Impact of Glaciers On The Hydrology of Kashmir Rivers:: A Case Study of Kolahoi Glacier
Impact of Glaciers On The Hydrology of Kashmir Rivers:: A Case Study of Kolahoi Glacier
Kashmir Rivers:
A Case Study of Kolahoi Glacier.
DISSERTATION
BY
CERTIFICATE
Scholar
Supervisor Head
ii
DECLARATION
supervision of Prof. Tasawoor Ahmad Kanth. This work has not been
submitted in part or full for any degree or diploma to this or any other
University.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iv
and Mr. Najeeb Ahmed (Range officers) of the forest department for their kind support. I
also acknowledge Mr. Gh. Mohidin and Mr. Parveez Ahmed of Floods and irrigation
department.
Besides academic help a lot of non-academic help was needed to carry out this
study. A great deal of such help was provided by my parents, Mr. Shah Gh. Rasool and
Mrs. Shah Hamida Akhter and my brother Mr. Meiraj-ud-din Shah, my sister Shah Rohie
Akhter and my close friends Shah Imran Rashid and Syed Saba Hamid Bukhari to whom I
express my sincere gratitude and shall remember all my life their kind of help. They have
supported, encouraged and helped me throughout my academic career.
Lastly, I am thankful to Mr. Parvaiz Ahmad (Virus Digital Internet Cafe) who
meticulously computerized the manuscript of this dissertation.
v
Dedicated
To
My Beloved Parents
(Papa Jee and Umee Jan)
Who Always Kindly Supported Me
and My Activities
vi
CONTENTS
Chapter No. Description Page No.
Certificate ii
Declaration iii
Acknowledgement iv
List of Tables ix
List of Maps x
List of Plates xi
List of Figures xii
1 INTRODUCTION 1-12
1.1. Introduction 1
1.2. Significance of the study 8
1.3. Objectives of the study 12
vii
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 49-108
5.1. Change Detection- 1963, 1992 and 2005 49
5.2. Factors Responsible for Glacier Recession 64
5.3. Glacial features as the indicators of Glacier
Recession 75
5.4. Impact of Climatic Change on the Kolahoi Glacier:
(1980-2007) 81
5.4.1. Temperature OC-Mean Monthly Maximum 84
5.4.2. Temperature OC -Mean Monthly Minimum 87
5.4.3. Precipitation (mm)-Mean Monthly and Total
Annually 89
5.4.4. Relative Humidity (%)-Mean Monthly and
Mean Annually 91
5.5. Discharge Regimes from the Kolahoi Glacier at
Liddar Head – Aru (West Liddar): 1970, 1975,
1980, 1985, 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2007 and
2008 93
5.6. Discharge of Liddar river at Sheshnag (East
Liddar): 1992, 1995, 2002 and 2008 100
5.7. Discussion 104
BIBLIOGRAPHY 116-139
ANNEXURES
viii
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page No.
1 Available records regarding the change detection of 54
Kolahoi Glacier
2 Glacier area (1963, 1992 and 2005) 56
3 Total change and retreat (km2/ year) 57
4 Tourist arrival to Pahalgam (1997-2008) 66
5 Tourist estimate- Pahalgam 2025 67
6 Yatries coming to Amar Nath Ji (lakh) 70
7 Population growth- Pahalgam Township 71
8 Estimate population of Pahalgam-2025 72
9 Temperature (OC)-Mean Monthly Maximum 85
10 Temperature (OC)-Mean Monthly Minimum 87
11 Precipitation (mm)-Mean Monthly and Total Annually 89
12 Relative humidity (%)-Mean Monthly and Mean Annually 91
13 Mean monthly discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at 94
Liddar Head-Aru (west Liddar)-1970, 1975, 1980, 1985,
1992, 1995, 2000 and 2005
14 Mean monthly discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at 96
Liddar Head-Aru (west Liddar)- 2007 and 2008
15 Total Annual Discharge from Kolahoi glacier at Liddar 98
Head-Aru (west Liddar) 1970-2008
16 Discharge of Liddar river at Sheshnag (East Liddar) 1992- 100
2008
17 Comparisons of discharge between the Kolahoi glacier 102
(West Liddar) and Sheshnag (East Liddar)- 1992, 1995,
2000 and 2008
18 Mean annually values of temperature (OC), precipitation 104
(mm) and discharge (cusecs) in Liddar basin (1980-2007)
ix
LIST OF MAPS
Map No. Title Page No.
x
LIST OF PLATES
Plate No. Title Page No.
1 Snout of Kolahoi glacier in 1909 52
2 Snout of Kolahoi glacier in 1961 52
3 Snout of Kolahoi glacier in 2007 53
4 Snout of Kolahoi glacier in 2011 53
5 Ice breaking at the accumulation zone of the Kolahoi 77
glacier (2007)
6 Ice breaking at the accumulation zone of the Kolahoi 77
glacier (2011)
7 Crevasses developed in Kolahoi glacier (2007) 78
8 Crevasses developed in Kolahoi glacier (2011) 78
9 Caves present in the snout of Kolahoi glacier (2007) 79
10 Caves present in the snout of Kolahoi glacier (20011) 79
11 Amount of debris present on the surface of the Kolahoi 80
glacier (2007)
12 Amount of debris present on the surface of the Kolahoi 80
glacier (2011)
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. No. Title Page No.
1 Flow chart for change detection 26
2 Bar diagram showing glacier area (km2) 56
3 Total tourist flow to Pahalgam (lakh) 68
4 Tourist arrival to Pahalgam 68
5 Tourist estimation- Pahalgam 2025 68
6 Line graph showing number of Yatries coming to 70
Amarnath ji (lakh)
7 Population of Pahalgam 73
8 Estimated population of Pahalgam-2025 73
9 Mean monthly maximum temperature (oC) Liddar valley, 86
1980-2007
10 Mean annual maximum Temperature oC, Liddar Valley, 86
1980-2007
11 Mean monthly minimum temperature oC, Liddar valley, 88
1980-2007
12 Mean annual minimum Temperature oC, Liddar Valley, 88
1980-2007
13 Mean monthly precipitation (mm) in Liddar Valley, 1980- 90
2007
14 Total annual precipitation (mm), 1980-2007 90
15 Mean monthly relative humidity (%) in Liddar valley, 92
1980-2007
16 Mean annually relative humidity (%) in Liddar valley, 92
1980-2007
17 Bar diagram showing discharge from Kolahoi glacier from 97
1970-2008
18 Line graph showing discharge from Kolahoi glacier from 97
1970-2008
19 Total annual discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at Aru 99
(Liddar Head), 1970-2008
xii
20 Comparisons of discharge from Kolahoi glacier at Aru 99
between 1970, 1992, 2005 and 2008
21 Line graph showing mean monthly discharge comparison 101
between west and the east Liddar for the year 1992
22 Line graph showing mean monthly discharge comparisons 101
between west and the east Liddar for the year 2008
23 Showing discharge of the Liddar at Sheshnag (East Liddar) 103
1992-2008
24 Showing total annual discharge between west and the east 103
Liddar, 1992-2008
25 Bar graph showing comparisons between glacier area and 106
prevailing temperature conditions in Liddar basin, 1963,
1992 and 2005
26 Line graph showing comparisons between glacier area 106
and prevailing temperature conditions in Liddar basin,
1963, 1992 and 2005
27 Trends in total discharge and total glacier area between 107
1980 and 2005 in Liddar basin
28 Relationship between precipitation and discharge in the 107
Liddar basin (1980-2007)
29 Trends in temperature, precipitation and discharge 108
between 1980 and 2007 in Liddar basin
xiii
Chapter – 1 Introduction
1.1. INTRODUCTION
Glaciers are dynamic entities which have changed in the past and will
continue to change in response to the pulsations in the climatic scenario.
During Pleistocene period, the glaciers occupied about 30 percent of the total
area of earth as against 10 percent area at present (Flint, 1964). Glaciers are
retreating in the face of accelerated global warming, and the resultant long-term
loss of natural fresh water storage. Since industrialization, human activities
have resulted in steadily increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere, leading to fears of enhanced greenhouse effect. As a result of
green house gas effect, the world’s average surface temperature has increased
between 0.3 and 0.6oC over the past hundred years (Samjwal, et al., 2006) as a
result of which, the mountain glaciers have thinned, lost mass and retreated.
The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC) has
stated that thinning of glaciers since the mid 19th century has been oblivious
and pervasive in many parts of the world. As per the recent reports, Siachin,
Baltora, Yamnotri, Gangotari and other Himalayan Glaciers are receding at an
alarming rate. Glaciers are defined as huge bodies of ice characterized with a
downward and outward movement. A glacier has been formed on land from
snow by compaction and recrystallisation. Negi (1982) states,” A glacier is a
naturally moving body of large dimensions made up of crystalline ice (neve in
the upper layers) formed on the earth’s surface as a result of accumulation of
snow”. These are formed in suitable climate and topography in favourably
located geological regions. Their formation is mostly governed by factors like
high humidity, shady, gentle snow fields and extremely low temperatures.
1
Chapter – 1 Introduction
Hemisphere, and the year 1998, the warmest year (IPCC, 2001a). According to
the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the mean global temperature
in 2005 is deviated by +0.47°C from the average of the normal period 1961 -
1990. It is thus one of the warmest years and currently ranks as the second
warmest year worldwide (Faust, 2005), similarly year 2002 and 2003 will be
the 3rd and 4th hottest years, respectively ever since climate statistics have
been monitored and documented began in 1861. According to the IPCC, 2001
and their assessments based on climate models, the increase in global
temperature will continue to rise during the 21st century. The increase in the
global mean temperatures by 2100 could amount anything from 1.4 to 5.8°C,
depending on the climate model and greenhouse gases emission scenario. On
the Indian sub-continent average temperatures are predicted to rise between 3.5
and 5.5oC by 2100 (Lal, 2002). These changes in climate will inevitably
interact with changes in glacier. The climatic fluctuations affect both the
amount of snow and ice stored in, and the quantities of melt water runoff
arising from the glaciers. Results show that the recession rate has increased
with rising temperature. A forecast was made that up to a quarter of the present
global mountain glacier mass could disappear by 2050 and up to half could be
lost by 2100 due to global warming (Kuhn, 1993; Oerlemans, 1994; and IPCC,
1996). For example, with the temperatures rise by 1°C, Alpine glaciers have
shrunk by 40% in area and by more than 50% in volume since 1850 (IPCC,
2001b & CSE, 2002). The IPCC’s 2007 working group II report asserted that
Himalayan glaciers are “receding faster than in any other part of the world and,
if the present rate continues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the year
2035”. A decrease of glacier mass of this magnitude presents a serious water
resources problem for the millions of peoples living within the Himalayan
region and in the adjoining plains. Climate change is causing the net shrinkage
and retreat of glaciers and the increase in size and numbers of glacial lakes in
2
Chapter – 1 Introduction
recent years. These changes in climate will have effects ultimately on life and
property of mountain people.
3
Chapter – 1 Introduction
natural reservoirs for supply of water to many major river systems in the
northern India as the Indus, the Ganga and the Brahmputra (Thompson, et al.,
2000). About 75% of the runoff in these three major river systems occurs
between June and September, in response to the snow and glacier ice-melt
(Collins and Hasnain, 1995). The annual contribution from snowmelt and
runoff from non-glacierized areas during the early part of summer (April to
June) amounts to 20%. As summer precedes (July to September) the
contributions from melting glacier ice and water stored within the glaciers
reach 50% (Hasnain, 1989). However, this source of water is not permanent as
geological history of the earth indicates that glacial dimensions are constantly
changing with changing climate. During Pleistocene the earth's surface has
experienced repeated glaciation over a large landmass. The maximum area
during the peak of glaciation was 46 Million sq. km. (Kulkarni, 2002). This is
three times more than the present ice cover of the earth. Available data
indicates that during the Pleistocene the earth has experienced four or five
glaciation periods separated by an interglacial period. During an interglacial
period climate was warmer and deglaciation occurred on a large scale. This
suggests that glaciers are constantly changing with time and these changes can
profoundly affect the runoff of Himalayan Rivers. The water reserves stored in
the Himalayan glaciers is estimated to be about 1012 m3 (Puri, 1994).
It has been found that the discharge of Himalayan snow-fed rivers per
unit area is roughly twice that of peninsular rivers of south India (Bahadur,
1988). This is mainly due to perennial contributions from melting snow and
glacier ice. Meier and Roots (1982) have observed that the amount of
precipitation in the form of snow has an inverse effect on the amount of runoff.
Fresh snow is highly reflective so that it absorbs less heat and melts slowly,
while old snow and glacier ice have a low reflectivity. Thus the greater the
precipitation in the form of snow, the longer the glacier is covered by a highly
reflective material, and the less the runoff. A decreased amount of snowfall
4
Chapter – 1 Introduction
Snow plays an important role in the hydrologic cycle, through its effects
on water storage and the land surface energy balance. Snowmelt is a significant
surface water input of importance to many aspects of hydrology including
water supply, erosion and flood control (Tarboton, et al., 1995). Water occurs
as a fluid, as an interstitial liquid, as a solid and as interstitial ice within all
glacial environments. As meltwater, it is active in debris erosion, entrainment
5
Chapter – 1 Introduction
and deposition. Meltwater causes channel bed erosion and scour, and the
development of complex drainage networks within all glacial environments
(Menzies, 1995). Glacial hydrology, therefore, is an integral element in
understanding all glacial environments and processes.
6
Chapter – 1 Introduction
the form of precipitation from winter snowfall to summer rain, and energy
supply usually peaking to a summer maximum, produce strong seasonal
periodicity of hydrological event which influences quantity, quality and timing
of drainage (Young, 1985). Typically, minimum flow of a glacierized river,
close to the glacier, is recorded in the early hours of the morning, between
seven and ten, and the maximum reaches in late afternoon, between three and
six, so that each diurnal hydrograph is asymmetrical, with the rising limb
steeper that recession, and the peak lagged by several hours after the time of
maximum solar radiation.
