InTech October 2024
InTech October 2024
Closed-Loop Control
Fundamentals
OCTOBER 2024
DIGITAL MAGAZINE Advertisers Index
To obtain further information, please contact
the advertiser using the contact information
contained in their ads.
WELCOME
Wireless communications and remote asset management are the
themes of this issue of InTech digital magazine, the official publi-
Page..............................................................................15
cation of the International Society of Automation (ISA). Written
for engineers, managers, and other automation decision-makers,
InTech serves ISA members and the wider automation community
with practical, in-depth coverage of automation technologies, Page..............................................................................11
applications, and strategies that help automation professionals
succeed.
Page..............................................................................14
International Society of Automation
Setting the Standard for Automation™
company/internationalsocietyofautomation
InternationalSocietyOfAutomation
Page................................................................................ 8
ISA_Interchange
Trademarks used in this document are the property of their respective owners.
When we named our industrial application software “Ignition” fifteen years ago, we had
no idea just how fitting the name would become...
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
Ignition’s industry-leading technology,
unlimited licensing model, and army of
certified integration partners have ignited
a SCADA revolution that has many of
the world’s biggest industrial companies
transforming their enterprises from the
plant floor up.
TRUSTED BY
Future-Ready
Industrial Wi-Fi
Empower industrial applications with wireless connectivity, no matter
how challenging the environment or how rugged the requirements are.
Deploy Moxa industrial wireless solutions for tough situations that need
a fast, reliable, and secure network experience now and tomorrow.
Scan or Click to
Learn More
AWK-1165C AWK-1161A
802.11ax Wireless Client
Compact Industrial
Wi-Fi 6 AP/Client
Connect with Us
+1-888-MOXA-USA info.us@moxa.com
+1-714-528-6777 www.moxa.com
OCTOBER 2024 | VOL 71, ISSUE 4
FEATURES
SMART MANUFACTURING
16 Total Automation:
The Next Frontier Is
Sensor-to-Cloud
By Jack Smith
Building an all-inclusive approach to
the entire process automation strategy
of a manufacturing enterprise.
STANDARDS
22 Document Projects
Consistently with
the Updated ISA5.1
Standard
By Jim Federlein, PE
A new release of this widely used ISA
standard adds content and improves
readability.
DIGITAL TWINS
26 A Roadmap for
Improved Simulation ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
SM
2025
Media Planner
Editorial and advertising offices are at 3252 S. Miami Boulevard, Suite 102, Durham, NC 27703; phone 919-549-8411;
email info@isa.org.
InTech digital magazine is published 4x per year: February, April, October, October. ISA Members receive InTech digital magazine as
part of their annual membership and get access to archived issues. Non-members can subscribe to InTech and InTech Plus newsletters
through ISA’s automation news and information subsidiary, Automation.com. InTech and the ISA logo are registered trademarks of ISA.
Trademarks used in this digital magazine are the property of their respective owners. Opinions expressed or implied are those of
the persons or organizations contributing the information and are not to be construed as those of ISA.
256 colors
Individually selectable:
Measurement in progress
Sensor switching
Process malfunction
Compact design
15 cm
Hygienic
adapter system
Adjustment via
smartphone
$518
VEGABAR 39 Clamp 1"
www.vega.com/vegabar
YOUR TICKET TO
COLLISION PROTECTION
Win a 3D safety sensor!
Register by 11/3/24
With a 3D time-of-flight
camera, you gain new perspectives.
Like 3D environment perception that
detects objects above the protective field
of a safety laser scanner. Enter to win the
safeVisionary2 from SICK, and your vehicles will be
one step closer to increased safety and availability.
The ISA Interchange blog has been around answer. This makes Mimo a richer and more
for more than 15 years. Upgraded in 2019, relevant resource for automation professionals
it has hosted a wide range of subject matter than ChatGPT or similar services. If you are
experts over the years. One of its longest-run- not an ISA member, or if you aren’t logged in,
ning components is the “Ask the Automation you’ll get a short and to-the-point answer. For
Pros” series. Monthly, ISA Fellow and 2010 more details and source files, log in to your
ISA Life Achievement Award recipient Greg member account or join ISA.
