AS & A Level Psychology Mark Scheme
AS & A Level Psychology Mark Scheme
PSYCHOLOGY 9990/23
Paper 2 Research Methods May/June 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2024 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers. They should be applied alongside the
specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit is given for valid answers which go beyond
the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these features are specifically assessed by the
question as indicated by the mark scheme. The meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed instructions or in the application of generic level
descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question (however; the use of the full mark range may
be limited according to the quality of the candidate responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should not be awarded with grade thresholds or
grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly convey the same meaning (unless the mark
scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended
writing is required rather than list-type answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required. (Check for evidence it is understood and not used
wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already credited unless the language itself is being tested.
This applies equally to ‘mirror statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of syllabus terms must allow for clear and
unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Annotation:
For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct
relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the meaning will be understood by all examiners
who marked that paper.
repetition (of stem/ use wiggly underline/ underline letter-tick when use to show Level
within response) highlighter to bring attention to required feature is in 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 in
a key part enough detail part (a) of last Q
Crossed out Please note that if a candidate crosses out a question and does not re-attempt the same question, you must attempt to mark the
work crossed out work.
Annotate Please place a marking icon on every question and to indicate each mark awarded (number of ticks = number of marks on all
every questions except part (a) of the last question). However, you do not need to put ‘seen’ on NR spaces.
question
‘In Piliavin the Ps did not know the observers were there’ = 0
= REP
2 The results from the study by Andrade (doodling) 2 Any descriptive point about the mean = 1
included the following data about the shading of shapes Any descriptive point about the range = 1
by participants in the doodling group: The mean/average doodling was in the bottom half of the
range; (mean)
Outline what these two results show about doodling by All participants in this group doodled; (range)
this group of participants. The variation in doodling was very wide; (range)
the mean number per participant was 36.3 Statements relating to the non-doodlers = 0 [NAQ]
the range was 3–110. Comparative statements to controls = 0 [NAQ]
Copying the numbers = 0 [REP]
Conclusions = 0 = NAQ
3 Describe how one feature of the study by Milgram 2 Link (feature of study) = 1
(obedience) helped to make the study valid. How it helped validity = 1
Shock machine looked real; / thought the shocks were Authority figure = 0
real; Authority figure looked real because of coat/of location = 1
Drawing lots was rigged;
Grey technician’s coat;
Location at a university;
Told it was about memory and punishment (deception);
All righthanded;
So not / less representative of lefthanders;
All adults;
So not / less representative of children;
Small sample;
So not much variability;
So not generalisable to ambidextrous people / wide variety
of…; (must be specific)
Outline what is meant by the term ‘objectivity’, using an an eyewitness seeing a thief stealing something = 0 [NAQ
example about eyewitnesses. not about objectivity]
judgment from external perspective; (outline) If an effective answer is given relating to Pozzulo, credit it.
independent viewpoint; (outline)
data obtained without personal bias; (outline)
5(b) Describe how one feature of the study by Pozzulo et al. 2 Objectivity strategy = 1
(line-ups) helped to make the study objective. How it helped = 1
responses to line-ups limited to present or not; (strategy) silhouettes (as a ‘target absent’ choice); (strategy)
so no ‘maybe’ or ‘more likely to be x than y’; (how it helped) making the choice an objective one between present/absent
participants’ responses were quantitative (present or not); rather than a difficult choice of present /not present; (how it
strategy) helped)
so the researchers did not have to interpret the results; (how
it helped)
6 Describe the following experimental designs, using any 6 1 mark per definition/point of detail, max 2 for each
example(s): term/concept.
matched pairs design 1 mark per example, max 2 for each term/concept.
repeated measures design. Examples can be any studies (core studies, other studies,
candidate’s own).
Repeated measures: Max 4 if no e.g.s or if only one term/concept.
Same Ps in each level of IV / condition; Only 1 example needed to access 6 marks.
