Eux 294
Eux 294
doi:10.1093/europace/eux294
Received 16 July 2017; editorial decision 20 August 2017; accepted after revision 25 August 2017; online publish-ahead-of-print 13 December 2017
Recurring questions when dealing with arrhythmias in athletes are about the cause of the arrhythmia and, more importantly, about the eli-
gibility of the athlete to continue sports activities. In essence, the relation between sports and arrhythmias can be understood along three
lines: sports as arrhythmia trigger on top of an underlying problem, sports as arrhythmic substrate promotor, or sports as substrate in-
ducer. Often, there is no sharp divider line between these entities. The athlete’s heart, a heart that adapts so magically to cope with the
demands of exercise, harbours many structural and functional changes that by themselves predispose to arrhythmia development, at the
atrial, nodal and ventricular levels. In essence, the athlete’s heart is a proarrhythmic heart. This review describes the changes in the ath-
lete’s heart that are related to arrhythmic expression and focuses on what this concept means for clinical decision making. The concept of
the athlete’s heart as a proarrhythmic heart creates a framework for evaluation and counselling of athletes, yet also highlights the difficulty
in predicting the magnitude of associated risk. The management uncertainties are discussed for specific conditions like extreme bradycar-
dic remodelling, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and flutter, and ventricular arrhythmias.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Keywords Sports • Athlete’s heart • Arrhythmia • Eligibility
* Corresponding author. Tel: þ32 3 821 46 93; fax: þ32 3 830 23 05. E-mail address: hein.heidbuchel@uantwerpen.be, hein.heidbuchel@uza.be, heinheid@gmail.com
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. V
C The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
1402 H. Heidbuchel
A quick overview on why the increase in LV mass and dimensions.12 In fact, these changes are pre-
athlete’s heart is a proarrhythmic sent and congruent in all four chambers of the heart, both at the ven-
heart tricular and at the atrial level.13 In some athletes, the eccentric
remodelling can be extreme. Despite still being ‘physiological’ (defined
We all agree that conditions that enlarge the atria (like valvular dis- as ‘in concordance with the VO2max of the athlete, and hence ex-
ease, hypertension, or heart failure) predispose to atrial fibrillation pected’) there is no clear definition on when such profound cardiac re-
(AF). We acknowledge the proarrhythmic role of the autonomic ner- modelling may increase the risk for arrhythmias at the atrial and
vous system by ablating vagal ganglia in the hope to increase our abla- ventricular level. Most likely, there is no real threshold: physiological
tion efficacy. We all understand that enlargement of the RV, like in dilatation may create a progressive propensity for developing arrhyth-
pulmonary valve regurgitation, is the strongest predictor for sudden mias (Figure 1). It explains why decision making becomes so difficult.
death in patients with tetralogy of Fallot.8 We know the epidemiolo- Intriguingly, the association between arrhythmias and female athletes
gical data that associate left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and dilata- is 5 to 10 times weaker, an explanation which remains unclear (less
tion with sudden cardiac death in different populations.9 Finnish intense condition? hormonal factors?).
investigators have demonstrated that early repolariation, which is a The best evidenced example of gradual conversion from exercise-
very common finding in young trained individuals, is associated with a induced benefit to development of an arrhythmogenic substrate is
higher risk for sudden death.10 Yet, somehow, we remain reluctant the U-shaped incidence of AF or flutter (AFl) with endurance activity.
