1|Page

S.NO TITLE PAGE REMARK

NO

1 Theoretical Frame work Of Business 3-7

problems

2 Tools Of Analysis Business Problems 7-10

3 Analysis the problem of Micromax 11-15

4 Problem Faced By Micromax 16-19

5 Root Cause Analysis and SWOT 19-24

Analysis of Micromax

6 Data Analysis Through Relevant 24-29

Reports Such As Financial Statements
Market Research Report Customer
Feedback etc.

2|Page
 Theoretical Frame work Of Business problems

That lens through which understanding business phenomena is based on the conduct of
research, analysis, and interpretation within the business context is termed as the
theoretical framework. Integrating theories, models, and concepts that exist previously into
a meaningful structure aid explanation and prediction in business behaviors, decisions, and
outcomes.
Introduction to theoretical framework
Purpose: Indicates the reason why a theoretical framework should be used for
understanding the problem statement of a business.
Scope: A review of the major theories and concepts which will be discussed.Business
problems can also be highly diverse, from industry to industry, organizational structure to
organizational structure, and even by external environment.
Types of Business Problems:
1. Strategic Problems
Market Positioning: Inability to attain and/or retain advantageous competitive marketplace
positioning.
Growth and Expansion: Failure in increasing scale of operations, penetrating into new
market, or expanding the range of products.
Innovation: Failure in innovation and failing to cope with changes in technology.

2. Operational Issues
Performance Efficiency: Processes too slow, incapable of minimizing waste, reducing costs,
or increasing productivity.
Supply Chain Management: Problems of suppliers, logistics, and inventory management.
Quality Control: Failed to maintain the quality standards of products or services.

3. Financial Issues
Cash Flow Management: Issue with cash inflow management and cash outflow management
causes liquidity.
Profitability: Failure to achieve or maintain profitability.
Funding: Failure to raise funds or manage its debt.

4. Human Resource Issues

Recruitment and Retention: Failure to attract and retain talent.

3|Page
Employee Engagement: Poor motivation, satisfaction, or productivity of employees.
Training and Development: An area of concern with regard to upskilling the employees along
the lines of changing business needs.

5. Marketing Issues Customer Acquisition:

Customer Acquistion: Incapacity to bring in new customers or exploit newly opened

markets.
Branding: Failure to build or maintain a strong brand image.
Customer Retention: Failure to retain current customers and attain customer loyalty.
6. Customer Service Issues
Customer Satisfaction: High dissatisfaction among the customers regarding the service,
turning into complaints or lost business.
Service Delivery: Incoherence or shoddy service delivery that affects the experiences of the
customers.
Response Time: Taking too long to respond to customers or to solve their problems.
7. Legal and Regulatory Problems
Compliance: An organization does not comply with industry regulations, rule of law or
government policies.
Litigation: Litigation that might ruin reputations and bleed money.
Intellectual Property: Patenting of intellectual property or infringement
8. Cultural problems
Company culture: Does not match organizational values or the behavior of employees.
Change Management: Non-readiness or inability to manage the changes within the
organizations.
Diversity and Inclusion: Issues in implementing a diversity and inclusive work environment.
9. Customer Service Issue
Service Delivery: Failure in the proper delivery of continuous and reliable customer service.
Customer Satisfaction: Failure in fulfilling the expectations of the customers or failure in
handling complaints efficiently.
Service Innovation: Failure of the customer service to change over time and new demands.
10. Compliance and Legal Issue
This encompasses failure to observe the regulations and legal provisions set by a particular
industry.

4|Page
It would encompass matters on patents, trademarks, or copyrights as an aspect of
intellectual property.
These could be legal fights regarding litigation or any type of legal case that may disrupt
business.
Some features of business problems :
1.Complicatedness: Business problems often tend to be complicated, requiring many
stakeholders, departments, or processes. The answers may not be straightforward, and the
problem may be hitched with several numbers.
2.Unertainty: Business problems often have an inbuilt uncertainty. It may be related to
market conditions, customer behavior, or future trends. Thus, the process of decision
making is tough.
3.Impact: Business problems always relate to some severe ramifications which adversely
affect the organization's functioning, profitability, the satisfaction level of the customers, or
market position.
4.Interdependence: Many business problems are interdependent and solving one can create
another or, worse still, aggravate another one. Cutting down cost may be correlated with
reducing the quality of the product or employee morale.
5.Constrained Resources: Business problems typically occur in a time, money, personnel,
etc. bound environment. Proper and optimum usage of resources becomes of paramount
importance in such environments.
6.Dynamically Changing Environment: Business problems revolve in an environment that is
not static and is dynamic. Technology, competition, regulations, and economic conditions
change over time and impact the problem and its solutions.
7. Stakeholder Involvement: Business problems often result from different stakeholders
with interlocking and conflicting interests. Their interests should be aligned with each other,
but this becomes challenging.
Sources of business problems
1. Internal Sources:
Operational Inefficiencies: Issues regarding processes, workflow or technology that triggers
wastes, delays, or added costs.
Financial Problems: The wrong management of finances, cash flow problems, or running of
budgets over cost may all result in significant business problems.
There may be leadership and management issues stemming from poor decisions or bad
leadership or direction from the managers.
Employee Problem: High turn over, low morale, lack of skills, and dysfunctionalism among
the employees lead to direct impacts on productivity and performance.

