Research Methadology
Research Methadology
S-R Notes
Important long Questions
Qualitative research
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH is a research method to explore and understand the meaning that some
individuals or groups of people think come from social or human problems (Creswell, 2013). The final
report of a qualitative study has a flexible structure or framework. The perspective used in this study is
inductive style, focuses on individual meanings, and translates the complexity of a problem.
Qualitative research begins in the field which is based on natural environments , not theory. The data
and information that have been obtained from the field are taken for the meaning and concept,
presented in descriptive analytic and generally without using numbers, because they prioritize the
processes that occur in the field.
In general, this type of research includes information about the main phenomenon that is being explored
in a study, research participants, and the location of a study. Qualitative research can also state the
research design chosen.
In the world of education, qualitative research has the objective of describing the process of educational
activities based on what is in the field as study material to find weaknesses and weaknesses so that
efforts can be determined to improve them; analyzing a symptom, facts, and educational events in the
field; compile a hypothesis related to the concepts and principles of education based on information and
data that occur in the field.
1. Natural environment (natural setting). Qualitative researchers collect field data at the locations
where participants experience the problem or issue to be studied. Qualitative researchers do not change
the environmental settings and activities of the participants. Information is gathered by talking directly
to people and seeing them act directly in a natural context.
4. Inductive data analysis. Qualitative researchers build categories, patterns and themes from the
ground up (inductive) or from separate data into a complete conclusion.
5. The meaning of the participants (participant's meaning). In the entire research process, the
researcher must focus on studying the meaning obtained from the participants about the issue or
research problem, not the meaning conveyed by other authors or researchers in certain literatures.
6. Design that develops (emergent design). Qualitative researchers argue that qualitative research is
always evolving and dynamic. This can mean that the initial plan is not a standard that must be adhered
to, all stages of research may change after the researcher goes into the field and collects data. Provided
that these changes are still in line in achieving the research objectives, namely obtaining information
about the problem or research issue.
7. Theoretical perspective (theoretical lens) . Qualitative researchers often use certain perspectives in
conducting research such as ethnography, cultural concepts, gender differences, race and others.
8. Interpretive. Qualitative researchers make an interpretation of what they see, hear and what they
understand. Usually there are differences in interpretation between researchers and readers and
participants, so it appears that qualitative research offers different views on a content or problem.
9. A holistic account. Qualitative researchers usually try to make a complex picture of a research issue or
problem. Researchers describe the perspectives and factors associated with the problem as a whole.
1. Ethnography
• Ethnography is a branch of anthropology to analyze the culture of a nation or society in its natural
environment over a long period of time in collecting main data, observational data and interviews.
• The purpose of the analysis is to understand a view of life from the perspective of the indigenous
people.
2. Case studies
• Researchers carefully investigate a program, event, activity, process, or group of individuals.
• Cases are limited by time and activity, and researchers collect complete information using time-based
procedures.
3. Phenomenology
• Researchers identify the nature of human experience about a particular phenomenon.
• Understanding the experience of human life makes phenomenological philosophy a research method
whose procedures require the researcher to study a number of subjects with relatively long and direct
involvement in it to develop patterns and meaning relationships.
4. Grounded Theory
• Researchers produce a general and abstract theory of a particular action, process, or interaction that
comes from the views of participants.
• Researchers must go through a number of stages of data collection and filtering categories for the
information that has been obtained.
5. Narrative
• Researchers investigate the lives of individuals and ask a person or group of individuals to tell their
lives.
• This information is retrieved by the researcher in a narrative chronology.
The following are strategies that need to be carried out in qualitative research:
1. Qualitative observation
Qualitative observation is an observation in which the researcher goes directly to the field to observe
participant behavior and activities at the research location. In this observation, the researcher can record
and record both structured and unstructured notes. Usually researchers are involved in a variety of roles,
it can be as a complete participant or non-participant.
2. Qualitative interviews
In qualitative interviews, qualitative researchers can interview face-to-face or face to face with
participants, by telephone, or can also be involved in focus group interviews or group interviews. The
questions are unstructured and open questions for the purpose of capturing the opinions and views of
participants on a particular issue.
