Visible Spectrum
Visible Spectrum
The visible spectrum is the band of the electromagnetic spectrum that is visible to the
human eye. Electromagnetic radiation in this range of wavelengths is called visible light (or
simply light). The optical spectrum is sometimes considered to be the same as the visible
spectrum, but some authors define the term more broadly, to include the ultraviolet and
infrared parts of the electromagnetic spectrum as well, known collectively as optical
radiation.[1][2]
A typical human eye will respond to wavelengths from about 380 to about 780 nanometers.[3]
In terms of frequency, this corresponds to a band in the vicinity of 400–790 terahertz. These
boundaries are not sharply defined and may vary per individual.[4] Under optimal conditions,
these limits of human perception can extend to 310 nm (ultraviolet) and 1100 nm (near
infrared).[5][6][7]
The spectrum does not contain all the colors that the human visual system can distinguish.
Unsaturated colors such as pink, or purple variations like magenta, for example, are absent
because they can only be made from a mix of multiple wavelengths. Colors containing only
one wavelength are also called pure colors or spectral colors.[8][9]
Visible wavelengths pass largely unattenuated through the Earth's atmosphere via the
"optical window" region of the electromagnetic spectrum. An example of this phenomenon is
when clean air scatters blue light more than red light, and so the midday sky appears blue
(apart from the area around the Sun which appears white because the light is not scattered
as much). The optical window is also referred to as the "visible window" because it overlaps
the human visible response spectrum. The near infrared (NIR) window lies just out of the
human vision, as well as the medium wavelength infrared (MWIR) window, and the long-
wavelength or far-infrared (LWIR or FIR) window, although other animals may perceive
them.[2][4]
Spectral colors
In the 17th century, Isaac Newton discovered that prisms could disassemble and reassemble
white light, and described the phenomenon in his book Opticks. He was the first to use the
word spectrum (Latin for "appearance" or "apparition") in this sense in print in 1671 in
describing his experiments in optics. Newton observed that, when a narrow beam of sunlight
strikes the face of a glass prism at an angle, some is reflected and some of the beam passes
into and through the glass, emerging as different-colored bands. Newton hypothesized light
to be made up of "corpuscles" (particles) of different colors, with the different colors of
light moving at different speeds in transparent matter, red light moving more quickly than
violet in glass. The result is that red light is bent (refracted) less sharply than violet as it
passes through the prism, creating a spectrum of colors.
Newton originally divided the spectrum into six named colors: red, orange, yellow, green,
blue, and violet. He later added indigo as the seventh color since he believed that seven was a
perfect number as derived from the ancient Greek sophists, of there being a connection
between the colors, the musical notes, the known objects in the Solar System, and the days
of the week.[12] The human eye is relatively insensitive to indigo's frequencies, and some
people who have otherwise-good vision cannot distinguish indigo from blue and violet. For
this reason, some later commentators, including Isaac Asimov,[13] have suggested that indigo
should not be regarded as a color in its own right but merely as a shade of blue or violet.
Evidence indicates that what Newton meant by "indigo" and "blue" does not correspond to the
modern meanings of those color words. Comparing Newton's observation of prismatic
colors with a color image of the visible light spectrum shows that "indigo" corresponds to
what is today called blue, whereas his "blue" corresponds to cyan.[14][15][16]
In the 18th century, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote about optical spectra in his Theory of
Colours. Goethe used the word spectrum (Spektrum) to designate a ghostly optical
afterimage, as did Schopenhauer in On Vision and Colors. Goethe argued that the continuous
spectrum was a compound phenomenon. Where Newton narrowed the beam of light to isolate
the phenomenon, Goethe observed that a wider aperture produces not a spectrum but
rather reddish-yellow and blue-cyan edges with white between them. The spectrum appears
only when these edges are close enough to overlap.