It has been estimated that there are about 15000 glaciers in the
Himalayan region, covering an area of about 33,200 sq. km. This is about 17 %
of the total geographical area of the Himalaya (Wissman, 1959). Glaciers in the
Indian Himalaya covers an area of 23,000 km2, broadly divided into three river
basins-- Indus, Ganga and Brahmaputra. The Indus basin has the largest
number of glaciers 3,538, followed by the Ganga basin 1,020 and Brahmaputra
662. The contribution of snow and ice melt mount to roughly 400-800 cubic
kms (Bahadur, 2000). The glaciers situated in five states ( Jammu and Kashmir,
Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Sikkim, and Arunachal Pradesh) in which
Kashmir has the largest concentration with 3,136 glaciers covering 32,00 km2,
nearly 13% of the State’s territory (Hasnain, 1999). Glaciers are important
storage of fresh water in Kashmir as they accumulate mass; particularly in the
winter and provide meltwater at lower elevation. The importance of glaciers is
not only limited to Kashmir only: all the water from Jhelum finally falls in the
Indus. Therefore any significant change in glacier mass is certain to impact
water resources on a regional level. Snow and Glacier melt water guarantee a
certain amount of base flow throughout the year to Kashmir Rivers. With fast
recession of glaciers, base flow of Kashmir Rivers will be affected very
adversely. For this, it is essential to know the total number of glaciers, their
7
Chapter – 1 Introduction
volume and the volume of melt water they generate in different climatic
regions of Kashmir valley.
8
Chapter – 1 Introduction
Himalayas contains the third largest snow and ice mass in the world
after Antarctica and Greenland. With 15,000 glaciers covering an area of about
33,000 km2, the region is aptly called the “Water Tower of Asia” as it provides
around 8.6 x 106 m3 of water annually (Dyurgerov and Maier, 1997). It is
important to mention here, that snow and glacier covered mountains in the
Himalaya are perennial sources of rivers and streams which flow out of the
Himalaya. Rivers originating in the Himalayas receive a substantial
contribution from the glacier melt that goes up, considerably, during the melt
season. This region is therefore, immensely rich in water resources and possess
huge potential of hydro power generation. Any fluctuation in this contribution
is bound to have impact on the hydroelectric power potential and the irrigation
potential of these rivers. To utilize these worthless natural resources, it is
necessary to study the Himalayan glaciers in a greater detail, and map all the
area with permanent and seasonal ice cover and calculate the total volume of
water available in different parts of the year.
9
Chapter – 1 Introduction
Snow and Glacier melt water feed permanently the rivers and
groundwater of the Kashmir Valley. Any change in the climatic parameters like
temperature or winter precipitation in the form of snowfall influences the flow
in the hydrological system of the valley. The main glaciers of the Kashmir
valley are Kolahoi, Sonamarg, Machoi, Nehnar, Sheshnag, Aru, etc. Different
river systems and their tributaries originate from these glaciers. Most of the
water resources are dependent on these glaciers in the valley. The sericulture,
irrigation, hydropower generation, domestic water supply all depends on these
surrounding glaciers. These glaciers are also the main source for recharging the
aquifers of the valley.
10
Chapter – 1 Introduction
11
Chapter – 1 Introduction
(Hussain, 1999). Taking this aspect and the receding trend of world and
Himalayan glaciers and their role in the Hydrological cycle of the valley into
consideration, the present study is attempt to study the impact of Glaciers on
the Hydrology of Kashmir rivers, to generate a data set and to estimate and
comprehend the vulnerability of these glaciers to various natural and unnatural
impacts.
1. To detect the change in the spatial extent of the glacier within three time
periods- viz., 1963, 1992 and 2005.
2. To study the hydro-meteorological characteristics of the study area.
3. To evaluate the impact of climatic change on the health of the Kolahoi
glacier.
4. To suggest a Geo-Environmental strategy for sustaining the Kolahoi
glacier.
12
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
13
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Japanese scientists with some collaboration from the Nepal govt. have
been engaged in the study of glaciers in Nepal since 1973. The study of snow
cover and of glaciers has been undertaken with international participation of
Pakistan in connection with the building of the Tarbeladam.
Ageta, et al. (1980), in the Nepal Himalaya, have studied many long
term observations on the mass balance of glaciers in east Nepal. They observed
on the basis of experimental results on small glacier that the altitude difference
between the equilibrium lines for annual balance and balance in summer is less
than 50 meters due to little accumulation in winter, and the rising equilibrium
line is more towards the lower temperature altitude in the lower precipitation
area due to less sensitivity of mass balance due to the change of air temperature
in the colder conditions at the higher altitudes. On the other hand, large glaciers
which have large accumulation basins with peaks above 6000 meters,
14
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Li Jijun, et al. (1986) have studied the termini of 100 glaciers in Beijing.
Theye found 47 glaciers were advancing and 53 were retreating. The
intensively studied glaciers, such as Jiabula glacier, the Gechongba glacier,
Bala glacier etc. were all retreating. Most glaciers retreated from 10m to
several tens of meters.
Motoyama, et al. (1987) have studied the winter runoff in the glacierised
drainage basin in Langtang Valley, Nepal Himalayas. They find that the winter
discharge of Langtang valley constitutes 4% of the annual discharge.
15
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Liu Chaohai, et al. (1999) have studied on the glacier variations and its
runoff responses in the arid region of Northwest China.
Ahmad Najafi Eigdir (2003) has investigated the snowmelt runoff in the
Orumiyeh region, using modelling, GIS and RS techniques.
Baolin, et al. (2004) have used the technique of remote sensing for the
detection of glacier changes in Tianshan Mountains for the past 40 years. From
1963 to 2000, all the eight glaciers except for one retreated over 70 m and the
retreating velocity was generally 5 m/a, but the glacier change varied greatly in
different stages. From 1963 to 1977, four of the eight glaciers advanced, two of
them retreated and another two kept stable, the glacier advanced generally.
From 1977 to 1986, four of the eight glaciers retreated and the others kept
stable. The retreating velocity was 10-30 m/a. However, the retreated glaciers
were those advanced from 1963 to 1977. This showed that glacier retreat
became obvious but not very great. From 1986 to 2000, seven of the eight
glaciers retreated and only one glacier kept stable, the retreating velocity was
10-15 m/a. This showed that the glacier retreat in this period became very fast
and universal.
Peter, et al. (2007) have Traced the glacier wastage in the Northern Tien
Shan (Kyrgyzstan/Central Asia) over the last 40 years. The changes observed
during the whole time period encompass (1) a decrease in average area, (2)
melting along the perimeter, (3) complete disappearance of former small
glaciers, (4) increase of the outcrop area, and (5) separation from parent
glaciers. The widespread global glacier wastage observed since the late 1970s-
with a marked acceleration in the late 1980s (Khromova et al., 2003; Paul et
al., 2004) - also occurred in the Sokoluk watershed. In fact, the annual area
16
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
decrease more than doubled, from 0.6% for the period 1963-1986 to 1.3% for
the period 1986-2000.
Yong Zhang, et al. (2007) have studied the Glacier change and glacier
runoff variation in the Tuotuo River basin, the source region of Yangtze River
in Western China.
Xin Gao, et al. (2010) have observed the glacier runoff variation and its
influence on river runoff during 1961-2006 in the Tarim river basin, China.
Glacial studies in India marked its beginning in late 19th century with the
snout measurements of a few glaciers. Realizing the importance as per the
“Commission International des Glacier”, secular movement studies were
carried out between 1906 and 1912. Cotter and Brown (1906) studied termini
of Pindari, Milam, Shankalpa and Potting glaciers of united provinces, besides
glaciers of Lahul valley. Grinlinton (1912) studied termini of Baling, Sona,
Cholungli, Naulphu, Nipchungkang, Dangan, Yamerson, Kharsa,
Chingchinmauri, and Raulphu glaciers of the Dhauli and Yankri valley. Gilbert
and Auden (1932 and 1935), studied the snouts of glaciers in Arwa valley and
Gangotri. The International Geo-physical year (1957-58), followed by
International Hydrological Decade (1965-1974), led to monitoring of several
glaciers that include, Gangotri, Milam, Pindari, Machoi, Sonapani, etc.
17
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Gulati (1973) has studied the role of snow and ice hydrology in India.
He delineated the glacierized areas in 20 major rivers having their catchments
in the Himalaya.
Bahadur (1988) has studied the Himalayan water from snow, ice and
glaciers. It has been found by him that the discharge of Himalayan snow-fed
rivers per unit area is roughly twice that of peninsular rivers of south India
Sharma, et al. (1991), have calculated the Water and sediment yields
into the Sutlej river from the high Himalaya. They find that 80% of annual flow
of the Sutlej River occurs between May and September.
Collins and Hasnain (1995) studied about 75% of the runoff in three
major river systems; the Brahmputra, Ganga and Indus occurs between June
and September in response to the snow and glacier-melt.
Collins (1996) has estimated that about 60% of the annual sediment of
the Hunza and 40 persent of that of Indus leaving the Karakoram is glacier
derived.
Singh, et al. (1997) have estimated the snow and glacier contribution to
the Chenab river, western Himalaya. They find that the Chenab basin by water
balance method suggested 49% of snow and glacier contribution to the Chenab
at Akhnoor.
18
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Philip and Ravindran (1998) have used the Remote sensing technique
and studied glacial mapping using Lansat Thematic Mapper data: A case study
in parts of Gangotri glacier, NW Himalaya. Visual interpretation of the images
has been carried out based on standard photo interpretation methods and
subsequently digital image processing has been carried out. In the visible bands
of Landsat TM, the highly reflected surface of snow and glaciers reach
saturation limits and are not useful in discriminating snow types and mapping
land forms in these areas. But the TM Bands 4, 5 and 7 in the NIR and SWIR
regions are found to be very useful not only in snow mapping but also in
identifying various glacial landforms.
Swaroop, et al. (2001) have studied the Short term run-off and ablation
characteristics of Triloknath glacier, Lahul and Spiti district. They find that
19
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
during the peak melting period of the Triloknath glacier, one-third of bulk run-
off comes from the ablation over the glacier.
Hasnain (2002) has observed the Himalayan glaciers meltdown and their
impact on south Asian rivers-a case study of the Dokriani glacier (Ganga
basin). In this study, he examines how climatic change influences glacier
behaviour and the quantity of discharge in rivers draining from glaciated
Himalayan basins.
Singh and Jain (2002) have studied the Snow and glacier melt in the
Satluj River at Bhakra Dam in the western Himalayan region. They find that
the snow/glacier melt contribution at Bhakra dam is about 59%.
20
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
during the period 1962–95 is 16.6 m/yr; however, the present study (1991–95)
reveals that the snout recession rate has increased by 1 m/yr. This increasing
recession rate is probably attributed to the effect of global warming. The
progressive recession of Dokriani glacier snout indicates that it has undergone
marked changes in shape and position.
Kulkarni, et al. (2007) have studied the glacial retreat in Himalaya using
Indian Remote Sensing satellite data. In their investigation, glacial retreat was
estimated for 466 glaciers in Chenab, Parbati and Baspa basins from 1962. The
investigation has shown an overall reduction in glacier area from 2077 sq. km.
in 1962 to 1628 sq. km. at present, an overall deglaciation of 21%.
Renoj, et al. (2007) have studied the Role of Glaciers and Snow cover
on headwater river hydrology in monsoon regime- Micro-scale study of Din
Gad catchment, Garhwal, Himalayas, India. The study shows that the
hydrometric station at 2360 m asl (Tela) experienced 45% reduction in summer
discharge from 1998 to 2000, which translated into a twofold increase in the
percentage glacier contribution. This paradox resulted from variations in the
winter precipitation characteristics masking the run-off variations of the glacial
regime. Glacier degraded run-off volume varied from 3.5% of the bulk glacier
discharge in 1994 to 7.5% in 1999. This study suggests that the uncertainties in
the precipitation characteristics in a changing climate, especially the winter
snowfall have pronounced effect on the headwater river run-off variability
rather than the run-off variations from a receding glacier. On the other hand,
21
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
glaciers play an important role in sustaining the river flows during the years of
low summer run-off.
Limited work has been done on the glacial studies of Kashmir region.
There is a good deal of information about the geology of the Kashmir
Himalayas in the Geological survey of India reports but little has been done on
the Kashmir glaciers.
Neve (1910) was the first to study and prepare the map of the Kolahoi
and its Northern glaciers in detail. He documented its movement during 1887
to 1909. In his study, he says, Kolahoi glacier has receded quite a quarter of a
mile since my first visit in 1887. His authentic observations were supported by
later investigations.
Dainelli (1922) and De Terra (1939) were among the first few
glaciologists to give a detailed account of glaciations of the Kashmir valley on
the basis of the Pleistocene deposits. They detected four main phases of the
glaciation on the basis of moraines and varves in Kerewa deposits. Danielle
reported Roche Mountonees and Subglacial moraines along one of the valley
walls of the Southern Liddar valley near Phalgam but De Terra and Patterson
did not accept his views on the glacial origin.
Grinlinton (1928) mapped the glaciated section of the East Liddar valley
and gave a general distribution of few erosional and depositional features. On
the basis of the depositional features he suggested that there were two glacial
epochs. During the second epoch there were many advances and retreats.
22
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Wadia (1941) and Krishnan (1960) described the Pleistocene ice age
deposits of Kashmir and also gave comprehensive straitigraphy of the
Southeastern part of Kashmir. They documented four glacial advances on the
basis of glacial deposits.
Odell (1963) has studied the Kolahoi Northern glacier, Kashmir. In his
study, he observed that the present altitude of the snout is about 12,000 ft. in
relation to the contours on the above maps; and the lower reaches of the glacier
at any rate are in a very passive and shrinking condition.
23
Chapter – 2 Literature Review
Since a little work has been done on the glaciers of the Kashmir valley
particularly on their Hydrological aspects and their recession, the present study
is being undertaken to identify the change that has taken place in the spatial
extent of the Kolahoi glacier over a period of more than three decades, viz.
1963, 1992 and 2005. The result clearly shows that there is a rapid decrease in
the spatial extent of the Kolahoi glacier from 1963 to 2005. The study also
attempts to examine the impact of this glacier on the hydrological scenario of
the valley. Due to the fast melting of the glacier, there is an increase in its
discharge. Lastly, an attempt is made to devise a comprehensive Geo-
environmental strategy for the management of this precious resource.
