Contract Law
Contract Law
)
.in
law
HOSUR ROAD, BANGALORE-560027
een
MODEL ANSWER PAPER
am
.al
DECEMBER 2016
ww
(w
5TH SEM 5YRS.LLB.
RE
LO
GA
SUBLECT - CONTRACT -I
AN
,B
AW
FL
PREPARED BY:
EO
JAYANTH.S [ ASST.PROF]
EG
BANGALORE.
CO
EN
ME
-A
AL
AL -AMEEN COLLEGE OF LAW
BANGALORE
)
.in
MODEL ANSWER PAPER DEC 2016
law
5TH SEM 5YRS LLB
een
SUBJECT :CONTRACT -I
am
.al
Duration: 3 Hours Max Marks:100
ww
Instruction to Candidates:
(w
RE
Answer Q.No 9 and any five of the remaining questions .
LO
Q.No 9 carries 20 marks and the remaining questions carry 16 marks each .
GA
contract.
FL
Law means a ‘set of rules’ which governs our behaviours and relating in a civilized
EO
society.
EG
Enforceable at law and is contracted by the acceptance by one party of an offer made to
EN
Him by the other party to do or abstain from doing some act.” – Halsbury
ME
-A
AL
3. “A contract is an agreement creating and defining obligation between the parties” –
Salmond
)
.in
law
Contract 2(h) :- An agreement enforceable by Law is a contract.
Sec.10 :-
een
“All agreements are contracts, if they are made –
am
by free consent of the parties, competent to contract,
.al
for a lawful consideration and
ww
with a lawful object, and
(w
not hereby expressly declared to be void.”
h.
RE
LO
ESSENTIALS OF A VALID CONTRACT
GA
=
AN
Agreement
,B
+
AW
1. Proper offer and proper acceptance with intention to create legal relationship.
EO
resulting in loss of B’s time B cannot claim any damages from B since the
LL
contract.
In case of social agreement there is no intention to create legal relationship and there
EN
)
.in
intention to create legal relations.
law
k. [an agreement of a purely domestic or social nature is not a contract ]
een
am
2. Lawful consideration: - consideration must not be unlawful, immoral or opposed to
.al
the public policy.
ww
3. Capacity: - The parties to a contract must have capacity (legal ability) to make valid
contract.
(w
Section 11:- of the Indian contract Act specify that every person is competent to
contract provided. RE
LO
(i) Is of the age of majority according to the Law which he is subject, and
GA
Person of unsound mind can enter into a contract during his lucid interval.
4. Free consent: - consent of the parties must be genuine consent means agreed upon
The consent is said to be free when it is not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud,
CO
misrepresentation or mistake.
EN
5. Lawful object
ME
)
.in
(a) Is forbidden by law; or
law
(b) Is of such nature that, if permitted, would defeat the provisions of any law;
een
or
am
(C) is fraudulent; or
.al
(d) Involves or implies, injury to person or property of another; or
ww
(e) Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy.
(w
6. Possibility of performance:
RE
q. The terms of the agreement should be capable of performance.
LO
r. An agreements to do act, impossible in itself cannot be enforced.
GA
AN
because the act in itself is impossible to be performed from the very beginning.
AW
7. The terms of the agreements are certain or are capable of being made certain [29]
drawing room. The agreement is void because the meaning of the term “ultra –
EO
The agreement should be such that it should be capable or being enforced by law.
LL
Certain agreements have been expressly declared illegal or void by the law.
CO
EN
)
.in
Basis
law
een
am
.al
ww
(w
RE
Where a particular type of contract is required by law to be in writing and registered, it
LO
must comply with necessary formalities as to writing, registration and attestation.
GA
If legal formalities are not carried out then the contract is not enforceable by law.
AN
Agreement is a wider term than contract where as all contracts are agreements. All
Thus we see that an agreement may be or may not be enforceable by law, and so all
EG
agreement are not contract. Only those agreements are contracts, which are enforceable
LL
by law, In short.
Hence, we can conclude “All contracts are agreement, but all agreements are not
CO
contracts.”
EN
)
.in
. Enforceability : enforceable by law. promises forming consideration
law
. Interrelationship: .Every contract is enforceable for each other is an agreements.
een
. Scope : .A contract includes an .Every promise is not
am
. Validity : agreement. enforceable.
.al
. Legal : .The scope of a contract is .An agreement does not include
ww
.Obligation limited, as it includes only a contract.
(w
commercial agreements. .Its scope is relatively wider, as
obligation.
FL
EO
Valid :an agreement which has all the essential elements of a contract is called a
EN
valid contract.
ME
)
.in
Voidable : (sec.2(i)) An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of
law
one or more of the parties there to, but not at the option of other or others is a
een
voidable contract.
am
Illegal contract : A contract is illegal if it is forbidden by law or is of such nature
.al
that, if permitted would defeat the provisions of any law or is fraudulent ; or
ww
involves or implies injury to a person or properly of another or court regards it as
(w
These are void-ab-initio.
RE
“All illegal agreements are void agreements but all void agreements are not
LO
illegal”.
GA
Express contract
FL
Implied contract.
EO
Quasi contract.
EG
gg.Executed contract.
LL
)
.in
one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing
law
anything, with a view of obtaining the assent of that other to such act or
een
abstinence, said to make a proposal. The term ‘proposal ‘is equivalent to the
am
term ‘offer’.
.al
Section 2(b) defines “promise”.
ww
Section 2(c) defines “promisor” or “promise”.
(w
Section 2(f) defines reciprocal promises.
RE
The person making it signifies his willingness or desire to another.
LO
This willingness is the expression of desire to do or to abstain from doing
GA
something.
AN
Object of the expression of this willingness is to obtain the assent of that other to
,B
b) It is made with a view to obtaining the assent of the offeree to the proposal act or
EG
abstinence.
