0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views6 pages

Stipulation and (Proposed) Order On Pretrial Schedule

This document is a stipulation and proposed order adjusting pretrial deadlines in three patent cases between Rambus Inc. and various defendants including Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., and Micron Technology Inc. The parties agree to reschedule the hearing on Daubert motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008 to December 11, 2008 at 2:00 pm. They also agree to adjust related briefing deadlines for Daubert motions, dispositive motions, and motions in limine. The stipulation is signed by attorneys for all parties and requests the court to enter the proposed order with the new schedule.

Uploaded by

sabatino123
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views6 pages

Stipulation and (Proposed) Order On Pretrial Schedule

This document is a stipulation and proposed order adjusting pretrial deadlines in three patent cases between Rambus Inc. and various defendants including Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., and Micron Technology Inc. The parties agree to reschedule the hearing on Daubert motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008 to December 11, 2008 at 2:00 pm. They also agree to adjust related briefing deadlines for Daubert motions, dispositive motions, and motions in limine. The stipulation is signed by attorneys for all parties and requests the court to enter the proposed order with the new schedule.

Uploaded by

sabatino123
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 6

1 [Parties Listed on Signature Page]


2

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-00334 RMW
11
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
12 ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE
vs.
13
HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR INC., et al.,
14
Defendants. Trial Date: January 19, 2009
15 Courtroom: 6
Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
16
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 05-02298 RMW
17
Plaintiff,
18
vs.
19
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
20 et al.,
21 Defendants.
22
RAMBUS INC., CASE NO.: C 06-00244 RMW
23
Plaintiff,
24
vs.
25
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC., et al.,
26
Defendants.
27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6301420.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 2 of 6

1 STIPULATION AND ORDER


2 WHEREAS, the scheduling order dated July 16, 2008, in the above-captioned
3 actions (“Patent Trial Scheduling Order”) sets certain pretrial deadlines for the trial that is
4 scheduled to begin on January 19, 2009, including the hearing date for Daubert motions and
5 dispositive motions, and the briefing schedule for Daubert motions, dispositive motions, and
6 motions in limine;
7 WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to alter the briefing schedule and
8 hearing date for the Daubert motions and dispositive motions via a joint stipulation and proposed
9 order filed on October 2, 2008 and signed by the Court on October 15, 2008;
10 WHEREAS, due to scheduling conflicts, the parties have agreed to reschedule the
11 hearing on Daubert motions and dispositive motions from December 2, 2008, to the afternoon of
12 December 11, 2008;
13 WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed to amend the briefing schedule for
14 Daubert motions, dispositive motions, and motions in limine;
15 WHEREAS, the parties are continuing to discuss other pretrial deadlines for the
16 January 19, 2009 trial set forth in the Court’s Standing Order Re: Pretrial Preparation, and,
17 subject to reaching agreement on these other pretrial deadlines, intend to file a comprehensive
18 joint stipulation on the pretrial schedule for the January 19, 2009 trial, covering pretrial filings
19 addressed in both the Patent Trial Scheduling Order and the Court’s Standing Order;
20 NOW therefore, it is hereby AGREED and STIPULATED, by and among the
21 parties hereto through their undersigned counsel, that the following hearing date for Daubert
22 motions and dispositive motions, and briefing schedules for Daubert motions, dispositive
23 motions, and motions in limine, shall be in place and shall supersede those set forth in the Patent
24 Trial Scheduling Order and the October 15, 2008 Stipulation and Order:
25 1. November 14, 2008: Deadline to file oppositions to Daubert motions and
26 dispositive motions;1
27 1
Deadlines for oppositions and replies on Daubert motions and dispositive motions apply to
28 motions filed on October 24, 2008, and October 27, 2008.

STIPULATION AND ORDER


6301420.1
-1- CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 3 of 6

1 2. November 25, 2008: Deadline to file replies to Daubert motions and


2 dispositive motions;
3 3. December 3, 2008: Deadline to file motions in limine;
4 4. December 11, 2008 at 2:00 p.m.: Hearing on Daubert motions and
5 dispositive motions;
6 5. December 12, 2008: Deadline to file oppositions to motions in limine.
7

8 SO ORDERED,
9 DATED: ________________________ ______________________________
10 Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6301420.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 4 of 6

1
DATED: November 7, 2008 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
2
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
3
McKOOL SMITH P.C.
4

5
By: /s/
6 ROSEMARIE T. RING

7 Attorneys for RAMBUS INC.

8 DATED: November 7, 2008 THEODORE BROWN III


TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND
9 CREW LLP

10

11
By /s/
12 THEODORE BROWN III

13 Attorneys for HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR


INC., HYNIX SEMICONDUCTOR
14 AMERICA INC., HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING
15 AMERICA INC., HYNIX
SEMICONDUCTOR U.K. LTD., and HYNIX
16 SEMICONDUCTOR DEUTSCHLAND
GmbH
17
SVEN RAZ
DATED: November 7, 2008
18 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

19

20 By: /s/
SVEN RAZ
21
Attorneys for MICRON TECHNOLOGY
22 INC., et. al.

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6301420.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 5 of 6

1 ROBERT BEREZIN
DATED: November 7, 2008 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
2

3
By: /s/
4 ROBERT BEREZIN
5 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
6 AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., AND SAMSUNG
7 AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P.
8
THERESA E. NORTON
9 DATED: November 7, 2008 ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
LLP
10

11
By: /s/
12 THERESA E. NORTON
13 Attorneys for NANYA TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION and NANYA
14 TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION USA
15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6301420.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW
Case 5:05-cv-00334-RMW Document 2529 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 6 of 6

1 Filer’s Attestation:
2 I, Rosemarie T. Ring am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
3 to file this STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER ON PRETRIAL SCHEDULE. In
4 compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Theodore Brown III, Sven Raz,
5 Robert Berezin and Theresa Norton concur in this filing.
6
By: /s/
7 ROSEMARIE T. RING
8

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
6301420.1 CASE NOS. 05-334 RMW; 05-2298 RMW; 06-244 RMW

You might also like