Fpsyt 12 735861
Fpsyt 12 735861
Geographical location Quanzhou, Fujian Chengdu, Sichuan Chengdu, Sichuan Mianzhu, Sichuan
Hospital size Tertiary grade A Tertiary grade A Tertiary grade A Tertiary grade B
Number of
Beds 2,305 4,300 1,450 800
Hospital medical workers 3,398 ∼10,000 ∼3,500 1,163
Number of participants 532 (100%) 503 (100%) 489 (100%) 535 (100%)
Medical doctor 97 (18.2%) 1 (0.2%) 22 (4.4%) 149 (27.9%)
Registered nurse 435 (81.1%) 488 (99.8%) 481 (95.6%) 386 (72.1%)
TABLE 2 | Rates of PTSD and CPTSD in HMWs 11 years after the Wenchuan Earthquake.
six latent factors in Model 2. Model 4 was a correlated two-layer 2,059), and 74.7% did not experience the earthquake (1,538 out
model in which PTSD accounted for the covariation between the of 2,059; Table 2). There were more female than male HMWs in
latent factors of RE, AV, and TH, whereas DSO accounted for the total sample (1,791 vs. 268). More participants had a college
the covariation between the latent factors of AD, NSC, and DR. education level or below (including diploma and subdegree) than
The maximum likelihood estimation was used, and the STDYX a university educational level or above (1,193 vs. 866). More of
standardization of estimate together with its standard errors (SE) the participants were married than unmarried (1,355 vs. 704).
were reported for each path in the CFA. More than 80% of the participants were registered nurses (1,790
The comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of of 2,059, 86.9%). The mean age of the participants was 31.4 with
approximation (RMSEA) with 95% CI, and Tucker–Lewis index a standard deviation (SD) of 7.1, whereas the mean length of
(TLI) were used to assess the fit of the hypothetical model. Cutoff service as an HMW was 9.6 years with an SD of 7.6 years.
values of 0.95 for CFI and TLI (a higher value is better) and The prevalence of PTSD and CPTSD was 0.58% (12 of
0.06 for RMSEA (a lower value is better) (27, 28) were used 2,059) and 0.34% (7 of 2,059), respectively. All participants with
to determine the goodness of fit. To identify the model with PTSD (100%, 12 of 12) and most of those with CPTSD (71.4%,
the optimal fit, changes in the CFI (1CFI), TLI (1TLI), and 5 of 7) had not been exposed to the Wenchuan earthquake.
RMSEA (1RMSEA) values were assessed. 1CFI ≥ 0.01, 1TLI Approximately equal numbers of participants were recruited
≥ 0.01, and 1RMSEA ≥ 0.015 were considered to be evidence of from the four hospitals. However, Hospital A reported the highest
a meaningful difference in the fit of the respective models (29). prevalence of PTSD (1.3%, 7 of 521) and CPTSD (0.9%, 5 of
521). Moreover, male participants reported a higher prevalence
RESULTS of both PTSD (1.1 vs. 0.5%) and CPTSD (0.4 vs. 0.3%) than their
female HMW counterparts. The participants with an education
Demographic Characteristics and at the university level or above reported a higher prevalence of
Prevalence of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD PTSD (0.7 vs. 0.5%) and a lower prevalence of CPTSD (0.1 vs.
Of the 2,059 HMWs in the study, 9.9% experienced the 0.5%) than their counterparts with lower educational levels. A
Wenchuan earthquake as survivors (204 out of 2,059), 15.4% higher prevalence of PTSD (0.7 vs. 0.5%) but a lower prevalence
experienced the earthquake as disaster relief workers (317 out of of CPTSD (0.3 vs. 0.4%), was reported by unmarried participants
TABLE 3 | Dimensional PTSD and DSO scores of HMWs. [F (3) = 12.973, p < 0.001] scores. Participants from Hospital
A reported the highest PTSD (mean = 6.24, SD = 6.08) and
PTSD score DSO score
DSO (mean = 6.49, SD = 6.55) scores, followed by those from
ICD-11-defined PTSD and F(2)= 154.896, F(2)= 89.685, Hospital C (PTSD: mean = 5.01, SD = 5.19; DSO: mean = 5.36,
CPTSD prevalence p < 0.001 p < 0.001 SD = 5.79). Moreover, participants with different marital statuses
Normal 4.95 (4.98) 5.11 (5.54) had significantly different DSO scores [F (1) = 7.453, p < 0.01].