2) Intension: The offer arises from the intension. It is not defined in Indian Contract Act,
LL
1872. Section 2 (a) uses the word “willingness” which is equal to intension.
CO
The offer must be made with willingness to do business on the proposed terms and
EN
conditions.
ME
The use of the word “willingness” shows that intensions to be bound by the
-A
AL
proposal when accepted are an integral part of the concept of agreement.
The party who offers must know the legal consequences of the offer.
)
.in
An offer or its acceptance should be made with the intensions of creating legal
law
relations.
een
The test of intension is objective not subjective.
am
The intension of the parties is naturally to be known from the terms of the
.al
agreement and the surrounding circumstances.
ww
3) Legal consequences: an offer must be intended to create legal relations and must be
capable of creating legal relations. Offer is the 1st step of agreement. When an agreement
(w
is enforceable by the law, then only it becomes contract.
RE
4) Assent of the other party: The proposal must be made with a view to obtaining the
LO
assent of the other party. Since the contract requires “consensus ad idem” (consent at the
GA
same time) unless the offeree is aware of the offer, there can be no acceptance and
AN
consequently no contract.
,B
5) Terms: the terms of an offer must be definite. Uncertain, indefinite and ambiguous
AW
specific person. An offer addressed to the world is called “general offer” and an offer
EO
addressed to a specific person is called “specific offer”. An offer can’t take effect so as to
EG
create a binding contract, unless and until it has been brought to the knowledge of the
even be made by conduct. Among these 3 ways, the offer made by writing is considered
EN
always the best. An offer which is made by conduct is called an “implied offer”. An offer
ME
)
.in
be done in following ways.
law
i) In person: a) by words of mouth; b) by writing; c) by conduct.
een
ii) By post
am
iii) By telephone
.al
iv) By telegram.
ww
v) By telex.
vi) By internet.
(w
vii) By e-mail website.
x) By SMS etc...
AN
9) Invitation to offer: invitation for offer is different form of legal offer. It is just an
,B
an invitation to offer.
The offer must not contain a term the non-compliances of which may be assumed
LL
Cross offers: where 2 parties make identical offers to each other, in ignorance of each
EN
other’s offer; the offers are known as cross offers and neither of the 2 can be called an
ME
ww
be free according to the Indian contract act, 1872?
(w
According to Section 13. Two persons are said to have consented when they agree upon
Example 1:-
X have two car one Maruti car and one Honda city car. Y does not know that X has
FL
two cars Y offers to buy car at Rs.50, 000. Here, there is no identity of mind in
EO
respect of the subject matter. Hence there is no consent at all and the agreement is
EG
void – ab – inito.
LL
Example 2:-
An Illiterate woman signed a gift deed thinking that it was a power of attorney – no
CO
consent at all and the agreement was void – ab – inito[ Bala Devi V S.
EN
Manumdats ]
ME
Free consent
-A
AL
Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by [Section 14]
)
.in
(b) Undue influence [Section 16]
law
(c) Fraud [Section 17]
een
(d) Misrepresentation [Section 18]
am
(e) Mistake [Section 20, 21, 22]
.al
Effect of absence of Free Consent: - If consent coercion, undue influence, fraud,
ww
Misrepresentation the contract is voidable at the option of party whose consent was not
(w
free [19, 19A]
Coercion (section-15)
RE
LO
Force, compulsion, treats of violence. (Voidable)
GA
(f) Coercion need not necessary is directed against the other contracting party.
LL
(g) It is immaterial whether the IPC is or is not in force at the time or at the
CO
(e) The consent is obtained by threat of an offence & the person is forced to give his
EN
consent.
ME
-A
AL
(f) It is mainly of a physical character
)
.in
(h) It is of a violent character
law
(i) The burden of proof lies upon plaintiff
een
(j) It must be uttered with the intention of causing Plaintiff to enter into an agreement.
am
Threat to strike is no coercion.
.al
Compulsion of law is not coercion.
ww
(w
Effect of threat to file a suit: - A threat to file a suit (whether civil or court) does not
amount to coercion unless the suit is on false charge. Threat to file a suit on false charge is
RE
an act forbidden by the IPC and thus will amount to an act of coercion
LO
GA
Effect of threat to file a suit: - A threat to file a suit (whether civil or court) does not
AN
amount to coercion unless the suit is on false charge. Threat to file a suit on false charge is
,B
an act forbidden by the IPC and thus will amount to an act of coercion
AW
Eg:-
A husband induced his wife to enter into contract u/a threat of committing suicide.
FL
English Law - Duress does not include detaining of property or threat to detain property.
- it must be aimed against the life or liberty of the person or members of his family.
CO
Effect:- when coercion is employed to obtain the consent of a party the contract is
-A
AL
voidable at the option of the party where consent was obtained by coercion.
)
.in
Undue influence (section-16)
law
Sec 19(A) (voidable)
een
Meaning of undue influence: - dominating the will of the other person to obtain an
am
unfair advantage over the others.
.al
(a) Where the relation subsisting between the parties must be such that one party is in
ww
position to dominate the will of the other.
(w
(b) The dominant party use his position.
RE
Nothing in this sub-section shall affect the provisions of sec 111 of the Indian Evidence
LO
act.
GA
AN
Circumstances
EG
Where he holds a real or apparent authority Master and servant, parent and child,
LL
Mental Capacity of a person is temporarily Guru and his disciples, solicitors and
ME
-A
AL
or permanent effected by reason of age, clients. Guardian and wards
)
.in
attendant and ward.
law
- Involves use of moral force (mental pressure)
een
- Obtain an unfair advantage (intention)
am
- Not criminally liable
.al
- Between the parties to the contract
ww
- One party dominate the other party
(w
- Voidable or court set aside
The contract is either voidable or the court may enforce it in a modified form.