to accept that exactly the same changes may predispose the athlete’s Atrial enlargement, more atrial ectopy, and autonomic changes are
heart to arrhythmias and even sudden death. part of the cardiac adaptations of athlete’s heart,14 thereby
There is an increasing amount of data on the electrical, structural, modestly increasing the risk for AF at the high end of exercise. In a
and functional cardiac alterations of the athlete’s heart. Although for- meta-analysis of smaller studies mainly looking at endurance athletes,
mer research has focused on different remodelling patterns, especially a 5.3-fold increase of AF was noted.15 Later data from three much
in the LV, due to static or dynamic exercise, most athletes nowadays larger studies investigating the interaction between exercise and AF
combine both forms of training in their daily regimes. Pure power ath- confirmed a U-shaped pattern of the exercise dose–response curve
letes (e.g. weightlifters) develop a predominantly concentric remodel- whereby regular mild-to-moderate exercise provides strong protec-
ling but generally do not reach the same magnitude of LV mass as tion from AF, while long-term intensive endurance exercise consti-
endurance athletes. Cardiac alterations are particularly profound in tutes a risk factor, albeit small.16–19
those athletes engaged in high-intensity activities that are of long dur- As mentioned, most focus of ventricular adaptation in the athlete’s
ation and combine endurance with power (e.g. cycling, triathlon, and heart has historically been on the LV. It is the RV, however, that is
rowing).11 Maximal oxygen consumption during exercise correlates most taxed by strenuous endurance exercise. Since pulmonary pres-
strongly and directly with the eccentric cardiac remodelling and the sures increase almost linearly with increasing cardiac output, RV wall
The athlete’s heart, a proarrhythmic heart 1403
stress increases more than LV wall stress (the latter being attenuated Current hypothesis is that these scar regions are the sequellae of sub-
as a result of the thicker LV wall and reduction of the systemic vascular clinical myocarditis. Athletes with such incidental finding, however,
resistance during exercise) (Figure 2A and B).20 This explains why tran- seem to have a high likelihood to develop major ventricular arrhyth-
sient contractile dysfunction of the RV (‘RV fatigue’), but not of the LV, mias during follow-up. Since similar incidental fibrotic areas in the LV
is observed at the end of an endurance event (Figure 2C), the size of are very rare findings in non-athletes, the hypothesis has been raised
which correlates with the leak of cardiac enzymes.21–23 Intriguingly, that intense exercise has a promoting effect on the development of
minor rises of tropinins are considered as myocardial damage in the this substrate. Maybe, intense exercise during a viral bout may make
context of ischaemic heart disease, whereas sports cardiologists tend the heart more vulnerable to develop scar, or exercise induces such
to call it ‘physiologic’. Why not accept that extreme wall stress on the scar regions on the background of an as yet unidentified genetic predis-
RV may result in some myocyte rupture, which may well repair in position. Clearly, more data are needed on this recently recognized
most instances? But maybe not in all and not after repetitive insults.24 new entity. However, it is another element in the main theme
This explains why exercising arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy described here that underlying structural or electrical disease in ath-
(ARVC) patients and mice with desmosomal mutations develop an letes is not just a coincidence but that it may have been promoted or
overt phenotype of ARVC more rapidly than when sedentary.4,5 This induced by physical activity itself, i.e. recognition of the concept that
also explains why the observation of the development of a similar the athlete’s heart is a proarrhythmic heart.
phenotype even in the absence of mutations (both in humans and in
rats) is pathophysiologically plausible as the extreme of a spectrum,
dubbed ‘exercise-induced ARVC’ (ExI-ARVC) or ‘gene-elusive General consequences of the
ARVC’.25–27
More recently, there have been reports of large areas of delayed
concept
gadolinium enhancement (DGE) in the wall of the LV, sometimes as an Recognizing that the athlete’s heart is a proarrhythmic heart should
incidental finding in athletes presenting with an increase in ventricular not be interpreted as a reason to avoid physical activity. There is
premature beats (VPB) or new repolarization abnormalities.28,29 overwhelming evidence about the benefits of physical activity. Just as
1404 H. Heidbuchel
a tennis elbow is no reason to argue against people playing tennis, the changes may be part of the remodelling proces. These may explain
potential proarrhythmic potential of the athlete’s heart should not be why there is no full reversibility of sinus bradycardia after cessation of
used to scare people of sports. There is not any data that even high- the active carreer: former Tour de Suisse cyclists at an average of
level athletes have a higher mortality rate than non-athletes, on the 28 years after their active carreer had a higher propensity to pro-
contrary.30,31 But this does not negate the fact that some athletes found sinus bradycardia (<40/min; 10% vs. 2%), sinus pauses of >2.5 s
may be the victim of annoying or even life-threatening arrhythmias. (6% vs. 0%), and pacemaker implantation (3% vs. 0%) than matched
Rather, there are three important consequences of the arrhythmic golfers from the same population.36 In athletes, sinus bradycardia or
athlete’s heart concept: (i) that the public should be informed prop- pauses by itself are no reason for concern when they are asymptom-
erly that physical activity to promote health does not require inten- atic. In symptomatic athletes, deconditioning may resolve symptoms.
