Namaa Guddaa
Namaa Guddaa
INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
BSC THESIS ON
JUNE, 2019
JUNE, 2019
         DECLARATION
We declare that this thesis is our own and original work of us and all sources of material
used for this thesis have been properly acknowledged, following scientific guidelines of
institute of technology.
This is to certify that, the thesis entitled “The Partial replacement of Eucalyptus wooden
ash in concrete, which could be submitted for partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the bachelor of Science in degree, the under Graduate Program of the Department of
Civil Engineering, Institute of Technology, School of under Graduate Studies Arba
Minch University Under my supervision, and has been carried out by:
1. GETAHUN TISASU
2. YESERA BELACHEW
3. GULTE NAGESO
4. SITOTA SETEGN
5. SAMSON G/MESKEL
6. TESFAYE KEFANI
7. CHERENET MEKOYA
8. YEWDIYANESH ABEBE
Therefore I recommend that the students have fulfilled the requirements and hence
hereby can submit the thesis to the department for defense.
Signature___________ Date______________
                             Signature___________Date_____________
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With the deepest gratitude, we wish to thank GOD for his endless support and we would
like to acknowledge to our advisors instructor Shamble k. and Gezahegn Z. for their
willing, motivation, and immense knowledge to the research time and to the report.
Beside our advisors, we would like to thank Arba Minch University Institute of
Technology for their laboratory facilitation and Etete construction plc. Their support by
providing materials.
Our sincere thanks also go to our group for their team spirit and motivation to work hard
and to do better.
                                                                                       ii
ABSTRACT
The objective of the research is to examine the effect of partial replacement of eucalyptus
wood ash workability of fresh concrete, compressive strength and density of hardened
concrete.
The scope of the research covered the potential of using eucalyptus wood ash as a cement
replacement material. The methodology of the study was mainly laboratory testing of the
materials. Wood ash limited to the grain size of less than 75µm is added to cement by
weight percentage of 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% by the method of replacement by weight.
Concrete with no wood ash serves as control. The mix ratio used was 1:1.97:2.91 with
water to binder ratio maintained at 0.53. The Compressive strength was determined at
curing ages 7, 14 and 28 days.
The compressive strength of wood ash concrete decreases with increasing wood ash
content. There was a sharp decrease in compressive strength beyond 20% wood ash
substitution. It was concluded that a maximum of 20 %,( 30.87Mpa) wood ash
substitution is adequate for use in structural concrete.
The main recommendation therefore was to replace cement with 20% eucalyptus wood
ash as this particular proportion of replacement would enable cost savings, reduction of
environmental pollution and achievement of normal strength concrete as well.
                                                                                        iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................. ii
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...................................................................................... 23
                                                                                                            iv
   3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 23
REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 62
APPENDIX I .................................................................................................................... 63
APPENDIX II ................................................................................................................... 67
                                                                                                                                  v
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
Mpa: - Mega Pascale
                                                                         vi
LIST OF FIGURE
                                                                                                                              vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2 Chemical composition of wood ash and comparison with OPC ......................... 18
                                                                                                                         viii
Table 22 Summary for compressive strength ................................................................... 57
                                                                                                                  ix
BSC THESIS REPORT                                                                       2019
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Concrete is made of cement, water, sand, and gravel mixed in definite proportions,
whereas mortar consists of cement, water, and aggregate. These are both used to bind
rocks, stones, bricks and other building units, fill or seal any gaps, and to make
decorative patterns.
The production of cement involves the depletion of natural resources and greenhouse gas
emissions. Thus, there is need to search for alternative materials to cement in the
construction. Continuous generation of wastes arising from industrial by-products and
agricultural residue, create acute environmental problems both in terms of their treatment
and disposal. The construction industry has been identified as the one that absorbs the
majority of such materials as filler in concrete.
Some industrial wastes have been studied for use as supplementary cementing materials
such as Fly ash, Silica fume, Pulverized fuel ash, volcanic ash, Rice husk ash and Corn
cob ash (CCA).
The ultimate aim of this study is to analyze the effect of eucalyptus wooden ash on
different major properties of concrete.
Wood ash contains amorphous silica making it fit as cement replacing material
due to its high pozzolanic activity. In many countries, the wood industries generate a
large amount of waste products in the worldwide.
The low costs, the proximity of the sources and the potential pollution from wood wastes
have led to studies into the possible use of the wood ash as fibers in concrete.
Incorporating the usage of wood ash as replacement for cement in blended cement is
beneficial for the environmental point of view as well as producing low cost
construction entity thus leading to a sustainable relationship. As the disposal cost of the
ashes are rising and volume of ash is increasing, a sustainable ash management
which integrate the ash within the natural cycles needs to be employed.
    What is the effect of partial replacement of cement by wood ash in fresh concrete
       property?
    What is the effect of partial replacement of cement by wood ash in hardened
       concrete property?
    What is the optimum percentage replacement of wooden ash in the concrete?
The general objective of the research is to evaluate the importance of eucalyptus wooden
ash as a partial replacement of cement in concrete.
In developing countries like Ethiopia most of the people uses wood in its day to day
activity for preparing food and other purposes. Using wood causes high amount of wood
waste ash, this needs wide land fill area and it becomes the factor for environmental
pollution. On the other hand, due to the booming of the construction industry, the demand
and consumption cement is largely increasing from time to time which causes large
natural resource depletion and increase construction cost. Thus, the replacement cement
by waste wood ash has got importance in reducing the cost to cement and ensuring cost
efficient construction, and also contributes to clean and green environment by reducing
the wastes from wooden ash.
The research is focused on evaluating the eucalyptus wooden ash as partial replacement
of cement for C-25 concrete grade. Fresh (slump, ) and hardened (compression strength,
ultrasonic pulse velocity, rebound hammer) concrete laboratory tests were conducted to
reach on conclusion. Other essential properties like ,flexural strength, Durability, and
permeability tests were not conducted due to the reason of unavailability and/or
malfunctioning of laboratory equipment’s, and also scarcity of raw materials like cement.
The research result will be affected by calibration of laboratory equipment’s, degree of
compaction and skill of manpower.
Wood ash: - is the residue powder left after the combustion of wood, such as burning
wood in a home fireplace or an industrial power plant. It is used traditionally
by gardeners as a good source of potash.