Levitating 6D
planar movers motion
Scalable Velocities
kg payload up to 2 m/s
www.beckhoff.com/xplanar
Elevate your automation game with XPlanar. Developed in-house by Beckhoff, this mechatronic
system makes your material handling literally fly with magnetically levitating movers and base tiles
that you can arrange to fit your unique applications – automated warehouses, distribution centers,
microfulfillment, pharmaceutical fulfillment, material handling in manufacturing and beyond.
So, what will you do with XPlanar?
Movement and handling with up to 6 degrees of freedom
Transport and processing in one system
Wear-free, hygienic and easy to clean
Create nearly any layout and path you can imagine
Multi-mover control enables parallel and individual product handling
Fully integrated into the powerful and standardized Beckhoff control system
(TwinCAT, IEC 61131, Motion, Measurement, Machine Learning, Vision, Communication, HMI)
Flexibly change paths in software and easily modify shape, size, and number of movers
IIOT INSIGHTS | WHERE THE INTERNET MEETS INDUSTRY
Several asset monitoring and inventory man- IoT-powered devices, sensors and cameras
agement challenges impact an enterprise’s throughout their supply chain which enables
supply chain efficiency. Collecting real-time remote and automated monitoring of various
data on asset location and condition on a asset conditions in real time. In previous
consistent basis is difficult without the proper generations of IoT, supply chain managers
technology infrastructure in place. Without would then analyze the data collected from
timely guidance and accurate intelligence, their IoT deployments to laboriously uncover
informed decision-making for successful actionable insights. However, now with the
supply chain operations is almost impossible. use of AI-driven analysis and leveraging
Optimizing asset and inventory management of ML models, organizations are unlocking
is crucial for reducing errors in inventory trends and patterns in inventory usage that
levels and avoiding out-of-stock and over- automagically enhance demand forecasting
stock situations. accuracy, reduce excess stock and minimize
Scalability issues pose another common out-of-stocks.
challenge. As inventories spanning multiple IoT sensing capabilities collect critical
locations, countries and continents become
data on the location and condition of an as-
larger and more globalized, the technology
set during transportation and storage while
platforms used to manage the value chain
reporting other variables such as light,
must scale accordingly. Unsurprisingly,
impact, temperature, humidity, vibration,
research from SAP found that 52% of busi-
etc. If an asset isn’t where it’s supposed to
ness leaders believe their supply chain needs
be or if any of these defined parameters
improvement. To overcome asset and inven-
exceed or dip below established thresholds,
tory challenges and bolster supply chains,
the IoT system will automatically notify the
companies must leverage advanced technolo-
pre-determined employee at the precise
gies and best security practices including the
time, empowering them to respond quickly
internet of things (IoT), integrated workflows
with corrective action before an issue
and real-time prescriptive analytics powered
results in inventory loss.
by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine
learning (ML). For example, an edge-to-cloud IoT solution
using fever tags for cattle monitoring tracks
Producing real-time intelligence the health of thousands of individual cattle
Enterprises optimize their asset and inven- which helps ranchers to identify, isolate and
tory management by strategically deploying treat sick cows before they infect the herd.
replace a battery. 40
YEAR
OPERATING
LIFE *
EtherCAT®
positioning
Advanced
motion
control
Pulse
positioning
PID PID Σ
Built-in & IN OUT
expansion
With the LS Electric XGB PLC by AutomationDirect, I/O
you can say “YES!” to...
High-
Advanced motion control with up to 400 moves per axis and various single- and multi-axis speed HS I/O
operations including position and speed control, helical interpolation, and ellipse interpolation I/O
FREE IEC programming with structured text, ladder logic, and more
Multiple networking options including EtherNet/IP, Modbus TCP and RTU, and ASCII
USB
EtherCAT support for precise, real-time motion control
High-density I/O (up to 32 points embedded on CPU and select I/O expansion modules)
High-speed I/O (integrated 2- or 6-axis pulse/direction motion inputs/outputs (up to 200kHz)
on the CPU module, and up to 4 channels of high-speed inputs at up to 500kHz on each Ethernet
high-speed counter module)
FREE award-winning service and technical support
NEW! LS Electric 2-axis and Relay Output XGB PLC Models RS-485
Three new LS Electric XGB PLC models have been released RS-232
providing advanced control at an even lower cost.