5|Page
A toxic or poorly aligned corporate culture leads to disengagement within the workforce,
inbuilt resistance to change, and poor collaboration.
Quality of Products or Services: Poor or unreliable quality of goods and services can make
thecustomers dissatisfied, return products, and also damage the reputation of a company.
Innovation and R&D: Failure in innovation or inability to respond to new technologies may
be harmful and eventually result in stagnation or loss of market share.
2. External Forces
Market Fluctuation: A shift in customer preference, market demand, or an emerging trend
may pose challenges to the business to be mainstream.
Economic Situation: Economic recession, inflation, rate of interest, or currency fluctuations
will have a profound influence on the performance of business through consumer
expenditure, cost structure, and availability of capital.
High competitive pressures: This challenge lies in forcing the company to maintain its
market share and profitability in the midst of new entrants or disruptive innovation.
Regulatory and Legal Changes: The implementation of the new law or regulation would
increase the cost of running the operations, limit business activities, or cause liability on
legality.
Supply Chain Disruptions: Suppliers aren't doing their job, logistics supply, and raw material
supply become disrupted and results in increased time to produce or increased production
cost.
Global Events: This unexpected challenge of business will be faced if geopolitics issues,
pandemics, natural disasters, and more, which can bring issues like distortion in the value
chain, market instability, and also a change in consumer behavior.
Hybrid Sources
Mergers and Acquisitions: These are strategic opportunities, but more often than not they
bring along integration problems, clashing of company culture, and redundancies that need
to be dealt with a lot of care.
Innovation and Product Development: Innovation itself as a process brings a set of
problems, such as the failure of new products, mismatch with customer needs, or cost of
R&D too high with uncertain returns.
Objectives of business problems
Improving Efficiency: Business problems, in most cases, focus on finding inefficiencies in
processes, operations, or resource distribution for efficiency; waste minimization and more
production.

6|Page
Increasing Profitability: In fact, most business issues are based on the analysis of those
areas from which the company is losing money or some opportunity exists to raise money
for increasing profitability.
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: The solution to business problems may be critical in
sustaining or gaining a competitive edge in the market. It may include innovations,
improvements in the level of customer service, or optimization of the supply chain.
Risk Mitigation: Business problems in most cases surround some potential risks that may
exhibit adverse effects on the firm. Therefore, in this context, the objective will be to identify
such risks and create appropriate strategies for proactively managing or mitigating them.
Conclusion
Solutions to business problems must therefore be accordingly methodical, based on a good
theoretic framework. Businesses can, therefore, develop effective solutions by clearly
identifying the problem, selecting the relevant theories, setting up hypotheses, and
analyzing data that are relevant to their specific problems.
This process not only helps in solving immediate problems but also reinforces the
There is, thus, the capacity of the organisation for its future problem-solving. This kind of
process empowers an organisation through perceptive decisions, optimization, and
enhancement of overall business performance. Business, while working on strategies on
their continuous feedback and results, keeps up with continuous improvement and is on the
path of keeping up in the dynamic market environment.

Identify Tools For Business Problem

1)Qualitative Analysis: Qualitative analysis is a research instrument which solely depends on
subjective judgment to assess the value and worth of a company in terms of non-
quantifiable data .
A) SWOT Analysis : A SWOT analysis is one such tool in planning wherein it helps
organizations track and identify internal and external factors which affect them. SWOT ref to

7|Page
the strengths, weak nesses, opportunities, and threats.

B) PESTEL Analysis: A PESTEL analysis is a framework or tool used bymarketers to analyze

and monitor the macro-environmental factors that have animpact on an organization,
company, or industry.
Political factor : Political factors usually relate to laws and regulation
created and enforced by national governments and international bodies (such as
the United Nations or the European Union).
a) Tax policies
b) Labor laws
c) political stability or instability
.Economic factor : Economic factors will comprise exchange rates economicGrowth Or fall,
globalization, inflation, interest rates and the cost of Living, labor costs and Customer
spending
a) Interest rates
b) Inflation rates
c) Exchange rates
.Social factors : Social factors like where you live personal values and
Socio-economic status affect where and why people make purchase.
a) Cultural and social trends
b) Health consciousness

8|Page
c) Education level
Technology factors: Factors related to technologies include productiontechniques,
Information and communication resources, production,logistics, marketing and e-commerce
technologies.
a) Technology transfer and infrastructure
b) Automation and digitization
c) cybersecurity
Environmental factor: The environmental factors in a business can range from political
Factors, social factors, economic factors, technological factors and cultural factors.
a) Waste management and recycling
b) Natural disaster and their impact
c) Climate change and global warming
. Legal aspect: Organizational, securities, employment, contract, commercial,immigration,
consumer protection, tax, and industry-specific laws and regulations.
a) intellectual property right
b) Anti trust laws
c) Data protection and privacy laws

C) Porter's five force method : Competitive Rivalry, Supplier PowerBuyer

Power, Threat of Substitution, and Threat of New Entry.

9|Page
D) Root cause analysis : Root cause analysis (RCA) refers to the process ofidentifying the
root causes of problems which allow proper formulation of solutions.RCA assumes that it is
much more effective to systematically prevent and solvefor root causes rather than merely
treating symptoms ad hoc and fighting ires.
E) Brainstorming: Brain storming is a group problem-solving technique thatrelies on the
free-wheeling spontaneous contributions of ideas and solutions.
F) Stakeholder analysis: Shareholder Analysis is an investigation, an appraisal of the
ownership structure of a company, that determines the shareholders and shareholders.
2) Qualitative analysis: This provides insight into the instantaneous feeling of employees
and customers or how they feel about the overall experience of it.
Profitability: The process of determining, out of a package of possible alternatives, the most
lucrative way in which a business could go. There must be analysis of market trend studies
and consumer preferences and other economic determinants that point to which resource
investment makes good business sense.
B) Cost Analysis: the process for calculating the economic benefitof a decision as a guide to
determine whether to pursue it or not.
C) Statistical analysis : the most valuable ammunition through which youget to learn about
the trends and shifting phases feasible amongst yourtarget audience .
. Mean
. Median
. Mode
. Standard Deviation
. Range
D) Financial ratio: financial ratios, solvency ratios compare a company'sdebt levels with its
assets, equity, and earnings.
E) Linear programming: Linear programming (LP) uses many linearinequalities pertaining to
a given scenario to determine the "optimal" valueone can obtain under those constraints.
Theoretical Frame work Of Business problems
A theoretical framework in business is the theoretical lens through which the basis for the
conduct of research, analysis, and interpretation is based in understanding business
phenomena. This framework integrates existing theories, models, and concepts into a
meaningful structure that will help explain and predict business behaviors, decisions, and
outcomes.