24
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
For detecting the glacier changes with remote sensing, there must be
images acquired in different years. Hence, Landsat series of earth observation
satellite, which firstly launched in early 1970s and IRS 1C LISS III, were
chosen for this study. The geometrically corrected Landsat ETM image for the
year 1992 and IRS 1C LISS III for the year 2005 were used to study the
changes in the spatial extent of the Kolahoi glacier. In general, image selection
for glacier mapping is guided by acquisition at the end of the ablation period,
cloud-free conditions, and lack of snow fields adjacent to the glacier.
3.1.3. Softwares
The work was carried out, utilizing the techniques of Remote Sensing &
GIS in the Erdas Imagine 8.4 and Arc view 3.2a.
In this study, the regional climate change has been discussed using
observations at the meteorological station located in Pahalgam, Anantnag. This
meteorological dataset consists of mean monthly maximum and minimum
25
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
temperatures, mean monthly and total annual precipitation and mean monthly
and mean annual relative humidity. It has been obtained from India
Meteorological Department, Srinagar for the years between 1980 and 2008.
Discharge data was obtained from the Flood and Irrigation Department,
Srinagar. In this study, discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at Aru- Liddar Head
(west Liddar) has been observed for the years between 1970 to 2008. Discharge
from the Sheshnag (east Liddar) has also been observed in this study to analyze
the contribution from these two upper streams to the Liddar river.
3.2. METHODOLOGY
The research applied an integrated approach by using Remote Sensing,
GIS and field data.
Methodology Adopted
Geo-referencing
STUDY AREA EXTRACTION
Digitization
Digitization
GLACIAL DATABASE
Fig.1: Flow Chart for Change Detection.
26
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
The Kolahoi glacier was identified using topographic map of the survey
of India (1:50,000 scale, 43 N/8) surveyed in 1963. Glacier boundary was
initially delineated manually and then the glacier area for the year 1963 was
delineated and demarcated with the help of the techniques of remote sensing.
The topographic map was first geo-referenced and then digitized in the GIS
27
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
It can be seen in past studies that there are different kinds of methods for
mapping or monitoring the glaciers with remote sensing. These methods can be
grouped into three: manual delineation of the glacier outline from different
color combinations, segmentation of ratio images and various supervised and
unsupervised classification techniques. There are several studies applied and
had successful results with each of three methods for different glacier areas in
the world.
To study the change in the spatial extent of the glacier, the Landsat ETM
image for the year 1992 with the spatial resolution of 30 metres and IRS 1C
LISS III for the year 2005 with the spatial resolution of 23.5 metres were
selected. To detect the change in the spatial extent of the glacier, two time
periods were selected. First time period starts from 1963 to 1992, which
indicates a time period of 29 years and other time period starts from 1992 to
2005, which indicates a time period of 13 years. In nutshell, we have to find the
change in the spatial extent of the glacier between 1963 and 2005, a time
period of 42 years.
Before using the satellite imageries for analysis, each image was
geometrically corrected and different contrast enhancements were used to
enhance the interpretability of the images. All satellite images were
geometrically corrected using the 1:50,000 topographical map and projected
into the world geodetic system 1984 (WGS84) and the universal transverse
Mercator (UTM) coordinate system.
28
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
The images were visually interpreted, using the clues such as tone,
color, texture, pattern, shadow, shape and association, etc. To differentiate
between the clouds and snow/glaciers, various color composites were analyzed.
Although all the remote sensing data were received in September, the seasonal
snow was obvious on the images.
3.2.4. Layer Extraction from the SOI Toposheet and the Satellite Data
Before using the satellite imageries for analysis, each image was
geometrically corrected and different contrast enhancements were used to
enhance the interpretability of the images. The SOI topographic map at the
scale of 1:50,000, of the study area was first scanned and then registered using
Erdas Imagine software. For the registration, the Ground Control Points
(GCPs) at the intersection of latitude-longitude were selected. Process of image
to image registration was then adopted for the registration of scanned imageries
with SOI topographic maps. AOI function of ERDAS Imagine software was
used for on screen digitization and to obtain the boundary of the glacier from
the registered SOI topographic map. By using the subset option, the glacial
areas from the imageries were also extracted. Images of September 1992 and
2005 were selected, because during this time period snow cover is at its
minimum and glaciers are generally fully exposed. On satellite images, glacial
boundary was mapped using standard combinations of bands such as band 2
(0.52-0.59 mm), band 3 (0.62-0.68 mm) and band 4 (0.77-0.86 mm). Image
enhancement technique was used to enhance difference between glacial and
non-glacial area. Position of Kolahoi glacier snout was verified by the field
investigations.
29
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
3.2.5. Digitization
The digitization was done by selecting new area followed by new vector
layer, whereby, the polygon tool was selected with confirming the area geo-
referenced. The digitization was started by employing the polygon tool.
30
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
31
Chapter – 3 Materials and Methods
accumulation portion of the glacier. On the surface of the glacier, large amount
of sediments are now being exposed by the fast retreat of the glacier. The
Kolahoi Gunz area was devoid of ice. Fresh ground and lateral moraines are
found at the Kolahoi Gunz area. The snout of the Kolahoi Glacier has narrowed
and moved away from lateral moraines leaving behind end and lateral
moraines; the earlier extent of the glacier can be estimated from them. The
fresh, lateral moraines on the either side of the glacial trough near Kolahoi
Gunj act as strong indicators of the past width and length of the glacier. The
crevasses developed in the ablation portion of the Kolahoi glacier testify the
fast retreat of the glacier.
32
Chapter – 4 Study Area
4.1. INTRODUCTION
The present study deals with the Impact of Glaciers on the Hydrology of
Kashmir Rivers-A case study of the Kolahoi Glacier. Kolahoi glacier lies in the
Liddar (also spelled as Lidder in the early Toposheets of the Survey of India)
valley of the Kashmir Himalaya. The Kashmir Himalaya forms the
westernmost extremity of the main Himalayan range. The Liddar valley
occupies the southern part of the giant Kashmir Himalayan synclinorium and
forms part of the middle Himalaya.
4.2. LOCATION
The Liddar catchment occupies the south eastern part of the Kashmir
valley and is situated between 33º 45′ 01″ N - 34º 15′ 35″ N and 75º 06′ 00″ E –
75º 32′ 29″ E (Map 1). The Liddar valley forms part of the middle Himalayas
and lies between the Pir Panjal range in the south and south-east, the north
Kashmir range in the north-east and Zanskar range in the southwest. The
satellite view of the study area is depicted in the Map 2. The Liddar valley has
been carved out by river Liddar, a right bank tributary of river Jhelum. It has a
catchment area of 1159.38 km2, which constitute about 10 per cent of the total
catchment area of river Jhelum (Bhat et al., 2007). The Liddar joins the
Jhelum (upper stream of Indus river) at Gur village after travelling a course of
70 kms (Raza et al., 1978).
The Liddar valley gives rise to a huge beautiful valley only next to the
Sind valley. Adjacent to the basin lie the basins of Arpat Kol on the south, Sind
on the north and Harwan and Arpat basins on the North West. The relief of the
basin is diverse comprising of high mountains, steep slopes, alpine meadows
(margs) and fluvial fans. The high mountain ranges of middle Himalayas form
a drainage divide, separating Liddar basin from the other adjacent basins. The
range contains peaks as high as 4889 meters. On the east, the mountain ranges
are even higher with peaks above Sheshnag Lake going on as high as 5200
meters. The slopes facing the basin are covered with thick forests.
33
Chapter – 4 Study Area
33o30’ 33o30’
74o00’ 75o30’
(KASHMIR VALLEY)
VAL 33o45’ 33o45’
75o06’ 75o32’
(LIDDAR VALLEY)
75O16’ 75O23’
34O12’ 34O12’
34O07’ 34O07’
75O16’ 75O23’
(KOLAHOI GLACIER)
Map 1.
1 Location Map of the Study Area
Source: Generated from the SOI Toposheet, 1963 and ETM, 1992
34
Chapter – 4 Study Area
Kolahoi Glacier
35
Chapter – 4 Study Area
4.3. PHYSIOGRAPHY
The area gradually rises in elevation from south (1600 metres) to north
(5400 metres) (Map 3). The Liddar valley is gridled on three sides by lofty
ridges, the Saribal-Katsal ridge (4800 metres) on the east, the Wokhbal (4200
metres) on the west and Basmai-Kazimpathlin bal (4800 metres) in the north.
The interior of the northern part of the Liddar valley has a concentration of
high mountain ridges like Dadwar (3560 metres), Goucher (4000 metres) and
Tramakzan (4200 metres), which run parallel to the course of the rivers.
The Liddar valley begins from the base of the two snow fields; the
Kolahoi and Sheshnag. From here its two main upper streams; the West and the
East Liddar originate and join near the famous tourist town of Pahalgam.
Below Pahalgam the Liddar passes through a narrow valley and ultimately
debouches on to the wide alluvial fan near Aishmaqam. The Liddar meanders
and forms a braided valley in the plains (Map 3). The Liddar valley reveals a
variegated topography due to the combined action of glaciers and rivers. At
present the glacial activity is mostly confined near the snouts of the Kolahoi
and Shishram where active glaciers are located. The glaciated section of the
valley contains many erosional and depositional features. The remnants of
these features extend parallel to the Liddar river. In the south, Liddar valley
terraces are predominantly developed in some sections.
36
Chapter – 4 Study Area
highest peaks not much above 4100 metres in the vicinity of Tar Sar Lake. The
digital elevation model of the Liddar valley is depicted in the Map 3. The
slopes facing the basin are covered with thick forests. The small stretch of plain
area at the South-west of the basin stands out in contrast to the high lofty
mountainous region. The plain area is in fact, an alluvium fan. It owes its origin
to the alluvium deposited by the many distributaries of Liddar river before their
confluence with river Jehlum.
37
Chapter – 4 Study Area
38
Chapter – 4 Study Area
4.4. GEOLOGY
The geological setting has three components: lithology, stratigraphy and
structure. The lithological formations of the study area range from
Carboniferous to Triassic with Recent formation near the rivers and the glaciers
of the Liddar Valley. The oldest formation stretches along the left bank of the
southern part of the Liddar Valley. The pioneer work on the geology of the area
was contributed by Middlemiss in 1910. Since then many geologists have
investigated the rocks of the present area and made revisions in respect of
lithostratigraphy and nomenclature in Middlemiss classification.
Shale-Slate-Greywacke Group
Orthoquartzite-Carbonate Group
39
Chapter – 4 Study Area
Limestone Group
40
Chapter – 4 Study Area
These deposits occur in the form of older and newer alluvium. The older
alluvium is deposited in the form of moraines, eskers, kames, and scree. The
older alluvium overlies the older rock groups from the Sheshnag to Ganeshbal
and Kolahoi to Pahalgam along the valley sections of the East and West Liddar
respectively. They are Recent (Late Pleistocene) in age. The recent alluvium
brought by the East and West Liddar has been deposited along the river beds
and banks in the form of silt, boulders and pebbles.
The major structures of the area are synclines and anticlines. The
syncline axis passes near Pahalgam whereas the corresponding anticlines are in
the north and south of Pahalgam (Map 4).
41
Chapter – 4 Study Area
42
Chapter – 4 Study Area
4.5. CLIMATE
The Liddar valley has distinct climatic characteristics. This is related to
its location at higher altitude and its setting which is enclosed on all sides by
mountain ranges. The study area has sub-Mediterranean type of climate with
nearly 80 % of its annual rainfall concentrated in winter and spring months
(Meher-Homji, 1971). The study area has CZW moisture regime
(Thornthwaite) and the climate type designated as B’1 with thermal efficiency
index of 55 per cent (Reza, M. et al., 1978).
Winter Season
43
Chapter – 4 Study Area
The summer and the winter rainfall variation with altitude are similar. It
is the highest (194 mm) at the higher altitudes of Chandanwari and the lowest
(142 mm) at the lower altitude of Pahalgam. The rainfall is local in nature and
gets marginal benefit from the monsoonal winds because of the rain-shadow
effect of the Pir Panjal range.
4.6. VEGETATION
The vegetation of the study area displays characteristic mixture of
temperate and alpine flora. The phytogeographic composition of the plant
communities is different at different elevation due to microclimate, biotic and
other environmental conditions. The following vegetation zones have been
identified by the botanists:
This zone extends up to the altitude of 2200 mtrs. In this zone Pinus
griffithii and Cedrus deodara grow along with broad-leaved species like Acer
caesium, Juglans regia and Salix species.
44
Chapter – 4 Study Area
4.7. DRAINAGE
The Liddar or the ‘Yellow’ river is the first right bank tributary joining
the river Jehlum at Sangam between Khanabal and Gur in the south Kashmir.
The stream rises at the base of Kolahoi and Seshnag glaciers (Map. 5). It is
formed by meeting of the two upper streams, the West (North West) and the
East (North East) Liddar, at the famous south Kashmir health resort of
Pahalgam. The West Liddar rises in the northern slopes of Kolahoi mountains
and is joined by a stream (Liddarwatt) flowing from the Tarsar and Chandasar
and runs down a distance of 30 km. before meeting the sister stream at
Pahalgam (Map. 5). The East Liddar trickles from the snow on the southern
slope of the Panjtarni mountains and flows into the Seshnag, which is
connected by another small lake, called Zamti. Leaving the Seshnag, the stream
flows in the westerly direction for a distance of 24 km before merging with
Western branch (Map. 5).
45
Chapter – 4 Study Area
water slightly less than that of Jehlum itself. In altitude, the Liddar falls from
2129 metres at Pahalgam to 1591 metres at Gur just in a distance of about 38
km. thus the fall is 14 metre in 1 km or 1 in 71. However, from the source of
west Liddar to Gur, the fall is 49 metre in 1 km or 1 in 20 (Reza, et.al. 1978).
Distribution
The majority of the meltwater streams are located in the East Liddar
valley. The melt water streams are tributaries to the main trunk streams of the
east and the west Liddar rivers and flow in the northeast-southwest and
northwest-southeast directions.