Unconscionable bargains.
EG
Sec 30, the specific relief act, 1963 such relief is granted to restore which may
EN
have received form the other party & to make any compensation to him which
A applies to a banker for a loan at a time when there is stringency in the money
)
.in
market. The banker declines to make the loan except at an unusually high rate of
law
interest. A accepts the loan on these terms. This is a transaction in the ordinary
een
course of business, and the contract is not induced by undue influence.
am
Example :
.al
A spiritual guru induced his chela to donate all his property to the ashram and said
ww
that in return of it, he will certainly get salvation. The chela did the same. Held, that
(w
Fraud (section 17)
Sec 19(voidable) RE
LO
The term fraud means a take representation of facts made wilfully with a view to deceive
GA
⇒ Sec.17- fraud means any act committed by a party to a contract or with his connivance
,B
or by his agent with intent to deceive another party there to or his agent or to induce to
AW
Essentials of fraud :-
EG
(b) There must be representation – [an opinion a statement of expression – does not
EN
fraud].
ME
(c) The representation must be false.(Cause to believe something that is not true)
-A
AL
(d) Before conclusion of contract.
)
.in
(f) The misrepresentation must be made with a view to deceive the other party.
law
(g) The other party must have actually been deceived.
een
(h) The other party have suffered a loss. ‘
am
(i) The suggestion, as to a fact, of that which is not true by one who does not believe it
.al
to be true.
ww
(j) The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact.
(w
(k)A promise made without any intention of performing it.
RE
(m) Any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.
LO
Intentionally misrepresentation is the essence of fraud.
GA
The suggestion, as to fact, of that which is not true by one who does not believe it to be
AN
true.
,B
The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact.
AW
Ex. A sells, by auction, to B a horse which A says nothing to B about the horse
A statement untrue in fact must be untrue in the belief of the person making it.
EO
A mere expression of opinion does not amount to fraud if the opinion is honestly
EG
held.
Caveat emptor (let the purchaser beware) it is the duty of the buyer to be
CO
Sec 57(Indian Evidence act 1882) the grantor of a licence is bound to disclose to
ME
)
.in
When the party who consent was caused by silence amount to fraud and be has the
law
means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence. [ Ex class room]
een
When the party give the consent in ignorance of fraud.
am
When the party after become aware of fraud takes a benefit.
.al
When the parties can’t be restored to their original position.
ww
Where interests of third parties intervene before the contract is avoided
(w
Misrepresentation (section 18)
Innocent misstatement / false statement. RE
LO
Misrepresentation is when a party (person) asserts something which is not true though he
GA
innocently.
,B
are satisfied.
(a) The party makes a representation of a fact [The representation by a stranger (By
FL
anyone with his connivance or by agent) to the contract does not affect the validity of
EO
the contract.
EG
(b) The misrepresentation was made innocently i.e. if was not made with a view to
(c) The other party has actually acted believing the misrepresent to be true.
CO
EN
Misrepresentation include:-
ME
uuu. Unjustified statement of facts – positive assertion – Believe true really not
-A
AL
true no basis misrepresentation
)
.in
www. Inducing other to make mistake as to qualify or nature of subject
law
matter.
een
xxx. Knowingly or without belief in its truth or recklessly careless whether it
am
be true or false.
.al
yyy. making of unwarranted statements which are not true
ww
zzz. make a mistake as to the substance of the thing
(w
bbbb. it does not involve dishonest intention
RE
cccc. a mere expression of opinion can’t be regarded as a misrepresentation
LO
dddd. discovering the truth with ordinary diligence
GA
eeee. It need not be made directly to the plaintiff. it can made to a third person
AN
misrepresentation.
AW
gggg. It must have caused the consent of the other party to contract.
FL
Effect of Misrepresentation:-
Rescission –sec 19
LL
Can’t do
ME
-A
AL
Discovering the truth with ordinary diligence.
)
.in
Become aware of misrepresentation takes a benefit
law
Where an innocent third party before the contract is rescinds acquires
een
consideration some interest in the property passing under the contract.
am
Where the parties can’t be restored to their original position.
.al
(2) Right to insist upon performance.
ww
Ex.:- Unlike Fraud he cannot sue for damage
Mistake
(w
(Void)
RE
Mistake Erroneous Belief about some facts
LO
Mistake of Fact Mistake of
GA
Law [21]
AN
foreign
AW
Law Law
One party Under Both parties under the contract is valid same as mistake
FL
void
Sec-20 agreement void where both parties are under mistake as to matter of fact
-A
AL
Sec 21 – effect of mistakes as to law
)
.in
Illustration:
law
A agrees to buy from B a certain horse. It turns out that the horse was dead at the time of
een
bargain, though neither party was aware of the fact. The agreement is void.
am
The court may reform the contract & rectify the written instrument.
.al
Ignorantia juris non excusat( ignorance of law is no excuse)
ww
(w
Classification of mistake:-
Common mistake
RE
Mutual mistake- subject matter/ title/ substance of thing/ root/ identity/ price
LO
Unilateral mistake
GA
Mistake of fact-----
AN
Q.NO.4 State briefly the various void agreements in the Indian Contract
EN
)
.in
1. Agreement unlawful in part(section23/24)
law
2. Agreement without consideration(section 25)
een
3. Agreement in restraint of marriage. (Section 26)
am
4. Agreement in restraint of trade. (Section 27)
.al
5. Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings.(Section 28).
ww
6. Agreement which is ambiguous and uncertain.(sec.29)
(w
7. Agreement by way of Wager. (Sec, 30)
lawful unless-
AN
1. It is forbidden by law.
,B
4. Is fraudulent
FL
enforced.