Strength: - is a subject who deals with the behavior of solid objects subject to stresses
and strains.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
The literature of the study involves recent findings pertaining to the application of wood
ash as a partial replacement for cement. It attempts to review material applied in the
construction industry about the suitability of wood ash in cement-based material
comparing the compression strength attained in the different percentages of the mix
design of concrete. (Wood ash, cement, concrete, mix design and construction industry).
Concrete is composed mainly of three materials, namely, cement, water and aggregate
(“inert” mineral fillers), and an additional material, known as an admixture, is sometimes
added to modify certain of its properties. When these materials are mixed and placed in
forms and allowed to curing, the chemical reaction between the water and cement forms a
hardened binding medium of cement paste, which surrounds and holds together the
aggregates by adhering them to a varying degree. Hence the properties of concrete may
be governed by careful selection (design) and control of the constituent materials. The
requirements for a fresh and a hardened concrete may vary in wide range, dependent on
the type of structure to be cast and the available equipment.
2.1.1 Cement
Cement is a binder substance used for construction that set, harden and adheres to other
material to bind them together. Cement is seldom used on its Owen, but rather to bind
sand and gravel (aggregate) together. Cement mixed with fine aggregate produces mortar
for masonry, or with sand and gravel, produces concrete. A number of different types of
cement are manufactured, by varying the ratio of the raw material and/or by adding some
additional materials.
These are manufactured with two or more raw materials. They have to be correctly
proportioned and thoroughly mixed. Lime, silica, and alumina are the important
ingredients.
This factor helps in quicker and complete hydration of cement particles during setting
and helps in gaining early strength. However, the setting time and ultimate strength of
Rapid Hardening Cement are same as of Ordinary Cement.
It is special purpose cement, used in those types of projects, where quick hardening is
required..
Low Heat Cement: It is that type in which a very low amount of heat or hydration is
liberated during setting and hardening. Mostly it is used in massive concrete structures
like Dams etc.
It is mostly used in mega projects construction like DAMS. If we use ordinary Portland
cement instead of low heat cement in such structures, Cracks will develop in such
structures due to the great amount of heat liberated during setting and hardening. And a
DAM with cracks is a useless structure. But when low heat cement is used, this danger
(development of cracks) can be eliminated.
Quick Setting Cement: These Types of Cement are quite different than rapid hardening
cement. Its quality is that it set into a stone-like mass within a period of fewer than 30
minutes. This property, of setting as quickly as possible is achieved by following controls
in the manufacturing process:
High Alumina Cement: These Types of Cement contains alumina in considerably larger
proportions (average 40 percent) than normal cement. High Alumina cement is
manufactured by calcining a well-proportioned mixture of Limestone and Bauxite
(Al2O3, n H2O). No other raw material is added, not even gypsum is mixed with the
clinker during grinding. The total Alumina content is generally above 32 percent.
Properties:
The most important properties of high alumina cement are summarized below:
Blast Furnace Slag Cement: It is a modified type of Portland cement which contains 25-
65 percent (by weight) of blast furnace slag. It is manufactured by grinding clinker and
specific amounts of blast furnace slag together. A small percent of gypsum is also added
for controlling its setting time. The slag, as we know, is a waste product from the blast
furnace which is used in the manufacture of iron (Ferrous Metal).
Properties: The slag cement offers a number of advantages, which are the following.
     They possess better workability, cohesiveness, and plasticity. These qualities are
        explained to be due to lesser specific gravity and greater specific surface area of
        slag cement.
     They have better resistance to sulfates of alkali metals, alumina, and iron.
     It produces low heat. This property makes it useful for use in mega projects like
        Dams.
     It is economical as compared to ordinary cement.
It is better suited for use in marine structures as in docks, harbors, and jetties. It is also
used in road construction in marshy and alkaline soils.
Pozzolana Cement: In this cement type, clinker and pozzolanic material such as
(volcanic ash, fly ash, etc.) are mixed in a definite proportion with Portland cement. The
pozzolanic materials do not have any cementing qualities when used alone, but when
mixed with Portland cement, they react with cement components and form compounds
with cementing properties. The pozzolana cement has many properties similar to ordinary
Portland cement. But it also offers some additional properties, which are given below.
     It produces less heat. Due to this property, it can be used in mega projects.
     It offers greater resistance to sulfates and corrosive actions of sea water.
Super Sulfate Cement: These types of cement are manufactured by adding additional
quantities of calcium sulfate and blast furnace slag in the Portland cement. It is especially
useful for mass concrete work especially in sulfate-rich environment and marine
conditions. Besides, it is comparatively economical than other types of cement.
Air Entraining Cement: This cement type is manufactured by adding some indigenous
air entraining agents such as glues, resins, sulfates, etc., during the grinding stage of
clinker. They are used to improve the workability of concrete with smaller water-cement
ratio and they also improve the frost resistance of concrete.
2.1.2 Water
Generally, water is a key ingredient in the manufacture of concrete work. Water fit for
drinking is generally suitable for making concrete. It is also material on its own right.
Understanding its properties is helpful in gaining and understanding of its effects on
concrete and other building materials. Although water is an important ingredient of
concrete little needs to be written about water quality, since it has little to do with the
quality of the concrete. However, mixing water can cause problems by introducing
impurities that have detrimental effects on concrete quality.
2.1.3 Aggregate
Aggregate is a granular material, such as sand, gravel, crushed stone or iron-blast furnace
slag. All materials that pass-through sieve 4.75mm is conventionally referred to as a fine
aggregate or sand, while all materials that retained sieve 4.75mm is referred as coarse
aggregates, gravel, or stone. Also, it is filler materials which make up a large portion
(roughly 65-80%) of the concrete volume. Considerable care should be taken to provide
the best aggregates available. They should be hard, clean and free of any harmful matter
to an extent which would adversely affect the hardening of a binder, or the strength or
durability of the finished material in which they are put.
It should consist of naturally occurring (crushed or uncrushed) stones, gravel and sand or
combination thereof. They should be hard, strong, dense, durable, clear and free from
veins and adherent coating, and free from injurious amounts of disintegrated pieces,
alkali, vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Also, possible, flaky,
coriaceous and elongated pieces are avoided.
