Employee
Motivation
CHAPTER 5
MOTIVATIONS STARTS FROM THE INDIVIDUAL
 Motivation means inspiring the personnel/workers/employees with an
 enthusiasm to work for the accomplishment of objectives of the
 organizations.
 An unsatisfied need is the
 starting point of motivation
 process   and   becomes      the
 primary   connection    in   the
 chain of events leading to
 behavior. The unsatisfied need
 leads the individual to execute
 behavior to satisfy the need.
 Attaining the goal satisfies the
 need   and   the   process    of
 motivation is complete.
MOTIVATIONS STARTS FROM THE INDIVIDUAL
One of the major faults people make when trying to motivate others is not
taking their individual needs into concern.
The ideal approach to motivate a person is to know his individual needs
first then present him a reward that either:
     Helps him continue the favorable status he used to live in
     Or present him a reward that would permit him to get away from the
      poor condition he used to live in
  CONTENT APPROACHES
 Motivation is a complex phenomenon.
 Several theories attempt to explain
 how motivation works. In management
 circles, probably the most popular
 explanations of motivations are based
 on the needs of the individual.
CONTENT APPROACHES
 The basic needs model, referred to as content theory of motivation,
 highlights the specific factors that motivate an individual. The content
 approaches center on the factors within the individual which rejuvenate,
 direct, sustain and stop behavior. These approaches try to determine the
 particular needs that motivate or inspire people which have an influence
 on managerial practices.
 They are:   Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Aldefer ’s ERG Theory,
 Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory and McClleland’s Learned Needs Theory.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
 Abraham     Maslow     defined    need    as    a
 physiological or psychological deficiency that
 a person feels the compulsion to satisfy. This
 need can create tensions that can influence’s
 a person’s work attitudes and behaviors.
 Maslow     formed   a   theory    based   on    his
 definition of need that proposes that humans
 are motivated by multiple needs and that
 these needs exist in a hierarchical order. His
 premise is that only an unsatisfied need can
 influence behavior; a satisfied need is not a
 motivator.
Maslow’s
Hierarchy of
Needs
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Maslow’s theory is based on the following two principles:
 Deficit principle – A satisfied need no longer motivates behavior because
 people act to satisfy deprived needs.
 Progression Principle - The five needs he identified exist in hierarchy,
 which means that a need at any level only comes into play after a lower-
 level need has been satisfied.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
       Need                      Home                           Job
Self-actualization   Education, religion, hobbies,   Training, advancement,
                     personal growth                 growth, creativity
Esteem               Approval of family, friends,    Recognition, high status,
                     community                       responsibilities
Belongingness        Family, friends, clubs          Teams, depts.,
                                                     coworkers, clients,
                                                     supervisors,
                                                     subordinates
Safety               Freedom from war, poison,       Work safety, job
                     violence                        security, health
                                                     insurance
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
The levels of motivation are the following:
 In the first level, physiological needs exist which include the most basic
 needs for humans to survive, such as air, water and food.
 In the second level, safety needs exist which include personal security,
 health, well-being and safety against accidents remain.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
 In the third level, belonging needs exit. This is where people need to feel
 a sense of belonging and acceptance. It is about relationships, families
 and friendship. Organizations fulfill this need for people.
 In the fourth level, self-esteem needs remain. This is where people looks
 to be respected and to have self-respect. Achievement needs, respect of
 others are in this level.
 In the top-level, self-actualization needs exist. This level of need pertains
 to realizing the person’s full potential.
Alderfer’s ERG Theory
 Clayton Alderfer ’s ERG (Existence,
 Relatedness, and Growth) theory
 is built upon Maslow’s hierarchy
 of needs theory. To begin his
 theory,      Alderfer     collapses
 Maslow’s five levels of needs into
 three categories.
Alderfer’s
ERG Theory
Alderfer’s ERG Theory
 Existence needs are desires for physiological and material well-being. (In
 terms of Maslow’s model, existence needs include physiological and
 safety needs)
 Relatedness needs are desires for satisfying interpersonal relationships.