• Two new 16-point 2-axis PLC versions support pulse/direction control
from the embedded I/O, featuring 4 high-speed inputs and 2 high-speed CPU with
outputs, as well as EtherCAT motion using EtherCAT expansion modules. 2-axis control, only:
$279.00
• New relay output PLC provides 8 inputs, 4 of which offer high-speed
capability, and 6 relay outputs supporting up to 2A per point. This PLC
version can also support EtherCAT motion using the optional EtherCAT
expansion modules.
Total Automation:
The Next Frontier Is Sensor to Cloud
Users need guidance to deploy sensors
appropriately. A new standard may be the answer.
Mustard shared some examples of the use z Level 1: Use of IIoT to collect remote sen-
of these technologies to move toward total sor data; use of AI or ML to maintain cali-
automation: bration and report on sensor discrepancies.
z Level 2: Use of AI in expert systems sup-
z Using ML to automatically analyze images
porting operator decision making.
to detect corrosion or other defects to
z Level 3: Use of AI to optimize production
reduce the time and effort involved in
schedules and analyze machinery health.
manual analysis and improve accuracy and
z Level 4: Use of big data analytics, AI,
reliability by the removal of human bias.
and cloud to automate business decision
z Using IIoT to automatically collect sensor
making.
data to remove the need for manual data
“Through all layers, the objective of total
collection.
automation is to use disruptive technology
z Using AI to analyze sensor data to look for
to streamline and automate all processes,”
patterns that are not obvious to humans to
Mustard said.
reduce unplanned downtime.
Brandl agrees that a total automation
The need for a total standard would apply to all layers of the
automation standard ISA 95 model (Figure 1). “Layer 2 is covered
The industry already has ISA95. But how
by existing ISA and automation standards.
would a total automation standard fit the
Layer 1 is partially covered by the standards
various levels of the ISA95 model?
on maintenance and security (automated
According to Mustard, total automation calibration, automated cleaning, automated
applies to all ISA95 levels: alignment, automated error detection, etc.).
Layer 3 is mostly covered by ISA 99, 95, and mechanical gauges should be replaced by
88. The concept of interoperable distributed sensors, where submetering is required, or
workflows helps fill in some of the missing what update period to set,” according to the
pieces, in my opinion,” he said. justification document. “A standard could help
Brandl and Mustard support the proposal plants—especially process plants. It would
of a new standard, or at least a revision to, or also make ISA more relevant in the digital
tion was submitted for the evaluation of such There seems to be a gap in the standards
a standard that lays out some considerations. with little to guide people in identifying,
users need guidance in deploying sensors ties. Some examples may repurpose the data
appropriately throughout their plants. from existing sensors, while others require
“However, there are many equipment cat- new sensors. For the former, it is critical that
egories to cover and if we try add sensors to the additional dependencies be documented.
everything, we will never finish. A good start There are not any existing standards that
would be common asset types like pumps are relevant to the use of this technology,
and heat exchangers found in all plants. More or that must be followed in its application,
equipment types and other positions could according to the justification document. “It
be included in subsequent revisions or other could be somewhat related to ASME PTC,
sections. We could start with common asset which defines equations using data because
types like pumps and heat exchangers found the proposed standard will help users get the
in all plants. More equipment types and other right data. API670 is limited to vibration. The
positions can [be included In] subsequent proposed standard would be far broader in
revisions or other sections.” scope because it would automate all manual
Whether total automation, digital transfor- measurements (automate corrosion, acoustic
mation, Industry 4.0, or IIoT, getting real-time noise [leaks], mechanical gauges, and clip-
data begins with the sensors. “Users don’t boards). API682 is limited to pump seals. The
always know what to sense, what sensors [proposed] standard would be far broader in
are required on each equipment type, what scope.”
