Residential Status and Tax Implications
Residential Status and Tax Implications
Basic conditions
○ Individual is in India
■ For 182 days or more during the previous year or
■ For 60 days or more during the previous year and for 365 days or more during 4 years
immediately preceding the relevant previous year.
● If any individual does not comply with any of the basic conditions mentioned above, he will be considered
to be non-resident
★ If the exact time of arrival is not known then the day of arrival shall be taken as complete day. Similarly if
time of departure is not known it shall also be taken as complete day.
★ The residence of an individual for income tax purposes has nothing to do with citizenship.
★ In the case of leap years (2004, 2008 ,2012, 2016, 2020) there will be 29 days in the month of February.
An Indian Citizen or a person of Indian origin whose total income from Indian sources exceeds Rs. 15 lakhs during
the previous year and who has been in India for a period of 120 days or more but less than 182 days who has
become resident as per section 6(1) (120 Days in Previous year + 365 Days in 4 years immediately preceding the
previous year ) will become RNOR
Example
Miss CHAN LEE , an American national, got married to Mr. Prem Kumar of India in the USA on 5.02.2022 and
came to India for the first time on 14.03.2022. She left for the USA on 19.9.2022. She returned to India again on
27.03.2023
Her stay in India during the previous year 2022-23 and in the preceding four years are as under:
P.Y. 2021-22
01.04.2022 to 19.09.2022 - 172 days
27.03.2023 to 31.03.2023 - 5 days
Total 177 days
Total 18 days The total stay of the assessee during the previous year in India was less than 182 days and during
the four years preceding this year was for 18 days.
Therefore, due to non-fulfillment of any of the two conditions for a resident, she would be treated as non-resident
for the Assessment Year 2023-24
Would her residential status undergo any change, assuming that she is a person of Indian origin and her total
income from Indian sources is Rs. 18,00,000 and she is not liable to tax in the USA?
Residential status of Miss CHAN LEE in case she is a person of Indian origin and her total income from Indian
sources is Rs. 18,00,000
If she is a person of Indian origin and her total income from Indian sources exceeds Rs. 15,00,000 (Rs. 18,00,000, in
her case), the condition of stay in India for a period exceeding 120 days during the previous year and 365 days
during the four immediately preceding previous years would be applicable for being treated as a resident.
Since her stay in India exceeds 120 days in the P.Y.2022-23 but the period of her stay in India during the four
immediately preceding previous years is less than 365 days , her residential status as per section 6(1) would
continue to be same i.e., non-resident in India.
Further, since she is not a citizen of India, the provisions of section 6(1A) deeming an individual to be a citizen of
India would not get attracted in her case, even though she is a person of Indian origin and her total income from
Indian sources exceeds Rs. 15,00,000 and she is not liable to pay tax in USA.
Therefore, her residential status would be non-resident in India for the previous year 2022-23.
Explanation 2 has been inserted to section 6 (1) to provide that in the case of an individual , being a citizen of
India and a member of the crew of a foreign bound ship leaving India, the period or periods of stay in India shall,
in respect of such voyage, be determined in the prescribed manner and subject to the prescribed conditions.
According to Rule 126, in case of an individual, being a citizen of India and a member of the crew of a ship, the
period or periods of stay in India shall, in respect of an eligible voyage, not include the period commencing from
the date entered into the Continuous Discharge Certificate in respect of joining the ship by the said individual for
the eligible voyage and ending on the date entered into the Conditions Discharge Certificate in respect of signing
off by that individual from the ship in respect of such voyage.
The explanation to this Rule defines the meaning of the following terms:
Terms Meaning
Continuous Discharge This term has the meaning assigned to it in the merchant shipping (Continuous Discharge
Certificate Certificate-cum-Seafarer’s Identify Document) Rules, 2001 made under the Merchant
Shipping Act, 1958.
Eligible voyage A voyage undertaken by a ship engaged in the carriage of passengers or foreign in
international traffic where-
1. For the voyage having originated from any port in India, has as its destination any
port outside India; and
2. For the voyage having originated from any port outside India, has as its destination
any port in India.
● Resident in India
○ If control and management of the affairs is wholly or partly situated in India during the relevant
previous year.
● Control and management is situated at that place
○ where decisions relating to the affairs of the HUF are taken, i.e.
○ where the head and brain of the business is situated.
● The place of control may be different from the usual place of running the business and sometimes even the
registered office.
○ This is because the control and management may not always be done from place of business or
registered office.
● Wholly Outside Indian Non-Resident
○ If control and management are wholly outside India, then Non- Resident .
● Resident and ordinarily resident in India
○ Karta should be resident in at least 2 out preceding 10 years and should be in India for at least 730
days in preceding 7 years.
● Resident but not ordinarily resident in India
○ If above mentioned conditions are not satisfied, then HUF will be RNOR.
