6.indifference Curve
6.indifference Curve
           TABLE OF CONTENTS
           1. Learning Outcomes
           2. Introduction
           3. Consumer Preferences
           4. Indifference Curves and Indifference Map
           5. Marginal Rate of Substitution
                 5.1 Principle of Diminishing MRS
                 5.2 Marginal Rate of Substitution and Marginal Utility
           6. Properties of Indifference Curves
           7. Exceptional Shapes of Indifference Curves
                  7.1 Perfect Substitutes and Perfect Complements
                  7.2 Good, Bad and Neutral commodities
           8. Summary
           2. Introduction
           Indifference curve analysis is a very popular method used to explain consumer behavior. The
           technique of indifference curve was first invented by Edgeworth (1881) and then by Fischer (1892).
           Later on the Italian economist Pareto (1906) put it to extensive use and the results were
           subsequently extended by Soviet economist Slutsky (1915).
           We have already explained the concepts of cardinal and ordinal utility theories. Modern
           indifference curve approach uses the concept of ordinal utility. The indifference curve analysis
           assumes that the consumer have complete information about all the aspects of economic
           environment. Further, the consumer is assumed to act rationally, so given the money income and
           prices of goods, he will choose the combination from among various alternatives that gives him
           maximum satisfaction.
           3. Consumer Preferences
           Preference means choosing one alternative over others. To analyze the preferences under two
           dimensional set up, the commodities, which a consumer can buy, can be divided into two groups
           as good X and good Y. The consumer’s choice among various alternatives depends upon his
           preferences, that is, the ranking he gives to various alternatives. Other factors, for example income
           and prices also influence his choice of an alternative. In indifference curve approach of consumer
           behavior, certain important assumptions about the nature of consumer’s preference are the
           following.
               1. Completeness: Under this assumption, the consumer is capable of comparing all the
                   alternative combinations and ranks them according to utility. Given two bundles P and Q,
                   he can decide whether he prefers P to Q, Q to P or he is indifferent between the two.
               2. Transitivity: Transitivity of preference means that if a person prefers a combination P to
                   Q and also prefers Q to R, then he will prefer P to R. Thus transitivity implies that
                   consumer’s taste and preferences are consistent.
           4. Indifference Curves
           An indifference curve represents the various alternative combinations of two commodities, which
           give the same level of satisfaction to the consumer – so the consumer is ‘indifferent’ between these
           combinations. The indifference curve is a graphical representation of indifference schedule, where
           all the alternative combination of commodities gives exactly the same satisfaction level or utility
           to the consumer. To explain it further, consider the example below:
Table 1
           The given table shows that the consumer is indifferent between the given five alternative
           combinations (P, Q, R, S and T) of two goods (X and Y). When all the combinations are represented
           in the form of a graph, we obtain an indifference curve as shown in the figure 1.
           Note, as we move down the indifference curve, an increase in quantity of good X is offset by a
           decrease in quantity of good Y, so as to maintain the same level of satisfaction along the curve.
            One indifference curve shows consumption bundles providing single level of satisfaction. We can
           now think of different indifference curves for each given satisfaction level. In fact, we can draw
           any number of indifference curves representing different level of utility. An indifference map is the
           whole set of indifference curves representing the consumer’s taste and preferences (figure 2).
           Higher indifference curve showing greater quantities of both commodities represent higher
           satisfaction levels as ‘more is better’. On the other hand lower indifference curves showing lesser
           quantities represents a lower satisfaction level.
           In the above diagram indifference curve shown as IC1 represents the lowest satisfaction level while
           the curve IC4 represents the highest satisfaction level. Along any given indifference curve the level
           of satisfaction remains same at all points.
           When a consumer moves from point P to Q on this indifference curve he sacrifices ΔY for ΔX and
           remains at the same satisfaction level. This means the marginal rate of substitution of X for Y
           (MRSX,Y) is ΔY/ ΔX (=PA/AQ).
           Now, if the points P and Q are very close, the values of ΔY and ΔX will be very small. Then the
           MRSX,Y will be given by the slope of the tangent to the indifference curve at that point (Figure 5).
