National Power Transmission Network Development Project in Myanmar (Power Network System Plan) Site Investigation Report
National Power Transmission Network Development Project in Myanmar (Power Network System Plan) Site Investigation Report
May 2015
Tokyo Electric Power Company Inc.
The First Site Investigation Report
1. Name of Experts, Belonging Organization and His Duty
Masaharu Yogo, TEPCO, Power System Planner
2. Name of the Project
National Power Transmission Network Development Project in Myanmar
3. Purpose of This Investigation
Myanmar government cited the development of 500 kV transmission lines and substations
as a matter of priority and issued a request of their development by utilizing yen loan.
According to the request, the Japanese Government informed Myanmar government of a
new yen loan project as the donor policy on March 24, 2014 targeting “National Power
Transmission Network Development Project Phase 1” in Myanmar. Furthermore, following
the Phase 1, the rapid development of Phase 2 are also needed. In this survey, engaged
member will carry out the supplementary investigation in cooperation with his counterpart,
the Myanmar Electric Power Enterprise, in order to examine and recommend the
appropriate power system plan for preparation of yean loan project by collecting and
organizing the relevant information based on the current plans and implementation of the
transmission lines and substation projects by Myanmar Government, power generation
plans utilizing IPP and the support planning and implementation status of other donors.
4. Methodology
The latest information regarding Myanmar’s power system network plan was collected and
reviewed. The necessary investigations were carried out for contributing to prepare the
appraisal as yen loan projects relevant to the power network system plans in Myanmar in
cooperation with the environmental expert and JICA staff (F/F mission and appraisal
mission).
5. Duration of the Project Survey
From January 16th 2015 to May 29th 2015 (scheduled)
The first site investigation was from January 18th to 28th 2015.
6. The First Site Investigation
In January 19th, 20th and 22nd, the information was collected based on the questionnaire
attached in this report through the discussion with the Power Transmission Project
Department of MEPE and DEP. In 26th January, the mission team carried out the site
investigations at the candidate sites of Pharyargyi and Hlaingtayar to confirm their latest
situations regarding the Phase 2 Project. The confirmed information is described as
follows.
To Hlaingtayar
1.1 km
Military Land
Switch Yard
230 kV
Around
400 m
Switch Yard
The following comments were raised for the Project that were not listed in Table 1.
- The completion year was uncertain of 500 kV Phayargyi – Dawei transmission line
because it depended on the plan of the Dawei power station.
- Shweli 3 was scheduled to be completed in 2020. There was an enterprise company
that expressed an interest in the installation of 500 kV transmission line from Shweli 3
to Methila and said that he might implemented.
- The survey of the transmission line from Mawlamyine to Dawei has been asked to
China Exim Bank. Dawei would have large power demand forecast due to its SEZ.
- The expected completion date of the transmission line between Taungoo and
Pharyargyi would be informed as much as possible because its completion date
seemed to be important information for JICA Project.
(3) Transmission Lines connected to New 500 kV Substations of Phase 2 Project just after
Their Completion
There were no changes from the results of the study in 2014 of the transmission line
connection to new 500 kV substations of Phase 2 Project. The followings were
scheduled.。
(5) Prioritized Projects of Transmission Lines and Substations Except for the System
from 500 kV Taugoo – Hlaingtayar
MEPE identified the study of the plan of the transmission lines from the hydropower
stations located in the north of Meiktila substation as the prioritized projects.
C. Power Flow Analysis for the 500 kV System of Phase 2 and 230 kV System in around
Yangon
PHAYARGYI DAWEI
JICA
KAMARNAT
MYAUNTAGAR
HLAWGA
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG E. DAGONG
6.
HLAINGTAYAR 5.
YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
7.
BAYINTNAUNG
2.
THAKETA
KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
3.
THIDA
1. THANLYIN
KYAIKLATT
4.
JICA
PWH Thailand DALA
TILAWA
4500
4000
3500
MP High
3000
33kV Load
2500 66kV load
MP Low Total
2000
1500
1000
500
0
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
・ The maximum load of around 2,081 MW for 66 kV system and the maximum load of
around 788 MW for 33 kV system were assumed to be supplied from 230 kV
substations in proportion to their power supply capacities. The estimated loads of 230
kV substations were listed as Table 4.
Total 2,081
The following two types of conductors are mainly used for 230 kV transmission lines in
Myanmar.
Twin bundle conductors of 605 MCM, its capacity is 288 MVA/cct
Single conductor of 795 MCM and its capacity is 164 MVA/cct
The single of 795 MCM is used for Tharyargone - Hlawga that has a smaller capacity and
the twin bundles of 605 MCM is mainly used for other interval.
