Maurel 2006
Maurel 2006
In this study, reactive free radicals derived from several nucleosides were spin trapped by 5,5-
dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and then detected by high-performance liquid chromatog-
raphy coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/ESI-MS/MS). This
method provides a specific detection of spin trapping adducts derived from nucleosides with a very
high sensitivity: quantities as low as 0.5 picomoles of spin trapping adducts corresponding to
concentrations of 2.5 10S8 mol. LS1 were detected. Different spin trapping adducts were characterized
by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS in three well-known systems producing free radicals photochemically: the
photolysis of 5-halo-2(-deoxyuridines, the photolysis of 5-thiophenylmethyl-2(-deoxyuridine and the
photolysis of thymidine with menadione bisulfite as a photosensitizer. A new radical photoreactivity
of uridine derivatives was also detected by this method both at the nucleoside and at the RNA level,
showing that the method is also relevant for studying spin trapping adducts derived from DNA and
RNA strands. Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The detection and characterization of radical transients are radical16 and of free radicals produced by lipid peroxi-
important in understanding chemical mechanisms involved dation.15 In these studies, while the combined approach is
in the photo-induced damage of genetic material.1,2 The very efficient, it was found that the presence of other redox
study of these transients is particularly difficult due to their forms of the spin trapping adducts16,17 (see Scheme 2)
short lifetimes. For instance the lifetime of pyrimidine- rendered MS data interpretation difficult. In further MS
derived radical cations can be shorter than 10 ns.3 Spin studies18,19 the same group of authors overcame this problem
trapping4,5 is a very efficient way to overcome this problem through the use of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide
by transforming short-lived radical transients into more (DMPO) as a spin trap in aqueous solution, for which the
stable free radicals named ‘spin trapping adducts’ (see oxidized spin trapping adduct (nitrone, see Scheme 2) is of
Scheme 1). These more stable adducts are usually studied by higher stability.20 The sensitivity of HPLC/EPR/MS is
electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). The spin trapping limited by the EPR detection of nitroxide adducts, which
technique with EPR detection of adducts has been used in has a lower threshold of 106 mol L1 in aqueous solution.
numerous studies for the detection of transient radicals The spin trapping approach could be greatly improved by
derived from DNA components.6–14 increasing its sensitivity while maintaining its selectivity for
Hyperfine coupling constants and g factors provided by trapped radicals. This is possible in the case of nucleosidic
the EPR spectrum of a spin trapping adduct are not always radicals by replacing EPR detection by electrospray ioniz-
sufficient, however, to unambiguously determine the ation tandem mass spectrometry coupled with high-
chemical structure of the trapped radical (for examples, performance liquid chromatography (HPLC/ESI-MS/
see Yue Qian et al.15). In these cases mass spectrometry can be MS).21,22 In the present work, potential DMPO spin trapping
useful in the characterization of spin trapping adducts as it adducts of nucleosidic radicals were detected using a specific
provides more complete structural information. Iwahashi fragmentation of nucleosides (loss of 2-deoxyribose moiety)
et al. explored this possibility by designing an on-line HPLC/ and identified on the basis of their molecular weights. Then,
EPR/MS experiment and applied it in the study of the phenyl the more sensitive multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)
mode was found to have a sensitivity about two orders of
*Correspondence to: J.-L. Ravanat or S. Gambarelli, Laboratoire magnitude higher than EPR detection, lowering the detection
des Lésions des Acides Nucléiques et Laboratoire de Résonances threshold to concentrations as low as 108 mol L1.
Magnétiques, LCIB (UMR-E 3 CEA-UJF), DRFMC, CEA-Greno-
ble, 17 Avenue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
E-mail: jravanat@cea.fr; sgambarelli@cea.fr
y
Present address: Laboratory of Photochemistry, University of
Ottawa, 10 Marie Curie, K1N 6N5, Ottawa, ON, Canada
acetonitrile in 5 mM ammonium formate, starting from 0%, monodeuterated D6-dUrd 20 -deoxyuridine in a 70:30 ratio, as
reached 50% within 30 min, the column being maintained at determined by ESI-MS.
288C.
