Key Judgments in Labour Law
Key Judgments in Labour Law
31/07/2021 (Saturday)
Introduction to labour law- Two judgments which have reflected the
extremities in time and perception.
1. Dred Scott v. Sanford US SC Judgment (1856)
The plaintiff was an African American, who was a slave to a physician in the US
Army. By virtue of being in the army, he used to get transferred regularly and, in
this process, he moved to Missouri. Must be kept in mind that each state in the US
is an independent sovereign. They have their own independent constitutions.
Dred Scott moved with his master to Illinois, meaning he was freed from his master
in Illinois. He was free from his slavery by application of law. Then they moved to
Missouri where slavery was not prohibited. Once they were in Missouri, Dred Scott
applied for his freedom.
‘All men’ does not include African origin humans as they are of inferior nature- this
is what the SC said. The SC also said that once he came to Missouri, he returned to
slavery.
2. Lochner v. New York (1905) [198 US 45]
The city of New York came up with a law that bakery workers shall not be given
work for more than 60 hours a week or more than 10 hours a day. Certain
bakery owners were prosecuted were prosecuted for engaging their workers beyond
threshold. They challenged their prosecution and the legislation on the ground of
the 14th Amendment of US Constitution. 14th Amendment is similar to the
triangle of 14, 19 and 21 in India (In the US, the original portion of the Constitution
cannot be amended; however, fresh matter can be added to it; the addition can only
be subsequent to what already existed in the beginning).
The bakery owners said that the law which restricted the working hours was
contrary to the liberty granted to them under 14th Amendment. The liberty they
claimed was that they had liberty to do business in the manner in which they like
and there couldn’t be any state regulation on the business. They were free to enter
into contracts with anyone they desire, without state interference (including
contract with slaves). They said they are free to use the property in the manner
in which they like.
The SC again favoured businesses and said that the law was affecting/contravening
the liberty of the bakery owners for the purpose of entering into contracts with slaves
and US SC struck down that law.
Project Topic: You are required to do an empirical research in the area nearby and
look for the child labour issues in your area. Secondly, you then need to see what
are the provisions under the law for the issues you have actually identified and then
give solutions to the problems identified.
07 Aug. (Saturday)
In India, in 1843, a British Act of Parliament (The Indian Slavery Act), it was
brought in with the objective of declaring the law regarding the condition of slavery
within the limits of the East India Company. This law was to be applicable only to
the East India Company. Roughly 13 years after this law, the Dred Scott judgment
was delivered.
Provisions of the 1843 Act: No execution of any decree for (1) enforcement of
demand of rent or (2) demand of revenue. The decree shall not be executed
against/for sale or cause to be sold any person.
No right arising of an alleged property in the person shall be enforced by civil or
criminal law. Further, all individuals were to be treated equally; if certain act has
been committed against free individual, and if that act becomes a crime then such
act if committed, against slaves, shall also be crime (this was important because
prior to the 1843 Act, a criminal offence could’ve been committed against a person
but it wouldn’t be an offence against the slave).
Factories Act was brought into India in 1883. This act stipulated 8 hours for
working of labour; it also abolished child labour; Restrictions on employment of
women at night; introduction of overtime pay.
Workmen’s Compensation Act 1923 (19 Aug | Thursday)
In 1923 during the industrial revolution, many factions came in support of
labourers. There was criticism regarding working conditions in which the workmen
performed their work. Thus, a legislation was sought to be passed to provide some
social security to the workers.
The Workmen’s Compensation Act is an act in the nature of- (a) social security (b)
welfare legislation (the purpose is also to compensate the workman in case of injury
which could be permanent/temporary or partial/complete); the person will be
compensated to the extent of the loss in the earning capacity due to such injury.
The necessity of the legislation was due to increase in use of complex machines
which resulted into increase in accidents involving workmen during the course of
their employment. The workman will be compensated for injury, which may be
partial or total. Total disability is not a reduction but a total loss in earning capacity.
Both these disabilities can be temporary or permanent.
Nature (X) Partial Total
Temporary Capacity to earn is Capacity to earn is
reduced for a specific completely lost for specific
time. time.
Permanent Capacity to earn is Capacity to earn is lost for
reduced for life. life.
The object of the Act is to impose an obligation upon the employer to pay
compensation for injury which may result due to accident. The accident must arise
out of and during the course of employment.
