Big 5
[01/08, 6:52 pm] Manas_Parewal: 1. Neuroticism
Overall Score: Low
Anxiety: 60
Anger: 35
Depression: 50
Self-Consciousness: 65
Immoderation: 55
Vulnerability: 60
2. Extraversion
Overall Score: High
Friendliness: 65
Gregariousness: 60
Assertiveness: 80
Activity Level: 65
Excitement-Seeking: 80
Cheerfulness: 80
3. Openness to Experience
Overall Score: High
Imagination: 65
Artistic Interests: 80
Emotionality: 60
Adventurousness: 60
Intellect: 60
Liberalism: 55
4. Agreeableness
Overall Score: Low
Trust: 70
Morality: 55
Altruism: 65
Cooperation: 60
Modesty: 40
Sympathy: 65
5. Conscientiousness
Overall Score: High
Self-Efficacy: 75
Orderliness: 50
Dutifulness: 65
Achievement-Striving: 50
Self-Discipline: 60
Cautiousness: 70
Manas_Parewal: Analysis
Neuroticism: Manas is generally calm and composed, displaying low levels of anxiety, anger,
and depression. However, the high score in self-consciousness suggests sensitivity to others'
opinions and potential social discomfort.
Extraversion: Manas is outgoing, sociable, and energetic. High scores in assertiveness, activity
level, excitement-seeking, and cheerfulness indicate a preference for social engagement and
dynamic environments.
Openness to Experience: Manas is imaginative, creative, and appreciates art and beauty. The
neutral scores in emotionality, adventurousness, and intellect, coupled with a low score in
liberalism, suggest a balanced but not overly adventurous or intellectually curious personality.
Agreeableness: The low overall score indicates a tendency to prioritize personal needs over
social harmony. Despite high trust, altruism, and sympathy, low scores in morality, modesty, and
a neutral score in cooperation suggest a complex interplay between personal integrity and social
interactions.
Conscientiousness: Manas is reliable and determined, with a strong sense of duty and cautious
decision-making. However, lower scores in orderliness and achievement-striving indicate
potential challenges in organization and ambition, balanced by high self-efficacy and dutifulness.
Overall, Manas appears to be a balanced individual with strengths in sociability, creativity, and
reliability, tempered by a cautious approach and a nuanced view of social interactions.
Belbin case study
Based on the provided Belbin Team Role scores, here’s an analysis of your role preferences and
team dynamics:
### **1. Plant**
- **Score:** 10
- **Analysis:** You have a solid capability for creativity and idea generation. You are good at
coming up with innovative solutions and approaches to problems. However, this score is not the
highest, indicating that while you have creative strengths, they are not your dominant team role.
### **2. Resource Investigator**
- **Score:** 6
- **Analysis:** Your score in this role is relatively low, suggesting that networking, exploring
opportunities, and bringing external insights may not be your primary strength. You might be less
focused on external interactions and discovering new opportunities compared to other roles.
### **3. Co-ordinator**
- **Score:** 14
- **Analysis:** This is your highest score, indicating a strong aptitude for leadership and
organization. You excel in coordinating team efforts, managing tasks, and ensuring that everyone
is working towards common goals. You likely thrive in roles where you can organize and
delegate tasks effectively.
### **4. Shaper**
- **Score:** 3
- **Analysis:** A low score in the Shaper role suggests that driving the team forward and
tackling challenges head-on might not be your strongest area. You may prefer roles that are less
focused on pushing for results and more on collaborative or organizational tasks.
### **5. Monitor Evaluator**
- **Score:** 11
- **Analysis:** You have a good ability to critically assess ideas and ensure that plans are viable.
This role involves providing objective analysis and valuable feedback, which aligns well with
your strengths in evaluation and judgment.
### **6. Teamworker**
- **Score:** 1
- **Analysis:** A very low score in the Teamworker role indicates that collaboration and
supporting team cohesion might not be your primary strengths. You may find it challenging to
focus on interpersonal support and maintaining harmony within the team.