10 | P a g e
 Company Name – Micomax

Earlier, the giant in the Indian smartphone market, Micromax's sale had been negatively
impacted by more aggressive competitors from China and incredible technological change in
recent years. Although the company had several attempts at making a comeback, it is
saddled with a series of theoretical problems that, if left unaddressed, would continue to
challenge its sustainability. The issues cut across business strategy, market positioning,
technology, and operations. This is an extensive discourse on the potential theoretical
vulnerabilities that Micromax is exposed to:

1. Incredible Competition from Global Brands

Micromax once thrived in an environment where global smartphone brands had not yet fully
tapped into the Indian market. With companies like Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Realme, and even
Samsung entering into the affordable segment, Micromax has faced stiff competition. These
brands bring the latest technology, premium design, and competitive pricing. The sheer scale
of production handled by these companies makes them offer high-spec devices at lower
costs because of economies of scale. A major challenge Micromax has faced an inability to
equalize their price-to-spec ratio and compete with them on the lines of innovations in
products developed.
Theoretical impact :If Micromax cannot compete with the global brands in terms of
innovation, pricing, and customer interaction, it may not able to increase its market share.
Even when it has a loyal customer base, without new and innovative products, customer
defection to other brands is very much inevitable.
2. Without Innovation and Technological Advancement
One of the major reasons by which a successful technology company can fail is that they are
unable to innovate continuously.

11 | P a g e
Over the years, the smartphone market has experienced tremendous transformations with
the development of technologies such as 5G, high definition camera systems with the power
of AI, folding displays, biometric security hardware, face recognition, fingerprint
identification, among many other. Companies at the top tier of the smartphone market, such
as Apple and Samsung, innovate at the edge, while companies at the more affordable end of
the spectrum, including Xiaomi and Realme, have slowly begun incorporating commendable
advancements within their product lines as well. **Theoretic Impact:** If Micromax does
not innovate or at least keep abreast with the latest technological trends, it may often be
mistakenly identified as a supplier of obsolete products. This is especially risky in an industry
as dynamic as this one where a company cannot afford to be too far behind in regard to
technology; this puts the company at a risk of losing interest from customers, which leads to
eventual market exit.

3. Changing Consumer Preferences and Brand Perception

When Micromax was at the top, they used to cater to budget-conscious consumers who
were looking for an affordable smartphone.

Consumer preferences, however, have been through a sea change over the years.
As incomes increase, and smartphones become integral to day-to-day life, even consumers
in developing markets like India are willing to spend more on devices that offer better
features, superior design, and a premium experience. Brands that were once so readily
aligned with value-for-money--and, by extension, concessions in quality or performance as
well--struggle to make credible claims to deliver prime, midtier products. For Micromax, its
brand equity is forever saddled in the "cheap phone" perception, and its challenge is to fight
the perception war in terms of being taken seriously as a competitor at the midtier or even
high-end level.
Theoretical impact: Repositioning a brand is expensive and time-consuming. If Micromax is
unable to change the perception of the consumer, then the firm will be stuck in the budget
category, where margin is increasingly eroded because of intense competition. Unless
repositioned successfully, the company would not be able to win higher-margin customers;
therefore, this would lower its profit and growth profiles in the long term.
4. Supply Chain and Manufacturing Constraints
Maintaining a robust and agile supply chain is one of the most important success factors for
the leading players in the smartphone sector.
Some vendors, especially budget ones, rely heavily on third-party suppliers for critical
components such as chipsets, displays, batteries, and cameras.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the global supply chain disruptions like a shortage of
chipsets have affected manufacturers worldwide.

12 | P a g e
This could place Micromax at a disadvantage with respect to such disruptions. Furthermore,
the company cannot have control over quality, price, or supply. Theoretical impact: Delays
or cost-overruns in supply can paralyze a narrow-margin player like Micromax. If Micromax
cannot guarantee that it will be able to source crucial components reliably and at low costs,
then it will fail to deliver the required quantities at acceptable prices, allowing its market
share to slide.
5. Limited International Presence and Overreliance on Domestic Market
Micromax is predominantly an Indian market focused company. Although India does
happen to be an enormous market, there are quite a few successful companies who
diversify their revenue streams by entering into other countries apart from one. Companies
like Xiaomi and Oppo have expanded very aggressively in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Africa.
By being heavily reliant on the Indian market, it makes Micromax vulnerable to economic
downturns, changes in regulations, and consumer behavior in India.

Theoretical impact:
Lack of international footprint will provide restriction on growth opportunities for Micromax.
In case the economic slowdown takes place in the Indian market or competition rises, then
severe pressure of financial crunch may affect the organization, which is staring at
unimaginable losses. It will be a huge investment in marketing, infrastructure development,
and relationship building for global expansion without it; the future of the organization is
not easy to predict.