3. Quality documents
Qualitative documents can be public documents such as newspapers, magazines or papers or in the form
of personal documents such as diaries, diaries and e-mails.
Among various research methods, the most popular and widely used design is qualitative research. This
design consists of many philosophical perspectives and various research methods, of which includes
action research and case study research.
Action research
Action research is a type of qualitative research, which is adopted by the researcher in order to solve
the immediate problem arisen during the particular course of time. It is a way which bridges the gap
between educational theory and professional practice by improvising their current practices. This type of
research helps the researcher to improvise its current practices and is applied for researching into issues.
The main purpose of action research is to learn through action leading to personal or professional
development. It enables researchers not only to suggest appropriate lines of action but also to
investigate the actual effects of such actions. Further, this type of research is situation based, is useful in
problem-solving and deals with individuals or groups with a common purpose of improving practice.
Action research is conducted in classrooms and organisations, where the practitioner will observe what
happens and then identify an issue or problem that they need to address. Further according to the
issues, ways to solve the problems are identified and applied by the practitioner in their practices. This
approach is applied using qualitative designs to explain what is happening and to understand the effects
of some educational intervention.
Further, this research helps in addressing practical problems and in generating knowledge to produce
change.
Key Characteristics:
1. Participatory: Involves active participation from stakeholders, including researchers, practitioners,
and community members.
2. Collaborative: Encourages joint ownership and decision-making throughout the research process.
3. Iterative: Involves cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection.
4. Contextual: Focuses on solving real-world problems within a specific context.
5. Empowering: Aims to empower stakeholders through capacity building, increased awareness, and
improved practices.
Advantages:
1. Practical Relevance: Addresses real-world problems.
2. Increased Stakeholder Engagement: Fosters collaboration and ownership.
3. Contextual Understanding: Provides rich, contextual insights.
4. Empowerment: Builds capacity and promotes sustainable change.
Limitations:
1. Lack of Objectivity: Researchers' involvement may introduce bias.
2. Time-Consuming: Iterative cycles can be lengthy.
3. Ethical Concerns: Power dynamics and informed consent require careful consideration.
Applications:
1. Education: Improving teaching practices and student outcomes.
2. Healthcare: Enhancing patient care and organizational efficiency.
3. Community Development: Empowering marginalized communities.
4. Organizational Change: Improving workplace practices and employee engagement.
Case Study:
Definition: A case study is an in-depth, detailed examination of a single case or a small number of
cases, aiming to provide rich, contextual understanding of a phenomenon, event, or process.
Key Characteristics:
1. In-depth analysis: Detailed examination of a single case or a small number of cases.
2. Contextual understanding: Emphasizes the case's unique context and setting.
3. Holistic perspective: Considers multiple factors and stakeholders.
4. Qualitative dominant: Often uses qualitative data collection and analysis methods.
5. Flexibility: Allows for adjustments during data collection and analysis.
Advantages:
1. Rich, contextual understanding: Provides detailed insights into a specific context.
2. In-depth exploration: Allows for examination of complex issues.
3. Flexibility: Accommodates changes during data collection and analysis.
4. Practical relevance: Offers actionable recommendations.
Limitations:
1. Limited generalizability: Findings may not apply to other contexts.
2. Subjectivity: Researcher bias and interpretation.
3. Time-consuming: Data collection and analysis can be lengthy.
4. Difficulty in establishing causality: Challenges in determining cause-and-effect relationships.
Applications:
1. Business and management: Examining organizational change, leadership, or innovation.
2. Education: Studying teaching practices, student learning, or educational policies.
3. Healthcare: Investigating patient care, healthcare systems, or medical practices.
4. Social sciences: Analyzing social phenomena, policies, or community development.
Best Practices:
1. Clearly define the case: Establish boundaries and scope.
2. Use multiple data sources: Triangulate data for validity.
3. Maintain a case study protocol: Document procedures and decisions.
4. Ensure ethical considerations: Protect participants' rights and privacy.
By following these guidelines and considerations, researchers can conduct rigorous and informative case
studies that contribute valuable insights to their field of study.
3-Questionnaires in Research
Questionnaires can be classified as qualitative or quantitative, depending on the nature of the questions.
