Fault Analysis in Transmission Line Using MATLAB
Rushikesh Masule
 Electrical Engineering Department                          Gaurav B. Patil                               Ruhul Desale
     SVKM’s Intitute of o, Dhule                 Electrical Engineering Department            Electrical Engineering Department
             Dhule, India                       SVKM’s Intitute of Technology, Dhule         SVKM’s Intitute of Technology, Dhule
   rushikeshmasule5@gmail.com                                Dhule, India                                 Dhule, India
                                                      gauravpatilee@gmail.com                    desalerahul2590@gmail.com
             Nikhil More
 Electrical Engineering Department                       Sandeep Ushkewar                                 Gaurav Kele
SVKM’s Intitute of Technology, Dhule             Electrical Engineering Department            Electrical Engineering Department
             Dhule, India                       SVKM’s Intitute of Technology, Dhule         SVKM’s Intitute of Technology, Dhule
   nikhlil.more1308@gmail.com                                Dhule, India                                 Dhule, India
                                                   sandeepunshkewar@svkm.ac.in                   gauravkele8046@gmail.com
Abstract - Since the demand for electricity has                     issues. The dependability and affordability of the electrical
skyrocketed, networks of electric power have become                 system are adversely affected when transmission line
increasingly important. Consequently, there are now a               failures occur. As a result, recognizing and accurately
considerably greater number and length of power                     diagnosis. The failures of the AC high voltage transmission
transmission lines. A widespread power loss could be                lines shown in fall into the following categories: Seventy-
caused by a transmission line tripping or interruption.             eight percent of a fault is single line to ground (SLG),
This means that these lines must be effectively                     seventeen percent is line to line (LL), ten percent is double
safeguarded. An effective protective system is produced             line to ground (LLG), and three percent of lines have a fault
through the examination of faults at various loads, which           (LLL).
aids in transient identification and, eventually, in the
localization, detection, and classification of power system
defects. This paper describes the faults in discrete
wavelet transmission lines. Among the faults examined
were double-line, three-phase, and line-to-ground faults.
The MATLAB Simulink environment has been used to
conduct extensive research on defect identification.
         Keywords:       discrete     wavelet     transform         The Phase Measurement Unit (PMU), Support Vector
transmission line, power, mother wavelet, MATLAB                    Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Wavelet
Simulink; system                                                    Transformation (WT), WT with fuzzy logic, and WT with
                                                                    ANN techniques are among the technologies that have been
                      I. Introduction                               studied and analysed by researchers for defect diagnosis and
Power Wavelet network fault detection analyses have been            detection. (Source:) Voltage fluctuations can be used in two
used to reduce equipment damage from short circuits. This           ways to identify a PMU issue: As stated in [2], the first
is accomplished by promptly locating the problematic line           phase was matching the matching degree with the degree
and turning it off. M. Tarafdar Hagh et al. [1] used a single       index to identify problematic buses because the matching
circuit, two machine power system simulation to find and            degree was low. Mathematical methods were utilized in the
isolate transmission line issues. They employed an artificial       second step to identify the precise location of the flaw.
neural network to categorize and locate errors. O. Dag et al.       Networks with long transmission lines use this technique.
[2] developed a classifier that could identify ten distinct         Errors can be categorized and sorted using artificial neural
types of 3-phase system failures using six-channel data of          networks. Transmission line networks in ring-connected
current and voltage signals from a power system, hence              power systems are susceptible to power interruptions. Using
enhancing fault classification performance. A case study of         a neural network (ANN) technique with backpropagation,
a distribution system in Istanbul, Turkey was looked at in          which delivers voltage and current as input sources, the
order to establish the recommended approach. Using                  flaws of this method are discovered. This method does a
Computer Aided Design (Power Systems) Design, simulate              respectable job of identifying and categorizing transmission
Electromagnetic Transients integrating DC. A technique for          line problems. But this approach can deal with the issue
classifying and classifying different transmission line             more simply than with nonlinear loads.
operating conditions was developed by M. Geethanjali et al.         Three currents and three voltages from a three-phase source
to ensure the timely and reliable operation of protective           made up the six inputs in the ANN approach described in.
relaying networks.                                                  The network has four outputs in total. In the power system,
Adopting a modern, precise, and safe power system is                MATLAB Simulink is used to model two generators and
imperative due to the intricate transmission line network that      transmission lines. Every cycle's sampling rate is set at 1
comprises the energy grid of today. Compared to other               kHz in order to train the artificial neural network data.
