0% found this document useful (0 votes)
311 views25 pages

GF-Scaffolding Calculations

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
311 views25 pages

GF-Scaffolding Calculations

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

Contractor: EL SEIF Project: Consultant:


ENGINEERING Project Future New Riyadh
CONTRACTING CO. Head Office
P.O. Box 2774, Riyadh 11461
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Employer:

TECHNICAL/ DOCUMENT SUBMISSION FORM (TS)


Project: Project Future New Riyadh Head Office Project No.: P142

Title : GF Scaffolding for Lobby Area Submittal No. : SABB-CAL-A-0001-00-ART-ARC


SABB-CAL-S-0003-00-ART-ARC

To : ARCADIS Design & Consultancy Revision : 00


Attention : Mr. Mohammed Hassan Date :
From : Mr. Patrick Moran Submittal Package:

TYPE OF SUBMITTAL DISCIPLINE


Pre-qualification Civil LEED
Method Statement, ITP & Checklist 2 Architectural Fire Fighting
Shop Drawing & Schedule Structural Interior Design
2 Calculations Electrical Excavation
Reports Mechanical Cladding
Variation Plumbing
Test Reports /or Inspection & Test Results HVAC
O & M Manuals Low Current
Programme Landscaping
Procedures/Plan Vertical Transportation
Others (Please specify) General

Enclosures :

Submitted for :
2 No Objection Acknowledged/ for Information Coordination

Signature : Date :
Name :

Consultant’s Comments :

No objection, Tem porary works are sole responsibility


of the contractor and part of CDP (Contractor's Design
liability).
Signature : Date :
Name :
RRK
Result :

A – No Objection B- No Objection C- Rejected D- Acknowledged/


W ith comments
X For Information
Signature :
Name : Date :
Note1: “Consultant’s review shall not relieve the Contractor of its obligations and liabilities under the Contract or constitute authorization of any
change to Contract Documents, and therefore, shall not imply any recognition whatsoever of additional time or cost to the Con tract.”
Note 2: “Consultant’s comments on submittals which are not in alignment with Co ntract IFC stamped documents will be ignored unless
accompanied with a corresponding Authorized Engineer’s Instruction.”

Form no. SABB-QF-ENGG-02 REV. 3 Date: April 7, 2018


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

M ANAR AL ESKAN CO
FOR SCAFFOLDING & FORMWORK
MAO - CUPLOCK SCAFFOLDING SYSTEM

CALCULATION SHEETS
EXTERNAL SCAFFOLDING

CONTRACTOR : ART GROUND CO,


PROJECT : ACCESS SCAFFOLDING
PREPARED BY : ENG. HUSSAM
CHECKED BY : ENG. FATHY
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

Manar Al ESKAN NO. OF SHEETS:24

(INCLUDING THIS NO.OF ATTACHED :12


CR No. 4030008606 PAGE)
P.O. Box 46217

Jeddah 21532 PROJECT: ACCESS SCAFFOLDING


Tel.: (02) 620-4582, SUBJECT:CALCULATION SHEET FOR EXTERNAL SCAFFOLDING.
620-0613 CLIENT: Prepared by: Eng. Hussam Date:
Fax: (02) 280-3645 ART GROUND CO, 27/06/2020

CALCULATION SHEET
CHECKED: ENG. FATHY Rev. 0
(STRUCTURAL)

Scaffolding elements technical data


1.CUP- LOCK VERTICAL STANDARD :

2.Standard scaffold tube :

 Tube diameter = 48.3 mm

 Tube thickness = 3.2 mm

 Safe working load :


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

3. Uhead & Basejack:

M aximum length of jack 670 mm (Hollow) jack


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

4. Ledger size and safe working load:


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

General Design Constraints:

1-The Scaffold System which will be used is M-Lock scaffold system.


2-The scaffold will be erected as dependent scaffold because it will be tied with the
building.
3-The scaffold will be erected as light duty scaffold which should be design to carry
2
without failure its own weight, wind load and 1.2 kn/m as a live load.
4-Maximum Number of working platform at the same time will be 2 ( two ) levels.

DESIGN CRITERIA:
Grid Size : 1.25 m x 2.5 m
Scaffold Height : 28.0 m
Scaffold W idth : 1.25 m
Vertical lift height of Ledger / Transom : 2.5 m
Design Live Load for Light Duty Scaffold : 1.2 KN/m2

CALCULATION OF DESIGN LOAD


a) Dead load (DL) calculation for one standard Leg.