● Non-Resident In India
○ If control and management of its affairs is wholly situated outside India during relevant previous
year.
Explanation to section 6(3) defines “Place of effective management” to mean a place where key management and
commercial decisions that are necessary for that conduct of the business of an entity as a whole are, in substance,
made.
A set of principles to be followed in determination of POEM would be issued for the guidance of the taxpayers as
well as, tax administration.
Exempt Income
Any income which is exempt under the Income Tax Act, 1961 will not be taxable for ROR, RNOR or NR, unless
otherwise specified.
Taxed Once
It must be noted that income that has been taxed on an accrual basis cannot be assessed again on a receipt
basis, as it will amount to double taxation.
Miscellaneous
Income by way of salary, received by non-resident seafarers, for services rendered outside India on a foreign going
ship (with Indian flag or foreign flag) and received into the NRE bank account maintained with an Indian bank
shall not be included in the total income.
4. Income chargeable under the head "Salaries" payable by the Government to a citizen of
India for service outside India.
○ However, allowances and perquisites paid or allowed outside India by the Government to an Indian
citizen for services rendered outside India is exempt.
Meaning of Royalty
The term ‘royalty’ means consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for
● the transfer or use of all or any rights (including the granting of licence) in respect of a patent, invention,
model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property.
● It includes Consideration for sale, distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films.
NOTE FOR Income by way of Interest, Royalty, Fees For Technical Know-How
Income deemed to accrue or arise in India to a non-resident by way of interest, royalty and fees for technical
services to be taxed irrespective of territorial nexus
Income by way of interest, royalty or fees for technical services which is deemed to accrue or arise in India shall
be included in the total income of the non-resident, whether or not
● the non-resident has a residence or place of business or business connection in India; or
● the non-resident has rendered services in India
Business connection’ shall include any business activity carried out through a person acting on behalf of the
non-resident.
1. Transaction in respect of any goods, services by a Aggregate of payments arising from such
non-resident with any person in India including transactions or transactions during the previous
provision of download of data or software in India year should exceed ₹ 2 crores.
2. Systematic and continuous soliciting of business The number of Users should be at least 3
activities or engaging in interaction with users in India lakhs.
Further, the above transactions or activities shall constitute significant economic presence in India, whether or
not,—
1. the agreement for such transactions or activities is entered in India;
2. the non-resident has a residence or place of business in India; or
3. the non-resident renders services in India:
However, where a business connection is established by reason of significant economic presence in India, only so
much of income as is attributable to the transactions or activities referred in the above table shall be deemed to
accrue or arise in India.
For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that the income attributable to the operations carried out in
India, shall include income from-
● Income from advt. targeting customers residing in India or accessing advt. through Internet Protocol
Address located in India. (Paying FB For Targeting Customers in India or People Clicking on advt. on
websites through Indian IPA, Google is earning from it)
● Income from sale of data collected from persons residing in India or using IPA located in India. (FB
collected data from us and is selling that data)
● Income from sales of goods and services using data collected from persons residing in India or using
IPA located in India. (FB starts selling us certain goods or services with the help of data collected)
No Business Connection
● In the case of a non-resident, the following shall not, however, be treated as business connection in India
○ Purchase of goods in India for export
○ Collection of news and views in India for transmission out of India
○ Shooting of cinematograph films in India
■ if such non-resident is :
● an individual, who is not a citizen of India or
● a firm which does not have any partner who is a citizen of India or who is resident
in India; or
● a company which does not have any shareholder who is a citizen of India or who is
resident in India.
○ Activities confined to display of rough diamonds in SNZs
■ In case of a foreign company engaged in the business of mining of diamonds, from the
activities which are confined to display of uncut and unassorted diamonds in any special
zone notified by the CG.
Miss Balachandran paid a sum of 10,000 USD to Mr. Malinga, a management consultant practising in Patong
(Thailand), specializing in project financing. The payment was made in Patong. Mr. Malinga is a
non-resident. The consultancy is related to a project in India with possible Thailand collaboration. Is this
payment chargeable to tax in India in the hands of Mr. Malinga, since the services were used in India?
A non-resident is chargeable to tax in respect of income received outside India only if such income accrues or
arises or is deemed to accrue or arise to him in India.
The income deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 9 comprises, inter alia, income by way of fees for
technical services, which includes any consideration for rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy
services. Therefore, payment to a management consultant relating to project financing is covered within the
scope of “fees for technical services”.
Provisions of Section 9 clarifies that income by way of, inter alia, fees for technical services, from services
utilized in India would be deemed to accrue or arise in India in case of a non-resident and be included in his
total income, whether or not such services were rendered in India or whether or not the non-resident has a
residence or place of business or business connection in India. (Please refer class discussion)
In the instant case, since the services were utilized in India, the payment received by Mr. Malinga, a
non-resident, in Patong is chargeable to tax in his hands in India, as it is deemed to accrue or arise in India.