They are the main instrument for survey research, offering advantages such as speed of data collection,
low cost, and objectivity. However, questionnaires also have disadvantages, including the selection of
random answers and limited expression of thoughts.
Types of Questionnaires
There are various types of questionnaires, including computer questionnaires, telephone questionnaires,
in-house surveys, and mail questionnaires. Each type has its advantages and disadvantages. For instance,
computer questionnaires are inexpensive and time-efficient, while telephone questionnaires can be
completed quickly but may be intrusive.
Types of Questions in Questionnaires
Questionnaires can include open-ended questions, multiple-choice questions, dichotomous questions,
and scaling questions. Open-ended questions produce unexpected results, making research more
original and valuable. Multiple-choice questions provide a set of answers for respondents to choose
from, while dichotomous questions offer two options. Scaling questions rank answers on a scale of given
values.
Conclusion
By understanding these data collection tools and methods, researchers can choose the most suitable
approach for their study, ensuring accurate and reliable results.
Grounded theory
Grounded theory research is an inductive approach in which a theory is developed based on data.
This is the opposite of the traditional hypothesis-deductive research approaches where hypotheses are
formulated and are then tried to be proved or disproved.
In 1967, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss published the book, The Discovery Of Grounded Theory
which introduced this method. Many disciplines have since used grounded theory, including
anthropology, sociology, economics, psychology, and public health.
Begins with data- Researchers using the grounded theory approach typically start with a case study by
observing an individual or group in action. Through an analysis of cases, researchers formulate a
tentative definition of their concept. An explanation for the construct is later crafted based on this case
analysis.
A personal approach- In this method, researchers study participants as they go about their daily
activities, observe them interacting with others, conduct individual or group interviews, and ask
participants specific questions about their observations, daily lives, experiences, or other sources
relevant to the study. The application of grounded theory qualitative research is a dynamic and flexible
way to answer questions that can't be addressed by other research methods.
The premise of grounded theory is that you discover new theories by inductive means. In other words,
you don't assume anything about the outcome and aren't concerned about validating or describing it.
Instead, you use the data you collect to inform your analysis and your theoretical construct, resulting in
new insights.
Analyzing and collecting data go hand in hand. Data is collected, analyzed, and as you gain insight from
analysis, you continue gathering more data. In this way, your data collection will be adequate to explain
the results of your analysis.
In grounded theory, the outcome is determined primarily by collected data, so findings are tightly tied to
those data. It contrasts with other research methods that are primarily constructed through external
frameworks or theories that are so far removed from the data.
Because gathering data and analyzing it are closely intertwined, researchers are truly observing what
emerges from data. By having a buffer, you avoid confirming preconceived notions about the topic.
An important aspect of grounded theory is that it provides specific strategies for analysis. Grounded
theory may be characterized as an open-ended method, but its analysis strategies keep you organized
and analytical throughout the research process.
Grounded theory is often a time-consuming process that involves collecting data from multiple sources,
analyzing the data for patterns and themes, and then finally coding the data – all steps that can take
significant time if not using qualitative data analysis software like NVivo.
Additional disadvantages in grounded theory include a researcher’s own biases and assumptions which
may impact their data analysis and the quality of their data – whether it’s low quality or simply
incomplete.
These definitions underscore the versatility and depth of content analysis in examining communication.
- Analyzing focus group interviews and open-ended questions to complement quantitative data.
1. Conceptual Analysis: This type examines the existence and frequency of concepts within a text. It
involves quantifying and counting the presence of selected terms, exploring explicit or implicit meanings.
2. Relational Analysis: Relational analysis delves deeper by examining the relationships among
concepts. It views individual concepts as having no inherent meaning; instead, meaning is derived from
the relationships between concepts.
2. Choose concepts to code and determine whether to allow flexibility or stick to predefined categories.
3. Decide whether to code for existence or frequency of concepts.
1. Determine the type of analysis (affect extraction, proximity analysis, cognitive mapping).
- Unobtrusive analysis.
- Error-prone.
- Reductive analysis.
- Context disregard.
- Automation difficulties.
By understanding content analysis, researchers can harness its potential to uncover meaningful patterns
and insights within text data.
