KINETIC APPLICATION OF VALENCE BOND

THEORY AND CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY

Master’s Thesis
Submitted to
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
SWATANTRATA SANGRAM SENANI VISHRAM SINGH GOVERNMENT P G
COLLEGE, CHUNAR MIRZAPUR
(Accredited ‘B’ Grade by NAAC)
Affiliated with
MGKVP VARANASI

FOR THE DEGREE OF

MASTER OF SCIENCE
IN
CHEMISTRY
BY
VISHVATMA RAV
M.Sc. (Chemistry Final Semester)
Session 2023-24
Roll No. 40224721032

Under the supervision of

Dr. Subedar Yadav

Associate Professor
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
SWATANTRATA SANGRAM SENANI VISHRAM SINGH GOVERNMENT P G COLLEGE
CHUNAR MIRZAPUR-231304
1
 SSSVS Govt PG College chunar Mahatma Gandhi Kashi
Mirzapur – 231304 Vidyapeeth Varanasi
Uttar Pradesh, India 221002

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the work is presented in the Master’s thesis entitled
“KINETIC APPLICATION OF VALENCE BOND THEORY AND
CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY” submitted for the partial fulfilment of the
M.Sc. Degree in Science under the guidance of “Dr. Subedar Yadav’’
Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry, Swatranta Sangram Senani
Vishram Singh Govt. PG College Chunar, Mirzapur.
All the regulations necessary for the submission of M.Sc. Degree have been
fully observed.
Dr. Subedar Yadav

Associate professor

2
 DECLARATION

I, VISHVATMA RAV. declare that the work presented in the M Sc Dissertation

entitled “KINETIC APPLICATION OF VALENCE BOND THEORY AND
CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY.” is a result based on Research/Study and Literature
survey submitted for the partial fulfillment of the degree in M. Sc. (Chemistry) has
been carried out by myself under the guidance of Dr. SUBEDAR YADAV, Associate
Professor, Department of Chemistry, SSSVS Govt P.G. College Chunar, Mirzapur.
I am aware about rules and regulation related to any plagiarism in my work and
I will be responsible for the same.

Name- VISHVATMA RAV

Class-M.Sc. Semester II Sem
Department-Chemistry
SSSVS Government P.G College, Chunar, Mirzapur U.P.
Roll No. 40224721032
Enrollment No. KA2K24/402721032
Session-2023-24

3
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I am grateful to my Supervisor Dr. Subedar Yadav who has provided me

extensive professional guidance and taught me a great deal about research
and helped me to achieve my academic goals. As my teacher and mentor,
he has taught me to read extensively and inculcate innovative approaches
in my project. Without him insightful feedback and encouragement, this
work would not have been possible. I would also like to express my
gratitude to Principal sir, Professor P. N. Dongre, who always encourages
us to do better and move forward. I am especially thankful to my
classmates and friends for their help and support. Nobody has been more
important to me in the pursuit of this thesis than the members of my
family. I would like to thank my parents, whose guidance and patience
provided me unending inspiration. Thank you all for your assistance and
support.
Note- Pls write above para as per your need. कृपया उपययुक्त पैरा को अपने

अनय सार लिखें

Name- VISHVATMA RAV

Class-M.Sc. Semester IV Sem
Department-Chemistry
SSSVS Government P.G College, Chunar, Mirzapur U.P.
Roll No. 40224721032
Enrollment No. KA2K24/402721032
Session-2023-24

4
 ABSTRACT

This report explores the kinetic applications of Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and
Crystal Field Theory (CFT), two foundational models in coordination chemistry.
VBT emphasizes the overlap of atomic orbitals and the formation of covalent bonds,
providing insights into the kinetics of reactions where bond formation and breaking
occur via covalent interactions. In contrast, CFT focuses on the electrostatic
interactions between metal ions and ligands, particularly in transition metal
complexes, explaining reaction kinetics based on d-orbital splitting and Crystal Field
Stabilization Energy (CFSE).
The study compares the kinetic implications of both theories, examining how orbital
overlap in VBT and CFSE in CFT influence the rates of ligand substitution and
electron transfer reactions. While VBT is useful for understanding covalent bond
formation and transition states, CFT offers a detailed analysis of ligand lability and
kinetic inertness in transition metal complexes. Case studies of complex reactivities
highlight the complementary roles of both theories in explaining reaction
mechanisms and kinetic behavior.
This report concludes by noting that VBT and CFT, though different in approach,
together provide a comprehensive framework for understanding chemical kinetics in
coordination chemistry, particularly in the context of transition metal complexes.

