words, it would imply that a gene-instigated chain
of chemical events provides a mental function where the perpetration of any
act is achieved regardless of any sanction of Will, through this function.
Let’s say that a magnetic instigating signal is pulsed to susceptible
individuals with suitable R Complex brains and from then on a special
chemistry synthesized by this brain translates any signals with a definite
predisposition to a selected action. Those actions will be predisposed
towards violence and aggression, ritual and deceit and all the associated
actions the R Complex brain provides the necessary chemistry for.
It may only be resisted with the power of well-attested and referenced
values and verifications based on a simple codex of ethics designed to
protect individual liberty and freedom. But how does this codex operate?
Where is it stored and how is it actioned in the brain such that it can resist a
chemically ‘programmed’ brain?
A programmable R Complex is only one of three dispositions in our
Triune Brains. We have to remember that we have two other brains. Just as
the R Complex’s brain chemistry may schedule predetermined tendencies,
so may the Limbic brain and so may the Neo Cortex. The predominance of
a particular brain’s receiving and actioning capacity depends on the fund of
previous actions and reactions catalogued by the individual. If actions were
centred on Neo Cortex functions long enough then the chemistry of the Neo
Cortex would be more developed and dominant in instigating and shaping
views and thus the likely results would be accented in positive, uniting,
binding modes of behaviour. The individual will act in a way that preserves
and maximizes the freedom of others. He or she will allow the best
dispositions and circumstances to prevail in any given scenario that
provides warmth, understanding and caring. In other words, what may be
described as loving forms of behaviour.
The urge to action may come from instinct, impulse, sensory gleaned
inspiration or electromagnetically imposed instigation, but well notified
sanction in conscience or reason may and will always put in its way a
stopping mechanism. Of course, this requires a free, aware and cogent mind
that can make the right choices at the

351
 right time. If the control of the mind is in some way restricted or in some
way removed from conscience then you have a problem. But, as I have said
previously, I believe the strength of connection with Godhead defines the
value gradient of conscience. In other words, the power of the Soul in you
is the best saviour of the self. It is the part of yourself no outside
mechanism that uses force can breach and deny without your choice to
control it. Lose Perspective and Will and thus this control through apathy
and carelessness and you are in fault and, what is more, in deadly danger.
You are prey to all the mind-bending external force that seeks to control
you.

1
The Old Testament of The Bible: Ezekiel Ch. l,V. 4-19

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-EIGHT:
DELUSIONS AND DEMONS

The real demons that policed humanity and composed the committees and
convocations of the past that decided on our religious ethics and freedoms
in terms of what was put up for us to believe were probably unsuspectingly
acting at the behest of the little grey ‘devils’.
These were scoundrels more deadly than murderers, these committees
that framed the religious beliefs of generations of men. They were in effect
what might be commonly termed the ‘Arms of Lucifer’ because their
manufactured lies and extrapolated distortions of the original words,
rhetoric and intentions of the authors of a faith condemned the faithful in
their millions to inappropriate and mistaken views and practices in the
names of these blessed ones throughout the centuries. Every faith has had
them. Their main purpose, one suspects, was to maintain power and
authority in the hands of the few religious administrators at the expense of
many for no more, in most instances, than temporal and purely physical
benefit. Organized corporations of pious plenitude, with the accent on
‘plenitude’ in most instances. It didn’t take long before the religious
organizations of the world had most of the land and the wealth all given to
them and seconded to them in the name of fear and favour by the poor mass
of people who sought the blessings of powerful, vengeful divines lest
thunderbolts and eternities of damnation were to be the legacy of their
futures.
Christ’s brief, as he himself declared, was to save our souls, and he did so
with burning zeal and blistered bleeding feet in the

353

most final act of love possible. The sacrifice of his own life. Such was
the magnitude of his intent. There were no scarlet sofas and decorated
guards for him. Those whose decision had a direct bearing in removing,
obscuring or in any way obfuscating the minutest detail of his sojourn on
this Earth, whatever the motive, whatever the intention, bear a horrendous
karma or debt to all mankind. They may well be reaping what they sowed
through their own hands in an eternity of devolving bodies desperately
seeking to redress their subterfuge. It is their legacy to us and presumes a
grand implicate injustice that we all bear.
That is the terrifying accountability of all who claim grand leadership in
collective terms, whatever purpose, way or function that leadership might
drive consequence to a conclusion. They take responsibility on a grand
scale and their debt when they are mistaken is in proportion to their motive
and the ways and means of its application. Karma is final only in the
individual’s free choice and guidance under coercion proscribes free choice.
It is surely the ultimate lesson that individual freedom of choice, free of
sanction, is the safest way past the trappings of karmic consequence and
thus a dispassionate objective view of all the facts and information,
available is a crucial prerogative for us all.
Of course, there are circumstances when the general collective good may
have to be marshalled within the precincts of delegated choice. In such
circumstances the urge to all the best results still runs complementary with
extrapolation on all the available information. The terrible thing about
censorship is that it signals insecurity, cowardice and lies and opens the
route to falsehood and misrepresentation. It stretches myth and legend into
the parlours of truth and in something as crucial as the custodianship of our
souls and our quest for eternal tenure, condemns us to sleep forever in limit
and damnation.
The lethal and instinctive tendency in those of Cro-Magnon origin to set
philosophical and theosophical perspectives with totalitarian ethnic, racial
and tribal marks and then set these marks as points for antagonism and
enmity further ensured that humanity would scale the heights of idiocy. It
ensured that whatever chance we had of spotting the aliens in our midst
evaporated through the lack of internal reference. This may well have been
the alien intention all along. The two mainstream intercepted human lines

354

were set at each other’s throats so that their handiwork in both could be
seen in action by them over time, and adjustments could be made along the
way to achieve their goal of a genotype best fitted for their purposes. It is a
remarkable fact that the two altered lines, Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon,
and their respective descendants, the Dravidio/Semitics (Neanderthal) and
the Caucasoids (Cro-Magnon), have interestingly derived congenital
diseases linked strictly to their respective groupings. As I have said before,
one wonders if the secret strategists who plan national and racial interests in
their ‘Think Tanks’ are looking at disease as a control mechanism to further
their dastardly interests. Ethnically derived disease-disseminating bombs
with germs tailor-made to take out particular populations based on racial
vulnerability may well be the order of the future.
I first wrote the above as a surmise when drafting this book. Little did I
think that it would be affirmed so soon afterwards. The Daily Telegraph of
the 30th September 1996 carried an article by Roger Highfield, their
Science Editor.1 I quote: ‘Scientists could develop genetic weapons
designed to infect and kill or sterilize specific ethnic groups, the World
Medical Association is to be told. Eugenic and ethnic viruses are among the
weapons that could be created as a result of burgeoning knowledge of
genetics, according to a paper to be submitted by the British Medical
Association to the WMA’s meeting in South Africa next month. Dr
Vivienne Nathanson, author of the paper and head of science and ethics at
the BMA, has explained that genes that provide the signature of a particular
population could be tagged with a probe armed with a toxin. In this way
scientists could genetically engineer a virus to infect a specific ethnic
group. She points out that ‘you could have a tribal group which has very
much the same genetic structure and that is equally true in white
populations as any other’ and she adds that it is possible that the effects of a
genetic weapon could be delayed so that it affects only the next generation.
‘What makes it very frightening is that it could be done in ways that are
much more insidious and less obvious’, she said. Her suggestion is that the
right international legislation is passed to prevent such weapons from being
developed. However, there has to be considerable doubt as to whether any
kind of legislation would stand in the way of the development and use of
these weapons. Given the fact that their

355

covert application is such a relatively easy task, how could any

legislation be effectively applied? So many ‘secret’ experiments that have
exposed specific groups of the population to certain ‘harmless’ chemicals
have recently been brought to light and even confessed to by those
governments (the British and American) who were involved. If there is the
motivation to develop these horrendous weapons in the first place, how can
any amount of legislation stand in the way of their application, particularly
at the hands of a right-wing ethnically-biased government? The Nazis are
not dead. They never were. They are alive and well in the bowels of all the
Western intelligence services and all their laboratory ‘mice’ in many secret
establishments all over the white Western world, dancing to the whims of
their deadly ‘Grey’ masters and, perhaps, fathers.

1
‘Doctors Urged to Fight Genetics Weapons Threat’ Daily Telegraph 30-9-96

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER TWENTY-NINE:
ENDS AND MEANS

The scaffolding of true Godhead is inherently scribed with the ink of logic.
Pure and natural mathematical logic. It stretches the ‘heavens’, charged
with the power for uniting all parts. Its urge is rescue and its touch is peace.
Herein, I believe, lies scope eternal and hope for everything and all. If there
is limit it has to be written in leftovers. The bits and pieces of a Universe of
Parts. The home of lies.
Close your eyes a moment. Take a deep breath and feel the contours of
yourself in the quietness of your individuality. The world is gone, and yet
the world is still there. Open your eyes now and feel its instant electric
blast. To many of us, alas, it is reassurance itself. Reassurance that we are
alive and that is all that seems to matter. It is where all our sureties seem to
lie. Yet to a blessed few it is the solace of a convincing falsehood. The edge
of all transient finite result. A feel-good factor for fools and mannequins.
The eye alone may never see truth. Its margins so often frame the lie and
the misconception. Yet it is all most of us really believe or indeed want to
believe. Our legacy as a species has been written for too long with the short
nibs of the bully and the scoundrel. The Lord of the temporal Manor
prevailed with the tribe and the bribe and the bludgeon while the poets and
the priests sang psalms and lullabies to themselves. They had to build their
ivory towers away from us. Most of us just did not want to listen. The
enforced universe, alas, makes the frame, the cradle and the baby.

357

God is quiet. Man is loud. We keep being told that the pen is mightier
than the sword but we keep using up more metal making the latter. We
institutionalized force in our nature and too many of us now tremble too
much within to its psychological syntax to want to listen to the sweetness of
birdsong. If you don’t believe me take a catalogue of how ‘force’ has
gradually and progressively increased in musical formats and formulas
through the centuries from the first sweet lullabies sung by a mother to her
baby child. Sweet cogent melodies and lyrics where meaning conveyed
music and song have given way to rasping, discordant cacophonies. You
can hardly describe heavy-metal rock as a musical format synthesized for
the peace of angels. Perhaps only Hell’s Angels. It is a remarkable
progression, affirming the insidious and unnoticed power of entropy to
demean reason.
As I have implied before: I am convinced that this universe is the true
Hell. The trouble with Hell is that you only qualify for it when you don’t
know what it is. That begs the question: How, then, am I as the author of
this work in Hell, if I have spotted this Universe for what it truly might be?
The answer to this might of course be that I am wrong and the Universe is
not the true Hell. It also might be that I am right, that Hell might simply
mean you don’t know what it is when you come into it, but that you can
learn what it is after you’ve been here some time. That may well be the
‘hell’ of it all. Hell is the darkness of ignorance itself. Every atom and every
particle of every atom that makes up its contours is the result of the loss of
knowledge and the gaining of ignorance. It needs something or someone
not intrinsically of it to show it up for its true nature and implication. I
know it is a hackneyed old thing to say that a light is useful in darkness but,
you know, humanity has had so many beautiful teachers and prophets,
we’ve had so many torches to light our ignorance, paying us a visit
proclaiming our predicament with the loud hailer of an entire life
commitment, don’t you feel we should gratefully acknowledge them? It is
the nature of Hell to drain all batteries and the nature of demons to short-
circuit them before their time. We all know our demons within our deepest
deep. The price for our education coloured the sands of Judea with a single
patch of red. It was the most devastating indictment of our ignorance. One
would have expected humanity to learn our lessons better. It was

358

the supplication of the truest love, after all. But the universe has an eraser
for that. It is its very nature to try to see that we don’t remember such
draughts and sentiments through the stem, cold, cruel and impersonal drift
of the devil’s orthodontia: the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It is in the
programme as part of the constitution of the Universe.
Yet the grandest thing of all is the discovery that even in Hell, Hope is
the watchword. That there can be the potential for absolute freedom of
choice. Choice through which freedom and liberation from Hell may come.
Damnation or Liberation is only eternal if you as an individual make it so.
No one else. There can be no directive from anyone or anything that cannot
be overcome through that awesome individual absolute freedom that is the
very central axiom of Godhead.
I have tried to write this book free of obscurity and in as plain and
effective a stance as possible. All of us who sincerely seek after the whys
and wherefores of our existence have been too often bludgeoned to death by
a smog of phoney intellectualization. The search for truth has too often been
steeped in the broth of cerebral vanity. Meaningless contrived verbiage,
daubed in thick coagulated lumps over the halls of religious and
philosophical learning, has over the centuries only served to conceal the
truth. The deliberate censorship of the available record can only be done
under motive. It can’t be innocent. The huge and proven worldwide
conspiracy of the military and the politicians in the USA to hide hard
evidence of alien landings can only profit those whose interests lie in
maintaining a myth. A myth that if exposed could have massive financial
and social implications that might affect the rich and the powerful and bring
crashing down some religious edifices that depend on their God being
divine and not some alien lifeform. It is not and cannot be done for the
usually touted altruistic reason of stopping panic among the general
population of the world. The conspirators well know that the public is far
more likely to react not with panic but with benign curiosity and perhaps
welcome the fact that we are not alone in the universe.
It is terrifying that every soul in the whole world may be held to ransom
for reasons such as this. Our eternity is mortgaged by a pack of scoundrels
who keep us all in the dark and steal our chance of a blessed tomorrow for
their blind, greedy and lethal

359

need for power and control. This whole thing concerns our sacred
individual destinies and countless millions have very likely been duped into
perdition and damnation by the running of the current lies that seek to hide
the truth about Flying Saucers and what the authorities know about them
and their occupants. If I am right about the existential base set in the strands
and obligations of karma, each and every one of these perpetrators will have
little or no chance of making amends to the millions of souls they have
duped. They would be chasing their tails into smaller and smaller bodies
through crippled forms and huge suffering, lifetime after lifetime. A
hopeless chase for atonement. It may be what they deserve but we would all
lie victim. Victims because we hadn’t what it took to solicit the truth. And
so we tacitly deserve our predicament, too.
It may well be that the whole ‘Flying-Saucer-aliens-in-our-backyard’
thing is as the governments claim — a total myth. If that is so then every
single individual human being has, if you’ll pardon the deliberate pun, an
inalienable right to decide for themselves its veracity for the reasons stated
above. The last thing we need is some deadly military general or
governmental politician or religious priest sitting in judgement on our right
to decide our own fate. The fate of our eternity. The final question for
answer is surely: Do you want to, in the final analysis, mortgage your right
to an eternity in Godhead on the behests of those empowered to rule and
kill?
I have only touched the tip of the iceberg in illustrating how our religious
custodians have raped our souls. with their proscription of the total
available record of most of the grand theo-philosophical authors of the
world’s spiritual codex. Most of it done, no doubt, in the ‘interests of the
public good’. This old adage has been the refuge of the self-seeking, self-
interested scoundrel and charlatan and cheat through the centuries. The
censorship practised by these deadly instruments of lies in the name of
Gautama Buddha, Jesus Christ, the grand prophets of Judaism and Islam
and all the other wondrous religious teachers who sought to love us all with
their wisdom and offertory. We have been given the total religious codex in
terms of subjective translations arrived at by individuals and committees,
till in contemporary times its dissemination is no more than a cheap tabloid
form of its former self. The full scan of the theological prospectus has been
subject to endless censorship

360

and downright interdiction to such an extent that the borders of truth as

the Masters revealed it may be seen no more against the margins of lies as
the interpreters have subsequently made it known. The church had selected
the twenty-seven books of the New Testament by the fourth century after a
great deal of political intrigue and internal rivalry. It was only when the
canon had become self-evident that it was argued that inspiration and
canonicity coincided.
Implicit in the parables that Christ used to illustrate the view of
existential truth is a clear invitation to use reason and logic to sort the wheat
from the chaff. His teaching method was a powerful exhortation to see that
veracity is the child of logic and reason. There is a further and more
important implication, and that is that the individual has to discretely work
out truth for himself or herself. That in this mechanism and ONLY this
mechanism is liberation of Being accomplished. That it never can be done
in proxy by anyone on behalf of anyone or Jesus with his stated love of the
‘Father’ for us all would have zapped us poor miserable sinners and
converted us all to see the light instantly and taken us all back home to the
Master Universe where our own one has its origins.
Obvious, you might think. But if one thing is clear, through the record of
the centuries of human endeavour, it is that human beings have the most
awesome capacity to believe humbug. Indeed, we seem to want to believe
humbug. If we are condemned as a species it is a just ‘reward’ for the
madness that sometimes claims even the best of us. The madness that
prompts us to abandon the stern pith of logically extrapolated truth in
preference for the lies our emotional comfort points dictate.
The rich man would spend thousands of dollars, pounds, marks or
roubles to push the muscles of his gluteus maximus a little more gently
against his hip bone in his Rolls-Royce than, say, a Morris Mini would do.
He would do this when perhaps a ten-thousandth of the value of that Rolls
will get him the same distance from A to B for as long a time, by the Mini,
an.d leave so much for saving the lives of perhaps hundreds of little
starving children. Such is the merit of the world we see today, where we
ruthlessly ignore the little starved faces crying at the empty paps of a Third
World mother in favour of decorated stones and empty fancy monoliths that
adorn our equally empty vanity.