“There are not really any models or other The technology that supports a proposed
architecture-related information that helps standard does not define an architecture
to understand the technology and its ap- per se. It does, however, imply a definite
plication.” “The standard would recommend increased sensor count—more sensors in
sensors—not how these sensors are architec- existing architectures. Sensors are selected,
turally connected. These are sensors ‘beyond installed, configured, and supported by
the P&ID’—not for process monitoring or instrument and control personnel, many of
control. This would be related to the NAMUR whom are members of ISA.
NE175 standard; it is for equipment perfor-
In addition, this standard will make plants
mance and condition monitoring. In addition,
more sustainable. By using the appropriate
it would also be related to sustainability like
sensors, collected data would detect and
energy management, WAGES [water, air, gas,
pinpoint energy overconsumption, emis-
electric, and steam] submetering for EMIS,
sions, and equipment inefficiency. It could
and emissions monitoring like relief valves,
monitor cleaning optimization and help
flaring, and methane. It would also support
reduce flaring. Downtime would be reduced
equipment performance monitoring. It would
due to more predictive maintenance, failure
also fit nicely in the various layers in the
prediction, and reduced loss of containment.
ISA95 model. There are not really any other
Plants will be safer because of reduced
technologies related to a proposed total
human error, and fewer manual valves and
automation standard. The standard should
leaks. Finally, automating existing manual
recommend what sensors to deploy on each
data collection will enable plants to be more
type of equipment and in other places. It
productive.
would not define sensor or signal transmis-
sion. However, most sensors will be wireless
Looking ahead
using IEC62591 or other methods.”
Brandl said the concept of a “digital com-
The technology behind a proposed total au- panion” has started in the medical field. A
tomation standard drives functionality, which digital companion provides personalized
enables how it would be applied. Application assistance. “We need a digital assistant for
areas include (but are not limited to): everyone performing manufacturing opera-
z Reliability/maintenance of rotating equip- tions management tasks, either on the shop
ment, valves, etc. floor or in the production back office. A
z Integrity (corrosion/erosion) of piping and digital assistant that looks over your shoul-
vessels. der would manage your tasks, make remind-
z Safety (including health and environment): ers, bring up relevant information, record
safety showers, manual valves, etc. completions, walk you through manual
z Production/quality would require sensors steps in processes, and collect information
in place of mechanical gauges. from equipment; it is truly mobile. We
already have a name for it: Manufacturing productivity effectiveness (PPE) is the human
operations management [MOM]. But it’s equivalent of overall equipment effectiveness
your personal MOM, loaded with your tasks (OEE),” he said.
and schedules,” he said.
Standards require consensus. With so
Brandl advocates performance manage- many things to gain, and nothing to lose, total
ment—measuring and improving indi- automation stands to take automated manu-
vidual processes—for all activities. “Personal facturing to the next level.
SEA-240013 Sealevel Flexio Print Ad InTech Digital 8.5 x 5.5.pdf 1 4/1/24 9:34 AM
Document
Projects
Consistently
with the
Updated ISA5.1
Standard
In project documents used to specify, devices. They are concise and function as
purchase, track, install and maintain instru- a specific means of communication for all
mentation and control system components, types and kinds of technical, engineering,
consistency is important. The International procurement, construction and maintenance
Society of Automation (ISA) has long known documents. This includes identification
that and promoted such consistency through schemes and graphic symbols for drawings
its standards. Seventy-five years after it was and documentation systems used in the
first introduced, ISA has published an update construction and maintenance of industrial
of its most widely used and internation- plants, including instrumentation and control
ally recognized standard: ANSI/ISA-5.1: diagrams, loop diagrams, electrical schematics
Instrumentation and Control -Symbols and and functional and binary logic diagrams.
Identification.
A common misconception is that this
The symbols and identification methods standard is a piping and instrument diagram
set forth in the standard are intended as con- (P&ID) standard. Although it does cover the
ceptualizing aids, design tools and teaching instrumentation and control portion of P&IDs
and process flow diagrams (PFDs), it does resulted in the evolution from a hardware
not cover the piping, mechanical and other (instruments)-centric standard to a hardware/
aspects of these drawings. software (automation)-centric standard.