The power generators in around Yangon area were set out as shown in Table 5. The
numerical values of power outputs from Thaketa, Ahlone, Ywama and Hlawga were used
that were also used in the previous study.
This case can be considered as the case with large power outputs of generators in around
Yangon area.
400
27 155
MYAUNTAGAR 292
125
93 KAMARNAT
434
320
*** 常 時 過 負 荷 潮 流
203
HLAWGA
56
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 172
540 229
830
11 N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG E. DAGONG
55
220
HLAINGTAYAR 118 252
396 YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
106 174 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG
415 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
58
358
THIDA
THANLYIN
534
195 104
KYAIKLATT
DALA
306 TILAWA
360
15 124
MYAUNTAGAR
110 449
102 KAMARNAT
342
106
5
HLAWGA
56
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 123
540 11
986
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG 419 E. DAGONG
222
201
HLAINGTAYAR 443 49 125
360 YWAMA
309
88 S. OAKKALALAR
135 THAKETA
483BAYINTNAUNG
108 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
95
18
THIDA
THANLYIN
192
232 104
KYAIKLATT
DALA
264 TILAWA
160 285
MYAUNTAGAR 100
6 71 KAMARNAT
81
Power flows in ( ) indicate
the case of a single circuit 80
fault or a single bank fault
55
564
HLAWGA
16 49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
698 E. DAGONG
540
(492) 563
51 (393)
NGAYOTEKAUNG
202
136 175
HLAINGTAYAR 219 359(252)
245 YWAMA
94 S. OAKKALALAR
336 (267) KYAIKASAN
BAYINTNAUNG 153 THAKETA
146
85 44
AHLONE 139
45
THIDA
THANLYIN
144
239 118
261
KYAIKLATT
DALA
TILAWA
PHAYARGYI DAWEI
447
11 182
MYAUNTAGAR
96 557
138 KAMARNAT
247
182
119
HLAWGA
56
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 172
540 119
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG 267 E. DAGONG
201
139
HLAINGTAYAR 256 27 270
250 YWAMA
211
S. OAKKALALAR
93
37 THAKETA
385BAYINTNAUNG
118 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
28 47
THIDA
THANLYIN
202
234 104
KYAIKLATT
DALA
266 TILAWA
Figure 8 Power Flow in Case of Not Implementing Phase 2 Project for B the case with the
230 kV east – west interconnections in 2020
The power flow would be increased from the northern area where a lot of hydropower stations
will be located to Yangon in case of the lower power outputs from the thermal power stations in
Yangon. The power flow was calculated for the both cases with and without Phase 2 setting out
no power outputs from Ngayotekaug power station located in the west of Yangon. The power
outputs were set out as follows.
Table 6 Power Outputs of Generators in around Yagon in Case of Lower Power Outputs
from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power output from Ngayotekaug in the west is
zero)
Power Station Power Outputs Stopped Power Outputs
Tilawa 50 MW 0 MW
Thakheta 92.2 MW 0 MW
Ahlone 278.4 MW 0 MW
Ywama 223.5 MW 0 MW
Hlawga 104.7 MW 51.1 MW
TWH Thailand 500 MW 0 MW
Ngayotekaung 0 MW 540 MW
Dawei 450 MW 0 MW
Figure 10 shows the power flow with Phase 2 in this generation pattern.
In the similar manner to the base case, the power flows between Hlaingtayar - Ahlon and
Kyaiklat – Ahlon exceed their capacity of transmission lines. There are some intervals of
230 kV transmission lines that have the over loading power flow in case of a fault of a
circuit around Hlawga, East Dagon and Ahlone.
Without Phase 2, the power flow calculation was not converged. This means that the power
transmission is not possible at the maximum power demand without Phase 2. Its calculation
was converged when the maximum power demand was decreased.The power flow became
not to exceed the capacities of the transmission lines when the power demand of Yangon
was decreased by around 28%. The Figure 11 shows the results of the power flow
calculation for this case.