sive or strenuous workouts, nor competition, in line with current If that does not occur, and symptoms persist after 2–3 months of de-
public health recommendations for moderate activity6; (ii) that like all training, pacemaker therapy may be needed.
sports injuries, more intense physical activity is related to a higher Two situations are of uncertain relevance: when very long pauses
more unusual arrhythmia substrates due to increased anisotropy. Some may prefer to use cryoenergy in such cases, although it may be
The outcome of ablation was similar in athletes compared to non- associated with more frequent recurrences.
athletes, with no athlete developing AV block (neither permanently
nor transiently) during ablation. Nevertheless, it is fair to discuss the
anticipated more complex ablation approach with athletes, maybe Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
even with a higher risk of AV block (which would constitute a
carreer-ending event for the athlete), when an AVNRT is anticipated. Apart from the now widely accepted interaction between sports ac-
There are no reports about the association of accessory pathway- tivity and AF, there also is an association between physical activity
related arrhythmias or special substrates in athletes. The most and atrial flutter. We have described the concept of ‘lone atrial flut-
embarrasing situation in athletes is the finding of a concealed para- ter’ (AFL) after observing that men of<65 years presenting with AFL,
Hisian accessory pathway, which not only is more difficult to ablate but without a history of structural heart disease, hypertension, or AF,
but definitely carries more risk for inadvertent third-degree AV block. were more often engaged in regular sports practice (50% vs. 17% of
1406 H. Heidbuchel
other AFL patients; P < 0.0001) or in endurance sports (31% vs. 8%; to that of non-athletic patients. It is unclear in how far this also applies
P = 0.0003).38 Lone atrial flutter, therefore, seems to be a right-sided to athletes with more persistent forms of AF in whom the atrial
expression of the same proarrhythmic changes that lead to AF in the structural alterations may be more widespread. So far, there are no
left atrium, i.e. dilatation, enhanced vagal tone, possibly microfibrosis, data on non-PV triggers, fibrosis mapping, mapping of fractionated
and induction through atrial ectopic beats. electrograms, or potential rotors specifically in athletes with AF.
Given the fact that most of these athletes are younger than the gen-
eral AF population, it is also unclear what the long-term effects of ab-
Atrial fibrillation lations will be in athletes, both concerning efficacy and safety. This
Athletes presenting with AF put the treating physician for therapeutic relates to the inevitable question as to whether sports can be
dilemmas. Although recommendations state that AF per se is not a resumed at the same level after ablation: assuming that physical activ-
contraindication for competitive sports, the ventricular rate should ity contributed to the pathogenesis of AF, it is unlikely that this would
be controlled when AF occurs during sports. Beta-blockers are the only pertain to the pulmonary veins. It is more likely that the changes
logical choice to counteract the enhanced sympathetic tone, but are widespread, judging from the dilatation of both atria. Hence, con-
these will not be tolerated by athletes wishing to perform during tinuation of the same sports stimulus may continue the disease pro-
sports. Calcium channel blockers and digitalis will usually not be po- cess which may lead to recurrence of non-PV dependent AF later. In
tent enough to slow down the ventricalur rate appropriatetly during the absence of definitive data about the long-term recurrence rate in
athletics. Rate control, therefore, is difficult to achieve. Moreover, al- athletes and the effect of sports on it, certainly no firm recommenda-
though Class 1 antiarrhythmic drugs may be able to prevent AF re- tion can be made towards the athlete about continuation or reduc-
currences in athlete’s heart, they cannot be used in monotherapy, tion of sports activities. However, it may be appropriate to discuss
since they may increase the propensity to develop AFL (even without the pathophysiological insights with the athlete, clarify the goals of
its documentation before; called ‘Class 1 AFL’), with prolonged cycle what the athlete wants to achieve with continuation (is he/she merely
length due to the Class 1 effect, which in the absence of adequate looking for the health benefit of it, or are there other performance-
rate control may lead to one-to-one AV conduction, resulting in high related goals that he/she wishes to achieve?), and come to a shared
ventricular rates and very profound intraventricular conduction slow- decision on the desirability to continue at the pre-ablation level. The
ing and haemodynamic compromise. An example is shown in Figure 4 same applies to patients who wish to hold off from ablation and pre-
of an athlete who despite 240 mg of verapamil once daily developed fer a medical treatment instead.
