8142 30474 1 PB
8142 30474 1 PB
                Hanning Mo1,2,3, Shaochun Ma1,3, Chen Qiu1,2,3*, Zhimin Huang1*, Shangping Li4
(1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of the Advanced Microwave Manufacturing Technology, Guangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanning 530007, China;
                  2. School of Mechanical and Resource Engineering, Wuzhou University, Wuzhou 543000, Guangxi, China;
        3. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Agricultural Power Equipment, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University,
                                                            Beijing 100083, China;
                          4. College of Electronic Information, Guangxi Minzu University, Nanning 530006, China)
          Abstract: The sugarcane field excitation, cutting forces and the engine excitation constitute complicated excitations acting on
          sugarcane harvesters. In this study, the sugarcane cutting mechanism under complicated excitations was analyzed. The
          dynamics and the mathematical models of sugarcane harvesters were established and simulated. Based on theoretical analysis,
          sugarcane cutting experiments were done on a self-built sugarcane harvester test platform (SHTP), designed as single-factor
          and the orthogonal experiments. Effects of the sugarcane field excitation characterized by the sugarcane field excitation device
          (SFED) output frequency, the engine excitation characterized by the actuating engine output frequency, the cutter rotating
          speed, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed simulated through the sugarcane transporting speed of the SHTP and the cutter
          inclination angle on the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters were studied. Effects of the axial cutter vibration on three-
          directional cutting forces and the sugarcane cutting quality (SCQ) as well as effects of three-directional cutting forces on the
          SCQ were further studied. It is shown that the sugarcane field excitation, the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency as
          well as the three-directional cutting forces have significantly negative monotonic correlated effects on the SCQ while the cutter
          rotating speed, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle have significantly positive monotonic
          correlated effects on the SCQ. Significance levels of effects on three-directional cutting forces and the SCQ form high to low
          are as follow, the axial cutter vibration, the sugarcane field excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the engine excitation, the cutter
          inclination angle, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed. The theoretical analysis results were verified through experiment
          and an optimal combination was obtained with the cutter rotating speed of 700 r/min, sugarcane harvester travelling speed of
          0.6 m/s and cutter inclination angle of 8º. This study can provide a reference for setting cutting parameters of sugarcane
          harvesters with a good SCQ.
          Keywords: sugarcane harvester, cutting quality, complicated excitations, experimental research, theoretical analysis
          DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20241705.7947
          Citation: Mo H N, Ma S C, Qiu C, Huang Z M, Li S P. Experimental research on affecting factors of the cutting quality of
          sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2024; 17(5): 176–192.
process. Yang et al.[17,18] studied effects of the cutter rotating speed                           In this study, a self-built sugarcane harvester test platform
and the sugarcane harvester travelling speed on the cutting quality                           (SHTP) with complicated excitations simulated through two
of sugarcane harvesters.                                                                      sugarcane field excitation devices (SFED) and an actuating engine
     Research above was about mechanics characteristics of                                    was developed to study effects of these influence factors on the
sugarcanes, effects of the sugarcane cutting form, design parameters                          axial cutter vibration, three-directional cutting forces and the cutting
of the cutters, the cutting system vibration, the sugarcane harvester                         quality of sugarcane harvesters. That is, experiments in sugarcane
travelling speed and the cutter rotating speed on the cutting quality                         fields can be simulated in labs, which is never achieved in previous
of sugarcane harvesters and cutting forces. It is shown that the                              study. This study provided a reference for setting such cutting
sugarcane field excitation has a bad effect on the cutting quality of                         parameters as the cutter rotating speed, the cutter inclination angle
sugarcane harvesters in that it causes vibrations of sugarcane                                and the travelling speed of sugarcane harvesters with a good SCQ.
harvesters leading to vibrations of the cutters.
     As is mentioned above, the axial cutter vibration has a bad                              2 Sugarcane cutting mechanism under complicated
effect on the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters. The sugarcane                          excitations
field excitation, cutting forces and the engine excitation constitute
complicated excitations acting on sugarcane harvesters. However,                                   Simplified as a planar problem, the force diagram of a
none of the research above was focused on effects of the sugarcane                            sugarcane cut by a blade is shown in Figure 1[19,20]. The x axis points
field excitation, the engine excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the                       to the direction of the sugarcane harvester travelling speed. The z
cutter inclination angle, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed on                         axis along the cutter axes points to the upward vertical direction.
the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters, the axial cutter vibration                       Forces and motions along the y axis are not considered, so gravities
and cutting forces comprehensively under actual complicated                                   and the supporting force generated by the ground acting on the
excitations in sugarcane fields.                                                              sugarcane are not considered[19,20].
                               x                                                                               x
                  y                                                                                y
                  a. Effect of the upward axial blade vibration on the sugarcane                 b. Effect of the downward axial blade vibration on the sugarcane
                                                                  Figure 1        Force diagram of a sugarcane
     According to Figure 1a and Figure 1b, when an upward axial or                            Equation (3a). When the downward axial cutter vibration appears,
a downward axial vibration of the cutters appears, the blade will                             the friction force f2 is calculated through Equation (3b).
generate an upward pressure Fz1 or a downward pressure Fz2 acting                                                        (             )
                                                                                                                                 N1
on the sugarcane and the upper or the lower surface of the cutter                                                    f1 = Fz1 +          µ                (a)
                                                                                                                                 cos θ1
will also generate a friction force, f1 or f2 acting on the upper or the                                                  (             )                                         (3)
                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                     f2 = Fz2 + N2 µ
lower surface of the sugarcane. Fz1 and Fz2 are vertical to the wedge                                                                                      (b)
                                                                                                                                        cos θ2
surface of the blade. Fz1 , Fz2 , f1 and f2 are along the same action line
at the contact point O. The sugarcane harvester travelling speed is                                Equation (1) and Equation (3) are combined to obtain Equation
vx. Therefore, the cutter will generate a pressure Fx along the x axis                        (4) used to calculate the resultant force, F1 or F2 are generated by
acting on the sugarcane at the point O. When stresses generated by                            the cutter along the tangential line of its circular motion.
Fx exceeded the lateral bending strength of the sugarcane, axial
cracks of the sugarcane will appear and the sugarcane ratoon may                                                                 F⃗ = F⃗0 + f⃗ − F⃗ A                             (4)
be broken. Fz1 and Fz2 can be decomposed into the horizontal                                                                                 dx
                                                                                                                                               2
cutting force F0, and the vertical compression N. The relationship                                                                 FA = m                                         (5)
                                                                                                                                             dt2
between these two component forces is shown in Equation (1).
                                                                                              where, FA is the inertia force keeping the rest state of the sugarcane
                                        F0
                                 N=                                    (1)                    when the axial cutter vibration shock acts on it, N; m is the
                                       tan φ
                                                                                              equivalent mass of the sugarcane, kg.
    F0 is calculated through the Experience Equation (2)[15].                                     Axial cutter vibration frequency components are complicated,
                            D                                                                 which can be regarded as a combination of several simple axial
                       F0 = θ + S vx − ξφ + C                                        (2)
                            2                                                                 harmonic vibrations shown in Equation (6a). According to force
where, vx is the sugarcane harvester travelling speed, m/s; D is the                          analysis of Figure 1, when the upward axial cutter vibration
diameter of the sugarcane, m; S is the cut-in depth, m; θ is the cutter                       appears, Fz1 will generate a bending moment Mz1 acting at the point
inclination angle, rad; φ is the cutting-edge angle, rad; ξ and C are                         O. According to the second Newton Law, Fz1 and Fz2 are calculated
constant dependent on mechanics characteristics of the sugarcane.                             through Equation (6b). When the downward axial cutter vibration
     According to the classical friction law, when the upward axial                           appears, Fz2 will generate a bending moment Fz2 acting at the point
cutter vibration appears, the friction force f1 is calculated through                         O. Mz1 and Mz2 are calculated through Equation (6c).
  178     October, 2024                                         Int J Agric & Biol Eng                                 Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                                                            Vol. 17 No. 5
                      
                          ∑N
                                                                                                                                   relationship between Mz and the axial cutter vibration amplitude Ai
                      
                        =     Ai sin (ωi t + φi )
                      
                      
                       z                                                  (a)                                                      and frequency ωi, the cut-in depth S while there is a negative
                      
                          i=1
                                                                                                                                   correlated relationship between Mz and the cutter inclination angle
                                   d2 z                                                                        (6)
                      
                       Fz = m 2                                          (b)                                                      θ. Therefore, the greater the axial cutter vibration amplitude and
                      