In the early 19th century, the concept of the visible spectrum became more definite, as light
outside the visible range was discovered and characterized by William Herschel (infrared) and
Johann Wilhelm Ritter (ultraviolet), Thomas Young, Thomas Johann Seebeck, and others.[17]
Young was the first to measure the wavelengths of different colors of light, in 1802.[18]
The connection between the visible spectrum and color vision was explored by Thomas Young
and Hermann von Helmholtz in the early 19th century. Their theory of color vision correctly
proposed that the eye uses three distinct receptors to perceive color.
The visible spectrum is limited to wavelengths that can both reach the retina and trigger
visual phototransduction (excite a visual opsin). Insensitivity to UV light is generally limited
by transmission through the lens. Insensitivity to IR light is limited by the spectral
sensitivity functions of the visual opsins. The range is defined psychometrically by the
luminous efficiency function, which accounts for all of these factors. In humans, there is a
separate function for each of two visual systems, one for photopic vision, used in daylight,
which is mediated by cone cells, and one for scotopic vision, used in dim light, which is
mediated by rod cells. Each of these functions have different visible ranges. However,
discussion on the visible range generally assumes photopic vision.
Atmospheric transmission
The visible range of most animals evolved to match the optical window, which is the range of
light that can pass through the atmosphere. The ozone layer absorbs almost all UV light
(below 315 nm).[19] However, this only affects cosmic light (e.g. sunlight), not terrestrial
light (e.g. Bioluminescence).
Ocular transmission
Before reaching the retina, light must first transmit through the cornea and lens. UVB light
(< 315 nm) is filtered mostly by the cornea, and UVA light (315–400 nm) is filtered mostly by
the lens.[20] The lens also yellows with age, attenuating transmission most strongly at the
blue part of the spectrum.[20] This can cause xanthopsia as well as a slight truncation of the
short-wave (blue) limit of the visible spectrum. Subjects with aphakia are missing a lens, so
UVA light can reach the retina and excite the visual opsins; this expands the visible range and
may also lead to cyanopsia.
Opsin absorption
Each opsin has a spectral sensitivity function, which defines how likely it is to absorb a
photon of each wavelength. The luminous efficiency function is approximately the
superposition of the contributing visual opsins. Variance in the position of the individual
opsin spectral sensitivity functions therefore affects the luminous efficiency function and
the visible range. For example, the long-wave (red) limit changes proportionally to the
position of the L-opsin. The positions are defined by the peak wavelength (wavelength of
highest sensitivity), so as the L-opsin peak wavelength blue shifts by 10 nm, the long-wave
limit of the visible spectrum also shifts 10 nm. Large deviations of the L-opsin peak
wavelength lead to a form of color blindness called protanomaly and a missing L-opsin
(protanopia) shortens the visible spectrum by about 30 nm at the long-wave limit. Forms of
color blindness affecting the M-opsin and S-opsin do not significantly affect the luminous
efficiency function nor the limits of the visible spectrum.
Different definitions
Regardless of actual physical and biological variance, the definition of the limits is not
standard and will change depending on the industry. For example, some industries may be
concerned with practical limits, so would conservatively report 420–680 nm,[21][22] while
others may be concerned with psychometrics and achieving the broadest spectrum would
liberally report 380–780, or even 380–800 nm.[23][24] The luminous efficiency function in the
NIR does not have a hard cutoff, but rather an exponential decay, such that the function's
value (or vision sensitivity) at 1,050 nm is about 109 times weaker than at 700 nm; much
higher intensity is therefore required to perceive 1,050 nm light than 700 nm light.[25]
Under ideal laboratory conditions, subjects may perceive infrared light up to at least
1,064 nm.[25] While 1,050 nm NIR light can evoke red, suggesting direct absorption by the L-
opsin, there are also reports that pulsed NIR lasers can evoke green, which suggests two-
photon absorption may be enabling extended NIR sensitivity.[25]
Similarly, young subjects may perceive ultraviolet wavelengths down to about 310–
313 nm,[26][27][28] but detection of light below 380 nm may be due to fluorescence of the
ocular media, rather than direct absorption of UV light by the opsins. As UVA light is
absorbed by the ocular media (lens and cornea), it may fluoresce and be released at a lower
energy (longer wavelength) that can then be absorbed by the opsins. For example, when the
lens absorbs 350 nm light, the fluorescence emission spectrum is centered on 440 nm.[29]
Non-visual light detection
In addition to the photopic and scotopic systems, humans have other systems for detecting
light that do not contribute to the primary visual system. For example, melanopsin has an
absorption range of 420–540 nm and regulates circadian rhythm and other reflexive
processes.[30] Since the melanopsin system does not form images, it is not strictly
considered vision and does not contribute to the visible range.