Visual inspection of gravel and natural sand is necessary for presence of clay lumps, clay
coating, silt, grading and shape, while for crushed aggregates and sand inspection is
necessary for stone dust, flaky shape and grading. If clay dust silt or mud is present and
not removed/reduce through washing, it may produce lower strength concrete.
Classifications are on the basis of source and specific gravity. Aggregates are classified
as natural or artificial aggregates according to their source:
  i.   Natural aggregates: Natural aggregates are those taken from native deposits with
       no and, gravel, crushed stone, and pumice is examples of Natural aggregates.
 ii.   Artificial aggregates: Artificial aggregates are those materials or particles which
       are obtained either as a by-product of an unrelated industrial process or by a
       special manufacturing process like heat treatment. Blast-furnace slag is typical
Types of Admixtures
cement content so as to reduce the heat of hydration in mass concrete, To increase the
workability so as to ease placing in accessible locations.
Set Retarders Admixture: The function of retarder is to delay or extend the setting time
of cement paste in concrete. This is useful when used with plasticizers to give workability
retention. Used on their own, retarders allow later vibration of the concrete to prevent the
formation of cold joints between layers of concrete placed with a significant delay
between them. The mechanism of set retards is based on absorption. The commonly
known retards are Calcium Ligno-sulphonate sand Carbohydrates derivatives used in
fraction of percent by weight of cement.
Fly Ash: It is finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of ground or
powdered coal. Fly ash is generally captured from the chimneys of coal-fired power
plants; it has Pozzolanic properties, and is sometimes blended with cement for this
reason.
blast furnace slag, silica fume, ground glass natural Pozzolans or calcined clay (e.g.,
metakaolin), zeolite, coal bottom ash, wood fiber waste, rice husk ash and limestone
powder waste.
Silica fume: Also known as micro silica or condensed silica fume. It is an ultrafine
powder collected as a by- product of the silicon and ferrosilicon alloy. It is highly
reactive, the smallness of the particles speed up the reaction with calcium hydroxide.
Very small particles of silica fume can enter the space between the particles of cement
and thus improves packing. Silica fume is usually incorporated in the mix at the batcher.
Blended cement containing silica fume (6.5 to 8% by mass). Ramezanianpour, A. A.
(2014).
Natural Pozzolans: These are materials with presence of moisture, chemically reacts
with the calcium hydroxide released by the hydration of Portland cement to form calcium
silica hydrate. Ramezanianpour, A. A. (2014).
These materials are used as: Supplementary cementing materials added to concrete as
part of the total cementing system. Used as a partial replacement of Portland cement or
blended cement. These materials are used to improve a particular concrete property.
Optimum amount: to be established by testing / trial mix.
Wooden ash
Cement replacement materials: - the research enables to construct light weight structures
and less costly concrete structures by partially replacing Portland cement by wooden ash.
Wood Ash (WA) prepared from the uncontrolled burning of the wood is evaluated for its
suitability as partial cement replacement in conventional concrete. Wooden ash is
residual powder left after the combustion of wood, such as burning wood in home fire
place or an industrial power plant. It is used traditionally by gardeners as a good source
of potash.
Wooden Ash is composed of many major and minor elements that trees need for growth.
Since most of these elements are extracted from the soil and atmosphere during the tree's
growth, they are common in our environment and are also essential in production of
crops and forages. Calcium is the most abundant element in wood ash and gives ash
properties similar to agricultural lime. Ash is also a good source of potassium,
phosphorus, and magnesium. In terms of commercial fertilizer, average wood ash would
be about 0-1-3 (N-P-K) mean nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium respectively. In
addition to these macro-nutrients, wood ash is a good source of many micronutrients
needed in trace amounts for adequate plant growth. Wood ash contains few elements that
pose environmental problems. Hardwoods usually produce more ash than softwoods, and
the bark and leaves generally produce more ash than the inner woody parts of the tree.
When ash is produced in industrial combustion systems, the temperature of combustion,
cleanliness of the fuel wood, the collection location, and the process can also have
profound effects on the nature of the ash material.
Therefore, wood ash composition can vary depending on geographical location and
industrial processes. This makes testing the ash extremely important.
Tarun, Rudolph and Rafat reported the following compound composition limits.
Naik et al. (2002): studied the drying shrinkage properties of concrete mixtures made by
the incorporation of wood waste ash as a partial cement replacement material. For mixes
produced during the study, wood ash was used at cement substitution level of 0, 5, 8 and
12%. Length changes of concrete specimens produced were monitored up to 232 days. It
was reported that the shrinkage value of control concrete specimens was 0.0092% (7
days) ,0.052% (232 days). Meanwhile shrinkage values of concrete mixtures with 5, 8
and 12% were recorded to 0.012%−0.027%, 0.014%/−0.013% and 0.0051%−0.044%.
From the results of drying shrinkage, it was observed that the inclusion of wood waste
ash significantly contributed to the reduction in magnitude of concrete upon drying. This
is a desirable attribute which may reduce formation of micro cracks within concrete mix
on drying.
Udeyo and Dashibil, (2002): They had common findings that show the use of wood
waste ash as a partial cement replacement material in concrete at all level of cement
replacement ranged between 5% and 30% it reduces the compressive strength of the
concrete mix produced relative to neat OPC concrete for all curing times.
Udeyo and Dashibil (2002): reported a reduction in both the compression and split
tensile strength of concrete produced by partial replacement of cement with wood waste
ash. Split tensile strength of concrete mixes at 7 and 28 days was observed to decline
with increasing level of cement replacement with wood waste ash. The effects of
reduction in split tensile strength of concrete by the use of wood waste ash as partial
cement replacement material was less pronounced in comparison with reduction in
compressive strength. It was observed that the marginal difference in split tensile strength
of SDA/OPC concrete mixes with reference to neat OPC concrete were more significant
at 7 days. However, at 28 days the SDA/OPC concrete mixes with a cement replacement
level up to 25% total binder weight exhibited a split tensile strength values of over 90%
of split tensile strength of neat OPC concrete.
Udoeyo and Dashibil (2002): investigated the resistance of concrete containing wood
waste ash against acid attack. Two batches of concrete specimens having the same mix
proportions (1 cement: 2 sand: 4 gravel and w/c ratio of 0.65) were produced. One of the
batches contained neat OPC as a binder while the other batch had 15% total binder
weight of wood waste ash used in partial replacement of cement and 85% total binder
weight of cement.