EG
*Illegal cohabitation
LL
*Dancing girls.
CO
6. Opposed to public policy: An agreement which is injurious to the public or against the
EN
)
.in
d. abuse of legal process- maintenance and champerty.
law
e. by interference with the course of justice.
een
f. agreements which create conflicts of interest and duty.
am
g. marriage breakage contracts.
.al
h. sale and public officers.
ww
Section 24: when consideration and object unlawful in part: If any part of a single
consideration for one or more objects or anyone or any part of anyone of several
(w
considerations for a single object is unlawful, the agreement is void.
supported with some consideration then only it becomes a contract. sec 2(d)
AN
defines consideration.
,B
which interferes with the performance of marital duties is against the public policy
is void.
FL
bbbbb. Every agreement is restraint of the marriage of any person, other than a
EO
minor, is void.
EG
)
.in
fffff. An agreement not to carry on some business for a period of 3 years or to
law
close down a mill for 3 months in a year, is void.
een
ggggg. Both the general as well as the partial restraint of trade is prima facie
am
void.
.al
EXCEPTIONS:
ww
hhhhh. Sale of good will: A person with its goodwill, the seller of the business
may make an agreement with the buyer not to carry on the business in
(w
competition with the buyer. Such an agreement, if imposes a reasonable
RE
restriction on the seller’s right to carry on business is valid.
LO
iiiii. Exception under the Indian partnership Act,1932:
GA
Section 11(2): the purpose is that the partners will not carry on their own business
AN
Section 36(2): It may be made between the outgoing partner and the remaining
AW
Section 54: It may be made upon or in anticipation of the dissolution of the firm.
EO
EG
Section 55(3): When a person purchases the goodwill of a business, his interest
may be protected by a covenant by the seller of goodwill that the latter will not
LL
which an employee agrees that he will serve a particular employer for certain
ME
duration and that he will not serve anyone else during that period is valid.
-A
AL
kkkkk. Trade combination: Some traders and manufacturers combine
)
.in
agreement fixing minimum price, regulating the supply of goods and putting
law
profits in a common pool and diving the same amongst themselves.
een
lllll. Solus agreements: The seller or the manufacturer of a certain product
am
may agree that he will supply the whole of his product to a particular single
.al
buyer only or similarly a buyer may agree that he will purchase all his
ww
requirements of a certain commodity from a particular seller or manufacturer
(w
E. AGREEMENT IN RESTRAINT OF LEGAL PROCEEDING:
RE
Section 28: An agreement absolutely restraining a party from enforcing his rights through
LO
a court of law, or an agreement which places a limit as to the time within which a right
GA
nnnnn. Agreement, which places a time limit for enforcing a right through
FL
legal proceedings.
EO
EG
Section 29: which is not certain or capable of being made certain are void. It is
LL
necessary that there should be no ambiguity about what that parties intend.
CO
Illustrations: ‘A’ agrees to sell to ‘B’a hundred tons of oil. There is nothing whatever to
EN
show what kind of oil was intended. The agreement was void for uncertainty.
ME
)
.in
rrrrr. There are chances of gain or loss to the parties on the determination of the
law
event one way or the other.
een
sssss. The parties have no other interest except winning or losing a bet.
am
ttttt. ‘A’ agrees to pay ‘B’ Rs.100 if it does not rain on 1stjan. Next, ‘B’agrees to
.al
pay ‘A’ Rs. 100 if it rains on that day.(win or loss depending upon the
ww
determination of the event.
(w
Void.
not happen. When the contract is dependent or conditional upon the happening or
EO
zzzzz. ‘A’ contracts to pay ‘B’ Rs. 10,000 if B’s house is burnt, this is a
contingent contract.
LL
person.
)
.in
eeeeee. Section 35: Contracts contingent on happening of specified event
law
within fixed time.
een
ffffff. Contracts contingent on not happening of specified event within a
am
fixed time.
.al
gggggg. Section 36: Agreements contingent on impossible event.
ww
(w
RE
LO
GA
hhhhhh. Perform
EG
Sec 42, 43 &44 of the contract act deal with the liability, rules are contained in these
EN
sections.
ME
)
.in
Performance of reciprocal promises-
law
Sec 51 to 54 deal with the performance of reciprocal promises.
een
Appropriation of Payments: - [Sec 59 – 61]
am
Appropriation means application of payments –
.al
– The question of appropriation of payments arises when a debtor owes several debts to
ww
the same creditor and makes a payment that is not sufficient to discharge the whole
indebtness.
(w
1. Appropriation of Payments
RE
Sometimes, a debtor owes several distinct debts to the same creditor and he makes
LO
a payment which is insufficient to satisfy all the debts. In such a case, a question
GA
Every debtor who owes several debts to a creditor has a right to instruct his
FL
Therefore, where the debtor expressly states that the payment is to be applied
EG
Example: A owes B three distinct debts of Rs.2,000, 3,000 and 5,000. A sends
LL
Rs.5,000 and instructs B that the payment should be appropriated against the
CO
third debt. He is bound to appropriate the payment against the third debt only.