           In our example (table 1) we observe that, when the consumer moves from point P to T, he does not
           have to sacrifice same amount of good Y for each extra unit of good X. Rather, he sacrifices lesser
           and lesser amount of commodity Y for each extra unit of X as he moves towards point T. This
           behavior of the consumer is said to be satisfying the principle of diminishing marginal rate of
           substitution which says that the MRSX,Y diminishes as more and more good X is substituted for
           It is evident from the figure 4a that, as the consumer move downwards along the IC, the length of
           ΔY becomes shorter and shorter while ΔX is kept the same. Put differently, the MRSX,Y falls as the
           consumer gets more of good X and less of good Y. The diminishing MRSX,Y can also be
           demonstrated by drawing tangents at different points on the same indifference curve. The MRSX,Y
           at any point is given by the slope of the tangent at that point on the indifference curve. It is clear
           from the Figure 4b that the slope of the tangent declines as we go down the indifference curve.
           From the law of diminishing marginal utility we know that, as consumption of X increases, its
           marginal utility decreases. Therefore, the consumer sacrifices lesser amount of good Y for each
           additional unit of good X. Thus MRSX,Y falls when the amount of X is increased.
           It can be shown mathematically that MRSX,Y between two commodities is equal to the ratio of
           marginal utilities of commodities X and Y.
           Since utility on each point of the indifference curve remains the same we can represent an
           indifference curve by
           Where ‘a’ represent the constant utility along indifference curve and x and y are the amount of
           commodities X and Y respectively. Taking total differentiation of (i), we get
                                                   𝜕𝑈      𝜕𝑈
                                                      𝑑𝑥 +    𝑑𝑦 = 0
                                                   𝜕𝑥      𝜕𝑦
∂U/∂x and ∂U/∂y are marginal utilities of goods X and Y respectively. Thus
                                                  𝑑𝑦 𝑀𝑈𝑥
                                              −     =    = 𝑀𝑅𝑆𝑥, 𝑦
                                                  𝑑𝑥 𝑀𝑈𝑦
Thus the MRS between two goods is equal to the ratio between the marginal utility of two goods.
              (1) Indifference curves slope downward to the right: This means that indifference curves
                  are negatively sloped. This follows from the assumption of non-satiation of preferences,
                  that is, more of a good is always preferable to less of that good. Negatively sloped
                  indifference curve shows that an increase in the amount of a good must be accompanied
                  by the decrease in amount of the other, so that satisfaction level remains same.
                  Let us consider a change in combination from point A to point B in a way that the quantity
                  of good X increases, while Y remains same. This will make B more preferable in
                  comparison to the original combination A and therefore the combination A and B will not
                  be on the same indifference curve.
                  Instead, of being negatively sloped if indifference curves were horizontal, the consumer
                  would be indifferent between the above two combinations, point A and point B. But this
                  would violate our assumption of non-satiated preferences, ruling out horizontal
                  indifference curves when the two goods are normal. The situation is illustrated in figure
                  5a.
           Likewise, with two normal goods an indifference curve cannot be represented by a vertical straight
           line (figure 5b) as in this case, combinations A and B yield same satisfaction level having same
           amount of X, but B contains more Y than A. Further, an upward or positively sloped indifference
           curve (figure 5c) means that the combinations A and B yield equal satisfaction, though B contains
           more of goods X and Y. But this cannot be so, if both the goods have positive marginal utilities.
           In all the three situations discussed above, the level satisfaction of the consumer rises, as he moves
           from point A to point B since he starts to consume more of at least one commodity. Therefore
           normal indifference curves cannot be horizontal, vertical or upward sloping. Thus, as a last
           possibility, an indifference curve must be downward sloping as shown in figure 5d. Negatively
           sloped indifference curve indicates that, for a consumer to get same satisfaction level from various
           combinations, as the quantity of good X is increased, the quantity of Y must be reduced.
