0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views42 pages

Slide5 Modulation Techniques

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views42 pages

Slide5 Modulation Techniques

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 42

Modulation Techniques in Digital

Communications
Chapter 4

c.kabiri@ur.ac.rw
Outline
 Digital modulation
 Pulse shaping techniques
 Linear modulation techniques
 Constant envelope modulation
 Modulation performance in fading and
multipath channels
Digital Modulation
 Modern radio communication systems use digital modulation
techniques
 Digital modulation offers many advantages over analog
modulation
 Greater noise immunity
 Robustness to channel impairments
 Easier multiplexing of various forms of information
 Greater security
 Support complex signal conditioning and processing techniques
such as source coding, encryption, equalization, and error control
coding
 Desired digital modulation should provide
 Low bit error rates at low received SNR
 Perform well in multipath and fading conditions
 Occupies a minimum of bandwidth
 Easy and cost-effective to implement
Pulse Shaping Techniques
 Transmission of a rectangular pulse through a bandlimited
channel will result in intersymbol interference
 Increase of channel bandwidth is not a solution to this problem
since radio communication systems operate within an allocated
and limited bandwidth
 Out-of-band radiation in the adjacent channel in mobile radio
system should be 40dB to 80dB below that of the desired
passband
 Techniques are required that

 Reduce modulation bandwidth


 Suppress out-of-band radiation
 Reduce intersymbol interference

 Use pulse shaping techniques


Time Waveforms of Binary Line
Codes
Power Spectral Density
Nyquist Criterion for ISI Cancellation
(I)
Nyquist Criterion for ISI Cancellation
(II)
 Impulse that satisfies Nyquist condition
for ISI cancellation

 Nyquist ideal pulse shape for zero ISI


Nyquist Criterion for ISI Cancellation
(III)
Raised Cosine Rolloff Filter (I)
 Transfer function

 Magnitude transfer function of a raised cosine filter


Raised Cosine Rolloff Filter (II)
 Impulse response

 Pulse shape having a raised cosine spectrum


Gaussian Pulse-shaping Filter (I)
 Non-Nyquist techniques for pulse shaping which is particularly
efficient when used in conjunction with Minimum Shift Keying
(MSK) modulation
 Transfer function of a Gaussian lowpass filter

 where  relates to the 3 dB bandwidth B of the baseband shaping filter

 Impulse response of a Gaussian pulse-shaping filter


Gaussian Pulse-shaping Filter (II)
 Impulse response
Linear Modulation Techniques
Binary Phase Shift Keying (I)
 BPSK constellation diagram

 Binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signal


Binary Phase Shift Keying (II)
 Power spectral density (PSD) of a BPSK signal at RF

 PSD of BPSK
Binary Phase Shift Keying (III)
 BPSK receiver with carrier recovery circuits

 Probability of bit error in AWGN


Q-function
 Tabulation of the Q-function (complementary error function)
Differential Phase Shift Keying (I)
Differential Phase Shift Keying
(II)
 Block diagram of a DPSK transmitter

 Block diagram of DPSK receiver


Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (I)
 QPSK constellation diagram

 QPSK signal
Quadrature Phase Shift Keying
(II)
 Block diagram of a QPSK transmitter
Quadrature Phase Shift Keying
(III)
 PSD of a QPSK signal at RF
Quadrature Phase Shift Keying
(IV)
 Block diagram of a QPSK receiver

 Probability of bit error in AWGN


Offset QPSK
 Offset QPSK (OQPSK) or staggered QPSK support more efficient
amplification
 In OQPSK signalling, the even and odd bit stream mI (t) and
mQ(t) are offset in their relative alignment by one bit period
 Example

 Maximum phase shift of the transmitted signal at any given time


is limited to ±90.

 Block diagram of a baseband differential detector
Constant Envelope Modulation (I) [Rappaport 311]

 Many practical mobile radio communication systems use


nonlinear modulation methods, where the amplitude of the
carrier is constant, regardless of the variation in the modulating
signal.
 The constant envelope family of modulations has the advantage
of satisfying a number of conditions, some of which are:

 Power efficient Class C amplifiers can be used without introducing


degradation in the spectrum occupancy of the transmitted signal.
 Low out-of-band radiation of the order of −60 dB to −70 dB can be achieved.
 Limiter-discriminator detection can be used, which simplifies receiver design
and provides high immunity against random FM noise and signal fluctuations
due to Rayleigh fading.

 While constant envelope modulations have many advantages,


they occupy a larger bandwidth than linear modulation schemes.
Constant Envelope Modulation (I) [Rappaport 311]

 Binary frequency shift keying (BFSK)


The frequency of a constant amplitude carrier signal is switched
between two values according to the two possible message states.

 Minimum shift keying (MSK)


MSK is a special type of continuous phase-frequency shift keying
(CPFSK) wherein the peak frequency deviation is equal to half the
bit rate.

 Gaussian minimum shift keying (GMSK)


GMSK is a simple binary modulation scheme which may be viewed
as a derivative of MSK. In GMSK, the sidelobe levels of the spectrum
are further reduced by passing the modulating NRZ data waveform
through a pre-modulation Gaussian pulse-shaping filter.
Power Spectral Density of MSK Signals as
Compared to QPSK and OQPSK Signals

 PSDs
Power Spectral Density of a
GMSK Signal
 PSD
Modulation Performance in Fading and
Multipath Channels
 To evaluate the probability of error of any digital modulation
scheme in a slow, flat-fading channel, one must average the
probability of error of the particular modulation in AWGN
channels over the possible ranges of signal strength due to fading

where
Slow Flat Rayleigh Fading Channel

 Rayleigh distribution

where

 Probability of error in slow flat Rayleigh fading channel


Probability of Error of a Particular Modulation Scheme in
Rayleigh Fading [Source: Rappaport]
Bit Error Rate Performance of Binary Modulation
Schemes in Rayleigh, Flat Fading Channel
BER for Pi/4 DQPSK in Flat Rayleigh
Fading Channel
BER for Pi/4 DQPSK in a 2-ray
Rayleigh Fading Channel
Exercises
 Problem 1

 Problem 2
Using the 4 QPSK signal of Problem 1, demonstrate how the received signal is
detected properly using a baseband differential detector. Assume the transmitter and
receiver are perfectly phase locked, and  0  0o.
Q&A

c.kabiri@ur.ac.rw

You might also like