Ch.
International Parity
Conditions
Interest Rate Parity
6-1 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives
• Examine how P and price level change (inflation) determine the ER
• Show how IRs are related with inflation and ER
• Explain how forward rate is determined
• Analyze how, in EQ’M, S & F are aligned with IR differentials and
differentials in expected inflation
6-2 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 2
International Parity Conditions
•The economic theories which link ER to P level & IR
in order to understand flows of finances & products are
called IPC.
• It seems fictional, but is central to realize how
international business is conducted
•Generally, the P parity and IR parity are taken for
study
6-3 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 3
ER & P parity
•The Law of one P states that all else being equal (& no
transaction cost) a good’s P should be the same in all MKTs
– But nations use different currencies
•Even if P for a particular good are in different currencies,
the law of one price states that…
P$ S = P¥
Where (P$ ) = US P; S = spot ER (¥ / $)
(P¥) = Japanese P
6-4 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 4
PPP & the Law of One Price
• PPP is the relative P of a set of goods b/w 2 countries. If the Law of one
P were true for all goods, the PPP is the ER, called the PPPER
• This is the Theory of absolute PPP
• Absolute PPP states that the spot ER is determined by the RPs of similar
basket of goods
Theory of absolute PPP says that ER should be the RP of a good in two
separate countries
6-5 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 5
Relative PPP
• RPPP is the linkage of Δ(inflation rate) b/w countries in a
period of time and Δ(S).
– Otherwise, any change in the differential rate of inflation b/w two
countries is offset by an equal relative change in the spot ER.
│ t – * t │ = (St / S t –1)− 1 = %ΔS
-(US, t – CN, t ) = (SCNY/$,t / SCNY/$, t –1)− 1
6-6
Remark: opposite direction !
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 6
Relative PPP -(US, t – CN, t ) = (SCNY/$,t / SCNY/$, t –1)− 1
6-7
Remark: opposite direction !
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 7
• The international Fisher effect, or Fisher-open, states that S
should change in an amount equal to but in the opposite direction of
the difference in IR b/w countries
S2 − S1
x 100 = i ¥ − i $ %ΔS = i – i*
S1
-- Due to IFE, ΔS makes investors gain or lose
-- IFE says that with unrestricted capital flows, investors should
be indifferent b/w investing in $ or in ¥ bonds, since they have
the same result.
6-8 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 8
1. The Theory of Interest Rate Parity
→ The logics behind IRP:
– suppose you buy a currency forward, there are two ways:
(1) Buy a forward contract;
(2) Buy FOREX, then invest for the required term.
-- State of nature: if no IRP there would be ……
-- Theoretically, (Forward rate/Spot rate) & IR-differential would be…
6-9 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
9
E.g. Kevin has $10M to invest;
iU.S.=8%; iU.K.= 10%; S=$1.60/£; F1-yr = $1.56/£
$10M * 1.08??
Calculation
1. Convert into FOREX using S: $10M/$1.60/£) = £6.25M
2. Invest at foreign IR: £6.25M * 1.10 = £6.875M
3. Convert back at forward rate: £6.875M * $1.56/£) = $10.725M
4. Compare to what you could have earned by just investing in your home
nation: $10M * 1.08 = $10.8M
Investing at home (U.S.) is more profitable for Kevin.
6-10 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 10
Situational Analysis
$10M to invest; iU.S.=8%; iU.K.= 10%; S=$1.60/£; F1-yr = $1.56/£
$10M * 1.08
Another scenario:
1.Borrow pounds: £1M * 1.10 = £1.1M (what Kevin owes at end of
investment term)
2.Convert pounds to dollars: £1M * ($1.60/£) = $1.6M
3.Invest at U.S. interest rate: $1.6M * 1.08 = $1.728M
4.Convert back at forward rate: $1.728M / $1.56/£) = £1,107,692
Kevin would make £7,692 profit for every £1M that is borrowed!
6-11 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 11
Diagram of Interest Arbitrage
6-12 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 12
• Deriving IRP
- When it occurs, investors are indifferent b/w investing at home
or abroad. General expression for IRP:
Subtracting 1 from each side and simplifying we obtain
Premium/discount = i – i*
6-13 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 13
Covered Interest Arbitrage is …..
Uncovered Interest Arbitrage is …..
Annualized rate * (number of days/360) = de-annualized rate
6-14 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
CIA
6-15 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 15
UIA
6-16 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 16
Interest Rates in the External Currency Market
6-17 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 17
Covered IR Parity with Bid-Ask Rates
ERs & IR associate with each arrow indicate
funds obtained in the currency at the arrow’s
point from selling 1 unit of the currency at the
arrow’s tail. E.g., at the $ today node, selling
$1 for $ in 1 year give (1+ i($)bid) in 1 year
6-18 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
18
An Example with Transaction Costs
$10M to invest Bid Ask
• Convert $10M to yen:
Spot (¥/$) 82.67 82.71
$10M * ¥82.67/$ = ¥826.7M
Forward (¥/$) 82.5895 82.6495
• Invest for 3 months:
Dollar int. rate 0.91 1.11
0.46 * (1/100) * (90/360) = 0.00115
Yen int. rate 0.46 0.58 ¥826.7M * 1.00115 = ¥827,650,705
• Sell forward (enter into forward contract):
(¥827,650,705)/(¥82.6495/$)= $10,013,983
•Compare to what we would make in U.S.:
$10,013,983 - ($10M * 1.002275) = -$8,767
We lose M this way – no arbitrage this way, but borrowing ¥ results in
losses as well.