5
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

 Overview of Chemical Kinetics

 Introduction to Valence Bond Theory (VBT)

 Introduction to Crystal Field Theory (CFT)

2. Valence Bond Theory (VBT)

 Fundamentals of VBT

 Application of VBT in Coordination Chemistry

 Kinetic Aspects of VBT

 Covalent Bond Formation and Reaction Rates

 Orbital Overlap and Transition States

3. Crystal Field Theory (CFT)

 Fundamentals of CFT

 d-Orbital Splitting and Electronic Configurations

 Kinetic Applications of CFT

 Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) and Reaction Rates

 Ligand Substitution Mechanisms: Associative vs. Dissociative

 Effect of Geometry and Spin States on Kinetics

4. Comparison of Valence Bond Theory and Crystal Field Theory in

Kinetics

6
  Bonding and Reactivity

 Transition State Theories in VBT and CFT

 Kinetic Inertness vs. Lability in VBT and CFT

 Applicability to Transition Metal Complexes

5. Case Studies

 Kinetics of Transition Metal Complexes in VBT

 Ligand Substitution in CFT-Analyzed Systems

 Real-World Applications of VBT and CFT in Kinetics

6. Conclusion

7. References

7
 INTRODUCTION

The study of chemical kinetics provides essential insights into the speed and mechanism of

chemical reactions, especially in understanding how atomic and molecular structures impact

reaction rates. Two important theories, Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and Crystal Field Theory

(CFT), have significantly contributed to explaining the electronic structure of molecules and

complexes, influencing both their thermodynamic stability and kinetic behavior.

Valence Bond Theory (VBT), developed in the early 20th century, explains chemical bonding

through the concept of orbital overlap. According to VBT, covalent bonds form when atomic

orbitals of two atoms overlap, allowing electron pairs to be shared between atoms. This bonding

concept is foundational in understanding reaction mechanisms and the kinetics of bond

formation and

8
breaking, especially in organic and coordination compounds. The degree of orbital overlap, bond

energies, and the spatial orientation of atoms all influence how fast or slow a reaction proceeds.

On the other hand, Crystal Field Theory (CFT), which emerged as an extension of electrostatic

concepts in the 1930s, focuses on the behavior of metal ions in coordination complexes. CFT

explains the splitting of d-orbitals of transition metal ions when placed in an electric field created

by surrounding ligands. The extent of this splitting influences the electronic configuration and,

consequently, the reactivity and kinetic behavior of these complexes. Kinetic phenomena such as

ligand substitution, electron transfer, and isomerization reactions in coordination chemistry are well

explained through CFT by examining the stabilization or destabilization of electron configurations

in specific geometries.

The kinetic applications of both VBT and CFT play a crucial role in understanding the behavior of

transition metal complexes, organometallic reactions, and bonding interactions. By exploring the

kinetic aspects of these theories, we gain a deeper understanding of how molecular structure and

electronic interactions influence reaction rates and mechanisms in various chemical systems.

9
 KINETIC APPLICATIONS OF VALENCE BOND THEORY
(VBT)

Valence Bond Theory (VBT) primarily explains chemical bonding through the overlap of atomic

orbitals, but it also provides valuable insights into reaction kinetics by focusing on the formation

and breaking of bonds in chemical reactions. The kinetic behavior of reactions, especially in

covalent systems, is closely related to the efficiency of orbital overlap, bond energies, and the

spatial orientation of atoms during a reaction.

10
 1. Orbital Overlap and Reaction Rates

In VBT, the extent of orbital overlap between atoms directly influences the strength of bonds and,

consequently, the energy barrier for chemical reactions. Reactions where the overlapping orbitals

form strong covalent bonds tend to have high activation energies, making the reaction slower.