critical components of the power system, electrical                 Identifying and categorizing errors are the two steps of the
transmission lines often have a greater failure rate since their    process outlined in [3]. Are identifying and classifying
start. Experts in power protection therefore place a great          mistakes. Six ANN system inputs are created, and for fault
importance on the ability to quickly recognize and diagnose
detection, we compare the inputs to the pre-fault value. The     11.7% in the SFCL's limitation when the copper stabiliser
output of an ANN system can malfunction or not; a simple 1       layer was lowered from 40 µm to 20 µm was unaffected by
or 0 communicates this. The same process is used to classify     a 3 K temperature increase.
faults, with the four. The following outputs could be            D. Guillen, M. Roberto, [3] This shows that the signals'
generated by an ANN system: A, B, C, or G. The simulation        detail coefficients are almost zero (straight line) in the
results demonstrated that the defect detection and               absence of an error, with the only effect being the
classification capabilities of the concept of ANN system         Daubechies wavelet's conclusion, which is likewise
design worked as expected. The learning machines known           minuscule and almost zero (1*10-3) and that each signal's
as support vector machines are a powerful technique for          energy is present with a negligible rate of change in energy
regression and classification. When employing support            following signal compression, close to 0.0. Due to the high-
vector machines as classifiers, there are two primary phases     frequency component that fault inception introduces into
involved: training and testing. Support vector machines can      signals, which has a substantial impact on the detail
classify data in two ways: linear and nonlinear. Series          coefficient, the ratio of energy change from the starting level
compensated transmission line faults (SVM) are the primary       was calculated while these signals were compressed.
application for support vector machines. The support vector      maintaining the approximation. Finding and shutting off the
machine receives a single cycle of series-compensated            circuit breaker at a line required one cycle of fault creation.
transmission lines delivering three-phase, zero-sequence         Using MATLAB, we simulated a number of errors. We
currents. Lastly, each support vector machine's output—          utilized the wavelet toolbox to decompose the transient
which can have one of two values—must be used to                 signals after they were recorded in order to obtain the
categorize defects.                                              maximum details coefficient and energy. We then
                                                                 compressed the signals and calculated the ratio of energy
                                                                 change from the first level while keeping the approximation
                     II.Literature Review                        because fault inception adds a high frequency component to
N. Iqbal, K. R. Abbasi, R. Shinwari, [1] Analyse a               the signals that significantly affects the detail coefficient.
photovoltaic farm's transmission line fault behaviours. The      The signals were first analyzed after one cycle of fault
MATLAB/Simulink environment has been used to model               formation at a line in order to identify the fault and turn off
the solar farm's transmission lines and power system             the circuit breaker. We simulated several errors using
architecture. It is estimated that there are two kilometres      MATLAB. To ascertain the ratio of energy change from the
separating the DCDC converters and the source of the issue.      first level and the ways in which faults impact the energy of
A capacitance of 0.5 mF is anticipated for each DC-DC            these signals, we compressed the decomposed transient
converter, which keeps the DC-link voltage constant. This        signals using the wavelet toolbox. This was carried out after
covers the inductance and resistance that exist between the      the signals were recorded to obtain their maximum detail
failure point and the converters. At position "Fault" on the     coefficient, or energy. In our simulation undertook.
transmission line, we applied a pole-to-pole fault for twenty
milliseconds, from t=1.0 sec to t=1.02 sec. The transmission     Mohammad Hassan Khooban, and Taher Niknam, [4] Fault
line current with and without SFCL, as well as with SFCL         analysis and an evaluation of the SFCL performance under
and a 40 µm copper stabilizer. Two types of copper               different fault scenarios have been carried out using a
stabilisers are used: the SFCL 20 µm and the SFCL 40 µm.         MATLAB/Simulink model of a community solar farm. The
Without requiring an SFCL, the current surged to 4.1 kA          1 MW solar farm is comprised of four 250 kWp PV arrays.