PTSD 24.00 (2.49) 18.33 (4.70) According to the multivariate regression models (Table 4),
CPTSD 26.86 (3.58) 27.29 (5.82) experiencing the Wenchuan earthquake as a survivor had a
Wenchuan earthquake F(2)= 17.281, F(2)= 20.547, significant negative effect on PTSD (β = −1.326, 95% CI: −2.160,
exposure p < 0.001 p < 0.001 −0.493) and DSO (β = −1.153, 95% CI: −2.053, −0.253) scores.
Unexposed HMWs 5.53 (5.58) 5.73 (6.06) Being a relief worker after the earthquake also had a significant
Earthquake survivors 3.74 (4.12) 3.93 (4.54) negative effect on PTSD (β = −1.188, 95% CI: −1.883, −0.492)
Earthquake relief workers 4.12 (4.41) 3.85 (4.51) and DSO (β = −1.481, 95% CI: −2.232, −0.729) scores.
Workplace F(3)= 11.985, F(3)= 12.973, The type of workplace also had a significant effect on the
p < 0.001 p < 0.001 HMWs’ PTSD and DSO scores. Specifically, working in Hospital
Hospital A 6.24 (6.08) 6.49 (6.55) D (located at the epicenter) was associated with a decrease in the
Hospital B 4.35 (4.74) 4.68 (5.28) PTSD score of 0.859 SDs (β = −0.859, 95% CI: −1.556, −0.163)
Hospital C 5.01 (5.19) 5.36 (5.79) and a decrease in the DSO score of 1.279 SDs (β = −1.279,
Hospital D 4.89 (4.99) 4.52 (5.11) 95% CI: −2.032, −0.527) while holding Wenchuan earthquake
Gender F(1)= 2.741, F(1)= 3.221, exposure and sociodemographic factors constant. Similarly,
p = 0.098 p = 0.073 working in Hospital B (close to the epicenter) was associated with
Male 5.64 (5.68) 5.85 (6.39) a decrease in the PTSD score of 1.521 SDs (β = −1.521, 95% CI:
Female 5.06 (5.27) 5.18 (5.66) −2.211, −0.831) and a decrease in the DSO score of 1.335 SDs
Education F(1)= 0.192, F(1)= 2.360, (β = −1.335, 95% CI: −2.080, −0.590) while holding Wenchuan
p = 0.662 p = 0.125 earthquake exposure and sociodemographic factors constant.
College or below 5.09 (5.36) 5.10(5.68) In addition, being married was associated with a decrease
University or above 5.20 (5.29) 5.49(5.87) in the DSO score of 0.697 SDs (β = −0.697, 95% CI: −1.280,
Marital status F(1)= 0.593, F(1)= 7.453, −0.115) while holding Wenchuan earthquake exposure, type of
p = 0.441 p < 0.01
workplace, and other sociodemographic factors constant. Finally,
Unmarried 5.26 (5.44) 5.75 (6.34)
none of the associations of HMWs’ PTSD or DSO scores with
Married 5.07 (5.27) 5.02 (5.43) gender, educational level, profession, age, and length of service
Profession F(1)= 3.647, F(1)= 1.464, was statistically significant (Table 4).
p = 0.056 p = 0.227
Medical doctor 5.71 (5.69) 5.66 (6.37)
Registered nurse 5.05 (5.27) 5.21 (5.67) The Structure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD
in HMWs
The CFA results are presented in Table 5; Figure 1. The chi-
compared with married participants. Medical doctors reported a
square statistics were significant for all four models. However,
much higher prevalence of PTSD (1.5 vs. 0.4%) than registered
Models 1 and 3 were rejected because of their poor fit. Models
nurses, whereas all cases of CPTSD were found in registered
2 and 4 had acceptable fits based on the CFI, TLI, RMSEA, and
nurses. The mean age was lower and the length of service as an
standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) values. Model
HMW was shorter in those with CPTSD than in those with PTSD
2 demonstrated the highest CFI and TLI values and the lowest
and those without CPTSD or PTSD.