In non-humans
The visible spectrum is defined as that visible to humans, but the variance between species is
large. Not only can cone opsins be spectrally shifted to alter the visible range, but
vertebrates with 4 cones (tetrachromatic) or 2 cones (dichromatic) relative to humans' 3
(trichromatic) will also tend to have a wider or narrower visible spectrum than humans,
respectively.
shortwave sensitive (SWS) with peak sensitivity between 415–470 nm, and
Testing the visual systems of animals behaviorally is difficult, so the visible range of animals
is usually estimated by comparing the peak wavelengths of opsins with those of typical
humans (S-opsin at 420 nm and L-opsin at 560 nm).
Mammals
Most mammals have retained only two opsin classes (LWS and VS), due likely to the nocturnal
bottleneck. However, old world primates (including humans) have since evolved two versions
in the LWS class to regain trichromacy.[19] Unlike most mammals, rodents' UVS opsins have
remained at shorter wavelengths. Along with their lack of UV filters in the lens, mice have a
UVS opsin that can detect down to 340 nm. While allowing UV light to reach the retina can lead
to retinal damage, the short lifespan of mice compared with other mammals may minimize
this disadvantage relative to the advantage of UV vision.[31] Dogs have two cone opsins at
429 nm and 555 nm, so see almost the entire visible spectrum of humans, despite being
dichromatic.[32] Horses have two cone opsins at 428 nm and 539 nm, yielding a slightly more
truncated red vision.[33]
Birds
Most other vertebrates (birds, lizards, fish, etc.) have retained their tetrachromacy,
including UVS opsins that extend further into the ultraviolet than humans' VS opsin.[19] The
sensitivity of avian UVS opsins vary greatly, from 355–425 nm, and LWS opsins from 560–
570 nm.[34] This translates to some birds with a visible spectrum on par with humans, and
other birds with greatly expanded sensitivity to UV light. The LWS opsin of birds is sometimes
reported to have a peak wavelength above 600 nm, but this is an effective peak wavelength
that incorporates the filter of avian oil droplets.[34] The peak wavelength of the LWS opsin
alone is the better predictor of the long-wave limit. A possible benefit of avian UV vision
involves sex-dependent markings on their plumage that are visible only in the ultraviolet
range.[35][36]
Fish
Teleosts (bony fish) are generally tetrachromatic. The sensitivity of fish UVS opsins vary
from 347-383 nm, and LWS opsins from 500-570 nm.[37] However, some fish that use
alternative chromophores can extend their LWS opsin sensitivity to 625 nm.[37] The popular
belief that the common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infrared and ultraviolet
light[38] is incorrect, because goldfish cannot see infrared light.[39]
Invertebrates
Some snakes can "see"[42] radiant heat at wavelengths between 5 and 30 μm to a degree of
accuracy such that a blind rattlesnake can target vulnerable body parts of the prey at which
it strikes,[43] and other snakes with the organ may detect warm bodies from a meter away.[44]
It may also be used in thermoregulation and predator detection.[45][46]
Spectroscopy
Spectroscopy is the study of objects based on the spectrum of color they emit, absorb or
reflect. Visible-light spectroscopy is an important tool in astronomy (as is spectroscopy at
other wavelengths), where scientists use it to analyze the properties of distant objects.