                             dt
                      
                      
                                                                                                                                   frequency as well as the cut-in depth are, the greater Fz and Mz will
                      M = F S                                            (c)                                                      be, then the much more easily axial cracks of the sugarcane will
                                       2 cos θ
                            z      z
                                                                                                                                   appear, the poorer the SCQ will be, matching the conclusion of the
where, Ai is the axial cutter vibration amplitude of the sine series,                                                              previous research[11,12] that the axial cutter vibration has a bad effects
m; ωi is the axial cutter vibration angular frequency, rad/s; φi is the                                                            on the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters, which was further
initial phase, rad.                                                                                                                verified through experiments in this study. The greater the cutter
     The tensile strength along the axial direction of the sugarcane is                                                            inclination angle is, the smaller Fz and Mz will be, then the less
much greater than that along the lateral direction. If a sugarcane is                                                              easily axial cracks of the sugarcane will appear, the better the SCQ
not cut off at once along the lateral direction, cracks will be                                                                    will be, also verified through experiments in this study.
extended along the axial direction. Therefore, if a sugarcane is cut
for several times, when the upward axial cutter vibration appears,                                                                 3 Dynamics and mathematical models of sugarcane
under the combined action of Mz1 and the moment generated by Fx,                                                                   harvesters
Mx is calculated through Equation (7), the axial tearing cracks of the                                                                 The dynamics model of a sugarcane harvester is simplified as a
sugarcane will be easy to appear. When the downward axial cutter                                                                   multi-freedom-degree spring-damping-mass system shown in
vibration appears, the sugarcane ratoon will be broken if Fz2 is                                                                   Figure 2[19]. Four wheels, two cutters, the body frame, the logistics
greater than the compressive strength of the sugarcane.                                                                            frame and the engine of the sugarcane harvester are simplified as
                                        S                                                                                          mass blocks. Connections of four wheels and the body frame as
                            Mx = F x                                (7)
                                     2 sin θ                                                                                       well as the sugarcane field, the cutting system and the body frame,
     According to Equation (6), there is a positive correlated                                                                     the engine and the body frame are simplified as spring dampers.
                                                                                                                   z
                                                                                                                                                      Fe′
                                                                                                                                    l3
                                                                                                                                                                       z7
m4
Iz3, θ3 Fe m 2′
                                                                                                                                                                                                 z6
                                                                                                                        K9                      B9         K5                 B5
                                                          2a                           m 1′                                                                                        2a′
                                                                      z2′                                                           ye                                                           z 4′
                                                                                                     z5′
                                                                                                                                                                                                        Iy1+ Iy2, θ2
                                                                                                               l4
                                         v                                             z5′                                                  Iy3, θ2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                 y
                                                                                                               r
                                                                                                                    z                                                           z3
                                                                                                                         Fx″
                                                                                           r′                                                                   m 1″
                                                     m1                                         K4″, B4″
                                                            Ix3,θ1′              z5                                     Fx         Fy
                                                           B2                                                                      Fy″
                                             k2                                                        m 3′                                                K7                 B7
                                                                                                                             l4′    2β
                                   Ix1+ Ix2,θ1
                                                  x                              l1                                                        l2
Note: m1, m2, m′′1 , m′′2 , m′′3 , m′1 , m′2 , m′4 are masses of two front wheels, two rear wheels, one cutter, the body frame, the logistics frame and the engine, kg; Icutter, Ix3, Iy3,
Iz3, Ix1, Iy1, Ix2, Iy2 are rotational inertias of a cutter around x, y and z axes, the body frame and the logistics frame around x and y axes, kg·m2; K1, B1, K3, B3 are stiffness and
damping coefficients between two front wheels and the body frame, N/m, N/(m/s); K2, B2, K8, B8 are stiffness and damping coefficients between two front wheels and the
sugarcane field, N/m, N/(m/s); K6, B6, K10, B10 are stiffness and damping coefficients between two rear wheels and the body frame, N/m, N/(m/s); K7, B7, K11, B11 are
stiffness and damping coefficients between two rear wheels and the sugarcane field, N/m, N/(m/s); K4′ , B′4 are the stiffness and the damping coefficients between the
cutting system and the body frame, N/m, N/(m/s); K4′′ , B′′4 are the stiffness and the damping coefficients between two cutter axes and the cutter frame, N/m, N/(m/s); K9,
B9, K5, B5 are stiffness and damping coefficients of the front and the rear anti-vibration pads of the engine, N/m, N/(m/s).
                                                                     Figure 2              Dynamics model of a sugarcane harvester
  October, 2024                 Mo H N, et al.    Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations              Vol. 17 No. 5     179
The mass center of the body frame is set as the coordinate origin.                              where, z1, z2, z3, z4, z5, z6, and z7 are vertical displacements of four
The z axis points to the upward vertical direction. The x axis along                            wheels, a cutter, the body frame and the engine, m; θcutter, θ1′ , θ2′ , and
radiuses of two cutters points to the left of the sugarcane harvester.                          θ3 are cutter rotating angles around its axis, the x, the y, and the z
The y axis along the sugarcane harvester travelling speed points to                             axes, rad. θ1 and θ2 are body frame rotating angles around the x and
the back of the sugarcane harvester.                                                            the y axes, rad; They are calculated through given values of
     Fw1, Fw2, Fw3, and Fw4 are sugarcane field excitations acting on                           parameters above.
the four wheels, calculated through Equation (8)[21,22].                                             According to the D’Alembert principle, the mathematical
                        Fwi (t) = Ki ξ (t) + Bi ξ̇ (t) , i = 2, 8, 7, 11                (8)     model of Figure 2 is written as Equation (14) in a matrix form[21-24].
where, ξ(t) is the piecewise fitting equation of sugarcane field                                                               M Z̈ + BŻ + KZ = F                               (14)
roughness every 20 s, m, shown in Equation (9)[21,22].
                         ∑
                         8
                                                         ∑
                                                         8                                      where, M, Z, B, K, and F are the generalized mass matrix, the
               ξ (t) =          ai sin(ωi t + φi ) =           ai sin(2π fi t + φi )    (9)     generalized displacement column vector, the generalized damping
                          i=1                            i=1                                    coefficient matrix, the generalized stiffness coefficient matrix and
where, ai is the amplitude, m; ωi is the angular frequency, rad/s; fi is                        the generalized external force column vector. M, B, and K are
the frequency, Hz; φi is the initial phase, rad.                                                13×13 square matrixes while Z and F are 13-dimentional column
     Fe and Fe′ are periodical forces acting on the body frame by the                           vectors. B and K depend on the force condition of Figure 2. All
engine and the engine by its internal structures, calculated through                            masses and rotational inertias are on the positive diagonal of M in
Equation (10).                                                                                  the order of the left and the right front wheels, the left and the right
                          Fe (t) = 55.17 sin (2π × 40.021t)                                     rear wheels, the cutter, the body frame and the engine. The
                                                                                       (10)     equivalent mass and rotational inertias of the body frame are
                          Fe′ (t) = 2493 cos (2 × 2π × 29.18t)
                                                                                                m′1 + m′2 , Ix1+Ix2, and Iy1+Iy2. Z and F are shown in Equation (15) and
where, Fx, Fy, and Fz are cutting forces along the x, the y, and the z                          Equation (16).
axes, N, calculated through Equation (11).
                                                 (                      )                                        Z = [z1 z2 z3 z4 z5 z6 z7 θcutter θ3 θ1′ θ2′ θ1 θ2 ]T           (15)
                           F x (t) = 517.2 sin 2π × 19.067t
                                                 (                      )                                                                                                         
                           Fy (t) = 414.2 sin 2π × 19.067t                             (11)                                         K2 ξ + B2 ξ̇
                                                 (                      )
                           Fz (t) = 373.2 sin 2π × 19.067t                                                                         K8 ξ + B8 ξ̇                                     
                                                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                   K7 ξ + B7 ξ̇                                     
          ′′       ′′             ′′
where, F , F , and F are the radial, the tangential and the axial                                                                                                                   
          x        y              z
                                                                                                                                  K11 ξ + B11 ξ̇                                    
cutting forces, N, calculated through Equation (12).                                                                                                                                
                                                     (                      )                                           Fz′′ cos β + Fy′′ sin β − F x′′ sin β                       
                         F x′′ (t) = 517.167 sin 2π × 19.067t                                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                          Fe                                        
                                                     (                      )                                                                                                       
                         Fy′′ (t) = 462.108 sin 2π × 19.067t                           (12)      F=
                                                                                                                                          Fe′                                       
                                                                                                                                                                                     
                                                     (                      )                                                                                                       
                         F (t) = 383.903 sin 2π × 19.067t
                           ′′
                                                                                                                                      −Fy′′ R                                       
                           z
                                                                                                                                    F x l4 cos β
                                                                                                                                       ′′ ′                                          
                                                                                                                                                                                    
where, a, a′, and R are halves of the front wheel distance, the rear                                F ′′ l′ sin β + F ′′ r′ cos β − F ′′ l′ sin β − F ′′ l′ cos β − F ′′ r′ sin β   
                                                                                                    x 4                                                                             
                                                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                      y                y 4             z 4            z
wheel distance and the centre distance of two cutters, a=0.68 m, a′=                                                                −F x′′ r′ cos β
                                                                                                                                                                                    
