Lecture 1 - SV1
Lecture 1 - SV1
LECTURE 1: OVERVIEW
1-1
PREVIEW OF CHAPTER 1
Intermediate Accounting
IFRS 2nd Edition
Kieso, Weygandt, and Warfield
1-2
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
1-3
GLOBAL MARKETS
ILLUSTRATION 1-1
1-4 LO 1
GLOBAL MARKETS
1-5 LO 1
GLOBAL MARKETS
2. economic entities to
3. interested parties.
1-6 LO 2
GLOBAL MARKETS
1-7 LO 2
GLOBAL MARKETS
1-8 LO 3
GLOBAL MARKETS
1-9 LO 4
GLOBAL MARKETS
1-10 LO 4
► lenders, and
► other creditors
1-11 LO 5
1-12 LO 5
OBJECTIVE OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Entity Perspective
► Companies viewed as separate and distinct from their
owners (shareholders).
Decision-Usefulness
► Investors are interested in assessing
1. the company’s ability to generate net cash inflows and
2. management’s ability to protect and enhance the capital
providers’ investments.
1-13 LO 5
STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS
1-14 LO 6
STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS
1-16 LO 6
1-17 LO 6
Due Process
The IASB due process has the following elements:
1. Independent standard-setting board;
2. Thorough and systematic process for developing
standards;
3. Engagement with investors, regulators, business leaders,
and the global accountancy profession at every stage of
the process; and
4. Collaborative efforts with the worldwide standard-setting
community.
1-18 LO 6
International Accounting Standards Board
ILLUSTRATION 1-5
International
Standard-Setting
Structure
1-19
LO 6
Types of Pronouncements
► International Financial Reporting Standards.
1-20 LO 6
STANDARD-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS
Hierarchy of IFRS
Companies first look to:
1. International Financial Reporting Standards; International
Financial Reporting Standards, International Accounting
Standards (issued by the predecessor to the IASB), and IFRS
interpretations originated by the IFRS Interpretations
Committee (and its predecessor, the IAS Interpretations
Committee);
2. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting; and
3. Pronouncements of other standard-setting bodies that use a
similar conceptual framework (e.g., U.S. GAAP).
1-21 LO 7
FINANCIAL REPORTING CHALLENGES
► Forward-looking information
► Soft assets
► Timeliness
1-22 LO 8
1-23 LO 8
1-24
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Following are the key similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and
IFRS related to the financial reporting environment.
Similarities
• Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for U.S. companies are
developed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The FASB
is a private organization. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) exercises oversight over the actions of the FASB. The IASB is also a
private organization. Oversight over the actions of the IASB is regulated by
IOSCO.
1-25
Relevant Facts
Similarities
• Both the IASB and the FASB have essentially the same governance
structure, that is, a Foundation that provides oversight, a Board, an
Advisory Council, and an Interpretations Committee.
• The FASB relies on the U.S. SEC for regulation and enforcement of its
standards. The IASB relies primarily on IOSCO for regulation and
enforcement of its standards.
• Both the IASB and the FASB are working together to find common grounds
for convergence. A good example is the recent issuance of a new standard
on revenue recognition that both organizations support. Also, the Boards
are working together on other substantial projects such as the
measurement and classification of financial instruments.
1-26
Relevant Facts
Differences
• U.S. GAAP is more detailed or rules-based. IFRS tends to simpler and
more flexible in the accounting and disclosure requirements. The difference
in approach has resulted in a debate about the merits of principles-based
versus rules-based standards.
• Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS should not be surprising
because standard-setters have developed standards in response to
different user needs. In some countries, the primary users of financial
statements are private investors. In others, the primary users are tax
authorities or central government planners. In the United States, investors
and creditors have driven accounting-standard formulation.
1-27
PREVIEW OF CHAPTER 2
Intermediate Accounting
IFRS 2nd Edition
Kieso, Weygandt, and Warfield
2-28
Conceptual Framework
2 for Financial Reporting
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
3. Understand the objective of financial 7. Explain the application of the basic principles
reporting. of accounting.
4. Identify the qualitative characteristics of 8. Describe the impact that the cost constraint
accounting information. has on reporting accounting information.
2-29
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
2-30 LO 1
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
2-32 LO 2
QUALITATIVE
CHARACTERISTICS ELEMENTS
1. Fundamental 1. Assets
qualities 2. Liabilities Second level
2. Enhancing 3. Equity Bridge between
qualities 4. Income
levels 1 and 3
5. Expenses
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting OBJECTIVE
Provide information
about the reporting
entity that is useful
to present and potential First level
equity investors, The "why"—purpose
lenders, and other of accounting
creditors in their
capacity as capital
2-33 providers.
FIRST LEVEL: BASIC OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
“To provide financial information about the reporting entity
that is useful to present and potential equity investors,
lenders, and other creditors in making decisions about
providing resources to the entity.