Key elements of ISA5.2-1976: “Binary Logic
A long and proud history Diagrams for Process Operations” were in-
The symbols and identification systems corporated. Binary logic symbols of Scientific
described in this standard accommodate Apparatus Makers Association (SAMA) PMC
advances in technology and reflect the col- 22.1-1981: “Functional Diagramming of
lective industrial experience gained since the Instrument and Control Systems” were also
original 1949 ISA recommended practice, RP- incorporated. Graphic symbol dimension
5.1, was revised, affirmed and subsequently tables were incorporated to establish mini-
published as ANSI/ISA5.1-1984. The 1949 mum mandatory dimensions for the symbols.
recommended practice and the 1984 stan-
Nonmandatory examples were moved to
dard were published as nonmandatory rather
a new Annex B: “Graphic symbol guidelines”
than as mandatory consensus documents.
(Informative) to provide some limited as-
The 1992 revision was published with sistance in the application or were removed
mandatory and nonmandatory requirements. for inclusion into future technical reports to
It incorporated key elements of ISA5.3-1983: provide special practices and requirements
“Graphic Symbols for Distributed Control/ of particular interest groups and/or specific
Shared Display Instrumentation, Logic, and industries.
Computer Systems.”
A significant change was to clarify the
The 2009 revision was published with meaning of the symbols circle-in-square
significant changes as technological advances and diamond-in-square. Previously, these
This example of the application of the standard is representative of the ISA standard and the two
companion technical reports, ISA TR5.1.02 and ISA TR5.1.03. Source: Figure 6 from ISA TR5.1.03.
ABOUT ISA
The International Society of Automation (ISA) is a nonprofit professional association founded in 1945
to create a better world through automation. ISA’s mission is to empower the global automation com-
munity through standards and knowledge sharing. ISA develops widely used global standards and con-
formity assessment programs; certifies professionals; provides education and training; publishes books
and technical articles; hosts conferences and exhibits; and provides networking and career develop-
ment programs for its members and customers around the world. Learn more at www.isa.org.
Today’s process manufacturers face a wide ar- them. New personnel are in short supply, and
ray of new complexities. An expanding global even when they are available, they take years
marketplace has made it more important than to upskill to a level where they can meet the
ever to increase efficiency and competitive- performance of their predecessors.
ness, while global events and trends continu- Further complicating the worker shortage
ally shift, making it harder to achieve those are new trends in the workforce, with mod-
goals. Many organizations around the globe ern plants seeing a trend of more transient
are facing a critical shortage of experienced workers. Gone are the days when an operator
workers. Plant engineers and operators are would sign on and stay for 30 years. Today’s
retiring at an unmatched pace, taking years or talent is typically ready to move to a new role,
even decades of institutional knowledge with or even a new location, in fewer than five
years. This is often less time than it takes to evaluate and validate process and automation
fully train them. Furthermore, today’s orga- designs, as well as enabling safer testing with
nizations are finding it hard to attract anyone improved results to help teams more easily
at all unless they offer modern working meet or even shorten project schedules.
environments. The new generation of workers
Yet even after project completion, simula-
was raised on digital technologies, and they
tion software continues to deliver value
expect to see those same capabilities in their
across its lifecycle. Dynamic simulation tools
workplace to help them learn more quickly,
provide the best possible training platform for
make better decisions and collaborate more
new operators, providing them the opportu-
effectively.
nity to work with systems that look, feel and
Global pressure to drive increased sustain- respond exactly like the controls they will use
ability while increasing performance is adding every day. These training simulations can be
additional complexity. Most teams must not built, deployed and used well before equip-
only focus on increasing production but also ment ever arrives onsite, ensuring operators
on doing so while reducing emissions and are ready to perform at their best on the very
curbing excessive energy use. Meeting those first day of operation. These simulations can
goals often means innovating on traditional then continue to be used to train new hires
operations—a big ask with fewer experienced throughout operations.
people and significantly reduced resources.
