21EEMP67 Marking Scheme for Mini Project Report Page 1 of 2

REFERENCE COPY

A. PRESENTATION [25 MARKS]

Criteria Fail Average Good – Very Good Excellent – Outstanding

Contents 0 1 2-3 4-5

[5 Marks] No slides prepared / absent Slide contents Inadequate, with poor Slides cover the topic content with Slides cover the topic thoroughly and
clarity, understanding need improvement reasonable understanding enhance easy understanding of topic
Organization 0 1 2-3 4-5
[5 Marks] No slides prepared / absent Average slides with partial flow of Slides organization is smooth reasonably smooth/logical transition from slide to
information on topic, need improvement good slide, Easy flow of information
Visual Design 0 1 2-3 4-5
[5 Marks] No slides prepared / absent Slides are visually distracting poorly Slides are visually appealing and Slides are visually appealing with
correlate with topic content, Ineffective, information flow is fair Satisfactory appropriate images, fonts, to enhance
no continuity, needs improvement design understanding
Time 0 1 2-3 4-5
Management No slides prepared / absent Presentation is excessively long or short, Presentation is over/under timed in the Presentation is within allotted time
[5 Marks] Lacking or Crowding of information allotted time, but still cover fairly the key with relevant coverage
points
Clarity / Body 0 1 2-3 4-5
language No slides prepared / absent Reads slides, Fumbles does not interact, Speaks clearly and able to hold audience Confident, speaks clearly and faces
[5 Marks] Looks helpless with reasonable gesture audience and engages throughout the
session

A. Marks Obtained -

B. Q&A [25 MARKS]

Criteria Fail Average Good – Very Good Excellent – Outstanding

Attendance 0 1-3 4-7 8 - 10

[10 Marks] Fully absent Attendance is < 50% Attendance is > 50% but < 75% Attendance is > 75% and further >
85%
Clarity of 0 1 2-3 4-5
answers Not able to answer / absent Gives vague answers Answers reasonably good Answers clearly and confidently
[5 Marks]
Understanding 0 1 2-3 4-5
of the topic Absent Demonstrates inadequate understanding Demonstrates fair understanding on topic Demonstrates deep understanding of
[10 Marks] the topic

B. Marks Obtained -
Semester 6 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2023-24
 21EEMP67 Marking Scheme for Mini Project Report Page 2 of 2

C. REPORT [50 MARKS]

Criteria Fail Average Good – Very Good Excellent – Outstanding

Format 0 1 2-3 4-5

[5 Marks] Poor level of Average level of documentation Good level of documentation standards Excellent level documentation
documentation standards standards standards
Introduction 0 1 2-3 4-5
[5 Marks] Poor or no introduction Introduction is not written clearly Good introduction with improper Excellent introduction with research
without research problem, aim and research problem, aim and objectives, problem, aim and objectives,
objectives, justification for this Research justification for this research justification for this research
Literature 0 1-3 4-7 8 - 10
Review No literature review carried Poor literature review carried out Good literature review carried out with Excellent literature review carried out
[10 Marks] out without summary table and citations average coverage of the project topic, covering the project topic extensively
summary table and citations with summary table and citations
Implementatio 0 1-7 8 - 15 16 - 20
n & Results No design implementation Poor block diagram, constructional Good block diagram, constructional Excellent block diagram,
[20 Marks] details, programming, and working details, programming, and working constructional details, programming,
No results process process with minor deficiencies and working process

Poor results Good results with minor deficiencies Excellent results

Conclusion 0 1 2-3 4-5
[5 Marks] No conclusion Summarized poor conclusion with no Summarized good conclusion along with Summarized excellent conclusion
limitations and recommendations limitations and recommendations w.r.t the objectives along with
limitations and recommendations
References 0 1 2-3 4-5
[5 Marks] No references given Related satisfactory referencing has been Good referencing has been carried out Explicit references
carried out

C. Marks Obtained (Out of 50) –

Mandatory comments for fail/outstanding criteria:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Student Names: A + B + C (same marks) = Total (100)

1.
2.
3.

Semester 6 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2023-24

 21EEMP67 Marking Scheme for Mini Project Report Page 3 of 2

4. Guide Name & Signature:

[
]

Semester 6 Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2023-24