柠檬霜
柠檬霜
Abstract
OPEN ACCESS
The squamates (lizards and snakes) are close relatives of birds and mammals, with more
Citation: Guo L, Bloom J, Sykes S, Huang E, Kashif than 10,000 described species that display extensive variation in a number of important bio-
Z, Pham E, et al. (2021) Genetics of white color and
iridophoroma in “Lemon Frost” leopard geckos.
logical traits, including coloration, venom production, and regeneration. Due to a lack of
PLoS Genet 17(6): e1009580. https://doi.org/ genomic tools, few genetic studies in squamates have been carried out. The leopard gecko,
10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580 Eublepharis macularius, is a popular companion animal, and displays a variety of coloration
Editor: Hopi E. Hoekstra, Harvard University, patterns. We took advantage of a large breeding colony and used linkage analysis, synteny,
UNITED STATES and homozygosity mapping to investigate a spontaneous semi-dominant mutation, “Lemon
Received: February 1, 2021 Frost”, that produces white coloration and causes skin tumors (iridophoroma). We localized
Accepted: May 4, 2021
the mutation to a single locus which contains a strong candidate gene, SPINT1, a tumor
suppressor implicated in human skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) and over-proliferation
Published: June 24, 2021
of epithelial cells in mice and zebrafish. Our work establishes the leopard gecko as a tracta-
Peer Review History: PLOS recognizes the ble genetic system and suggests that a tumor suppressor in melanocytes in humans can
benefits of transparency in the peer review
process; therefore, we enable the publication of
also suppress tumor development in iridophores in lizards.
all of the content of peer review and author
responses alongside final, published articles. The
editorial history of this article is available here:
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580
Author summary
Copyright: © 2021 Guo et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the The squamates (lizards and snakes) comprise a diverse group of reptiles, with more than
Creative Commons Attribution License, which 10,000 described species that display extensive variation in a number of important biologi-
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and cal traits, including coloration. In this manuscript, we used quantitative genetics and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
genomics to map the mutation underlying white coloration in the Lemon Frost morph of
author and source are credited.
the common leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. Lemon Frost geckos have increased
Data Availability Statement: All sequencing data is white body coloration with brightened yellow and orange areas. This morph also displays
available from the NCBI SRA database (accession
a high incidence of iridophoroma, a tumor of white-colored cells. We obtained phenotype
number PRJNA730084).
information and DNA samples from geckos in a large breeding colony and used genome
Funding: This work is supported by the Howard sequencing and genetic linkage analysis to localize the Lemon Frost mutation to a single
Hughes Medical Institute (to LK) and the Helen Hay
Results
The Lemon Frost allele is a spontaneous semidominant mutation
A male leopard gecko carrying the lemon frost (lf) allele, Mr. Frosty (Fig 1A and 1B), was
crossed to 12 female leopard geckos of different genetic backgrounds. The F1 progeny, which
Fig 1. The Lemon Frost mutant of the common leopard gecko, Eublepharis macularius. (A) wild type; (B) heterozygous mutant; (C)
homozygous mutant, with red arrow pointing to the eye lid; (D) blizzard mutant with minimal color; (E) Lemon Frost mutation (lf) on the
blizzard background; (F-H) segregation of the lf allele. Lemon Frost (LF) denotes heterozygotes for the mutation; super LF denotes homozygotes
for the mutation. All proportions are consistent with expectations for single-locus Mendelian inheritance (chi-square test p > 0.1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580.g001
were heterozygous for the lf allele, were backcrossed to the same maternal lines or intercrossed
to establish a colony of more than 900 animals (S2 Fig). Homozygous F2 intercross progeny
were named super Lemon Frost (Fig 1C). These homozygous mutants have an accentuated
color phenotype and thickened skin, which is most apparent in their eyelids (Fig 1C, red
arrow). Heterozygous Lemon Frost animals were also crossed to another mutant, Blizzard,
which is light yellow without other colors or patterns (Fig 1D). The homozygous Blizzard
progeny carrying the lf allele displayed excessive white color in their heads and trunks, which
brightened Blizzard’s yellow color (Fig 1E). The lf allele also increased white color in the retina
(Fig 1E). The segregation pattern of Lemon Frost in pedigrees is consistent with single-locus
Mendelian inheritance (Fig 1F–1H). The lf allele is semidominant, as homozygous mutants
have more pronounced phenotypes than do heterozygotes (Fig 1B, 1C and 1F–1H).
Fig 2. Tumor growth and metastasis in the Lemon Frost mutant. Designations are homozygous mutant (lf/lf); heterozygous
mutant (lf/+); wild type (+/+). (A) tumors in ventral skin; (B) thick layers of white tumor cells (lf/lf) vs. normal white cells (+/+);
(C) outgrowth of white tumor cells (lf/+); (D) metastasis of white tumor cells in the liver and oral cavity. Red arrows: white colored
tumor cells. Arrowhead in B: normal white cells.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580.g002
Fig 3. Localization of the Lemon Frost mutation. (A) p-value for association with white color and (B) linkage disequilibrium for 28 markers syntenic to chicken
chromosome 5 (red, ordered by synteny), 4 markers syntenic to chromosome 7 (cyan), and 16 markers without synteny information (green). Randomly selected markers
that are not associated with white color (purple). (C) A schematic of the region showing synteny and gene annotation. (D) Fraction of markers showing expected allele
frequency pattern in pools, plotted for 10kb windows along scaffold 996. The four windows with the highest fraction are marked by asterisks and span the location of the
gene SPINT1. Windows with fewer than 5 variants were not plotted (dashed red lines). (E) Genome-wide distribution of the fraction of markers showing expected allele
frequency pattern in pools for all 10 kb windows. The 4 highest windows on scaffold 996 (red arrows) marked in D are among the 6 highest windows in the entire genome.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580.g003
found that 17 of the 22 scaffolds that have synteny information (including scaffolds 6052 and
996) correspond to one region on chicken chromosome 5, human chromosome 15, and green
anole chromosome 1 (Fig 3A–3C and S1 Table). Three additional scaffolds also have synteny
to the green anole chromosome 1. The remaining two scaffolds without synteny to the green
anole chromosome 1 were more weakly associated with coloration. The 28 markers on these
17 scaffolds are in linkage disequilibrium (Fig 3B), which decays with distance when markers
are ordered by synteny (Fig 3B). These results indicate that a single genomic region is associ-
ated with the Lemon Frost phenotype, as expected for a new mutation with a Mendelian segre-
gation pattern.