6. Software and User Experience

Apart from the hardware, the software experience of a smartphone is also critical for
customer satisfaction and brand loyalty.

Micromax runs on Android-based operating systems in mostly customized skins.

However, that layer might not have been as fine-tuned as usability or optimizations of
competitors like Xiaomi's MIUI, OnePlus's OxygenOS, or Samsung's One UI.

Such software-related problems can demoralize a user, no matter the quality of the
hardware there is if it is set with bloatware, has no updates, runs slow, or just has a poorly
designed interface.
Theoretical impact Hardware is not the only important point in the modern smartphone
ecosystem. Optimization in software becomes equally important. In case of weaker software

13 | P a g e
development and update cycles, Micromax may lose customers due to a better software
experience offered by its rivals. This also includes the late arrival of software updates and
security patches, which would in the long run damage customer trust.
7. After-Sales
Service and Customer Care Quality in post-sale service has been an important determinant
of customer loyalty. Regarding this issue, most mobile phone firms underemphasize their
differences with others through the quality of servicing provided to customers, warranty
repair assurance, technical support, and service centers. In case Micromax fails to develop
robust customer support, then this may cause damage to the brand. What the company
needs to do is develop good service center network and get its customer service processes
streamlined so that it could win the trust of its customers.
Theoretical impact: Bad post-sales experience would lead to bad word-of-mouth and
damage brand value. If Micromax cannot offer a great post-sales experience, it will lose its
market as competitors often talk about their infrastructure for service as a major selling
point.
8. Pricing Dilemma and Profit Margins
Micromax has always been a brand of affordable products and value-for-money for the mass
market.
But on the lower side of things, the market is getting congested with really cheap
competitors offering high specification at giveaway prices.

The margins are notoriously thin on this segment and while Micromax may still have scale or
size to benefit it, it will be challenged severely to make money.

Coming to higher priced segments has its own problem: customers are not likely to pay the
premium for the Micromax brand, especially if they have built a perception that it's some
kind of low-tier brand.

Theoretical impact:
This problem of pricing leaves Micromax in an awkward position-between selling affordable
products at minimal margins and competing in the mid-tier category with less pull of brands.
It cannot scale appropriately, hence its growth process can stay frozen further more.
9. Impact of Global Economic Conditions and Currency :
Fluctuations Like any other in the emerging markets, Micromax’s performance would
depend on the overall macro-economic scenario with regards to inflation, currency
devaluation and global recessions. Mostly all the parts that go into the smart phones of

14 | P a g e
Micromax are imported and hence with fluctuations in the Indian Rupee in comparison to
the U.S. dollar or other currencies, such as Chinese Yuan, may well send higher costs. Trade
regulations, tariffs, and duties will reflect on Micromax, especially when there have been so
many tensions in geopolitics going on in the world that change the dynamics of worldwide
trade.

Global economic instability increases costs, reduces consumer spending, and challenges
competitive pricing. If Micromax cannot absorb these shocks or pass along increased costs
to consumers, it will have difficulty keeping profitability.

10. Brand Loyalty and Retention

It stands out as a differentiator in the very competitive market. Companies like Apple and
Samsung have huge loyal customer bases, which continue to upgrade within their same
brand ecosystem. Micromax hasn’t developed strong brand loyalty so that its customers may
be shifted to its competition easily, which is indeed an attractive offer in the same price
range. Theoretical Impact: If Micromax does not have a loyal customer base, it might end
up facing major churn rates. Further, it also indicates that the longer it takes for a customer
to become converted into a loyal one, it increases its customer acquisition cost. In general, it
is also more expensive for companies to spend time trying to retain customers than to gain a
new customer. It would continue to strain their marketing and product development efforts.
Conclusion
The theoretical challenges that Micromax is going to face relate to competition, innovation,
and brand perception all the way to the operational functions such as supply chain
management and customer service. If left unarticulated by a strategic push, these factors
will limit the organization’s ability to regain its earlier position within the smart-phone
market. This is achieved by fully investing in the research and development function,
expansion globally, some form of repositioning within the brand, and to the customer
experience across every facet of the business.

15 | P a g e
 Problem Faced By Micromax
Micromax was once a leading Indian smartphone player and has had problems crop up time
and again. These problems have caused the firm to decline and not able to catch up with
international brands. From them, some of the significant problems that Micromax had are as
follows:

1 Rising Competition from Chinese Players.

One of the biggest challenges for Micromax came in the form of the entry of Chinese mobile
makers like Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, and Realme in the Indian market. Brands sold their
smartphones at a much better spec but at a highly competitive price that wouldn't have
seemed feasible for Micromax. Chinese brands quickly gained momentum by offering better
quality in assembling, more innovative, and above all, strategized marketing inputs that
positioned them strongly over Micromax.

2. Lack of Innovation
Micromax lagged as far as innovation is concerned. As the smartphone market was fast
picking up with the addition of 4G and better cameras, among other software features,
Micromax remained behind. It continued with outdated technology in its products, which is
less attractive for a consumer looking at the latest options.
3. Dependence on Imported Components
As is the case with most smartphone manufacturers, Micromax has relied on imports, mainly
from China. Such dependence left it very vulnerable to the disruption of its supply chain and
price volatility. What's more, the recent flare-up of political tension between India and China
has led the public to boycott products made in China, which indirectly hits the company
because it has shown reliance on Chinese suppliers.