The injury could be caused due to an accident or an occupational disease- in both
circumstances, the requirement is that the injury must have arisen out of and
during the course of employment.
This compensation can be claimed by anyone who is dependent on the workman
and not specifically family members. A dependent could be a widow, minors
(legitimate or adopted), unmarried daughter, widowed mother, infirm son or anyone
who is completely dependant upon the earning of the workman. Definition of
‘dependant’ is under Sec. 2(d) of WC Act 1923.
Sec. 2(g) defines ‘partial disablement’ and Sec. 2(l) defines ‘total disablement’.
Partial disablement is reduction in the earning capacity.
Course of employment: (a) Point of time (b) Point of place (place where accident
occurred must be construed to be place of employment and the place of employment
does not have notional boundaries) and (c) Point of circumstances. These points are
to be tested to determine whether the accident could be said to be arising out of the
course of employment.
Exceptions: (1) If the period of temporary disability (total or partial) does not exceed
3 days, in such circumstances, compensation need not be awarded.
(2) If injury not resulting in death of workman, is caused by accident which can be
directly attributable to (a) workman or employee having influence of drinking or
drugs (b) wilful disobedience by the workman of the order expressly made or rules
framed, then in such cases the workman need not be awarded any compensation.
If this injury results in death, this exception is not applicable.
(3) Wilful removal or disregard of any safety guard or any other device which is for
the safety of the workman, then in such circumstances, compensation need not be
paid.
28.08.2021 (Saturday)
‘Arising out of and during the course of employment’- any kind of personal injury.
The personal injury must have causal connection with the employment. Quantum
of compensation will be determined as per S. 4 of the Act.
The exceptions discussed in last class, are in the nature of contributory negligence.
Under the common law, contributory negligence is a complete defence. Any other
defence apart from these exceptions in nature of contributory negligence are not
available to the employer.
[1933 PC 225]- Identical case decided by the SC in (2001) ILLJ 117 (SC) {State of
Rajasthan v. Ram Prasad & Anr.}- In this case, the workman Geeta died due to
lightning while working on a site of the employer. Employer took the defence that
the lightning was an act of God. The employer had taken all measures to avoid any
untoward incident on the site but the accident took place because of act of God. It
was argued that lightning had no causal connection with the employment. It cannot
be said that such lightning could have arisen out of or during the course of
employment. The SC said that her presence on the site was due to her
employment. Had she not been employed; she would not have been present at
the place where lightning struck. Thus, she was entitled to receive compensation.
Law provision: Section 3- Employer’s liability for compensation.
Class Problem: Driver of a petrol tanker found a leakage in the tanker which he
reported to the owner of the tanker. The owner in order to check the leakage,
instructed the driver to remove all the petrol from the tanker and to fill the tanker with
water. On tanker, there was a permanent marking, which said “no fire in and around
10 feet of the tanker”. On the next day, the owner instructed the driver to get inside
the tanker and check the leakage. Driver went inside but since there was darkness,
in order to verify the leakage, he lit the matchstick. The tanker caught fire and driver
sustained serious injuries. The appropriate authority granted compensation in favour
of driver for injuries sustained. The employer preferred an appeal before the
appropriate authority.
Sol. No alcohol or drug influence/there is no disobedience of any order or rule/ but
given that there is a permanent marking on the tanker saying that there should be
no fire.
The problem is loosely based on the case of R.B. Mundra and Co. v. Mr. Bhanwari
[AIR 1970 Raj 111]- the difference here was that the driver actually succumbed to
his injuries.
30.08.2021 (Monday)
Class Problem: A workman was employed in the lorry/truck belonging to the
employer. This lorry is used to carry quarry material. The duty was to load the truck
with the quarry material, travel in the truck and lastly unload the material at the
material at the destination. One day when the truck was plying on the road with the
quarry material, the workman saw a rabbit crossing the road. Workman felt that the
rabbit would come under the wheels of the truck. In order to avoid this mishap, the
workman took the stone and tried to hit the rabbit to make it move away. While doing
so, the workman fell out of the truck and received serious injury but not in the nature
of permanent total disablement. You need to identify if workman is eligible for
compensation or not.