Dynamic simulation tools also provide a
To meet these challenges, simulation test bed where operations teams can test
software can be a game changer, but only if a new equipment, strategies, and configura-
project team approaches it thoughtfully. While tions to help them increase performance and
it is possible to build one-off simulations for drive more sustainable operations, without
each project and operational need, the result interrupting or risking operation of the plant.
will be costly and difficult to maintain. A better With the right simulation software in place,
solution is to evaluate simulation at every the dynamic simulation can be continually
stage of a project, building a cohesive simula- synchronized with the changing plant to
tion roadmap that will meet the organization’s ensure it is always available to empower
needs at every stage and continue to deliver operators and enhance the way they work to
value well after operations commence. meet their ever-changing goals.
different types of simulation software, and Leveraging these high-fidelity models, the
they all must be paired strategically. The earli- team will develop their final visions for plant
est stages of project engineering will typically operations, define their operating philosophy,
require steady-state models. In the pre-front- set the project strategy and then use those
end engineering and design (PreFEED) stage, elements to continue to develop and validate
project teams will typically build a simplified their core process designs.
steady-state simulation they can use for the
As the team moves into project execution,
conceptualization of the plant.
their simulation needs will change. The team
These models have limited details, only will begin working with dynamic simulation
providing the general parameters of the software to execute detailed design, where
design of the plant the team wants to build. they develop the automation system and
Such a simulation might work in tandem begin testing procedures and controls, tune
with a capital cost estimator—effectively its control loops and eventually enter the com-
own style of simulation—to gather estimates missioning and training stage. Each of these
and calculations for what each element of elements can be performed on the simulation
construction might cost, allowing the team software to reduce risk and shorten time to
to scale certain elements up or down to stay full production.
within budget. Teams at this stage might
After project execution, the organization
even work with Monte Carlo simulation tools
will continue to use and update its dynamic
to see how different economic factors will
simulation, both to extend training new and
impact their design.
experienced operators as roles change, and
Later, in the FEED stage, the project as a test bed to define and test new operat-
team will further refine its steady-state ing strategies to unlock constant innovation
model using high-fidelity simulation software. (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Dynamic
simulation can be used
to train operators and
test control strategies
in the control room or
even in the field.
many purposes as possible to maximize its and far more easily managed long term in
Figure 2. Simulation software allows users to quickly develop high-fidelity simulations using configurable
dynamic models of process unit operations.
the simulation might need to be high fidelity. Solutions built for success
However, that same high-fidelity bioreac- Whether an organization still has a deep
tor model might be in a training simulation bench of experienced operators or is trying
with many other low- and medium-fidelity to onboard a new generation of workers
elements as well. Every model that can be with limited experience, finding a safe
created in lower fidelity reduces the number way to test, train and tune new processes
of complex interconnections in the simulation is critical. New workers will need to gain
(Figure 2). experience as quickly as possible if the plant
hopes to meet the necessary performance
Dynamic simulation software with the
benchmarks dictated by competition in a
capability to easily incorporate high, medium
global economy.
and low fidelity empowers teams to custom-
ize their solution to the unique specifications Conversely, even experienced workers will
of their process. By eliminating unnecessary have to learn many new operating procedures
interconnections, teams reduce the likelihood (on very different, and often more complex
that the simulation will be too hard to main- equipment than they are used to) if they hope
tain as variables change due to equipment to help their plant meet new sustainability
swap-outs, degradation, fouling, or other benchmarks and comply with regulations.
changes. In either case, operators need a risk-free
Figure 3. As
operations become
more complex, plant
personnel will need
increasing access to
safe ways to learn
and test innovative
operations strategies.
Simulation will
be central to this
capability.
environment to learn, test and innovate. Such drive fast return on investment and continu-
an environment cannot be provided on live ous value over the lifecycle of the facility,
equipment (Figure 3). from the earliest stages of design, through
automation development and startup, and
Fortunately, today’s multipurpose steady-
even throughout operations as they change
state and multi-fidelity dynamic simulation
over the years. The key is selecting an inte-
tools are up to the task. Modern, best-in-class
grated solution upfront that is designed for
simulation tools offer the flexibility to meet
the unique needs of every stage.
the dynamic environment of today’s plants.