2. Hypothesis: Develop a hypothesis based on the research question. This hypothesis will be tested
in the remaining steps.
3. Research design: In this step, the most appropriate quantitative research design will be selected,
including deciding on the sample size, selecting respondents, identifying research sites, if any,
etc.
4. Data collection: This process could be extensive based on your research objective and sample
size.
5. Data analysis: Statistical analysis is used to analyze the data collected. The results from the
analysis help in either supporting or rejecting your hypothesis.
6. Present results: Based on the data analysis, conclusions are drawn, and results are presented as
accurately as possible.
• Structured data and measurable variables: The data are numeric and can be analyzed
easily. Quantitative research involves the use of measurable variables such as age, salary range,
highest education, etc.
• Easy-to-use data collection methods: The methods include experiments, controlled
observations, and questionnaires and surveys with a rating scale or close-ended questions,
which require simple and to-the-point answers; are not bound by geographical regions; and are
easy to administer.
• Data analysis: Structured and accurate statistical analysis methods using software applications
such as Excel, SPSS, R. The analysis is fast, accurate, and less effort intensive.
• Reliable: The respondents answer close-ended questions, their responses are direct without
ambiguity and yield numeric outcomes, which are therefore highly reliable.
• Reusable outcomes: This is one of the key characteristics – outcomes of one research can be
used and replicated in other research as well and is not exclusive to only one study.
Primary quantitative research involves collecting numerical data to answer research questions, providing
a comprehensive understanding of various phenomena.
Primary quantitative research methods are widely applied in various fields, including social sciences,
healthcare, education, business, and economics. These methods provide valuable insights, informing
decision-making processes and contributing to evidence-based practices.
This method involves conducting research using already existing or secondary data. This method is less
effort intensive and requires lesser time. However, researchers should verify the authenticity and
recency of the sources being used and ensure their accuracy.
• The Internet
• Public libraries
• Educational institutions
Experimental design
Experiments are used to study causal relationships. You manipulate one or more independent
variables and measure their effect on one or more dependent variables.
Experimental design create a set of procedures to systematically test a hypothesis. A good experimental
design requires a strong understanding of the system you are studying.
There are five key steps in designing an experiment:
1. When time is an important factor in establishing a relationship between the cause and effect.
2. When there is an invariable or never-changing behavior between the cause and effect.
3. Finally, when the researcher wishes to understand the importance of the cause and effect.
To publish significant results, choosing a quality research design forms the foundation to build the
research study. Moreover, effective research design helps establish quality decision-making procedures,
structures the research to lead to easier data analysis, and addresses the main research question.
Therefore, it is essential to cater undivided attention and time to create an experimental research design
before beginning the practical experiment.
By creating a research design, a researcher is also giving oneself time to organize the research, set up
relevant boundaries for the study, and increase the reliability of the results. Through all these efforts,
one could also avoid inconclusive results. If any part of the research design is flawed, it will reflect on the
quality of the results derived.
Based on the methods used to collect data in experimental studies, the experimental research designs
are of three primary types:
• There is a control group that is not subjected to changes and an experimental group that will
experience the changed variables
• A variable that can be manipulated by the researcher
• Random distribution of the variables
Experimental research allows you to test your idea in a controlled environment before taking the
research to clinical trials. Moreover, it provides the best method to test your theory because of the
following advantages:
2. The subject does not impact the effectiveness of experimental research. Anyone can implement
it for research purposes.
4. Post results analysis, research findings from the same dataset can be repurposed for similar
research ideas.
5. Researchers can identify the cause and effect of the hypothesis and further analyze this
relationship to determine in-depth ideas.
6. Experimental research makes an ideal starting point. The collected data could be used as a
foundation to build new research ideas for further studies.
When designing research, beware of these critical errors that can compromise quality:
1. Invalid Theoretical Framework: Ensure your hypothesis is logical and grounded in basic
assumptions.
2. Inadequate Literature Review: Conduct comprehensive research to identify knowledge gaps and
contribute meaningfully.
3. Insufficient/Incorrect Statistical Analysis: Validate results with accurate statistical methods.
4. Undefined Research Problem: Clearly articulate the research problem and develop focused
research questions.
