Silk's Global Journey
Silk's Global Journey
Test 1
READING PASSAGE 1
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 1-13, which are based on Reading passage 1 on
pages 2 and 3.
use of silk, which was once confined to the Byzantine church and state created imperial
nobility has now spread to all classes without workshops, monopolising production and
distinction – even to the lowest.’ The desire keeping the secret to themselves. This
for silk continued to increase over the allowed a silk industry to be established,
centuries. Despite this demand, the price of undercutting the market for ordinary-grade
silk remained very high. Chinese silk. However, high quality silk
textiles, woven in China especially for the
In spite of their secrecy about Middle Eastern market, continued to achieve
production methods, the Chinese eventually high prices in the West, and trade along the
lost their monopoly on silk production. Silk Road continued as before. By the sixth
Knowledge of silk production methods century the Persians, too, had mastered the
reached Korea around 200 BC, when waves of art of silk weaving, developing their own rich
Chinese immigrants arrived there. Shortly patterns and techniques. But it wasn't until
after 300 AD, it travelled westward, and the the 13th century that Italy began silk
cultivation of the silkworm was established in production, with the introduction of 2,000
India. skilled silk weavers from Constantinople.
Eventually, silk production became
Around 550 AD silk production
widespread throughout Europe.
reached the Middle East. Records indicate
that two monks from Constantinople
World silk production has
(modern-day Istanbul), capital of the
approximately doubled during the last 30
Byzantine Empire, appeared at their
years in spite of man-made fibres replacing
emperor's court with silkworm eggs which
certain uses of silk. Before this period, China
they had obtained secretly, and hidden in
and Japan were the two main producers,
their hollow bamboo walking sticks. Under
together manufacturing more than 50 per
their supervision the eggs hatched into
cent of world production each year. After the
worms, and the worms spun silk threads.
late 1970s, however, China dramatically
Byzantine was in the silk business at last. The
increased its silk production, and once again
became the world's leading producer.
Test 1
Questions 1 - 7
Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 7-13 on your answer sheet.
Chinese silk
Early Uses
Clothing
In industry
silk items included parts of musical instruments, fishing strings and 2 ……………………
Currency
silk was used as payment of 3....................... as well as for wages and rewards
silk replaced 4 .......................as a unit of value
silk soon used as payment in 5 .......................trade
9 The quality of Chinese silk imported by the early Romans varied widely.
10 The Byzantine emperor first acquired silkworm eggs from the Chinese emperor.
11 The price of high-grade Chinese silk fell due to competition from Middle-Eastern
producers.
12 Silk was produced in the Middle East several centuries before it was produced in
Europe.
B Mammoths became extinct between 14,000 and 10,000 years ago and since the extinctions
coincided with the end of the most recent Ice age, many researchers believe that the
primary cause of the great die-off was the sharp rise in temperature, which dramatically
altered the vegetation. ‘We have strong evidence that the temperature rise played a
significant part in their extinction.’ says Adrian Lister, a palaeontologist and mammoth
expert at London's Natural History Museum. 'In Eurasia, the timing of the two events
matches closely.' The extinctions also coincided, however; with the arrival of modern
humans. In addition to exploiting mammoths for food, they used their bones and tusks to
make weapons, tools, and even dwellings. Some scientists believe humans were as much to
blame as the temperature rise for the great die-off. Some say they caused it.
C The body of the baby mammoth was eventually sent to the St Petersburg Zoological
Museum in Russia. Alexei Tikhonov, the museum's director, was one of the first scientists
to view the baby, a female. According to Tikhonov, Khudi had rescued 'the best preserved
mammoth to come down to us from the Ice Age', and he gratefully named her Lyuba, after
Khudi's wife. Tikhonov knew that no-one would be more excited by the find than Dan
Fisher, an American colleague at the University of Michigan who had spent 30 years
researching the lives of mammoths. Tikhonov invited Fisher, along with Bernard Buigues, a
French mammoth hunter, to come and view the baby mammoth. Fisher and Buigues had
examined other specimens together, including infants, but these had been in a relatively
poor state. Lyuba was another story entirely. Other than the missing hair and toenails, the
only flaw in her pristine appearance was a curious dent above the trunk.
D Fisher was particularly excited about one specific part of Lyuba's anatomy: her milk tusks.
Through his career, Fisher has taken hundreds of tusk samples. Most of these came from
the Great Lakes region of North America, and his research showed that these animals
continued to thrive, despite the late Pleistocene* temperature change. On the other hand,
to Fisher the tusks often revealed telltale evidence of human hunting. His samples
frequently came from animals that had died in the autumn, when they should have been at
their peak after summer grazing, and less likely to die of natural causes, but also when
humans would have been most eager to stockpile meat for the coming winter. He has done
limited work in Siberia, but his analysis of tusks from Wrangel Island, off the coast of Siberia,
suggests the same conclusion.
F Studies are ongoing, but Lyuba has begun to shed the secrets of her short life and some
clues to the fate of her kind. Her good general health was shown in the record of her dental
development, a confirmation for Fisher that dental research is useful for evaluating health
and thus key to investigating the causes of mammoth extinction. Analysis of her well-
preserved DNA has revealed that she belonged to a distinct population of Mammuthus
primigenius and that, soon after her time, another population migrating to Siberia from
North America would take their place. Finally, Lyuba's premolars and tusks revealed that
she had been born in late spring and was only a month old when she died.
Questions 14-18
Reading Passage 2 has six paragraphs, A-F.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
Write the correct letter, A-F, in boxes 14-18 on your answer sheet.
14 similarities between studies of mammoth remains from different parts of the world
21 The corpse of the baby mammoth is in better condition than any other that has been
discovered.