To narrow down the location of the causal gene within this genomic region, we used whole
genome sequencing and homozygosity mapping. We pooled DNA from 25 super Lemon Frost
genomes (lf/lf), 63 Lemon Frost genomes (lf/+), and 71 wildtype geckos (+/+) and sequenced
each pool to 30x coverage. We reasoned that the lf mutation in Mr. Frosty and its flanking vari-
ants should form a haplotype that would be found in the super Lemon Frost pool with 100%
frequency, in the Lemon Frost pool with 50% frequency, and would not be seen in the wildtype
pool. We scanned the genome in 10 kb windows and measured the fraction of heterozygous
variants from Mr. Frosty that followed this expected pattern in the pools (S2 Table). This statis-
tic was highest for a window on scaffold 996 (S2 Table and Methods), the main candidate scaf-
fold from statistical mapping (S1 Table). The expected frequency pattern was observed for 20
of 22 variants in this window (630-640kb on scaffold 996). Four of the top six intervals fall in
the region from 570kb to 640kb on scaffold 996, with the signal decaying with distance away
from this region (Fig 3D and 3E). The linkage between this region and Lemon Frost was repli-
cated in an independent 3-generation backcross between Mr. Frosty and a Sunburst Tangerine
morph (Fig 4 and S3 Table). These results indicate that scaffold 996 contains the Lemon Frost
mutation.
Fig 4. The lemon frost allele in a backcross. (A) We genotyped 7 progeny with the Lemon Frost phenotype and 6 wild type progeny from the third generation of
a backcross of Mr. Frosty to the Sunburst line for markers in the SPINT1 region and observed a consistent inheritance pattern. (B) Sequencing chromatogram of a
heterozygous animal (lf/+) at an insertion marker. (C) Sequencing chromatogram of a homozygous animal (+/+) at the same insertion marker.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009580.g004
We used BLASTn to examine whether some of the non-coding differences between the ref-
erence and the Lemon Frost SPINT1 alleles are located in well-conserved vertebrate sequences.
We found that intron 1 has >90% sequence identity to Gekko japonicus and >80% sequence
identity to Zootoca vivipara. Intron 8 has >80% sequence identity to Saurodactylus brosseti.
The 3’ UTR has 79% identity to Gekko japonicus. We also found that human SPINT1 introns
1/2 and the 3’ UTR are the most conserved non-coding regions of the gene among 100
vertebrates by PhyloP analysis [57–59], with conservation scores that are comparable to those
for exons 8 and 10. The ENCODE candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCRE) analysis showed
that introns 1/2 and the 3’ UTR are the major regions with multiple candidate enhancers
[57,60]. Similar results were obtained for the mouse SPINT1 gene. These observations suggest
that some of the 22 sequence variants in intron 1 or 20 variants in the 3’ UTR of the leopard
gecko SPINT1 may be functionally important.
Sequencing of RNA extracted from normal gecko skin and from skin peripheral to tumors
in homozygous mutants confirmed that SPINT1 is expressed in this tissue (S5 Fig). However,
we did not observe a significant difference between homozygous mutants and wildtype geckos
in SPINT1 mRNA levels or splicing patterns. This result suggests that the putative causal muta-
tion in SPINT1 may alter translation or protein activity, rather than transcription. Alterna-
tively, the mutation might reduce SPINT1 expression only in tumors, which are refractory to
RNA extraction as noted above.
Discussion
Several lines of evidence support our hypothesis that a defect in SPINT1 causes iridophoroma
in Lemon Frost geckos. First, SPINT1 function is dosage-dependent, consistent with our
observation that Lemon Frost is a semi-dominant phenotype. In humans, carcinoma tissues
in vivo and carcinoma-derived cell lines in vitro have reduced SPINT1 on the cell membrane
[61,62] through enhanced shedding of the extracellular domain or decreased mRNA or protein
expression. Reduced expression of SPINT1 has been associated with a negative prognosis of
human Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) [45] and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [46].