2-34 LO 3
2-35 LO 4
ILLUSTRATION 2-2
Hierarchy of Accounting
Qualities
2-36 LO 4
Relevance
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting
2-37 LO 4
Fundamental Quality—Relevance
2-38 LO 4
Fundamental Quality—Relevance
Fundamental Quality—Relevance
2-40 LO 4
Fundamental Quality—Relevance
Faithful Representation
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting
2-42 LO 4
SECOND LEVEL: FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
2-43 LO 4
2-44 LO 4
2-45 LO 4
SECOND LEVEL: FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
2-46 LO 4
Enhancing Qualities
2-47 LO 4
Enhancing Qualities
2-48 LO 4
SECOND LEVEL: FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
Enhancing Qualities
2-49 LO 4
Enhancing Qualities
2-50 LO 4
Basic Elements
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting
2-51 LO 5
SECOND LEVEL: BASIC ELEMENTS
Elements of Financial Statements
Equity
Income
Expenses
2-52 LO 5
Asset
A present obligation of the entity arising
from past events, the settlement of which
Liability
is expected to result in an outflow from the
entity of resources embodying economic
Equity benefits.
Income
Expenses
2-53 LO 5
Asset
Liability
Income
Expenses
2-54 LO 5
SECOND LEVEL: BASIC ELEMENTS
Elements of Financial Statements
Asset
Liability
Asset
Liability
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework for
Financial Reporting
2-57 LO 6
THIRD LEVEL: ASSUMPTIONS
Basic Assumptions
Economic Entity – company keeps its activity separate from its
owners and other business unit.
Measurement Principles
Historical Cost is generally thought to be a faithful
representation of the amount paid for a given item.
IASB has given companies the option to use fair value as the
basis for measurement of financial assets and financial
liabilities.
2-59 LO 7
Revenue Recognition
When a company agrees to perform a service or sell a product to
a customer, it has a performance obligation.
2-60 LO 7
THIRD LEVEL: BASIC PRINCIPLES
2-61 LO 7
Full Disclosure
Providing information that is of sufficient importance to
influence the judgment and decisions of an informed user.
Provided through:
Financial Statements
Supplementary information
2-62 LO 7
Cost Constraint
Companies must weigh the costs of providing the information
against the benefits that can be derived from using it.
2-63 LO 8
Summary of
the Structure
ILLUSTRATION 2-7
Conceptual Framework
for Financial Reporting
2-64 LO 8
2-65
Relevant Facts
Following are the key similarities and differences between U.S. GAAP and
IFRS related to the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting.
Similarities
• In 2010, the IASB and FASB completed the first phase of a jointly created
conceptual framework. In this first phase, they agreed on the objective of
financial reporting and a common set of desired qualitative characteristics.
These were presented in the Chapter 2 discussion. Note that prior to this
converged phase, the Conceptual Framework gave more emphasis to the
objective of providing information on management’s performance
(stewardship).
2-66
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Similarities
• The existing conceptual frameworks underlying U.S. GAAP and IFRS are
very similar. That is, they are organized in a similar manner (objective,
elements, qualitative characteristics, etc.). There is no real need to change
many aspects of the existing frameworks other than to converge different
ways of discussing essentially the same concepts.
• The converged framework should be a single document, unlike the two
conceptual frameworks that presently exist. It is unlikely that the basic
structure related to the concepts will change.
2-67
Relevant Facts
Similarities
• Both the IASB and FASB have similar measurement principles, based on
historical cost and fair value. In 2011, the Boards issued a converged
standard on fair value measurement so that the definition of fair value,
measurement techniques, and disclosures are the same between U.S.
GAAP and IFRS when fair value is used in financial statements.
Differences
• Although both U.S. GAAP and IFRS are increasing the use of fair value to
report assets, at this point IFRS has adopted it more broadly. As examples,
under IFRS, companies can apply fair value to property, plant, and
equipment; natural resources; and, in some cases, intangible assets.
2-68
Relevant Facts
Differences
• U.S. GAAP has a concept statement to guide estimation of fair values when
market-related data is not available (Statement of Financial Accounting
Concepts No. 7, “Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in
Accounting”). The IASB has not issued a similar concept statement; it has
issued a fair value standard (IFRS 13) that is converged with U.S. GAAP.
• The monetary unit assumption is part of each framework. However, the unit
of measure will vary depending on the currency used in the country in which
the company is incorporated (e.g., Chinese yuan, Japanese yen, and British
pound).
2-69
GLOBAL ACCOUNTING INSIGHTS
Relevant Facts
Differences
• The economic entity assumption is also part of each framework although
some cultural differences result in differences in its application. For
example, in Japan many companies have formed alliances that are so
strong that they act similar to related corporate divisions although they are
not actually part of the same company.
2-70