Origin
Morphology
46
Chapter – 4 Study Area
Map 5.
5. Drainage Map of the Liddar Catchment
Catchment.
47
Chapter – 4 Study Area
Sex ratio and literacy rate are very important indicators of demographic
structure of a town. Sex ratio which was 752 in 1961 has increased to 800 in
1971 and 802 in 1981. This increase could be the migration of males engaged
in service sector, improved medical facilities and standards of life.
48
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
49
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
39 km2 (Jeelani and Hasnain, 2010). The melt water feeds the west and east
Liddar Rivers and downstream in the valley, they joined and forms river
Jhelum which is the main source of water and live hood to entire Kashmir
valley.
In order to study the total snout recession of Kolahoi glacier during the
period of investigation, three sets of data were obtained: (i) comparison of
snout position from different photographs of Kolahoi glacier via dated, 1909
(Plate 1), 1961 (Plate 2), 2007 (Plate 3) and 2011 (Plate 4) showed that the
snout is retreating very fast; (ii) total recession between 1963 and 2005 was
obtained as 2.88km2, with an average rate of 0.06km2/yr; (iii) field observation
showed that the glacier has developed various crevasses in its ablation portion
and forms numerous caves at its snout position which act as the important
indicators of its recession. The study reveals that the snout of the glacier is
continuously retreating and the annual rate increased slightly. The snout has
narrowed and moved away from lateral low moraines by a similar distance
leaving behind end and lateral moraines near the front. This increasing
recession rate is probably attributed to the effect of global warming. The
progressive recession of Kolahoi glacier snout indicates that it has undergone
marked changes in shape and position.
50
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
51
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Plate 1.
1 Snout of Kolahoi glacier in 1909.
Source: N.E.Odell-1961
52
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
53
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
During Pleistocene, Kolahoi glacier was fed by nine other glaciers and
its basin covered about 650km². The present snow field feeding this glacier
covers only 2.5km², and no other glacier joins it. In Pleistocene it extended for
35km to terminate near 2760m ASL and at present it terminates within 3km
from its cirque at 3650m ASL (Ahmad and Rais, 1998). In Pleistocene,
Kolahoi glacier came down its cirque facing north. About a kilometer from the
snout, this glacier turn west, and finally it joined the East-Liddar glacier at
Pehalgam, facing southeast. A large part of West Lidder valley is on Panjal
Traps (Permo-carboniferous lava flow), which has hexagonal Joint pattern.
Kolahoi valley also changes direction in confrontation with this joint pattern
and it flows along the sides of the hexagon. It is very difficult to say whether
the glacier has carved its own valley or it moved in an older valley.
The fluctuation records of the Kolahoi Glacier snout are available for the
past 100 years (A. D 1857 to 1961). An analysis of the available records is
presented in this study. It appears that considerable recession of the snout has
taken place since 1857 (Table 1). The glacier has receded about 1.6km2 from
1857-1909 (52 years) and 0.82 km2 from 1912-1961 (50 years).
In the present study, the change detection in the spatial extent of the
Kolahoi glacier within three time periods, viz. 1963, 1992 and 2005 is detected.
54
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
The result clearly shows that the glacier is receding very fast in recent times
and will disappear in future if the same trend of recession continues.
The Kolahoi glacier was identified using topographic map of the Survey
of India (1:50,000 scale, 43 N/8) surveyed in 1963. Glacier boundary was
initially delineated manually and then the glacier area for the year 1963 was
delineated and demarcated with the help of the techniques of Remote Sensing
(Map 7). The total area of the Kolahoi glacier was 13.57 km2 in this year (Table
2).
The glacier area for the year 1992 was calculated from Landsat ETM
satellite image for the year 1992 (Map. 8). The total area of the Kolahoi glacier
was 11.22 km2 in this year (Table 2).
The glacier area for the year 2005 was calculated from IRS 1C LISS III
satellite image for the year 2005 (Map. 9). The total area of the Kolahoi glacier
was 10.69 km2 in this year (Table 2).
The present study reveals that Kolahoi glacier is receding very fast and is
decreasing in its size. The spatial extent of the glacier has changed from 13.57
km2 in 1963 to 11.22 km2 in 1992, a net change of 2.35 km2 in 29 years (Map.
10). The glacier has further receded up to 10.69 km2 in 2005, showing a net
change of 0.53 km2 in 13 years from 1992 (Map. 11). In nutshell, Kolahoi
glacier has changed from 13.57 km2 in 1963 to 10.69 km2 in 2005, showing a
net change of 2.88 km2 in 42 years with an average rate of change of 0.06 km2
per year (Table 3). The change detection map of the glacier within three time
periods is shown in Map 12.
55
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1963 13.57
1992 11.22
2005 10.69
Source: Computed from SOI Toposheet 1963, Landsat ETM 1992 and IRS 1C LISS III 2005.
The above table clearly indicates that there is significant increase in the
rate of glacier recession for last few decades (Fig. 2). The area of the Kolahoi
glacier in the year 1963 was 13.57 km² which receded up to 11.22 km² in the
year 1992. The glacier further receded up to 10.69 km2 in the year 2005 (Table
2).
The total change and retreat (Km2/year) in the spatial extent of the
Kolahoi glacier in 42 years (1963 to 2005) is given in Table 3.
8 GLACIER
AREA
6
4
2
0
1963 1992 2005
YEARS
Fig. 2: Showing Glacier Area (sq. km.) for the Years 1963, 1992 and 2005.
56
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Source: Computed from SOI Toposheet 1963, Landsat ETM 1992 and IRS 1C LISS III 2005.
The above table clearly indicates that the glacier receded up to 2.35 km2
between 1963 and 1992, with an average rate of 0.08 km2 per year in a time
period of 29 years. The glacier further receded up to 0.53 km2 between 1992
and 2005, with an average rate of 0.04 km2 per year in a time period of 13
years. In nutshell, it can be say that the glacier receded up to 2.88 km2 between
1963 and 2005, with an average rate of 0.06 km2 per year in a time period of 42
years. This means that glacier is receding very fast in recent times. In a time
period of 29 years, glacier receded with an average rate of 0.08 km2/y between
1963 and 1992. In comparison to this rate, presently, glacier is receding at an
average rate of 0.04km2/y in only 13years between 1992 and 2005, which is
very alarming rate.
57
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
2 0 2 Kilometers
58
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
2 0 2 Kilometers
59
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
2 0 2 Kilometers
60
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Glacier(1992)
Glacier(1963)
2 0 2 Kilometers
Source: Generated from SOI Toposheet, 1963 and Landsat ETM 1992
61
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Glacier(2005)
Glacier(1992)
2 0 2 Kilometers
Source: Generated from Landsat ETM 1992 and IRS 1C LISS III 2005
62
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Glacier(2005)
Glacier(1992)
Glacier(1963)
Source: Generated from SOI Toposheet 1963, Landsat ETM 1992 and IRS 1C
LISS III 2005
63
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1. Tourism.
3. Local Population.
4. Deforestation.
64
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1. TOURISM
Tourism is the backbone of economy in the J & K state. Kashmir, for its
natural beauty and grandeur is often referred as the “Paradise on Earth”. The
Kashmir as a tourist region offers the maximum opportunities of entertainment,
enjoyment, adventure & travel. The main features of Kashmir tourism are:
Climate, Scenery, Sports, Adventure, Pilgrimage, Research, Handicrafts,
Fishing, etc.
Negative impacts from tourism occur when the level of visitor use is
greater than the environment’s ability to cope with this use within the
accessible limits of change. Uncontrolled conventional tourism poses potential
threats to many natural areas around the world. It can put enormous pressure on
an area and lead to impacts such as soil erosion, increased pollution, natural
habitat loss, etc. which in turn affects the snow cover of the surrounding areas.
Pahalgam is a tourist’s pride. Its charm and granduear delights the eyes, the
cool breeze and the widening sounds in the pine forests close to the site,
mesmerize the tourists. At present, Pahalgam is not only a tourist resort of
exceptional beauty but it has also highest attitude Golf course providing every
delight to golf lovers besides it possess rich flora and fauna. Thus invites
tourists of varied character to Pahalgam from all over the world. Its
accessibility, unpoiled wilderness and beautiful nature offer immense potentials
for its development as a tourist resort of international importance. Pony riding
is the main attraction here. Tourist fishing in Liddar River is a popular sport.
Pahalgam is the ultimate destination for trekking. The trekking season extends
from mid may to mid October.
65
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
effects are on to revive the tourist industry in the valley as a result tourist flow
has picked up almost in all the tourist resorts of Kashmir including Pahalgam.
66
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
2. 70-80% of tourists visiting Kashmir from outside the state would visit
Pahalgam.
1 1988 5.05
2 2005 7.75
3 2010 8.95
4 2025 12.80
The above table clearly indicates that the inflow of tourists into
Pahalgam was 5.05 lakhs in 1988. This number increases to 8.95 in 2010 and
will further increases upto about 12.80 lakhs in 2025, if the above mentioned
conditions prevail in the valley.
67
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
600000
500000
400000 TOTAL
TOURISTS
300000
200000
100000
0
1965 1980 1988 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEARS
Fig. 3: Total Tourist Flow to Pahalgam (lakhs)
1000000
TOURIST ARRIVAL TO PAHALGAM
900000
TOURIST ARRIVAL (Lakh)
800000
700000 DOMESTIC
600000 FOREIGNERS
500000
400000 LOCALS
300000
200000
100000
0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
YEARS
Fig. 4: Tourist Arrival to Pahalgam (lakhs)
TOURIST ESTIMATION
14
12
NUMBER(LAKH)
10
8
6 NUMBER
4 (Lakhs)
2
0
1988 2005 2010 2025
YEARS
68
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
69
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
3
2.5
2 YATRIES
1.5
1
0.5
0
1960
1965
1967
1974
1977
1978
1980
1981
1985
1989
1990
1992
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2003
2004
2005
2006
YEARS
70
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
3. LOCAL POPULATION
1 1961 1920 - 58
71
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
which was 2626 persons in 1981 rises to about 8527 persons in 2021 (Table 8;
Fig. 8). It means that there will be an increase of 5901 persons in 40 years. The
population is further expected to increase from 8527 persons in 2021 to 9379
persons in 2025 (Table 8; Fig. 8). This means that there will be an increase of
852 persons in only 4 years.
72
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
POPULATION OF PAHALGAM
7000
6000
POPULATION (Persons)
5000
4000
3000 PERSONS
2000
1000
0
1961 1971 1981 2001
YEARS
ESTIMATED POPULATION
10000
9000
8000
7000
POPULATION
6000
5000
4000 POPULATION
3000
2000
1000
0
1981 2001 2005 2011 2021 2025
YEARS
73
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
4. DEFORESTATION
5. CEMENT PLANTS
74
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
In 1982, a large cement factory has been set up at Khrew, known as the
J&K Cements Limited, Khrew. There are 500 workers employed in this factory
producing about 600 tonns of cement a day. The dust from this factory affects
the valley glaciers in general and surrounding glaciers in particular. The dust
laden winds from this area ultimately affect the glaciers in the Liddar valley.
More than 300 military convoys producing high level green house gases
move everyday across the valley. The effluents of the vehicles go in a long way
to disturb the atmosphere of the valley and ultimately the glacier cover of the
valley.
75
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
ablation portion of the Kolahoi glacier testify the fast retreat of the glacier
(Plate 7 and Plate 8). The main snout of the glacier has developed numerous
caves which act as an indicator of fast recession (Plate 9 and Plate 10). The
distinctive location of end moraines at the three altitudinal sites of the west
Liddar valley provides an evidence of three distinctive phases of deposition.
76
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
77
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
78
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
79
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
80
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
81
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Glaciers are a valuable source of fresh water which sustain life and
provide water for drinking, irrigation, hydro power generation, etc. Besides,
these exert considerable influence on the climate of a region and fluctuate in
dimension in response to the climatological changes and therefore, these are
regarded as sensitive indicators of the climate of a region. Glaciers have
receded substantially during the last century in response to the climatic
warming; especially in the mountainous regions such as Himalayas. The
differences in the global mean temperature between the last glacial maximum
and present warm period is about 5°C. However, this slow rate of climate
change probably changed in the 20th century due to rapid industrialization.
Large emissions of CO2, other trace gases and aerosols have changed the
composition of the atmosphere (Seiler & Hahn, 2001). This has affected the
radiation budget of the earth-atmosphere system. Investigations carried out by
intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC, 2001) have concluded that
the earth’s average temperature has increased by 0.6±0.20C in 20th century. In
addition, climate modeling suggests that increasing human -made green house
gases and aerosols have led to absorb 0.85± 0.15 watt/m2 more energy by earth
than emitting to space. This means additional global warming of about 0.6oC in
21st century without further change in atmospheric composition (Hanses, et al.,
2005). In addition, numerous scenarios of climate change suggest that an
average surface temperature of the earth can rise by 1.4 to 5.80C by the end of
the 21st century (IPCC, 2001). This projected rate of warming is much higher
than the observed changes during 20th century (IPCC, 2001). Obviously this
will have a profound impact on snow accumulation and ablation rate in the
Himalaya, as snow and glaciers are sensitive to global climate change.
Investigations carried out in the Himalayas suggest that almost all glaciers are
retreating and annual rate of retreat is varying from 16 to 35 m (Dobhal, et al.,
2004; Oberoi, et al., 2001).