during the fault due to the converters' instantaneous            A DC/DC converter increases the output voltage from 600 V
capacitor discharge at t= 1.0 sec, as shown by the blue line.    to 3 kVDC in order to connect each PV array to the main
Utilizing the SFCL with a 40 µm copper stabiliser allowed        DC bus. Subsequently, an inverter is used to flip the DC bus
for a 22% reduction in fault current, as indicated by the red    so that it can be connected to the utility. For DC system fault
dotted line, to 3.2kA. A 20 µm copper line (yellow dotted        analysis, one of the most crucial variables is the line
line) stabiliser reduced the fault current to 2.8 kA, compared   impedance. Due to their large amplitude fault currents and
to the fault current without the SFCL, which resulted in an      lack of zero crossing spots, DC power systems are thought
almost 31.7% drop in the SFCL's drop percentage.                 to require protection. an essential. Factors such as voltage
E. Kato and A. Kurosawa, [2] Electricity passing through         level, grounding impedance, line impedance, and DC-link
the SFCL and over the 40 µm copper stabilizer. Overall           capacitance influence the fault current behaviour. Both pole-
current through the fault is shown by the blue line. The red,    to-ground and pole-to-pole DC faults can occur in bipolar
yellow, purple, and green lines represent, respectively, the     systems. A fault that connects the positive and negative
current flowing through the copper, silver, and YBCO             poles has a high voltage and low line impedance, making it
layers. The red dashed line indicates that the YBCO layer        the most dangerous type. By contrast, a pole-to-ground fault
was currently conducting electricity prior to the fault. The     occurs when the ground is connected to the positive or
YBCO resistivity spiked as a result of the current being         negative pole directly. Short circuits of the pole-to-ground
diverted to other layers as the temperature increased after      type are more frequent than those of the pole-to-pole type,
the fault. Because the copper stabiliser had the lowest          but they are less dangerous. Due to its significant challenge,
resistance, the copper flowed through it the most during the     this paper focuses on the pole-to-pole fault. Because it has a
failure. The current flow of the SFCL 20 µm copper               higher fault current and presents a significant threat to
stabiliser is shown. The total current flowing through the       circuit breakers, the pole-to-pole fault is the subject of this
fault is represented by the blue line. Throughout the fault      paper.
period, he was fully current. The red, yellow, purple, and       X. Li, Q. Song, W. Liu, H. Rao, S. Xu, and L. Li [5]
green lines represent the current flowing through the copper,    "Shielding of MMC-based HVDC systems from no
silver, and YBCO layers in that order. The improvement of        permanent faults on DC overhead lines, "The maximum,
minimum, standard deviation, and energy levels of the             that is almost always zero (a straight line) and only shows
wavelet detailed coefficients are all higher in the presence of   up in the absence of a defect. Every signal has energy, and
a fault than in the absence of one. This indicates that the       that energy changes at a very small rate (close to 0.001)
error originated in phase A. Wavelet analysis can be used to
                                                                  following signal compression. Daubechies wavelet also has
distinguish and identify different types of faults. For
example, shaded data can be used to compare the deviation         an extremely small final effect that is close to zero (1*10-3)
of the statistical values for the Bus-1 fault from the healthy    and very small.
condition and the energy values for the various faulty phase
voltage and current wave breakdown stages with the
corresponding energy levels of the healthy condition. This
applies to symmetrical faults in different phases that occur at
different bus locations or locations, such as three-phase
symmetrical faults, line-to-line, double-line-to-ground, and
single-line-to-ground.[6]-[10] Every time a phase fault has
occurred, the wavelet detailed coefficient's maximum,
minimum, and standard values as well as the usual
behaviour of the energy level data have deviated from
values under healthy conditions. It might be sufficient to
compare and analyse the wavelet data in great detail in order
to distinguish between the various system states (defective
and healthy). The same methodology was used to gather                   Figure .2: Three phase current signals at normal
statistics about faults and energy level data at the other five
locations.[11]-[14]
                                                                   B. Single phase to ground fault
                                                                  Signals for current in three phases. The ground fault is
                                                                  associated with phase A in Figure 3, which shows three-
             III.CIRCUIT AND DESCRIPTION                          phase current signals. Although there was little to no change
Two three-phase sources, two three-phase transformers, and        in the other two phases compared to the massive amount of
a three-phase load make up the circuit. Selecting the ratings     change during the A phase, the arrow pointed directly
of different components, including two transmission line          toward the beginning of the fault inception (around sample
lengths, two three-phase transformers, and three-phase            1800, which is half the number of samples from the initial
sources, is crucial for the simulation study's objectives [3].    signal fault inception time). Along with the energy change
The MATLAB software model created using the Sim Power             ratio being higher than normal and the detail coefficient
System for the implementation of the simulation of various        being greater than 0.001, the data also clearly showed that
failures is shown. The simulation study used a discrete           the gearbox line was malfunctioning at that particular point.
PowerGrid with a sample time of 3e-05s under various fault
scenarios.
                                                                    Figure.3: Three phase current signals at Single phase to
                                                                                         ground Fault
      Figure. 1: Transmission line model in MATLAB                C. . Double phase to ground fault
                                                                  Just two of the faulty phases at the fault inception time show
                                                                  a high degree of detail coefficient and significant change,
                                                                  while the healthy phase shows almost no change (Figure 4).