4. Poor Brand Perception

The company first positioned itself as a budget smartphone brand. It was okay for Micromax
to attract more price-sensitive consumers but then became a weakness in an evolving
market. As time went by, Micromax got stereotyped with low-cost, low-quality products
which proved a great challenge for it to enter the mid-range or premium segments. On the
other hand, the increase in mostly aspirational brands like Xiaomi and OnePlus hurt
Micromax's chances in trying to attract more affluent consumers.

5. Poor Software Experience

16 | P a g e
 Micromax was never known for optimizing its software efficiently and not rolling out time-
of-the-art updates for a very long time. The custom UI and bloatware that came with the
device were slow and snail-paced, which made it increasingly uncomfortable to use.
Compare this with Xiaomi's ready-to-use MIUI interface or Samsung's One UI; such flawless
user experience helped the two competitors retain customers in their stores.

6. Product Fragmentation
The product portfolio was neither aligned nor had any strategy in terms of pricing or
features. Instead, multiple models launched were not in coordination with a marketing
strategy followed by the company which caused confusion among consumers. On the other
hand, competitors like Xiaomi had more aligned and well-defined product portfolios
addressing very specific market segments.

7. Lack of focus on R&D

Compared to the rest of the world, Micromax was not investing much in R&D. This led to
fewer innovations and less adaptability of new technologies such as 5G and AI-based
features, which reduced the scope for attracting more tech-savvy consumers. Its lack of
innovation products made it an also-ran in a fast-changing marketplace.

8. Supply Chain and Manufacturing Problems

Micromax faced many issues along the supply chain, including delay in launching new
products into the market. Neither the scale of production nor the efficiency was comparable
to the leaders across the globe, where the small players like Xiaomi and Samsung were
leading the flock. Hence, products from Micromax arrived either late or costlier than others,
thereby less competitive.

17 | P a g e
9. Poor Marketing Strategy
Marketing strategy was also one cause for Micromax's downfall. The company did very well
in initial stages with massive celebrity endorsements, but it failed to establish any
meaningful and engaging brand story in later phases of competition. Chinese brands Oppo
and Vivo utilized strict marketing strategies and aggressive offline retailing to generate
visibility in tier-2 and tier-3 cities.

10. After Sales Service and Customer Care

Another frequent criticism of Micromax was its weak after-sales service. It took a long time
to make repairs, lay down warranty claims, and provide technical support. In contrast, global
competitors developed stronger after-sales networks, making it easier for customers to be
served or supported. This can further reduce the brand and customer retention.

11. Late Entry into the 4G and 5G Markets

Micromax was also very hesitant in embracing new network technologies like 4G and, more
recently, 5G. It was after the Indian telecom market had begun its shift to 4G in the mid-
2010s that brands like Xiaomi, Samsung, and OnePlus launched affordable 4G smartphones
in a big way. As a result, when Micromax finally woke up from its slumber and tried to make
a comeback, it lost a huge piece of the pie, especially as data consumption went through the
roof with the entry of Reliance Jio.

12. Lack of International Foray

Micromax was more focused towards the Indian market, but did not also scale up
considerably in international markets. Companies like Xiaomi and Oppo scaled globally and,
hence, possess the more revenue streams and economies of scale. It has the limited
international footprints, which did not help Micromax in capitalizing on the greater diversity
of opportunities which it could have exploited in international markets, that would not only
have diversified its streams of revenues but also cut reliance on an increasingly competitive
Indian market.

13. Economic and Geopolitical Factors

External economic and geopolitical factors too played a role in the downfall of Micromax.
The Indian economy periodically went into slowdowns at different instances that had a
negative effect on the consumer expenditure. Moreover, the political and economic
competition between India and China, along with the "Make in India" plan, forced many
import-dependent Chinese companies to start leveraging local market opportunities.

18 | P a g e
Micromax, an Indian brand that sourced its components from Chinese manufacturers but
presented itself as an indigenous brand, caught a bad time when anti-China sentiments
increased. ### 14. **Delayed Comeback Attempts**

While aware of its lowly position in the market, Micromax's reentry was late and not very
impactful. In 2020, the company tried to recapture a space in the market by launching new
"In" series products promising a revival of a homegrown alternative to Chinese
manufacturers. Lack of great value proposition, innovation, and a defined marketing strategy
partly limited this relaunch campaign's success.
Conclusion
Micromax has wasted away due to internal and external causes; the pressures internal into it
are lack of innovation, failing perception of the brand, inconsistency in product strategy, and
customer support. However, it could not regain the glory it had lost even though it made an
effort to reposition its brand. The company would look to innovation, customer experience,
and competitive power in a fast-moving and very competitive marketplace for its future
success.

Examine Problem Through Root Cause Analysis

To simplify the serious issues affecting Micromax using **Root Cause Analysis (RCA)**, we
identify the problems and lead them back to their underlying causes. RCA is a structured
method of solving problems, that is, essentially leading to finding the root of the problem
rather than its symptoms. Now, let's use an RCA for Micromax to decline .

Problem: Loss of Market Share to Competitors

A declining market share was being faced by Micromax by its competitors, particularly by the
Chinese brands.

Symptoms
Consumer is changing his or her loyalty to other brands like Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, and Realme.
Products of Micromax were perceived to be obsolete or of low value.

19 | P a g e
The sales figures were declining as was its visibility in markets too.