0.605 m, R=0.27 m; l1 and l2 are distances between the mass centre                                                                      Fl                                          
                                                                                                                                              e 3
of the body frame and the front axle, the mass centre of the body                                                                          Fe ye
frame and the rear axle, l1=1.8 m, l2=1.2 m; l4 and l4′ are distances                                                                                                            (16)
between the mass centre of the cutter frame and the z axis when the
cutter inclination angle is 0º, the mass center of a cutter and the z                                  Relationship curves of z1, z2, z3, z4, z5, z6, z7, θ1, and θ2 changing
axis in the sugarcane cutting process, l4=0.9 m, l4′ =0.83 m; β and v                           with time drawn through MATLAB according to Equation (14) are
are the cutter inclination angle and the sugarcane harvester                                    shown in Figures 3a-3i.
travelling speed, β=8º, v=0.6 m/s; l3 and ye are distances between                                     As shown in Figures 3 that z1-z7, θ1 and θ2 change with time in
the mass centre of the body frame and the action line of Fe along the                           periodical damping variation laws with gradually decreasing
x axis and the y axis, l3=0.1 m, ye=0.303 m; r and r′ are the length of                         amplitudes in that Fw, Fe, and Fe′ are periodical excitations. θcutter,
a cutter axis and the distance between the mass centre of a cutter                              θ1′ , θ2′ , and θ3 become greater and greater along with time in that
and the y axis in the sugarcane cutting process, r=0.5 m, r′=                                   two cutters keep rotating around their axes, the x, the y, and the z
0.495 m.                                                                                        axes in the sugarcane cutting process, so their relationship curves
     z′1 , z′2 , z′3 , z′4 are vertical displacements of connection points of                   changing with time are simple monotonically-increasing lines
four wheels and the body frame; z′5 is the vertical displacement of                             neglected here. Therefore, the dynamics and the mathematical
connection points of the cutting system and the body frame. They                                models of sugarcane harvesters are reasonable. Besides, according
are calculated through Equation (13)[21,22].                                                    to Equation (14), there are 13 dependent variables in the
                                          a                                                     mathematical model of sugarcane harvesters, so the dynamics
                               z′1 = z6 − θ2 + r′ θ2 − l4′ θ1
                                          2                                                     model of sugarcane harvesters is a multi-input and multi-output
                                          a                                                     second-order underdamped linear time-invariant discrete dynamics
                               z2 = z6 + θ2 + r′ θ2 − l4′ θ1
                                ′
                                          2                                                     systems with 13 degrees of freedom.
                                          a′                            (13)
                               z3 = z6 − θ2 − r′ θ2 + l4′ θ1
                                ′                                                                      Relationship curves of z5 changing with ai, fi, n, v and β drawn
                                           2                                                    through MATLAB according to Equation (14) are shown in
                                             ′
                                          a
                               z′4 = z6 + θ2 − r′ θ2 + l4′ θ1                                   Figures 4a-4e.
                                           2
                                                                                                       As is shown in Figure 4, the greater ai and fi are, the greater z5
                               z′5 = z6 + r′ θ2 − l4′ θ1
                                                                                                is, showing the more obvious the sugarcane field excitation is, that
  180    October, 2024                                         Int J Agric & Biol Eng                     Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                                                       Vol. 17 No. 5
Z2/mm
                                                                                                                                                        Z3/mm
                                                                                                                                                                  0.2
                   0
                                                                                                                                                                    0
                −0.2
                −0.4                                                                  0                                                                          −0.2
                −0.6                                                                                                                                             −0.4
                −0.8                                                                                                                                             −0.6
                −1.0                                                             −0.5                                                                            −0.8
                         0   20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                   0     20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                            0    20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
                                      t/s                                                                 t/s                                                                         t/s
                                            a. z1                                                               b. z2                                                                     c. z3
Z5/mm
                                                                                                                                                        Z6/mm
                 0.2
                                                                                 −0.5                                                                               0
                   0                                                                                                                                             −0.2
                −0.2                                                             −1.0                                                                            −0.4
                −0.4                                                                                                                                             −0.6
                                                                                 −1.5
                −0.6                                                                                                                                             −0.8
                −0.8                                                             −2.0                                                                            −1.0
                         0   20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                   0     20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                            0    20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
                                       t/s                                                                 t/s                                                                         t/s
                                      d. z4                                                               e. z5                                                                       f. z6
θ1/rad
                                                                                                                                                       θ2/rad
                                                                                    0                                                                               0
                −0.5                                                             −0.5                                                                            −0.5
                                                                                                                                                                 −1.0
                                                                                 −1.0
                −1.0                                                                                                                                             −1.5
                                                                                 −1.5                                                                            −2.0
                −1.5                                                             −2.0                                                                            −2.5
                         0   20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                   0     20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160                                            0    20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
                                      t/s                                                                 t/s                                                                         t/s
                                            g. z7                                                               h. θ5                                                                     i. θ6
                   10                                                           10                                                                      0.4835
                                                                                                                                                        0.4830
                    8                                                            8                                                                      0.4825
                    6                                                            6                                                                      0.4820
                                                                                                                                                        0.4815
                                                                      Z5/mm
                                                                                                                                               Z5/mm
           Z5/mm
                    4                                                            4                                                                      0.4810
                                                                                                                                                        0.4805
                    2                                                            2                                                                      0.4800
                    0                                                            0                                                                      0.4795
                                                                                                                                                        0.4790
                   −2                                                           −2                                                                      0.4785
                         0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90                                0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90                                                   0       50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
                                     ai/m                                                        fi/m                                                                                n/(r·m−1)
                                          a. z5 m ai                                                      b. z5 m fi                                                                  v. z5 m n
                                          0.34725                                                                               0.45
                                          0.34720                                                                               0.40
                                          0.34715
                                          0.34710                                                                               0.35
                                  Z5/mm
Z5/mm
                                          0.34705                                                                               0.30
                                          0.34700                                                                               0.25
                                          0.34695
                                          0.34690                                                                               0.20
                                          0.34685                                                                               0.15
                                                −1.0    −0.6     −0.2 0.2                  0.6      1.0                                0   5           10           15    20     25     30
                                                                  v/(m·s−1)                                                                                       β/(°)
                                                                  d. z5 m v                                                                                     e. z5 m β
is, the hillier a sugarcane field is, the more severe the axial cutter                                                 Additionally, according to Figures 4c-4e, the greater n, v and β
vibration will be, then the poorer the SCQ will be according to                                                   are, the smaller z5 is, showing the greater the cutter rotating speed,
sugarcane cutting mechanism analysis, matching the conclusion of                                                  the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination
research above[11,12] that the sugarcane field excitation and the axial                                           angle are, the weaker the axial cutter vibration will be, then the
cutter vibration have bad effects on the cutting quality of sugarcane                                             better the SCQ will be according to the sugarcane cutting
harvesters, further verified through experiments.                                                                 mechanism, further verified through experiments.
    October, 2024           Mo H N, et al.   Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations                    Vol. 17 No. 5   181
convertors, a piezoelectric three-directional force-measuring Figure 5 Structural diagram and prototype of SHTP
                        5                      1                                                            5                             1
                                               2
                        6                                                                                   6                             2
                                               3
                                                 4                                                          7                             3
                    7
                    8
                    9                                                                                       8
                                                                                                                                          4
                                                                                                            9
                1, 2. External and the internal sleeves of the upper spring 3. Eccentric   1, 2. External and the internal sleeves of the upper spring 3. Eccentric
                mass blocks 4. Axis coupler 5, 6, 9. Upper, middle and lower support       mass blocks 4. Axis coupler 5, 6, 9. Upper, middle and lower support
                platforms 7, 8. External and the internal sleeves of a lower spring        platforms 7, 8. External and the internal sleeves of a lower spring
                                a. Three-dimensional model of SFED                                                  b. Prototype of SFED
                                                     Figure 6     Three-dimensional model and prototype of SFED
    Three-directional cutting forces were measured through the                             forces were obtained through the common milling force-measuring
force-measuring system. According to the high-speed                                        system in every group of experiments. In every column vector, the
photographing result in the sugarcane cutting process, there are                           number of absolute values much greater than others is equal to the
wave crests, showing in the sugarcane cutting process of sugarcane                         number of wave crests got by high-speed photographing. The
harvesters, a sugarcane is cut off in more than one time of cutting.                       average value of these greater absolute values was calculated as the
Three column vectors corresponding to three-directional cutting                            value of the cutting force along this direction.
  182   October, 2024                                     Int J Agric & Biol Eng             Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                                      Vol. 17 No. 5
                 a. The laser of the LK-G150 laser displacement sensor falling on the                     b. The digital angle-measuring instrument put on the cutter to
                 cutter along the z axis to measure the axial cutter vibration amplitude                               measure the cutter inclination angle
        c. Piezoelectric three-directional force                          d. Three channels of the piezoelectric three              e. Piezoelectric three-directional force
                measuring instrument                                       -directional forcemeasuring instrument                   measuring instrument installed under
                                                                          corresponding to the x, the y and the z axes                   the sugarcane-holding device
                                                                     Figure 7        Main experiment equipment
                 
                                             ∑   m                                                amplitude and frequency, the cutter rotating speed, the cutter
                 
                  k = 1/ ln m, e j = −k
                 
                                                    pi j ln pi j                                  inclination angle and the sugarcane harvester travelling speed on
                                               i=1                                                three-directional cutting forces and the SCQ.
                                                    ¿∑                                (17)
                 
                 
                                                      4                                                 In order to avoid the resonance of the SHTP, constant levels of
                 
                  g     = 1 − e   ,    w     = g        gj
                 
                 
                     j           j         j      j                                                the SFED output frequency and the actuating engine output
                 
                 
                 
                 
                                                     j=1
                                                                                                   frequency were set as 4 Hz and 30 Hz[25]. According to previous
                 
                          ∑ 4
                                                     ∑
                                                     m
                                                             ¿
                 