Chemical elements and small molecules can be detected in astronomical objects by observing
emission lines and absorption lines. For example, helium was first detected by analysis of
the spectrum of the Sun. The shift in frequency of spectral lines is used to measure the
Doppler shift (redshift or blueshift) of distant objects to determine their velocities towards
or away from the observer. Astronomical spectroscopy uses high-dispersion diffraction
gratings to observe spectra at very high spectral resolutions.
See also
 1. Pedrotti, Frank L.; Pedrotti, Leno M.; Pedrotti, Leno S. (December 21, 2017).
   Introduction to Optics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 7–8. ISBN 9781108428262.
 5. D. H. Sliney (February 2016). "What is light? The visible spectrum and beyond" (https://w
   ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763133) . Eye. 30 (2): 222–229.
   doi:10.1038/eye.2015.252 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Feye.2015.252) . ISSN 1476-5454 (h
   ttps://search.worldcat.org/issn/1476-5454) . PMC 4763133 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.ni
   h.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4763133) . PMID 26768917 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2
   6768917) .
10. Bruno, Thomas J. and Svoronos, Paris D. N. (2005). CRC Handbook of Fundamental
   Spectroscopic Correlation Charts. (https://books.google.com/books?id=FgjHjhCh5wsC
   &pg=PP1) Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20241004082506/https://books.goog
   le.com/books?id=FgjHjhCh5wsC&pg=PP1) 2024-10-04 at the Wayback Machine CRC Press.
   ISBN 9781420037685
11. Coffey, Peter (1912). The Science of Logic: An Inquiry Into the Principles of Accurate
   Thought (https://archive.org/details/thescienceoflogi01coffuoft) . Longmans. p. 185
   (https://archive.org/details/thescienceoflogi01coffuoft/page/185) . "roger bacon
   prism."
12. Isacoff, Stuart (16 January 2009). Temperament: How Music Became a Battleground for
   the Great Minds of Western Civilization (https://books.google.com/books?id=2kasFeTRc
   f4C&pg=PA12) . Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 12–13. ISBN 978-0-307-56051-
   3. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20241004082506/https://books.google.com/
   books?id=2kasFeTRcf4C&pg=PA12#v=onepage&q&f=false)          from the original on 4 October
   2024. Retrieved 18 March 2014.
13. Asimov, Isaac (1975). Eyes on the universe : a history of the telescope (https://archive.
   org/details/eyesonuniverse00isaa/page/59) . Boston: Houghton Mifflin. p. 59 (https://
   archive.org/details/eyesonuniverse00isaa/page/59) . ISBN 978-0-395-20716-1.
14. Evans, Ralph M. (1974). The perception of color (null ed.). New York: Wiley-
   Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-24785-2.
15. McLaren, K. (March 2007). "Newton's indigo". Color Research & Application. 10 (4): 225–
   229. doi:10.1002/col.5080100411 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fcol.5080100411) .
16. Waldman, Gary (2002). Introduction to light : the physics of light, vision, and color (htt
   ps://books.google.com/books?id=PbsoAXWbnr4C&q=Newton+color+Indigo&pg=PA193)
   (Dover ed.). Mineola: Dover Publications. p. 193. ISBN 978-0-486-42118-6. Archived (ht
   tps://web.archive.org/web/20241004082617/https://books.google.com/books?id=PbsoA
   XWbnr4C&q=Newton+color+Indigo&pg=PA193#v=snippet&q=Newton%20color%20Indigo&f=
   false)   from the original on 2024-10-04. Retrieved 2020-10-29.