Case: Smt. Koduri v. Polongi Atchamma (1969) Lab IC 1415 (AP)- Facts modified
to the extent that in this case, the employee actually died. In this case, it was held
that there could be no compensation as the act resulting in accident had no
connection with the employment. Hitting a wild rabbit was not part of service of the
workman for which he was employed. The Court observed that there has to be a
causal connection between the accident and the work for which the employee is
employed.
Case: M. Mackenzie v. IM Issak (AIR 1970 SC 1906)- Initially an investigation
was done by the Commissioner and found no medical evidence to suggest that death
of the seaman was caused by accident arising out of his employment. The SC held
that the Commissioner did not commit any error of law in reaching to the above
finding. Accordingly, no compensation was payable.
Case: Trustees Port of Bombay v. Yamunabai (AIR 1952 Bom. 382)- Bomb placed
in a workshop exploded and caused injury to a workman. Held that the workman
was not responsible for placing the bomb and injury was caused by virtue of his
employment at that workplace. The injury was a result of an accident arising out of
his employment. In a different case, the same thing was also held where an aircraft
crashed on a factory premises.
Case: Public Works Department v. Kaunsa Gokul (1967) ILLJ 344 (MP)- Court
held that accident would not have happened had he not been engaged in the
employment. A workman was found dead at considerable distance from the place
while other members of his gang were working on the road. Held that death of Gokul
was an accident arising out of his employment because the accident would not have
happened had he not been engaged in that employment. The accident arose because
of the nature of the employment that exposed him to particular danger.
04.09.2021 (Saturday)
Ravuri Kotayya v. Dasari- AP HC discussed the test of injury arising out of and
during the course of employment.
Doctrine of Notional Extension: Difficulty arises when the accident does not coincide
with working hour during his duty. If the worker has not yet started performing his
duty and gets injured, that poses a tricky situation. As a rule, the employment of a
worker does not commence until he has reached the place of employment and does
not continue when he has left the place of employment, the journey to and from the
place of employment being excluded. It is however settled now, that this is subject
to the theory of notional extension of the employer’s premises so as to include an
area which the workman passes and repasses in going to and leaving from the actual
place of work. The moment from when the workman mentally decides to go for
his work (mental aspect of the workman; whether he had mentally started his
job or not); if this is shown, the Court may grant compensation despite his presence
not being marked for the day on the roll. The moment he is mentally prepared for job,
he is said to be in job and he will remain so, till the time he reaches his house i.e.,
until he relaxes himself mentally that he is back home.
Ex.: a man is going back home from work and stops to take vegetables and meets
with an accident. The moment he steps down to get vegetables, it implies that his
duty has ended and the tasks he is performing are now personal in nature.
There is no uniform rule to identify if a workman is on duty or not; this varies from
case-to-case basis.
11.09.2021 (Saturday)
Indian Factories Act, 1881- The object of the British law was to break competition
in textile industries. Under the 1881 Act, child labour was abolished or restricted;
overtime wages were to be paid; working hours was limited; woman workers were to
be appointed for specified purpose and not during night hours.
Factories Act 1948 has specified objects and reasons which are to provide health,
safety and welfare of workers and factories; to regulate working conditions, working
hours, leave, holidays, overtime, child employment, women employment, adolescent
employment.
Section 2(m) defines the meaning of factory. Important to keep in mind any day in
the preceding 12 months. 10 or more workers working in a premises for
manufacturing process with the aid of power. Then that premises would become
factory if they were working there on any day in the preceding 12 months. If the
work is without the aid of power, there must be 20 or more workers. Power means
electrical energy or any other mechanically transmitted energy which is not
generated by human or animal agency.
Worker is defined under section 2(l)- A person employed directly or indirectly,
with or without the knowledge of his principal employer, with remuneration or
without remuneration but must be involved in manufacturing process.
Manufacturing process is defined under Section 2(k).
DISPUTE RESOLUTION UNDER INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT | 17.10.2021
In-house mechanism: This is not mentioned under the Act; this name is for purpose
of understanding- it is a mechanism to resolve disputes within the establishment
within the workers and the employers. Works committee is the first of its kind and
another is Grievance redressal mechanism. They are the two types of modes of
resolution which take place within the establishment itself. Works committee is
under Sec. 3 and Grievance redressal mechanism is under Sec. 9C of the Act.