EN
debtor fails to give any instructions, the creditor can apply the amount to any of the debts
)
.in
including a time barred debt.
law
When the debtor indicates that particular payment is to be applied for the discharge of a
een
particular debt, the creditor has to apply the same accordingly.
am
When a debtor has to make payment under multiple heads, he has an option u/sec 59 to
.al
indicate the head to which the amount paid should be appropriated.
ww
2. Application of payment where debt to be discharge is not indicated [60]
If section 60 is attracted, the creditor shall have the discretion to apply such
(w
payment for any lawful debt which is due to him from the person making the
payment. RE
LO
Example: A owes to B, among other debts; the sum of Rs.520. B writes to A and
GA
llllll. Appropriation by the creditor-----if the debtor fails to make any indication
AW
of his intention, the creditor has a right to appropriate the amount to any debt
they are or are not based by the limitation Act 1963, if the debt are of equal
CO
standing (i.e. payable on the same date) the payment shall be applied in discharge
EN
)
.in
pppppp.
law
qqqqqq. Appropriation towards debts in order of time----
een
When neither the debtor nor the creditor make any appropriation, then the rule mentioned
am
in sec 61 determines to which amount is to be applied for discharging which particular
.al
debt.
ww
In such a case, the payment shall be applied in discharge the debts in order of time. The
oldest one is to be discharged first of all, even though it may be a time barred debt. If the
(w
debts are of equal standing, the payment shall be applied in discharge of each such debt
proportionately. RE
LO
GA
Amount of Positions of
FL
A sends Rs.1,500 in the month of June. He neither expressly intimates nor circumstance
EN
of the case imply as to which debt the amount is to be applied. Moreover, B also does not
ME
appropriate the payment at his own discretion. Therefore, the payment will be
-A
AL
appropriated in order of time. However, here in this case two debts are of equal standing.
The payment will, therefore, be appropriated in order of time but to all equal standing
)
.in
debts. In this case, Rs.1,500 will be appropriated towards the first two debts of equal
law
standing proportionately, i.e. in the ratio of 2:1.
een
am
The rules mentioned in sec 59 to 61, although are meant for being applied to several
.al
distinct debts, the same principles are applicable when there is a single debt and also
ww
interest thereon.
(w
RE
LO
GA
cases.
,B
AW
DISCHARGE OF CONTRACT
It means a contract ceases to operate. It also means the rights and obligations created
FL
)
.in
When the performance of the contract becomes impossible the purpose which the
law
parties have in mind is frustrated. If the performance becomes impossible, because of a
een
supervening event , the promisor is excused from the performance of the contract. In
am
English law, it is called “Doctrine of Frustration”. In Indian law, it is called
.al
“Impossibility of Performance”.
ww
Section 56 of the Indian Contract act, 1872: this doctrine is applicable in two
circumstances (i) when the performance of the contract was physically cut off: and (ii)
(w
when the object was failed.
RE
Sec.56. Agreement to do Impossible Act- an agreement to do an act impossible in itself
LO
is void.
GA
Illustrations:
AN
yyyyyy. A and B contract to marry each other. Before the time fixed for the
AW
bbbbbbb. The promisor knew or might have known with reasonable diligence
CO
that the act he promised is impossible or unlawful, but the promisee did not
EN
compensation to the promisee for any loss occurred by the promisee for the
-A
AL
non-performance of the promise.
)
.in
this doctrine.
law
een
EFFECT OF FRUSTRATION
am
“It is well settled that if and when there is frustration the dissolution of the contract occurs
.al
automatically.”
ww
ddddddd. The frustrations should not be self-induced:
Frustration should arise without blame or fault on either side. Reliance cannot be
(w
placed on a self-induced frustration.
their opinions or even knowledge, as to the event. This is particularly true of Indian
AW
law as section 56 of the contract Act lays down a rule of positive law. There must not
Section 65: Obligation of the person who has received advantage under void
EG
or when a contract becomes void, any person who has received any advantage under
LL
such agreement or contract is bound to restore it, or to make compensation for it, to the
CO
Grounds of frustration
)
.in
Following are the well-recognised grounds of frustration on which the doctrine of
law
frustration may be applied by the courts:
een
iiiiiii. Destruction of the subject matter of the contract:
am
Where the performance of the contract becomes impossible by the destruction of the
.al
specific thing essential to that performance that contract is discharged. The destruction
ww
of the music hall in Taylor v. Caldwell case is a good example.
(w
jjjjjjj. Non-occurrence of a particular state of things:
RE
particular event which is essential for the performance of the contract.
LO
kkkkkkk. Death or incapacity of the party:
GA
Where the performance of a contract depends upon the personal services of a party, the
AN
death or incapacity of such a party may be treated to be a valid ground for frustration
,B
of contract. A leading case on the point is ‘Robinson v. Davinson. In this case, the
AW
defendant’s wife was a famous pianist. She contracted for performing a concert but
could not fulfil her promise because of a serious illness. The plaintiff brought an action
FL
to claim damages for non-performance (breach) of contract. The court held that in this
EO
case the continued health of the pianist was a condition attached to the agreement. Her
EG
serious illness was a valid ground on the basis of which she was discharged from her
If the change of circumstances makes the performance of the contract impossible, the
EN
contract will frustrate and parties will be discharged from their obligations under the
ME
contract. If, however, despite the change of circumstances, the performance is still
-A
AL
possible the contract will not be deemed to have been discharged.
)
.in
Where the execution of the contract is delayed or otherwise becomes impossible by the
law
happening of an external event, the contract is discharged. But much will depend upon
een
the facts and circumstances and each case has to be judged on its own merits.
am
nnnnnnn. Change in law:
.al
The performance of a contract may also become legally impossible by the change in
ww
law. If the performance legally impossible, the contract will be discharged. But as
pointed in Anson’s Law of Contract, “The change in the law must be such as to strike
(w
at the root of the agreement and not merely to suspend or hinder its operation in part.
ooooooo. RE
Legislative or government Intervention: are the well-recognised
LO
grounds of frustration on which the doctrine of frustration may be applied by
GA
the courts.
AN
,B
AW
FL
Remedy means course of action available to an aggrieved party when other party breaches
LL
the contract.
CO
1. Rescission of contract
ME
)
.in
5.Quantum Meruit
law
een
RESCISSION OF CONTRACT – SEC 39
am
It means right to party to cancel contract.