361
 Poverty and disease in the non-white Third World has existed on such a
tremendous scale and for so long in the face of so much excess and
profligacy in the Occident. We should have long ago seen that it has never
been a question of ‘Can we cure it?’ It has always been one of ‘Do we want
to cure it?’ By ‘we’ I mean us in the shamefully wasteful West. It is now
way beyond a reasonable doubt that we don’t care enough to cure it. There
is something truly evil in the thinking paradigm of the broadly white
Occident, and it prompts the conclusion that most of its population are
really covert racists. The country that proudly claims to be the moral leader
of the world today, the USA, has imprisoned one in fourteen of her black
citizens. This heinous figure exposes the unpalatable possibility that, one
hundred and fifty years since the emancipation of slaves in that country,
with all the modern devices at her command to promote mass-media
attention to the evil of racism, the majority of her people have remained
primitive racists to this day and continue to be so. And so it is in every Cro-
Magnon seeded country in the world today. No matter how hard they seek
to hide the fact, how cleverly they posture the sublimation of it, their
citizens by and large succumb to the stench of racism on the slightest
excuse. In elections over in the Occident it’s called ‘playing the race card’.
Take a look around the world. The least is done to relieve the condition
of the hundreds of millions of desperately sick and hungry people
everywhere but particularly in the Third World. It is no longer a question of
ignorance. Information technology explodes it in our faces daily. When
something is done it’s largely palliative: it is embarrassingly minute and
miserly but carefully orchestrated and presented to look grand and generous
by the Western media. Such a contradiction to the natural drive in human
nature generally to give aid and succour as an immediate reaction to
someone who might suddenly fall down in the street immediately in front of
you. Why?
What devil can do such as this? What demon can possess our instincts
and our insight such that we can’t and won’t see the folly of such
contradictory ‘thinkability’? As I say, we walk along any street. Someone
nearby drops down and falls to the pavement in distress. The vast majority
of us will instinctively reach down to lend a helping hand. Our unthinking
instant urge is not to finish them off into oblivion with manic relish. The
natural instant reaction
 362

of almost all human beings will be to serve and to help. The power of
Godhead is immediate and always present still within our human condition
at the very base of our knowing.
Why, then, has humanity long ago not rid the earth of poverty and want?
Disease and suffering? Why has one-fifth of the population of the world
conspired for so long to keep four-fifths destitute and condemned to
meagreness when it so easily could have banished indigence from the face
of the earth long ago? The social statisticians are constantly giving us the
numbers that betray a covert congress deliberately preventing this. There
can be no doubt that if the world had continued to put the same effort to
beat starvation as they put into the effort to beat Saddam Hussein in the
Gulf War, or indeed if all the world’s countries were to halt for one year
their expenditure on arms and put that money they save towards developing
the systems to beat famine and disease in the Third World, we would
eradicate want and suffering from the Earth forever.
As I have said before, the most remarkable thing is that if you look
around the Third world, and count the number of white or Occidental faces
that are not those of tourists, consultants of one thing or the other, priests,
nuns or religious servers of some kind, the number of purely voluntary
servers of the poor and the unfortunate in the non-white world, acting in
generous unselfish offertory, amounts to about 0.00000001 of the total
Occidental population of the world.
Measure this against the horrendous picture of the massive scale of want
and deprivation we see daily on TV screens and it provides a stunning
indictment of the altruistic nature of the so-called civilized people of the
West.
We are all fooled into thinking that the Cro-Magnon legacy to the world
is one of civilisation, largesse and highly cultured magnitude. Such is the
skill of the media humbug makers. A quick empiric measure of actual
results shows a quite different story. It shows a story of pirates, parasites,
murderers and covert manipulators of cleverly set-up systems that steal
from the poor to give to the rich. A largely callous, heartless machine-
minded breed of fortune hunters hell-bent on coldly and selfishly exploiting
defenceless and disadvantaged people for their cheap labour or raw
materials and skilfully making it look like goodly service for the

363

poor and the unfortunate. Many non-Occidental countries have of course

the local versions of such people, ever ready and willing to assist their
Western counterparts in their work. But they are largely Occidentally
educated and usually have heavy traces of Cro-Magnon juice in their veins.
What I am trying to say is that this juice might well be infected with the
sap of alien origin. That the heavily extraterrestrially apprenticed Cro-
Magnons magnified their influence on the affairs of man and lead the ways
and means of things done in the name of humanity. It includes elements of
machine-minded programming. No room in the inn for sentiment,
compassion and offertory.
There has to be a covert agency, a deadly hidden factor in the affairs of
men and perhaps in the psyche of human beings that can keep the instant
natural instinct in man to save, to proffer and to help and give succour to the
helpless in check and prevent the species from employing the means and
the good sense to save itself from its own destruction. There can be no
doubt whatsoever that we have the intelligence and the expertise, the
hardware and the software to easily rid and forever forbid the source of
much of the trouble in the world today: poverty and the want engendered by
the basic human need for shelter, food, and clothing, with dignity. The vast
majority of the world’s eminent social and demographical experts haven’t
the slightest disagreement about this. If we have the collective intelligence
to go to the Moon, build nuclear reactors, nuclear bombs, build and deploy
complex missile systems, satellite systems, planetary explorative systems,
how is it we are supposed to lack the intelligence to build a simple social
system that brings us all together in co-operation for the good of the very
survival of the species? The point, as we all know, is that we don’t lack the
intelligence to see to our saving. We lack the WILL to see to it. Herein lies
the rub.. Again, WHY?
We all, of course, know that human nature is a mix of the monster and
the saint. Or so it seems to be. You hear the oft-quoted adage to the point of
triteness, ‘There’s good and bad in everyone.’ What, then, makes the bad
dominate so much the good? Or how is it we all seem to be led by the nose
to world crisis after world crisis? War to war. Famine to famine. Pogrom to
pogrom. Evil certainly is the dominant and deadly drive that underpins the
world. The daily casualty rate from wars and skirmishes and

364

social and political murder around our planet pour out in huge
magnitudes. The peace makers, century after century, can never sleep. The
deadly horsemen of death ride rampant, the ropes seeking to restrain their
steeds covered in the blood of failure till they have borne away their fill of
innocent blood.
I am convinced that the central point of all evil rests at the pivot where
we demarcate on the principle called ‘Difference’. The root of it all in terms
of our human predicament lies in the operation of social, racial and ethnic
platitudes and taboos. The welfare of the whole planet lies here at this one
point. A point when a socially diseased white Occidental mind’s ‘eye’
meets a complexion a darker shade than pink. The point when an accent can
turn away a face in disgust or the sound of a surname can forbid an
opportunity. Through millions of instances such as this taking place each
day all over the world, the globe of our living rostrum spins a darker and
darker announcement that we are doomed.
What is it in us that instigates such evil, if our basic nature in instant
reaction to someone who falls in injury before us is to immediately and
unthinkingly go to their aid and is thus ‘goodly’ or ‘godly’, for want of
better words? Why do we do such injury and harm to so many so often and
so constantly when we have more time to think about things? What are the
driving points that cause us to proffer such a deadly harvest of doom on
ourselves with calculated instigations to war, starvation, (it is used very
effectively by rich western nations as a tool for political control of poor
ones), if our innate unthinking reactive nature is to aid and give succour to
those in need?
I believe, as I have said before, that there is a covert agency, a ‘force’ not
of man, that intervenes in and interferes with the affairs of man and prompts
division and separation among us all. The ignorant and the weak-willed will
always be the first to fall prey to this ‘force’ and will be the first guinea pigs
in a giant universe-wide experiment for the artificial seeding and
reallocation of soul, impossible though it may be to achieve. It is done
through an agency not intrinsically and endemically of our world, our
planet or, most importantly, of our nature. I believe it operates remotely
from the nature of man and invades man from without. Further, it is not
natural in the ways of the cosmos itself. It is an artificial modulation of the
Universe and is a contrivance of it. I believe this agency is

365

one that operates universe-wide and affects all natural existential forms
that have their ancestral origin in Godhead and thus have a soul. Be it
Human or Oglander, the phenomena of alien primary Cloned-Being and
artificial synthetic Roboid-Being programmed with artificial intelligence
will infect all the living soul-possessing occupants of the Universe with
their own emotionless machine-type binary standards in an endless search
for definition and thus their own place in a self-propagating eternity. Our
original fathers, the Inaugural Adam Beings all over the Universe, just
should not have made a duplicate physical creation such as a Clone. It was,
I believe, what should be termed the Original Sin. The demons of
mythology were always real. We just did not know who or what they were
until now.
The choice of final settlement is thus to be made by those who possess
the widest range of options and that has to be the prerogative of Beings with
a soul. We don’t always make the best choices that would maintain and
grant us this eternity. That is an intrinsic function of free will. But the
potential to make the right choices is nevertheless there. We have the
fantastic privilege of knowing that we have an incidental ongoing eternity
as long as we have a direct connection to Godhead. No external entity may
inherently forbid us to make choices in free will. It is we who forbid
ourselves to do this. The widest stretch of choice will inherently lie with
being connected to Godhead even in a Universe of separated Parts and the
ultimate poles that define the apparent infinity that lies between.
The universe IS a system of opposites. The universe itself has its
opposite. If there is a push for things to unite, there will be a push for things
to separate and divide. Where, how and in what way these compliances
operate in the micro-and macroverse is the name of the game we call life,
living and the pursuit of … well, whatever!
I have tried to seek the answers to the questions posed by the Flying
Saucers and their occupants with reason and logic and without claims that
may not be independently verified in the journals of science or religion. The
whole so-called phenomenon has too often been the butt of every bar room
joke and cheap dismissive aside by our so-called expert mentors. It is the
favourite way that their own ‘agents’, both biological and psychological,

366

use most effectively to dismiss and thus hide the phenomenon from more
serious examination and view. I too had summarily dismissed it as the
rantings and ravings of over-enthusiastic buffs with over-active
imaginations. I have found, way beyond reasonable doubt, that it is
certainly one thing if it is anything. It does NOT belong in the realms of the
Hobbit and the Tooth Fairy. It has a real and very tangible verification of its
own. All of the tangible part of it, unfortunately, is in the hands of the
governmental and world organizational powers that be, that for reasons best
known to themselves have kept it all from those that really matter. The
children. The future citizens of the planet Earth. They are, I believe, taking
away from them their furthest heritage. The place where they must build or
relinquish their eternity. It is the ultimate act of piracy and has to be
controlled by those with minds that wink with the briefs of diodes. No
human that can feel and truly care can perpetrate a subterfuge so awesome
when looking into the eyes of a child and still say goodnight with a kiss.
The authors of this staggering deceit have to be of the plasticated
biosensitivity of Clones and roboids and I believe unequivocally that they
were and are just that.
I sought after the truth of a predicament written for humanity in the
nebulous shaped forms of saucers, discs, ovals and cigars. The geometry of
our times written in the firmament of even our most trite day-to-day
dreams. It led me to discover that this was no phenomenon discrete from
the central avenues of our frame of being within the face of reason as
existential truth.
 Existential truth can only be the most personal of things. Its verification
and thus its value has no functional meaning unless it is deeply subjective.
It has no value in the ether. It can never be, what just IS. It always IS, what
you and I ARE.
For me, it all has led to a fundamental catharsis of both nature and
outlook. In doing the research for this book and subsequently chasing an
answer as to the nature and properties of the ‘Flying Saucer’ phenomenon, I
have to admit, somewhat incredulously at first, the entire existential gamut
unfolded before me in the light of reason and not personal claim, opinion
and fancy. I began to see the size of the con that had been worked on
humanity by some religious administrations through the centuries I saw
way past their lies and deceit. The Dragon may be slain, the R

367

Complex brain in all our heads circumvented and left for dead by simple
realizations in logic. Logic is the kiss of Godhead. Realizations that point
each one of us to act in our day-to-day lives with actions that cherish our
fellow man, no matter where he or she hails from, or what he or she looks
like. Against the dead cold minds of the Greys we all look the same. What
is more horrendously to the point, our children taste the same. It is the
ultimate sanction that should make us all seek to add, to bind, to unite, to
reason logically with objective and not subjective analysis. To me, all this
goes up to make what is Good against what is Bad. Terms that would
otherwise be meaningless. This is the codex of true Grace. It is a gift of salt.
A flavour, a zest of spice, of colour, of light and perhaps Enlight as we look
to our personal horizons. I know that I, as a stranger to you and as an
individual, can touch the whole world and through that I can touch you.
With reverence and respect. I for one know you for your splendour and your
precious value no matter what others might say or do to deny the awesome
glory of your individuality with a soul in humanity. And I know truly it is
no fanciful poetic notion. I am smiling now, when I only thought I was
smiling before. I hope that in sharing all this with you, you will be smiling
too.
The author of the Judeo-Christian ethic came to turn the other cheek. He
came to spell the reasons for love with the finest logic and sense. He had to
do it with the sight of his blood. He came to plead for peace through peace.
Yet have you noticed how, in the hands of the Cro-Magnon legacy, despite a
hideously contrived codex of huge and mighty sanction formed in fire and
brimstone underwritten by the threat of final and eternal damnation, it is the
faith that now spawns the emptiest places of worship? In addition, the
Christian churches and their administrative zeal through the centuries have
been responsible for the most repulsive acts of torture, murder, mayhem,
suicide and sexual debauchery on a scale unprecedented in the history of
the world, all in the name of the ‘King of Peace’.
The Buddhist philosophy, on the other hand, with reason and freedom of
choice as its arbour of faith, has kept its adherents in resolute devotion
through the centuries without the slightest resort to violence and thievery.
Yet they seem to have achieved it without horrendous threats of final and
exemplary damnation

368

in a vat of fire through eternity. The Buddhists have, in fact, with

exquisite reason argued a philosophy that gives no limit to change. It
contained no threat, no sanction. Just purely logical consequence. A
triumph of reason, and thus a true and noble triumph.
In searching for the answer to my son’s question I was led on a
metamorphosic search for the meaning of life itself. It was an incidental
result. A result that made me see a way through to truth such as truth may
be found. History has taught us unequivocally that to make the discovery
more important than its existential meaning is to assassinate both the
discovery and the meaning. Yet again and again the sirens of the ‘flesh’
were too formidable a screen that blinded most of us to this rule. The
universal anthem of disposable, the true Satan, entropy made its machines
of dispatch all too easily, and we wait, we all wait for the final outcome.
It is so easy to make prognostications of doom. To sit on a base that all
too often has delivered a dead reckoning and never learn our lessons in
terms of the cohortship of humanity. We can see that the misleading
geometry of material development, with its sharp, clear, sometimes pretty
lines hasn’t changed for the better the deeper underbase of human motive
for the caring for the betterment of the species — Mankind. As a whole we
kill more, we maim more, more cruelly and with more efficiency, than we
did before. We dismiss more than ever on no better a decision point than the
mere colour of a skin, or the shape of a physical contour. The deadly tribal
lines speak more evocatively in the affairs of men than they ever did.
The right to belief in independence becomes a panordinate threat to the
instinct of the herd. We have not as a species developed out of the animal
sense and its attendant paranoia against ‘difference’ of any kind. Instead of
an increase in a sense of our group-species identity for the betterment of co-
responsive social perspectives, the deadly entropic drive has increased the
pro-eclectic drive in the ‘Macluhan’ sense that lauds individual goal-
orientation at the cost of the group. Such perspective now rules the day
wherever we look in the Occidental world and it is my firm belief that it
will rule our future days with increasing strength and bring about the
prophecies of grand insight we tend to dismiss as heraldic excess.
Entropy isolates to separate. Those who follow this in terms are thus
what may be described with a new word in the

369

English lexicon: Entropes. But, gloriously, we still have their opposites.