For example, the formation of a covalent bond between two atoms requires the overlap of half-

filled atomic orbitals. The effectiveness of this overlap affects the reaction kinetics, as reactions

that lead to stronger, more stable bonds proceed more slowly due to higher energy requirements in

the transition state.

2. Bond Energy and Transition States

VBT helps explain how the energy associated with bond formation or bond breaking impacts the

reaction rate. In a chemical reaction, as reactants transition to products, bonds between atoms must

break and reform. The energy required to break these bonds is related to their bond dissociation

energy, which is determined by the degree of orbital overlap.

For example, in homolytic bond dissociation, where a single bond is broken to form two radicals,

VBT explains that the stronger the overlap of atomic orbitals, the more

11
energy is required to break the bond. This leads to slower kinetics for reactions involving strong

bonds.

3. Influence of Hybridization on Kinetics

The concept of hybridization in VBT, where atomic orbitals mix to form new hybrid orbitals, also

plays a role in kinetics. Hybrid orbitals, such as sp, sp², and sp³, have different geometries and

bonding capacities. The type of hybridization influences the orientation and strength of bonds,

which in turn affects reaction rates.

For example, sp³ hybridized atoms in tetrahedral geometries often lead to slower reactions

compared to sp or sp² hybridized atoms, as the latter involve more directional bonding and

stronger orbital overlap, which makes the transition state easier to achieve.

4. Applications in Organic Reactions

VBT is frequently applied to explain the kinetics of organic reactions, particularly those involving

the formation or breaking of covalent bonds. For example, in nucleophilic substitution reactions

(SN1 and SN2), VBT helps explain the formation of transition states and intermediate complexes.

In an SN2 reaction, the back-side attack mechanism, where the nucleophile forms a new bond with

the carbon center

12
while the leaving group departs, can be explained by VBT’s concept of orbital overlap and how it

affects the reaction's kinetic speed.

In reactions like the Diels-Alder reaction, VBT explains the formation of new sigma bonds between

diene and dienophile through efficient orbital overlap, which dictates the kinetic favorability of the

reaction.

5. Transition Metal Complexes

Although primarily applicable to organic systems, VBT has been extended to explain the reactivity

of transition metal complexes. In these systems, the overlap between metal d-orbitals and ligand

orbitals affects the reaction kinetics, particularly in substitution reactions where ligands are

exchanged. The stronger the overlap between the metal and ligand orbitals, the slower the rate of

ligand dissociation.

6. Example: The Reaction of Hydrogen Molecule Formation

A classical example of VBT's kinetic application is the formation of a hydrogen molecule (H₂)

from two hydrogen atoms. VBT explains the formation of H₂ through the overlap of the 1s orbitals

of the two hydrogen atoms. The extent of this overlap determines the bond strength and the energy

barrier required for bond formation, affecting the reaction kinetics.

13
As the 1s orbitals approach each other, they begin to overlap, forming a bonding molecular orbital.

The rate at which this reaction proceeds depends on how effectively these orbitals overlap and

how much energy is required to overcome the repulsive forces between the two nuclei.

14
 KINETIC APPLICATIONS OF CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY
(CFT)

Crystal Field Theory (CFT) is primarily used to describe the electronic structure and reactivity of

transition metal complexes. It explains how the splitting of d-orbitals in a metal ion due to the

presence of surrounding ligands affects the complex's stability, color, and magnetism. Beyond its

structural insights, CFT provides valuable understanding of the kinetics of reactions involving

transition metal complexes, particularly in processes like ligand substitution, electron transfer, and

isomerization.

1. Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) and Kinetics

Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) is a key concept in CFT that affects both the

thermodynamic stability and the kinetic behavior of transition metal complexes.

15
CFSE arises from the stabilization of certain d-electrons in a metal ion when ligands create a crystal

field.

Complexes with high CFSE are kinetically more inert because breaking bonds to replace ligands

requires overcoming the stabilization provided by the crystal field. For example, octahedral

complexes of low-spin d⁶ metal ions, such as Co³⁺ or Cr³⁺, have high CFSE, making them more

resistant to ligand substitution reactions, resulting in slower reaction rates.