Knockdown of SPINT1 expression by siRNA in cancer cell lines led to increased invasion or
metastasis [47,62,63]. Second, loss of SPINT1 function in fish and mice leads to tumor forma-
tion in epithelial cells. In mice, homozygous deletion of SPINT1 leads to disrupted placental
basement membranes and embryonic lethality [52,54]. Rescued mosaic animals developed
scaly skin with hyperkeratinization [55]. Intestine-specific deletion of SPINT1 leads to
increased tumor growth of intestine epithelium [48]. Increased expression of SPINT1 in the
skin abrogated matriptase-induced spontaneous skin squamous cell carcinoma [64]. In zebra-
fish, reduced expression led to hyperproliferation of basal keratinocytes [51] and enhanced
proliferation of epithelial cells [56]. Furthermore, SPINT1 deficiency was used to establish a
disease model for Skin Cutaneous Melanoma (SKCM) in zebrafish [45]. In all three studies in
zebrafish, skin inflammation was observed. Third, insertions in introns [51,52] and promoters
[56] have caused loss of SPINT1 function. Together with our genetic localization of the lf locus
to SPINT1, these lines of evidence make this gene a very strong candidate for the Lemon Frost
phenotype.
Molecular genetics in reptiles is not well established due to long reproductive cycles and
challenges in laboratory breeding. Early work focused on careful documentation of patterns of
inheritance [2,65]. Molecular studies have examined sequence variants in a candidate pigmen-
tation gene, melanocortin-1 receptor, and their association with melanic or blanched pheno-
types in different species and ecological niches [66–73]. Recent work in the wall lizard [74] and
the corn snake [75] used a similar sequencing-based approach to our study to identify the
molecular basis of coloration polymorphisms in these species. Successful use of CRISPR-
Cas9-mediated gene editing to mutate the tyrosinase gene has been reported in the lizard
Anolis sagrei [76]. Although this species is only distantly related to the leopard gecko, this
advance offers promise that targeted studies of the role of SPINT1 mutations in the Lemon
Frost phenotype will become possible.
Most of our knowledge about molecular and cellular regulation of iridophores derives from
work in zebrafish [11,13,17,19,23,77–85]. Interestingly, few cases of iridophoroma have been
reported in zebrafish [86]. Our data suggest that an evolutionarily conserved gene, SPINT1,
regulates the proliferation of white iridophores in the leopard gecko. Increased production of
reflective platelets in Lemon Frost iridophores is a novel finding that warrants further investi-
gation, for instance by manipulating SPINT1 expression. The tumor suppressor function of
SPINT1 establishes a potential link between iridophoroma and regulation of white coloration
in reptiles. Our work suggests that cancer genes can play as important a role in iridophores as
they do in melanocytes and melanoma [87], and that Lemon Frost leopard geckos may serve
as a disease model to study Skin Cutaneous Melanoma.
Methods
Ethics statement
All activities involving animals included in this manuscript were approved by the University of
California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, approval
number: ARC #2018–035 (6/19/2018~6/18/2021).
Phenotyping
Lemon Frost and super Lemon Frost phenotypes were scored by experienced breeders who
used visual inspection to determine an increase in white color of the body, eye, and belly com-
pared to normal wildtype animals. The Lemon Frost mutation increases the white base color
of the gecko over its entire body. This results in an overall brightening of white, yellow, and
orange colors of the gecko. The effects of the mutation can also be observed in a whitening of
the eyes and in white color spreading down the sides onto the belly. Pictures were taken for
each animal to document the phenotypes.
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh tail tips with Easy-DNA gDNA purification kit
(K180001, ThermoFisher), or from the saliva with PERFORMAgene (PG-100, DNAgenotek).
Genomic DNA extracted from saliva was further purified with ethanol precipitation before
genotyping assays. DNA libraries for whole genome sequencing were prepared with Nextera
DNA Library Prep Kit (FC-121-1031, Illumina). Libraries for RADseq were prepared
according to the procedures of Adapterama III [88] with few modifications. Libraries were
sequenced on a HiSeq 3000 (Illumina).
Only scaffolds larger than 5kb in the draft genome assembly were used as a reference. RAD-
seq reads and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) reads were aligned to the leopard gecko
draft genome [31] with bwa mem (version 0.7.17) [89]. Variants for WGS were identified with
GATK (version 4.1.4.1) [90]. Variants for RADseq were identified with Stacks (version 2.41)
[91,92]. All variants were filtered with VCFtools (version 0.1.14) [93]. First, variants had to be
are bi-allelic and heterozygous in Mr. Frosty. The ratio of the reads for the two alleles was
required to be in the range 0.4–0.6. Second, only high-quality variants were used in homozy-
gosity mapping or statistical mapping (DP> = 30, GQ> = 30).
Transcriptome sequencing
Skin tissue samples around 6mm in diameter were taken from the ventral side of the geckos
after anesthetization with 1–5% isoflurane. As tumor tissues are refractory to RNA extraction,
flanking tumor-free tissue samples were taken for homozygous Lemon Frost animals. All sam-
ples were homogenized with TissueRuptor in buffer RLT immediately after collection. Lysates
were immediately frozen on dry ice until all tissues were collected from animals. Then all
lysates were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 13,000 rpm to remove debris. Supernatants were
taken to fresh tubes, and mRNA was extracted according to the procedures of RNeasy Fibrous
Tissue Mini Kit (74704, QIAGEN).
Libraries of extracted mRNA were prepared with RNA HyperPrep kit (KAPA) and
sequenced on a HiSeq 3000 (Illumina). RNA-seq reads were mapped to the leopard gecko
draft genome [31] using HISAT2 with default parameters. Identification of alternative and dif-
ferential splicing events was performed using JuncBase [94]. Gene expression was compared
using Sleuth [95] after RNA transcript abundance was quantified using Kallisto [96].
Pathology
Complete postmortem examination was performed, and representative tissue samples were
obtained. All tissues obtained at necropsy were preserved in 10% neutral-buffered formalin
solution for up to 5 days before being processed and embedded in paraffin. All tissues were
sectioned at 5 μm, and routinely stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin.