.al
⇒ In case of breach of contract, other party may rescind contract.
ww
Effect of Rescission of Contract
(w
under contract.
qqqqqqq. RE
Aggrieved party claims compensation for any loss.
LO
rrrrrrr. Party is liable to restore benefit, if any.
GA
AN
The amount of money allowed by a court as compensation for the violation of a duty.
EG
Kinds of damages:
vvvvvvv. Liquidated
LL
wwwwwww. Un liquidated
CO
yyyyyyy. Special
ME
)
.in
cccccccc. Inconvenience/ discomfort- equal to tortious liability.
law
Duty of mitigate: - to make less severe, to make calmer, less angry, a reduction in
een
punishment/ penalty, to reduce in amount or degree to mitigate the damage caused by a
am
wrongful act.
.al
dddddddd. Estimation of loss / damage arising from a breach of contract.
ww
eeeeeeee. The party suffering from the breach of contract should take
(w
reasonable steps to mitigate the loss he will not be entitled to claim
ffffffff. Such damages which naturally arose in the usual course of things
AN
gggggggg. Such damages which the parties knew, when they made the
,B
contract
AW
hhhhhhhh. But such compensation is not to be given for any remote or indirect
Sec 74- compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated foe
EG
restitution).
-A
AL
llllllll. In India, rules relating to damages are based on English judgment of
Hadley vs. Baxendale.
)
.in
The facts of case were – H’s mill was stopped due to the breakdown of the shaft. He
law
delivered the shaft to common carrier to repair it and agree to pay certain sum of repair it
een
and agree to pay certain sum of money for doing this work. H has informed to B that
am
delay would result into loss of profit. B delivered the shaft after reasonable time after
.al
repair. H filed suit for loss of profit. It was held that B is not liable for loss of profit. The
ww
court laid down rule that damage can be recovered if party has breach of contract.
In fact the mill was already stopped due to the breakage of the shaft, with which the
(w
defendant was nothing to do. It was the fault of the plaintiff not informing the real
circumstances. RE
LO
It was accrued in the nature and mechanical process. If the importance of the arranging
GA
new one was told to the defendant, he might have arranged the substitute arrangements
AN
KINDS OF DAMAGES
AW
Illustration: A contracts to repair B’s house in a certain manner, and receives payment in
EO
advance. A repairs the house, but not Acc to the contract. B is entitled to recover from A
EG
Sec 74: compensation for breach of contract where penalty stipulated for.
ME
These are the damages which are payable for the loss arising naturally and directly
)
.in
as result of breach of contract. It is also known as proximate damage or natural
law
damage.
een
oooooooo.
am
pppppppp. Special damages
.al
These are damages which are payable for loss arising due to some special
ww
circumstances. It can be recovered only if special circumstances which result in
special loss in case of breach of contract and party have notice of such damage.
(w
Example: A sends sample of his products for exhibition to an agent of a railway
RE
company for carriage to “New Delhi” for an exhibition. The consignment note
LO
stated: “Must be at New Delhi, Monday Certain.” Due to negligence of the
GA
company, the goods reached only after the exhibition was over. Held, the company
AN
was liable for the loss caused by late arrival of the products because the company’s
,B
These damages are allowed not to compensate party but as mean of punishment to
FL
defaulting party. The court may award these damages in the case of:
EO
Where party suffers no loss, the court may allow nominal damages simply to
CO
establish that party has proved his case and won. Nominal damage is very small in
EN
amount.
ME
-A
AL
uuuuuuuu. Damages for inconvenience
If party has suffered physical inconvenience, discomfort for mental agony as result
)
.in
of breach of contract, party can recover the damage for such inconvenience.
law
Example: A photographer agreed to take photographs at a wedding ceremony but
een
failed to do so. The bride brought an action for the breach of contract. Held, she
am
was entitled to damages for her injured feelings.
.al
vvvvvvvv.
ww
wwwwwwww. Liquidated damages and penalty
Party may specify amount at the time of entering into contract. The amount so
(w
specified may be (a) liquidated damage, or (b) penalty.
RE
If specified sum represent, fair and genuine pre – estimate damages likely to result
LO
due to breach, it is called liquidated damage.
GA
As regard the payment of liquidated damages and penalty court can’t’ increase
,B
Example : A gives B, a bond for the repayment of Rs.1,000 with interest at 12 per
FL
cent, at the end of six months, with a stipulation that, in case of default, the interest
EO
shall be payable at the rate of 75 per cent, from the date of default. This is a
EG
Any clause in contract entitling the aggrieved party to forfeit security deposit in the
ME
)
.in
a. It is permissible.
law
b. If interest is in nature of penalty, court may grant relief.
een
c. If no rate of interest is specified in contract party shall be liable to pay
am
as per the law in force or as per custom or usage of trade.
.al
ww
yyyyyyyy. Cost of suit or decree
The court has also discretion to award cost of suit for damages in addition to the
(w
damages for breach of contract.
RE
LO
Suit for Specific Performance
GA
It means, demanding an order from court that promise agreed in contract shall be carried
AN
)
.in
i. Example: A agree to sell B, an artist painting for Rs.30,000. Later on,
law
he refused to sell it. Here B can file suit against A for specific
een
performance of the contract.
am
zzzzzzzz. Suit for Injunction
.al
aaaaaaaaa. It means stay order granted by court. This order prohibits a person
ww
to do particular act. Restraining the other party from making a breach of
contract.
(w
bbbbbbbbb. Where there is breach of contract by one party and order, of
RE
specific performance is not granted by court, injunction may be granted.