367
30 139
MYAUNTAGAR 874
358
131
32
HLAWGA
56
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 132
0 29
871
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG 380 E. DAGONG
223
187
HLAINGTAYAR 268 49 179
335 YWAMA
291
S. OAKKALALAR
74 465 117
BAYINTNAUNG THAKETA
103 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
87
11
THIDA
THANLYIN
185
236 104
KYAIKLATT
DALA
264 TILAWA
Figure 9 Case of Lower Power Outputs from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power
output from Ngayotekaug in the west is zero)
363
42 159
MYAUNTAGAR
205
104 KAMARNAT
338
123
115
HLAWGA
41
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 124
0 135
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG 52 E. DAGONG
116
22
9
HLAINGTAYAR 107 208
40 YWAMA
73
S. OAKKALALAR
59 198 52 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG
27 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
20
41
THIDA
THANLYIN
166
254 61
KYAIKLATT
DALA
246 TILAWA
Figure 10 Case of Lower Power Outputs from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power
output from Ngayotekaug in the west is zero) without Phase 2 Decreasing Power Demand
of Yangon by 28%
PHAYARGYI DAWEI
MYAUNTAGAR
KAMARNAT
HLAWGA
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
E. DAGONG
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG
HLAINGTAYAR
YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
KYAIKASAN
BAYINTNAUNG THAKETA
AHLONE
THIDA
THANLYIN
KYAIKLATT
DALA
TILAWA
Abovementioned recommendations would be required even for the situations where power
outputs from generators in around Yangon are relatively large. However, the detailed
studies will be required including the fault current analysis regarding the bulk power
system in Yangon because the system power flow can be changed in accordance with the
power generation plans and their operation.
In future, some 230 kV substations will be required apart from the current plan. Those
substations will be connected to east and west in Yangon respectively.
Site Survey
JICA 500 kV Phase II Project means “500 kV Phatyargyi and Hleigntayar substation and
their connecting 500 kV transmission line”.
Previous Study means “JICA Expert for Strengthening of Implementation Capacity for
Transmission Line and Substation, 2014”.
4. Methodology
The latest information regarding Myanmar’s power system network plan was collected and
reviewed. The necessary investigations were carried out for contributing to prepare the
appraisal as yen loan projects relevant to the power network system plans in Myanmar in
cooperation with the environmental expert and JICA staff (F/F mission and appraisal
mission).
(1) The Revision of the List of the Plan of 230 kV System in Yangon
MEPE revised the list of the plan of 230 kV system in Yangon that was obtained during
the first site investigation.
- 230 kV (Hlawga-Tharketa) In/Out Transmission Line & North Oakkalar Substation was
canceled.
- Projects of 66 kV were deleted from the list and only the 230 kV projects were described.
The maximum demand for the whole system in JICA Master Plan
Year 2020: High Case 4,531 MW, Low Case 3,862 MW
Year 2030: High Case 14,542 MW, Low Case 9,100 MW
The following projects in around Yangon were recommended in the ADB’s report.
Thida - Thaketa TL、Thaketa SS (extension)、Thaketa - Kyaikasan、Kyaikasan SS (new)、
South Oakkalarpa SS (new)、West University SS (new)
The 230/33kV West University Substation, that is listed above, was not informed in Table
1. However, this substation would have an effect on the Phase 2 Project because the ADB
report described this substation was to be installed at the same location of 500 kV
Hlaingtayar substation of Phase 2. JICA mission team had a discussion with MEPE
regarding this substation.
The layout of the facilities of the foregoing ADB 230 kV West Univrsity substation should
be necessarily incorporated with the future layout of Phase 2 500 kV Hlaingtayar
Substation.
It is necessary to study the treatment of the protection relays and supervisory control
system of the foregoing ADB 230 k West University Substation when Phase 2 500 kV
Hlaingtayar substation will be installed. Generally, it is not enough for connection of bus
bars not only by the connection of bus bars itself. It also requires for changing the
connection of the information-telecommunication system utilized for supervisory control
system in the substation. (such as the selection of the locations of control rooms for both
The Second Site Investigation -3
old and new substations or the selection of the protection scheme against bus fault)
In case of difficulties, an option can be considered that connects new and old buses by
installation of the circuit breakers between them to ensure their independent operation as
shown in the following figure.
230 kV
230/33 kV transformers
230/33 kV 500/230 kV
West University Substation Hlaingtayar Substation
(The number of circuits between Ahlone - Thidar was assumed two and Thidar – Thaketa
single in this study according to the ADB’s Report “TA 8342 MYA Preparing the Power
The following two types of conductors are mainly used for 230 kV transmission lines in
Myanmar.
Twin bundle conductors of 605 MCM, its capacity is 288 MVA/cct
Single conductor of 795 MCM and its capacity is 164 MVA/cct
The single of 795 MCM is used for Tharyargone - Hlawga that has a smaller capacity and
the twin bundles of 605 MCM is mainly used for other interval.
The ADB’s Report that was mentioned in the previous section described the application of
ACCC (Aluminum Conductor Composite Core) for the interval of Thida – Thaketa. This
conductor can be used at high temperature with large capacity of 1,576 A (628 MVA) per
circuit. Thus, only this interval was assumed to be equipped with this conductor.