Statistical mapping
Biallelic markers with minor allele frequency of less than 5% and with fewer than 10 individu-
als called as homozygous for both the reference and alternative alleles were excluded from
mapping and kinship matrix construction. A kinship matrix was calculated using the function
A.mat with default parameters from the rrBLUP [97] R package. Phenotype was encoded as 0
for wild type, 1 for Lemon Frost, and 2 for super Lemon Frost. Association statistics between
this phenotype vector and marker genotypes were computed using the function gwas2 in the
NAM [98] R package using a linear mixed model with a random effect of kinship to control
for population structure. The effective number of tests was computed to be 141.1 based on the
procedure of Galwey et al [99]. A family-wise error rate significance threshold was calculated
as 0.01/141.1 or p<7.09e-5.
Homozygosity mapping
Pooled animals and Mr. Frosty were sequenced to ~30x coverage on a HiSeq 3000 (Illumina).
Variants were identified with GATK and filtered with VCFtools. Biallelic heterozygous
variants from Mr. Frosty, including indels, were used as markers to localize the Lemon Frost
mutation. Allele ratios (AF) were calculated by dividing the read count of alternative alleles by
the sum of the counts of reference alleles and alternative alleles. Variants closely linked to the
Lemon Frost mutation are expected to have AF between 0.4 and 0.6 in the Lemon Frost pool
and in Mr. Frosty, AF > 0.85 in the super Lemon Frost pool, and AF < 0.15 in the wildtype
pool. The number of variants meeting these criteria was counted for every 10kb genome inter-
val. The fraction of such variants among all variants heterozygous in Mr. Frosty within the
interval was then calculated. Intervals with fewer than 5 variants were excluded because they
could not provide statistically meaningful results.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Coloration and pattern diversity of the common leopard gecko, Eublepharis macu-
larius. (A) wild type; (B) black night; (C) variant of black night; (D) granite snow; (E) gem
snow; (F) white knight; (G) sunburst tangerine; (H-I) variants of sunburst tangerine; (J) red
stripes; (K) bold stripes; (L) rainbow.
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Breeding pedigree of the Lemon Frost mutation. Mr. Frosty, the original carrier of
the spontaneous Lemon Frost mutation, was bred to 12 female geckos from different genetic
backgrounds. F1s carrying the lf allele were bred among themselves or back to their female
parent, producing the second generation of animals heterozygous or homozygous for the lf
allele. Blue: lf/lf; green: lf/+; red: +/+. Dashed line: same individual/line.
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Histopathology of skin tumors. (A) Thick layers of white tumor tissue (star) infiltrat-
ing white skin (arrow). (B) Skin biopsies organized and fixed in a paper roll for sectioning. (C)
H&E staining of the skin sections. Arrow: skin; star: infiltrated tumor mass. (D) H&E staining
of the skin sections showing normal skin cells and neoplastic cells (star). Neoplastic cells have
eccentric and condensed nuclei.
(TIF)
S4 Fig. Potential metastasis of iridophoroma. (A) In normal skin, cell nuclei are oval and
perpendicular to the skin surface. In Lemon Frost skin, cell nuclei are flat, elongated and paral-
lel to the skin, reminiscent of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. (B) Iridophoroma in the
liver, stained dark in H&E sections. In dark field imaging, iridophores are bright white. Such
iridophores invade blood vessels in the tissue (red arrows). (C) In TEM imaging, white tumor
skins in super LF are filled with abundant iridophores with excessive brightly reflective crystals
(Tumor). In normal skin, iridophores are much fewer and have less crystals (Normal).
(TIF)
S5 Fig. SPINT1 expression in gecko skin. SPINT1 mRNA reads from transcriptome sequenc-
ing were aligned to the genome and visualized in IGV. Top 3 rows show samples from homo-
zygous mutants. Bottom 3 rows show samples from wild type geckos. Skin tissue adjacent to
the tumors was used in the mutants. Peaks mark SPINT1 exons. The last exon on the right is
transcribed together with the 3’UTR.
(TIF)
S1 Table. Scaffolds associated with Lemon Frost phenotype.
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Candidate Lemon Frost mutations on SPINT1.
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Genotyping results of the backcross.
(XLSX)
S4 Table. Candidate and background mutations in homozygosity mapping.
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Aaron Miller, Jasmine Gonzalez, Kendall Placido and James Walter for their assis-
tance in gecko DNA collection and phenotyping. We thank members of the Kruglyak lab for
helpful feedbacks on the project, and Giancarlo Bruni, Stefan Zdraljevic, Eyal Ben-David and
Olga Schubert for helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank Chunni Zhu (Electron
Microscopy Core Facility, UCLA Brain Research Institute) for her assistance in TEM sample
processing and imaging. We thank Jonathan Eggenschwiler and Douglas Menke for helpful
discussions.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Data curation: Longhua Guo, Zain Kashif, Elise Pham, Katarina Ho.
Formal analysis: Longhua Guo, Joshua Bloom, Elaine Huang, Xinshu Grace Xiao.
Funding acquisition: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Investigation: Longhua Guo, Joshua Bloom, Steve Sykes, Ana Alcaraz, Sandra Duarte-Vogel,
Leonid Kruglyak.
Methodology: Longhua Guo, Joshua Bloom, Ana Alcaraz, Sandra Duarte-Vogel, Leonid
Kruglyak.
Project administration: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Resources: Steve Sykes.