Root Causes
1. Failure to Innovate:
Cause: Not investing enough in R&D to match the pace of technology change, especially
from 4G, higher-quality cameras, and new software. Competitors were highly investing in
these latter.
Root Cause: Strategic failure in the firm's choice of focusing on short-term profit drivers-
that is, low-cost smartphones-than long-term competitiveness through innovation

2. Intense Competition from Chinese Brand:

Cause: Chinese brands provided better hardware and software in the market at competitive
prices; they exploited superior economies of scale.
Root Cause: Micromax was unable to provide a similar level of global scale and the best
production process as compared to Chinese competitors. Additionally, Micromax was still
dependent on manufacturers outsourced outside, mainly from China, which caused
unlikeness in price criteria
.
3. Brand Perception:
Cause: Micromax was still restricted to the budget segment, which allowed competition like
Xiaomi to mop up both budget and mid-ranged consumers.
Root Cause: The brand stood for low-cost, low-quality devices; the brand failed to reposition
effectively and competitions were better in marketing and consistently making available
higher quality devices that evoked trust among customers.

Problem: Customer Experience Poor (After Sale Service and Software Issues)**
Micromax continued to face complaints related to after-sales services and lumpy software.

Manifestations
Customer complaints over faulty products.
Detracting comments over after-sales support.
Customer defection increased.

20 | P a g e
Underlying Causes
1. After-Sales Infrastructure :
Reason: It was seen that weak investment in a service network and support infrastructure
for customers led to a lousy customer relationship.
Root Cause: The company has ignored customer retention and brand loyalty by way of
constant service. A rival network was placed, which was not done by Micromax.

2. Poor Software Experience:

Cause: The UI was unpolished and slow updates were charging the users on nerves.
Bloatware irritation was added. Software development was not done on basis of hardware
giving sluggish user experience.
Root Cause: There was no software development in-house, and third-party development
teams for the Android skin were causing poor performance. Companies like Xiaomi and
Samsung spent on dedicated software teams, which improved the user experience.

Problem: Indistinct Lineu

The product lineup of Micromax is not clear and very poorly differentiated, resulting in
confusion among consumers and a reduced market presence for the brand.

Symptoms:
-There are no flagship products or more individual devices that would be highly
differentiated.
- Launched random products without focusing on specific market segments.
- Not competing in the budget and mid-range level.

Root Causes
1. No Integrated Product Strategy
Cause: Micromax had a range of products from within different price ranges without any
integrated strategy and some specific market segmentation, which further resulted in
overlapping products and more confusion within the markets.

21 | P a g e
Root Cause: Micromax has lacked effective management of products as well as deep
research on markets. Well-defined user personas or target segments have not been
developed. It resulted in a scattershot approach.

2. Reactive Launches:

Cause: Most of the products offered by Micromax appear to be reactive offerings to the
competing products rather than thoughtful development of innovation or differentiated
offerings.
Root Cause: Lack of long-term strategic planning and foresight. Instead of defining the
market, Micromax followed the trends seen by its rivals and always remained one step
behind.

Problem:
Entrance Delay in 4G and 5G Markets
Micromax entered the market late for 4G and 5G technologies, and a significant percentage
of the customers had already moved to the rival.

Symptoms:
Late arrival on the 4G/5G front.
- The competitors were able to capture the major market share using 4G-enabled phones,
primarily at the time of Reliance Jio's booming growth.
- Micromax was not able to capitalize on the mobile data usage growth.

Root Causes:
1. Technological adoption slow:
Cause: Micromax dint launch 4G-enabled devices at the right time that meant launching
such devices in the market. It was the time when Indian consumers were upgrading rapidly
to 4G smartphones.
Root Cause: Lack of thinking ahead and investment in new network technologies.
Competitors sensed this shift and prepared their product portfolios; Micromax was not so
alert to changing market conditions and telecom tie-ups.
2. External Manufacturing Reliance:

22 | P a g e
Impact: Sometimes, the dependence on third-party manufacturers made it take a little
longer for new technologies to be rolled into the market compared to competitors who had
better control over their respective supply chains.
Root Cause: An operational structure of Micromax made it not easy to change technologies
quickly when dependent on external suppliers. It had competitors with better control over
manufacturing processes, like Xiaomi and Vivo, change technologies more easily.

Problem:
Micromax doesn't have a Global Presence
Micromax focused heavily on the Indian markets and never really expanded much beyond
the borders.

Symptoms
- Heavily reliant on Indian market revenue.
- Weak global footprint, when compared to other international brands such as Xiaomi or
Oppo.
- Vulnerable to fluctuations in the Indian markets and the competition.

Root Causes
1. Heavy Reliance on Home Market:
Cause: Micromax concentrated most of its efforts on the Indian market, since competitors
vigorously continued to expand into international markets, won economies of scale, and
gained larger customer bases.
Root Cause: Lack of strategy on global expansion and international partnerships. It did not
seize early momentum to enter other emerging markets, hence losing opportunities for
diversification and scale.

2. Brand Not Widespread Elsewhere:

Cause: Micromax was not making sufficient investments to create itself as an international
brand, whereas the other company, especially Chinese companies, employed global
marketing strategies and entered into joint ventures to tap a number of markets.
Root Cause: Lack of proper budget and purely focusing on short-term profits ensured it was
unable to launch its products across international borders; in contrast, some other brands

23 | P a g e
were much more capitalized and invested in marketing and distribution in global markets as
well.

Conclusion:
Root Causes Summary
The root causes of Micromax's problems can be summarized as below:
1. A lack of investment in R&D and innovation kept it from competing technically with global
players.
2. The strategic foresight was weak, and consequently, there was weak adoption of crucial
technologies like 4G and 5G, along with an incoherent product line-up.
3. Poor brand management, market perception has subdued its march from the budget
category to move into mid- and premium segments.
4. It has been due to operational inefficiencies and over dependence on external
manufacturers which have also resulted in a tardy launch of the products and lower
competitiveness.
5. Limited global outreach and solely relying on the home market makes Micromax
completely exposed to local competition and vulnerable to fluctuation in the Indian market.