They also include the features necessary to All figures courtesy of Emerson
How to Harness
Applied AI in Industrial
Manufacturing
By Michael J. Anthony, Jon A. Mills, and
David C. Mazur, Ph.D.
sectors are facing unprecedented levels of 2030. However, properly using AI in automa-
pressure. These pressures include increasing tion and manufacturing environments re-
demand for products, large backlogs due to quires first understanding some key concepts.
supply shortages from the COVID-19 pan-
demic and significant labor shortages due to How NLP solves the data
lack of skillset ready to enter these markets. problem
Natural language processing (NLP), a field at the
Due to the difficulty of hiring and retaining
intersection of computer science and linguistics,
talent and the skills gap shortage, businesses
has evolved significantly from its preliminary
need to turn to alternatives to help ease the
pressures they are facing. Many manufactur- concepts in 17th-century philosophy to its
ers turned to robotics to help solve the labor formal establishment with the dawn of comput-
challenges with various levels of success. ing in the 1940s. These early ideas laid the
groundwork for machine translation and the
first computational models of language.
There is much opportunity to use The field has seen steady progression, with
early rule-based (symbolic) methods being sup-
applied AI in manufacturing, but
plemented by statistical models and eventually
along with that opportunity come overtaken by today’s advanced neural network
many challenges. approaches. Among the most transformative
neural network architectures for NLP is the
“transformer,” introduced in the seminal paper
“Attention is All You Need” under the umbrella
A second problem that manufacturers are
of Google’s research initiatives in 2017.
attempting to solve is the data problem. With
computing and processing costs at the lowest Transformers have laid the foundation for
levels ever, data from devices and equipment the diverse array of NLP-powered AI now be-
is more prevalent. Manufacturers are strug- ing developed across the technology sector.
gling on their digital journeys with how to From compact models designed for budget
consume the growing volumes of data they’re devices to enormous architectures operating
producing. Extracting insights to drive useful on cutting-edge cloud computing resources,
outcomes is not easy. the scope and application of NLP models
The solution for many manufacturers is ap- have never been broader. Rather than only
plied AI. The impact of applied AI is promising being present in research fields, this is offered
in industrial automation and manufacturing. in forms that are relevant to industry adop-
A major consulting firm has estimated that tion or hyper-specific domain-bound tasks.
An analytics module uses AI to detect production anomalies and alert workers so they can investigate or
intervene, as necessary.
Applied AI example in
industrial automation
Building on the discussion of prompt injection
techniques, such as retrieval-augmented gen-
eration (RAG), an experiment was conducted
to evaluate their efficacy in improving model
accuracy and reducing instances of generated
hallucinations. The authors used the GPT-
3.5-turbo model developed by OpenAI for
this investigation, structuring our prompts to
solicit specific information. The initial prompt
was constructed as follows:
To address this variation in response, the With this additional context, a subsequent
authors performed a second trial, introducing a set of 10,000 queries yielded only 19 unique
JSON object into the system context, derived responses. The majority appropriately identi-
directly from the relevant source material: fied the alarm as shown in Table 2.
{
Precharge Open Alarm 7,808
“Condition Type”: “Alarm 2”,
Precharge Open Alm 1,742
“Condition Code”: “10041\n11041”,
Precharge Open 344
“Display Text”:
“PrechargeOpenAlm”, PrechargeOpenAlm 44
Precharge Open Alrm 29
“Full Text”: “Precharge Open Alarm”,
Precharge Open Alar 12
“Fault”: “The internal precharge-
circuity-bypass relay (for drives) Precharge Open Alarm. 11
or main contactor (for CBIs) was
commanded to open while the drive
Precharge Open - Alarm 3
was stopped (PWM was not active) The name of alarm 10041 2
due to low DC bus voltage.”, on the PowerFlex 755T is
“Precharge Open Alarm”.