23 Mammoths often died at a time of year when they should have been in good
physical condition.
List of People
A Yuri Khudi
B Kirill Serotetto
C Adrian Lister
D Alexei Tikhonov
E Dan Fisher
F Bernard Buigues
G Naoki Suzuki
Questions 24 - 26
Complete the sentences below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 24-26 on your answer sheet.
25 Fisher concluded that many of the mammoth tusks he looked at displayed signs
of ……………….. .
26 Not long after Lyuba’s death, the Mammuthus primigenius group she belonged to
was replaced by another group that came from ……………….. .
READING PASSAGE 3
You should spend about 20 minutes on Question 27-40, which are based on Reading Passage 3 on
pages 10 and 11
Does that class of people acknowledged to be musical experts just have more of the same
basic skills we are all endowed with, or do they have a set of abilities – or neural structures -
that are totally different from those of the rest of us? Are high levels of musical
achievement simply the result of training and practice, or are they based on innate brain
structure - what we refer to as ‘talent’? Talent can be defined as something that originates
in genetic structures and that is identifiable by trained people who can recognize it
existence before a person has achieved exceptional levels of performance. The emphasis on
early identification means that to investigate it, we study the development of skills in
children.
It is evident that some children acquire skills more rapidly than others: the age of onset for
walking and talking varies widely, even between children in the same household. There may
be genetic factors at work, but these are closely linked with other factors - with a
presumably environmental component- such as motivation and family dynamics. Similar
factors can influence musical development and can mask the contribution of genetics to
musical ability.
Brain studies, so far, haven't been of much use in sorting out the issues. Gottfried Schlaug at
Harvard collected brain scans of individuals with absolute pitch* (AP) and showed that a
region in the brain called the planum temporale is larger in these people than in others. This
suggests that the platinum is involved in AP, but it's not clear if it starts out larger in people
who eventually acquire AP, or if the acquisition of AP makes the planum increase in size.
Results of research into the areas of the brain involved in skilled motor movement are more
conclusive. Studies of violin players have shown that the region of the brain responsible for
controlling the movement of the left hand (the hand that requires greater precision in violin
playing) increases in size as a result of practice. We do not know yet if the propensity for
increase pre-exists in some people and not others.
The evidence against talent comes from research on how much training the experts do. Like
experts in mathematics, chess, or sports, experts in music require lengthy periods of
instruction and practice. In several studies, the very best music students were found to have
practiced more than twice as much as the others. In another study, students were secretly
divided into two groups based on teachers’ perceptions of their talent. Several years later, it
was found that the students who achieved the highest performance ratings had practiced
the most, irrespective of which ‘talent’ group they had been assigned to, suggesting that
practice does not merely correlate with achievement, but causes it.
Anders Ericsson, at Florida State University, approaches the topic of musical expertise as a
general problem in cognitive psychology. He takes as a starting point the assumption that
there are certain issues involved in becoming an expert at anything; that we can learn about
musical expertise by studying expert chess players, athletes, artists, mathematicians, as well
as the musicians themselves. The emerging picture from such studies is that ten thousand
hours of practice is required to achieve the level of mastery associated with being a world-
class expert – in anything. In study after study, of composers, ice skaters, concert pianists,
chess players and master criminals, this number comes up again and again. Someone would
do this amount of practice if they practiced, for example, roughly 20 hours a week for ten
years. Of course, this doesn't address why some people don't seem to get anywhere when
they practice, and why some people get more out of their practice sessions than others. But
no-one has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished in less
time. It seems that it takes the brain this long to assimilate all that it needs to know to
achieve true mastery.
The ten-thousand-hour theory is consistent with what we know about how the the brain
learns. Learning requires the assimilation and consolidation of information in neural tissue.
The more experiences we have with something, the stronger the memory/learning trace for
that experience becomes. Although people differ in how long it takes them to consolidate
information neurally, it remains true that increased practice leads to a greater number of
neural traces, which create stronger memory representation.
The classic rebuttal to this theory goes something like this: ’What about Mozart? I hear that
he composed his first symphony at the age of four!’ First, there is a factual error here:
Mozart didn't write it until he was eight. Still, this is unusual, to say the least. However, this
early work received little acclaim and was not performed very often. In fact the only reason
we know about it is because the child who wrote it grew up to become Mozart. And Mozart
had an expert teacher in his father, who was renowned as a teacher of musicians all over
Europe. We don't know how much Mozart practiced, but if he started at age two and
worked thirty - two hours a week (quite possible, given that his father was a stern
taskmaster) he would have made his ten thousand hours by the time he composed his first
symphony. This does not mean that there are no genetic factors involved in Mozart's
greatness, but that inborn traits may not be the only cause.
Questions 27-30
Choose the correct letter A, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-30 on your answer Sheet
27 In the first paragraph, the writer suggests that a musician who is ‘talented’ is
someone
28 According to the winter, what is unclear about the findings of Gottfried Schlaug?
30 According to the writer, findings on the amount of practice done by expert musicians
suggest that
31 Anders Ericsson's work with cognitive psychology has influenced other researchers.
34 Anyone who practices for long enough can reach the level of a world-class expert.
35 Occasionally, someone can become an expert at global level with fewer than 10,000
hours’ practice.
Questions 37-40
Complete the summary using the list of words, A-J below
Write me connect letter A-J, n boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet
Mozart
The case of Mozart could be quoted as evidence against the 10,000-hour-practice theory.
However, the writer points out that the young Mozart received a lot of 37 ................ from his
father, and that the symphony he wrote at the age of 38 ……………. was not 39 ................ and
may be of only academic interest. The case therefore supports the view that expertise is not
solely the result of 40................ characteristics.