Transcribed 8 1
Transcribed 8 1
Year 3 | Lesson 21
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
Table of Contents
The QP Transcribing team makes every effort to ensure the notes are complete and correct. If you notice a typo or
error, please use this form to let us know so that we can correct it. Please also use this form if you would like to give
us feedback to help improve our notes.
Introduction
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
So we are on the 95th surah of the Quran. So the 95th surah of the Quran is Surah at-Tin. And Surah at-Tin as
we know, means the fig. The surah of the fig. And this is the surah which we are going to go through now. We
are going to speak about it.
And that is a good example of using tafsir and contemplation. So you have the tafsir, which is the apparent
verses of the Quran, the Book of Allah what they mean. And then you have tadabbur which is reflection,
contemplation, to ponder over the verses of Allah and to draw out deeper meanings.
ِ ورة ه الت
ِين َ س❖ ه
ونه َّ
ِ ِين َوٱلز ْيت ه
ِ ورة َوٱلت َ س❖ ه
ِينت ٱلو
ِ َ َ ❖ ه ه ة ور س
Surah at-Tin
And the first of those names that this surah is known by is the famous name which is Surah at-Tin, which is
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
the common name that we give to this surah today. And that is actually mentioned by many of the scholars of
tafsir in their works and in the books of hadith.
So for example, Ibn Qutaybah mentions this in his works. Al-Imam at-Tirmidhi, an-Nisa'i from the scholars
of hadith. In their collections of hadith, when they come to the tafsir of this surah, they speak about it and they
name it Surah at-Tin.
Ibn al-Hazm the famous scholar of the Ẓahiri madhhab, also calls it Surah at-Tin. Ibn Hazm has a whole, a
number of works on the sciences of the Quran including an-Nasikh al- Mansukh so you will often find him being
referenced as a scholar in the sciences of the Quran.
5
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
Ibn Abi Hatim in his tafsir, called it Surah at-Tin. Al-Hakim in his Mustadrak, another collection of hadith
also calls it Surah at-Tin.
00:05:00 And then from the famous scholars of tafsir that we often reference in QP, al-Imam al-Baghawi, Ibn al-'Atiyyah,
Ibn al-Jawzi, Imam as-Suyuti and al Imam ash-Shawkani . So the vast majority of the scholars in their works
refer to this surah as Surah at-Tin. So that is the first name by which the surah is known.
Surah Wa at-Tin
The third name by which it is known by is Wa at-Tin, Surah Wa at-Tin. So the first name is ِين ِ التwithout theواو
at the beginning. And the third name is ِين ِ َوٱلتwith the واوat the beginning - as you find in the actual verse.
And this is referenced, or it is called by this name, by al-Imam 'Abdullah ibn Mubarak the famous scholar
of hadith and tafsir, and also by Imam at-Tabari who we often call as the Shaykh al-Mufassirin, the scholar
of all of the scholars of tafsir. And Imam at-Tabari also references this surah as Surah wa at-Tin. So those are
the three names that you will find by and large for this particular surah.
❖ Surah at-Tin, which is the common name that we now know it by and call it by.
❖ Surah wa at-Tin wa az-Zaytun, which is taken after the whole verse, verse number 1 of the surah.
❖ Surah wa at-Tin, which is the first portion of the first verse of this surah.
Makki
Madani
(majority)
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
And from amongst those scholars is az-Zajjaj and Ibn Hazm and al-Baghawi and Ibn Kathir . They just
mentioned that it’s a Makki surah by consensus, meaning that there is no difference of opinion.
Al-Imam ibn 'Atiyyah also said the same thing. He said,
Madani Surah
However, there is actually a difference of opinion that you will find, if you reference and find, or look at other
works of tafsir. So for example, if you were to go back to al-Imam al-Qurtubi and his tafsir, and Ibn al-Jawzi,
or Imam ash-Shawkani and Tahir ibn 'Ashur, they will mention another opinion, and that is that some of the
scholars said that it is a Madani surah.
And that particular reference of it being a Madani surah, meaning revealed post-migration to Madinah, seems
to be by and large attributed to the companion 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas . And then from him it's also referenced
as being the position of some or a handful of the tabi'in including Qatadah .
narration to that companion, some of those narrations are weak in their chain so they are not all authentically
ascribed to that companion. It is possible that there could be a difference or a discrepancy for a number of
reasons.