Conciliation: An officer is appointed by the Central Government as a conciliation
officer. There is a Board of conciliation as well. Conciliation officer is appointed u/s
4 and the Board is under Sec. 5. Duty of board is to resolve disputes amicably by
talks.
Voluntary Arbitration: Parties may agree by way of agreement, to refer the dispute to
the arbitrator. The only caveat is that the agreement must be executed prior to
reference of dispute by the appropriate government to the courts (courts include all
sorts of courts established under this Act). Covered under Sec. 10-A of the Act.
Adjudicating Process: Three types of courts: labour court, industrial tribunal,
national industrial tribunal. Labour court established under Sec. 7 and the
tribunals are established under Sec. 7A and 7B of the Act.
Reference u/s 10 of ID Act- No party can approach conciliator directly. The dispute
is required to be referred to the appropriate government, which is usually
represented by the labour commissioner. Issues will be raised before the appropriate
government and the appropriate government will refer upon considering the nature
of the dispute for its resolution either to conciliating officer, board of conciliation,
labour court or industrial tribunal. If the dispute is concerned with Schedule II, it
will be referred to the labour court. If dispute is concerned with Sch. II and III then
it is referred to Industrial Tribunal. But if this dispute is affecting less than 100
workmen, then appropriate government may refer the dispute to labour court.
All these bodies are not acting as appellate bodies over one another. They are
independent adjudicatory bodies. They can only adjudicate disputes which are
referred to them.
National Industry Tribunal- Only central government may refer disputes to the
National Industrial Tribunal. If Central Government finds that the dispute is of
national importance, or general public importance or its adjudication affects more
than one state or more than one state is interested in the dispute’s adjudication
process, then in these three circumstances, without prejudice whether central
government is appropriate government or not, may refer such disputes to the
National Industrial Tribunal.
Suppose prior to dispute being referred by the central government to the National
Industrial Tribunal, the dispute has been referred by the appropriate government
either to labour court or industrial tribunal as the case may be, then upon reference
by central government of the dispute to the national tribunal, the adjudication
process by labour court or industrial tribunal gets quashed automatically. Once the
reference is made to the National Tribunal, the same reference cannot be made
elsewhere by the central government.
Constitution of the Labour Court- Covered under Sec. 7 of the Act. It says that
the appropriate government may constitute labour court. This can be done by
notification in official Gazette. There could be one or more labour court and the
presiding officer shall be a person who has held the post of judicial officer for not less
than 7 years.
Sec. 3- Works Committee must be compulsory in an establishment where more than
100 workers are working. There must also be equal representation of employers and
workmen. Function is to promote amity between employer and workmen and
endeavour to compose any material difference of opinion between employer and
workmen.
Function of Grievance Redressal Machinery under Sec. 9C of the Act: Wherever
there are twenty or more workers working then there shall be grievance redressal
mechanism. GRM shall be represented by equal number of workmen and employers.
The chairman shall be selected from member representing employer and workmen
alternatively. Total number of members of GRM shall not exceed six. It is desired if
practicable, to have representation of women in GRM. This GRM shall complete
proceedings before them within 30 days. Pendency of proceedings before GRM shall
not affect right of workmen to raise industrial dispute for the same matter.
Conciliation officer: These officers are to be appointed by the appropriate
government for specified area and its duty is to mediate and promote settlement of
industrial disputes. Boards of conciliation are covered under Sec. 5. The Board is
also appointed by appropriate government and it shall consist of chairman and 2/4
other members other than chairman. Duty of the board is to settle industrial dispute
by way of mediation process.
Court of Inquiry (Sec. 6): Court on inquiry shall have all powers of the civil courts
like enforcing attendance, compelling the production of documents, issuing
commissions, examination of witness, other incidental powers.
24.10.2021 (Sunday)
Life of the Settlement/Award: Ordinarily in civil disputes, the life of the award is
in perpetuity. This means that the award would have binding effect on parties and
their successors in perpetuity. Under labour courts, this life is limited.
Example: Payment of Rs. 500 p.m. as bonus amount which employer will pay to the
workmen for the period for which the workman has worked with establishment. This
workman will be eligible to get 500x13 for 13 months. After 10 years, however, this
payment of bonus dispute will not be said to be settled. Because after 10 years,
rupees 500 will lose their value.