O N O N
HO hν HO
O X + O
OH OH a
X = Br or I
+
N
-
O
O O
+
HN N HN N
-
O O
O N O N
HO oxidation HO
O O
OH c OH b
O O O O
° N
HN UV-B HN - H+ HN DMPO HN
+° O°
O N O N O N O N
Menadione
dR dR d dR e dR f
DMPO
O
HN O +
N
O N HN
+ O
dR N
O N
O g
h dR
for the transition m/z 354 ! 238 at 16.24 min. A much weaker
peak is observed for the transition m/z 356 ! 240 than that
observed for the photosensitization of Thd in the presence of
menadione, confirming the specific formation of the
thymidyl-5-yl radical from photolysis of 5-thiophenyl-
Figure 5. (a) HPLC/ESI-MS/MS chromatogram obtained for
methyl-20 -deoxyuridine (Scheme 6). The lack of an intense
the transition m/z 340 ! 224 of an aqueous solution of dUrd
peak for that m/z 356 ! 240 transition is in agreement with
containing DMPO photolyzed by UV-C using a UV lamp.
the proposed mechanism of formation of the DMPO adduct
Dose: 250 mJ. Inset: Quantities of nitrone c detected during
h detected upon photosensitization of Thd by menadione
similar experiments as a function of the UV-C irradiation dose
(vide supra).
received. (b) Quantity of generated nitrone c vs. power of a
According to these experiments and to the well-estab-
single UV-C laser flash used for irradiation of an aqueous
lished homolytic rupture of the C–S bond by UV-C
solution of dUrd and DMPO.
photolysis of the photoprecursor 5-thiophenylmethyl-20 -
deoxyuridine,23,24 the peak observed at 16.3 min on the
chromatograms shown in Fig. 3 could be unambiguously Therefore, additional experiments were carried out to confirm
attributed to the nitrone g produced after spin trapping of that the detected product corresponded to nitrone c.
radical e by DMPO. First, it was checked that the nitrone c is not produced
following an over-irradiation of dUrd. This was done by
using a single shot of a nanosecond pulsed laser to irradiate
Detection of spin adducts from dUrd, Urd, solutions of dUrd and DMPO. In such an experiment all
and RNA strands photons are absorbed in 5 ns, before the completion of
Aqueous solutions of dUrd containing DMPO were UV-C photochemical reactions. The corresponding chromatograms
irradiated and then analyzed by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS using are similar to those recorded for samples irradiated by UV
the MRM method developed for the detection of nitrone c lamps and they confirm the presence of nitrone c. In addition,
(Fig. 5(a), to be compared with Fig. 1). Interestingly, UV-C the amount of nitrone c formed was also found to be linear
irradiation of dUrd was found to generate nitrone c with a with the light intensity (Fig. 5(b)) at least for laser intensities
quantum yield determined to be 5.5 105. The quantum lower than 1.5 107 W cm2 per pulse. Such a linear
yield of formation of this product from UV-C-induced relationship indicates that nitrone c is produced via a
decomposition of dUrd is only 2.2 and 20 times lower than monophotonic mechanism. For higher intensities, the
those determined for 5-BrdUrd and 5-IdUrd, respectively. relationship is no longer linear, most probably due to the
The UV-C irradiation of 20 -deoxyuridine was not expected2 overwhelming biphotonic ionization of dUrd.
to produce radical e, at least not in significant amounts. To confirm that upon UV-C irradiation of dUrd the
detected product could be attributed to nitrone c, with a
DMPO residue linked to the C5 position of dUrd, deuterated
O O
analogues of dUrd were prepared. Irradiation of solutions of
Ph
HN S HN D6-dUrd (deuterium on C6) and DMPO led to chromato-
UV-C
O N O N
grams for the transition m/z 341 ! 225 that were identical to
dR dR e
the chromatograms obtained for the transition m/z 340 ! 224
with non-deuterated dUrd (data not shown). This indicates
Scheme 6. Formation of radical e by photolysis of the photo- that DMPO is not bound to the C6 position of dUrd. In
precursor 5-thiophenylmethyl-20 -deoxyuridine. addition, when a sample containing bideuterated 2D5,6-dUrd
Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006; 20: 2235–2242
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
Detection of spin-trapped radicals of nucleosides 2241
(deuterium on C6 and C5 positions, the sample containing additional transitions observed for nitrone c( obtained from
also 30% of contaminating D6-dUrd) was irradiated in the irradiation of 5-BrUrd, i.e. transitions m/z 356 ! 206,
presence of DMPO, only monodeuterated nitrone c was 356 ! 163 and 356 ! 135 (Fig. 6). The presence of these
detected using the transition m/z 341 ! 225 (data not shown). transitions upon UV-C-mediated photolysis of RNA in the
These experiments demonstrate that the hydrogen in the C6 presence of DMPO confirms that nitrone c( can be produced
position is conserved and that the hydrogen in the C5 in RNA, and that the product can be detected by HPLC/ESI-
position of dUrd is lost during the formation of the nitrone c. MS/MS subsequent to RNA hydrolysis.
These results are consistent with the proposed formation of
nitrone c from the initially generated 20 -deoxyuridin-5-yl
DISCUSSION
radical a.