RMSEA and SRMR values. However, the 1CFI and 1TLI values
between Models 2 and 4 were lower than 0.01, and the 1RMSEA
Dimensional Scores of PTSD and DSO and value was lower than 0.015. Thus, the difference in fit between
Their Determinants Models 2 and 4 was not significant. Therefore, both Models 2 and
Participants, who were probable with CPTSD, reported 4 had a good fit to examine the constructs of PTSD and CPTSD
the highest PTSD (mean = 26.86, SD = 3.58) and DSO in HMWs.
(mean = 27.29, SD = 5.82) scores, followed by those with PTSD All of the factors loaded in Models 2 and 4 were significant
(Table 3). Participants with different types of Wenchuan (p < 0.001) with coefficients ranging from 0.693 (SE = 0.013,
earthquake exposure reported significantly different of AD1 loaded on affective dysregulation) in Model 4 to 0.930
PTSD [F (2) = 17.281, p < 0.001] and DSO [F (2) = 20.547, (SE = 0.008, negative self-concept loaded on DSO; SE = 0.011,
p < 0.001] scores. Unexposed HMWs reported the highest affective dysregulation loaded on DSO) in Model 4. All
PTSD (mean = 5.53, SD = 5.58) and DSO (mean = 5.73, correlations between the six latent factors were significant with
SD = 6.06) scores. coefficients ranging from 0.508 (RE with DR, SE = 0.22;
Participants from different hospitals showed significantly and AV with NSC, SE = 0.20) to 0.875 (NSC with DR,
different PTSD [F (3) = 11.985, p < 0.001] and DSO SE = 0.009) in Model 2. In Model 4, the latent factors of
TABLE 4 | Multivariate regression analysis of the effects of disaster exposure and sociodemographic factors on the dimensional scoring of PTSD and DSO.
Wenchuan earthquake Earthquake survivors −1.326 −2.160, <0.001 −1.153 −2.053, <0.05
exposure (Ref. −0.493 −0.253
unexposed HMWs)
Earthquake relief −1.188 −1.883, <0.01 −1.481 −2.232, <0.001
workers −0.492 −0.729
Workplace (Ref. Hospital B −1.521 −2.211, <0.001 −1.335 −2.080, <0.001
Hospital A) −0.831 −0.590
Hospital C −0.985 −1.669, <0.01 –0.708 –1.447, 0.060
−0.300 –0.031
Hospital D −0.859 −1.556, <0.05 −1.279 −2.032, <0.01
−0.163 −0.527
Gender (Ref. male) Female –0.315 –1.156, 0.463 –0.485 –1.394, 0.295
0.526 0.424
Education (Ref. College University or above –0.006 –0.518, 0.983 0.296 –0.258, 0.295
or below) 0.507 0.849
Marital status (Ref. Married –0.133 –0.673, 0.628 −0.697 −1.280, <0.05
unmarried) 0.406 −0.115
Profession (Ref. Registered nurse –0.111 –1.039, 0.814 0.198 –0.805, 0.699
medical doctor) 0.817 1.200
Age Years 0.001 –0.103, 0.995 0.057 –0.055, 0.320
0.104 0.169
Length of service Years 0.030 –0.062, 0.524 –0.013 –0.113, 0.803
0.123 0.087
Model performance F(11)= 5.451, p < 0.001 F(11)= 6.937, p < 0.001
R2 = 0.028 R2 = 0.033
β coefficients, p-values, and 95% CIs are reported for each factor.
N = 2,059; estimator, maximum likelihood (ML); χ2, chi-square goodness-of-fit statistic; df, degrees of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA (95% CI),
root-mean-square error of approximation with 95% confidence interval; SRMR, standardized root mean squared residual.