Software: Joshua Bloom, Elaine Huang.
Supervision: Xinshu Grace Xiao, Leonid Kruglyak.
Validation: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Visualization: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Writing – original draft: Longhua Guo, Leonid Kruglyak.
Writing – review & editing: Longhua Guo, Zain Kashif, Katarina Ho, Ana Alcaraz, Sandra
Duarte-Vogel, Leonid Kruglyak.
References
1. Fujii R. in International Review of Cytology Vol. 143 (eds Kwang W. Jeon, Martin Friedlander, and Jona-
than Jarvik) 191–255 ( Academic Press, 1993).
2. Olsson M., Stuart-Fox D., Ballen C. Genetics and evolution of colour patterns in reptiles. Seminars in
Cell & Developmental Biology 24, 529–541, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.04.001 (2013).
PMID: 23578866
3. Cuthill I. C., Allen W. L., Arbuckle K., Caspers B., Chaplin G., Hauber M. E., et al. The biology of color.
Science 357, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan0221 (2017). PMID: 28774901
4. Shawkey M. D., D’Alba L. Interactions between colour-producing mechanisms and their effects on the
integumentary colour palette. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.
2016.0536 (2017). PMID: 28533449
5. Thayer R. C., Allen F. I., Patel N. H. Structural color in Junonia butterflies evolves by tuning scale lamina
thickness. Elife 9, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.52187 (2020). PMID: 32254023
6. Kelsh R. N., Harris M. L., Colanesi S., Erickson C. A. Stripes and belly-spots—a review of pigment cell
morphogenesis in vertebrates. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20, 90–104, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.
2008.10.001 (2009). PMID: 18977309
7. Parichy D. M., Spiewak J. E. Origins of adult pigmentation: diversity in pigment stem cell lineages and
implications for pattern evolution. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 28, 31–50, https://doi.org/10.1111/
pcmr.12332 (2015). PMID: 25421288
8. Nordlund J. J., Abdel-Malek Z. A., Boissy R. E., Rheins L. A. Pigment Cell Biology: An Historical
Review. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 92, S53–S60, https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.1989.33 (1989).
9. Nordlund J. J., Boissy R. E., Hearing V. J., King R. A., Oetting W. S., Ortonne J-P. The Pigmentary Sys-
tem: Physiology and Pathophysiology. 2nd edn, ( Wiley, 2008).
10. Goda M., Fujii R. The Blue Coloration of the Common Surgeonfish, Paracanthurus hepatus-II. Color
Revelation and Color Changes. Zoolog Sci 15, 323–333, https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.15.323 (1998).
PMID: 18465994
11. Frohnhofer H. G., Krauss J., Maischein H. M., Nusslein-Volhard C. Iridophores and their interactions
with other chromatophores are required for stripe formation in zebrafish. Development 140, 2997–
3007, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.096719 (2013). PMID: 23821036
12. Gur D., Bain E. J., Johnson K. R., Aman A. J., Pasoili H. A., Flynn J. D. In situ differentiation of irido-
phore crystallotypes underlies zebrafish stripe patterning. Nature Communications 11, 6391, https://
doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20088-1 (2020). PMID: 33319779
13. Salis P., Lorin T., Lewis V., Rey C., Marcionetti A., Escande M-L., et al. Developmental and comparative
transcriptomic identification of iridophore contribution to white barring in clownfish. Pigment Cell Mela-
noma Res 32, 391–402, https://doi.org/10.1111/pcmr.12766 (2019). PMID: 30633441
14. Gur D., Palmer B. A., Weiner S., Addadi L. Light Manipulation by Guanine Crystals in Organisms: Bio-
genic Scatterers, Mirrors, Multilayer Reflectors and Photonic Crystals. Advanced Functional Materials
27, 1603514, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201603514 (2017).
15. Teyssier J., Saenko S. V., van der Marel D., Milinkovitch M. C. Photonic crystals cause active colour
change in chameleons. Nat Commun 6, 6368, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7368 (2015). PMID:
25757068
16. Rohrlich S. T., Rubin R. W. Biochemical characterization of crystals from the dermal iridophores of a
chameleon Anolis carolinensis. J Cell Biol 66, 635–645, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.66.3.635 (1975).
PMID: 1167183
17. Volkening A., Sandstede B. Iridophores as a source of robustness in zebrafish stripes and variability in
Danio patterns. Nat Commun 9, 3231, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05629-z (2018). PMID:
30104716
18. Fadeev A., Krauss J., Frohnhöfer H. G., Irion U., Nüsslein-Volhard C. Tight Junction Protein 1a regu-
lates pigment cell organisation during zebrafish colour patterning. eLife 4, e06545, https://doi.org/10.