5. Unaddressed Research Limitations: Acknowledge and incorporate study limitations into
conclusions.
6. Unconsidered Ethical Implications: Minimize participant risk and ensure research integrity.
By avoiding these pitfalls, researchers can ensure robust, reliable, and ethically sound studies that
contribute meaningfully to their field.
Data analysis is one of the most flourishing fields right now as businesses around the world are trying to
make sense of their data. However, there are a number of data analysis tools available in the market. In
this article, we are going to discuss the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS): one of the
most-used statistical analysis tools.
It is a suite of software programs that analyzes scientific data related to the social sciences. SPSS offers a
fast-visual modeling environment that ranges from the smallest to the most complex models. The data
obtained from SPSS is used for surveys, data mining, market research, etc.
SPSS is popular because of its simplicity, easy-to-follow command language, and well-documented user
manual. Government entities, educational institutions, survey companies, market researchers, marketing
organizations, health researchers, data miners, and many others use it for analyzing survey data.
• Statistical program for quantitative data analysis – It includes frequencies, cross-tabulation, and
bivariate statistics.
• Modeler program that allows for predictive modeling. It enables researchers to build and
validate predictive models using advanced statistical procedures.
• Text analysis helps you derive insights from qualitative inputs through open-ended
questionnaires.
• Visualization Designer allows researchers to use their data for a variety of visual representations.
SPSS is a popular tool for research, experimentation, and decision-making. It is one of the most widely
used statistical software worldwide in the world for its attractive features. Here are some of them:
1. Using SPSS features, users can extract every piece of information from files for the execution of
descriptive, inferential, and multiple variant statistical procedures.
2. Thanks to SPSS’ Data Mining Manager, its users can conduct smart searches, extract hidden
information with the help of decision trees, design neural networks of artificial intelligence, and
market segmentation.
3. SPSS software can be used to solve algebraic, arithmetic, and trigonometric operations.
4. SPSS’s Report Generator feature lets you prepare attractive reports of investigations. It
incorporates text, tables, graphs, and statistical results of the report in the same file.
5. SPSS offers data documentation too. It enables researchers to store a metadata directory.
Moreover, it acts as a centralized information repository in relation to the data – such as
relationships with other data, its meaning, origin, format, and usage.
• Methodologies such as cluster analysis and factor analysis which is great for predicting for
identifying groups
➢ SPSS Views:
In simple terms:
Quantitative analysis requires numeric information in the form of variables. A variable is a way of
measuring any characteristic that varies or has two or more possible values. Many characteristics are
naturally numeric in nature (such as years of education, age, income); for these numeric variables, the
numbers used to measure the characteristic are meaningful in that they measure the amount of that
characteristic that is present. Often researchers are interested in characteristics which are not numeric
in nature (such as gender, race, religiosity), but even these variables are assigned numeric values for use
in quantitative analysis although these numbers do not measure the amount of the characteristic
present. For example, although the categories of the variable “gender” may be coded as female=1,
male=2 this does not imply that males have twice the amount of the characteristic “gender” compared
to females. Variables can thus be divided into numeric variables (in which the numbers have meaning)
and categorical variables (which are commonly words or ranges).
Quantitative data can be collected in a variety of ways. In experimental settings, researchers can directly
collect quantitative data (such as reaction times, blood pressure) or such data can be self-reported by
research participants on a pretest or posttest. Questionnaires – either interviewer- or self-administered
– are commonly used to collect quantitative data by asking respondents to report attitudes, experiences,
demographics, etc. Direct observation of quantitative data which has been gathered for another
purpose is also common, such as quantitative data that is recorded in patients’ medical charts or the
results of students’ standardized tests.
A common quantitative approach is known as secondary data analysis, in which a researcher analyzes
data that were originally collected by another research team. Often these are large-scale, nationally-
representative data sets that require extensive resources to collect; such data sets are made available by
many organizations to allow many researchers to conduct independent research using high quality data.
Hypotheses for quantitative analysis tend to be highly specific, describing clear relationships between
the independent and dependent variables. For hypotheses involving two numeric variables, the
expected direction of the relationship will be described. For example, a hypothesis might read: we
expect that age and functional limitations are related; as age increases, the number of functional
limitations individuals experience will also increase. Hypotheses for categorical variables specify which
category of the independent will be more likely to report a certain category of the dependent variable;
for example: gender is associated with having experienced sexual harassment; women are more likely to
report ever having experienced sexual harassment than men.