LO
Example: Film actress agreed to act exclusively for W for a year and for no one
GA
Section 68-72 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 deals -- with certain relations
CO
known as quasi contracts under English Law. The basis of the obligations is that no
ME
one should have unjust benefit at the cost of the other. In an action for unjust
-A
AL
enrichment, the following essentials have to be proved:
)
.in
ddddddddd. The enrichment is at the expense of the plaintiff.
law
eeeeeeeee. The retention of the enrichment is unjust.
een
The Indian contract Act deals with the following quasi-contractual obligations:
am
fffffffff. Claim for necessaries supplied to a person incompetent
.al
to contract (section 68):
ww
Where one person supplies necessaries suited to the condition in life of a person, who
(w
incompetent person is legally bound to support (for example, to a lunatic’s wife or
RE
children) the person furnishing such supplies is entitled to a reimbursement from the
LO
property of such incompetent person.
GA
Illustration:
AN
69):
FL
bound by law to pay and who therefore pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed by the
other.
LL
Two essentials:
CO
iiiiiiiii. Another person is bound by law to pay the same, but he fails to pay.
-A
AL
jjjjjjjjj. Obligation of person enjoying benefit of non-gratuitous
)
.in
act (section 70): for applications of this section, the following conditions are
law
to be satisfied.
een
kkkkkkkkk. A person lawfully do something for another person, or should
am
deliver something to him,
.al
lllllllll. The person making the payment or delivering the thing must not do
ww
so gratuitously, i.e. he should expect payment for the same: and
mmmmmmmmm. The other person should enjoy the benefit of this payment
(w
or delivery of the thing.
RE
When all the above conditions are satisfied, the person receiving the benefit becomes
LO
bound to pay compensation to the person conferring.
GA
intend to do it gratuitously but expects payment for the same on doing such
,B
acceptance of the benefit of the work done or the thing delivered is the
FL
the principle that one should not gain unjust enrichment at the cost of the
application.
CO
)
.in
government can still be made liable to compensate for the same under section 70 of the
law
contract act, if it has enjoyed the benefit of what has been done under the purported
een
contract.
am
qqqqqqqqq. Section 70 cannot be invoked against a minor:
.al
A minor’s agreement being void ab initio, he cannot be made liable under sections 64 and
ww
65 of the Contract Act. But if necessaries are supplied to a minor, his estate can be made
liable under the section 68. It has been held that no action can be brought against a minor
(w
to recover compensation from him under section 70. Section 70 cannot be invoked against
RE
a minor. Firstly, the section covers every “person” whether he is competent to contract or
LO
not. Secondly, there is nothing in law which debars a minor from enjoying the benefit of
GA
Section 71 contemplates still another quasi contractual situation, i.e. when a person is a
AW
finder of goods belonging to another and takes the goods to his custody and is in the
position of a bailee with all responsibility. Every bailee has the following duties:-
FL
(sec.165-167)
EN
)
.in
zzzzzzzzz. Unjust benefit under mistake: section 72 covers a situation where
law
money has been paid, or anything delivered by one person to another either
een
by mistake or under coercion.
am
aaaaaaaaaa. Money paid or anything delivered under mistake: According to
.al
Article 265 of constitution, no tax shall be levied or collected except by the
ww
authority of law. Law here means only valid law. Section 72 and the same
(w
allowed to unjustly enrich itself by retaining the tax so received.
bbbbbbbbbb. RE
Money not recoverable where there is no unjust enrichment of
LO
the defendant: If the receiver of the money has no longer the same with him,
GA
cccccccccc. Unjust benefit under coercion: Section 72 permits the money paid
AW
back.
FL
When the injured party has performed a part his obligation under the contract before the
ME
breach of contract has occurred, he is entitled to recover the value of what he has done,
-A
AL
under this remedy.
Where one party has absolutely refused to perform, or has rendered himself incapable of
)
.in
performing his part of the contract, he puts it in the power of the other party either to sue
law
for the breach of it or to rescind the contract and sue on quantum meruit for the work
een
actually done.
am
Quantum Meruit= “as much as earned”, as much as is merited.
.al
When a person has done some work under a contract, and the other party repudiates the
ww
contract, or some event happens which makes the further performance of the contract
impossible, then the party who has performed work can claim remuneration for the work
(w
he has already done.
RE
Illustration: A agrees to delivered 100 bags, B 500 bags of wheat and when A has
LO
already delivered 100 bags, B refuses to accept any further supply, and A can recover
GA
discovered to be void or becomes void any person who has received any
AW
Illustration:
EO
A pays B Rs.1000 in consideration with B’s promise to marry C, A’s daughter. C is dead
EG
at the time of the promise. The agreement is void, but B must repay A the sum of Rs.
1000.
LL
so gratuitously, and such other person enjoys the benefit. Thereof, the latter
ME
)
.in
but there was no agreement as to remuneration, in such circumstances
law
reasonable remuneration is payable i.e. quantum meruit.
een
hhhhhhhhhh. When the completion of the contract has been prevented by
am
the act of the other party to contract.
.al
5. When a contract is divisible and the party in default has enjoyed the benefit of the
ww
part performance, the party who performed the contract may sue on quantum meruit. If
the contract is not divisible, the party who performed the contract cannot claim
(w
remuneration on the ground of quantum meruit.
Ex. (2):- A – B decline 250 quince of rice before the 1st of May. A delivers 130 qu.
FL
Only before that day and none after. B retains the 130 qu. after the first of May. He
EO
Ex(3):-A singer – two nights in every week during the next two month and B any
ages to pay her Rs 100 for each night’s performance on the sixth night, A wilfully
LL
absent perfect. B must pay a for the five night on which she had sung.
CO
EN
)
.in
Ex.:- owner – P write a book to be published as series in his magazine. After a few
law
series were published the publication of the magazine was stopped. It was held that
een
P could claim payment on quantum meruit for the part already published.
am
(c) In case of divisible contract:-
.al
(1) If the contract is divisible and
ww
(2) If the party not at default has enjoyed benefit of the point performance.