17. Mary Jo Nye, ed. (2003). The Cambridge History of Science: The Modern Physical and
   Mathematical Sciences (https://books.google.com/books?id=B3WvWhJTTX8C&q=spectru
   m+%22thomas+young%22+herschel+ritter&pg=PA278) . Vol. 5. Cambridge University
   Press. p. 278. ISBN 978-0-521-57199-9. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/202410
   04082507/https://books.google.com/books?id=B3WvWhJTTX8C&q=spectrum+%22thomas+
   young%22+herschel+ritter&pg=PA278#v=snippet&q=spectrum%20%22thomas%20young%2
   2%20herschel%20ritter&f=false)     from the original on 2024-10-04. Retrieved
   2020-10-29.
18. John C. D. Brand (1995). Lines of light: the sources of dispersive spectroscopy, 1800–
   1930 (https://books.google.com/books?id=sKx0IBC22p4C&q=light+wavelength+color++y
   oung+fresnel&pg=PA30) . CRC Press. pp. 30–32. ISBN 978-2-88449-163-1. Archived (htt
   ps://web.archive.org/web/20241004082507/https://books.google.com/books?id=sKx0IB
   C22p4C&q=light+wavelength+color++young+fresnel&pg=PA30#v=snippet&q=light%20wave
   length%20color%20%20young%20fresnel&f=false)        from the original on 2024-10-04.
   Retrieved 2020-10-29.
19. Hunt, D.M.; Wilkie, S.E.; Bowmaker, J.K.; Poopalasundaram, S. (October 2001). "Vision in
   the ultraviolet" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337280) . Cellular
   and Molecular Life Sciences. 58 (11): 1583–1598. doi:10.1007/PL00000798 (https://doi.or
   g/10.1007%2FPL00000798) . PMC 11337280 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article
   s/PMC11337280) . PMID 11706986 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11706986) .
   S2CID 22938704 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:22938704) . "Radiation
   below 320 nm [ultraviolet (UV)A] is largely screened out by the ozone layer in the Earth's
   upper atmosphere and is therefore unavailable to the visual system,"
20. Boettner, Edward A.; Wolter, J. Reimer (December 1962). "Transmission of Ocular
   Media". Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 1: 776-783.
21. Laufer, Gabriel (1996). "Geometrical Optics" (https://books.google.com/books?id=4Mx
   LPYMS5TUC&pg=PA11) . Introduction to Optics and Lasers in Engineering. Cambridge
   University Press. p. 11. Bibcode:1996iole.book.....L (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/a
   bs/1996iole.book.....L) . doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174190.004 (https://doi.org/10.1017%2F
   CBO9781139174190.004) . ISBN 978-0-521-45233-5. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
23. Ohannesian, Lena; Streeter, Anthony (2001). Handbook of Pharmaceutical Analysis (http
   s://books.google.com/books?id=DwPb4wgqseYC&pg=PA187) . CRC Press. p. 187.
   ISBN 978-0-8247-4194-5. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
24. Ahluwalia, V.K.; Goyal, Madhuri (2000). A Textbook of Organic Chemistry (https://books.
   google.com/books?id=tJNJnn0M75MC&pg=PA110) . Narosa. p. 110. ISBN 978-81-7319-
   159-6. Retrieved 20 October 2013.
25. Sliney, David H.; Wangemann, Robert T.; Franks, James K.; Wolbarsht, Myron L. (1976).
   "Visual sensitivity of the eye to infrared laser radiation". Journal of the Optical Society
   of America. 66 (4): 339–341. Bibcode:1976JOSA...66..339S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.ed
   u/abs/1976JOSA...66..339S) . doi:10.1364/JOSA.66.000339 (https://doi.org/10.1364%2FJ
   OSA.66.000339) . PMID 1262982 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1262982) . "The
   foveal sensitivity to several near-infrared laser wavelengths was measured. It was
   found that the eye could respond to radiation at wavelengths at least as far as 1,064 nm.
   A continuous 1,064 nm laser source appeared red, but a 1,060 nm pulsed laser source
   appeared green, which suggests the presence of second harmonic generation in the
   retina."