(However, the ADB’s report also mentioned that this conductor should not be applied for
other intervals because it would produce huge losses when the power flow reached closed to
its capacity.)
KAMARNAT
MYAUNTAGAR
HLAWGA
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
NGAYOTEKAUNG E. DAGONG
WEST UNIVERSITY
YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
HLAINGTAYAR
BAYINTNAUNG
THAKETA
KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
THIDA
THANLYIN
KYAIKLATT
DALA
TILAWA
合計 2,081
The power generators in around Yangon area were set out as shown in the following table.
The numerical values of power outputs from Thaketa, Ahlone, Ywama and Hlawga were
used that were also used in the previous study.
This case can be considered as the case with large power outputs of generators in around
Yangon area.
(3) The Results of Power Flow Analysis for the 500 kV and 230 kV System in around
Yangon around 2020 (Base Case)
Figure 4 shows the results of power flow calculation of the 500 kV and 230 kV system in
The Second Site Investigation -9
around Yangon around 2020 (base case) with modeling the original plan by MEPE.
The power flow at the intervals of Hlaingtayar – Ahlon and Kyaiklat-Ahlone exceed the
capacity of their transmission lines. Some intervals of the 230 kV transmission lines become
overloaded around Hlawga, East Dagon and Ahlone when the single circuit is dropped.
The overload of an intervals caused by dropping a single circuit would make circuit
breakers opened through working of protection relays and it is feared that other intervals are
also dropped out in a cascading manner causing a large black out.
For example, the power flow of Ahlone – Thida becomes 477 MW when its single circuit is
dropped causing overloading at this interval and making its circuit breakers opened. This
causes the other overloaded transmission lines. Figure 5 shows the power flow in this
situation.
Some intervals of the transmission lines such as Myaungtagar – Hlawga – Thaketa、
Phayargyi – East Dagon – Thaketa become overloaded. At that time, protection relays work
and make their circuit breakers opened causing multiple circuits dropped. In this case, large
power shortage can be expected. The similar situations is considered for the overloaded
intervals.
387
23 144 (180)
When
MYAUNTAGAR 329 Myuntagar-Hlawga
dropped
120 KAMARNAT
89
Overloaded power flow
*** under normal operation 419
(285)
(***) Overloaded power flow in
case of fault of a single When N-1
250 (314)
circuit
When Tharayargonr-Hlawga
dropped
138
HLAWGA
49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 163
540 184
830
NGAYOTEKAUNG 28 E. DAGONG
216
HLAINGTAYAR 6 223
387 YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
100 189 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG 190
406 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE 57
313
THIDA
THANLYIN
504
(477)
195 When N-1 118
KYAIKLATT
DALA
305 TILAWA
172
MYAUNTAGAR
41
KAMARNAT
HLAWGA
NGAYOTEKAUNG E. DAGONG
BAYINTNAUNG THAKETA
190
KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
THIDA
THANLYIN
KYAIKLATT
DALA
TILAWA
Figure 5 Power Flow in Case of a Fault between Ahlone and Thida for Base Case in 2020
357
45 122
MYAUNTAGAR
110 456
102 KAMARNAT
339
(224)
99
7
HLAWGA
49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 120
540 5
993
378
NGAYOTEKAUNG E. DAGONG
(304) 350
187
(315)
HLAINGTAYAR 175 145
336 YWAMA
254 S. OAKKALALAR
87
444
64 THAKETA
(358) BAYINTNAUNG
123 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
98
3
THIDA
THANLYIN
187
234 118
KYAIKLATT
DALA
266 TILAWA
208 347
MYAUNTAGAR 112
6 104 KAMARNAT
85
Power flows in ( ) indicate
the case of a single circuit 109
fault or a single bank fault
74
639
HLAWGA
3 49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
746 E. DAGONG
540
(533) 637
46
NGAYOTEKAUNG (458)
242
145
175 300(212)
HLAINGTAYAR 148
263 YWAMA
93 S. OAKKALALAR
357 (285)
KYAIKASAN THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG 153
167
92 22
AHLONE 110
37
THIDA
THANLYIN
153
467
46 178
MYAUNTAGAR
135
205 KAMARNAT
248
16
HLAWGA
49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 196
540 213
NGAYOTEKAUNG 28 E. DAGONG
153
HLAINGTAYAR 24 300
275 YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
67 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG 190
282 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE 24
175
THIDA
THANLYIN
365
212 118
KYAIKLATT
DALA
288 TILAWA
Figure 8 Power Flow in Case of Not Implementing Phase 2 Project for Base Case 2020
Table 6 Difference of Transmission System Loss between Before and After Phase 2
Case Myanmar 500 kV and 230 kV Transmission
System Loss
Before Implementation 204.4 MW
After Implementation 179.9 MW
Difference (Effect on Loss Reduction) 24.5 MW
Annual Loss Reduction 64,386 MWh
Conversion for reduction of CO2 emission 45,933 tCO2/Year
Annual loss reduction of the system and its conversion for CO2 emission are estimated as
64,386 MWh and 45,933 tCO2/year respectively by using the loss reduction of transmission
lines at the maximum power demand assuming its annual loss factor 0.3.