Ibn 'Ashur said concerning this surah, it is a Makki surah, the opinion of the majority of the scholars to the
extent that Ibn 'Atiyyah even said that he knows of no difference of opinion.
And al-Imam as-Suyuti in his Itqan, as we know his book on the sciences of the Quran, Al-Itqan fi 'Ulum al-
Quran.
And by the way has this book been translated, al-Itqan? Does anyone know if al-Itqan by al-Imam as-Suyuti has
been translated into English? If someone can let me know if they have come across anything concerning that.
So al-Imam as-Suyuti in his book, he has a whole section, a chapter that he dedicates to the Makki and the
Madani surahs. And he mentions where there is a difference of opinion.
And he doesn't mention this being from amongst them. So in his opinion as well, as we said before he is one
of those scholars that seems to just simply say that it is a Makki surah.
However, al-Imam al-Qurtubi as we said, mentions the other narration of Ibn 'Abbas that it is a Madani
surah. But that seems to be, just that one narration, and there is obviously the conflicting report that goes with
the majority. And that is, that it is a Makki surah.
﴾
۱ ن َّ ﴿و َٱلتِّينِّ و
ِّ َٱلز ي ْت ُو
Verse 1
So now we come on to verse number 1. Allah says,
ّه ّ ۡ ُّ ّه ّ ه
ِ أعوذ بِٱَللِ مِن ٱلشيطَٰ ِن ٱلر
جي ِم
1 https://sunnah.com/bukhari/97/171
8
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
﴾
۱ ن َّ ﴿و َٱلتِّينِّ و
ِّ َٱلز ي ْت ُو
Oath
Allah takes an oath, and He takes an oath by two things.
The first is at-tin ال ِتينwhich means the fig, which is a well-known fruit. And the second is az-zaytun الز ْيتُون
َّ by
the olive, also a well-known thing that's eaten by people.
Allah takes an oath by these two things and we have already established in a number of verses and surahs
that we've done before of this kind, that Allah , when He takes an oath by something is to show its important
and to show its benefits. It's to show and emphasize its position.
The trees
and their
At-tin Fruits of fig
benefits
wa az- and olive
Masjid al-
Haram in
Makkah and
Bayt al-
zaytun Mosque of
Nuh upon
Judiyy
Maqdis
Mountain on Mountains
which al- of figs and
Aqsa is Mosque of olives
the people Mosque or
of the cave mountain of
and Damascus
Jerusalem
of narrators of ahadith. To understand who they are, when they are mentioned by just that simple name or for
example if in the hadith, the narrator of the hadith, the companion is called 'Abdullah. Who is 'Abdullah in the
hadith? Which 'Abdullah? Is it 'Abdullah ibn Umar, 'Abdullah ibn 'Abbas, 'Abdullah ibn 'Amr which person is
it that's been referred to?
That’s the methodology. That’s important whether you are studying tafsir, or whether you are studying Quran
or whether you're studying whatever is. It is important to understand how those scholars deal in that particular
topic. So, in the hadith for example, if it said 'Abdullah as a companion and, nothing else. Generally speaking,
nine times out of 10, it is 'Abdullah bin Mas'ud that is being referred to. But the question here is in tafsir, if
the scholars of tafsir, and you will find this name common. He is a commonly referenced scholar of tafsir, from
the early scholars of tafsir. And he is called Ibn Zayd. Who is Ibn Zayd? Can anyone tell me? Anyone know
who Ibn Zayd is?
Student's response: Was he the son of Zayd ibn Harithah ?
Shaykh's comment: No. Not the free slave of the Prophet . No. That’s Usamah ibn Zayd, the famous com-
panion, the son of Zayd ibn Harithah.
Scholar info Who is Ibn Zayd? Ibn Zayd, amongst the scholars of tafsir, is 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn Zayd ibn Aslam. So Ibn
Zayd, his name is 'Abd ar-Rahman. Ibn Zayd means the son of Zayd. His name is 'Abd ar-Rahman, his father's
name is Zayd and his grandfather's name is Aslam. And Aslam is the free slave of 'Umar . And so he comes
and is often therefore called al 'Adawi. Because he takes the ascription of the tribe of 'Umar because he is a
free slave from his tribe and 'Umar is 'Adawi, his tribe is 'Adawi. So this is not Usamah ibn Zayd.