7554/eLife.06545 (2015). PMID: 25915619
19. Singh A. P., Schach U., Nusslein-Volhard C. Proliferation, dispersal and patterned aggregation of irido-
phores in the skin prefigure striped colouration of zebrafish. Nat Cell Biol 16, 607–614, https://doi.org/
10.1038/ncb2955 (2014). PMID: 24776884
20. Irion U., Frohnhöfer H. G., Krauss J., Champollion T. Ç., Maischein H-M., Geiger-Rudolph S., Weiler
C., et al. Gap junctions composed of connexins 41.8 and 39.4 are essential for colour pattern formation
in zebrafish. eLife 3, e05125, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05125 (2014). PMID: 25535837
21. Kimura T., Takasaki M., Hatai R., Nagai Y., Uematsu K., Oaki Y., et al. Guanine crystals regulated by
chitin-based honeycomb frameworks for tunable structural colors of sapphirinid copepod, Sapphirina
nigromaculata. Sci Rep 10, 2266, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59090-4 (2020). PMID:
32042000
22. Morrison R. L., Frost-Mason S. K. Ultrastructural analysis of iridophore organellogenesis in a lizard,
Sceloporus graciosus (Reptilia: Phrynosomatidae). J Morphol 209, 229–239, https://doi.org/10.1002/
jmor.1052090209 (1991). PMID: 1960736
23. Krauss J., Frohnhöfer H. G., Walderich B., Maischein H-M., Weiler C., Irion U., et al. Endothelin signal-
ling in iridophore development and stripe pattern formation of zebrafish. Biol Open 3, 503–509, https://
doi.org/10.1242/bio.20148441 (2014). PMID: 24857848
24. Kaelin C. B., Xu X., Hong L. Z., David V. A., McGowan K. A., Schmidt-Küntzel A., et al. Specifying and
sustaining pigmentation patterns in domestic and wild cats. Science 337, 1536–1541, https://doi.org/
10.1126/science.1220893 (2012). PMID: 22997338
25. Heckers K. O., Aupperle H., Schmidt V., Pees M. Melanophoromas and iridophoromas in reptiles. J
Comp Pathol 146, 258–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2011.07.003 (2012). PMID: 21864845
26. Rousselet E., Souza C. H. D. M., Wellehan J. F. X. Jr, Epperson E. D., Dark M. J., Wamsley H. L. Cuta-
neous iridophoroma in a Green iguana (Iguana iguana). Vet Clin Pathol 46, 625–628, https://doi.org/
10.1111/vcp.12536 (2017). PMID: 28815678
27. Munoz-Gutierrez J. F., Garner M. M., Kiupel M. Cutaneous Chromatophoromas in Captive Snakes. Vet
Pathol 53, 1213–1219, https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985816644302 (2016). PMID: 27121299
28. de Brot S., Sydler T., Nufer L., Ruetten M. Histologic, Immunohistochemical, and Electron Microscopic
Characterization of a Malignant Iridophoroma in a Dwarf Bearded Dragon (Pogona Henrylawsoni). J
Zoo Wildl Med 46, 583–587, https://doi.org/10.1638/2013-0113.1 (2015). PMID: 26352965
29. Bronson E., Pereira M., Sanchez C., Murray S. Iridophoroma in a Veiled Chameleon, Chamaeleo calyp-
tratus. Journal of Herpetological Medicine and Surgery 16, 58–60, https://doi.org/10.5818/1529-9651.
16.3.58 (2006).
30. Szydłowski P., Madej J. P., Duda M., Madej J. A., Sikorska-Kopyłowicz A., Chełmońska-Soyta A., et al.
Iridophoroma associated with the Lemon Frost colour morph of the leopard gecko (Eublepharis macu-
larius). Scientific Reports 10, 5734, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62828-9 (2020). PMID:
32235892
31. Xiong Z., Li F., Li Q., Zhou L., Gamble T., Zheng J., et al. Draft genome of the leopard gecko, Euble-
pharis macularius. GigaScience 5, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13742-016-0151-4 (2016). PMID:
27784328
32. Wise P. A. D., Vickaryous M. K., Russell A. P. An Embryonic Staging Table for In Ovo Development of
Eublepharis macularius, the Leopard Gecko. The Anatomical Record 292, 1198–1212, https://doi.org/
10.1002/ar.20945 (2009). PMID: 19645023
33. McLean K. E., Vickaryous M. K. A novel amniote model of epimorphic regeneration: the leopard gecko,
Eublepharis macularius. BMC Developmental Biology 11, 50, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-11-
50 (2011). PMID: 21846350
34. Delorme S. L., Lungu I. M., Vickaryous M. K. Scar-Free Wound Healing and Regeneration Following
Tail Loss in the Leopard Gecko, Eublepharis macularius. The Anatomical Record 295, 1575–1595,
https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22490 (2012). PMID: 22933425
35. Bagnara J. T. in International Review of Cytology Vol. 20 (eds Bourne G. H. & Danielli J. F.) 173–205 (
Academic Press, 1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60801-3 PMID: 5337298
36. Denefle J. P., Lechaire J. P. Localization of pigment cells in cultured frog skin. Am J Anat 188, 212–
220, https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001880210 (1990). PMID: 2375284
37. DeMartini D. G., Krogstad D. V., Morse D. E. Membrane invaginations facilitate reversible water flux
driving tunable iridescence in a dynamic biophotonic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 2552–
2556, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217260110 (2013). PMID: 23359694
38. Aramaki T., Kondo S. Method for disarranging the pigment pattern of zebrafish by optogenetics. Devel-
opmental Biology 460, 12–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.12.019 (2020). PMID: 30578760
39. Alfoldi J., Di Palma F., Grabherr M., Williams C., Kong L., Mauceli E., et al. The genome of the green
anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477, 587–591, https://doi.org/
10.1038/nature10390 (2011). PMID: 21881562
40. Hillier L. W., Miller W., Birney E., Warren W., Hardison R. C., Ponting C. P. et al. Sequence and compar-
ative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432,
695–716, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03154 (2004). PMID: 15592404
41. Lander E. S., Linton L. M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M. C., Baldwin J., et al. Initial sequencing and
analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921, https://doi.org/10.1038/35057062 (2001). PMID:
11237011
42. Kataoka H., Kawaguchi M., Fukushima T. Shimomura T. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitors
(HAI-1 and HAI-2): Emerging key players in epithelial integrity and cancer. Pathol Int 68, 145–158,
https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12647 (2018). PMID: 29431273
43. Kataoka H., Suganuma T., Shimomura T., Itoh H., Kitamura N., Nabeshima K., et al. Distribution of
hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 (HAI-1) in human tissues. Cellular surface localization
of HAI-1 in simple columnar epithelium and its modulated expression in injured and regenerative tis-
sues. J Histochem Cytochem 47, 673–682, https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549904700509 (1999).