26. Lynch, David K.; Livingston, William Charles (2001). Color and Light in Nature (https://bo
   oks.google.com/books?id=4Abp5FdhskAC&pg=PA231)          (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge
   University Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-521-77504-5. Archived (https://web.archive.org/
   web/20221008031821/https://books.google.com/books?id=4Abp5FdhskAC&pg=PA231)
   from the original on 8 October 2022. Retrieved 12 October 2013. "Limits of the eye's
   overall range of sensitivity extends from about 310 to 1,050 nanometers"
27. Dash, Madhab Chandra; Dash, Satya Prakash (2009). Fundamentals of Ecology 3E (http
   s://books.google.com/books?id=7mW4-us4Yg8C&pg=PA213) . Tata McGraw-Hill
   Education. p. 213. ISBN 978-1-259-08109-5. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20
   221008031820/https://books.google.com/books?id=7mW4-us4Yg8C&pg=PA213)                  from
   the original on 8 October 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2013. "Normally the human eye
   responds to light rays from 390 to 760 nm. This can be extended to a range of 310 to 1,050
   nm under artificial conditions."
28. Saidman, Jean (15 May 1933). "Sur la visibilité de l'ultraviolet jusqu'à la longueur d'onde
   3130" (http://visualiseur.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3148d)       [The visibility of the
   ultraviolet to the wave length of 3130]. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences (in
   French). 196: 1537–9. Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20131024092515/http://vis
   ualiseur.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k3148d)      from the original on 24 October 2013.
   Retrieved 21 October 2013.
29. Kurzel, Richard B.; Wolbarsht, Myron L.; Yamanashi, Bill S. (1977). "Ultraviolet Radiation
   Effects on the Human Eye". Photochemical and Photobiological Reviews. pp. 133–167.
   doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2577-2_3 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-1-4684-2577-2_3) .
   ISBN 978-1-4684-2579-6.
30. Enezi J, Revell V, Brown T, Wynne J, Schlangen L, Lucas R (August 2011). "A "melanopic"
   spectral efficiency function predicts the sensitivity of melanopsin photoreceptors to
   polychromatic lights" (https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0748730411409719) . Journal of
   Biological Rhythms. 26 (4): 314–323. doi:10.1177/0748730411409719 (https://doi.org/10.117
   7%2F0748730411409719) . PMID 21775290 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21775290) .
   S2CID 22369861 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:22369861) .
31. Gouras, Peter; Ekesten, Bjorn (December 2004). "Why do mice have ultra-violet
   vision?". Experimental Eye Research. 79 (6): 887–892. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2004.06.031 (ht
   tps://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.exer.2004.06.031) . PMID 15642326 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nl
   m.nih.gov/15642326) .
32. Neitz, Jay; Geist, Timothy; Jacobs, Gerald H. (August 1989). "Color vision in the dog".
   Visual Neuroscience. 3 (2): 119–125. doi:10.1017/S0952523800004430 (https://doi.org/10.1
   017%2FS0952523800004430) . PMID 2487095 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/248709
   5) . S2CID 23509491 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:23509491) .
33. Carroll, Joseph; Murphy, Christopher J.; Neitz, Maureen; Ver Hoeve, James N.; Neitz,
   Jay (3 October 2001). "Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in the horse" (ht
   tp://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1377/4cd02663758c3ed42d9492edc251e0e0246b.pdf)
   (PDF). Journal of Vision. 1 (2): 80–87. doi:10.1167/1.2.2 (https://doi.org/10.1167%2F1.2.
   2) . PMID 12678603 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12678603) . S2CID 8503174 (http
   s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8503174) .
34. Hart, Nathan S.; Hunt, David M. (January 2007). "Avian Visual Pigments: Characteristics,
   Spectral Tuning, and Evolution". The American Naturalist. 169 (S1): S7–S26.
   CiteSeerX 10.1.1.502.4314 (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.
   1.502.4314) . doi:10.1086/510141 (https://doi.org/10.1086%2F510141) . PMID 19426092 (h
   ttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19426092) . S2CID 25779190 (https://api.semanticsch
   olar.org/CorpusID:25779190) .