6-19 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 19
Does interest rate parity hold?
• No, but approximately
• Prior to 2007 – no significant violation of IRP
• Crisis or MKT volatility creates apparent arbitrage opportunities
Why Deviation from IRP seems to Exist: Too good to be true?
–Default risks – one counterparties may fail to honor its contract
– Exchange controls: limitations & taxes
–Political risk
✓Political disorder cause foreign investors to perceive a higher default
risk on their investments.
6-20 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 20
4. Hedging Transaction Risk in the Money Market
• There are two ways to hedge a transaction (either a
liability or a receivable)
-- Forward MKT hedge (FMH)
-- Money market hedge (MMH) – if an underlying
transaction gives you a receivable/payable, you use a money
MKT to borrow/lend in order to hedge the position
6-21 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 21
Hedging a FOREX liability (cost/payment/payable)
Zachy is a wine company in NY which imports wine from France with
payable of €4M in 90 days.
S = $1.10/ € F = $1.08/ €
US 90-day IR = 6% p.a. EU 90-day IR = 8% p.a
Option 1: enter into forward contract
In 90 days deliver: 4,000,000 1.08 = $4,320,000
Option 2: Money MKT hedge
Invest x amount now to own €4M in 90-days (deposit, buy securities),
and how much should be X?
6-22 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discounting FV!
De-annualization the €-IR for 90-days:
Buy Pv-amount at S, we have PV in $:
Pv ($) = €3,921,569 * 1.10 = $ 4,313,725
To make decision we compare the PV-of-MMH and PV-of-FH
6-23 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Your decision? Difference: 57,567$
Pv (€) = 4,000,000 / (1.02) = 3,921,568 €
➔ Pv($) = 3,921,568 € * 1.10 = 4, 313,725$
➔ Fv ($) = 4, 313,725$ * (1.015) = 4,378,431$
Vs. FH, Fv ($) = 4,320,000$, (FC fee = 10,000$)
Fv + fee = 4, 330,000,
6-24 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hedging a FOREX receivable (revenue/asset)
Shetland Sweaters is winter clothing company in UK which exports
sweaters to Japan with revenue to come of ¥500M in 30 days.
-- S=¥179.5/£ & 30-day F = ¥180/£
-- 30-day £IR = 3.0% p.a. & 30-day ¥IR = 6.0% p.a.
Option 1: By using the forward contract, Shetland sells ¥ forward and it
is going to receive:
In 30 days: ¥500,000,000/ ¥180/£ = £2,777,778
Option 2: Money MKT hedge
Shetland borrows ¥PV now for ¥500,000,000 (FV in 30 days) and buys
£ in current Spot MKT?
6-25 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Discounting FV!
De-annualization the ¥-IR for 30-days:
Buy £ at S, we have PV in £:
To make decision we compare the FV-of-MMH and FV-of-FH
6-26 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Compare and make decision?
Difference: £808
6-27 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
5. The Term Structure of Forward Premiums and Discounts
•The term structure of IRs is a variety of spot IRs for various
maturities into the future
On the vertical axis, yields p.a.
On the horiz. axis, years of maturity
6-28 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 28
• A review of bond pricing
1) Price of a 10-year pure discount bond with a face value of $1,000 is
$460. What is the spot IR for the 10-year maturity per annum?
$460(1+i) 10= $1,000 ; solving i=8.07%
* Yields to maturity = the discount rate
2) A 2-year bond with face value equal to $1,000, an annual coupon of
$60 and a market price of $980. If the 1-year spot rate is 5.5%, the 2-
year spot rate is found by solving:
$980 = ($60/1.055) + [($1060/(1+i)2])
6-29 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
29
A Small quiz
Yen: Spot and Forward (¥/$)
Mid Rates Bid Ask
Spot 129.87 129.82 129.92
Forward Rates
1 month
20 18
6 months 136 132
Swaps
12 months 117.65
Bp: 1232 Bp: 1212
15 months 115.50
Bp: 1452 Bp: 1422
6-30 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Summary
1. F ≠ S by an amount equal to the interest differential (ih - if)
2. The forward premium or discount equals the IR differential.
(F - S)/S = (ih – if )
3. When the international financialMKT is in equilibrium, the interest
parity occurs which can be written…
(1+i)/(1+i*) = F/S
4. Covered Interest Arbitrage occurs because i – i* ≠ (F - S)/S. Finances
will move from a country to another seeking a more attractive rate.
END of
CHAPTER
6-31 © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 31