PMID: 10219059
44. Shimomura T., Denda K., Kitamura A., Kawaguchi T., Kito M., Kondo J., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor
activator inhibitor, a novel Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor. J Biol Chem 272, 6370–6376, https://
doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.10.6370 (1997). PMID: 9045658
45. Gomez-Abenza E., Ibáñez-Molero S., Garcı́a-Moreno D., Fuentes I., Zon L. I., Mione M.C., et al. Zebra-
fish modeling reveals that SPINT1 regulates the aggressiveness of skin cutaneous melanoma and its
crosstalk with tumor immune microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38, 405, https://doi.org/10.
1186/s13046-019-1389-3 (2019). PMID: 31519199
46. Sakugawa C., Haruyama Y., Tanaka H., Fukushima T., Kawaguchi M., Kataoka H. Prognostic signifi-
cance of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 (HAI-1) immunoreactivity in pancreatic duc-
tal adenocarcinoma. BMC Res Notes 10, 674, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3014-x (2017).
PMID: 29202869
47. Baba T., Kawaguchi M., Fukushima T., Sato Y., Orikawa H., Yorita K., et al. Loss of membrane-bound
serine protease inhibitor HAI-1 induces oral squamous cell carcinoma cells’ invasiveness. J Pathol
228, 181–192, https://doi.org/10.1002/path.3993 (2012). PMID: 22262311
48. Hoshiko S., Kawaguchi M., Fukushima T., Haruyama Y., Yorita K., Tanaka H., et al. Hepatocyte growth
factor activator inhibitor type 1 is a suppressor of intestinal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 73, 2659–2670,
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3337 (2013). PMID: 23447577
49. Kawaguchi M., Takeda N., Hoshiko S., Yorita K., Baba T., Sawaguchi A., et al. Membrane-bound serine
protease inhibitor HAI-1 is required for maintenance of intestinal epithelial integrity. Am J Pathol 179,
1815–1826, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.038 (2011). PMID: 21840293
50. Kawaguchi M., Yamamoto K., Kanemaru A., Tanaka H., Umezawa K., Fukushima t., et al. Inhibition of
nuclear factor-kappaB signaling suppresses Spint1-deletion-induced tumor susceptibility in the ApcMin/
+ model. Oncotarget 7, 68614–68622, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11863 (2016). PMID:
27612426
51. Carney T. J., von der Hardt S., Sonntag C., Amsterdam A., Topczewski J., Hopkins N., et al. Inactivation
of serine protease Matriptase1a by its inhibitor Hai1 is required for epithelial integrity of the zebrafish
epidermis. Development 134, 3461–3471, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.004556 (2007). PMID:
17728346
52. Fan B., Brennan J., Grant D., Peale F., Rangell L., Kirchhofer D. Hepatocyte growth factor activator
inhibitor-1 (HAI-1) is essential for the integrity of basement membranes in the developing placental laby-
rinth. Dev Biol 303, 222–230, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.11.005 (2007). PMID: 17174946
53. Cheng H., Fukushima T., Takahashi N., Tanaka H., Kataoka H. Hepatocyte growth factor activator
inhibitor type 1 regulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition through membrane-bound serine protein-
ases. Cancer Res 69, 1828–1835, https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3728 (2009). PMID:
19223533
54. Tanaka H., Nagaike K., Takeda N., Itoh H., Kohama K., Fukushima T., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor
activator inhibitor type 1 (HAI-1) is required for branching morphogenesis in the chorioallantoic placenta.
Mol Cell Biol 25, 5687–5698, https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.13.5687-5698.2005 (2005). PMID:
15964823
55. Nagaike K., Kawaguchi M., Takeda N., Fukushima T., Sawaguchi A., Kohama K., et al. Defect of hepa-
tocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1/serine protease inhibitor, Kunitz type 1 (Hai-1/Spint1)
leads to ichthyosis-like condition and abnormal hair development in mice. Am J Pathol 173, 1464–
1475, https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2008.071142 (2008). PMID: 18832587
56. Mathias J. R., Dodd M. E., Walters K. B., Rhodes J., Kanki J. P., Look A. T., et al. Live imaging of
chronic inflammation caused by mutation of zebrafish Hai1. J Cell Sci 120, 3372–3383, https://doi.org/
10.1242/jcs.009159 (2007). PMID: 17881499
57. Navarro Gonzalez J., Zweig A. S., Speir M. L., Schmelter D., Rosenbloom K. R., Raney B. J., et al. The
UCSC Genome Browser database: 2021 update. Nucleic Acids Res 49, D1046–D1057, https://doi.org/
10.1093/nar/gkaa1070 (2021). PMID: 33221922
58. Siepel A., Bejerano G., Pedersen J. S., Hinrichs A. E., Hou M., Rosenbloom K., et al. Evolutionarily con-
served elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 15, 1034–1050,
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3715005 (2005). PMID: 16024819
59. Pollard K. S., Hubisz M. J., Rosenbloom K. R., Siepel A. Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on
mammalian phylogenies. Genome Res 20, 110–121, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.097857.109 (2010).