              (2) Indifference curves are convex to the origin: indifference curves are usually convex to
                  the origin which means that the left portion of an indifference curve is relatively steeper
                  while the right portion is relatively flatter. Thus, with movement from left to right, down
                  the indifference curve the value of its slope (absolute) declines. This property of the
                  indifference curve follows from the principle of diminishing marginal rate of substitution
                  discussed in section 5.1. A convex shaped indifference satisfies the condition of
                  diminishing MRSX,Y as is clear from the figures 6a where, as the consumer moves down
                  along the IC from A to F, he gives up lesser and lesser amount of Y for each additional unit
                  of X. This is because, when the consumer reduces his consumption of good Y while
                  increasing his consumption of good X, the urge for more units of X declines continuously,
                  making the consumer sacrifice fewer Y for each extra unit of X. Instead, if the indifference
                  curve was concave this would imply that MRSX,Y increases as more and more units of X
                  are substituted for Y.
                  It is clear from figure 7 that, for each extra unit of good X, the consumer is ready to sacrifice
                  more and more quantity of Y, that is, MRSX,Y increases as more quantity of good X is
                  substituted for good Y. Thus, an indifference curve that is concave to the origin violates
                  the principle of diminishing marginal rate of substitution. Therefore, in the presence of
                  diminishing marginal rate of substitution, we cannot have concave indifference curves.
              (3) Two indifference curves cannot intersect or touch each other: Intersection of two
                  indifference curves, representing two different levels of satisfaction, is not possible. This
                  property follows from the assumptions of transitivity and non-satiation of preferences. This
                  property can be proved through the method of contradiction. Suppose two indifference
                  curves intersect (or touch) each other at point P (figure 8 and 9). Now consider point A on
                  indifference curve IC1 and point B on IC2 which is vertically above point A. Consumer will
                  be indifferent between combinations A and P since both are lying on the indifference curve
                  IC1. Further, the combinations B and P will provide equal utility to the consumer as they
                  both lie on same indifference curve IC2. Applying transitivity assumption, it follows that
                  the combination A will be equivalent to B in terms of satisfaction. But combination B lies
                  on a higher indifference curve and contains more of good Y than combination A while the
                  amount of X is same in both the combinations. Thus, the consumer will definitely prefer B
                  to A if the assumption of non-satiation of preferences holds. But the intersection of two
                  indifference curves leads to a conclusion of A being equal to B in terms of utility or
                  satisfaction which is not possible. Therefore it can be concluded that the indifference
                  curves cannot intersect or touch each other.
              (4) Higher indifference curves represent higher level of satisfaction: A higher indifference
                  curve will represent a higher satisfaction level than a lower indifference curve. Put
                  differently, the combinations lying on higher indifference curve will provide greater
                  satisfaction than the combinations lying on lower indifference curve. In the figure 10, IC2
                  is a higher indifference curve than IC1. Therefore, the combination B which lies on
                  indifference curve IC2 will provide the consumer more satisfaction than combination A
                  which lies on IC1. This is because the combination B contains more of both commodities
                  X and Y than the combinations A. Applying the assumption of non-satiety, the consumer
                  must prefer B to A. Now, using transitivity assumption it can be said that the consumer
                  will prefer any combinations on IC2 to any combination on IC1. We therefore conclude that
                  a higher indifference curve represents a higher level of satisfaction.
           Two commodities are said to be perfect substitute, if one good can be substituted for the other good
           at a constant rate. Put differently, the consumer is ready to sacrifice same quantity of one
           commodity for each additional unit of other commodity. This means that the marginal rate of
           substitution between the two commodities is constant and thus the indifference curve is linear. Thus
           a straight line indifference curve implies that MRSXY remains constant as more and more unit of X
           substituted for Y. As explained in figure 11, on a straight line indifference curve consumer is willing
           to give up same amount of Y for each additional unit of X (ΔY1 = ΔY2 = ΔY3 = ΔY4) as more and
           more unit of X substituted for Y. Since MRSXY is equal to the slope of indifference curve at a point
           on it, and because a straight line has same slope throughout, therefore the straight line indifference
           curve will mean the same MRSXY throughout. However, in real life, goods tend to be imperfect
           substitutes and therefore the indifference curves are not normally a straight line.