82
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
As all the Kashmir Himalayan glaciers are in a state of fast retreat. The
same process of retreat is found in the valley’s largest glacier, Kolahoi (Liddar
valley). Thus, it is of great significance to obtain the accurate information of
changes in Kolahoi glacier. Kolahoi glacier is receding very fast due to changes
that have been taking place in the climate of the Kashmir valley in general and
Liddar valley in particular. In this backdrop, an attempt has been made to
quantify the impact of climatic variability on the spatial extent of Kolahoi
glacier. The study reveals that that there has been a considerable change in the
spatial extent of the glacier under study from 1963 to 2005. In 1963, the area
83
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
of the Kolahoi glacier was 13.57 km2, which receded up to 11.22km2 in 1992,
showing a net change of 2.35km2 in 29 years with an average retreating rate of
0.08 km2 per year. Further glacier has receded up to 0.53km2 in a very short
span of time of 13 years between 1992 & 2005, with an average retreating rate
of 0.04 km2, which is very alarming. These changes in the glacier are due to the
increase in surrounding temperature. The analysis of climatic factors of the
study area shows the recession is coherent with the warming trend. It can be
said that, increasing trend of both minimum and maximum temperatures (Table
9 and 10; Fig. 10 and Fig. 12) are responsible for areal decrease with the effect
of melting. Furthermore the precipitation values over years have shown a
declining trend (Table 11; Fig. 14.). This may be because of the decline in the
relative humidity in the study area (Table 12; Fig. 16). The alarming increase in
mean maximum temperature in Liddar valley induces rapid melting of snow
whereas the increase in mean minimum temperature does not allow glaciers to
freeze to required extent and ultimately affects its life span.
1. Temperature
84
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Year Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean
1980 3.9 5.6 8.2 18.0 21.8 24.8 24.5 25.0 22.5 19.2 13.2 3.4 15.84
1982 5.2 3.8 8.1 16.8 21.6 23.7 24.5 25.3 23.3 17.3 10.1 4.0 15.30
1985 2.9 8.3 13.9 16.8 19.7 23.2 25.1 25.8 24.8 17.8 12.6 6.0 15.57
1990 5.4 7.1 9.7 16.4 25.4 26.0 27.2 25.5 24.0 18.6 14.4 6.2 17.15
1992 4.2 6.2 9.3 17.0 20.1 24.3 25.4 25.3 22.6 18.5 13.7 8.5 16.25
1995 0.5 4.4 8.7 14.2 22.5 27.3 25.3 25.1 23.7 17.7 14.0 3.3 15.55
2000 5.1 6.1 11.4 18.7 26.1 25.4 24.9 25.2 23.3 22.8 13.8 7.6 17.53
2005 4.0 3.1 10.1 16.7 18.9 25.3 24.4 26.3 25.5 20.0 13.3 8.0 16.30
2007 7.4 8.6 11.6 22.2 22.0 25.1 25.2 25.2 23.7 21.4 15.9 7.7 18.0
It is evident from the above table that the mean monthly maximum
temperature of the Liddar valley shows an increasing trend. The annual mean
maximum temperature increases from 15.84oC in 1980 to 17.15oC in 1990
showing a net increase of 1.31OC in only 10 years (Fig. 9). The temperature
further shows an increasing trend from 17.52oC in 2000 to 18.0oC in 2007 (Fig.
9). This means that there is an increase of 0. 48OC in only 7 years. In nutshell,
it can be say that during a time period of 27 years, temperature increases from
15.84oC in 1980 to 18.0oC in 2007 (Table 9 and Fig. 10), showing a net
increase of 2.16oC. This alarming increase in mean maximum temperature in
Liddar valley induces rapid melting of snow and glaciers of the surrounding
areas. The composite diagram for mean monthly maximum temperature (1980-
2007) in Liddar valley is depicted in Figure 9.
85
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1990
15
1992
10 1995
2000
5
2005
0 2007
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
16
15.5 TEMPERATURE
15
14.5
14
13.5
1980 1982 1985 1990 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
86
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Year Jan. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean
1980 -6.1 -4.2 -0.8 3.0 5.6 9.3 11.6 11.9 8.3 3.5 -0.8 -4.6 3.05
1982 -6.1 -7.3 -2.7 2.6 5.0 7.9 11.2 10.8 7.4 2.7 -1.1 -4.9 2.12
1985 -10 -7.6 0.3 3.3 5.1 7.2 13.5 12.8 8.4 2.6 -2.2 -3.9 2.45
1990 -3.1 -3.4 -2.8 1.9 5.9 9.6 12.8 13.3 9.8 1.4 -2.6 -4.7 3.17
1992 -9.7 -5.0 -1.0 2.9 6.1 6.6 9.8 10.6 8.7 2.2 -0.4 -0.7 2.59
1995 -11 -6.2 -3.0 2.0 4.9 7.6 12.8 13.4 7.1 2.8 -2.8 -5.7 1.82
2000 -5.6 -3.2 -1.6 3.2 7.4 10.3 13.4 11.4 7.5 1.9 -1.4 -4.7 3.19
2005 -4.5 -2.0 -0.1 2.7 5.8 8.9 12.9 12.5 10.3 2.7 -2.2 -5.1 3.49
2007 -5.7 -1.2 -1.5 4.0 6.7 10.7 13.0 13.5 9.7 1.9 -2.1 -4.8 4.63
It is evident from the above table that the mean monthly minimum
temperature of the Liddar valley also shows an increasing trend. The annual
mean minimum temperature increases from 3.05oC in 1980 to 3.17oC in 1990
(Fig. 11) showing a net increase of 0.12oC in only 10 years. The temperature
further shows an increasing trend from 3.19oC in 2000 to 4.63oC in 2007 (Fig.
11). This means that there is an increase of 1.44oC in only 7 years. In nutshell,
it can be say that during a time period of 27 years, temperature increases from
3.05oC in 1980 to 4.6oC in 2007,(Table 10; Fig. 12), showing a net increase of
1.58 OC. This alarming increase in mean minimum temperature in Liddar valley
does not allow glaciers to freeze to required extent and ultimately affects its life
span. The composite diagram for mean monthly minimum temperature (1980-
2007) in Liddar valley is depicted in Figure 11.
87
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
10 1982
1985
5 1990
TEMP.(OC)
1992
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1995
-5 2000
2005
-10
2007
-15
MONTHS
3
TEMPERATURE
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
1980 1982 1985 1990 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
88
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
89
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1985
250
1990
200
150 1992
100 1995
50 2000
0 2005
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2007
MONTHS
1000
800
PRECIPITATION
600
400
200
0
1980 1982 1985 1990 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
90
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
Table 12: Relative Humidity (%) Mean Monthly and Mean Annually:
Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May. Jun. July. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total
1980 84 86 75 53 51 53 70 65 64 59 69 88 68
1985 77 78 74 46 52 58 58 67 48 58 68 88 64
1990 84 79 80 51 49 60 67 70 68 59 57 69 66
1995 92 86 78 70 48 43 65 80 68 69 67 87 71
2000 82 76 66 63 56 58 68 67 64 44 58 73 64
2005 88 91 80 55 63 58 73 60 05 55 60 67 62
2007 75 75 69 45 54 54 62 63 61 36 46 75 59
The above table clearly shows a decreasing trend of the mean annual
relative humidity in the study area. It declined from 68% in 1980 to 66% in
1990. From 1995, it further declined from 71% in 1995 to 59% in 2007 (Table
12 and Fig. 16). It means, in the study area the air becomes dry year after year
which directly affects the precipitation and in turn the surrounding glaciers in
the study area. The mean monthly relative humidity in the study area is given
in Fig. 15.
91
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
1985
70
60 1990
50 1995
40
2000
30
2005
20
10 2007
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
70
RELATIVE HUMIDITY (%)
60
50
40 HUMIDITY
30
20
10
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
92
5.5. DISCHARGE REGIMES FROM THE KOLAHOI
GLACIER AT LIDDAR HEAD – ARU (WEST LIDDAR)
It has been estimated that a single glacier of the size of the Gangotri
glacier has a total volume of over 20 cubic kms of ice as against the total by a
very large dam like the Bhakra of less than 8 cubic km (Vohra, 1981). Almost
all the glaciers in the valley are in the state of fast retreat. Kolahoi glacier is
one of among them. The Kolahoi glacier is receding very fast because of
climatic change and anthropogenic pressure. This glacier is a major source of
water to the entire valley. The fast melting of the Kolahoi glacier can be traced
by observing an increase in its discharge patterns (Table 15; Fig. 19 and 20).
With the marked increase in temperature and glacier shrinkage in the Liddar
valley since the early 1960s, an increasing amount of additional fresh water is
very likely to be released from the Kolahoi glacier storage, resulting in a
dramatic increase in the runoff of the Liddar river which is a glacier-fed river.
The stream (west Liddar) fed by the Kolahoi glacier shows an increase in the
discharge for last few decades as compared to the other streams fed dominantly
by snow melt.
The discharge from the Kolahoi glacier is calculated from the Aru (west
Liddar) (Table 13 and 14), because the water from the Kolahoi glacier directly
enters into its drainage basin. Therefore, the annual discharge at this station
reflects the total amount of melting in the Kolahoi glacier (West Liddar). By
analyzing the said data from Aru, it is clear that the discharge from Kolahoi
glacier is increasing very rapidly year after year. The west Liddar shows an
increase in its discharge as compared to the east Liddar in recent times. It
appears that fast recession of the glacier, global and regional warming, below
normal precipitation occurred during the period of snow accumulation are
perhaps the main reasons for accelerating the rate of its melting during recent
times.
93
Table 13: Mean Monthly Discharge from the Kolahoi Glacier at Liddar Head-
Aru (west Liddar) – 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1992, 1995, 2000 and
2005.
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Date Date Date Date
(cusecs) (cusecs) (cusecs) (cusecs)
YEAR 1970 YEAR 1980 YEAR 1992 YEAR 2000
Jan. 1970 75 Jan 1980 80 Jan 1992 30 Jan 2000 81
Feb. 1970 92 Feb 1980 89 Feb 1992 71 Feb 2000 79
Mar. 1970 260 Mar 1980 118 Mar 1992 250 Mar 2000 231
Apr. 1970 263 Apr 1980 255 Apr 1992 314 Apr 2000 242
May 1970 457 May 1980 672 May 1992 570 May 2000 481
Jun. 1970 522 Jun 1980 602 Jun 1992 810 Jun 2000 533
Jul. 1970 725 Jul 1980 591 Jul 1992 795 Jul 2000 508
Aug. 1970 599 Aug 1980 347 Aug 1992 470 Aug 2000 432
Sep. 1970 334 Sep 1980 210 Sep 1992 395 Sep 2000 395
Oct. 1970 193 Oct 1980 75 Oct 1992 135 Oct 2000 234
Nov. 1970 115 Nov 1980 72 Nov 1992 100 Nov 2000 141
Dec. 1970 70 Dec 1980 29 Dec 1992 92 Dec 2000 75
YEAR 1975 YEAR 1985 YEAR 1995 YEAR 2005
Jan. 1975 86 Jan 1985 29 Jan 1995 40 Jan 2005 35
Feb. 1975 113 Feb 1985 39 Feb 1995 65 Feb 2005 40
Mar. 1975 270 Mar 1985 200 Mar 1995 310 Mar 2005 326
Apr 1975 426 Apr 1985 533 Apr 1995 430 Apr 2005 278
May 1975 640 May 1985 948 May 1995 468 May 2005 733
Jun. 1975 727 Jun 1985 872 Jun 1995 665 Jun 2005 1111
Jul. 1975 625 Jul 1985 654 Jul 1995 465 Jul 2005 1000
Aug. 1975 509 Aug 1985 511 Aug 1995 390 Aug 2005 509
Sep. 1975 315 Sep 1985 375 Sep 1995 238 Sep 2005 414
Oct. 1975 225 Oct 1985 214 Oct 1995 196 Oct 2005 63
Nov. 1975 192 Nov 1985 199 Nov 1995 54 Nov 2005 13
Dec. 1975 90 Dec 1985 180 Dec 1995 26 Dec 2005 18
94
By analyzing the mean monthly discharge for the year of 1970, it is
clear that July with 725 cusecs and December with 70 cusecs have respectively
high and low runoff (Table 13; Fig. 17, 18 and 20). Similarly, in the year 1975,
the highest mean monthly discharge was in the month of June (727 cusecs) and
the lowest discharge was in January (86 cusecs) (Table 13; Fig. 17 and 18). In
the year 1980, the highest mean monthly discharge of 672 cusecs was in the
month of May and the lowest discharge was in the month of December (29
cusecs). Similarly, for the year 1985, the highest and the lowest figures for
discharge were 948 cusecs (May) and 29 cusecs (January) respectively (Table
13; Fig. 17 and 18). By observing the above mentioned figures, it is evident
that the discharge from the glacier is increases year after year. In the month of
July for the year 1970, the discharge was 725 cusecs. But, as compared to it the
discharge was 948 cusecs in the month of May for the year 1985, which clearly
indicates an increase in the discharge from the Kolahoi glacier during the
summer months. This means that the discharge from the Kolahoi glacier is
increased in summer months, which is due to its fast retreat and high
temperature conditions prevailing in the catchment.
By observing the discharge from the year 1992, it is evident that the
discharge from the Kolahoi glacier has attained a very fast rate as compared to
the previous years. This means that the glacier is receding very fast in recent
times. In the year 1992, the highest discharge of 810 cusecs was found in the
month of June and the lowest discharge of 30 cusecs was found in the month of
January (Table 13; Fig. 17 and 18). As against to this, in 2005, the highest
discharge of 1111 cusecs was in the month of July and the lowest discharge of
13 cusecs was found in the month of November (Table 13; Fig. 17, 18 and 20).
These figures clearly indicate a drastic increase in the discharge from the
glacier.
95
The mean monthly discharge from the Kolahoi glacier in recent times is
given in table 14. In recent time, the discharge from the glacier is increases
drastically due to its fast retreat.
Table 14: Mean Monthly Discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at Liddar Head-
Aru (west Liddar) – 2007 and 2008.
It is evident from the above table that in recent years Kolahoi glacier is
receding at a faster rate. This can be judged by observing an increase in its
discharge from the west Liddar. This increase in discharge is given in Table 14
and depicted in Fig. 17 and 18. In 2008, the discharge during the summer
months was higher than the summer discharge in previous years. The discharge
was 700 cusecs, 1774 cusecs, 1687 cusecs, 1130 cusecs, 649 cusecs and 677
Cusecs for the months of April, May, June, July, August and September
respectively, which indicates a dramatic increase in its discharge. The
composite diagrams showing the discharge for all the years from 1970 to 2008
are depicted in the Figure 17 and 18.