At the tenth week of immersion, there was observable mass decrease in both batches of
specimens and it could be noted that mass decrease of the concrete specimens with 15%
total binder weight of wood ash were less pronounced in comparison to control concrete
specimens with neat OPC as binder.
Naik et al. (2004) investigate that the property of wood waste ash particles collected
from different sources located in different areas. The specific gravity obtained 2.26 to 2.6
and fineness of (% retained on 45 µm sieve) -23% to90%.
Elinwa and Ejeh (2004): studied the effects of the incorporation of wood waste ash as a
partial cement replacement material in mortar mixes on its water absorption property.
Two batches of mortar mixes with the same mix proportions (1 binder: 3 sand: 0.6 w/b
ratio) were cast whereby one batch contained 15% wood waste ash as a partial
replacement material while the other had no wood waste ash content. It was observed that
inclusion of wood waste ash as a cement replacement material at 15% total binder weight
contributed towards the reduction in water absorption of the mortar mix produced.
Average water absorptions of mortar mixes with 15% of wood waste ash and without
wood waste ash content were recorded to be 0.8% and 1.25% respectively whereby both
are still far below maximum of 10%.
Abdullia et al. (2006): Investigated the effect of wooden ash on concrete compressive
strength for 5%,10%,15%,20% and 25% replacement of cement with wooden ash. After
conducting the test, he concludes that the optimum percentage of wooden ash
replacement is 15%.but the sample was crushed for 7th, 14th and 21th days this may
cause variation in test results.
Abdullahi (2006) : studied the influence of wood ash (WA) on the slump of concrete. He
used wood ash as partial replacement of cement in varying percentages (0, 10, 20, 30, and
40%) in concrete mixture proportion of 1:2:4. The Test result showed that mixtures with
greater wood ash content require greater water content to achieve a reasonable
workability.
Udoeyo et al. (2006): studied the flexural strength development behavior of concrete
mixes produced with the use of wood waste ash as a partial cement replacement material
at varying levels of cement replacement; (0 (control concrete), 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30%
binder weight. Flexural strengths of concrete specimens produced were recorded at 3, 7,
14, 21 and 28 days. Analysis of the results indicated that at all ages the concrete there
was an increased level of cement replacement with wood waste ash that resulted in a
decreased magnitude of flexural strength. For instance, at 28 days, the flexural strength of
the concrete mix with 5% wood waste ash content was recorded at 5.20 MPa as compared
to 5.57 MPa of control concrete specimens. A gradual reduction occurred in the flexural
strength over 28 days. Results revealed a decrease from 5.20 MPa with 5% wood waste
ash concrete to 3.74 MPa with 30% total binder mass with wood waste ash content in the
mix was observed. By performing a regression analysis of flexural strength and
compressive strength data acquired, they also found a strong direct linear proportional
correlation between flexural strength and the compressive strength of wood waste ash
concrete mixes produced for up to 28 days as presented in the following equation.
Udoeyo et al. (2006) : evaluated the water absorption capacity of concrete made with
varying percentages (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30% by weight of cement) of waste wood ash
. It can be seen that concrete specimens absorbed more water as the ash content
increased. The water absorption at 5% WWA content was 0.4% and increased to 1.05%
at 30% WWA content. However, these values are less than 10% which is the percentage
water absorption value accepted for most construction materials.
Ghorpade, V. G. (2012): stated that the effect of addition of wood waste ash (0-30%) in
concrete. The compressive strength and tensile strengths of wood ash concrete was
evaluated by conducting laboratory experimentation. The results obtained were compared
with reference to M30 grade concrete and he concluded that wood waste ash can be
effectively used in higher grade concrete also up to 10% by weight of cement.
Barathan, S., & Gobinath, B. (2013): stated that Wood ash limited to the grain size of
less than 75 micrometers is added to cement by weight percentage of 10%, 20% and 30%
by the method of replacement by weight. Finally, they conclude that the wood ash
exhibits an appreciable amount of pozzolanic properties up to a 10% replacement of
wooden ash.
Muluken Negaw, Butula Buba (2017) graduated civil engineering students investigate
the effect of wooden ash as partial replacement of cement. The replacement was done for
5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% wood ash by weight.in this investigation workability,
compressive strength and flexural strength tests are conducted. The optimum
recommended value of the research is 10%.
This investigation fills those gaps using wood ash from one species specially eucalyptus
wood ash and sieving it through 75µm sieve size, as the ash is finer its surface area
increases so the rate of hydration become high and contributes to increasing the concrete
strength.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter deals with the methodology of the research. The research involves a wide
range review of literature related to the theme of study; issues dealing with the research
design, experiment analysis, the use of quantitative data for analysis of results, ethical
considerations, and expected outcomes; and results are reflected.
The materials that have used in the study are Cement, Coarse Aggregate, fine aggregate,
Water and Replacement of eucalyptus wooden ash.
3.2.1 Cement
In a general sense of the word, Cements are materials with adhesive and cohesive
properties, which make them capable of uniting or bonding together fragments or
particles of solid matter into a compact whole. In this study ordinary Portland cement
(OPC) grade 42.5 MPa has been used.
The density of cement is used in the calculation of the total aggregate content and of the
concrete density. It this study uses the following apparatus Le Chatelier’s Flask – The
standard flask is circular in cross section and dimensions conform essentially.
There shall be a space of 10mm between the highest graduation mark and the lowest
point of grinding for the glass stopper, Kerosene, free of water, or naphtha.
(1). Fill the flask with two liquids to a point on the stem between the 0 and the 1 ml mark.
(2) Dry the inside of the flask above the level of the liquid, if necessary, after pouring,
Record the first reading after the flask has been immersed in the water bath. The bath
shall maintain the temperature of the water constant ~for sufficient period of time to
avoid flask temperature variations greater than 0.2°C between the initial and final
readings, Introduce a quantity of cement for weighed to the nearest 0.05 g, in small
increments at the same temperature as the liquid. A vibrating apparatus used to accelerate
the introduction of the cement into the flask and to prevent the cement from sticking to
the neck. Place the stopper in the flask and roll the flask in an inclined position, or gently
whirl it in a horizontal circle, so as to free the cement from air until no further air bubbles
rise to the surface of the liquid. If a proper amount of cement has been added, the level of
the liquid will be in its final position at some point of the upper series of graduations and
Take the final reading after the flask has been immersed in the water bath.