such proarrhythmic state under flecainide 100 mg twice daily at the
end of his Sunday morning running routine; he collapsed and required
urgent cardioversion. Atrial flutter
These limitations bring up early discussions about ablation in ath- In an athlete presenting with atrial flutter, there should be a very low
letes with AF. Smaller series have shown that the outcome of pul- threshold to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus, given the efficacy and
monary vein isolation (PVI) in athletes with paroxysmal AF is similar safety of the procedure versus the risks for recurrences during sports
The athlete’s heart, a proarrhythmic heart 1407
as discussed above. European recommendations even advice that the other subforms too.47,48 Therefore, some authors argue for con-
isthmus ablation is mandatory in athletes with prior AFL, given the ab- tinued sports participation or at least shared and informed decision
sence of adequate and safe medical treatment.39 They even recom- making rather than flat diseligibility in these athletes.48,49 Ancillary
mend to ablate the isthmus prophylactically in athletes with AF, measures, such as avoiding QT-prolonging drugs, avoidance of elec-
especially when drug treatment is considered (see earlier) or con- trolyte disturbances, or even the provision of an automatic external
comitantly with PVI. Athletes should be explained that there is a high defibrillator (AED) should be discussed.50
propensity for developing AF, even after succesfull isthmus ablation: In a number of such situations, apart from other evaluation tools
in a series of patients presenting initially with AFL only, about 50% de- like (repeat) exercise tests and Holters during training or competi-
veloped at least one episode of AF during the ensuing 2 years after tion, implantation of an implantable loop recorder (ILR) that is cap-
succesful isthmus ablation. The risk for AF was higher in those with a able of remote transmissions may be used as a sort of intermediate
history of endurance sports activity or continuing it after ablation.40 management path. At least, the athlete can be followed closely during
Hence, the same considerations as discussed above after succesfull ongoing sports participation. Limitations of such approach are that
further deterioration with consequent arrhythmias or maybe even insights, it may be preferrable to reduce physical activity while main-
heart failure symptoms at rest later in life. An example of an interna- taining intense arrhythmic follow-up, potentially including an ILR.
tional professional cyclist with the incidental finding of LV scar (re-
vealed by CMR after a routine yearly ECG showed new
repolarization abnormalities) and with clear subnormal LV contract- An implantable defibrillator as
ile performance, is shown in Figure 6. He stopped his carreer, not so
much because of the associated nonsustained VT (for which an
bailout to continue sports?
implantable cardioverter defibrillator could be implanted), but be- A large Multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry has shown that after
cause of the haemodynamic findings. a median follow-up of 44 months, there were no ocurrences of death
Athletes with RV arrhythmias due to ExI-ARVC often (but not al- nor of arrhythmia- or shock-related physical injury in 440 athletes
ways) have low voltage areas in the RVOT, with a different distribu- who continued organized competitive or high-risk sports after ICD
tion than in typical ARVC, and can succesfully be ablated in those implantation.57 An additional analysis in 82 recreational athletes con-
areas.55,56 However, just like in the case of PVI for AF, as discussed firmed these reassuring outcomes in non-professional athletes
above, the question arises on the possibility for resumption of vigor- (Heidbuchel, unpublished observation), which is relevant for the
ous endurance sports after succesful ablation. Realizing that the ar- many ICD recipients who want to continue recreational sports activ-
rhythmias where the expression of exercise-induced structural ities, some even intensive, after implantation. Although sports partici-
changes, one can wonder whether resumption of the same activities pation with an ICD seems safer than previously considered (and
may lead to more widespread RV changes and new arrhythmias. No hence may lead to relaxation of the current rather restrictive recom-
prospective data are present, but based on the pathophysiological mendations on sports with an ICD),39,58 based on the concept that
The athlete’s heart, a proarrhythmic heart 1409
monitoring, has been member of the scientific advisory boards and/ 22. La Gerche A, Connelly KA, Mooney DJ, MacIsaac AI, Prior DL. Biochemical and
functional abnormalities of left and right ventricular function after ultra-
or lecturer for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb,
endurance exercise. Heart 2008;94:860–6.
Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Cardiome, received travel support from 23. Stewart GM, Yamada A, Haseler LJ, Kavanagh JJ, Koerbin G, Chan J et al. Altered
St. Jude Medical, and received unconditional research grants through ventricular mechanics after 60 min of high-intensity endurance exercise: insights
from exercise speckle-tracking echocardiography. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
the University of Hasselt from Bayer and through the University of 2015;308:H875–83.
Antwerp from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Bracco Imaging 24. Heidbuchel H, Prior DL, La Gerche A. Ventricular arrhythmias associated with
Europe. long-term endurance sports: what is the evidence? Br J Sports Med 2012;46:
i44–50.
25. La Gerche A, Robberecht C, Kuiperi C, Nuyens D, Willems R, de Ravel T et al.
References Lower than expected desmosomal gene mutation prevalence in endurance ath-
1. Fagard R. Athlete’s heart. Heart 2003;89:1455–61. letes with complex ventricular arrhythmias of right ventricular origin. Heart
2. Pluim BM, Lamb HJ, Kayser HW, Leujes F, Beyerbacht HP, Zwinderman AH 2010;96:1268–74.
et al. Functional and metabolic evaluation of the athlete’s heart by magnetic res- 26. Sawant AC, Bhonsale A, Te Riele AS, Tichnell C, Murray B, Russell SD et al.
onance imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Exercise has a disproportionate role in the pathogenesis of arrhythmogenic right
45. Finocchiaro G, Papadakis M, Dhutia H, Millar LM, Robertus JL, Behr ER et al. 52. Konhilas JP, Watson PA, Maass A, Boucek DM, Horn T, Stauffer BL et al.
Circumstances of sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Data from a Exercise can prevent and reverse the severity of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
large pathology registry. Eur Heart J 2016;37(abstract suppl):1226–7. Circ Res 2006;98:540–8.
46. Maron BJ, Udelson JE, Bonow RO, Nishimura RA, Ackerman MJ, Estes NA 3rd 53. La Gerche A, Claessen G, Van de Bruaene A, Pattyn N, Van Cleemput J, Gewillig
et al. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes M et al. Cardiac MRI: a new gold standard for ventricular volume quantification
with cardiovascular abnormalities: task force 3: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, during high-intensity exercise. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;6:329–38.
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy and other cardiomyopa- 54. La Gerche A, Claessen G, Dymarkowski S, Voigt JU, De Buck F, Vanhees L et al.
thies, and myocarditis: a scientific statement from the American Heart Exercise-induced right ventricular dysfunction is associated with ventricular ar-
Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66: rhythmias in endurance athletes. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1998–2010.
2362–71. 55. Venlet J, Piers SR, Jongbloed JD, Androulakis AF, Naruse Y, den Uijl DW et al.
47. Aziz PF, Sweeten T, Vogel RL, Bonney WJ, Henderson J, Patel AR et al. Sports Isolated subepicardial right ventricular outflow tract scar in athletes with ven-
participation in genotype positive children with long QT syndrome. JACC Clin tricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:497–507.
Electrophysiol 2015;1:62–70. 56. Corrado D, Basso C, Leoni L, Tokajuk B, Turrini P, Bauce B et al. Three-dimensional
48. Johnson JN, Ackerman MJ. Return to play? Athletes with congenital long QT syn- electroanatomical voltage mapping and histologic evaluation of myocardial substrate
drome. Br J Sports Med 2013;47:28–33. in right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:731–9.
49. Providencia R, Teixeira C, Segal O, Ullstein A, Mueser KT, Lambiase P. Is it time 57. Lampert R, Olshansky B, Heidbuchel H, Lawless C, Saarel E, Ackerman M et al.