                                                                                                  research results, constant levels of the cutter rotating speed, the
                 
                  Q   i =       x  ′
                                    i j w j ,  Q  =      Q i  m                                    sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination angle were
                             j=1                    i=1
                                                                                                   set as 650 r/min, 0.6 m/s and 15º[29]. Levels of these experimental
where, xi′ j , xij are the membership degree and the value of j-th index                           factors are listed in Table 1.
in i-th repeated experiment under the same condition, j=1, 2, 3, 4,
                                                                                                                   Table 1     Levels of experimental factors
respectively, the number of sugarcanes whose ratoons were broken,
                                                                                                              Experimental factor             Constant level   Range       Step length
the axial crack number, the axial crack depth and the axial crack
                                                                                                    Cutter rotating speed/r·min–1                  650         450-750         50
length, i=1, 2, 3, …, m, Every group of experiments in this study
                                                                                                    Cutter inclination angle/(°)                    15          0-20           2
were done for five times, so m=5; xjmax and xjmin are the maximum
                                                                                                    Sugarcane transporting speed/m·s–1             0.6         0.1-0.8         0.1
and the minimum values of j-th index; pij is the proportion of j-th
                                                                                                    SFED output frequency/Hz                        4            1-9           1
index in i-th experiment; ej, gj, and wj are the entropy value, the                                 Actuating engine output frequency/Hz            30
difference coefficient and the weight of j-th index; Qi is the SCQEV
of i-th experiment; Q is the average value of Qi, as the SCQEV of                                  4.4.2 Orthogonal experiment design
this experiment condition. The greater the SCQEV is, the poorer the                                     Experimental factors of this orthogonal experiment were output
SCQ is.                                                                                            frequencies of the SSFE and the actuating engine, the cutter rotating
    October, 2024         Mo H N, et al.   Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations                                             Vol. 17 No. 5       183
speed, the sugarcane transporting speed, the cutter inclination angle.                   vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces with the
Their levels are listed in Table 2. Experimental indexes were the                        SFED output frequency were studied.
axial cutter vibration displacement, three-directional cutting forces                         A three-directional cutting force signal under a 4 Hz output
and the SCQEV. This orthogonal experiment was aimed at studying                          frequency of the SFED and a 700 r/min cutter rotating speed is
significance levels of effects of the sugarcane field excitation, the                    shown in Figure 8. The total number of blades is 8 and the blades
engine excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the sugarcane harvester                    distribute uniformly around the cutters, so the shortest cutting time
travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle on the axial cutter                    interval of the cutters is 0.0106 s. There are two wave crests in
vibration, three-directional cutting forces and the SCQ. Effects of                      Figure 8, that is, the sugarcane was cut by the cutters twice and the
the axial cutter vibration on three-directional cutting forces and the                   sugarcane was cut off after two times of cutting according to what
                                                                                         was captured by the high-speed camera in Figure 9, so in the
SCQ as well as effects of three-directional cutting forces on the
                                                                                         sugarcane cutting process of sugarcane harvesters, a sugarcane is
SCQ were further studied. The L25(56) orthogonal table was chosen.
                                                                                         cut off by more than one time of cutting. Moreover, in Figure 9,
The experiment arrangement is listed in Table 3.
                                                                                         these two cut-in points were different, that is, there was a height
            Table 2     Levels of the five experimental factors                          difference between them, so when the sugarcane was cut for the
                                                              Level                      second time, the cutters pressed the sugarcane and the axial cutter
              Experiment factor                                                          vibration might make the sugarcane ratoon broken. Therefore, the
                                                  1     2      3       4      5
 SFED output frequency A/Hz                       8     11     17      20    25          axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency directly affect the
 Actuating engine output frequency B/Hz           19    22     26      28    30
                                                                                         SCQ. Three-directional cutting forces were measured through a
                                                                                         common milling force-measuring system.
 Cutter rotating speed C/r·min–1               450      500   650     700    750
 Sugarcane transporting speed D/m·s–1             0.4   0.5    0.6     0.7   0.8                                                                       x-direction    y-direction         z-direction
                                                                                                                           Three-directional cutting
                                          4.5                                                                                                          700           The z-directional cutting force
                 amplitude/mm             4.0                                                                                                          600
                                          3.5
                                          3.0                                                                                                          500
                                                                                                                                  forces/N
                                          2.5                                                                                                          400
                                          2.0                                                                                                          300
                                          1.5                                                                                                                                              Fx=280.64e0.0553x R2=0.98
                                                                                                                                                       200                                 Fy=393.39e0.0501x R2=0.95
                                          1.0
                                          0.5                                                                                                          100                                 Fz=307.51e0.0547x R2=0.98
                                            0                                                                                                            0
                                                0    1       2    3    4     5     6     7      8   9      10                                                0   1      2    3    4    5      6    7    8       9   10
                                                             The SFED output frequency/Hz                                                                               The SFED output frequency/Hz
                                         a. Axial cutter vibration amplitude and SFED output frequency                                                 b. Three-directional cutting forces and SFED output frequency
        Figure 10                           Relationship curves of the axial cutter vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces changing with the SFED
                                                                                           output frequency
  Table 4 Monotonic correlation analysis results of the axial                                                             Moreover, monotonic correlation coefficients are greater than 0, so
 cutter vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces                                                          there are significantly positive monotonic correlated relationships
           changing with the SFED output frequency                                                                        between the axial cutter vibration amplitude and the SFED output
        Experimental index                                       Monotonic correlation coefficient       p-value          frequency, three-directional cutting forces and the SFED output
 Axial cuter vibration amplitude                                                 0.957                     0.000          frequency, matching what are found through Figure 10. Therefore,
 x-directional cutting force                                                     0.065                     0.040          the more obvious the sugarcane field excitation is, that is, the hillier
 y-directional cutting force                                                     0.043                     0.045          a sugarcane field is, the more severe the axial cutter vibration and
 z-directional cutting force                                                     0.190                     0.039          the greater three-directional cutting forces will be. The more severe
                                                                                                                          the axial cutter vibration is, the greater the axial cutter vibration
     It is listed in Table 4 that p values are smaller than 0.05, so                                                      amplitude and frequency will be, so the more obvious the sugarcane
there are significant monotonic correlated relationships between the                                                      field excitation is, that is, the hillier a sugarcane field is, the greater
axial cutter vibration amplitude and the SFED output frequency,                                                           the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency will be, matching
three-directional cutting forces and the SFED output frequency.                                                           what are found through Figures 4a and 4b.
                            Table 5                   Single-factor variance analysis results with the SFED output frequency as the independent variable
Experimental index                                                    Axial cutter vibration amplitude                                                                            x-directional cutting force
        Source                                  Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value                                           Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value
    Inter-group                                     458.398                17                  26.965           302.562   0.000                          2 865 071.943            17              168 533.644            3.27    0.001
    Intra-group                                      3.208                 36                   0.089                                                    1 855 500.245            36              51 541.673
    Total value                                     461.606                53                                                                            4 720 572.188            53
Experimental index                                                         y-directional cutting force                                                                            z-directional cutting force
        Source                                  Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value                                           Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value
    Inter-group                                 7 628 341.311              17                448 725.959         3.247    0.001                          4 769 919.277            17              280 583.487          9.029     0.000
    Intra-group                                 4 974 733.432              36                138 187.040                                                 1 118 757.555            36              31 076.599
    Total value                              12 603 074.743                53                                                                            5 888 676.831            53
     Besides, as shown in Table 5 that p values are smaller than                                                          forces will be.
0.05, so the SFED output frequency has significant effects on the                                                         5.1.2 Effects of the cutter rotating speed on the axial cutter
axial cutter vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces.                                                    vibration and three-directional cutting forces
Therefore, the sugarcane field excitation has significantly positive                                                           Relationship curves of the axial cutter vibration amplitude and
monotonic correlated effects on the axial cutter vibration and three-                                                     three-directional cutting forces changing with the cutter rotating
directional cutting forces.                                                                                               speed are shown in Figure 11.
     On the other hand, according to Figure 10a, when the SFED                                                                 According to Figure 11a, the axial cutter vibration amplitude
output frequency was 6 Hz, the axial cutter vibration amplitude                                                           increased along with the cutter rotating speed increasing at the
increased to 4.03 mm, the maximum value. According to LMS                                                                 beginning. When the cutter rotating speed was 550 r/min, the axial
modal test results of the SHTP got previously by our research                                                             cutter vibration amplitude reached the maximum value, 0.36 mm.
group[21,22], there is an inherent frequency of the SHTP near 6 Hz. In                                                    Then the axial cutter vibration amplitude decreased along with the
order to avoid the resonance of the SHTP, the SFED output                                                                 cutter rotating speed increasing and it kept being 0.24 mm.
frequency should be far away from 6 Hz. According to Figure 10b,                                                          Therefore, there should be a resonance point of the SHTP near
the resonance of the SHTP made three-directional cutting forces                                                           9.2 Hz, the output frequency of 550 r/min, matching results of the
increase significantly. Therefore, the greater the SFED output                                                            LMS modal test of the SHTP got previously by our research group
frequency and the axial cutter vibration amplitude are, making the                                                        that there is an inherent frequency of the SHTP near 10 Hz[21,22].
compressive frequency and the pressure of the cutters acting on the                                                       According to Figure 11b, along with the cutter rotating speed
sugarcane greater, then causing three-directional cutting forces to                                                       increasing, three-directional cutting forces increased firstly and then
increase. That is, the more obvious the sugarcane field excitation                                                        decreased. When the cutter rotating speed was 550 r/min, three-
and the more severe the axial cutter vibration are, that is, the hillier                                                  directional cutting forces increased significantly. Change laws of
a sugarcane field is and the greater the axial cutter vibration                                                           three-directional cutting forces with the cutter rotating speed are
amplitude and frequency are, the greater three-directional cutting                                                        similar to that of the axial cutter vibration amplitude.
  October, 2024                                                        Mo H N, et al.      Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations                                                                                             Vol. 17 No. 5     185
                                                             0.30                                                                                                                        500
                                                                                                                                                                                         400
                                                             0.25
                                                                                                                                                                                         300
                                                             0.20                                                                                                                        200
