We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
fa Aish
7_ cnan dai
- min Ranadut
hI —
Procurement an
Chapter 6 \_Supplier Selection
aa importance and steps of the
procurement process
Learfiing Outcomes
Key Terms
Procurement Cycle
Criteria of Supplier Selection
Mult-crteria Decision Making
TOPSIS
ZA rapter Outline
Introduction \ sj
Procurement Proce3s-
[ Supplier Selection
——=—_—V~—_— “Ly‘The decision-maker has wanted che supplie
to the company and the lead time co be smal
determined as
which supplier
02271
04336
03717
03304
0.3097
01858
0.3923
02478
0.2994
02788
Rica =|
‘The best values in columns of the Vien matiix => AY =
‘The worst values in columns ofthe Visa matiix
1°0:20 w3=0.50 and w=0,30, respectively. In this
by using the TOPSIS method.
01198
05971,
01990
03981,
02787
03583
0.1990
00796
o3nes
0.2787
1
Se
Procurement and Supplier Selection
$F capacity to be
large and the distance fiom the supplier
Weights represent
the importance of these criteria were
‘case, the decision-maker should select
(0.8374), the decision-maker should select the Supplier 1 according to
M0 3 1
20 15 4
wo s 2
160 10 0
1507 6
% 9 2
190 5 2
2 2 5
Ms 8 0
15 7 3)
1005 0454 0.0597 03015
04020 010867 02986 0.12060
0.2010 0.0743 00995 906030
0.0000 0.0661 0.1990 0,00000
06030 Wrn=| 00619 0.1393 0.18091
02010 9.0372 0.1791 0.06030
0.2010 0.0785 00595 9.06030
05025 0.0496 orsore |
1.0000 90599 01592 0,000
03015 00558 01393 0.05045
9.0867 0,0398 0,000
= A= 00372 02986 9.15001
0.2826 0.8374
00781 02147
02357 07332
0.2085 05649
ongi2 c= | ores
0.1697 05152
02364 07349
0.2608 0.6268
02295 06521
0.1841 os7isSupply Chain Management
review had TOPSIS confirm the answers proposed
by other MCDM methods, The advantage of its
simplicity and its abiliry to maintain the same
amount of steps regardless of problem size has
allowed it to be utilized quickly to review other
methods or to stand on its own as a decision
making tool.
TOPSIS is ‘an approach co identify an
alternative which is closest to the ideal
solution and farthest to the negative ideal
solution in a multi-dimensional computing
space’ (Qin et al., 2008).
‘An ideal solution for multi-criteria decision
problems, the hypothetical option with the best
values that can be reached in all criteria; the anti-
ideal solution is defined as the hypothetical option
with the worst values in all criteria. The option
chosen with TOPSIS should be both the closest to
the ideal solution and the farthest to the anti-ideal
solution. The method consists of six steps
Before proceeding ¢6 the first step, the decision
matrix must be created by the decision-maker. The
rows of the decision matrix correspond to options,
and the columns correspond to criteria to be used
in decision making. It is created by evaluating each
option according to each criterion. ‘The size of the
matrix is mxn to indicate the number of options,
‘m, n the number of criteria,
Step 1: Creating the standard decision matrix.
The standard decision matrix (R,,.,), is calculated
using the decision matrix (X,,,,,) according to the
ie
saation of ideal and anti-ideal
Step 3: Determine eal solution (A*) and
are defined as follows. Av
‘best’ values in
anti-ideal solution aa
.s the hypothetical option s
ee pee Av is another hypothedical option
that takes ‘worst’ values in each eriterion. The best
Tecchreanced ommcline ete VA en
the best values, A® and the worst values are A.
Step 4: Calculation of the separation measure,
In this step, Euclidian distance relation is used for
the measure of separation between alternatives. The
distances of each option from the ideal solution
(5¢) and anti-ideal solution (S7) are calculated
by the following formulas.
Sr Oy, ST =YLijen @y-¥5F
Step 5: Calculating the relative closeness to
the ideal solution. The relative closeness to the
ideal solution (G,) is calculated as follows:
=
G i
Sp +S)
Here G, will take a value in the range (0,1).
Step 6: Sorting options. When the relative
closeness to the ideal solution (G,) values of the
options are sorted from large to small, and the
most preferred options will be in the top rows.
] irporens
e
As an option approaches the ideal solution,
the relative proximity value to the ideal
solution (G) approaches 1. If G, = 1, the
‘option is equal co the ideal solution.
An Example to Solve the Supplier
Selection Problem With TOPSIS
Method
To select the most proper supplier among
ten candidate suppliers, the decision-maker has
determined three criteria as the capacity of the
supplicr, the distance from the supplier to the
company, and the lead time. The decision matrix
(xjo,3) is given below.Procurement and Supplier Selection
Learning Outcomes
aaa DUK en eee eam
BTS OT Wiey
Associate
companies’ 5
‘What is th
vppliclcion pce | siemens and sip] | She super ein
2 selection process with each Process that you observe in
J other | real life,
a
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES IN HE SUPPLI E
LS ECHN Ss IER SELECTION
Multi-criteria Decision Making
peso ea Se Sa used for supplier selection can be divided into three
, namely, multi-criteria decisi ing (MCDM), artificial intelligence (Al), and mathematical
Programming (MP) (Chai & Ngai, 2020). Among these streams, MCDM, which is used to determine che
‘most suitable one among the alternatives by considering many criteria, stands out.
‘There are many MCDM methods such as Analytic
Hierarchy Process (AHP), ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, & inporane
and Technique for Order Preferences by Similarity co e
Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS), etc. in the literature. Chai and TOPSIS is one of the mos preferred MSDM
Ngai (2020) and Velasquez and Hester (2013) examined methods because ofits features, such as its
these techniques in detail in their papers. One of these simple process, case of use, the fact that che
techniques, TOPSIS, has a simple process, it is easy to use, number of steps does nor increase regardless
and the number of steps remains the same regardless of the _ ofthe number of criteria, and use of Euclidean.
number of criteria. Its use of Euclidean Distance does not Distance.
consider che correlation of atcributes; itis difficult to weigh
and keep the consistency of judgment.
TOPSIS Method
TOPSIS is ‘an approach to identify an alternative which is closest to the ideal solution and farthest to
the negative ideal solution in a multi-dimensional computing space’ (Qin et al., 2008). It has numerous
advantages. For example, it has a simple process. Itis easy to use and programmable. The number of steps
remains the same regardless of the number of attributes (Ic, 2012). TOPSIS has been used in supply chain
management and logistics, and manufacturing systems, business and management,
environmental | management, and water resources management. This
plication popular. Many of the uses seen in the literature