Item Description Qty (Pcs) Unit W eight ( Kg ) Total W eight

1 M-Lock Standard 3.00m 9 14.30 128.7

2 Spigot with Bolt / Nuts. 8 0.75 6.0

3 M- Lock Ledger 1.25 m 14/2 4.15 29.05

4 M- Lock Ledger 2.5 m 14 8.3 116.2

5 Adjustable Base Jack 67cm Length. 1 3.60 3.6

6 Anchoring Plate 2.00m Length 5 7.50 37.5

7 Swivel Coupler 10 1.11 11.1


2
8 Scaffolding Board (1.25 x2.5)/2 X 11 LEVELS 17.16 m 25.00 429

9 Scaffolding Pipe 3.00m 10 9.9 99

Total Dead Load on one Standard Leg. 860.15 kg

= 860.15 x 9.81/1000 8438.1

= 8,438.1 N/1000 8.44 KN


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

2
b) Live Load = 1.2 x 0.625 x 2.5 KN/m = 1.875 KN.

CHECK SCAFFOLD CABACITY UNDER VERTICAL LOAD:-

AS per IBC (2009) code of practice- Scaffolding will be safe if it is fit to take

without failure its dead load plus (+) 4 tim es the life load. (attached the

docum ent).

So,

8.44 kn + 4 x1.875 = 15.94 KN < 29.75 KN. ࡕࡕ..OK. ( next page).


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

SAFE W ORK LOAD ON CUPLOCK STANDARD (Max lift of Hz Ledger = 2000 m m )

DESIGN ACCORDING TO AISC/ASD (Allowable Stress Design) METHOD

Load Carry Capacity of Standard per Vertical Leg:

Properties of the Standard (Vertical) Pipe

Outer Diameter (OD) = 48.3mm.

W all Thickness ( t) = 3.20mm.


2
C/S Area ‘A’ = 453mm

Moment of Inertia ‘l’ = 1.16x 105 mm 4

Radius of gyration ‘r’ = 16mm.


2
Yield Strength ( Fy) = 235 N/mm
5 2
Modulus of Elasticity (E) = 2.0 x 10 N/mm .

1) Max Lift Ht of Hz Ledger = 2000mm c/c (Intermediate Lifts Ht Unsupported Length)

K=1.0

Effective Length of Standard ( Leff) = ‘KL’ = 2000mm


Slenderness Ratio H = KL/r= 2000/16 = 125
2
Euler critical Stress Cc = Sqrt (2x(3.142) x E)/ Fy
2
= Sqrt ( 2 x (3.142) x 200000)/235

2
=129.63 N/mm .

Leff/rmin < Cc

Allowable Axial Stress ( Corresponding to Leff/rmin = 125 )=

2
Fa = Fy { 1-1/2 [ (Leff/rmin)/Cc] }
3
5/3 +3/8 (Leff/rmin)/Cc-1/8[ (Leff/rmin)/Cc]
2
=65.60N/mm

Allowable Axial Load Carry Capacity per Vertical Standard (P) = Fa x A

= 65.60 x 453.45 = 29.75 Kn.


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

C.1 - Design Check Scaffold Planks (LVL Boards – Hyplank)


M ax. Span of M ain Scaffold Planks =
1250mm

The maximum allowable span of Scaffold Planks, as


recommended in CSM II section 2.4.3D,
as determined by the manufacturer in accordance with
ANSI A10.8-2001 (Appendix C)

M ax. Allowable span of Scaffold Plank =


1800mm
(Scaffold Planks for 3 Persons, see Att

M ax. Span of Scaffold Plank, L = 1250mm < 1800mm


OK
Size of Scaffold plank = 230mm (W idth) x 42mm (Thk)
߰
W t of Scaffold Plank = 0.25KN/m

Modulas of Elasticity Ep = 10563Mpa.