                                                             0.15                                                                                                                        100
                                                              0.1                                                                                                                          0
                                                                400       450      500   550   600    650    700      750        800                                                       400                                       450        500    550    600    650     700     750   800
                                                                                The cutter rotating speed/(r·min−1)                                                                                                                        The cutter rotating speed/(r·min−1)
                                                             a. Axial cutter vibration amplitude and the cutter rotating speed                                                          b. Three-directional cutting forces and the cutter rotating speed
      Figure 11                                                   Relationship curves of the axial cutter vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces changing with the cutter
                                                                                                                  rotating speed
     Monotonic correlation and single-factor variance analysis                                                                                   forces will be, so the greater the cutter rotating speed is, the greater
results with the cutter rotating speed as the independent variable got                                                                           the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency will be, matching
though SPSS are listed in Tables 6 and 7.                                                                                                        what is found through Figure 4c.
     As is listed in Table 6, p values are smaller than 0.05, so there
are significant monotonic correlated relationships between the axial                                                                               Table 6 Monotonic correlation analysis results of the axial
cutter vibration amplitude and the cutter rotating speed, three-                                                                                  cutter vibration amplitude and three-directional cutting forces
directional cutting forces and the cutter rotating speed. Moreover,                                                                                          changing with the cutter rotating speed.
monotonic correlation coefficients are smaller than 0, so there are                                                                                                                     Experimental index                                                    Monotonic correlation coefficient       p-value
significantly negative monotonic correlated relationships between                                                                                 Axial cuter vibration amplitude                                                                                           –0.025                    0.044
the axial cutter vibration amplitude and the cutter rotating speed,
                                                                                                                                                  x-directional cutting force                                                                                               –0.043                    0.040
three-directional cutting forces and the cutter rotating speed.
                                                                                                                                                  y-directional cutting force                                                                                               –0.023                    0.045
Therefore, the greater the cutter rotating speed is, the more severe
                                                                                                                                                  z-directional cutting force                                                                                               –0.120                    0.044
the axial cutter vibration and the greater three-directional cutting
                                                             Table 7         Single-factor variance analysis results with the cutter rotating speed as the independent variable
Experimental index                                                                       The axial cutter vibration amplitude                                                                                                                           x-directional cutting force
      Source                                                        Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value                                                       Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value
    Inter-group                                                           39.466               11                  3.588               108.757   0.000                                    244 532.067                                                    11             22 230.188          4.574      0.001
    Intra-group                                                           0.792                24                  0.033                                                                  116 652.457                                                    24                4860.519
    Total value                                                           40.258               35                                                                                         361 184.524                                                    35
Experimental index                                                                             y-directional cutting force                                                                                                                              z-directional cutting force
      Source                                                        Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value                                                       Quadratic sum Freedom degree Mean square value F value p value
    Inter-group                                                     934 882.281                11             84 989.298                4.342    0.001                                    628 898.261                                                    11             57 172.569          10.044     0.000
    Intra-group                                                     469 822.212                24             19 575.926                                                                  136 610.341                                                    24                5692.098
    Total value                                                     1 404 704.493              35                                                                                         765 508.602                                                    35
     Moreover, it is shown in Table 7 that p values are smaller than                                                                             fitting equations are greater than 0.96, so they have high accuracies.
0.05, so the cutter rotating speed has significantly negative                                                                                    There are obviously positive monotonic correlated relationships
monotonic correlated effects on the axial cutter vibration and three-                                                                            between three-directional cutting forces and the sugarcane
directional cutting forces.                                                                                                                      transporting speed, three-directional cutting forces, and the cutter
5.1.3 Effects of the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the                                                                                inclination angle. That is, the greater the sugarcane transporting
cutter inclination angle on three-directional cutting forces                                                                                     speed and the cutter inclination angle were, the greater three-
     Relationship curves of three-directional cutting forces changing                                                                            directional cutting forces were. Monotonic correlation and single-
with the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination                                                                                 factor variance analysis results with the sugarcane transporting
angle are shown in Figures 12 and 13.                                                                                                            speed and the cutter inclination angle as independent variables got
     Determination coefficients of these fitting curves and their                                                                                though SPSS are listed in Tables 8-11.
                                                                                                                                                                                          Three-directional cutting forces/N
        Three-directional cutting forces/N
   Table 8 Monotonic correlation analysis results of three-                                       Table 9 Monotonic correlation analysis results of three-
directional cutting forces and the sugarcane transporting speed                                   directional cutting forces and the cutter inclination angle
        Experimental index              Monotonic correlation coefficient   p value                Experimental index                       Monotonic correlation coefficient          p value
 The x-directional cutting force                     0.688                  0.000               x-directional cutting force                                0.154                           0.042
 The y-directional cutting force                     0.665                  0.000               y-directional cutting force                                0.144                           0.044
 The z-directional cutting force                     0.867                  0.000               z-directional cutting force                                0.194                           0.049
            Table 10      Single-factor variance analysis results with the sugarcane transporting speed as the independent variable
Experimental
                             x-directional cutting force                            y-directional cutting force                                        z-directional cutting force
   index
                Quadratic Freedom Mean square F      p                  Quadratic Freedom Mean square F      p                            Quadratic Freedom Mean square   F     p
   Source
                  sum      degree   value    value value                  sum      degree   value    value value                            sum      degree   value     value value
 Inter-group 144 558.591           7       20 651.227 3.060 0.030 552 587.222            7      78 941.032 3.636 0.015 370 760.430                         7       52 965.776 12.010 0.000
 Intra-group 107 987.836         16         6749.240                  347 384.372       16      21 711.523                               70 564.646        16       4410.290
 Total value 252 546.428         23                                   899 971.594       23                                               441 325.076       23
               Table 11        Single-factor variance analysis results with the cutter inclination angle as the independent variable
Experimental
                             x-directional cutting force                            y-directional cutting force                                        z-directional cutting force
   index
                Quadratic     Freedom Mean square F      p              Quadratic     Freedom Mean square F      p                         Quadratic    Freedom Mean square F      p
   Source
                  sum          degree   value    value value              sum          degree   value    value value                         sum         degree   value    value value
 Inter-group 106 469.987           10      10 646.999 1.955 0.041 406 990.367            10      40 699.037 2.323 0.048 273 071.685                         10      27 307.169 7.673 0.000
 Intra-group 119 810.773           22       5445.944                   385 417.389       22      17 518.972                               78 290.343        22       3558.652
 Total value 226 280.760           32                                  792 407.756       32                                               351 362.028       32
      It is listed in Tables 8 and 9 that p values are smaller than 0.05,                     The optimal sugarcane transporting speed is 0.6 m/s with the best
so there are significant monotonic correlated relationships between                           SCQ, that is, the optimal sugarcane harvester travelling speed is
three-directional cutting forces and the sugarcane transporting                               0.6 m/s. According to Figure 17, the SCQ will be poorer when the
speed, three-directional cutting forces and the cutter inclination                            cutter inclination angle increases. The optimal cutter inclination
angle. Moreover, monotonic correlation coefficients are greater than                          angle is 8º with the best SCQ.
0, so there are significantly positive monotonic correlated
                                                                                                                                     The curve          The fitting curve
relationships between three-directional cutting forces and the                                                       0.55
sugarcane transporting speed, three-directional cutting forces and                                                   0.50
                                                                                                         The SCQEV
                                                                                                                     0.45
the cutter inclination angle, matching what are found through                                                        0.40
Figure 12 and Figure 13. Therefore, the greater the sugarcane                                                        0.35
harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle are, the                                                 0.30                             y=−0.0042x2+0.0604x+0.264
greater three-directional cutting forces will be.                                                                    0.25                             R2=0.826
                                                                                                                     0.20
      Meanwhile, according to Tables 10 and 11, p values are smaller                                                        0    1      2   3   4    5     6   7   8           9     10
than 0.05, so the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter                                                                           The SFED output frequency/Hz
inclination angle have significant effects on three-directional cutting                                Figure 14                 Relationship between SCQEV and SFED
forces. Therefore, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the                                                                    output frequency
cutter inclination angle have significantly positive monotonic
correlated effects on three-directional cutting forces.                                                              0.65            The curve          The fitting curve
5.1.4 Effects of field excitation, cutter rotating speed, harvester                                                  0.60
                                                                                                        The SCQEV
                                                                                                                     0.55
the SCQ can be improved when the cutter rotating speed increases.                                                    0.50
The optimal cutter rotating speed is 700 r/min. When the cutter                                                      0.45
rotating speed was 550 r/min with the output frequency of 9.2 Hz,                                                    0.40                          y=1.1429x2−1.1881x+0.7732
                                                                                                                     0.35                          R2=0.9064
the SCQ was the poorest in that the resonance of the SHTP                                                            0.30
appeared, causing the greatest axial cutter vibration amplitude                                                             0    0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8                     0.9
according to Figure 10a. According to Figure 16, along with the                                                                   The sugarcane transporting speed/(m·s−1)
sugarcane transporting speed increasing, the SCQEV decreased                                        Figure 16                   Relationship between SCQEV and sugarcane
firstly with a better SCQ and then it increased with a poorer SCQ.                                                                     transporting speed
  October, 2024                      Mo H N, et al.   Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations           Vol. 17 No. 5     187
                     0.65            The curve            The fitting curve                         SCQ will be, matching what are found through Figures 4a and 4b.
                     0.60                                                                           Monotonic correlation coefficients between the SCQEV and the
         The SCQEV
                     0.55
                                                                                                    cutter rotating speed, the SCQEV and the sugarcane transporting
                     0.50
                     0.45                                                                           speed, the SCQEV and the cutter inclination angle are smaller than
                     0.40                                y=6E−0.5x2−0.0112x+0.578                   0, so there are significantly negative monotonic correlated
                     0.35                                R2=0.5775                                  relationships between the SCQEV and the cutter rotating speed, the
