Position Paper
On
A Case on the Proposed SOGIE Bill
Submitted by: Joy Torreon
Ludinia Espinosa
Submitted to: Elpidio M. Ortega Jr., PhD
College Instructor
In Compliance with the Subject Requirement In Social Studies II:
Law Related Studies, for the S.Y. 2023 - 2024,
2nd Semester (2nd Term)
May 2024
Exploring Differing qualities: Analyzing the SOGIE Bill
Introduction
The case of separation against a transgender lady in Manila, who was
compelled to cut her hair to enlist in school, has brought consideration to the require
for comprehensive approaches in instructive teach. This occurrence sheds light on the
broader issue of segregation based on sexual introduction, sex character, and
expression (SOGIE), inciting promotion for the entry of the SOGIE charge to defend
people from such unfair practices.
Various organizations, such as the Commission on Human Rights,
Northeastern University Library, World Health Organization, Office of Children and
Family Services, Trillium Health Resources, and Defense Health Agency Publications
Librar, are effectively included in supporting the well-being and rights of the
LGBTQIA+ community and pushing for comprehensive arrangements that cater to
the differing needs of people, independent of their SOGIE. The collective endeavors
emphasize the centrality of advancing inclusivity and regard for all people,
emphasizing the significance of maintaining nobility and rights to cultivate a society
grounded in balance and common respect.
Argument 1
The case of separation against a transgender lady in Manila, who was
constrained to get a hair style to select in school, serves as a piercing illustration of
the challenges confronted by people due to their sexual introduction, sexual
orientation personality, and expression (SOGIE). This occurrence underscores the
critical require for comprehensive arrangements in instructive educate to ensure the
rights and nobility of all understudies, in any case of their SOGIE.
The Commission on Human Rights has highlighted this case, emphasizing the
significance of supporting for the entry of the SOGIE charge to anticipate such biased
practices.
Moreover, the assets given by the Northeastern College Library on
LGBTQIA+ thinks about offer a comprehensive understanding of the issues
encompassing SOGIE segregation. These assets shed light on the chronicled setting,
rights, and mental wellbeing challenges confronted by the LGBTQIA+ community,
advance emphasizing the need of enactment like the SOGIE charge to address these
issues effectively.
The World Health Organization's commitment to making strides the Health
and well-being of LGBTIQ+ people through comprehensive health frameworks and
arrangements adjusts with the objectives of the SOGIE charge. By supporting the
improvement of comprehensive approaches, the WHO contributes to a worldwide
exertion to guarantee that people are not segregated against based on their SOGIE, in
line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Organizations such as the Office of Children and Family Administrations and
Trillium Health Resource play a pivotal part in giving rules and assets to bolster
differing communities influenced by SOGIE-related issues. These organizations
emphasize the significance of comprehensive arrangements and back frameworks that
cater to the needs of all people, independent of their sexual introduction or sex
identity.
The Defense Health Agency Publication Library's endeavors to standardize
forms and give rules for healthcare administrations for the LGBTIQ+ community
advance highlight the importance of comprehensive approaches in moving forward
wellbeing results for marginalized populaces. These confirmations collectively
emphasize the need of the SOGIE charge in advancing inclusivity and regard for all
people, notwithstanding of their SOGIE.
Argument 2
The thrust for the SOGIE charge is encourage backed by the acknowledgment
of the LGBTQIA+ community's rights and the require for lawful assurance against
segregation based on SOGIE.
The case of the transgender lady in Manila serves as a stark update of the
challenges confronted by people who do not acclimate to conventional sex norms.
Advocates for the charge contend that it is fundamental to have enactment in
put that expressly denies segregation on the premise of sexual introduction, sex
character, and expression to guarantee rise to treatment and openings for all
individuals.
Arguments in Favor of the SOGIE Bill
Promoting Correspondence: The SOGIE charge points to advance
uniformity by ensuring the rights of people notwithstanding of their SOGIE. It looks
for to make a more comprehensive society where everybody is treated with respect
and regard, independent of their sexual introduction or sexual orientation identity.
Preventing Segregation: The charge serves as a pivotal device in anticipating
separation against the LGBTQIA+ community. By unequivocally laying out the rights
of people and the results of unfair hones, the charge acts as a obstacle to those who
lock in in oppressive behavior.
Ensuring Get to to Instruction and Work: With the section of the SOGIE
charge, people will have way better get to to instruction and business openings
without fear of separation. This will contribute to a more assorted and comprehensive
workforce and instructive environment.
Protecting Mental Wellbeing: Segregation based on SOGIE can have
extreme suggestions on the mental wellbeing and well-being of people. The SOGIE
charge can offer assistance make a more secure and more strong environment for
LGBTQIA+ people, decreasing the disgrace and segregation they face.
Arguments Against the SOGIE Bill
Religious and Social Resistance: A few bunches contend that the SOGIE charge
goes against devout and social convictions that characterize sexual orientation and
sexuality in a particular way. They accept that the charge undermines conventional
values and may lead to clashes with devout teachings.
Concerns around Execution: Faultfinders of the charge raise concerns almost its
execution, citing potential challenges in upholding the enactment and checking
compliance. They contend that the charge may be troublesome to actualize viably and
might lead to unintended consequences.
Perceived Risk to Opportunity of Discourse: Rivals of the SOGIE charge express
concerns approximately its affect on opportunity of discourse, especially in talks
around sex and sexuality. They fear that the charge may confine open exchange and
talk about on these themes, restricting scholastic and mental freedom.
Unintended Results: A few pundits caution of potential unintended results of the
charge, such as clashes with existing laws or approaches. They contend that the
charge may make legitimate ambiguities or escape clauses that seem be misused,
driving to unanticipated outcomes.