In order to check if UV-C irradiation of RNA could also The objective of the present work was to evaluate the
induce the formation of a uridin-5-yl radical, a HPLC/ESI- potential of HPLC/ESI-MS/MS to detect spin trapping
MS/MS method was developed for the detection of the adducts derived from nucleosides, as already described
corresponding ribonucleoside of nitrone c. Aqueous for amino acids.18,19 First, photolysis of 5-halogenated
solutions containing 5-BrUrd or Urd and DMPO were UV- pyrimidine derivatives, a well-known system for the
C irradiated and analyzed by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS using a generation of the pyrimidin-5-yl radical, was performed in
constant neutral loss of 132 Da corresponding to a ribose the presence of DMPO, a classic spin trap. Potential spin
moiety. After irradiations of 5-BrUrd (Fig. 6, left panel) and trapping adducts were then detected by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS
Urd (Fig. 6, middle panel), only the transition m/z 356 ! 224 using a neutral loss scan method. The overwhelming
produces a signal and the corresponding chromatograms detected adduct was found to correspond to the expected
exhibited peaks at similar retention times. All these nitrone c in which the pyrimidine moiety is linked at C5 to
observations are consistent with the formation of the nitrone DMPO. The proposed structure of the adduct was confirmed
c(, an analogue of the nitrone c but containing a ribose moiety by NMR analysis. Application of the HPLC/ESI-MS/MS
instead of a 20 -deoxyribose moiety. A more sensitive MRM method was then extended to other systems known to induce
method was then developed for the detection of nitrone c( several pyrimidine radicals. The obtained results are in
using the transition m/z 356 ! 224 and additional specific agreement with the previously described photoreactivities of
transitions (Fig. 6). 5-thiophenylmethyl-20 -deoxyuridine and thymidine photo-
To detect the formation of nitrone c( in RNA, RNA sensitized by menadione bisulfite.
solutions were UV-C irradiated in the presence of DMPO. The detection of neutral losses of 116 Da or of 132 Da, (mass
Thereafter, RNA was precipitated to eliminate the excess of of deoxyribose and ribose moieties, respectively) in HPLC/
DMPO and then digested enzymatically to corresponding ESI-MS/MS is very specific and ensures that only com-
ribonucleosides. Using the specificity and sensitivity of the pounds derived from nucleosides are detected. Application
developed MRM method, a peak was observed at a retention of more sensitive MRM methods enabled us to detect
time similar to that of nitrone c(. Its intensity was found to amounts of spin trapping adducts as low as 0.5 pmol
increase with the irradiation time. The peak was not detected corresponding to a concentration in spin trapping adducts
in the absence of irradiation or when irradiation was as low as 108 mol L1.
performed in the absence of DMPO. Confirmation that this Difficulties in the mass spectrometric studies of spin
peak corresponds to nitrone c( was obtained by monitoring trapping adducts due to the different possible redox forms of
these adducts are well documented.16,17 In the absence of any
reducing agent, due to the higher stability of the nitrone
oxidized forms, the interpretation of the HPLC/ESI-MS/MS
data of spin trapping adducts derived from nucleosides is
simple, as described for those obtained for amino acids.19
Under our experimental conditions, only the oxidized forms
of the spin trapping adducts were detected, which leads to a
straightforward interpretation of mass spectral data.
The detection of nitrone c or its analogue c( after
irradiation of either dUrd or Urd and RNA is very puzzling
since the formation of the radical e by UV-C irradiation of the
pyrimidine has never been reported.2 However, our
experimental results clearly establish the formation of
nitrone c and the corresponding analogue c(. First, the
obvious similarity between the chromatograms obtained
Figure 6. HPLC/ESI-MS/MS detection of nitrone c( gener- after irradiation of halogenated and non-halogenated nucleo-
ated from (i) UV-C irradiation of 5-BrUrd in the presence of sides demonstrates that the same adducts are produced in
DMPO, left panel; (ii) UV-C irradiation of Urd in the presence both cases and the NMR analysis of nitrone c unambiguously
of DMPO, middle panel; (iii) UV-C irradiation of RNA in the confirms the proposed structure. Secondly, the experiments
presence of DMPO (right panel) subsequent to enzymatic performed with mono- and bideuterated dUrd confirm that
digestion. For all chromatograms, the four transitions used to the hydrogen at the C5 position is lost during the formation
detect nitrone c( are shown. of the spin trapping adducts. Thirdly, the observation of the
Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006; 20: 2235–2242
DOI: 10.1002/rcm
2242 V. Maurel, J.-L. Ravanat and S. Gambarelli
adduct after only one laser shot indicates that nitrone c is not Acids, vol. 1, Morrison H (ed). Wiley-Interscience: New York,
produced by the secondary oxidation of an initially 1990; 1.