http://pub.iges.or.jp/modules/envirolib/view.php?docid=2136
- Loss factor is often estimated by the following formula. Assuming Load Factor of 0.48 gives a Loss
Factor of 0.3.
Loss Factor = k x Loss Factor +(1-k) x Loss Factor2 (where k is often used as 0.3 for transmission system
The power flow would be increased from the northern area where a lot of hydropower
stations will be located to Yangon in case of the lower power outputs from the thermal
power stations in Yangon. The power flow was calculated for the both cases with and
without Phase 2 setting out no power outputs from Ngayotekaug power station located in
the west of Yangon. The power outputs were set out as follows.
Table 7 Power Outputs of Generators in around Yagon in Case of Lower Power Outputs
from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power output from Ngayotekaug in the
west is zero)
Power Stations In service Out of service
Tilawa 50 MW 0 MW
Thakheta 92.2 MW 0 MW
Ahlone 278.4 MW 0 MW
Ywama 223.5 MW 0 MW
Hlawga 104.7 MW 51.1 MW
TWH Thailand 500 MW 0 MW
Ngayotekaung 0 MW 540 MW
Dawei 450 MW 0 MW
Figure 9 shows the power flow with Phase 2 in this generation pattern.
In the similar manner to the base case, the power flows between Hlaingtayar - Ahlon and
Kyaiklat – Ahlon exceed their capacity of transmission lines. There are some intervals of
230 kV transmission lines that have the over loading power flow in case of a fault of a
circuit around Hlawga, East Dagon and Ahlone.
Without Phase 2, the power flow calculation was not converged. This means that the power
transmission is not possible at the maximum power demand without Phase 2. Its calculation
was converged when the maximum power demand was decreased.The power flow became
not to exceed the capacities of the transmission lines when the power demand of Yangon
was decreased by around 28%. The Figure 10 shows the results of the power flow
calculation for this case.
390
58
MYAUNTAGAR 767
157 (194)
168 When
89 KAMARNAT
Myuntagar-Hlawga
Overloaded power flow dropped
*** under normal operation
429
AYOTEKAUNG
(***) Overloaded power flow in (291)
case of fault of a single When N-1
257 (327)
circuit
When Tharayargonr-Hlawga
dropped
86
HLAWGA
49
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 168
0 203
765
NGAYOTEKAUNG 28 E. DAGONG
198 14
HLAINGTAYAR 232
355 YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
85 189 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG 190
376 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE 52
280
THIDA
THANLYIN
470
199 (446) 118
KYAIKLATT When N-1
DALA
301 TILAWA
Figure 9 Case of Lower Power Outputs from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power
output from Ngayotekaug in the west is zero)
423
[Power Demand in Yangon
22 is decreased by 28%] 143
MYAUNTAGAR
140
142 KAMARNAT
395
111
88
HLAWGA
36
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV 145
0 131
NGAYOTEKAUNG 43 E. DAGONG
22 5
HLAINGTAYAR 252
37 YWAMA
73
S. OAKKALALAR
75 198 137 THAKETA
BAYINTNAUNG
19 KYAIKASAN
AHLONE
1
68
THIDA
THANLYIN
204
247 71
KYAIKLATT
DALA
253 TILAWA
Figure 10 Case of Lower Power Outputs from Thermal Power Stations in 2020 (Power
output from Ngayotekaug in the west is zero) without Phase 2 and decreasing power
demand of Yangon by 28%
PHAYARGYI DAWEI
MYAUNTAGAR
KAMARNAT
HLAWGA
HLAINGTAYAR 500kV
E. DAGONG
N. OAKKALAR
NGAYOTEKAUNG
HLAINGTAYAR
YWAMA
S. OAKKALALAR
KYAIKASAN
BAYINTNAUNG THAKETA
AHLONE
THIDA
THANLYIN
KYAIKLATT
DALA
TILAWA