Argument 3: The Proposed SOGIE Charge Advances Uniformity and Human
Rights
One of the key contentions in back of the proposed SOGIE Charge is that it
advances balance and human rights for all people, in any case of their sexual
introduction, sexual orientation personality, or expression. By unequivocally
recognizing and ensuring the rights of LGBTQ+ people, the charge points to make a
more comprehensive and tolerant society where everybody can live unreservedly and
without fear of discrimination.
Opponents of the charge may contend that it goes against conventional values
or devout convictions, but it is vital to keep in mind that human rights ought to not be
subject to individual suppositions or convictions. Everybody merits to be treated with
nobility and regard, and the SOGIE Charge is a step towards guaranteeing that
LGBTQ+ people are managed the same rights and securities as everybody else.
In a differing and multicultural society like our own, it is vital to maintain the
standards of uniformity and human rights for all. By supporting the proposed SOGIE
Charge, we are taking a stand against segregation and partiality, and working towards
a more fair and comprehensive society for everyone.
Counterarguments
Opponents of the SOGIE charge raise concerns almost potential clashes with
devout and social convictions, contending that the enactment may negate
conventional values. They fear that the charge seem weaken built up standards
encompassing sexual orientation and sexuality, driving to societal discord.
However, it is basic to recognize that the SOGIE charge is not planning to
encroach upon devout flexibilities but or maybe to ensure the rights and nobility of all
people, counting those in the LGBTQIA+ community. By advancing uniformity and
inclusivity, the charge points to make a society where different points of view are
regarded and valued.
Critics too express worries around the usage of the SOGIE charge, citing
challenges in upholding the enactment and observing compliance. Whereas these
concerns are substantial, it is vital to recognize that the bill's entry speaks to a
noteworthy step towards combating separation based on SOGIE.
By building up clear rules and results for oppressive hones, the charge serves
as a obstacle to those who lock in in such behavior, eventually cultivating a more
comprehensive and impartial society.
Furthermore, rivals highlight potential dangers to opportunity of discourse,
especially in dialogs encompassing sexual orientation and sexuality. They contend
that the charge may limit open discourse and scholastic flexibility on these topics.
However, it is imperative to note that the SOGIE charge is planned to ensure
people from separation and advance regard for all, or maybe than smother wrangle
about. By defending the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community, the charge contributes
to a more tolerant and tolerating society where different perspectives are encouraged.
Lastly, faultfinders caution of unintended results of the SOGIE charge, such as
clashes with existing laws or approaches. Whereas these concerns are substantial, it is
basic to prioritize the security of individuals' rights and well-being.
The bill's center on advancing balance and avoiding separation underscores its
significance in tending to the challenges confronted by the LGBTQIA+ community.
By maintaining crucial human rights and cultivating a culture of acknowledgment, the
SOGIE charge plays a vital part in building a more comprehensive and conscious
society for all individuals.
Conclusion
The collective endeavors of different organizations and advocates emphasize
the noteworthiness of advancing inclusivity and regard for all people, notwithstanding
of their SOGIE. The case of the transgender lady in Manila highlights the critical
require for comprehensive arrangements to ensure the rights and nobility of all
individuals.
The thrust for the SOGIE charge is assist bolstered by the acknowledgment of
the LGBTQIA+ community's rights and the basic require for lawful assurance against
separation based on SOGIE. Advocates contend that the charge is basic to guarantee
rise to treatment and openings for all people, independent of their sexual introduction,
sexual orientation personality, or expression.
The SOGIE charge points to advance uniformity, anticipate separation,
guarantee get to to instruction and work, and ensure mental wellbeing for people in
the LGBTQIA+ community. Whereas there are substantial concerns and contentions
against the charge, it is vital to prioritize the security of the rights and nobility of all
individuals.
By tending to the challenges confronted by the LGBTQIA+ community and
advancing regard for all people, the SOGIE charge plays a imperative part in
maintaining crucial human rights and cultivating a culture of acknowledgment and
understanding.
Opponents' concerns almost clashes with devout and social convictions, usage
challenges, dangers to flexibility of discourse, and unintended results are recognized.
In any case, the center remains on the significance of the SOGIE charge in combating
separation and advancing inclusivity.
By setting up clear rules and results for oppressive hones, the charge serves as
a obstacle to unfair behavior, eventually cultivating a more comprehensive and
impartial society. Maintaining protected standards and ensuring person rights are
fundamental in making a society where differences is celebrated, and separation is
effectively combated.
References
https://www.divinalaw.com/news-and-updates/sogie-equality-bill/
https://www.amnesty.org.ph/campaigns/sogiesc/
https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/iq/238593-timeline-sogie-equality-philippines/
https://alfi.org.ph/2019/10/position-paper-on-the-sogie-equality-bill/
Civil Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 386)
Hughes, Ieuan A. (1 August 2001). “Minireview: Sex Differentiation”.
Endocrinology. 142 (8): 3281–3287.
It Is Now Okay For a Man To Hit a Woman.
https://medium.com/@r.smith42371980/it-is-now-okay-for-a-man-to-hit-a-woman-
5d00c47c8aea
‘Actually a male’: Transgender weightlifter stripped of world records.
https://ph.news.yahoo.com/transgender-weightlifter-mary-gregory-raw-powerlifting-
federation-094109354.html
Pew Research Center (4 June 2013). “The Global Divide on Homosexuality”
https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2013/06/04/the-global-divide-on-homosexuality/
The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines – Article III (Bill of Rights)
Why an LGBTQ member strongly opposes the SOGIE bill:
http://www.interaksyon.com/politics-issues/2019/08/29/154073/sogie-bill-opposition-
arguments/