Call them what you will. Seers, Mystics, or Prophets had the glorious
insight to see the writing on the wall, because they were ahead of their time
in one simple respect. They noticed that all things, in purely material terms,
were always dying, all ways. They simply had a view of entropy by adding
the signposts of doom that others ignored. The rest was easy. They saw the
material, existential vista for what it was — as Devolution and that the
human physical capacity was measured in loss and not gain — ongoing loss
that is measured exponentially in increments and not decrease, as the
atomically derived Universal slant separates the basal and doesn’t add to it.
The true glory of these superior, or Spirit Dominant, souls was listed
within their insight, an insight that viewed the spirit sense from within the
standpoint of flesh, so to speak. These were individuals whose physical
atomic array had the quality of possessing stupendous ‘aerials’ that received
a visionary view of the final existential domain, clearer than most others.
Far from being ephemeral dreamers with their heads in the clouds, they
truly had their heads beyond the clouds, beyond the margins of matter itself
and realized and understood the true ultimate reality of a Universe of Union
called Spirit. Too often, and it seems sometimes necessarily, they fall prey
and victim to the inferior atom-dominant ‘aerials’ of lessening, reducing
mankind, who could only see a truth of the physical senses.
Strictly atomic ‘viewability’ is the hard line of entropic derivation. As the
scenario for separating, it is inevitable that vast hordes, probably through
the repeated life-generative procedure of reincarnation, (believed,
incidentally, by every major religious ethic in the world at its inception, as I
have said previously) would pay the price of ‘dipping’ into matter, or
atomic, universes. In the wake of such a disaster, individual scope for
grander view would, for most it seems, inevitably dim, until the very
control mechanism of everything in existential tenure — Will — was itself
mitigated in the end, through staging posts we call Man, Ape, Plasmid, Tree
or Stone. Christ saw escape through Thought as the only life raft outside
these atomic fingerprints. He clearly saw ‘Thought in Will’ as something so
wondrous, it was the cradle of meaning itself — and, as such, not part of the
‘idle, static dependent’ resolution of

370

force that made up the dead disbursive physical world of matter. The
Great Teachers saw the existential vista was marked by three states of Being
— the highest and most final they called Spirit. The lowest being static
dependency non-life, with ‘physical’ life being the intermediate state. The
home environment state of eternal life’ alluded to by Jesus Christ as the
ultimate progression of Being. Spirit was confirmed as a concept that we
may not in our parts-conscious finite environment in the separation of
points envisage accurately, in its own terms: when Christ chided Nicodemus
with the exhortation that if he (Nicodemus) and others found it hard to
understand and believe what was said by Him (Jesus) about the world of
‘flesh’, how could they believe or see anything of the world of Spirit’?
Ultimate everlasting tenure in awareness, meaning and knowing, was the
only ‘reward’ promised by Jesus Christ as the consequence of leading a
righteous life. Nothing else was made an implicit certainty by this
marvellous teacher, and in the light of any logical progression could never
have been promised by Him, because it simply stresses what is patently
obvious. There can be no greater achievement in existential terms than the
confirmation of existence — in eternal tenure. A state, or effect, that
provides for such a thing, therefore, implies the absence of inherent implicit
risk. No physical-matter state can be free of risk. All matter is implicitly
destructible. We may build the grandest civilizations — cities that provide
the facilities, self-appreciating facilities that run themselves endlessly —
and one day, as I have said, an asteroid may crash into this world and a
million years of development will count as nought.
Quite clearly, the great teachers in asking for what may be commonly
called ‘righteous living’ as a behavioural vector to be followed for release
into this effect they called Spirit, marked the abstract metaphysical concepts
of Thought exerted through Will, with a wonderful connection and
connectability, to the hard dead world of the physical atom. Christ, Buddha,
Mohammed and many others saw this magical connecting point quite
clearly. I believe that by the public demonstration of His ‘transfiguration’
on where it is said to have taken place, the Mount of Olives, Jesus Christ
was the only being who actually achieved direct release into the Spirit
‘frame’, from the force vector of atoms that holds us all bound. Buddha, I
believe, glimpsed it from within the frame of

371

atoms, but Jesus actually achieved the transfer temporarily, when He

transfigured on the Mount of Olives, and at His ‘death’ and subsequent
resurrection achieved the transfer completely.
Here, at last, through all the foregoing prescriptions of doom I have
outlined, we arrive at the most marvellous admission of all: the triumphant
accession out of this predicament of ours through the example and
wondrous everydayness of Christ, Buddha and Mohammed is possible. This
is now the Age of Reason. Alas, the ages of Faith implicit have gone with
time in our procedure through the churn of Entropy. For many, we now
have to see Truth reflected through the elbows of connected logical reason
and not through the highly aspected blind resources of faith, belief and trust
that once served a lesser entropic form of mankind as signposts for release
from atomic capture.
 I believe that what was once man in some glorious, mild, force print, in
some far away league of Space/Time knew better the truth of Loss. In this
faraway ‘then’, when the Spirit ruled the atom, to the claims of first men,
the proposition for return from whence we all came was easier and achieved
for many. We, alas, are the leftovers. The last ones to know and not do
enough. To see and not achieve enough. We have delivered ourselves
through the universal entropic churn — from planet to planet — finding
through all the vagaries of atomic disbursement in the Universe-wide
‘places’ the exact matching of the resonant resolutions for our surviving
spirit-field to make bodies — material bodies, be they Oglander, Earthling
or Fool. Alas, to get progressively more captured by these same bodies.
Buddha, Christ and Mohammed demonstrated the most awesome
techniques in the everydayness of living and Being, both with their example
and teaching of gaining this world of eternal life, instantly, and this is the
most wonderful thing of all — directly. I mentioned the instance earlier of
Christ’s demonstration of transfiguration on the Mount of Olives. Here His
triumph over atoms was completed. I believe Christ showed the chosen
Apostles the final result of living a life in such a way that His power of
thought and deed unravelled the very atoms of His physical being. I believe
that all His exhortations to doing ‘good’, as it is commonly expressed, had
far more atomic a result than has been appreciated up to now.

372

I am saying that I believe that any genuine act that provides a mental or
physical momentum of will to bring parts together, to unite endeavour, to
add to each other and make whole, any resolution of will that binds,
sublimates and encourages Union, will open out the valve inside you that
channels the ‘power’ of Godhead in the universe (Enlight) and every
hydrogen atom in you will be subjected to, within itself, a natural antiforce
or unscrewing effect of the force that keeps it a hydrogen atom. If you
maintain this momentum enough, as Jesus Christ demonstrated, you will
inravel (I apologize for the new word) the force in you to the point that you
will no more be substantial. You could no more be embodied. You will
transfigure. In other words, you will resonate with the next quantumly less
enforced environment, call it Heaven, Valhalla, Paradise, whatever you like.
You will be on your way back to Godhead and eternal life without the
incumbency of ever having to reincarnate and thus go through the process
of rotting from conception again. You will, in fact, have ‘forgiven’ yourself
and while doing the acts of retrieval, if you have done them well enough
and often enough, you would have learnt enough to free yourself from
restriction and thus sin, You would have seen the humbug of the humbugs
that populate the precincts of the axiom ‘Praise the Lord and pass me the
money’ for what they are. Never more will your soul be subject to the
whims of Karmic obligation. I think that the word ‘enough’ is the most
important word in any language lexicon. We all, alas, mostly touch the
surface of belief as we only skim the surface of what we believe.
The thematic of all conventional religions consist of a series of platitudes
that usually describe abstract ideas in abstract terms. They commonly
border on the obscure to the very obscure and leave the listener and
postulant nothing real to get to grips with. For example: we are asked to
practise right thinking. Even the Buddhists are sometimes capable of cant. It
is a favourite chant of religious teachers in countries like Sri Lanka, for
instance. What on earth does ‘right thinking’ mean? It is never clearly
defined. Right thinking to a thief will mean the best possible way of
depriving another man of his goods. It is all a relative scale, if you see what
I mean. Yet the world is subject to a pack of enrobed clowns chanting these
pious platitudes in fusillade after fusillade from temple and pulpit alike, and
we are asked to take seriously these

373

squeezed, excruciating cacophonies as some glorious blessing and

benediction that will metathesize our very souls.
When asked to give details of what exactly all these things mean, or how
they work on our physicality, we are told that it is not for us to ask
questions. It is for us to disqualify reason and reasoning. That is for God to
know and answer in God’s way and in God’s own good rime. They imply
they are a conveyance for God’s message. The Christian would hear, in
mind-numbing repetition, the bumbling bromide ‘Jesus came to take on
the.sins of the world’. He has vacuumed the vat of our transgressions. Paid
the piper on our behalf. He was the great ethereal blotting pad. Absorbed all
the rubbish in our souls and thus we need not ever redeploy ourselves for
any returns anywhere. In smooth timbres, the cannoning chants and well-
meaning voices rise in massaging platitudes to this day extolling the virtue
of letting our redeemers carry our burdens. The flatulent madness and
shame of acquiescence in another’s gains, works and example was another
way of saying to a burgeoning organization: ‘He did it for you. We are his
church. His representatives. Hold to us and our ways, and as we hold the
admission tickets to the reward he earned for you, we will give you one if
you earn it in the way we prescribe’. In other words, there is no way to
heaven unless you go through our door. A nice way to comer the market.
Could it not just be that ‘taking on the Sins of the world’ might simply
have meant a valuation of ignorance? An explanation and expurgation of
mendacity? The simple laying bare of the megalithic falsehood that is our
status as beings in atoms? It is far more likely to have been an invitation to
revelation.
The Christian redeemer was born in flesh as a human being and did not
arrive as some celestial light form that magically zapped us all, and beamed
us all unconditionally up to Heaven because he and his Father loved us so
much. His entire brief was didactic. The implication of this was that we had
to do the ‘doing’ bit ourselves. It was a charge. Not a request. He showed us
why and how, with the sacrifice of his life. There could be no free carriages
to Alhambra borne by angels if we did not build the carriage ourselves for
ourselves. In other words, he endorsed that we all had free will and thus had
the choice to do it ourselves because the system dictated that it could not be
done otherwise. The alternative was, ‘Beam them all up, Ark-angel Scottie,
I like

374

this lot on Earth. They are so ignorant and so cluttered up with the dirt of
restriction (Sin) this ignorance gives, it would be a great exercise giving
them all a bath.’ You don’t clean anyone in a cesspit. They would be dirty
again as soon as you had finished cleaning them up. You would surely take
them to the great bathroom in the sky and let all the angels at your disposal
do the job. At a guess, the Son of God might have qualified for a fair team
of the winged beings. Why, then, did he do nothing of the sort?
 This great teacher cleansed us by telling us about soap and bathing. He
let us figure out how, where and why we were ‘dirty’ because only we knew
best where we put our own dirt and where, how and why we were polluting
our own individualities. He knew very well that all the detritus would only
be back again if we did not understand within ourselves its true nature and
what it was doing to us. It was up to us to want to be clean. If we did not do
this, it would all be a waste of time. It is psycho-restrictive dirt. Highly
person-specific. It is thus a panoramic perspective of the principles that
define restriction that would serve our interests best. That is what he did. He
taught us the lexicon of restriction (Sin) and left the choices to us. The
existential fundamental paradigm of Free Will left him no choice.
Yet this theocratic nonsense that suggests that we must put ourselves into
some kind of spiritual palanquin created for us by this lovely being is a
mind-numbing insult to his labour and final sacrifice and a denial of his
lasting meaning in all that is good sense.
This kind of madness leads to experts taking a chimpanzee’s paintings, as
has happened several times, and unknowingly hailing it as the work of a
great Master. It literally has made monkeys out of men if devolution is
indeed the way of the ‘world’.
All this would be funny if our line of ancestry back to Godhead were not
dependent on the objective logical and rational interpretation of the glorious
wisdom and knowledge imparted to us by the great religious teachers. We
have been left more often than not on the subjective whims of scoundrels
who have hijacked the ancient teachings for their own powermongering
convenience and purposes and led millions to perdition through their
debauched claims and fancies.
The great teachers taught by living example. They were on

375

the roads with bleeding feet and parched dry throats screaming in the zeal
only the touch of Godhead can provide. Their words were translated into
deeds. Deeds drenched in devotion and gut-wrenching dedication to the
poor and the lowly. A dedication that by any rational yardsticks
exemplified, proclaimed and backed exactly the words they spoke.
 Whose words would you take seriously? Those of Mother Theresa of
Calcutta or those spoken and written by cassock-draped hypocrites at
religious helms the world over who in pious and plenary rectitude claim the
right to pronounce on morals, ethics and other social magnitudes while
sitting in their candlewax-soaked vestries and parlours, and grand incense-
smoked cathedrals of religious academia. It seems to me they have made it
a quest to stare at plagues of gnats and swallow whole herds of camels. The
Inquisitions have gone. The requisitions are here. The grand retreat into the
primitive logistics of fundamentalism has begun. Dripping with ignorant
fawnings and naive distortions and meaningless platitudes, more often than
not as a sop for ignorance and the lack of a credible and rational argument.
They say the juice of the devil seeps from fundamentalist sap. You can’t get
more fundamental than the physical fathers of humanity and who in fact
they might be. If the efforts of the alien Clones and Greys have made them
the progenitors of most of humanity, it is easy to see what trees the sap of
all so-called religious fundamentalists will grow. God help us if I am right
and some of our ‘Fathers’ come in the form of winking diodes and sheet
electricity travelling on grey, green, yellow and blue biosynthetic
superconducting tracks. We are done for if we have to deal with pure robots
without the merest sense of Soul. There is no quark called ‘feeling’. Find it,
boys. Make it happen. There are a lot more fundamental particles than have
been found by detectors. There is still room for one called ‘feeling’.
I know where it would be safer to listen and follow if my soul was at
stake. Christ said in the simplest, most awesome wisdom: ‘By their fruits
shall ye know them’. My simple axiom for what it’s worth is: ‘If you can’t
taste the fruit as sweet, don’t eat it.’
We all live in divided societal pro-formas. Modules of humanity defined
by political philosophies, ethnic and cultural standpoints based in the main
on race, caste, creed, colour and, of course, geophysical environment. We
call them Countries, States, Tribal