This will call for a radical overhaul of the strategy Micromax has set out to implement both in
terms of innovation and R&D and brand repositioning as well as in terms of operational
efficiency.

24 | P a g e
Data Analysis Through Relevant Reports Such As Financial Statements Market
Research Report Customer Feedback etc.

Analyzing Micromax's problems, using data from the following sources-including financial
statements, market research reports, customer feedback, and others-provides a
comprehensive view of the company's decline. Here's how challenges in Micromax can be
further understood with these data sources:
1. Financial Statements Analysis
Revenue Trends: Revenue would decline during the subsequent period compared to
Micromax's peak (around 2014-2015). A sudden decline in revenue would be indicative of
losing market share and demand.
Profit Margins: Gross, operating, and net profit margins shall be analyzed. If a company's
margins decline, then it can be inferred that the cost is increasing (component prices,
supply-chain issues) or that competitors are pushing down the price.
R&D Spending: If the R&D spending percentage is relatively lower than that of competitors,
then it would comment on the lack of innovation coming from Micromax. For a rapid fire
technology world, high R&D values are very important.
Marketing Expenses: Compare the marketing expenses relative to competitors. Indian
market has Chinese brands that have promoted their products very aggressively both online
and offline, due to which they were able to enjoy such fast growth.
Debt Levels: High debt levels or declining liquidity could suggest inefficiencies in operations
or financial stress due to competition and downward sales trends.

Data Example:
If the revenue of Micromax had fallen from $50 million in 2015 to $25 million in 2019, and if
the revenues for Xiaomi and Oppo had risen by the same percentage, this would indicate a
disadvantage on the side of Micromax when considering competition

2. Market Research Reports

25 | P a g e
Market research reports shall provide data regarding trends in the smartphone market,
customer preference, and the position of Micromax in the marketplace vis-à-vis competitors.
Market Share Data: Reports from IDC, Counterpoint, or Canalys that document market share
about how Micromax gradually lost share in India would emphasize the time when Chinese
brands invaded India. The more devastation of a market share, the more competitors
increase.
Average Selling Price (ASP): ASP of smartphones by Micromax compared to its peers. If
Micromax's ASP continued being low while others shifted up to mid-range products, then it
would hint that Micromax couldn't address more premium-value segments.
Consumer Preference Trends: The company was not meeting consumer expectations for
desirable features such as 4G connectivity, better cameras, and software optimization. The
lag in entering the 4G market for Micromax would indeed account for its loss of appeal.
Regional Sales Numbers: Failure to tap rural or tier-2 city sales revenues while competition
entered the very lucrative metro markets could account for limited scalability.
It was in 2014 that Micromax gained the position of the second largest smartphone brand in
India. It was having a market share close to 16% of the market. By 2020, its market share had
dipped to less than 1%. It was the turn of around 27% of the market being captured by
Xiaomi. The above data clearly tells a story of competing struggle against Micromax.

3. Customer Feedback Analysis

This customer feedback can be elicited through reviewing products on websites, social
media, and customer feedback forms. This information will give qualitative knowing about
how the customers perceive Micromax and the service they receive from it.

Customer Feedback Focus to Be Addressed

Product Reviews: Common complaints registered on those e-commerce sites, Amazon and
Flipkart, would include complaints from users of Micromax. This should have happened
when software would lag, the battery will be very weak, and after selling service leaves a
bad impression. Even then, that is enough to explain why they switched to competitors.
Customer Satisfaction Score Would be reflected by how likely customers are to recommend
the brand when comparing Micromax's Net Promoter Score with that of Xiaomi, Oppo, or
Samsung. Low scores in NPS would indicate poor customer satisfaction and loyalty.
After-Sales Service Feedback: Poor customer review of the after-sales service and repairs at
Micromax would indicate weaknesses of the service infrastructure as against competitors
like Samsung.

26 | P a g e
Slow or no software updates: The consumers can become vocal if the update and patch
delivery is slow or not at all happening, especially when one finds their competitors
delivering the same on a timely basis.

Example Data:
Average rating on Amazon and Flipkart customer reviews for Micromax smartphones: 3.2/5.
Xiaomi budget phones ensure 4+ ratings every time. Customers are voicing complaints about
slow performance, buggy software, and service center that aren't doing enough.

4. Operational Reports and Supply Chain Data

Operational data and supply chain reports can further throw light on how much Micromax
depends on imported component, some from China, and its manufacturing delay.

Important Operational Data for Review:

-component Sourcing and Supplier Data: Sourcing data analyzed over time would have
revealed that Micromax relied heavily on Chinese components and, hence, was extremely
vulnerable to supply chain disruption and pricing pressures. The competition that invested in
local manufacturing and vertical integration would have had the edge.
Manufacturing Efficiency: Production lead times and capacity utilization. If production lead
times were significantly longer at Micromax than they were at strong competition such as
Xiaomi, then inefficiencies may be present in the supply chain.
Product Launch Delays: Internal reports or market observations could show how many
customers Micromax lost because its 4G or 5G smartphone launched late.

Example Data
Second, Micromax was also highly reliant on Chinese suppliers for 80% of components
including, MediaTek chipsets for which it did not have much of a space to bargain and
negotiate prices due to geopolitical tensions. Its competitor Xiaomi and Samsung, on the
other hand, were investing heavily in local manufacturing and low-cost and better time-to-
market strategies.

