Industry with small firms
Majority of canada’s output are from small firms
Small firms: relative size to industry
Theory of monopolistic competition explains why there are many small firms, but each firm have
some degree of market power
Industries with few large firms
Monopolies typically owned by government
Internet, telephone, cable are subjected to government regulation
Theory of oligopoly helps understand industries where small number of large firm with
considerable market power
Ex. airline industry dominated by air Canada and west jet
Industrial concentration
High concentrated: small number of relatively large firms
Concentration ratio: formal measure of industrial concentration
Concentration ratio
When measuring whether industry has power concentrated over few firms or dispersed over
many, not sufficient to count firms
Ex. industry with one enormous firm and 29 very small firms are more concentrated in
meaningful sense than industry with five equal-sized firms
Concentration ratio shows fraction of total market sales controlled by largest sellers
Defining the market
Market may be smaller than whole country
Ex. concentration ratio in national cement sales are low, but understate market power
of cement companies because high transportation costs divide the cement industry into series of
regional markets with each having relatively small firms
More common for companies producing raw materials
Firms differentiate their product
Ex. new smartphone industry, firm must decide on characteristics of new products to design and
sell
Develop its own variations on existing products or product with new capability
Differentiated product: group of products similar enough but not identical
Firms set their price
Each firm must decide on a price to set
Ex. single price not established for products equate to overall demand with overall
supply
One manufacturer typically have several product lines that differ from each other and from
competing product lines of other firms
Price setters: firms that choose their prices
Each firm has expectations about quantity it can sell at each price that might set
Unexpected demand fluctuation might cause unexpected variations in quantities sold at price
Firms that sell differentiated products have many distinct products
Changing long list of prices is often costly that it is done infrequently
Cost of changing prices include printing new list prices and notifying customers and
difficulty of keeping track of changing prices for accounting purposes and loss of customers and retailer
goodwill caused by frequent price changes
Imperfectly competitive firms respond to fluctuations in demand by changing output and
holding prices constant
Firms that rely on online sales do not follow this behavior
Ex. airlines have websites where they post their prices and can change frequently
Firms engage in non-price competition
Advertising
Many firms spend large sums of money on advertising
Attempt to shift demand curve for industry product and to attract customers from competing
firms
Firm in perfectly competitive market don’t engage in advertising because firm faces perfectly
elastic demand curve at market price
Advertising involve costs that wouldn’t increase firm’s revenue
Monopolist has no competitors in industry and won’t advertise to attract customers away from
other brands
Sometimes monopolist will advertise to convince consumers to shift spending away from other
types of products and towards monopolist product
Product quality
Ex. Samsung competes against each other by offering new products with innovative designs and
applications
Entry barriers
Firms engage in activities to hinder entry of new firms by preventing erosion of existing profits
ex. price match
Oligopoly and game theory
Oligopoly: industries that make up small number of large firms and have market structure
Industry that contains two or more firms
Oligopolistic: high concentration ratio for firms serving one market
Negatively sloped demand curves
Profit maximization is complicated
Oligopolist want to maximize profits that produces level of output where marginal revenue =
marginal cost
Determining level of output more complicated for oligopolist
Firm’s marginal revenue depends on what rivals do
Ex. if Toyota increase production of compact cars to make MR = MC, Ford and Nissan may
respond by increasing their output of compacts and reducing Toyota’s marginal revenue
Or Ford and Nissan can reduce output of compacts and focus on market niches that Toyota plays
a smaller role in
Or leave output levels unchanged and introduce new options on compact cars to attract
customers to products
Strategic behavior: behavior designed to take account of rival’s reaction
Basic dilemma of oligopoly
Firms can cooperate in attempt to joint profits or they can compete in effort to maximize
individual profits
To compete or cooperate depends on how rivals will respond
If firms cooperate, they reach cooperative outcome
Worthwhile for any one of them to cut prices or raise output so long as others don’t
If every firm does the same, they are worse off as a group and worse off individually
Non cooperative outcome: an industry outcome when firms maximize own profits without
cooperating
Simple game theory
Game theory: decision making in situations where one player anticipates reaction of other
player
Game theory applies to oligopoly when
Players are firms
Game played in market
Strategies are price out output decisions
Payoffs are profits
If firms cooperate, each firm produces one-half of monopoly output and each earn high profit
If firms compete, they produce more than half of monopoly output and earn low profit
Nash equilibrium: equilibrium that results when each player doing its best and given current
behavior of other player
Has both firms competing and producing higher level of output
Extensions in game theory
Game theory can be used in other settings
How firms interact when charge different prices for differentiated products
How firms interact when developing new product
Oligopoly in practice
Cooperative behavior
Collusion: agreement among sellers to act jointly in common interest, may be overt, covert,
explicit or tacit
When firms agree to cooperate to restrict output and raise prices
When explicit agreement occurs, it is overt or covert depending if agreement is open or closed
Competitive behavior
Firms in oligopoly choose to compete actively with each other to attract consumers away from
rivals to increase overall share of market and to increase profits
Actions good for consumers because results in lower prices, better products, or better services
Winners find profits rising and business expanding
Losers see business shrinking and profits falling
Firms with differentiated products compete by reducing prices and hoping to attract customers
Actively engage in non-price competition through advertising campaigns and product quality
Can develop new products by making significant improvements in existing ones
Importance of entry barriers
Oligopolistic firms must create entry barriers if they want profits in long run
Brand proliferation
Altering characteristics of differentiated product, it’s possible to produce an array of variations
on general theme of product
Ex. soaps produces several brands
Brand proliferation is response to consumer’s preferences and can have effect of discouraging
entry of new firms
Large number of differentiated products leaves small market share available to new firm
Advertising
Where heavy advertising established strong brand images for existing products, new firms must
spend heavily on advertising to create brand image
If firm’s sales are small, advertising costs per unit will be large and price must be
correspondingly high to cover
Combined use of brand proliferation and advertising creates powerful entry barrier
Predatory pricing
Firm will not enter market if it expects continued losses after entry
Existing firm can create this by cutting prices below costs until new entrant is bankrupt
Existing firms sacrifices profits doing this, but sends discouraging message to potential future
rivals and present ones
If strategy is costly in terms of lost profits in short run, pay for itself in long run by creating
reputation effects that deter entry of new firms
Oligopoly and economy
Firms in oligopolistic industries come close to joint profit maximization in short run
Oligopolistic industries firms compete they come close to achieving competitive prices and
outputs
To extent that price remains above competitive levels and output below, oligopolies are less
efficient than perfect competition
In long run, profits that survive competitive behavior attract entry
Oligopoly leads to more innovation than monopoly or perfect competition
Oligopolist face strong competition from existing rivals and can’t afford relaxed life of
monopolist