376

Areas, Enclaves etc. For the most part they are pigeon holes that
demarcate our living ‘everydayness’ through necessities that define
administrative convenience. The awesome and fundamental personal
individuality and its unique properties can never be taken in itself into
consideration when set against the interests of the herd. Yet our only
existential importance as living beings when scaled against the omniversal
poles of Godhead and its opposite lies in our individuality. It is the place
that each of us begins and ends. It is the place of final summary and result.
The dichotomy that elucidates the interests of the herd against that of the
individual seems an impossible one to reconcile. It has always through
history led to the terrorization of the individual in the interests of the
system. It need not have been so, or indeed be so, if the simple rules of
omniversal engrandisement as spoken through reason and logic were totally
believed by all. Impossible, you might say, in a universe of physically
diminishing returns.
We have, by and large, a world of Communists and Capitalists.
Irreconcilable opposites, some might say. But are they, really? In their best
meanings they outline the principles that cater for the highest interests of
the group and the individual. The cherishment of each other and the
cherishment of the self. The evil moiety in each system lies in the corrupt
individuals within the assemblage that usually propitiates the principle with
excesses in self-interest and greed. The grand spiritual leaders all hailed a
resolute and abiding group ethic in the highest measures of kinship and
fellowship and coupled it with the strongest recommendations for a sense of
personal individual value. It was all said in Christ’s most potent of axioms:
‘Love thy neighbour as thyself.’ Alas, the story of our world and history
runs overwhelmingly, not with the pure sap of goodwill in unionizing parts
but all too often to its opposite momentum as dictated by the swansong of
the universe -entropy. The ‘weight’ of the dead Universe dragging the
universe of life to the dispossessing articulacy of the Second Law of
Thermodynamics and, most importantly of all, the hidden factor only now
coming to light: the Greys, Greens, Yellows and Blues. Our hitherto alien
synthetic ‘Fathers who art of the Universe.’
It is the role of this deliberately hidden unknown factor that has
artificially altered the natural value scales of living systems Universe-wide.
Intelligent life is the amalgam of the two most

377
 basic existential natural drifts. It is the sum of countervailing properties
commensurate with what is of Godhead and what is not. The disposition
and function of insets, such as intelligent beings with free will, will thus
define all the non-natural ways and means of ‘Being’ in the Universe. A
cosmos empty of life and intelligence will be a very different place. The
almost hysterical urge for scientists these days to deny anything that
suggests there may be existence beyond the atom has led to the most bizarre
theories postulating that the Universe is so conveniently arranged in all its
balances and artefacts as to be totally anthropocentric and this is the
incredible bit. It would not be there, they claim, if it weren’t so.
Cosmologists believe that initially there could have been many Universes
possible, each with its own laws and constants. That we live in the only
Universe compatible with our presence. The other theory known as the
Anthropic Principle postulates that the Universe must be such that it allows
and even favours the presence of human beings.
Professor Ramon Moliner says that one way to interpret the Anthropic
Principle is that some universes are more ‘fit’ than others in being
compatible with our inquisitive presence. One of them was the fittest for us.
But what came first, the chicken or the egg? Was there indeed a ‘first’?
Professor Moliner, in an article in New Scientist, goes on to make a very
salient point. If the world was not discoverable by conscious beings, we
would not be here to discover it.1
Scientists like random arbitration. It is why they feel so comfortable with
the Darwinian theory of natural selection. They shy away, as Professor
Moliner puts it, from a belief in ‘cosmic purpose.’ I believe it is because it
smacks too much of a God creator.
Moliner, an eminent neurobiologist, goes on: ‘We are happy to assume an
inventive principle in human affairs, but we cannot imagine the presence of
something in nature capable of”imagining” evolutionary objectives. When
people invent anything, they start out by having a representation of what
they want to improve, or the function that the invented item will have. But
we cannot conceive how nature could have a representation or “Idea” of the
biological characteristics that she wants to develop or improve.

378
 ‘Yet something nags at the back of the mind: The only way to make this
view consistent is to EXCLUDE humans from nature. If Darwin was right,
either humans continue to be an unsuspecting and non-foresighted product
of past interactions between mutations and natural selection or things
drastically changed with their arrival. To build an aeroplane, the conscious
brain of a foresighted engineer is necessary. But we are told that nothing of
the kind is needed to create the gliding skill of an albatross: Blind natural
selection will suffice. Darwin’s hidden message is that human creativity and
inventiveness constitute totally novel processes in the history of the
universe. It is not easy to accept this hidden message, but it is equally
difficult to propose a general mechanism to account for both human and
non-human inventiveness.
‘Is it reasonable to admit that the conscious intervention of humans
represents a phenomenon that was absent in nature prior to their advent?
The age of the earliest civilization is less than one-millionth the age of the
universe. Do we have to accept that during that fleeting instant something
happened that had never occurred before? That humans can achieve highly
improbable feats thanks to their capacity to plan ahead is self-evident. For
example, two teams of workers can start tunnels on opposite sides of a
mountain and meet exactly in the middle after months of drilling in the
dark. Without foresight this would be impossible.
‘Many co-operative adaptive features found in the living world are
equally amazing. Take the fangs of a viper, which have evolved with a canal
inside them; an adjacent gland that secretes the poison; a reservoir to store
the poison; a membranous duct connecting the reservoir to the canal in the
fang; an intricate osteomuscular system that erects the fangs before they
strike; an enveloping muscle system that contracts the poison reservoir at
the right time; a nervous system that sends the signal for contraction, also at
the proper time; and the instinct to use the fangs against prey and not
against mates.
‘It is easy to visualize how random mutations followed by natural
selection could lead to the right curvature of the fangs for better grasping of
prey. But what would have been the selective advantage of the rest of the
poison system if just one of its components had failed to evolve? To claim
that it can be achieved through unbiased evolution is like expecting that
nine independent miners can attack the core of Mount Everest from various
points at the foot of the
 379

Himalayas and meet exactly in the middle without the guidance of a

surveyor.’ (New Scientist, November 1995).
As I said before, such is the stuff of baboons.
I am, of course, perfectly aware that my own intuition of existential
outlay as outlined by this book flies in the face of arguably the most
hallowed and sacred vestment of science ‘The Darwin Psycholith’. I have
no reputation in science to defend and so the vipers and their fangs will be
wasting their fury and their poison on me if and when they try to take all
this apart. Let me say that when all the judgements are made and the dust
settles I am quietly confident I will still stand vindicated. I have merely
stood with the minds that originally revealed all this but were
misunderstood because nobody then and since knew’ about the existence of
UFOs till their more contemporary appearance after the first nuclear
explosion on the Earth. I have tried to explain some of the religious
invective with it all included in contemporary terms. I realize I am a poor
measure for the glorious and truly original standpoints of the original
Master originators of the world’s major religious faiths, the grand teachers
who came among humanity and tried to warn us about this artificial and
synthetic creation of the Universe. What I have realized and deciphered in
the way outlined has always been there for discovery century after century
and only hidden and obscured by the vanity of humanity. It was however
underwritten by the lives and courage of countless saints through the banner
of their belief in the warnings given to our species by the Great Teachers of
all the credible grand Faiths. I have merely stood on their platforms and
simply asked the questions. Were they all liars? And if so, why?

1
Forum: ‘I Hiss Therefore I Am’: New Scientist 11-11-95

OceanofPDF.com
CHAPTER THIRTY:
CONCLUSIONS

There can be no doubt that the whole alien phenomenon is potentially the
most awesome threat humanity has faced in all the time of its existence as a
species. I have been pretty scathing about their entire prospectus and it is
clear that their influence on our species has, if not deliberately, tacitly had
the effect of gradually turning us all into a machine psychology over the
centuries. They are, it seems, defeating that property in us that might give
them a chance at redemption too. The instinctive reach for what is beyond
the atom, in other words the Godsense in us, has lessened in the entire
Occidental world with the cold one-sided influence of science through
technology and the fact that the leadership of the entire world comes from
the Euro-American sphere. If anything will beat these creatures it will be
the power of what lies beyond or out of atoms. These alien Clones are
Masters of the world of atoms and we are dead in the water before we start
if we take them on in those terms.
Alas for us all, we seem to have little choice but to face a catastrophe
while the leadership of the world rests in the hands of the techno-
materialistic behemoth of Euro-America.
Europe is the world’s ‘father’ of psycho-existential corruption. European
forces through the centuries systematically unleashed on the world a
holocaust of detriment through conquest, colonialization and slavery that
has left the entire planet poisoned and burnt out, its people subjugated and
starving and torn apart in racialism and ethnically and fiscally fermented
wars and conflicts. North America

381

is now the ‘son’ carrying on more of the same, and doing it better and at
a faster rate than the ‘old man’ — Europe.
What a glorious country the United States could have been if it had
followed the precepts of wholesome family values of its founding fathers.
How is it possible that the most magnificent opportunity for all mankind to
prove that we are one family was squandered here? The ‘global immigrant
ethic’ that founded this nation out of the four corners of the world now lies
in tatters. It claims to be the moral leader of the world. Yet the most cursory
examination of the place now will reveal its present values extolling
materialism and banal and delusive consumerism to be the least likely
keeper of the world’s ethical standards. Anyone who has been to America
recently cannot have failed to notice on its negative side what an
intrinsically superficial, deeply racist, violent and vicious society it is. The
world requires a moral lead of enormous magnitude. If the United States of
America is currently our planet’s most influential and powerful country, if
nearly ten thousand years of civilization has produced in summary the
leading nation in the world saturated with such debauchery, where and to
whom does our species look to find a change? It would be one thing for
America to be this way if the widespread simplistic ‘Mickey Mouse’
psychology that seems to prevail over there could be isolated and strictly
and exclusively reserved for Americans only and not exported to other
regions of the world. Speech after speech from a succession of their
Presidents claims America to be the moral and martial leader of the world.
This nation is so forceful in packaging, marketing and selling its wretched
brew of fiscally modulated electronic Clone juice to the unsuspecting world
that we should all beware this humbug and note the nature of the poison
that it sells to us all.
There is little doubt that, sadly, judged by any objective standards, the
USA is the most morally defunct and debauched source of influence the
world has ever seen. This is the leading spokesman nation of the Northern
Occidental world. The so-called civilized world. What price a hundred
centuries of human development if this is the result? What price our future
as a species?
The historian Michael Woods puts it thus: ‘Throughout the countries of
the rich West, there’s a growing and profound disquiet — a feeling that the
Western way of life itself is no longer supportable morally or practically,
because of pollution,

382

environmental destruction and the continuing exploitation of the mass of

humanity.’ I believe that God is effectively dead there now and the people
of the Barbarian West must, and will, face their own terrible consequences.
The rest of humanity has to take the greatest care that we do not face their
consequences.
How did a group of tiny islands in the western and northern Atlantic
come to dominate the world, when huge civilizations like China and India
that were seats of learning that far surpassed the Barbarian cultures of this
era did no such thing? I believe it can be put down to something inherent in
the nature of the people. Let me put it this way. A man who will throw a
javelin, no matter how small he is, will always dominate a man who throws
a handful of rice, no matter how big he is.
Gunpowder was known in China for centuries before Marco Polo
brought it to the West. The Chinese used it only for firecrackers. Polo
immediately saw its potential to kill, to maim, to conquer. Could it really be
that the inheritors of direct Cro-Magnon ancestry are the true bearers of the
mark of Cain? After all, colonialism showed us in vivid and undeniable
terms all the qualities Cain ever had and more. The instinct to kill, to steal,
to pollute, to destroy the inheritance of others seems so natural in the
Occidental varieties of humanity. Certainly a historical scan of the colonial
era provides ample and undeniable proof of this.
The deliberate genocide of hundreds of thousands of Native American
Indians. The enslavement of millions of Africans in Europe and America.
Their subsequent genocide. The wiping out of the Australian Aborigines
and their culture. The wiping out of the magnificent Maori culture. The
deliberate enforcement of dope addiction on more than a hundred million
Chinese. The horrendous holocaust that took from us six million precious
Jews with an industrialized disposal procedure. And this is only the modern
equivalent of other countless ancient pogroms conducted by the Greek and
Roman civilizations on millions of victims. The destruction of the Incas, the
Aztecs. The list of Cro-Magnon-sponsored debauchery is endless.
The precincts north of the Tropic of Cancer define largely the most
decadent and entropically driven varieties of our species. Industrial
technology is the spokesman of the damned and it was inevitable that it was
born of the central crucible of Force

383
 on our planet, the Occident. The forge where all the metals of our nature
were beaten into the swords that have ravaged the innocence and the
innocents of Man century after century. The ‘Barbarian West’ stands
condemned as the birthing pool of cultures that defiled the Earth with
countless wars, pestilence and famine. The broadscope of Babylon that
idealized the extremes of human grossness more consistently and for longer
than anywhere else. How, then, could cultures that boast the glories of
Shakespeare, Newton, Da Vinci, Michelangelo, Mozart, Beethoven,
Schiller, Goethe, Franklin, Edison and the host of others such as they be the
cornerstone of depravity for a whole world? Does the culture of wisdom
lead or does it follow in the wake of another more dominant behest? A
Master behest that claims the heart and sentiment in favour of the strict
edict of socialized geometry? Is it a mere afterthought? An inevitable spin-
off that simply happens because its opposite does?
Have you noticed that, when all the totting-up is done, the culture of the
West comes down to a culture of the mind? The song of the list-file and the
binary system. The Christian prophet chided one of his disciples with the
axiom: ‘Think with the heart’. That disciple was Judas. The implication is
inevitable and obvious for any objective mind to see that has travelled to the
societies of the more spiritual and social mid-band of our planet. Largely
the countries between the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn.
Yet how many of the Northern Occident and Northern Orient would tread
the poverty and deprivation-ridden streets of the Third World and look
down with relief and perhaps disdain on the little hungry eyes and
outstretched hands, breathe a sigh of superior relief and give thanks that
they are not thus because of their racial and mental superiority? One can’t
help feeling that, with the deepest irony, they are looking out with the eyes
of the damned.
The greatest prophets and seers through the centuries have predicted, as
the falls of Egypt, Greece and Rome confirmed, that the development of the
human resource as a consumer-based ethic with the self-centred acquisitive
materialistic sense dominant is the ultimate paradigm for damnation. Why
did all the greatest seers affirm this point of view, without exception, as
true? If they were right, and history teaches us that they were categorically
right,
 384

those in the West who are driven by this ethic are done for. I have no
doubt that the synthetic Greys, as biomachines, run to a computer program,
as do all their cohorts on the Earth that have brought about this situation via
the psychochemical interception of mankind through the Cro-Magnon
legacy. There can be no doubt of this if you judge it by the increasing
tendency of many Northern-hemisphere people to have a cold-blooded,
machineminded list-filing mentality. This psychotype of humanity gave
birth to industrial technology and thus the heartless consumerism (some
would say the two things are synonymous) that increasingly dominates the
people of the Northern hemisphere. It begs the salient question: Are they
largely under the control of the Greys already?
‘And man shall walk as machine,’ the prophets screamed.
It is undeniable now that our future as a biological species is increasingly
fuelled with the sap of engine oil. Switch the TV on any day of the week
anywhere in North America and the enthusiasts of virtual reality and
futurescope will fawn, enthuse and facilitate the anarchic glories of inner
space, while in near space, just out of the window in the street outside,
some unfortunate African-American or Hispanic is getting his head beaten
to a pulp by the pure white sons of America riding out of black-and-white
carriages. A random selection of any ten of the most popular newspapers
and any ten of the most popular films at any one time that come from that
part of the world will show you in vivid Technicolor what I mean. The
Clones seem to have the entire shooting match well and truly taped up and
posted to the furthest reaches of a Euro-American hell if Western values as
propagated by our media are anything to go by. It may well be that the only
way out of self-destruction for most Northern Caucasoids is a ride on a
spaceship designed by their own ‘mummies and daddies’. There will
certainly be a surprising number of them lining up enthusiastically to
welcome the cold grey list-filing bioids as their long-lost relatives when the
sky ‘nerds’ finally come to ground and declare themselves.
In the end it is the power of focus of mind away from the material that
Christ and all the greatest teachers told us was the answer to beating all that
is not natural in Godhead. Have you noticed how the deeply spiritual
nations and regions of the world, mainly in the tropics, where focus outside
the atom is strongest,
 385

are being gradually overwhelmed by the grotesque monster of the fiscal

ethic? The last psychoactive bastion for our defence crumbles under the
covert intercession of the deadly grey ‘men’ on the back of the Moon and
their cohorts, be they in Wall Street, Threadneedle Street, or the one they
call ‘the street where you live’.
The simple adjunct ‘Where your focus is, so will your heart be’ is beyond
any doubt the final and most powerful psycho-existential resolution for us
all. I am convinced that all those simplistic exhortations to ‘be good’, do the
‘right’ thing, be ‘right-minded’ are meaningless nonsense and no more than
transient palliatives to ward off temporary states of distress for parents,
teachers and mentors all over the world. What do they really mean in actual
terms of effect? What actually happens when you are good? What really
does the word ‘good’ mean? No one ever tells us this. No one can. It is and
has to be the most relative abstraction in the lexicon of meaning itself.
If you see physicality as screwed-down space formed out of screwed-
down atoms, in the case of our bodies mostly screweddown hydrogen
(eighty-seven per cent of our body is made out of hydrogen) and that this
screwing down has a particular direction, a direction in line with the action
of the forces of entropy, then action in line with what entropy does will
enhance and propagate the screwing-down effect. If your actions divide,
separate, tear apart, destroy, hurt, kill, maim, you are a child of entropy (an
entrope). You will forever be bound in line with what entropy does, and that
is to break up, divide, decay into more and more basic assemblies of parts
in more and more states of randomness and enforced chaos with time. Not
just your atoms, ALL that is you will distort and get more and more tightly
screwed down.
I explained previously that individuality is simply Godhead twisted by
atoms in a particular way. Your way, or my way, or anyone’s way. We, at
least our metaphysical consciousness, ‘thinkability’, or ‘knowability’ in
every single one of us, is just Godhead in a unique trapped and twisted
pattern of the forceless centre points of the space between atoms. We can
know, be conscious and think, simply because we are connected to Godhead
in this way. And so thought is God. The clearer the pathway of the space
between atoms is. The freer it is of twists and turns. The more incisive and
clear the reach of Godhead. The nearer we are to God.