RE, AV, and TH constructed the second-layer latent factor of have had PTSD had left the HMW labor market and could not
PTSD, while AD, NSC, and DR constructed DSO. PTSD was be recruited for this study. Moreover, in general, the prevalence
significantly correlated with DSO with a medium-sized effect of PTSD is lower after natural disasters than after manmade
(β = 0.655, SE = 0.016). disasters (30). For example, the prevalence of PTSD ranged from
7 to 24% (mean 18%) in medical responders in the first 1 or 2
DISCUSSION years following the 2004 tsunami in Asia (31), the 2010 Yushu
earthquake (32), and the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake (33).
PTSD and CPTSD in HMWs After the However, after manmade disasters, the prevalence of PTSD has
Wenchuan Earthquake a wide range from 1 to 90% (34–36). The low PTSD prevalence
The prevalence rate of PTSD and CPTSD in HMWs was low (1%) reported for nurses and doctors during violent events in
(0.58 and 0.34%, respectively) 11 years after the Wenchuan Judea and Samaria (36) was mostly related to a highly restricted
earthquake. Moreover, none of the participants who reported selection process and more comprehensive training. A high
Wenchuan earthquake exposure were probable for PTSD. After prevalence of PTSD was identified during violent wars in 2012
such a long time, many cases of PTSD may have been treated (35, 70%) and Israel-Gaza in 2014 (34, 90%). As these wars
or spontaneously resolved. In some cases, the rescuers who may continued for a long duration, they may have caused daily
FIGURE 1 | Factor models of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The STDYX standardization of estimate and SE for Model 2: RE
with AV, 0.802(0.007)***; RE with TH, 0.795(0.016)***; RE with AD, 0.596(0.022)***; RE with NSC, 0.505(0.022)***; RE with DR, 0.508(0.022)***; AV with TH,
0.837(0.012)***; AV with AD, 0.605(0.019)***; AV with NSC, 0.508(0.020)***; AV with DR, 0.525(0.019)***; TH with AD, 0.636(0.019)***; TH with NSC, 0.558(0.020)***;
TH with DR, 0.525(0.019)***; AD with NSC, 0.861(0.012)***; AD with DR, 0.855(0.012)***; NSC with DR, 0.875(0.009)***.
traumatic events. Therefore, all HMWs are urged to be equipped past 11 years may be warranted to evaluate the effect of other
with competency-driven, high-quality disaster education and traumatic events during this period. Third, we used an online
training to enhance their knowledge and skills to meet the global self-reported survey, and we did not conduct interviews to make
challenge of disasters (9, 10, 37). the diagnoses. Finally, this was a cross-sectional study with a
non-random sampling strategy. With the recent increase in the
The Factors Associated With HMWs’ PTSD number of disasters globally, a long-term longitudinal study is
and CPTSD Scores needed to serve as a guide to advocating for the protection of the
The factors that had a significant and positive association with mental health of healthcare professionals working in hospitals of
HMWs’ PTSD and CPTSD scores were not being exposed to different sizes.
the earthquake and working in a hospital that was distant from
the epicenter (i.e., Hospital A). These findings confirm that CONCLUSIONS
geographical location has a significant role in an individual’s
adaptation following a disaster as previously reported (38). The findings of this study suggest that HMWs who were
Another possible explanation for these findings is that we only exposed to the Wenchuan earthquake rarely reported PTSD or
examined the effect of Wenchuan earthquake exposure on PTSD CPTSD 11 years following the disaster. However, psychological
and did not evaluate the effects of other natural disasters (e.g., support is still necessary for all HMWs, especially for single
floods) on HMWs’ mental health. Hospital A was distant from HMWs working in smaller hospitals. Further research is required
the epicenter of the Wenchuan earthquake but is located in a to evaluate the mental health status of HMWs using the
coastal area where typhoons, rainstorms, and high tides have ICD-11 criteria for PTSD and CPTSD to provide ongoing
become common in recent years (39). For example, in 2016, evidence to help HMWs cope effectively with the challenges of
Typhoon Megi, which landed in Fujian, resulted in 91 deaths, 16 future disasters.
missing persons, and the collapse of 10,203 houses (40). HMWs
who were working in Hospital A may have been deployed to DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
the affected area of Fujian and exposed to traumatic incidents
during flood relief work, which may have contributed to the The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be
development of PTSD in these HMWs (41). made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
In addition to earthquake exposure and the type of workplace,
sociodemographic factors were also associated with HMWs’ ETHICS STATEMENT
PTSD and CPTSD scores. An unmarried status was positively
associated with PTSD and CPTSD scores, which is consistent The studies involving human participants were reviewed and
with the findings of previous studies (41). This may be due to approved by the Human Subjects Ethics Sub-Committee in the
a lack of family and social support. Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Ref.HSEARS20190416035).