96
Discharge From Kolahoi Glacier (1970-2008)
2000
1970
1800
1975
1600
1980
DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
1400
1200 1985
1000 1992
800 1995
600 2000
400 2005
200 2007
0 2008
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
Fig. 17: A Bar Diagram showing Discharge from Kolahoi Glacier from
1970-2008
1985
1200
1992
1000
1995
800 2000
600 2005
400 2007
200 2008
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
Fig. 18: A Line Graph showing Discharge from Kolahoi Glacier from
1970-2008
97
The total annual discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at Aru (west Liddar)
is given in Table 15. The discharge shows an increasing trend from 3705
cusecs in 1970 to 4754 cusecs in 1985. It further increases from 4100 cusecs in
1992 to 7298 cusecs in 2008 (Fig. 19). In summer, the discharge increases due
to the rapid melting of the glacier and increasing temperature conditions in the
surrounding areas. It has been seen that the fast melting of the Kolahoi glacier
results in the increase in its discharge.
Table 15: Total Annual Discharge from Kolahoi glacier at Liddar Head -Aru
(west Liddar) 1970 – 2008.
YEAR TOTAL ANNUAL DISCHARGE (cusecs)
1970 3705
1975 4218
1980 3140
1985 4754
1992 4100
1995 3347
2000 3432
2005 4540
2007 4574
2008 7298
If we compare the mean monthly discharge from the Kolahoi glacier for
the years 1970, 1992, 2005 and 2008, it is clear that the discharge is increasing
year after year. This fluctuating trend in the discharge regimes from the
Kolahoi glacier for the years of 1970, 1992, 2005 and 2008 is depicted in
Figure 20. It is clear from the figure that in 1992 the discharge was more than
the discharge in 1970 and in 2005 the discharge was more than the 1992 and
similarly the discharge in the year 2008 was more than the discharge in 2005.
This means that discharge from the Kolahoi glacier is increases year after year
which is due to its fast receding trend in the recent times.
98
Total Annual Discharge (Cusecs) from Kolahoi
Glacier
8000
TOTAL DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
7000
6000
5000
4000 DISCHARGE
3000
2000
1000
0
1970 1975 1980 1985 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007 2008
YEARS
Fig. 19: Total Annual Discharge from the Kolahoi glacier at Aru (Liddar
head) - (1970-2008)
1400 1970
1200 1992
1000
2005
800
600 2008
400
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
99
5.6. DISCHARGE OF LIDDAR RIVER AT SHESHNAG
(EAST LIDDAR): 1992-2008
As we know that the Liddar valley begins from the base of the two snow
fields; the Kolahoi and Sheshnag. From here its two main upper streams; the
West and the East Liddar originate and join near the famous tourist town of
Pahalgam. It therefore, becomes necessary to calculate the discharge from the
East Liddar also to analyze the contribution from both these upper streams to
the Liddar river. The discharge from the East Liddar at Sheshnag (1992-2008)
is given in Table 16 and depicted in Figure 23.
Table 16: Discharge of the Liddar river at Sheshnag (East Liddar, 1992-
2008):
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
Date Date Date Date
(cusecs) (cusecs) (cusecs) (cusecs)
Jan 1992 50 Jan 1995 45 Jan 2002 42 Jan 2008 40
Feb 1992 55 Feb 1995 62 Feb 2002 60 Feb 2008 70
Mar 1992 85 Mar 1995 94 Mar 2002 17 Mar 2008 104
Apr 1992 231 Apr 1995 116 Apr 2002 117 Apr 2008 374
May 1992 320 May 1995 298 May 2002 64 May 2008 936
Jun 1992 370 Jun 1995 345 Jun 2002 20 Jun 2008 1019
Jul 1992 380 Jul 1995 439 Jul 2002 350 Jul 2008 443
Aug 1992 290 Aug 1995 340 Aug 2002 6 Aug 2008 464
Sep 1992 200 Sep 1995 280 Sep 2002 470 Sep 2008 170
Oct 1992 125 Oct 1995 192 Oct 2002 5 Oct 2008 37
Nov 1992 48 Nov 1995 95 Nov 2002 3 Nov 2008 24
Dec 1992 40 Dec 1995 54 Dec 2002 2 Dec 2008 20
Source: Flood Control and Irrigation Department, Srinagar.
By comparing the discharge from the Sheshnag (East Liddar) with that
from the Kolahoi glacier (West Liddar), it is clear that the contribution from
Kolahoi glacier to the river Liddar is more and increases very rapidly in recent
times (Table 13, 14 and 16). This is due to the fast retreat of Kolahoi glacier
which helps in increase in its discharge. The Figure 21 and 22 shows the mean
monthly increasing trend of discharge from the Kolahoi glacier as compared to
the discharge from Sheshnag for the years of 1992 and 2008 respectively.
100
Discharge Comparisons from West and the East Liddar
(1992)
900
800
700
DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
600
WEST
500 LIDDAR
400 EAST
300 LIDDAR
200
100
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
Fig. 21: Showing mean monthly discharge comparisons between West and
the East Liddar for the year 1992
1400
1200 W. LIDDAR
1000
E. LIDDAR
800
600
400
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
101
The comparison in the mean annual discharge regimes from the Kolahoi
glacier (west Liddar) and Sheshnag (east Liddar) for the years of 1992, 1995,
2000 and 2008 is shown in the Table 17.
Table 17: Comparisons of Discharge between the Kolahoi glacier (west Liddar)
and Sheshnag (East Liddar) - 1992, 1995, 2000 and 2008
The above table clearly indicates that the total annual discharge from the
Kolahoi glacier (west Liddar) is increasing drastically year after year as
compared to the discharge from Sheshnag (east Liddar). The discharge from
the Sheshnag increases from 2194 cusecs in 1992 to 3701 cusecs in 2008 (Fig.
24). As compared to it the discharge from the Kolahoi glacier increases from
4100 cusecs in 1992 to 7298 cusecs in 2008 (Fig. 24), thus showing a drastic
increase in recent times which clearly indicates its fast retreat.
102
Discharge of Liddar at Sheshnag (East Liddar)-
1200
1992-2008
1000
1992
DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
800
1995
600 2000
400 2008
200
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTHS
6000
DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
5000
WEST
4000 LIDDAR
EAST
3000
LIDDAR
2000
1000
0
1992 1995 2000 2008
YEARS
Fig. 24: Showing total annual discharge between west and the east
Liddar- 1992-2008
103
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
5.7. DISCUSSION
Mean annually values of temperature, precipitation and discharge for the
years 1980 to 2007 in the Liddar basin are listed in Table 18. The average
annual maximum temperature was around 15oC between 1980 and 1995. From
1995 onwards temperature increases to about 0.47oC. Not only the mean annual
maximum temperature increases but the mean annual minimum temperature
also shows an increasing trend from the year 2000 onwards (Table 18). This
increase in temperature in the Kolahoi glacier valley may have resulted in
enhanced glacier shrinkage. It is evident from the Figures 25 and 26 that
anomalously high rates of glacier shrinkage have resulted due to the climatic
warming and Figure 27 shows that how high rates of glacier shrinkage due to
climatic warming have resulted in high runoff.
Mean
Mean Total Annual Total Annual
Annually
Year Annually Min. Precipitation Discharge
Max. Temp.
O
Temp. (OC) (mm) (Cusecs)
( C)
1980 15.84 3.26 1231 3140
1985 15.57 2.45 1147 4754
1992 17.15 3.17 1371 4100
1995 15.55 1.82 1353 3347
2000 17.53 3.19 921 3432
2005 16.3 3.49 1300 4540
2007 18.0 4.63 921 4574
Source: India Meteorological and Flood Control and Irrigation Department, Srinagar.
104
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
precipitation in the form of snow has an inverse effect on the amount of runoff.
Fresh snow is highly reflective so that it absorbs less heat and melts slowly,
while old snow and glacier ice have a low reflectivity. Thus the greater the
precipitation in the form of snow, the longer the glacier is covered by a highly
reflective material, and the less the runoff. A decreased amount of snowfall
leads to a low-reflective surface being exposed longer, producing greater melt
and increased runoff. This is evident from Fig. 28 which clearly shows that
with decrease in precipitation, runoff increases rapidly.
105
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
12
10 MEAN MAX.
8 TEMP.
MEAN MIN.
6
TEMP.
4
2
0
1963 1992 2005
YEARS
Fig. 25. A Bar diagram showing Comparision between Glacier Area and
Prevailing Temperature Conditions in Liddar basin(1963, 1992
and 2005).
12
10 MEAN MAX.
8 TEMP.
MEAN MIN.
6 TEMP.
4
2
0
1963 1992 2005
YEARS
Fig. 26. A Line graph showing Comparision between Glacier Area and
Prevailing Temperature Conditions in Liddar basin(1963, 1992
and 2005).
106
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
DISCHARGE (CUSECS)
5000
4000
3000
2000 DISCHARGE
1000
0
1970 1992 2005
YEARS
10
GLACIAL AREA
5
0
1963 1992 2005
YEARS
Fig. 27: Trends in total annual discharge and total glacial area in Liddar basin.
3000
2500 DISCHARGE
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1980 1985 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
107
Chapter – 5 Results and Discussion
15
Mean Annual Maximum
TEMP. (0C)
Temp.
10
Mean Annual Minimum
5 Temp.
0
1980 1985 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
1400
1200
1000
800 PRECIPITATION
600
400
200
0
1980 1985 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
4000
3500
3000
2500 DISCHARGE
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1980 1985 1992 1995 2000 2005 2007
YEARS
Fig. 29: Trends in temperature, precipitation and discharge between 1980 and
2007 in Liddar basin.
108
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
6.1. CONCLUSION
The following conclusions were drawn from the present study:
In the present study an attempt has been made to evaluate the changes in
the spatial extent of the Kolahoi glacier within 42 years (1963–2005).
The results clearly show that the glacier is receding very fast in recent
times and will disappear in future if the same trend of recession
continues. The spatial extent of the glacier has changed from 13.57 km2
in 1963 to 11.22 km2 in 1992, a net change of 2.35 km2 in 29 years,
showing a net rate of change of 0.08 Km2/year. The glacier has further
receded up to 10.69 km2 in 2005, a net change of 0.53 km2 in 13 years
from 1992, showing a net rate of change of 0.04 Km2/year. In nutshell, it
can be say that the glacier receded up to 2.88 km2 between 1963 and
2005, with an average rate of 0.06 km2 per year in a time period of 42
years.
109
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
in the region. The number of Yatries increases from 0.04 lakhs in 1960
to 4.54 lakhs in 2006.
110
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
The analysis of climatic factors of the study area shows that the
recession is coherent with the warming trend. It can be said that,
increasing trend of both minimum and maximum temperatures are
responsible for areal decrease with the effect of melting. Furthermore
the precipitation values over years have also shown a declining trend.
The mean annual maximum temperature in the study area increases from
15.8oC in 1980 to 18.0oC in 2007. This alarming increase in mean
maximum temperature in Liddar valley induces rapid melting of snow
and glaciers. The mean annual minimum temperature in the study area
has also shows an increasing trend and increases from 3.05oC in 1980 to
4.63oC in 2007. This increase in mean minimum temperature does not
allow the surrounding glaciers to freeze to required extent and ultimately
affects its life span. Increase in temperature conditions is facilitated by a
corresponding declining trend in precipitation. The precipitation
declines from 1231 mm in 1980 to 921.2 mm in 2007.
The discharge from the Kolahoi glacier is increasing year after year
which shows its fast recession in recent time. The total annual discharge
from the Kolahoi glacier at Aru (west Liddar) shows an increasing trend
from 3705 cusecs in 1970 to 4100 cusecs in 1990. The discharge further
increases from 1990 and reaches upto 7298 cusecs in 2008.
By comparing the discharge from the Sheshnag (East Liddar) with that
of the Kolahoi glacier (West Liddar), it seems that the contribution from
Kolahoi glacier is more and increases drastically in recent times.
Discharge from the Sheshnag increases from 2194 cusecs in 1990 to
3701 cusecs in 2008. As compared to this the discharge from the
Kolahoi glacier increases from 4100 cusecs in 1990 to 7298 cusecs in
2008, thus showing a drastic increase in recent times which may be due
to its fast retreat.
111
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
6.2. SUGGESTIONS
The observed changes in the spatial extent of the Kolahoi glacier
highlighted the urgency of collaborative sustainable management to confront
the problem of water resources in the study area. The major recommendations
helpful in solving the problems regarding the fast receding trend of the Kolahoi
glacier are listed below:
The present study deals with the impact of glaciers on the hydrology of
Kashmir rivers. The results clearly reveal that the glacier under
investigation is receding very fast as compared to other valley glaciers
as a result of which its discharge is increasing in recent times and will
decrease in near future if the same trend continued happen to it. Hence
satellite based monitoring must be employed. Since the accessibility to
the Himalayan snow covered region is very difficult, one has to depend
on remote sensing technique for snow cover studies. Owing to their
synoptic view, repetitive coverage and up-to-datedness, remote sensing
materials are an unprecedentedly powerful and efficient media to study
glaciers that are usually located in remote, inaccessible and inhospitable
environments.
The snow and ice in the study area is very valuable economic resources
for the people who are living there as besides meteorological and
environmental significance, the socio-economics of the area is totally
governed by the melt from this glacier. It is important for this resource
to be measured, monitored, studied and understood so that the maximum
use can be made of it.
While studying the glaciers , not only the spatial extent of the glaciers
undertaken, but also other parameters like snow density, glacier
thickness, geomorphology, snow melt runoff, hydrology, digital
elevation models and all other associated features and phenomenon
112
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
Control the carbon dioxide emission. This is the most important step for
tackling the problem of global warming. A drastic cut in the fossil fuel
consumption in the study area is needed. More emphasis should be
given on developing new alternative fossil fuels, such as CNG and LPG
in the study area. The solar energy also offers a great potential as an
alternative fuel.
Checking on the quantity of pollution in the study area after every one
month, therefore, it is recommended to start a pollution control board in
the Pahalgam.
Stop the increasing activity of Gujjars and Bakerwalls near the glacier.