   A. Normal Condition                                            The figure shows three-phase current signals with phases A-
                                                                  B to the ground fault. The information in Table 4 further
A yellow, B blue, and C red phase current signals at no fault     supports this, demonstrating that even though the defective
condition, along with their detail coefficient, are typical       phases were very different from each other and had
setups. It follows that these signals have a detail coefficient
maximum detail coefficients higher than 0.001, they were          each DC-DC converter should contain a capacitor of about
still in a defective state. Furthermore, it suggests that the     0.5 mF. The transmission line in Fig. 1 was subjected to a
defective phases were connected to the transmission line's        pole-to-pole fault at the "Fault" position for 20 milliseconds,
ground because the amounts of energy that changed for the         starting at t=1.0 and terminating at t=1.02 seconds. Figure 4
two faulty phases when compression was applied varied.            (a) depicts the transmission line current with and without
                                                                  SFCL, as well as a 40 µm and 20 µm copper stabilizer.
                                                                  Figure 4 (a) illustrates that without SFCL, the current rose to
                                                                  4.1 kA when the fault occurred at t= 1.0 sec because the
                                                                  converters' capacitors emptied immediately. Using the SFCL
                                                                  with a 40 µm copper stabiliser resulted in a 22% decrease in
                                                                  fault current, as seen by the red dashed line in Figure 4 (a).
                                                                  The SFCL obtained a fault current limitation of 2.8 kA and a
                                                                  decrease percentage of approximately 31.7% when utilizing
                                                                  a 20 µm copper stabiliser (yellow dotted line). Figure 4(b)
                                                                  shows the current flowing through the SFCL 40 µm copper
                                                                  stabiliser. The blue line depicts the whole current flowing
                                                                  through the fault. Each layer's current is shown by a
                                                                  separate-colored line: red for YBCO, yellow for copper,
                                                                  purple for silver, and green for Hastelloy. In Fig. 4 (b), the
 Figure. 4: Three phase current signals at Double phase to        red dashed line indicates that the current went through the
                       ground Fault                               YBCO layer before the fault. The current was directed to the
                                                                  other layers due to a quick increase in YBCO resistivity
    D. Double phase fault                                         produced by the fault's formation and subsequent
Three-phase current signals with faulty phases A–C are            temperature rise. Because of its low resistance, the copper
shown in the image below. Out of these, the healthy phase         stabiliser received almost all of electricity after the incident.
exhibited almost no change, while only two faulty phases at       Figure 4(c) depicts the current passing through the SFCL 20
fault time show significant change. This is corroborated by       µm copper stabiliser. The blue line depicts the whole current
Table 4's data, which demonstrates that in terms of               flowing through the fault. Each layer's current is shown by a
coefficient, energy, and energy change, there was essentially     separate-colored line: red for YBCO, yellow for copper,
no change during the healthy phase and a close resemblance        purple for silver, and green for Hastelloy. Figure 4 (d) shows
to the normal condition. the ratio Although the maximum           that lowering the copper stabiliser layer from 40 µm to 20
detail coefficient of the faulty phases was greater than 0.001,   µm reduced the SFCL restriction by 11.7%, despite a rise in
when compression was applied, the energy change ratio of          temperature of 3 K. Figure 4(d) displays both the 40 µm and
the two faulty phases was typically the same or                   20 µm SFCL heats. The failure occurred when the two
insignificantly different, indicating that the faulty phases      SFCLs were at 77 K, the temperature of LN2. Following the
were not connected to the transmission line's ground. It          fault, the two SFCLs' temperatures increased to 91 and 94 K,
means that there were challenges with these stages of             respectively. The SFCL with a 40 µm copper stabilizer and
development.                                                      the SFCL with a 20 µm stabilizer were impacted differently.
                                                                  The efficiency of the SFCL restriction ability and the
                                                                  increase in temperature are clearly linked. The SFCL with a
                                                                  little copper stabiliser improves fault current limitation, but
                                                                  it raises the temperature.
Figure 5 Three phase current signals at Double phase fault
     IV. SIMULATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
As shown in Figure 1, the solar farm's power system
architecture and transmission lines have been modelled in
the MATLAB/Simulink environment to investigate
transmission line failure behaviour. The DC-DC converters
are around 2 kilometres from the point of failure. Figure 1
shows that the DC-DC converters have a resistance of 172
mΩ and an inductance of 0.76 mH, as determined by (1) and
(2), respectively. To maintain a constant DC-link voltage,
                The main conclusions, findings, and implications of the
                study should all be summarized in the conclusion of a
                transmission line fault detection project. The significance of
                the project for improving the efficiency and dependability of
                electrical power transmission ought to be discussed as well.