Final the difference between the first and the final reading represents the volume of liquid
displaced by the mass of cement used in the test.
Coarse aggregate was obtained from quarries (crushed aggregate). According to the
Ethiopian Standard coarse aggregates are those between 75 and 4.75 mm in size. Gravel,
crushed rock and blast furnace slag are generally used as aggregates. The grading curve
of the aggregate is given in Table5 below, and the specific gravity of the aggregate was
2.68 and the other parameters given below with the figures.
(i). Specific Gravity and Absorption Capacity of Coarse Aggregates (ASTM C-127)
The specific gravity of a substance is the ratio between the weight of the substance and
that of the same volume of water. The test is conducted by washing aggregate to remove
dust from the surface of the particles and dry the sample to constant weight and cool in
air for 1 hrs. And then immerse in water at room temperature for a period of 24hrs.
Remove the sample from the water and roll in a large absorbent cloth and Weigh the
sample in the saturated-surface-dry condition and record (B).then Immediately place the
saturated-surface-dry sample in the sample container and determine its weight in water
and record (C).After than dry the sample and cool in air and weigh (A).
Sample calculation
Specific gravity =
= 2.65
Where: -
This test is performed to determine the percentage of different grain sizes of aggregate.
The mechanical or sieve analysis is performed to determine the distribution of the
coarser, larger-sized particles, and the method is used to determine the well graded
particles
                                                     Gradation curve
                           120
80
                            60                                                                    %passing
                            40                                                                    minimu
20 maximu
                             0
                                 1                            10                            100
Seive opennig
Sample calculation
Sample calculation
Absorption capacity=
= = 1.1%
These absorption capacities indicate the porosity of aggregate to absorb water under
moisture. The moisture capacity of aggregate is 1.1% for sample indicated in table 5. The
absorption capacity is to minimum which indicate that the aggregate has less porosity.
Sample calculation
Bulk density =
=1556.6kg/m3
There are different types of aggregate used for concrete production. From those type of
aggregate crushed stone aggregate provided for mix with density of 1556          as shown in
the table. the recommended bulk density of the normal weight aggregate is within the
range of 1200-1760      as shown in the table 6 the value obtained in the test is within the
Test done to control the quality of sand used includes: sieve analysis of fine aggregate,
specific gravity and absorption capacity of sand, silt content and bulking of sand.
Sample Calculation
H =100 -D =100 - 1 = 99
B=weight of sieve,
C =weight of Retained
D =percentage Retained,
                                                                                                       cumulative percentage
                    weight of sample and
                                                                      weight of Retained
                                                    weight of sieve
                                                                                                                                                                                  max % passing
                                                                                                                                                           min % passing
sieve opening
%Retained
                                                                                                                                                %Passing
                                                                                                                               retain
                                            sieve
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
                                                                         0.00
          0.075   0.15      0.3     0.6    1.18   2.36    4.75    9.5
                                  sieve size in mm
                     sample        minimum % passing        maximum %passing
As the gradation graph shows the sand used for this research was well graded, it satisfies
the upper and lower limit of grain sizes based on ASTM C-128 recommendation.
This test used to determine the average density of a quantity of fine aggregate particles,
specific gravity and the absorption of the fine aggregate. The oven dry density and oven
dry specific gravity are determined after drying sand. The saturated surface dry specific
gravity and absorption are determined after soaking the aggregate in water for 24 hours.
Test is done as per ASTM C-128.
    As per ASTM C-128 recommendation the specific gravity of fine aggregate around
    2.65.from table specific gravity 2.61. The sand is good for the mix.
Sample calculation
               Weight of
                            Weight of                       Weight          Apparent
               sample                       Weight
Sample                      oven dry                        pycnometer      Specific     Average
                                            pycnometer(B)
                            sample(gm)(A)                   +sample water   gravity
               (SSD)
    1             500            482           1303.1            1608.3        2.73
    2             500            487           1303.1            1613.4        2.76           2.75
    3             500            486           1303.1            1613          2.76
Sample calculation
As per ASTM C-29 the approximate bulk density of sand that is commonly used in
normal weight concrete is between 1520-1680 Kg/m3. Since the bulk density of sand
1521 Kg/m3 which is between recommended value.
W%= *100%
Where
Sample calculation
       Test
  sample                A in (gm.)        B in (gm.)             W%         Average w%
        1                  500                499                0.20
        2                 502.5              498.5               0.80            0.47
        3                 497.5              495.5               0.40
For construction purpose moisture content less than 5% is preferable. Since the moisture
of sand 0.2%. It is appropriate for concrete production.
The objective of the test is to determine the silt content in sand. This test should not be
used for crushed rock sands. According to the Ethiopian Standard it is recommended to
wash the sand or reject if the silt content exceeds a value of 6%.
Apparatus used in this test includes: graduated cylinder or any glass jar, dish for taking
sample of sand, small size spoon, sample sand, funnel and clean water.
Where:
The objective of this test is to determine the amount of surface moisture in fine aggregate
by displacement in water. The apparent increase in volume of sand due to surface
moisture is technically known as bulking of sand. It has to be determined in laboratory or
on site to calculate the correct volume of sand at hand. Apparatus used for the test
includes: graduated cylinder, sample of sand and small size spoon.
Sample calculation
Excessive presence of moisture content in the sand makes the concrete to less durable and
loss its strength. As per IS2386-3 recommendation for less than 2% moisture content
bulking of sand 15%.From table the bulking of sand 2.67%.The sand recommended for
construction work since it has less bulking.
The following mix design procedure is based on the ACI manual of concrete of concrete
practice standard ACI 211.1-91, using metric units. For normal weight aggregate. Mix
design tables are attached in the appendix-I.
Step- 1 From Table 1-1a, slump allowed is 25-100mm for building column, beam and
reinforced walls.
Step -2 Maximum aggregate sizes is 37.5mm obtained from sieve analysis result. It is the
sieve size >=90% of aggregate passes through.
Step- 3 From Table 1-1b, mixing water required is 166 kg/m3 for 25-50mm slump.
Step -4     Maximum W/C ratio for strength for non-air entrained concrete is 0.62 (Table
1-4a) and is 0.45 for exposure (Table 1-4b). Use the smaller value 0.45.