386

The less we become physical. The more we know. The more we are like
God the more powerful we are in making thought accomplish all that is the
reverse modulus of entropy. In God all is totally free to accomplish all
things. Christ said, ‘Seek ye FIRST the kingdom of God and all things shall
be freely added unto you.’ Here is the ultimate power to cancel out the
strictly atomically derived power of the Second Law of Thermodynamics in
its effect on our Soul. It will always have an effect on the atomic side of us,
our bodies, but in the exercise of Will through Thought all its power of
incidental corrupting effect on our Soul will be nought.
I alluded previously to the nature of thought, thinking and strength of
focus and what right thinking might mean. For these exhortations to have
any power and meaningfulness at all they have to imply that the focus of
thought in ways that add, bring together and bind has a real and active
power to reverse the effect of entropy on a given individual’s quantum of
unique being. The implication is that mere thinking can influence and
change atomic determinations of force. Our bodies, as I have said, are
eighty-seven per cent hydrogen. It is most of our physicality. A mode of
thinking that cares, brings together, unites and adds rather than divides and
subtracts, I believe, can actual physically unwind the hydrogen bond that
keeps us all bound and trapped in force and thus in the Universe of Parts. To
illustrate what I mean with a metaphor: When we act in what is commonly
accepted as goodly perspective in the ‘everydayness’ of life, shall we say,
we pull at the bond and try to take it apart. But it is rather like trying to
extract a screw by pulling it out of the wood with a pair of pliers, without
trying to unscrew it with a screwdriver. Well-considered ‘right’ thinking can
unscrew the hydrogen bond, the natural way it should be done, as Jesus
Christ accomplished it and proved it could be done with his transfiguration.
A life led as his example showed is the way and the truth to the state of
enlighted being in Godhead. The screw has a particular-sided thread and
wrong thinking only serves to make it tighten further in its place. This of
course implies what I said about the one-sided nature of entropy. That when
things are seen in an atomic context alone, just in terms of the physical and
not the metaphysical, all things go one way to Chaos. They rot, break up,
and their parts break up to greater states of randomness till all that is left is
a Universe of heat with no differentiated parts.

387

(What scientists call the Heat-death of the Universe). The force and urge
necessary to do it without understanding what we are up against is
forbidding and cannot accomplish anything, just as pliers can’t grip a screw
head without destroying both the screw and that which it is set in.
Maybe what is commonly called Love provides the power of mind to act
as a kind of screwdriver that unscrews and loosens the bond, and hate does
the opposite. This is what the Christian prophet and ‘redeemer’ Jesus Christ
probably invited us to do when he said, ‘Believe in me and I will give you
eternal life’. Perhaps his entire glorious life’s example and those of his
beautiful contemporaries were master paradigms showing how we as a
species can in the Earth’s ‘force print’ physically unloosen the atomic cloak
and thus transfigure into the Universe of the Whole. He put such
importance on the power of prayer. The problem is that it seems we don’t
believe enough in what we do in righteousness, and thus our mental focus
in what we want and do is not strong enough for this power to accomplish
our wishes and dreams and make them come true. It is up to the as yet by
and large innocent people of the non-occidental world to see that the
debauched societies of Euro-America do not further infect them with the
plague of materialistic filth they export under the name of freedom. The
mid-band nations of the world are the most spiritually devotional places in
the world and still hold to the pulse of that which is beyond the atom with
some quantum of decency and moral certitude. It is here, mainly in Africa
and Asia, that a defined moral sense and strong family values still prevail,
by and large. It is here we can paint a haven of example for any machine-
man with no gun (as our own kind from the Occident have, alas, too often
proven to be) and show them that the answer to both our predicaments is to
realize that we perhaps need each other. Now more than ever.
There can be no time for niceties any more in face of the alien threat. All
nations pale beneath the intelligence of the grey species that has been
gradually singing their anthem with our voices. Carefully chosen words
written by behavioural psychologists and calculated to bring out the surface
gloss of particular vested interests, be they scaled in terms of the individual
or a nation, serve only to gild a dying lily. It is the can of worms beneath the
surface that will take both individual and nation

388

out if the hidden putrefaction is not squarely faced with open and
complete honesty. ‘America the Great’, the Marseillaise, and ‘Rule
Britannia’ will sound rather metallic and hollow in voice boxes driven by
helium.
I believe that the threat to our species — Humanity — is greater than we
have ever faced in the history of our planet. A crucible beyond our own
natural quantum of atoms awaits to pour its poison into the centres of our
very being. The ancient texts that spoke of the threat have been wiped off
the common lexicons of man by hands that count with strange-looking
fingers. The Kabbala, the Tetragrammaton, the Pistis Sophia and countless
other ancient texts spoke loudly of an unnatural creation that was not of the
ancient aegis of life eternal. They gave us a warning through the centuries
about the true fathers of men. A warning written in the blood of humanity
crying out in bewilderment for justice. The same dispassionate cruelty that
will eat the pieces of our children on tables of crystal onyx and stone just as
we now discuss test-tube mice and their juices over mouthfuls of claret and
cheese.
The vast majority of us are simple folk. We see, know and understand
things best if they are presented simply and in ways that illustrate their
meaning for all to see. It has been the curse of most theosophies and
philosophies that their, in many instances, self-appointed custodians have
more often than not been intellectuals who pontificate in chant, recitative,
and complex conundrums the simple erudition of the great Teachers’
accounts of the way beyond atoms. So often pulpits and temple precincts
are the places for ego-vending intellectualization that comes down to no
more than mumbo-jumbo. The vast majority of these utterances are of little
or no value to the listener or student. We are so often left none the wiser,
and we go our way too embarrassed to say that we haven’t a clue as to
what’s been written or said. The Great Teachers such as Gautama Buddha,
Jesus Christ, and the Prophet Mohammed taught in the simplest of ways.
Christ is noted for his brilliantly illustrative parables. The Koran is a glory
of wisdom and simple elucidation.
The rascals who came afterwards so often mangled it all. In high-handed
and self-centred and self-interested authority these lethal ‘human beings’
hijacked the Masters’ words and meanings and twisted and mutilated their
blazing sagacity. The heart of

389

Truth as we on Earth could know it. A vital word changed here and there.
A phrase misquoted, a deed misrepresented, sometimes deliberately, could
and did serve to distort and in some instances reverse completely a
statement of vital revelation. Let me give you an incisive example.
The word ‘Repent’ in the theosophical lexicon is commonly taken to
imply an expression of culpability in sin. A powerful suggestion of guilt,
contrition, penitence and regret was culled from its meaning and touted by
priests and partisans of theology the world over, century after century. Then
the marvellous scholarship of Martin Luther, a philologist priest and a
seeker after religious humbug, ascertained that the word ‘repent’, as used by
Christ in the Aramaic (the language spoken by Christ) when translated into
Greek meant ‘metanoite’, the Greek word that literally meant ‘Change your
mind’. It was an exhortation or an invitation to think again and change the
base of your thinking. It had nothing to do with contrition or forgiveness. It
did not mean that one had to rue, despoil one’s value in supplication and
guilt-ridden penitence. It encouraged the discovery of righteous value in
whatever quandary you faced and a simple change of one’s future thinking
in line with this. A dignified and free choice to change one’s mind in the
light of a better, more rational alternative.
The original counsellors and administrators of the Christian Faith perhaps
saw in this translation an interpretation that gave them an opportunity for
awesome power of administration and control of the flock. One does not
know whether this was done deliberately or not. (The subsequent treatment
of Martin Luther by the Roman Church implies that it might well have been
deliberate.) A difference of catastrophic consequence to the human psyche
befell common moralistic thinking with this simple distortion. It provided
for the depression of the human spirit, such that the vital change of
perspective encouraged was immediately couched and surrounded by an air
of perverse indulgence and, worst of all, fear.
A simple solicitation to ‘see clearly and change one’s mind’ does not
carry the sting that the stance of supplication and regret does. It doesn’t
include the perverse satisfaction of wallowing in self-pity and masochistic
indulgence. Moreover, and this is the important point, it does not allow for a
hold or control over the individual by a third party, such as the body politic
of a Church. A, guilt-ridden

390

penitent is easier to control with the threat of damnation, especially if the

expurgation of that guilt is joined into the fabric of ordained forgiveness
under the total prerogative of the priests. Many of whom, at least in the
early Christian church, were ecclesiastical refugees from life’s hard ways at
that time and nothing more special than that.
It is easy to see that the axiom, ‘You have done something wrong, now
make amends or you are damned’ could get a lot of ‘roubles’ for a newly
forming organization and more importantly its organizers. The obligation to
depend for the future tenure of one’s soul on the movement of a particularly
blessed hand making the sign of the cross, while the palm of the other one
is held flat upright and open is more to do with politics and accountancy
than with the ethics of grace and righteousness. It passes immediate control
of one’s life and values to others who may then dictate henceforth a
prescription for future behaviour. Stupefying effective control is the name
of the game. All through the distortion of the meaning of one little word.
And so the meaning of the word ‘repent’ as taught as a theosophical ethic
grew to be the sword to smite the world with humbug. Humbug that has
perhaps condemned millions to live in fear and guilt-ridden feelings and,
worse than that, to die in this state.
You cannot go to heaven in my head and I cannot do it in yours. We as
individuals are the ultimate guardians of our own destinies and that most
precious and awesome phenomenon of connection to Godhead called a
Soul. If someone else gets it wrong on our behalf, he she they or it may not
be around to blame for the error when the chutes to hell are open for each of
us. Preferment by proxy invites damnation by principle. It is true madness.
Words like ‘hell’ and ‘damnation’ have too often been the clue words for
practitioners of religious deceit and debauchery through the ages. They
define the anthem of the bogus holy men and religious charlatans that have
led so many astray through the millennia. Many have mortgaged their very
souls into the custody of such as these without a second thought about their
investiture. Anyone who has switched on a television set in the USA or
Canada cannot have failed to see parade after parade of phoney and
beguiling platitudes pouring out of the mouths of armchair evangelists
shouting, ‘Praise the Lord and pass me the money’. The Bible

391

is used as an instrument of fear soliciting belief in Jesus Christ under a

twin axiom of carrot and stick. A heaven for favourites and courtiers and
hellfire and damnation for the unbeliever. One wonders just how many of
these well-groomed tailor’s dummies with their plastic smiles and make-up
adorned, media-cultured voices and faces would cope in the jungles of
ignorance where mosquitoes bite with death and deadly abandon and
sunlight bums the sweated brow. Where churches are built with bricks and
mortar that actually tear and bruise hands connected to your own head.
Where the stench of poverty, disease and death call for a few moments to be
spent away from air-conditioned Waldorf Salads and iced tea.
We are and have to be our own masters. ‘Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea
maxima culpa’ rings out loud and clear as the tenet that underlies Will and
any resource to do anything. If reason has any meaning then each result of
each decision is intrinsically and totally our own responsibility and no one
else’s. We all must, it seems, take the utmost care to know what adorns our
Soul line to Godhead with strength and not weakness. It is crucial that we
glean the knowledge of how this is done with objectivity and dispassionate
zeal of the highest order through our individual state and not the proxy
formulas of others. It simply invites outsiders to make our own individual
disasters. We cannot for a single moment afford to be ‘second-hand’. Our
individuality is the most precious thing to no one but ourselves. We may
observe, learn and borrow the best, but we can never afford to relinquish a
particle of ourselves to another’s keeping for a moment.
So how do we know who or what to follow? How do we know how to
judge what is eternally right and wrong? ‘By their fruits shall ye know
them’ a certain man of Nazareth once said. But against what final list of
priorities may Truth be known? Where do we find the perfect scale that is
safe and true?
The basic yardstick that says if you add, bring together, unite in total fit
elemental parts, you simplify and make clear, and if you subtract, divide
and set apart you complicate and obfuscate, is all one needs to know to set
the compass points for any journey to enlightenment.
Ignorance is the paymaster of Hell. We welcome its demons as
restriction. We settle on the shelves of damnation with Apathy. The cry of
the billions in ignorance marks the nibs that have

392

written the history of our species. A history forged in the blood of short-
term sensory result despite so many warnings. So many sacrificial lambs on
the altars of superior insight.
Yet we are still fair in eternal scope. Impossible though it may. seem. The
vastness of this giant conspiracy that has blinded us all through the
millennia to our true predicament and destiny also gave us blessed pilots
who have and will love our simple lost fold for as long as justice is eternal.
They too were claimed because our ignorance caused them to be claimed.
A nail pierced the sweetest flesh and no finger did ‘The Father’ move.
For such is love. Such is forgiveness. The sublimation of ignorance with
wisdom. Such is the most powerful antidote to alien or any other
malevolent influence. It is no empty platitude. It is reason itself.
The truth of the predicament of the alien beings and ours has to be
demonstrated in love and forgiveness towards the representatives of these
alien intelligences too. That truth rings loud and clear and says
unequivocally and paradoxically that the strengthening of our soul retaining
cordage with the Universe of the Whole comes as their most urgent priority
too. With ultimate irony we are their Masters in still having the glorious
dispensation of a Soul, as they don’t. If finding a Soul is their quest they
will have to help us to preserve ours. All extraterrestrial or indeed intra-
terrestrial aliens have to be made to realize what a Soul really is. In doing
so they will see that no single soul is open to being hijacked. That each one
of us is connected to each other through karmic obligation somewhere
along the line. The wasteful loss of a single one of us shakes the entire Tree
of Life all through the Universe and beyond. That the Opening of the
Universe of the Whole is in the hands of Compassion and Mercy
personified. Therein, and only therein, is the final margin of all margins and
in mutual understanding we may reach it more certainly, again in ultimate
irony, together and not apart.
What does all of the foregoing finally imply for our collective family —
Humanity? What does it say about our predicament and status as
functioning beings now in our most contemporary stance as a species? In
trying to answer my son’s two questions my own spirit was led on a trail
that for me at least threw up an insight into the whole existential paradigm
that has left me concussed