                     0.30                                                                           SCQEV and the sugarcane transporting speed, the SCQEV and the
                            0    2    4     6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
                                          The cutter inclination angle/(°)                          cutter inclination angle, matching what are found through
                                                                                                    Figures 15-17. Therefore, the greater the cutter rotating speed, the
        Figure 17                Relationship between SCQEV and cutter
                                                                                                    sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle
                                       inclination angle
                                                                                                    are, the better the SCQ will be, matching the sugarcane cutting
     Based on analysis above, optimal level combination of the                                      mechanism and what are found through Figures 4c-4e.
cutter rotating speed, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and                                      Furthermore, it is listed in Table 13 that p values are smaller
the cutter inclination angle is 700 r/min, 0.6 m/s and 8º for                                       than 0.05, so the SFED output frequency, the cutter rotating speed,
sugarcane harvesters with a good SCQ.                                                               the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination angle
     Monotonic correlation and single-factor variance analysis                                      have significant effects on the SCQEV. Therefore, the sugarcane
results with the SFED output frequency, the cutter rotating speed,                                  field excitation has a significantly positive monotonic correlated
the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination angle as                                effects on the SCQ while the cutter rotating speed, the sugarcane
independent variables and the SCQEV as the dependent variable got                                   harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle have
though SPSS are listed in Tables 12 and 13.                                                         significantly negative monotonic correlated effects on the SCQ.
                                                                                                    5.2 Orthogonal experiment result analysis
Table 12 Monotonic correlation analysis results of the SCQEV                                             Main effect analysis results obtained through multi-factor
 changing with SFED output frequency, cutter rotating speed,                                        variance analysis of SPSS are listed in Tables 14-16.
 sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination angle
      Experimental factor                     Monotonic correlation coefficient     p-value
                                                                                                        Table 14 Main effect analysis result of the axial cutter
 SFED output frequency                                         0.106                 0.046
                                                                                                     vibration displacement in the sugarcane cutting process as the
 Cutter rotating speed                                        –0.012                 0.045
                                                                                                                         dependent variable
                                                                                                                      Dependent variable: axial cutter vibration displacement in the
 Sugarcane transporting speed                                 –0.664                 0.000
                                                                                                                                      sugarcane cutting process G
 Cutter inclination angle                                     –0.167                 0.044              Source                              Mean                                Partial
                                                                                                                       III-type Freedom                    F-           p-
                                                                                                                                            square                                eta
                                                                                                                    quadratic sum degree                  value        value
                                                                                                                                             value                              square
 Table 13 Single-factor variance analysis results with SFED                                         The corrected
                                                                                                                      260.423a       20      13.021     141.663       0.000     0.981
output frequency, cutter rotating speed, sugarcane transporting                                          model
speed and cutter inclination angle as independent variables and                                     The intercept     2754.351        1     2754.351 29 965.851       0.000     0.998
              SCQEV as the dependent variable                                                         The SFED
                                                                                                         output       247.260         4      61.815     672.513       0.000     0.980
                                                                Mean                                 frequency A
   Experimental                               Quadratic Freedom         F-    p-
                                  Source                        square
      factor                                    sum      degree        value value                  The actuating
                                                                 value
                                                                                                    engine output       2.577         4       0.644       7.009       0.000     0.342
                                Inter-group      41.001         17      2.412   1.207 0.048          frequency B
   SFED output
                                Intra-group      71.942         36      1.998                         The cutter
    frequency
                                Total value   112.943           53                                      rotating        7.742         4       1.936      21.058       0.000     0.609
                                                                                                        speed C
                                Inter-group      0.276          11      0.025   0.159 0.049         The sugarcane
  Cutter rotating
                                Intra-group      3.801          24      0.158                        transporting       1.262         4       0.316       3.433       0.014     0.203
      speed
                                Total value      4.077          35                                     speed D
                                                                                                      The cutter
                   Inter-group                   0.161          7       0.023   1.424 0.043           inclination       1.582         4       0.395       4.303       0.004     0.242
    Sugarcane
                   Intra-group                   0.259          16      0.016                           angle E
transporting speed
                   Total value                   0.420          23                                       Error          4.963        54       0.092
                                Inter-group      0.119          10      0.012   1.096 0.046          Total value    3019.738       75
 Cutter inclination                                                                                 Corrected total
                                Intra-group      0.238          22      0.011                                        265.387       74
       angle                                                                                            value
                                Total value      0.357          32
                                                                                                                           a. R2=0.981 (Corrected R2=0.974)
     According to Table 12, p values are smaller than 0.05, so there                                     As listed in Tables 14-16, when the axial cutter vibration
are significant monotonic correlated relationships between the                                      displacement in the sugarcane cutting process is the dependent
SCQEV and the SFED output frequency, the SCQEV and the cutter                                       variable, the p value of the sugarcane transporting speed is smaller
rotating speed, the SCQEV and the sugarcane transporting speed,                                     than 0.05 while those of the other four experimental factors are
the SCQEV and the cutter inclination angle. Moreover, the                                           smaller than 0.01, so the sugarcane harvester travelling speed has a
monotonic correlation coefficient between the SCQEV and the                                         significant effect on the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane
SFED output frequency is greater than 0, so there is a significantly                                cutting process while the cutter inclination angle, the sugarcane
positive monotonic correlated relationship between the SCQEV and                                    field excitation, the cutter rotating speed and the engine excitation
the SFED output frequency, matching what is found through                                           have highly significant effects on the axial cutter vibration in the
Figure 14. Therefore, the more obvious the sugarcane field                                          sugarcane cutting process. Moreover, partial eta square values of
excitation is, that is, the hillier a sugarcane field is, the poorer the                            these five experimental factors are greater than 0.14, so effect sizes
  188       October, 2024                                Int J Agric & Biol Eng        Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                                         Vol. 17 No. 5
of the sugarcane field excitation, the engine excitation, the cutter                         cutter inclination angle on the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane
rotating speed, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the                             cutting process are large.
Table 15        Main effect analysis result of the axial cutter vibration displacement in the sugarcane cutting process as the co-variate and
                                             three-directional cutting forces as dependent variables
                                                                      Dependent variable: three-directional cutting forces
 Source                 III-type quadratic sum                  Freedom degree             Mean square value                      F-value            p-value       Partial eta square
                   x                 y              z            x      y    z         x            y            z            x      y      z    x     y       z     x     y     z
Corrected
          1 848 069.754a 6 188 978.115a 4 138 789.808a           21    21    21   88 003.322 294 713.244 197 085.229 20.344 12.004 55.158 .000 .000 .000 .890 .826 .956
 model
Intercept 85 460.645      237 130.145     53 768.583             1     1     1    85 460.645 237 130.145 53 768.583 19.756 9.659 15.048 .000 .003 .000 .272 .154 .221
    A         83 861.492       232 124.313     52 785.409        4     4     4    20 965.373 58 031.078 13 196.352 4.847 2.364 3.693 .002 .045 .010 .268 .151 .218
    B         30 388.189        77 931.778     19 250.230        4     4     4     7597.047 19 482.945 4812.557              1.756 0.794 1.347 .152 .535 .265 .117 .057 .092
    C         51 190.817       149 376.589     32 068.590        4     4     4    12 797.704 37 344.147 8017.148             2.958 1.521 2.244 .028 .209 .077 .183 .103 .145
    D         16 854.042        49 835.837     10 544.992        4     4     4     4213.510 12 458.959 2636.248              0.974 0.507 0.738 .430 .730 .570 .068 .037 .053
    E         21 046.915        55 002.884     13 312.254        4     4     4     5261.729 13 750.721 3328.063              1.216 0.560 0.931 .315 .693 .453 .084 .041 .066
    G         219 503.045       20 673.922       2389.249        1     1     1    219 503.045 20 673.922 2389.249        50.743 2.842 4.669 .000 .043 .007 .489 .160 .312
   Error     229 266.206 1 301 200.634 189 374.076               53    53    53    4325.777 24 550.955 3573.096
   Total
            19 249 394.378 73 010 425.262 48 135 884.017         75    75    75
   value
Corrected
            2 077 335.960 7 490 178.749 4 328 163.884            74    74    74
total value
        2
   a. R          0.890          0.826          0.956
    Table 16 Main effect analysis result of the axial cutter                                 inclination angle are greater than 0.05 while those of the SFED
 vibration displacement in the sugarcane cutting process as the                              output frequency and the axial cutter vibration displacement are
     co-variate and the SCQEV as the dependent variable                                      smaller than 0.05, so except the cutter rotating speed, the engine
                                 Dependent variable: SCQEV                                   excitation, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter
     Source                                Mean                                              inclination, the sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter
                      III-type   Freedom             F-    p-   Partial eta
                                          square                                             vibration have significant effects on the y-directional cutting force.
                   quadratic sum degree             value value  square
                                           value
                                                                                             Moreover, partial eta square values of the SFED output frequency
 The corrected
                       2.150a            21      0.102     0.663 0.849        0.208          and the axial cutter vibration displacement are greater than 0.14, so
    model
 The intercept         0.637             1       0.637     4.125 0.047        0.072          effect sizes of the sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter
        A              0.628             4       0.157     1.016 0.048        0.144          vibration on the y-directional cutting force are large.
        B              0.238             4       0.060     0.385 0.818        0.028               When the z-directional cutting force is the dependent variable,
        C              0.370             4       0.092     0.599 0.665        0.043          p values of the cutter rotating speed, the actuating engine output
        D              0.121             4       0.030     0.195 0.940        0.015          frequency, the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter inclination
        E              0.163             4       0.041     0.264 0.900        0.020          angle are greater than 0.05 while that of the SFED output frequency
        G              0.378             1       0.378     2.449 0.004        0.171          is smaller than 0.05 and that of the axial cutter vibration displacement
     Error             8.186             53      0.154                                       are smaller than 0.01, so except the cutter rotating speed, the engine
  Total value          29.095            75                                                  excitation, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter
 Corrected total
                       10.336            74                                                  inclination angle, the sugarcane field excitation has a significant
     value
                                                                                             effect on the z-directional cutting force and the axial cutter vibration
                            a. R2=0.208 (Corrected R2=0.106)
                                                                                             has a highly significant effect on the z-directional cutting force.
     When the x-directional cutting force is the dependent variable,                         Moreover, partial eta square values of the SFED output frequency
p values of the actuating engine output frequency, the sugarcane                             and the axial cutter vibration displacement are greater than 0.14, so
transporting speed and the cutter inclination angle are greater than                         effect sizes of the sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter
0.05 while those of the SFED output frequency, the axial cutter                              vibration on the z-directional cutting force are large.
vibration displacement are smaller than 0.01 and that of the cutter                               When the SCQEV is the dependent variable, the p value of the
rotating speed is smaller than 0.05, so except the engine excitation,                        SFED output frequency is smaller than 0.05 and that of the axial
the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination                          cutter vibration displacement is smaller than 0.01 while those of the
angle, the sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter vibration                         other four experimental factors are greater than 0.05, so except the
have highly significant effects on the x-directional cutting force                           engine excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the sugarcane harvester
while the cutter rotating speed have a significant effect on the x-                          moving speed and the cutter inclination angle, the sugarcane field
directional cutting force. Moreover, partial eta square values of the                        excitation has a significant effect on the SCQ and the axial cutter
SFED output frequency, the axial cutter vibration displacement and                           vibration has a highly significant effect on the SCQ. Moreover,