Area of Cross Section Ab = 9660mm߰

3
Section Modulus ‘Sp’ = 67620 mm
4
Moment of Inertia ‘Ip’ = 1420020mm

Safe Bending Capacity M p = 1.03 KN-m


Allowable Deflection
 = Allowable deflection.= L/60 as per CSM II Section 2.5.1 (I) )
2
Light Duty Rating = 1.20 kN/m
2 2
Dead Load, DL = 0.25 kN/m ; Live Load, LL = 1.20 kN/m ; Span of Transoms = 0.9m
߰
Loading ‘W’ = DL + 4LL = 0.25 + 4x 1.20 = 5.05 kN/m
Considering a single plank width 230mm wide strip
Loading per meter run = 0.23 x 5.05 = 1.162 kN/m
Max Bending Moment ‘Mp’ = W l߰ /8 2
= 1.162 x (1.25) /8 = 0.23KN-m.< M b=1.03KN-m
߰
Loading W d (unfactored) = DL + LL = 0.25 + 1.20 = 1.45 kN/m (as per CSM II Section 2.5.1 (I))
Considering a single plank width 230mm wide strip
Loading per meter run = 0.23 x 1.45 = 0.334 kN/m

(M ax) = 5W l4/384 EI = 5 x0.334 x (1250)4/ 384 x10563x1420020 = 0.71 mm.


 Allow = L/60 = 1250/60 = 20.00mm .

(actual) <  Allow OK Safe .

M ax. Span of Scaffold Plank, L = 1250mm < 1800mm


OK
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

CHECK HORIZONTAL LEDGER OF CUPLOCK SYSTEM

Check Ledger :

FY = 235 N/mm2

Live Load (Light Duty Scaffolding) = 1.50KN/m2

Scaffold Platform Rating = 0.25KN/m2

2.42 kn/m "



 
1.25 m .
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

10

1- DEAD LOAD

Self wt of Ledger = 0.0228KN/M

Scaffold Platform Rating = 0.25x0.9 = 0.22 KN/M

2- Live Load = 2.4x 0.9 = 2.16 KN/M

_________________________________________________

Total Load ( W ) = 2.4 KN/M

PROPERTIES OF PIPE (LEDGER)

MATERIAL

1) MAO ‘CUPLOCK’ specification


Out Diameter side ‘OD’ = 48.3mm.

Wall Thickness ‘t’ = 3.20mm.


߰
Yield Strength (min) Fy = 250N/mm

Physical Properties of Tube

Inner Diameter ‘ ID’ = OD-2( THICKNESS ) = 48.3-2(3.20) = 41.90mm

Area of Cross Section ‘A’ = 3.142 [(OD) 2-(ID) 2]/4 = 453.16 mm ߰

Plastic Section Modulus ‘Z’ = (OD3/6) – (ID3/6) = 6519.75 mm3


Moment of Inertia ‘I’ = 3.142[(OD4) – (ID4)]/64 = 115,797.77 mm4
Radius of Gyration ‘r’ = Sqrt I/A = 16.00mm

OD = 48.3mm Ø

ID = 41.9mm Ø

Fy = 235N/mm2

Fb = Bearing Bending Stress


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

11

Fb = 0.66 Fy (permissible) = 0.66 x 235 = 155N/mm2


2
Max m om ent bending ‘M’ = W L /10
2
= 2.4 x (1.25) /10 = 0.47 KN.M
6
Required Sections modulus‘S’= Moment / Fb =0.47x10 /155 = 3032 mm3

Provided Section Modulus ‘Z’ = 6519.75 mm3


Z > S SAFE (OK )

2
The ledger is safe for 2.4 KN/M live load & Span 1.25 m

STABILITY AND SCAFFOLDING UNDER HORIZONTAL LOAD:

To facilitate determining the conceptual shape of the structure, and in order to provide a sufficient shaped
system, the lateral force resisting system is considered as cantilevered column. As for all cantilevers, the
most economical shape shall be a tapered section with the wide base lying on the ground and the narrow
section at the tip of cantilever. Such approach will increase the lever arm at the base and produce a lesser
couple forces in comparison with a narrow prismatic section.
Despite the additional scaffolds and the larger required ground area to accommodate the wide base of the
tapered section, the scaffolds heights are significantly dropped. Also, the structure will require much less
counterweights in comparison with the prismatic section.

AND BECAUSE OF THAT THE SCAFFOLDING HIEGHT IS LESS THAN 4 TIMES

SCAFFOLDING W IDTH , THEN NO NEED FOR CALCULATING THE LATERAL FORCE

AND THE STRUCTURE W ILL BE STABLE.


received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

12
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

13
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

14
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

15
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

16
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

17
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

18
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

19
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

20
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

21
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

22
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

23
received by Arcadis on 30/06/2020 Forwarded to ELSEIF on 7/15/2020

24

You might also like