The results of quantitative analysis are most commonly reported in the form of statistical tables or
graphs. The presentation of results usually begins with descriptive statistics describing who is in the
sample. This can take the form of univariate statistics (such as frequency distributions, means, standard
deviations) or simple graphs (such as pie charts, bar graphs, or historgrams). Bivariate results are
commonly presented next to show the demographic distributions of key variables of interest. For
example, the crosstabulation of gender and attitudes toward abortion may be reported to establish
whether a bivariate relationship exists between these variables. Finally, the results of statistical models
in which control variables are included are presented and interpreted. Such models allow researchers to
rule out alternative explanations and to specify the conditions under which their hypotheses are upheld.
The quantitative approach is especially useful for addressing specific questions about relatively well-
defined phenomena. Quantitative analysis requires high-quality data in which variables are measured
well (meaning the values of the variables must accurately represent differences in the characteristics of
interest); this can be challenging when conducting research on complicated or understudied areas that
do not lend themselves well to being measured with specific variables. Because it uses deductive logic
and is therefore more easily viewed as “real science,” the quantitative approach is often perceived as
providing stronger empirical evidence than other research approaches.
In research, data management involves several key steps. First, data cleaning removes errors,
inconsistencies, and missing values. Data integration combines data from multiple sources, ensuring
compatibility and consistency. Data transformation converts data formats to facilitate analysis. Data
reduction selects relevant data, reducing the overall dataset size. Finally, data storage secures data,
ensuring accessibility and backup.
Researchers employ various tools for data management. Spreadsheets (Excel, Google Sheets) and
database management systems (MySQL, Oracle) organize and store data. Data warehousing solutions
(Amazon Redshift, Google BigQuery) integrate data from multiple sources. Data integration tools (Talend,
Informatica) streamline data combination. Data governance platforms (Collibra, Data360) ensure data
quality and compliance.
Data analysis involves several methods to extract meaningful insights. Descriptive statistics summarize
data, providing overview metrics. Inferential statistics draw conclusions about populations based on
sample data. Data visualization graphically represents data, facilitating pattern identification. Machine
learning predictive models forecast outcomes. Text analysis extracts insights from textual data.
Big data research employs specialized tools. Hadoop and Spark process large datasets. NoSQL databases
(MongoDB, Cassandra) store unstructured data. Cloud-based analytics (AWS, Google Cloud) provide
scalable infrastructure. Distributed computing (Apache Flink, Storm) enables real-time processing.
Data science research utilizes interactive tools. Jupyter Notebook and R Studio provide interactive
environments. Python libraries (Pandas, NumPy) and MATLAB facilitate data manipulation. Julia offers
high-performance computing.
Conclusion:
By employing these data management and analysis methods and tools, researchers ensure rigorous and
reliable findings, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in various fields.
There are various steps which the researcher should follow. Those are;
1. Type of universe: In the first step the researcher should clarify and should be expert in the study
of universe. The universe may be finite (no of items are know) or Infinite (numbers of items are
not know).
2. Sampling unit: A decision has to be taken concerning a sampling unit before selecting a sample.
Sampling unit may be a geographical one such as state, district, village etc., or construction unit
such as house, flat, etc., or it may be a social unit such as family, club, school etc., or it may be an
individual.
3. Source list: Source list is known as ‘sampling frame’ from which sample is to be drawn. It consists
the names of all items of a universe. Such a list would be comprehensive, correct, reliable and
appropriate and the source list should be a representative of the population.
4. Size of sample: Size of sample refers to the number of items to be selected from the universe to
constitute a sample. Selection of sample size is a headache to the researcher. The size should not
be too large or too small rather it should be optimum. An optimum sample is one which fulfills
the requirements of efficiency, representativeness, reliability and flexibility. The parameters of
interest in a research study must be kept in view, while deciding the size of the sample. Cost
factor i.e., budgetary conditions should also be taken into consideration.