“Action”: “Investigate low DC bus
voltage or the reason the drive Precharge Open-Drive Stopped 2
entered precharge.”,
Table 2. Responses from the contextual prompt.
“Fault Action”: “—”,
ing requires properly understanding key con- that opportunity come many challenges. We are
cepts and using necessary contextual data in AI in an exciting time to see how this evolves.
A trip through past issues of InTech reveals a control means adjusting multiple single-loop
wealth of resources for understanding closed- controllers in unison to meet constraint
loop control fundamentals. control and optimization objectives of an
additional set of related process variables.
As I wrote in my August 2023 InTech article
Multivariable control is a central aspect of
on temperature measurement and control
nearly every industrial process operation.”
fundamentals, “Automatic control in continu-
ous processes uses industrial control systems While Kern’s article delves into more
to achieve a production level of consistency, complex subject matter that most of our read-
economy, and safety that could not be ers are familiar with, APC and multivariable
achieved by human manual control only. It control still depend on single-loop controllers.
is implemented widely in industries such as Understanding the fundamentals and/or re-
oil refining, pulp and paper manufacturing, viewing the basics can be beneficial to techni-
chemical processing, and power generating cians and operators who need a refresher.
plants, to name a few. The “big four” process
control parameters are temperature, pressure,
flow, and level.”
“APC continues to rely on the
Although that article was primarily about
lowly flow control loop, the most
controlling temperature, closed-loop control basic single-loop control, as the
concepts are fundamentally the same. Only
best rejector of unmeasured
the sensors and processes are changed.
disturbances and the most
Allan Kern, PE has 35 years of industrial
process automation experience and has
stable platform for the APC/
authored dozens of papers on more practical, optimization control hierarchy.”
reliable, and sustainable advanced process
control solutions. Kern helps companies
Jim Ford’s article in June 2019 InTech
improve process efficiency, quality, and
describes how single-loop control is still the
profits on-site or with online consulting
mainstay of advanced process control. He
complementing in-house resources, helping
says, “Today, even after 50 years, APC con-
bridge a skill shortage at many sites. He is the
tinues to rely on the lowly flow control loop,
founder of APC Performance LLC.
the most basic single-loop control, as the best
In his Feb. 2019 InTech article, Kern wrote, rejector of unmeasured disturbances and the
“Advanced process control (APC) refers pri- most stable platform for the APC/optimiza-
marily to multi-variable control. Multivariable tion control hierarchy.”
Again, although Ford was writing about into a strong standardized signal and transmit
flow, the concepts still apply to the other it to a control system. Sophisticated transmit-
three of the big four. ters can perform diagnostics on the sensor
to determine if there is degradation of the
It starts with the sensor actual element. The transmitter connects to
Process control parameter measurements the control system to provide the process
start with the sensor. The aforementioned variable (PV) measurements.
temperature control uses thermocouples,
Maintaining a digital signal to the control
resistance temperature detectors (RTDs),
system maximizes accuracy. Digital com-
and associated transducers and transmitters.
munications avoid the errors of converting
Pressure measurement requires pressure
the digital signal to analog 4-20 mA on both
transducers, flow requires flowmeters, and
the transmitter end and the control system
level requires a level measurement system.
end. Digital options include HART, Modbus,
Much can be—and has been—written on each
Profibus, and FOUNDATION Fieldbus.
of these technologies.
Accuracy and stability are fundamental
A transducer converts a physical phe-
traits of any process measurement. Although
nomenon into an electrical signal. In effect,
closed-loop control can be accomplished in
thermocouples and RTDs are types of trans-
many ways with many technologies, such
ducers. The use of the term is more common
as programmable logic controllers (PLCs)
in flow and pressure control.
or distributed control systems (DCSs), this
Transmitters convey a measured signal to article assumes a stand-alone single-loop
a control device. The signal coming directly controller (Figure 1). This theoretical con-
from the sensor is at a low level. The job of troller includes a signal processing front
a transmitter is to convert the sensor output end that converts low-level input from the
Courtesy: AutomationDirect