the cutter rotating speed are greater than 0.14, so effect sizes of the                      partial eta square values of the SFED output frequency and the axial
sugarcane field excitation, the axial cutter vibration and the cutter                        cutter vibration displacement are greater than 0.14, so effect sizes of
rotating speed on the x-directional cutting force are large.                                 the sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter vibration on the
     When the y-directional cutting force is the dependent variable,                         SCQ are large.
p values of the cutter rotating speed, the actuating engine output                                In addition, significance levels of effects of the sugarcane field
frequency, the sugarcane transporting speed and the cutter                                   excitation, the engine excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the
  October, 2024                        Mo H N, et al.   Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations                           Vol. 17 No. 5       189
sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle                                 directional cutting forces, the axial cutter vibration displacement
on the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane cutting process from                                   and the SCQEV, three-directional cutting forces and the SCQEV.
high to low are A>C>B>E>D. Significance levels of effects of these                                    That is, the greater the axial cutter vibration displacement is, the
five experimental factors and the axial cutter vibration on three-                                    greater three-directional cutting forces are. The greater the axial
directional cutting forces and the SCQ from high to low are G>                                        cutter vibration displacement and three-directional cutting forces
A>C>B>E>D.                                                                                            are, the greater the SCQEV is, the poorer the SCQ will be. Their
     Fitting equations of the axial cutter vibration displacement,                                    monotonic correlation analysis results obtained through SPSS are
three-directional cutting forces and the SCQEV changing with these                                    listed in Tables 17 and 18.
five experimental factors obtained through multi-factor linear
                                                                                                                                     0.65         The curve          The fitting curve
regression analysis of SPSS are shown in Equations (18)-(22), in
                                                                                                                                     0.60
which experimental factors with p values greater than 0.05, that is,
                                                                                                                         The SCQEV
                                                                                                                                     0.55
without significant effects, were removed.                                                                                           0.50
                                                                                                                                     0.45
    y1 = 1.022 + 0.37A − 0.38B + 0.015C + 3.999D − 0.054E                                  (18)                                      0.40                           y=0.824x+0.001
                                                                                                                                     0.35                           R2=0.9971
                           y2 = 59.121 + 29.426A + 1.156C + 308.059G                       (19)                                      0.30
                                                                                                                                         2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
                                 y3 = 107.738 + 57.613A + 69.262G                          (20)                                                The axial cutter vibration displacement/mm
                                                                                                        Figure 19                         Fitting curve of the SCQEV changing with the axial
                                 y4 = 149.544 + 46.357A + 58.608G                          (21)                                                 cutter vibration displacement
                                    y5 = 0.233 + 0.029A + 0.069G                           (22)                                          The fitting equation of the SCQEV changing with the
                                                                                                                                         x-directional cutting force: y=0.001Fx+0.002 R2=0.9961
where, y1-y5 are the axial cutter vibration displacement, the x-                                                                         The fitting equation of the SCQEV changing with the
directional cutting force, the y-directional cutting force, the z-                                                                       y-directional cutting force: y=0.0005Fx+0.0001 R2=0.9961
directional cutting force and the SCQEV; A-G are the SFED output                                                                         The fitting equation of the SCQEV changing with the
                                                                                                                                         z-directional cutting force: y=0.0007Fx+0.0005 R2=0.9976
frequency, the actuating engine output frequency, the cutter rotating
                                                                                                                              0.8
speed, the sugarcane transporting speed, the cutter inclination angle                                                         0.7
                                                                                                             The SCQEV
                                                                                                                              0.6
and the axial cutter vibration displacement in the sugarcane cutting                                                          0.5
process.                                                                                                                      0.4
                                                                                                                              0.3
     Effects of the axial cutter vibration on three-directional cutting                                                       0.2
                                                                                                                              0.1
forces and the SCQ as well as effects of three-directional cutting                                                              0
forces on the SCQ were further studied. Fitting curves of three-                                                                     0       200       400     600 800 1000 1200 1400
                                                                                                                                                             Cutting force/N
directional cutting forces changing with the axial cutter vibration
displacement, the fitting curve of the SCQEV changing with the                                                                 The fitting curve of the SCQEV changing with the x-directional
                                                                                                                               cutting force
axial cutter vibration displacement and fitting curves of the SCQEV
                                                                                                                               The fitting curve of the SCQEV changing with the y-directional
changing with three-directional cutting forces drawn through                                                                   cutting force
Excel based on the orthogonal experiment result are shown in                                                                   The fitting curve of the SCQEV changing with the z-directional
Figures 18-20.                                                                                                                 cutting force
                         1200
                         1000                                                                                                                                                  Cutting force
                                                                                                                                         Coefficient
                          800                                                                                                                                           x            y               z
                          600
                          400                                                                            Monotonous correlation coefficient                          0.999        0.999            0.998
                          200                                                                                                             p value                    0.000        0.000            0.000
                            0
                             2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0
                                    The axial cutter vibration displacement/m
                                                                                                           As shown in Table 17 that p values are all 0, so there are
                                                                                                      significant monotonic correlated relationships between three-
                           The fitting curve of the x-directional cutting force changing
                           with the axuak cutter vibration displacement                               directional cutting forces and the axial cutter vibration
                           The fitting curve of the y-directional cutting force changing              displacement. Moreover, monotonic correlation coefficients are all
                           with the axuak cutter vibration displacement                               greater than 0, so there are significant positive monotonic correlated
                           The fitting curve of the z-directional cutting force changing              relationships between three-directional cutting forces and the axial
                           with the axuak cutter vibration displacement
                                                                                                      cutter vibration displacement, that is, the greater the axial cutter
    Figure 18 Fitting curves of three-directional cutting forces                                      vibration displacement is, the greater three-directional cutting forces
       changing with the axial cutter vibration displacement                                          will be. Therefore, the more severe the axial cutter vibration in the
    Determination coefficients of these fitting curves and fitting                                    sugarcane cutting process is, the greater three-directional cutting
equations are all greater than 0.95, so they have high accuracies.                                    forces will be. This verifies the discovery about the effect of the
There are obvious positive monotonic correlated relationships                                         axial cutter vibration on three-directional cutting forces obtained in
between the axial cutter vibration displacement and three-                                            single-factor experiments.
    190   October, 2024                          Int J Agric & Biol Eng          Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                          Vol. 17 No. 5
Table 18 Monotonic correlation analysis results of the SCQEV                          appear. When a sugarcane is cut for the second time, the cutters will
 and the axial cutter vibration displacement, the SCQEV and                           press the sugarcane and the axial cutter vibration will make the
                three-directional cutting forces                                      sugarcane ratoon broken. The breaking degree of the sugarcane is
                                     Independent variable                             dependent on the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency, so
     Coefficient      Axial cutter
                                     x-directional y-directional z-directional
                                                                                      the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency directly affect the
                       vibration                                                      SCQ, matching the sugarcane cutting mechanism.
                                     cutting force cutting force cutting force
                     displacement
    Monotonous                                                                             There are positive monotonic correlated relationships between
    correlation           0.993         0.992         0.992         0.995             three-directional cutting forces and the axial cutter vibration
    coefficient                                                                       amplitude and frequency. The greater the axial cutter vibration
      p value             0.000         0.000         0.000         0.000
                                                                                      amplitude is, the greater the pressure, the friction force and the z-
                                                                                      directional cutting force generated by the cutters acting on the
     What’s more, as listed in Table 18 that p values are all 0, so
                                                                                      sugarcane will be, which makes the x-directional and the y-
there are significant monotonic correlation relationships between
                                                                                      directional cutting forces also increase.
the SCQEV and the axial cutter vibration displacement, the SCQEV
                                                                                           Along with the cutter rotating speed increasing, three-
and three-directional cutting forces. Moreover, monotonic
                                                                                      directional cutting forces increased firstly and then decreased. This
correlation coefficients are all greater than 0, so there are significant
                                                                                      is mainly relative to cutter rotations around cutter axes and
positive monotonic correlated relationships between the SCQEV
                                                                                      sugarcane toughness. Effects of the axial cutter vibration amplitude
and the axial cutter vibration displacement, the SCQEV and three-
                                                                                      on three-directional cutting forces are significant. When the cutter
directional cutting forces, that is, the greater the axial cutter
                                                                                      rotating speed decreases, causing lack of cutting energies, the
vibration displacement and three-directional cutting forces are, the
                                                                                      cutters will push down and compress the sugarcane instead of
greater the SCQEV will be, the poorer the SCQ will be. Therefore,
                                                                                      cutting off the sugarcane at once. This will cause a cutting force
the more severe the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane cutting
                                                                                      accumulation.
process is, the poorer the SCQ will be. This verifies the discovery
                                                                                           Three-directional cutting forces increase along with the cutter
about effects of the axial cutter vibration and three-directional
                                                                                      inclination angle increasing in that the contact area between the
cutting forces on the SCQ obtained in single-factor experiments.
                                                                                      cutters and the sugarcane is increased when the cutter inclination
     On the other hand, there is an obviously positive monotonic
                                                                                      angle increases. When the sugarcane harvester moves forward, the
correlated relationship between SCQEV and the axial cutter
                                                                                      cutters will generate a pushing force acting on the sugarcane. The
vibration amplitude according to Figure 19. That is, the greater the
                                                                                      cutters are inclined, so this pushing force can be decomposed into
axial cutter vibration amplitude is, the greater the SCQEV is, the
                                                                                      three-directional component forces, that is, three-directional cutting
poorer the SCQ will be. It is also shown by their monotonic
                                                                                      forces. The greater the cutter inclination angle is, the greater these
correlation analysis result that there is a highly significant positive
                                                                                      three-directional component forces will be.
monotonic correlated relationships between the SCQEV and the                               Three-directional cutting forces increase along with the
axial cutter vibration amplitude, matching the conclusion of the                      sugarcane harvester travelling speed increasing. This is similar to
previous research[11,12] and the sugarcane cutting mechanism that the                 effects of the cutter inclination angle on three-directional cutting
axial cutter vibration has a bad effect on the cutting quality of                     forces, so Figures 12 and 13 are similar. When the cutter inclination