And this is why it is an important methodology of tafsir. Because if you were to just say Ibn Zayd generally as
a companion, then yes maybe the one who would come to your mind is, as you're saying, Usamha ibn Zayd,
the companion of the Prophet , the son of Zayd ibn Harithah. But in each science; so when you're speaking
in for example fiqh, or you're speaking in tafsir, or you're speaking in hadith, these names when they are men-
tioned, they are mentioned in that context. So Usamah bin Zayd is not amongst the famous scholars of tafsir
amongst the companions, he doesn’t have many narrations of tafsir, and so therefore he's not the one that's
being referred to.
So who is the one being referred to if they say Ibn Zayd in the books of tafsir? He is this scholar. 'Abd ar-
Rahman ibn Zayd ibn Aslam. And he has many narrations of tafsir. His father Zayd ibn Aslam was a famous
scholar of hadith, and tafsir, and so on, as well. But this is when they say Ibn Zayd, it is normally 'Abd ar-
Rahman ibn Zayd ibn Aslam.
So Ibn Wahb says Ibn Zayd said that his father said concerning this, that at-tin is the mosque of Damascus.
And az-zaytun is the mosque of Iliya'. Iliya' is Jerusalem in Arabic. The mosque of Damascus and az-zaytun is
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
ُ ْ َع
﴾ٱْلود ِهِى
ّّ ْ ّّ ْ ّ
﴿وٱستوت
and it [i.e., the ship] came to rest on the [mountain of] Jūdiyy 3
So he says that it is the mosque that Nuh built upon Judiyy. That's one narration of Ibn 'Abbas.
2 https://www.alim.org/quran/tafsir/ibn-kathir/surah/95/1/
3 https://quran.com/11/44
12
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
And that's why I said to you at the beginning that there is a difference of opinion amongst the scholars of tafsir,
whether this is something which is a literal thing that Allah has taken an oath by, or whether it is symbolic
and metaphorical, that Allah is actually referring to something else. And the tin and the zaytun are not actually
the fig and the olive that Allah is referring to, but it is something else. So let me give you now a summary.
Summary – At-Tabari
Those are the different statements that you will find and there are more as well, but I’ve just chosen a section
of them. But I have to give you a summary.
At-Tabari's Summary
As al-Imam at-Tabari will summarise it and he mentions it as two broad points. He mentions it as two broad
points or two main, two broad opinions.
And actually, if you look at the narration that we mentioned, the majority of those narrations amongst the
scholars who chose the opinion that it is not literal, that the fig and the olive are not literally the fig and olive,
but they’re symbolic of something, only in this narration of Ibn ‘Abbas do you find the mention of the mosque
of Nuh .
In fact, what the majority would say, is that one is the land of Damascus, the trees, or the mountains, of the
land of Damascus. And the other one are the other trees that you find in Jerusalem, the land of Jerusalem.
And that general area of ash-Sham as we know is a place of blessing. It's a place that Allah has blessed and
َ ض ْال هم
Allah calls it بارك األر ه.
ْ He calls it a Blessed Land. Allah says in Surah al-Isra’,
13
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
Strongest opinion
Al-Imam at-Tabari however, after mentioning this difference of opinion, he says, and the strongest of those
opinions is the one that is the first opinion. The one that says that the fig is a fig, and the olive is an olive. And
he says that is because that is what the Arabs understood, those two terms to mean.
refers to Damascus, or refers to Jerusalem, or it refers to this land, or that land, or this mountain, or that
mountain. They would tell you, that it is two items of food that you consume. They are two things that you eat.
That's what it's going to refer to. Now then, at a different stage, to say, and those two Allah chose for X, Y
and Z reason, that is possible.
And that is how these statements of Ibn ‘Abbas and others from amongst the tabi’in should be understood in
that light, that they already knew that the Arabs that they were speaking to the companions and the students of
the companions, the scholars amongst the tabi’in know the meaning of تِينand زَ ْيتهون. They are not just going
4 https://quran.com/17/1
14
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
to sit there and tell them what’s obvious. They’re telling them the deeper meaning. That now once you under-
stand this, what it’s referring to is look at the lands in which these particular types of food items and plants
grow, where you find these trees in abundance. And that is how it should be understood.