Life of the settlement is for the period agreed upon by the parties to the
settlement. If there is a period mentioned in the settlement, then such period would
be the operation period of the settlement. If no period is mentioned in the settlement
deed, then it would be six months from the date of settlement. Even after completion
of the specified period, or six months period, as be the case, the settlement will
continue to operate. Even after completion of the period, the settlement continues to
operate but either of the parties can serve notice of termination of settlement and on
completion of two months period, from the date of service of settlement termination
notice, the settlement will cease to operate. On completion of six months or
specified period, the settlement is eligible for termination by notice. There is
no restriction on sending a notice prior to end of the period. Settlement will however
continue till the period specified or till 6 months as is the case. Merely by sending a
notice in the third month, will not cease the settlement in the fifth month. Such
notice will not have any value. The notice must mention time post the
settlement period.
This settlement could be done by any of the modes mentioned earlier. It all
eventually comes down to a settlement deed. A tribunal does not settle. It
adjudicates. So, in that case, the rules regarding ‘award’ become applicable. Life of
the award is one year from the date on which it is passed. In certain cases,
appropriate government may increase the period of one year. This is terminated in
the same manner as a settlement. There must be a notice for intention of
termination of award by either of the party and two months after service of that
notice.
Sec. 25-B: Continuous Service: It is an uninterrupted service. A person who has
worked for 240 days in a year with the establishment, uninterruptedly. In order to
claim regular employment right, he needs to show that he was in a continuous
service. Further, if the work is below ground level, then 190 days.
Sec. 17-B: When order of reinstatement is passed by the labour court and it is
challenged before the HC or the SC, then the employer is required to pay the
employee last drawn salary each month till pendency of challenge.
08.11.2021 (Monday)
Payment of Gratuity Act
If the appointment is by
contractor, employer will
be contractor.
➢ Sec. 5 says no employer shall pay to any employee; wages less than minimum
rate of wages notified by the appropriate government. Fixation of min. wage is
subject to floor wages. The min. wage is to be fixed as per procedure u/S. 8 of
the Wages Code 2019. Appropriate Govt. can fix min. wages for (a) time work (b)
piece work (in such case, the appropriate govt. is obliged to fix min. rate on time
work basis; so, the govt. needs to understand the time taken to complete one
piece of work and multiply it by the number of pieces).
➢ Min. wages can be fixed for hourly, daily or monthly basis.
➢ For fixing minimum wages, factors to be considered by appropriate govt. are
(covered under Sec. 6 of the Code on Wages):
a. Skill of workers under similar category.
b. Differentiation of min. wages is permitted for skilled, semi-skilled and highly
skilled workers.
c. The hazardousness of the work (temperature, humidity, underground work
etc.).
➢ Floor Wage: Floor Wage is to be fixed by central government and while fixing the
FW, the CG shall take into account, minimum living standards of a worker in
specified area.
21.11.2021 (Sunday)
Procedure for fixing minimum wage: This procedure is applicable for (a) fixing
minimum wage for the first time and for (b) revising minimum rate of wage. This is
to be done by the appropriate government.
Procedure 1: Fixation of Min. Wages by Committee
1. There shall be a committee to be appointed by appropriate government.
2. There can be one or more than one committee which appropriate government
may appoint by notification in official gazette.
3. Constitution of committee: The committee shall consist of persons- (a)
representing employers (b) representing employees (the number of such persons
shall be equal in number of the persons representing employer) (c) independent
persons (neither representing employee nor employer; and the number shall not
be less than 1/3rd of the total members of the committee).
4. Committee has to recommend the proposed minimum wage for the area under
consideration to the appropriate government.
5. Upon this recommendation of the committee, the appropriate government may
fix the minimum wage as recommended by the committee by way of notification
and upon such notification being issued, three months after notification, the
minimum wage shall come into force.
Procedure 2: By fixing minimum wages without Committee
1. The appropriate government needs to make publication of its proposal to fix min.
wage for the person who are likely to be affected by fixation of such min. wage.
2. The persons likely to be affected by fixation of proposed min. wage may prefer
objections before appropriate government.
3. The appropriate govt. may consider the objection and thereafter fix the
min. wage by notification.
4. This min. wage fixed by notification shall come into force immediately after 3
months from the notification.