Step-6 from Table 1-3a, volume of dry-rodded CA per unit volume of concrete is 0.69
depending on its fineness modulus.
Water = 166 kg
Cement = 368.89 kg
Total =1608.25 kg
Coarse aggregate.
Volume of water m3
Step 8 Adjustment
Fine aggregate
% of moisture content=
% of absorption capacity=
Coarse aggregate
% of moisture content=
% of absorption capacity=
                    Material                                   Weight(kg)
                    Cement                                       368.89
               Fine aggregate                             720.36+3.53=723.89
              Coarse aggregate                          1073.36+1.5349=1074.9
                     Water                        166+22.19+12.99-3.53-1.53=196.27
Step -10 Make trial batches & conduct different tests to check its suitability to satisfy the
requirements, and by adding water during mixing if it dry’s. Then calculate the corrected
batch quantities.
The proportion of cement to eucalyptus wood ash varied with the different percentage of
replacement as follows.
Fresh concrete is the concrete which is taken immediately after mixing, meaning that the
concrete before the mix starts its initial setting stage. Different tests like workability,
consistency and other tests are conducted to determine properties of fresh concrete.
Under this study workability of concrete was checked by conducting slump test.
i. Slump test
The slump of each mixture was measured in accordance with ASTM C-143, “Standard
Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic Cement Concrete.” The test was carried out by
filling a mold, in the shape of a truncated cone, with concrete and then withdrawing the
mold. The amount by which the concrete subsides or 'slumps' is then measured as shown
in Figures. After the slump has been measured, the concrete is tapped gently on the side
to obtain an indication of the cohesion of the mix.
The mass per unit volume, i.e. density, of freshly mixed concrete is determined by a
simple test in which the mass of concrete in a container of known volume is measured.
The standard procedure for conducting this test is described in NZS 3112 Part 1, Section
4.Its principal application is the determination of the volume of concrete produced from a
given mass of materials. Thus, it can be used to determine the volume of concrete
delivered to major sites by weighing delivery. The unit weights of fresh concrete were
measured according to ASTM C-138, “Standard Test Method for Unit Weight.
The strength characteristics of 0%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% replaced concrete blocks
sample were compared with the control concrete block sample. The apparatus used for
conducting this test cubic mold (150x150x150mm), spatula, vibrator, mixer and
compressive testing machine. The test conducted for 7day, 14day and 28day using
compression testing machine. The compressive strength of concrete calculated as follow.
Strength of concrete =
Non- destructive
The objective of the test is to determine the compressive strength of the concrete by
relating the rebound index and the compressive strength, to assess the uniformity of the
concrete, to assess the quality of the concrete based on the standard specification and to
relate one concrete element with other in terms of quality.
The operation of rebound hammer is when the plunger of rebound hammer is pressed
against the surface of concrete, a spring-controlled mass with a constant energy is made
to hit concrete surface to rebound back. This extent of rebound on a graduated scale is
measured value is designated as rebound number or a rebound index.
The test conducted by holding the instrument in apposition that allows the plunger to
strike perpendicular to the surface of the sample test. Until the hammer impacted, the
pressures increase gradually. The test taken to ten times in a region 25mm closer between
the impacted point .After the hammer impact, the rebound number recorded in two
significant digits. The test of rebound hammer taken at 40-day curing time. Due to the
lack of material and insufficient time to test at 40 days the test was conducted in 28-day
curing time.
A higher velocity indicates good quality and continuity of the material, while slower
velocities may concrete with many cracks or voids.
V=L/T
CHAPTER FOUR
                                           56        56
                                           54                   54.5
                                           52                          52.5
                                                                              51.5
                                                                                                 slump height in
                                           50                                        50
                                                                                                 mm
                                           48
                                                0%        10%      20%           30%
                                                 percentage of Eucalyptus ash
                                                      partial repacement
In the study, workability of concrete specimens with eucalyptus wood ash checked
through slump test.
As the result shows that the value obtained from slump decreased with increase in
cement replacement with wood ash (0%,10%,15%,20%,25%). A typical plot using the
data from the work is shown in above figure 11.
In the other words, the material becomes less workable turning into harsh mixes with
increased content of wood ash, and thus requires higher water content to maintain its
workability. Finally, we conclude that the higher water content to attain a reasonable
workability may be due to the relatively high carbon content in wooden ash.
       % /ash by weight                          0            10          15              20            25
   Average density in                          2.60           2.48       2.52            2.56          2.50
                          gm/cm3
                        2.58
                        2.56
                        2.54
                        2.52                                                        Average density in gm/cm^3
                         2.5
                        2.48
                        2.46
                               0%   5%   10%     15%    20%      25%   30%
                                         % of Ash by weight
As result shows density of fresh concrete decrease with partial replacement of eucalyptus
wooden ash with respect to control mix. However 20% replacement gives optimum fresh
concrete density from 10%, 15%,20% and 25% eucalyptus wooden ash replacement.
ARBA MINCH UNVERSITY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY                                                        Page 51
BSC THESIS REPORT                                                                                  2019
% ash by weight 0 10 15 20 25
                        2.48
                        2.46
                        2.44
                                                                                   Average density in
                                                                                   gm/cm^3
                        2.42
                        2.40
                        2.38
                        2.36
                               0%   5%      10%     15%    20%     25%   30%
                                                  % Ash by weight
As the above result shows the density of hardened concrete without partial replacement
of wood ash gives 2.55kg/                           .for partially replaced hardened concrete the density
increases for 10%-20% replacement, from 2.38kg/                            to 2.50kg/   and decreased to
2.40kg/                    for 25% replacement of ash.
This indicates that as percentage of ash increase the density of concrete decrease as
compared to normal concrete but increase relative to each other up to the maximum value
of replacement. See appendix-II, Page 70
    0%                                            2.6                       2.55
    10%                                           2.48                      2.38
    15%                                           2.52                      2.43
    20%                                           2.56                      2.5
    25%                                           2.5                       2.4
                              2.65
         Density in gm/cm^3
                               2.6
                              2.55
                               2.5                                             density of fresh concrete
                              2.45
                                                                               density of hardened
                               2.4
                                                                               concrete
                              2.35
                                     0%         10%           20%          30%
                                               % of Ash by weight
The above graph indicates density of fresh and hardened concrete decreases as percentage
of wood ash increases. Density of fresh concrete is greater than its hardened density this
indicates that for fresh concrete the water used for mix design increases the weight of the
concrete.