35. Cuthill, Innes C (1997). "Ultraviolet vision in birds". In Peter J.B. Slater (ed.). Advances
   in the Study of Behavior. Vol. 29. Oxford, England: Academic Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-
   12-004529-7.
37. Carleton, Karen L.; Escobar-Camacho, Daniel; Stieb, Sara M.; Cortesi, Fabio; Marshall,
   N. Justin (15 April 2020). "Seeing the rainbow: mechanisms underlying spectral
   sensitivity in teleost fishes" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC718844
   4) . Journal of Experimental Biology. 223 (8). doi:10.1242/jeb.193334 (https://doi.org/1
   0.1242%2Fjeb.193334) . PMC 7188444 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC
   7188444) . PMID 32327561 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32327561) .
38. "True or False? "The common goldfish is the only animal that can see both infra-red and
   ultra-violet light." " (https://web.archive.org/web/20131224110616/http://www.skeptiv
   e.com/disputes/4484) . Skeptive. 2013. Archived from the original (http://www.skeptiv
   e.com/disputes/4484)      on December 24, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2013.
39. Neumeyer, Christa (2012). "Chapter 2: Color Vision in Goldfish and Other Vertebrates".
   In Lazareva, Olga; Shimizu, Toru; Wasserman, Edward (eds.). How Animals See the World:
   Comparative Behavior, Biology, and Evolution of Vision. Oxford Scholarship Online.
   ISBN 978-0-19-533465-4.
40. Briscoe, Adriana D.; Chittka, Lars (January 2001). "The evolution of color vision in
   insects". Annual Review of Entomology. 46 (1): 471–510.
   doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.471 (https://doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev.ento.46.1.47
   1) . PMID 11112177 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11112177) .
41. Skorupski, Peter; Chittka, Lars (10 August 2010). "Photoreceptor Spectral Sensitivity in
   the Bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae)" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.
   gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919406) . PLOS ONE. 5 (8): e12049. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...512049S
   (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PLoSO...512049S) .
   doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012049 (https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0012049) .
   PMC 2919406 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2919406) .
   PMID 20711523 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20711523) .
42. Newman, EA; Hartline, PH (1981). "Integration of visual and infrared information in
   bimodal neurons in the rattlesnake optic tectum" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
   articles/PMC2693128) . Science. 213 (4509): 789–91. Bibcode:1981Sci...213..789N (http
   s://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981Sci...213..789N) . doi:10.1126/science.7256281 (htt
   ps://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.7256281) . PMC 2693128 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
   v/pmc/articles/PMC2693128) . PMID 7256281 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/725628
   1) .
43. Kardong, KV; Mackessy, SP (1991). "The strike behavior of a congenitally blind
   rattlesnake". Journal of Herpetology. 25 (2): 208–211. doi:10.2307/1564650 (https://doi.
   org/10.2307%2F1564650) . JSTOR 1564650 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/1564650) .
44. Fang, Janet (14 March 2010). "Snake infrared detection unravelled". Nature News.
   doi:10.1038/news.2010.122 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnews.2010.122) .
45. Krochmal, Aaron R.; George S. Bakken; Travis J. LaDuc (15 November 2004). "Heat in
   evolution's kitchen: evolutionary perspectives on the functions and origin of the facial
   pit of pitvipers (Viperidae: Crotalinae)" (https://doi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.01278) .
   Journal of Experimental Biology. 207 (Pt 24): 4231–4238. doi:10.1242/jeb.01278 (https://d
   oi.org/10.1242%2Fjeb.01278) . PMID 15531644 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/155316
   44) .
46. Greene HW. (1992). "The ecological and behavioral context for pitviper evolution", in
   Campbell JA, Brodie ED Jr. Biology of the Pitvipers. Texas: Selva. ISBN 0-9630537-0-1.