Not to say, for example, that Ibn ‘Abbas doesn’t make tafsir of the Quran with what is apparent, but he has
his own symbolism or understanding. That's not befitting of one of the companions of the Prophet . But for
them to understand, because they're speaking to a group of scholars, their students are the likes of Mujahid and
'Ikrimah and 'Ata. These are not people who are just your average Muslims, people like me and you, that don't
have any background in tafsir. These are in and of themselves imams, scholars of Hadith and tafsir and Quran
and so on. And so when he is speaking and addressing them in his narrations, it is important to understand that
context, and that methodology is important to understand as well.
So al-Imam ibn Jarir at-Tabari chooses the opinion that a تينis a تين. The تينis the fig that Allah refers to
and the زيتونare olives that Allah refers to. And it is because the Arabs don't know if it in any other way
except that.
And so, you can say then, as Imam at-Tabari goes on to say5,
وإن لم يكن على صحة ذلك أنه كذلك داللة في ظاهر، فيكون ذلك مذهبا، ومنابت الزيتون، القسم بمنابت التين:والمراد من الكالم
. وبيت المقدس منابت الزيتون، ألن دمشق بها منابت التين، وال من قول من ال يجوز خالفه،التنـزيل
He said, then by extension, it is possible for you to say that now that we understand that the fig is a fig and the
olive is the olive, where do these two plants and trees generally grow in abundance amongst the Arabs? It is in
the land of Ash-Sham – in Damascus, in Jerusalem.
Then now, by extension, to understand what is the significance of those places? They are places of
prophethood, places that Allah has blessed, places that Allah refers to in the Quran. Now, by extension,
you can say that. But to just jump from A to Z without anything in between, that is what Imam at-Tabari is
saying, is not something which should be done. And no doubt that is a better way of making tafsir, and is a
safer way of making tafsir, and an easier, more methodologically sound way of making tafsir of the Book of
Allah .
5 http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/tabary/sura95-aya1.html
15
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
And many of the prophets of Bani Isra’il are sent in ash-Sham – the most prominent amongst them perhaps
and the one that is the closest to our Prophet in terms of chronology, and in terms of message and so on,
00:30:00 or Shari'ah, is no doubt the Prophet ‘Isa .
Fig is a pure fruit and olive has benefits and blessing - Al-Imam al-Baghawi
Al-Imam al-Baghawi said Allah chooses in the surah the mention of a fig and takes an oath by it because it
is a pure fruit, and a fruit that will be similar to the fruits of Jannah. And He chooses the olive because of its
many benefits and because it is a blessed tree as is mentioned in the Sunnah and the Quran in general. And that
its fruit – meaning the actual olive itself – and its oil is something which can be used in terms of cooking, in
terms of benefitting, in terms of using in many different ways.
And we already know the importance of olive oil, and how it is used in many different ways and the many
benefits that it has, in terms of health and how pure it is. And Allah refers to it in the Quran as the oil of
So that is verse number 1. Allah takes an oath by those two things – والتين والزيتون
Verse 2
Oath
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
And then in verse number 2, Allah takes a third oath and He says,
﴾
٢ َ﴿وَطُورِّ سِّينِّين
And [by] Mount Sinai
By Mount Sinai.
6 https://quran.com/24/35
16
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
Mosque
of at-Tur
Mountain
A blessed
of ash-
mountain
Sham
Tur
Sinin
Every Any
mountain mountain
that has that is
greenery green
Mountain A blessed
of Musa mountain Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
﴾
٢ َ﴿وَطُورِّ سِّينِّين
Summary – At-Tabari
Al-Imam at-Tabari he summarises it in his tafsir, and I like his summary of this particular verse, so I will
mention it to you.
And he says, and this is the opinion of Ibn 'Umar . There is a narration that he mentions of this being the
statement of Ibn 'Umar and Qatadah. Qatadah said Tur Sinin is,
علَي ِه السَّالم
َ سى
َ سج هد همو
ِ َم
And al-Hasan al-Basri also said that it is the mountain of Musa, and there is a narration also of Ibn 'Abbas
saying that Tur Sinin is the mountain of at-Tur, meaning the mountain of Musa . So that’s the first body
of opinion. That’s the first opinion concerning the meaning of Tur Sinin.
there is greenery.
So as we know, there are mountains that don’t have anything. They're just full of rocks, or mountains that are
made of sand, or mountains that don’t have anything that grows from them. But then there are mountains that
are green. They have plants and leaves and so on.
