0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views5 pages

Interim Orders

Uploaded by

texmo legal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views5 pages

Interim Orders

Uploaded by

texmo legal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

LAWYERSCLUBINDIA

 Live Classes Combos Books Writs and PIL NDPS Matrimonial

More 

Home / Articles / Civil Law

interim orders
Guest

Last updated: 29 October 2009


 4 min read  Share  Bookmark

INTRODUCTION
According to the dictionary meaning of interim means for the time

being, meanwhile, temporary, provisional, not final, intervening.[1] Thus

interim or interlocutory orders are those order passed by a court during

the pendency of a suit or proceeding which do not determine finally the

substantive rights and liabilities of the parties in respect of the subject

matter of the suit or proceeding. After the suit is instituted by the

plaintiff and before it is finally disposed of the court may make

interlocutory orders as may appear to the court to be just and

convenient. They are made in order to assist the parties to the suit in the

prosecution of the case or for the purpose of protection of the subject

matter of the suit. Courts are constituted for the purpose of doing justice

and must be deemed to possess all such powers as may be necessary to


do the right and undo the wrong in the course of administration of

justice.

Interim orders are necessary to deal with and protect rights of the parties

in the interval between commencement of the proceedings and final

adjudication. They enable the court to grant such relief or to pass such

order as may be necessary, just or equitable. They also prevent any

abuse of process during the pendency of proceedings. Hence interim or

interlocutory proceedings play a crucial role in conduct of litigation

between parties.

The term 'interim order' refers to an order passed by


a court during the pendency of the litigation. It is generally
passed by the Court to ensure Status quo. The rationale for such

orders to be passed by the Courts lie are best explained


by Latin legal maxim "Actus curiae neminem gravabit" which
translated to (English) stand for "an act of the court shall
prejudice no one". Therefore to ensure that the interests of none
of the party to the litigation are harmed, the court may pass an

interim order.

Interim orders passed by the court may be of various courts. The


nature of the order essentially depends on the direction passed

by the Court and on these basis they may be classified as under;

§ Restraining order (also called Injunction), which are passed to stop

either party from acting in a particular manner during the pendency

of the civil action. These are essential passed by the court to prevent
situations in which either party may suffer a harm because the other

party did/continued an act which was the matter in issue and

§ Directive order, which are passed to direct either part to continue

to act in a particular manner till the conclusion of the trial or till

further orders. These may be passed if the non-continuation of the

act would cause harm to the other party.]

An interim order may be passed by the court only if the


following conditions are satisfied;

1. Where there is a prima facie case in favour of the party seeking

the order,

2. Irreparable damage may be caused to the party if the order is

not passed and such damage may not be ascertained in terms or

money and payable as damages, and

3. Where the balance of convenience lies with the party

requesting for the order.[2]


Interim order is passed on the basis of prima facie findings, which are

tentative. Such order is passed as a temporary arrangement to preserve

the status quo till the matter is decided finally, to ensure that the matter

does not become either infructuous or a fait accompli before the final

hearing. The object of the interlocutory injunction is, to protect the

plaintiff against injury by violation of his right for which he could not be

adequately compensated in damages recoverable in the action if the

uncertainty were resolved in his favour at the trial.[3] Grant of an interim

relief in regard to the nature and extent thereof depends upon the facts

and circumstances of each case as no strait-jacket formula can be laid

down. There may be a situation wherein the defendant/respondent may

use the suit property in such a manner that the situation becomes

irretrievable. In such a fact situation, interim relief should be granted.[4]

In Deoraj vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.[5] the Supreme Court

Court considered a case where the courts below had refused the grant of

interim relief. While dealing with the appeal, the Court observed that

ordinarily in exercise of its jurisdiction under Art.136 of the Constitution,

this Court does not interfere with the orders of interim nature passed by

the High Court. However, this rule of discretion followed in practice is by

way of just self-imposed restriction. An irreparable injury which forcibly

tilts the balance in favour of the applicant, may persuade the Court even

to grant an interim relief though it may amount to granting the final

relief itself. The Court held as under:-

"The Court would grant such an interim relief only if satisfied that

withholding of it would prick the conscience of the court and do

violence to the sense of justice, resulting in injustice being


perpetuated throughout the hearing, and at the end the court would

not be able to vindicate the cause of justice."

Such a course is permissible when the case of the applicant is based on

his fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of India.[6]

Such interim orders may be summarized thus:

1. Commissions : Order 26
2. Arrest before judgement : Order 38
3. Attachment before judgement : Order 38
4. Temporary injunction : Order 39
5. Interlocutory orders : order 39
6. Receiver : Order 40
7. Security for Costs : Order 25
8. Payment in court : Order 24

COMMISSIONS : SECTIONS 75-78 AND


ORDER 26
Section 75 to Section 78 deals with the power of the court to issue
commissions and order 26 lay down detail provisions. The power of the
court to issue commission is discretionary and can be exercised by the
court for doing full and complete justice between the parties.[7] Section
75 runs as under:

75. Power of court to issue commissions- Subject to such conditions


and limitations as may be prescribed, the court may issue a
commission-

(a) to examine any person;

You might also like