2. Ligand Substitution Reactions

Ligand substitution reactions are one of the primary kinetic applications of CFT, especially in

octahedral and tetrahedral transition metal complexes. The kinetics of these reactions depend on

the geometry of the complex and the d-electron configuration of the metal ion.

Complexes with a high degree of d-orbital splitting (such as low-spin complexes) tend to be

kinetically inert, meaning they undergo substitution reactions slowly. This is because the energy

required to displace a ligand is high due to the stabilization of the d-electrons.

For instance, Cobalt(III) complexes ([Co(NH₃)₆]³⁺) are kinetically inert due to their large CFSE,

making ligand exchange very slow. In contrast, Cobalt(II) complexes

16
([Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺) are more labile, undergoing faster ligand exchange due to their lower CFSE and

high-spin configuration.

3. Activation Energy and Transition States

In CFT, the reaction mechanism for ligand substitution can follow two main pathways: the

dissociative mechanism (D) and the associative mechanism (A).

In a dissociative mechanism (D), a ligand leaves the metal complex first, forming a lower-

coordinate intermediate. This mechanism is more common for complexes with large metal ions

and high CFSE, where the transition state is stabilized by the empty coordination site.

In an associative mechanism (A), a new ligand enters the coordination sphere before the original

ligand departs, forming a transient higher-coordinate intermediate. This is typical for smaller metal

ions with low CFSE, where the transition state can accommodate an additional ligand.

The energy required to reach the transition state depends on the metal's electronic configuration

and the extent of d-orbital splitting, with greater splitting leading to higher activation energy and

slower reaction rates.

4. Influence of Ligand Field Strength on Kinetics

17
The strength of the ligands in the coordination complex, described by the spectrochemical series,

also affects reaction kinetics. Strong field ligands (such as CN⁻ or CO) cause greater d-orbital

splitting, leading to higher CFSE and more inert behavior. This means that ligand substitution

reactions are slower because breaking the bonds with strong field ligands requires more energy.

On the other hand, weak field ligands (like H₂O or Cl⁻) lead to smaller d-orbital splitting, resulting

in more labile complexes that undergo faster substitution reactions.

5. Kinetic Inertness and Lability

CFT is particularly useful in explaining the concept of kinetic inertness (slow reactions) and

kinetic lability (fast reactions) in transition metal complexes.

Kinetically inert complexes: Complexes with high CFSE, particularly low-spin configurations

(like d⁶ or d³) and strong field ligands, tend to be inert. For example, Cr³⁺ and Co³⁺ octahedral

complexes are often inert due to their electronic configuration, which maximizes CFSE.

Kinetically labile complexes: High-spin complexes with lower CFSE, such as Fe²⁺, Ni²⁺, or Cu²⁺,

tend to be labile and undergo fast ligand substitution reactions.

18
 6. Electron Transfer Reactions

CFT also provides insights into the kinetics of electron transfer reactions in transition metal

complexes, such as in redox reactions. The rates of these reactions depend on the changes in the

metal ion's oxidation state, which affect the splitting of the d- orbitals and the associated CFSE.

For example, inner-sphere electron transfer involves a ligand bridge between the donor and

acceptor metal ions. CFT explains that the rate of electron transfer depends on the ease with which

the d-electrons can transition between the metal ions, influenced by the crystal field splitting and

the symmetry of the orbitals involved.

Outer-sphere electron transfer reactions, on the other hand, occur without a direct ligand bridge

and are often influenced by the metal ion’s electronic configuration and the reorganization energy

required to accommodate the new oxidation state.

7. Isomerization Reactions

CFT can also explain the kinetics of isomerization reactions, where a transition metal complex

changes its geometry (e.g., from cis to trans or from octahedral to square planar).

19
The energy barrier for such transformations is influenced by the CFSE of the initial and final

geometries. Complexes that undergo a significant change in d-orbital splitting during

isomerization tend to have slower kinetics, as the reorganization of d-electrons can involve high

activation energy.