00:35:00 And so they said, this second opinion amongst the scholars of tafsir is that Tur Sinin refers to any mountain
that is green that has leaves and that has greenery and plants growing upon it. And that is referred to as the
statement of 'Ikrimah . He said Tur Sinin, it is a good tree. 'Ikrimah continues, and he says, and it is a tree
18
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
upon which you will find vegetation and greenery. And similar to it is the statement of Mujahid . So they said
that it is a tree7 that has greenery upon it.
Conclusion
Land of ‘Isa
And so as we can see now, these scholars who take this position of
َّ التِين و
الزيتون
being the fig and the olive as actual, those things that you eat, Tur Sinin being a mountain that is blessed, but
they still say that it is possible by extension then, to look at those places and their locations. So the first one
refers to the أَرضor the land of ash-Sham, of Jerusalem, and Damascus, and those are the lands of 'Isa .
Why is Damascus the land of ‘Isa?
Why is Damascus mentioned as being the land of 'Isa ? And that’s a question for you guys, why? So we know
Jerusalem is, because that’s where he lived, and that’s where he spent his time, and that’s where he was given
his prophethood, and that’s where he called his people to Allah and that’s where he is raised into heaven.
But why Damascus, why are they saying Damascus as well?
Student's response: He will return there.
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
Shaykh's response: Yeah, very good, because that’s where he will descend and return. Towards end of time as
we know in the signs of Yawm al-Qiyamah from the major signs, is the descent of 'Isa and his descent will
be as the Prophet said by the white minaret of Damascus. And so that’s why the scholars have chosen those
two locations as referring to 'Isa .
7The transcribing team transcribes word for word. We think Shaykh may have intended to say mountain here, based on
context earlier in the paragraph.
19
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
But in verse 2, what is it referring to? Verse 2 is referring to, as we said, the land of Musa . Jabal at-Tur or
the Turi Saina, is the mountain of Musa . So now it's referring to the land in which Musa resided.
And we know that Musa didn’t enter into Jerusalem. Because his people, as we know, as Allah mentions
in the Quran, because of their refusal to enter, and to fight, and to rid Jerusalem of the evil tyrannical people
that lived therein, they were stopped from entering and finding the place and they wandered the earth - the
wandering years, the years of bewilderment.
﴾ض
ِّ ﴿أَ رْبَع ِّينَ سَن َة ًۭ ۛ يَت ِّيه ُونَ فِّى ٱلْأَ ْر
for forty years [in which] they will wander throughout the land8
For 40 years they wandered. And it was during those years of wandering upon the earth that Musa passes
away. And Musa so therefore he doesn’t enter into Jerusalem.
There are narrations in the Sunnah9 that Musa asked Allah before He takes his soul, that He should allow
him to see Jerusalem from a distance and a horizon. And so Musa went up to a mountain, and he looked
and saw from a distance the city of Jerusalem, and that is where his soul was taken .
So this is the second position. But even so, we still say that the tafsir of,
َور سِينِين ُ و
َِ ط
is that it’s referring to the actual mountain.
So first and foremost, the fig, it refers to the fig, the olive refers to the olive, Tur Sinin refers to Tur Sinin.
Research Question
Research I have a research question for you, that refers also to this particular verse, verse 2. The difference of opinion
that we find here is because of the word Sinin.
And Sinin, as we said, some of the scholars said that the word refers to a mountain in which there is greenery,
00:40:00 vegetation. Others said that it refers to a mountain that is good and blessed. And that’s because Sinin, the
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
scholars differ as to whether it is an actual Arabic word, or whether it's a word that comes from a different
language that has been Arabised.
And so it is something which is ب َ معرa foreign word that is then taken into Arabic language and used as being
part of Arabic. That brings us to the issue, which is a very interesting issue, that you will find in the books of
tafsir, in the books of usul at-tafsir – the principals of tafsir and also in the books of usul al-fiqh as well.
8 https://quran.com/5/26
9 https://sunnah.com/muslim/43/206
20
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
ٓ ۭ ُّم ِب
﴾ي َبٓ﴿ل ِ َسانٓ َع َر ِ ى
So therefore, for there to be sentences or a group of words that come together one after the other that make
up part of a sentence, or part of a verse, to be non-Arabic goes against the Quran itself. And because it goes
against, and Allah clearly says that it is an Arabic Quran, the scholars have agreed by consensus, that the
Quran doesn’t bring either a verse in its entirety or part of a verse meaning a number of words together in a
verse that are non-Arabic. That’s an issue of consensus. So you don’t need to worry about category number
one.