Tourism is the main economy for Kashmiri people. But when the
number of tourists increases they pose a threat to the environment of the
visiting place. Therefore, this is suggested that their number should be
reduced to a greater extent.
113
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
The garbage pits and open lavatories made for the Yatries should be
avoided.
Mini sewage treatment plants should be used to treat the polluted water
and sewage at the source.
114
Chapter – 6 Conclusion and Suggestions
115
Bibliography
Ageta, Y., Iwata, S., Yabuki, H., Naito, N., Sakai, A., Narma and Karma, C.
(2000). Expansion of Glacier Lakes in Recent Decade in the Bhutan
Himalaya, In: debris-covered glaciers, pp. 165-175 IAHS Publ. no. 264.
Ageta, Y., Ohata, T., Tanaka, Y., Ikegami, K. and Higuchi, K. (1980). Mass
Balance of Glacier AX010 in Shorong Himalaya, East Nepal during the
Summer Monsoon Season. Seppyo Special issue, 41, pp. 34-41.
Ahmad, M., Gh. Jeelani and Zahid Majeed (2009). Glacial Recession a case study
of the Kolahoi glacier, Jammu and Kashmir (India), NGRI, Uppal Road,
Hyderabad, India.
116
Bibliography
Auden, J.B. (1935). ‘The Snout of the Biafo Glacier in Bultistan’. Rec. G.S.I., 38,
pp. 400-13.
Auden, J.B. (1937). The Snout of the Gangotri Glacier, Tehri Garhwal, Rec. Geol.
Surv. Ind., 72(2), pp. 135-140.
Bahadur, J. (1988). Himalayan Water from Snow, Ice and Glaciers. Aquaworld, v.
59, pp. 59-65.
117
Bibliography
Baolin, L. I., Zhang Yichi and Zhou Chenghu (2004). Remote Sensing Detection
of Glacier Changes in Tianshan Mountains for the Past 40 years, State Key
Laboratory of Environment and Resources Information System, Institute of
Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijjing
100101, China, pp. 297-302.
Bajracharya Samjwal Ratna and Mool Pradeep Kumar (2006). Impact of Global
Climate Change from 1970s to 2000s on the Glaciers and Glacial Lakes in
Tamor Basin, Eastern Nepal, ICIMOD.
Batten, J. H. (1845). On the Line of Perpetual Snow in the Himalaya. Cal. Jl. Nat.
Hist. 5, pp. 383-8.
Blanford, W.T. (1877). Remarks on Himalayan Glaciers. Proc. A.S.B. pp. 3-4.
118
Bibliography
(1891) Note on Age and Ancient Glaciers of the Himalayas, Geol. Mag.
Dec. 3, pp. 209-10; 8, pp. 372-5.
Braithwaite, R .J. and Raper, S .C. B. (2002). Glaciers and Their Contribution to
Sea Level Changes. Phys. Chem. Earth 27, pp. 1445-1454.
Center for Science and Environment (CSE) 2002. “Melting into Oblivion,” Down
To Earth, 15 May, 2002, China Daily, 23 September 2004.
Chinn, T.J. (1988). Glaciers of New Zealand. In: Satellite image atlas of glaciers
of the world. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1386-H,
Washington, pp. 25–48.
Chow, V.T., David, R., Maidment and Larry W. Mays. (1988). Applied
Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, pp. 1-17 & 64-66.
119
Bibliography
Dahe, Q. (2000). Evidence for Recent Climatic Changes from Ice Cores in the
Central Himalaya. Ann. glacial.31, pp. 153-158.
De Terra, H. & Patterson, T. T. (1939). Studies on the Ice Age in India and
Associated Human Culture, Washington, D.C., Publication Carnegie
Institute, No. 439, pp. 1-345.
Dobhal, D. P., J. T. Gergan and Renoj, J. Thayyen (2004). Recession and Morpho
Geometrical Changes of Dokriani Glacier (1962–1995) Garhwal Himalaya,
120
Bibliography
India. Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun 248 001, India. pp.
692-696.
Dowdeswell, J.A. (1986). Remote Sensing of Ice Cap Outlet Glacier Fluctuations
on Nordaustlandet, Svalbard. Polar Research 4, pp. 25–32.
Espizua, L.E. (1986). Fluctuations of the Rio del Plomo glaciers. Geografiska
Annaler (Series A) 68, pp. 317–28.
Faust, E. (2005). Climate Review, Munich Re, Topics Geo, Annual Review:
Natural catastrophes, Knowledge Series, pp. 51.
Fetter, C. W. (1990). Applied Hydrogeology, CBS Publishers, New Delhi, pp. 1-9.
Flint, R. F. (1964). Glacial and Quaternary Geology, John Wiley, pp. 63–85.
Fujita, K., Kadota, T., Rana, B., Shrestha, R. B., and Ageta, Y. ( 2001). Shrinkage
of Glacier AX010 in Shorong region, Nepal Himalayas in the 1990s.
Bulletin of Glaciological Research 18, pp. 51-54. http://www.icimod-
gis.net/glof/glof.php.
Fujita, K., Nakawo, M., Fujito, T.Y., and Pandyal, P. (1997). Changes in Glaciers
in Hidden Valley, Mukut Himalaya, Nepal Himalaya, from 1974-1994. J.
Glaciol. 43, pp. 583-588.
121
Bibliography
Fukushima, Y., Suzuki, M., Ohta, T., Motoyama, H., Kawashima, K., Kubota, H.
H., and Bajracharya, O.M. (1987). Runoff Characteristics in Three
Glaciercovered Watersheds of Langtang Valley, Nepal Himalayas. Bull.
Glacier Res., 5, pp. 11–18 and 115-120.
Gansser, A. (1964). Geology of the Himalayas, New York; John Willey and Sons,
pp. 1-289.
Ghosh, D.K. (1973). ‘Report on Liddar Valley Hydel section’, Geological Society
of India, Special paper, No. 5, pp. 17-21.
Gilbert, L.B. and Auden, J.B. (1933). Note on a Glaciers in the Arwa valley,
British Garhwal, Rec. Geol. Surv. India., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 388-404.
Gulati, T. D. (1973). Role of Snow and Ice Hydrology in India. Proc. Of Int.
Symp. On the Role of Snow and Ice Hydrology, Banaiff, Sept. 1972, Int.
glacial. Soc., pp. 610-623.
Hambrey, M. and Jurg Alean (2004). Glaciers, Cambridge University Press, pp.
227-335.
122
Bibliography
Hansen, J. and Lebedeff, S. (1987). Global Trends of the Measured Surface Air
Temperature. J. Geophysical Research, D (11): pp. 13345-13372.
Hasnain S. I. (2000). Status of the Glacier Research in the HKH Region, School of
Environmental Science, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India,
pp. 1-5.
Hasnain, S.I., P.G. Bose, S. Ahmad and D.C. Negi (2001). Character of the Sub-
glacial Drainage System in the Ablation Area of Dokriani Glacier, India,
as revealed by Dye-Tracer Studies. Glacier Research Group, School of
123
Bibliography
Hayden, H.H. (1907): Notes on Certain Glaciers in North West Kashmir, Rec.
Geol. Surv. Ind., 35, pp.127-137.
Higuchi, K., Ageta, Y. and Kodama, H. (1976). Water Discharge of Imja Khola in
Khumbu Himal. Sepyo, J. Jpn. Soc. Snow Ice, 38, pp. 22–26.
ICIMOD and UNEP (2000). Inventory of Glaciers, Glacial Lakes and Glacial
Lake Outburst Floods, Monitoring and Early Warning System in the Hindu
Kush Himalayan Region, Bhutan.
Inoe, J. (1977). Mass Budget of Khumba Glacier. Seppyo, Special issue, 39, pp.
15-19.
IPCC (1996). Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigtion of Climate
Change: Scientific and Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working
124
Bibliography
IPCC (2001a). IPCC Third Assessment Report- Climate Change 2001. Working
Group I: Technical Summary. Geneva, WMO and UNEP.
IPCC (2001b). IPCC Third Assessment Report- Climate Change 2001. Working
Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Summary for Policy
Makers. Geneva, WMO and UNEP.
125
Bibliography
Kalapna, R. (2009). Geography, Spectrum Books Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India, pp.
246-247.
Kang, S., Zhang, Y., Qin, D., Ren, J., Zhang, Q., Bajorn, G. and Paul A.M. (2007).
Recent Temperature Increase Recorded in an Ice Core in the Source
Region of Yangtze River. Chin Sci Bull 52(6), pp. 825-831.
Kanwar Sain (1946). The Role of Glaciers and Hydrology of Punjab Rivers,
Central Board of Irrigation, Pub. No. 36, New Delhi, pp. 29.
Kaser, G. (1995). Some Notes on the Behaviour of Tropical Glaciers. Bull Inst. Fr.
Etudes andines, 24 (3), pp. 671-681.
Kaul. M.K. (1999). Inventory of Himalaya Glaciers. GSI Special Publication. No.
34.
Kaul, M.N. (1982). ‘Fluvial and Glacial Geomorphology of the Wangat Basin
(Sind River), Kashmir valley’, M.Phil Dissertation, University of Kashmir,
Srinagar, pp. 1-103.
Kaul, M.N. (1994). “Late Quaternary Glacial and Climatic History of the Liddar
valley, Kashmir Himalaya”, in K.R. Dikshit, et.al. (eds.), India:
Geomorphological Diversity, Rawat Publications, Jaipur and New Delhi,
pp. 48-126.
126
Bibliography
Kaul, M.N. (1986). Mass Balance of Lidder Glacier, Trans Institute, India
Geographers, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 95-112.
Kaul, M.N. (1988). ‘Geometry and Mass Balance Estimates of Kolahoi glaciers’,
National Academy of Sciences, India, 58th Annual Session, pp. 61.
Khan, A.R., G.R. Ganai and S.A. Bhat (2001). Jammu and Kashmir, A
Geographical Study, Gulshan Publishers, Srinagar, pp. 1-157.
Khan, A. R. (2003). Kashmir – Land and People, City Book Centre, Srinagar, pp.
2-6 & 33-35.
Krimmel, R.M. and Meier, M.F. (1975). Glacier Applications of ERTS Images.
Journal of Glaciology 15, pp. 391–402.
Kuhn, M. (1993). Possible Future Contribution to Sea Level Chane from Samall
Glaciers. In: Climate and Sea Level Change: Obsevations, Projections and
Implications (Eds. R.A. Warrick et al.), Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK. .pp. 134-143.
Kulkarni, A.V. and Buch, A.M. (1991). Glacier Atlas of Indian Himalaya.
SAC/RSA/RSAG-MWRD/SN/05/91, pp. 62.
127
Bibliography
Kulkarni, A.V., Sunil Dhar, B. P. Rathore, Babu Govindha Rajk and Rajeev Kalia
(2006). Recession of Samudra Tapu Glacier, Chandra River Basin,
Himachal Pradesh. Marine and Water Resources Group, Space
Applications Centre (ISRO), Ahmadabad, India, pp. 39-46.
Kulkarni, A.V., I.M. Bahuguna, B.P. Rathore, S.K. Singh, S.S. Randhawa, R.K.
Sood and Sunil Dhar (2007). Glacial Retreat in Himalaya using Indian
Remote Sensing Satellite Data, Marine and Water Resources Group, Space
Applications Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, (ISRO),
Ahmadabad, India. pp. 69-74.
Kulkarni, A.V., Mathur, P., Rathore, B.P., Alex, S., Thakur, N. and Manoj Kumar
(2002). Effect of Global Warming on Snow Ablation Pattern in the
Himalayas. Current Science, 83(2), pp. 120-123.
Kumar, K., Miral, M. S., Joshi, V. and Panda, Y. S. (2006). Discharge and
Suspended Sediment in Meltwaters of Gangotri Glacier, Garhwal Himlaya,
India. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47, pp. 611–619.
128
Bibliography
Li Jijun, Zheng Benxing, and Yang Xijin (1986). Glaciers in Xizang. Beijing:
Science Press, pp. 176-193.
Liu Chaohai, Kang Eris, Liu Shiyin, Chen Jianming and Liu Zongxiang (1999).
Study on the Glacier Variation and its Runoff Responses in the Arid Region
of Northwest China, Lanzhou Institute of Glaciology and Geocryology,
Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China, pp. 64-71.
129
Bibliography
Liu, S.Y. Ding Y. J. and Zhang Y. (2006). Impact of the Glacier Change on Water
Resources in the Tarim Water Basin (in Chinese). Acta Geol Sin, 61, pp.
482-489.
Meier, M.F. and E.F. Roots (1982). Glaciers as a Water Resource, Nature and
Resources, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 7-15.
Mennis, J. L. and Fountain, A.G. (2001). A Spatial - Temporal GIS Database for
Monitoring Alpine Glacier Change. Photogrametric Engineering & Remote
Sensing, 67(8), pp. 967-975.
130
Bibliography
Motoyama, H., Ohta, T. and Yamada, T. (1987). Winter Runoff in the Glacierised
Drainage Basin in Langtang Valley, Nepal Himalayas. Bull. Glacier Res.,
5, pp. 29–33.
Naito. N., Nakawo, M., Kadota, T. and Raymond, C.F. (2000). Numerical
Simulation of Recent Shrinkage of Khumb Glacier, Nepal, IN: Debris-
Covered Glaciers, pp. 245-254. IAHS publ. no. 264.
Nesje, A. and Svein Olaf Dahl. (2000). Glaciers and Environmental Change,
Arnold Publishers, London, pp. 1-6 and 17-45.
131
Bibliography
Neve, E. F. (1910). ‘Mt. Kolahoi and its Northern Glacier’, Alpine Journal, Vol.
25, pp. 39-42.
Peter Niederer, Viktor Bilenko, Natasha Ershova, Hans Hurni, Sergeji Yerokhin
and Daniel Maselli (2007). Tracing Glacier Wastage in the Northern Tien
Shan (Kyrgyzstan/Central Asia) Over the Last 40 years, Centre for
Development and Environment (CDE), NCCR-South, University of Berne,
Bern, Switzerland, pp. 227-234.