The patients/participants provided their written informed
The Structure of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD consent to participate in this study.
in HMWs
The results from the CFA indicate that both the correlated AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
first-order model (Model 2) and the correlated two-layer model
(Model 4) had a good fit to explain the structure of PTSD and SL and SC designed and performed data collection. CG, SL,
DSO. The correlated first-order model, which was constructed and SC analyzed the data. CG and SL drafted the manuscript.
with three latent variables (RE, AV, and TH) representing PTSD All authors contributed to the article and approved the
and three latent variables (AD, NSC, and DR) representing DSO, article submission.
was the model with the best fit. The correlated two-layer model
included two second-order latent variables, PTSD and DSO, to
explain the covariation among the six first-order factors. These FUNDING
results are consistent with previous studies showing that these
This study was supported by Dean’s Reserve Grants (FHSS
two models are generally the best-fitting models (42–44).
and FENG) from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Limitations and Further Research (Project ZZHH).
First, this study was limited by its sampling methodology and
the unbalanced ratio between medical doctors (18.2%) and ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
registered nurses (81.1%) from the four selected hospitals. This
may limit the generalizability of the finding that being a medical We thank Thanos Karatzias and Dr. Grace Ho for providing
doctor predicted the development of PTSD and CPTSD. Second, us with valuable guidance on the research tools in both English
this study only assessed HMWs’ exposure to the Wenchuan and Chinese. We also thank Xianqiong Feng, Dr. Xin Jiang,
earthquake, which occurred 11 years prior to the survey. There Ms. Shaohua Chen, Ms. Xuemei Luo, and Ms. Rui Xia for their
may have been other traumatic events during that period that assistance with data collection. We also give special thanks to all
caused PTSD or CPTSD. Therefore, a life event checklist for the of the participants in this study.
REFERENCES 19. McNally RJ, Robinaugh DJ, Wu GW, Wang L, Deserno MK,
Borsboom D. Mental disorders as causal systems: A network
1. Neria Y, DiGrande L, Adams BG. Posttraumatic stress disorder following the approach to posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Psychol Sci. (2015)
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: a review of the literature among highly 3:836–49. doi: 10.1177/2167702614553230
exposed populations. Am Psychol. (2011) 66:429–46. doi: 10.1037/a0024791 20. Li J, Wang W, Hu W, Yuan Z, Zhou R, Zhang W, et al. Validation of
2. Norris FH, Friedman MJ, Watson PJ, Byrne CM, Diaz E, Kaniasty K. posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD in Chinese children
60,000 disaster victims speak: part I. An empirical review of the empirical as per the ICD-11 proposals using the International trauma questionnaire. Eur
literature, 1981–2001. Psychiatr Interpers Biol Process. (2002) 65:207- J Psychotraumatol. (2021) 12:1888525. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1888525
39. doi: 10.1521/psyc.65.3.207.20173 21. Bryant RA, Creamer M, O’Donnell M, Forbes D, McFarlane AC, Silove D,
3. Norris FH, Friedman MJ, Watson PJ. 60,000 disaster victims speak: part I et al. Acute and chronic posttraumatic stress symptoms in the emergence of
Summary I. and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatr posttraumatic stress disorder: A network analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2017)
Interpers Biol Process. (2002) 65:240-60. doi: 10.1521/psyc.65.3.240.20169 74:135–42. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3470
4. Setti I, Argentero P. Traumatization PTSD in rescue workers: prevention, 22. La Greca AM, Danzi BA, Chan SF. DSM-5 and ICD-11 as competing models
assessment, interventions. In: Martin C, Preedy V, Patel V, editors. of PTSD in preadolescent children exposed to a natural disaster: assessing
Comprehensive Guide to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders. Cham: validity and co-occurring symptomatology. Eur J Psychotraumatol. (2017)
Springer. (2016). 8:1310591. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1310591
5. Guo C, Li S, Chan S. Long-term effects of disaster exposure on 23. Cloitre M, Shevlin M, Brewin CR, Bisson JI, Roberts NP, Maercker A, et al. The
health care workers’ resilience: A comparison of the Wenchuan International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure
earthquake-exposed and unexposed groups. Int J Dis Risk Reduct. (2022) of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Act Psychiatr Scand. (2018) 138:536-
67:102658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102658 46. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956
6. Mattei A, Fiasca F, Mazzei M, Necozione S, Bianchini V. Stress and 24. Haselgrube A, Solva K, Lueger-Schuster B. Validation of ICD-
burnout in health-care workers after the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake: 11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the