 (In terms of Maslow’s model, relatedness correspondence to social needs)
 Growth needs are desires for continued psychological growth and
 development. (In terms of Maslow’s model, growth needs include esteem
 and self-realization needs)
Herzberg’s Two-Factor
Theory
 Frederick Herzberg offers another
 framework for understanding the
 motivational implications of work
 environments. In his two-factor
 theory, Herzberg identifies two
 sets   of   factors   that   impact
 motivation in the workplace.
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
1. Hygiene factors include salary, job security, working conditions,
organizational policies, and technical quality of supervision. Although
these factors do not motivate employees, they can cause dissatisfaction if
they are missing. Something as simple as adding music to the office place
or implementing a no-smoking policy can make people less dissatisfied
with these aspects of their work. However, these improvements in hygiene
factors do not necessarily increase satisfaction.
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory
2.   Satisfiers   or   motivators   include   such   things   as   responsibility,
achievement, growth of opportunities, and feelings of recognition, and are
the key to job satisfaction and motivation. For example, managers can find
out what people really do in their jobs and make improvements, thus
increasing job satisfaction and performance.
Herzberg’s Two-Factor
Theory
 Hygiene factors determine dissatisfaction,
 and   motivators   determine    satisfaction.
 The two scales are independent, and you
 can be high on both. Following Herzberg ’s
 two-factor   theory,   managers    need   to
 ensure that hygiene factors are adequate
 and then build satisfiers into jobs.
McClelland’s Learned
Needs Theory
 David     McClelland’s       acquired
 needs      theory    recognizes     that
 everyone        prioritizes        needs
 differently. He also believes that
 individuals    are    not   born    with
 these needs, but that they are
 actually    learned     through      life
 experiences. McClleland identifies
 three specific needs.
McClelland’s Learned Needs Theory
1. Need for achievement is the drive to excel. High achievers differentiate
   themselves from others by desires to do things better. These individuals
   are strongly motivated by job situations with personal responsibility,
   feedback, and an intermediate degree of risk.
    Seek personal responsibility for finding solutions to problems.
    Want rapid feedback on their performances so that they can tell easily
     whether they are improving or not.
    Set moderately challenging goals and perform best when they
     perceive their probability of success as 50-50
McClelland’s Learned Needs Theory
2. Need for power is the desire to cause others to behave in a way that
they would not behaved otherwise. An individual with a high need of
power is likely to follow a path of continued promotion over time.
Individuals with a high need of power often demonstrate the following
behaviors:
    Enjoy being in charge
    Want to influence others
    Prefer to be placed into competitive and status-oriented situations.
    Tend to be more concerned with prestige and gaining influence over
     others than with effective performance.
McClelland’s Learned Needs Theory
3. Need for affiliation is the desire for friendly, close interpersonal
relationships and conflict avoidance. People with the need for affiliation
seek   companionship,    social   approval,   and   satisfying   interpersonal
relationships. People needing affiliation display the following behaviors:
    Take a special interest in work that provides companionship and social
     approval
    Strive for friendship
    Prefer cooperative situations rather than competitive ones
    Desire relationships involving a high degree of mutual understanding
    May not make the best managers because their desire for social
     approval and friendship may complicate managerial decision making
McClelland’s Learned Needs Theory
    McClleland associates each need with a
     distinct     set   of   work     preferences,   and
     managers can help tailor the environment to
     meet these needs. Interestingly enough, a
     high need to achieve does not necessarily
     lead to being a good manager, especially in
     large      organizations.      People   with    high
     achievement needs are usually interested in
     how well they do personally and not in
     influencing others to do well. On the other
     hand, the best managers are high in their
     needs for power and low in their needs for
     affiliation.