5. Sampling procedure: In the final step of the sample design, a researcher must decide the type of
the sample s/he will use i.e., s/he must decide about the techniques to be used in selecting the
items for the sample.
While selecting samples a researcher must remember that the procedure of sampling analysis involves
two costs viz., (i) the cost of collecting the data and (ii) the cost of an incorrect inferences resulting from
the data. So, far as the cost of collecting data is concerned, it completely depends on the researcher to
reduce it and to some extent it is within the control of the researcher. But the real problem arises while
taking into account about the cost of incorrect inferences which is again of two types,
2. Sampling error.
Systematic bias results from errors in the sampling procedures, and it cannot be reduced or eliminated
by increasing the sample size. It can be eliminated by eliminating and correcting the causes which are
responsible for its occurrence.
Sampling errors on the other hand, is the random variations in the sample estimated around the true
population parameters. Since they occur randomly and are equally likely to be in either direction, their
nature happens to be of compensatory type and the expected value of such errors happens to be equal
to zero. Sampling error can be measured for a given sampling design and size which is called as ‘a
precision of the sampling plan’.
3. Sampling design must be viable in the context of funds available for the research study,
4. Sample design must be such that systematic bias can be controlled in a better way, and
5. Sample should be such that the results of the sample study can be applied, in general, for the
universe with a reasonable level of confidence.
Survey Research Design
Survey research design is a fundamental method in the field of research where the primary
method of data collection is through surveys. This type of research design allows researchers to
collect structured data from individuals or groups to gain deeper insights into their thoughts,
behaviors, or experiences related to a specific topic. Online surveys or forms typically consist of
structured questions, each tailored to gather specific information, making them a versatile tool
in both quantitative and qualitative research.
Survey design is highly valued in research because it is an accessible and efficient way for
respondents to share their perspectives. This method is widely used in academic, business, and
government research to uncover data that can lead to actionable solutions or further study.
One of the key strengths of survey research is its ability to provide a snapshot of trends or
opinions within a population, allowing researchers to generalize findings and make informed
decisions. Additionally, surveys can be used to test hypotheses, track changes over time, or serve
as the foundation for more in-depth studies. As a result, survey research design remains a
cornerstone of modern research methods.
In contrast, a qualitative survey design is often employed in smaller-scale studies. This type of
survey relies on open-ended questions that allow respondents to elaborate on their thoughts,
attitudes, or behaviors. Qualitative data is typically collected in interview format and is analyzed
and reported in the respondents' own words, often in the form of direct quotes. Qualitative
surveys offer in-depth insights into the motivations behind responses, providing rich, detailed
data that goes beyond numbers.
Both quantitative and qualitative survey methods have their advantages and can be applied
depending on the research objectives.
The systematic development and administration of a survey are essential to ensure you gather
accurate and relevant data. Following a structured procedure for designing and conducting a
survey study will help you obtain the insights you're seeking. Here are the key steps involved in
creating an effective survey design:
1. Define the Purpose of Your Survey
Start by deciding the specific aim of your survey. Clarifying the purpose will guide you in
constructing focused survey questions and obtaining the right data. Look at other surveys for
reference, and consider what unique aspect you want to address in your study. Define what
insights you hope to gain and make predictions about the expected outcomes.
When conducting survey research, it’s important to keep your surveys short and sharp unless
there’s a specific reason to make them longer. While longer surveys can provide more detailed
data, excessively long surveys risk causing participants to lose interest, which can lead to
incomplete responses or inaccurate answers. Here are a few helpful tips to keep your survey
focused and effective.
1. Informed Consent
One of the primary concerns is informed consent, which involves obtaining participants' voluntary
agreement to participate in research. Researchers must explain the research purpose, risks, and benefits,
disclose data collection methods, assure confidentiality and anonymity, and statement of voluntary
participation.
Maintaining confidentiality and anonymity is critical. Researchers must protect participants' identities
and data by using pseudonyms or codes, anonymizing data, securing data storage, and limiting access to
data.
3. Privacy
Privacy is also a significant concern, as researchers must respect participants' personal boundaries. This
involves avoiding intrusive questioning, protecting sensitive information, and respecting cultural norms.