393

with wonder and stunned with joy. It has also left me poised and
tantalized with a thundering concern and fear for our children’s tomorrow. I
believe the ET factor, for so long so apparent yet impossibly hidden from
the sight and thus the affairs of men, defined the very root of all our
yesterdays and no one knew or seemed to know. The reasons for how it
could have happened are now irrelevant. For me the thing that matters is
that there can be no doubt that it did happen and, more chillingly, it is still
happening and so few seem to care.
There can be no satisfactory resolutions to the premise ‘Stop the world, I
want to get off.’ There is nowhere else to go. The Druids of expediency
who advocate taking a hike into space as our future for a clean new start
and a better tomorrow carry go-nowhere smart cards. They will have to
know that all the real estate is infected with the same seeds that poisoned
the home they have just left. Like the pioneers who leave for all promised
lands and soon discover that, alas, they have brought old heads into new
perspectives of hope. America has proved in a mere three hundred years
that the dreams of her pioneers have been dashed into the fragments of the
decadence, debauchery and superficiality you see in any city there any
second, minute, hour, day, or month of the year. She claims to be the
standpoint dream of civilization. The American dream is touted as the
highest masthead of social result in the world today. It has turned instead
into the hallmark recipe from which all nightmares are made. Most thinking
Americans in their heart of hearts know this, as they know that it will be the
tub-thumping zealots of ‘God Bless White America and pass me the
money’ who will hold the societal smoking guns when the song of the
Greys is finally sung on the Earth.
Yet America is beautiful too. Awesomely beautiful as written in the
signatures of her sons: Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Chomsky, Crosby,
Disney. Yes, Crosby and Disney. The names enshrine the glory of pleasant
dreams. Decency, vision, romance, sweetness, the fellowship of all life and
living. It speaks of hallowed margins. Margins defined in the scale of
Godhead itself. A scale that verified an American dream so different from
what is seen now laid out before us in any street of any city in the US of A.
Disney internalized the beautiful human dream. America externalized it as a
nightmare. Generations there once formed, and still do in

394

some remote regions, whole mental visionary quantums of decent lives

led with decent rules of living. Wholesome forms and ethics spoke and of
course still speak of better ways for us all to be. Stage and screen still
assured millions of us that the Wizard of Oz and what was over the rainbow
was America, while southern trees hid the deadly truth of the Cro-Magnon
legacy with burning crosses and stretched black necks.
Do we ever learn our lessons? History unequivocally proves we don’t.
We always exchange righteous hopes and dreams for failure. Failures that
each time result in parades of disappointment. Yet somewhat paradoxically
we never cease to strive for the Rubicon, each time plastering the walls of
previous failures with contrived reassurances that we’ll get it right next
time. The honest objective eye sees the truth of this as humbug. The
subjective eye tells us our own truths as mostly lies. And surely it is here in
this cushion of distortion and personal make-believe that the greatest threat
to all our tomorrows has lain hidden right in the very bosom of humanity.
Our genes.
The ET of Close Encounters turns out to be the most singular signal fire
of doom for all reasoning life forms when judged against the scale of
freedom that marks eternal standpoints. It seals us all with the punctuation
of the finite. It writes on our future with a language of limit and seeks to
steal our eternity with a subterfuge counted in millions of years.
Yet could it all have been different if we had spotted the subterfuge
earlier, for what it was? We have always been confronted with this
seemingly impossible paradox of a human nature that is instinctively
tutored to save and at the same time to mindlessly destroy. Does the stance
of natural Godhead in all of us urge us to save and the artificially implanted
elements of the false and self-appointed ET God or gods of the atomic and
thus physical Universe urge us to destroy? Would it have helped us to know
that the destructive side to our nature is a constructed artefact alien to us in
every sense of the word? Could we then have been more capable of being
more watchful of its effect if we had known the true nature of its origin? I
believe it would have made an awesome difference.
Imagine for a moment that you are standing at a vantage point in space
and can see the entire universe arrayed before you. Billions of

395

galaxies with trillions of suns and mega-trillions of planets. What price

size? Our home the Earth is a tiny point among all these magnitudes and we
as individuals are reduced further in size in such enormity to the smallest
imaginable fractions of it all. Yet we instinctively magnify our size and
place an importance on ourselves as beings to a scale that transcends these
numbers and imperatives. It gives us Godlike importance. Tiny shapes on a
tiny planet all going about their business, thinking their individual wants
and needs are the most important things in all this panorama. We kill, we
maim, we injure and practice the most heinous affronts to each other in the
name of this tacit self-proclaimed idea that we are bigger and better than it
all. We expect a Divine Being in all these numbers to take a personal
interest in us. In all our specific individual affairs. Respond to our whims
and fancies, however trite. In other words, be on our individual telephone
line twenty-four hours a day, at our beck and call. How many of us ever
asks the question: How?
If God existed and functioned for us personally in our personal private
contexts and was referenced in terms of this Universe’s spatially judged and
sequentially tallied time, as I believe ninety-nine per cent of us expect and
believe, then a most spectacular nonsense is revealed. God just won’t have
time for us all — personally. Just take a look at the numbers involved.
We have about 7,000,000,000 (seven billion) people on this Earth. If each
one prayed to God and told the great deity his troubles, wants and wishes
and gave him our usual personally marked shopping list — Gimme this,
Gimme that, do this, do that etc. — just how much time is He/She going to
have to listen and respond to us individually, say in a given year?
Let’s do the sum. There are 60 seconds x 60 minutes x 24 hours x 365
days in a year. Multiply that all and we have 31,536,000 seconds in a year.
That’s thirty-one million, five hundred and thirty-six thousand seconds in
one year. But there are seven thousand million people on this earth and only
thirty-one million, five hundred and thirty-six thousand seconds available in
any given year. That means that if the deity is fair, each one of us has just
31,536,000 divided by 7,000,000,000 = 0.450 of a second per person of
God’s time in any one year, or (0.450 x 70), a mere 31.5 seconds’ worth of
God’s exclusive attention in an average lifetime.
Ah! I hear you say. This is ridiculous. Not all of us on Earth

396

believe in God and not all of us who do will be all praying at the same
time. True. You got me! … But a squirmy little thought is forming in my
head. What if we are not alone in this Universe? Last time it looked, the
Hubble space telescope told us that there may be more planets in the
Universe than stars. Just a hundred more planets in the entire Universe like
ours with Homo Sapiens equivalents among the billion that scientists now
think might support our type of life, and God won’t have one second in an
entire lifetime to hear our personal pleas.
Ah, but I hear a few lone voices out there saying: Phew! That’s a relief.
We must be the only intelligent life in the Universe! (Let me say at this
point that there are people who still believe seriously that the Earth is
square.) Can anyone still believe that we are alone? I am tempted here to
say, in the light of what I have discovered in researching and writing this
book, I wish to God we were.
Is the lesson of all of this merely that we have to keep our prayers very
short? (Ha! Ha!) Just think of all that wasted prayer-time that in any given
moment is going adrift in our Universe. All that heartfelt, concentrated,
deeply centred thought and will-power travelling at the speed of light and
going to waste somewhere out there in the Universe.
But where is that somewhere? Where indeed is God? There has surely
got to be a point from which a response can come. If we judge God by the
laws of physics as we know them and he, she or it is too far away when our
prayers leave us, we may have to wait thousands of millions of light years
for an answer. That is, of course, presupposing, as scientists tell us, that
nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. So is it any wonder that
many prayers are not answered? At least, they may be answered but the
answer may still be winging its way on a relatively slow postal service
travelling at the speed of light and you, me and Uncle Tom next door may
be grossly unable to care while little worms are finishing their fine dining
exercises on our carcasses six feet under, when it finally arrives.
It all seems preposterous put this way, doesn’t it? Yet that is just what it
is. We continue to believe this nonsense. In fact many of us will fight and
even kill to maintain belief in this humbug.
However, what it all does is to force us to see God as a concept that bears
no relation to the atomically derived basic laws of physics.

397

It all implies that God is a phenomenon outside time, space and matter,
perhaps akin to a giant telephone exchange. A huge quantum sponge, timed
into every point everywhere. Capable of isolating mega trillions of calls
every instant and sorting it all out on an individual basis across the length
and breadth of the Universe and able to respond instantly i.e. faster than the
speed of light. If we thus put God outside the Universe in a totally different
frame of existence and still claim that we are not isolated from God, then
there has to be a way the two connect. The clear implication from this is
that the mechanism that allows us to conceive all of this in the first place,
and indeed reach and communicate with God, may indeed be Thought. It
may be a capacity that can reach and exist outside the frames of Space and
Time and indeed ‘travel’ faster than the speed of light.
So much for seeing the phenomenon of God in inappropriate
anthropocentric terms. We fight and kill millions for little pieces of real
estate we call countries, or ethnic enclaves that are so small when seen
against the awesome context and grandeur of the size of the Universe as to
shame the word ‘minute’ for giving a false impression of magnitude. This is
the size of our madness. Our condition as a species. Yet we can love, can’t
we? How is it possible that we can do this when we are as humanity in such
an apoplectic state of lunacy? They say that the other side of hate is love.
Can it really be that the one can be the other at one and the same time? The
most stunning contradiction of all terms. I do not believe it for an instant. I
insist that while there’s love there can be no hate. Love is Godhead and thus
the bequest of Godhead and hate the legacy of that which is not in any way
directly of it. I believe that hate came through the hypodermics or whatever
may have been used by artificial machine-type extraterrestrial robots. A
poisoned alien engine oil. A lethal alien genetic mulch that held no recipe
for tenderness, compassion or grand references that told of an emotional
sense, of feeling and caring. The Snake in the Adam and Eve story that
tempted and brought down the whole edifice set up by God is an association
with reptiles. Surprise surprise, many so-called ‘abductees’ describe these
alien Greys and their cohort Clones who abduct them to be like ‘Humanoid
reptiles’. Food for thought, isn’t it?
I believe hate is in us but not of us. It rises to a command we

398

never see. A flash of invisible light. A pulse of cold microwave force. An

unreasoned mental prompt. All centred on what is referred to as the R
Complex of the brain. Hate is a prompt, the property of a deliberate genetic
and unnatural alteration of our brain. A transceiving grey-mattered
mechanism that receives, transmits, sorts and synthesizes signals through
three distinct schemes of tissue and a series of fissures called sulchi. That is
all of it. The plum that became a prune. Our curse. Original Sin.
 We can envision and understand the Universe in a single swoop of our
mind. The microbe on the Leviathan’s pulse. Yet who really is the Giant?
Haven’t we got something the wrong way round here? Not a single one of
those multi-trillion gargantuan points out there in space has the slightest
idea themselves, out of themselves, that they are even there. That they in
fact exist. But the spindly brown Sri Lankan beggar scuttling along the
streets of Colombo can quote Tagore in awesome affirmation that it is the
‘living’ atom and not the ‘dead’ one that makes up all this size.
Yes, we are of Godstuff, but not made out of it. It is a fine and absolutely
vital distinction. The stardust that scientists proclaim made us all is merely
a decaying robe that encircles Godstuff. The robot-minded biologist who
hysterically claims there is no Godstuff and that it all comes from a purely
atomic derivation might well be saying it out of his particular ‘alienized’
programme of star-stuff. He has just, alas, switched off his Godstuff. That is
all. And sadly for him or her that is everything.
A billion hungry stomachs. A million crying eyes. Ten thousand silos
storing food, a trillion pounds of relief and no one moves a finger to wipe
the pain away. When the legacy of supremacists, be they Cro-Magnon,
Mongoloid, ET, Grey or whatever, is examined for its true nature amid the
lies touted on a billion television screens daily, it is plain that it is a legacy
that has given the world great suffering. It has also given rise to generations
that hold the keys to the kingdom of hope for, the whole world. Yet these
keys are still turning to close the door of hope to many and open it for the
few. It is their sin that remains. It is their gauntlet that all our souls have to
run. It is my last behest in this work, that I attempt to show your son and
mine a sight of it, perhaps before it is too late to matter. And if that is
conceit, I humbly bow my head without an apology.

399

It may be said of this all that it is the singular purpose of the Universe to
see to it that all that is there goes the way of death and decay. That it is truly
inevitable, and that the Enforced Cosmos can do nothing else. The great
mathematician and philosopher Bertrand Russell affirmed that the Universe
was under a death sentence from the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and
argued that all human life was ultimately futile and existed to no real higher
purpose. As he put it: ‘All the noonday brightness of the human genius’
would count for nothing in the wake of the entropic process, if the Universe
and all that was in it came to a final demise in an unimaginable void of
heated nothing. It implies that it is the legacy of Godstuff in all planets to
finally cede itself to this awesome and final behest. To sublimate all things
in this Universe into a divided form that will be the last dispatch of Soul
and life and thus the capacity for independence from it. It may well be true,
but I for one don’t believe it for a moment, if what we commonly call sense
and meaning have any resource or recourse in the nature of our species. I
believe Russell was right insofar as the atom was concerned. It is the atom
that is damned. We, fortunately, are not just atoms. The existential blanket
that makes for living being sparkles in every fraction with the quiet glorious
Enlight of eternal tenure. Godstuff. Our own personal ‘godstuff’ encoded
with our individual restrictions making our own unique fingerprint
emblazoned within Godhead called our Soul. Like a glass paperweight with
the air bubbles (Godness) in it. The ‘air-conditioned aeration’ provided by
Godhead in this Universe provides living paradigms with intelligence and
thus the ability to make rational choices. Yes, we are both here in this
Universe and there in God at the same time. Yet the likelihood of keeping
some fraction of ourselves beyond the ‘Margin of Forever’ gets less and
less likely the longer we linger in this Universe. We have to get out of this
Hell. Fast. It is the imperative to end all imperatives if Gautama Buddha,
Jesus Christ, the Prophet Mohammed, Confucius and all the great Prophets,
Masters and Seers of logically derived existential Truth are to be believed.
There can be no compromises with this engine of doom we call the
Universe of enforced Parts. We have to go home to our true point of eternal
belonging — Godhead itself — as soon as we can. We have, in other words,
got to get the hell out of this Universe while we can make effective enough
choices

400

to do so, or slowly, inexorably, be damned by drifting into a state or

living paradigm that does not allow for such effective choices to be made.
In my search for an added insight into the phenomenon of UFOs and so-
called ‘Flying Saucers’, I have tried to demonstrate and verify that
existentiality consists of two bases. Two final drifts. The first and most
important base consists of all that is Godhead and out of it naturally. The
second base is a derivation out of the first and is made up of all that is
created and manufactured from it and out of it unnaturally. It is on this
‘soul-less’ second base that UFOs and flying saucers and Clones and
roboids and all the rest of the ‘artificial’ negative and deadly paraphernalia
in the Universe of Parts find an existential margin. In this ‘Universe of
enforced Parts’ what is natural and what is created continually impinge on
one another. Whatever the whole final truth might be of it all, one thing for
me stands clear and veritable above all else. That is simply this: The vast
majority of naturally existing beings (i.e entities with Soul) capable of
making intelligent choices don’t really know the difference between the two
states. This vital, crucial, awesome difference is lost on so many that their
respective eternities are seriously mortgaged. We systematically kill, maim
and make impotent all those who still have enough insight into the
difference to shout a warning to us all of the consequences of not knowing
this contradiction. We thus drift into the oblivion of a future in atoms to
finally exist as atoms, divided and damned.
If my children were to ask me what I might say as a last word of advice
to them in a father’s valedictory words of love, when I close my eyes for the
last time, I would suggest a lesson. A lesson that might serve them well, if
they would bum it into their minds. I would ask that they pay heed to
logical sense alone. Nothing else. I would ask that they never listen with
sanction or fear. There are no pipers to pay for pink elephants and tooth
fairies. Above all I would ask that they never commit themselves to the
behests of others, but only to behests on behalf of others. In that way the
only piper one pays will be guaranteed to be present when the final payment
is due. It will be you and only you alone that have earned the result, and if a
blank go-nowhere eternity will be yours to reap, you and you alone would
have chosen it to be so.
And so, when all the summaries are taken and all the totals are