PMID: 19858363
60. Consortium E. P., Moore J. E., Purcaro M. J., Pratt H. E., Epstein C. B., Shoresh N., et al. Expanded
encyclopaedias of DNA elements in the human and mouse genomes. Nature 583, 699–710, https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41586-020-2493-4 (2020). PMID: 32728249
61. Kataoka H., Uchino H., Denda K., Kitamura N., Itoh H., Tsubouchi H., et al. Evaluation of hepatocyte
growth factor activator inhibitor expression in normal and malignant colonic mucosa. Cancer Letters
128, 219–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3835(98)00067-6 (1998). PMID: 9683286
62. Ye J., Kawaguchi M., Haruyama Y., Kanemaru A., Fukushima T., Yamamoto K., et al. Loss of hepato-
cyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 participates in metastatic spreading of human pancreatic
cancer cells in a mouse orthotopic transplantation model. Cancer Sci 105, 44–51, https://doi.org/10.
1111/cas.12306 (2014). PMID: 24147538
63. Koivuniemi R., Mäkelä J., Hokkanen M. E., Bruelle C., Ho T. H., Ola R., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor
activator inhibitor-1 is induced by bone morphogenetic proteins and regulates proliferation and cell fate
of neural progenitor cells. PLoS One 8, e56117, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056117 (2013).
PMID: 23409135
64. List K., Szabo R., Molinolo A., Sriuranpong V., Redeye V., Murdock T., et al. Deregulated matriptase
causes ras-independent multistage carcinogenesis and promotes ras-mediated malignant transforma-
tion. Genes Dev 19, 1934–1950, https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1300705 (2005). PMID: 16103220
65. Olsson M. Healey M., Wapstra E., Schwartz T., Lebas N., Uller T. Mating system variation and morph
fluctuations in a polymorphic lizard. Molecular Ecology 16, 5307–5315, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
294X.2007.03578.x (2007). PMID: 18092994
66. Micheletti S., Parra E., Routman E. J. Adaptive Color Polymorphism and Unusually High Local Genetic
Diversity in the Side-Blotched Lizard, Uta stansburiana. PLOS ONE 7, e47694, https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0047694 (2012). PMID: 23133520
67. Rosenblum E. B., Hoekstra H. E., Nachman M. W. ADAPTIVE REPTILE COLOR VARIATION AND
THE EVOLUTION OF THE MCIR GENE. Evolution 58, 1794–1808, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-
3820.2004.tb00462.x (2004). PMID: 15446431
68. Nunes V. L., Miraldo A., Beaumont M. A., Butlin R. K., Paulo O. S. Association of Mc1r variants with
ecologically relevant phenotypes in the European ocellated lizard, Lacerta lepida. Journal of Evolution-
ary Biology 24, 2289–2298, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02359.x (2011). PMID:
21812853
69. Fulgione D., Lega C., Trapanese M., Buglione M. Genetic factors implied in melanin-based coloration of
the Italian wall lizard. Journal of Zoology 296, 278–285, https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12242 (2015).
70. Rosenblum E. B., Römpler H., Schöneberg T., Hoekstra H. E. Molecular and functional basis of pheno-
typic convergence in white lizards at White Sands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
107, 2113, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911042107 (2010). PMID: 20080544
71. Laurent S., Pfeifer S. P., Settles M. L., Hunter S. S., Hardwick K. M., Ormond L., et al. The population
genomics of rapid adaptation: disentangling signatures of selection and demography in white sands liz-
ards. Molecular Ecology 25, 306–323, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13385 (2016). PMID: 26363411
72. Corso J., Gonçalves G. L., Freitas T. R. O. d. Sequence variation in the melanocortin-1 receptor
(MC1R) pigmentation gene and its role in the cryptic coloration of two South American sand lizards.
Genetics and Molecular Biology 35, 81–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-47572012005000015
PMID: 22481878
73. Jin Y., Tong H., Shao G., Li J., Lv Y., Wo Y., Brown R. P., Fu C., et al. Dorsal Pigmentation and Its Asso-
ciation with Functional Variation in MC1R in a Lizard from Different Elevations on the Qinghai-Tibetan
Plateau. Genome Biology and Evolution, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evaa225 (2020). PMID: 33095228
74. Andrade P., Pinho C., Pérez i de Lanuza G., Afonso S., Brejcha J., Rubin C-J., et al. Regulatory
changes in pterin and carotenoid genes underlie balanced color polymorphisms in the wall lizard. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 5633–5642, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820320116 (2019). PMID:
30819892
75. Ullate-Agote A., Burgelin I., Debry A., Langrez C., Montange F., Peraldi R., et al. Genome mapping of a
LYST mutation in corn snakes indicates that vertebrate chromatophore vesicles are lysosome-related
96. Bray N. L., Pimentel H., Melsted P., Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat
Biotechnol 34, 525–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3519 (2016). PMID: 27043002
97. Endelman J. B. Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP.
The Plant Genome 4, 250–255, https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024 (2011).
98. Xavier A., Xu S., Muir W. M., Rainey K. M. NAM: association studies in multiple populations. Bioinfor-
matics 31, 3862–3864, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv448 (2015). PMID: 26243017
99. Galwey N. W. A new measure of the effective number of tests, a practical tool for comparing families of
non-independent significance tests. Genet Epidemiol 33, 559–568, https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.20408
(2009). PMID: 19217024