0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

Rule 113 Arrest

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views1 page

Rule 113 Arrest

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Rule 113.

Arrest
Arrest – taking a person into custody in order that
he may be bound to answer for the commission of
some offense, made by an actual restraint of the
person or by his submission to custody

General Rule: No person may be arrested


without a warrant.
 Not all persons detained are arrested; only those
detained to answer for an offense.
 "Invitations" are not arrests and are usually not
unconstitutional, but in some cases may be taken
as commands;
 however, the practice of issuing an "invitation" to a
person who is investigated in connection with an
offense he is suspected to have committed is
considered as placing him under “custodial
investigation.” (RA 7438 – Custodial
Investigation)
 WA remain valid until arrest is effected, or the
warrant is lifted
 Arrest may be made at any time of the day or night

Warrantless arrests by peace officer or private


person.
1) person to be arrested is committing, attempting or
has committed offense
2) offense has just been committed and person
making arrest has personal knowledge the person
to be arrested committed it.
 Warrantless arrest anytime for continuing offense
like rebellion, subversion
 The continuing crime, not the crime finally
charged, needs only be the cause of arrest
3. person to be arrested is escaped detainee (either
serving sentence or case pending)
4. person lawfully arrested, escapes
5. Bondsman, for purpose of surrendering the
accused
6. Accused attempts to leave country without court
permission

Procedure: With warrant:


1) Complainant files application with affidavits
attached
Judge conducts ex parte preliminary exam to
determine probable cause
 Personally examine witness
 Witness must be under oath
 Examination must be reduced to writing
2) In determining probable cause, the judge may
rely on findings by police officer
3) Judge issues WA - If without preliminary exam,
considered irregular
4) If peace officer is unable to serve warrant 10
days after issuance, he must file a report and
explanation with judge within 10 days
5) If warrant served
 Person informed that he is being
arrested
 Informed of cause of his arrest
 Officer may break door or window if
admission to building is refused

You might also like