           Now, we consider the case of perfect complements, which are consumed together in a fixed
           proportion. Perfect complements cannot at all be substituted for each other and are therefore
           marginal rate of substitution between such goods is zero. A consumer needs fixed quantities of both
           the goods (for example left and right shoe) to give him satisfaction. He cannot maintain satisfaction
           by substituting one commodity for the other. In figure 12, the indifference curve for perfectly
           complementary goods will be L-shaped or right angled, with the vertex of L showing the proportion
           in which the two complementary commodities are used. Here the satisfaction level can only be
           If a commodity is ‘good’, more of the commodity is always preferable to less of that commodity.
           We have explained the indifference curves of such commodities which slope downward and are
           convex to the origin. On the contrary, when a commodity is a ‘bad’, more of it will lower the
           consumer’s satisfaction. Such ‘bads’ (for example, pollution) are undesirable and provide disutility
           to the consumer. Therefore the indifference curves in this case assume a different shape. Suppose
           a bad is represented on X-axis and a good is represented on Y-axis, then the indifference curve will
           be positively sloped as shown in figure 13a. This is because, a movement towards the right along
           the indifference curve reduces the consumer’s satisfaction level due to increased consumption of
           ‘bad’ and therefore, to keep his satisfaction level constant, the amount of ‘good’ has to be increased.
           Thus the direction of preference in this case is upward to the left (Figure 13a). If commodity X is
           a ‘good’ and commodity Y is a ‘bad’ the indifference curves are upward sloping to the right as
           shown in figure 13b.
           When commodity X and Y both are ‘bads’ indifference curves will be downward sloping and
           concave to the origin as shown in figure 14. If the consumption of one bad is increased, the
           consumption of other bad must fall so that the fall in satisfaction level due to increase in
           consumption of one bad can be compensated by increase in the satisfaction level due to decrease
           in consumption of other bad. As the consumer goes down the indifference curve absolute slope
           increases and hence the MRSX,Y increases. This means that equal successive increase in the amount
           of X will have to be compensated by more and more reduction in quantity of Y.
           In the case of ‘neuters’ or ‘neutral’ goods the consumer does not care whether he has more or less
           of that commodity. In other words, marginal utility of such commodity is zero and they do not
           provide any satisfaction to the consumer. If a commodity X is a neuter and Y a normal commodity,
           the indifference curves will be horizontal straight lines as shown in the figure 15a indicating that a
           higher satisfaction level can only be achieved from increasing the consumption of the normal good.
           On the other hand, if commodity Y is neuter and commodity X is a normal good, then the
           indifference curves will be vertical straight lines as depicted in figure 15b. In this case, to increase
           the satisfaction and therefore to reach a higher indifference curve, the consumer must acquire more
           of normal good X as commodity Y does not provide any utility to the consumer.
           A commodity may be a ‘good’ up to a point, called the point of satiation and then becomes ‘bad’
           if the consumer is forced to increase his consumption beyond that point. In short, far too much of
           any good may be bad. Let us suppose that the commodity X becomes bad as its consumption
           increases beyond X1 unit and commodity Y becomes bad beyond the quantity Y1. This case is
           represented in figure 16 where circular indifference curves are obtained. Point B represents the
           highest satisfaction level that can be achieved under this condition therefore is the point of satiation
           or bliss. In the figure, different shapes of indifference curves are shown in four possible situations.
           In zone I both commodities are goods and thus the indifference curves have normal shape. In zone
           II, commodity X is a bad and Y is a good and therefore the indifference curves are upward sloping.
           In zone III, X is a good while Y is a bad and shown by upward sloping indifference curves. In zone
           IV both the commodities are bad and thus indifference curves slope downward.
           When the consumer has excess of a commodity (so that it becomes a ‘bad’), his satisfaction can be
           increased by reducing that ‘bad’. For example, the consumer can increase his satisfaction by
           moving from point P to Q. In general, the preference direction of the consumer will be towards
           point B i.e. the closer the consumer is to point B, the better off he is.