CHOMSKY
PRINCIPLES AND PARAMETERS OF
         INNATENESS
 INTRODUCTION OF CHOMSKY
• An American linguist, philosopher, cognitive, scientist,
  social critic and historian.
• Born in December 7,1928.
• Sometimes described as Father of modern linguistics.
• He is the author of over 100 book on politics and
  linguistics.
• He developed the theory of transformational grammar.
• He is credited as the creator of universal grammar theory ,
  the generative grammar and some other theories.
           INTRODUCTION
• Chomsky’s work has been
  highly influential in a wide
  array of academic fields.
• Chomsky has been one of the
  profound scholar of his own
  generation.
• He continued to publish his
  linguistic ideas in 1966
  including, in Aspects of the
  theory of Syntax, topics in
  the theory of generative
  grammar.
             INTRODUCTION
• Within the field of linguistics,
  Chomsky has introduced “ cognitive
  revolution”.
• The basis of Chomsky's linguistic
  theory is rooted in biolinguistics,
  holding the concept that the
  principles underlying the structure of
  language are biologically determined
  in human mind and genetically
  transmitted. Therefore, he argued
  that all humans are having same
  linguistics structure, irrespective of
  the sociocultural differences.
     CHOMSKY’S CRITICISM
• Chomsky criticised the work of B.F
  Skinner.
• Chomsky has played a pivotal role in
  the decline of Behaviourism.
• Chomsky argued against the skinner’s
  view of language as learned behaviour.
• He said that Skinner has ignored the
  role of human creativity in linguistics.
• He said that Behaviourism cannot
  provide sufficient explanations for child
  language acquisition.
INNATENESS OF LANGUAGE
• Innateness means language is
  present by birth.
• Only a human’s baby is born
  with language ability. It is clear,
  then, that there must be some
  element in our biology that
  accounts for this unique ability.
• An innate form of knowledge
  specific to language, is a
  concrete theory.
              INNATENESS
• Chomsky has proposed that human posses a
  structure for the knowledge of possible language,
  which enables young human to acquire language
  with speed, efficiency and uniformity.
• Chomsky talks about psychology in relation to
  linguistics. He was not a structuralist but he was
  inspired by De Saussure.
• He purposed that “ all children share the same
  internal constraints which characterized narrowly
  the grammar they are going to construct”.
                  INNATENESS
• Chomsky explained about ‘poverty of
  stimulus’ in language learning process.
• Argument from the ‘poverty of stimulus’ :
   1. Knowledge of language consist of
      knowing its grammar.
   2.Grammar could not be learned.
   3. Universal grammar in innately known.
   4. Grammar is present in minds of
       speakers is by default bioprgorame.
               INNATENESS
• The linguistic development of every human being is
  amazing. When a child is born, he does not speak and
  understand the language of his social environment.
• But after some years every child speaks and understand
  the language of his environment and he also understand
  what and how peoples communicate with each others.
• After some additional years, child is a fluent user of
  first language.
• Chomsky argued by giving the concept of ‘linguistic
  competency’ ( Hard-wired of language).
             INNATENESS
• The human language learning
  mechanism based on LAD (
  Language Acquisition Device),
  the part of the brain to build
  knowledge about language.
UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR
     UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR
• In the 1960s, Chomsky purposed a
  revolutionary idea:
• We are all born with an innate
  knowledge of grammar that serves
  as the basis for all language
  acquisition. In other words, for
  humans, language is a basic
  instinct.
• Rules generate language.
• UG is part of an innate biologically
  endowed language faculty.
    UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR
• All human languages have certain common
  points related to grammar and those common
  points are subject, object and verb. That’s why
  he says that language is having structured
  dependency; language cannot be without
  structure.
• UG is a theory relevant to the issue of
  linguistic competence, i.e., a theory as to the
  nature of grammatical representation
       MACAHNISM OF INNATE
            THEORY
• Structure dependency of UG :
 Input  BLACK BOX Output
 Black box= LAD ( Language Acquisition
 Device)
• Children are born with LAD.
• UG contains certain principles and
  parameters for language acquisition.
• He argued that human is born with a
  fundamental understanding of principles
  for language production..
            INNATE THEORY
• Basically universal grammar is not a grammar in the
  ordinary sense. It is system of conditions because every
  first language learning process of human beings is fulfil
  with the universal grammar. The importance if
  universal grammar and its generic features are apparent
  in theory of principle and parameter that has been
  developed within the research programme of universal
  grammar.
• In the past, LAD had been taken as equated with UG, t
  it would be more accurate to think of UG as just part of
  an LAD or part of language faculty.
        CRITICAL PERIOD OF
           HYPOTHESIS
     “Biologically determined period of life when
  language can be acquired more easily and beyond
 which language is increasingly difficult to acquire”
• The hypothesis claims that there is an ideal time
   window to acquire language.
• Lenneberg accepted the claim given by Chomsky
   about innateness of language.