ARBA MINCH UNVERSITY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY                                                           Page 53
BSC THESIS REPORT                                                                    2019
       % of Ash by
          weight          Curing Time          Average compressive strength in Mpa
           0                                                 28.87
           10                                                23.87
           15                  7day                          24.27
           20                                                25.02
           25                                                20.87
       % ash by
         weight            Curing time            Compressive strength in Mpa
           0                                                 30.93
           10                                                25.73
           15                  14day                         25.74
           20                                                26.93
           25                                                 24.6
       % ash by
         weight            Curing time            Compressive strength in Mpa
           0                                                 32.87
           10                                                 28.5
           15                  28day                          29.5
           20                                                30.87
           25                                                26.33
                                                                30
                                                                20
                                                                                                                   compressive
                                              Mpa
                                                                10                                                 strength in Mpa
                                                                 0
                                                                     0           10          20         30
                                                                                  % of ash by weight
From the above figure 14day compressive strength of concrete decreases by 16.81%,
16.78%, 12.92% and 20.47% within replacing of 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% ash by
weight respectively with respect to pure(0%ash) concrete compressive strength. This
shows that optimum percentage of eucalyptus                                         ash by weight replacement is 20%
eucalyptus ash.
                                                30
                                                25
                                                20
                                                15
                                                10                                                compressive
                                                 5                                                strength in Mpa
                                                 0
                                                     0           10       20        30
                                                            % of Ash by weight
                                      30
                                      25
                                      20
                                                                                                                 7day
                                      15
                                                                                                                 14day
                                      10
                                                                                                                 28day
                                       5
                                       0
                                           0%        5%      10%          15%   20%          25%   30%
                                                              % of Ash by weight
The graph shows that comparison of compressive strength of 0%, 10%.15%, 20% and
25% of eucalyptus wood ash by weight with respect to 7day, 14day and 28day curing
time.
The trend observed in the above graph is most probably due to the mechanisms that
eucalyptus wood ash particles act as filler and binding materials initially. As content of
ash increases the binding property increases up to optimum value, beyond this limit the
wood ash particle act more like filler material within the cement paste matrix than as
binder material. And also results in increased surface area of filler material to be bonded
by decreasing the amount of cement which caused a decline in strength. And also the
concrete loses its cohesive properties resulted in decreased compressive strength.
25
20
15
                                        10
                                                                                     28 day RH compressive
                                         5                                           strength in Mpa
                                         0
                                             0%        10%      20%       30%
                                                    % of Ash by weight
As result shows the rebound compressive strength of the concrete decrease within
replacing of ash with respect to pure concrete. However,20% ash by weight replaced
cement is the optimum value which satisfy the standard requirement as per ASTM C-805.
                                    0%                                      3693.98
                                   10%                                      3532.39
                                   15%                                      3554.78
                                   20%                                      3589.59
                                   25%                                      3488.99
                                   3700.00
                                   3650.00
                                   3600.00
                                   3550.00                                        UPLS velocity (m/s)
                                   3500.00
                                   3450.00
                                             0%    10%      20%       30%
                                                  % Ash by weight
The figure shows that for the first 10% Ash by weight the pulse velocity of concrete is
linearly decreasing and after than increasing up to 20% of ash replacement and become
that it is decreasing.This shows that 20% eucalyptus wooden ash by weight is the
optimum. As result 20% wood ash replacement is high bonded and strength development
of wood ash concrete.
CHAPTER FIVE
5.1 Conclusion
The use of wooden ash in concrete helps to transform it from environmental concern to a
useful resource for the production of effective alternative cementing materials. Based on
the results and discussion of this investigation the following conclusion has been reached.
5.2 Recommendations
Based on the results, discussions and conclusions, the following recommendations arise:
    From this investigation the potentials for wood ash to be used as structural
       concrete constituent for the development of sustainable is not in doubt.
    Using appropriate dosage of super plasticizer could be used with wood ash to
       maintain required workability.
    It could be possible to use the 20% replacement of wood ash by weight in a
       structure, which has a concrete grade of C – 25.
    Further investigation shall be added to conclude the effects of wood ash on
       concrete properties which are not covered in this paper like flexural strength,
       tensile strength, durability, permeability, bending behavior and associated
       properties like cracking and stiffness.
    Quantity and quality of wood ash may vary with many factors such as combustion
       temperature, species of wood and combustion technology used. Hence proper
       analysis of wood ash is important before its application in concrete.
REFERENCES
   1. ASTMC618. (1998). Specifications for coal fly ash and raw and calcind natural
      pozzolan for use minearal admixture in concrete. Annual book of ASTM
      standard.
   2. Cheah, C. (2011). the implementation ofstructural grade concrete and mortar. An
      overview resources,conversation and recycling., 1-8.e. (n.d.).
   3. Elinwa AU, E. S. (2008). Assesing of fresh concrete property containing sawdust
      ash . construction building material ..
   4. Etiiegni L, c. A. (1991). Physical and chemical characterstic of wood ash.
   5. Loo SV, k. (2003). hand book of biomass combustion and co firing.
   6. M, A. (2006). Characterstics of wood ash/opc cncrete. wood ash as an effective
      raw material for concrete.
   7. Misshra MK, R. K. (1993). Wood ash composition as function of furance
      temprature. Biomass Bioenergy .
   8. Muluken Negaw, B. B. (2017). Partial replacement cement by wooden ash .
      arbaminch university.
   9. Rajamma R, B. R. (2009). Characterstic and use of biomass fly ash in cement
      based materials. Hazard mater.
   10. Siddique, R. (20012). Utilization of wood ash in concrete manifacturing.
      Resource conservation and recycling.
   11. TR, N. (2002). Demonstration of manufucturing technology for concrete
      utilization of wood ash from wisconnsin departement of natural resource.
   12. Udoeyo FF, D. P. (2002). Sawdust ash as concrete material.
   13. Udoeyo FF, I. D. (2006). Potential of wood ash as additive in concrete.
   14. Werther J, S. M. (2000). combustion of aggricultral residue. prog energy combust.
APPENDIX I
       The upper limit may be increased by 20mm for compaction made by hand.