Risk of order effects / practice or fatigue effects;
As Ps see experimental situation more than once;
Also risk of recognising demand characteristics;
Order effects resolved by counterbalancing;
Where half Ps do conditions in order AB, others BA;
eg Dement & Kleitman 5/15 minutes;
Hölzel pre/post mindfulness course;
Perry personal space situations (CIDs) Ps did all of the
different approaching objects (ball, stranger, friend, authority
figure);
Perry different room configurations (of table/chair/plant);
Matched pairs:
Different Ps in each level of the IV;
similar individuals allocated one to each level of IV;
eg one twin in each group;
reducing effects of individual differences;
similarities relevant to study;
e.g. age / IQ / gender;
e.g. similar to Bandura aggression levels of children;
situation/group/condition from which the IV is absent; Accept ‘no change to the IV’
Accept ‘a level of the IV where the IV is absent’ Accept: A condition where the IV is absent
Do not accept ‘baseline’ / ‘to compare’ alone
7(b)(ii) Suggest a control condition that Yashal could use in her 1 Example = 1
experiment.
7(c) Yashal is planning to use students working at home as 2 Type of experiment = 1 Field [definitive]
participants. Explanation (linked) = 1 (may be ‘why it is’ or ‘why it has to
be’)
Explain the type of experiment Yashal would be
conducting.
8(a) Suggest one way that the parrots could be taught to 3 Way = 1 [can be interpreted in different ways]
enter the cage. Detail = 2
Response must be linked to task for 3 marks
Positive reinforcement; (way) Punish parrots; (way)
Give a reward each time they go into the cage; (detail+link) If they go a different direction; (detail)
Eg food; (detail) E.g. have shock wires under their feet either side of the
route to the cage; (link)
Using food; (way)
To shape behaviour; (detail)
Punish parrots; (way)
For getting closer to the cage; (detail+link)
If they go a different direction; (detail)
operant conditioning = 0 [REP] E.g. have shock wires under their feet either side of the
route to the cage; (link)
8(b)(i) Suggest two practical problems with this measurement 4 Limitation = 1} [2]
of success. Either limitation or detail must be linked for 2 marks
1: …. Detail = 1}
2: …. Individual differences between parrots = 0 = NAQ
8(b)(ii) For one of the problems you suggested in part (b)(i): 2 Way = 1
Detail = 1
Suggest one way this problem could be solved. The prompt (Problem: 1 or 2) should be used. If not clear,
credit if possible
1 min = 1 day / Ceiling effect:
Make interval shorter / avoids a ceiling effect / easier to
distinguish between learning speed / bigger range of scores
is possible; (way)
eg count hours; (detail)
parrot focus:
only train in short bouts; (way)
or stop when parrot isn’t focussing; (detail)
8(c)(i) Explain one reason why the parrots may learn better if 2 Explanation for staff presence = 1
the other staff are present during the parrots’ training. Detail = 1
8(c)(ii) Explain one reason why the parrots may learn better if 2 Explanation for staff absence = 1
the other staff are absent during the parrots’ training. Detail = 1
9(a) Suggest one reason why conducting a laboratory 2 Reason = 1 (can be basic and generic, eg. named
experiment for Faiza’s investigation could have been guideline)
unethical. Linked detail = 1
9(c) Faiza is concerned about uncontrolled variables in her 4 uncontrolled variable linked to mood = 1 } x2
study. detail (why hard to control / mood affected) = 1 }
Suggest how two uncontrolled variables could affect the e.g. people might be happier in cities regardless of pollution;
measurement of emotion.
10(a) Describe how Bhaavik could conduct a correlational 10 Use the table opposite to mark candidate responses to this
study to investigate the relationship between shyness question.
and happiness.
To mark Q10(a), create four ‘imaginary columns’ down one
Do not describe sample/sampling technique or ethical margin, using one column for each of the four required
issues/guidelines in your answer. features. Tick each feature (tick-a, tick-b, tick-c, tick-d)
when it appears, then underline the letter( ) for detail.
The four required features for this correlation are:
Use L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 at the end of the response to indicate
(a) two co-variables (shyness defined & happiness the level.
defined).
(b) measure of variable 1 (shyness – how measured) Use the table below to mark candidate responses to this
(c) measure of variable 2 (happiness – how measured) question.
(d) relationship (scatter graph, pos/neg, st/wk)
Note: Both variables must be at least ordinal scales for L3 Level The response:
10(a)
Level The response:
0 No creditable response.
marks