a cross-sectional observational study. Front Psychiatr. (2017) International Trauma Questionnaire. Act Psychiatr Scand. (2020)
8:98. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00098 141:60–73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100
7. Jacobs M, Harville E. Long-term mental health among low-income, minority 25. Ho GW, Hyland P, Shevlin M, Chien WT, Inoue S, Yang PJ, et al. The validity of
women following exposure to multiple natural disasters in early and late ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in East Asian cultures: findings with young
adolescence compared to adulthood. Child Youth Care Forum. (2015) 44:511- adults from China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Taiwan. Eur J Psychotraumatol.
25. doi: 10.1007/s10566-015-9311-4 (2020) 11:1717826. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1717826
8. Zhang L, Liu X, Li Y, Liu Y, Liu Z, Lin J, et al. Emergency medical rescue 26. Kazlauskas E, Zelviene P, Daniunaite I, Hyland P, Kvedaraite M, Shevlin
efforts after a major earthquake: lessons from the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. M, et al. The structure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in adolescents
Lancet. (2012) 379:853–61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61876-X exposed to potentially traumatic experiences. J Affect Disord. (2020) 265:169–
9. Loke AY, Guo C, Molassiotis A. Development of disaster nursing education 74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.061
and training programs in the past 20 years 2000–2019: a systematic review. 27. Buhi ER, Goodson P, Neilands TB. Structural equation modeling: a
Nurse Educ Today. (2021) 99:104809. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104809 primer for health behavior researchers. Am J Health Behav. (2007) 31:74–
10. Loke AY, Li S, Guo C. Mapping a postgraduate curriculum in disaster nursing 85. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.31.1.8
with the International Council of Nursing’s Core Competencies in Disaster 28. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
Nursing V2.0: the extent of the program in addressing the core competencies. analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model
Nurse Educ Today. (2021) 106:105063. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105063 Multidiscipl J. (1999) 6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
11. Zhen Y, Huang ZQ, Jin J, Deng XY, Zhang LP, Wang JG. Posttraumatic 29. Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of
stress disorder of Red Cross nurses in the aftermath of the measurement invariance. Struct Equat Model Multidiscipl J. (2007)
2008 Wenchuan China earthquake. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (2012) 14:464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
26:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.02.004 30. Naushad VA, Bierens JJ, Nishan KP, Firjeeth CP, Mohammad OH,
12. Liang Y, Cheng J, Ruzek JI, Liu Z. Posttraumatic stress disorder following Maliyakkal AM, et al. A systematic review of the impact of disaster on
the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake: A 10-year systematic review among the mental health of medical responders. Prehosp Dis Med. (2019) 34:632–
highly exposed populations in China. J Affect Disord. (2019) 243:327- 43. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004874
39. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.047 31. Armagan E, Engindeniz Z, Devay AO, Eurdur B, Ozcakir A. Frequency of
13. Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou M, Shi Z, Liu P. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress post-traumatic stress disorder among relief force workers after the tsunami
disorder among health care workers in earthquake-affected areas in southwest in Asia: do rescuers become victims? Prehosp Dis Med. (2006) 21:168–
China. Psychol Rep. (2010) 106:555–61. doi: 10.2466/pr0.106.2.555-561 72. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X00003630
14. Schenk EJ, Yuan J, Martel LD, Shi GQ, Han K, Gao X. Risk factors for long- 32. Kang P, Lv Y, Hao L, Tang B, Liu Z, Liu X, et al. Psychological consequences
term post-traumatic stress disorder among medical rescue workers appointed and quality of life among medical rescuers who responded to the 2010
to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake response in China. Disasters. (2017) Yushu earthquake: a neglected problem. Psychiatry Res. (2015) 230:517–
41:788–802. doi: 10.1111/disa.12222 23. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.047
15. Yin M, Li XL, Ma Y, Wu XH, Zhu SC. Post-traumatic stress disorder in nurses 33. Sakuma A, Takahashi Y, Ueda I, Sato H, Katsura M, Abe M, et al. Post-
n hard-hit areas after Wenchuan earthquake 2 years later. Chin Mental Health traumatic stress disorder and depression prevalence and associated risk factors
J. (2013) 27:155-6. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S247527 among local disaster relief and reconstruction workers fourteen months after
16. Guo J, Wu P, Tian D, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhang X, et al. Post- the Great East Japan Earthquake: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry.