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
10 https://quran.com/12/2
11 https://quran.com/16/103
21
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
These names of the prophets of Bani Isra'il, some of them, and others from amongst them, these are not Arabic
names. They were Arabised, they became popular names in Arabic, and they're embedded into the Arabic
language and so on, but they are not. Even the names of the angels Jibra'il and Mika’il, the scholars say that
they are non-Arabic names originally, that they are Aramaic or Hebrew in their origin. That's also not an issue
of difference of opinion that those names are mentioned in the Quran, and their origin is non-Arabic, their
origin is from other languages. but they are names that Allah mentions in the Quran, because it refers to
those individuals. There is no difference of opinion on these two issues.
So number one, that the Quran can't consist of more than one word in succession, or a number of words
together being non-Arabic.
And number two, that there are names that are mention of places perhaps, or names of people, or names of
angels and so on, prophets, that are non-Arabic. There is no difference of opinion in those two issues amongst
the scholars.
And the way that the scholars speak about this, is that they referred to these words as انفاض النكرةal-fadhul
nakir, just general words. So we're not talking about names and places that are referenced, we're talking about
just general words. So, like the word, َ سِينِينand the word َ إِسْتبْرقand the word َس ْندُس
ُ in the Quran – are these
12 https://quran.com/26/195
22
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
words originally Arabic, or are they Persian, are they Hebrew, are they Roman, what are they? Where did they
come from? Are they Habashi? Abyssinian in origin? And so on, and so forth.
Verse 3
Oath
Verse number 3, Allah then takes another oath, and Allah says,
ّۡ ّ ۡ ّ ّ ّ
﴾٣ِي ِ ّ﴿وهَٰذا ٱۡل
ِ َل ٱۡل
م
It can have possible, multiple meanings in the Quran and in the Arabic language. And likewise التينand الزيتون
But when it comes to the safe city, there is only one safe city that Allah has mentioned in the Quran as being
بلدًا آمِ ًناor حر ًما آمَِ ًناand that is the city of Makkah. And this was the statement as mentioned by Ibn 'Abbas
,and K'ab, and al-Hasan al-Basri, and Mujahid, and 'Ikrimah, and Qatadah, and 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn Zayd
ibn Aslam, and Imam at-Tabari said the same thing. That it's referring to al-balad al-amin. And balad al-
amina is the city of Makkah.
It's a place that gives sanctuary to the Arabs from its enemies, because as we said before in the tasfir of Surah
al-Fil and Surah Quraysh, it's the place that Allah defended, that those people didn't have to worry about
enemies from outside, because Allah made it a sacred and holy city and land. And therefore, the Arabs
respected its position as being such. And also, Allah saved the people within it from civil war, and strife, and
poverty and those types of things as well. That's why Ibn 'Atiyyah says, Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
وبلد اآلمين مكة بال خالف
And the safe town that Allah is referencing in this verse, is the city of Makkah, and there is no difference of
opinion in this. The one issue [gap in audio] that these first three verses which Allah took an oath, by the
fig, and by the olive, and by َور سِينِين
ِ ط هand by the safe town of Makkah, is that whether it's literal, or whether
it's referring to something else.
ِإ ْن شَا َء ٰ هdiscussion, that we're going to leave for next week, because it will require from us some
So that's what ٱّلل
time to go into. And it's not something which I want to go over very quickly, or rush in the short space of time
that we have remaining with us today. So ٱّلله ٰ إِ ْن شَا َءthat's something which we will leave till next week.
23
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
So please remember the research question. Just again to reiterate, and so that we understand, there are three
categories concerning the issue, are there non-Arabic words in the Quran? Two of them are issues of consensus.
You can't have a number of words in succession. You can't have for example a whole verse or even half a verse
that is non-Arabic, because that goes against what is clearly mentioned in the Quran, that the Quran is an Arabic
Quran. And at the same time, it's possible to have names that are originally non-Arabic names in the Quran.
Those two are issues of consensus, agreement amongst the scholars.