PROCESS APPROACHES
Process approaches are concerned with “how” motivation happens. They
provide a description and analysis of how behavior is energized, directed,
sustained, and stopped. In other words, it explains how an employee’s
behavior is initiated, redirected, and halted.
PROCESS APPROACHES
Implications of process theories include the following:
 Establishing goals to direct behavior is an important part of a
 motivational program.
 Motivational programs should be perceived as equitable and deliver
 desirable outcomes the individual has an exception of achieving.
Expectancy Theory
 Expectancy Theory argues that humans act according to their conscious
 expectations that a particular behavior will lead to specific desirable
 goals.
 Victor H. Vroom, developed the expectancy theory in 1964, producing a
 systematic explanatory theory of workplace motivation. Theory asserts
 that the motivation to behave in a particular way is determined by an
 individual’s expectation that behavior will lead to a particular outcome,
 multiplied by the preference or valence that person has for that outcome.
Expectancy Theory
Here is the equation suggests that human behavior is directed by
subjective probability.
           Motivation = Expectancy X Instrumentality X Valence
Where:
 M (motivation) is the amount a person will be motivated by the situation
 they find themselves in. It is a function of the following:
 E (expectancy) is the person’s perception that effort will result in
 performance.
Expectancy Theory
 (Instrumentality) is the person’s perception that performance will be
 rewarded/punished. I. e the person’s assessment of how well the amount
 of reward correlates with the quality of performance.
 V (Valence) is the perceived strength of the reward or punishment that
 will result from the performance. If the reward is small, the motivation
 will be small, even if expectancy and instrumentality are both perfect
 (high).
Equity Theory
 Developed by John Stacey Adams in 1963, Equity Theory suggests that if
 the individual perceives that the rewards received are equitable, that is,
 fair or just in comparison with those received by others in similar
 positions in or outside the organization, then the individual feels
 satisfied. Adams asserted that employees seek to maintain equity
 between the inputs that they bring to a job and the outcomes that they
 receive from it against the perceived inputs and outcomes of others.
Equity Theory
Adams identifies six types of possible behavior as consequences of
inequity. They are:
 Changes to input – a person may increase or decrease the level of his
 inputs.
 Changes to outcomes – a person may attempt to change outcomes such
 as pay, without changes to inputs.
Equity Theory
 Cognitive distortion of inputs and outcomes – Adams suggests that it is
 difficult for people to distort facts about themselves but it is possible to
 distort the utility of those facts; for example, the belief about how hard
 they are really working.
 Leaving the field – a person may try to find a new situation with a more
 favorable balance, for example, by absenteeism.
Equity Theory
 Acting on others – a person may attempt to bring about changes in
 others, for example is lower their inputs or accept greater outcomes.
 Changing the object of comparison – means changing the reference
 group with whom comparison is made. For example, where another
 person with a previous similar outcome – input ratio receives greater
 outcomes without any significant increase in contribution, that other
 person. The essential aspect is a similar ratio of outcomes to inputs. For
 example by attempting to change a person’s inputs or encouraging a
 different object of comparison.
Goal-setting Theory
 Edwin Locke proposed Goal Theory in 1968, which proposes that
 motivation and performance will be high if individuals are set specific
 goals which are challenging, but accepted, and where feedback is given
 on performance.
Goal-setting Theory
The attributes that Locke made emphasis in this theory are:
 Goal specificity – the degree of quantitative preciseness of the goal
 Goal difficulty – the degree of proficiency or the level of goal
 performance that is being sought.
 Goal intensity – the process of setting a goal or of determining how to
 reach it.
 Goal commitment – the amount of effort that is actually used to achieve
 a goal.
Goal-setting Theory
The two most important findings of this theory are:
 Setting specific goals (e.g. I want to earn a million before I am 30 )
 generates higher levels of performance than setting general goals (e.g. I
 want to earn a lot of money)
 The goals that are hard to achieve are linearly and positively connected
 to performance. The harder the goal, the more a person will work to
 reach it.