traumatic stress disorder among adult survivors of the Wenchuan earthquake (2015) 15:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0440-y
in China: a repeated cross-sectional study. J Anx Disord. (2014) 28:75- 34. Abu-El-Noor NI, Aljeesh YI, Radwan AS, Abu-El-Noor MK, Qddura IAI,
82. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.12.001 Khadoura KJ, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder among health care
17. Brewin CR, Cloitre M, Hyland P, Shevlin M, Maercker A, Bryant RA, providers following the Israeli attacks against Gaza Strip in 2014: A
et al. A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for call for immediate policy actions. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. (2016) 30:185–
diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD. Clin Psychol Rev. (2017) 58:1– 91. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2015.08.010
15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001 35. Alhajjar B. Gaza nurses after war: are they traumatized? Proc Soc Behav Sci.
18. First MB, Reed GM, Hyman SE, Saxena S. The development of the ICD- (2014) 114:802–9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.789
11 clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines for mental and behavioural 36. Lubin G, Sids C, Vishne T, Shochat T, Ostfield Y, Shmushkevitz M. Acute
disorders. World Psychiatr. (2015) 14:82–90. doi: 10.1002/wps.20189 stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder among medical personnel
in Judea and Samaria areas in the years 2000–2003. Mil Med. (2007) 172:376– using the International Trauma Questionnaire. Act Psychiatr Scand. (2017)
8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED.172.4.376 136:313–22. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771
37. Molassiotis A, Guo C, Abu-Odah H, West C, Loke AY. Evolution 44. Karatzias T, Shevlin M, Fyvie C, Hyland P, Efthymiadou E, Wilson D, et al.
of disaster nursing research in the past 30 years (1990–2019): a An initial psychometric assessment of an ICD-11 based measure of PTSD and
bibliometric and mapping analysis. Int J Dis Risk Reduct. (2021) complex PTSD (ICD-TQ): evidence of construct validity. J Anxiety Disord.
58:102230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102230 (2016) 44:73–9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.009
38. Guo C, Sim T, Su G. Individual disaster preparedness in drought-
and-flood-prone villages in northwest china: impact of place, out- Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the
migration and community. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a
18:1649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041649 potential conflict of interest.
39. Flood Control and Drought Relief in China. National flood disasters in 2017:
a literature review. Flood Drought Dis. (2018) 28:60-6. (In Chinese). Publisher’s Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors
40. Lin F. A brief discussion on typhoon flood disasters in Fuzhou, Fujian from and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of
2013-2016. Flood Control Drought Relief China. (2018) 28:41–4. (In Chinese).
the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in
41. Lowell A, Suarez-Jimenez B, Helpman L, Zhu X, Durosky A, Hilburn
this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or
A, et al. 9/11-related PTSD among highly exposed populations: a
systematic review 15 years after the attack. Psychol Med. (2018) 48:537- endorsed by the publisher.
53. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002033
42. Ben-Ezra M, Karatzias T, Hyland P, Brewin CR, Cloitre M, Bisson JI, et al. Copyright © 2022 Li, Guo and Chan. This is an open-access article distributed
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD (CPTSD) as per under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use,
ICD-11 proposals: a population study in Israel. Depress Anxiety. (2018) distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original
35:264–74. doi: 10.1002/da.22723 author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication
43. Hyland P, Shevlin M, Brewin CR, Cloitre M, Downes AJ, Jumbe S, et al. in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use,
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
APPENDIX I
TABLE A1 | Descriptive analysis of items of ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD.
Items 0 1 2 3 4 Mean
N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) N(%) (S.D.)
Post-traumatic stress Re-experiencing RE1. Having upsetting 892 957 143 61 6 0.7
disorder dreams that replay part of (43.3%) (46.5%) (6.9%) (3.0%) (0.3%) (0.7)
(PTSD) the experience or are clearly
related to the experience
RE2. Having powerful 951 903 142 53 10 0.7
images or memories that (46.2%) (43.9%) (6.9%) (2.6%) (0.5%) (0.8)
sometimes come into your
mind in which you feel the
experience is happening
again in the here and now
Avoidance AV1. Avoiding internal 1,057 738 190 63 11 0.7
reminders of the experience (51.3%) (35.8%) (9.2%) (3.1%) (0.5%) (0.8)
(for example, thoughts,
feelings, or physical
sensations)
AV2. Avoiding external 1,109 736 144 57 13 0.6
reminders of the experience (53.9%) (35.7%) (7.0%) (2.8%) (0.6%) (0.8)
(for example, people,
places, conversations,
objects, activities, or
situations)
Sense of threat TH1. Being “super-alert,” 1,129 665 (32.3%) 176 71 18 0.6
watchful, or on guard (54.8%) (8.5%) (3.4%) (0.9%) (0.8)
TH2. Feeling jumpy or easily 1,053 747 182 60 (2.9%) 17 0.7
startled (51.1%) (36.3%) (8.8%) (0.8%) (0.8)
PTSD functional PTSDI1. Affected your 1,430 497 (24.1%) 96 30 6 0.4
impairment relationships or social life (69.5%) (4.7%) (1.5%) (0.3%) (0.7)
PTSDI2. Affected your work 1,431 494 95 26 (1.3%) 13 0.4
or ability to work (69.5%) (24.0%) (4.6%) (0.6%) (0.7)
PTSDI3. Affected any other 1,402 512 94 41 10 0.4
important part of your life (68.1%) (24.9%) (4.6%) (2.0%) (0.5%) (0.7)
such as parenting, school or
college work, or other
important activities
Disturbances in Affective AD1. I react intensely to 722 971 285 68 (3.3%) 13 0.87
self-organization Dysregulation things that do not seem to (35.1%) (47.2%) (13.8%) (0.6%) (0.81)
(DSO) affect other people so much
AD2. When I am upset, it 1,202 636 (30.9%) 142 66 13 0.57
takes me a long time to (58.4%) (6.9%) (3.2%) (0.6%) (0.81)
calm down
Negative NSC1. I feel like a failure 985 789 185 75 25 0.72
self-concept (47.8%) (38.3%) (9.0%) (3.6%) (1.2%) (0.86)
NSC2. I feel worthless 1,207 625 145 64 18 0.57
(58.6%) (30.4%) (7.0%) (3.1%) (0.9%) (0.82)
Disturbances in DR1. I feel distant or cut off 1,290 577 (28.0%) 127 53 12 0.50
relationships from people (62.7%) (6.2%) (2.6%) (0.6%) (0.77)
DR2. I find it hard to stay 1,142 692 147 57 21 0.60
emotionally close to people (55.5%) (33.6%) (7.1%) (2.8%) (1.0%) (0.82)
DSO functional DSOI1. Affected your 1,213 668 (32.4%) 127 40 11 0.53
impairment relationships or social life (58.9%) (6.2%) (1.9%) (0.5%) (0.74)
DSOI2. Affected your work 1,341 571 102 37 (1.8%) 8 0.45
or ability to work (65.1%) (27.7%) (5.0%) (0.4%) (0.71)
DSOI3. Affected any other 1,355 540 114 40 10 0.45
important part of your life (65.8%) (26.2%) (5.5%) (1.9%) (0.5%) (0.73)
such as parenting, school or
college work, or other
important activities