### **7. Implementer**
- **Score:** 7
- **Analysis:** You show a decent capability for turning ideas into practical actions and
organizing tasks. However, this score suggests that while you can implement plans effectively, it
is not your most dominant role.
### **8. Completer**
- **Score:** 10
- **Analysis:** You are reliable in ensuring tasks are completed to a high standard. This role
involves attention to detail and finishing tasks effectively. Your score indicates a strong ability to
follow through on tasks and address any issues.
### **9. Specialist**
- **Score:** 8
- **Analysis:** You have a good level of specialized knowledge and expertise. This role
involves providing in-depth knowledge and technical support. Your score suggests you
contribute valuable expertise but might not be as dominant in this role compared to others.
### **Summary**
Your primary strength lies in the **Co-ordinator** role, indicating strong leadership,
organization, and delegation skills. You also have notable capabilities as a **Monitor
Evaluator**, contributing valuable analysis and judgment. Areas where you are less focused
include **Shaper** (driving challenges) and **Teamworker** (supporting team dynamics). You
have moderate strengths in **Plant**, **Completer**, **Implementer**, and **Specialist**
roles, showing a balanced skill set in creativity, task completion, practical implementation, and
specialized knowledge. Your profile suggests a strong organizational leader with critical
evaluation skills and a good balance of practical and creative strengths.
Locus of inventory
1. **High Internal Locus of Control**: You generally believe that your own actions and efforts
are significant in shaping outcomes in your life. This reflects a strong sense of personal
responsibility and effectiveness.
2. **Proactive Approach**: You are likely proactive and confident in your ability to influence
various aspects of your life, including career, academic performance, and social interactions.
3. **Resilience and Motivation**: Your perspective suggests that you are likely motivated and
resilient, viewing challenges as opportunities for personal growth rather than as obstacles
imposed by external factors.
4. **Self-Efficacy**: You have a high level of self-efficacy, believing that your skills and actions
are crucial in achieving your goals and influencing the world around you.
### **Conclusion**
Your responses indicate a high internal locus of control, suggesting that you see yourself as
having significant influence over your life’s outcomes. This perspective is associated with
proactive behavior, higher motivation, and a strong sense of personal agency.
Mach test
### **Analysis of a MACH Score of 36**
1. **Moderate Machiavellian Traits**: A score of 36 suggests a moderate level of Machiavellian
tendencies. You might use strategic thinking and manipulation in some situations but not to an
extreme degree.
2. **Strategic Thinking**: Individuals with this score may be strategic in their approach, using
calculated decisions to achieve personal goals. You might be skilled at influencing others and
navigating complex social situations.
3. **Balance Between Manipulation and Honesty**: While you might employ some level of
manipulation, you are likely to balance this with honesty and straightforwardness. This suggests
a pragmatic approach to interactions rather than an overwhelmingly deceitful one.
4. **Situational Use of Machiavellian Tactics**: You might apply Machiavellian tactics
selectively, depending on the situation and potential outcomes. This indicates an adaptive and
context-dependent approach to manipulation and strategic behavior.
5. **Ethical Considerations**: With a score in this range, you might sometimes prioritize
personal gain or strategic advantage over ethical considerations. However, this does not
necessarily mean a lack of ethical awareness; rather, you might weigh outcomes and benefits
more pragmatically.
### **Implications of a MACH Score of 36**
- **Leadership and Influence**: You could be effective in leadership roles that require
negotiation, persuasion, and strategic decision-making. Your moderate Machiavellianism might
help in scenarios that demand tactical thinking and achieving goals through complex
interactions.
- **Relationship Dynamics**: In personal relationships, your behavior may be more calculated
but not excessively manipulative. You might use charm and persuasion but also maintain genuine
connections.
- **Career and Social Interactions**: In professional settings, this score might help in navigating
competitive environments and achieving career goals. However, balancing strategic behavior
with ethical considerations can enhance long-term success and maintain positive relationships.
In summary, a MACH score of 36 indicates a moderate level of Machiavellian traits. You likely
engage in strategic thinking and manipulation to some extent but balance these with honesty and
ethical considerations. This score reflects an adaptable and pragmatic approach to personal and
professional interactions.