                This sample project conclusion demonstrates how modern
                technologies, such as machine learning algorithms and
                phaser measurement units (PMUs), can be used to identify
                transmission line faults early on. Faster response times and
                the possibility of reducing downtime and damage to the
                electrical infrastructure are brought about by this enhanced
                detection capability. Fault analysis of three phase
                transmission lines is made much easier with the use of
                MATLAB and ETAP tools. Our effort is focused on
                modelling these problems to obtain a better understanding of
                transmission line properties. Single line-to-ground, double
                line, and three-phase faults are among the many fault types
                that we model. This simulation technology enhances
                accuracy and user experience while improving efficiency in
                the identification of problems in transmission lines. It can
                also be used with more complex power systems because of
                its versatility.
                                             References
V. CONCLUSION   [1]   N. Iqbal, K. R. Abbasi, R. Shinwari, W. Guangcai, M. Ahmad, and K.
                      Tang, “Does exports diversification and environmental innovation
      achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies?,” J. Environ.      [8]    PriyaYadav “Simulation and Performance Analysis of a lkWp
      Manage., vol. 291, no. April, p. 112648, 2021, doi:                           Photovoltaic System Using PVsyst” 2015 International Conference on
      10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648.                                                Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication.
[2]   Qin Jian, Peng Li-ping and Wang He-chun, “Single Terminal              [9]    A. Wani, P. Mistari and G. B. Patil, "Comparative Analysis of Power
      Methods of Traveling Wave Fault Location in Transmission Line                 Quality Issues in Grid-Integrated Wind Energy System," 2022
      Using Wavelet Transform,” Automation of Electric Power Systems,               International Interdisciplinary Humanitarian Conference for
      vol. 29, pp. 62–65, 2005.                                                     Sustainability (IIHC), Bengaluru, India, 2022, pp. 1485-1489
[3]   M. Irwanto, Y. Irwan, I. Safwati, W. Leow, and N. Gomesh,              [10]   G. B. Patil and L. D. Arya, "Voltage Stability Assessment of Grid
      “Analysis simulation of the fault dtection output performance, ” and          Connected Solar PV System," 2021 Third International Conference on
      Optimization Conference (PEOCO'2014), IEEE 8th International, pp.             Intelligent Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile
      477–481, 2014.                                                                Networks (ICICV), Tirunelveli, India, 2021, pp. 563-568
[4]   Mohammad Hassan Khooban, and Taher Niknam, “Fast fault                 [11]   M. Thakur, A. Patil and G. Patil, "The Current State of the Art for PV
      detection and classification based on a combination of wavelet                Grid Connected System Issues with Power Quality," 2022
      singular entropy theory and fuzzy logic in distribution lines in the          International Interdisciplinary Humanitarian Conference for
      presence of distributed generations,” International Journal of                Sustainability (IIHC), Bengaluru, India, 2022, pp. 1515-1520.
      Electrical Power and Energy Systems, vol. 78, pp. 455–462, 2016.       [12]   Patil, G.B., Raghuwanshi, S.S., Arya, L.D. (2023). Effect of PV
[5]   M. Monadi, M. A. Zamani, J. I. Candela, A. Luna, and P. Rodriguez,            Penetration on the Steady-State Voltage on Grid-Integrated PV
      “Protection of AC and DC distribution systems Embedding                       System. In: Rajakumar, G., Du, KL., Rocha, Á. (eds) Intelligent
      distributed energy resources: A comparative review and analysis,”             Communication Technologies and Virtual Mobile Networks. ICICV
      Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 51, pp. 1578– 1593, 2015, doi:              2023. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications
      10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.013. Superpower Inc., “2G HTS Wire                     Technologies, vol 171. Springer, Singapore.
      Specification.” https://www.superpower-inc.com/specification.aspx.     [13]   S. Baviskar, G. B. Patil and R. Beldar, "Predictive Analysis of 50 KW
[6]   Bindu U Kansara and B.R. Parekh, “Modelling and simulation of                 Solar       Photovoltaic       System        using      PVsyst," 2024
      distributed generation system using HOMER software”, IEEE 2011.               InternationalConference on Intelligent and Innovative Technologies in
[7]   Maria A. Mazuera, Johnny Posada and Paul Manrique, “Analysis and              Computing, Electrical and Electronics (IITCEE), Bangalore, India,
      Emulation of a fault detection System Using a MATLAB/Simulink                 2024, pp. 1-4.
      Model and the DS1104 Unit”, IEEE October 2016.