5. Industry Analyst Reports

27 | P a g e
Reports from industry analyst and consultant firms, such as Deloitte and Gartner, will
provide an expert analysis of Micromax strategy, key operational weaknesses, and its
competitive environment

Key Insights to Extract:

Strategic Failures: Analysts will refer to the strategic mishaps of Micromax for example not
playing a strong game in the fast growth smartphone market and not having a product
portfolio comparable with the likes of OnePlus.
Competitive Benchmarking: New product developments, supply chain efficiency, and R&D
spend of Micromax with global as well as local competitors to get some evident areas where
Micromax was trailing behind.
An analyst report could highlight that Micromax spent only 2-3% on R&D as against that of
Xiaomi, which is 7-8%, pointing out the reason why Micromax took so long in innovation and
new feature development.

6. Consumer Behavior Surveys

Surveys conducted through research agencies or firms would have highlighted why
consumers shy away from Micromax and instead opted to buy from competing brands.

Key Survey Insights:

Why Switch Brands?: What did the people have to say about changing from Micromax to
Xiaomi or Samsung? Were they looking at them being more value for money, camera
performance, or that the brand was better?
Brand Loyalty Scores: These are metrics that would suggest how much time it would take for
people to lose interest in buying from Micromax, while competitors like Xiaomi were
scooping out base through online selling, sales, and other forms of marketing.
A 2017 survey may show that 65% of the users who shifted from Micromax to Xiaomi
mentioned the better features at par prices as the reason for shifting, while 20 % cite poor
after-sales support as a reason for shifting.

Conclusion:
Multi-faced view of challenges that Micromax is facing can be identified while going through
financial statement data, market research reports, customer feed backs, and operational
metrics.

28 | P a g e
Financial data- Revenue is on a decline with investment in R&D on the lower scale, which
suggests lack of innovation as the main cause.
These reports pointed out the shrinking market share as competitors captured consumers
based on better technology and value for money.
- Customer feedback suggested disappointment with the performances of products and
after-sales service.
- Operational data revealed inefficiencies in supply chains, improper launching of products,
and finally failed to present competitive products.

With these sources, it has been found that the failure of Micromax results from not-so-wise
strategic decisions, operational inefficiency, and a disconnection between the need of
customers and the products offered in the market.

29 | P a g e
 The solutions by evaluating given alternatives and arriving at a independent
solution of micromax company
To attain an independent solution for Micromax-an Indian smartphone and electronics
company-the first prerequisite is to understand the major challenges, opportunities, and
alternatives in their business landscape. Here is a step-by-step approach to this:

1. Problem Identification
Tough Competition: Global smartphone giants like Samsung, Xiaomi, Realme, and Vivo are
all tough as they have deep pockets and economies of scale.
Market Share: Currently, Micromax's market share has come down considerably since its
peak during 2014-2015, largely because of competition in the market and high penetration
of Chinese smartphone brands.
Brand Perception: Micromax is perceived as a budget smartphone brand, which sort of
eliminates it from entering the higher ends.

2. Alternatives to Consider
Rebrand and Innovation: One way forward is the rebranding of an image. Micromax can
position itself as the leading provider of premium to value-for-money devices. The strategy
here would be launching feature-packed smartphones at a competitive price point with a
focus on quality.
Foray into IoT and Consumer Electronics Space: The scope is massive for Micromax to
venture into newer categories like smart home appliances under the umbrella of Internet of
Things (IoT) and wearable technology in the wake of a growing Indian digital ecosystem.
Localization of Production: With the "Make in India" policy, increasing local production for
Micromax will enhance its competitiveness due to low costs and incentives from the
government.
Niche Market Focus: Micromax can focus on niche market segments like rural India, where
penetration is low. The company can offer "affordable yet high quality" devices for a sizeable
market share.

3. Evaluation of Options
Rebrand and Innovate:
This may add to the brand image and enable Micromax to compete with premium
products.

30 | P a g e
Cons: Higher R&D investment and a significant marketing campaign
- Diversification
Pros: Expands the product line of the company and thereby reduces the company's
business reliance on mobile phones.
Cons: Multi-business lines may not be a good idea if not managed correctly
Localization of Manufacturing
Advantages: Lower cost, higher brand value in India, and government incentives
Disadvantages: Capital expenditure on infrastructure and supply chain
Niche Market Focus
Advantages: Helps Micromax achieve monopoly power over certain niches in areas of lesser
competition.
Cons: May limit the growth prospects for the company in the premium segment of a
smartphone.

4. Coming to an Independent Solution

A combination of the strategies would be apt for Micromax. From the analysis, here's an
independent solution:

Product Innovation & Rebranding: Micromax must come up with new lines of products that
ensure a new and differential value proposition for each feature (battery life, hardiness,
camera, etc) with a price advantage. Software company partnerships can be used to provide
regional language support and applications relevant to the Indian market.
Niche Market Focus Strategy: Targets the ignored pockets of India, particularly the rural and
semi-urban regions. It might provide a strong position for Micromax by putting the brand in
peoples' minds as reliable and affordable for smartphones.

Manufacturing Localization: "Make in India" initiative can be used for local manufacturing
units. Such strategies may reduce the cost of production, increase margins, and give an edge
over international competitors.

Strategic Partnerships: It would partner with the telecom operators to create exclusive
packages that integrate services and content for price-sensitive consumers. This would work
out effectively to keep the customers engaged and therefore lock them in and collect a
regular revenue stream through services.

31 | P a g e
Product Line Expansion: Expand into smart homes, budget laptops, or tablets for education
to leverage the surging demand for affordable digital solutions in the post-pandemic world.

By taking this route, Micromax would be able to regain the brand and be able to compete
effectively with both international and local competitors and regain market share.

32 | P a g e