The third issue is, can you have other words, don't fall into those two categories? Just the odd word, like َسِينِين
َ س ْند
here, like the word مشكوةlike the word ُس ُ like the word َ إِسْتبْرقall of those, that's something which we can
look at ٱّلل
َ ٰهء َا
ش ْ
ن إ
ِ .
Q&A
ِإ ْن شَا َء ٰ هwe'll take them now, otherwise we'll conclude for today.
Okay. So any questions ٱّلل
Q. I know we have had this lesson three weeks ago, but I'd really appreciate if you can answer this question
urgently. When in salah, if I want to finish on a sajdah ayah, and not read any further surahs, like for example
the last ayah of Surah al-'Alaq, can I combine my tilawah sajdah with my salah sajdah? i.e. I go to ruku', do
sajdah as normal with the intention of it also being tilawah sajdah?
A. No, they are two separate things. The sajdah at-tilawah is different to your sajdah that you normally do in
salah. The two are not combined. And the Prophet never combined them. There's no narration of him, or
any of his companions, or anyone else, having combined them. And so therefore, it's not something which you
00:50:00 can do.
The most that you will find that some of the scholars say, is whether it can be made up, is it something that
you can make qadha of? So for example, if you're reading in a silent prayer behind the imam, and the imam is
reading whatever he's reading, but you decide to read Surah al-'Alaq. Now for you, as we said, it's not good for
you to go into sajdah at the end of that surah, because you're going to break away from what the imam is doing,
and you're not following them.
But can you make sajdah at the end, by yourself, after the salam? After the prayer finishes, you make sajdah of
your own? That's an issue of difference of opinion, is there qadha for as-sajdah at-tilawah? And if so, then when
and how long can that gap remain? That's an issue that you will find.
And the reason why that issue is made is, because of this type of circumstance, that you generally don't delay
it. And so when you now delay your sajdah at-tilawah and combine it with your normal sajdah, that is also part
of that issue which therefore goes against the general principle, and that is, that you make the sajdah at-tilawah
at the time that it's done.
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
And that's why as we said, that the majority of the scholars recommend that if you're going to read something
like Surah al-'Alaq after your sajdah, you will come up and you wouldn't go into ruku', and you would read the
opening of another surah, or another short surah, and then you would go into ruku'. And Allah knows best.
Thank you also for those of you that sent the links to al-Itqan. If anyone comes across this, actually looks into
it properly, rather than just a cover or something, if someone can look into it and give me feedback in terms
of; if it's actually the whole thing, or not the whole thing, or how well it's been done, that will be very helpful.
So it's a very good book, and it would actually be a good book to do reading of. Al-Itqan fi 'Ulum al-Qur'an would
24
Quranic Progression | Shaykh Ahsan Hanif
Q. In al-Imam at-Tabari's two broad opinions, why did he not include the opinion of at-Tin referring to Da-
mascus, given that this was more predominant to the opinion of it being al-Judiyy?
A. That's a good question. And the reason why that seems to be the case, even though Imam at-Tabari mentions
all of those narrations, so he mentions them, but then he chooses as the broad opinion of mentioning just al-
Judiyy, because he seems to say that Damascus and Jerusalem are one. It's referring to one thing, because both
of them are referring to 'Isa . Whereas if you add Judiyy, then now you add another prophet to that mix.
Q. Going back to the Quls, is it allowed to combine reading into the hands, blowing and wiping with the Quls
we recite after Salah? Or is the reciting, blowing and wiping into the hands specifically for bedtime?
A. That's generally the Sunnah. So the Prophet would blow upon himself before he would sleep, upon his
face, and his body, and what he could reach with his hands. But that's mentioned at the time of sleeping. As
for the Prophet doing it after salah, I don't know of any narration, that the Prophet in terms of his adhkar
Chapter: Tafsir Surah at-Tin
and generally after salah, when he's reading these surahs, that he would blow on his hands and wipe over
himself.
If however, for example, this is the last thing you do before you go to bed, so this is the last thing you do as
you go into bed, it's the last thing, you go and read literally this and then you go straight to bed, then if someone
ِإ ْن شَا َء ٰ هI hope that, that it's okay. But generally speaking, you would separate the two. And
combines them, ٱّلل
to follow the Sunnah as it is, so you do the Quls after salah and then you do them again at the time for bed.
00:53:53 That seems to be better. And Allah knows best.