401

totted up, could it all have been a series of innocent incidental natural
atmospheric events and secret military procedures of strictly terrestrial
origin going on around the world? Could it be that these have been hitched
and stitched together to form a preposterous paranoid conspiracy theory
about an invasion of little green, or in this case little grey men from outer
space? I’m sure many will think so. But what if it is not? What if it is NOT?
How would one begin to tell the world that an alien presence is already
here if there is a conspiracy of silence of the size and power we have clearly
had demonstrated as succeeding at Roswell and elsewhere in covering it all
up, a conspiracy maintained by top secret government organizations? If you
read this then you know there is at least one avenue still untainted and
uncontrolled by the Alien Protective Conspiracy. I am convinced it won’t be
long before all adverse serious critical analysis and comment on the
endeavours of the Clones and Greys will be covertly stopped before it can
get to full and worldwide public exposure.
If all this is paranoia blended with a fertile imagination then, as I have
said before, little harm will have been done to the general consensus of
truth. It will have at worst been a horror story that cannot compare with the
verifiable pictures of hell that have come out of Bosnia and Rwanda that are
broadcast by the electronic and print media all over the world. But I would
rather be paranoid and right than incredulous, cautious and wrong. I am
thoroughly convinced that we as a species are at the rim of a cataclysm if
we don’t expose the presence of an alien influence in the affairs of
humanity. It is for the simple citizen to find the truth of it for him or herself.
Governments should never be trusted to do it. I believe most governments
don’t know how deeply they are penetrated and controlled by the agents of
these insidious alien interlopers. After all, thousands of years of covert
genetic culturing have given their hybrids human faces. I believe it will be
almost impossible to spot the subterfuge now unless we are all as a species
aware that it is going on. The vast majority of the people of this planet
haven’t a clue that such a thing as an alien interception of our species has
been and still is going on. What I fear most of all is that most won’t care.
In the final analysis it is the future of all our human children that counts.
I believe, for what it’s worth, that what I have discovered

402
 needs urgent exposure. Its veracity is for the reader to judge within the
halls of his or her inalienable individuality and sense of what is true. It is
vitally important, if true, for all our sakes, and particularly for the sake of
the generations to come, that somehow the cat of an alien extraterrestrial
possession of our future be let out of the bag. I have tried to lay before you
informed opinion and, I hope, a prima facie case for it. It is the final
courtesy I can pay to all my fellow human beings simply because we are all
human and might want to stay in every way truly human.
Well, here goes folks… One more try … Wish me luck … Wish us all
luck.
If you sing the song of the Little Grey Men, perhaps you will sing it now
with a tinge of sadness and a little irony. It’s a simple song. Anyone can
sing it:
‘Grey, Green, Yellow and Blue,
We are here to take ‘care’ of you’

OceanofPDF.com
ADDENDUM
CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS

CENTRE GOD-NESS
If God-ness is the view of parts from the Universe of the Whole, then
Centre God-ness is the view of the whole within the ultimate coalescence of
all sentient being in perfect PEACE (i.e. unenforcedness) and the absolute
and perfect union of all parts. As the perfect reconciliation of all difference
in total fit, it can be seen as that ultimate point in which all absolutes arc
contained.

COMPLEXITY
Complexity is neither order nor chaos. It is the confluence of both.

ENLIGHT
This is my word for potentiality and therefore freedom and sentience within
a physical universe of dead actuality, or static dependency. I present a case
that our brains do not manufacture awareness, but that our bodies are living
AERIALS that receive it through an antecedental line of un-enforcedness
(SOUL) traced all the way to the big bang. So God-ness is how Enlight is
resolved in the Universe of the Whole; Enlight is how God-ness touches the
Universe of Parts. They are one and the same:

404

FIELD
In scientific parlance the term ‘field’ is used to denote any effect that has a
set of contours joining points with equal amounts of what scientists call
POTENTIAL. This is potential in the sense that an electrical voltage is a
POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE and doesn’t of itself imply lines of open
potential in the sense of free choice, i.e. the freedom to ‘Be’ or not to ‘Be’;
not to be or what to be without compulsion by force. I have argued that
force and therefore force potentials are, in fact, simply the derivative of true
potentiality formed out of the choice for separation. So why do I use the
term SOUL FIELD? Isn’t that a contradiction in terms, if SOUL refers to
the encapsulation of Enlight or potentiality of un-enforcedness and the term
FIELD refers to the contours of enforcedness? It need not be a
contradiction. As I have pointed out earlier, the power of a vacuum is its
LACK of enforcedness? It is this when set against the huge (normally
unnoticed) pressures surrounding a vacuum that define the ‘VACUUM
EFFECT’.
When you turn on a vacuum cleaner it is not, strictly speaking the
vacuum that draws the air and rubbish into the machine, it is actually the
surrounding atmospheric pressure that ‘pushes’ it in. ‘Ah, got you!’ you
might say. If force dominates non-force then according to your definitions
matter would dominate THOUGHTness and how could this be consistent
with your postulation that the whole physical universe is just one little
‘pimple on the face of God’, so to speak?
The resolution of this apparent paradox into no paradox at all is actually
very simple: If the vacuum effect in question has NO inherent enforced-
ness, then it must be infinitely malleable in terms of the where, when and
how of its intercession in force. ‘Soul field’ therefore refers to the
individualized patterns of reception of. Enlight and therefore the shapes of
vacuum field effect, and therefore to the fulcrum points where the Thought-
Awareness-Will continuum ‘becomes’ the Matter-Space-Time continuum
and vice versa. What about what I have called, LIFE’s fields and DEATH’s
fields? As I have said, the term ‘field’ is used to denote ‘iso-contours’ of
like effect in the sense that iron filings, for example, trace the contours of a
magnetic field around a bar magnet. What has that to do with ‘life’ and
‘death’? What are their contours?

405

Consider, if you will, the structure of a sponge. The holes have their
contours and the material of the sponge has its contours. Each is, in fact, in
summary a picture or impression of the other. The holes have a kind of
discreteness as separate holes although the sponge is one sponge. The
sponge also has a kind of definition in fixture as the holes define location
within the sponge such that it is not all-over ‘sponge-ness’.
 So what I call Life’s fields are simply the writings of the ‘vacuum pen’ of
Enlight or potentiality through and within atoms i.e. bodies of ‘living’
beings, or organisms. DEATH’s fields, then, are simply the signature of
discarnate SOUL field manifested and contoured through and within the
various shells of tension in the space between atoms. In other words, I am
suggesting that in the state of discarnacy that is often misleadingly referred
to as death, our ‘bodies’ are our capsules of Thought-ness that keep us
discrete from the universe of the whole. So that once the restrictions of
outlook that maintain limit in separation are undone we could merge with
the ALL of perfect fit and therefore balance, but that any tendencies we
have towards separation may pull us back into a downward spiral of
reincarnations into further and further exponencies of LOSS, to become any
previous form of ‘BEING’.

FORCE
Force is the ‘Paradigm of Potential’ for things or events to ‘happen’. It
defines the interface between what is of GODHEAD and what is not. It is
an effect that occurs when what we term the abstraction ‘WILL’ as it exists
in the state of GODHEAD is sublimated into the state of separation in the
Universe of Parts or Portions.
Force may also be seen as the summary quantum of the potential
difference that exists between the Universe of Parts (our Universe) and the
Universe of the Whole (Godhead). In other words, FORCE defines the lines
of slippage that favour events to happen such that the reconciliation of the
two Universes, one with the other, occurs and a state of ultimate and
absolute balance is achieved.

406

GOD-NESS
The view point of ALL TOGETHERNESS within the state of PERFECT
UNION OF ALL PARTS and therefore the ultimate reach of the Universe
of the Whole into the Universe of Parts, implying and defining what may be
called God in you and me as sentient beings.

GODHEAD
Godhead is to Centre Godness as Enlight is to God-ness. While Enlight
DOES, Godhead IS, if you like.

GRAVITATION
As I have said, Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity defines gravity as
the curved, bent and twisted contours of the Matter- Space-Time continuum
(M.S.T.c.) that shapes the lines of ‘happening’ between the two poles of the
M.S.T.c., i.e. the Big Bang at one end and the Heat-Death, or ‘Big Crunch’
at the other. According to many theoretical physicists the other
‘fundamental’ forces (electromagnetism and the two nuclear forces) are also
contours of the M.S.T.c. If this is so, then it implies an implicate nine-
dimensional space but if, as I have argued in Chapter Three, two
dimensions imply four without four happening, then three can also imply
nine (as three is the root of nine). If this is the case, then all the ‘forces of
nature’ are implied derivatives of gravitation which is itself the line of
connectedness from God-ness to nothingness and back.

HOLOGRAM
This is a word derived from the Greek, meaning a device for providing a
whole picture. This picture or holograph is made by combining information
from two light beams to provide a three-dimensional image viewable from
all directions. This image has the property that if it is broken into small
parts, each part retains the whole shape.

407

Electromagnetic radiation e.g. visible LIGHT

This is what Einstein inferred to be the matrix that sets and juxtaposes the
axes (axial dimensions) of the matter-space-time continuum, its speed (or
the square of its speed) a measure of the inextricable binding of these three
elements one to the other. The equations of ‘special relativity’ define the
inter-relatedness of matter, space and time, while those of ‘general
relativity’ define what had previously been called GRAVITATIONAL
FORCE. These are simply the contours of the matter-space-time Universal
map defining the path of least action, or ‘geodesic’, between two points.
Thus ‘happening’ or ‘events’ are mapped through geodesic ‘WORLD
LINES’ of matter ‘in’ space and time. Matter makes and shapes space and
time as actual effects when a further ingredient exists to give these elements
a non-inertial, but non-ethereal reference frame of all references to exist
against.
I suggest that the MATTER-SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM is no more
than a sublimation of what I call the THOUGHT-AWARENESS-WILL
CONTINUUM. A sublimation of where the elements of one take on the
appearance of the other. A sublimation that is always a ‘half-way house’
because sublimation means no matter, space or time and total sublimation in
an ultimate ‘universal heat death’ would also lead to a state of
NOTHINGNESS and perhaps another ‘big bang’. Let me explain:
The simplest demonstration of this is through the example of TIME. As I
have intimated, time, space and matter are one continuum, so in illustrating
my thesis through the concept of time it will, I hope, become self-evident
that matter and space are tied in with the same thread.

The law of MINIMUM ACTION TO MAXIMUM RESULT

This ‘law’ describes the process of becoming anything. It is the description
of how the progression of events, or happening, will always at the most
basic level follow the shortest possible path between any two points
between the Pole of Absolute Order and the Pole of Absolute Chaos.

408

MOROID
This is a word I have used to denote Möbius toroid (see Chapter Three). A
toroid is a shape like a doughnut with a hole in the middle and can be made
by taking a cylinder and bending its central axis to form a circle thereby
joining its two ends (see diagrams 5 & 6 in the illustrated section), or by
taking a Möbius strip and spinning it about either or both axes, the shape of
a toroid is traced out on space. So the ‘moroid’ is a suggestion as to how a
Möbius-twisted design of space can be seen to take up all directions in
separation.

ORDER and CHAOS

Chaos is the summary of a multitude of separate but interacting points of
enforced-ness. Each point evolves in space and time according to ‘The Law
of Maximum Result in Minimum Action’, but each point has its unique
quantum of direction and parcelled tension. As all directions are possible,
‘all over’ directed-ess is inevitable, so in fulfilling this scope, chaos
ultimately provides in summary a balance point or EQUILIBRIUM state of
NO IMPLICIT POTENTIAL FOR CHANGE. This is what science predicts
as the Heat-Death of the Universe. Along the way to it, sub-states of chaos
make for homogenized ‘soups’ of diverse ingredients with apparently
random but in fact finely-tuned fluctuations, hence the statement of
mathematicians who study chaos that the flapping of a butterfly’s wings can
create a storm on the other side of the planet. Order, then, is the singular
resolve of parts in union that implies ‘all over’-ness, i.e. isotropic
homogeneity through symmetry and all over-ness implicit also in the
potential for dissolution or break up. Order, as seen within the Universe of
Parts, implies concepts like together-ness, i.e. proximity, but the pole of
absolute order is something different to this and implies a singularity of
no-’thing’-ness in all potentials. It bears saying that though SEPARATION
and CHAOS proceed out of this point of ORDER and state of perfect
balance, (i.e. NOTHINGNESS gives birth to order), it is not subject and
cannot be subject to what we call TIME. It therefore cannot be created or
destroyed.

409

The Universe of PARTS (Physical Universe)

A phenomenon that occurs when a previous state of the Union of all Parts is
disrupted into platforms of break-up and disorder. The Universe is this state
of separation and therefore presents as what we call SPACE, TIME and
MATTER. It is the summary of the CHOICE to be separate (i.e. the ‘Big
Bang’). It defines a state of ACTUALITY (potentiality actualized through
implicit and explicit choice. This further implies that the prior state is an
abstraction. A state of ALL KNOWING in a paradigm we might describe as
THOUGHTNESS). The concept of NOW (TIME) is therefore. the interface
between the actual (‘past’) and what is potential (‘future’) within any
observer (sentient being with the capacity to free choice) and therefore
implies and points to the existence of: the universe of the whole together —
Godhead.

SOMETHING from NOTHING and nothing from something

Physicists tell us that the whole physical universe came out of a prior state
of nothingness and also that if you tot up the sum of all mass in the universe
and set that against all the energy that there is precisely enough
gravitational energy to balance out all the mass. In other words it still adds
up to ZERO. This supports my assertion that matter, space and time are
products of nothingness which proceed into nothingness and at any point on
the way there their summary is nothingness and therefore that ‘something-
ness’ is merely a blip or an anomaly that happens between ‘forever’ and
‘never’. I have suggested that the MATTER-SPACE-TIME continuum
(M.S.T.c.) is simply the exposition or outward manifestation of what I have
called the THOUGHT-AWARENESS-WILL continuum into separation and
therefore limit. I have also made a case that this sublimation into fixture is
‘never’ complete and I have coined the term ENLIGHT to describe the
reach of potentiality into the state of exposed actuality. So, what then is the
‘equation’ for transfiguration? The equation that describes how the twist
that ‘freezes’ matter, space and time in limit is undone to release them as
Enlight. Mathematically I think it is best expressed as 0 = 0, ZERO
EQUALS ZERO. We have already

410

seen that the final summary of physicality is zero and that the state of
Enlight in potentiality prevails through a BALANCED state of no force and
therefore No-Thing-ness. It is an interesting fact that until relatively
recently in history, European mathematicians had no concept of a number
zero. This concept was, in fact, introduced to them by Arab scholars: even
the word ‘algebra’ is actually a word brought into the English language
from the Arabic.

SOUL
Encapsulated Enlight with discreteness defined as memory through choices.
The quality of reception of Enlight defines and is defined by the propensity
of an individual towards UNION against SEPARATION. An important sign
of the propensity towards union is CONSCIENCE, i.e. the implicit tacit
recognition of ultimate value in all sentient being that can choose. Hence
the suggestion of the great teachers ‘Love thy neighbour as thyself. Love is
a word implying cherishment of focus in logically derived value of that
which has subjective value, and therefore meaning to an individual. What
you value or treasure is where your heart (or Will) is and therefore where
what is YOU will be.

STEM CELLS
These are pluri-potent early progenitor cells. In other words, cells with the
potential to make of themselves many cell types in a biological entity.

THOUGHT-ness
This is a term I have used to specify or personify, if you like, Awareness
and Will through MEMORY, i.e. individualized action and experiences
encoded as patterns of reception or filtering out of Enlight, so if the concept
of NOW is the summary of what is commonly termed PAST, PRESENT
and FUTURE then THOUGHT-ness is the past, AWARENESS the present
and WILL the various Lines of Open Potential that comprises the
FUTURE. The three together summarize Enlight which is the unchanging
reference of total un-enforcedness.