3. Görner H, Schulte-Frohlinde D. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1995; 45:
generated photoproduct. In spite of all these indications, 677.
the results described here concerning dUrd and Urd are not 4. Janzen EG. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971; 4: 31.
sufficient by themselves to propose a consistent mechanism. 5. Tordo P. Spin trapping: recent developments and appli-
cations. In Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, Specialist Period-
Such a mechanistic study is beyond the scope of the ical Reports, vol. 16, Gilbert BC, Davies JD, McLauchlan AD
methodological study of the detection of spin trapping (eds). Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1998; 116.
adducts by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS reported in this work. 6. Rustgi S, Riesz P. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1978; 33: 21.
7. Lagercrantz C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 220.
Finally, the detection of the nitrone c( after irradiation of 8. Ho WF, Gilbert BC, Davies MJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
RNA subsequent to its enzymatic digestion to nucleosides 1997; 2533.
shows that HPLC/ESI-MS/MS of DMPO spin trapping 9. Davies MJ, Gilbert BC, Hazlewood C, Polack NP. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995; 13.
adducts of nucleoside free radicals is a versatile method 10. Catterall H, Davies MJ, Gilbert BC, Polack NP. J. Chem. Soc.,
which can be used to detect transient radicals in the Perkin Trans. 2 1993; 2039.
chemistry and in the photochemistry of RNA and DNA. 11. Murali Krishna C, Decarroz C, Wagner JR, Cadet J, Riesz P.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1987; 46: 175.
12. Hazlewood C, Davies MJ. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995;
895.
CONCLUSIONS 13. Luxford C, Morin B, Dean RT, Davies MJ. Biochem. J. 1999;
344: 125.
HPLC/ESI-MS/MS is a very specific, sensitive and infor- 14. Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002; 15: 83.
mative method for the detection of DMPO spin trapping 15. Yue Qian S, Tomer KB, Yue GH, Guo Q, Kadiiska MB, Mason
adducts of reactive free radicals derived from nucleosides. RP. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2002; 33: 998.
16. Iwahashi H, Parker CE, Mason RP, Tomer KB. Anal. Chem.
This method was successfully applied to detect free radicals 1992; 64: 2244.
from three well-established radical decomposition pathways 17. Iwahashi H. J. Chromatogr A 1996; 753: 235.
involving nucleoside derivatives. In addition, a spin trapping 18. Detweiler CD, Deterding LJ, Tomer KB, Chignell CF,
Germolec D, Mason RP. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2002; 33: 364.
adduct from a new radical pathway was detected in the 19. Deterding LJ, Ramirez DC, Dubin JR, Mason RP, Tomer KB.
photolysis of Urd and dUrd. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 11600.
Experiments with RNA strands show that DMPO spin 20. McIntire GL, Blount HN, Stronks HJ, Shetty RV, Janzen EG.
J. Phys. Chem. 1980; 84: 916.
adducts of base-centred radicals can also be detected by 21. Frelon S, Douki T, Ravanat J-L, Pouget J-P, Tornabene C,
HPLC/ESI-MS/MS after enzymatic hydrolysis, which opens Cadet J. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2000; 13: 1002.
a wide range of applications for this technique. 22. Regulus P, Spessotto S, Gateau M, Cadet J, Favier A, Ravanat
J-L. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004; 18: 2223.
23. Bellon S, Gasparutto D, Romieu A, Cadet J. Nucleosides,
Acknowledgements Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2001; 20: 967.
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Sophie Bellon and Dr 24. Bellon S, Ravanat J-L, Gasparutto D, Cadet J. Chem. Res.
Didier Gasparutto for the gift of 5-thiophenylmethyl-20 -deox- Toxicol. 2002; 15: 598.
25. Romieu A, Bellon S, Gasparutto D, Cadet J. Org. Lett. 2000; 2:
yuridine, Dr Colette Lebrun for technical assistance concern- 1085.
ing mass spectrometry, and Dr Jean Cadet for helpful 26. Ravanat J-L, Douki T, Duez P, Gremaud E, Herbert K, Hofer
comments and discussions. T, Lasserre L, Saint-Pierre C, Favier A, Cadet J. Carcinogenesis
(London) 2002; 23: 1911.
27. Rabi JA, Fox JJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973; 95: 1628.
28. Ravanat J-L, Remaud G, Cadet J. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000;
REFERENCES 374: 118.
1. Ravanat J-L, Douki T, Cadet J. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B: Biol. 29. Rahn RO, Sellin HG. Photochem. Photobiol. 1982; 35: 459.
2001; 63: 88. 30. Campbell JM, Schulte-Frohlinde D, von Sonntag C. Photo-
2. Cadet J, Vigny P. The photochemistry of nucleic acids. In chem. Photobiol. 1974; 20: 465.
Bioorganic Photochemistry, Photochemistry and the Nucleic 31. Foote CS. Photochem. Photobiol. 1991; 54: 659.
Copyright # 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006; 20: 2235–2242
DOI: 10.1002/rcm