Philip, G. and K.V. Ravindran (1998). Glacial Mapping using Landsat Thematic
Mapper Data: A Case Study in Parts of Gangotri Glacier, NW Himalaya.
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, P.B. No. 74, Dehra Dun-248001,
India, pp. 29-34.
Philip, G., Sah, M. P. (2004). Mapping Repeated Surges and Retread of Glaciers
Using IRS-1C/1D Data: A Case Study of Shaune Garang Glacier,
Northwestern Himalaya. International Journal of Applied Earth
Observation and Geo-information Vol. 6(2), pp. 127-141.
132
Bibliography
Pratap, R. and Kamla Prasad (2005). Tourism Geography, Shree Publishers, New
Delhi, pp. 89-130.
133
Bibliography
Sharma, P. D., Goel, A. K. and Minhas, R. (1991). Water and Sediment Yields into
the Sutlej River from the High Himalaya. Mount. Res. Dev., 11, pp. 87–100.
Shi, J., Dozier, J. and Rott, H. (1994). Snow Mapping in Alpine Regions with
Synthetic Aperture Radar. IEEE Transactions on Geo-science and Remote
Sensing 32, pp. 152–58.
134
Bibliography
Singh, P. (2008). Engineering and General Geology, S.K. Katria and Sons, Delhi,
pp. 101-114.
Singh, P., Jain, S. K. and Kumar, N. (1997). Estimation of Snow and Glacier
Contribution to the Chenab River ,Western Himalaya. Mount. Res. Dev.,
17, pp. 49–55.
Singh, P. and Jain, S. K. (2002). Snow and Glacier Melt in the Satluj River at
Bhakra Dam in the Western Himalayan Region. Hydrol. Sci. J., 47, pp. 93–
106.
Srikantia, S.V. and Bhargava, O.N. (1983). ‘Geology of the Palaeozoic sequence
of the Kashmir Tethys Himalayan basin in the Liddar Valley, Jammu and
Kashmir’, Geological Society of India, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 363-377.
135
Bibliography
Tewari, A.P. (1973). ‘Recent changes in the position of the snout of Pindari
glacier (Kumaon Himalayas) Almora district, Uttar Pradesh, India,’ the role
of snow and ice hydrology, Proceedings of the Banff Symposia, Vol. 2.
Unesco-WMO-IAHS, pp. 114-149.
Thompson, L.G., Mosley. Thompson, E., Davis, M.E., Lin, P.N., Henderson,
K.A., Cole-Dai, J., Bolzon, J.F. and K.B. Liu (1995). Last Glacial Stage
and Holocene tropical ice core records from Huascaran. Peru. Science,
NO. 269, pp. 46-50.
Tyagi, A. (2006). Climate Change and Global Warming, Rajat Publications, New
Delhi, pp. 46-51.
136
Bibliography
Tufnell, L. (1984). Glacier Hazards, Longman Group Limited, New York, pp.7-
29.
Vohra, C.P. (1981). ‘Himalayan Glaciers’, The Himalaya: Aspect of Change, Lall,
J.S. and Moddie, A.D. (Eds.), Delhi; Oxford University Press, pp. 138-151.
Vohra, C.P. (1993). Himalayan Glaciers, Koknark Publishers, New Delhi, pp. 2-
40.
Wagnon, P., Ribestein, P., Kaser, G. and P. Berton (1999). Climate variability
energy balance and runoff on a tropical glacier. Global Planetary Changes,
22, pp. 49-58.
Wood, F.B, 1990. Monitoring Global Climatic Change: the case of Greenhouse
Warming. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 71, 1, pp. 42 –
52.
137
Bibliography
Xin gao, Ye BaiSheng, Zhang ShiQiang, Qiao ChengJun and Zhang Xiao Wen
(2010). Glacier Runoff Variation and its Influence on River Runoff during
1961-2006 in the Tarim River Basin, China, State Key Laboratory of
Cryospheric Sciences CAREERI, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou
730000, China, pp.880-891.
Yao Tandong and Shi Yafeng (1990). Fluctuations and Future Trends of Climate,
Glaciers and Discharge of Urumqi River in Xinjiang, Science in China, 33
(No. 1), Series B.
Yong Zhang, Shiyin Liu, Junil Xu and Donghui Shangguan (2007). Glacier
Change and Glacier Runoff Variation in the Tuoto River Basin, the Source
Region of Yangtze River in Western China, Graduate School of
Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan, pp.
59-68.
138
Bibliography
Webliography
www.interscience.com
www.oxfordjournals.org
www.physicalgeography.com
www.sciencedirect.com
www.springerlink.com
139
Annexure – I: Contour Map of Liddar Valley- 1963
Annexure – II: Base Map of Liddar Valley- 1963
Annexure – III: Field Truth Photographs
(B)
(C)
Sample – 4: (A) Glacial Striations; (B) Glacial Grooves; and (C) Polished Rochee Mountaines
in the Kolahoi Glacier
Recent Research in Science and Technology 2011, 3(9): 68-73
ISSN: 2076-5061
www.scholarjournals.org
www.recent-science.com
RRST- Geography
Geomorphologic Character & Receding Trend of Kolahoi Glacier in
Kashmir Himalaya
T.A. Kanth, Aijaz Ahmad Shah, Zahoor ul Hassan*
Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K, India
Article History Glaciers are a valuable source of fresh water which sustain life and provide water for
Received : 30-06-2011 drinking, irrigation, hydro power generation, etc. Besides, these exert considerable influence
Revised : 04-08-2011 on the climate of a region and fluctuate in dimension in response to the climatological
Accepted : 04-08-2011 changes and therefore, these are regarded as sensitive indicators of the climate of a region.
Glaciers are in the process of retreat in almost all the parts of the world due to global
*Corresponding Author warming. The same process of retreat is found in the valley’s largest glacier, Kolahoi. Thus,
Tel : +91-9419524604 it is of great significance to obtain the accurate information of changes in Kolahoi glacier
(34° 07′ to 34° 12′ N latitude; & 75° 16′ to 75° 23′ E longitude, Liddar valley, Kashmir
Himalayas). The study was carried out using Remote Sensing and GIS techniques and
Email:
zahoordand@gmail.com thorough field observations were conducted to identify the geomorphologic features. The
area of the glacier receded from 13.57km² in 1963 to 10.69km² in 2005, registering a change
of 2.88km2at a rate of 0.068km2per year. The Crevasses developed in the ablation portion of
the Kolahoi Glacier and the formation of numerous caves at its snout position act as the
important indicators of its recession. The result of this retreat will prove disastrous for the
valley in many fields like drinking water, agriculture, horticulture, ground water, hydro power
capacity of the state, etc. Therefore, we need to make efforts to save this precious source of
water for the present as well as for future generations.
©ScholarJournals, SSR Key Words: retreat, global warming, Kolahoi glacier, Liddar valley, geomorphology
Introduction
Glaciers are considered as the important renewing the earth-atmosphere system. With the acceleration of global
sources of fresh water. These play an important role in the warming in the 1980s, it has become more and more important
hydrological cycle of the earth. A glacier is a naturally moving to understand the ability of glaciers to provide water sources
body of large dimensions formed from the recrystallization and the disasters related to glaciers and climate change [3].
under pressure of accumulated snow. Glaciers move very Glaciers in the Kashmir valley are in the process of fast retreat
slowly, from tens of meters to thousands of meters per year. due to increase in temperature, globally. Glaciers are one of
Kashmir Himalayas has got the largest concentration of the earth’s most sensitive indicators of climatic change.
glaciers with 3116 glaciers covering an area of 3200km²; Glacial geomorphology is the study of landform produced
nearly 13% of the states territory [1]. The main glaciers of by glacial and fluvioglacial processes in the areas of present
Kashmir valley are: Kolahoi, Thajwas, Machoi, Nehnar, etc. glaciers as well as in areas covered by the glaciers during the
Different river systems and their tributaries originate from these Pleistocene. Much of the spectacular character of the present
glaciers. Any change in the temperature or winter precipitation topography of the northern part of the Liddar Valley has
in the form of snowfall influences the flow in the hydrological resulted from the glaciations in the remote past. A study of the
system of the valley. glacial processes operating currently can throw light on the
Glaciers have receded substantially during the last landforms that were created by similar processes in the past.
century in response to the climatic warming; especially in the Therefore, it will be helpful in reconstructing the genesis of the
mountainous regions such as Himalayas. The differences in landform features. During the advance movement of glacier; it
the global mean temperature between the last glacial creates some erosional and depositional features which remain
maximum and present warm period is about 5°C. However, stagnant and act as evidences for the glacial recession. The
this slow rate of climate change probably changed in the 20th geomorphologic features of glaciers which act as indicators for
century due to rapid industrialization. Large emissions of CO2, its retreat or recession are glacial grooves, cirques, moraines,
other trace gases and aerosols have changed the composition crevasses, eskers, outwash plains etc. The present study
of the atmosphere [2]. This has affected the radiation budget of
68
T.A.Kanth et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 68-73
involves the change detection and geomorphic character of the The Liddar valley begins from the base of two main ice
valley’s largest glacier, i.e., Kolahoi glacier. fields, the Kolahoi and the Shisram. From here, its two main
upper streams the west Liddar and the east Liddar originate
Study Area
and join near pahalgam. The liddar merges with Jhelum at Gur
The Liddar valley occupies the southern part of the giant
after traveling a course of about 70kms from Kolahoi to Gur. It
Kashmir Himalayan synclinorium and forms part of the middle
has a catchment area of 1134km². It lies between 33° 45′ to
Himalayas. The Liddar valley lies between the Pir Panjal range
34° 15′ N latitude and 75° 0′ to 75° 30′ E longitude. The
in the south and southeast, the north Kashmir range in the
Liddar valley relives a variegated topography due to the
main Himalayan range in the northeast and Zaskar range in
combined action of glaciers and rivers. The glaciated section of
the northwest. The area gradually rises in elevation from south
the valley contains many erosional and depositional features.
(1600mts.) to north (5400mts.). The location map of the study
The Liddar valley has distinct climatic characteristics. It
area is given in fig. 1.1.
has sub-Mediterranean type of climate with nearly 80% of its
annual rainfall in winter and spring season.
69
T.A.Kanth et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 68-73
discharge from the glacier in two time periods viz; 1992 & 2008
is studied which shows an increase in the glacier melt during
the summer season.
(A) Geomorphic Features
Glaciers generally give rise to erosional features in the
highland and depositional features on the lowland, although it
shows all the three processes, erosion, transportation and
deposition throughout its course. Abrasion and plucking are the
two main processes responsible for the creation of erosional
landforms of the study region. They operate when the glacier
Fig.1.2. Steps of Methodology moves in the bed rock channels of the east and west Liddar
valley in response to gravity and basal sliding.
(A) Striations, Glaciers carry many types of fragments and particles embedded in them. Those 1. Glacial striated
Grooves, & particles placed along the base of a glacier may scratch, grind or groove the rock erratic at ARU.
Roche surface during the movement of ice. Such fine cut lines and scratches become 2. Grooving in
Moutonnee. exposed when the glacier disappears. These are termed as striations or striae, and limestone at
are considered among the most reliable evidence of glacial erosion of the past ages. Nagakhoti, East
The small scale streamlined depressions are called as glacial grooves Liddar.
Roche Moutonnee is a glacial erosional feature, consisting of asymmetrical mounds 3. Polished Roche
of rock of varying size, with a gradual smooth abraded slope on one side and a moutonnee at
steeper rougher slope on the other. Nagakhoti, East
Liddar.
(B) Glaciated Well developed glacier valleys are called troughs. The glaciated valleys of the study Glacial trough at
trough(valleys) region are asymmetrical and approximately parabolic in form. In their transverse Liddarwat
profile, glacial valleys present a typical U-shaped outline, tending more towards a
semi-circle. This is attributed to the fact that glaciers, unlike streams cut their sides
at an equal or even at a faster rate than their bases.
(C)Whaleback Whalebacks are glacially moulded, hard rock surfaces. Their length is greater than Northern part of the
their height. They have smooth rock surfaces on all sides which have been Liddar Valley.
produced by glacial abrasion. Whalebacks in the study region are rounded and
elongated hillocks
(D) Cirques A cirque is a semi-circular steep-sided depression formed through glacial erosion. A Near Kolahoi Gunj
cirque is formed at the head of a valley glacier where some snow accumulates and area and Hoskar
is compacted to form a cirque glacier flowing down slope to feed the valley glacier.
Source: Field Observation, 2010
70
T.A.Kanth et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 68-73
(A) Lateral These are thin or thick streaks of rock debris that generally along the sides of a glacier. Kolahoi Gunj
moraines Area.
(B) Ground These are formed when glacial sediments (Till) are deposited at the floor of glacial valley. Glacial till at
moraines The sediments are not sorted because coarse and fine sediments are deposited together. Kolahoi,
Lidderwat
(C) Terminal These are formed due to deposition of glacial Till across the moving ice sheets at the Near Satlangan
moraines snouts of glaciers after ablation of ice.
Source: Computed from SOI Toposheets, 1963 & IRS 1C LISS III 2005
Fig. 1.3.(a,b,c & d): Change Detection of Kolahoi
Glacier[a:1963;b:2005;c:Change 1963-2005;d:changed area]
71
T.A.Kanth et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 68-73
(C) Discharge from the Glacier (1992 & 2008) Liddar river. The variability in the discharge in the years 1992 &
The Hydrological data of west Liddar of 1992 & 2008 as 2008 is shown in Fig. 1.4.
given in Table 1.4 shows a net increase in the discharge of
Table-1.6: Discharge at Aru (west Liddar) for the years 1992 & 2008.
{YEAR 1992} {YEAR 2008}
Date Discharge (cusecs) Date Discharge (cusecs)
In the months of May, June & July for the year 1992, the may be due to the increase in the glacier melt & subsequent
discharge was 470, 810, & 790 cusecs respectively. In runoff and thus indicates the rapid melting of the glacier in the
comparison to this, the discharge from these months for the year 2008 in the summer season (May, June & July) in
year 2008 was 1393, 1687 &1130 cusecs respectively. This Kashmir.
72
T.A.Kanth et al./Rec Res Sci Tech 3 (2011) 68-73
73