sugarcane harvesters. Therefore, the more severe the axial cutter                     angle is constant, the greater the sugarcane harvester travelling
vibration is, that is, the greater the axial cutter vibration amplitude               speed is, the greater the pushing force generated by the cutters
and frequency are, the poorer the SCQ will be, so the more obvious                    acting on the sugarcane will be. Thus, three-directional cutting
the sugarcane field excitation is, that is, the hillier a sugarcane field             forces will be greater. Based on analysis above, some SCQ-
is, the poorer the SCQ will be in that the more obvious the                           improving methods can be obtained as follow:
sugarcane field excitation is, the more severe the axial cutter                            When the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency
vibration will be, making the axial cutter vibration amplitude and                    increase, the sugarcane will suffer from the pressure Fz and the
frequency greater, further matching what are found through                            bending moment Mz. When the sugarcane is cut for the second time,
Figures 4a and 4b. The greater the cutter rotating speed, the                         the sugarcane will be easy to be compressed and torn. The
sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle                 sugarcane ratoon will be broken if the axial cutter vibration
are, the better the SCQ will be in that the greater the cutter rotating               amplitude is extremely great, so the axial cutter vibration amplitude
speed, the sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter                        should be reduced through vibration reducing methods of sugarcane
inclination angle are, the weaker the axial cutter vibration is,                      harvesters. Inherent frequencies of sugarcane harvesters should be
making the axial cutter vibration amplitude and frequency smaller,                    increased to avoid their resonance. Besides, it is good for improving
further matching what are found through Figures 4c-4e.                                the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters to increase the cutter
                                                                                      rotating speed. Lack of cutting energies appear with a low cutter
6     Analysis and discussions
                                                                                      rotating speed, making the cutters generate shocks acting on the
    According to the sugarcane cutting mechanism, the pressure Fz                     sugarcane, compress and shock it instead of cutting it off rapidly.
and the bending moment Mz generated by the cutter acting on the                       Then sugarcane toughness prevents cutting energies and the cutters
sugarcane increase along with the axial cutter vibration amplitude                    reaching the interior of the sugarcane rapidly, causing damages and
and frequency increasing. This will make axial cracks of the                          cracks of the sugarcane. Therefore, the cutter rotating speed ought
sugarcane appear and the ratoon broken.                                               to be great enough to cut off the sugarcane rapidly in order to
    There are height differences among different cut-in points. This                  effectively improve the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters.
is bad for the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters, making a                      Moreover, a great cutter inclination angle increases the contact area
sugarcane cut off by more than one time of cutting and Fz increase.                   between the cutters and the sugarcane, making the sugarcane ratoon
Then Mz generated by Fz will make axial cracks of the sugarcane                       not easy to be broken by the cutters. The axial tensile strength of the
    October, 2024     Mo H N, et al.   Affecting factors of the cutting quality of sugarcane harvesters under complicated excitations           Vol. 17 No. 5    191
cutters is much greater than the radial one, so a great cutter                       Research Ability Promotion Project of Guangxi Universities, China
inclination angle is able to help cut off the sugarcane. Additionally,               (Grant No. 2024KY0697); Wuzhou University Research
under a low sugarcane harvester travelling speed, the sugarcane                      Foundation for Advanced Talents, China (Grant No.
may be cut off after several times of cutting, which leads to a poor                 WZUQDJJ17179); Major Special Project of Guangxi Sugarcane
SCQ while under a high sugarcane harvester travelling speed, the                     Science and Technology in the 14th Five-year Plan, China (Grant
cutters may generate a great pushing force acting on the sugarcane,                  No. 2022AA01010); the general program of the National Natural
which makes it easy to break the sugarcane ratoon. Therefore, it is                  Science Foundation Project, China (Grant No. 32071916); a
necessary to find suitable values of such cutting parameters as the                  horizontal technical service project of the Zhenkang Professor
cutter rotating speed, the cutter inclination angle and the sugarcane                Workstation, Yunnan, China; the Double First-class Discipline
harvester travelling speed for sugarcane harvesters with a good                      Construction Project: Mechanized sugarcane harvesting equipment
SCQ.                                                                                 development of Zhenkang, Yunnan, China; the first university-
                                                                                     directly-under-Education-Ministry-served         innovative      rural
7     Conclusions                                                                    revitalization test project: the China-Agricultural-University-served
     1) The sugarcane field excitation, the sugarcane harvester                      innovative Bangdong Village revitalization test plan, mechanized-
travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle have significantly                 sugarcane-harvesting assistant rural revitalization in hilly areas,
positive monotonic correlated effects on the axial cutter vibration                  Zhenkang, Yunnan, China; the Portable Sugarcane Harvester
and three-directional cutting forces while the cutter rotating speed                 Research and Development, China (Grant No. NK2022160504); the
has a significantly negative monotonic correlated effect on the axial                2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural
cutter vibration and three-directional cutting forces.                               University; Guangxi Science and Technology Project, China (Grant
     2) The sugarcane field excitation, the axial cutter vibration                   No. Guike AA22117007); Guangxi Science and Technology
amplitude and frequency have significantly negative monotonic                        Project, China (Grant No. Guike AA22117005); Guangxi Special
correlated effects on SCQ while the cutter rotating speed, the                       Project of Science Technology Bases and Talents, China (Grant No.
sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle                Guike AD23026033); the Opening Project of Guangxi Key
have significantly positive monotonic correlated effects on the SCQ.                 Laboratory of Advanced Microwave Manufacturing Technology,
     3) Optimal level combination of the cutter rotating speed, the                  China (Grant No. 2024GKLAMMTKFKT001).
sugarcane harvester travelling speed, and the cutter inclination angle
is 700 r/min, 0.6 m/s, and 8º for sugarcane harvesters with a good                                                   [References]
SCQ.                                                                                 [1]    Thanomputra S, Kiatiwat T. Simulation study of cutting sugarcane using
     4) The sugarcane harvester travelling speed has a significant                          fine sand abrasive water jet. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2016;
effect on the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane cutting process                       50(2): 146–153.
while the cutter inclination angle, the sugarcane field excitation, the              [2]    Mello R C, Harris H D. Angled and serrated blades reduce damage, force
                                                                                            and energy for a harvester basecutter. Proceedings of the 2001 Conference
cutter rotating speed and the engine excitation have highly
                                                                                            of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists held at Mackay,
significant effects on the axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane                          Queensland, Australia, 1st-4th May 2001. PK Editorial Services Pty Ltd,
cutting process.                                                                            2001; pp.212–218.
     Except the engine excitation, the sugarcane harvester travelling                [3]    Momin M A, Wempe P A, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effects of four base
speed and the cutter inclination angle, the sugarcane field excitation                      cutter blade designs on sugarcane stem cut quality. Transactions of the
                                                                                            ASABE, 2017; 60(5): 1551–1560.
and the axial cutter vibration have highly significant effects on the x-
                                                                                     [4]    Silva R P D, Corrêa C F, Cortez J W, Furlani C E. Statistical control
directional cutting force while the cutter rotating speed have a                            applied in the process of mechanical sugar cane harvest. Engenharia
significant effect on the x-directional cutting force.                                      Agrícola, 2008; 28: 292–304.
     Except the cutter rotating speed, the engine excitation, the                    [5]    Ripoli T C, Ripoli M L C, Gamero C A, Oliveira M A. Effects of two
sugarcane harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination, the                        different base cutters in green cane mechanical harvest. 2003 ASAE
sugarcane field excitation and the axial cutter vibration have                              Annual Meeting, ASABE, 2003; 1.
                                                                                     [6]    Johnson P C, Clementson C L, Mathanker S K, Grift T E, Hansen A C.
significant effects on the y-directional cutting force, the z-                              Cutting energy characteristics of Miscanthus x giganteus stems with
directional cutting force and the SCQ.                                                      varying oblique angle and cutting speed. Biosystems engineering, 2012;
     Significance levels of effects of the sugarcane field excitation,                      112(1): 42–48.
the engine excitation, the cutter rotating speed, the sugarcane                      [7]    Mathanker S K, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effect of blade oblique angle and
harvester travelling speed and the cutter inclination angle on the                          cutting speed on cutting energy for cane stems. Biosystems Engineering,
                                                                                            2015; 133: 64–70.
axial cutter vibration in the sugarcane cutting process from high to
                                                                                     [8]    Kroes S, Harris H D. A kinematic model of the dual basecutter of a sugar
low are A>C>B>E>D. Significance levels of effects of these five                             cane harvester. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1995; 62(3):
experimental factors and the axial cutter vibration on three-                               163–172.
directional cutting forces and the SCQ from high to low are G>                       [9]    Liu Q T, Ou Y G, Qing S L, Chen H B. Failure tests of sugarcane stalks
A>C>B>E>D.                                                                                  under torsion, compression and tension load. Transactions of the CSAE,
                                                                                            2006; 22(6): 201–204. (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements                                                                     [10]   Taghijarah H, Ahmadi H, Ghahderijani M, Tavakoli M. Cutting forces and
                                                                                            energy during an impact cut of sugarcane stalks. Australian Journal of Crop
    This work was supported by the Middle-aged and Young                                    Science, 2011; 5(6): 630–634.
Teachers' Basic Scientific Research Ability Promotion Project of                     [11]   Lai X, Li S P, Ma F L, Zhou J H, Li W. Effect of field excitation on cutting
Guangxi Universities, China (Grant No. 2023KY0701); Wuzhou                                  quality for sugarcane. Transactions of the CSAM, 2011; 42(12): 97–101.
                                                                                            (in Chinese)
University Research Foundation for Advanced Talents, China
                                                                                     [12]   Lai X, Li S P, Ma F L, Qin Z W, Zhou J H, Zheng G P. Simulation and
(Grant No. WZUQDJJ17195); Key University-level Scientific                                   experimental study on sugarcane field excitation to the cutter. Advanced
Research Project of Wuzhou University, China (Grant No.                                     Materials Research. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2011; 156: 1105–1108.
2020B003); Middle-aged and Young Teachers' Basic Scientific                          [13]   Wang P, Wei D G, Yang D T, Liu Q T. Research on the influence of
  192      October, 2024                               Int J Agric & Biol Eng            Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org                                   Vol. 17 No. 5
        bearing clearance on vibration characteristics of sugarcane cutter.                    [22] Mo H N, Qiu C, Li S P, Ma S C. Dynamic characteristic research on a
        Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering, 2013; 51(7): 6–9, 13. (in                     simulated sugarcane field exciter for small sugarcane harvesters:
        Chinese)                                                                                    simulations and experiments. Journal of Vibroengineering, 2022; 24(5):
[14]    Huang H D, Wang Y X, Tang Y Q, Zhao F, Kong X F. Finite element                             806–823.
        simulation of sugarcane cutting. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011; 27(2):                [23] Zhang L, Tian X, Chabani Z. Application of higher order ordinary
        161–166. (in Chinese)                                                                       differential equation model in financial investment stock price forecast.
[15]    Liu Q T, Ou Y G, Qing S L, Wang W Z. Cutting force calculation of                           Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 2022; 7(1): 893–900.
        sugarcane stalk. Transactions of the CSAM, 2006; 37(9): 89–92. (in                     [24] Qu L, Chen Z. A mathematical model of plasmid-carried antibiotic
        Chinese)                                                                                    resistance transmission in two types of cells. Applied Mathematics and
[16]    Xu X, Yin Z H, Sun X C, Jiang D J. Finite element simulation of                             Nonlinear Sciences, 2022; 8(1): 2331–2344.
        reciprocating sugarcane cutter. Value Engineering, 2018; 37(1): 148–150.               [25] Zhou J H, Li S P, Yang D Y, Zhong J Q, Mo H N, Zhang B, Deng X.
        (in Chinese)                                                                                Influence of sugarcane harvester cutterhead axial vibration on sugarcane
[17]    Yang J, Liang Z X, Mo J L, Wang R G, Gu M Y. Experimental research on                       ratoon cutting quality. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(2): 16–24. (in
        factors affecting the cutting quality of sugarcane cutter. Transactions of the              Chinese)
        CSAE, 2005; 21(5): 60–64. (in Chinese)                                                 [26] Mo H N, Ma S C, Huang Z M, Li S P, Qiu C. Factors influencing axial no-
[18]    Pelloso M F, Pelloso B F, de Lima A A, Ortiz A H T. Influence of                            load cutter vibration of sugarcane harvesters. Sugar Tech, 2024; 26(3):
        harvester and rotation of the primary extractor speed in the agro-industrial                668–682.
        performance of sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 2021; 23(3): 692–696.                            [27] Mo H N, Li S P, Zhou J, Zeng B, He G, Qiu C. Simulation and
[19]    Mo H N. Research on effects of complicated excitations on the cutting                       experimental investigations on the sugarcane cutting mechanism and
        quality of sugarcane harvesters. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2022. (in                     effects of influence factors on the cutting quality of small sugarcane
        Chinese)                                                                                    harvesters under vibration excitations. Mathematical Problems in
[20]    Mo H N, Ma S C, Huang Z M, Li S P, Qiu C. Experimental research on                          Engineering, 2022; 1: 6929776.
        effects of influence factors on the axial cutter vibration, cutting forces and         [28] Mo H N, Li S P, Qiu C, Ma S C, Huang Z M. Effects of the blade disk
        the sugarcane cutting quality under complicated excitations. Advances in                    vibration in axial and cutting parameters on the cutting quality of sugarcane
        Mechanical Engineering, 2024; 16(2): 16878132231221919.                                     harvesters. Transactions of the CSAE, 2022; 38(18): 62–71. (in Chinese)
[21]    Mo H, Li S P, He G, Zeng B, Qiu C. Dynamic characteristics of a                        [29] Li S P, Zhang B, Ye C F, Yang D Y. Analysis on the vibration of small
        simulated sugarcane field exciter for small sugarcane harvesters. Discrete                  sugarcane harvester cutter under the complex excitation. Journal of
        Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1): 3209449.                                           Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2018; 40(1): 40–45.