411

TIME
Time is so central to all our experience that to find a way to define it has
never been easy. Our attempts at a definition of time seem to be like the
attempts of a fish to define the sea. A fish has no concept of anything
outside its watery world, so it would be very difficult for a fish to speculate
on what water might be, if you get my metaphorical drift. So, in deference
to the philosophers who have pondered the subject of time, I shall now
attempt to define a common-sense outlook on it which is, at least as far as I
can see, consistent with logic and reason.
I suggest that what we call ‘NOW’ is simply the confluence between that
which is actual and fixed, i.e. what we commonly call ‘THE PAST’, and
that which exists as Lines of Open Potential, i.e. ‘THE FUTURE’. Fixture,
of course, implies sublimation outside of the eternal continuum of all
potentials which I call the Thought-Awareness-Will continuum and ‘Lines
of Open Potentiality’ are, of course, only open as long as there is an implicit
potential for change from out of a prevailing situation. In other words, as
long as there are still islands of Awareness and Will that can experience a
‘now’ in thought. So once total sublimation would be reached it would
already have ended. Time is therefore the bridge between FOREVER and
NEVER.

TRANSFIGURATION
This is the release mechanism from out of the twisted loophole that defines
the transient existence of physicality for a soul manifesting Enlight. The
capsule that maintains limit is dissolved and in so doing the loophole is
partially untwisted THROUGHOUT the Matter-Space-Time continuum.
Could this be what makes the vast voids in space detected by astronomers?
What about all the ‘missing mass’? Scientists say that the large-scale
gravitational evolution of the universe implies that ninety per cent of the
mass which ‘should’ exist in order to ‘produce’ this gravity is not visible
and is therefore pronounced ‘missing presumed as W.I.M.P.s’ — Weakly
Interacting Massive Particles (or WIMPs to their friends) are one attempt of
theoretical physicists to explain the missing mass. If gravity is, as I have
suggested, the lines that trace the pathways of relativity

412

between the two poles of absoluteness, then the undoing of the knot that
freezes potential in matter as mass doesn’t break the line of connectedness
which continues until the consummation of the state of separation.
This is no ‘god of the gaps’ philosophy. It really is not. I am suggesting
that it is the physical universe itself which is the GAP if you like. If the
equation that defines the dissolution of all limits is 0=0, then what happens
if we rearrange this equation? If we divide both sides by zero we get = ?
WHAT IS ZERO DIVIDED BY ZERO?
According to the ‘big bang’ theory, the whole universe came from
nothing. A point with no size that existed for an instant of no duration
divided itself to make space, time and matter including the raw materials
that now make human bodies so that we are here now also as a result of it.
But how do you split up or divide a point that has no size (or dimensions) to
start with? There was no yardstick or measure in space and time to gauge
division of this first point as space and time are themselves the products of
its division. So all that was there to divide it was itself. In other words, ‘Big
Bangs’ are what happens when zero is divided by zero.
Every mathematician I have asked, however, says that the question is
meaningless and can’t be answered. If they had been asked the same
question some time ago in the past, many mathematicians would probably
have replied: ‘Zero? But what’s that?’ I think we can afford to take the
mathematical law into our own hands, so to speak, and try to derive
logically what the question and its answer might be about. So here goes.
There are three simple algebraic rules which I use:

1. . = 0
2. =1

3. =∞ (∞ is the mathematical symbol for infinity!)

Substituting x with zero we have the result that: zero, one and infinity
and therefore zero, unity and infinity are all different expressions of the
same effect. In fact, you can further derive that if you can divide zero by
zero all numbers are equivalent to each other. So is this why many
mathematicians are reluctant to consider ? If all numbers are the same as
all others then they’re out of a job.

413

I’m joking, of course, but I wonder what mathematics really means to its
experts? I mean REALLY? After the lights have gone out in the lecture
theatre and all the students have gone home leaving the differential
equations on the blackboard, what is it all about? Although I don’t agree
with everything in his book, Professor Penrose of Oxford, England, seems
to be one mathematician who does at least try to see the relevance of pure
mathematics to deeper, more philosophical questions and tries to make his
subject accessible by the ordinary person. In his recent book Shadows of the
Mind he uses simple mathematical reasoning to highlight certain critical
differences between the human mind and a computer’s capacity for
information processing. He infers that what people call ‘artificial
intelligence’ refers to the processing of information and not to the sentient
experience of that information by a being with AWARENESS and WILL.
The value of this to me is that it contrasts the sanctity of human life with the
functional utility of a computer and therefore exposes as nonsense the
notion of many scientists that people could be in a sense immortalized by
having all their memories encoded in a self-maintaining computer program
which could be sent into space carrying with it the ‘mind’ of the subject
whose memory it copied in the hardware of self-replicating robots, perhaps.
I call this nonsense because the encoded memories could never manufacture
awareness and will. Their concept of our future sounds chillingly
reminiscent of ‘Planet of the Greys’, don’t you think?
To return to = ?: I have implied that it is the formula defining all
potentials being contained within the state of nothingness. It is interesting
that it implies all extents through three roots: zero, one and infinity. If you
think about it, I think you might agree that these three numbers, as well as
the fact that there are three of them, summarize best of all numbers the
perceived defining attributes of God in all the world’s major religions. One
central tenet of all the religions is that God is not a ‘thing’ and exists
beyond the labels that apply to THINGS; beyond extent, size and limit and
therefore able to prevail in a state described as ‘void’ or nothingness.
Secondly, they are all agreed that ‘God is ONE’. (The Hindu concept of
‘gods’ is said by Hindu scholars to be an attempt to describe the various
attributes of a singular Godhead as it relates to human life. The Christian
concept of the ‘Trinity’ is, likewise,

414

seen as three discrete parallax views of a singular effect and not as three
gods.)
Thirdly, all are united in their view that God is eternal and without limit.
Hang on a minute, though, if 0 = 0 implies = ? then why when I add one
apple to another do I get two apples rather than, say, fifty-six? Yes, of
course 1 + 1 = 2 as long as there is a 1 and a 2, in other words within the
state of the phenomenon we call separation. In what I have called Centre-
Godness (see definition above), however, all potentials are summarized into
nothingness, the one and the ALL, and I have suggested that it is this
phenomenon of perfect union that proffers the potential for ‘separation-
ness’. I have also suggested that we all, as sentient beings, are the receivers
of this 0 = 0 effect in the Universe of Parts and that it is this that allows us to
‘KNOW’ that 1 + l = 2. As Professor Penrose points out in his book, what we
know as true is not computable through self-consistent formal systems of
logic so that the fact that we can know it is proof that our minds are not the
product of a point-to-point computational process. In the above, I have
addressed the issue of TRANSFIGURATION through an equation, without
yet putting this in a historical perspective. It is reported that Jesus Christ
demonstrated a certain phenomenon to three of his closest friends. They
went with him up a mountain and saw him glow ‘brighter than the SUN’,
but remarked that it didn’t hurt their eyes to behold him. A second time the
same thing is said to have happened except this time his body is said to
have disappeared. This is usually called ‘the Ascension’. As I have tried to
show, I believe that if a big bang is possible, i.e. the condensation of matter,
space and time out of nothing but pure potentiality through the action of
choice, then its opposite, i.e. transfiguration, must also be possible. One
clue to the nature of this phenomenon is, I believe, that witnesses saw him
glowing brighter than the sun without hurting their eyes. Sunlight is
electromagnetic radiation released out of the encapsulated mass-energy of a
star through nuclear fusion as summarized in Einstein’s famous equation
E=mc2. (The same basic processes underlie the flash, blast and
electromagnetic pulse of an atom bomb.) If E=mc2 is the equation for stars
and atom bombs to shine then what is the equation for transfiguration?
Why, if all the mass-energy of his body was released (he is said to have
disappeared), is there no record of a devastating explosion?

415

E=mc2 implies that a tiny piece of matter has enough locked-in energy to
move a mountain if all the mass-energy were released. So what would have
happened to the Mount of Olives and to Judea and, indeed, the surrounding
continents of Asia, Africa and Europe if about 70 kg of mass-energy were
suddenly released? Perhaps the light that they saw is what I have called
Enlight, so that by uniting at each point of choice (see definition of ‘soul’
above) he was simply undoing the bonds of separation and therefore
undoing the twist that makes the image of matter-space-time out of Enlight.
By undoing the twist, he released the Enlight which is, of course, totally un-
enforced, which is why there was no explosion.

The Universe of the WHOLE

The state of perfect union of all parts in perfect peace (unenforcedness) or
stillness. It is therefore the summary of all POTENTIALITY, TO BE OR
NOT TO BE. Potentiality is the implicit product of the total absence of
Force (compulsion). It is potentiality expressed through
‘THOUGHTNESS’, which is itself expressed as Awareness and Will, and
provides an insight into how at the big bang ‘somethingness’ or everything
can be spontaneously generated out of NOTHINGNESS. Nothingness
implies the total absence of force to make anything happen, in any given
direction.

OceanofPDF.com
BIBLIOGRAPHY

CHAPTER 1
1 Mack, John E.: Abduction (pp 115-117) (Simon & Schuster, 1994)
2 Randles, Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (pp 70-71) (Anaya Publishers Ltd, 1992)
3 Jacobs, David M.: Interview, UFO Magazine (pp 5-8) Nov/ Dec 1995

CHAPTER 2
1 Stannard, Russell: Doing Away with God (pp 7-79) (Marshall Pickering, 1993)

CHAPTER 3
1 Stannard, Russell: Doing Away with God (pp 72-73) (Marshall Pickering, 1993)
2 ‘Death Wish’: Horizon B.B.C. Television 17-1-94
Wyllie, A.H.: ‘Death from Inside Out: an Overview’ Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London, Aug 1994 345 (1313): 237-41
Wyllie, A.H., Bellamay, C.O., Malcomson R.D., Harrison, DJ.: ‘Cell Death in Health and
Disease: the Biology & Regulation of Apoptosis’ Seminars in Cancer Biology, Feb 1995 6(1): 3-16

CHAPTER 9
1 Coptic Gnostic Library: Pistis Sophia (Book II, ch 100, p.249). Edited by Carl Schmidt (Leiden:
E.J. Brill, 1978)

417

CHAPTER 10
1 ‘Chips Full of Protein’: Newell, John The Guardian 9-8-91
2 ‘Living Factories’: New Scientist 3-2-96
3 ‘Silicon Cells with a Life of Their Own’: New Scientist 18-11-95
4 Daily Telegraph 18-7-96
5 The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1984)
‘The Hypostasis of the Archons’ (II 4: 86, 94)
6 ‘Aeronautics, a Manuscript from the Prehistoric Past’ International Academy of Sanskrit Research,
Mysore, India (1976). As quoted in Secrets of the Last Races, Rene Noorbergen, New English
Library, 1977
7 Crawford, Ian: ‘Some Thoughts on the Implications of Faster than Light Interstellar Space Travel’
(Royal Astronomical Society Quarterly, 1995)
8 Warwick, Kevin (Professor of Cybernetics at Reading University): ‘Beware the Robot Slave
Masters’ The Times 12-9-95 ‘Machines Could Take Over Planet’ The Independent 12-9-95
9 Pearson, Ian: ‘Terror Robots Need to be Curbed’ The Engineer 21-9-95

CHAPTER 12
1 ‘Reptiles Don’t Leave Evolution to Chance’ New Scientist 16-9-95
2 ‘Making Evolution Run Backwards’ New Scientist 2-10-95
3 ‘In the Beginning’: Scientific American, Feb 1991
4 Hoyle, Fred: The Intelligent Universe (pp 12, 19) (Michael Joseph Ltd, 1983)

CHAPTER 13
1 Easteal, Simon: Australian National University DNA Profile Conference, Canberra (16-11-94)
2 ‘Monkey Murders may be Falsely Accused’ New Scientist 15-7-95
3 ‘Neanderthals’: National Geographic, Vol. 189 Jan 1996 (pp 2-36)

CHAPTER 14
l Randles, Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (pp 72-73) (Anaya Publishers Ltd, 1992)
2 Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 191) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

CHAPTER 15
1 ‘Creators of the Forty-Seventh Chromosome’ New Scientist 11-11-95
2 ‘Living Factories’ New Scientist 03-02-96

418

3 Arthur, Charles: ‘Eating New Food May Change Your Genes’ Independent 3-1-97
4 ‘Did Genetic Garbage Spur Primate Evolution?’ New Scientist 16-9-95
5 ‘Message in a Genome’ New Scientist 12-8-95
6 ‘When DNA Turns Traitor’ New Scientist 25-3-95
7 ‘India Looks Farther East for its Ancestors’ New Scientist 8-3-97

CHAPTER 16
1 Jacobs, David M .: Secret Life (p 243) (Simon & Schuster, 1992) .
2 Spurdle, A.B.,Jenkins, T.:’The Y Chromosome as a Tool for Studying Human Evolution’ Current
Opinion in Genetics & Development (1992 2: 487-491)
3 Ritte, Neufeld, Broit, Shavit, Motro: ‘The Differences among Jewish Communities — Maternal &
Paternal Contribution’ Journal of Molecular Evolution -1993 37: 435-440)
4 The Dead Sea Scrolls: ‘The Ages of the Creation’ (40 180)
5 The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd, 1983) (Edited by James
Charlesworth) Appendix to 3 Enoch Ch 15 B.
6 The Old Testament of The Bible: Exodus Ch. 39, v.2-3
7 The Old Testament of The Bible: Leviticus Ch. 21
8 The Old Testament of The Bible: Ezekiel Ch. 27
9 Mysteries of the Unknown: Mystic Places (pp 151-152) (Time/Life
Books, 1987)

CHAPTER 17
l Bauval R., Gilbert A.: The Orion Mystery (pp 7-9) (Heinemann)

CHAPTER 18
1 The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) The Gospel of Philip II 3:81

CHAPTER 19
1 Cheetham, Erika: The Further Prophecies of Nostradamus (Corgi, 1985)
2 Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 170) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

CHAPTER 20
l The Nag Hammadi Library in English (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) ‘The Dialogue of the Saviour’ III.
122.
2 The New Testament: St. Luke, Ch. 4, V.8.

419

CHAPTER 21
l The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘The Dialogue of the Saviour’ III, 5:142
2 The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha (Darton, Longman & Todd, 1983) (Edited by James
Charlesworth) 1 Enoch Ch. 6-8
3 The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1984) ‘Apochryphon of John’ III, 1:9-
13
4 The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) Sophia of Jesus Christ III, 4:117-122
5 The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘First Apocalypse of James’ V, 3:32-33
6 The Nag Hammadi (see reference above) ‘Apochryphon of John’ II, 1:28
7 Fange, Erich Von: ‘Strange Fire on the Earth’ Creation Research Society Quarterly, Dec 1975
8 The Old Testament of the Bible: Genesis Ch. 18-19
9 ‘Robot Are Us’: Asiaweek 10-8-94

CHAPTER 22
1 Maclean, Paul: ‘Ritual and Deceit’ Science Digest Nov /Dec, 1980

CHAPTER 23
1 ‘The Way of Logic’: New Scientist 2-12-95
2 ‘Onward Cyber Soldiers’: Time Magazine 21-8-95

CHAPTER 25
1 ‘Go On, Read My Mind’: New Scientist 16-12-95
2 Mack, John E.: Abduction (pp 360-361) (Simon & Schuster, 1994)
3 Verschuur, Gerrit: Impact (Oxford University Press, 1996)

CHAPTER 26
1 Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 172) (Simon & Schuster 1992)
2 ‘The Boy Whose Blood has no Father’ New Scientist 7-10-95
3 Randles Jenny: UFOs and How to See Them (p 72) (Anaya Publishers Ltd)
4 Jacobs, David M.: Secret Life (p 316) (Simon & Schuster, 1992)

420

CHAPTER 27
1 The Old Testament of The Bible: Ezekiel Ch. l,V. 4-19

CHAPTER 28
l ‘Doctors Urged to Fight Genetics Weapons Threat’ Daily Telegraph 30-9-96

CHAPTER 29
1 Forum: ‘I Hiss Therefore I Am’: New Scientist 11-11-95
OceanofPDF.com
OceanofPDF.com