Examples of Kinetic Applications

[Cr(NH₃)₆]³⁺: This complex is kinetically inert due to its high CFSE and d³ low-spin configuration.

Ligand substitution reactions in such a complex occur very slowly, requiring significant energy to

overcome the CFSE.

[Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺: This is a kinetically labile complex with a d⁶ high-spin configuration. The smaller

CFSE in this complex leads to fast ligand exchange reactions.

Substitution reactions in square planar complexes (e.g., Pt²⁺ complexes): These typically proceed

via an associative mechanism, where the reaction kinetics are controlled by the availability of a

vacant coordination site and the steric properties of the entering ligand.

20
 COMPARISON OF VALENCE BOND THEORY (VBT) AND

CRYSTAL FIELD THEORY (CFT) IN

KINETICS

Both Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and Crystal Field Theory (CFT) offer valuable insights into the

kinetics of chemical reactions, particularly in coordination and transition metal complexes.

However, they approach the explanation of reaction rates and mechanisms from different

perspectives. Here, we compare the two theories in the context of their kinetic applications.

1. Focus on Bonding

VBT: Emphasizes the overlap of atomic orbitals to form covalent bonds. The strength and extent

of this overlap directly influence reaction kinetics. The theory primarily deals with the formation

and breaking of bonds in terms of covalent interactions.

CFT: Focuses on the electrostatic interactions between a metal ion and surrounding ligands. The

theory explains the splitting of d-orbitals in the metal ion and how this affects reaction kinetics.

Kinetics are influenced by the electron configuration and the stabilization energy in different

geometries.

21
 2. Kinetic Factors

VBT: Reaction kinetics in VBT are largely controlled by the extent of orbital overlap. Stronger

orbital overlap leads to more stable bonds, making the reaction slower due to higher energy

barriers for bond breaking.

In organic and coordination systems, the hybridization state and the spatial arrangement of atoms

significantly impact the transition states and reaction rates.

CFT: The primary kinetic factor in CFT is the Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE), which

depends on the d-orbital splitting. Complexes with high CFSE are kinetically inert because ligand

substitution or bond breaking requires overcoming the stabilization provided by the crystal field.

The metal's d-electron configuration (high-spin or low-spin) and the ligand's position in the

spectrochemical series determine the kinetic inertness or lability of a complex.

3. Mechanism of Reaction

VBT: In reactions involving covalent bond formation, VBT explains the transition state based on

the orbital overlap and the bonding interactions between atoms. The theory is particularly useful

for explaining the kinetics of organic reactions (e.g., SN1, SN2) and coordination systems where

bonds form or break based on covalent interactions.

22
For example, VBT can explain nucleophilic substitution by analyzing how nucleophiles attack

specific atomic centers through orbital overlap.

CFT: In CFT, the reaction mechanism is often explained by the dissociative or associative

pathways in ligand substitution reactions.

Dissociative mechanisms (D) involve the breaking of bonds first (leading to slower kinetics in

complexes with high CFSE), while associative mechanisms (A) involve the formation of a bond

with an entering ligand before a ligand departs.

4. Reactivity and Kinetics in Metal Complexes

VBT: For transition metal complexes, VBT explains reactivity by focusing on how d-orbitals of

the metal ion overlap with ligand orbitals. The strength of this overlap affects the energy barrier

and, therefore, the reaction rate. VBT tends to be less effective at describing the kinetic details of

electron transfer or ligand substitution in complexes with significant electrostatic interactions.

CFT: CFT provides a much more detailed and accurate explanation of the reactivity of metal

complexes. It is particularly effective in explaining the ligand substitution kinetics in transition

metal complexes, such as the inertness of octahedral low-spin d⁶ complexes or the lability of

high-spin d⁷ complexes. The theory also explains

23
electron transfer reactions and the factors that control the rates of redox processes based on

changes in d-electron configurations.

5. Kinetic Inertness vs. Lability

VBT: Kinetic inertness or lability in VBT is largely based on bond strength and the extent of

overlap between metal and ligand orbitals. Stronger bonds due to better overlap lead to kinetically

slower reactions because more energy is required to break these bonds.

