0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages

Robots and Medicine

Resumen del tema Robots and Medicine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views3 pages

Robots and Medicine

Resumen del tema Robots and Medicine
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Robots and Medicine – Shaping and Defining the

Future os Surgery, Endovascular Surgery,


Elecrophysiology and Interventional Radiology
Robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery are both minimally invasive surgical
techniques that offer benefits over traditional open surgery. This article is discussing
the development of ro-botic surgery from its beginnings to the present.

Here we have a pros of a robotic surgery has:

1. Enhanced precision: Robotic systems offer greater dexterity and precision


compared to traditional laparoscopic instruments, allowing surgeons to
perform intricate movements with better control.

2. 3D visualization: Robotic systems provide high-definition, three-dimensional


visualization, which can enhance depth perception and allow surgeons to
navigate complex anatomy more easily.

3. Reduced hand tremors: The robotic arms can filter out any hand tremors from
the surgeon, resulting in steadier movements during surgery.

4. Remote surgery: Robotic systems can enable telepresence surgery, allowing


experienced surgeons to perform procedures from remote locations,
potentially expanding access to specialized care.

5. Shorter learning curve: Some argue that robotic surgery may have a shorter
learning curve compared to laparoscopic surgery, potentially allowing
surgeons to become proficient more quickly.

This procedure also has a cons:

1. Cost: Robotic systems are expensive to purchase and maintain, which can
increase the overall cost of procedures.

2. Lack of tactile feedback: Robotic surgery systems do not provide tactile


feedback, meaning surgeons rely solely on visual and auditory cues, which can
make it challenging to assess tissue characteristics.

3. Complex setup: Setting up and calibrating robotic systems can be


timeconsuming, potentially leading to longer surgical setup times.
4. Limited availability: Robotic surgery systems may not be available in all
healthcare facilities, limiting access to this technology for some patients.

Robotic technology continues to shape and define the future of medicine, particularly
in surgery, endovascular procedures, electrophysiology, and interventional radiology.

By offering unprecedented precision, efficiency, and safety, robots are revolutionizing


healthcare practices, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. As
technology advances further, the integration of robotics into medical practice is
expected to continue expanding, paving the way for more advanced and sophisticated
treatments across various medical specialties.

Laparascopy surgery
The laparascopy pros are:

1. Minimally invasive: Like robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery is minimally


invasive, resulting in smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery
times compared to open surgery.

2. Lower cost: Laparoscopic instruments are generally less expensive than


robotic systems, making laparoscopic surgery a more cost-effective option for
many healthcare facilities.

3. Tactile feedback: Unlike robotic surgery, laparoscopic instruments provide


tactile feedback, allowing surgeons to directly feel tissue characteristics,
which can aid in surgical decision-making.

4. Versatility: Laparoscopic instruments can be used for a wide range of


procedures across multiple surgical specialties.

5. Widespread availability: Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted and


is available in most healthcare facilities, ensuring broader access to minimally
invasive surgical techniques.

On the other hand, the cons are:

1. Limited range of motion: Laparoscopic instruments have limited range of


motion compared to robotic arms, which can sometimes make it challenging
to perform intricate maneuvers.
2. Two-dimensional visualization: Laparoscopic cameras provide
twodimensional visualization, which may result in reduced depth perception
compared to robotic systems.
3. Steep learning curve: Laparoscopic surgery often requires significant training
and practice to become proficient, potentially leading to a steeper learning
curve compared to robotic surgery.
4. Risk of hand fatigue: Laparoscopic surgeons may experience hand fatigue
during prolonged procedures due to the manual manipulation of instruments.

Conclusión of the two:

In summary, both robotic surgery and laparoscopic surgery offer significant


advantages over traditional open surgery in terms of reduced trauma, faster recovery
times, and improved patient outcomes. The choice between the two techniques often
depends on factors such as cost, availability of technology, surgeon expertise, and
specific patient needs.

You might also like