   Table 1- 1b: Approximate mixing water and air- content requirements.
Water Kg/m3, For Indicated Nominal Sizes of Aggregates ( mm)
Slump, mm           9.5      12.5      19        25     37.5     50          75       150
Non – Air –Entrained Concrete
20-50               207      199       190       179    166      154         130      113
80-100              228      216       205       193    181      169         145      124
150-180             242      118       216       202    190      178         160      -
Approximate         3        2.5       2         1.5    1        0.5         0.3      0.2
Entrapped air (%)
Air Entrained Concrete
20-50               181      175       168       160    150      142         122      107
80-100              202      193       184       175    165      157         133      119
150-180             216      205       197       184    174      166         145      -
Recommended air Content (%)
Mild exposure*      4.5       4.0          3.5    3.0      2.5      2.0     1.5         1.0
Moderate            6.0       5.5          5.0    4.5      4.5      4.0     3.5         3.0
exposure**
Severe              7.5       7.0          6.0    6.0      5.5      5.0     4.5         4.0
exposure888
Note:
 * Where air entrainment is not required for durability.
 * Where concrete will not be continually exposed to water before freezing or to de-icing
agents (Na & Ca Cl2).
 * Where de-icing or similar agents are used or where concrete may be highly saturated before
freezing.
Table 1-3a: Dry Bulk Volume of Coarse Aggregate per Unit Volume of Concrete
   Nominal              Bulk Volume of Dry- Rodded Coarse per Unit Volume of Concrete
   Maximum Size 0 For Fineness modulus of Fine Aggregate (sand of:
   Aggregate, mm        2.40               2.60                2.80               3.00
   9.5                  0.50               0.48                0.46               0.44
   12.5                 0.59               0.57                0.55               0.53
   19                   0.66               0.64                0.62               0.60
   25                   0.71               0.69                0.67               0.65
   37.5                 0.75               0.73                0.71               0.69
   50                   0.78               0.76                0.74               0.72
   75                   0.82               0.80                0.78               0.76
   150                  0.87               0.85                0.83               0.81
Table 1-3b: Factors to be applied to the volume of coarse aggregate calculated on the
basis of table 1-3a for mixes of consistency other than plastic.
Table 1-4a: Relation between W/C ratio & Compressive strength of concrete.
                                          Exposure conditions
                                          Structure continuously or Structure     exposed   to
 Type of Structure
                                          frequently Wet &exposed seawater or sulphates
                                          to Freezing & Thawing*
 Thin sections (railings, curbs, sills,
 ledges,     Ornamental    work)       & 0.45                          0.40**
 section with less than 25mm, cover
 over steel.
 All other structures.                    0.50                         0.45**
          Air- entrained concrete should be used under all conditions involving severe
           exposure.
          When Type II or type V cement is used, the maximum W/C ratio may be
           increased by 0.05.
APPENDIX II
For 0%
For 10%
For 15%
For 20%
For 25%
    For 10%
    Sample         Weight(gm.)      Volume()cm3)          Density(gm./cm3)         Average density
       1              8070                 3375                 2.39
       2              8036                 3375                 2.38                     2.38
       3              8003                 3375                 2.37
    For 15%
     Sample         Weight(gm.)      Volume(cm3)           Density(gm./cm3)            Average
                                                                                       Density
        1              8277                3375                  2.45
        2              8110                3375                  2.40                    2.43
        3              8226                3375                  2.44
    For 20%
     Sample        weight(gm.)        Volume             density(gm./cm3)          average density
                                       (cm3)
        1             8442             3375                    2.50
        2             8462             3375                    2.51                     2.50
        3             8364             3375                    2.48
 For 25%
      sample          weight(gm.)        Volume       density(gm./cm3)      average
                                             (cm3)                          density
           1             8135                3375              2.41
           2             8141                3375              2.41          2.40
           3             8065                3375              2.39
               1                     30.4                     32.8           31
               2                     27.8                     28            35.6
               3                     28.4                     32             32
       Avg.comp                      28.87                   30.93         32.87
For 10%
  For 15%
      sample                 7 Day                   14 Day              28 Day
           1                  26.4                    28.4                28.6
           2                  23.6                    25.62               29.5
           3                  22.8                    23.2                30.4
    Avg.comp                 24.27                    25.74              29.50
For 20%
 For 25%
        sample                  7 Day               14 Day             28 Day
            1                   22.803               23.8               25.2
            2                   22.003               24.6               26.1
            3                   17.803               25.4               27.7
      Avg.comp                  20.87               24.60              26.33
                     Average of 10
     Sample                              Result      Average Result(ccs),N/mm2
                    rebound reading
        1                37.7            28.3
        2                35.3            25.8                  27.13
        3                34.5            27.3
For 10%
                     Average of 10
          Sample                       Result   Average Result(ccs),N/mm2
                    rebound reading
            1             28.1         19.35
            2             28.8          20.8              19.90
3 29.5 19.55
For 15%
                     Average of 10
          Sample                       Result   Average Result(ccs),N/mm2
                    rebound reading
            1              31           21
            2             35.1         20.95              20.57
            3             34.7         19.75
For 20%
                     Average of 10
          Sample                      Result    Average Result(ccs),N/mm2
                    rebound reading
            1            29.2         21.037
            2            30.9         21.003              20.71
            3            29.1         20.086
For 25%
                     Average of 10
          Sample                      Result    Average Result(ccs),N/mm2
                    rebound reading
            1           23.03         19.805
            2            22.8          11.6               15.35
            3           23.76         14.632
For 15%
                Calibratio     Result(µs        Final
 No of trials                                                   Velocity(m/sec)     Vavg(m/sec)
                   n(µs)           )          result(µs)
        1           0.3          41.2           41.5               3614.46
        2           0.3          40.9           41.2               3640.78              3554.78
        3           0.3          43.7            44                3409.09
For 20%
 No of                                                  Final
            Calibration(µs)      Result(µs)                           Velocity(m/sec)     Vavg(m/sec)
  trials                                           result(µs)
For 25%
 No of                                     Final
          Calibration(µs)   Result(µs)                Velocity(m/sec)     Vavg(m/sec)
 trials                                  result(µs)
   1           0.6            41.7         42.3          3546.10
   2           0.6            43.1         43.7          3432.49           3488.99
   3           0.6            42.4          43           3488.37