• Lanneberg says, that a child can learn a language
   within a specific period of time that period start
   from 10 to 13 years old and once the period is
   over so a child cannot acquired language.
              CRITICAL PERIOD
                HYPOTHESIS
• Children having a certain amount of time to acquire
  language, until the age of 13 years language is present in
  both hemisphere on human brain.
• In this period, Berg says that at the age of 3 a child can start
  to speak right grammatical sentence and within 13 years old
  fluency also become apparent in this period.
• After 13 years of age, child starts dropping out certain rules.
• If a language input does not occur until after this time, the
  individual will never achieve full command of language
  especially grammatical system.
• William Syndrome: ‘Language will finish at specific time
  because of suppressed development’.
      CRITICISM ON CRITICAL
       PERIOD HYPOTHESIS
• In 1970s, the case of critical period
  hypothesis was brought in media.
• An experiment on a child called Genie
  was discovered in scientific report. In
  experiment, she was locked away from
  normal civilization and was
  undeveloped physically and
  emotionally. Genie was an infant who
  trapped in 13 years old body because
  she could only make infant like sounds
  and no words or sentences.
               CRITICISM
• Then, after training of 8 months
  for language teaching, Genie used
  to speak English as other native
  speaker.
• This experiment rejected CPH.
• Intelligence can be finished but
  language cannot be finished.
• Loss of memory can occur but
  language can never disappear.
• Cognition process will never ever
  stops in human’s life.
                PRINCIPLES
      ‘The universal basic features of grammar’
•   Principles related to first language acquisition.
•   ‘Language faculty is above all the faculties in
    human brain’ said by Chomsky.
•   Limited number of rules exist in human mind
    and we can construct unlimited number of
    sentences.
•   UG contains the core rules of grammar.
              PRINCIPLES
• Structural positions of sentences in cognition
  filled by the lexicons.
• Principles are linguistic universals.
• Chomsky talks about theory driven.
             PARAMETERS
• There are certain parameters. Parameters are vary
  language to language because every language has
  its own parameters that a child needs to set.
1. PRO DROP PARAMETER:
• There are certain parameters of certain languages
  for example pro drop parameters. There are
  certain languages which drop pronouns and
  nouns.
   Example: Arabic, Chinese, Spanish and Japanese
languages.
• There are pro drop languages.
            PARAMETERS
  Example: I say ‘Speak’, then listener will
understand that noun is by default present there.
• But English, German, French, Urdu, Persian and
  Turkish languages are having non pro drop
  parameters, because parameters do not drop
  subject in these languages.
• In English language, a sentence cannot be
  completed without subject.
• Black Ver necular language drop ‘copular’ means
  helping verb or auxiliary verbs.
  Example: I teaching.
              PARAMETERS
2. HEAD PARAMETER:
• Head parameters, In English language head comes
  before action in sentence. Head is first parameter in
  English language.
  Example: NP N is head
             VP V is head
3. POST-POSITION PARAMETER:
• Urdu, Japanese, Persian, Turkish and Hindi languages
  are post position languages.
  Example: Clitic subject: It was this I wanted for.
              Dummy subject: It was this I was wanted.
   DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
PRINCIPLES AND PARAMETERS
 PRINCIPLES:
• Principles are set of rules.
• Set phenomena that a child is born with.
• Principles are fixed.
• All the similarities which are present in all human
  languages.
• Principles are innate and related to first language.
• Principles are Linguistics ground.
• Language principle are gifted by GOD.
               DIFFERENCE
    PARAMETERS:
•   Parameters are variable.
•   Parameters vary from one language to another.
•   Parameters are Acquired and related to second
    language.
•   Parameters construct the linguistics rules.
•   Parameters are sentence structure of the
    language.
Linguistic competence:
• Ability of linguistic knowledge and
  grammatical linguistic knowledge in language
Linguistics Performance:
• Actual use of linguistic knowledge is called
  linguistic performance.
• Chomsky talks about ‘I’ language and ‘E’
  language.
 ‘I’ Language:
• ‘I‘ language is called Internal language is
   similar to competence and langue but not
   identical.
• I language is essentially concern to mind,
   cognition, abstract.
 ‘E’ Language
• ‘E’ Language is called external language.
• It is similar to parole and performance but not
  identical.
• ‘E’ language is essentially related to
  performance based on convention, society,
  situation and environment.
            CONCLUSION
 Children's acquisition of grammatical rules is
  guided by principles of an innate UG which
  could apply to all human languages.
 Children know certain things of the language
  just by being exposed to the limited number of
  sentences and can produce multiple number of
  sentences.
 Language is separated from other aspects of
  cognitive development.
             CONCLUSION
We can conclude about Chomsky’s views that :
 Children are biologically programmed for
   language.
 Human brain contains LAD which contains all
   and only the principles which are universal to
   all human languages i.e. Universal Grammar.
 Once the LAD is activated in human brain.
   He will discover the structure of the language to
   be learned.