Topic: In order to learn about new information around the world, it is better to watch film
and video records than written documents.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A is better than B
A: watching records
B: written documents
Position:
agree: A > B
disagree: 1. B > A
2. A = B (partially agree).
Agree => thuận theo logic
Many people believe that acquiring new information about the world is more effective
through watching films and videos than through reading written documents. However, I
disagree with this perspective.
On the one hand, proponents of videos have valid points. First, watching videos can
enhance the learning experience for viewers. Videos often incorporate vibrant visuals and
sound effects that help viewers visualize the subjects being discussed. These engaging
features can lead to better retention of information and a clearer understanding with less
confusion/ turbulence. For example, a study conducted in primary schools in Texas (địa
điểm) found that children who watched historical videos were able to remember information
longer than those who read the same material in books. This demonstrates the potential
effectiveness of learning through videos and movies. Additionally, watching videos is more
time-effective than reading written documents. To elaborate this stance, many videos are
narrated (voiced) and accompanied by transcripts, allowing learners to absorb information
while multitasking. In contrast, individuals who opt for documents, should stay highly
concentrated to grasp the main content of provided information.
On the other hand, there are compelling reasons to argue that reading written documents
despite the benefits of watching videos, I believe that the accuracy of information presented
in videos- especially on social media platforms, can often be questionable. To capture the
attention of viewers, many video creators intentionally include sensational or misleading
information. While this might engage viewers, it can distort their understanding of certain
events. For example, many YouTube videos exaggerate the crimes committed by black
individuals without addressing the historical context of systematic oppression they have
faced for centuries. In contrast, books undergo rigorous editing and review processes by
various organizations and experts before publication. This careful scrutiny ensures that the
information provided is accurate and reliable. Therefore, I firmly opine that reading books is
more beneficial for education.
In conclusion, there are two primary methods for acquiring knowledge: reading books and
watching records. While videos can enhance visualization and create engaging learning
experiences, they often contain inaccurate content that can mislead viewers. Books, though
less visually stimulating, provide thoroughly vetted/ checked/ inspected information that
guides readers towards a more insightful understanding of the truth. Thus, it is reasonable to
conclude that reading books is the better choice for knowledge acquisition.
+ watching videos can reduce eye strain, which is a common issue for those who read
physical books for an extended period of time.
the benefits/ human rights of black individuals were generally trivialized
A typical example can be mentioned is that
To elaborate
department of education => Department of Education
youtube => Youtube => YouTube
superficial
comprehensive
=> This body will acknowledge the strong points of watching videos.
The first reason that can be mentioned in this body is that …+ clause => học thuộc
main content < linking sentence => unnatural/
