1

Binet-Kamat Test

Chandana S -2337411 (2MPCLA)

Department of Psychology, CHRIST (Deemed-to-be University)

Psychodiagnostic Lab - I (MPS251)

Dr. Deepakkumar S

April 09, 2024

 2

Contents

Binet-Kamat Test............................................................................................................................. 4

Applications............................................................................................................................... 5

Psychometric Properties.............................................................................................................5

Diagnostic Report............................................................................................................................ 6

Proforma of the Client............................................................................................................... 6

Results..............................................................................................................................................7

Table 1........................................................................................................................................7

Discussion........................................................................................................................................ 8

Impressions and recommendations............................................................................................ 8

References......................................................................................................................................10
3
 4

Binet-Kamat Test

The term "intellect" is quite common and can refer to a wide range of abilities, including

quick thinking, quick doing, accurate learning, quick understanding, and quick learning. Cicero

originated the Latin word "intelligence" to translate a Greek term that encompasses all cognitive

functions (Sternberg & Kaufman, 2011).

The first attempt at fairly comprehensive and scientific lines goes as far back as 1922

when Dr. C. H. Rice of Lahore developed his Hindusthani – Binet - Performance point scale

meant primarily for the children of Punjab in 1939. Dr Kamat of Bombay University issued his

revision of Binet’s tests, which could be used among Marathi and Kannada speaking children. In

1942, Dr Lahalal of U.P constructed and standardised a verbal scale of intelligence test for plus

school-going children of UP. This was in Hindi and Urdu. Since 1940, intelligence testing seems

to have acquired more momentum (Roopesh,2020).

The Binet-Kamat Test has numerous questions and tasks designed to evaluate various

cognitive capacities. It consists of spoken questions that assess one's vocabulary, understanding,

and critical thinking abilities. Additionally, there are performance-based activities that gauge a

person's ability to solve problems and use their visual-spatial skills. Examples of these tasks

include assembling puzzles or arranging blocks. The exam also includes memory activities that

measure the test taker's working memory and attention span by asking them to retrieve and

manipulate material. All things considered, the Binet-Kamat Test offers a thorough assessment of

a person's cognitive abilities in a number of areas, such as verbal reasoning, numeric reasoning,

visual-spatial processing, memory, and attention (Roopesh,2020).

 5

Applications

One of the most used intelligence tests in clinical and educational settings is the Binet

Kamat test. It is used in the clinical setting to screen children who are mentally challenged,

learning handicapped, have speech and language issues, are slow learners, etc. Additionally, it

can evaluate cognitive performance in a variety of domains, including language, reasoning,

memory, social skills, etc. BKT is utilised in the educational system to evaluate pupils' general

intellectual capacity and compare it to their academic performance and accomplishments.

Educational training for kids with learning difficulties might be started based on their current

level of functioning. The exam has also been used extensively in psychological and educational

studies.

The Binet-Kamat Test (BKT) has found widespread application in both educational and

clinical settings. In the clinical context, it is employed to evaluate the mental age of children

experiencing learning disabilities, language impairments, or intellectual disabilities. Additionally,

it serves as a tool for assessing intellectual functioning across various domains, including

memory, reasoning, and social competence (Devi, 2014; Chokshi, n.d.). Within the educational

realm, the BKT is utilized to gauge students' general intellectual levels while comparing it with

their academic performance and general achievements. This information obtained can aid in

modifying educational interventions and training programs to meet specific needs of individual

students, ensuring a more personalized and effective learning experience. (Devi, 2014; Chokshi,

n.d.)

Psychometric Properties

The Binet-Kamat Test is an Indian adaptation of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale,

which is a widely used test for measuring intelligence. Numerous research investigations have
 6

examined and documented the psychometric qualities of the Binet-Kamat Test.A research that

looked at the validity and reliability of the Binet-Kamat Test discovered that it was consistently

reliable in measuring intelligence, with strong split-half and test-retest reliability (Kamat, 1934).

Additionally, the study found a strong link between academic accomplishment and the

Binet-Kamat Test scores, indicating the test's validity as an intelligence test. The study examined

the Binet-Kamat Test's factorial structure and discovered evidence of the presence of verbal and

non-verbal factors, which are regarded as fundamental elements of intelligence (Kamat, 1934).

Diagnostic Report

Proforma of the Client

Name: AT

Age: 16

D.O.B: 20th April 2008

Gender: Female

Education: Master’s Student

Test Administered: Binet-Kamat Test

Purpose of Testing: To Assess the Intelligence

Behavioural Observations: The participant was initially interested and eager to do the test. But

eventually seemed to lose patience.

 7

Results

Table 1

Mental Age for Domain-wise Classification of Intelligence

Domain Sub Domains MA

Language 16

Memory Meaningful 19

Non-Meaningful 16

Conceptual Thinking 19

Reasoning Non-Verbal 19

Verbal 16

Numerical 16

Visuo Motor 19

Social Intelligence 16

Overall Total 103.48

Interpretation Average

BKT IQ =104.34

Wechsler’s IQ = 103.48

The mental age associated with the areas of language, non-meaningful memory, verbal

reasoning, numerical reasoning, and social intelligence is 16 years old, based on the table. The

mental age obtained, however, is higher and is 19 years for meaningful memory, conceptual

thinking, nonverbal reasoning, and visuomotor skills. This distinction can provide light on a

person's relative advantages and disadvantages in several areas of intellectual functioning. For

the test, PD's IQ was determined to be 104.34. The adjusted IQ, however, was discovered to be
 8

103.48 after being compared to Wechsler's IQ categorisation, indicating an average level of

intelligence.

Discussion

The subject's basal age was 16 years, and the terminal age was 22 years. AT got the last

two items incorrect in the test for 19 years. An intricate profile of intellectual functioning is

revealed by the mental age scores obtained from different areas. A mental age of 16 is average

for language, non-meaningful memory, verbal reasoning, numerical reasoning, and social

intelligence; however, a mental age of 19 is average for meaningful memory, conceptual

thinking, non-verbal reasoning, and visuo-motor skills. This implies varying degrees of

proficiency in abstract thought, motor coordination, meaningful knowledge retention, and spatial

reasoning. On the other hand, domains such as linguistic analogies, social awareness,

memorising random material, and mathematical problem solving correspond to normal

development. The different mental ages highlight the significance of taking domain-specific

talents and difficulties into account, allowing for customised treatments and support plans to

optimise overall intellectual development and performance according to a person's distinct

cognitive profile.

Impressions and recommendations

The individual's strengths, as well as educational and developmental efforts, should

prioritise experiential learning, project-based activities, and opportunities for hands-on

exploration that leverage conceptual thinking, visual-spatial reasoning, and motor skills.

Simultaneously, targeted interventions focused on improving language proficiency, memory

strategies for unrelated information, verbal and numerical reasoning, and social skill

development could help address areas of relative weakness. A balanced approach that nurtures
 9

existing talents while bolstering weaker domains through personalised support and

accommodations could foster a well-rounded intellectual growth trajectory.

 10

References

Chokshi, D. (n.d.). BKT Manual. Scribd.

https://www.scribd.com/document/509169684/BKT-Manual

Kamat, V. V. (1934). A REVISION OF THE BINET SCALE FOR INDIAN CHILDREN:

(Kanarese and Marathi speaking). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(3),

296–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1934.tb02959.x

Roopesh, B. N. (2020). Binet kamat test of intelligence: Administration, scoring and

interpretation–An in-depth appraisal. Indian Journal of Mental Health, 7(3), 180.

Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, S. B. (2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence. In

Cambridge University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511977244