(w
If the above condition an satisfied, the party at fault may claim on payment on quantum
RE
meruit for the part of contract performed by him be con recover such proportion of the
LO
contract price as the work done, by him bears to the work under the contracts.
GA
The party at fault may recover the contract price (Lump sum price) less the deduction
EG
Ex.:- X agreed to decorate Y’s flat for a lump sum of Rs20,000. X did the complete work
LL
but Y complained of faulty work man stop. It costs Y another Rs3000 to remedy the
CO
gratuitously
)
.in
And
law
(iii) The person from whom the act is done must have enjoyed the benefit of the act.
een
Ex.:- A, a tradesman leaves goods at B’s shop be mistake B treats the good as his own.
am
He is bound to pay A for them.
.al
ww
(c) Time for performance
(w
Time place and manner of performance [46–50]
RE
The parties are free to decide as to when and where the performance of the contract is to
LO
be made.
GA
perform without, a demand from the promise the performance must be made
AW
question of fact.
FL
Sec 36(2) the sale of goods act also contains a similar provision:- when the seller is
EO
bound to deliver the goods, but no time for sending them is fixed, the seller is bound to
EG
promisee
-A
AL
pppppppppp. Performance must perform on the day fixed during the usual
business hours and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed.
)
.in
qqqqqqqqqq. Time and place for performance of promise, where time is
law
specified, and no application to be made.( during business hours on such
een
day/ usual closing time)
am
A promise to deliver goods at B’s warehouse on 1st Jan. On that day, A brings the goods to
.al
b’s warehouse, but after the usual hour for closing it, and they are not received. A has not
ww
performed his promise.
(w
rrrrrrrrrr. Proper place and within the usual hour of business
place.
EO
to appoint a reasonable place for the purpose of receiving it, & must deliver it to him at
CO
such place.
EN
[50]
-A
AL
wwwwwwwwww. In such prescribed manner and
)
.in
yyyyyyyyyy. The performance of any promise may be made in any manner, or
law
at any time which the promise prescribes or sanctions.
een
Ex: - ‘A’ desires ‘B’ who owes him Rs 10,000 to send him a promissory note for Rs
am
10,000 by Post. The debt is discharged as soon as ‘B’ puts into the post a letter
.al
containing the promissory note duly addressed to ‘A’.
ww
B owes A 2,000 rupees. A desires B to pay the amount to A’s account with C, a banker. B
who also banks with C, orders the amount to be transferred from his account to A’s credit,
(w
and this is done by C.
RE
LO
Q.No.9.Solve any two of the following problems.
GA
AN
- But y becomes insolvent, so now x & z are compelled to pay the amount to D, may have
EO
performed the whole of the promise and they are right to claim the compensation from y
EG
Section 42, 43and 44 of the Contract act deal with the question of liability of
EN
The liability of the joint promisor is joint and several: When two or more
-A
AL
persons make a joint promise, the promise may, in the absence of express agreement to
the contrary, compel anyone or more of such joint promisors to perform the whole of the
)
.in
promise. Their liability to pay the money is joint and several under section 43 of the
law
Contract act.
een
Contribution between joint promisor: Since the liability of the joint promisors is
am
joint and several, one of them may have performed the whole of the promise. He may
.al
have, for instance, paid for the share of others also. If that is so, he has right to claim
ww
contribution from the others (section 43).
Effect of release of a joint promisor: Section 44 of the Indian Contract act, 1872:
(w
“when two or more persons have made a joint promise, a release of one such joint
RE
promisors by the promise, does not discharge the other joint promisors, neither does it
LO
free the joint promisor so released from the responsibility to other joint promisors.
GA
Effect of death of a joint promisor: section 42: On the death of a joint promisor,
AN
his representatives substitute him for the purpose of liability. The liability of the surviving
,B
joint promisors is there along with the representatives of the deceased one. When all the
AW
joint promisors die, the representatives of them all must jointly fulfil the promise.
FL
(b) A musical hall was agreed to be let out on certain day. But before that,
EO
zzzzzzzzzz. Yes.
LL
the contract.
ME
)
.in
eeeeeeeeeee.It is held that the contract has become void. Before the date of
law
performance arrived, the music hall was destroyed by fire. The contract was
een
possible when the contract is entered into but because of fire the performance
am
subsequently become impossible or unlawful.
.al
fffffffffff. The performance is deemed to be impossible and the parties are
ww
excused from performing the contract.
Discharge of contract:
(w
In the following ways;
RE
ggggggggggg. By performance of the contract sec 37-67
LO
hhhhhhhhhhh. By breach of the contract sec 39
GA
contract is entered into but because of some event, the performance may
ME
)
.in
promisor is excused from the performance of the contract. This is known as
law
doctrine of frustration under English law.
een
am
(c) “M’’ tells his wife that he would commit suicide if she did not transfer her
.al
personal assets to him. She does so under threat. Can wife avoid this contract?
ww
-yes
(w
-wife can avoid this contract.
RE
Acc to sec 14, consent is said to be free from coercion. Acc
LO
Sec 10 of the act (valid contract)—there should be free consent of the parties, when they
GA
Reasons:--
,B
Section 15 defines coercion. The consent is given under the threat is an offence under
AW
IPC.
xxxxxxxxxxx. The party avoiding the contract is bound to restore to the other
-A
AL
party any benefit which he may have received under the contract.
yyyyyyyyyyy. A real or apparent authority which one person has over another.
)
.in
zzzzzzzzzzz.Confidence response by one party in another (fiduciary
law
relationship).
een
am
.al
ww
(w
RE
LO
GA
AN
,B
AW
FL
EO
EG
LL
CO
EN
ME
-A
AL