Payment of Wages Act:
• The object of the Act is two-fold: whatever wage is to be paid by the employer; it
must be paid within the min. possible time from the date it becomes payable. It
was found earlier, that after completion of work, employers didn’t pay the wages
on time. This led to employees’ exploitation. It was thus made an obligation for
the employer to pay wages on time.
• The second object is to see that the payment of wages are being made under the
current currency/denomination of currency. It had been seen that wages were
being paid in kind rather than cash. However, the value and price of ‘kind’ used
to reduce in commodity market, which resulted majorly in losses to employees.
In order to avoid these situations, the government fixed that payment of wages
shall be made by way of current currency or current denomination.
• The third aspect of the law is to regulate deductions. It was found earlier that
the employer in order to avoid payment of complete wages, deducted certain
amount from wages payable to the employee. These deductions might not be
completely legal. In order to regulate deductions from the wages by the employer
and whether if they are done legally, the Payment of Wages Act makes the
necessary provisions.
Fixation of Wage Period: The period could be daily, weekly, fortnightly or monthly;
but no wage period shall exceed more than one month’s time.
Ques. Calculate the PF contribution: Consider that there is no other deduction other
than PF contribution. CTC: Salary of Y is Rs. 9,60,000 per annum. Find (a) amount
Y will get on hand per month (b) Contribution of employee towards PF per month.
Ans. Monthly salary= Rs. 9,60,000/12= Rs. 80,000
If wages are ‘x’, then CTC= x+ x/10
CTC= 11x/10= 80,000 (where ‘x’ are the wages)
X= Rs. 72,727.27
Contribution of the employee= x/10= Rs. 7272.72
Y’s in-hand salary= Rs. 72,727.27- Rs. 7272.72= Rs. 65,454.55
Ques. If workman T has worked with institution for 12 years 7 months and 13 days,
his last drawn wages was Rs. 7000. This wage incudes DA. He met with an accident
and died. The accident was not arising out of employment. Calculate (a) gratuity
amount (b) wages that T used to get after deducting ESI contribution (c) What is PF
employee contribution and what is ESI employee contribution.
Ans. Gratuity= (Salary/26) x 15 x Years of Service= (7000/26) x 15x13= Rs. 52,500.
Wages after deducting ESI contribution: 1% of wages for employee= 7000/100= Rs.
70 ESI contribution per month. So Salary= Wages-ESI Contribution= 7000-70=
Rs. 6930.
Employee PF contribution= Wages/10= 7000/10= Rs. 700.
Ques. Mr. S has basic wage of Rs. 13,000 per month. He is getting Rs. 1700 p.m.
towards dearness allowance and Rs. 1200 towards food concession. Calculate (a) PF
and (b) ESI contributions of employer (c) calculate amount that S will get in-hand
as monthly salary.
Ans. Total Wages= Rs. 14,700
PF contribution= 10% of Wages= Rs. 1470.
ESI contribution of employer= 14700/25= Rs. 588
ESI contribution of employee= Rs. 147
In hand salary= 14700-1470-147= Rs. 13083.
Maternity Benefit Act 1961 | Thursday | 02.12.21
The aim of maternity benefit law is to regulate employment of women during certain
periods, i.e., before and after childbirth. Prior to this Act, each state had different
benefits for women employees. The benefits given under this law are maternity
leave, wages (definition of wages herein is different than the definition of wages
studied till now), nursing breaks and bonuses.
• This Act is to protect the dignity of motherhood and also provides maintenance
of women and her child during the maternity period. These benefits are
applicable only to employed women when they are not working.
• Applicability of the Act: It applies on almost all nature of establishments with
a caveat that there must be 10 or more persons employed on any day in the
preceding 12 months. It applies to factories, mines, plantations or
establishment where 10 or more persons are employed on any day in
preceding 12 months. The Act is also applicable if persons are less than 10,
where the employment is related to exhibition of equestrian (horse riding). It is
also applicable in case of acrobatic performances (less than 10 workers).
• This Act doesn’t talk about the number of women required; this Act will be
applicable even if there are 10 males; it has nothing to do with the employment
of female members, and 10 workers are just the legislative threshold.
• Eligibility to claim maternity benefit: Section 5 of the Act requires that in
order to claim maternity benefit, the woman must’ve worked not less than 80
days in the 12 months immediately preceding the date of her expected delivery.
Revision Notes (Externals-Sem IX)