CFT: Kinetic inertness or lability in CFT is closely tied to CFSE and d-orbital splitting.

Complexes with high CFSE (e.g., low-spin d⁶, d³) are kinetically inert, while those with lower

CFSE (e.g., high-spin d⁵, d⁷) tend to be more labile and undergo faster reactions.

6. Example Systems

VBT: Useful in explaining the kinetics of organic reactions and simple coordination complexes

where the bonding is primarily covalent. For example, the kinetics of SN1 and SN2 reactions are

explained by orbital overlap and bond strength.

CFT: More effective in explaining the kinetics of transition metal complexes, especially in ligand

substitution reactions. For example, CFT can explain why

24
[Cr(H₂O)₆]³⁺ is kinetically inert due to its large CFSE, while [Fe(H₂O)₆]²⁺ is more labile and

reacts faster due to its lower CFSE.

7. Synergistic Use

In some cases, both VBT and CFT can be used together to explain the kinetics of a reaction. For

example, while VBT might explain the bonding interactions in a transition metal complex, CFT

could offer deeper insights into how the electronic configuration of the metal ion influences its

reactivity and the rate of ligand substitution or electron transfer reactions.

25
 CONCLUSION

The kinetic applications of both Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and Crystal Field Theory (CFT)

provide critical insights into the behavior and reactivity of transition metal complexes, though they

approach the subject from different perspectives. VBT emphasizes the importance of orbital overlap

and covalent bonding, making it useful for understanding reaction mechanisms in organic systems

and simpler coordination compounds. In contrast, CFT focuses on the electrostatic interactions

between metal ions and ligands, providing a detailed framework for understanding the effect of d-

orbital splitting and Crystal Field Stabilization Energy (CFSE) on reaction rates.

VBT is particularly useful for explaining covalent interactions and predicting the reactivity of

complexes based on bond strength, while CFT excels in explaining the kinetic inertness or lability

of transition metal complexes, as well as the pathways for ligand substitution and electron transfer

reactions. Complexes with high CFSE tend to be kinetically inert, while those with lower CFSE

are more labile and reactive.

In sum, while VBT offers a more generalized view of bonding and reactivity, CFT provides a

more nuanced and accurate explanation of the kinetics of transition metal complexes, especially in

the context of ligand exchange, electron transfer, and geometric isomerization reactions.

Together, these theories contribute to a

26
comprehensive understanding of the factors that govern reaction rates and mechanisms in

coordination chemistry.

27
 REFERENCES

 Cotton, F. A., Wilkinson, G., Murillo, C. A., & Bochmann, M. (1999).

Advanced Inorganic Chemistry (6th ed.). Wiley-Interscience.
 This classic textbook provides a detailed explanation of Crystal Field
Theory, including its applications to kinetics and reactivity in transition
metal complexes.
 Miessler, G. L., Fischer, P. J., & Tarr, D. A. (2014). Inorganic Chemistry
(5th ed.). Pearson.
 This book covers Valence Bond Theory and Crystal Field Theory, providing
insights into their application in understanding the reactivity and kinetics of
coordination compounds.
 Housecroft, C. E., & Sharpe, A. G. (2018). Inorganic Chemistry (5th ed.).
Pearson.
 A comprehensive guide on coordination chemistry, including detailed
discussions of kinetic applications of Crystal Field Theory and ligand
substitution reactions.
 Lever, A. B. P. (1984). Inorganic Electronic Spectroscopy (2nd ed.).
Elsevier.
 Focuses on the electronic aspects of transition metal complexes and includes
the role of electronic structure in influencing reaction kinetics as described
by CFT.
 Atkins, P., Overton, T., Rourke, J., Weller, M., & Armstrong, F. (2010).
Shriver & Atkins' Inorganic Chemistry (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
 This text provides a good overview of both VBT and CFT, with a focus on
their kinetic and thermodynamic applications in coordination chemistry.

28
 Basolo, F., & Pearson, R. G. (1988). Mechanisms of Inorganic
Reactions (2nd ed.). Wiley.
 A key resource for understanding the mechanistic aspects of

reactions in transition metal chemistry, offering explanations

grounded in both VBT and CFT.