4. Power Dynamics
Power dynamics are another essential consideration, as researchers must recognize and address
researcher-participant relationships. This includes cultural sensitivity, social status, and researcher bias.
Data collection and analysis raise ethical concerns. Researchers must ensure data accuracy and
interpretation, validate data, avoid selective reporting, and acknowledge researcher bias through
reflexivity.
6. Participant Vulnerability
Participant vulnerability is a critical issue, as researchers must protect participants from harm. This
includes minimizing emotional distress, protecting vulnerable populations, and providing support
services.
7. Researcher Bias
Researcher bias is a significant concern, as researchers must recognize and address their perspectives.
Strategies include reflexivity, peer review, and data triangulation.
Best Practices
In quantitative research, after collecting data, the first step of statistical analysis is to describe
characteristics of the responses, such as the average of one variable (e.g., age), or the relation between
two variables (e.g., age and creativity).
The next step is inferential statistics, which help you decide whether your data confirms or refutes your
hypothesis and whether it is generalizable to a larger population.
You can apply these to assess only one variable at a time, in univariate analysis, or to compare two or
more, in bivariate and multivariate analysis.
Several techniques are employed to analyze and present descriptive statistics. Frequency Distribution
displays data distribution using tables or graphs, while Histograms visually represent data distribution
using bars. Box Plots show data distribution, outliers, and central tendency, and Scatter Plots visualize
relationships between variables.
Descriptive statistics have numerous applications in research. They enable Data Exploration, allowing
researchers to understand data characteristics. Descriptive statistics also facilitate Data Cleaning,
identifying errors or outliers. Additionally, they inform Hypothesis Generation, guiding research
questions. Finally, descriptive statistics aid in Communication, summarizing complex data in a concise
manner.
Researchers utilize various software and tools for descriptive statistics analysis. Popular options include
Excel, SPSS, R, and Python libraries such as Pandas and NumPy. Tableau is also widely used for data
visualization.
Suppose we have data on exam scores (0-100) for 100 students. The descriptive statistics analysis
reveals:
- Mean: 75.2
- Median: 78
- Mode: 80
- Range: 40-100
This analysis provides valuable insights into the central tendency, variability, and distribution of exam
scores.
By applying descriptive statistics, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of their data, identify
areas for further investigation, and communicate findings effectively.
1. Correlation Coefficients
Correlation coefficients, such as Pearson's r, Spearman's rho, and Kendall's tau, measure the strength
and direction of linear relationships. These coefficients range from -1 to 1, indicating perfect negative,
no, or perfect positive correlation.
2. Regression Analysis
Regression analysis involves simple linear regression, multiple linear regression, and logistic regression.
These techniques model the relationship between variables, allowing researchers to predict outcomes.
4. Non-Parametric Tests
Non-parametric tests, such as Mann-Whitney U tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, analyze
relationships in non-normally distributed data.
5. Data Visualization
Data visualization techniques, including scatter plots, heat maps, and correlograms, facilitate
understanding of associations.
Data-Related Factors
Measures of association are significantly influenced by data quality, distribution, type, and sample size.
Data errors, missing values, or outliers can distort associations, while non-normal distributions can
impact correlation coefficients. The type of data, whether continuous, categorical, or ordinal, also
requires different measures. Furthermore, small sample sizes can yield unreliable associations.
Variable-Related Factors
The selection and measurement of variables also impact measures of association. Relevant variables
must be chosen, and their measurement scales, precision, and reliability can affect associations.
Multicollinearity or confounding variables can obscure associations, making it essential to carefully
consider variable interrelationships.
Statistical Factors
Statistical assumptions, power, and multiple testing considerations are crucial. Linearity,
homoscedasticity, and normality assumptions must be met, while adequate sample size and effect size
ensure reliable associations. Correction for multiple comparisons prevents false positives.
Interpretation Factors
Context, causality, and effect size are vital considerations. Researchers must consider the research
question, literature, and theoretical framework when interpreting associations. Correlation does not
imply causation, and alternative explanations must be considered. Practical significance and clinical
relevance must also be evaluated.
2. Sensitive to outliers
By applying measures of association, researchers can uncover hidden relationships, identify predictive
variables, and inform modeling decisions.